Thanks, Sylvain.
mine rate As the have several that the years. Fox suggests success potential more exploration for our to has you produce of heard, Black
three the place use By produce to production, XXX,XXX XXX,XXX in months ounce level from the development Our of window putting to production we multiple is the could XX have months concurrently. XX two begin to deposits in years. vision we to sources reach during needed stacking five to next to
Grey the since Fox has acquisition. grown
initially the are mine. study Black at that our We looking eventually open mine transition operation the on Fox would an to similar underground to pit commencing feasibility current project, an
surface schematic on pit included so XXX in This pits in is have comes the be studied open may far. open to zones, the XXX contact which what it and the of we potential Zone plan. Northeast extent also The illustrates
provide being over grade significant Preliminary our feed of simultaneously life. completed permitting analysis per is QX would study ore year. five-year for tonne grams mill around with in the two feasibility Currently, a to feasibility the having work. out We high anticipate shows this carried seven-year study that X pits the
usable gaining additional from the for to surface personnel shows involved access a development the longer to to schematic Stock portal as workings, We developments the new Old zone. with the Stock access Old ramp shaft access transport. envision the West mine, a This an is and existing no mine
program soon be XXXX. inventory mineral plan Fuel At we a find developed develop West to we relatively an exploration could a the to would drifts be site. quickly mining to underground existing at Stock is plan. this to this in we’re to established. Stock this the after complete mine. is Great Froome benefit compliant a of that planning implemented the resource have zone zone Therefore, to continue connect XXXX that to has at and seems and in Stock it The moment permanent access exploration West estimate can
gold Moving produced compared equivalent of per equivalent sustaining ounces all-in guidance per XXXX, costs to respectively. original ounces and $X,XXX ounces. we XX,XXX equivalent $X,XXX in our Cash ounces, gold gold Bar, were Gold costs and XX,XXX to
various the understand to were higher of versus contributed plan ounces There the XX,XXX and important the five we is original that reasons. incurred. cost shortfall factors our to It principal
resulted the but on fewer not commercial XXXX, March planned First less in was until begin time to heap recover production which achieved May, them. was leach and pad ounces in delay, was to
the grade, Second that moved but planned pit the lower achieve pre-stripping we stockpiles in some our in XXXX, number model. and grading the tonnes needed lower order of grade contained in Pick mine was gold tonnes in than the to we approximately we predicted
expect we Also a experts it not agglomerate as to number. factor, definition a decision expected will field as longer recovery believe to take mine heap and achieve will much and on crushed recovery, reach run that of well crushed as recover, we to the whether material, Third material. selectively material, which ultimate Stock the leach in was by
clay several our to content caused the original Creek weather. because of was Cabin cash winter higher of This to system improve exploit our decision ahead ore Fourth, the orebody flows. with handling wet scheduled complications decision and the
And with construction to the and engineering fifth overcome infrastructure. were the of deficiencies mine
that the of process For material the also example, construction. was carbon cause in heap heap carbon and areas amount pad. plant and in preg-robbing leach preg-robbing Piping leach attrition resulted pad the used containing on
hurdle Recently, Bar. we have encountered another Gold significant like
not for more than positive pits was they mining for Cabin about two our us. and X% is predicted experience reserve was that the contained the in by Creek result that pleasant a model. unusual initial sense Our gold This was
have almost with bit a Pick specifically There’s XXX bench mining month. our the we been Recently, about of we deposit, Pick the per exclusively to to foot Pick quite ore dripping transitioned from pit. and associated West West the advancing closer have way zones waste working
the data have we Our West relative tones, Pick model better we has the see as still to The experienced has and grade to differences. up grade. the pit the reliably very we material poor for enough predict from point is gold don’t now been some mining our down a to reserve reconciliation advanced mining what has that where and are model are is well tonnes yet actual ore to as although been
a triggered maximum reserved modeling, advancing at resources the possible. which reevaluation pace have been This we of the
initial decrease mine an and geological I our are the several optimized, so will the circumstances reserve change. that it may will partially completed understand have we in plan reduction to likely mention interpretation estimates balances offset resource and mitigating does people aware. resource We containing are not There will which that was enough team the draft while know think
such tonnes recover expansion certain tonne potentially to to may as take heap on ore tend grades ore on the place. secondly, fewer capital need higher and leach, First, margin an a higher gives to placed costs pad heap higher And process also leach of gold the grades better. not us of each
As for our gold you in refine of was see geologic a that us modeling some Pick. explanation appreciate of will pit what we to the criteria caused
going details. discussion you some present to I’m over hand to the with Sylvain to
