SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 9 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. |
|
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. |
|
Management Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. Certain significant accounting policies that contain subjective management estimates and assumptions include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, pension and other post-retirement benefit costs, goodwill, other intangible assets and long-lived assets, and income taxes. Descriptions of these policies are discussed in the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods. |
|
Currency Translation and Transactions |
|
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are translated at period-end rates of exchange, while revenue and expenses are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange for the period. Unrealized translation gains (losses) reported as cumulative translation adjustments through other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. amounted to $(144.4) million and $(7.6) million, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $(392.5) million and $50.4 million, net of tax, during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. |
|
For the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiary operating in a highly inflationary economy, the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. Remeasurement adjustments in financial statements in a highly inflationary economy and other transactional gains and losses are reflected in earnings. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the Venezuelan government enacted changes to the foreign exchange controls that expanded the use of its then-existing exchange mechanisms and created another exchange control mechanism (“SICAD II”), which allowed companies to apply for the purchase of foreign currency and foreign currency denominated securities for any legal use or purpose. The Company considered its specific facts and circumstances in determining the appropriate remeasurment rate and determined the SICAD II rate was the most appropriate rate that reflected the economics of its Venezuelan subsidiary’s business as of March 24, 2014, when the SICAD II mechanism became operational. As a result, the Company changed the exchange rate used to remeasure the monetary assets and liabilities of its Venezuelan subsidiary from 6.3 to the SICAD II rate, which was 49.81 as of March 31, 2014. Accordingly, a remeasurement charge of $38.3 million, on a before and after tax basis, was reflected in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014. |
|
On February 12, 2015, the Venezuelan government introduced a new open market foreign exchange system (“SIMADI”), which effectively replaced the SICAD II mechanism. As the SIMADI is the only mechanism legally available at this time for the Company’s highest priority transactions, which are the import of goods, the Company changed the exchange rate used to remeasure the monetary assets and liabilities of its Venezuelan subsidiary to the SIMADI rate, which was 191.97 as of March 31, 2015. Accordingly, a remeasurement charge of $5.3 million, on a before and after tax basis, was reflected in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of earnings for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015. The net monetary assets of the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiary were not material at March 31, 2015. |
|
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and may enter into option contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions for periods consistent with its identified exposures. Accordingly, the Company categorizes these instruments as entered into for purposes other than trading. |
|
The accompanying consolidated statements of earnings include net exchange gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions, including the effects of Venezuelan remeasurement charges, of $7.2 million and $(41.7) million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $(9.2) million and $(48.1) million during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. |
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
Accounts receivable is stated net of the allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions totaling $20.7 million and $23.9 million as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
The Company is a worldwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. The Company’s sales subject to credit risk are made primarily to department stores, perfumeries, specialty multi-brand retailers and retailers in its travel retail business. The Company grants credit to all qualified customers and does not believe it is exposed significantly to any undue concentration of credit risk. |
|
The Company’s largest customer sells products primarily within the United States and accounted for $268.6 million, or 10%, and $284.0 million, or 11%, of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $827.4 million, or 10%, and $907.0 million, or 11%, of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This customer accounted for $199.7 million, or 15%, and $158.5 million, or 11%, of the Company’s accounts receivable at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. |
|
Inventory and Promotional Merchandise |
|
Inventory and promotional merchandise, net consists of: |
|
| | March 31 | | June 30 | |
(In millions) | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
| | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 254.5 | | $ | 317.5 | |
Work in process | | 133.3 | | 192.4 | |
Finished goods | | 551.2 | | 599.5 | |
Promotional merchandise | | 134.1 | | 184.6 | |
| | $ | 1,073.1 | | $ | 1,294.0 | |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
| | March 31 | | June 30 | |
(In millions) | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Assets (Useful Life) | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 14.9 | | $ | 15.4 | |
Buildings and improvements (10 to 40 years) | | 195.5 | | 205.0 | |
Machinery and equipment (3 to 10 years) | | 642.1 | | 673.9 | |
Computer hardware and software (4 to 10 years) | | 985.0 | | 994.8 | |
Furniture and fixtures (5 to 10 years) | | 68.0 | | 75.1 | |
Leasehold improvements | | 1,534.5 | | 1,565.7 | |
| | 3,440.0 | | 3,529.9 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | 2,041.8 | | 2,027.3 | |
| | $ | 1,398.2 | | $ | 1,502.6 | |
|
The cost of assets related to projects in progress of $156.8 million and $229.9 million as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively, is included in their respective asset categories above. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment was $97.2 million and $94.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $292.3 million and $275.1 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the Company’s manufacturing process is included in Cost of Sales, and all other depreciation and amortization is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings. |
|
Other Accrued Liabilities |
|
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following: |
|
| | March 31 | | June 30 | |
(In millions) | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
| | | | | |
Advertising, merchandising and sampling | | $ | 305.7 | | $ | 301.7 | |
Employee compensation | | 384.6 | | 468.2 | |
Payroll and other taxes | | 155.0 | | 161.2 | |
Accrued income taxes | | 147.9 | | 113.6 | |
Other | | 471.2 | | 469.1 | |
| | $ | 1,464.4 | | $ | 1,513.8 | |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The effective rate for income taxes was 29.2% and 35.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to a reduction in the effective tax rate on the Company’s foreign operations, partially offset by an increase in income tax reserve adjustments. Contributing to a higher effective tax rate in the prior-year period was the impact of the Venezuelan remeasurement charge for which no tax benefit was provided. |
|
The effective rate for income taxes was 30.0% and 32.5% for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to a reduction in the effective tax rate on the Company’s foreign operations, partially offset by an increase in income tax reserve adjustments. Contributing to a higher effective tax rate in the prior-year period was the impact of the Venezuelan remeasurement charge for which no tax benefit was provided. |
|
As of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties, totaled $75.1 million and $58.1 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2015 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $51.6 million. The total gross interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings was $0.9 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The total gross accrued interest and penalties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was $16.7 million and $12.5 million, respectively. On the basis of the information available as of March 31, 2015, the Company does not expect any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. |
|
During the nine months ended March 31, 2015, the Company formally concluded the compliance process with respect to fiscal 2013 under the U.S. Internal Revenue Service Compliance Assurance Program. The conclusion of this process did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
As of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company had current net deferred tax assets of $262.3 million and $295.1 million, respectively, substantially all of which are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the Company had noncurrent net deferred tax assets of $76.4 million and $85.5 million as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively, substantially all of which are included in Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards |
|
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. If either (i) an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward is not available as of the reporting date under the governing tax law to settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position or (ii) the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose (provided that the tax law permits a choice), an entity should present an unrecognized tax benefit in the financial statements as a liability and should not net the unrecognized tax benefit with a deferred tax asset. This guidance became effective for unrecognized tax benefits that existed as of the Company’s fiscal 2015 first quarter. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In March 2013, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to resolve the diversity in practice concerning the release of the cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) into net income (i) when a parent sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity, and (ii) in connection with a step acquisition of a foreign entity. This amended guidance requires that CTA be released in net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided, and that a pro rata portion of the CTA be released into net income upon a partial sale of an equity method investment in a foreign entity only. In addition, the amended guidance clarifies the definition of a sale of an investment in a foreign entity to include both, events that result in the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity and events that result in an acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately prior to the date of acquisition. The CTA should be released into net income upon the occurrence of such events. This guidance became effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal 2015 first quarter. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
|
In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. Under the revised guidance, entities would no longer be able to recognize debt issuance costs as an asset in the balance sheet. The amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update. This guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2017 first quarter. Early adoption is only permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Upon adoption, a reporting entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis and required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. The Company will apply this new guidance retrospectively when it becomes effective, and the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to clarify the accounting treatment for fees paid by a customer in cloud computing arrangements. Under the revised guidance, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If the cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The revised guidance will not change a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2017 first quarter, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, a reporting entity can elect to apply the new guidance prospectively after the effective date, or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance on accounting for certain share-based payment awards. The amended guidance requires that if share-based compensation awards have terms of a performance target that affect vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, such performance target should be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award and compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. This guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2017 first quarter, with early adoption permitted. The guidance will permit an entity to apply the amendments in the update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the consolidated financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The Company will apply this new guidance when it becomes effective, and is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that defines how companies should report revenues from contracts with customers. The standard requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It provides companies with a single comprehensive five-step principles-based model to use in accounting for revenue and supersedes current revenue recognition requirements, including most industry-specific and transaction-specific revenue guidance. This guidance becomes effective for the Company’s fiscal 2018 first quarter, and early adoption is not permitted. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a deferral of the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year. The proposal will be subject to the FASB’s due process requirements, which include a period for public comments. If the proposed deferral is passed, the new standard would not be effective for the Company until fiscal 2019. The guidance permits an entity to apply the standard retrospectively to all prior periods presented, with certain practical expedients, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. The Company will apply this new guidance when it becomes effective and has not yet selected a transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which changes the criteria for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation. This revised standard defines a discontinued operation as (i) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results or (ii) an acquired business or nonprofit activity that is classified as held for sale on the date of acquisition. The standard also requires expanded disclosures related to discontinued operations and added disclosure requirements for individually material disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria. This guidance becomes effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal 2016 first quarter, with early adoption permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available to be issued. The Company will apply this new guidance when it becomes effective, and the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|