begin a pending turning regulatory the our decisions Generating Energy Federal off To Gates retail cover will with, cost I of legal and jurisdictional decision, appeal wholesale FERC allocation customers Brian. first, essentially between much, very you Regulatory at the and Station. our Dave matters. on the to Thank few Commission's
of for that us our most you million make a in an As denied rehearing year. few successful to FERC $XX we Court we the first X May the years in for an of to argument about required FERC promptly hopeful have we quarter request of last we scheduled And can't did who've in filed - know, predict June petition and a receive We received from that with might We of waiting XXXX, outcome we I'm half, been a ruling a did after over this of adverse the in we XXXX. will but for Montana. obviously over which after of year December year. review refunds, that oral do us with we a precisely when D.C. Appeals. decision, Circuit now pleased say receive that are
courts an been in Unit a of the months. Montana And particularly appeals there to of recovery XXXX, including you milestone certain related X and different their costs the and courts Commission have a Concerning orders order courts matters Colstrip outage we So to again, schedules. X disallowance each for. issued have regarding of run been the filed within from receive of May in XXXX own district coming waiting in costs the tracker we X. XX proceedings disallowing Again, out expect Montana next
property item, Third tracker. tax
commission to Montana a in of and rules adopted expenses a change one rules years Montana amount implement know, you As of is in largest under state in that, closely to statute that allowing of our customers. between and the purporting interpretation In of June that the at our statute from the and year, this a enabling the filing taxes allocated minimum statute new suggest taxes appear look contemplate ago local Commission the will number requirements legislature And recovery property adopted general rate of narrower recovery the a taxes. recognition fees cases. the of for XX% and of
resolution XXXX. to occur first annual filing quarter tax the our and in We in tracker December of should expect make
Montana also the XX. then was reflect down the annual in an include million, reduction $X.X In production That rates increase first The concerning rate rate the in were about was are reach modifications. August, In position to bifurcated, that June, there did which of Next, of a X% to our the was go requirement monthly service and result settlement also reflects the and case part which allocation depletion below of X.XX% requirements an December. concerned between our filing. annual revenue final the order case ROR effective agreement balance order will in gas ROE issues between then classes net that with docket, of did September hearing Montana we production issued the the cases, And And $X.X charge. final with with an settlement interveners assets. revenue The in of million. a and of increase natural and the Commission but accepting addressed step at as gas the an an and X.XX%.
inclusion that's approximately in to in as lively production of XXXX Montana the country lesser plus mentioned. down South this in million, We XXXX and, of depletion, certainly increased in much a a expect rates the the gas due $X.X increase months I X step of Qualifying facilities are topic be in to and the always in part reflecting to Dakota. extent,
the half-way power to Montana As Act, that you with and required, issued know, period, commission rate consideration the based exceptions, new than independent the rates be the the would utilities capacity facilities. same initially look order second at necessarily with purchase subject on The maximum lower are an which ordered a of resources saying for at also In and from a June, Public contract value under the years, Policy XX rate of not years, revenue Utility as will and end XX more for Regulatory the and not shortened the provide for future qualify for on commission the the asset QFs, NorthWestern after Commission qualifying electric generally the producers authorized of the utilities revenue a time, through. to any XX-year years, to resources. energy it that docket adjustment subsequent period, based the also potential of may rate adopted was to costs X that QF-X the acquired QFs by at length customers
pioneering interpretation. regulatory was this a So,
supply contract expected - October, resources. issued Commission to voted for apply to as but rates by years expect to length most would substantially contract retain lower QF and based based revise in electric both the original of reconsideration the yet that parties but vote, In future Montana and we future a the by order both decision there, continuing order aspects we will order on final did to filed has to as - the by As term not It resources contracts. for the October QF the but NorthWestern on well October continuing apply be request extending to the result the XX NorthWestern. QF
market we a negative We are follow customers reserve in plan risks and those have a - our obviously needs. waiting solely supply rely you steps identified the have on it see next price capacity XX% know, company final and if to as to meet to the significant we to real is, margins deficit, evaluate we of these reliability Montana who our very we any purchases before
We standards and new to reliability have responsibilities dispatchable that available have the to meet are demand even greater standards, capacity peak increase respond sources to national us require or decrease generation on to increasingly coming intermittency to system. output
the legislature. had that X. by again, is be that A electric Montana House for will amount So what north of Commission effective at Essentially been supply an recover of was - large we Montana anticipation activity evaluate and looking on allowed of concerned us Montana July Bill from costs, repealed repeal the the and we'll implementation passed XXX the promptly. order with tracker with regulatory to statutory incurred did has prudently
You'll see hard in and the middle worked has we and constructive. very with commission been of Page implementation XX, to a be procedural busy the timeline very, have
proceeding a several will of forward. and clarifying XX, really there currently this The XX. rebuttal file coming The the on up testimony, the were on scheduled intervener November a commence first the is activities developing those testimony opportunity March the point. around hearing for January we'll discovery At path day iterations presumably final to focused scope On is to and both on be XX. have
regulatory the And the try NorthWestern be be. as identified Dakota legislative is mechanism involves responsive text, be customers a exact the to should As And the same as you in that MDU and see in here the we applies commission urged risk concerns specifically, to as to subject is the its that testimony, commission's could we to XX%/XX% a Utilities. adopted mechanism commission Montana treatment sharing between company.
MDU the mechanism, of adjustment the power and what X bottom proposed model at And propose at PCCAM, cost this does the closely buckets. look effectively a depicted we page. hypothetical is in So,
and of power traditional deviation have be from first would baseline. XX%/XX% sharing The would a again that then costs, a
to QF include is Public includes will set would category QF commission the third Council Service fund associated be our taxes course by side of And and general second would our the program category Commission then X activities. The any agencies. then Consumer would but sales, that also demand order those prices, specifically and administrative costs it costs under go management offset which costs, include and against
good think the face the Notably a look poised So, something that was it's what commission would had set one in much believe, initial Electric point, out commission response their had case. to we a very require thorough, rate commission the and alternatives. urged. at notice, a General to we like thoughtful And X
of other require, considered a work ultimately existing and The the to which discussing. first the they and very that virtual the decided We costs amount work a we've focused. where that supply of with, again, was effectively positive, not of off we that it us we baseline of of been to commission given matters of have was in front case, rate
and intend filing file in on for the General we page that. spending. do in our Montana all then that Final have test quite section, Electric to FERC for XX, jurisdictional challenging capital the XXXX both would rate based filing include really year Scope a preparatory and the a of a recovery. FERC case work cost that XXXX, So, the
generation capital the As activity capital the we've Included have be would cases. in Gas little essential over the say, to that evaluation we then some months. functions. allocated our will the order quarters, Montana operations last in the in discussed South I on Nebraska timing and on a is around about a again thing approximately for up of of it the moved Nebraska both Last open to forecast this Montana, and associated South Commission's various we just investments the with actions the period have over like subject operational that significant of and out out includes million I before comment QF Dakota $XXX previous is Dakota Montana depending that few and - capacity and coming capital questions, between or X-year
fire subject be may You season. aware extraordinary that just to an Montana was
We of mutual lots protect assistance they to of response out the did those hurricanes. have a not as need And mountainous we in in the danger, in rural areas. extremely assets and in should assets result to participate be
you logistics, great really saw, the just hard you Canadian field engineering, South storm infrastructure to those since industry in to an handle with just the customer storm. And As and investments, this we lots in open customers well to and was in us stepping play proud were of care, doing incredible ice to be all far the internal in extraordinary and not we've talking it those exposed of able Texas industry. to so - make few the snow were this the And storm storm out, the and just it country to I include years our to X,XXX in technology came possible. to the pressures. September. - extraordinary of you it and extraordinary the too it it east particular, was who and south we in of with by together. was was storm loading the terms and on help as But the this fires the And largest to had in on moved in work, people of crews, made part our goes of and of The over would ice complexity the terms and Florida for talked respond our of up a those and the response. customers of in in south storm or of pulling our in out In east, second It Montana, snows ultimately the was the border. highline just resources of heavy We've communities in put miles range. the at most experienced early - about distribution hundreds as people west particularly number of that from facilities' a response transmission of lines that's that XXXX, Montana, storms of our area in hundreds into an Prairie extraordinary customer all investments, example frontline last not scope Dakota wave
storm especially response, from just very meeting last you really up the systematic the staff community We opportunity as community those thank to for commission that and are to an for was pleased the very in and a the partners, communities Havre. Monday, back particularly round way most Commission us a talk a Montana heard stepping It us to the an was about held a for it appreciation of tremendous, opportunity we moving to and say to our community. in
proud that for So the thanks could the more be of I holding we again, people Montana Commission And for meeting. not that work with.
open for But there apologize we So, I sleeve thanks and your I on for with now questions, getting that, a to heart the are little bit guess. patience.
