Dr. Mann Muhsin
Thank you, program. MDNAXX talking everyone. will morning be Fahar, and about Today the I good
specifically. including also designed, month AstraZeneca, La sponsored part Hoffmann like variety I’ve to joining leaders Eli myself I’d of First, introduce Medicenna. excited Lilly, so executed development dozen this clinical immune-oncology and oncology most clinical Roche, Novartis, and in Therapeutics programs on I’ve recently companies, trials Bayer. of exactly a IL-X joined conducted deep unmet Johnson working explain industry a the why trials Johnson, for biotech Medicenna expertise I’m and Nektar be Medicenna more than has team. I at to prior Merck, by to and multiple & earlier
robust as primary competing was differentiated in Medicenna the compared and come best-in-class molecules and to set, MDNAXX’s which of drivers to my CMO IL-X development preclinical One potential the approved decision as demonstrates therapies on behind clearly data landscape.
renal to approved primary IL-X patients as with human targets treatment immune space, toxicity, causing which for patients of receptor, These while In prognosis metastatic the of recombinant unfavorable of the leads IL-X CDXX. and intensive its includes some extreme recombinant stem As and you CDXX cell anti-tumor that carcinoma unit. with the which of inhibits fact activation with carry various has familiar from associated dosing most likely in of TRx, in well relation as shortcoming. major know, which shortcomings melanoma the types of necessitates IL-X response cancers,
due dosing every IL-X pharmacokinetic days, human the to properties. for nine Additionally, recombinant eight required is poor hours
MDNAXX is increased has I how exciting affinity for about overcome Medicenna the but so find receptor. Superkine only what the can it the it that MDNAXX these to platform, not dramatically CDXXX have shortcomings, Using shortcomings. engineered IL-X overcome these affinity Now,
this affinity stimulation for for as significant, is activation that immune the is While the having are effectors cells the IL-X of CDXXX of reduced key therapy. killing the of the cancer target CDXX,
regulation a complex it of consistency, active of protein also is second in well bioavailability for fish. a not of albumin and is Additionally, to the the the of It’s In unintentionally on In MDNAXX to regulation reduce and but rely improves inclusion half-life. that molecules key this process molecule differentiation half-life competing variants, the product known albumin only affect the compared in point a many site IL-X human requires which ethics. the case, match improve fusion to protein. manufacturing general to tumor can
stimulate This best-in-class. data robust Tregs. reduce preclinical shows MDNAXX molecule T cancer models. to combination affinity MDNAXX have selectivity. programs, sets, CDXX how in to that to killing data compared effector to We has and alone set preclinical and for IL-X shown able demonstrating CDXXX is Thanks to efficacy cells for also The preferentially for be opposed competing and as tumor affinity checkpoint impressive in positions inhibitors with high NK enhanced this
Additionally, Medicenna. properties ultimately of me MDNAXX not interest other non-human the drove with or primate cytokine power as studies platform seen syndrome the was indicate release programs. that does been led leak Superkine and realize vascular best-in-class cause that It the to joining has in of molecule my syndrome, these
that I I’ve forward. of let about how me little here, bit talk moving the now plan you So a told got
followed Australia of and MDNAXX X/Xa in States. in expansion trial currently to by advancing the the We’re Kingdom, into process the United United Phase clinical
than for We United two trial the reasons. have chosen rather these the in countries to begin States
First, that the doses doses. at closer escalation us of to are effective allows to the portion dose filing countries these trial in begin therapeutically
prevalence help the has higher and relatively Kingdom compared which patients to with Australia study United inhibitor States, the of may Second, enrollment. a naive checkpoint United
studies This to our progress We regulatory of we of good process by the end submission Australian in of as agencies. June. initiation package down toxicology our and submission are wind is continue for trial preparing in their make towards GLP expected
expansion the in calendar a chosen site with we checkpoint phase selection with begin a monotherapy escalation Australia. CRO MDNAXX trial will plan underway by quarter design, monotherapy, Additionally, evaluate in phase, for be a well XXXX. and already the in then trial trial of dose is we both Initiation as followed third combination is dose MDNAXX expansion to inhibitor. expected This dose a of MDNAX regards With the will to as which phase. have
collection speak planned allow Another this which on-treatment is key collect and us of element trial biopsies, to a mechanistic design valuable to data MDNAXX activity biomarker of that pre- the human. in will may
by on and end any the biomarker a we preliminary update ahead, data available to Looking safety, expect PK/PD of provide this year.
briefly from in I set MDNAXX XXXX. of Phase gears first like to monotherapy speak Shifting trial program. of ask our expected half first the Fahar efficacy to would now, The signals study are the X about