Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-27544
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CANADA | 98-0154400 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
275 Frank Tompa Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 0A1
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (519) 888-7111
(Former name former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
At October 26, 2010, there were 56,999,274 outstanding Common Shares of the registrant.
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
Page No | ||||||
PART I Financial Information: | ||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and June 30, 2010 | 3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income—Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) | 4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings—Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) | 5 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) | 6 | |||||
Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7 | |||||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 26 | ||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 35 | ||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 36 | ||||
PART II Other Information: | ||||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 37 | ||||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 38 | ||||
39 |
2
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 384,692 | $ | 326,192 | ||||
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,062 as of September 30, 2010 and $4,868 as of June 30, 2010 (note 2) | 104,442 | 132,143 | ||||||
Income taxes recoverable (note 10) | 23,702 | 44,509 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 25,831 | 21,086 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets (note 10) | 19,239 | 20,242 | ||||||
Total current assets | 557,906 | 544,172 | ||||||
Capital assets (note 3) | 56,976 | 54,286 | ||||||
Goodwill | 666,064 | 666,055 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets (note 4) | 304,014 | 328,193 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets (note 10) | 27,025 | 30,420 | ||||||
Other assets (note 5) | 18,843 | 16,896 | ||||||
Deferred charges (note 6) | 58,923 | 27,558 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes recoverable (note 10) | 50,072 | 48,102 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,739,823 | $ | 1,715,682 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 7) | $ | 96,738 | $ | 119,604 | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) | 15,393 | 15,486 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 210,587 | 219,752 | ||||||
Income taxes payable (note 10) | 37,683 | 39,666 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities (note 10) | 37,816 | 28,384 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 398,217 | 422,892 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities (note 7) | 10,826 | 15,755 | ||||||
Deferred credits | 5,799 | — | ||||||
Pension liability | 17,638 | 15,888 | ||||||
Long-term debt (note 8) | 284,278 | 285,026 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 11,603 | 10,085 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes payable (note 10) | 84,573 | 64,699 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities (note 10) | 3,274 | 13,459 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 417,991 | 404,912 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Share capital (note 9) | ||||||||
56,997,864 and 56,825,995 Common Shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively; Authorized Common Shares: unlimited | 606,363 | 602,868 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 64,278 | 61,298 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 51,612 | 44,021 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 215,362 | 193,691 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (307,579 and 307,579 shares, respectively at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010) | (14,000 | ) | (14,000 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 923,615 | 887,878 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,739,823 | $ | 1,715,682 | ||||
Guarantees and contingencies (note 15)
Related party transactions (note 18)
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
License | $ | 42,646 | $ | 47,329 | ||||
Customer support | 129,757 | 123,649 | ||||||
Service and other | 45,002 | 40,444 | ||||||
Total revenues | 217,405 | 211,422 | ||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||
License | 3,502 | 3,145 | ||||||
Customer support | 19,356 | 20,939 | ||||||
Service and other | 35,113 | 33,294 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets (note 4) | 15,427 | 14,142 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues | 73,398 | 71,520 | ||||||
Gross profit | 144,007 | 139,902 | ||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Research and development | 30,963 | 31,542 | ||||||
Sales and marketing | 44,180 | 50,690 | ||||||
General and administrative | 19,810 | 21,225 | ||||||
Depreciation | 4,875 | 4,147 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets (note 4) | 8,801 | 8,917 | ||||||
Special charges (note 13) | 3,195 | 18,589 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 111,824 | 135,110 | ||||||
Income from operations | 32,183 | 4,792 | ||||||
Other income, net | 2,480 | 3,440 | ||||||
Interest expense, net | (4,135 | ) | (3,046 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes | 30,528 | 5,186 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes (note 10) | 8,857 | 3,456 | ||||||
Net income for the period | $ | 21,671 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Net income per share—basic (note 17) | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Net income per share—diluted (note 17) | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—basic | 56,883 | 55,388 | ||||||
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding—diluted | 57,922 | 56,469 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Retained earnings, beginning of period | $ | 193,691 | $ | 104,479 | ||||
Net income | 21,671 | 1,730 | ||||||
Retained earnings, end of period | $ | 215,362 | $ | 106,209 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income for the period | $ | 21,671 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets | 29,103 | 27,206 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 2,600 | 3,690 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense | (432 | ) | (691 | ) | ||||
Pension expense | 123 | 192 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 333 | 266 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on financial instruments | — | (2,390 | ) | |||||
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities to income | — | (4,353 | ) | |||||
Deferred taxes | (181 | ) | (2,957 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 27,878 | 7,928 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (2,528 | ) | (3,218 | ) | ||||
Income taxes | 32,862 | (4,787 | ) | |||||
Deferred charges and credits | (27,725 | ) | — | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (25,991 | ) | (6,852 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue | (7,234 | ) | (12,437 | ) | ||||
Other assets | (1,545 | ) | 1,175 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 48,934 | 4,502 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Additions of capital assets-net | (6,943 | ) | (7,665 | ) | ||||
Purchase of Vignette Corporation, net of cash acquired | — | (90,600 | ) | |||||
Purchase consideration for prior period acquisitions | (1,406 | ) | (4,801 | ) | ||||
Investments in marketable securities | (668 | ) | — | |||||
Maturity of short-term investments | — | 27,171 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,017 | ) | (75,895 | ) | ||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | ||||||||
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense | 432 | 691 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Common Shares | 3,246 | 4,477 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (878 | ) | (864 | ) | ||||
Debt issuance costs | — | (1,024 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,800 | 3,280 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain on cash held in foreign currencies | 15,783 | 4,484 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period | 58,500 | (63,629 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 326,192 | 275,819 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | $ | 384,692 | $ | 212,190 | ||||
Supplementary cash flow disclosures (note 16) |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (consolidated financial statements) include the accounts of Open Text Corporation and our wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “Open Text” or the “Company”. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
These consolidated financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). These financial statements are based upon accounting policies and the methods of their application are consistent with those used and described in our annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The information furnished reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements do not include certain financial statement disclosures included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and therefore should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
The operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any succeeding quarter or the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In particular, significant estimates, judgments and assumptions include those related to: (i) revenue recognition, (ii) allowance for doubtful accounts, (iii) testing goodwill for impairment, (iv) the valuation of acquired intangible assets, (v) the valuation of long-lived assets, (vi) the recognition of contingencies, (vii) restructuring accruals, (viii) acquisition accruals and pre-acquisition contingencies, (ix) asset retirement obligations, (x) realization of investment tax credits, (xi) the valuation of stock options granted and liabilities related to share-based payments, including the valuation of our long-term incentive plan, (xii) the valuation of financial instruments, (xiii) the valuation of pension assets and obligations, and (xiv) accounting for income taxes.
7
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Comprehensive income
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive income for the reporting periods indicated:
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income for the period | $ | 21,671 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Other comprehensive income—net of tax, where applicable: | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 5,977 | 18,448 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on short-term investments | — | (37 | ) | |||||
Release of unrealized gain on marketable securities to income | — | (4,353 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | 44 | — | ||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges | 1,570 | 413 | ||||||
Actuarial gain (loss) relating to defined benefit pension plans | — | (270 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income for the period | $ | 29,262 | $ | 15,931 | ||||
Reclassifications
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010 a purchase price adjustment was made to the acquisition of Burntsand Inc., acquired on May 27, 2010, which resulted in the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeding the purchase price. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805 “Business Combinations” (ASC Topic 805) negative goodwill was recognized upon the acquisition of the business. For more details on this purchase price adjustment, see Note 14. As a result of this purchase price adjustment, the opening retained earnings and certain balance sheet amounts presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q have been retroactively adjusted, in accordance with ASC Topic 805, from that which were originally published in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010.
NOTE 2—ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2010 | $ | 4,868 | ||
Bad debt expense for the period | 774 | |||
Write-off/adjustments | (580 | ) | ||
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2010 | $ | 5,062 | ||
NOTE 3—CAPITAL ASSETS
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net | ||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | $ | 14,292 | $ | 9,878 | $ | 4,414 | ||||||
Office equipment | 7,104 | 6,314 | 790 | |||||||||
Computer hardware | 93,155 | 78,547 | 14,608 | |||||||||
Computer software | 33,047 | 26,363 | 6,684 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 25,908 | 15,260 | 10,648 | |||||||||
Buildings* | 22,080 | 2,248 | 19,832 | |||||||||
$ | 195,586 | $ | 138,610 | $ | 56,976 | |||||||
8
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
As of June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net | ||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | $ | 13,600 | $ | 9,197 | $ | 4,403 | ||||||
Office equipment | 6,542 | 5,630 | 912 | |||||||||
Computer hardware | 89,191 | 73,789 | 15,402 | |||||||||
Computer software | 31,244 | 24,047 | 7,197 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 23,679 | 13,570 | 10,109 | |||||||||
Buildings | 18,399 | 2,136 | 16,263 | |||||||||
$ | 182,655 | $ | 128,369 | $ | 54,286 | |||||||
* | Included in the cost of buildings is an amount which relates to the Company’s construction of a new building in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Additions to the building amounted to $3.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010. Construction of the building is in progress and therefore depreciation has not yet commenced. |
NOTE 4—ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Technology Assets | Customer Assets | Total | ||||||||||
Net book value, June 30, 2010 | $ | 197,996 | $ | 130,197 | $ | 328,193 | ||||||
Amortization expense | (15,427 | ) | (8,801 | ) | (24,228 | ) | ||||||
Foreign exchange and other impacts | 42 | 7 | 49 | |||||||||
Net book value, September 30, 2010 | $ | 182,611 | $ | 121,403 | $ | 304,014 | ||||||
The weighted average amortization period for acquired technology and customer intangible assets is approximately 6 years and 7 years, respectively.
The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for the fiscal years indicated below. This calculation assumes no future adjustments to acquired intangible assets:
Fiscal years ending June 30, | ||||
2011 (nine months ended June 30) | $ | 71,869 | ||
2012 | 93,850 | |||
2013 | 90,585 | |||
2014 | 32,005 | |||
2015 and beyond | 15,705 | |||
Total | $ | 304,014 | ||
9
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 5—OTHER ASSETS
As of September 30, 2010 | As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Debt issuance costs | $ | 4,027 | $ | 4,362 | ||||
Deposits and restricted cash | 8,845 | 8,486 | ||||||
Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets | 5,053 | 3,858 | ||||||
Miscellaneous other assets | 918 | 190 | ||||||
$ | 18,843 | $ | 16,896 | |||||
Debt issuance costs relate primarily to costs incurred for the purpose of obtaining our term loan and are being amortized over the life of the loan (see Note 8). Deposits and restricted cash relate to security deposits provided to landlords in accordance with facility lease agreements and cash restricted per the terms of contractual-based agreements. Long-term prepaid expenses and other long-term assets primarily relate to certain advance payments on long-term licenses that are being amortized over the applicable terms of the licenses.
NOTE 6—DEFERRED CHARGES
Deferred charges relate to cash taxes payable and the elimination of deferred tax balances on account of legal entity consolidations done as part of an internal reorganization of our international subsidiaries. Deferred charges will be amortized to income tax expense over a period of 6 years.
NOTE 7—ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are comprised of the following:
As of September 30, 2010 | As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Accounts payable—trade | $ | 8,843 | $ | 12,247 | ||||
Accrued salaries and commissions | 26,619 | 34,062 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 45,554 | 53,844 | ||||||
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other special charges (note 13) | 8,226 | 11,498 | ||||||
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals | 3,626 | 4,417 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 3,870 | 3,536 | ||||||
$ | 96,738 | $ | 119,604 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Long-term accrued liabilities
As of September 30, 2010 | As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring and other special charges (note 13) | $ | 505 | $ | 582 | ||||
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals | 2,272 | 2,514 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 5,393 | 9,982 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 2,656 | 2,677 | ||||||
$ | 10,826 | $ | 15,755 | |||||
Asset retirement obligations
We are required to return certain of our leased facilities to their original state at the conclusion of our lease. We have accounted for such obligations in accordance with ASC Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”. As of September 30, 2010 the present value of this obligation was $6.5 million (June 30, 2010 – $6.2 million), with an undiscounted value of $7.0 million (June 30, 2010 – $6.8 million).
Accruals relating to acquisitions
In relation to our acquisitions made before July 1, 2009, the date on which we adopted ASC Topic 805, we have accrued for costs relating to legacy workforce reductions and abandonment of excess legacy facilities. Such accruals were capitalized as part of the cost of the subject acquisition and in the case of abandoned facilities, have been recorded at present value less our best estimate for future sub-lease income and costs incurred to achieve sub-tenancy. The accrual for workforce reductions is extinguished against the payments made to the employees and in the case of excess facilities, will be discharged over the term of the respective leases. Any excess of the difference between the present value and actual cash paid for the abandoned facility will be charged to income and any deficits will be reversed to goodwill. The provisions for abandoned facilities are expected to be paid by February 2015.
11
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table summarizes the activity with respect to our acquisition accruals during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Balance June 30, 2010 | Usage/ Foreign Exchange | Balance September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Captaris | ||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | $ | 62 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 6 | |||||
Excess facilities | 3,937 | (225 | ) | 3,712 | ||||||||
Transaction-related costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
3,999 | (281 | ) | 3,718 | |||||||||
IXOS | ||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
Excess facilities | 2,663 | (689 | ) | 1,974 | ||||||||
Transaction-related costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
2,663 | (689 | ) | 1,974 | |||||||||
Other acquisitions | ||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
Excess facilities | 269 | (63 | ) | 206 | ||||||||
Transaction-related costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
269 | (63 | ) | 206 | |||||||||
Totals | ||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | 62 | (56 | ) | 6 | ||||||||
Excess facilities | 6,869 | (977 | ) | 5,892 | ||||||||
Transaction-related costs | — | — | — | |||||||||
$ | 6,931 | $ | (1,033 | ) | $ | 5,898 | ||||||
NOTE 8—LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt
Long-term debt is comprised of the following:
As of September 30, 2010 | As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Long-term debt | ||||||||
Term loan | $ | 287,271 | $ | 288,019 | ||||
Mortgage | 12,400 | 12,493 | ||||||
299,671 | 300,512 | |||||||
Less: | ||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | ||||||||
Term loan | 2,993 | 2,993 | ||||||
Mortgage | 12,400 | 12,493 | ||||||
15,393 | 15,486 | |||||||
Long-term portion of long-term debt | $ | 284,278 | $ | 285,026 | ||||
12
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Term loan and Revolver
On October 2, 2006, we entered into a $465.0 million credit agreement (the credit agreement) with a Canadian chartered bank (the bank) consisting of a $390.0 million term loan facility (the term loan) and a $75.0 million committed revolving long-term credit facility (the revolver). The term loan was used to finance a portion of our Hummingbird acquisition. We have not drawn down any amounts under the revolver to date.
Term loan
The term loan has a seven year term, expires on October 2, 2013 and bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. The quarterly scheduled term loan principal repayments are equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount, due each quarter with the remainder due at the end of the term, less ratable reductions for any non-scheduled prepayments made. From October 2, 2006 (the inception of the loan) to September 30, 2010, we have made total non-scheduled prepayments of $90.0 million towards the principal on the term loan. Our current quarterly scheduled principal payment is approximately $0.7 million.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded interest expense of $1.9 million (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $1.8 million) relating to the term loan.
Revolver
The revolver has a five year term and expires on October 2, 2011. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at rates specified in the credit agreement. The revolver is subject to a “stand-by” fee ranging between 0.30% and 0.50% per annum depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of September 30, 2010.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded an expense of $0.06 million (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $0.06 million), on account of stand-by fees relating to the revolver.
Mortgage
The mortgage consists of a five year mortgage agreement entered into during December 2005 with the bank. The original principal amount of the mortgage was Canadian $15.0 million. The mortgage: (i) has a fixed term of five years, (ii) matures on January 1, 2011, and (iii) is secured by a lien on our headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Interest accrues monthly at a fixed rate of 5.25% per annum. Principal and interest are payable in monthly installments of Canadian $0.1 million with a final lump sum principal payment of Canadian $12.6 million due on maturity. As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value of the mortgage was $12.4 million (June 30, 2010 – $12.5 million).
As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value of the existing Waterloo building was $15.8 million (June 30, 2010 – $15.9 million).
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded interest expense of $0.2 million (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $0.2 million) relating to the mortgage.
13
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 9—SHARE CAPITAL, OPTION PLANS AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
Share Capital
Our authorized share capital includes an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of first preference shares. No preference shares have been issued.
Treasury Stock
We did not purchase any of our shares during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Share-Based Payments
Total share-based compensation cost for the periods indicated below is detailed as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Stock options | $ | 997 | $ | 3,383 | * | |||
Restricted stock units (legacy Vignette employees) | 48 | 307 | ||||||
Deferred stock units (Directors) | 52 | — | ||||||
Performance stock units (Fiscal 2010 LTIP) | 1,503 | — | ||||||
Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 2,600 | $ | 3,690 | ||||
* | Inclusive of charges of $2.2 million booked to Special charges (see Note 13). |
Summary of Outstanding Stock Options
As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase an aggregate of 2,486,811 Common Shares were outstanding and 1,407,345 Common Shares were available for issuance under our stock option plans. Our stock options generally vest over four years and expire between seven and ten years from the date of the grant. The exercise price of the options we grant is set at an amount that is not less than the closing price of our Common Shares on the trading day on NASDAQ immediately preceding the applicable grant date.
A summary of option activity under our stock option plans for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($’000s) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 | 2,669,142 | $ | 23.55 | |||||||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (153,693 | ) | 18.83 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired | (28,638 | ) | 32.53 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 | 2,486,811 | $ | 23.74 | 3.35 | $ | 57,983 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 | 1,720,198 | $ | 19.12 | 2.65 | $ | 48,035 | ||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, consistent with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (ASC Topic 718), and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The option-pricing models require input of subjective assumptions including the estimated life of the option and the expected volatility of the underlying stock over the estimated life of the option. We use historical volatility as a basis for projecting the expected volatility of the underlying stock and estimate the expected life of our stock options based upon historical data.
We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair value of our stock option grants. Estimates of fair value are not intended, however, to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.
For the periods indicated, the weighted-average fair value of options and weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | NA | * | $ | 13.54 | ||||
Weighted-average assumptions used: | ||||||||
Expected volatility | NA | 40 | % | |||||
Risk—free interest rate | NA | 2.2 | % | |||||
Expected dividend yield | NA | 0 | % | |||||
Expected life (in years) | NA | 4.3 | ||||||
Forfeiture rate (based on historical rates) | NA | 5 | % |
* | There were no options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2010. |
As of September 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to the unvested stock awards not yet recognized was $6.7 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.
As of September 30, 2009, the total compensation cost related to the unvested stock awards not yet recognized was $9.0 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.
In each of the above periods, no cash was used by us to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation arrangements.
We have not capitalized any share-based compensation costs as part of the cost of an asset in any of the periods presented.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, cash in the amount of $2.9 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $0.9 million.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, cash in the amount of $4.3 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the three months ended September 30, 2009 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $0.7 million, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
15
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs) and Performance Stock Units (PSUs)
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we granted 157 deferred stock units (DSUs) to certain nonemployee directors (three months ended September 30, 2009-nil). The DSUs were issued under the Company’s Deferred Share Unit Plan that came into effect on February 2, 2010 and will vest at the date of the Company’s next annual general meeting (expected to be in December, 2010).
We did not grant any performance stock units (PSUs) under our Fiscal 2010 LTIP plan (LTIP 3), during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Awards achieved under the LTIP 3 will be settled over the three year period ending June 30, 2012.
Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs)
On July 21, 2009, we granted, as part of our acquisition of Vignette, 574,767 Open Text RSAs to certain legacy Vignette employees and directors as replacement for similar restricted stock awards held by these employees and directors when they were employed by Vignette. These awards were valued at $13.33 per RSA on July 21, 2009, and a portion has been allocated to the purchase price of Vignette. The remaining portion is amortized, as part of share-based compensation expense, over the vesting period of these awards.
Long Term Incentive Plans
On September 10, 2007, our Board of Directors approved the implementation of a LTIP called the “Open Text Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan”. The LTIP is a rolling three year program whereby we make a series of annual grants, each of which covers a three year performance period, to certain of our employees, and which vests upon the employee and/or the Company meeting pre-determined performance and market-based criteria.
Grants made in Fiscal 2008 under the LTIP (LTIP 1) took effect in Fiscal 2008, starting on July 1, 2007. Awards under LTIP 1 have been settled in cash in the aggregate amount of $14.4 million, of which $10.4 million has been paid during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Grants made in Fiscal 2009 under the LTIP (LTIP 2) took effect in Fiscal 2009 starting on July 1, 2008. Awards under LTIP 2 may be equal to 100% of the target. We expect to settle LTIP 2 awards in cash.
Grants made in Fiscal 2010 under the LTIP (LTIP 3) took effect in Fiscal 2010 starting on July 1, 2009. Awards under LTIP 3 may be equal to 50%, 100% or 150% of the target. We expect to settle LTIP 3 awards in stock.
Consistent with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, we have measured the fair value of the liability under the LTIP liability plans as of September 30, 2010 and recorded an expense relating to such liability plans to compensation cost in the amount of $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $2.7 million). The outstanding liability under the LTIP liability plans as of September 30, 2010 was $5.6 million (June 30, 2010 – $15.4 million) and is re-measured based upon the change in the fair value of the liability, as of the end of every reporting period, and a cumulative adjustment to compensation cost for the change in fair value is recognized. The cumulative compensation expense recognized upon completion of the LTIP will be equal to the payouts made.
16
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
PSUs granted under LTIP equity plans have been measured at fair value, consistent with ASC Topic 718 and will be charged to share-based compensation expense over the remaining life of the plan. During the three months ended September 30, 2010 an amount of $1.5 million has been charged to share-based compensation expense, (three months ended September 30, 2009 – nil), on account of the LTIP equity plans.
NOTE 10—INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate represents the net effect of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that are subject to a wide range of income tax rates.
We classify interest related to liabilities for income tax expense under the “Interest income (expense), net” line and penalties related to liabilities for income tax expense under the “Other income (expense)” line of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized interest in the amount of $1.8 million (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $0.9 million) and incurred no expense on penalties (three months ended September 30, 2009—a recovery of $0.2 million). The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of September 30, 2010 was $8.6 million ($6.8 million as of June 30, 2010) and $12.0 million ($12.0 million as of June 30, 2010), respectively. We believe that it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits, as of September 30, 2010 could increase tax expense in the next 12 months by $0.3 million, relating primarily to the expiration of competent authority relief and tax years becoming statute barred for purposes of future tax examinations by local taxing jurisdictions.
Our most significant tax jurisdictions are Canada, the United States, Germany and Luxembourg. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Tax years that remain open to examinations by local taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction up to ten years.
We are subject to tax examinations in all major taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and currently have examinations open in Canada, Germany, the United States, France and Spain. On a quarterly basis we assess the status of these examinations and the potential for adverse outcomes to determine the adequacy of the provision for income and other taxes.
We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our tax examinations and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, we cannot predict with any level of certainty the exact nature of any future possible settlements.
NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC Topic 820) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and addresses disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value, in this context, should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including our own credit risk.
17
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
In addition to defining fair value and addressing disclosure requirements, ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:
• | Level 1—inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. |
• | Level 2—inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 3—inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. |
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
Our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments as of September 30, 2010:
September 30, 2010 | Fair Market Measurements using: | |||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets | Significant other observable inputs | Significant unobservable inputs | ||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instrument assets (note 12) | $ | 2,218 | $ | n/a | $ | 2,218 | $ | n/a | ||||||||
Marketable securities | 712 | 712 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,930 | $ | 712 | $ | 2,218 | $ | n/a | |||||||||
Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of the derivative instruments, the counterparty to which has high credit ratings, were derived from pricing models including discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data, as no quoted market prices exist for the derivative instruments. Our discounted cash flow techniques use observable market inputs, such as foreign currency spot and forward rates. Our valuation techniques used to measure the fair values of our marketable securities were derived from quoted market prices as an active market for these securities exists.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, no indications of impairment were identified and therefore no fair value measurements were required.
18
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 12—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
In July 2010, we entered into a hedging program with a Canadian chartered bank, to limit the potential foreign exchange fluctuations incurred on future cash flows related to a portion of the payroll expenses that are expected to be paid by our Canadian subsidiary. We operate internationally and are therefore exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course of our business, in particular to changes in the Canadian Dollar (“CAD”) on account of large costs which get incurred from our centralized Canadian operations, that are denominated in CAD. As part of our risk management strategy, we use derivative instruments to hedge portions of our payroll exposure. We do not use these forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes. These forward contracts typically mature between one and twelve months.
We have designated these transactions as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions under ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASC Topic 815). As the critical terms of the hedging instrument, and of the entire hedged forecasted transaction, are the same, in accordance with paragraph 815-20-25-84 of ASC Topic 815 we have been able to conclude that changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged are expected to completely offset at inception and on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, quarterly unrealized gains or losses on the effective portion of these forward contracts have been included within other comprehensive income. The fair value of the contracts, as of September 30, 2010, is recorded within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets”.
As of September 30, 2010, the notional amount of forward contracts we held, to sell U.S. dollars in exchange for Canadian dollars was $92.4 million (June 30, 2010 – nil).
Fair value of Derivative Instruments and Effect of Derivative Instruments on Financial Performance
The effect of these derivative instruments on our consolidated financial statements as of, and for the three months ended September 30, 2010, were as follows (amounts presented do not include any income tax effects).
Fair value of Derivative Instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Note 11)
Asset Derivatives | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 2,218 | |||
19
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Effects of Derivative Instruments on Income and Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)
Derivatives in Cash | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2010 | Three months ended September 30, 2010 | Three months ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | $ | 2,426 | Operating expense | $ | 208 | N/A | — | |||||||||||
NOTE 13—SPECIAL CHARGES
Special charges are primarily costs related to certain restructuring initiatives that we have undertaken from time to time under our various restructuring plans. In addition, with effect from July 1, 2009, Special charges also include acquisition-related costs with respect to acquisitions made on or after July 1, 2009.
The following tables summarize total Special charges incurred during the periods indicated below:
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (cash liability portion) | $ | 3,195 | $ | 12,510 | ||||
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (share-based compensation expense) | — | 2,182 | ||||||
Total Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan | 3,195 | 14,692 | ||||||
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan | — | 2,505 | ||||||
Acquisition-related costs | — | 1,392 | ||||||
Total special charges | $ | 3,195 | $ | 18,589 | ||||
Total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2010 restructuring plan, exclusive of other costs, are expected to be approximately $32 million to $40 million. To date, $40.2 million of costs have been recorded within Special charges. Reconciliations of the liability relating to each of our outstanding restructuring plans are provided hereunder:
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan (cash liability portion)
In the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, our Board approved, and we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate certain excess facilities (Fiscal 2010 restructuring plan). These charges relate to workforce reductions and other miscellaneous direct costs. The provision related to workforce reduction is expected to be paid by June 2011. The provision related to facility costs is expected to be paid by July 2012. On a quarterly basis, we will conduct an evaluation of the remaining balances relating to workforce reductions and facility costs and revise our assumptions and estimates as appropriate.
20
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is shown below.
Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan | Workforce reduction | Facility costs | Other* | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 | $ | 8,731 | $ | 1,221 | $ | — | $ | 9,952 | ||||||||
Accruals and adjustments | 1,050 | 338 | 1,807 | 3,195 | ||||||||||||
Cash payments | (3,466 | ) | (307 | ) | (1,807 | ) | (5,580 | ) | ||||||||
Noncash draw-downs and foreign exchange | 380 | 83 | — | 463 | ||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2010 | $ | 6,695 | $ | 1,335 | $ | — | $ | 8,030 | ||||||||
* | Other costs relate to one-time legal and consulting fees incurred on account of an internal reorganization of our international subsidiaries initiated to consolidate our intellectual property within certain jurisdictions and to effect an operational reduction of our global subsidiaries with a view to, eventually, having a single operating legal entity in each jurisdiction. |
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2009, our Board approved, and we began to implement, restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate certain excess facilities (Fiscal 2009 restructuring plan). The total costs incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2009 restructuring plan were $17.1 million, which has been recorded within Special charges since the commencement of the plan. The $17.1 million charge consisted primarily of costs associated with workforce reduction in the amount of $12.4 million and abandonment of excess facilities in the amount of $4.7 million. The provision related to workforce reduction has been substantially paid and the provision relating to facility costs is expected to be paid by April 2012.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is shown below.
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plan | Workforce reduction | Facility costs | Total | |||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 | $ | 329 | $ | 1,628 | $ | 1,957 | ||||||
Accruals and adjustments | — | — | — | |||||||||
Cash payments | (81 | ) | (1,212 | ) | (1,293 | ) | ||||||
Noncash draw-downs and foreign exchange | (126 | ) | (3 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2010 | $ | 122 | $ | 413 | $ | 535 | ||||||
NOTE 14—ACQUISITIONS
Fiscal 2011
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, there have been no acquisitions made by the Company.
21
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal 2010
The following updates have been made to acquisitions made during Fiscal 2010:
Burntsand Inc.
On May 27, 2010, we acquired Burntsand Inc. (Burntsand), a provider of technology consulting services for customers with complex information processing and information management requirements, focusing in particular in areas such as ECM, Collaboration and Service Management. Burntsand was based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We believe the acquisition of Burntsand will complement and enhance our current service offerings to further strengthen our position in the ECM market. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, this acquisition was accounted for as a business combination.
The results of operations of Burntsand have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning May 27, 2010.
The following tables summarize the consideration paid for Burntsand and the amount of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the goodwill recorded as of the acquisition date:
Cash consideration paid | $ | 10,792 | ||
Acquisition related costs (included in Special charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income) since date of acquisition (three months ended September 30, 2010 – nil) | $ | 303 | ||
The recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their fair values as of May 27, 2010 are set forth below:
Current assets (inclusive of cash acquired of $2,629) | $ | 11,085 | ||
Long-term assets | 3,504 | |||
Intangible customer assets | 753 | |||
Total liabilities assumed | (2,886 | ) | ||
Total identifiable net assets | 12,456 | |||
Negative goodwill | (1,664 | ) | ||
$ | 10,792 | |||
The final valuation of the fair value assessment of acquired Burntsand’s assets and liabilities, as at May 27, 2010, was concluded in the current quarter. This valuation established an additional $7.2 million in deferred tax assets relating primarily to legacy net operating losses. Taking into account these deferred tax assets, total consideration paid was determined to be in excess of total identifiable net assets by $1.7 million, thereby generating a negative goodwill of $1.7 million at the time of acquisition. As required by ASC Topic 805, this negative goodwill is recorded in the income statement, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, on a retroactive basis. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, goodwill was reduced by $5.5 million, negative goodwill of $1.7 million was booked to retained earnings, and short term deferred tax assets, long term deferred tax assets, and long term income taxes recoverable, as of June 30, 2010, have been adjusted in the amounts of $4.5 million, $3.0 million and ($0.3) million, respectively, as a result of the final valuation.
The fair value of current assets acquired includes accounts receivable with a fair value of $3.3 million. The gross amount receivable was $3.3 million, all of which is expected to be collectible.
22
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 15—GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum annual payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
Payments due between | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | October 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 | July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2013 | July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2015 | July 1, 2015 and beyond | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 321,185 | $ | 19,956 | $ | 20,441 | $ | 280,788 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations* | 113,143 | 19,974 | 33,276 | 24,473 | 35,420 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 3,471 | 1,453 | 2,003 | 15 | — | |||||||||||||||
$ | 437,799 | $ | 41,383 | $ | 55,720 | $ | 305,276 | $ | 35,420 | |||||||||||
* | Net of $5.8 million of non-cancelable sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to other parties. |
Guarantees and indemnifications
We have entered into license agreements with customers that include limited intellectual property indemnification clauses. Generally, we agree to indemnify our customers against legal claims that our software products infringe certain third party intellectual property rights. In the event of such a claim, we are generally obligated to defend our customers against the claim and either settle the claim at our expense or pay damages that our customers are legally required to pay to the third-party claimant. These intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses generally are subject to limits based upon the amount of the license sale. We have not made any indemnification payments in relation to these indemnification clauses.
In connection with certain facility leases, we have guaranteed payments on behalf of our subsidiaries either by providing a security deposit with the landlord or through unsecured bank guarantees obtained from local banks.
We have not accrued a liability for guarantees, indemnities or warranties described above in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets since no material payments are expected to be made. The maximum amount of potential future payments under such guarantees, indemnities and warranties is not determinable.
Litigation
We are subject from time to time to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business, and accrue for these items where appropriate. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
23
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
NOTE 16—SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 2,109 | $ | 3,165 | ||||
Cash received during the period for interest | $ | 240 | $ | 338 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | 447 | $ | 5,736 |
NOTE 17—NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the shares used in the calculation of basic net income per share plus the dilutive effect of common share equivalents, such as stock options, using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 21,671 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 21,671 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding | ||||||||
Basic | 56,883 | 55,388 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | 1,039 | 1,081 | ||||||
Diluted | 57,922 | 56,469 | ||||||
Excluded as anti-dilutive* | 272 | 476 | ||||||
* | Represents options to purchase Common Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than or equal to the average price of the Common Shares during the period. |
NOTE 18—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our procedure regarding the approval of any related party transaction is that the material facts of such transaction shall be reviewed by the independent members of our Board and the transaction approved by a majority of the independent members of our Board. The Board reviews all transactions wherein we are, or will be a participant and any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Board generally takes into account, among other facts it deems appropriate:
24
Table of Contents
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances; the extent and nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the benefits to the company of the proposed transaction; if applicable, the effects on a director’s independence; and if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable services or products.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, Mr. Stephen Sadler, a director, earned approximately $28,000 (three months ended September 30, 2009 – $0.3 million), in consulting fees from Open Text for assistance with acquisition-related business activities. Mr. Sadler abstained from voting on all transactions from which he would potentially derive consulting fees.
NOTE 19—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
StreamServe Inc.
On October 27, 2010, we announced that we acquired StreamServe Inc., a global provider of business communication solutions. The acquisition will add complementary document output and customer communication management software to our ECM Suite, while enhancing our SAP partnership and extending our reach in the Nordic market.
Total consideration for this acquisition is expected to be approximately $71.0 million, and is subject to customary purchase price and holdback adjustments.
25
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and created under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements.
Certain statements in this report may contain words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “could,” “would” and other similar language and are considered forward looking statements or information under applicable securities laws. In addition, any information or statements that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking, and based on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the operating environment, economies and markets in which we operate. Such forward-looking information or statements are subject to important assumptions, risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and the actual outcome may be materially different. Our assumptions, although considered reasonable by us at the date of this report, may prove to be inaccurate and consequently our actual results could differ materially from the expectations set out herein.
We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking information or statements. You should carefully review Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable securities regulators. A number of factors may materially affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. These factors include but are not limited to those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K under Part I Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Any one of these factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results. You should not rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, because these forward-looking statements are relevant only as of the date they were made.
The following MD&A is intended to help readers understand the results of our operation and financial condition, and is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (the Notes) under Part I, Item1 of this Form 10-Q.
Growth and percentage comparisons made herein generally refer to the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared with the three months ended September 30, 2009, unless otherwise noted.
Where we say “we”, “us”, “our”, “Open Text” or “the Company”, we mean Open Text Corporation or Open Text Corporation and its subsidiaries, as applicable.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Open Text
We are an independent company providing Enterprise Content management (ECM) software solutions. ECM is the set of technologies used to capture, manage, store, preserve, find and retrieve structured and unstructured content. We focus solely on ECM software solutions with a view to being recognized as “The Content Experts” in the software industry. We endeavor to be at the leading edge of content management technology, by regularly upgrading and improving on our product offerings. We have endeavored to achieve this objective internally and through acquisitions of companies that own technologies we feel will benefit our clients.
Our initial public offering was on the NASDAQ in 1996 and we were subsequently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 1998. We are a multinational company and currently employ approximately 3,800 people worldwide.
26
Table of Contents
Quarterly Highlights and Features:
Some highlights and features of our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2010 include:
• | Operating cash flows increased from $4.5 million to $48.9 million over the same period in the prior fiscal year. |
• | Total revenue increased by 2.8% on a quarter over quarter basis to $217.4 million. |
• | Customer support revenue increased from $123.6 million to $129.8 million over the same period in the prior fiscal year. |
• | Our overall cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2010 increased by $58.5 million over June 30, 2010. |
Other highlights were as follows:
• | In September 2010, we launched “Open Text ECM Suite 2010” which integrates over 90 different products and modules, including those from partners such as Microsoft and SAP, into one comprehensive suite, allowing customers to more easily use and bundle their Open Text needs. The launch of “Open Text ECM Suite 2010” is considered a milestone for the Company as the new suite offers many improvements and new offerings over the old suite, and marks a continued commitment to help organizations continue to control and do more with their content, in compliance with corporate governance. |
• | In August 2010, we announced the unveiling of a complete set of products and services intended to help enterprise information technology groups centrally manage numerous Microsoft SharePoint 2010 sites from the creation stage to the archiving stage. “Open Text Content Lifecycle Management” (CLM) and “Open Text Case Management Framework for SharePoint 2010”, makes use of software from recently acquired acquisitions, to bring information governance to customers with multiple Microsoft SharePoint 2010 sites. |
Acquisitions
Our competitive position in the marketplace requires us to maintain a complex and evolving array of technologies, products, services and capabilities. In light of the continually evolving marketplace in which we operate, we regularly evaluate various acquisition opportunities within the ECM marketplace and elsewhere in the high technology industry. We believe our acquisitions support our long-term strategic direction, and are intended to strengthen our competitive position, expand our customer base, provide greater scale to accelerate innovation, and increase shareholder value. We expect to continue to strategically acquire companies, products, services and technologies to augment our existing business.
Partners
Partnerships are fundamental to the Open Text business. We have developed strong and mutually beneficial relationships with key technology partners, including major software vendors, systems integrators, and storage vendors, which we believe gives us leverage to deliver customer-focused solutions. Key partnership alliances of Open Text include, but are not limited to, Oracle©, Microsoft©, and SAP©. We rely on close cooperation with partners for sales and product development, as well as for the optimization of opportunities which arise in our competitive environment. We aim to strengthen our global partner program, with emphasis on developing strategic relations and achieving close integration with partners. Our partners continue to generate business in key areas such as archiving, records management and compliance.
27
Table of Contents
Outlook for the remainder of Fiscal 2011
We believe that we have a strong position in the ECM market and that the market for content solutions remains generally stable. We think that our diversified geographic profile helps strengthen our position, in that approximately half of our revenues come from outside of North America and thus helps cushion us from an economic “downturn” in any one specific region. Additionally, we believe that our focus on compliance based products also helps to partially insulate us from “recessionary cycles” in the macroeconomic environment. We also believe we have a strong position in the ECM market because over 50% of our revenues are from customer support revenues, which are generally a recurring source of income, and we expect this trend will continue.
Results of Operations
Revenues
Revenue by Product Type and Geography:
The following tables set forth our revenues by product and as a percentage of total revenue, as well as revenue by major geography and as a percentage of total revenue for each of the periods indicated:
Revenue by product type
Three months ended September 30, | Change/ increase (decrease) | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
License | $ | 42,646 | $ | 47,329 | $ | (4,683 | ) | |||||
Customer support | 129,757 | 123,649 | 6,108 | |||||||||
Services and Other | 45,002 | 40,444 | 4,558 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 217,405 | $ | 211,422 | $ | 5,983 | ||||||
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(% of total revenue) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
License | 19.6 | % | 22.4 | % | ||||
Customer support | 59.7 | % | 58.5 | % | ||||
Services and Other | 20.7 | % | 19.1 | % | ||||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Revenue by Geography
Three months ended September 30, | Change/ increase (decrease) | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
North America | $ | 117,636 | $ | 107,317 | $ | 10,319 | ||||||
Europe | 81,193 | 91,386 | (10,193 | ) | ||||||||
Other | 18,576 | 12,719 | 5,857 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 217,405 | $ | 211,422 | $ | 5,983 | ||||||
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
% of total revenue | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
North America | 54.1 | % | 50.8 | % | ||||
Europe | 37.3 | % | 43.2 | % | ||||
Other | 8.6 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
28
Table of Contents
License Revenuesconsists of fees earned from the licensing of software products to customers. Our license revenues are impacted by the strength of general economic and industry conditions, the competitive strength of our software products, and our acquisitions.
License revenues decreased by $4.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in license revenue is geographically attributable to a decrease in Europe license sales of $9.0 million. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in North America and Other geographies of $0.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively.
Customer Support Revenue consists of revenue from our customer support and maintenance agreements. These agreements allow our customers to receive technical support, enhancements and upgrades to new versions of our software products when and if available. Customer support revenue is generated from support and maintenance relating to current year sales of software products and from the renewal of existing maintenance agreements for software licenses sold in prior periods. Therefore, changes in customer support revenue do not always correlate directly to the changes in license revenue from period to period. The terms of support and maintenance agreements are typically twelve months, with customer renewal options.
Customer support revenues increased by approximately $6.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in customer support revenues was attributable to an increase in North America customer support revenue of $4.7 million and an increase in customer support revenue in Other geographies of $2.3 million. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenue generated in Europe of $0.9 million.
Service and Other RevenuesService revenue consists of revenues from consulting contracts and contracts to provide implementation, training and integration services (Professional Services). “Other” revenue consists of hardware revenue. These revenues are grouped within the “Service and Other” category because they are relatively immaterial. Professional Services, if purchased, are typically performed after the purchase of new software licenses.
Service and other revenues increased by approximately $4.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. Geographically, the increase was attributable to an increase in North America of $4.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from Europe of $0.3 million. Other geographies remained stable.
Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin by Product Type
The following tables set forth the changes in cost of revenues and gross margin by product type for the periods indicated:
Three months ended September 30, | Change/ increase (decrease) | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
License | $ | 3,502 | $ | 3,145 | $ | 357 | ||||||
Customer Support | 19,356 | 20,939 | (1,583 | ) | ||||||||
Service and Other | 35,113 | 33,294 | 1,819 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assets | 15,427 | 14,142 | 1,285 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 73,398 | $ | 71,520 | $ | 1,878 | ||||||
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
Gross Margin | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
License | 91.8 | % | 93.4 | % | ||||
Customer Support | 85.1 | % | 83.1 | % | ||||
Service and Other | 22.0 | % | 17.7 | % |
29
Table of Contents
Cost of license revenues consists primarily of royalties payable to third parties and product media duplication, instruction manuals and packaging expenses.
Cost of license revenue remained consistent during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, increasing slightly by $0.4 million. Overall gross margin on cost of license revenue has decreased slightly to 91.8%, as a result of a decrease in license revenue with costs remaining stable.
Cost of customer support revenues is comprised primarily of technical support personnel and related costs, as well as third party royalty costs.
Cost of customer support revenues decreased by $1.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The decrease in costs is mainly due to savings on labour costs as headcount relating to our customer support business has decreased by 69 employees from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Overall gross margin on customer support revenue has increased to 85.1% as a result of the increase in revenue and the decrease of costs.
Cost of service and other revenuesconsists primarily of the costs of providing integration, customization and training with respect to our various software products. The most significant components of these costs are personnel-related expenses, travel costs and third party subcontracting.
Cost of services and other revenues increased by $1.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of higher training and support costs associated with an increase in service and other revenues.
Overall gross margin on cost of services and other revenues has increased to 22.0% primarily as the result of an 11.3% increase in revenue of services and other, compared to a smaller increase in costs over the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Amortization of acquired technology-based intangible assetsincreased by $1.3 million, due to the increase in intangible assets on account of acquisitions during Fiscal 2010.
Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth total operating expenses by function and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:
Three months ended September 30, | Change/ increase (decrease) | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Research and development | $ | 30,963 | $ | 31,542 | $ | (579 | ) | |||||
Sales and marketing | 44,180 | 50,690 | (6,510 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative | 19,810 | 21,225 | (1,415 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation | 4,875 | 4,147 | 728 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets | 8,801 | 8,917 | (116 | ) | ||||||||
Special charges | 3,195 | 18,589 | (15,394 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | 111,824 | $ | 135,110 | $ | (23,286 | ) | |||||
30
Table of Contents
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
(in % of total revenue) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Research and development | 14.2 | % | 14.9 | % | ||||
Sales and marketing | 20.3 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||
General and administrative | 9.1 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||
Depreciation | 2.2 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assets | 4.0 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||
Special charges | 1.5 | % | 8.8 | % |
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, contracted research and development expenses, and facility costs. Research and development enables organic growth and as such we dedicate extensive efforts to update and upgrade our product offering. The primary driver is typically budgeted software upgrades and software development.
Research and development expenses remained stable for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year, with only a slight reduction of $0.6 million.
Overall, our research and development expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, have remained relatively consistent within the range of 14% – 15%.
Our expectation for Fiscal 2011 is that research and development expenses will be in the range of 14% – 16% of total revenue.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses and costs associated with advertising and trade shows.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $6.5 million primarily as a result of a decrease in direct labour and labour-related benefits and expenses.
Overall, our sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, have decreased as a result of efficiencies achieved.
Headcount at September 30, 2010 related to sales and marketing activities decreased by 75 employees compared to September 30, 2009.
Our expectation for Fiscal 2011 is that sales and marketing expenses will be in the range of 21% – 23% of total revenue.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, related overhead, audit fees, other professional fees, consulting expenses and public company costs.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $1.4 million primarily due to a reduction in miscellaneous costs, which include audit and legal fees of $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Overall, our general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, have decreased slightly to 9.1%.
Our expectation for Fiscal 2011 is that general and administrative expenses will be in the range of 8% – 10% of total revenue.
Depreciation expensesincreased slightly by $0.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, as a result of increased capital asset acquisitions.
31
Table of Contents
Amortization of acquired customer-based intangible assetswas consistent compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year as there was no acquisition of intangible assets during the quarter.
Special chargestypically relate to amounts that we expect to pay in connection with restructuring plans relating to employee workforce reduction, abandonment of excess facilities, impairment of long-lived assets, acquisition related costs and other similar charges. Generally, we implement such plans in the context of streamlining existing Open Text operations with that of acquired entities. Actions related to such restructuring plans are, more often than not, completed within a period of one year. In certain limited situations, if the planned activity does not need to be implemented, or an expense lower than anticipated is paid out, we record a recovery of the originally recorded expense to special charges.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, $18.6 million of restructuring related charges were recorded, primarily resulting from the implementation of our “Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan”, announced and approved by our board during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, $3.2 million of restructuring related charges were incurred, primarily as a result of accounting for the remaining employee workforce reduction within the “Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan”. For more details on Special charges, see Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Other income, net relates to the net impact of non-operational gains and losses consisting primarily of foreign exchange gains (losses) and tax-related penalties. These gains and losses are not generally predictable and the slightly higher (net) other income in the prior quarter is due to the impact of certain “one-time” gains that were not repeated during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Interest expense, net is primarily made up of cash interest paid on our debt facilities and interest related to income tax exposures, offset by interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents. Net interest expense increased by $1.1 million primarily due to an increase in interest related to income tax expense, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Income taxes: The net increase in tax expense from $3.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $8.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010, was primarily due to the increase in net income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth changes in cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated:
Three months ended September 30, | Change/ increase (decrease) | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 48,934 | $ | 4,502 | $ | 44,432 | ||||||
Cash used by investing activities | $ | 9,017 | $ | 75,895 | $ | (66,878 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by financing activities | $ | 2,800 | $ | 3,280 | $ | (480 | ) |
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Cash flows from operating activities increased by $44.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to an increase in net income of $19.9 million, non-cash adjustments of $10.6 million and operating assets and liabilities of $13.9 million.
The increase in non-cash adjustments was primarily the result of an unrealized gain and the release of an unrealized gain to income incurred in the last fiscal year, in the amount of $2.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, which were not incurred in the current period. As well, this quarter there was an increase of $2.8
32
Table of Contents
million related to lower deferred taxes in the current quarter and $1.9 million related to depreciation and amortization charges. The remaining change in non-cash adjustments related to miscellaneous items.
The increase in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to, (i) $20.0 million related to stronger accounts receivable collections in the current quarter, (ii) $9.9 million related to the net impact of changes in the income taxes payable balance offset by changes in tax related deferred charges and credits (iii) $5.2 million related to deferred revenues. These increases were offset by decreases of, (i) $2.7 million related to other assets, and (ii) $19.1 million related to accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The remaining change in operating assets and liabilities related to miscellaneous items.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Our cash flows used in investing activities are primarily on account of business acquisitions.
Cash flows used in investing activities decreased by $66.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to an overall reduction in acquisition related spending of approximately $94.0 million, offset by the absence of cash inflows from the maturity of short-term investments, in the amount of $27.1 million, when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Cash flows from financing activities
Our cash flows from financing activities consist of long-term debt financing and monies received from shares exercised by our employees. These inflows are typically offset by scheduled and non-scheduled repayments of our long-term debt financing and, when applicable, the repurchases of our shares.
Cash flows provided by financing activities decreased slightly by $0.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to a reduction in proceeds from common shares exercised by our employees in the amount of $1.2 million and a decrease in excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense in the amount of $0.3 million. These decreases were offset by an increase in cash flows resulting from reduced spending on debt issuance costs, in the amount of $1.0 million when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. We did not enter into any new or additional long-term debt arrangements during the period.
Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
On October 2, 2006, we entered into a $465.0 million credit agreement (the credit agreement) with a Canadian chartered bank (the bank) consisting of the term loan facility in the amount of $390.0 million and a $75.0 million committed revolving long-term credit facility (the revolver). The term loan was used to partially finance the Hummingbird acquisition and the revolver will be used for general business purposes, if necessary. No amount has been drawn under the revolver to date. The credit agreement is guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries. For details relating to this and our other credit facilities, see Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
The material financial covenants under our term loan agreement are that:
• | We must maintain a “consolidated leverage” ratio of no more than 3:1 at the end of each financial quarter. Consolidated leverage ratio is defined for this purpose as the proportion of our total debt, including guarantees and letters of credit, over our “trailing twelve months” net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and |
• | We must maintain a “consolidated interest coverage” ratio of 3:1 or more at the end of each financial quarter. Consolidated interest coverage ratio is defined for this purpose as our consolidated EBITDA over our consolidated interest expense. |
33
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value of the term loan was $287.3 million and we were in compliance with all loan covenants relating to this facility.
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents, as well as available credit facilities and committed loan facilities will be sufficient to fund our anticipated cash requirements for working capital, contractual commitments, and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. Any material acquisition related activities may require additional sources of financing.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum annual payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:
Payments due between | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | October 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 | July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2013 | July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2015 | July 1, 2015 and beyond | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 321,185 | $ | 19,956 | $ | 20,441 | $ | 280,788 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Operating lease obligations * | 113,143 | 19,974 | 33,276 | 24,473 | 35,420 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 3,471 | 1,453 | 2,003 | 15 | — | |||||||||||||||
$ | 437,799 | $ | 41,383 | $ | 55,720 | $ | 305,276 | $ | 35,420 | |||||||||||
* | Net of $5.8 million of non-cancelable sublease income to be received from properties which we have subleased to other parties. |
The long-term debt obligations are comprised of interest and principal payments on our term loan agreement and a five-year mortgage on our headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2010 there were no borrowings outstanding under our revolver, however if the revolver is drawn down, it would increase our contractual obligations.
Litigation
We are subject from time to time to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, our management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not enter into off-balance sheet financing as a matter of practice except for the use of operating leases for office space, computer equipment, and vehicles. None of the operating leases described in the previous sentence has, or potentially may have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenue, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, neither the lease liability nor the underlying asset is carried on the balance sheet, as the terms of the leases do not meet the criteria for capitalization.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as
34
Table of Contents
well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
• | Revenue recognition |
• | Business combinations |
• | Goodwill and intangible assets—impairment assessments |
• | Accounting for income taxes |
• | Legal and other contingencies |
• | The valuation of stock options granted and liabilities related to share-based payments, including the long-term incentive plan |
• | Allowance for doubtful accounts |
• | Facility and restructuring accruals |
• | Financial instruments |
• | The valuation of pension assets and obligations |
Please refer to our MD&A contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 for a more complete discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are primarily exposed to market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates on our term loan and foreign currency exchange rates.
Interest rate risk
Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations relate primarily to our term loan, as we had no borrowings outstanding under our line of credit as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, we had an outstanding balance of $287.3 million on the term loan. The term loan bears a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus a fixed rate of 2.25%. As of September 30, 2010, an adverse change in LIBOR of 100 basis points (1.0%) would have the effect of increasing our annual interest payment on the term loan by approximately $2.9 million, assuming that the loan balance as of September 30, 2010, is outstanding for the entire period.
Foreign currency risk
Our reporting currency is the U.S dollar. On account of our international operations, a substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents is held in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As of September 30, 2010, this balance represented approximately 61% of our total cash and cash equivalents. A 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar would have decreased our reported cash and cash equivalents by approximately 6%.
Our international operations expose us to foreign currency fluctuations. Revenues and related expenses generated from subsidiaries, other than those located in the U.S., are generally denominated in the functional currencies of the local countries. These functional currencies include Euros, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars and British Pounds. The income statements of our international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the foreign currency conversion of these foreign currency denominated transactions into U.S. dollars results in reduced revenues, operating
35
Table of Contents
expenses and net income (loss) for our international operations. Similarly, our revenues, operating expenses and net income (loss) will increase for our international operations, if the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies. We cannot predict the effect foreign exchange fluctuations will have on our results going forward. However, if there is a change in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar, it could have a material effect on our results of operations. To limit the potential exposure we have to foreign currency fluctuations, we have entered into a hedging program with a Canadian chartered bank. For more details of our hedging program, see Note 12.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Based on the evaluation completed by our management, in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated, our management has concluded that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
36
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. These are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies.
37
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following exhibits are filed with this report:
Exhibit | Description of Exhibit | |
14.1 | Open Text Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. | |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL instance document | |
101.SCH | XBRL taxonomy extension schema | |
101.CAL | XBRL taxonomy extension calculation linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL taxonomy extension definition linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL taxonomy extension label linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL taxonomy extension presentation linkbase |
38
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OPEN TEXT CORPORATION | ||||
Date: October 28, 2010 | By: | /s/ JOHN SHACKLETON | ||
John Shackleton President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
/s/ PAUL MCFEETERS | ||||
Paul McFeeters Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
/s/ SUJEET KINI | ||||
Sujeet Kini Vice President, Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
39