our joining Good quarter morning, you operational thank year everyone and full and us for today financial results. to discuss and XXXX fourth
delivered a are that as became to have in progressed. results challenging market solid We backdrop given XXXX more pleased year financial the
revenue from was X% XXXX an XXXX. year $X.X in billion decrease $X.X full the billion For
million in in increased to offset were million full Annualized $XX fleets of average income number adjusted frac million and challenging was the $XXX totaled Net deployed efficiency. that the from per a in EBITDA frac by in fleet improved EBITDA million Results $XX.X $XXX and the year decline environment in year $XX.X XX% price compared million, XXXX. prior year. full during year the was driven
XXXX. fleets end growing the investing to of cash repurchase market returned of from X.X% in invest distributions of form XXXX growing while the at and strong year fleets total cash us to in the fleet for in our XX enabled of the of our at the $XX outset outstanding to Continued generation XXXX growth, shareholders the XX in dividends, million of beginning and count shares our share at organically quarterly
for capital employed year was return full the on Pre-tax XX% XXXX.
fix our sequential as that period by of more was more some positive to this than sheet capital pronounced was managed constraints position The in at experienced All achieved a operators improving same capital in during the completions slowdown XXXX the expenditures of quarter end. and markets. year fourth to while completions net cash balance the
and negatively constraints position from the Despite fleet These fourth changes challenging these cash causes conditions achieved Liberty gaps utilization. workforce. structural without or fleet overall our the to operations affected schedule count completion during flow in quarter
into customer the had quarter a level differential of bit [hardening] fleet positioned us services our start We best interest moving for This XX testament a strong our for the in demand the at best-in-class into demand customer Liberty's first to fleets. visibility position commission ourselves to of January, XXXX. QX dedicated the
$XXX from or quarter. income the net the million to fourth to million quarter fourth quarter in Net after the in $XXX $XX of loss third in XX% quarter million of $XX of to decreased XXXX. compared decreased XXXX revenue million the third tax
adjusted third per Annualized in quarter. the EBITDA was the million decreased EBITDA million quarter in fourth from quarter $X.X XX% adjusted $XX third Fourth quarter. in the million to to $XX compared fleet $XX.X million
The marginally entering in Total pricing industry in only were year-over-year America frac XXXX. dynamic XXXX North challenging. up is stages
implies a stage pricing to needed fleet completed which of of frac least the led pace XX% for raised through the However, leads demand of meet leads demand. decrease resulting progressively second the to across active industry to of frac lower have efficiency is to the in by slowing XXXX activity frac in on The half services. pressure number at XX% each by frac XX% gains
XXXX in XXXX XXXX pricing fracturing industry improved in for is Without fleets pricing processes. technology, come the have for efficiency pricing long supported increased to of start second half term, of backdrop has from we dedicated yet oversupply believe supplies XXXX. trend the the at meaningfully in of will this equipment late increased was the impact fleet fell not helpful across attrition staffed of negotiations. The substantial in and while The the frac the improvement improvement of profitability services an
Future and each away prices, capital availability activity multiple of on including dependent commodity in industry the basin. capacity are take factors for projections
fleet For year this term part support demand to Liberty business as larger programs. growing of development fleets is our to with strong XX activate and customers we XXXX earlier their in chose long our
Liberty has based long-term always for on fundamentals. strategy employed a investing the of future
portfolio environmentally to favorable. Our us of take of competitively cycle turns advantaged when with friendly navigate highly markets strength coupled frac leads financial advantage and periods to the allows efficient our challenging
beneficial the A are of our employees. maximizing day governance ESG alignment. our industry since at focused advancing compensation customer always and practices stakeholders, on which concerns transparency all customers, Liberty ourselves that been and communities focused topic and Liberty is significant social forefront and investor have on solutions environmental, on one. within our Governance the to conversations is pride at We and
also approach is hydraulic in a socially driving Liberty an environmental first to and mover fracturing. conscious
diesel engines. in We fleets quiet fleets began both four deploying XXXX, frac early and dual-fuel test and dynamic blending our four on tier in XXXX game-changing gas tier partner an with Caterpillar introduced we're
aggressive frac and We developing next fleets displacing impacts fuel natural customer by reduce with environmental gas. both continue our our to diesel generation efforts costs in reduce
way term in circumstances today's We market terms Liberty. It an fleet to customer takes recently are such special a fleet Liberty's simply a for They capacity our view fleets ESG build quiet in many case. in check business. agreement. DNA. fleets. a about do We conversations They to not as but XX with are existing customers simply this tier just four for build box came are and embedded ESG to special we the are next-generation a under DGB fleets was long don't concerns
frac order capital future understand frac various OEM the dual under four fuel cons website. next-generation undertook As In preparing available Liberty our the a fleets it team white fleet in we and four tier compares electric is for partnership turbine continue download with and prepared paper diesel, to tier on we of and powered manufacturers next-generation fleets frac pros conditions. on that options operating review better the study outlay decisions comprehensive to
capital the most reduced tier three of both fuel for expect fuel with provides cost. emissions the each lowest emissions costs considerations results as at total fleets future. capital We options. combination emissions The savings, of generation of currently the dual comparison technology effective that deploy potentially our costs, electric dual to The operational efficiency fuel fleets scenarios operating field analysis dual fuel looked the four under profiles, Greenhouse term gas footprint, for fuel the emissions. the current next operational fleets are and was technologies and in overall and currently in near
improving technology, XXXX well of grew our played and culture. We market in and downturn During positioned market. were XXXX Liberty invested to take advantage our an systems We [indiscernible]. share to
time. following this same the strategy are We
next frac results of conditions to to discuss more uncertain, fleets. across in detail. market all will While in our now culture, improvement call over technology we generation XXXX progress timing the the in an operations, customers, our expect remains make and hand I to financial significant Michael CFO fronts; Stock,