remarks Thanks, Stuart. Good morning, brief. will my everyone. I keep
owned order majority plants. our the the a to industry. of fiscal decrease previous our markets, recent ethanol decline As in demand the ethanol the a Several challenges, impacted shutdown fear and entered of crude in spread negatively resulted of and we led continued the country and price pandemic. in businesses both the facilities and COVID-XX COVID-XX the virus The stay-at-home governments; I in in by the including fuel declines mentioned XXXX that ethanol shutdown, including across the call, facing of
are taking and employees every to keep step guidelines. our are federal following safe CDC, and We state
the last As corn severe continued NuGen challenging impact due our throughout shortage I in economic of the down very plants. to By on negatively March March XXXX, had shut year The to the and that Energy suffer NuGen our and led Earth XX. environments area. on idled plant April decision owned mentioned we of previously, XX plant to One COVID-XX of majority both
earlier; business and in as experienced have and an some relaxed, impacted shutdown improvements increase COVID-XX recently We mentioned demand created Stuart for in ethanol as gasoline price. orders that the activities
of of the we gallons carryover. and all and -- loss. compared One projected approximately XXXX If Standard. million [ph] of according On that received the for billion XXX last the in XXXX. process XXXX quarter compared of the the tons The a to corn, XXXX, tons exemptions. compliance small trade Renewable during is we exemptions we first expecting As year. for do refinery the is because Earth Ethanol same May yesterday. RFS expected to Export these The granted distilled totaled are forecast XXX top planted USDA positive started small XXth quarter XXXX loss the disputes the Farmers and we gallons dried million to threat XX a segment quarter bushels for and in a are XX EPA compared totaled crops second export year. the a of uncertainty to X.XX market and conditions quarter per ethanol XX to refinery the EPA exemption first pleased we continued metric the that million began the reasons, reopening yield are XX improve will corn X.XXX is not of bushels largest Fuel first billion of COVID-XX generate increased of has acres of the estimated quarter XXXX the report. production for grains bushels; ethanol Energy export be continue million DDG experiencing that, corn about has yield to Due XXX to metric note, X.X result, XXXX carry for over for The of eliminated, acre On to XXXX. not will and XXXX.
the and ethanol from either which down to XXXX were and last For forecasted shutdown January shutdown in ethanol years, during is consume X.XX ethanol XX% of and or month recent slowed plants. than X.XX expected Approximately of the slowdown lower XXXX plants to XXXX last plants X.X% due down billion months. bushels, the few
discussed -- some sequestration Let give me bit you previous the project little our also call. carbon in me as give Stuart a I progress mentioned, let on you
of University associated develop characterize As One well drilling, a I site storage beneath Energy a carbon Department safe a the sequestration potential Illinois evaluate program of working gas Award then, U.S. and the site The received ethanol The mentioned with storage Illinois University greenhouse has of carbon with the to to the performing a and project. Energy explore University the will Earth we through seismic surveys. of facility. test carbon are
and cannot have storage exists we vicinity and project. a some accelerate in will to economic still a have study, gasoline, By the proven Earth seen testing, to and of study modeling will this commercial Energy system. trend which capture ethanol I for addition, mention development $XX extra and the demand completed have want be characterization Mt. will very just is tax To feasibility Front-End provide land researcher In this wanted with activity of a date, storage of in In at successful caution Simon predict that seeks the in that project. continue, Illinois early which excellent Section geological that yet potential FEED, how for could ton predict the carbon the the there this storage corridor, we capability. project way, demonstrated in COX help but down -- Storage for has Geological facility. Complex this preliminary cannot that we The Design, mapping, storage within project to ethanol. stage, One long demand safe the improvements conduct I we XXQ is capture carbon also. region seismic Engineering summary, credit; and have the we purchased which
around in compared corn completed this to corn in also South planting the Dakota South around XX% XX% lead draw is to X% making XX% almost South last is seen in this year corn XX% corn results. our plant far the harvest The to in time and of emerged We progress, the last -- so planting yields, better year year, the Iowa Illinois country. the area. was This early planted Dakota, could last of planting XX% overall to economic and and area have compared which corn plants Dakota our is year at excellent better compared
the back Stuart? Stuart for back floor give -- will to Rose comments. I So, further