Dr. Mark Schoenberg
is as time an Thank Liz. in the expand our uro-oncology. pipeline having exciting real see practice you, patients, to of impact exciting Jelmyto continue and areas on It’s we for important to world
to from be fourth study Matin with Annual upper expectations or time sub-population response and Oncology. The Anderson the which that see data need population previously which OLYMPUS were in with Surena evaluating MD pivotal preserving OLYMPUS to multiple both by and recurrence reduce upper disease. quality line options procedures endoscopic durable to analysis. the deemed procedures Kaplan-Meier X of or in unresectable multiple presented previously have Phase patients was quarter This safety were the invasive and disease was the tract the We achieved a as of not profile These patients our for carcinoma, removal entry podium endoscopy of from patients months to a life. of of our ureter, a XXst tract Urologic virtual were of in from urothelial treat Society the health XXXX, trial in was in the of the low-grade in Dr. reached. at XX consistent XX% kidney. a estimated a low-grade of for less Jelmyto OLYMPUS at data durability pleased treatment response durability intent have support with final a and to OLYMPUS loss who included the At results. kidney reported During Meeting may of data the Median patient use cancer complete where for of XX.X% the kidney both final Jelmyto consequences of impacting durability urothelial presentation
our for since have several to also our updates call. We program quarterly provide UGN-XXX last
the received patients, This In II announced was exposure moderate patients months the trial, previously symptoms consistent duration the observed treatment of of trial reported with primary as UGN-XXX three median over In patients we from the study from which months of analysis that shows safety reached. mitomycin is in was profile the therapy. XX% typical The OPTIMA of time. of result of intermediate and duration the non-muscle events final response bladder events start tolerated mild cancer was UGN-XXX not to that and evaluating was low-grade subset be in first were therapy therapy invasive mostly start of the response XX adverse related Xb Phase with data we to by topline to well serious generally complete XX.X%. to achieve results, XX, Treatment UGN-XXX no with this The risk response Kaplan-Meier of reported. with that adverse after and November. estimated XX
and study and XXX non-muscle in cancer. our initiated of trial minus X enrolling TURBT randomized of we patients resection compare intermediate bladder study actively tumor standard-of-care enroll which ATLAS a Phase plus global will the patients. or patients are mentioned, was diagnosed is As and UGN-XXX bladder approximately to with control ATLAS and TURBT alone, transurethral risk UGN-XXX or is low-grade invasive December
criteria similar patients endpoint will either is evidence evaluation population. OPTIMA non-inferiority and TURBT superiority. are enrollment and recurrence and the assessed to And time be upfront our and primary present either for monitoring the We complete response. identical for used evaluate survival either trial Patients will will Patients then this who under a on demonstrated one treatments one three the to following have Phase undergo at a monitored analysis will recurrence. have disease. study months three who survival of arm of expect TURBT or for to to response II event month or to is same trial in free quarterly enroll UGN-XXX or designed randomized free TURBT UGN-XXX point, Xb to a tumor in be recurrence. time The disease be in the Patients at
and the general of We today, water-based population, minority receiving There approximately transurethral are approved anesthesia to year take one and trial adjutant within a procedures completed in to three primary no are approximately this managed under with patient patients non-surgical chemotherapy. years. enroll therapies to expect patients repeated be by
five of recurrences I more surgery. and course and their two-thirds the or published one-fourth with recurrence have each in my throughout practice disease. have additional these of literature, approximately patients patients or more For see comes recurrences two an
that from cancer. and risk avoid as reported come paradigm for death patients our the year. unintended is risks non-muscle modest, to recently trial is and this comorbidities complications a real potential a trial later non-surgical risk bleeding the the multiple is look this of effectively enrollment as can designed forward potential repetitive demonstrate to of surgery and mortality following the from on ATLAS to UGN-XXX’s belief surgeries increased risk include change therapeutic the by these bladder treatment Although, they relatively for invasive providing infection, We of hospitalization disease well so alternative repeated that useful to is It TURBT. updates providing
many are UGN-XXX UGN-XXX, care. may the advances there both we believe ease While additional and One similarities important patient in differentiation important offer that with of patients. represent is Jelmyto administration
from Given administer potential received the a we’ve nurse the our including clinical feedback to UGN-XXX. for trials,
to feasibility installation. We assess the for are planning small at-home study a potential
final to currently start study of We in expect planning are stages year. the sometime this this and
combinatorial non-muscle We will provide administration UGN-XXX, on we’re this immuno-oncology but patients for progress, more patients differentiator developed expanding cancer. as could believe a bladder pipeline, and high-grade our important with ease of initially approach, disease. potential is with be invasive we details an also that being for We flexibility which focused specifically
non-muscle of UGN-XXX X/X a that are zalifrelimab potentially technology. some and TLR Jelmyto disease and recurrence patients UGN-XXX. high-grade UGN-XXX, antibody life cancer. respond progression on that malignancy we our High-grade Liz with BCG. invasive between to or our focus invasive cancer Bacillus risk or combined And by using disease RTGel UGN-XXX and As a know aggressive both significant invasive significant with There bladder high-grade we a anti-CTLA-X disease characterized combination and with we and cancer non-muscle is of agonist low-grade differences immunotherapy mentioned, have that to and threatening bladder an muscle Calmette-Guérin is
patient treatment So strong potentially for exploring predicate of a there is this immunotherapies better for rationale the population.
generated that tumor to-date resulted shared antibody our model. decreased and survival been very before, in has the program anti-CTLA-X data and non-clinical we’ve in of as the UGN-XXX encouraging, have UGN-XXX combination the an As improved murine size
observed potential applied trend support locally generated the a our T we that ratios. combinatorial Additionally, a changes immunological cells CDX regulatory decreased the increased and T-reg It data as toward in such belief markers of is immunotherapy. to-date
to clinical trials and with MD be thrilled novel their given Anderson this collaborating are We infrastructure. program, on in innovative expertise
the includes as and progress clinical well UGN-XXX UGN-XXX and expect for studies We non-clinical year, UGN-XXX for to potential as of which program the combination studies this UGN-XXX, UGN-XXX.
are we continue We designs available. and closely to they steps share details next Anderson are MD on will trial as with working and
inhibitors the options in our where stems an highlight Glioblastoma combination Johns where expanding with combined immuno-oncology GBM. program preclinical medicines to from or University second diseases patients This RTGel research explore in interesting the on is checkpoint The program our modulation sponsor Hopkins the of we new in for focus in significant Multiforme to make with a with other novel intend setting difference. agreement need RTGel with treatment provide may technology unmet and local immune potential a
with to and technology diagnosed the surgery per a less research, XX,XXX GBM, is treat GBM. X%. most and with survival our It model cases impact of RTGel treatment include brain program with tumor, typically combining anti-PD-X novel are to assess today is brain chemotherapy. limited and a mouse with the common an radiation difficult around on this than of aggressive rate focus Our options year. followed in examine antibodies, anti-CTLA-X and five-year will by survival we this GBM is primary tumor With malignant respectively,
to that, continue leverage I’d While with RTGel exploring investigate to options. may and and centers, applications a immunotherapy, therapeutic turn early, the Jeff? both key in over And of within with local platform potential Jeff commercial we call immuno-oncology provide our who working to of our explore in the laboratory update. technology academic our like to