to Chip, afternoon call. Thanks, on everyone and good the
Phase X results lower As our be X risk just of the Chip mentioned, we're excited from planned MDS away trial. to months top-line
if in study readout, are across execution by the confirms population, lower investigators, current has risk collaboration similar approved, failed significant and options. MDS occur or is that quality the early operations, sites. IMerge lower need As who trial with safety, the same designed patients trial of believe everyone remind We remain of for investigational confident and inhibition results, Phase trials for the imetelstat readouts XX% dependence focused for Moreover, many all dosing approximately refractory treatments use address patient requires data partnerships which Furthermore, are and the other our provides MDS X as like We well are MDS. clinical clinical ESA with and same teams, to and teams imetelstat biostats or I'd such, regimen treatment. of confusion, the to confirm secondary could for Phase will risk would our investigators. and on mechanism the that that management the data January RS-negative from primary unique disease durability are sites for telomerase us, high preparations differentiates geographies the CRO potential, to low X currently steps imetelstat who Phase XXXX. treatment risk of modifying with since which endpoints X believe patients imetelstat the and we as underserved needs
initiated our submission results, to In top-line NDA has team preparing preparations. regulatory for addition
to a the first in and U.S. NDA to half second in assuming XXXX. sites Phase IMerge mentioned, XXXX. submit we open in interim of MAA our in With we potential confident an regards X the refract of trial, completion activation selected Europe an XXXX. the support and we the will with Phase Chip As clinical MF site in remaining XXXX progress make of enable plan results this progress We to the continue submissions will half X in and enrollment analysis regulatory remain of believe
trial can is transformative our be in MS overall MF the confirmed primary lack journal, option by a Verstovsek, the in We principal treatment OS the trial for IMpactMF. a to their X only observed IMpactMF respond present of Dr. in Phase survival publication given and X Imetelstat using MS refractory recent that the in IMpactMF of treatment and for who dismal survival paper highlights need Phase lack believe in JAK patients to inhibitors, potentially are reminder, a note, inhibitor and improvement failures. no Mascarenhas many in the in for of dilemma this options. as investigators these improvements and longer cancer endpoint. trial who X reinforces describes JAK outcomes could Of in both prognosis our Phase This co-authored Dr. patient unmet JAK inhibitors, patients poor population. treatment As clinical
X clinical first this in ruxolitinib activity in earlier the in frontline of for stage frontline to the the disease opened we These our for to with study, the improve study. [Ph] want to our evaluate clinical treatments MF. study site this, with on the potential programs month, explore is designed pipeline, combination modification and this MS disease Moving MF in patients Phase safety we imetelstat setting. imetelstat earlier In in in
receive As parts, reminder, improved showed study approximately the In efficacy by Parts identified efficacy safe safety patients confirm to experiments. preclinical further and ruxolitinib collected. two objective and will synergistic additive One enroll a and of open part we patients with collect schedule part MF XX drugs single with with that patients in followed also In the enroll to both with the to identify are data arm plan of in in to and up parts. one, MF a dose the objective dose imetelstat data. being two dosing while label a consisting imetelstat, combination who of frontline a ruxolitinib effects for patients two, XX the
Medicine, in XXXX the AML, pediatric continue the in from acute trials the and led of to publication recent non-clinical our Clinical diseases. higher Journal expect second risk further the in MDS or start supports imetelstat of myeloid in investigator our these For developments AML in leukemia, we although half
believe that on Lastly, on-going likely Ukraine our for line Russia clinical impact and activity At the to call we have comment limited over Bloom timelines, and turn our across X, will our and conflict financial Financial IMerge for like we our all enrollment in want the to IMpactMF. would I and no Chief update. Officer in analysis results have top Olivia? for questions, including to now that anticipation trials. Phase the Olivia significant trials or moment, of trial on interim I