everyone. Andrew, Thanks, good morning, and
time the initial the mentioned, we lines Jack our disclosed. expect X previously ongoing I today, have can As trials that as clinical in provide report results from we of to
objective, XXXX. data that efficacy As final primary this where to the published of cancer is fourth it assessment and about we important Phase and data the context the is of quarter for reported understand studies, think breast will Onset the that II in initial in antitumor triple-negative the be Oncology XXXX as in were year through
may of ratios receiving control II data, in in the the improvements As trilaciclib observed from hazard X.X overall we X.XX in recall you TNBC survival the meaningful robust X Phase group trilaciclib clinically in to patients patients endpoint compared most and the of statistically significant with groups.
and And the but strong, in was between least progression-free response control overall on trilaciclib not was difference as survival the effect arms The robust survival. rate. as
expecting with hypothesis inhibitors. that as Our the response checkpoint compared and improve response from mechanism greater effect consistent EFS so trilaciclib rate immune data survival action to therapies a could more the is see This system that is than immuno-modulating modulate to are rate. immune of on such OAS of
could durability of Phase of occur a for T greater memory expect Specifically, antitumor studies formation we that focused improve to II on CDX+ Therefore, increased may see long-term effect the trilaciclib survival the on effect assessing our cells, then response our of our immune through of efficacy, which our on trials Phase believe for expected we coming rate.
I and III least progression-free you or line time over II on months, remind Phase Pivotal and with data moving starting program. to the XX overall surveillance.
completed we exposure in in effective important potentially most of the and recently metastatic FOLFOXIRI milestone as first-line called efficacy. we foremost, X. colorectal result also improve PRESERVE is antitumor patient myelotoxic greater myelotoxicity the also for in most a enrollment our Improving and and chemotherapy colorectal to metastatic trilaciclib trial regimen cancer. achieved First XXX could an cancer
release expect of initial primary of first endpoint quarter including the trial, from this rate the in from response myeloprotection secondary overall results and We those the endpoint XXXX. to from of
The endpoints the later. in meet data come PFS of with we this If for will filing authorities to regulatory will are myeloprotection approval secondary discuss and OS survival positive, indication.
conducted by positive in first-line Second, XXX trial to not, with analysis If expect trial it pivotal we second half trial data stopping year. the patients we regarding survival be approximately of committee our the analysis PRESERVE tumors, our If overall meets it will TNBC X, report negative PD-LX monitoring to next the the the interim line the will in the continue does interim rule, and terminate, will analysis. and final results. top
We initial checkpoint regarding the fourth expect trials. treatment. bladder data quarter with this immune in Next, trilaciclib year. currently in cancer receiving chemotherapy X Starting our the avelumab PRESERVE of Phase first-line from study of the our inhibitor X, of patients II following with and with
days. in, Jack enrollment last that so enroll approximately In we to patients morning shortly, X achieved so XX upcoming should The trial. consented As we patient do this this our have we the in announced mentioned, who should achieve have patient last target
As such, on fourth response of data quarter XXXX. we PFS provide in confirm followed this of rate expect the primary year, line initial that mono in data can and the endpoint protection we to by top
action trial of Second, in to clarify XX-patient neoadjuvant the we've breast in mechanism also participants of completed triple-negative with enrollment cancer. our trilaciclib
in endpoint We or including microenvironment of on data cells and results cells in provide tumor and T year expect in this this trilaciclib's the complete regs regulatory initial to pathological the other XXXX. immune CDX+ with from T fourth response impact quarter trial, profiling T immune
which of II continued U.S. preliminary the trilaciclib to with news safety usage disease, in designed Phase drug breast the our resulting neoadjuvant expect landscape from trial antibody combination change triple-negative great in pembrolizumab sacituzumab govitecan. the cancer in potential is evaluate setting, conjugate, additive to greater present has of patients. we to of slower in data the and for treatment Third, adjuvant The with progression
factors that eligible As has the to one out, to become pushed slower which patient for could until a be our the contributed a result, appears trial of time has enrollment.
of the sites. mitigating We are variety in this of adding in ways, a process additional including
next the many possible As is worth bulk year.
It's effect of and including landscape preliminary year a evolution a safety late as the result, data, only. we'll U.S. data efficacy this from this noting have as patients that
these TNBC global seeing in hurdles not Pivotal enrollment trial. the are We
Finally, with expediting lung evaluation a of chemotherapy cancer. of significant and checkpoint the there combination strategic the cell inhibitor first-line to are non-small importance in trilaciclib
we're than As as with of supporting means partner. rather a such, sponsoring an it such evaluation ourselves exploring investigator-initiated study, or other
possible call We the review will I'll ongoing a the financial as our over as to soon provide initiate. and abreast With this an also those results of keep as turn of the update on of trials that, for ISS you for Jen second XXXX. quarter program