![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/CORRESP/0001193125-12-297811/g379184g65g61.jpg)
July 6, 2012 Via E-Mail Terence O’Brien, Branch Chief United States Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F St., NE Washington, D.C. 20549-4631 RE: Blount International, Inc. Form 10-K Filed March 13, 2012 File No. 1-11549 Dear Mr. O’Brien: Thank you for your further comment letter dated June 21, 2012 regarding our Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012. We appreciate your assistance with improving our disclosures and financial reporting. For your convenience, we have set forth your comments in bold type face below and have added our responses and explanatory comments beneath each item. The numbering of the paragraphs below corresponds to the numbering of your original comments. Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 Management’s Discussion and Analysis, page 21 Operating Results, page 21 1. We have read your response to comment 8 in our letter dated May 21, 2012. It is not clear why you cannot apparently quantify higher unit sales volume, including volume attributable to the recently acquired businesses, impacting this segment’s gross profit and/or operating income/loss. Please explain. Regarding the supply problems with certain vendors of SpeeCo, the extent of the problem is also not clear. In this regard, you have told us that these vendors “were temporarily unable to provide components when needed during the first quarter of 2012, which affected our ability to supply products to customers when requested.” In “an attempt to maintain customer service levels”, you incurred “higher air freight expenses to expedite deliveries” but expect such higher freight costs into at least the second and third quarters of 2012. Please tell us and revise future filings accordingly to: i) disclose whether the vendors were unable to provide components also during the second quarter of 2012, and to provide your outlook for the third quarter and rest of the year regarding this issue; and ii) clarify whether other Company businesses could supply the component in question. If your other businesses could not supply the component themselves, it is not clear how expedited shipping on your part would address the underlying component procurement problem. Response: We are able to quantify the effects of unit volume changes on our gross profit and operating income and did so in our response to your first letter but can understand that our statement was not as clear as it could have been. Following is a clearer explanation in response to your original question: Increased unit sales volume, including sales of recently acquired businesses, added $7.1 million to gross profit and contribution to operating income of the FRAG segment in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. However, the benefit to contribution to operating income from increased unit sales volume was more than offset by increased acquisition accounting effects of $2.0 million, increased SG&A expenses of $7.6 million, primarily attributable to recently acquired businesses, higher production and sourcing costs associated with supplier problems and the relocation of SpeeCo’s assembly operations from Golden, Colorado to Kansas City, Missouri. 4909 SE INTERNATIONAL WAY | PORTLAND, OREGON 97222 | 503.653.8881 |