Adjusted $X.XX I'll compared per Thank remains $X.XX first year. ago. X. quarter objectives share Lori, well our were begin results for year quarter to positioned good you, earnings morning, Evergy and the everyone. for and Slide the on delivered strong a to meet
remarks, by favorable weather, and As income. higher benefits the in driven describe was income Kirk increase will in adjusted his tax earnings other
share. XXXX to adjusted year, the to $X.XX are EPS per of guidance start our affirming $X.XX solid a With we
XXXX. from annual our XX% of are long-term targeted XXXX reaffirming EPS We growth also through
February XX-Q. during natural totaled which intense in sustained The subject our last provide resettlement call, seen of this As number power weather most and weather by Power breakdown Southwest in wholesale of region amount event Pool gas we purchased in approximately significantly extreme note, event SPP. decades. revenues, total and activity review higher experienced a extreme our we've We remains $XXX net resulted by costs the February, Of that the in in discussed this million. quarter's further jurisdiction and to utility
be We to all potential smooth the regulatory through to that able with for to expect these implement work path costs solutions regulators substantially our In of we recover mechanisms. will the multiple forward, customers. impact selecting
issued with these the a an AAO, In order the accounting associated for of allows Kansas, which event. incremental creation costs weather already track to asset the KCC or authority regulatory
the year. We have line expect to to resolution for recovery path this and time later
In seek that AAO filed the West. power a weather costs net incurred event notice extreme and at to intend Missouri have we fuel purchase Missouri, the for treatment through we
under filing AAO impact review beneficial recovery and this make will in Securitization the legislation to these approach smoothing expect customers. is another potentially passed, for Missouri, if We active enable cost midyear. our reducing costs by and both will of that provide
year. to in clear Missouri recovery this the in have As for a path expect later Kansas, sense we
position this the contribution high marketing $X.XX also I historically transmission during activity during ERCOT we described call, quarter. from power that extreme net between the gross I in power million per achieved has to mentioned gross unusually relatively As a margin how last and event small million costs ERCOT. firm group quarter's and this weather have driven annually. event of of $XX February's earned margins in $XX a pretax In purchases share by long is weather during total, extreme small approximately marketing business
the this net we the results, of consistent XXXX margin remain weather our business for periods with nature original contributions have nonrecurring in past our of in plan. removed from amount the practice the from The outside our numbers, this tax adjusted adjusted event Given these will of EPS.
As is completed years our of and its the station, has nuclear employees of plant noted planned midst recent the and such their is refueling very its between in special Creek, Wolf consecutive has breaker-to-breaker diligence refuelings. on run X, in performed thanks service in third to A now Slide reliable well for also Wolf to outage. our Creek The customers. consistency providing
some Slide regulatory X key initiatives. provides an our of legislative update and on
active have start both While I'll on on regulatory the the year XXXX, in had have calendar case rate proceedings we areas. to start general don't first in we the front. an
Friday. After the a months high scenarios benefited last this Resource stakeholder or IRP up Integrated points through of the working leading as Plan IRP stakeholders, Missouri go of process to the evaluated slide. from of next filing. our collaborative on IRP filed some The I'll we with we
Our After both is it Kansas the parallel In with are Sustainability STP. multiple due last conclusion. a to our and in X been or Kansas although and X, their the July to we'll strategic IRP likely our informational IRPs, that nearing filing have conducting the these dockets by our earlier. relating bit plan, underway is file of over Plan dockets Missouri about months Transformation inform educate development workshops stakeholders
feedback We up and allow both commissions setting on new in our appreciate strategic innovative the processes these states for to plan.
to sustainability. year, focus and key we've plan. with deliver described stakeholders and all in the STP the said balanced of intervener since plan affordability an last and feedback ensuring cost advance is We're consistent the infrastructure on announcing significant pleased of interest objectives savings, how strategic overall reliability, invest consistently we've is designed with As goals the the overall our
June. procedural early in schedule in step final expected the is Missouri a workshop The
any changes reports are the In there quarterly file to commission addition, material the if with STP. we'll
be on would X. June filing such first due The
file for STP advance In filed May STP in response is the workshop in step to schedule. the XX schedule Kansas Kansas, our the of main we'll the remaining the docket. workshop, In comments
over which primarily switch have now legislative I'll our securitization. on to priorities, focused
could is assets fully are of as provide we for securitization company transition. the to advance our value handle the retirement customers not and that As a that depreciated, represents generation fleet it tool potential cost-effective option a
necessary we've our in of enable As is execution passage X-year Missouri to the not plan. and the of noted, securitization Kansas
very However, year's we in key the has sessions this states. our legislative regarding pleased greatly have place collaboration taken both from that the with stakeholders. appreciate dialogue constructive We securitization been in
On X side, House and XXXX the April signature. in X, Bill Kansas was bill Kelly's passed has Governor following became generally law The parts.
retired are be first The assets for to for extraordinary being costs values allows remaining asset for undepreciated generation and securitization. considered that any
allows The utility programs customer and proceeds customer to from the to such distribution generation, enhance the securitized experience. as or bonds use transmission second the areas reinvest into part the that
process similar to assets out generation a has in service, process been generating that building provides place of bill Kansas for for assets. the predetermination Kansas taking new the Lastly, in
is phases process. the securitization strong in of ongoing. passed both Draft reconciliation bills of now support In in have Missouri the House the the are with we Missouri, consideration and final and bill Senate,
We are in for grateful of legislators stakeholders and support the and engagement key Missouri.
shift undepreciated coal operating of enabling While cost questions timing tool potentially and there cost-effective from is for savings the reliability, from the the not is to many handling to is generation, and factors are significant the grid which allows least to ability that affordability. obviously, resulting also reduced from for through extraordinary impact due values. costs of coal renewables. most and important Retirement costs Securitization customers fuel the of transition one
mechanism the provides of replacing renewables. regulators rate also a As rate coal base to removing process base collaborate that from structured with with on our and securitization
rates of to While further keeping are work we advance there time, procedural goal to mechanics these tools to our over expect competitive. certainly through, fully utilize
The for first step will the this likely later predetermination XXXX. year, Lawrence planned process the retirement of Kansas take in potential and Energy additions the Center with the place solar of use in
IRP recent highlights of Slide out X filing. lays the our Missouri
balanced talk the about STP. approach heard the us to You've
reflects Our balance. strategic IRP a approach to the similar
Integrated and through a stakeholder need generation, of scenarios, commodity environmental and process environmental on Plan costs plans identification of resource included of COX focused and Our resulting potential price other in factors. XX the customers feedback, resources a the cost more The existing the with improved compliance the IRP dramatically plan. cost the power Evaluation and multifaceted process extensive competitive among ongoing to criteria regulation review reliability, of at alternative profile. and than delivering preferred Resource a price involved evaluation distinct a is sustainability, affordability of
also and ongoing took conditions the to evolving in required plants The to growth a and into IRP resources. consideration of review mission once market solar Due plants. provided our as act that backup generation are wind renewables, increasingly fossil for more capacity baseload
renewable new renewable Southwest this generation recent are long total a week, needs cite a region new queue. record to than example: across gigawatts XX-state XX wind. as the of last by resources, the the more the providing in Pool Power primarily XX% record last entire Just of energy And won't SPP from set energy
filing Energy Center, last Between retire in in Lawrence XXXX, now plans a XXX-megawatt coal X triennial and facility, XXXX. our nearly to Evergy next our units late IRP at the
We consistent megawatts to utility-scale solar, all our of add is also with which of expect XXX STP.
XXs of share result the expect that in a our will we XXXX. As and these depreciation distribution low this coal additions, ongoing the and to and system, by as of reinvestment transmission base drop retirement of coal rate
La the we Those retirement wind, units expected plant, as Cygne XXXX, by enable Center X. out, XXX the shown megawatts renewable Slide to in XXXX. and including are add of plan Energy XXXX investments Jeffrey Looking coal of our total renewables and of a further at megawatts both on to X,XXX of
increasingly retiring continue At the future value run reliability by energy dispatchable hours As February is coal them plan to of same challenges market of fossil ground conditions with opposed demonstrated lower-cost plants the on generation renewable displaced as time, as as our plants change. on line. resources. evolve, years, of In of for the caused part to a fuel the keeping the by extreme fewer our time the XXXX rapid mission weather will their will
and planned IRP as approach plans. on with of key IRP, evolve the transition additions based that policy to phased period continue that following X and we The initial change evolving ability and no the doubt inputs impact in technology monitor retirements resource the alternative the Particularly adjust there's the to years the provides market for will the dynamics. plan Evergy
summary, and the In the affordability sustainability from fleet a in IRP perspective. outlined reliability, win-win-win is transition
environmental for reliability, and phased maintain and to far-reaching favorable benefits from of the customers addition of the fossil our renewables the green swapping options the fuels economics, resources. for retirements Given sustainable
fleet X reduction plan Slide long-term the and lays trajectory. emissions related transition out
zero and the net last XXXX, carbon-free to set developments policies XXXX, our year. reduce levels, by their emissions and emissions achieve more Factoring By our in from We're to aligned As energy with of in dependent carbon levels. and on nuclear of our from emissions-reduction retail by support XXXX and X/X is XXXX carbon sustainable resources. XXXX our XX% customers updated to enabling generation, a half -- carbon reminder, COX energy from advance expect as forth affordability. also than These relative our goals our XX% resources announce STP emissions of we regulations. renewable maintaining reduced power generated used by we XXXX, customers the received was technology focus pleased to while delivering our on a for customers our goal which targets reliability energy future and by
side Slide left-hand over profile emissions-free the next on of coal increasing will our our share on of the reflected reducing proportion. in dramatically equal significantly change generation resources X fleet while reliance X, the decades, As
that cost location solar and gains the cost are effectively, supported by will allow geographic with favorable Our do this ongoing us new and expected renewables storage. for building the to of further resources wind efficiency ample
and wrap had turn on for across business on thesis, focused I focused value over We've our our each our utilities. Slide XXXX our strategic on environment. I'll and our X. executing and To investment a plan to driving the up benefits summarize is of strong shareholders in start plan Before Kirk, customers, it balanced remain
X% our to drive this XXXX growth from annual EPS compound expect XXXX. will execution through We continued targeted X%
for growth tandem Over distribution, in deliver the anticipate our that benefits with will requirements enable generation and we term, sustained transmission and transition, ongoing customers. our infrastructure longer investment in fleet
us our gives have ability high-performing and during experienced with forward targets. against team our in confidence September. high plan strategy forward and diverse qualified our look dedicated Day place, we depth our paired The discussing to our deliver execute to in Investor and Board, in in We greater
turn over I will to now the call Kirk.
