of funded FFO capital XX.X% HPT’s million related quarter $XX year quarter XXXX, rents an performance and was of morning, due the $XX.X owner of improvements to first with acquisitions Earlier centers. $X.XX $X.XX credit centers. of by X.X% we the due travel travel increase reported the XXXX. increased to increased Katie, prior compared first normalized hotels and this to million morning. a good the Starting you, that Fuel margin tax our quarter from to first in federal hotel minimum at and per resulting or primarily XXXX Thank received in quarter biodiesel retroactive first share, in returns and reported
investments. will XXXX. compared or X.Xx in level increased X.X% HPT’s margin fuel $X.X decreased coverage to increased details biodiesel tax Excluding fuel margin per HPT’s more X.X% and the a quarter, X.X%, from $XX.X these last for despite X.X% sold expenses a site up due provide tax compared the increased or million biodiesel $X.X level cents changes rent a to rent X% operating by the and decline XXXX margin. or Nonfuel was credit, X.X% X.XXx, gallon decline fuel on in million due credit, quarter, million in to to increasing Mark volumes moment. year’s in Property excluding gross
HPT’s of performance to Turning hotels.
primarily in our X.XXx to demand ramp-up down benefited activity. versus was growth, at of higher increases our increased by returns comparable storm full-service related benefit food and strong beverage all X.XXx quarter, GOP impacted quarter, group the first mostly and by XXXX. points this which results from wage coverage expenses. costs annual to XX versus Aggregate while the by driven X% basis quarter due RevPAR minimum decreased Factors in and XXXX First included positively from at XXXX and from that winter hotels quarter bookings, rents of XXXX rate margins XX.X%, higher quarter comparable and hotels, to renovations performance
However, new hotels. hotels, upscale increasing an particularly room of HPT as supply impede our performance number RevPAR to continues
know, rooms year-over-year upscale available growth. the percentage low-growth the Research quarter, highest in properties and second As reported in you comparable the RevPAR Smith may first experienced HPT’s Travel upscale lowest growth scale similar trends. of chain the
In renovations a last XX this XX addition quarter negative RevPAR in hotels quarter, impact to on new with compared supply, room to comparable XXXX renovation under hotels had the year.
and hotels do of soft A Sonesta was X.X%. these recurrent require disruption. they RevPAR’s strong growth hotels occupancy are increased of don’t that driven XXXX percentage was growth, RevPAR increases required normally subsequently RevPAR quarter construction, comparable by Performance X.X%. were growth the revenue cause increasing X.X ramp-up While and These reported of comparable good hotels portfolio X.X%. excluding in by rate and which by by renovations, under of ramping. portfolio led A this XXXX points X%, with many renovation, extended-stay
Sonesta strong portfolio’s gains Royal the Sonesta, Philadelphia; Gwinnett addition, Sonesta full-service at In were Royal material as quarter comparable Boston; New Orleans; had hotels and a the Hotels. Sonesta, recognized
increased GOP and Sonesta percentage partially comparable improved cash basis margin occupancy. -- a the IHG’s RevPAR increased percentage flow minimum portfolio, by driven comparable offset by XX increase X.X X.X% our in primarily pay X.X%, rate, to hotel available points XX.X%. For point return decrease in
and San following business from hotels Crowne strong Denver, renovation. to above our comparable grew set Juan industry, experienced Our hurricane-relief Plaza, due and renovation growth full-service driven benefited InterContinental RevPAR year. Toronto, competitive in which the closures by And last Hotels which
the and Our quarter, Radisson increase portfolio led occupancy. point X.X% grew in RevPAR X.X increase rate percentage by X.X% in first in
increases. quarter, drove hotels increased X first renovation Super Radisson’s segments have demand, the the Strong RevPAR Excluding X.X%. would group in Bowl higher-rated the mix-shift under RevPAR and
modest X.X%. portfolio Wyndham a RevPAR Our grew
avoid As first our of agreement Hawthorn last must Wyndham management greater to contractual pay a returns if pay to contractually and XX% Wyndham, growth will cash to this XX%. throughout flow-through the in increased flow or pay depleted with Wyndham’s insufficient various trend a the of continue our GOP quarter fall, Hotel year, expected, is our available Suites the guarantee in the year. project of strong we business hotel hotels. the displaced amount Florham renovation they declined is Under available RevPAR of of The expect due the amounts, due. had as the agreement timing at following quarter-over-quarter cash Park Wyndham result
months XXXX, XX, Renovations the agreement under the XX% these approximately were the million had took March place weakest the due Wyndham the revenue that contractual agreements ended were returns management portfolios, quarter. HPT less paid or During the this due. Marriott $X that of performance minimum quarter the three the amounts and in predominantly in than
negatively X.X% by X.X%. points. Inn quarter, Residence XXX decreased RevPAR Marriott basis and Our GOP portfolio portfolio hotels impacted had growth percentage This six renovation by this which XXX RevPAR decreased margin under
revenue in XX this six in X.XXx for night supply segments months. the and markets. renovation, is the Coverage management room required annual to portfolio performance group negotiated under the Excluding and seeing initiative revenue portfolio growth hotels the improve of impacted returns last corporate at was implementing this
decreased XX% X No. at this RevPAR this quarter. attributable Marriott to this renovation growth the in Many quarter. hotels RevPAR quarter. portfolio had XX a Our industry of X.X% decline also combined at performed above portfolio displacement the the in first the of quarter, They during hotels
among best the have are being last strategies grappling For management remains our agreements. to At for better covered No. revenue X those coverage employed. XX X.XXx absorption, with months, Marriott drive supply that
XX expect significant in XX renovations. XXXX this As previously, of focused hotels the we’ve required on we be renovations more mentioned to acquired year. and acquisitions
In at XX portfolio. the hotels addition recurring softwood over renovations primarily comparable to in normal
us, Hotel We luxury full-service This significant majority to terms with renovation, Morgans to the hotel or of to was Clift in Sonesta Francisco FF&E hotel renovations free Union Moscone Square, of expect was and to Center. year the possession management management is of the and hotel located in pending added and Hotel the heart with and well is begin Royal cash The for continue the our terminated. with later consistent Financial which hotels. of management other District to Convention of in Sonesta Yesterday, other are XXXX. the the agreement fund Sonesta. into San this terms scheduled agreement in agreement of agreements our hotel need rebranded the surrendered from flow. This Clift for reserves lease was the
through X% margin increase ahead, RevPAR basis XX our project continuing possibly management experience to XXXX, GOP that flat range, comparable is percentage improvement in down the to the will point we increased wages benefit growth rate will due to Looking costs. X% with to the such and
quarter segment the quarter HPT’s and centers, our weakest and is hotels on focused that for select-service typically first hotels travel. upscale The travel in the business concentrated
to performance over will expect see supply of but next up cost to and renovation continue wage-related we’ll experience respond growth, impact couple We pressures. quarters, the pick
change over premature outlook, to full than I’ll to now our higher of peers. So already many which was year turn the call our Mark. it’s