Thank you, Camilla, and good afternoon, everyone.
coupled our As least you half XX% our execution quarter delivered of raising guidance volume by expectations revenue our are at with another strong XXXX. million, on we of announcement half our deliver for from strong has XX% and business, in the full over revenue expect and to the XXXX, currently increase XXXX. second confidence an ago, $XXX growing of year a minutes second Bioscience total and test yet XX% Based saw first to by quarter report few compared Castle
around Before highlights, test. I the of quarterly get me into excitement our the some address let DecisionDx-SCC
to XXXX. proposed proposes let's are that encompass oncology number used of Testing genetic and July tests. of First, other Genetic quarter language non coverage tests XXXX among This first and reviewed in includes that We proposed in Novitas on for a coverage by laboratory DecisionDx-SCC, April the since XXXX a about for entitled the LCD XX, Medicare talk contractor coverage. of received Novitas were Separately, Oncology. attempts published LCD
see proposed of ADLT for LCDs Moldyx that period LCDs X, The Status, Advanced coverage June Medicare proposed for for and posted period XXXX. to ended The X, on September XXXX, common contractors known New Meridian these completed review extremely for on the our common Palmetto, closes of as CMS Technology non on July Test XX, the also recommending XXXX. Laboratory Status. Separately, its both application were Division Diagnostic pleased Xnd, of we DecisionDx-SCC.
expected, ADLT we June we Status effective XXXX. XX, were As granted
four be met criteria to to are need achieve There status. that ADLT
the of DecisionDx-SCC criteria the result metastasis, our works. that test One SCC of that yields test we a that means that predicts is, proven test have specific developing probability the our patient
combination also Another metastasis. DecisionDx-SCC our That is is, be criteria diagnostic tests other of our from test other all cannot new or test or means risk that That clinical that other information. test of clinical predict that proven any independent combination or test provides of any we've pathologic factors obtained tests.
designated available. of as develop we that a do ADLTs. biosciences view clinically that achievement tests what five differently, been one are have that has ADLTs us. all offered to improve patient incredible improve by have ADLT Castle received patient Stated that that tests innovative beyond We tests develop care third demonstrating and as looking clearly status, is at mission are this mark Castle our tests innovative of care
Now, not aforementioned of these Medicare I in lays meeting a two contained the LCDs out positions that will the ADLT we separately. because, be mentioned release to the while analyses is contractor, for coverage that purposes a criteria the it through local communicating two some as of have proposed status mentioned and used I
recently eligible value study very Moldyx we pleased the are part patients on from present identify and guidelines. into multi are who current of included large comments Adjuvant of therapy that radiation our our our tests to results upcoming analyses to center Novitas, completed for NCCN As our under to comments cohort
importance out I in population? emphasize Specifically, question. Adjuvant our risk enough question the cannot was radiation of to what therapy provide ruling this clinical value ruling can we in high this or
think about. are There areas significant three to
if features benefit which not. relies from perspective the accuracy and clinical pathologic one may of may informing is the first known limitations which The in staging eligible patients upon and alone
with therapy, indication therapy? but find just Adjuvant who is, outcomes improved of can risk second patients provide Adjuvant to may an test radiation warrant high our have enough not we whose The consideration does of could be metastasis of a
healthcare is the Adjuvant radiation therapy impact cost finally, of enormous. And
In average patient roughly rate their a data a XX% $XX,XXX the long test mention creating data if also receive therapy, risk adjuvant Adjuvant compared Radiation year potential but therapy like to who Icuvia test had It in from around first well to fact, metastasis weighted our treatment shows looks in cost as Class place. overtreated therapy highest did not patients matched both costs using patients runs result complications Class XB in the published result a reduction our have aAsthma as that who with receive the was term data. of per not XB patient, five radiation
you that the of XA, Class see treatment tests important these not when radiation This Class X results majority a and are from is therapy. recognize cost Adjuvant data did or patients benefit
to contractors, course, in sharing look the study the our and, the We you. greater detail in customers, published near and expect forward of clinician future results Medicare with be to our
unknowns validity clearly are differences now only future for identified there a Adjuvant significant receive clinical and DecisionDx-SCC in We current radiation some and need. validating Well, who test, regarding liquidity We not clinical outcome in see therapy. unmet but successful also utility patients clinical coverage. developing were can
guidelines, potential for roughly high risk asthma XXX,XXX that believe and with the reduced on patients eligible healthcare and impact current outcomes year each NCC SCC improved are who radiation Given is there therapy tremendous. and per diagnosed we are costs
period, and the highlights in the questions. with the execution then Frank highlights through and you take me remaining provide will for let quarter, your including Now strategy
with start and business Let's Combined was prior XX,XXX, XX% dermatology over of our volume growth and DecisionDx-Melanoma for year quarter. test DecisionDx-SCC year core the XX% from
clinicians time, very order new see quarter. tests clinicians to more first all for tests and clinicians ordering the total dermatologic our continue ordering during with XXXX for three XXX new We approximately the than
DecisionDx-Melanoma, the quarter XXXX an increase quarter, XXXX. test For second we the reports delivered XX% of of over second in
our significant prior and the believe test, to investments expansion clinical most the strong our drivers continue our of impact base. our can evidence are management contribute coupled to with our strong customer intended Melanoma to of commercial educate We tests the growth supporting
increase second XX% over For DecisionDx-SCC, second of XXXX an test the quarter reports we of delivered the XXXX. quarter, in
due the clinicians growth the their large for growth we clinical our that combination need in provides our with with value for unmet the to and strong part of Decision-Dx-Melanoma, coupled patients. As our volume DecisionDx-SCC high in and test SCC is believe
a pillar clinical use development key second our impacting quarter. evidence of tests, outcomes. support in including continued is a to growth Two recall, of our you As strategy the studies of were published
are focus survival just the significant remarks with very the study JCO oncology to one real in DecisionDx-Melanoma That with patient large study pleased showed testing with data SEER regarding that on unselected precision going my published the outcomes. and is this prognostic we our to information them. Institute's program registries of provided population data world I'm National collaboration related Cancer
relative to that the they longer. DecisionDx-Melanoma patients is, in tested associated not clinically Specifically, they lower specific an did melanoma untested and That is mortality DecisionDx-Melanoma with benefit patients had overall and group were the have who of testing. were lived who those
In fact, to melanoma associated XX% not DecisionDx-Melanoma mortality mortality with who was a XX% DecisionDx-Melanoma relative testing and patients receive specific testing. overall lower a did lower
well and sharing the with will NCC them would be providing expect, the we publication customers clinician you full as As our as Melanin to panel.
gastroenterology Now, let's our to turn franchise.
quarter compared the in During the TissueCypher to test delivered XXX of reports, XXXX second we quarter, XXXX.
Barrett's the can also providing in new Esophagus. management decisions during inform our risk that announced We value stratification improve data of with demonstrating information patients the quarter test objective, TissueCypher for
the Best Use of Medtech winner Intelligence Additionally, Breakthrough Program. Healthcare Annual TissueCypher was In the selected Xth the Artificial as Award. of and Awards
we As risk Barrett's recall, XXXX, in esophageal us designed TissueCypher Sernostics a patients development cancer giving predict a of leading in stratification will test with you acquired Esophagus. future from December to
integration made esophageal for US. year into Barrett's answers from than the fastest have and gastroenterology adoption of our With progress the and our factor current community, the capacity. we Since Esophagus considerable cancer, quarter our the that strong laboratory with rate only five is improvements. orders a risk operational the of much moved have XX%. We less during process acquisition, known in one in have Pittsburgh forecasts survival new of second efforts development so outpaced the the seen so our growing and XXXX of
test instrumentation our July we to personnel and such, in online. and bring accepting for in clinical orders improvements paused As additional process elected order temporarily additional the
We report of the efforts in Despite end that will to to this and be temporary quarter. expect XXXX of we third pause currently half begin orders compared are increase prior second through the half. the the first we working believe these for volume to ordering, to accepting new able
mental franchise, second our in a from XXX the to up GenX test we and XX% up XXXX, ago quarter from year health of ID delivered reports the quarter. XXXX Turning prior
As during test only we from Castle second the acquired the delivered XXXX, XX. test, through the date April reports a June quarter of reminder, XX,
momentum with the continue are be We to thus we far. pleased seeing
rates. remission data trial. moderate In patients real study guide can of we previously published recently current demonstrating data improve with of to announced response the world management fact, was to compared consistent use medication depression controlled that standard and randomized with significantly severe diagnosed care This In to our medication Ideogenics treatment.
an ECRI, its and organization a the healthcare of safety, effectiveness quality four cost genetic Igenics nonprofit five of rating. independent concluded care of test out assessment recently improving across settings, with Additionally, all
equity commercial test. is believe them valuations in recognize As payers coverage encourage important of to to payers utilize to another we Igenics making the this benefits metric decisions, assist our
with interactions Ideogenics and and help test Igenx health the to truly personalized benefit has and analysis patients response to drug standard clinicians offers factors drug testing incremental and our our match clinical comprehensive trial this to need patients of rates, a accelerate lifestyle including right improve we treatment. high admission area identification interactions feel believe an on with clinicians We to drug medication care compelling mental gene medication, approach. impact and for the by potential genetic of patient the offering With unmet over in error solution value
who our will details over to I to financial turn results the now call relating outlook. and Frank, will provide