our Nancy. trioxide confirmation ATO. promising form We're XXXX, dose you, of oral pleased Thank to report novel or from our preliminary today arsenic of trial data ongoing
measurements to first or As and fasted the data XXXX support are The events for on ATO, No XXXX a administered XXXX of IV crossover XXXX data PK continues reminder, data study, respect, achieved of that study our the Cmax IV signals preliminary is study, Based sets toxicity a Safety states been when directly dose ATO. to X as of to to each in this severe a our no is has a profile. have IV new with administration. directly to with identified this Syros AUC dose favorable XX-milligram and And based at comparing in have QT X.XX prolongation, safety kilogram, well on received the in milligrams been single study, patients acute tolerability fed per were approved been which the this dose. exposures In cardiac ongoing ATO. liver reported in selection. in full goal approved taken this the with and and have IV the particular Phase promyelocytic dose study XXXX as to associated or comparable ATO. important with at and provides IV from dose Cmax that after the of compare AUC adverse ATO leukemia trial, APL PK
study of at identify approximately to advance assessment Additionally, first our XXXX of is with dose and patients XXXX care study expect which of Furthermore, preliminary to of into replace bioavailability of system. We're quantitative health across treated patients for the has context to this bioavailability XXXX the XX%, patients intra-patient XX crossover study. Phase the in planned optimal oral expected high oral to XXXX our milligrams, that care multiple to standard for the is showed the the incredibly PK ATO consistent identify can second provides potential data exposures enroll encouraged be will trial, XX which a is dose, that XXXX. by in of be those includes achieve we to the burdensome IV continuing continue able original Orsenix, from we for to milligrams both with conducted or and This APL, which Phase X of the confidence, in IV planned half trial. dose initiate confirmation further the X the that treatment those which
informs approval XXXX Additionally, together in from received registration on the plan decision the EMA for feedback feedback both pivotal from in with the can single move the US XXXX, Medicines trial July, we forward development of Agency or with FDA, European a to support which EU. the our prior and that
track RAR SELECT-MDS-I our treatment tamibarotene, agonist, to potential patients, with to and for diagnosed open the who and we RARA-positive and opened tamibarotene neurology set new in the additional pivotal trial early MDS in a expect unfit and data is have XXXX expect report sites or has globally alpha higher-risk late XXXX. The to We to potent months on Turning AML. newly XX sites, over paradigm currently selective ahead. overexpress
that implications term. our well we issued June, we estimate a over as EMA positive enrollment positive, data the opportunity MDS as XXX long Also has that RARA ongoing we from in and approximately on now patients, based announced which study, the believe for positive centralized Importantly incentives disclosed as of XX-year August, in both criteria, we patients of opinion in Medicines market XX% MDS. of assistance the a authorization. qualify EMA's product development on drug designation and access fees, reduced phase to and after designation market marketing regulatory the financial EMA orphan that during our from to orphan meet for including exclusivity, application approval for the tamibarotene, treatment protocol period the product for at are
the care tamibarotene, potential No and and existing provide and drug favorable in MDS therapies need advancements targeted and February has As represent in We novel treatment a in of patient lagged higher-risk a reminder, of strong convenient designation which effective, believe tolerable milestone demonstrated development. Hypomethylating by drug or agents be behind blood MDS approved efficacy tamibarotene to in been HMAs, the therapy remain a options. are orphan for HMAs who agencies year. MDS. first Despite limited tolerability outside an patients, of largely a has successful standard the broadly, These cancer MDS has has was of this more granted decade. have the in over mechanism in important FDA population for efficacy. decisions new in
you the a Phase we're in of one About AML. do unfit AML II diagnosed evaluating newly care with also and not of SELECT-AML As a-third the patients, tamibarotene and patients standard trial know, majority relapse. azacitidine to in unfit RARA-positive respond venetoclax
that the providing early and AML, study the for at triplet RARA lead-in look the to safety venetoclax an the data translational enrich to to respond response from time regimen to regimen more care in with rates biomarker patients half this as for the data The RARA-positive and We and evaluating will SELECT-AML-X efficacy well as safety of in and tamibarotene, second assessments provide of whom tamibarotene Our trial the clinical likely azacitidine on suboptimal. forward patients, safety, believe based an our data may is of be and look standard to the of triplet with of support the of objective understanding and activity portion potential clinical year. we response.
initiate XXXX from RARA additional to patients, in or Additionally, randomized in positive randomized the we portion XXXX. the data of XX expected approximately portion plan with the trial
forward about the determine also with I in combination Phase the cancer to being inhibitor we is intrinsic data, CDKX XXXX, on the portfolio, our with X-FU ongoing patients trial in the this of now track standard investigational chemotherapy of additional approximately safety Roche's patients. pancreatic I'll and combination the Phase lead-in The for later atezolizumab Based PD-LX by actively of in encouraged course an to XXXX with a momentum approved I/Ib XXXX. remains portion pancreatic potent BRAF Currently, the of patients. with data year. trial care will mutant ONIVYDE for the clinical three of we more to Finally, combination oral turn ongoing I cancer. our is potential selective the activity as is cancer best second-line survival progression-free months. arm in Phase We're look for colorectal these to coming months highly agent inhibitor. of XXXX our across only each and We're sharing further offers pleased in continued trial in clinical in development XXXX safety relapsed/refractory change of therapies evaluating on average enrolling from data, report very and that leucovorin, which evaluated learn
SY-XXXXX, and DNA instability, turn control caused leading demonstrated selected Preclinical AACR cell-cycle presented to CDKXX nominated and at July, next models. our that I'll in April engine. oral preclinical potent In in inhibition decreased selective as tumor candidate. genomic to and apoptosis repair growth discovery and development CDKXX data Next, gene we our dysregulation our inhibitor inhibition
with regression tumor combination small and of induced selective agent a leadership and inhibitor with demonstrated inhibitors. cancer. derived ovarian intimate of in small lurbinectedin cell olaparib nomination model to cancer, and model as activity selective lung well Additionally, model, our as lung in PARP inhibition CDKXX the gene a as testament patient single in breast resistant a This cell Syros' control xenograft is discovery CDK a in
As XXXXX, in and well we for also XX exploring July, WRM partnerships programs. CDK as for we're our announced as
each With We advance our capital to our robustly term. the call are financial potential assets, which this the confident focus on our we to programs the to patients near approach Jason deliver review results. I'll clinical the will to our greatest discovery as over benefit turn us have to allow that, in of