Sure.
morning, and you joining for call, thank good Mike. First,
the two patients seven study placebo. Basically, on were the same dosing the that on was Part treatment were all was kind It nine and of for had planned regime. safety. got in short. So, We was X, patients, a treatment on
So placebo. on they all got day one,
dose. low a got they day, second the On
got they it from they cases day, third high in a day the right? then, past the compassionate if you that And a dosing, that the dose. day was days a consecutive we four to -- of On twice roughly go of reduction. treatment, a twice XX-day led bacterial And got knew sort that back,
Kind in So, expectations low I days, look, think versus the many XX days very had Part only that's the why patients. four we X. said, it's not of
effect are low. of likelihood Part X:X, days expecting randomized patients the robust compassionate X. the seeing the see replication day the in a signal So, XX dosed Part And actually right? cases, twice we is use is So kind XX of was to X, of which
an extremely what X, log saw, we was X.X and encouraging surprising again, average Part reduction. was of
reduction from XX% baseline. a like that's So,
X.X with that a a within log. to have two is XX%. reduction, accepted. the XX.XX% which reduction, placebo with We up like to was with X one of log, XX%, X.X in what's seen reduction patients noise log Compared the and that's reduction, patient We half X patients the seeing the around count know assays log bacterial log like
the So a well-behaved quite in placebo, dramatic kind it effect was a of treatment.
we're very hopefully X, longer gives signal. confidence replication, that encouraged, robust move kind duration. of a forward And So, And is where to where to we're expecting which Part a I right? more think a that's us that's