fabrication-related problems that may affect the availability of our products, delay our shipments or increase our costs.
In recent years, we purchased over 70% of our wafers from MagnaChip, TSMC and GlobalFoundries, with the balance from other wafer suppliers. Our reliance on independent wafer suppliers to fabricate our wafers at their production facilities subjects us to possible risks such as:
reduced control over delivery schedules, quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs; and
unanticipated changes in wafer prices.
Any inability or unwillingness of our wafer suppliers to provide adequate quantities of finished wafers to meet our needs in a timely manner would delay our production and product shipments and seriously harm our business. In March 2004, GlobalFoundries shut down one of their production facilities used to manufacture our products. We transitioned the production of these products to different facilities. The transfer of production of our products to other facilities subjects us to the above listed risks as well as potential yield or other production problems, which could arise as a result of any change.
At present, we purchase wafers from our suppliers through the issuance of purchase orders based on our rolling nine-month forecasts. The purchase orders are subject to acceptance by each wafer supplier. We do not have long-term supply contracts that obligate our suppliers to a minimum supply or set prices. We also depend upon our wafer suppliers to participate in process improvement efforts, such as the transition to finer geometries. If our suppliers are unable or unwilling to do so, our development and introduction of new products could be delayed. Furthermore, sudden shortages of raw materials or production capacity constraints can lead wafer suppliers to allocate available capacity to customers other than us or for their internal uses, interrupting our ability to meet our product delivery obligations. Any significant interruption in our wafer supply would seriously harm our operating results and our customer relations. Our reliance on independent wafer suppliers may also lengthen the development cycle for our products, providing time-to-market advantages to our competitors that have in-house fabrication capacity.
In the event that our suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture our key products in required volumes, we will have to identify and qualify additional wafer foundries. The qualification process can take up to nine months or longer. Furthermore, we are unable to predict whether additional wafer foundries will become available to us or will be in a position to satisfy any of our requirements on a timely basis.
We primarily rely on foreign subcontractors for the assembly and packaging of our products and, to a lesser extent, for the testing of finished products. Some of these subcontractors are our single source supplier for some of our packages. In addition, changes in our or a subcontractor's business could cause us to become materially dependent on a single subcontractor. We have from time to time experienced difficulties in the timeliness and quality of product deliveries from our subcontractors and may experience similar or more severe difficulties in the future. We generally purchase these single or limited source components or services pursuant to purchase orders and have no guaranteed arrangements with these subcontractors. These subcontractors could cease to meet our requirements for components or services, or there could be a significant disruption in supplies from them, or degradation in the quality of components or services supplied by them. Any circumstance that would require us to qualify alternative supply sources could delay shipments, result in the loss of customers and limit or reduce our revenues. Introducing new products or transferring existing products to a new third party manufacturer or process may result in
unforeseen product specification and operating problems. These problems may affect our shipments and may be costly to correct.
We may experience integration or other problems with potential future acquisitions, which could have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations. New acquisitions could dilute the interests of existing stockholders, and the announcement of new acquisitions could result in a decline in the price of our common stock.
Our previous and potential future acquisitions could result in the following:
·
large one-time write-offs;
·
the difficulty in integrating newly-acquired businesses and operations in an efficient and effective manner;
·
the challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings, and other benefits from acquisitions as anticipated;
·
the risk of diverting the attention of senior management from other business concerns;
·
risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or limited prior experience and potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations;
·
the risk that our markets do not evolve as anticipated and that the technologies and capabilities acquired do not prove to be those needed to be successful in those markets;
·
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities;
·
excessive usages of cash;
·
the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to intangible assets;
·
difficulties in the assimilation of operations, personnel, technologies, products and the information systems of the acquired companies; and
·
difficulties in integrating or expanding information technology systems and other financial or business processes that may lead to financial reporting issues.
As part of our business strategy, we may seek acquisition prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, improve our market coverage or enhance our technological capabilities. In addition, from time to time, we invest in other companies, without actually acquiring them, and such investments involve many of the same risks as are involved with acquisitions.
Implementation of new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) rules and the issuance of new corporate governance regulations or other accounting regulations, or reinterpretation of existing laws or regulations, could materially impact our business or stated results.
In general, from time to time the government, courts and the financial accounting boards may issue new corporate governance regulations or accounting regulations, or modify or reinterpret existing ones. There may be future changes in laws, interpretations or regulations that would affect our financial results or the way in which we present them. Additionally, changes in the laws or regulations could have adverse effects on hiring and many other aspects of our business that would affect our ability to compete, both nationally and internationally.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act required the SEC to establish new disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in their products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. When these new requirements are implemented, they could adversely affect the sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of our products. There will also be costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, including for due diligence in regard to the sources of any conflict minerals used in our products, in addition to the cost of remediation and other changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities.
If we are unable to maintain processes and procedures to sustain effective internal control over our financial reporting, our ability to provide reliable and timely financial reports could be harmed and this could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.
Under the rules promulgated under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to maintain, and evaluate the effectiveness of, our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In our annual reports on Form 10-K for the years ended
35
July 3, 2010, June 27, 2009, June 30, 2007 and July 2, 2005, we reported material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We have since remediated these deficiencies and continue to spend a significant amount of time and resources to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. As reported in Item 9A of our most recent Form 10-K, our management does not believe that we had any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of June 29, 2013, and management has determined that as of June 29, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. However, we have and will continue to evolve our business in a changing marketplace. In addition, we are expanding our overseas operations, and as we grow in these locations, we may have difficulty in recruiting and retaining a complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Due to these factors, there can be no assurance that other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies will not arise in the future. Should we or our independent registered public accounting firm determine in future periods that we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, the reliability of our financial reports may be impacted, and investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price and we could suffer other materially adverse consequences.
Changes to environmental laws and regulations applicable to manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment are causing us to redesign our products, and may increase our costs and expose us to liability.
The implementation of new environmental regulatory legal requirements, such as lead free initiatives, may affect our product designs and manufacturing processes. The impact of such regulations on our product designs and manufacturing processes could affect the timing of compliant product introductions as well as their commercial success. Redesigning our products to comply with new regulations may result in increased research and development and manufacturing and quality control costs. In addition, the products we manufacture that comply with new regulatory standards may not perform as well as our current products. Moreover, if we are unable to successfully and timely redesign existing products and introduce new products that meet new standards set by environmental regulation and our customers, sales of our products could decline, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of or inability to attract key personnel would harm us.
To a greater degree than non-technology companies, our future success will depend on the continued contributions of our executive officers and other key management and technical personnel. None of these individuals has an employment agreement with us and each one would be difficult to replace. We do not maintain any key person life insurance policies on any of these individuals. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel or the inability to continue to attract qualified personnel could delay product development cycles or otherwise harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success also will depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales, marketing, finance and management personnel, particularly highly skilled design, process and test engineers, for whom competition can be intense. During strong business cycles, we expect to experience difficulty in filling our needs for qualified engineers and other personnel. If we do not succeed in hiring and retaining candidates with appropriate qualifications, our revenues, operations and product development efforts could be harmed.
Our limited ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights could harm our competitive position. Litigation regarding intellectual property could divert management attention, be costly to defend and prevent us from using or selling the challenged technology.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and licenses and preserve other intellectual property rights covering our products and development and testing tools. In the United States, we currently hold 106 patents covering certain aspects of our product designs and have eight additional patent applications pending. Copyrights, mask work protection, trade secrets and confidential technological know-how are also key to our business. Additional patents may not be issued to us or our patents or other
36
intellectual property may not provide meaningful protection. We may be subject to, or initiate, interference proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. These proceedings can consume significant financial and management resources. We may become involved in litigation relating to alleged infringement by us of others' patents or other intellectual property rights. This type of litigation is frequently expensive to both the winning party and the losing party and takes up significant amounts of management's time and attention. In addition, if we lose such a lawsuit, a court could require us to pay substantial damages and/or royalties or prohibit us from using essential technologies. For these and other reasons, this type of litigation could seriously harm our business. Also, although we may seek to obtain a license under a third party's intellectual property rights in order to bring an end to certain claims or actions asserted against us, we may not be able to obtain such a license on reasonable terms or at all.
Because it is important to our success that we are able to prevent competitors from copying our innovations, we intend to continue to seek patent, trade secret and mask work protection for our technologies. The process of seeking patent protection can be long and expensive, and we cannot be certain that any currently pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents, or that, even if patents are issued, they will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to us. Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design around the patents we own.
We also rely on trade secret protection for our technology, in part through confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties. However, these parties may breach these agreements. In addition, the laws of some territories in which we develop, manufacture or sell our products may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
Our independent foundries use a process technology that may include technology we helped develop with them, that may generally be used by those foundries to produce their own products or to manufacture products for other companies, including our competitors. In addition, we may not have the right to implement key process technologies used to manufacture some of our products with foundries other than our present foundries.
We may not provide adequate allowances for exchanges, returns and concessions.
We recognize revenue from the sale of products when shipped, less an allowance based on future authorized and historical patterns of returns, price protection, exchanges and other concessions. We believe our methodology and approach are appropriate. However, if the actual amounts we incur exceed the allowances, it could decrease our revenue and corresponding gross profit.
Our future tax rates and tax payments could be higher than we anticipate and may harm our results of operations.
As a multinational corporation, we conduct our business in many countries and are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions. The taxation of our business is subject to the application of multiple and sometimes conflicting tax laws and regulations as well as multinational tax conventions. A number of factors, including unanticipated changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates or by unexpected changes in existing tax laws or our interpretation of them, could unfavorably affect our future effective tax rate. In the event our management determines it is no longer more likely than not that we will realize a portion of our deferred tax assets we will be required to increase our valuation allowance which will result in an increase in our effective tax rate. Furthermore, our tax returns are subject to examination in all the jurisdictions in which we operate which subjects us to potential increases in our tax liabilities.We are currently under examination of our federal tax returns for fiscal 2010 and 2011 by the Internal Revenue Service.
In addition, during the quarter ended December 29, 2012, we began implementation of an operating structure to more efficiently align the Company's transaction flows with the Company's geographic business operations. As a result we have formed new legal entities and begun realigning existing ones, completed the intercompany transfer of intellectual property rights, inventory and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions, and implemented intercompany intellectual property licensing agreements between our U.S. and foreign entities. These changes may result in unanticipated changes to our tax rates and tax payments. All of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
37
If our liability for U.S. and foreign taxes is greater than we have anticipated and reserved for, our operating results may suffer.
We are subject to taxation in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions in which we do business, including China. We believe that we have adequately estimated and reserved for our income tax liability. However, our effective tax rates may not be as low as we anticipate. Our business operations, including our transfer pricing for transactions among our various business entities operating in different tax jurisdictions, may be audited at any time by the U.S., Chinese or other foreign tax authorities.
A number of factors may adversely impact our future effective tax rates, such as:
·
changes in the tax laws of any of the countries in which we pay substantial taxes, including changes to tax rates or to transfer pricing standards, or more fundamental changes such as the various proposals that exist from time to time for U.S. international tax reform;
·
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;
·
changes in U.S. general accepted accounting principles; and
·
the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings with respect to which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes.
A change in our effective tax rate due to any of these factors may adversely impact our future results from operations. Also, changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our ability to utilize cash in a tax efficient manner.
A large portion of our revenues is derived from sales to a few key customers, and the loss of one or more of our key customers, or their key end user customers, could significantly reduce our revenues. In addition, our sales through distributors increase the complexity of our business.
A relatively small number of key customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net revenues in each of the past several fiscal years. In general we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future. We had two direct customers who each accounted for more than 10% of net revenues during the three months ended September 28, 2013 and September 29, 2012. As a percentage of net revenues, sales to our top five direct customers during the three months ended September 28, 2013 and September 29, 2012 totaled 47% and 42%, respectively.
We do not have long-term sales agreements with any of our customers. Our customers are not subject to minimum purchase requirements, may reduce or delay orders periodically due to excess inventory and may discontinue purchasing our products at any time. Our distributors typically offer competing products in addition to ours. For the three months ended September 28, 2013 and September 29, 2012, sales to our domestic and international distributors were approximately 67% and 66% of net revenues, respectively. Distributors therefore continue to account for a significant portion of our sales. The loss of one or more significant customers, or the decision by a significant distributor to carry additional product lines of our competitors could decrease our revenues.
Selling through distributors increases the complexity of our business, requiring us to, among other matters:
·
manage a more complex supply chain;
·
manage the level of inventory at each distributor;
·
provide for credits, return rights and price protection;
·
estimate the impact of credits, return rights, price protection and unsold inventory at distributors; and
·
monitor the financial condition and creditworthiness of our distributors.
Any failure to manage these challenges could cause us to inaccurately forecast sales and carry excess or insufficient inventory, thereby adversely affecting our operating results and cash flows. For further detail on credits, return rights and price protection, see Part I, Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Critical Accounting Policies – Revenue Recognition.
38
Because we sell products in foreign markets and have operations outside of the United States, we face foreign business, political, economic and currency risks that could seriously harm us. Almost all of our wafer suppliers and assembly subcontractors are located in Southeast Asia, as are our FCP manufacturing facilities, which exposes us to the problems associated with international operations.
Risks associated with international business operations include the following:
·
disruptions or delays in shipments;
·
changes in economic conditions in the countries where these subcontractors are located;
·
currency fluctuations;
·
changes in political conditions;
·
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property;
·
foreign governmental regulatory requirements and unexpected changes in them;
·
the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;
·
import and export controls;
·
delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining export licenses for technology;
·
changes in tax laws, tariffs and other barriers, and freight rates; and
·
U. S. GAAP accounting compliance.
Regulatory, geopolitical and other factors could seriously harm our business or require us to modify our current business practices. We are subject to general geopolitical risks in connection with our international operations, such as political and economic instability and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. Although most of our products are sold in U.S. dollars, we incur a significant amount of certain types of expenses, such as payroll, utilities, capital equipment purchases and taxes in local currencies. The impact of currency exchange rate movements could harm our results and financial condition. In addition, changes in tariff and import regulations and in U.S. and non-U.S. monetary policies could harm our results and financial condition by increasing our expenses and reducing our revenue. Varying tax rates in different jurisdictions could harm our results of operations and financial condition by increasing our overall tax rate.
In the three months ended September 28, 2013, we generated approximately 92%, 6% and 2% of our net revenues from sales in Asia, the United States and the rest of the world, respectively. In the three months ended September 29, 2012, we generated approximately 93%, 5% and 2% of our net revenues from sales in Asia, the United States and the rest of the world, respectively. We expect that foreign sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net revenues. We intend to continue the expansion of our sales efforts outside the United States. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources and further subject us to international operating risks.
We have subsidiaries located in Asia. We manufacture some of our FCPs in Taiwan as well as in the Jinan Development Zone in the Shandong Province of the PRC. The development of the Jinan facility depended upon various tax concessions, tax rebates and other support from the local governmental entity. There can be no assurance that the local governmental entity will not change their position regarding such tax and other support and such a change might adversely affect the profitability of this facility. In addition, there can be no assurance we will be able to assemble and maintain sufficient management resources in our Asia subsidiaries, including a sales force knowledgeable about our target markets and an accounting staff with sufficient U. S. GAAP accounting expertise.
We are expanding our presence in China with manufacturing and research and development activities. We will be subject to increased risks relating to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. The value of the Chinese renminbi against the United States dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in China's political and economic conditions. Significant future appreciation of the renminbi could increase our component and other raw material costs as well as our labor costs, and could adversely affect our financial results. To the extent that we need to convert United States dollars into renminbi for our operations, appreciation of renminbi against the United States dollar could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Conversely, if we decide to convert our renminbi into United States dollars for other business purposes and the United States dollar appreciates against the renminbi, the United States dollar equivalent of the renminbi we convert would be reduced. The Chinese government recently announced that it is pegging the exchange rate of the renminbi against a number of currencies, rather than just the United States dollar. Fluctuations in the renminbi exchange rate could increase and could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
39
In addition, there is a potential risk of conflict and further instability in the relationship between Taiwan and the PRC. Conflict or instability could disrupt the operations of one of our principal wafer suppliers, several of our assembly subcontractors located in Taiwan, and our FCP manufacturing operations in Taiwan and the PRC.
Our operations and financial results could be severely harmed by natural disasters.
Our headquarters and some of our major suppliers' manufacturing facilities are located near major earthquake faults. In particular, our Asian operations and most of our third party service providers involved in the manufacturing of our products are located within relative close proximity. Therefore, any disaster that strikes within or close to that geographic area could be extremely disruptive to our business and could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
One of the foundries we use is located in Taiwan, which suffered a severe earthquake during fiscal 2000. We did not experience significant disruption to our operations as a result of that earthquake. Taiwan is also exposed to typhoons and tsunamis, which can affect not only foundries we rely upon but also our PSE-TW subsidiary. In March 2011, an earthquake and tsunami occurred off the northeast coast of Japan which disrupted the global supply chain for core materials manufactured in Japan that are incorporated in our products and manufacturing equipment. Thailand experienced floods in the quarter ended December 31, 2011, which interrupted the industry’s supply chain for storage products and impacted our sales as well. If a major earthquake, typhoon, tsunami or other natural disaster were to affect our operations or those of our suppliers, our product supply could be interrupted, which would seriously harm our business. Natural disasters could also affect the operations of the distributors and contract manufacturers we sell to, as well as the operations of our end use customers, which would adversely affect our operations and financial results. Natural disasters anywhere in the world may potentially adversely affect us by harming or causing interruptions to our supply chain or the supply chains of our suppliers, direct customers or end use customers.
RISKS RELATED TO THE SECURITIES MARKETS AND OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our stock has been and will likely continue to be subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile. The securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in the past, and the market prices of the securities of semiconductor companies have been especially volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, including the current global economic situation, could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating performance. Our stock price could fluctuate widely in response to factors some of which are not within our control, including:
·
general conditions in the semiconductor and electronic systems industries;
·
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
·
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance;
·
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;
·
changes in earnings estimates by analysts; and
·
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, which have particularly affected the market prices of many high technology companies.
Our shareholder rights plan may adversely affect existing shareholders.
On March 6, 2012, we adopted a shareholder rights plan that may have the effect of deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that otherwise might be in the best interests of our shareholders. Under the rights plan, we declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each share of our common stock held by shareholders of record as of March 6, 2012. Each right entitles shareholders, after the rights become exercisable, to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
40
In general, the rights become exercisable when a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced or commenced. After such event, our other stockholders may purchase from us additional shares of our common stock at a 50% discount to the then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The rights should not interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by our Board of Directors since the rights may be redeemed by us at $0.001 per right at any time before any person or group acquire 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. These rights expire in March 2022.
41
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On April 26, 2012, the Board authorized a share repurchase program for $25 million of our common stock. We were authorized to repurchase the shares from time to time in the open market or private transactions, at the discretion of our management. The following table summarizes the stock repurchase activity during the three months ended September 28, 2013.
| | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | | | Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased | | | Average
Price Paid
per Share | | | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs | | | Maximum $ Value
That May Yet be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs |
July, 2013 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 17,927,870 | |
August, 2013 | | | | 65,362 | | | | 7.19 | | | | 65,362 | | | | 17,458,074 | |
September, 2013 | | | | 41,283 | | | | 7.14 | | | | 41,283 | | | | 17,163,188 | |
Total | | | | 106,645 | | | $ | 7.17 | | | | 106,645 | | | $ | 17,163,188 | |
Current cash balances and the proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases in the stock purchase plan have funded stock repurchases in the past, and we expect to fund future stock repurchases from these same sources.
42
Item 6. Exhibits.
| | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit
Description |
| |
31.1 | Certification of Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Aaron Tachibana, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 | Certification of Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | Certification of Aaron Tachibana, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed herewith, is not a part of a registration statement or Prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Pericom Semiconductor Corporation
(Registrant)
| | |
Date: October 31, 2013 | By: | /s/ Alex C. Hui |
| | Alex C. Hui |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Aaron Tachibana |
| | Aaron Tachibana |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
44
