UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PUSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One) |
|
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006 | |
OR | |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-14130
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
New York |
| 11-3289165 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) |
| Identification No.) |
|
|
|
75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York |
| 11747 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
(516) 812-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
WEBSITE: WWW.MSCDIRECT.COM
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
| Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 |
| The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
| Accelerated filer o |
| Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of November 6, 2006, 48,141,198 shares of Class A common stock and 18,839,874 shares of Class B common stock of the registrant were outstanding and the aggregate market value of Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,840,986,348.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 annual meeting of stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.
2
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (including Item 1 (“Business”) and Item 7 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”)) contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future events and our plans, goals and objectives. Such statements are generally accompanied by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “think,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” or similar terms. Our actual results may differ materially from such statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, without limitation, our ability to timely and efficiently integrate the J&L America, Inc. (“J&L”) business and realize the anticipated synergies from the transaction, changing customer and product mixes, changing market conditions, industry consolidation, competition, general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates, rising commodity and energy prices, risk of cancellation or rescheduling of orders, work stoppages or other business interruptions (including those due to extreme weather conditions) at transportation centers or shipping ports, the risks of war, terrorism, and similar hostilities, dependence on our information systems and on key personnel. See “Risk Factors” at page 15. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, the Company cannot make any assurances that the results contemplated in such forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the future events, plans or expectations contemplated by the Company will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future performance. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes the effect of the acquisition of J&L America, Inc., DBA J&L Industrial Supply (“J&L”), a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., unless otherwise noted. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations. The financial results of J&L are included in the consolidated financial results in the balance sheet as of the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006, and in the consolidated statements of income as of the acquisition date which was June 8, 2006.
J&L estimates their number of stock-keeping units (“SKUs”) at 160,000, active customers to be approximately 86,000, and the number of suppliers to be approximately 2,700. MSC is currently working on validating such amounts to be able to account for this data on a consolidated basis. This information is not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. When J&L is fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2007) the information will be reported as a consolidated total.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “MSC,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), incorporated in the State of New York in 1995, is one of the largest direct marketers of a broad range of industrial products to industrial customers throughout the United States. We distribute a full line of industrial products intended to satisfy our customers’ maintenance, repair and operations (“MRO”) supplies.
Excluding J&L, we offer over 500,000 stock-keeping units (“SKUs”) through our master catalogs, weekly, monthly and quarterly specialty and promotional catalogs, newspapers and brochures and the Internet, including our website, MSCDirect.com. We service our customers from 95 branch offices and
3
seven customer fulfillment centers. These include four branch offices and three customer fulfillment centers that were acquired as part of the J&L acquisition. J&L has its own website, JLIndustrial.com, which offers a broad range of metalcutting tools, abrasives, drills, machine tool accessories, precision measuring tools, gages, hand tools and other supplies used in metalcutting operations. When J&L’s systems are fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2007) both of J&L’s U.S. customer fulfillment centers will be closed, and their volume will be absorbed into MSC’s existing logistics network. Excluding J&L, most of our products are carried in stock, and orders for these in-stock products are typically fulfilled the day on which the order is received.
Our business strategy is to provide an integrated, lower cost solution to the purchasing, management and administration of our customers’ MRO needs. We believe we add value to our customers’ purchasing process by reducing their total MRO and supplies costs, taking into account both the direct cost of products and the administrative, personnel and financial cost of obtaining and maintaining MRO supplies. We try to achieve this reduction in MRO supplies costs in the following manner:
· Our extensive product offerings allow customers to reduce the administrative burden of dealing with many suppliers for their MRO needs.
· We guarantee same-day shipping of our core business products, which enables our customers to reduce their inventory investment and carrying costs. J&L has its own service model and does not guarantee same-day shipping.
· We consolidate multiple purchases into a single order, provide a single invoice relating to multiple purchases over varying periods of time and offer direct shipments to specific departments and personnel within a single facility or multiple facilities, allowing our customers to reduce administrative paperwork, costs of shipping and personnel costs related to internal distribution and purchase order management.
· We have extensive e-commerce abilities that enable our customers to lower their procurement costs. This includes many features such as swift search and transaction abilities, access to real-time inventory, customer specific pricing, workflow management tools, customized reporting and other features. We can also interface directly with many purchasing portals such as ARIBA and Perfect Commerce, in addition to ERP Procurement Solutions such as Oracle and SAP. We offer inventory management solutions with our Customer Managed Inventory (“CMI”) and Vendor Managed Inventory (“VMI”) systems that can lower customers’ inventory investment, reduce sourcing costs and out of stock situations and increase business efficiency. Orders generated through these inventory management solutions are integrated directly with MSCDirect.com and many e-procurement software solutions.
Our customers include a wide range of purchasers of industrial supply products, from one-person machine shops to Fortune 1000 companies, to government agencies such as the General Services Administration (“GSA”) and the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). Our core business focuses on selling relatively higher margin, lower volume products and, excluding J&L, we had an average order size of approximately $280 in fiscal 2006. As our national account and government programs sales grow, the Company will face continued pressures on maintaining gross margin because these customers receive lower pricing due to their higher sales volumes. Excluding J&L, we have in excess of 346,000 combined active customers (companies that have purchased at least one item during the past 12 months). Our customers select desired products from MSC’s various publications and place their orders by telephone, the Internet, including MSCDirect.com, direct computer link or facsimile.
We operate primarily in the United States, with customers in all 50 states, through a network of seven customer fulfillment centers (six customer fulfillment centers are located within the U.S. and one is located in the U.K.) and 95 branch offices (94 branches are located within the U.S. and one is located in the U.K.). These include three customer fulfillment centers and four branch offices that were acquired as part of the J&L acquisition. MSC’s customer fulfillment centers are located near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Atlanta,
4
Georgia; Elkhart, Indiana and Reno, Nevada. The customer fulfillment centers acquired as part of the J&L acquisition are located in Elk Grove, Illinois; Livonia, Michigan and Wednesbury, United Kingdom. When J&L’s systems are fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2007) both the J&L U.S. customer fulfillment centers will be closed, and their volume will be absorbed into MSC’s existing logistics network. Excluding J&L, the strategic locations of MSC’s customer fulfillment centers allow for next day ground delivery via low cost ground carriers in 38 states. J&L has its own service model and does not guarantee same-day shipping. Our experience has been that areas accessible by next day ground delivery generate significantly greater sales than areas where next day ground delivery is not available. Accordingly, our long-term strategy is to expand our geographic next day delivery coverage throughout the continental United States, which at some point in the future may require the expansion of existing facilities or the opening of new facilities.
On June 8, 2006, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc. J&L provides metalworking consumables, related products and related technical and supply chain-related productivity services to small and medium-sized manufacturers in the United States and the United Kingdom. J&L markets products and services through mail-order catalogs and monthly sales flyers, telemarketing, the Internet and field sales. J&L distributes a broad range of metalcutting tools, abrasives, drills, machine tool accessories, precision measuring tools, gages, hand tools and other supplies used in metalcutting operations. The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $349.5 million subject to certain preliminary post-closing purchase price adjustments of $9.7 million and certain further purchase price adjustments claimed by Kennametal, Inc., which are currently subject to arbitration. In addition, costs and fees of $7.1 million related to professional fees and other expenses will be included in the purchase price, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the acquisition of J&L, Kennametal, Inc., J&L and the Company entered into certain business arrangements, including: (a) a distributor agreement under which the Company and J&L will receive an exclusive five-year national level distribution arrangement for Kennametal branded products (within the U.S.), a non-exclusive distributorship in the U.S. for other products and a non-exclusive distributorship for Kennametal branded and other products in the UK; (b) a trademark license agreement which grants an exclusive, royalty-free, right and license in perpetuity for the use of the HERTEL trademark in the United States and United Kingdom, and limited rights in Canada and other jurisdictions; (c) a private label agreement under which Kennametal will manufacture and supply to the Company certain products under the HERTEL trademark; (d) certain noncompetition arrangements; and (e) an administrative services agreement including, but not limited to, data support services.
MSC operates in a large, fragmented industry characterized by multiple channels of distribution. We believe that there are numerous small retailers, dealerships and distributors that supply a majority of the market. The distribution channels in the industrial products market include retail outlets, small distributorships, national, regional and local distributors, direct mail suppliers, large warehouse stores and manufacturers’ own sales forces.
Almost every industrial, manufacturing and service business has an ongoing need for MRO supplies. We believe that, except in the largest industrial plants, MRO supplies inventories generally are not effectively managed or monitored, resulting in higher purchasing costs and increased administrative burdens. In addition, within larger facilities, such items are frequently stored in multiple locations, resulting in excess inventories and duplicate purchase orders. MRO items are also frequently purchased by multiple personnel in uneconomic quantities and a substantial portion of most facilities’ MRO supplies are
5
“one-time purchases,” resulting in higher purchasing costs and time-consuming administrative efforts by multiple plant personnel.
Based on industry estimates, we believe that the administrative costs associated with manually placing a purchase order are approximately $100 per order. Awareness of these high costs and purchasing inefficiencies has been driving large companies to streamline the purchasing process by utilizing a limited number of suppliers which can provide a broad selection of products, prompt delivery and superior customer service. Customized billing practices and report generation capabilities tailored to customer objectives are also becoming increasingly important to customers seeking to reduce costs, allowing such customers to significantly reduce the need for purchasing agents and administrative personnel. We believe that industry trends and economic pressures have caused customers to reduce their supplier base and move toward more efficient cost saving models, such as those offered by premier companies such as MSC.
Despite the inefficiencies of the traditional MRO purchasing process, long-standing relationships with local retailers and distributors have generally perpetuated the status quo. Due to limited capital availability, high operating cost structures and relatively small sales volumes, smaller suppliers to the industrial market are experiencing increasing pressure to consolidate and curtail services and certain product lines in order to remain competitive. Even large suppliers with extensive field sales forces are finding it increasingly difficult to visit all buyers cost-effectively and provide the support necessary to satisfy customer demands for control of costs and improved efficiency. We believe that the relative inability of traditional distribution channels to respond to these changing industry dynamics has created a continuing opportunity for the growth of hybrid business models with direct marketing and direct sales organizations such as MSC. As a result of these dynamics, we have captured an increasing share of sales by providing lower total purchasing costs, broader product selection and a higher level of service.
We believe that we provide a low cost solution to the purchasing inefficiencies and high costs described above. Customers that purchase products from us will generally find that their total purchasing and shipping costs, inventory investment and carrying costs, internal distribution costs and administrative inefficiencies are reduced. We try to achieve this through:
· consolidation of multiple sources of supply into fewer suppliers;
· consolidation of multiple purchase orders into a single purchase order;
· consolidation of multiple invoices into a single invoice;
· significant reduction in tracking of invoices;
· significant reduction in stocking decisions;
· reduction of purchases for inventory; and
· e-commerce and e-procurement integration capabilities.
Our business strategy is to reduce our customers’ total cost of procurement for obtaining and maintaining MRO supplies. The strategy includes the following key elements:
· broad selection of in-stock products;
· offering both name brand and generic products;
· prompt response and same-day shipping;
· superior, value-added customer service;
· competitive pricing;
· targeted direct mail marketing; and
· a commitment to technological innovation.
6
Broad Selection of Products. We believe that our ability to offer customers a broad spectrum of brand name and generic MRO and metalworking products and a “good-better-best” product selection alternative has been critical to our success. We offer similar products with varying degrees of name recognition, quality and price, thus permitting the customer to choose the appropriate product based on cost, quality and the customer’s specific needs. Our customers are increasingly purchasing from fewer suppliers to reduce the administrative burden of ordering from multiple suppliers. Excluding J&L, we offer for sale over 500,000 products, most of which are generally in stock and available for immediate shipment, and we aim to provide a broad range of merchandise in order to become our customers’ preferred supplier of MRO products.
Same-Day Shipping. Our guaranteed same-day shipping of products results in next day or second day delivery for customers in most of the continental United States. This prompt delivery allows customers to reduce the administrative burden of dealing with many suppliers and reduces their inventory investment and carrying costs. Excluding J&L, we fulfill our same-day shipment guarantee 99.99% of the time. J&L has its own service model and does not guarantee same-day shipping. Our experience has been that areas accessible by next day ground delivery will generate significantly greater sales than areas where next day ground delivery is not available. The strategic locations of our customer fulfillment centers allow next day ground delivery via low cost ground carriers in 38 states.
Superior Customer Service. Customer service is a key element in becoming a customer’s preferred provider of MRO supplies. Our commitment to customer service is demonstrated by our investment in sophisticated information systems and extensive training of our associates. Utilizing our proprietary customer support software, our in-bound sales representatives (excluding J&L) implement the “one call does it all” philosophy. In-bound sales representatives are able to inform customers on a real-time basis of the availability of a product, recommend substitute products, verify credit information, receive special, custom or manufacturer direct orders, cross-check inventory items using customer product codes previously entered into our information systems and arrange technical assistance. We believe that our simple, “one call does it all” philosophy of fulfilling all purchasing needs of a customer through highly-trained customer service representatives, supported by our proprietary information systems, results in greater efficiency for customers and increased customer satisfaction. To complement our customer service, we seek to ease the administrative burdens on our customers by offering customized billing services, customer savings reports and other customized report features, electronic data interchange ordering, e-commerce capabilities, bulk discounts and stocking of specialty items specifically requested by customers.
Targeted Direct Mail Marketing Strategy. Our primary tools for marketing and product reference are the annual master catalogs used to showcase over 500,000 (excluding J&L) items. In fiscal 2006, our master catalogs were supplemented by 107 specialty and promotional catalogs and brochures covering such specialty areas as cutting tools, measuring instruments, tooling components and maintenance and repair, industrial supply, and hose and tubing. Excluding J&L, we use our database of approximately 1.9 million companies with 2.5 million individual contacts, and we also purchase mailing lists of prospective customers, to target the distribution of these various publications to specific individuals within an organization whose purchasing history or other criteria suggest receptiveness to mailings of specific publication titles. The use of specialty and promotional publications, which are produced in-house, has resulted in increased productivity through lower costs, increased response rates and more efficient use of advertising space. MSC’s publication circulation increased to 29.6 million (including 0.7 million from J&L) in fiscal 2006 from 28.6 million in fiscal 2005. Excluding the increase from J&L, this slight increase is in line with our continuing strategy to increase the productivity of our direct marketing efforts and increase overall return on advertising dollars spent.
Commitment to Technological Innovation. We take advantage of technological innovations to support growth, improve customer service and to reduce our operating costs through more effective buying practices, automated inventory replenishment and efficient order fulfillment operations. Excluding J&L,
7
MSC’s proprietary software tracks all of the SKUs (over 500,000) and enables the customer and the sales representatives to determine the availability of products in stock on a real-time basis and to evaluate alternative products and pricing. MSC’s website, MSCDirect.com, is a searchable on-line catalog with electronic ordering capabilities designed to take advantage of the opportunities created by e-commerce. The MSCDirect.com website offers a broad array of products, services, workflow management tools and related information to meet the needs of customers seeking to reduce process costs through e-commerce-enabled solutions. Our information systems have been designed to enhance inventory management and turnover, customer service and cost reduction for both MSC and our customers. In addition to internal and customer information systems, we continually upgrade our distribution methods and systems to improve productivity and efficiency. We also provide a comprehensive EDI ordering system to support our customer based purchase order processing. We continue to invest in inventory management solutions with our CMI program which allows for automated inventory replenishment by customers, thereby enabling the customer to lower their overall procurement costs and maintain lower inventory levels.
Our objective is to become the preferred supplier of industrial products for businesses throughout the United States. We intend to increase sales to existing customers and diversify our customer base by:
· expanding government and national account programs;
· expanding our direct sales force and increasing their productivity;
· opening additional branches in the western region of the United States;
· penetrating J&L customers with MSC’s entire SKU offering;
· increasing the number of product lines and SKUs offered, including the Kennametal line of cutting tools through the MSC and J&L channels, and also including generic and imported products;
· targeting the circulation and content of our master catalog and our direct mail campaign;
· continually developing technological innovations employing modern technologies to reduce our customers’ costs and utilizing extensive e-commerce capabilities, making it even easier and more appealing to do business with MSC;
· expanding next day ground delivery into new markets;
· maintaining excellent customer support service; and
· considering and/or pursuing selected acquisitions.
Expand Government and National Account Programs. We have developed internal government and national account programs to meet the specific needs of these types of customers. We believe that significant growth opportunities exist within these segments and that they are an integral part of our customer diversification program. Allocating resources to these segments will allow us to better support these customers, expand our customer acquisition activities and is a key component of our overall growth strategy.
Increasing the size and improving the productivity of our direct sales force. We believe that increasing the size of the sales force, providing high levels of customer service and improving sales force productivity can have a positive effect on our sales per customer. The focus is to enable our sales force to spend more time with our customers and provide increased support during the MRO purchasing process thereby capturing more of their MRO spend.
Opening additional branches in the western region of the United States. As part of our west coast expansion strategy, we have opened new branches in the Los Angeles, San Diego and Oakland areas. In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, to date, we opened a new branch in Fresno. We believe that this is an opportunity to increase our market share in the western region.
8
Penetrating J&L customers with MSC’s entire SKU offering. We have begun the process of sending our catalog to the J&L customers to promote our metalworking products. We are providing access and training to the J&L sales force and incorporating the MRO product offering into our direct marketing campaigns.
Increasing the number of product lines and productive SKUs. We believe that continuing to increase the breadth and productivity of our product line are effective methods of increasing sales to current customers and attracting new customers. By expanding the product lines and SKUs offered within existing product categories, including the Kennametal line of cutting tools, we seek to satisfy an increasing percentage of the supplies purchases of our customers and to attract new customers. To continue to provide a diverse product line and maintain profit margins in our competitive market place, we have has also sought out vendors to supply higher margin generic and imported products. In fiscal 2006, excluding the J&L catalog, we added approximately 21,000 SKUs and removed approximately 25,000 slower selling SKUs. In fiscal 2007, excluding the J&L catalog , we added approximately 22,000 new SKUs and removed approximately 29,000 existing SKUs in its fiscal 2007 catalog which was distributed in September 2006. Excluding J&L, we currently have over 500,000 SKUs in total. We generally add SKUs based on the value they will bring to our customers.
Targeted circulation of our master catalog and direct mail campaign. Excluding J&L, we have accumulated a buyer database of approximately 1.9 million businesses with 2.5 million individual contacts, and industry expertise within specific markets. We utilize empirical information from this database to prospect for new customers, thereby increasing the circulation of our master catalogs. We supplement our master catalogs with direct mailings of specialty and promotional publications to further increase customer response and product purchases. Industry specific expertise is used to target customer growth areas and focus sales and marketing campaigns.
E-commerce capabilities. MSCDirect.com is a proprietary business-to-business horizontal marketplace serving the industrial market, offering customers full access to all of the parts that we sell. All orders placed online at MSCDirect.com are backed by our same-day shipping guarantee. MSCDirect.com utilizes the same highly trained sales force and support services as MSC’s traditional business, emphasizing MSC’s values of placing customers’ needs first. Our website is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, providing real-time inventory availability, superior search capabilities, on-line bill payment, delivery tracking status and a number of other enhancements including work flow management tools. The user-friendly search engine allows customers to search for parts by keyword, part description, competitive part number, vendor number or brand. As part of our continued effort to improve our e-commerce capabilities the keyword search function was enhanced. We believe MSCDirect.com is a key component of our strategy to reduce customers’ transaction costs and internal requisition time. The website also allows customers to control which of their staff are entitled to purchase products online, how much they are entitled to spend and which staff require secondary approval. The process is fully automated and integrated into our operating systems. Most orders move directly from the customers’ desktop to the customer fulfillment center floor, removing human error, reducing handling costs and speeding up the transaction flow. MSC continues to evaluate our website and solicit customer feedback, making on-going improvements targeted at allowing MSCDirect.com to remain one of the premier websites in its marketplace. Our MSCDirect.com marketing campaign continued in fiscal year 2006 to raise awareness and drive volume to the website. MSCDirect.com generated revenue of more than $249 million in fiscal year 2006, a 35% increase over the prior year.
E-procurement solution providers sell a suite of e-commerce products designed to meet the needs of businesses seeking reduced procurement costs and increased effectiveness of their MRO/direct materials process by using Internet-enabled solutions. We have associations with many of these providers such as Ariba, Perfect Commerce, Oracle, SAP, Infor (formerly known as Datastream) and more. We continue to evaluate and expand our capabilities in these areas, as the needs of our customers grow in these areas.
9
Expanding next day ground delivery. Our experience has been that sales in areas accessible by next day ground delivery are significantly greater than in areas with second day delivery. Accordingly, our long-term goal is to expand our geographic coverage of next day ground delivery throughout the United States, which at some point in the future may require the expansion of existing facilities or the opening of new facilities.
Maintain excellent customer support service. Our goal is to anticipate a customer’s service needs. We are continuing to proactively expand the services that we provide and respond and build programs at customer requests. Our “one call does it all” philosophy continues to be the cornerstone of our service model even as the complexity of the needs of our customers continues to grow. This focus on our customers’ needs provides a market differentiator, which enables us to retain existing customers and grow our customer base.
Considering and/or pursuing selected acquisitions. The acquisition of J&L has played a role in our recent growth. From time to time, we may consider and/or pursue selected acquisitions that either could expand or complement our business in new or existing markets, although at this time, we are not engaged in any discussions or negotiations with respect to any material acquisition candidate.
Excluding J&L, we currently offer over 500,000 SKUs, representing a broad range of MRO (including metal working) product lines that include: cutting tools; measuring instruments; tooling components; fasteners; flat stock, raw materials; abrasives; machinery hand and power tools; safety, janitorial; plumbing; material handling; power transmission; electrical supplies as well as other categories. We attribute a portion of our sales growth to the total number of SKUs offered, which helps our customers reduce the number of suppliers they use to meet their MRO needs. In this regard, we intend to continue to add new products to our existing product categories. Our offering of specific products from multiple manufacturers at different prices and quality levels permits us to offer a “good-better-best” product selection alternative. This value proposition provides similar product offerings with varying degrees of name recognition, quality and price enabling the customer to choose the appropriate product for a specific task on the most cost-effective basis. MSC seeks to distinguish itself from its competition through offering both name brand and generic products and significant depth in its core product lines while maintaining competitive pricing.
Our in-bound sales representatives and technical support personnel are trained to assist customers in making intelligent cost-saving purchases. We believe this approach results in significant amounts of repeat business and is an integral part of our strategy to reduce our customers’ industrial supply costs.
Excluding J&L, we purchase substantially all of our products directly from approximately 2,100 suppliers. We are not materially dependent on any one supplier or small group of suppliers. No one single supplier accounted for more than 5% of our total purchases in fiscal 2006.
A significant number of our products are carried in stock. Excluding J&L, approximately 84% of sales are fulfilled from the customer fulfillment centers or branch offices. Certain products, such as specialty or custom items and some very large orders, are shipped directly from the manufacturer. Our customer fulfillment centers are managed via computer-based SKU tracking systems and radio frequency devices that facilitate the location of specific stock items to make the picking process more efficient. We have invested significant resources in technology and automation to increase efficiency and reduce costs, and continually monitor our order fulfillment process. We currently utilize seven customer fulfillment centers for product shipment located near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Atlanta, Georgia; Elkhart, Indiana and Reno, Nevada, as well as the customer fulfillment centers acquired as part of the J&L acquisition, located in Elk Grove, Illinois; Livonia, Michigan and Wednesbury, United Kingdom. When the J&L systems are fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2007) both of J&L’s U.S.
10
customer fulfillment centers will be closed, and their volume will be absorbed into MSC’s existing logistics network.
Our customers include a broad range of purchasers of industrial supply products, from one-man machine shops, to Fortune 1000 companies, to government agencies. Our core business focuses on selling relatively higher margin, lower volume products and, we had an average order size of approximately $280 in fiscal 2006, excluding J&L. We market to small, medium and large companies in a wide range of sectors, including but not limited to durable and non-durable goods manufacturing, (which, excluding J&L, accounted for 72% of our revenue in fiscal 2006) education, government and health care. J&L does not accumulate this data, however, a significant portion of their revenue is generated from the durable and non-durable goods manufacturing sector. We also have government and national account programs designed to address the needs of these customers.
One focus area for our sales force is the execution of contracts with both the GSA, the USPS and the procurement agencies of numerous individual states. We believe that expanding our business with government agencies will assist us to better manage periodic downturns in the manufacturing industry. These national relationships are for MRO products and are well matched to MSC’s product breadth and depth. GSA customers include military bases, veteran’s hospitals, federal correctional facilities, army corps of engineers facilities, etc. The USPS contract connects MSC to over 37,000 postal facilities nation-wide, including bulk mail centers, processing centers, vehicle maintenance facilities, post offices and more. In addition to the individual state contracts that MSC already has or is currently pursuing, we are now pursuing a number of state cooperatives that present MSC an opportunity to leverage a single relationship over numerous states and/or agencies.
We also plan to continue our successful strategy of growing national account sales through the acquisition of new accounts and the penetration of existing accounts. The MSC value proposition is consistent with the procurement strategies of large, Fortune 1000 corporations as they attempt to reduce their supplies base by partnering with companies that can serve their needs nationally and drive costs out of their supply chain by using e-commerce solutions such as MSC’s e-procurement integration abilities, VMI and CMI inventory programs. By adding national accounts, we are able to diversify into new customer segments, strengthen our MRO product lines and acquire the scale that helps us achieve our purchasing goals. We have identified hundreds of additional national account prospects and have given our sales team tools to ensure we are targeting and implementing programs with the companies that best fit the MSC model.
One of our subsidiaries also offers wholesalers and other distributors the ability to create their own customized mail order catalog, by offering turnkey marketing programs and promotional mailers. Any resulting orders are serviced directly by MSC, which stocks and ships the products under the customer’s program. Another division of MSC offers a line of lower priced products to the budget-oriented customer.
11
Excluding J&L, we have in excess of 346,000 combined active customers (companies which have purchased at least once during the past 12 months). Typically, a customer’s industrial supply purchases are managed by several buyers responsible for different categories of products. We target these individual buyers within an organization and distribute publications corresponding to the product categories for which such buyers are responsible. We are able to implement this direct-marketing strategy because of the depth of customer information contained in our information systems databases. Our customers select desired products from our various publications and place their orders by telephone, facsimile, Internet or direct computer link.
We have invested significant resources in developing an extensive customer and prospect database. This database is a key component of our growth strategy. The customer and prospect database includes detailed information, including company size, number of employees, industry, various demographic and geographic characteristics and personal purchase histories (catalog preference, product preference, and order value). We believe that this variety and depth of information on our customers and prospects offers us a significant competitive advantage in increasing sales to existing customers and attracting new customers.
We rely on approximately 838 (including 152 from J&L) in-bound sales representatives at our call centers, customer fulfillment centers and branch offices, who are responsible for substantially all customer contacts and order entries. These sales representatives are highly trained individuals who build relationships with customers, assist customers in reducing costs, provide technical support, coordinate special orders and shipments with vendors and update customer account profiles in our information systems databases. Our “one call does it all” philosophy is predicated on the ability of the sales representative, utilizing our information systems’ comprehensive databases as a resource, to respond effectively to the customer’s needs. When a customer places a call to MSC, the sales representative taking the call has immediate access to that customer’s company and specific buyer profile, as well as inventory levels by customer fulfillment center on all of the SKUs offered by MSC. The customer’s profile includes historical and current billing information, historical purchasing information and plant and industry information.
MSC’s in-bound sales representatives at our call centers undergo an intensive two-week training course, are required to attend regular on-site training seminars and workshops, and are monitored and evaluated at regular intervals. Additionally, the sales representatives are divided into teams that are evaluated monthly and monitored on a daily basis by team supervisors. Sales representatives receive technical training regarding various products from vendors and in-house training specialists. We also maintain a separate technical support group dedicated to answering specific customer inquiries and assisting customers with the operation of products and finding low cost solutions to manufacturing problems.
Our approximately 715 (including 146 from J&L) direct sales representatives work out of the branches and generate a significant portion of our sales. They are responsible for increasing sales per customer and servicing existing customers. The sales representatives accomplish this by taking our product offering, distribution capabilities, customer service models and value added programs directly to the customer. These associates are the touch-point to the customer and provide the organization feedback on competitive landscape, and purchasing trends and help to drive process and service improvement in order for MSC to retain and increase our market position.
We currently operate 95 branch offices, which includes four branch offices that were acquired as part of the J&L acquisition. There are 94 branch offices within the United Sates with locations in 37 states, and one branch is located in the United Kingdom. We have experienced higher sales growth and market
12
penetration in areas where we have established a branch office and believe our branch offices are important to the success of our business strategy of obtaining and penetrating new and existing accounts. As part of our west coast expansion strategy, we opened a new branch in Fresno, California, during the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Our primary reference tool is our annual master catalog, which is supported by specialty and promotional catalogs and brochures. J&L produces a master catalog bi-annually, which is also supported by specialty and promotional catalogs and brochures. We use specialty and promotional publications to target customers in specific areas, such as metal fabrication, facilities management, safety and janitorial. We distribute specialty and promotional catalogs and brochures based on information in our databases and purchased mailing lists to customers whose purchasing history or profile suggests that they are most likely to purchase according to specific product categories or product promotions. Consequently, specialty catalogs offer a more focused selection of products at a lower catalog production cost and more efficient use of advertising space.
MSC’s in-house marketing staff designs and produces all of our catalogs and brochures. Each publication contains photographs, detailed product descriptions and a toll-free telephone number and website address to be used by customers to place a product order. In-house production helps reduce overall expense and shortens production time, allowing us the flexibility to alter our product offerings and pricing and refine our catalog and brochures more quickly.
The number of pieces mailed has increased from approximately 28.2 million in fiscal 2004 to approximately 29.6 million (including 0.7 million from J&L) in fiscal 2006. The increase in circulation and number of publications are a result of our ongoing strategy to increase direct mail productivity and increase overall return on advertising dollars spent, as well as the effect of the J&L acquisition.
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||
|
| August 28, |
| August 27, |
| August 26, |
|
Number of publication titles |
| 96 |
| 97 |
| 112 |
|
Number of publications mailed |
| 28,200,000 |
| 28,600,000 |
| 29,600,000 |
|
One of our goals is to make purchasing our products as convenient as possible. Since a majority of customer orders are placed by telephone, the efficient handling of calls is an extremely important aspect of our business. Order entry and fulfillment occurs at each of our branches and main call centers located at our customer fulfillment centers. Calls are received by customer service phone representatives who utilize on-line terminals to enter customer orders into computerized order processing systems. Excluding J&L, our telephone ordering system is flexible and, in the event of a local or regional breakdown, can be re-routed to alternative locations. When an order is entered into the system, a credit check is performed, and, if the credit is approved, the order is electronically transmitted to the customer fulfillment center closest to the customer and a packing slip is printed for order fulfillment. We believe that our relationships with all our carriers are satisfactory. We guarantee same-day shipping of in-stock products if the order is received prior to regional cut-off times and most customers receive their orders (other than custom items and large industrial items shipped directly by the manufacturer) within one or two business days of the order date. J&L fulfills orders through each of their branches and call centers, however, J&L has its own service model and does not guarantee same-day shipping. Customers are invoiced for merchandise, shipping and handling promptly after shipment.
13
Our proprietary information systems allow centralized management of key functions, including communication links between customer fulfillment centers, inventory and accounts receivable management, purchasing, pricing, sales and distribution, and the preparation of daily operating control reports that provide concise and timely information regarding key aspects of our business. These proprietary information systems enable us to ship to customers on a same-day basis, respond quickly to order changes, provide a high level of customer service, achieve cost savings, deliver superior customer service and manage our operations centrally. Our proprietary information systems are also a key component of our e-commerce capabilities. J&L has its own service model and does not guarantee same-day shipping.
Most of our information systems operate over a wide area network and are real-time information systems that allow each customer fulfillment center and branch office to share information and monitor daily progress relating to sales activity, credit approval, inventory levels, stock balancing, vendor returns, order fulfillment and other measures of performance. We maintain a sophisticated buying and inventory management system that monitors substantially all of our SKUs and automatically purchases inventory from vendors for replenishment based on projected customer ordering models. We also maintain an electronic data interchange (EDI) purchasing program with our vendors with the objective of allowing us to place orders more efficiently, reduce order cycle processing time, and increase the accuracy of orders placed.
In addition to developing the proprietary computer software programs for use in the customer service and distribution operations, we also provide a comprehensive EDI and XML ordering system to support our customer based purchase order processing. We have developed a Windows®-based CD-ROM electronic catalog package and provide product information and ordering capabilities on the Internet. MSC also supports a proprietary hardware and software platform in support of its VMI initiative which allows customers to integrate scanner-accumulated orders directly into our Sales Order Entry system. In 2004, we introduced our CMI program, which allows our customers to simply and effectively replenish inventory, by submitting orders directly to our website. In 2005, we expanded both our VMI and CMI capabilities to function directly as front-end ordering systems for our E-portal based customers.
We run our systems on an IBM iSeries platform and utilize disaster recovery techniques and procedures, which we believe are adequate to fulfill our needs and are consistent with this type of equipment. We believe that planned enhancements and upgrades to the next generation of our existing operating platforms will be sufficient to sustain our present operations and our anticipated growth for the foreseeable future.
J&L continues to use the existing Kennametal computer systems, which are secure, under a service agreement and a significant aspect of the integration will be to migrate these systems on to the MSC computer system.
The MRO supply industry is a large, fragmented industry that is highly competitive. We face competition from traditional channels of distribution such as retail outlets, small dealerships, regional or national distributors utilizing direct sales forces, manufacturers of MRO supplies, large warehouse stores and larger direct mail distributors. We believe that sales of MRO supplies will become more concentrated over the next few years, which may make the industry more competitive. Our competitors challenge us with a greater variety of product offerings, financial resources, services or a combination of all of these factors. In the industrial products market, customer purchasing decisions are primarily based on one or more of the following criteria: price, product selection, product availability, level of service and convenience. We believe we compete effectively on all such criteria.
14
We generally experience slightly lower sales volumes during the summer months (our fourth fiscal quarter) as a result of our industrial customers’ plant shutdowns during this period.
As of August 26, 2006, we employed 3,775 associates, including 3,607 full-time and 168 part-time associates. This includes 602 J&L associates, of which 596 were full-time and 6 were part-time. No associate is represented by a labor union. We consider our relationships with associates to be good and have experienced no work stoppages.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.
The Company’s Internet address is http://www.mscdirect.com. We make available on or through our investor relations page on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5 and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after this material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. We also make available, on our website, the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors and Management’s Code of Ethics, the Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines pursuant to SEC requirements and New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following factors should be considered in evaluating the Company and its business. Our future operating results depend upon many factors and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The known material risks and uncertainties which may cause our operating results to vary from anticipated results or which may negatively affect our operating results and profitability are as follows:
Our ability to timely and efficiently integrate the J&L business and realize the anticipated synergies from the transaction will have a significant effect on our future operations.
On June 8, 2006, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., for $349.5 million subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments which have not been finalized. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Our future results of operations will be significantly influenced by the operations of J&L, and we will be subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the following:
· We will face a number of significant challenges in integrating the technologies, operations, and personnel of J&L in a timely and efficient manner, and our failure to do so effectively could have a material, adverse effect on our business and operating results.
· We may not achieve the strategic objectives and other anticipated potential benefits of the acquisition, or do so in the time we anticipate and our failure to achieve these strategic objectives or
15
to do so in a timely manner could have a material, adverse effect on our revenues, expenses, and operating results.
· Transaction costs associated with the acquisition will be included as part of the total purchase cost for accounting purposes. Although to date transaction costs have been within our original estimates, in future quarters we may incur charges to operations in amounts that are not currently estimable to reflect costs associated with integrating the operations of two companies. In addition, we will continue to record additional operating expenses associated with the amortization of other intangible assets. These costs could adversely affect our future liquidity and operating results.
· Both companies have the U.S. Government and civilian and military agencies of the U.S. Government as significant customers. We face risks associated with integrating the contracting activities of the expanded company, and although to date we have not received any negative indications from the U.S. Government, there can be no assurance that the U.S. Government will maintain existing, or enter into any new contracts with the expanded company.
· As a result of the acquisition, we incurred debt of approximately $205.0 million. In addition we are subject to various operating and financial covenants under the new Credit Facility; our failure to comply with these covenants could result in the lender declaring a default and accelerating repayment of the indebtedness. Our failure to repay this debt when due would materially, adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
· As a result of the acquisition, we are a larger, more geographically dispersed and complex organization, and if our management is unable to continue to effectively manage the expanded company, our operating results will suffer.
· The acquisition will increase the cost and complexity of complying with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with regard to the evaluation and attestation of our internal control systems and may increase the risks of achieving timely compliance.
· Achieving the benefits of the acquisition will depend on many factors, including the successful and timely integration of the operations of the two companies. These integration efforts may be difficult and time consuming. Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert significant management attention and resources. This diversion of attention and resources could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to maintain its past growth performance levels.
The acquisition of J&L has played a role in our recent growth. From time to time, we may consider and/or pursue selected acquisitions that either could expand or complement our business in new or existing markets, although at this time, we are not engaged in any discussions or negotiations with respect to any material acquisition candidate. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and to acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on terms favorable to us and in a timely manner. The failure to complete or successfully integrate prospective acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our growth strategy.
Changes in our customer and product mix could cause our gross margin percentage to fluctuate.
From time to time, since our formation, we have experienced changes in our customer mix and in our product mix. Changes in our customer mix have resulted from geographic expansion, daily selling activities within current geographic markets, and targeted selling activities to new customer segments. Changes in our product mix have resulted from marketing activities to existing customers and needs communicated to us from existing and prospective customers. As our large account customer program sales grow, the Company will face continued pressures on maintaining gross margin because these customers receive lower pricing due to their higher sales volumes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our historical gross margins. The Company plans to continue its efforts to buy better in order to maintain current margin levels. Although we have been successful in incrementally increasing our gross margin
16
percentage by varying our customer and product mix over the last several years and our strategy has emphasized higher margin, lower volume orders, changes in our customer and product mix, including increased sales to our large account customer programs, could cause our gross margin percentage to fluctuate or decline from time to time in the future.
Our industry is consolidating which could cause it to become more competitive.
The business of selling MRO supplies in North America is currently undergoing some consolidation. This consolidation is being driven by customer needs and supplier capabilities, which could cause the industry to become more competitive as greater economies of scale are achieved by suppliers.
Traditional MRO suppliers are attempting to consolidate the market through internal expansion, through acquisition or merger with other industrial and construction suppliers, or through a combination of both. This consolidation allows suppliers to improve efficiency and spread fixed costs over a greater number of sales, and to achieve other benefits derived from economies of scale.
Customers are increasingly aware of the total costs of fulfillment, and of their need to have consistent sources of supply at multiple locations. Consistent sources of supply provide not just reliable product quantities, but also consistent pricing, quality, services and engineering capabilities. We believe these customer needs could result in fewer suppliers as the industry consolidates, and as the remaining suppliers become larger and capable of being a consistent source of supply.
The trend of our industry toward consolidation could make it more difficult for us to maintain our operating margins. There can be no assurance that we will be able to take advantage of the trend or that we can do so effectively.
In addition, as various sectors of the industrial and construction customer base face increased foreign competition, and in fact lose business to foreign competitors or shift their operations overseas in an effort to reduce expenses, we may face increased difficulty in growing and maintaining our market share and growth prospects.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
The MRO supply industry, although consolidating still remains a large, fragmented industry that is highly competitive. We face competition from traditional channels of distribution such as retail outlets, small dealerships, regional or national distributors utilizing direct sales forces, manufacturers of MRO supplies, large warehouse stores and larger direct mail distributors. We believe that sales of MRO supplies will become more concentrated over the next few years, which may make the industry more competitive. Our competitors challenge us with a greater variety of product offerings, financial resources, services or a combination of all of these factors.
Although we have recently had success in diversifying our customer base, which we believe will assist us to better manage periodic downturns in the manufacturing industry, there can be no assurance that sales to these additional customers will offset the adverse effects of other competitive trends in our industry, including those discussed above.
Rising commodity and energy prices may adversely affect operating margins.
As commodity and energy prices increase, the Company may be subject to price increases from vendors that we may be unable to pass along to our customers. Raw material costs used in our products (steel, tungsten, etc.) and energy costs have been rising resulting in increased production costs for our vendors. The fuel costs of our independent freight companies are rising as well. Our vendors and independent freight carriers typically look to pass these costs along to us through price increases. When we are forced to accept these price increases, we may not be able to pass them along to our customers, resulting in lower operating margins.
17
The risk of cancellation or rescheduling of orders may cause our operating results to fluctuate.
The cancellation or rescheduling of orders may cause our operating results to fluctuate. Although we strive to maintain ongoing relationships with our customers, there is an ongoing risk that orders may be cancelled or rescheduled due to fluctuations in our customers’ business needs or purchasing budgets, including changes in national and local government budgets. Additionally, although our customer base is diverse, ranging from one-person machine shops to Fortune 1000 companies and large government agencies, the cancellation or rescheduling of significant orders by larger customers may still have a material adverse effect on our operating results from time to time.
Work stoppages and other disruptions, including those due to extreme weather conditions, at transportation centers or shipping ports may adversely affect our ability to obtain inventory and make deliveries to our customers.
Excluding J&L, our ability to provide same-day shipping of our core business products is an integral component of our overall business strategy. Disruptions at transportation centers or shipping ports, due to events such as the hurricanes of 2005, the severe winter weather experienced during the third quarter of fiscal 2003 and the longshoreman’s strike on the West Coast in fiscal 2002, affect both our ability to maintain core products in inventory and deliver products to our customers on a timely basis, which may in turn adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, severe weather conditions could adversely affect demand for our products in particularly hard hit regions.
The risks of war, terrorism, and similar hostilities may adversely affect our operating results.
In addition to having an impact on general economic conditions, events such as the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the conflict in Iraq may adversely affect our revenues and our ability to service our customers. We believe that both the events of September 11, 2001 and the Iraq conflict had an adverse effect on our results of operations, although the impact of such events can be difficult to quantify.
Disruptions of our information systems could adversely affect us.
We believe that our computer software programs are an integral part of our business and growth strategies. We depend upon our information systems to help process orders, to manage inventory and accounts receivable collections, to purchase, sell and ship products efficiently and on a timely basis, to maintain cost-effective operations, and to help provide superior service to our customers. Any disruption in the operation of our information systems, including widespread power outages such as those that affected the northeastern and midwest United States in August 2003, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we utilize disaster recovery techniques and procedures, which we believe are adequate to fulfill our needs, and we believe that planned enhancements and upgrades to the next generation of our existing operating platforms will be sufficient to sustain our present operations and our anticipated growth for the foreseeable future, there can be no assurance that disruptions of our information systems will not occur.
Our success is dependent on certain key personnel.
Our success depends largely on the efforts and abilities of certain key senior management. The loss of the services of one or more of such key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. We do not maintain any key-man insurance policies with respect to any of our executive officers.
Customer fulfillment centers expansions.
In the future, as part of our long term strategic planning, we may open new customer fulfillment centers to improve our efficiency, geographic distribution and market penetration and may make, as we
18
have in the past, capital improvements and operational enhancements to certain of our existing customer fulfillment centers. Moving or opening customer fulfillment centers and effecting such improvements requires a substantial capital investment, including expenditures for real estate and construction, and opening new customer fulfillment centers requires a substantial investment in inventory. In addition, new customer fulfillment centers will have an adverse impact on distribution expenses as a percentage of sales, inventory turnover and return on investment in the periods prior to and for some time following the commencement of operations of each new customer fulfillment center. Additionally, until sales volumes mature at new customer fulfillment centers, operating expenses as a percentage of sales may be adversely impacted. Further, substantial or unanticipated delays in the commencement of operations at new customer fulfillment centers could have a material adverse effect on our geographic expansion and may impact results of operations.
Our common stock price may be volatile.
We believe factors such as fluctuations in our operating results or the operating results of our competitors, changes in economic conditions in the market sectors in which our customers operate (notably the durable and non-durable goods manufacturing industry, which, excluding J&L, accounted for 72% of our revenue in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006) and changes in general market conditions, could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to fluctuate substantially. J&L does not accumulate this data, however, a significant portion of their revenue is generated from the durable and non-durable goods manufacturing sector.
Our principal shareholders exercise significant control over us.
The Chairman of our Board of Directors, his sister, certain of their family members and related trusts, collectively own 100% of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock. Consequently, such shareholders will be in a position to elect all of the directors of the Company and to determine the outcome of any matter submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders for approval. In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Class A common stock.
Shares eligible for future sale.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of Class A common stock in the public market could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the Class A common stock and could impair our future ability to raise capital through an offering of our equity securities. As of August 26, 2006 there were 48,087,141 shares of Class A common stock outstanding. In addition, as of August 26, 2006, 2,931,064 options to purchase shares of Class A common stock granted under the Company’s 1995, 1998, and 2001 Stock Option Plans remain outstanding. As of August 26, 2006, restricted stock or options to purchase an additional 2,837,852 shares of Class A common stock were available for grant or unissued, respectively, under the Company’s 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan. Approximately 245,293 shares may be sold through the Company’s Associate Stock Purchase Plan. The Omnibus Equity Plan replaced the 1995, 1998, and 2001 Stock Option Plans, and the 1995 Restricted Stock Plans (the “Previous Plans”). The Omnibus Equity Plan covers 3,000,000 shares in the aggregate, and is in lieu of and replaced the unissued shares not covered by previous grants that were made under the Previous Plans, for an aggregate of approximately 500,000 fewer shares than were covered under the Previous Plans.
Our Class B common stock is convertible, on a one-for-one basis, into our Class A common stock at any time. As of August 26, 2006, there were 18,839,874 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. All of the shares of Class B common stock (and the shares of Class A common stock into which such shares are convertible) are “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act.
19
Subject to the volume and other limitations set forth in Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, all of such restricted securities are eligible for public sale.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
We have customer fulfillment centers near the following locations:
Location |
|
|
| Approx. |
| Operational |
|
Atlanta, Georgia(1) |
| 529,000 |
| October 1990 |
| ||
Elkhart, Indiana(2) |
| 391,000 |
| March 1996 |
| ||
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania(2) |
| 637,000 |
| January 1997 |
| ||
Reno, Nevada(2,4) |
| 419,000 |
| November 1999 |
| ||
Livonia, Michigan(3) |
| 75,000 |
| December 1989 |
| ||
Elk Grove, Illinois(3) |
| 144,000 |
| October 2001 |
| ||
Wednesbury, United Kingdom(3) |
| 79,000 |
| June 1998 |
|
(1) The related party lease for this facility expires on July 1, 2023.
(2) This facility is owned by MSC.
(3) This facility was acquired as part of the J&L acquisition and is leased.
(4) This facility was expanded during fiscal 2006.
We maintain 94 branch offices within the United States located in 37 states and one location in the United Kingdom. The branches range in size from 670 to 55,000 square feet. The leases for these branch offices will expire at various periods between January 2007 and July 2012. The aggregate annual lease payments on these branches and the Atlanta, Livonia, Elk Grove and Wednesbury customer fulfillment centers in fiscal 2006 was approximately $6,495,000.
We maintain headquarters at a 170,000 square foot facility that we own in Melville, New York. We also maintain headquarters at a 50,000 square foot facility that we lease in Southfield, Michigan, that was acquired as part of the J&L acquisition.
When the J&L systems are fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the fiscal 2007) both of J&L’s U.S. customer fulfillment centers will be closed, and their volume will be absorbed into MSC’s existing logistics network. We believe that our facilities will be adequate for our current needs and that for the foreseeable future, suitable additional space will be available as needed.
There are various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and its subsidiaries incident to the operations of its businesses in the ordinary course. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of such claims, lawsuits and pending actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
20
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
MSC’s Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “MSM.” MSC’s Class B common stock is not traded over any public market.
The following table sets forth the range of the high and low closing sales prices as reported by the NYSE and cash dividends per share for the period from August 29, 2004 to August 26, 2006.
|
| Price of Class A |
| Dividend Per Share |
| |||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended August 26, 2006 |
|
|
| High |
| Low |
| Class A & Class B |
| |||||
First Quarter |
| $ | 39.70 |
| $ | 31.97 |
|
| $ | 0.12 |
|
| ||
Second Quarter |
| 47.88 |
| 38.09 |
|
| 0.14 |
|
| |||||
Third Quarter |
| 54.72 |
| 44.00 |
|
| 0.14 |
|
| |||||
Fourth Quarter |
| 49.41 |
| 38.01 |
|
| 0.14 |
|
| |||||
|
| Price of Class A |
| Dividend Per Share |
| |||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended August 27, 2005 |
|
|
| High |
| Low |
| Class A & Class B |
| |||||
First Quarter |
| $ | 36.27 |
| $ | 30.86 |
|
| $ | 0.10 |
|
| ||
Second Quarter |
| 36.59 |
| 31.28 |
|
| 0.10 |
|
| |||||
Third Quarter |
| 33.21 |
| 26.87 |
|
| 0.12 |
|
| |||||
Fourth Quarter |
| 38.69 |
| 29.76 |
|
| 1.62 | (1) |
| |||||
(1) Includes a special dividend of $1.50 per share.
On July 10, 2003, the Board of Directors instituted a policy of regular quarterly cash dividends to shareholders. This policy is reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors. In fiscal 2005, in addition to the regular quarterly cash dividends, on June 29, 2005, the Board of Directors approved a special cash dividend of $1.50 per share, which resulted in a cash payout of approximately $99.8 million, on August 15, 2005 to holders of record on August 8, 2005.
On October 16, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share payable on November 16, 2006 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 2, 2006. The dividend of $0.14 per share will result in a quarterly payout of approximately $9.4 million.
On November 6, 2006, the last reported sales price for MSC’s Class A common stock on the NYSE was $38.85 per share.
The approximate number of holders of record of MSC’s Class A common stock as of November 6, 2006 was 614. The number of holders of record of MSC’s Class B common stock as of November 6, 2006 was 14.
The following table sets forth repurchases, by the Company, of its outstanding shares of Class A common stock, during the quarter ended August 26, 2006:
Fiscal Month |
|
|
| Total Number of |
| Average Price |
| Total Number |
| Maximum Number |
| |||||||||
05/28/06–07/01/06 |
|
| — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 5,000,000 |
|
| ||
07/02/06–07/29/06 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| $ | 39.77 |
|
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| 4,500,000 |
|
| ||
07/30/06–8/26/06 |
|
| 190,000 |
|
|
| $ | 38.35 |
|
|
| 190,000 |
|
|
| 4,310,000 |
|
| ||
Total |
|
| 690,000 |
|
|
| $ | 39.38 |
|
|
| 690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
(1) During fiscal 1999, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s stock repurchase plan to allow for the repurchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. In September 2002, the Board of Directors reaffirmed and replenished the stock repurchase plan so that the total number of shares of Class A common stock authorized for future repurchase was restored to 5,000,000 shares. On June 29, 2005 the Board of Directors reaffirmed and replenished the stock repurchase plan so that the total number of shares of Class A common stock authorized for future repurchase was restored to 5,000,000 shares. There is no expiration date for this program.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information for our equity compensation plans in effect as of August 26, 2006 is as follows: (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
| (a) |
| (b) |
| (c) |
| |||||||||
Plan category |
|
|
| Number of securities to |
| Weighted-average |
| Number of securities |
| |||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
| 2,931 |
|
|
| $ | 20.57 |
|
|
| 2,838 |
|
| ||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Total |
|
| 2,931 |
|
|
| $ | 20.57 |
|
|
| 2,838 |
|
| ||
22
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following selected financial information is qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained elsewhere herein. The selected consolidated income statement data for the fiscal years ended August 28, 2004, August 27, 2005 and August 26, 2006 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of August 27, 2005 and August 26, 2006 are derived from MSC’s audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere herein. The selected consolidated income statement data for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002 and August 30, 2003 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of August 31, 2002, August 30, 2003 and August 28, 2004 are derived from MSC’s audited consolidated financial statements not included herein. For the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006, the selected consolidated income statement data includes J&L as of June 8, 2006, which was the acquisition date, and the selected consolidated balance sheet data includes J&L as of the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contained herein.
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| |||||||||||||
|
| August 31, |
| August 30, |
| August 28, |
| August 27, |
| August 26, |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
| |||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net sales |
| $ | 793,976 |
| $ | 844,663 |
| $ | 955,282 |
| $ | 1,099,915 |
| $ | 1,317,519 |
|
Gross profit |
| 346,160 |
| 379,698 |
| 430,369 |
| 504,075 |
| 613,460 |
| |||||
Operating expenses |
| 286,185 |
| 296,760 |
| 299,661 |
| 326,415 |
| 392,594 |
| |||||
Income from operations |
| 59,975 |
| 82,938 |
| 130,708 |
| 177,660 |
| 220,866 |
| |||||
Income taxes |
| 23,773 |
| 32,321 |
| 51,886 |
| 69,484 |
| 85,381 |
| |||||
Net income |
| 36,415 |
| 52,092 |
| 81,155 |
| 112,270 |
| 136,389 |
| |||||
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Basic |
| 0.53 |
| 0.78 |
| 1.21 |
| 1.65 |
| 2.04 |
| |||||
Diluted |
| 0.51 |
| 0.77 |
| 1.17 |
| 1.61 |
| 2.00 |
| |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Basic |
| 68,918 |
| 66,537 |
| 67,056 |
| 67,934 |
| 66,827 |
| |||||
Diluted |
| 70,783 |
| 67,912 |
| 69,548 |
| 69,889 |
| 68,319 |
| |||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
| — |
| $ | 0.05 |
| $ | 0.29 |
| $ | 1.94 | (2) | $ | 0.54 |
| |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at period end): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Working capital |
| $ | 299,260 |
| $ | 353,940 |
| $ | 326,376 |
| $ | 339,194 |
| $ | 374,746 |
|
Total assets |
| 562,948 |
| 618,970 |
| 729,387 |
| 651,598 |
| 1,014,298 |
| |||||
Short-term debt |
| 213 |
| 169 |
| 142 |
| 151 |
| 7,843 |
| |||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
| 1,308 |
| 1,132 |
| 997 |
| 830 |
| 192,986 |
| |||||
Shareholders’ equity |
| 474,679 |
| 510,355 |
| 618,206 |
| 530,416 |
| 639,273 |
| |||||
Selected Operating Data:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Active customers |
| 329 |
| 343 |
| 344 |
| 343 |
| 346 | (3) | |||||
Approximate Number of SKUs |
| 500 |
| 530 |
| 550 |
| 550 |
| 550 | (3) | |||||
Orders entered |
| 3,721 |
| 3,777 |
| 4,020 |
| 4,295 |
| 4,774 | (3) | |||||
Number of publications mailed |
| 36,000 |
| 33,500 |
| 28,200 |
| 28,600 |
| 29,600 |
| |||||
Number of publication titles (not in thousands) |
| 98 |
| 91 |
| 96 |
| 97 |
| 112 |
|
(1) See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—General.”
(2) Includes a special dividend of $1.50 per share.
(3) Excludes J&L.
23
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Our objective is to become the preferred supplier of industrial products for companies throughout the United States. We intend to increase sales to existing customers and diversify our customer base by:
· expanding government and national account programs;
· opening additional branches in the western region of the United States;
· penetrating J&L customers with MSC’s entire SKU offering;
· expanding our direct sales force and increasing their productivity;
· increasing the number of product lines and SKUs offered, including the Kennametal line of cutting tools through the MSC and J&L channels, and also including generic and imported products;
· targeting the circulation and content of our master catalog and our direct mail campaign;
· continually developing technological innovations employing modern technologies to reduce our customers’ costs and utilizing extensive e-commerce capabilities, making it even easier and more appealing to do business with MSC;
· expanding next day ground delivery into new markets;
· maintaining excellent customer support service; and
· considering and/or pursuing selected acquisitions
In the future, we intend to take advantage of the additional products offered and our expanded distribution capabilities through our direct marketing efforts and by increasing the size of our sales force; however, the costs associated with the sales force expansion and our direct marketing program will be incurred in advance of increased sales and may negatively impact operating margins in the short term. We have begun the process of sending our catalog to J&L customers to promote our metalworking products, as well as training the J&L sales force and incorporating the MRO product offering into our direct mail campaign. Historically, we have been able to acquire new customers and increase sales to existing customers through our direct marketing program, although there is no guarantee that this will continue in the future.
On June 8, 2006, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc. J&L provides metalworking consumables, related products and related technical and supply chain-related productivity services to small and medium-sized manufacturers in the United States and the United Kingdom. J&L markets products and services through mail-order catalogs and monthly sales flyers, telemarketing, the Internet and field sales. J&L distributes a broad range of metalcutting tools, abrasives, drills, machine tool accessories, precision measuring tools, gages, hand tools and other supplies used in metalcutting operations.
The acquisition of J&L has played a role in our recent growth. From time to time, we may consider and/or pursue selected acquisitions that either could expand or complement our business in new or existing markets, although at this time, we are not engaged in any discussions or negotiations with respect to any material acquisition candidate.
Through fiscal 2006, we continued to benefit from a strong U.S. economy as well as the execution of our growth strategies to increase revenues. For the year ended August 26, 2006, net sales increased 19.8% and 15.1% in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. Excluding net sales of J&L of approximately $67.9 million, net sales increased 13.6% over prior year net sales of $1.1 billion. We have been able to gain market share in the national account and government program (the “large account customer”) sectors, which have become important components of our overall customer mix, revenue base, recent growth and planned business expansion. By expanding in these sectors, which involve
24
customers with multiple locations and high volume MRO needs, we are diversifying our customer base beyond small and mid-sized customers, thereby reducing the cyclical nature of our business. We are continuing to increase the number of sales associates in existing markets and new markets, and we have opened up new branches in San Diego and Oakland areas with their own sales force as part of our west coast expansion strategy. Sales related to the new branches did not have a significant impact on our total sales for fiscal 2006. We have increased the number of sales associates (including those in the new branches) to 715 at August 26, 2006 compared to 520 at August 27, 2005. The increase in fiscal 2006 includes the addition of the J&L sales associates of 146. We expect to continue to increase the sales force to approximately 725 by the end of November 2006, which includes the additional sales associates in the new branch in Fresno, as part of the west coast expansion strategy.
By passing on most of our vendors’ product price increases and independent freight carriers’ surcharges and raising prices due to market conditions, we have been able to increase gross profit margins to 46.6% in fiscal 2006, even after taking into account the impact of J&L’s lower gross margin. Excluding the acquisition of J&L, the Company generated a gross margin of 47.3% in fiscal 2006. The increase in gross margin percentage and net sales contributed to another year of strong cash flows. As a result of current and prior years cash flows, we were able to return approximately $36.3 million to shareholders in the form of dividends and made repurchases of $27.2 million of Class A common stock.
As our sales have increased in fiscal 2006 we have seen an increase in operating expenses to support the sales growth (primarily payroll related costs and freight expenses) and increases in medical benefits expenses. Operating expenses have increased by 20.3% in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. However, the increase in gross margin and operating leverage from prior investments in our infrastructure enabled us to increase operating margins to 16.8% for fiscal 2006 as compared to 16.2% in fiscal 2005. We expect operating expenses to continue to increase during fiscal 2007 as a result of increased sales volume, inflation in our salary costs, increased spending on sales force expansion and increased freight and utility costs due to rising energy prices.
During fiscal 2006, we increased direct mail advertising levels compared to fiscal 2005 levels. Excluding J&L, the number of active customers (defined as those that have made at least one purchase in the last 12 months) increased at August 26, 2006 to approximately 346,000, as compared to 343,000 at August 27, 2005. We continue to see the benefits of our more focused mailing strategy as our sales per advertising piece continues to grow. During fiscal 2007, we expect mailing levels to increase slightly over fiscal 2006 levels.
The Institute for Supply Management (“ISM”) index, which measures the economic activity of the U.S. manufacturing sector, is important to our planning because it historically has been an indicator of our manufacturing customers’ activity. Excluding J&L, approximately 72% of our revenues came from sales in the manufacturing sector during fiscal 2006, including some national account customers. J&L does not accumulate this data, however, a significant portion of their revenue is generated from the manufacturing sector. The ISM is currently at 51.2% for the month of October 2006. This is a lower number than the previous month’s ISM of 52.9%, which may be indicative of a deceleration in the growth of the overall economy. We have historically grown revenues at rates well in excess of the industrial growth and we believe that we are well positioned to continue to do so. It is possible that the impact of rising energy prices, inflation, interest rates and raw material availability will have an adverse effect on customer order flow. We believe that companies will be seeking cost reductions and shorter cycle times from their suppliers. Our business model focuses on providing overall procurement cost reduction and just-in-time delivery to meet our customers’ needs. To meet our customers’ needs and our business goals, we will seek to continue to drive cost reduction throughout our business through cost saving strategies and increased leverage from our existing infrastructure, and continue to provide additional procurement cost savings solutions to our customers through technology such as with our CMI and VMI programs.
25
The following table shows selected items of MSC’s Consolidated Statement of Operations, percentages of sales and comparisons between the fiscal years ended August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, and between the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004.
Net Sales
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
| $ | 1,317,519 |
| $ | 1,099,915 |
|
| 19.8 | % |
| $ | 1,099,915 |
| $ | 955,282 |
|
| 15.1 | % |
|
Net sales increased 19.8% and 15.1% for the fiscal years ended 2006 and 2005, respectively. Excluding net sales of J&L of $67.9 million, net sales increased 13.6% over prior year net sales of $1.1 billion. Of these amounts, excluding J&L, we estimate approximately 37.5% of the growth for fiscal 2006 was attributable to our increase in prices on certain stock keeping units (“SKUs”) based on market conditions in accordance with our pricing strategy. We estimate approximately 36.8% and 39.5% of the net sales growth, for the fiscal years ended 2006 and 2005, is attributable to our large account customer programs. The remaining net sales growth is primarily a result of an increase in sales to our new and existing core accounts. Excluding J&L, sales to manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors grew 12.9% and 15.4%, respectively in fiscal 2006 and 14.4% and 17.2% respectively, in fiscal 2005. J&L does not accumulate this data, however, a significant portion of their revenue is generated from the manufacturing sector.
The primary reasons for the increase in sales to existing customers during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 is a combination of the success of our sales force in expanding the accounts as well as the continued strength of the U.S. economy. Our national account and government programs sales initiative continued to be successful throughout fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, and contributed strongly to our total sales growth and the diversification of our customer mix and revenue base. We expect this to continue into fiscal 2007. The growth of the national account and government programs (these customers tend to order larger amounts) and the strong U.S. economy are the primary reasons for the increase in average order size to approximately $280, excluding J&L, for fiscal 2006 from $256 in fiscal 2005 and $237 in fiscal 2004. These large customers tend to require advanced e-commerce capabilities. We believe that our ability to transact with our customers through various portals and directly through our website, MSCDirect.com, gives us a competitive advantage over smaller suppliers. Sales through MSCDirect.com increased to $249.4 million for fiscal 2006 from $184.5 million in fiscal 2005 and $129.7 million in fiscal 2004, an increase of 35.2% and 42.3% for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. As our national account and government programs continue to grow we will benefit from processing more sales through electronic transactions that carry lower operating costs than orders processed manually through our call centers and branches. These cost savings may be offset by the lower gross margins on national accounts and government business.
We grew the field sales force to 715 associates (including 146 J&L associates) at August 26, 2006, from 520 at August 27, 2005 and 453 at August 28, 2004, an increase of approximately 37.5% and 14.8% for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, as part of our strategy to acquire new accounts and expand existing accounts across all customer types. Included in the sales force numbers in fiscal 2006 is the sales team for the San Diego and Oakland area branches that were opened in fiscal 2006 as part of our west coast expansion. Sales related to the new branches did not have a significant impact on our total sales during fiscal 2006. We plan to continue to increase the size of the sales force in fiscal 2007 which includes adding additional sales associates to continue to execute on its west coast expansion, including a new branch in Fresno, which was opened during the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
26
Excluding the J&L catalog, we introduced approximately 21,000 new SKUs in our fiscal 2006 catalog and removed approximately 25,000 non-productive SKUs. We believe that the new SKUs improve the overall quality of our offering and will be important factors in our sales growth. Excluding the J&L catalog, we added approximately 22,000 new SKUs and removed approximately 29,000 existing SKUs in our fiscal 2007 catalog which was distributed in September 2006.
Gross Profit
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
| $ | 613,460 |
| $ | 504,075 |
|
| 21.7 | % |
| $ | 504,075 |
| $ | 430,369 |
|
| 17.1 | % |
|
Gross Profit Margin |
| 46.6 | % | 45.8 | % |
|
|
|
| 45.8 | % | 45.1 | % |
|
|
|
| ||||
The increase in gross profit margin in fiscal 2006 to 46.6% is a result of our price increases on certain SKUs based on market conditions, offset by increases in the cost of goods purchased and J&L’s lower gross margins due to pricing. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we incurred a non-recurring charge to cost of goods sold of $3.6 million related to a valuation adjustment of the acquired J&L inventory. Gross profit margin for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 was 44.9%, and excluding the non-recurring charge was 45.8%. We anticipate that margins will be approximately 46.0% for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
The slight increase in gross margin in fiscal 2005 to 45.8% is primarily attributable to increased efforts to buy better by employing competitive reverse auctions, the benefits of volume buying from our vendors, and expanding our selection of higher margin imported private label and generic products coupled with the strengthening U.S. economy.
Operating Expenses
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
| $ | 392,594 |
| $ | 326,415 |
|
| 20.3 | % |
| $ | 326,415 |
| $ | 299,661 |
|
| 8.9 | % |
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
| 29.8 | % | 29.7 | % |
|
|
|
| 29.7 | % | 31.4 | % |
|
|
|
| ||||
The dollar increase in operating expenses for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily the result of an increase in payroll and payroll related costs, an increase in freight expense to support increased sales and an increase in stock-based compensation expense. Also, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we incurred a non-recurring charge to operating expenses of $3.2 million related to J&L acquisition integration costs, including severance relating to the departure of certain J&L executives. The J&L operating expenses incurred, since the acquisition in June 2006, accounted for approximately one-third of the overall increase in operating expenses in fiscal 2006.
Payroll and payroll related costs continue to make up a significant portion of our operating expenses. These costs increased in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily as a result of an increase in headcount and annual payroll increases. The increase in headcount is primarily the result of the acquisition of J&L and an increase in sales associates as part of our overall growth strategy (which includes additional sales associates in the new San Diego and Oakland area branches) to build sales as well as an increase in personnel in our customer fulfillment centers and branches to handle increased sales volume. We expect to continue to build the sales force during fiscal 2007 (including the addition of associates in the new Fresno branch which opened during the first quarter of fiscal 2007), which will result in increased payroll and payroll related costs.
27
Medical costs per covered associate for our self-insured group health plan for fiscal 2006 were slightly lower than the fiscal 2005 levels. However, medical expenses did increase for fiscal 2006 as a result of an increase in participants, primarily related to the J&L acquisition.
The increase in stock-based compensation is the result of the Company adopting FAS 123R as of the beginning of fiscal 2006. As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, prior to adopting FAS 123R, we were not required to record any compensation expense for stock options since all of our options were granted at the market price. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options for fiscal 2006 was $7.9 million, resulting in a reduction to earnings per share of $0.09. The unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to stock option expense at August 26, 2006 was $8.6 million and will be recognized over a weighted average of 2.45 years.
The slight increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2006, as compared to fiscal 2005, is primarily a result of the increase in stock-based compensation recorded, acquisition integration costs and the amortization of identifiable intangibles related to the J&L acquisition, offset by productivity gains and the allocation of fixed expenses over a larger revenue base.
The dollar increase in operating expenses for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 was primarily the result of an increase in payroll and payroll related costs and an increase in freight expense to support increased sales. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we incurred a charge to operating expenses of $0.8 million related to the settlement of a patent infringement claim.
We experienced an increase in the cost of claims filed by participants for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 for medical expenses for our self-insured group health plan. Medical costs were approximately $2.5 million greater in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, in part because the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 reflected exceptionally good experience as compared to our experience for fiscal 2005.
The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 is primarily the result of productivity gains and the allocation of fixed expenses over a larger revenue base.
Income From Operations
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Income from Operations |
| $ | 220,866 |
| $ | 177,660 |
|
| 24.3 | % |
| $ | 177,660 |
| $ | 130,708 |
|
| 35.9 | % |
|
Percentage of Net Sales |
| 16.8 | % | 16.2 | % |
|
|
|
| 16.2 | % | 13.7 | % |
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from operations for fiscal 2006 was $220.9 million, an increase of $43.2 million, or 24.3% compared to fiscal 2005, and as a percentage of sales, increased to 16.8% in fiscal 2006 from 16.2% in fiscal 2005. The dollar increase in income from operations for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 was primarily attributable to the increase in net sales, a portion of which is attributable to J&L, offset in part by the increase in operating expenses as described above. As a percentage of net sales, the increase is primarily the result of the distribution of expenses over a larger revenue base and the increase in gross profit margin as described above offset by the dollar increase in operating expenses also described above.
28
Interest Expense
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
|
| $ | (2,926 | ) |
|
| $ | (35 | ) |
|
| 8,260.0 | % |
|
| $ | (35 | ) |
|
| $ | (36 | ) |
|
| -2.8% |
|
|
The increase in interest expense for fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 is a result of the borrowings in connection with the J&L acquisition in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. As such, the interest expense is expected to increase in fiscal 2007.
Interest Income
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
|
| $ | 3,559 |
|
|
| $ | 4,008 |
|
|
| -11.2% |
|
|
| $ | 4,008 |
|
|
| $ | 2,015 |
|
|
| 98.9 | % |
|
The decrease in interest income for fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 is a result of lower cash and investment balances due to the acquisition of J&L and the repurchase of our Class A common stock in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. The interest income is expected to decrease in fiscal 2007.
The increase in interest income for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 was a result of higher average cash and investments balances and higher interest rates. Our cash and investment balances decreased during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2005, as the result of repurchases of our Class A common stock and the payment of the special dividend of $1.50 per share of common stock.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
| $ | 85,381 |
|
|
| $ | 69,484 |
|
|
| 22.9 | % |
|
| $ | 69,484 |
|
|
| $ | 51,886 |
|
|
| 33.9 | % |
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
| 38.5 | % |
|
| 38.2 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
| 38.2 | % |
|
| 39.0 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
Our fiscal 2006 effective tax rate was 38.5% compared to fiscal 2005 of 38.2%. The rate increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in tax exempt interest income from investments and the adoption of FAS 123R. Partially offsetting this was a favorable revision to the estimate of various state requirements and resolution of certain federal and state tax contingencies. The change in the effective tax rate resulted in a $1.4 million decrease in income tax expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. We anticipate that the effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 will be approximately 39.0%.
Our fiscal 2005 effective tax rate was 38.2% compared to the fiscal 2004 rate of 39.0%. The change in rate is primarily attributable to an increase in tax exempt interest income from investments and unlike fiscal 2004, results did not require an increase in state tax requirements.
29
Net Income
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| Percentage |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| Percentage |
| ||||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
| $ | 136,389 |
| $ | 112,270 |
|
| 21.5 | % |
| $ | 112,270 |
|
| $ | 81,155 |
|
|
| 38.3 | % |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
| $ | 2.00 |
| $ | 1.61 |
|
| 24.3 | % |
| $ | 1.61 |
|
| $ | 1.17 |
|
|
| 37.6 | % |
|
The factors which affected net income and diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 as compared to prior periods have been discussed above. The full impact of our repurchase of approximately 3.5 million shares of our Class A common stock in fiscal 2005 on the annual weighted average shares outstanding calculation was reflected in fiscal 2006. The full impact of our repurchase of approximately 0.7 million shares of our Class A common stock in fiscal 2006 on the annual weighted average shares outstanding calculation will not be reflected until fiscal 2007.
Quarterly Results and Seasonality
The following table sets forth unaudited financial data for each of MSC’s last eight fiscal quarters.
|
| Fiscal Year Ended August 27, 2005 |
| Fiscal Year Ended August 26, 2006 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| First |
| Second |
| Third |
| Fourth |
| First |
| Second |
| Third |
| Fourth |
| ||||||||
|
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Net sales |
| $ | 263,328 |
| $ | 271,365 |
| $ | 288,465 |
| $ | 276,757 |
| $ | 295,906 |
| $ | 305,927 |
| $ | 329,817 |
| $ | 385,869 |
|
Gross profit |
| 118,801 |
| 124,862 |
| 133,005 |
| 127,407 |
| 138,860 |
| 145,440 |
| 156,005 |
| 173,155 |
| ||||||||
Income from operations |
| 41,897 |
| 43,899 |
| 48,958 |
| 42,906 |
| 51,524 |
| 54,082 |
| 59,028 |
| 56,232 |
| ||||||||
Net income |
| 25,987 |
| 27,419 |
| 30,688 |
| 28,176 |
| 31,935 |
| 33,329 |
| 37,018 |
| 34,107 |
| ||||||||
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Basic |
| 0.38 |
| 0.40 |
| 0.45 |
| 0.43 |
| 0.48 |
| 0.50 |
| 0.55 |
| 0.51 |
| ||||||||
Diluted |
| 0.37 |
| 0.39 |
| 0.44 |
| 0.42 |
| 0.47 |
| 0.49 |
| 0.54 |
| 0.50 |
| ||||||||
The fourth quarter results of fiscal 2006 include the effect of the J&L acquisition as of June 8, 2006. However, we have generally experienced slightly lower sales volumes during the summer months, and we expect this trend to continue in the foreseeable future. As a result, net income in the fourth fiscal quarter is historically somewhat lower than in the third fiscal quarter, due largely to the continuation of our fixed costs during slower sales periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary capital needs have been to fund the working capital requirements necessitated by our sales growth, adding new products, and facilities expansions. Our primary source of financing has been cash generated from operations. Taken as a whole, cash, cash equivalents and all available-for-sale securities decreased by approximately $77.8 million to $7.7 million at August 26, 2006 from $85.5 million at August 27, 2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to the use of cash to fund the acquisition of J&L and repurchases of the Company’s Class A common stock offset by cash generated from operations as discussed below.
30
On June 8, 2006, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc, for $349.5 million subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments. We financed $205.0 million of the purchase price with a portion of the proceeds of a new unsecured Credit Facility which was closed simultaneously with the acquisition. The new Credit Facility includes a $205.0 million term loan, which was drawn in entirety to provide the funding for the acquisition, and a $75.0 million revolver which is available for working capital purposes. There are currently no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The loan is due for repayment in full on June 8, 2011. Principal payments will begin on June 30, 2007, and will be made in quarterly installments in accordance with the credit agreement. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we repaid $5.0 million of the term loan, reducing the balance to $200.0 million. The interest rate payable for all borrowings is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rate in effect for the Company at August 26, 2006 was 5.85%. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are subject to various operating and financial covenants including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At August 26, 2006, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Credit Facility. We anticipate cash flows from operations, available cash reserves and funds available under the Credit Facility will be adequate to support our operations for the next 12 months.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005 was $133.5 million and $125.1 million, respectively. The increase of approximately $8.4 million in net cash provided from operations resulted primarily from higher net income, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset by increased growth in inventory and accounts receivable. Net cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 was $125.1 million and $66.9 million, respectively. The increase of approximately $58.2 million in net cash provided from operations resulted primarily from higher net income combined with lower growth in inventory and accounts receivable.
Net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006 was $333.8 million and the net cash provided by investing activities for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 was $87.4 million. The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2006 consists primarily of cash paid in connection with the acquisition of J&L, and purchases of property, plant and equipment, offset by the net proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments used to fund the acquisition of J&L. The net cash provided from investing activities in fiscal 2005 is a result of the net sales of available-for-sale investments to fund the special dividend, offset by purchases of property plant and equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004 was $152.7 million. The usage of cash in fiscal 2004 was primarily the result of our decision to invest approximately $144.1 million of our cash equivalents in available-for-sale securities and purchases of property plant and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006 was $167.0 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 was $211.0 million. The cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2006 was primarily attributable to the proceeds of a new unsecured Credit Facility and proceeds from the exercise of Class A common stock options, offset by the quarterly cash dividends paid to shareholders and our repurchases of shares of Class A common stock.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004 was $11.0 million. The net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2004 resulted primarily from proceeds from the exercise of Class A common stock options, offset by the quarterly cash dividend paid to shareholders and our repurchases of Class A common stock.
On June 29, 2005 the Board of Directors reaffirmed and replenished our stock repurchase plan so that the total number of shares of Class A common stock authorized for future repurchase on the open market
31
was restored to 5,000,000 shares. The stock repurchase plan allows us to repurchase shares at any time and in any increments it deems appropriate in accordance with Rule 10(b)-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon market conditions, future expectations, our strong cash position and the evident value to shareholders, we repurchased 690,000 shares of our Class A common stock in the open market for $27.2 million and 3,467,000 shares of our Class A common stock (prior to the replenishment on June 29, 2005) in the open market at a cost of $104.8 million in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. We currently anticipate that we may make further repurchases based upon market conditions. We have adequate cash reserves to fund such future repurchases. We reissued approximately 68,000 and 71,000 shares of treasury stock during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, to fund the associate stock purchase plan. We repurchased 128,200 shares of our Class A common stock for $4.9 million, during the first quarter of fiscal 2007, to date.
On July 10, 2003, the Board of Directors instituted a policy of regular quarterly cash dividends to shareholders. This policy is reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors. We paid dividends to shareholders totaling $36.3 million and $129.8 million, in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. Included in the fiscal 2005 payment of dividends is a special cash dividend of $1.50 per share, which resulted in a cash payout of approximately $99.8 million, on August 15, 2005 to holders of record on August 8, 2005.
On October 16, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share payable on November 16, 2006 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 2, 2006. The dividend of $0.14 per share will result in a quarterly payout of approximately $9.4 million.
As a result of implementing operational enhancements and expansions in our customer fulfillment centers, we may continue to see an increase in capital expenditures during fiscal 2007. We have adequate resources to fund these plans out of cash and our new $75.0 million revolving credit line as part of the new Credit Facility.
We are affiliated with two real estate entities (together, the “Affiliates”) which are owned primarily by our principal shareholders. We paid rent under operating leases to the Affiliates of approximately $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.8 million for fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. In the opinion of our management, based on its market research, the leases with Affiliates are on terms which approximate fair market value. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Contractual Obligations” below for discussion of related-party transactions with the various real estate entities.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at August 26, 2006 (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
| Total |
| Less than |
| 1–3 years |
| 3–5 years |
| More than |
| |||||||||
Operating lease obligations with non-affiliates(1) |
| $ | 35,039 |
|
| $ | 9,959 |
|
| $ | 15,795 |
| $ | 4,525 |
|
| $ | 4,760 |
|
| ||
Operating lease obligations with affiliates(1) |
| 29,750 |
|
| 1,745 |
|
| 3,492 |
| 3,431 |
|
| 21,082 |
|
| |||||||
Total operating leases |
| 64,789 |
|
| 11,704 |
|
| 19,287 |
| 7,956 |
|
| 25,842 |
|
| |||||||
Long-term notes payable(2) |
| 200,829 |
|
| 7,843 |
|
| 77,201 |
| 115,771 |
|
| 14 |
|
| |||||||
Total |
| $ | 265,618 |
|
| $ | 19,547 |
|
| $ | 96,488 |
| $ | 123,727 |
|
| $ | 25,856 |
|
|
(1) Certain of our operations of are conducted on leased premises, two of which are leased from Affiliates. The leases (most of which require us to provide for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating costs) are for varying periods, the longest extending to the year 2023. In
32
addition, we are obligated under certain equipment and automobile operating leases, which expire on varying dates through the year 2010.
(2) The Company has a long-term note payable in the amount of approximately $0.8 million to the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority which is secured by the land on which the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania customer fulfillment center is located which expires September 1, 2011. We also have $200.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility; established for the J&L acquisition as discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” which expires June 8, 2011.
We believe that existing cash together with cash generated from operations and amounts available under our new $75.0 million revolving credit line as part of the new Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next five years.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
We make estimates, judgments and assumptions in determining the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimates are used to form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amount of revenues and expenses reported that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies described below are impacted by our critical accounting estimates.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and collateral is generally not required. We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on numerous factors, including past transaction history with customers and their credit-worthiness. We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net sales based on historical bad debt experience and adjusts it for changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable as well as specifically identified customers that are having difficulty meeting their financial obligations (e.g. bankruptcy, etc.). Historically, there has not been significant volatility in our bad debt expense due to strict adherence to our credit policy.
Inventory Valuation Reserve
Inventories consist of merchandise held for resale and are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments to reduce inventory to net realizable value on a quarterly basis. The reserve is initially provided for based on a percentage of sales. Each quarter items to be liquidated are specifically identified and written-down, using historical data and reasonable assumptions, to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.
Sales Returns
We established a reserve for anticipated sales returns based on historical return rates. The return rates are periodically analyzed for changes in current return trends. Historically, material adjustments to the estimated sales reserve have not been required based on actual returns. In the second quarter of fiscal
33
2005, based on an improvement in return trends we were able to adjust the reserve downward. If future returns are materially greater than estimated returns the sales return reserve may need to be increased which would adversely impact recorded sales.
Reserve for Self-insured Group Health Plan
We have a self-insured group health plan. We are responsible for all covered claims to a maximum liability of $300,000 per participant during a September 1 plan year. Benefits paid in excess of $300,000 are reimbursed to the plan under our stop loss insurance policy. Due to the time lag between the time claims are incurred and the time claims are paid by us, a reserve for these incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) amounts is established. There was an adjustment to the IBNR reserve for the increase in the number of participants as a result of the J&L acquisition. The amount of this reserve is reviewed quarterly and is evaluated based on a historical analysis of claim trends, reporting and processing lag times and medical costs inflation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a method of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure within the financial statements for uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for the Company beginning on September 2, 2007. We are in the process of evaluating the provisions of FIN 48 to determine if there will be any impact of adoption on our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
On June 8, 2006, we acquired, through our wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., for $349.5 million subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments. We financed $205.0 million of the purchase price with a portion of the proceeds of a new unsecured Credit Facility, which was closed simultaneously with the acquisition. The new Credit Facility includes a $205.0 million term loan, which was drawn in entirety to provide the funding for the acquisition, and a $75.0 million revolver which is available for working capital purposes. There are currently no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The loan is due for repayment in full on June 8, 2011. Principal payments will begin on June 30, 2007, and will be made in quarterly installments in accordance with the credit agreement. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we repaid $5.0 million of the term loan, reducing the balance to $200 million. The interest rate payable for all borrowings is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rate in effect for the Company at August 26, 2006 was 5.85%. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are subject to various operating and financial covenants including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At August 26, 2006, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
We also have a long term note payable in the amount of approximately $0.8 million to the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority which is secured by the land on which the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania customer fulfillment center is located, which bears interest at 3% per annum and is payable in monthly installments of approximately $15,000 (includes principal and interest) through September 2011.
In addition, our interest income is most sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. In this regard, changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents.
34
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT |
|
|
| PAGE |
| ||
|
| 36 |
|
| |||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT AUGUST 26, 2006 AND AUGUST 27, 2005 |
|
| 37 |
|
| ||
|
| 38 |
|
| |||
|
| 39 |
|
| |||
|
| 40 |
|
| |||
|
| 41 |
|
|
35
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries as of August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 26, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries at August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 26, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 3, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R “Share-Based Payment,” effective August 28, 2005.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP | |
Melville, NY |
|
November 3, 2006 |
|
36
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
| August 26, 2006 |
| August 27, 2005 |
| ||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
| $ | 7,718 |
|
|
| $ | 41,020 |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
| — |
|
|
| 4,254 |
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,914 and $2,547, respectively |
|
| 185,734 |
|
|
| 126,501 |
|
| ||
Inventories |
|
| 298,391 |
|
|
| 231,199 |
|
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
| 21,341 |
|
|
| 18,856 |
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
| 14,289 |
|
|
| 10,166 |
|
| ||
Total current assets |
|
| 527,473 |
|
|
| 431,996 |
|
| ||
Available-for-sale securities |
|
| — |
|
|
| 40,224 |
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
| 122,100 |
|
|
| 102,219 |
|
| ||
Goodwill |
|
| 271,652 |
|
|
| 63,202 |
|
| ||
Identifiable intangibles, net |
|
| 76,292 |
|
|
| — |
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
| 16,781 |
|
|
| 13,957 |
|
| ||
Total Assets |
|
| $ | 1,014,298 |
|
|
| $ | 651,598 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
| $ | 56,877 |
|
|
| $ | 36,571 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
| 88,007 |
|
|
| 56,080 |
|
| ||
Current portion of long-term notes payable |
|
| 7,843 |
|
|
| 151 |
|
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
| 152,727 |
|
|
| 92,802 |
|
| ||
Long-term notes payable |
|
| 192,986 |
|
|
| 830 |
|
| ||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
| 29,312 |
|
|
| 27,550 |
|
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
| 375,025 |
|
|
| 121,182 |
|
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| ||
Class A common stock (one vote per share); $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 57,475,835 and 54,281,413 shares issued, 48,087,141 and 45,514,011 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
| 57 |
|
|
| 54 |
|
| ||
Class B common stock (ten votes per share); $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,839,874 and 21,006,394 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
| 19 |
|
|
| 21 |
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
| 379,630 |
|
|
| 351,649 |
|
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
| 477,305 |
|
|
| 376,251 |
|
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
| 27 |
|
|
| (82 | ) |
| ||
Class A Treasury stock, at cost, 9,388,694 and 8,767,402 shares, respectively |
|
| (217,765 | ) |
|
| (191,943 | ) |
| ||
Deferred stock compensation |
|
| — |
|
|
| (5,534 | ) |
| ||
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
| 639,273 |
|
|
| 530,416 |
|
| ||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
| $ | 1,014,298 |
|
|
| $ | 651,598 |
|
|
See accompanying notes.
37
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except net income per share data)
|
| For The Fiscal Years Ended |
| |||||||||||||
|
| August 26, 2006 |
| August 27, 2005 |
| August 28, 2004 |
| |||||||||
NET SALES |
|
| $ | 1,317,519 |
|
|
| $ | 1,099,915 |
|
|
| $ | 955,282 |
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
| 704,059 |
|
|
| 595,840 |
|
|
| 524,913 |
|
| |||
Gross profit |
|
| 613,460 |
|
|
| 504,075 |
|
|
| 430,369 |
|
| |||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
| 392,594 |
|
|
| 326,415 |
|
|
| 299,661 |
|
| |||
Income from operations |
|
| 220,866 |
|
|
| 177,660 |
|
|
| 130,708 |
|
| |||
OTHER INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
|
| (2,926 | ) |
|
| (35 | ) |
|
| (36 | ) |
| |||
Interest income |
|
| 3,559 |
|
|
| 4,008 |
|
|
| 2,015 |
|
| |||
Other income, net |
|
| 271 |
|
|
| 121 |
|
|
| 354 |
|
| |||
|
|
| 904 |
|
|
| 4,094 |
|
|
| 2,333 |
|
| |||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
| 221,770 |
|
|
| 181,754 |
|
|
| 133,041 |
|
| |||
Provision for income taxes |
|
| 85,381 |
|
|
| 69,484 |
|
|
| 51,886 |
|
| |||
Net income |
|
| $ | 136,389 |
|
|
| $ | 112,270 |
|
|
| $ | 81,155 |
|
|
PER SHARE INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic |
|
| $ | 2.04 |
|
|
| $ | 1.65 |
|
|
| $ | 1.21 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
| $ | 2.00 |
|
|
| $ | 1.61 |
|
|
| $ | 1.17 |
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Basic |
|
| 66,827 |
|
|
| 67,934 |
|
|
| 67,056 |
|
| |||
Diluted |
|
| 68,319 |
|
|
| 69,889 |
|
|
| 69,548 |
|
|
See accompanying notes.
38
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED AUGUST 26, 2006, AUGUST 27, 2005 AND AUGUST 28, 2004
(In thousands)
|
| Class A |
| Class B |
| Additional |
|
|
| Accumulated |
| Treasury Stock |
| Deferred |
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Common Stock |
| Common Stock |
| Paid-In |
| Retained |
| Comprehensive |
|
|
| Amount |
| Stock |
|
|
| ||||
|
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Shares |
| Amount |
| Capital |
| Earnings |
| (Loss) Income |
| Shares |
| at cost |
| Compensation |
| Total |
|
BALANCE, August 30, 2003 |
|
| 38,826 |
|
|
| $ | 39 |
|
| 32,137 |
|
| $ | 32 |
|
|
| $ | 261,849 |
|
| $ | 331,568 |
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| 5,183 |
|
| $ | (83,133 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 510,355 |
|
Exchange of Class B common stock for Class A common stock |
|
| 10,891 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
| (10,891 | ) |
| (11 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Grant of restricted common stock (Note 10) |
|
| 52 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,477 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (1,477 | ) |
| — |
| ||||||||
Cancellation of restricted common stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 151 |
|
| 151 |
| ||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 98 |
|
| — |
|
|
| (62 | ) |
| 1,307 |
|
| — |
|
| 1,405 |
| ||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 250 |
|
| (6,754 | ) |
| — |
|
| (6,754 | ) | ||||||||
Exercise of common stock options, including income tax benefits of $15,368 |
|
| 2,659 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 51,384 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 51,386 |
| ||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| (19,480 | ) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (19,480 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 81,155 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 81,155 |
| ||||||||
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities net of tax benefit |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (12 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (12 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81,143 |
| ||||||||
BALANCE, August 28, 2004 |
|
| 52,428 |
|
|
| $ | 52 |
|
| 21,246 |
|
| $ | 21 |
|
|
| $ | 314,710 |
|
| $ | 393,341 |
|
| $ | (12 | ) |
|
| 5,371 |
|
| $ | (88,580 | ) |
| $ | (1,326 | ) |
| $ | 618,206 |
|
Exchange of Class B common stock for Class A common stock |
|
| 240 |
|
|
| — |
|
| (240 | ) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Grant of restricted common stock (Note 10) |
|
| 145 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 5,088 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (5,088 | ) |
| — |
| ||||||||
Cancellation of restricted common stock |
|
| (3 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| (76 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 76 |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 804 |
|
| 804 |
| ||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 405 |
|
| — |
|
|
| (71 | ) |
| 1,396 |
|
| — |
|
| 1,801 |
| ||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,467 |
|
| (104,759 | ) |
| — |
|
| (104,759 | ) | ||||||||
Exercise of common stock options, including income tax benefits of $10,043 |
|
| 1,471 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 31,927 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 31,929 |
| ||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| (129,765 | ) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (129,765 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 112,270 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 112,270 |
| ||||||||
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities net of tax benefit |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (70 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (70 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 112,200 |
| ||||||||
BALANCE, August 27, 2005 |
|
| 54,281 |
|
|
| $ | 54 |
|
| 21,006 |
|
| $ | 21 |
|
|
| $ | 351,649 |
|
| $ | 376,251 |
|
| $ | (82 | ) |
|
| 8,767 |
|
| $ | (191,943 | ) |
| $ | (5,534 | ) |
| $ | 530,416 |
|
Exchange of Class B common stock for Class A common stock |
|
| 2,166 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| (2,166 | ) |
| (2 | ) |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Exercise of common stock options, including income tax benefits of $9,270 |
|
| 924 |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 23,967 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 23,968 |
| ||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 1,001 |
|
| — |
|
|
| (68 | ) |
| 1,351 |
|
| — |
|
| 2,352 |
| ||||||||
Reclassification of restricted stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| (5,534 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 5,534 |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Grant of restricted common stock, net of cancellations (Note 10) |
|
| 105 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| ||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,657 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1,657 |
| ||||||||
Share based payment expense |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 7,891 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 7,891 |
| ||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| 690 |
|
| (27,173 | ) |
| — |
|
| (27,173 | ) | ||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| (36,336 | ) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (36,336 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 136,389 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 136,389 |
| ||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 27 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 27 |
| ||||||||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on available for sale securities, net of tax |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 82 |
|
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 82 |
| ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136,498 |
| ||||||||
BALANCE, August 26, 2006 |
|
| 57,476 |
|
|
| $ | 57 |
|
| 18,840 |
|
| $ | 19 |
|
|
| $ | 379,630 |
|
| $ | 477,305 |
|
| $ | 27 |
|
|
| 9,389 |
|
| $ | (217,765 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 639,273 |
|
See accompanying notes
39
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED AUGUST 26, 2006, AUGUST 27, 2005 AND AUGUST 28, 2004
(In thousands)
|
| For The Fiscal Years Ended |
| |||||||||||||
|
| August 26, 2006 |
| August 27, 2005 |
| August 28, 2004 |
| |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
|
| $ | 136,389 |
|
|
| $ | 112,270 |
|
|
| $ | 81,155 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 15,233 |
|
|
| 12,258 |
|
|
| 12,315 |
|
| |||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
| — |
|
|
| 219 |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Gain on sale of securities |
|
| (769 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Stock-based compensation |
|
| 9,548 |
|
|
| 804 |
|
|
| 151 |
|
| |||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
| 2,506 |
|
|
| 2,711 |
|
|
| 1,761 |
|
| |||
Deferred income taxes |
|
| (2,361 | ) |
|
| 2,213 |
|
|
| (2,617 | ) |
| |||
Stock option income tax benefit |
|
| — |
|
|
| 10,043 |
|
|
| 15,368 |
|
| |||
Amortization of bond premium |
|
| 170 |
|
|
| 471 |
|
|
| 248 |
|
| |||
Reclassification of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
| (8,016 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of J&L acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Accounts receivable |
|
| (24,626 | ) |
|
| (15,135 | ) |
|
| (22,240 | ) |
| |||
Inventories |
|
| (19,172 | ) |
|
| (5,772 | ) |
|
| (23,825 | ) |
| |||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
| 119 |
|
|
| (2,488 | ) |
|
| (4,329 | ) |
| |||
Other assets |
|
| 78 |
|
|
| (242 | ) |
|
| 2,534 |
|
| |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
| 24,409 |
|
|
| 7,780 |
|
|
| 6,396 |
|
| |||
Total adjustments |
|
| (2,881 | ) |
|
| 12,862 |
|
|
| (14,238 | ) |
| |||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
| 133,508 |
|
|
| 125,132 |
|
|
| 66,917 |
|
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Proceeds from sales of investments in available-for-sale securities. |
|
| 177,290 |
|
|
| 205,573 |
|
|
| 56,070 |
|
| |||
Purchases of investments in available-for-sale securities |
|
| (132,131 | ) |
|
| (106,795 | ) |
|
| (200,127 | ) |
| |||
Cash used in business acquisition |
|
| (356,095 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
| (22,837 | ) |
|
| (11,412 | ) |
|
| (8,664 | ) |
| |||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
| (333,773 | ) |
|
| 87,366 |
|
|
| (152,721 | ) |
| |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Borrowings under credit facility |
|
| 205,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Credit facility financing costs |
|
| (776 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
| (20,839 | ) |
|
| (104,759 | ) |
|
| (6,754 | ) |
| |||
Payment of cash dividends |
|
| (36,336 | ) |
|
| (129,765 | ) |
|
| (19,480 | ) |
| |||
Reclassification of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
| 8,016 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Proceeds from sale of Class A common stock in connection with associate stock purchase plan |
|
| 2,352 |
|
|
| 1,801 |
|
|
| 1,405 |
|
| |||
Proceeds from exercise of Class A common stock options |
|
| 14,698 |
|
|
| 21,886 |
|
|
| 36,018 |
|
| |||
Repayments of notes payable under the credit facility and other notes |
|
| (5,152 | ) |
|
| (158 | ) |
|
| (162 | ) |
| |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
| 166,963 |
|
|
| (210,995 | ) |
|
| 11,027 |
|
| |||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
| (33,302 | ) |
|
| 1,503 |
|
|
| (74,777 | ) |
| |||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of |
|
| 41,020 |
|
|
| 39,517 |
|
|
| 114,294 |
|
| |||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year |
|
| $ | 7,718 |
|
|
| $ | 41,020 |
|
|
| $ | 39,517 |
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash paid during the year for interest |
|
| $ | 2,071 |
|
|
| $ | 49 |
|
|
| $ | 40 |
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes |
|
| $ | 78,328 |
|
|
| $ | 52,855 |
|
|
| $ | 42,184 |
|
|
See accompanying notes.
40
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)
1. BUSINESS
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company” or “MSC”) is a distributor of industrial supplies and equipment with headquarters in Melville, New York. The Company serves primarily domestic markets through its distribution network of 95 branch offices and seven customer fulfillment centers located near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Elkhart, Indiana; Atlanta, Georgia; Reno, Nevada; Elk Grove, Illinois; Livonia, Michigan and Wednesbury, United Kingdom. The Company acquired J&L America, Inc., DBA J&L Industrial Supply (“J&L”), a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. When the J&L systems are fully integrated into MSC (which is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2007) both of J&L’s U.S. customer fulfillment centers will be closed, and their volume will be absorbed into MSC’s existing logistics network.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MSC and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year is on a 52 or 53 week basis, ending on a Saturday close to August 31. Fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 each included 52 weeks. Fiscal 2007 will include 53 weeks.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks, as well as certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Excluding J&L, the Company’s mix of receivables is diverse, with approximately 346,000 combined active customer accounts. The Company sells its products primarily to end-users. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and collateral is generally not required. Receivables are generally due within 30 days. The Company evaluates the collectibility of accounts receivable based on numerous factors, including past transaction history with customers and their credit worthiness and provides a reserve for accounts that are potentially uncollectible.
41
The Company maintains the majority of its cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities with high quality financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed insurance limits. These deposits may be redeemed upon demand and therefore bear minimal risk.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories consist of merchandise held for resale and are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
Available-For-Sale Securities
During fiscal 2006, all available-for-sale securities were sold, and a loss of approximately $82 was realized. The Company’s investments are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on investments are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of any related tax effect. The Company will recognize an impairment charge if a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary.
The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses, interest and dividends and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is based on the first-in, first-out method. During fiscal 2006, the Company invested in a short-term income fund. All holdings were sold in fiscal 2006. Realized gains of $858 from the sale of this investment are included in interest income.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; costs of major renewals and improvements are capitalized. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts and the profit or loss on such disposition is reflected in income.
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment are computed for financial reporting purposes on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets.
The Company capitalizes certain payroll costs associated with the development of internal computer systems in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-1 “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” These costs are included within property, plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related computer systems, not to exceed five years.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with business acquisitions. Accumulated amortization was $7,286 at August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which was adopted by the Company on September 2, 2001, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently, if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Goodwill increased in fiscal 2006 by $208,450 as a result of the J&L acquisition. The Company tests goodwill for impairment as of the first day of its fiscal fourth quarter using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS No. 142. Based on the impairment tests performed, there was no impairment of goodwill for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004.
42
Other intangible assets with definite lives, which were acquired pursuant to the J&L acquisition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, consist of contract rights, customer relationships and the website, and net of accumulated amortization were $21,645, $47,678, and $969, respectively. These assets are being amortized by the straight-line method over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years (weighted average amortization period of 9.9 years). Other intangible assets also consist of a trademark license agreement acquired pursuant to the J&L acquisition which has an indefinite life and is not being amortized and has a gross carrying value of $6,000. Accumulated amortization of the intangible assets at August 26, 2006 was $1,828.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the 5 succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
| $ | 7,780 |
| ||
2008 |
| 7,687 |
| |||
2009 |
| 7,600 |
| |||
2010 |
| 7,340 |
| |||
2011 |
| 7,340 |
| |||
Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The Company has evaluated its intangible assets to identify goodwill separately from other identifiable intangibles. The Company has classified certain of its intangible assets as goodwill with an indefinite life and no longer amortized. Separate identifiable intangibles exist, and are amortized, as noted above.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically evaluates the net realizable value of long-lived assets, including property and equipment, and deferred catalog costs, relying on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. Impairment is assessed by evaluating the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized. No impairment loss was required to be recorded by the Company during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Deferred Catalog Costs
The costs of producing and distributing the Company’s principal catalogs are deferred ($13,618 and $11,894 at August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, respectively) and included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in accordance with SOP 93-7, “Reporting on Advertising Costs.” These costs are charged to expense over the period that the catalogs remain the most current source of sales, which is typically one year or less (J&L’s catalog is amortized for two years). The costs associated with brochures and catalog supplements are charged to expense as distributed. The total amount of advertising costs, net of co-operative advertising receipts from vendor sponsored programs, included in operating expenses was approximately $17,578, $15,521 and $18,199 for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively.
The Company, in accordance with Emerging Issue Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor,” records cash consideration received for advertising costs incurred to sell the vendor’s products as a reduction of the Company’s advertising costs and is included in operating expenses. Rebates received from a vendor related to volume purchases are recorded as a reduction to the cost of goods sold.
43
Product Warranties
The Company offers a maximum one-year warranty, including parts and labor, for certain of its machinery products. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold. The Company may be able to recoup certain of these costs through product warranties it holds with its original equipment manufacturers, which typically range from thirty to ninety days. In general, many of the Company’s general merchandise products are covered by third party original equipment manufacturers’ warranties. The Company’s warranty expense has been minimal.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In most cases, these conditions are met when the product is shipped to the customer or services have been rendered. The Company reports its sales net of the amount of actual sales returns and the amount of reserves established for anticipated sales returns based upon historical return rates.
Shipping and Handling Costs
In accordance with EITF Issue 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs,” the Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net sales and shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The shipping and handling costs in operating expenses were approximately $60,686, $50,573, and $45,882 for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively.
Self-Insurance
The Company has a self-insured group health plan. The Company is responsible for all covered claims to a maximum liability of $300 per participant during a September 1 plan year. Benefits paid in excess of $300 are reimbursed to the plan under the Company’s stop loss policy. Group health plan expense for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $25,774, $23,885, and $18,902, respectively.
Stock Based Compensation
Prior to August 28, 2005, the Company accounted for these plans under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“FAS 123”). As permitted under this standard, compensation cost was recognized using the intrinsic value method described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). On August 28, 2005, the first day of the Company’s 2006 fiscal year, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”) and applied the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 using the modified-prospective transition method. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in fiscal 2006 includes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of August 28, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FAS 123, and compensation cost for all share-based payments granted on or subsequent to August 28, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R.
APB 25 did not require any compensation expense to be recorded in the financial statements if the exercise price of the award was not less than the market price on the date of grant, except in the case of a stock purchase plan where a discount of up to 15% of the market price was allowed before any compensation expense was required to be recognized. Since all options granted by the Company had exercise prices equal to the market price on the date of grant and the shares purchased through the
44
Associate Stock Purchase Plan were discounted at 15% of the market price, no compensation expense was recognized for stock option grants or Associate Stock Purchase Plan grants prior to August 28, 2005.
In accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R, using the modified-prospective transition method (prior periods are not adjusted), stock-based compensation expense related to stock option plans and the Associate Stock Purchase Plan included in operating expenses for fiscal 2006 was $7,891. Tax benefits related to this expense for fiscal 2006 was $1,626, resulting in a reduction in net income of $6,265 ($0.09 per share). The tax benefit recorded for the stock-based option expense is at a lower rate than the Company’s current effective tax rate because a significant portion of the options are Incentive Stock Options (“ISO”). In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes,” no tax benefit is recorded for an ISO unless upon exercise a disqualifying disposition occurs.
Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R all tax benefits from the exercise of stock options were reported as operating cash flows in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. In accordance with FAS 123R, the Company will prospectively record excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options as cash flows from financing activities. The total tax benefits for fiscal 2006 was $9,270 of which $8,016 are excess tax benefits and reported as cash flows from financing activities.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions, under which compensation expense would be recognized as incurred, of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.
|
| 2005(1) |
| 2004(1) |
| ||
Net income: |
| $ | 112,270 |
| $ | 81,155 |
|
Add: Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects |
| 490 |
| 92 |
| ||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
| 3,594 |
| 1,375 |
| ||
Pro forma net income |
| $ | 109,166 |
| $ | 79,872 |
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income per common share, as reported |
| $ | 1.65 |
| $ | 1.21 |
|
Net Income per common share, pro forma |
| 1.61 |
| 1.19 |
| ||
Diluted net income per common share, as reported |
| $ | 1.61 |
| $ | 1.17 |
|
Diluted net income per common share, pro forma |
| 1.56 |
| 1.15 |
|
(1) The stock-based employee compensation expense has been reduced for tax benefits received for disqualifying dispositions made by stock option plan participants. This resulted in an increase to pro forma net income of $3,963 and $6,466 in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.
In accordance with APB 25, the Company recorded compensation expense for restricted stock awards based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value was recorded as deferred compensation in a separate component of shareholders’ equity and expensed over the vesting period. In accordance with FAS 123R, on August 28, 2005, the deferred compensation balance of $5,534 was reclassified to paid-in-capital.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized for restricted stock awards was $1,657, $804 and $151 for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively.
45
Acquisitions
On June 8, 2006, the Company acquired, through its wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc. J&L provides metalworking consumables, related products and related technical and supply chain-related productivity services to small and medium-sized manufacturers in the United States and the United Kingdom. J&L markets products and services through mail-order catalogs and monthly sales flyers, telemarketing, the Internet and field sales. J&L distributes a broad range of metalcutting tools, abrasives, drills, machine tool accessories, precision measuring tools, gages, hand tools and other supplies used in metalcutting operations. The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $349,500 subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments of $9.7 million and certain further purchase price adjustments claimed by Kennametal, Inc., which are currently subject to arbitration. In addition, costs and fees of $7.1 million related to professional fees and other expenses will be included in the purchase price, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Preliminary post-closing purchase price adjustments that the Company has agreed to have been reflected below.
The acquisition of J&L was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” (the “Purchase Method”) and accordingly, the acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair values.
The total preliminary post-closing purchase price to date has been determined under purchase accounting under GAAP as follows:
Cash paid at closing |
| $ | 349,500 |
|
Post-closing purchase price adjustments(1) |
| 9,688 |
| |
Professional fees and other costs |
| 7,130 |
| |
Total purchase price |
| $ | 366,318 |
|
(1) The Company and Kennametal, Inc., the seller of J&L, are currently engaged in arbitration proceedings regarding further purchase price adjustments claimed by Kennametal, Inc., which are not material to the total purchase price and would not significantly affect the ongoing amortization of the intangible assets associated with the acquisition of J&L.
The acquisition was funded by borrowings under the Company’s new unsecured Credit Facility (as defined herein), which was closed simultaneously with the acquisition, and the remaining amount was funded from available cash reserves and the liquidation of investments in available-for-sale securities. The preliminary post-closing purchase price allocation is as follows:
Total current assets |
| $ | 87,764 |
|
Intangible assets |
| 78,120 |
| |
Goodwill |
| 208,450 |
| |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 9,639 |
| |
Other assets |
| 2,171 |
| |
Total liabilities |
| (19,826 | ) | |
Total purchase price |
| $ | 366,318 |
|
The following unaudited pro forma financial information is for illustrative purposes only and presents the results of operations for the years ended August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, as though the acquisition of J&L occurred at the beginning of the respective periods.
The unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had MSC and J&L been a combined company during the specified periods. The unaudited pro forma financial information
46
does not reflect any operating efficiencies and cost savings MSC may achieve with respect to the combined companies, nor do they include the effects of MSC’s repayment of the borrowings under the Credit Facility, with the exception of the optional loan repayments made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any non-recurring charges, and any remaining post-closing purchase price adjustments to be resolved by the Company and Kennametal, Inc. in future periods. These adjustments could have the effect of the Company paying incremental purchase price, but which amount is not expected to be material in relation to the size of the overall transaction. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable at this point in time. The unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, was prepared by combining the historical statements of income of the Company and J&L.
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
| For The Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| ||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| ||
Net sales |
| $ | 1,526,394 |
| $ | 1,357,415 |
|
Net income |
| 141,173 |
| 113,638 |
| ||
Diluted income per share |
| 2.07 |
| 1.63 |
| ||
Credit Facility
On June 8, 2006, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., for $349,500 subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments. The Company financed $205,000 of the purchase price with a portion of the proceeds of a new unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which was closed simultaneously with the acquisition. The new Credit Facility includes a $205,000 term loan, which was drawn in entirety to provide the funding for the acquisition, and a $75,000 revolver which is available for working capital purposes. There are currently no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The loan is due for repayment in full on June 8, 2011. Principal payments will begin on June 30, 2007, and will be made in quarterly installments in accordance with the credit agreement. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company repaid $5,000 of the term loan, reducing the balance to $200,000. The interest rate payable for all borrowings is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rate in effect for the Company at August 26, 2006 was 5.85%. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is subject to various operating and financial covenants including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At August 26, 2006, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
Affiliates
The Company is affiliated with two real estate entities (together, the “Affiliates”). The Affiliates are owned by the Company’s principal shareholders. See Note 11 for discussion of related-party transactions with the various real estate entities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s available-for sale securities are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices. The fair value of the Company’s debt, including current maturities are estimated based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The carrying amounts of the Company’s debt at August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005 approximates its fair value.
47
Foreign Currency
The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on translation of assets and liabilities is included as a component of shareholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains and losses from foreign currency translations have not been significant.
Comprehensive Income
The Company complies with the provisions of SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which establishes standards for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. The components of comprehensive income, net of tax are as follows:
|
| For the Fiscal Years Ended |
| |||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| |||||||||
Net income, as reported |
|
| $ | 136,389 |
|
|
| $ | 112,270 |
|
|
| $ | 81,155 |
|
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax. |
|
| — |
|
|
| (70 | ) |
|
| (12 | ) |
| |||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax. |
|
| 82 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
| 27 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |||
Comprehensive income |
|
| $ | 136,498 |
|
|
| $ | 112,200 |
|
|
| $ | 81,143 |
|
|
Website Development Costs
The Company complies with the provisions of EITF Issue 00-02, “Accounting for Web Site Development Costs.” This standard categorizes certain costs as an internal use of software, which would be subject to the requirements of SOP 98-1, while other costs would be subject to capitalization or expense pursuant to SOP 93-7.
Income Taxes
The Company provides for income taxes in accordance with the asset and liability method specified by SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The deferred income tax amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse.
Geographic Regions
MSC sales and assets are predominantly generated from U.S. locations. Sales and assets related to the J&L UK branch and are not significant to the Company’s total operations.
Segment Reporting
The Company’s results of operations are reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer on a consolidated basis and the Company operates in only one segment.
Common Stock
Each holder of the Company’s Class A common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held of record on the applicable record date on all matters presented to a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors. The holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share on the applicable record date and are entitled to vote, together with the holders of the Class A common stock, on all matters which are subject to shareholder approval. Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock have no cumulative voting rights or preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for any stock
48
or other securities and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such stock.
The holders of the Company’s Class B common stock have the right to convert their shares of Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock at their election and on a one-to-one basis, and all shares of Class B common stock convert into shares of Class A common stock on a one to-one basis upon the sale or transfer of such shares of Class B common stock to any person who is not a member of the Jacobson or Gershwind families or any trust not established principally for members of the Jacobson or Gershwind families or is not an executor, administrator or personal representative of an estate of a member of the Jacobson or Gershwind families.
Preferred Stock
The Company has authorized 5,000 shares of preferred stock. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of preferred stock. Shares of preferred stock have priority over the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock with respect to dividend or liquidation rights, or both. As of August 26, 2006, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a method of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure within the financial statements for uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for the Company beginning on September 2, 2007. The Company is in the process of evaluating the provisions of FIN 48 to determine if there will be any impact of adoption on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
3. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic net income per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents and convertible securities then outstanding. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of the consolidated statements of income.
The following provides a reconciliation of information used in calculating the per share amounts for the fiscal years ended August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively:
|
| Net Income |
| Shares |
| Net Income |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||||
BASIC EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net income |
| $ | 136,389 |
| $ | 112,270 |
| $ | 81,155 |
| 66,827 |
| 67,934 |
| 67,056 |
| $ | 2.04 |
| $ | 1.65 |
| $ | 1.21 |
|
Effect of dilutive associate stock options |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,492 |
| 1,955 |
| 2,492 |
| (.04 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.04 | ) | ||||||
DILUTED EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net income |
| $ | 136,389 |
| $ | 112,270 |
| $ | 81,155 |
| 68,319 |
| 69,889 |
| 69,548 |
| $ | 2.00 |
| $ | 1.61 |
| $ | 1.17 |
|
Options to purchase approximately 20 shares of Class A common stock in fiscal 2005 were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS because the exercise price exceeded the average market price of common shares for the period. These options were still outstanding at the end of the related periods.
49
4. INVESTMENTS
During fiscal 2006, all of the Company’s available-for-sale securities were sold and a loss of approximately $82 was realized. The following tables summarize the Company’s available-for-sale securities for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005:
August 27, 2005 |
|
|
| Amortized |
| Gross |
| Gross |
| Fair |
| ||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Corporate Notes and Bonds |
|
| $ | 11,998 |
|
|
| $ | 23 |
|
|
| $ | (9 | ) |
| $ | 12,012 |
| ||
Municipal Notes and Bonds |
|
| 32,614 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| (148 | ) |
| 32,466 |
| ||||||
Total available-for-sale securities: |
|
| $ | 44,612 |
|
|
| $ | 23 |
|
|
| $ | (157 | ) |
| $ | 44,478 |
|
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following is a summary of property, plant and equipment and the estimated useful lives used in the computation of depreciation and amortization:
|
| Number of Years |
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| ||
Land |
| — |
| $ | 11,600 |
| $ | 11,552 |
|
Building |
| 40 |
| 57,734 |
| 51,132 |
| ||
Building and leasehold improvements |
| The lesser of the life of the |
| 19,224 |
| 19,005 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 3–15 |
| 74,504 |
| 59,826 |
| ||
Automobiles |
| 5 |
| 365 |
| 427 |
| ||
Computer systems, equipment and software |
| 3–5 |
| 75,567 |
| 64,108 |
| ||
|
|
|
| 238,994 |
| 206,050 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
| 116,894 |
| 103,831 |
| ||
|
|
|
| $ | 122,100 |
| $ | 102,219 |
|
The amount of capitalized interest, net of accumulated amortization, included in property, plant and equipment is $1,226 and $1,268 at August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, respectively.
6. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
|
| For the Fiscal Years Ended |
| |||||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| |||||||||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
|
| $ | 69,294 |
|
|
| $ | 55,840 |
|
|
| $ | 45,271 |
|
|
State and local |
|
| 13,726 |
|
|
| 11,431 |
|
|
| 9,232 |
|
| |||
|
|
| 83,020 |
|
|
| 67,271 |
|
|
| 54,503 |
|
| |||
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
|
| 2,090 |
|
|
| 1,836 |
|
|
| (2,163 | ) |
| |||
State and local |
|
| 271 |
|
|
| 377 |
|
|
| (454 | ) |
| |||
|
|
| 2,361 |
|
|
| 2,213 |
|
|
| (2,617 | ) |
| |||
Total |
|
| $ | 85,381 |
|
|
| $ | 69,484 |
|
|
| $ | 51,886 |
|
|
��
50
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| ||
Current and non-current deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
| $ | (22,203 | ) | $ | (22,009 | ) |
Deferred catalog costs |
| (4,686 | ) | (4,658 | ) | ||
Goodwill |
| (2,423 | ) | (883 | ) | ||
|
| (29,312 | ) | (27,550 | ) | ||
Current and non-current deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
| 847 |
| 499 |
| ||
Inventory |
| 4,559 |
| 4,966 |
| ||
Deferred compensation |
| 2,006 |
| 703 |
| ||
Stock Based Compensation |
| 2,653 |
| 372 |
| ||
Intangible Amortization |
| 245 |
| 0 |
| ||
Internet investments |
| 3,117 |
| 3,386 |
| ||
Other |
| 3,979 |
| 3,626 |
| ||
Valuation allowance |
| (3,117 | ) | (3,386 | ) | ||
|
| 14,289 |
| 10,166 |
| ||
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities |
| $ | (15,023 | ) | $ | (17,384 | ) |
The Company records a valuation allowance to properly reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that most likely will not be realized due to the capital loss generated by the impairment charge related to its Internet investments.
Reconciliation of the statutory Federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
|
| For the Fiscal Years Ended |
| ||||||||||
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| August 28, |
| ||||||
U.S. Federal statutory rate |
|
| 35.0 | % |
|
| 35.0 | % |
|
| 35.0 | % |
|
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit |
|
| 4.4 |
|
|
| 4.3 |
|
|
| 5.0 |
|
|
Other, net |
|
| (0.9 | ) |
|
| (1.1 | ) |
|
| (1.0 | ) |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
| 38.5 | % |
|
| 38.2 | % |
|
| 39.0 | % |
|
7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| ||||||
Accrued payroll, bonus and fringe |
|
| $ | 35,979 |
|
|
| $ | 27,475 |
|
|
Accrued advertising |
|
| 4,119 |
|
|
| 4,955 |
|
| ||
Accrued sales, property and income taxes |
|
| 13,761 |
|
|
| 12,868 |
|
| ||
Accrued acquisition costs(1) |
|
| 10,222 |
|
|
| — |
|
| ||
Accrued treasury stock purchases |
|
| 6,334 |
|
| �� | — |
|
| ||
Accrued other(2) |
|
| 17,592 |
|
|
| 10,782 |
|
| ||
Total accrued liabilities |
|
| $ | 88,007 |
|
|
| $ | 56,080 |
|
|
(1) These represent costs related to the acquisition of J&L that were unpaid as of August 26, 2006. As such, this amount was not reflected in the statement of cash flows for the period ended August 26, 2006. Estimates are still preliminary and subject to change.
(2) Included in this amount is an estimate of J&L exit costs of $4.2 million. The accrual includes costs for severance and costs related to the closure of the J&L customer fulfillment centers. Estimates are still preliminary and subject to change.
51
8. LONG-TERM NOTES PAYABLE
Long-term notes payable consist of the following:
|
| August 26, |
| August 27, |
| ||||
Revolving credit agreement(1) |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
|
Credit facility(1) |
| 200,000 |
|
| — |
|
| ||
Term notes payable(2) |
| 829 |
|
| 981 |
|
| ||
|
| 200,829 |
|
| 981 |
|
| ||
Less: current portion |
| 7,843 |
|
| 151 |
|
| ||
|
| $ | 192,986 |
|
| $ | 830 |
|
|
(1) On June 8, 2006, the Company acquired, through its wholly owned subsidiary, MSC Acquisition Corp. VI, all of the outstanding common stock of J&L, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., for $349,500 subject to certain post-closing purchase price adjustments. The Company financed $205,000 of the purchase price with a portion of the proceeds of a new unsecured Credit Facility, which was closed simultaneously with the acquisition. The new Credit Facility includes a $205,000 million term loan, which was drawn in entirety to provide the funding for the acquisition, and a $75,000 revolver which is available for working capital purposes. There are currently no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The loan is due for repayment in full on June 8, 2011. Principal payments will begin on June 30, 2007, and will be made in quarterly installments in accordance with the credit agreement. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we repaid $5,000 of the term loan, reducing the balance to $200,000. The interest rate payable for all borrowings is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rate in effect for the Company at August 26, 2006 was 5.85%. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are subject to various operating and financial covenants including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At August 26, 2006, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
(2) The term notes payable consist of notes payable to the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority which are secured by the land on which the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania customer fulfillment center is located and bears interest at 3% per annum payable in monthly installments of approximately $15 (includes principal and interest) through September 2011.
Maturities of notes payable are as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
| $ | 7,843 |
| ||
2008 |
| 33,473 |
| |||
2009 |
| 43,728 |
| |||
2010 |
| 59,108 |
| |||
2011 |
| 56,663 |
| |||
Thereafter |
| 14 |
| |||
|
| $ | 200,829 |
|
9. CAPITAL STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
Treasury Stock Purchases
On September 26, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the replenishment of the Company’s stock repurchase plan (the “Plan”) that allows for the repurchase of up to 5,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The Plan allows the Company to repurchase shares at any time and in
52
any increments it deems appropriate in accordance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. During fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, the Company repurchased 690 shares and 3,467 shares, respectively, of its Class A common stock for $27,173 and $104,759, respectively, which is reflected at cost as treasury stock in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. On June 29, 2005, the Board of Directors reaffirmed and replenished the Plan so that the total number of shares of Class A common stock authorized for future repurchase was restored to 5,000 shares. At August 26, 2006, the maximum number of shares that the Company may repurchase under the Plan was 4,310 shares.
The Company reissued approximately 68 and 71 shares of treasury stock during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, to fund the associate stock purchase plan (Note 10). During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, to date, the Company repurchased 128 shares of its Class A common stock for $4,935.
Cash Dividend
On July 10, 2003, the Board of Directors instituted a policy of regular quarterly cash dividends to shareholders. This policy is reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors. In fiscal 2005, in addition to the regular quarterly cash dividends, on June 29, 2005, the Board of Directors approved a special cash dividend of $1.50 per share, which resulted in a cash payout of approximately $99,762, on August 15, 2005 to holders of record on August 8, 2005.
On October 16, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share payable on November 16, 2006 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 2, 2006. The dividend of $0.14 per share will result in a quarterly payout of approximately $9,400.
10. ASSOCIATE BENEFIT PLANS
Stock Compensation Plans
2005 Omnibus Equity Plan
The 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan replaced the 1995, 1998, and 2001 Stock Option Plans, and the 1995 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Previous Plans”). The Omnibus Equity Plan covers 3,000 shares in the aggregate, and is in lieu of and replaced the unissued shares not made by previous grants made under the Previous Plans, for an aggregate of approximately 500 fewer shares than were covered under the Previous Plans. However, existing awards under the Previous Plans continue to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule and will expire at the end of their original term.
53
Stock Options
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options at August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative below:
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| (in thousands) |
|
|
| (in thousands) |
|
|
| (in thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding—beginning of year |
|
| 3,625 |
|
|
| $ | 17.80 |
|
|
| 4,807 |
|
|
| $ | 15.79 |
|
|
| 6,820 |
|
|
| $ | 14.09 |
|
| |||
Granted |
|
| 395 |
|
|
| 37.76 |
|
|
| 362 |
|
|
| 32.55 |
|
|
| 718 |
|
|
| 23.63 |
|
| ||||||
Exercised |
|
| (926 | ) |
|
| 15.91 |
|
|
| (1,471 | ) |
|
| 14.88 |
|
|
| (2,659 | ) |
|
| 13.55 |
|
| ||||||
Cancelled/forfeited |
|
| (163 | ) |
|
| 27.16 |
|
|
| (73 | ) |
|
| 17.93 |
|
|
| (72 | ) |
|
| 15.03 |
|
| ||||||
Outstanding—end of year |
|
| 2,931 |
|
|
| 20.57 |
|
|
| 3,625 |
|
|
| 17.80 |
|
|
| 4,807 |
|
|
| 15.79 |
|
| ||||||
Exercisable—end of year |
|
| 1,719 |
|
|
| 15.92 |
|
|
| 1,884 |
|
|
| 14.93 |
|
|
| 2,324 |
|
|
| 15.08 |
|
| ||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
| $ | 10.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 14.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 12.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006, August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 was $26,347, $29,014, and $40,898 respectively. As of August 26, 2006, the total intrinsic value of options exercisable was $38,802, and the total intrinsic value of options outstanding was $52,525. The unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to stock option expense at August 26, 2006 was $8,582 and will be recognized over a weighted average of 2.45 years.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
| 2006 |
| 2005 |
| 2004 |
|
Expected life (years) |
| 4.7 |
| 5.5 |
| 7.5 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
| 3.1 | % | 3.6 | % | 4.0 | % |
Volatility |
| 30.2 | % | 48.7 | % | 51.1 | % |
Dividend yield |
| 1.20 | % | 1.23 | % | 0.85 | % |
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at August 26, 2006:
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
|
| Number of Options |
| Weighted Average |
| Weighted |
| Number of Options |
| Weighted |
| ||||||||||||
$7.75–$11.63 |
|
| 152 |
|
|
| 3.2 |
|
|
| $ | 7.77 |
|
|
| 152 |
|
|
| $ | 7.77 |
|
| ||
11.64–17.46 |
|
| 1,475 |
|
|
| 4.2 |
|
|
| 14.35 |
|
|
| 1,179 |
|
|
| 14.31 |
|
| ||||
17.47–26.21 |
|
| 616 |
|
|
| 6.2 |
|
|
| 22.39 |
|
|
| 287 |
|
|
| 21.25 |
|
| ||||
26.22–39.33 |
|
| 653 |
|
|
| 5.8 |
|
|
| 34.75 |
|
|
| 101 |
|
|
| 31.75 |
|
| ||||
39.34–41.93 |
|
| 35 |
|
|
| 7.9 |
|
|
| 40.95 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| ||||
|
|
| 2,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 20.57 |
|
|
| 1,719 |
|
|
| $ | 15.92 |
|
|
54
Restricted Stock (Unvested Stock)
A summary of the activity of restricted stock under the Company’s 1995 Restricted Stock Plan and 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006 is as follows:
|
| Shares |
| Weighted Average Grant |
| |||||
Outstanding on August 27, 2005 |
|
| 194 |
|
|
| $ | 33.40 |
|
|
Granted |
|
| 127 |
|
|
| 42.84 |
|
| |
Vested |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| |
Forfeited/Canceled |
|
| (22 | ) |
|
| 35.71 |
|
| |
Outstanding on August 26, 2006 |
|
| 299 |
|
|
| $ | 37.24 |
|
|
The unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested restricted shares at August 26, 2006 is $7,728 and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.97 years.
Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has established a qualified Associate Stock Purchase Plan, the terms of which allow for qualified associates (as defined in the Associate Stock Purchase Plan) to participate in the purchase of up to a maximum of 5 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price at the beginning or end of each stock purchase period. The associates purchased approximately 68 and 71 shares of common stock during fiscal 2006 and 2005 pursuant to this plan at an average per share price of $34.23 and $25.37, respectively. On January 4, 2005, shareholders of the Company approved a 300 share increase to the Associate Stock Purchase Plan. As of August 26, 2006, approximately 245 shares remain reserved for issuance under this plan.
On October 16, 2006, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Associate Stock Purchase Plan. The amendment modifies the definition of “Purchase Price” under the Associate Stock Purchase Plan to 90% of the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Associate Stock Purchase Plan) of the Class A Common Stock as of the Exercise Date (as defined in the Associate Stock Purchase Plan). The amendment is effective February 1, 2007.
Savings Plan
The Company maintains a defined contribution plan with both a profit sharing feature and a 401(k) feature which covers all associates who have completed at least one month of service with the Company. For fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company contributed $2,092, $1,743 and $1,594, respectively, to the plan. The Company contributions are discretionary.
55
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
Certain of the operations of the Company are conducted on leased premises, two of which are leased from affiliates. The leases (most of which require the Company to provide for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating costs) are for varying periods, the longest extending to the year 2023. In addition, the Company is obligated under certain equipment and automobile operating leases, which expire on varying dates through 2010. At August 26, 2006, approximate minimum annual rentals on such leases are as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
|
| Total |
| Related Party |
| ||||||
2007 |
|
| $ | 11,704 |
|
|
| $ | 1,745 |
|
| ||
2008 |
|
| 10,634 |
|
|
| 1,745 |
|
| ||||
2009 |
|
| 8,653 |
|
|
| 1,747 |
|
| ||||
2010 |
|
| 4,463 |
|
|
| 1,745 |
|
| ||||
2011 |
|
| 3,493 |
|
|
| 1,687 |
|
| ||||
Thereafter |
|
| 25,842 |
|
|
| 21,082 |
|
| ||||
Total |
|
| $ | 64,789 |
|
|
| $ | 29,751 |
|
|
Total rental expense (exclusive of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating costs) for all operating leases for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $6,495, $5,487 and $5,261, respectively, including approximately $1,734, $1,734 and $1,794, respectively, paid to affiliates. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the leases with affiliates are on terms which approximate fair market value.
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into various employment/severance agreements with certain former management. The agreements contain non-compete clauses for the term of the agreement. Payments related to these agreements will be made as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
| $ | 2,591 |
| ||
2008 |
| 482 |
| |||
2009 |
| 338 |
| |||
Total |
| $ | 3,411 |
|
There are various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and its subsidiaries incident to the operations of its businesses in the ordinary course. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of such claims, lawsuits and pending actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
56
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of the Company’s management, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s internal control system was designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance to MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are being recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
57
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements under all potential conditions. Therefore, effective internal control over financial reporting provides only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that a restatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s management assessed the effectiveness of MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment under that framework and the criteria established therein, MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s management concluded that MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 26, 2006.
The Company acquired J&L America, Inc., DBA J&L Industrial Supply, a former subsidiary of Kennametal, Inc., on June 8, 2006 and has excluded J&L Industrial Supply from its assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. For the year ended August 26, 2006, J&L Industrial Supply accounted for 5.2% of the Company’s total net revenue. As of August 26, 2006, J&L Industrial Supply accounted for 10.8% of the Company’s total assets, excluding $284.7 million of goodwill and other intangible asset amounts that were recorded in connection with the acquisition.
There were no changes in MSC Industrial Direct Company’s, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited management’s assessment of the effectiveness of MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, as stated in their report which is included herein.
58
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in Item 9A, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of J&L America, Inc. which are included in the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries and constituted 10.8% of total assets as of August 26, 2006, excluding $284.7 million of goodwill and other intangible asset amounts recorded in connection with the acquisition, and 5.2% of revenues for the fiscal year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of J&L America, Inc.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and
59
Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 26, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries as of August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 26, 2006 and our report dated November 3, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP | |
Melville, NY |
|
November 3, 2006 |
|
60
None.
61
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
Information called for by Item 10 is set forth under the heading “Election of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in January 2007 (the “2006 Proxy Statement”), which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The Company makes its code of ethics available free of charge through its internet website, www.mscdirect.com. The Company will disclose on its website amendments to or waivers from its code of ethics in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
Excluding J&L, the Company has also adopted a separate Code of Business Conduct applicable to the Board of Directors, the Company’s officers and all of the Company’s associates. The Code of Business Conduct is posted on the Company’s website, www.mscdirect.com. The Company will disclose on its website amendments to or waivers from its Code of Business Conduct in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
Printed copies of all of the foregoing are available to any shareholder requesting a copy by writing to: Corporate Secretary, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Information called for by Item 11 is set forth under the heading “Executive Compensation” in the 2006 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Information called for by Item 12 is set forth under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the 2006 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Information called for by Item 13 is set forth under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the 2006 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Information called for by Item 14 is set forth under the heading “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors” in the 2006 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
62
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
Financial statements filed as a part of this report are listed on the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” at page 35 herein.
a. Exhibits
Exhibit No. |
| Description |
2.01 |
| Stock Purchase Agreement by and among JLK Direct Distribution, Inc., Kennametal Inc., MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and MSC Acquisition Corp. VI dated as of March 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 16, 2006). |
*3.01 |
| Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. |
*3.02 |
| By-laws of Registrant. |
3.03 |
| Amendment to By-laws of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-110357, as amended). |
3.04 |
| Amendment to By-laws of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s current report of Form 8-K, filed on October 27, 2005). |
*4.01 |
| Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate. |
10.01 |
| Registrant’s 1995 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
10.02 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Registrant’s 1995 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
10.03 |
| Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s 1995 Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 4, 2005, filed with the Commission on December 3, 2004). |
*10.04 |
| Registrant’s 1995 Stock Option Plan. |
10.05 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Registrant’s 1995 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
10.06 |
| Registrant’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 1, 1998, filed with the Commission on December 5, 1997). |
10.07 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Registrant’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 8, 1999, filed with the Commission on December 8, 1998). |
10.08 |
| Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 7, 2000, filed with the Commission on December 8, 1999). |
63
10.09 |
| Amendment No. 3 to Registrant’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
10.10 |
| Registrant’s 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 4, 2002, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2001). |
10.11 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Registrant’s 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
10.12 |
| Registrant’s Associate Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 8, 1999, filed with the Commission on December 8, 1998). |
10.13 |
| Amendment No.1 to Registrant’s Associate Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2004, filed with the Commission on December 5, 2003). |
*10.14 |
| Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Associate Stock Purchase Agreement Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 4, 2005, filed with the Commission on December 3, 2004). |
10.15 |
| Employment Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2000, between the Registrant and Charles Boehlke (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.06 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000, filed on November 14, 2000 (File No. 1-14130). |
10.16 |
| Employment Agreement, dated as of January 8, 1999, between the Registrant and James Schroeder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 19, 1999). |
10.17 |
| Employment Agreement, dated as of January 8, 1999, between Registrant and David Sandler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 19, 1999). |
10.18 |
| Summary of MSC Industrial Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 117514), as amended). |
10.19 |
| 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 3, 2006 filed with the Commission on December 2, 2005). |
10.20 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and David Sandler dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.21 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Charles A. Boehlke, Jr. dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
64
10.22 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and James Schroeder dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.23 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Shelley Boxer dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.24 |
| Amended and Restated Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Thomas Eccleston dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.25 |
| Change in Control Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Thomas Cox dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.26 |
| Change in Control Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Erik David Gershwind dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.27 |
| Change in Control Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Eileen McGuire dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.28 |
| Change in Control Agreement by and between MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Douglas E. Jones dated as of December 27, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 5, 2006). |
10.29 |
| Credit Agreement among MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and Sovereign Bank as co-documentation agents, dated as of June 8, 2006(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 13, 2006). |
10.30 |
| Severance Agreement dated as of March 16, 2006 by and between Ross Anker and MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on April 6, 2006. |
10.31 |
| Employment Agreement dated as of March 14, 2006 between J&L America, Inc. (DBA J&L Industrial Supply) and Michael Wessner(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on July 6, 2006). |
10.32 |
| Amendment No. 3 to Registrant’s Associate Stock Purchase Plan.** |
21.01 |
| List of Subsidiaries.** |
23.01 |
| Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.** |
31.1 |
| Chief Executive Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
65
31.2 |
| Chief Financial Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
32.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
32.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 33-98832, as amended.
** Filed herewith.
Financial Statement Schedules
For the three fiscal years ended August 26, 2006.
|
| Page |
| ||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
| S-1 |
|
|
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
| S-2 |
|
|
All other schedules have been omitted because the information is not applicable or is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
66
Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ DAVID SANDLER |
|
| David Sandler |
Dated: November 8, 2006 |
| Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
|
| Title |
|
|
| Date |
| |
/s/ MITCHELL JACOBSON |
| Chairman of the Board of |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Mitchell Jacobson |
| Directors |
|
| ||||||
/s/ DAVID SANDLER |
| Chief Executive Officer, President |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
David Sandler |
| and Director |
|
| ||||||
/s/ CHARLES BOEHLKE |
| Executive Vice President, Chief |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Charles Boehlke |
| Financial Officer and Director |
|
| ||||||
/s/ ROGER FRADIN |
| Director |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Roger Fradin |
|
|
|
| ||||||
/s/ DENIS KELLY |
| Director |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Denis Kelly |
|
|
|
| ||||||
/s/ RAYMOND LANGTON |
| Director |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Raymond Langton |
|
|
|
| ||||||
/s/ PHILIP PELLER |
| Director |
| November 8, 2006 | ||||||
Philip Peller |
|
|
|
|
67
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries as of August 26, 2006 and August 27, 2005, and for each of the three years in the period ended August 26, 2006, and have issued our report thereon dated November 3, 2006 (included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(b) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP | |
|
|
Melville, NY |
|
November 3, 2006 |
|
S-1
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)
Description |
|
|
| Balance at |
| Charged to |
| Charged to |
| Deductions |
| Balance at |
| |||||||||||||||
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
For the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts(1) |
|
| $ | 2,617 |
|
|
| $ | 1,761 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 1,931 | (3) |
|
| $ | 2,447 |
|
| ||
Restructuring and relocation charges(2) |
|
| $ | 473 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 198 |
|
|
| $ | 275 |
|
| ||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
| ||
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
For the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts(1) |
|
| $ | 2,447 |
|
|
| $ | 2,711 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 2,611 | (3) |
|
| $ | 2,547 |
|
| ||
Restructuring and relocation charges(2) |
|
| $ | 275 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 275 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
| ||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
| ||
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
For the fiscal year ended August 26, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts(1) |
|
| $ | 2,547 |
|
|
| $ | 2,506 |
|
|
| $ | 1,482 | (4) |
|
| $ | 1,621 | (3) |
|
| $ | 4,914 |
|
| ||
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets |
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
| $ | 3,386 |
|
|
(1) Included in accounts receivable.
(2) Included in accrued liabilities.
(3) Comprised of uncollected accounts charged against the allowance.
(4) Amount related to the acquisition of J&L.
S-2