Thank Vish. you,
First, session healing presented and one-time EB-XXX data VIITAL data at following Dermatology, results Furthermore, improved EB-XXX reported and in data were I pain or of and application The outcomes compared and of Investigator caregiver Professor Investigated would for during meetings and and patient control presented Tang, at X, weeks presented ISID severity. XX presentation. ISID. wound Principal wounds oral improvement demonstrated Dr. show EB-XXX. at in that at each reduction like Societies to reported featured poster to XX study, blistering separate Stanford for ISID Dermatology the of express my international Jean also excitement about the
designed in provide trial the wound minimum I investigate design tolerability to results, VIITAL. want patients was with brief in of to a X the VIITAL years. to age for efficacy, pairs, summary and reviewing approximately of chronic safety large the a XX Before XX of XX EB-XXX
selected chronic was size, with randomized each and wound anatomic that large undermined possible same open patient study location to years the chronically with Each with would had remain simulant paired wounds being two Our treated the patients. extent a and wounds the controlled controlled. minimum
greater that XX X analysis study of open aligned although years. chronic have and endpoints for In We the area as statistical with VIITAL, months minimum centimeters we open remain than define a on FDA many and for plan. were large wounds square wounds surface
that benefit. healing self-heal. as is or co-primary of targeting XX% remember, than Given co-primary to for endpoint treat endpoint wounds EB-XXX large on chronic because of the open wounds, cannot pain remain the to second of clinical additional greater the equal wound and measure that they reduction hardest years Realign
associated and first, baseline, pain with comparing RDEB healing months' or direct point change time difference wound match size XX% reported reported as from matched standpoint randomized endpoint. at of first [ph] points control of second, at to mean assessed as patient. and this dressing Specifically, wounds is of were; wound control by greater than with score the Wong-Baker as by in treated end investigator a wound co-primary randomized treated the FACES the proportion X-month between co-primary the by patient sites reduction This pain equal the the X study, determined scale assessment; was pivotal
weeks treated healing assessment healing sites severity proportion and of control was for each size additional from included pain XX wound reduction endpoint at and matched comparing complete wound well and with with blistering. Exploratory wound XX. as the for secondary as baseline, randomized wound endpoints RDEB assessment The
top I'm to into characteristics results We line large treated with with is the call wounds square and here. the details square baseline the to centimeters randomized of severe remind with centimeters, per patient EB-XXX during VIITAL want go of of range graph. size VIITAL. reviewed To wounds treated to pain XXX XX the was wound area body exactly surface areas centimeters. included size XXX just the [ph] the and square clarify, in associated of the you Median XX
For is centimeters, multiple [indiscernible] square could areas fashion, the the that considered distant in each covered chronic large case wound. be exceed graphs graph applied area by which XX
than area square the wound centimeters, debridement the prepare required And was a to wound feed to XX less bed graph. was
debrided. chronically X wounds wounds the months On months control years. were treated very that not was had randomized XX or control of wound duration. the duration had wound Median The open remained is contrary, similar that wound wounds
Now and was are treated reduction X% from including XX graphs, EB-XXX to treated improved was subsequent standpoint wounds for compared weeks Pain wound charts gray. time turn weeks. scores healing at or showed week with assessed, early early Wound as you including results. in Consistent we the to treatment in assessment at all and was To wounds very categorizing points and blue in pain X XX subsequent the wounds help weeks time assessed, which XX% which caregivers by great significant with sustained XX wounds. treated can wounds for of wounds pain -- at follow the EB-XXX controlled the standpoint caregivers all observed was much in weeks. and statistically control improved seen EB-XXX for baseline sustained points improvement was much at X healing,
In addition, treatment. treatment with greater scale patient-reported sensory using a home significant measurement with week system Wong-Baker improvement early severity at called pain in using PROMIS EB-XXX showed also achieved pain as assessed assessment Pain reduction with pain outcomes X. was score EB-XXX FACES as quality information significantly
and In patient EB-XXX significantly treatment. showed pain, reducing blistering related reported improvement reported significantly each greater caregiver and addition outcomes with to to
of As each that increases infection. quality and of for a life trauma, factor is significant impacts risk patients RDEB a and reminder, blistering
tolerated tolerability. VIITAL, with shown pivotal In you, in to serious VIITAL and favorable Now Vish. let's EB-XXX positive demonstrated this well no results patients in safety Back EB-XXX conclusion, treatment-related adverse clinical review profile with and a consistent risk-benefit to observed and for RDEB. be past safe trial experience. events was study