Legal Proceedings - Narrative (Details) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
Mar. 27, 2021USD ($)claims | Mar. 28, 2020USD ($) | Dec. 26, 2020USD ($) |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Revenues | $ 2,924,961,000 | $ 2,428,871,000 | |
Loss Contingency, Management's Assessment and Process | As of March 27, 2021, we had accrued our best estimate of potential losses relating to claims that were probable to result in liability and for which we were able to reasonably estimate a loss. This accrued amount, as well as related expenses, was not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our method for determining estimated losses considers currently available facts, presently enacted laws and regulations and other factors, including probable recoveries from third parties. | | |
Archer and White Sales, Inc. v. collectively, the Danaher Defendants [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | August 31, 2012 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Henry Schein, Inc. as well as Danaher Corporation and its subsidiaries Instrumentarium Dental, Inc., Dental Equipment, LLC, Kavo Dental Technologies, LLC and Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation (collectively, the “Danaher Defendants”) | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Archer and White Sales, Inc. | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | Archer alleges a conspiracy between Henry Schein, an unnamed company and the Danaher Defendants to terminate or limit Archer’s distribution rights. | | |
Archer filed amended complaint adding Patterson Compnies Inc. and Benco Dental Supply Co. as Defendants [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | August 1, 2017 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Patterson Companies, Inc. (“Patterson”) and Benco Dental Supply Co. (“Benco”) as defendants | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Archer | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | alleging that Henry Schein, Patterson, Benco and Burkhart Dental Supply conspired to fix prices and refused to compete with each other for sales of dental equipment to dental professionals and agreed to enlist their common suppliers, the Danaher Defendants, to join a price-fixing conspiracy and boycott by reducing the distribution territory of, and eventually terminating, their price-cutting competing distributor Archer. | | |
Archer filed second amended complaint under seal [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | October 30, 2017 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Archer | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | add additional allegations that it believes support its claims. The named parties and causes of action are the same as the August 1, 2017 amended complaint. | | |
The County of Summit, Ohio et al. v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | May 29, 2018 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | adding Henry Schein, Inc., Henry Schein Medical Systems, Inc. and others as defendants | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | The County of Summit, Ohio et al. | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | Summit County alleged that manufacturers of prescription opioid drugs engaged in a false advertising campaign to expand the market for such drugs and their own market share and that the entities in the supply chain (including Henry Schein, Inc. and Henry Schein Medical Systems, Inc.) reaped financial rewards by refusing or otherwise failing to monitor appropriately and restrict the improper distribution of those drugs. | | |
Loss Contingency, Settlement Agreement, Terms | On October 29, 2019, the Company was dismissed with prejudice from this lawsuit. Henry Schein, working with Summit County, donated $1 million to a foundation and paid $250,000 of Summit County’s expenses, as described in our prior filings with the SEC. | | |
Donation amount to Pain Management Education Foundation | $ 1,000,000 | | |
Litigation Settlement, Amount Awarded to Other Party | $ 250,000 | | |
Actions consolidated in the MultiDistrict Litigation [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Henry Schein and/or one or more of its affiliated companies | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | allege claims similar to those alleged in the County of Summit Action | | |
Actions consolidated in the MultiDistrict Litigation [Member] | Maximum [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Pending Claims, Number | claims | 150 | | |
Maximum sales of opioids in North America during the year, percentage | | | 0.10% |
Actions consolidated in the MultiDistrict Litigation [Member] | Continuing Operations [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Revenues | | | $ 10,100,000,000 |
City of Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System V. Henry Schein, Inc., Covetrus, Inc., and Benjamin Shaw and Christine Komola [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | September 30, 2019 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Henry Schein, Inc., Covetrus, Inc., and Benjamin Shaw and Christine Komola (Covetrus’s then Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | City of Hollywood Police Officers Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 and asserts that defendants’ statements in the offering documents and after the transaction were materially false and misleading | | |
Putative shareholder derivative action [Member] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract] | | | |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | February 5, 2021 | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Benjamin Shaw, Christine T. Komola, Steven Paladino, Betsy Atkins, Deborah G. Ellinger, Sandra L. Helton, Philip A. Laskaway, Mark J. Manoff, Edward M. McNamara, Ravi Sachdev, David E. Shaw, Benjamin Wolin, and Henry Schein, Inc., with Covetrus, Inc. | | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Jack Garnsey filed a putative shareholder derivative action on behalf of Covetrus, Inc. | | |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties under state law in connection with the same allegations asserted in the City of Hollywood securities class action described above and further alleges that Henry Schein aided and abetted such breaches. The complaint also asserts claims for contribution under the federal securities laws against Henry Schein and other defendants, also arising out of the allegations in the City of Hollywood lawsuit. | | |
Period Of Time Action Is Stayed | 45 days | | |