much, very Megan. Thanks
the dose BCXXXXX. with cohort very are D early of study data patients PNH our inhibitor lowest Factor in oral share We our excited to from treatment-naïve ongoing proof-of-concept
milligrams You and goal our of on XX the well monotherapy. data a to XXX from we way twice are will achieving day a see that
was effect the signals. subjects on benefit. have control and healthy the to compared dose We no study, of pathway seen lower dose We’ve activity milligrams day related of effects milligrams superior XXX doses. at on and XXX twice the hemolysis alternative clinical XXXX in seen And ascending multiple a safety
XXX we hemolysis. should cohort twice you tell the data move next PNH treatment-naïve As day control a and These see patients. milligram us to complete XXX in of
the As X will the a XX twice shown Cohort and milligrams twice day, is XXX testing XXX of and a X Slide milligrams cohort on XXX study a PNH day. test reminder, is XX. design
XXX as benefit had continued of in drugs. X that is the far, X patients long-term on drug, days So days XX have visit, treatment-naïve from the milligrams XX we enrolled day we a inhibitor day completed of XXX are that today? a XX where have XX milligrams orally twice assessed twice the not clinical a PNH PNH CX administered by So all day. means all have dosing at milligrams and monotherapy. by followed day, investigators day they a At X twice twice so dosing patients XXXX had extension.
One, PNH. seriously third second the cerebral aplastic required with vein see cell had that and On thrombosis Slide the and – had you PNH. XX, were patients disease, transfusions, from a these red anemia had previously ill the can
degrees among liter, elevated of had or the patients units bone reticulocytes counts, variable marker of was X.X XXX X.X to grams PNH the dehydrogenase sensitive a with patients, of And X,XXX LDH per to over degree deciliter. the try over times of lactate anemia, level X quite limit from normal. X.X anemia of before treatment to severe hemolysis XX to overtime In the range hemolysis get show patients and X the to or per working reflecting hemoglobin upper marrow All hemoglobin our up.
encouraged the responses with a twice very doses of laboratory hemolysis the day, and day We and key of are milligrams by milligrams seeing that clinical all twice the a biomarkers improved. lowest XXXX, XXX but XX we’re
individual PNH effect magnitude another of in dose baseline Total can clinically given patients in on All and hemolysis Slide Bilirubin, sources had in these the dependent You XXXX. patients. see fill normalized data low of and X on elevated The X optimized. Reticulocytes that meaningful marker is at and drops not in counts impressive, XX. are was X all LDH.
X XX.X eight day red see week takes it day. study already from This hemoglobin stabilization doses, XXXX Previous dependent at and at Hemoglobin of studies the and shown transfusion a our of cell while study of example, have for about transfusion in to on X window to week X post hemoglobin free XX. X now has in hemoglobin doses. unit transfusions X the is X.X on on has milligrams study, X.X patient subject for at with XXX lowest following day our complement X, increasing weeks been a weeks, transfusion a optimized with twice risen inhibitors at
observation on effect shown The profile no XX safety is serious which headache drug complement patients inhibitor well-recognized healthy earlier volunteers, early evaluation the drug tolerability PNH. transient in treatment in our dosing, XXXX during a XX. in no a common day Phase Unlike There related Slide were of experience X Most rash. and of period adverse is class was developed events.
patient on and taking and who other dangerous event event clinical exposed occurred to corticosteroids this disseminated subsequently contracted lymphocytes. varicella treated determined to to the was Varicella led period, patients serious the known adverse drugs azathioprine, a steroids has a worker, suppress XXXX. a be unrelated unrelated extension Based varicella. that that investigator with history, is death. especially One was in we This is infection to was in frontline PNH patient healthcare chronic
twice X and CX following XXX we cohort patient a strong treatment-naïve continue patient interest And patients fourth are we patients, despite testing begin X, enroll to was Our to to inhibitor of receive efficacy in PNH recently Africa, expect day. South responders in naïve to XXX from the milligrams cohort inhibitors. COVID investigators challenges, who in cohort CX completion enrolled X, enrollment and of poor
We expect responding the patients end these to report beginning patients rolling the quarter and from for third year. in of by the data
about excited XXX patients. and a milligrams XX early at day very in this data We’re twice PNH
MAD milligrams profile were the the Note for subjects. state in and a pharmacodynamic MAD have for consistent there period cohorts profile results were individual safety hours for XXX shown for XX especially the The both XX The twice treatment, is and day Hemolysis superior dose. PD doses provide the are XX XXX for to PNH doses twice signals. last Weislab the we coverage, the no Slide continued the higher completed the after that the AP and milligrams these in Also, XXX in XX healthy of subjects beyond and assays on of healthy dose, importantly day a more hours clearly AP after steady assays.
super the The values level may healthy the characterization see milligrams assays XXX dosing interval of at more subject milligrams, as pharmacology XX, on at twice When complement you cohorts blocked XX% of this additional clinical be. daily and well up once-a-day activity plan might than profile by day, study, steady you the a AP of do as explore in study of Slide was XXX and have suppression, ask MAD state. of main be if doses. XXX we with the could in throughout we by therapeutic both shown drug, testing XXX both wrapping it XXXX once as And the of to dosing
XX we have twice what a treatment-naïve and patients XXX So clear learned with dose? is benefits. at response clinical there First, about milligrams day in dose PNH a
the to results day level to Second, CX subjects XXX were XXX XXX in superior twice lower and healthy plan milligram. cohort doses that Therefore, the i.e., dose PD milligram poor a begin at milligram, doses. of responder we XXX
MAD monotherapy PNH The support is develop other as strongly BCXXXXX we and mediated healthy share for complement data subject to all that goal. today goal PNH Our disease. an patient and
of complete about PNH excited with proof-of-concept and We’re to study diseases a speak other by to and regulators in dis-regulation our next caused complement. steps