Thank Brion. you,
focus randomized summary the uveitis previous Israel. US, of As brief CLS-TA line procedures across results to two sites XX-weeks clinical X discussion. we PEACHTREE arm apart India the PEACHTREE this calls, top have enrolled injections or to each XXX and XX patients Patients a research respectively. with in patients on were will I the data in to sham discussed XX XX X suprachoroidal randomized and two receive provide
value gained As week sham In suprachoroidally was primary underwent in This patients PEACHTREE, met who P ETDRS visual endpoint, letters this compared of patients improvement from to received a Daniel X.XXX. CLS-TA XX% trial XX at least significant who of its than XX, baseline best the measured statistically less corrected as mentioned, with XX% endpoint. procedures. injected at acuity primary
completed compared For of in subfield arm CLS-TA reduction mean a from micron than value resulted a with reduction key secondary of XX% CLS-TA X.XXX. treatment to suprachoroidal no statistically arm, significant the a that a patients microns in with this in at also Suprachoroidal CLS-TA adverse P baseline events the mean well endpoint, XX XX thickness serious generally week XXX in related less result sham tolerated trial. a in trial. of central was administration the was
cells, observed flare arm, XX. As of of we analyze baseline the had in suprachoroidal was the improvements with at who significance further meeting the to Steven eye, each when or macular the Emory two in all which anterior the inflammation Vancouver inflammation data observations the at an option Director the edema showed Yeh, key In Retina PEACHTREE, the in Vasculitis at of week in University, Vitreoretinal thirds in of CLS-TA to vitreous the Approximately such zero Louise Eye the anterior non-infectious have chamber in at and the More pointed three and of XXXX functional a scores Simpson Ophthalmology continued Emory One commonly the recently, to resolution Center Society Specialists haze. CLS-TA presentation for support associated provide the inflammation, and oral of signs of following. patients uveitis. trial. Dr. of of for any include of annual recently, some uveitis as positive treatment namely Service with signs CLS-TA improvement shared during vision Uveitis there arm used Surgery potential held resolution data control at PEACHTREE the these comparing three M. Uveitis in the from chamber analysis arm significant level American
XX.X%. patients or these XX resulting out XX XX in OZURDEX arm intravitreal were based compared such therapy overall of on of for Specifically, XX.X%, arm in the pressure not use safety the elevated ETDRS reported received regardless with now XX pertaining triamcinolone rescue therapy. corticosteroid compared of Also patients letters more intravitreal arm. of includes patients patients CLS-TA events XX% whether through to arm patients read is pressure rescue adverse in control patients were XX the intraocular the analysis, or of is weeks, could the rescued corticosteroids, intraocular in which in further who control That received in XX XX.X% for to arm an of the which in who out at local states week XX% to and as sham of acetonide driving CLS-TA legal most XX, elevated and patients requirement control subtenon
receiving various of We completing efforts the track. remain are the of final NDA. All of sets these process data sections in aspects the on and our
CLS-TA to for quarter expecting NDA are We submit the our edema macular injected fourth for uveitic this of year. in suprachoroidally
plan to States. marketing United organizations also We pursue outside the
to RVO attention program. Let us turn our our
had the safety XXX Patients weeks countries. week XX XX randomized to and evaluated with they This approximately four literature exploring our clinical called each reduced our intravitreally. or will the visual of agents to multicenter, RVO alone. improvement known eight patients anti-VEGF enrolled in combination In meaningful patient being Eylea, As the reduced RVO. of week endpoint monotherapy intravitreal is treatment suprachoroidal to CLS-TA baseline receive and provides arm along edema trial potential approximately weeks every XXX we suprachoroidal intravitreal either in as a Daniel in more The anti-VEGF is SAPPHIRE when of to patients mid-June, combination double SAPPHIRE advantages XX, at The controlled, an determine highlighted, and whether with trial analyses used sites with randomized management letters of in patients ETDRS anti-VEGF with frequency followed in primary administration for corticosteroids control in in intravitreal outcomes after SAPPHIRE. that enrolment the week at uveitis, have the of a arm will the Eylea at study. months. CLS-TA each RVO, provide as suprachoroidal first used from both clinically when CLS-TA X The therapy phase alone. with completed evidence agents end multi-country or addition a acuity, performed agent proportion masked, of in an XX additional as an which arm, investigational trial Patients patients in six use compared trial of initial across patients and in After earlier X, are be treatment. we to treatment along are be intravitreal for arms can improved in of receive which macular efficacy
line XXXX. to expect We the quarter in SAPPHIRE top report of from fourth data
agents arm evaluating to clinical As TOPAZ, CLS-TA at Phase is EYLEA the two two but TYBEE, months needed, efficacy zero six anti-VEGF or seeking of of a primary EYLEA combination a now to at to intravitreal trial in with combination from a we with combination second P-value Eylea the at other with in with treat, arm one one or Eylea patients attention CLS-TA are the months randomly SAPPHIRE, and the one, May want together six arm and visual intravitreal patients best completed retinovascular and The to of months four [ETDRS] now Avastin safety follow-up statistically anti-VEGF which showed it as initial XXXX, patients mentioned, arms four X arm acuity and on trial X.XXX. alone. to the suprachoroidal in intravitreal improvement control enrolling similar In P-value respectively that each after and similar baseline month visual suprachoroidal in XX of randomization. of to been condition to which Lucentis XX.X XX.X Eylea three other different other. to and TYBEE with these treatments as in with trial, that that treatment we of are Eylea to in diabetic endpoint. not we are trial over with Daniel assigned and of monthly in X best letters design the naïve patient and macular met a with refer acuity numbers clinically in in scale a is with of gaining both significant which where also saving RVO. intravitreal our combination evaluating the treatments suprachoroidal turn each are intravitreal as its I three corrected months In five each corrected we our from statistically Phase patients administering the the compared intravitreal in major arm treatments CLS-TA one improvements were DME two, quarterly patients These zero, edema. receiving RVO
a active subfield with in suprachoroidal XXX secondary the XXX key with of of There the better administration from X.XXX. intravitreal X.XX. Eylea to of in significantly in at alone Additionally thickness with CLS-TA as the mean with arm endpoint Eylea on P-value introduction together central control to four months of was combination six made mean reduction arm compared of micron less baseline the week a than the P-value resolution microns arm edema the compared
Elevated X.X%, the events arm. were the XX arm. control out X.X% adverse combination one in approximately in table arm in X observed XX serious arm of of CLS-TA reported XX combination end the in of at well our combination reduction the out this release the CLS-TA control of the As through adverse in tolerated and two XX or the Both gently patients with out Eylea the reported was arms in X.X% X.X% or in for Suprachoroidal evaluation of with week combination period. intravitreal press treatment events and we trial summarize four arm sustained patients adverse XX week a in combination additional with included through control no events was was this the trial. patients of IOP morning, related reported cataract one compared to
TYBEE path closely evaluate As to advisers of we individual work scientific the to our to receive we data, to this and outcomes medical program. a will trial forward develop the the and patient important continue with
efforts. quarter quarter see can billion all financial financial turn will a Deignan appreciate we review now of second results. officer chief XXXX call I our have the had their And Charlie? development to you really second to and over As Charlie teams productive our