| | FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424(b)(2) |
| | REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-261764-04 |
| | |
PROSPECTUS
$812,896,000 (Approximate)
Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust
(Central Index Key Number 0002030476)
as Issuing Entity
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
(Central Index Key Number 0001004158)
as Depositor
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company
(Central Index Key Number 0001541502)
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.
(Central Index Key Number 0001701238)
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC
(Central Index Key Number 0001840727)
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.
(Central Index Key Number 0001549574)
Bank of Montreal
(Central Index Key Number 0000927971)
German American Capital Corporation
(Central Index Key Number 0001541294)
as Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2024-V9
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II is offering certain classes of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2024-V9 consisting of the certificate classes identified in the table below. The certificates being offered by this prospectus (and the non-offered Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR, Class J-RR and Class R certificates) represent the ownership interests in the issuing entity, which will be a New York common law trust named Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust. The assets of the issuing entity will primarily consist of a pool of fixed rate commercial mortgage loans, which are generally the sole source of payment on the certificates. Credit enhancement will be provided solely by certain classes of subordinate certificates that will be subordinate to certain classes of senior certificates as described under “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”. Each class of certificates will be entitled to receive monthly distributions of interest and/or principal on the 4th business day following the 11th day of each month (or if the 11th day is not a business day, the next business day), commencing in September 2024. The rated final distribution date for the offered certificates is the distribution date in August 2057.
Class | Approximate Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount(1) | Approximate Initial Pass-Through Rate | Pass-Through Rate Description | Assumed Final Distribution Date(2) |
Class A-1 | $1,595,000 | 4.84942% | Fixed | April 2029 |
Class A-3 | $622,886,000 | 5.60190% | Fixed | August 2029 |
Class X-A | $722,614,000(3) | 1.26335% | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 |
Class X-B | $75,828,000(3) | 0.46595% | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 |
Class X-D | $14,454,000(3) | 2.42636% | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 |
Class A-S | $98,133,000 | 6.06412% | Fixed(5) | August 2029 |
Class B | $43,490,000 | 6.46569% | Fixed(5) | August 2029 |
Class C | $32,338,000 | 6.45331% | Fixed(5) | August 2029 |
Class D | $14,454,000 | 4.50000% | Fixed | August 2029 |
(Footnotes on table on page 3)
You should carefully consider the summary of risk factors and the risk factors beginning on page 55 and page 57, respectively, of this prospectus.
None of the certificates or the mortgage loans are insured or guaranteed by any governmental agency, instrumentality or private issuer or any other person or entity.
The certificates will represent interests in the issuing entity only. They will not represent interests in or obligations of the sponsors, depositor, any of their affiliates or any other entity.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators have not approved or disapproved of the offered certificates or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II will not list the offered certificates on any securities exchange or on any automated quotation system of any securities association.
The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in this prospectus).
The underwriters, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Academy Securities, Inc. and CastleOak Securities, L.P. will purchase the offered certificates from GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and will offer them to the public at negotiated prices, plus, in certain cases, accrued interest, determined at the time of sale. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. are acting as co-lead managers and joint bookrunners in the following manner: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC is acting as sole bookrunning manager with respect to approximately 37.9% of each class of offered certificates, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as sole bookrunning manager with respect to approximately 27.7% of each class of offered certificates, Barclays Capital Inc. is acting as sole bookrunning manager with respect to approximately 20.3% of each class of offered certificates, BMO Capital Markets Corp. is acting as sole bookrunning manager with respect to approximately 7.8% of each class of offered certificates and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. is acting as sole bookrunning manager with respect to approximately 6.3% of each class of offered certificates. Academy Securities, Inc. and CastleOak Securities, L.P. are acting as co-managers.
The underwriters expect to deliver the offered certificates to purchasers in book-entry form only through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company in the United States and Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg and Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, in Europe, against payment in New York, New York on or about August 29, 2024. We expect to receive from this offering approximately 106.9% of the initial aggregate principal balance of the offered certificates, plus accrued interest from August 1, 2024, before deducting expenses payable by us.
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | Barclays | BMO Capital Markets | Deutsche Bank Securities | Citigroup |
Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners |
Academy Securities | CastleOak Securities, L.P. |
Co-Manager | Co-Manager |
| | | | |
August 14, 2024
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397finalpros_img001.jpg)
Summary of Certificates
Class | Approximate Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount(1) | Approximate Initial Credit Support(6) | Approximate Initial Pass-Through Rate | Pass-Through Rate Description | Assumed Final Distribution Date(2) | Weighted Average Life (Years)(7) | Principal Window(7) |
Offered Certificates |
Class A-1 | $1,595,000 | | 30.000% | 4.84942% | | Fixed | April 2029 | 2.47 | 09/24 – 04/29 |
Class A-3 | $622,886,000 | | 30.000% | 5.60190% | | Fixed | August 2029 | 4.90 | 04/29 – 08/29 |
Class X-A | $722,614,000 | (3) | NAP | 1.26335% | | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 | NAP | NAP |
Class X-B | $75,828,000 | (3) | NAP | 0.46595% | | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 | NAP | NAP |
Class X-D | $14,454,000 | (3) | NAP | 2.42636% | | Variable IO(4) | August 2029 | NAP | NAP |
Class A-S | $98,133,000 | | 19.000% | 6.06412% | | Fixed(5) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class B | $43,490,000 | | 14.125% | 6.46569% | | Fixed(5) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class C | $32,338,000 | | 10.500% | 6.45331% | | Fixed(5) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class D | $14,454,000 | | 8.880% | 4.50000% | | Fixed | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
| | | | | | | |
Non-Offered Certificates | | | | | | |
Class E-RR | $13,424,000 | | 7.375% | 6.92636 | % | Variable(8) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class F-RR | $17,844,000 | | 5.375% | 6.92636 | % | Variable(8) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class G-RR | $10,037,000 | | 4.250% | 6.92636 | % | Variable(8) | August 2029 | 4.96 | 08/29 – 08/29 |
Class J-RR | $37,915,230 | | 0.000% | 6.92636 | % | Variable(8) | May 2032 | 5.32 | 08/29 – 05/32 |
Class R(9) | NAP | | NAP | NAP | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
| (1) | Approximate, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%. |
| (2) | The assumed final distribution dates set forth in this prospectus have been determined on the basis of the assumptions described in “Description of the Certificates—Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date”. |
| (3) | The Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates (the “Class X certificates”) will not have certificate balances and will not be entitled to receive distributions of principal. Interest will accrue on each of the Class X certificates at its respective pass-through rate based upon its respective notional amount. The notional amount of each Class of the Class X certificates will be equal to the aggregate certificate balances of the related class(es) of certificates (the “related Class X class”) indicated below: |
Class | Related Class X Class(es) |
Class X-A | Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates |
Class X-B | Class B and Class C certificates |
Class X-D | Class D certificates |
| (4) | The pass-through rate of each Class of the Class X certificates for any distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs, over (ii) the pass-through rate (or the weighted average of the pass-through rates, if applicable) of the related Class X class(es) for that distribution date. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Pass-Through Rates”. |
| (5) | The pass through rate of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for each distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the lesser of (i) a fixed rate (described in the table as “Fixed”) at the pass-through rate set forth opposite such class in the table and (ii) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30 day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs. |
| (6) | The initial credit support percentages set forth for the certificates are approximate and, for the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, are represented in the aggregate. |
| (7) | The weighted average life and period during which distributions of principal would be received as set forth in the foregoing table with respect to each class of certificates having a certificate balance are based on the assumptions set forth under “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations—Weighted Average Life” and on the assumptions that there are no prepayments, modifications or losses in respect of the mortgage loans or whole loans and that there are no extensions or forbearances of maturity dates of the mortgage loans or whole loans. |
| (8) | The pass-through rates of the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates (together with the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates (collectively, the “principal balance certificates”) for each distribution date will each be a per annum rate (described in the table as “Variable”) equal to the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30 day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs. |
| (9) | The Class R certificates will not have a certificate balance, notional amount, pass-through rate, rating or rated final distribution date. The Class R certificates will represent the residual interests in each of two (2) separate real estate mortgage investment conduits (each, a “REMIC”), as further described in this prospectus. The Class R certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal or interest. |
The Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR, Class J-RR and Class R certificates are not offered by this prospectus. Any information in this prospectus concerning such non-offered certificates is presented solely to enhance your understanding of the offered certificates.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Certificates | 3 |
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates | 12 |
Important Notice About Information Presented in This Prospectus | 12 |
Summary of Terms | 23 |
Summary of Risk Factors | 55 |
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans | 55 |
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest | 56 |
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates | 56 |
Risk Factors | 57 |
Special Risks | 57 |
Cyberattacks or Other Security Breaches Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business of the Transaction Parties | 57 |
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans | 58 |
Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed | 58 |
Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally | 58 |
Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases | 60 |
Retail Properties Have Special Risks | 65 |
Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks | 67 |
Mixed Use Properties Have Special Risks | 71 |
Industrial Properties Have Special Risks | 71 |
Hospitality Properties Have Special Risks | 72 |
Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company | 74 |
Manufactured Housing Properties Have Special Risks | 75 |
Office Properties Have Special Risks | 76 |
Self-Storage Properties Have Special Risks | 77 |
Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements | 78 |
Master Leased Properties Have Special Risks | 80 |
Operation of a Mortgaged Property Depends on the Property Manager’s Performance | 80 |
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses | 81 |
Climate Change May Directly or Indirectly Have an Adverse Effect on the Mortgage Pool | 82 |
Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses | 83 |
Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties | 84 |
Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses | 85 |
Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions | 87 |
Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties | 88 |
Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations | 88 |
Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate | 88 |
Inadequacy of Title Insurers May Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates | 91 |
Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties | 91 |
Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance | 92 |
Condemnation of a Mortgaged Property May Adversely Affect Distributions on Certificates | 93 |
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty | 93 |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Failed Assumptions | 93 |
Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment | 94 |
The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reviewed or Re-Underwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied With Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria | 95 |
Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool | 96 |
Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property | 96 |
Seasoned Mortgage Loans Present Additional Risk of Repayment | 97 |
The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property | 98 |
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks | 98 |
A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans | 101 |
Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions | 101 |
Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk | 102 |
Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery | 104 |
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization | 104 |
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions | 104 |
Risks Associated with One Action Rules | 105 |
State Law Limitations on Assignments of Leases and Rents May Entail Risks | 105 |
Various Other Laws Could Affect the Exercise of Lender’s Rights | 105 |
The Absence of Lockboxes Entails Risks That Could Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates | 106 |
Borrower May Be Unable To Repay Remaining Principal Balance on Maturity Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk | 107 |
Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests | 108 |
Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds | 110 |
Collective Bargaining Activity May Disrupt Operations, Increase Labor Costs or Interfere with Business Strategies | 110 |
State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds | 110 |
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest | 110 |
Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests | 110 |
The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan Will Shift to Other Servicers | 112 |
Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests | 113 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer | 114 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor | 117 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer | 118 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Holder and the Companion Loan Holders | 118 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans | 120 |
Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Applicable Directing Holder To Terminate the Special Servicer of the Applicable Whole Loan | 121 |
Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment | 121 |
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates | 122 |
The Certificates Are Limited Obligations | 122 |
The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline | 122 |
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded | 123 |
Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors | 126 |
Subordination of the Subordinated Certificates Will Affect the Timing of Distributions and the Application of Losses on the Subordinated Certificates | 129 |
Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment | 130 |
Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans | 134 |
The Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan | 135 |
Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation | 136 |
Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer | 136 |
Risks Relating to a Bankruptcy of an Originator, a Sponsor or the Depositor, or a | |
Receivership or Conservatorship of Goldman Sachs Bank USA | 137 |
The Requirement of the Special Servicer to Obtain FIRREA-Compliant Appraisals May Result in an Increased Cost to the Issuing Entity | 138 |
Realization on the Mortgage Loans That Are Part of a Serviced Whole Loan May Be Adversely Affected by the Rights of the Holder of the Related Serviced Companion Loan | 139 |
Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment | 139 |
General Risk Factors | 141 |
Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss | 141 |
The Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You | 141 |
The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue To Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS | 141 |
Other Events May Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment | 142 |
Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates | 142 |
The Master Servicer, any Sub-Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator or the Custodian May Have Difficulty Performing Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or a Related Sub-Servicing Agreement | 146 |
Book-Entry Securities May Delay Receipt of Payment and Reports and Limit Liquidity and Your Ability to Pledge Certificates | 146 |
Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be | |
Recognized as a Holder of Record | 146 |
Description of the Mortgage Pool | 147 |
General | 147 |
Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans | 148 |
Certain Calculations and Definitions | 148 |
Definitions | 149 |
Mortgage Pool Characteristics | 156 |
Overview | 156 |
Property Types | 157 |
Mortgage Loan Concentrations | 163 |
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans and Related Borrower Mortgage Loans | 163 |
Geographic Concentrations | 165 |
Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History | 166 |
Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership | 166 |
Condominium Interests and Other Shared Interests | 166 |
Fee & Leasehold Estates; Ground Leases | 166 |
Environmental Considerations | 167 |
Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion | 171 |
Assessments of Property Value and Condition | 171 |
Appraisals | 171 |
Engineering Reports | 172 |
Zoning and Building Code Compliance and Condemnation | 172 |
Litigation and Other Considerations | 172 |
Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings | 175 |
Loan Purpose | 175 |
Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings | 175 |
Tenant Issues | 177 |
Tenant Concentrations | 177 |
Lease Expirations and Terminations | 177 |
Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal | 182 |
Affiliated Leases | 183 |
Insurance Considerations | 184 |
Use Restrictions | 185 |
Appraised Value | 186 |
Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations | 187 |
Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations | 187 |
Delinquency Information | 188 |
Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans | 188 |
Amortization of Principal | 188 |
Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest | 188 |
Single Purpose Entity Covenants | 189 |
Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments | 190 |
“Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions | 191 |
Defeasance; Collateral Substitution | 192 |
Partial Releases | 193 |
Escrows | 197 |
Mortgaged Property Accounts | 198 |
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines | 199 |
Additional Indebtedness | 199 |
General | 199 |
Whole Loans | 199 |
Mezzanine Indebtedness | 200 |
Other Secured Indebtedness | 201 |
Preferred Equity | 202 |
Other Unsecured Indebtedness | 202 |
The Whole Loans | 202 |
General | 202 |
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans | 205 |
The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans | 208 |
Additional Information | 211 |
Transaction Parties | 212 |
The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers | 212 |
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company | 212 |
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. | 221 |
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 230 |
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. | 239 |
Bank of Montreal | 245 |
German American Capital Corporation | 253 |
Compensation of the Sponsors | 262 |
The Depositor | 262 |
The Issuing Entity | 263 |
The Trustee and Certificate Administrator | 264 |
The Master Servicer | 266 |
The Special Servicer | 270 |
The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer | 273 |
Credit Risk Retention | 274 |
General | 274 |
Qualifying CRE Loans | 275 |
HRR Certificates | 275 |
General | 275 |
Retaining Party | 275 |
Material Terms | 276 |
Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions | 276 |
Operating Advisor | 277 |
Representations and Warranties | 277 |
Description of the Certificates | 280 |
General | 280 |
Distributions | 281 |
Method, Timing and Amount | 281 |
Available Funds | 282 |
Priority of Distributions | 283 |
Pass-Through Rates | 286 |
Interest Distribution Amount | 287 |
Principal Distribution Amount | 288 |
Certain Calculations with Respect to Individual Mortgage Loans | 289 |
Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections | 290 |
Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums | 293 |
Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date | 294 |
Prepayment Interest Shortfalls | 295 |
Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses | 296 |
Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information | 298 |
Certificate Administrator Reports | 298 |
Information Available Electronically | 303 |
Voting Rights | 308 |
Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination | 309 |
Book-Entry Registration | 309 |
Definitive Certificates | 312 |
Certificateholder Communication | 312 |
Access to Certificateholders’ Names and Addresses | 312 |
Requests to Communicate | 312 |
List of Certificateholders | 313 |
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements | 313 |
General | 313 |
Dispute Resolution Provisions | 322 |
Asset Review Obligations | 322 |
Pooling and Servicing Agreement | 323 |
General | 323 |
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans | 323 |
Servicing Standard | 324 |
Subservicing | 325 |
Advances | 326 |
P&I Advances | 326 |
Property Protection Advances | 327 |
Nonrecoverable Advances | 328 |
Recovery of Advances | 329 |
Accounts | 331 |
Withdrawals from the Collection Account | 332 |
Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses | 335 |
General | 335 |
Master Servicing Compensation | 339 |
Special Servicing Compensation | 342 |
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees | 347 |
Certificate Administrator and Trustee Compensation | 348 |
Operating Advisor Compensation | 348 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation | 349 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee | 349 |
Appraisal Reduction Amounts | 350 |
Maintenance of Insurance | 356 |
Modifications, Waivers and Amendments | 359 |
Enforcement of “Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions | 364 |
Inspections | 365 |
Collection of Operating Information | 366 |
Special Servicing Transfer Event | 366 |
Asset Status Report | 368 |
Realization Upon Mortgage Loans | 371 |
Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties | 373 |
The Directing Holder | 376 |
General | 376 |
Major Decisions | 378 |
Asset Status Report | 382 |
Replacement of Special Servicer | 382 |
Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event | 382 |
Servicing Override | 384 |
Rights of Holders of Companion Loans | 384 |
Limitation on Liability of Directing Holder | 385 |
The Operating Advisor | 385 |
General | 385 |
Duties of Operating Advisor In General | 386 |
Annual Report | 388 |
Additional Duties of the Operating Advisor While an Operating | |
Advisor Consultation Event Has Occurred and is Continuing | 389 |
Recommendation of the Replacement of the Special Servicer | 389 |
Eligibility of Operating Advisor | 390 |
Other Obligations of Operating Advisor | 390 |
Delegation of Operating Advisor’s Duties | 391 |
Termination of the Operating Advisor With Cause | 391 |
Rights Upon Operating Advisor Termination Event | 392 |
Waiver of Operating Advisor Termination Event | 393 |
Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause | 393 |
Resignation of the Operating Advisor | 393 |
Operating Advisor Compensation | 394 |
The Asset Representations Reviewer | 394 |
Asset Review | 394 |
Eligibility of Asset Representations Reviewer | 399 |
Other Obligations of Asset Representations Reviewer | 399 |
Delegation of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Duties | 400 |
Assignment of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Rights and Obligations | 400 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Events | 401 |
Rights Upon Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event | 401 |
Termination of the Asset Representations Reviewer Without Cause | 402 |
Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer | 402 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation | 402 |
Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause | 402 |
Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote | 405 |
Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause | 406 |
Servicer Termination Events | 406 |
Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event | 407 |
Waiver of Servicer Termination Event | 409 |
Resignation of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer | 409 |
Resignation of Master Servicer, Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Operating Advisor or Asset Representations Reviewer Upon Prohibited Risk Retention Affiliation | 410 |
Limitation on Liability; Indemnification | 410 |
Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA | 412 |
Dispute Resolution Provisions | 413 |
Certificateholder’s Rights When a Repurchase Request is Initially Delivered by a Certificateholder | 413 |
Repurchase Request Delivered by a Party to the PSA | 413 |
Resolution of a Repurchase Request | 414 |
Mediation and Arbitration Provisions | 417 |
Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan | 418 |
General | 418 |
Rating Agency Confirmations | 421 |
Evidence as to Compliance | 423 |
Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding | 424 |
Termination; Retirement of Certificates | 424 |
Amendment | 425 |
Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator | 427 |
Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial; and Consent to Jurisdiction | 429 |
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans | 429 |
New York | 429 |
Texas | 429 |
General | 430 |
Types of Mortgage Instruments | 430 |
Leases and Rents | 431 |
Personalty | 431 |
Foreclosure | 431 |
General | 431 |
Foreclosure Procedures Vary from State to State | 432 |
Judicial Foreclosure | 432 |
Equitable and Other Limitations on Enforceability of Certain Provisions | 432 |
Nonjudicial Foreclosure/Power of Sale | 432 |
Public Sale | 433 |
Rights of Redemption | 434 |
Anti-Deficiency Legislation | 434 |
Leasehold Considerations | 435 |
Cooperative Shares | 435 |
Bankruptcy Laws | 435 |
Environmental Considerations | 442 |
General | 442 |
Superlien Laws | 442 |
CERCLA | 442 |
Certain Other Federal and State Laws | 443 |
Additional Considerations | 443 |
Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions | 443 |
Subordinate Financing | 444 |
Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments | 444 |
Applicability of Usury Laws | 444 |
Americans with Disabilities Act | 445 |
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act | 445 |
Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery | 445 |
Potential Forfeiture of Assets | 446 |
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties | 446 |
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties | 448 |
Use of Proceeds | 448 |
Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations | 448 |
Yield Considerations | 448 |
General | 448 |
Rate and Timing of Principal Payments | 449 |
Losses and Shortfalls | 450 |
Certain Relevant Factors Affecting Loan Payments and Defaults | 450 |
Delay in Payment of Distributions | 451 |
Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts | 451 |
Weighted Average Life | 452 |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity Tables | 455 |
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations | 458 |
General | 458 |
Qualification as a REMIC | 459 |
Status of Offered Certificates | 461 |
Taxation of Regular Interests | 461 |
General | 461 |
Original Issue Discount | 462 |
Acquisition Premium | 464 |
Market Discount | 464 |
Premium | 465 |
Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method | 465 |
Treatment of Losses | 465 |
Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums | 466 |
Sale or Exchange of Regular Interests | 466 |
Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC | 467 |
Prohibited Transactions | 467 |
Contributions to a REMIC After the Startup Day | 467 |
Net Income from Foreclosure Property | 468 |
REMIC Partnership Representative | 468 |
Taxation of Certain Foreign Investors | 468 |
FATCA | 469 |
Backup Withholding | 469 |
Information Reporting | 470 |
3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income” | 470 |
Reporting Requirements | 470 |
Certain State and Local and Foreign Tax Considerations | 471 |
Method of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest) | 471 |
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference | 473 |
Where You Can Find More Information | 474 |
Financial Information | 474 |
Certain ERISA Considerations | 474 |
General | 474 |
Plan Asset Regulations | 475 |
Administrative Exemptions | 475 |
Insurance Company General Accounts | 477 |
Legal Investment | 478 |
Legal Matters | 479 |
Ratings | 479 |
Index of Defined Terms | 482 |
ANNEX A-1 | CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS AND MORTGAGED PROPERTIES |
ANNEX A-2 | MORTGAGE POOL INFORMATION |
ANNEX A-3 | DESCRIPTION OF THE TOP 15 MORTGAGE LOANS |
ANNEX B | FORM OF DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT |
ANNEX C | FORM OF OPERATING ADVISOR ANNUAL REPORT |
ANNEX D-1 | GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX D-2 | EXCEPTIONS TO GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-1 | CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC., GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION, BANK OF MONTREAL, BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC. AND 3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-2 | EXCEPTIONS TO CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-3 | EXCEPTIONS TO 3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-4 | EXCEPTIONS TO BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-5 | EXCEPTIONS TO BANK OF MONTREAL REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
ANNEX E-6 | EXCEPTIONS TO GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES |
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates
WE HAVE FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION A REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, WITH RESPECT TO THE CERTIFICATES OFFERED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. HOWEVER, THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THIS PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD REFER TO OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS TO IT. OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS TO IT CAN BE OBTAINED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE SEC’S INTERNET WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV.
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE OFFERED ON A “WHEN, AS AND IF ISSUED” BASIS.
THE UNDERWRITERS DESCRIBED IN THESE MATERIALS MAY FROM TIME TO TIME PERFORM INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES FOR, OR SOLICIT INVESTMENT BANKING BUSINESS FROM, ANY COMPANY NAMED IN THESE MATERIALS. THE UNDERWRITERS AND/OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES MAY FROM TIME TO TIME HAVE A LONG OR SHORT POSITION IN ANY CONTRACT OR CERTIFICATE DISCUSSED IN THESE MATERIALS.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPERSEDES ANY PREVIOUS SUCH INFORMATION DELIVERED TO ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR.
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES DO NOT REPRESENT AN INTEREST IN OR OBLIGATION OF THE DEPOSITOR, THE SPONSORS, THE MORTGAGE LOAN SELLERS, THE MASTER SERVICER, THE SPECIAL SERVICER, THE TRUSTEE, THE OPERATING ADVISOR, THE ASSET REPRESENTATIONS REVIEWER, THE CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATOR, THE DIRECTING HOLDER, THE UNDERWRITERS OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES. NEITHER THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES NOR THE MORTGAGE LOANS ARE INSURED OR GUARANTEED BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY OR PRIVATE INSURER.
THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SECONDARY MARKET FOR THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU THAT A SECONDARY MARKET WILL DEVELOP OR, IF A SECONDARY MARKET DOES DEVELOP, THAT IT WILL PROVIDE HOLDERS OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WITH LIQUIDITY OF INVESTMENT OR THAT IT WILL CONTINUE FOR THE TERM OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. THE UNDERWRITERS CURRENTLY INTEND TO MAKE A MARKET IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BUT ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. THE ABILITY OF THE UNDERWRITERS TO MAKE A MARKET IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE IMPACTED BY CHANGES IN ANY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO THE MARKETING, HOLDING AND SELLING OF, AND ISSUING QUOTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR CMBS GENERALLY. ACCORDINGLY, PURCHASERS MUST BE PREPARED TO BEAR THE RISKS OF THEIR INVESTMENTS FOR AN INDEFINITE PERIOD. SEE “RISK FACTORS—OTHER RISKS RELATING TO THE CERTIFICATES—THE CERTIFICATES MAY HAVE LIMITED LIQUIDITY AND THE MARKET VALUE OF THE CERTIFICATES MAY DECLINE”.
Important Notice About Information Presented in This Prospectus
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus.
This prospectus begins with several introductory sections describing the offered certificates and the issuing entity in abbreviated form:
| ● | “Summary of Certificates”, which sets forth important statistical information relating to the certificates; |
| ● | “Summary of Terms”, which gives a brief introduction of the key features of the certificates and a description of the mortgage loans; and |
| ● | “Summary of Risk Factors” and “Risk Factors”, which describe risks that apply to the certificates. |
This prospectus includes cross references to sections in this prospectus where you can find further related discussions. The table of contents in this prospectus identifies the pages where these sections are located.
Certain capitalized terms are defined and used in this prospectus to assist you in understanding the terms of the offered certificates and this offering. The capitalized terms used in this prospectus are defined on the pages indicated under the caption “Index of Defined Terms”.
All annexes and schedules attached to this prospectus are a part of this prospectus.
In this prospectus:
| ● | the terms “depositor”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II. |
| ● | references to “lender” or “mortgage lender” with respect to a mortgage loan generally should be construed to mean, from and after the date of initial issuance of the offered certificates, the trustee on behalf of the issuing entity as the holder of record title to the mortgage loans or the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, with respect to the obligations and rights of the lender as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
| ● | unless otherwise specified, (i) references to a mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) by name refer to such mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (ii) references to a mortgage loan by name refer to such mortgage loan secured by the related mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (iii) any parenthetical with a percent next to a mortgaged property name (or portfolio of mortgaged properties name) indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage loan (or, if applicable, the allocated loan amount with respect to such mortgaged property) represents of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date for this securitization, and (iv) any parenthetical with a percent next to a mortgage loan name or a group of mortgage loans indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of such mortgage loan or the aggregate outstanding principal balance of such group of mortgage loans, as applicable, represents of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date for this securitization. |
Until ninety days after the date of this prospectus, all dealers that buy, sell or trade the offered certificates, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities in any state or other jurisdiction where such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA
PROHIBITION ON SALES TO EEA RETAIL INVESTORS
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY EEA RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (“EEA”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, AN “EEA RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING: (I) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); OR (II) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97 (AS AMENDED), WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR (III) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129 (AS AMENDED, THE “EU Prospectus Regulation”).
CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 (AS AMENDED, THE “EU PRIIPS Regulation”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO EEA RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE EEA HAS BEEN PREPARED AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY EEA RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EEA MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE EU PRIIPS REGULATION.
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EU PROSPECTUS REGULATION.
MIFID II PRODUCT GOVERNANCE
ANY PERSON OFFERING, SELLING OR RECOMMENDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES (A “DISTRIBUTOR”) SUBJECT TO MIFID II IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNDERTAKING ITS OWN TARGET MARKET ASSESSMENT IN RESPECT OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES AND DETERMINING APPROPRIATE DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MIFID II PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES UNDER COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU) 2017/593 (AS AMENDED, THE “DELEGATED DIRECTIVE”). NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR (EXCEPT AS REGARDS ITSELF OR AGENTS ACTING ON ITS BEHALF, TO THE EXTENT RELEVANT) ANY UNDERWRITER MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO A DISTRIBUTOR’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE DELEGATED DIRECTIVE.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
PROHIBITION ON SALES TO UK RETAIL INVESTORS
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY UK RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (THE “UK”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, A “UK RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING: (I) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2 OF COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2017/565 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 (AS AMENDED, THE “EUWA”) AND AS AMENDED; OR (II) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED, THE “FSMA”) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE FSMA (SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS AS AMENDED) TO IMPLEMENT DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97, WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT, AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2(1) OF REGULATION (EU) NO 600/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED; OR (III) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED (THE “UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION”).
CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED (THE “UK PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO UK RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE UK HAS BEEN PREPARED AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO UK RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE UK MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE UK PRIIPS REGULATION.
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION.
UK PRODUCT GOVERNANCE
ANY PERSON OFFERING, SELLING OR RECOMMENDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES (A “DISTRIBUTOR”) THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE FCA HANDBOOK PRODUCT INTERVENTION AND PRODUCT GOVERNANCE SOURCEBOOK (THE “UK MIFIR PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES”) THAT IS OFFERING, SELLING OR RECOMMENDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNDERTAKING ITS OWN TARGET MARKET ASSESSMENT IN RESPECT OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES AND DETERMINING APPROPRIATE DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS. NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR (EXCEPT AS REGARDS ITSELF OR AGENTS ACTING ON ITS BEHALF, TO THE EXTENT RELEVANT) ANY UNDERWRITER MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO A DISTRIBUTOR’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE UK MIFIR PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES.
EEA AND UK SELLING RESTRICTIONS
EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT:
(a) IT HAS NOT OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE AND WILL NOT OFFER, SELL OR OTHERWISE MAKE AVAILABLE ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO ANY EEA RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION:
(i) THE EXPRESSION “EEA RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING:
(A) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); OR
(B) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97 (AS AMENDED), WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR
(C) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129 (AS AMENDED); AND
(ii) THE EXPRESSION “OFFER” INCLUDES THE COMMUNICATION IN ANY FORM AND BY ANY MEANS OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TERMS OF THE OFFER AND THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO BE OFFERED SO AS TO ENABLE AN INVESTOR TO DECIDE TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES;
(b) IT HAS NOT OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE AND WILL NOT OFFER, SELL OR OTHERWISE MAKE AVAILABLE ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO ANY UK RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (THE “UK”). FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION:
(i) THE EXPRESSION “UK RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING:
(A) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2 OF COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2017/565 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 (AS AMENDED, THE “EUWA”) AND AS AMENDED; OR
(B) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED, THE “FSMA”) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE FSMA (SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS AS AMENDED) TO IMPLEMENT DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97, WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT, AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2(1) OF REGULATION (EU) NO 600/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED; OR
(C) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) 2017/1129 AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA AND AS AMENDED; AND
(ii) THE EXPRESSION “OFFER” INCLUDES THE COMMUNICATION IN ANY FORM AND BY ANY MEANS OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TERMS OF THE OFFER AND THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO BE OFFERED SO AS TO ENABLE AN INVESTOR TO DECIDE TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES.
(c) IT HAS ONLY COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED AND WILL ONLY COMMUNICATE OR CAUSE TO BE COMMUNICATED AN INVITATION OR INDUCEMENT TO ENGAGE IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21 OF THE FSMA) RECEIVED BY IT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUE OR SALE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SECTION 21(1) OF THE FSMA DOES NOT APPLY TO THE ISSUING ENTITY OR THE DEPOSITOR; AND
(d) IT HAS COMPLIED AND WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FSMA WITH RESPECT TO ANYTHING DONE BY IT IN RELATION TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN, FROM OR OTHERWISE INVOLVING THE UK.
EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION AND UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION
NONE OF THE SPONSORS, THE DEPOSITOR, THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE UNDERWRITERS OR ANY OTHER PARTY TO THE TRANSACTION INTENDS TO RETAIN A MATERIAL NET ECONOMIC INTEREST IN THE SECURITIZATION TRANSACTION CONSTITUTED BY THE ISSUE OF THE CERTIFICATES, OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY (A) EUROPEAN UNION REGULATION 2017/2402 (THE “EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION”) OR (B) REGULATION (EU) 2017/2402, AS IT FORMS PART OF UK DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA, AND AS AMENDED BY THE SECURITISATION (AMENDMENT) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS 2019 (THE “UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION”). IN ADDITION, NO SUCH PARTY WILL TAKE ANY ACTION THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR OR CERTIFICATEHOLDER FOR THE PURPOSES OF ITS COMPLIANCE WITH ANY REQUIREMENT OF THE EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION OR THE UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION. FURTHERMORE, THE ARRANGEMENTS DESCRIBED UNDER “CREDIT RISK RETENTION” HAVE NOT BEEN STRUCTURED WITH THE OBJECTIVE OF ENSURING COMPLIANCE BY ANY PERSON WITH ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION OR THE UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY NOT BE A SUITABLE INVESTMENT FOR ANY PERSON THAT IS NOW OR MAY IN THE FUTURE BE SUBJECT TO ANY REQUIREMENT OF THE EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION OR THE UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EU SECURITIZATION REGULATION AND THE UK SECURITIZATION REGULATION, SEE “RISK FACTORS—GENERAL RISK FACTORS—LEGAL AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS AFFECTING INVESTORS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE LIQUIDITY OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES”.
UK FINANCIAL PROMOTION REGIME AND PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT
SCHEMES REGIME
THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY CONSTITUTE A “COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME” AS DEFINED BY SECTION 235 OF THE FSMA THAT IS NOT A “RECOGNISED COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME” FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FSMA AND THAT HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED, REGULATED OR OTHERWISE RECOGNIZED OR APPROVED. AS AN UNREGULATED SCHEME, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES CANNOT BE MARKETED IN THE UK TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FSMA.
THE COMMUNICATION OF THIS PROSPECTUS (A) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, OR DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UK, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005 (AS AMENDED, THE “FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER”), OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.”) OF THE FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER, (IV) OTHERWISE FALL WITHIN AN EXEMPTION SET FORTH IN SUCH ORDER SUCH THAT SECTION 21(1) OF THE FSMA DOES NOT APPLY TO THE ISSUING ENTITY OR (V) ARE PERSONS TO WHICH THIS PROSPECTUS MAY OTHERWISE LAWFULLY BE COMMUNICATED OR DIRECTED (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS “FPO PERSONS”); AND (B) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, AND DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UK, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATING IN UNREGULATED SCHEMES (AS DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES) (EXEMPTIONS) ORDER 2001 (AS AMENDED, THE “PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER”)) AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 14(5) OF THE PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER, OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 22(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.”) OF THE PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER, OR (IV) ARE PERSONS TO WHOM THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY LAWFULLY BE PROMOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 4.12 OF THE FCA HANDBOOK CONDUCT AUTHORITY’S CONDUCT OF BUSINESS SOURCEBOOK (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER WITH FPO PERSONS, “RELEVANT PERSONS”).
THIS PROSPECTUS MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR RELIED ON BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS PROSPECTUS RELATES, INCLUDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO RELEVANT PERSONS AND WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY PERSONS OTHER THAN RELEVANT PERSONS SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON THIS PROSPECTUS.
POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN THE UK ARE ADVISED THAT ALL, OR MOST, OF THE PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE UK REGULATORY SYSTEM WILL NOT APPLY TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES AND THAT COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE UK FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPENSATION SCHEME.
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WILL NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (EXCLUDING HONG KONG, MACAU AND TAIWAN, THE “PRC”) AS PART OF THE INITIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BUT MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY INVESTORS RESIDENT IN THE PRC FROM OUTSIDE THE PRC.
THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES IN THE PRC TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE THE OFFER OR SOLICITATION IN THE PRC.
THE DEPOSITOR DOES NOT REPRESENT THAT THIS PROSPECTUS MAY BE LAWFULLY DISTRIBUTED, OR THAT ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE LAWFULLY OFFERED, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE REGISTRATION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IN THE PRC, OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION AVAILABLE THEREUNDER, OR ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR FACILITATING ANY SUCH DISTRIBUTION OR OFFERING. IN PARTICULAR, NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE DEPOSITOR WHICH WOULD PERMIT AN OFFERING OF ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS IN THE PRC.
ACCORDINGLY, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE NOT BEING OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE PRC BY MEANS OF THIS PROSPECTUS OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT. NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY ADVERTISEMENT OR OTHER OFFERING MATERIAL MAY BE DISTRIBUTED OR PUBLISHED IN THE PRC, EXCEPT UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WILL RESULT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
HONG KONG
NO PERSON HAS ISSUED OR DISTRIBUTED OR HAD IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE OR DISTRIBUTION, OR WILL ISSUE OR DISTRIBUTE OR HAVE IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE OR DISTRIBUTION, WHETHER IN HONG KONG OR ELSEWHERE, ANY ADVERTISEMENT, INVITATION OR DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, WHICH IS DIRECTED AT, OR THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE LIKELY TO BE ACCESSED OR READ BY, THE PUBLIC OF HONG KONG (EXCEPT IF PERMITTED TO DO SO UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF HONG KONG) OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO OFFERED CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE OR ARE INTENDED TO BE DISPOSED OF (A) ONLY TO PERSONS OUTSIDE HONG KONG OR (B) ONLY TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) (THE “SFO”) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE SFO.
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES (IF THEY ARE NOT A “STRUCTURED PRODUCT” AS DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG)) HAVE NOT BEEN OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD, BY MEANS OF ANY DOCUMENT, OTHER THAN (A) TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN THE SFO AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE SFO, OR (B) IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DO NOT RESULT IN THE DOCUMENT CONSTITUTING A “PROSPECTUS” AS DEFINED IN THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE (CAP. 32 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) OR WHICH DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE (CAP. 622 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG). FURTHER, THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION OF HONG KONG OR ANY OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN HONG KONG. YOU ARE ADVISED TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN RELATION TO THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS.
W A R N I N G
IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT ABOUT ANY OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE.
SINGAPORE
NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OFFER OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAS BEEN OR WILL BE LODGED OR REGISTERED AS A PROSPECTUS WITH THE MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE (“MAS”) UNDER THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) OF SINGAPORE (THE “SFA”). ACCORDINGLY, MAS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS AS DEFINED IN THE SFA AND STATUTORY LIABILITY UNDER THE SFA IN RELATION TO THE CONTENTS OF PROSPECTUSES WOULD NOT APPLY. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSIDER CAREFULLY WHETHER THE INVESTMENT IS SUITABLE FOR IT.
THIS PROSPECTUS AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS OR MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER OR SALE, OR INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY NOT BE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ISSUED, CIRCULATED OR DISTRIBUTED, NOR MAY THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BE OFFERED OR SOLD, OR BE MADE THE SUBJECT OF AN INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, WHETHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO PERSONS IN SINGAPORE OTHER THAN TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4A(1)(C) OF THE SFA) (“INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR”) PURSUANT TO SECTION 304 OF THE SFA.
UNLESS SUCH OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE OF THE SAME CLASS AS OTHER OFFERED CERTIFICATES OF THE ISSUING ENTITY THAT ARE LISTED FOR QUOTATION ON AN APPROVED EXCHANGE (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2(1) OF THE SFA) (“APPROVED EXCHANGE”) AND IN RESPECT OF WHICH ANY OFFER, INFORMATION, STATEMENT, INTRODUCTORY DOCUMENT, SHAREHOLDERS’ CIRCULAR FOR A REVERSE TAKE-OVER DOCUMENT ISSUED FOR THE PURPOSES OF A TRUST SCHEME OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR DOCUMENT APPROVED BY AN APPROVED EXCHANGE WAS ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH AN OFFER OR THE LISTING FOR QUOTATION OF THOSE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, ANY SUBSEQUENT OFFERS IN SINGAPORE OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES ACQUIRED PURSUANT TO AN INITIAL OFFER MADE HEREUNDER MAY ONLY BE MADE, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 304A, TO PERSONS WHO ARE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS.
AS THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE ONLY OFFERED TO PERSONS IN SINGAPORE WHO QUALIFY AS AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR, THE ISSUING ENTITY IS NOT REQUIRED TO DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES PURSUANT TO SECTION 309B OF THE SFA.
NOTHING SET OUT IN THIS NOTICE SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE AND EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN LEGAL COUNSEL. THIS NOTICE IS FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE SFA AND ITS REGULATIONS AS THE SAME MAY BE AMENDED OR CONSOLIDATED FROM TIME TO TIME AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE EXHAUSTIVE IN ANY RESPECT.
THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT, AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THIS PROSPECTUS TO BE CONSTRUED AS, A PUBLIC OFFERING OF SECURITIES IN KOREA. NEITHER THE ISSUER NOR ANY OF ITS AGENTS MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE ELIGIBILITY OF ANY RECIPIENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS TO ACQUIRE THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES UNDER THE LAWS OF KOREA, INCLUDING, BUT WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSACTION LAW AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER (THE “FETL”). THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION OF KOREA FOR PUBLIC OFFERING IN KOREA, AND NONE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE OFFERED, SOLD OR DELIVERED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR OFFERED OR SOLD TO ANY PERSON FOR RE-OFFERING OR RESALE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN KOREA OR TO ANY
RESIDENT OF KOREA EXCEPT PURSUANT TO THE FINANCIAL INVESTMENT SERVICES AND CAPITAL MARKETS ACT AND THE DECREES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, THE FETL AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS AND MINISTERIAL GUIDELINES IN KOREA. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE FOREGOING, THE NUMBER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES OFFERED IN KOREA OR TO A RESIDENT OF KOREA SHALL BE LESS THAN FIFTY AND FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE ISSUE DATE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, NONE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE DIVIDED RESULTING IN AN INCREASED NUMBER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES. FURTHERMORE, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY NOT BE RESOLD TO KOREAN RESIDENTS UNLESS THE PURCHASER OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOVERNMENT REPORTING APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE FETL AND ITS SUBORDINATE DECREES AND REGULATIONS) IN CONNECTION WITH THE PURCHASE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES.
JAPAN
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND EXCHANGE LAW OF JAPAN, AS AMENDED (THE “FIEL”), AND DISCLOSURE UNDER THE FIEL HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. ACCORDINGLY, EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT IT HAS NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFER OR SELL ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN (WHICH TERM AS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MEANS ANY PERSON RESIDENT IN JAPAN, INCLUDING ANY CORPORATION OR OTHER ENTITY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF JAPAN) OR TO OTHERS FOR REOFFERING OR RE-SALE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF, AND OTHERWISE IN COMPLIANCE WITH, THE FIEL AND OTHER RELEVANT LAWS, REGULATIONS AND MINISTERIAL GUIDELINES OF JAPAN.
JAPANESE RETENTION REQUIREMENT
The JAPANESE Financial Services Agency published a risk retention rule as part of the regulatory capital regulation of certain categories of Japanese investors seeking to invest in securitization transactions (the “JRR RULE”). The JRR Rule mandates an “indirect” compliance requirement, meaning that certain categories of Japanese investors will be required to apply higher risk weighting to securitization exposures they hold unless the relevant originator commits to hold a retention interest in the securities issued in the securitization transaction equal to at least 5% of the exposure of the total underlying assets in the securitization transaction (the “JAPANESE RETENTION REQUIREMENT”), or such investors determine that the underlying assets were not “inappropriately originated.” In the absence of such a determination by such investors that such underlying assets were not “inappropriately originated”, the Japanese Retention Requirement would apply to an investment by such investors in such securities.
No party to the transaction described in this Prospectus has committed to hold a risk retention interest in compliance with the Japanese Retention Requirement, and we make no representation as to whether the transaction described in this prospectus would otherwise comply with the JRR Rule.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF CANADA
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE SOLD IN CANADA ONLY TO PURCHASERS PURCHASING, OR DEEMED TO BE PURCHASING, AS PRINCIPAL THAT ARE ACCREDITED INVESTORS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 45-106 PROSPECTUS EXEMPTIONS OR SUBSECTION 73.3(1) OF THE SECURITIES ACT (ONTARIO), AND ARE PERMITTED CLIENTS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS. ANY RESALE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MUST BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE PROSPECTUS REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS.
SECURITIES LEGISLATION IN CERTAIN PROVINCES OR TERRITORIES OF CANADA MAY PROVIDE A PURCHASER WITH REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES IF THIS PROSPECTUS (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENT THERETO) CONTAINS A MISREPRESENTATION, PROVIDED THAT THE REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES ARE EXERCISED BY THE PURCHASER WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY. THE PURCHASER SHOULD REFER TO ANY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY FOR PARTICULARS OF THESE RIGHTS OR CONSULT WITH A LEGAL ADVISOR.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 3A.3 OF NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 33-105 UNDERWRITING CONFLICTS (“NI 33-105”), THE UNDERWRITERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF NI 33-105 REGARDING UNDERWRITER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING.
MEXICO
THIS PROSPECTUS HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED NOR APPROVED BY THE MEXICAN NATIONAL BANKING AND SECURITIES COMMISSION (COMISIÓN NACIONAL BANCARIA Y DE VALORES, OR THE “CNBV”). THIS OFFERING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC OFFERING IN MEXICO AND THIS PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED IN MEXICO. THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED WITH THE MEXICAN NATIONAL SECURITIES REGISTRY (REGISTRO NACIONAL DE VALORES, OR “RNV”) MAINTAINED BY THE CNBV, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED PUBLICLY IN MEXICO EXCEPT TO MEXICAN INSTITUTIONAL AND QUALIFIED INVESTORS PURSUANT TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH IN THE MEXICAN SECURITIES MARKET LAW (LEY DEL MERCADO DE VALORES). THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY ANY CERTIFICATION AS TO THE INVESTMENT QUALITY OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, OUR SOLVENCY, LIQUIDITY OR CREDIT QUALITY OR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS EXCLUSIVELY OUR RESPONSIBILITY AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR AUTHORIZED BY THE CNBV. THE ACQUISITION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BY AN INVESTOR WHO IS A RESIDENT OF MEXICO WILL BE MADE UNDER SUCH INVESTOR’S OWN RESPONSIBILITY.
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Summary of Terms
This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information you need to consider in making your investment decision. To understand all of the terms of the offering of the offered certificates, read this entire document carefully.
Relevant Parties
| Depositor | GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, a Delaware corporation. The depositor’s address is 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282 and its telephone number is (212) 902-1000. See “Transaction Parties—The Depositor”. |
Issuing Entity | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust, a New York common law trust, to be established on the closing date under the pooling and servicing agreement. For more detailed information, see “Transaction Parties—The Issuing Entity”. |
| Sponsors | The sponsors of this transaction are: |
| Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a New York limited partnership; |
| Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., a New York corporation; |
| 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; |
| Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., a Delaware corporation; |
| Bank of Montreal, a Canadian chartered bank; and |
| German American Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation. |
| The sponsors are sometimes also referred to in this prospectus as the “mortgage loan sellers”. |
| Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company is an affiliate of each of the depositor and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, one of the underwriters and an initial purchaser of certain of the non-offered certificates, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, an originator. Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. is an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters and an initial purchaser of certain of the non-offered certificates. Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters and an initial purchaser of certain of the non-offered certificates. Bank of Montreal is an affiliate of BMO Capital Markets Corp., one of the underwriters and an initial purchaser of certain of the non-offered certificates. German American Capital Corporation is an affiliate of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., one of the underwriters and an initial purchaser of certain of the non-offered certificates, and DBR Investments Co. Limited, an originator. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. |
| The sponsors originated, co-originated or acquired (or, on or prior to the closing date, will acquire) and will transfer to the depositor the mortgage loans set forth in the following chart: |
| Sellers of the Mortgage Loans |
Sponsor(1) | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Principal Balance of Mortgage Loans | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company | 3 | | $136,850,000 | 15.3 | % |
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. | 7 | | 246,800,000 | 27.7 | |
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 7 | | 201,700,000 | 22.6 | |
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. | 8 | | 181,096,230 | 20.3 | |
Bank of Montreal | 5 | | 69,170,000 | 7.8 | |
German American Capital Corporation | 2 | | 56,500,000 | 6.3 | |
Total | 32 | | $892,116,230 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Each mortgage loan was originated by its respective mortgage loan seller or its affiliate, except those certain mortgage loans that were acquired from unaffiliated third-party originators or are part of larger whole loan structures that were co-originated by the applicable mortgage loan seller or its affiliate with one or more other lenders. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans” below. |
| See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. |
Master Servicer | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is expected to act as the master servicer and will be responsible for the master servicing and administration of the mortgage loans and any related companion loans pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement (other than any mortgage loan and companion loan identified in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below that is part of a whole loan and serviced under the servicing agreement indicated in that table and the servicing shift mortgage loan on and after the servicing shift securitization date). The principal servicing office of the master servicer is located at 10851 Mastin Street, Building 82, Suite 300, Overland Park, Kansas 66210, and its telephone number is (800) 327-8083. See “Transaction Parties—The Master Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
| Prior to its servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loan will be serviced by the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after its servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loan will be serviced under, and by the master servicer designated in, the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
| Pursuant to one or more limited subservicing agreements between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties with respect to certain of the mortgage loans. |
| The master servicer of each non-serviced mortgage loan is set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Special Servicer | 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is expected to act as the special servicer with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan, any excluded special servicer loan and the servicing shift mortgage loan on and after the servicing shift securitization date) and any related companion loans other than with respect to any non-serviced whole loan set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below. The special servicer will be primarily responsible for (i) making decisions and performing certain servicing functions with respect to such mortgage loans and any related companion loans as to which a special servicing transfer event (such as a default or an imminent default) has occurred and (ii) generally, reviewing, evaluating, processing and/or providing or withholding consent as to certain major decisions and certain other transactions and performing certain enforcement actions relating to such mortgage loans and any related companion loans for which a special servicing transfer event has not occurred, in each case pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction. The principal servicing office of the special servicer is located at 2977 McFarlane Road, Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33133, and its telephone number is (305) 901-1000. See “Transaction Parties—The Special Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
| Prior to its servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loan, if necessary, will be specially serviced by the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after its servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loan will be specially serviced, if necessary, under, and by the special servicer designated in, the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
| If the special servicer obtains knowledge that it is a borrower party with respect to any mortgage loan (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan) or serviced whole loan (such mortgage loan or serviced whole loan, referred to in this prospectus as an “excluded special servicer loan”), the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer of that excluded special servicer loan and will be replaced as discussed under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause”. |
| 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to be appointed as the special servicer by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC is expected to retain (directly or through one or more majority-owned affiliates) the “eligible horizontal residual interest” and, on the closing date, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC or an affiliate is expected to be the initial directing holder with respect to each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan, the servicing shift mortgage loan and any applicable excluded loan) and any related serviced companion loans. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder” and “Credit Risk Retention”. |
| 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is also the initial special servicer with respect to the 500 Delaware whole loan pursuant to the 3650R 2022-PF2 pooling and servicing agreement. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (which is also an affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC) is also the initial directing holder and initial controlling class representative under the 3650R 2022-PF2 pooling and servicing agreement. |
| The special servicer of each non-serviced mortgage loan is set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Affiliated Sub-Servicer | Pursuant to one or more limited subservicing agreements, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties solely consisting of assisting the master servicer with collecting financial statements, rent rolls and other information with respect to certain of the mortgage loans. |
| Trustee | Computershare Trust Company, National Association, a national banking association, will act as trustee. The corporate trust office of the trustee is located at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045. Following the transfer of the mortgage loans to the issuing entity, the trustee, on behalf of the issuing entity, will become the mortgagee of record for each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related companion loans. See “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and Certificate Administrator” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
| The initial mortgagee of record with respect to the servicing shift mortgage loan will be the trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after its servicing shift securitization date, the mortgagee of record with respect to the servicing shift mortgage loan will be the trustee designated in the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”. |
| With respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan, the entity set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below, in its capacity as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction, is the mortgagee of record for that non-serviced mortgage loan and any related companion loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Certificate Administrator | Computershare Trust Company, National Association, a national banking association, will act as certificate administrator. The certificate administrator will also be required to act as custodian, certificate registrar, REMIC administrator, 17g-5 information provider and authenticating agent. The corporate trust offices of Computershare Trust Company, National Association, in its capacity as certificate administrator, are located at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045, and for certificate transfer services, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, 1505 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108. See “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and Certificate Administrator” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
| The custodian with respect to the servicing shift mortgage loan will initially be the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after the servicing shift securitization date, the custodian of the mortgage file (other than the promissory note evidencing the servicing shift mortgage loan) will be the custodian under the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
| The custodian with respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan will be the entity set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below, the custodian under the pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Operating Advisor | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC, will be the operating advisor. The operating advisor will have certain review and reporting responsibilities with respect to the performance of the special servicer, and in certain circumstances may recommend to the certificateholders that the special servicer be replaced. The operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights as operating advisor under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan or any related REO property. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”. |
Asset Representations Reviewer | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC, will also be serving as the asset representations reviewer. The asset representations reviewer will be required to review certain delinquent mortgage loans after a specified delinquency threshold has been exceeded and receipt of notification from the certificate administrator that the required percentage of voting rights have voted to direct a review of such delinquent mortgage loans. |
| See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Asset Representations Reviewer”. |
Directing Holder | The directing holder will have certain consent and consultation rights in certain circumstances with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan and any applicable excluded loan), as further described in this prospectus. The directing holder (other than with respect to the servicing shift whole loan, any non-serviced mortgage loan and any applicable excluded loan) will generally be the controlling class certificateholder (or its representative, the “controlling class representative”) selected by a majority of the controlling class certificateholders (by certificate balance, as certified by the certificate registrar from time to time as provided for in the pooling and servicing agreement). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder”. However, in certain circumstances there may be no directing holder even if there is a controlling class, and in other circumstances there will be no controlling class. |
| The controlling class will be the most subordinate class of the Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates then-outstanding that has an aggregate certificate balance, as notionally reduced by any cumulative appraisal reductions allocable to such class, at least equal to 25% of the initial certificate balance of that class. |
| It is anticipated that on the closing date (i) 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (or a “majority-owned affiliate” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules)) will be the holder of the “eligible horizontal residual interest” and (ii) 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC will be the initial controlling class representative and will appoint itself or an affiliate as the initial directing holder with respect to each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan, the servicing shift mortgage loan and any applicable excluded loan) and any related serviced companion loans. |
| With respect to the servicing shift whole loan, the holder of the companion loan identified in the co-lender agreement as the controlling note will be the directing holder with respect to the servicing shift whole loan. From and after the date such controlling note is included in a securitization transaction (the “servicing shift securitization date”), the directing holder of the servicing shift whole loan is expected to be the directing holder (or its equivalent) under the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement, and will be entitled to certain consent and consultation rights with respect to such servicing shift whole loan, which are substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, those of the controlling class representative under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization. The controlling class representative of this securitization will only have limited consultation rights with respect to certain servicing matters or mortgage loan modifications affecting the servicing shift mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”. |
| With respect to the controlling class representative, an “excluded loan” is a mortgage loan or whole loan with respect to which the controlling class representative or the holder of the majority of the controlling class certificates (by certificate balance) is a borrower, a manager of a mortgaged property, the holder of a mezzanine loan that has accelerated the related mezzanine loan or commenced foreclosure or enforcement proceedings against the equity collateral pledged to secure the related mezzanine loan (subject to certain exceptions), or any borrower party affiliate thereof. |
| Each entity identified in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below is the initial directing holder (or the equivalent) under the pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction and will have certain consent and consultation rights with respect to the related non-serviced whole loan, which are substantially similar, but not identical, to those of the controlling class representative under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization, subject to similar appraisal mechanics. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Certain Affiliations and
| Relationships | The originators, the sponsors, the underwriters, and the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement have various roles in this transaction as well as certain relationships with parties to this transaction and certain of their affiliates. These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as further described in this prospectus under “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” and “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”. |
Relevant Dates and Periods
Cut-off Date | With respect to each mortgage loan and whole loan, the related due date in August 2024 for that mortgage loan or whole loan (or, in the case of any mortgage loan or whole loan that has its first due date after August 2024, the date that would have been its due date in August 2024 under the terms of that mortgage loan or whole loan if a monthly payment were scheduled to be due in that month). |
Closing Date | On or about August 29, 2024. |
Distribution Date | The fourth (4th) business day following each determination date. The first distribution date will be in September 2024. |
Determination Date | The eleventh (11th) day of each month or, if the eleventh (11th) day is not a business day, then the business day immediately following such eleventh (11th) day. |
Record Date | With respect to any distribution date, the last business day of the month preceding the month in which that distribution date occurs. |
Interest Accrual Period | The interest accrual period for each class of offered certificates for each distribution date will be the calendar month immediately preceding the month in which that distribution date occurs. Interest on the offered certificates will be calculated assuming that each month has 30 days and each year has 360 days. |
Collection Period | For any mortgage loan to be held by the issuing entity and any distribution date, the period commencing on the day immediately following the due date for such mortgage loan in the month preceding the month in which that distribution date occurs and ending on and including the due date for such mortgage loan in the month in which that distribution date occurs. However, in the event that the last day of a collection period (or applicable grace period) is not a business day, any periodic payments received with respect to the mortgage loans relating to that collection period on the business day immediately following that last day will be deemed to have been received during that collection period and not during any other collection period. |
Assumed Final Distribution Date;
Rated Final Distribution Date | The assumed final distribution dates set forth below for each class of offered certificates have been determined on the basis of the assumptions described in “Description of the Certificates— Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date”: |
| Class A-1 | April 2029 |
| Class A-3 | August 2029 |
| Class X-A | August 2029 |
| Class X-B | August 2029 |
| Class X-D | August 2029 |
| Class A-S | August 2029 |
| Class B | August 2029 |
| Class C | August 2029 |
| Class D | August 2029 |
| The rated final distribution date for the offered certificates will be the distribution date in August 2057. |
Transaction Overview
On the closing date, each sponsor will sell its respective mortgage loans to the depositor, which will in turn deposit the mortgage loans into the issuing entity, a common law trust created on the closing date. The issuing entity will be formed by a pooling and servicing agreement to be entered into among the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer.
The transfers of the mortgage loans from the sponsors to the depositor and from the depositor to the issuing entity in exchange for the offered certificates are illustrated below:
The foregoing illustration does not take into account the sale of any non-offered certificates.
Offered Certificates
| General | We are offering the following classes of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates as part of Series 2024-V9: |
| The certificates of this Series will consist of the above classes and the following classes that are not being offered by this prospectus: Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR, Class J-RR and Class R (collectively, the “non-offered certificates”). |
Certificate Balances and
Notional Amounts | Your certificates will have the approximate aggregate initial certificate balance or notional amount set forth below, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%: |
| Class A-1 | $1,595,000 |
| Class A-3 | $622,886,000 |
| Class X-A | $722,614,000(1) |
| Class X-B | $75,828,000(1) |
| Class X-D | $14,454,000(1) |
| Class A-S | $98,133,000 |
| Class B | $43,490,000 |
| Class C | $32,338,000 |
| Class D | $14,454,000 |
Pass-Through Rates
A. Offered Certificates | Your certificates will accrue interest at an annual rate called a pass-through rate. The initial approximate pass-through rate is set forth below for each class of offered certificates: |
| Class A-1 | 4.84942%(1) |
| Class A-3 | 5.60190%(1) |
| Class X-A | 1.26335%(2) |
| Class X-B | 0.46595%(2) |
| Class X-D | 2.42636%(2) |
| Class A-S | 6.06412%(3) |
| Class B | 6.46569%(3) |
| Class C | 6.45331%(3) |
| Class D | 4.50000%(1) |
| (1) | The pass-through rates of the Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class D certificates for each distribution date will each be a per annum rate equal to a fixed rate at the pass-through rate set forth opposite each such class in the table above. |
| (2) | The pass-through rate of the Class X-A certificates for each distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest |
| | rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates of the Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates for that distribution date, weighted on the basis of their respective certificate balances immediately prior to that distribution date. The pass-through rate of the Class X-B certificates for any distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates of the Class B and Class C certificates for that distribution date weighted on the basis of their respective certificate balances immediately prior to that distribution date. The pass-through rate of the Class X-D certificates for any distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs, over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class D certificates for that distribution date. |
| (3) | The pass through rate of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for each distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the lesser of (i) a fixed rate at the pass-through rate set forth opposite such class in the table above and (ii) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs. |
B. Interest Rate Calculation
| Convention | Interest on the offered certificates at their applicable pass-through rates will be calculated based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, or a “30/360 basis”. |
| For purposes of calculating the pass-through rates on the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates and any other class of offered certificates that has a pass-through rate limited by, equal to or based on the weighted average net mortgage interest rate (which calculation does not include any companion loan interest rate), the mortgage loan interest rates will not reflect any default interest rate, any loan term modifications agreed to by the special servicer or any modifications resulting from a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency. |
| For purposes of calculating the pass-through rates on the offered certificates, the interest rate for each mortgage loan that accrues interest based on the actual number of days in each month and assuming a 360-day year, or an “actual/360 basis”, will be recalculated, if necessary, so that the amount of interest that would accrue at that recalculated rate in the applicable month, calculated on a 30/360 basis, will equal the amount of interest that is required to be paid on that mortgage loan in that month, subject to certain adjustments as described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Pass-Through Rates” and “—Interest Distribution Amount”. |
C. Servicing and
Administration Fees | The master servicer and the special servicer are entitled to a servicing fee and a special servicing fee, respectively, from the interest payments on each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan with respect to the special servicing fee only), any serviced companion loan and any related REO loans and (a) with respect to the servicing fee, if unpaid after final |
| recovery on the related mortgage loan, out of general collections with respect to the other mortgage loans and (b) with respect to the special servicing fees, if the related mortgage loan interest payments (or other collections in respect of the related mortgage loan or mortgaged property) are insufficient, then from general collections on all mortgage loans. The servicing fee for each distribution date, including the master servicing fee and the portion of the servicing fee payable to any primary servicer or subservicer, is calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related serviced companion loans at the servicing fee rate equal to a per annum rate ranging from 0.00250% to 0.03125%. |
| The principal compensation to be paid to the special servicer in respect of its special servicing activities will be the special servicing fee, the workout fee and the liquidation fee. |
| The special servicing fee for each distribution date is calculated based on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related serviced companion loans as to which a special servicing transfer event has occurred (including any related REO loans), on a loan-by-loan basis at the special servicing fee rate equal to the greater of 0.25% per annum and the rate that would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 for the related month. The special servicer will not be entitled to a special servicing fee with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan. |
| The workout fee will generally be payable with respect to each specially serviced loan (other than a non-serviced whole loan) which has become a “corrected loan” (which will occur (i) with respect to a specially serviced loan as to which there has been a payment default, when the borrower has brought the mortgage loan current and thereafter made three (3) consecutive full and timely monthly payments, including pursuant to any workout and (ii) with respect to any other specially serviced loan, when the related default is cured or the other circumstances pursuant to which it became a specially serviced loan cease to exist in the commercially reasonable judgment of the special servicer). The workout fee will be payable out of each collection (other than penalty charges) of interest and principal (including scheduled payments, prepayments, balloon payments and payments at maturity) received on the related corrected loan for so long as it remains a corrected mortgage loan, in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) 1.00% of each such collection of interest and principal (or such higher rate as would result in a workout fee equal to $25,000) and (2) such lower rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000. |
| A liquidation fee will generally be payable with respect to each specially serviced loan and any related REO property as to which the special servicer obtains a full, partial or discounted payoff from the related borrower and, except as otherwise described in this prospectus, with respect to any specially serviced loan or REO property as to which the special servicer |
| receives any liquidation proceeds or insurance and condemnation proceeds. The liquidation fee for each specially serviced loan and any related REO property will be payable from the related payment or proceeds in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) 1.00% of such payment or proceeds and (2) such lower rate as would result in a liquidation fee of $1,000,000; provided, however, that, except as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”, no liquidation fee will be less than $25,000. |
| Any primary servicing fees or sub-servicing fees with respect to each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related serviced companion loans will be paid by the master servicer out of the servicing fee described above. |
| The master servicer and the special servicer are also entitled to additional fees and amounts, including income on the amounts held in certain accounts and certain permitted investments, liquidation fees and workout fees. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”. |
| The certificate administrator/trustee fee for each distribution date is calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and each REO loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan) at a per annum rate equal to 0.010230%. |
| The operating advisor will be entitled to a fee on each distribution date calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and each REO loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan, but not any companion loan) at a per annum rate equal to 0.001757%. The operating advisor will also be entitled under certain circumstances to a consulting fee. |
| As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to a fee on each distribution date calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and REO loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan, but not any companion loan) at a per annum rate equal to 0.000280%. Upon the completion of any asset review with respect to each delinquent loan, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to a per loan fee in an amount described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation”. |
| Each party to the pooling and servicing agreement will also be entitled to be reimbursed by the issuing entity for costs, expenses and liabilities borne by them in certain circumstances. Fees and expenses payable by the issuing entity to any party to the pooling and servicing agreement are generally payable prior to any distributions to certificateholders. |
| Additionally, with respect to each distribution date, an amount equal to the product of 0.00050% per annum multiplied by the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and any |
| REO loan will be payable to Commercial Real Estate Finance Council® as a license fee for use of its name and trademarks, including an investor reporting package. This fee will be payable prior to any distributions to certificateholders. |
| Payment of the fees and reimbursement of the costs and expenses described above will generally have priority over the distribution of amounts payable to the certificateholders. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses” and “—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. |
| With respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan set forth in the following table, the related master servicer and/or sub-servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of that mortgage loan will be entitled to a primary servicing fee (which includes any subservicing fee) at a rate equal to a per annum rate set forth in the following table, and the related special servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement will be entitled to a special servicing fee at a rate equal to the per annum rate set forth below. In addition, each party to the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the related non-serviced whole loan will be entitled to receive other fees and reimbursements with respect to the related non-serviced mortgage loan in amounts, from sources, and at frequencies, that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described above and, in certain cases (for example, with respect to unreimbursed special servicing fees and property protection advances with respect to the related non-serviced whole loan), such amounts will be reimbursable from general collections on the mortgage loans to the extent not recoverable from the related non-serviced whole loan and to the extent allocable to the related non-serviced mortgage loan pursuant to the related co-lender agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
NON-SERVICED MORTGAGE LOANS(1)(2)
| Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan | Primary Servicing Fee Rate and Sub-Servicing Fee Rate | Special Servicing Fee Rate(3) |
| 500 Delaware | 0.00125% | 0.25000% |
| (1) | Does not reflect the Baybrook Mall mortgage loan, which is part of a split loan structure comprised of the related mortgage loan and one or more pari passu companion loans that may be included in one or more future securitizations. After the securitization of the related controlling pari passu companion loan, the related mortgage loan will also be a non-serviced mortgage loan, and the related servicing shift master servicer and related servicing shift special servicer under the related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement will be entitled to a primary servicing fee and special servicing fee, respectively, as will be set forth in such related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. |
| (2) | The fees related to the whole loans listed in the above chart relate to securitization transactions that have either closed or are expected to close on or prior to the closing date, and, in certain instances are based on publicly available information. |
| (3) | In the case of certain mortgage loans, the Special Servicing Fee Rate will be subject to a cap or floor amount. |
Distributions
A. Amount and Order of
Distributions on the
| Certificates | On each distribution date, funds available for distribution to the holders of the certificates, net of any yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums, will be distributed in the following amounts and order of priority: |
| First, to the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the interest entitlements for those classes; |
| Second, to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, to the extent of funds available for distribution of principal, in reduction of the then-outstanding certificate balances of those classes, in the following priority: |
| (A) | to the Class A-1 certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and |
| (B) | to the Class A-3 certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal after the distributions pursuant to clause (A) above. |
| However, if the certificate balances of each class of principal balance certificates other than the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates have been reduced to zero, funds available for distributions of principal will be distributed to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, pro rata, based on their respective certificate balances. |
| Third, to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to, and pro rata based upon, the aggregate unreimbursed realized losses previously allocated to each such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth above at the pass-through rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related realized loss was allocated to such class until the date such realized loss is reimbursed; |
| Fourth, to the Class A-S certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class A-S certificates in the amount of their interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds available for distributions of principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates), to the Class A-S certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class A-S certificates first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate unreimbursed realized losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth above at the pass-through rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related realized loss was allocated to such class until the date such realized loss is reimbursed; |
| Fifth, to the Class B certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class B certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds available for distributions of principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates), to the Class B certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class B certificates first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate unreimbursed realized losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth above at the pass-through rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related realized loss was allocated to such class until the date such realized loss is reimbursed; |
| Sixth, to the Class C certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class C certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds available for distributions of principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S and Class B certificates), to the Class C certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class C certificates first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate unreimbursed realized losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth above at the pass-through rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related realized loss was allocated to such class until the date such realized loss is reimbursed; |
| Seventh, to the Class D certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class D certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds available for distributions of principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates), to the Class D certificates until their certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class D certificates first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate unreimbursed realized losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth above at the pass-through rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related realized loss was allocated to such class until the date such realized loss is reimbursed; and |
| Eighth, to the non-offered certificates, in the amounts and order of priority described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”. |
| For more detailed information regarding distributions on the certificates, see “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”. |
B. Interest and Principal
| Entitlements | A description of the interest entitlement of each class of certificates (other than the Class R certificates) can be found in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Interest |
| Distribution Amount”. As described in that section, there are circumstances in which your interest entitlement for a distribution date could be less than one full month’s interest at the pass-through rate on your certificate’s balance or notional amount. |
| A description of the amount of principal required to be distributed to each class of certificates entitled to principal on a particular distribution date can be found in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Principal Distribution Amount”. |
C. Yield Maintenance Charges,
Prepayment Premiums | Yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums with respect to the mortgage loans will be allocated to the certificates as described in “Description of the Certificates—Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums”. |
| For an explanation of the calculation of yield maintenance charges, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”. |
D. Subordination, Allocation of
Losses and Certain Expenses | The following chart describes the manner in which the payment rights of certain classes of certificates will be senior or subordinate, as the case may be, to the payment rights of other classes of certificates. The chart also shows the corresponding entitlement to receive principal and interest on any distribution date in descending order (beginning with the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates). Among the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, payment rights of certain classes will be as more particularly described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus. It also shows the manner in which mortgage loan losses are allocated in ascending order (beginning with certain certificates that are not being offered by this prospectus). Principal losses on the mortgage loans allocated to a class of certificates will reduce the related certificate balance of that class. Although no principal payments or mortgage loan losses will be allocated to the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-D or Class R certificates, principal payments or mortgage loan losses will reduce the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates (to the extent such principal payments or mortgage loan losses are allocated to the Class A-1, Class A-3 or Class A-S certificates), the Class X-B certificates (to the extent such principal payments or mortgage loan losses are allocated to the Class B or Class C certificates) and the Class X-D certificates (to the extent such principal payments or mortgage loan losses are allocated to the Class D certificates), and, therefore, the amount of interest they accrue. |
| * | Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates are interest-only certificates. |
| ** | Other than the Class R certificates. |
| Other than the subordination of certain classes of certificates, as described above, no other form of credit enhancement will be available for the benefit of the holders of the offered certificates. |
| Principal losses and principal payments, if any, on mortgage loans that are allocated to a class of certificates (other than the Class X-A, Class X-B or Class X-D certificates) will reduce the certificate balance of that class of certificates. |
| The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal losses or principal payments, if any, allocated to the Class A-1, Class A-3 or Class A-S certificates. The notional amount of the Class X-B certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal losses or principal payments, if any, allocated to the Class B or Class C certificates. The notional amount of the Class X-D certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal losses or principal payments, if any, allocated to the Class D certificates. |
| To the extent funds are available on a subsequent distribution date for distribution on your offered certificates, you will be reimbursed for any losses allocated to your offered certificates with interest at the pass-through rate on those offered certificates in accordance with the distribution priorities. |
| See “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses” for more detailed information regarding the subordination provisions applicable to the certificates and the allocation of losses to the certificates. |
E. Shortfalls in Available Funds | Shortfalls will reduce the available funds and will correspondingly reduce the amount allocated to the certificates. The reduction in amounts available for distribution to the certificates will reduce distributions to the classes of certificates with the lowest payment priorities: |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from the payment of special servicing fees and other additional compensation that the special servicer is entitled to receive; |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from interest on advances made by the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee (to the extent not covered by late payment charges or default interest paid by the related borrower); |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from the application of appraisal reductions to reduce interest advances; |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from extraordinary expenses of the issuing entity including indemnification payments payable to the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement; |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from a modification of a mortgage loan’s interest rate or principal balance; and |
| ● | shortfalls resulting from other unanticipated or default-related expenses of the issuing entity. |
| In addition, prepayment interest shortfalls on the mortgage loans that are not covered by certain compensating interest payments made by the master servicer will be allocated among the classes of certificates (other than the Class R certificates), on a pro rata basis, to reduce the amount of interest payable on each such class of certificates to the extent described in this prospectus. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”. |
| With respect to a whole loan that is comprised of a mortgage loan, in some cases, one or more pari passu companion loans and, in some cases, one or more subordinate companion loans, shortfalls in available funds resulting from any of the foregoing will result first in a reduction in amounts distributable in accordance with the related co-lender agreement in respect of the related subordinate companion loan(s), if any, and then, result in a reduction in amounts distributable in accordance with the related co-lender agreement in respect of the related mortgage loan (and any pari passu companion loans, on a pro rata basis), which allocations to the related mortgage loan will in turn reduce distributions in respect of the certificates as described above. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Co-Lender Agreement”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Co-Lender Agreement”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loan” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations—Yield Considerations—Losses and Shortfalls”. |
Advances
A. P&I Advances | The master servicer is required to advance a delinquent periodic payment on each mortgage loan, including any non-serviced mortgage loan or REO loan (other than any portion of an REO loan related to a companion loan), unless the master servicer, the trustee or the special servicer determines that the advance would be non-recoverable. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be required to advance balloon payments due at maturity in excess of the regular periodic payment, interest in excess of a mortgage loan’s regular interest rate, default interest, late payment charges, prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges. |
| The amount of the interest portion of any advance will be subject to reduction to the extent that an appraisal reduction of the related mortgage loan has occurred (and with respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, to the extent such appraisal reduction amount is allocated to the related mortgage loan). There may be other circumstances in which the master servicer will not be required to advance a full month of principal and/or interest. If the master servicer fails to make a required advance, the trustee will be required to make the advance, unless the trustee determines that the advance would be non-recoverable. If an interest advance is made by the master servicer, the master servicer will not advance the portion of interest that constitutes its servicing fee, but will advance the portion of interest that constitutes the monthly fees payable to the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer and the CREFC® license fee. |
| Neither of the master servicer nor the trustee will make, or be permitted to make, any principal or interest advance with respect to any companion loan. The special servicer is under no obligation to, and will not make, any principal or interest advance with respect to any mortgage loan or companion loan. |
| See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
B. Property Protection Advances | The master servicer may be required to make advances with respect to mortgage loans and related companion loans that it is required to service to pay delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums and similar expenses necessary to: |
| ● | protect and maintain (and in the case of REO properties, lease and manage) the related mortgaged property; |
| ● | maintain the lien on the related mortgaged property; and/or |
| ● | enforce the related mortgage loan documents. |
| The special servicer will have no obligation to make any property protection advances (although it may elect to make them in an emergency circumstance). If the special servicer makes a property protection advance, the master servicer will be required |
| to reimburse the special servicer for that advance (with interest thereon) (unless the master servicer determines that the advance would be nonrecoverable, in which case the advance will be reimbursed out of the collection account) and the master servicer will be deemed to have made that advance as of the date made by the special servicer. |
| If the master servicer fails to make a required advance of this type, the trustee will be required to make this advance. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee is required to advance amounts determined by such party to be nonrecoverable. |
| None of the master servicer, special servicer or trustee will make or be permitted to make any advance of this type in connection with the exercise of any cure rights or purchase rights granted to the holder of any subordinate companion loan under the related co-lender agreement. |
| See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
| With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, the master servicer (and the trustee, as applicable) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of that non-serviced whole loan will be required to make similar advances with respect to delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums as described above. |
C. Interest on Advances | The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to interest on the above described advances at the “Prime Rate” (and solely with respect to the master servicer and the special servicer, subject to a floor rate of 2.0%), compounded annually, as published in The Wall Street Journal, as described in this prospectus. Interest accrued on outstanding advances may result in reductions in amounts otherwise payable on the certificates. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be entitled to interest on advances made with respect to principal and interest due on a mortgage loan until the related due date has passed and any grace period for late payments applicable to the mortgage loan has expired. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
| With respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, the applicable makers of advances under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced whole loan will similarly be entitled to interest on advances, and any accrued and unpaid interest on property protection advances made in respect of such non-serviced mortgage loan may be reimbursed from general collections on the other mortgage loans included in the issuing entity to the extent not recoverable from such non-serviced whole loan and to the extent allocable to the related non-serviced mortgage loan in accordance with the related co-lender agreement. |
The Mortgage Pool | The issuing entity’s primary assets will be thirty-two (32) fixed rate commercial mortgage loans, each evidenced by one or more promissory notes secured by first mortgages, deeds of trust, deeds to secure debt or similar security instruments on the fee and/or leasehold estate of the related borrower in seventy-four (74) commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing properties. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness”. |
| The aggregate principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date will be approximately $892,116,230. |
| In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified, (i) references to a mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) by name refer to such mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (ii) references to a mortgage loan by name refer to such mortgage loan secured by the related mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (iii) any parenthetical with a percent next to a mortgaged property name (or portfolio of mortgaged properties name) indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage loan (or, if applicable, the allocated loan amount with respect to such mortgaged property) represents of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date for this securitization, and (iv) any parenthetical with a percent next to a mortgage loan name or a group of mortgage loans indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of such mortgage loan or the aggregate outstanding principal balance of such group of mortgage loans, as applicable, represents of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date for this securitization. |
| Unless otherwise expressly stated in this prospectus, the term “mortgage loan” refers to each of the thirty-two (32) commercial mortgage loans to be held by the issuing entity. Of the mortgage loans, each of the mortgage loans in the table below is part of a larger whole loan, each of which is comprised of the related mortgage loan and one or more loans that are pari passu in right of payment to the related mortgage loan (each referred to in this prospectus as a “pari passu companion loan”) and/or are subordinate in right of payment to the related mortgage loan (if any) (each referred to in this prospectus as a “subordinate companion loan”, and together with the pari passu companion loans, the “companion loans”). The companion loans, together with their related mortgage loan, are each referred to in this prospectus as a “whole loan”. |
Whole Loan Summary
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | % of Initial Pool Balance | Aggregate Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Aggregate Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2) | Whole Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(3) | Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(2) | Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(3) |
Stonebriar Centre | $89,000,000 | 9.98% | $166,000,000 | NAP | 42.1% | 42.1% | 2.30x | 2.30x |
Baybrook Mall | $25,000,000 | 2.8% | $195,000,000 | NAP | 56.0% | 56.0% | 1.72x | 1.72x |
Columbus Business Park | $23,200,000 | 2.6% | $38,800,000 | NAP | 42.2% | 42.2% | 1.95x | 1.95x |
500 Delaware | $5,000,000 | 0.6% | $80,000,000 | NAP | 67.6% | 67.6% | 2.03x | 2.03x |
| (1) | With respect to certain of the mortgage loans identified above, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratios have been calculated using “as-stabilized”, “portfolio premium” or similar hypothetical values, as described under the definition of “Appraised Value” set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”. |
| (2) | Calculated including the related pari passu companion loans but excluding any related subordinate companion loan(s), any related mezzanine loan(s) and any other subordinate indebtedness. |
| (3) | Calculated including the related pari passu companion loans and any related subordinate companion loan(s) but excluding any related mezzanine loan(s) and any other subordinate indebtedness. |
| The Stonebriar Centre whole loan and the Columbus Business Park whole loan will be serviced by the master servicer and the special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction. Each such whole loan, as well as the servicing shift whole loan prior to the servicing shift securitization date, is referred to in this prospectus as a “serviced whole loan”, and any related companion loan that is pari passu in right of payment to the related mortgage loan is referred to in this prospectus as a “serviced pari passu companion loan” or a “serviced companion loan”. |
| The Baybrook Mall whole loan (the “servicing shift whole loan”), will initially be serviced by the master servicer and the special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction. From and after the date on which the controlling companion loan is securitized (the “servicing shift securitization date”), it is anticipated that the servicing shift whole loan will be serviced under, and by the master servicer designated in, the pooling and servicing agreement entered into in connection with such securitization (the “servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement”). |
| The whole loans identified in the table below will not be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement and instead are each being serviced under a separate servicing agreement identified below relating to a related companion loan. Each of the whole loans identified in the table below, as well as the servicing shift whole loan on and after the servicing shift securitization date, is referred to in this prospectus as a “non-serviced whole loan”. The related mortgage loans are each referred to as a “non-serviced mortgage loan” and any related companion loans are each referred to in this prospectus as a “non-serviced companion loan” or collectively as the “non-serviced companion loans”. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Non-Serviced Whole Loans(1)
Mortgage Loan Name | Transaction/ Pooling and Servicing Agreement(2) | % of Initial Pool Balance | Master Servicer | Special Servicer | Trustee | Certificate Administrator and Custodian | Initial Directing Party | Operating Advisor | Asset Representations Reviewer |
500 Delaware | 3650R 2022-PF2 | 0.6% | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association | 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC | Computershare Trust Company, National Association | Computershare Trust Company, National Association | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC |
| (1) | Does not reflect the Baybrook Mall mortgage loan, a servicing shift mortgage loan. With respect to the servicing shift mortgage loan, on and after the servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift mortgage loan will also be a non-serviced mortgage loan and the whole loan will be a non-serviced whole loan. The initial controlling noteholder and initial directing party of the Baybrook Mall whole loan will be Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as the holder of the controlling companion loan. On and after the servicing shift securitization date, the controlling noteholder of the servicing shift whole loan is expected to be the controlling class representative or other directing holder (or equivalent) under such securitization transaction. |
| (2) | The identification of a “Transaction/Pooling and Servicing Agreement” above indicates that we have identified a securitization trust that has closed or priced or as to which a preliminary prospectus or final prospectus has printed, or otherwise based on publicly available information, and that has included, or is expected to include, the related controlling note for such whole loan. |
| For further information regarding the whole loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”, and for information regarding the servicing of the non-serviced whole loans, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
| Mortgage Loan Characteristics |
| The following table sets forth certain anticipated characteristics of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (unless otherwise indicated). Except as specifically provided in this prospectus, various information presented in this prospectus (including loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, debt yields and cut-off date balances per net rentable square foot, room, bed or unit, as applicable) with respect to any mortgage loan with a pari passu companion loan or subordinate companion loan is calculated including the principal balance and debt service payment of the related pari passu companion loan(s), but is calculated excluding the principal balance and debt service payment of any related subordinate companion loan(s) (or any other subordinate debt encumbering the related mortgaged property or any related mezzanine debt or preferred equity). However, unless specifically indicated, for the purpose of numerical and statistical information with respect to the composition of the mortgage pool contained in this prospectus (including any tables, charts and information set forth on Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3), no subordinate companion loan is reflected in this prospectus. |
| The sum of the numerical data in any column may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. Unless otherwise indicated, all figures and percentages presented in this “Summary of Terms” are calculated as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Information” and, unless otherwise indicated, such figures and percentages are approximate and, in each case, represent the indicated figure or percentage of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date. The principal balance of each mortgage loan as of the cut-off date assumes (or, in the case of each mortgage loan with a due date prior to the date of this prospectus, reflects) |
| the timely receipt of principal scheduled to be paid on or before the cut-off date and no defaults, delinquencies or prepayments on, or modifications of, any mortgage loan on or prior to the cut-off date. Whenever percentages and other information in this prospectus are presented on the mortgaged property level rather than the mortgage loan level, the information for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts as stated on Annex A-1. |
| The mortgage loans will have the following approximate characteristics as of the cut-off date: |
| Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Characteristics |
| | All Mortgage Loans |
| Initial Pool Balance(1) | $892,116,230 |
| Number of Mortgage Loans | 32 |
| Number of Mortgaged Properties | 74 |
| Range of Cut-off Date Balances | $3,700,000 - $89,000,000 |
| Average Cut-off Date Balance | $27,878,632 |
| Range of Mortgage Rates(2) | 4.8400% to 8.0000% |
| Weighted Average Mortgage Rate(2) | 6.71961% |
| Range of original terms to maturity | 60 to 120 months |
| Weighted average original term to maturity | 60 months |
| Range of remaining terms to maturity | 57 to 93 months |
| Weighted average remaining term to maturity | 60 months |
| Range of original amortization terms(3) | 360 to 360 months |
| Weighted average original amortization term(3) | 360 months |
| Range of remaining amortization terms(3) | 359 to 360 months |
| Weighted average remaining amortization term(3) | 360 months |
| Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(2)(4) | 42.1% to 74.4% |
| Weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2)(4) | 58.6% |
| Range of Maturity Date LTV Ratios(2)(5) | 42.1% to 74.4% |
| Weighted average Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2)(5) | 58.5% |
| Range of UW NCF DSCR(2)(6) | 1.26x to 2.30x |
| Weighted average UW NCF DSCR(2)(6) | 1.65x |
| Range of UW NOI Debt Yield(2)(7) | 8.5% to 18.0% |
| Weighted average UW NOI Debt Yield(2)(7) | 11.8% |
| Percentage of Initial Pool Balance consisting of: | |
| Interest-Only Balloon | 96.3% |
| Full-Term Amortizing Balloon | 3.7% |
| (1) | Subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%. |
| (2) | With respect to each mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, the related pari passu companion loan (but not any related subordinate companion loan) are included for the purposes of calculating the Mortgage Rate, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date LTV Ratio, UW NCF DSCR and UW NOI Debt Yield unless otherwise expressly stated. Other than as specifically noted, the Mortgage Rate, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date LTV Ratio, UW NCF DSCR and UW NOI Debt Yield information for each mortgage loan is presented in this prospectus without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related mortgaged property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future, in order to present statistics for the related mortgage loan without combination with the other indebtedness. |
| (3) | Does not include mortgage loans that pay interest-only until their maturity dates. |
| (4) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value (which in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation). With respect to two (2) mortgage loans (3.7%), the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated based upon a valuation other than an “as-is” value of each related mortgaged property. The weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making any adjustments is 58.8%. |
| (5) | With respect to two (2) mortgage loans (3.7%), the Maturity Date LTV Ratio was calculated using a value other than the “as-is” value of each related mortgaged |
| | property. The weighted average Maturity Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making such adjustments is 58.6%. |
| (6) | Unless otherwise indicated, the UW NCF DSCR is generally calculated using the average of the principal and interest payments for the first twelve payment periods of the mortgage loan following the cut-off date; provided that (i) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for interest-only payments through maturity, such items are calculated based on the interest payments scheduled to be due on the first due date following the cut-off date and the 11 due dates thereafter for such mortgage loan and (ii) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for an initial interest-only period that ends prior to maturity and provides for scheduled amortization payments thereafter, such items are calculated based on the monthly payment of principal and interest payable immediately following the expiration of the interest-only period. |
| (7) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI for each mortgage loan is the related mortgaged property’s Underwritten NOI divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of such mortgage loan. |
| All of the mortgage loans accrue interest on an actual/360 basis. |
| For further information regarding the mortgage loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool”. |
Modified and Refinanced Loans | As of the cut-off date, none of the mortgage loans were modified due to a delinquency. |
| Three (3) of the mortgage loans (5.8%) (i) were refinancings in whole or in part of prior loans (or refinancings of bridge loans that in turn refinanced prior loans) that were secured by, or mezzanine loans that were secured by interests in the owner of, the related mortgaged property, which prior loan was in default at the time of refinancing and/or otherwise involved a discounted pay-off, maturity extension, short sale or other restructuring or (ii) provided acquisition financing for the related borrower’s purchase of the related mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale or after becoming an REO property. |
| See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings”. |
Loans Underwritten Based on
Projections of Future Income | One of the mortgaged properties (3.4%) was constructed, in a lease-up period or was the subject of a major renovation that was completed within 12 calendar months prior to the cut-off date and, therefore, the related mortgaged property has no or limited prior operating history or the related mortgage loan seller did not take the operating history into account in the underwriting of the related mortgage loan.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History”. |
Certain Variances from
Underwriting Standards | Three (3) of the mortgage loans vary from the underwriting guidelines described under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes— |
| Exceptions to CREFI’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”. |
| Additional Aspects of Certificates |
| Denominations | The offered certificates with certificate balances that are initially offered and sold to purchasers will be issued in minimum denominations of $10,000 and integral multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The offered certificates with notional amounts will be issued, maintained and transferred only in minimum denominations of authorized initial notional amounts of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000. |
Registration, Clearance and
| Settlement | Each class of offered certificates will initially be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC. |
| You may hold offered certificates through: (1) DTC in the United States; or (2) Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System. Transfers within DTC, Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, will be made in accordance with the usual rules and operating procedures of those systems. |
| We may elect to terminate the book-entry system through DTC (with the consent of the DTC participants), Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, with respect to all or any portion of any class of the offered certificates. |
| See “Description of the Certificates—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination—Book-Entry Registration”. |
Credit Risk Retention | For a discussion of the manner by which 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, as retaining sponsor, intends to satisfy the credit risk retention requirements of the Credit Risk Retention Rules, see “Credit Risk Retention”. |
| None of the sponsors, the depositor, the underwriters, the issuing entity or any other party to the transaction intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issuance of the offered certificates, or take any other action, in a manner prescribed by the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation (as each such term is defined herein). In addition, no such person undertakes to take any other action which may be required by any investor for the purposes of its compliance with any applicable requirement of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK |
| Securitization Regulation. Furthermore, the arrangements described under “Credit Risk Retention” have not been structured with the objective of ensuring compliance by any person with any requirements of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation. Consequently, the certificates may not be a suitable investment for investors which are subject to any such requirements. See “Risk Factors—General Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates”. |
Information Available to
| Certificateholders | On each distribution date, the certificate administrator will prepare and make available to each certificateholder of record a statement as to the distributions being made on that date. Additionally, under certain circumstances, certificateholders of record may be entitled to certain other information regarding the issuing entity. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. |
Deal Information/Analytics | Certain information concerning the mortgage loans and the certificates may be available to subscribers through the following services: |
| ● | Bloomberg Financial Markets, L.P., Trepp, LLC, Intex Solutions, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, CMBS.com, Inc., BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., Markit Group Limited, RealINSIGHT, Thomson Reuters Corporation, Intercontinental Exchange | ICE Data Services, KBRA Analytics, LLC, DealView Technologies Ltd. and CRED iQ; |
| ● | The certificate administrator’s website initially located at www.ctslink.com; and |
| ● | The master servicer’s website initially located at www.pnc.com/midland. |
Optional Termination | On any distribution date on which the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans remaining in the issuing entity is less than 1.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, certain entities specified in this prospectus will have the option to purchase all of the remaining mortgage loans (and all REO property acquired through exercise of remedies in respect of any mortgage loan) at the price specified in this prospectus. |
| The issuing entity may also be terminated in connection with a voluntary exchange of all the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class R certificates) for the mortgage loans, and all REO property held by the issuing entity, provided that (i) the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates are no longer outstanding, (ii) there is only one holder (or multiple holders acting unanimously) of the outstanding certificates (other than the Class R certificates), and (iii) certain other conditions are satisfied as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”. |
| See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”. |
Required Repurchases or
Substitutions of Mortgage
Loans; Loss of Value Payment | Under certain circumstances, the related mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Capital Holdings Inc., with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. to the same extent as Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.) may be obligated to (i) repurchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) or substitute for an affected mortgage loan from the issuing entity or (ii) make a cash payment that would be deemed sufficient to compensate the issuing entity in the event of a document defect or a breach of a representation and warranty made by the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the mortgage loan in the mortgage loan purchase agreement that materially and adversely affects the value of the mortgage loan, the value of the related REO property or the interests of the trustee, any certificateholders in the mortgage loan or REO property or causes the mortgage loan to be other than a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective loan to be treated as a “qualified mortgage”). See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”. |
Sale of Defaulted Loans | Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, under certain circumstances the special servicer is required to solicit offers for defaulted mortgage loans (other than non-serviced mortgage loans) or defaulted serviced whole loans and/or related REO property and may accept the first (and, if multiple offers are received, the highest) cash offer from any person that constitutes a fair price for the defaulted mortgage loan (or defaulted serviced whole loan) and/or related REO property, determined as described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans” and “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”, unless the special servicer determines, in accordance with the servicing standard, that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the certificateholders and any related companion loan holders (as a collective whole as if such certificateholders and such companion loan holders constituted a single lender and, with respect to a whole loan with a subordinate companion loan, taking into account the subordinate nature of such subordinate companion loan). |
| If a non-serviced mortgage loan with a related pari passu companion loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan and the special servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement for the related pari passu companion loan determines to sell such pari passu companion loan, then that special servicer will be required to sell such non-serviced mortgage loan together with the related pari passu companion loan in a manner similar to that described above. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. |
Tax Status | Elections will be made to treat designated portions of the issuing entity as two (2) separate REMICs (the “lower-tier REMIC” and the “upper-tier REMIC” and each, a “trust REMIC”) for federal income tax purposes. |
| In addition, a REMIC was formed on April 7, 2023 with respect to the 500 Delaware mortgage loan (the “500 Delaware loan REMIC”). The 500 Delaware loan REMIC will be designated as the “loan REMIC”. |
| The 500 Delaware loan REMIC, created pursuant to a REMIC declaration effective as of April 7, 2023, holds the 500 Delaware mortgage loan and other related assets and has issued a class of uncertificated regular interests, an approximately 15.4% interest of which is to be held by the lower-tier REMIC (such regular interests, the “loan REMIC regular interest”). |
| Pertinent federal income tax consequences of an investment in the offered certificates include: |
| ● | Each class of offered certificates will constitute REMIC “regular interests”. |
| ● | The offered certificates will be treated as newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes. |
| ● | You will be required to report income on your offered certificates using the accrual method of accounting. |
| ● | It is anticipated that the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-D and Class D certificates will be issued with original issue discount and that the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates will be issued at a premium for federal income tax purposes. |
| See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations”. |
Certain ERISA Considerations | Subject to important considerations described under “Certain ERISA Considerations”, the offered certificates are eligible for purchase by persons investing assets of employee benefit plans or individual retirement accounts. |
Legal Investment | No class of the offered certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended. If your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, then you may be subject to restrictions on investment in the certificates. You should consult your own legal advisors for assistance in determining the suitability of and consequences to you of the purchase, ownership, and sale of the certificates. |
| The issuing entity will not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in this prospectus). |
| Ratings | The offered certificates will not be issued unless each of the offered classes receives a credit rating from one or more of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates. The decision not to engage one or more other rating agencies in the rating of certain classes of certificates to be issued in connection with this transaction, may negatively impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of those classes of certificates. Neither the depositor nor any other person or entity will have any duty to notify you if any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization issues, or delivers notice of its intention to issue, unsolicited ratings on one or more classes of certificates after the date of this prospectus. |
| See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded” and “Ratings”. |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Summary of Risk Factors
Investing in the certificates involves risks. Any of the risks set forth in this prospectus under the heading “Risk Factors” may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow on one or more mortgaged properties, the related borrowers’ ability to meet their respective payment obligations under the mortgage loans, and/or on your certificates. As a result, the market price of the certificates could decline significantly and you could lose a part or all of your investment. You should carefully consider all the information set forth in this prospectus and, in particular, evaluate the risks set forth in this prospectus under the heading “Risk Factors” before deciding to invest in the certificates. The following is a summary of some of the principal risks associated with an investment in the certificates:
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans
| ● | Non-Recourse Loans: The mortgage loans are non-recourse loans, and in the event of a default on a mortgage loan, recourse generally may only be had against the specific mortgaged property(ies) and other assets that have been pledged to secure the mortgage loan. Consequently, payment on the certificates is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income or market value of the mortgaged properties, each of which may be volatile. |
| ● | Borrowers: Frequent and early occurrence of borrower delinquencies and defaults may adversely affect your investment. Bankruptcy proceedings involving borrowers, borrower organizational structures and additional debt incurred by a borrower or its sponsors may increase risk of loss. In addition, borrowers may be unable to refinance or repay their mortgage loans at the maturity date. |
| ● | Property Performance: Certificateholders are exposed to risks associated with the performance of the mortgaged properties, including location, competition, condition (including environmental conditions), maintenance, ownership, management, and litigation. Property values may decrease even when current operating income does not. The property type (e.g., retail, multifamily, mixed use, industrial, hospitality, manufactured housing, office and self storage) may present additional risks. |
| ● | Loan Concentration: Certain of the mortgage loans represent significant concentrations of the mortgage pool as of the cut-off date. A default on one or more of such mortgage loans may have a disproportionate impact on the performance of the certificates. |
| ● | Property Type Concentration: Certain property types represent significant concentrations of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage pool as of the cut-off date, based on allocated loan amounts. Adverse developments with respect to those property types or related industries may have a disproportionate impact on the performance of the certificates. |
| ● | Other Concentrations: Losses on loans to related borrowers or cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted loan groups, geographical concentration of the mortgaged properties, and concentration of tenants among the mortgaged properties, may disproportionately affect distributions on the offered certificates. |
| ● | Tenant Performance: The repayment of a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing mortgage loan is typically dependent upon the ability of the related mortgaged property to produce cash flow through the collection of rents. Therefore, the performance of the mortgage loans will be highly dependent on the performance of tenants and tenant leases. |
| ● | Significant Tenants: Properties that are leased to a single tenant or a tenant that comprises a significant portion of the rental income are disproportionately susceptible to interruptions of cash flow in the event of a lease expiration or termination or a downturn in the tenant’s business. |
| ● | Underwritten Net Cash Flow: Underwritten net cash flow for the mortgaged properties could be based on incorrect or flawed assumptions. |
| ● | Appraisals: Appraisals may not reflect the current or future market value of the mortgaged properties. |
| ● | Inspections: Property inspections may not identify all conditions requiring repair or replacement. |
| ● | Insurance: The absence or inadequacy of terrorism, fire, flood, earthquake and other insurance may adversely affect payment on the certificates. |
| ● | Zoning: Changes in zoning laws may affect the ability to repair or restore a mortgaged property. Properties or structures considered to be “legal non-conforming” may not be able to be restored or rebuilt “as-is” following a casualty or loss. |
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
| ● | Transaction Parties: Conflicts of interest may arise from the transaction parties’ relationships with each other or their economic interests in the transaction. |
| ● | Directing Holder and Companion Holders: Certain certificateholders and companion loan holders have control and/or consent rights regarding the servicing of the mortgage loans and related whole loans. Such rights include rights, subject to certain limitations, to remove and replace the special servicer without cause and/or to direct or recommend the special servicer or non-serviced special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of certificates. The right to remove and replace the special servicer may give the directing holder the ability to influence the special servicer’s servicing actions in a manner that may be more favorable to the directing holder relative to other certificateholders. |
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates
| ● | Limited Obligations: The certificates will only represent ownership interests in the issuing entity, and will not be guaranteed by the sponsors, the depositor or any other person. The issuing entity’s assets may be insufficient to repay the offered certificates in full. |
| ● | Uncertain Yields to Maturity: The offered certificates have uncertain yields to maturity. Prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans will affect the average lives of the certificates; and the rate and timing of prepayments may be highly unpredictable. Optional early termination of the issuing entity may also adversely impact your yield or may result in a loss. |
| ● | Rating Agency Feedback: Future events could adversely impact the credit ratings and value of your certificates. |
| ● | Limited Credit Support: Credit support provided by subordination of certain certificates is limited and may not be sufficient to prevent loss on the offered certificates. |
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks before making an investment decision. In particular, distributions on your certificates will depend on payments received on, and other recoveries with respect to, the mortgage loans. Therefore, you should carefully consider the risk factors relating to the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties.
If any of the following events or circumstances identified as risks actually occur or materialize, your investment could be materially and adversely affected. We note that additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us may also impair your investment.
This prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Special Risks
Cyberattacks or Other Security Breaches Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business of the Transaction Parties
In the normal course of business, the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, the borrowers and the other transaction parties may collect, process and retain confidential or sensitive information regarding their customers (including mortgage loan borrowers and applicants). The sharing, use, disclosure and protection of this information is governed by the privacy and data security policies of such parties. Moreover, there are federal, state and international laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information and user data. Although the transaction parties may devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of their systems through information security and business continuity programs, their facilities and systems, and those of their third-party service providers, may be subject to external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors, or other similar events. The access by unauthorized persons to, or the improper disclosure by the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, the borrowers or any other transaction party of, confidential information regarding their customers or their own proprietary information, software, methodologies and business secrets could result in business disruptions, legal or regulatory proceedings, reputational damage, or other adverse consequences, any of which could materially adversely affect their financial condition or results of operations (including the servicing of the mortgage loans). Cybersecurity risks for organizations like the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, the borrowers and the other transaction parties have increased recently in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile and other connected devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others, and the evolving nature of these threats. For example, hackers recently have engaged in attacks against organizations that are designed to disrupt key business services. We cannot assure you that the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, the borrowers or the other transaction parties will not suffer any such losses in the future.
Cyberattacks or other breaches, whether affecting the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, the borrowers or other transaction parties, could result in heightened consumer concern and regulatory focus and increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the sponsors’, the master servicer’s, the special servicer’s, a borrower’s or another transaction party’s businesses. If the business of the sponsors or any of their affiliates is materially adversely affected by such events, the sponsors may not be able to fulfill their remedy obligations with respect to a mortgage loan.
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed
The mortgage loans are not insured or guaranteed by any person or entity, governmental or otherwise.
Investors should treat each mortgage loan as a non-recourse loan. If a default occurs, recourse generally may be had only against the specific mortgaged properties and other assets that have been pledged to secure the mortgage loan. Consequently, payment prior to maturity is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income of the mortgaged property. Payment at maturity is primarily dependent upon the market value of the mortgaged property or the borrower’s ability to refinance or sell the mortgaged property.
Although the mortgage loans generally are non-recourse in nature, certain mortgage loans contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters. Certain mortgage loans set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations” either do not contain non-recourse carveouts or contain material limitations to non-recourse carveouts. Often these obligations are guaranteed by an affiliate of the related borrower, although liability under any such guaranty may be capped or otherwise limited in amount or scope. Furthermore, the guarantor’s net worth and liquidity may be less (and in some cases, materially less) than amounts due under the related mortgage loan or the guarantor’s sole asset may be its interest in the related borrower. In addition, the related guarantees may expire upon certain events, including upon the lender taking title to the related mortgaged property or a mezzanine lender taking title to equity in the borrower, or in the case of guarantees for environmental items, upon payment in full of the related mortgage loan and provision of a clean environmental report. Certain mortgage loans may have the benefit of a general payment guaranty of a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan. In addition, certain non-recourse carveout guarantors may not be United States citizens. We cannot assure you that the lender will be able to collect on a guaranty from non-US citizens as such individuals or entities may be beyond the jurisdiction of United States courts. In all cases, however, the mortgage loans should be considered to be non-recourse obligations because neither the depositor nor the sponsors make any representation or warranty as to the obligation or ability of any borrower or guarantor to pay any deficiencies between any foreclosure proceeds and the mortgage loan indebtedness. No mortgage loan will be insured or guaranteed by any government, governmental instrumentality, private insurer or (except as described above) other person or entity.
Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally
The mortgage loans will be secured by various income producing commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing properties. The repayment of a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing loan is typically dependent upon the ability of the related mortgaged property to produce cash flow through the collection of rents. Even the liquidation value of a commercial property is determined, in substantial part, by the capitalization of the property’s ability to produce cash flow. However, net operating income can be volatile and may be insufficient to cover debt service on the loan at any given time.
The net operating incomes and property values of the mortgaged properties may be adversely affected by a large number of factors. Some of these factors relate to the properties themselves, such as:
| ● | the age, design and construction quality of the properties; |
| ● | perceptions regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the properties; |
| ● | the characteristics and desirability of the area where the property is located; |
| ● | the strength and nature of the local economy, including labor costs and quality, tax environment and quality of life for employees; |
| ● | the proximity and attractiveness of competing properties; |
| ● | the adequacy of the property’s management and maintenance; |
| ● | increases in interest rates, real estate taxes and operating expenses at the property and in relation to competing properties; |
| ● | an increase in the capital expenditures needed to maintain the properties or make improvements; |
| ● | a decline in the businesses operated by tenants or in their financial condition; |
| ● | an increase in vacancy rates; and |
| ● | a decline in rental rates as leases are renewed or entered into with new tenants. |
Other factors are more general in nature, such as:
| ● | national, regional or local economic conditions, including plant closings, military base closings, industry slowdowns, oil and/or gas drilling facility slowdowns or closings and unemployment rates; |
| ● | local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of competing properties, retail space, office space, multifamily housing or hotel capacity; |
| ● | consumer tastes and preferences; |
| ● | retroactive changes in building codes; |
| ● | changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; |
| ● | location of certain mortgaged properties in less densely populated or less affluent areas; and |
| ● | the public perception of safety for customers and clients. |
The volatility of net operating income will be influenced by many of the foregoing factors, as well as by:
| ● | the length of tenant leases (including that in certain cases, all or substantially all of the tenants, or one or more sole, anchor or other major tenants, at a particular mortgaged property may have leases that expire or permit the tenant(s) to terminate its lease during the term of the loan); |
| ● | the quality and creditworthiness of tenants; |
| ● | in the case of rental properties, the rate at which new rentals occur; and |
| ● | the property’s “operating leverage”, which is generally the percentage of total property expenses in relation to revenue, the ratio of fixed operating expenses to those that vary with revenues, and the level of capital expenditures required to maintain the property and to retain or replace tenants. |
A decline in the real estate market or in the financial condition of a major tenant will tend to have a more immediate effect on the net operating income of properties with relatively higher operating leverage or short-term revenue sources, such as short-term or month-to-month leases, and may lead to higher rates of delinquency or defaults.
Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases
General
Any tenant may, from time to time, experience a downturn in its business, which may weaken its financial condition and result in a reduction or failure to make rental payments when due. If tenants’ sales were to decline, percentage rents may decline and, further, tenants may be unable to pay their base rent or other occupancy costs. If a tenant defaults in its obligations to a property owner, that property owner may experience delays in enforcing its rights as lessor and may incur substantial costs and experience significant delays associated with protecting its investment, including costs incurred in renovating and reletting the property. Additionally, the income from, and market value of, the mortgaged properties leased to various tenants would be adversely affected if:
| ● | space in the mortgaged properties could not be leased or re-leased or substantial re-leasing costs were required and/or the cost of performing landlord obligations under existing leases materially increased; |
| ● | leasing or re-leasing is restricted by exclusive rights of tenants to lease the mortgaged properties or other covenants not to lease space for certain uses or activities, or covenants limiting the types of tenants to which space may be leased; |
| ● | a significant tenant were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case; |
| ● | rental payments could not be collected for any other reason; or |
| ● | a borrower fails to perform its obligations under a lease resulting in the related tenant having a right to terminate such lease. |
Certain tenants currently may be in a rent abatement period. We cannot assure you that such tenants will be in a position to pay full rent when the abatement period expires. We cannot assure you that the net operating income contributed by the mortgaged properties will remain at its current or past levels.
A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses
Mortgaged properties that are owner-occupied or leased to a single tenant, or a tenant that makes up a significant portion of the rental income, also are more susceptible to interruptions of cash flow if that tenant’s business operations are negatively impacted or if such tenant fails to renew its lease. This is so because:
| ● | the financial effect of the absence of rental income may be severe; |
| ● | more time may be required to re-lease the space; and |
| ● | substantial capital costs may be incurred to make the space appropriate for replacement tenants. |
In the event of a default by that tenant, if the related lease expires prior to the mortgage loan maturity date and the related tenant fails to renew its lease or if such tenant exercises an early termination option, there would likely be an interruption of rental payments under the lease and, accordingly, insufficient funds available to the borrower to pay the debt service on the mortgage loan. In certain cases where the tenant owns the improvements on the mortgaged property, the related borrower may be required to purchase such improvements in connection with the exercise of its remedies.
With respect to certain of these mortgaged properties that are leased to a single tenant, the related leases may expire prior to, or soon after, the maturity dates of the mortgage loans or the related tenant may have the right to terminate the lease prior to the maturity date of the mortgage loan. If the current tenant does not renew its lease on comparable economic terms to the expired lease, if a single tenant terminates its lease or if a suitable replacement tenant does not enter into a new lease on similar economic terms, there could be a negative impact on the payments on the related mortgage loan.
A deterioration in the financial condition of a tenant, the failure of a tenant to renew its lease or the exercise by a tenant of an early termination right can be particularly significant if a mortgaged property is owner-occupied, leased to a single tenant, or if any tenant makes up a significant portion of the rental income at the mortgaged property.
Concentrations of particular tenants among the mortgaged properties or within a particular business or industry at one or multiple mortgaged properties increase the possibility that financial problems with such tenants or such business or industry sectors could affect the mortgage loans. In addition, the mortgage loans may be adversely affected if a tenant at the mortgaged property is highly specialized, or dependent on a single industry or only a few customers for its revenue. See “—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” below, and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Tenant Concentrations” for information on tenant concentrations in the mortgage pool.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Multiple Tenants Also Have Risks
If a mortgaged property has multiple tenants, re-leasing expenditures may be more frequent than in the case of mortgaged properties with fewer tenants, thereby reducing the cash flow available for payments on the related mortgage loan. Multi-tenant mortgaged properties also may experience higher continuing vacancy rates and greater volatility in rental income and expenses. See Annex A-1 for tenant lease expiration dates for the five largest tenants at each mortgaged property.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks
If a mortgaged property is leased in whole or substantial part to the borrower under the mortgage loan or to an affiliate of the borrower, there may be conflicts. For instance, it is more likely a landlord will waive lease conditions for an affiliated tenant than it would for an unaffiliated tenant. We cannot assure you that the conflicts arising where a borrower is affiliated with a tenant at a mortgaged property will not adversely impact the value of the related mortgage loan.
In certain cases, an affiliated lessee may be a tenant under a master lease with the related borrower, under which the tenant is obligated to make rent payments but does not occupy any space at the mortgaged property. Master leases in these circumstances may be used to bring occupancy to a “stabilized” level with the intent of finding additional tenants to occupy some or all of the master leased space, but may not provide additional economic support for the mortgage loan. If a mortgaged property is leased in whole or substantial part to the borrower or to an affiliate of the borrower, a deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or its affiliates could significantly affect the borrower’s ability to perform under the mortgage loan as it would directly interrupt the cash flow from the mortgaged property if the borrower’s or its affiliate’s financial condition worsens. We cannot assure you that any space leased by a borrower or an affiliate of the borrower will eventually be occupied by third-party tenants.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases” for information on properties leased in whole or in part to borrowers and their affiliates.
Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a number of smaller tenants, such as in retail properties, may have an adverse impact on the mortgaged properties affected and the income produced by such mortgaged properties. Under the federal bankruptcy code codified in Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time (“Bankruptcy Code”), a tenant has the option of assuming or rejecting or, subject to certain conditions, assuming and assigning to a third party, any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, the landlord’s claim for breach of the lease would (absent collateral securing the claim) be treated as a general unsecured claim against the tenant and a lessor’s damages for lease rejection are generally subject to certain limitations. We cannot assure you that tenants of the mortgaged properties will continue making payments under their leases or that tenants will not file for bankruptcy protection in the future or, if any tenants do file, that they will continue to make rental payments in a timely manner. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” for information regarding bankruptcy issues with respect to certain mortgage loans.
In the case of certain mortgage loans included in the mortgage pool, it may be possible that the related master lease or lease to a borrower affiliate could be construed in a bankruptcy as a financing lease or other arrangement under which the related master or affiliated lessee (and/or its affiliates) would be deemed as effectively the owner of the related mortgaged property, rather than a tenant, which could result in potentially adverse consequences for the trust, as the holder of such mortgage loan, including treatment of the mortgage loan as an unsecured obligation, a potentially greater risk of an unfavorable plan of reorganization and competing claims of creditors of the related master or affiliated lessee and/or its affiliates.
Sale-Leaseback Transactions Also Have Risks
The 500 Delaware mortgaged property (0.6%) was the subject of a sale-leaseback transaction in connection with the acquisition of such property by the related borrower or an affiliate prior to origination of the related mortgage loan. A mortgaged property that is the subject of a sale-leaseback transaction is leased to a tenant, who is the former owner of the mortgaged property (or is affiliated with the former owner of the mortgaged property), pursuant to a lease. We cannot assure you that the tenant at the related mortgaged property will not file for bankruptcy protection.
A bankruptcy with respect to a tenant in a sale-leaseback transaction could result in the related lease being recharacterized as a loan from the borrower to the tenant. If the lease were recharacterized as a loan, the lease would be a deemed loan and the tenant would gain a number of potential benefits in a bankruptcy case. The tenant could retain possession of the mortgaged property during the pendency of its bankruptcy case without having to comply with the ongoing post-petition rent requirements of section 365(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires a tenant to start paying rent within 60 days following the commencement of its bankruptcy case, while deciding whether to assume or reject a lease of nonresidential real property. The tenant desiring to remain in possession of the mortgaged property would not have to assume the lease within 120 days following the commencement of its bankruptcy case pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code or comply with the conditions precedent to assumption, including curing all defaults, compensating for damages and giving adequate assurance of future performance. To the extent the deemed loan is under-secured, the tenant would be able to limit the secured claim to the then-current value of the mortgaged property and treat the balance as a general unsecured claim. The tenant also might assert that the entire claim on the deemed loan is an unsecured claim. In Liona Corp., Inc. v. PCH Associates (In re PCH Associates), 949 F.2d 585 (2d Cir. 1991), the court considered the effect of recharacterizing a sale-leaseback transaction as a financing rather than a true lease. The court held that the landlord’s record title to the leased property should be treated as an equitable mortgage securing the deemed loan. Under the reasoning of that case, if a lease were recharacterized as a loan, the related borrower would have a claim against the tenant secured by an equitable mortgage. Here, that secured claim has been collaterally assigned to the mortgagees. However, the legal authority considering the effects of such a recharacterization is limited, and we cannot assure you that a bankruptcy court would follow the reasoning of the PCH Associates case.
There is also a risk that a tenant that files for bankruptcy protection may reject the related lease. It is likely that each lease constitutes an “unexpired lease” for purposes of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Code provides generally that rights and obligations under an unexpired lease of a debtor may not be terminated or modified at any time after the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code solely on the basis of a provision in such lease providing for the termination or modification of such rights or obligations upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the occurrence of certain other similar events. This prohibition on so called “ipso facto clauses” could limit the ability of a borrower to exercise certain contractual remedies with respect to a lease. In addition, the Bankruptcy Code provides that a trustee in bankruptcy or debtor in possession may, subject to approval of the court, (a) assume an unexpired lease and (i) retain it or (ii) unless applicable law excuses a party other than the debtor from accepting performance from or rendering performance to an entity other than the debtor, assign it to a third party (notwithstanding any other restrictions or prohibitions on assignment) or (b) reject such contract. In a bankruptcy case of a tenant, if the lease were to be assumed, the trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of the tenant, or the tenant as debtor in possession, or the assignee, if applicable, must cure any defaults under the lease, compensate the related borrower for its losses and provide such borrower with “adequate assurance” of future performance. Such remedies may be insufficient, however, as the borrower may be forced to continue under the lease with a tenant that is a poor credit risk or an unfamiliar tenant if the lease was assigned (if applicable state law does not otherwise prevent such an assignment), and any assurances provided to the borrower may, in fact, be inadequate. If the lease is rejected, such rejection generally constitutes a breach of the lease immediately before the date of the filing of the petition. As a consequence, the borrower would have only an unsecured claim against the tenant for damages resulting from such breach, which could adversely affect the security for the certificates.
Furthermore, there is likely to be a period of time between the date upon which a tenant files a bankruptcy petition and the date upon which the lease is assumed or rejected. Although the tenant is obligated to make all lease payments within 60 days following the commencement of the bankruptcy case, there is a risk that such payments will not be made due to the tenant’s poor financial condition. If the lease is rejected, the lessor will be treated as an unsecured creditor with respect to its claim for damages for termination of the lease and the borrower must re-let the mortgaged property before the flow of lease payments will recommence. Pursuant to section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, a lessor’s damages for lease rejection are limited to the amount owed for the unpaid rent reserved under the lease for the periods prior to the bankruptcy petition (or earlier surrender of the leased premises) which are unrelated to the rejection, plus the greater of one year’s rent or 15% of the remaining rent reserved under the lease (but not to exceed three (3) years’ rent).
As discussed above, bankruptcy courts, in the exercise of their equitable powers, have the authority to recharacterize a lease as a financing. We cannot assure you such recharacterization would not occur with respect to the mortgage loans that are subject to a sale-leaseback transaction.
The application of any of these doctrines to any of the sale-leaseback transactions could result in substantial, direct and material impairment of the rights of the certificateholders.
Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure
In certain jurisdictions, if tenant leases are subordinated to the liens created by the mortgage but do not contain attornment provisions that require the tenant to subordinate the lease if the mortgagee agrees to enter into a non-disturbance agreement, the tenants may terminate their leases upon the transfer of the property to a foreclosing lender or purchaser at foreclosure. Accordingly, if a mortgaged property is located in such a jurisdiction and is leased to one or more desirable tenants under leases that are subordinate to the mortgage and do not contain attornment provisions, such mortgaged property could experience a further decline in value if such tenants’ leases were terminated. This is particularly likely if those tenants were paying above-market rents or could not be replaced. If a lease is not subordinate to a mortgage, the issuing entity will not possess the right to dispossess the tenant upon foreclosure of the mortgaged property (unless otherwise agreed to with the tenant). Also, if the lease contains provisions inconsistent with the mortgage (e.g., provisions relating to application of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards) or which could affect the enforcement of the lender’s rights (e.g., a right of first
refusal to purchase the property), the provisions of the lease will take precedence over the provisions of the mortgage. Not all leases were reviewed to ascertain the existence of attornment or subordination provisions.
With respect to certain of the mortgage loans, the related borrower may have given to certain tenants or others an option to purchase, a right of first refusal and/or a right of first offer to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property in the event a sale is contemplated, and such right is not subordinate to the related mortgage. This may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure, or, upon foreclosure, this may affect the value and/or marketability of the related mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal” for information regarding material purchase options and/or rights of first refusal, if any, with respect to mortgaged properties securing certain mortgage loans.
Early Lease Termination Options May Reduce Cash Flow
Leases often give tenants the right to terminate the related lease, abate or reduce the related rent, and/or exercise certain remedies against the related borrower for various reasons or upon various conditions, including:
| ● | if the borrower for the applicable mortgaged property allows uses at the mortgaged property in violation of use restrictions in current tenant leases, |
| ● | if the borrower or any of its affiliates owns other properties within a certain radius of the mortgaged property and allows uses at those properties in violation of use restrictions, |
| ● | if the related borrower fails to provide a designated number of parking spaces, |
| ● | if there is construction at the related mortgaged property or an adjacent property (whether or not such adjacent property is owned or controlled by the borrower or any of its affiliates) that may interfere with visibility of, access to or a tenant’s use of the mortgaged property or otherwise violate the terms of a tenant’s lease, |
| ● | upon casualty or condemnation with respect to all or a portion of the mortgaged property that renders such mortgaged property unsuitable for a tenant’s use or if the borrower fails to rebuild such mortgaged property within a certain time, |
| ● | if a tenant’s use is not permitted by zoning or applicable law, |
| ● | if the tenant is unable to exercise an expansion right, |
| ● | if the landlord defaults on its obligations under the lease, |
| ● | if a landlord leases space at the mortgaged property or within a certain radius of the mortgaged property to a competitor, |
| ● | if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time, |
| ● | if significant tenants at the subject property go dark or terminate their leases, or if a specified percentage of the mortgaged property is unoccupied, |
| ● | if the landlord violates the tenant’s exclusive use rights for a specified period of time, |
| ● | if the related borrower violates covenants under the related lease or if third parties take certain actions that adversely affect such tenants’ business or operations, |
| ● | in the case of government sponsored tenants, any time or for lack of appropriations, |
| ● | if an authorized retailer is no longer authorized by a parent or unaffiliated corporate entity, or |
| ● | if the related borrower violates covenants under the related lease or if third parties take certain actions that adversely affect such tenants’ business or operations. |
In certain cases, compliance or satisfaction of landlord covenants may be the responsibility of a third party affiliated with the borrower or, in the event that partial releases of the applicable mortgaged property are permitted, an unaffiliated or affiliated third party.
Any exercise of a termination right by a tenant at a mortgaged property could result in vacant space at the related mortgaged property, renegotiation of the lease with the related tenant or re-letting of the space. Any such vacated space may not be re-let. Furthermore, such foregoing termination and/or abatement rights may arise in the future or materially adversely affect the related borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Lease Expirations and Terminations” for information on material tenant lease expirations and early termination options.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Not-for-Profit Tenants Also Have Risks
Certain mortgaged properties may have tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on office space and other operating expenses. We cannot assure you that the rate, frequency and level of individual contributions or governmental grants and subsidies will continue with respect to any such institution. A reduction in contributions or grants may impact the ability of the related institution to pay rent, and we cannot assure you that the related borrower will be in a position to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents if such tenant fails to pay its rent.
Retail Properties Have Special Risks
The value of retail properties is significantly affected by the quality of the tenants as well as fundamental aspects of real estate, such as location and market demographics, as well as changes in shopping methods and choices. Some of the risks related to these matters are further described in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, and “—Changes in the Retail Sector, Such as Online Shopping and Other Uses of Technology, Could Affect the Business Models and Viability of Retailers”, “—The Performance of the Retail Properties is Subject to Conditions Affecting the Retail Sector” and “—Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants” below.
Rental payments from tenants of retail properties typically comprise the largest portion of the net operating income of those mortgaged properties. We cannot assure you that the net operating income contributed by the mortgaged retail properties or the rates of occupancy at the retail stores will remain at the levels specified in this prospectus or remain consistent with past performance. In addition, some or all of the rental payments from tenants may be tied to that tenant’s gross sales, so the success of that tenant’s business directly correlates to the value of the retail property. To the extent that a tenant changes the manner in which its gross sales are reported it could result in lower rent paid by that tenant. For example, if a tenant takes into account customer returns of merchandise purchased online and reduces the gross sales, this could result in lower gross sales relative to gross sales previously reported at that location even if the actual performance of the store remains unchanged.
Changes in the Retail Sector, Such as Online Shopping and Other Uses of Technology, Could Affect the Business Models and Viability of Retailers
Online shopping and the use of technology, such as smartphone shopping applications, to transact purchases or to aid purchasing decisions have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the future. This trend is affecting business models, sales and profitability of some retailers and could adversely affect the demand for retail real estate and occupancy at retail properties securing the mortgage loans. Any resulting decreases in rental revenue could have a material adverse effect on the value of retail properties securing the mortgage loans.
Some of these developments in the retail sector have led to retail companies, including several national retailers, filing for bankruptcy and/or voluntarily closing certain of their stores. Borrowers may be unable to re-lease such space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms. As a result, the bankruptcy or closure of a national tenant may adversely affect a retail borrower’s revenues. In addition, such closings may allow other tenants to modify their leases to terms that are less favorable for borrowers or to terminate their leases, also adversely impacting their revenues. See also “—Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants” below.
In addition to competition from online shopping, retail properties face competition from sources outside a specific geographical real estate market. For example, all of the following compete with more traditional retail properties for consumer dollars: factory outlet centers, discount shopping centers and clubs, catalogue retailers, home shopping networks, and telemarketing. Continued growth of these alternative retail outlets (which often have lower operating costs) could adversely affect the rents collectible at the retail properties included in the pool of mortgage loans, as well as the income from, and market value of, the mortgaged properties and the related borrower’s ability to refinance such property. Moreover, additional competing retail properties may be built in the areas where the retail properties are located.
We cannot assure you that these developments in the retail sector will not adversely affect the performance of retail properties securing the mortgage loans.
The Performance of the Retail Properties is Subject to Conditions Affecting the Retail Sector
Retail properties are also subject to conditions that could negatively affect the retail sector, such as increased unemployment, increased federal income and payroll taxes, increased health care costs, increased state and local taxes, increased real estate taxes, industry slowdowns, lack of availability of consumer credit, weak income growth, increased levels of consumer debt, poor housing market conditions, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, plant closings, and other factors. Similarly, local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the supply and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants may negatively impact those retail properties.
In addition, the limited adaptability of certain shopping malls that have proven unprofitable may result in high (and possibly extremely high) loss severities on mortgage loans secured by those shopping malls. For example, it is possible that a significant amount of advances made by the applicable servicer(s) of a mortgage loan secured by a shopping mall property, combined with low liquidation proceeds in respect of that property, may result in a loss severity exceeding 100% of the outstanding principal balance of that mortgage loan.
Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants
The presence or absence of an “anchor tenant” or a “shadow anchor tenant” in or near a retail property also can be important to the performance of a retail property because anchors play a key role in
generating customer traffic and making a retail property desirable for other tenants. Retail properties may also have shadow anchor tenants. An “anchor tenant” is located on the related mortgaged property, usually proportionately larger in size than most or all other tenants in the mortgaged property, and is vital in attracting customers to a retail property. A “shadow anchor tenant” is usually proportionally larger in size than most tenants in the mortgaged property, is important in attracting customers to a retail property and is located sufficiently close and convenient to the mortgaged property so as to influence and attract potential customers, but is not located on the mortgaged property.
If anchor stores in a mortgaged property were to close, the related borrower may be unable to replace those anchors in a timely manner or without suffering adverse economic consequences. In addition, anchor tenants and non-anchor tenants at anchored or shadow anchored retail centers may have co-tenancy clauses and/or operating covenants in their leases or operating agreements that permit those tenants or anchor stores to cease operating, reduce rent or terminate their leases if the anchor or shadow anchor tenant goes dark or if the subject store is not meeting the minimum sales requirement under its lease. Even if non-anchor tenants do not have termination or rent abatement rights, the loss of an anchor tenant or a shadow anchor tenant may have a material adverse impact on the non-anchor tenant’s ability to operate because the anchor or shadow anchor tenant plays a key role in generating customer traffic and making a center desirable for other tenants. This, in turn, may adversely impact the borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan. In addition, in the event that a “shadow anchor” fails to renew its lease, terminates its lease or otherwise ceases to conduct business within a close proximity to the mortgaged property, customer traffic at the mortgaged property may be substantially reduced. If an anchor tenant goes dark, generally the borrower’s only remedy may be to terminate that lease after the anchor tenant has been dark for a specified amount of time.
If anchor tenants or shadow anchor tenants at a particular mortgaged property were to close or otherwise become vacant or remain vacant, we cannot assure you that the related borrower’s ability to repay its mortgage loan would not be materially and adversely affected.
Certain anchor tenant and tenant estoppels will have been obtained in connection with the origination of the mortgage loans. These estoppels may identify disputes between the related borrower and the applicable anchor tenant or tenant, or alleged defaults or potential defaults by the applicable property owner under the lease or a reciprocal easement and/or operating agreement (each, an “REA”). Such disputes, defaults or potential defaults, could lead to a termination or attempted termination of the applicable lease or REA by the anchor tenant or tenant or to the tenant withholding some or all of its rental payments or to litigation against the related borrower. We cannot assure you that the anchor tenant or tenant estoppels obtained identify all potential disputes that may arise with respect to the mortgaged retail properties, or that anchor tenant or tenant disputes will not have a material adverse effect on the ability of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans.
Certain retail properties have specialty use tenants. See “—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” below.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Retail Properties”.
Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of multifamily properties, including:
| ● | the physical attributes of the apartment building such as its age, condition, design, appearance, access to transportation and construction quality; |
| ● | the quality of property management; |
| ● | the ability of management to provide adequate maintenance and insurance; |
| ● | the types of services or amenities that the property provides; |
| ● | the property’s reputation; |
| ● | the level of mortgage interest rates, which may encourage tenants to purchase rather than lease housing; |
| ● | the generally short terms of residential leases and the need for continued reletting; |
| ● | rent concessions and month-to-month leases, which may impact cash flow at the property; |
| ● | the presence of competing properties and residential developments in the local market; |
| ● | the tenant mix, such as the tenant population being predominantly students or being heavily dependent on workers from a particular business or industry or personnel from or workers related to a local military base or oil and/or gas drilling industries; |
| ● | outstanding building code violations or tenant complaints at the property; |
| ● | in the case of student housing facilities or properties leased primarily to students, which may be more susceptible to damage or wear and tear than other types of multifamily housing, the reliance on the financial well-being of the college or university to which it relates, competition from on campus housing units and new competitive student housing properties, which may adversely affect occupancy, the physical layout of the housing, which may not be readily convertible to traditional multifamily use, and that student tenants have a higher turnover rate than other types of multifamily tenants, which in certain cases is compounded by the fact that student leases are available for periods of less than 12 months; |
| ● | certain multifamily properties may be considered to be “flexible apartment properties”. Such properties have a significant percentage of units leased to tenants under short-term leases (less than one year in term), which creates a higher turnover rate than for other types of multifamily properties; |
| ● | certain multifamily properties may be master leased in whole or part to a hotel operator which leases out such properties for short term stays similar to an extended stay hotel. In the event such operator were to terminate or default on its lease, or fail to renew such lease, such properties would be subject to the risk of concentrated vacancy, and may incur significant costs in order to convert to use as traditional multifamily properties. |
| ● | restrictions on the age of tenants who may reside at the property; |
| ● | dependence upon governmental programs that provide rent subsidies to tenants pursuant to tenant voucher programs, which vouchers may be used at other properties and influence tenant mobility; |
| ● | adverse local, regional or national economic conditions, which may limit the amount of rent that may be charged and may result in a reduction of timely rent payments or a reduction in occupancy levels; |
| ● | state and local regulations, which may affect the building owner’s ability to increase rent to market rent for an equivalent apartment; and |
| ● | the existence of government assistance/rent subsidy programs, and whether or not they continue and provide the same level of assistance or subsidies. |
Certain of the mortgage loans are secured by multifamily properties that have been the site of criminal activities. Perceptions by prospective tenants of the safety and reputation of the mortgaged real property may influence the cash flow produced by these mortgaged properties, particularly in the case of student housing facilities or properties leased primarily to students. In addition, litigation may be brought against a borrower in connection with any criminal activities that occur at the related mortgaged property.
Certain states regulate the relationship of an owner and its tenants. Commonly, these laws require a written lease, good cause for eviction, disclosure of fees, and notification to residents of changed land use, while prohibiting unreasonable rules, retaliatory evictions, and restrictions on a resident’s choice of unit vendors. Apartment building owners have been the subject of suits under state “Unfair and Deceptive Practices Acts” and other general consumer protection statutes for coercive, abusive or unconscionable leasing and sales practices. A few states offer more significant protection. For example, there are provisions that limit the bases on which a landlord may terminate a tenancy or increase its rent or prohibit a landlord from terminating a tenancy solely by reason of the sale of the owner’s building.
In addition to state regulation of the landlord tenant relationship, numerous counties and municipalities impose rent control on apartment buildings. These ordinances may limit rent increases to fixed percentages, to percentages of increases in the consumer price index, to increases set or approved by a governmental agency, or to increases determined through mediation or binding arbitration. Any limitations on a borrower’s ability to raise property rents may impair such borrower’s ability to repay its multifamily loan from its net operating income or the proceeds of a sale or refinancing of the related multifamily property.
Certain of the mortgage loans may be secured in the future by mortgaged properties that are subject to certain affordable housing covenants and other covenants and restrictions with respect to various tax credit, city, state and federal housing subsidies, rent stabilization or similar programs, in respect of various units within the mortgaged properties. The limitations and restrictions imposed by these programs could result in losses on the mortgage loans. In addition, in the event that the program is cancelled, it could result in less income for the project. These programs may include, among others:
| ● | rent limitations that would adversely affect the ability of borrowers to increase rents to maintain the condition of their mortgaged properties and satisfy operating expense; and |
| ● | tenant income restrictions that may reduce the number of eligible tenants in those mortgaged properties and result in a reduction in occupancy rates. |
The difference in rents between subsidized or supported properties and other multifamily rental properties in the same area may not be a sufficient economic incentive for some eligible tenants to reside at a subsidized or supported property that may have fewer amenities or be less attractive as a residence. As a result, occupancy levels at a subsidized or supported property may decline, which may adversely affect the value and successful operation of such property.
Certain of the mortgage loans may be subject to New York’s Section 421-a (16) Program, which provides, among other things, that a market rate residential unit will be subject to rent stabilization unless the owner would be entitled to remove such market rate residential unit from rent stabilization upon vacancy of such unit by reason of the monthly rent exceeding any limit established under the rent stabilization laws. In general, in Section 421-a (16) Program buildings, apartments initially rented at a rent amount in excess of the high rent threshold qualify for permanent exemption from the rent regulations. Rent concessions given to a particular tenant may be relevant in determining whether a unit has been initially rented at a rent that is at or above the high rent threshold. However, there is currently no governing statute, judicial decision, or governmental authority regulatory guidance as to whether rent concessions such as free rent, should be included or excluded in determining whether a unit has been initially rented at a rent that is at or above the high rent threshold. Accordingly, if the lower net effective rent (taking any rent concessions into consideration) is used as the relevant rent (rather than the higher contractual stated rent), more units at such property could be subject to rent stabilization.
In addition, some counties and municipalities may later impose stricter rent control regulations on apartment buildings. For example, the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (the “HSTP Act”), among other things, limits the ability of landlords to increase rents in rent stabilized apartments at the time of lease renewal and after a vacancy. The HSTP Act also limits potential rent increases for major capital improvements and for individual apartment improvements. In addition, the HSTP Act permits certain qualified localities in the State of New York to implement the rent stabilization system. In particular, the impact of the HSTP Act on the appraised value of mortgaged real properties located in the City of New York that have significant numbers of rent stabilized units, such as the NYC Multifamily Portfolio - 155 East 55th Street mortgaged property, the NYC Multifamily Portfolio - 210 East 58th Street mortgaged property and certain of the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio mortgaged properties (collectively, 7.7%), is uncertain. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations”.
We cannot assure you that the rent stabilization laws or regulations will not cause a reduction in rental income or the appraised value of mortgage real properties. If rents are reduced, we cannot assure you that any such mortgaged real property will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy debt service payments and operating expenses.
Certain of the multifamily properties may be residential cooperative buildings and the land under the building are owned or leased by a non-profit residential cooperative corporation. The cooperative owns all the units in the building and all common areas. Its tenants own stock, shares or membership certificates in the corporation. This ownership entitles the tenant-stockholders to proprietary leases or occupancy agreements which confer exclusive rights to occupy specific units. Generally, the tenant-stockholders make monthly maintenance payments which represent their share of the cooperative corporation’s mortgage loan payments, real property taxes, reserve contributions and capital expenditures, maintenance and other expenses, less any income the corporation may receive. These payments are in addition to any payments of principal and interest the tenant-stockholder may be required to make on any loans secured by its shares in the cooperative.
A number of factors may adversely affect the value and successful operation of a residential cooperative property. Some of these factors include:
| ● | the primary dependence of a borrower upon maintenance payments and any rental income from units or commercial areas to meet debt service obligations; |
| ● | the initial concentration of shares relating to occupied rental units of the sponsor, owner or investor after conversion from rental housing, which may result in an inability to meet debt service obligations on the residential cooperative corporation’s mortgage loan if the sponsor, owner or investor is unable to make the required maintenance payments; |
| ● | the failure of a borrower to qualify for favorable tax treatment as a “cooperative housing corporation” each year, which may reduce the cash flow available to make payments on the related mortgage loan; and |
| ● | that, upon foreclosure, in the event a cooperative property becomes a rental property, certain units could be subject to rent control, stabilization and tenants’ rights laws, at below market rents, which may affect rental income levels and the marketability and sale proceeds of the rental property as a whole. |
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Multifamily Properties”.
Mixed Use Properties Have Special Risks
Certain properties are mixed use properties. Such mortgaged properties are subject to the risks relating to the property types described in “—Office Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Industrial Properties Have Special Risks”. See Annex A-2 for the 5 largest tenants (by net rentable area leased) at each mixed use property. A mixed use property may be subject to additional risks, including the property manager’s inexperience in managing the different property types that comprise such mixed use property.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Mixed Use Properties”.
Industrial Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of industrial properties, including:
| ● | reduced demand for industrial space because of a decline in a particular industry segment; |
| ● | the property becoming functionally obsolete; |
| ● | building design and adaptability; |
| ● | unavailability of labor sources; |
| ● | changes in access, energy prices, strikes, relocation of highways, the construction of additional highways or other factors; |
| ● | changes in proximity of supply sources; |
| ● | the expenses of converting a previously adapted space to general use; |
| ● | the location of the property; and |
| ● | the property may be leased pursuant to a master lease with the related borrower. |
Industrial properties may be adversely affected by reduced demand for industrial space occasioned by a decline in a particular industry segment in which the related tenant(s) conduct their businesses (for example, a decline in consumer demand for products sold by a tenant using the property as a distribution center). In addition, a particular industrial or warehouse property that suited the needs of its original tenant may be difficult to relet to another tenant or may become functionally obsolete relative to newer properties. Furthermore, lease terms with respect to industrial properties are generally for shorter periods of time and may result in a substantial percentage of leases expiring in the same year at any particular industrial property. In addition, mortgaged properties used for many industrial purposes are more prone to environmental concerns than other property types.
Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of an industrial property. Site characteristics that are generally desirable to a warehouse/industrial property include high clear ceiling heights, wide column spacing, a large number of bays (loading docks) and large bay depths, divisibility, a layout that can accommodate large truck minimum turning radii and overall functionality and accessibility.
In addition, because of unique construction requirements of many industrial properties, any vacant industrial property space may not be easily converted to other uses. Thus, if the operation of any of the industrial properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of the improvements or other factors such that the borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the related mortgage loan, the liquidation value of that industrial property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the industrial property were readily adaptable to other uses.
Location is also important because an industrial property requires the availability of labor sources, proximity to supply sources and customers and accessibility to rail lines, major roadways and other distribution channels.
Further, certain of the industrial properties may have tenants that are subject to risks unique to their business, such as cold storage facilities. Cold storage facilities may have unique risks such as short lease terms due to seasonal use, making income potentially more volatile than for properties with longer term leases, and customized refrigeration design, rendering such facilities less readily convertible to alternative uses. Because of seasonal use, leases at such facilities are customarily for shorter terms, making income potentially more volatile than for properties with longer term leases. In addition, such facilities require customized refrigeration design, rendering them less readily convertible to alternative uses.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Industrial Properties”.
Hospitality Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” above, various other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of hospitality properties, including:
| ● | adverse economic and social conditions, either local, regional or national (which may limit the amount that can be charged for a room and reduce occupancy levels); |
| ● | the quality of hospitality property management; |
| ● | the presence or construction of competing hotels or resorts; |
| ● | continuing expenditures for modernizing, refurbishing and maintaining existing facilities prior to the expiration of their anticipated useful lives; |
| ● | ability to convert to alternative uses which may not be readily made; |
| ● | the lack of a franchise affiliation or the loss of a franchise affiliation or a deterioration in the reputation of a franchise; |
| ● | a deterioration in the financial strength or managerial capabilities of the owner or operator of a hospitality property; |
| ● | changes in travel patterns caused by general adverse economic conditions, fear of terrorist attacks, adverse weather conditions, pandemics and changes in access, energy prices, strikes, travel costs, relocation of highways, the construction of additional highways, concerns about travel safety or other factors; |
| ● | whether management contracts or franchise agreements are renewed or extended upon expiration; |
| ● | desirability of particular locations; |
| ● | location, quality and management company or franchise affiliation, each of which affects the economic performance of a hospitality property; and |
| ● | relative illiquidity of hospitality investments which limits the ability of the borrowers and property managers to respond to changes in economic or other conditions. |
Because rooms are generally rented for short periods of time, the financial performance of hospitality properties tends to be affected by adverse economic conditions and competition more quickly than other commercial properties. Additionally, as a result of high operating costs, relatively small decreases in revenue can cause significant stress on a property’s cash flow.
Moreover, the hospitality and lodging industry is generally seasonal in nature and different seasons affect different hospitality properties differently depending on type and location. This seasonality can be expected to cause periodic fluctuations in a hospitality property’s room and entertainment revenues, occupancy levels, room rates and operating expenses. We cannot assure you that cash flow will be sufficient to offset any shortfalls that occur at the mortgaged property during slower periods or that the related mortgage loans provide for seasonality reserves, or if seasonality reserves are provided for, that such reserves will be funded or will be sufficient or available to fund such shortfalls.
In addition, some of the hospitality properties are limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels. Hospitality properties that are limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels may subject a lender to more risk than full-service hospitality properties as they generally require less capital for construction than full-service hospitality properties. In addition, as limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels generally offer fewer amenities than full-service hospitality properties, they are less distinguishable from each other. As a result, it is easier for limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels to experience increased or unforeseen competition.
In addition to hotel operations, some hospitality properties also operate entertainment and sports complexes that include restaurants, theaters, lounges, bars, nightclubs and/or banquet and meeting spaces and may derive a significant portion of the related property’s revenue from such operations. Consumer demand for entertainment resorts is particularly sensitive to downturns in the economy and the corresponding impact on discretionary spending on leisure activities. Changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences could be driven by factors such as perceived or actual general economic conditions, high energy, fuel and food costs, the increased cost of travel, the weakened job market, perceived or actual disposable consumer income and wealth, fears of recession and changes in consumer confidence in the economy, or fears of war and future acts of terrorism. These factors could reduce consumer demand for the leisure activities that the property offers, thus imposing practical limits on pricing and harming operations. Restaurants and nightclubs are particularly vulnerable to changes in consumer preferences. In addition, a nightclub’s, restaurant’s or bar’s revenue is extremely dependent on its popularity and perception. These characteristics are subject to change rapidly and we cannot assure you that any of a hospitality property’s restaurants, theaters, lounges, bars or nightclubs will maintain their current level of popularity or perception in the market. With respect to mortgaged properties that operate entertainment venues, the entertainment industry’s brand perception of the mortgaged property’s entertainment venue may have a significant impact on the ability to book talent and sell shows at the property. Any change in perception of entertainment venues by consumers or by the entertainment industry could have a material adverse effect on the net cash flow of the property. Furthermore, because of the unique construction requirements of restaurants, theaters, lounges, bars or nightclubs, the space at those hospitality properties would not easily be converted to other uses.
Some of the hospitality properties have liquor licenses associated with the mortgaged property. The liquor licenses for these mortgaged properties are generally held by affiliates of the related borrowers, unaffiliated managers or operating lessees. The laws and regulations relating to liquor licenses generally prohibit the transfer of such licenses to any person, or condition such transfer on the prior approval of the governmental authority that issued the license. In the event of a foreclosure of a hospitality property that holds a liquor license, the special servicer on behalf of the issuing entity or a purchaser in a foreclosure sale would likely have to apply for a new license, which might not be granted or might be granted only after a delay that could be significant. We cannot assure you that a new license could be obtained
promptly or at all. The lack of a liquor license in a hospitality property could have an adverse impact on the revenue from the related mortgaged property or on the hospitality property’s occupancy rate. In addition, certain state laws prohibit the assignment of liquor revenues. In such case, the lender may not be able to obtain a security interest in such revenues, which may constitute a material portion of the revenues at the related hospitality property. As a result, the lender may lose its ability to obtain such revenues in a foreclosure in certain scenarios, including if there is bankruptcy of the liquor license holder. In certain cases, the liquor license holder may not be a single purpose entity.
Further, liquor licenses are subject to extensive regulation. A revocation of the liquor license at a hospitality property, particularly a property with significant revenues from nightclubs, casinos, other entertainment venues, restaurants and lounges, could have a material adverse effect on revenues from such property.
In addition, there may be risks associated with hospitality properties that have not entered into or become a party to any franchise agreement, license agreement or other “flag”. Hospitality properties often enter into these types of agreements in order to align the hospitality property with a certain public perception or to benefit from a centralized reservation system. We cannot assure you that hospitality properties that lack such benefits will be able to operate successfully on an independent basis.
With respect to certain hospitality properties, including hospitality properties that are unflagged, the collateral may include the collateral assignment of the rights of the borrower in certain intellectual property and brand names used in connection with the operation of the properties. The success of the operation of the mortgaged property depends in part on the borrower’s continued ability to use this intellectual property and on adequate protection and enforcement of this intellectual property, as well as related brands, logos and branded merchandise, including to increase brand awareness and further develop the property’s brand. Not all of the trademarks, copyrights, proprietary technology or other intellectual property rights used in the operation of such a mortgaged property may have been registered, and some of these trademarks and other intellectual property rights may never be registered. Despite the borrower’s efforts to protect their proprietary rights, third parties may infringe or otherwise violate such intellectual property rights, and use information that the borrower regards as proprietary, and the borrower’s rights may be invalidated or rendered unenforceable.
A portion of certain mortgaged properties may be used as event space. Mortgaged properties used as event space derive their income from one-time events and do not have long-term leases with third parties. Therefore, these properties may be sensitive to declines in general economic and business conditions. Demand for event space may be seasonal. Event center properties may also be subject to competition from other property types that provide similar services, such as hospitality properties or restaurants. In addition, mortgaged properties used as event space may not be readily convertible to alternative uses if these properties were to become unprofitable.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Hospitality Properties”.
Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company
The performance of a hospitality property affiliated with a franchise or hotel management company depends in part on:
| ● | the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor or hotel management company; |
| ● | the public perception of the franchise or hotel chain service mark; and |
| ● | the duration of the franchise licensing or management agreements. |
The continuation of a franchise agreement, license agreement or management agreement is subject to specified operating standards and other terms and conditions set forth in such agreements. The failure of a borrower to maintain such standards or adhere to other applicable terms and conditions, such as property improvement plans, could result in the loss or cancellation of their rights under the franchise, license or management agreement. We cannot assure you that a replacement franchise could be obtained in the event of termination or that such replacement franchise affiliation would be of equal quality to the terminated franchise affiliation. In addition, replacement franchises, licenses and/or hospitality property managers may require significantly higher fees as well as the investment of capital to bring the hospitality property into compliance with the requirements of the replacement franchisor, licensor and/or hospitality property managers. Any provision in a franchise agreement, license agreement or management agreement providing for termination because of a bankruptcy of a franchisor, licensor or manager generally will not be enforceable.
The transferability of franchise agreements, license agreements and the property management agreements is restricted. In the event of a foreclosure, the lender may not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent or the manager might be able to terminate the management agreement. Conversely, in the case of certain mortgage loans, the lender may be unable to remove a franchisor/licensor or a hotel management company that it desires to replace following a foreclosure and, further, may be limited as regards the pool of potential transferees for a foreclosure or real estate owned property.
In some cases where a hospitality property is subject to a license, franchise or management agreement, the licensor, franchisor or property manager has required or may in the future require the completion of various repairs and/or renovations pursuant to a property improvement plan issued by the licensor, franchisor or property manager. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion”. Failure to complete those repairs and/or renovations in accordance with the plan could result in the hospitality property losing its license or franchise or result in termination of the management agreement. Annex A-1 and the related footnotes set forth the amount of reserves, if any, established under the related mortgage loans in connection with any of those repairs and/or renovations. We cannot assure you that any amounts reserved will be sufficient to complete the repairs and/or renovations required with respect to any affected hospitality property. In addition, in some cases, those reserves will be maintained by the licensor, franchisor or property manager. Furthermore, the lender may not require a reserve for repairs and/or renovations in all instances.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Hospitality Properties”.
Manufactured Housing Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of manufactured housing properties, including:
| ● | the number of competing residential developments in the local market, such as: other manufactured housing properties apartment buildings and site built single family homes; |
| ● | the physical attributes of the community, including its age and appearance; |
| ● | the location of the manufactured housing property; |
| ● | the presence and/or continued presence of sufficient manufactured homes at the manufactured housing property (manufactured homes are not generally part of the collateral for a mortgage loan secured by a manufactured housing property; rather, the pads upon which manufactured homes are located are leased to the owners of such manufactured homes; manufactured homes may be moved from a manufactured housing property); |
| ● | the type of services or amenities it provides; |
| ● | the property’s reputation; and |
| ● | state and local regulations, including rent control and rent stabilization. |
The manufactured housing properties have few improvements (which are highly specialized) and are “single purpose” properties that could not be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Thus, if the operation of any of the manufactured housing properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of the improvements or other factors such that the borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the related mortgage loan, the liquidation value of that manufactured housing property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the manufactured housing property were readily adaptable to other uses.
Some manufactured housing properties are either recreational vehicle resorts or have a significant portion of the properties that are intended for short-term recreational vehicle hook-ups, and tenancy of these communities may vary significantly by season. This seasonality may cause periodic fluctuations in revenues, tenancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses for these properties.
Certain of the manufactured housing mortgaged properties may not be connected in their entirety to public water and/or sewer systems. In such cases, the borrower could incur a substantial expense if it were required to connect the property to such systems in the future. In addition, the use of well water enhances the likelihood that the property could be adversely affected by a recognized environmental condition that impacts soil and groundwater.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Manufactured Housing Properties”.
Office Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of office properties, including:
| ● | the quality of an office building’s tenants; |
| ● | an economic decline in the business operated by the tenant; |
| ● | the physical attributes of the building in relation to competing buildings (e.g., age, condition, design, appearance, access to transportation and ability to offer certain amenities, such as sophisticated building systems and/or business wiring requirements); |
| ● | the physical attributes of the building with respect to the technological needs of the tenants, including the adaptability of the building to changes in the technological needs of the tenants; |
| ● | the diversity of an office building’s tenants (or reliance on a single or dominant tenant); |
| ● | an adverse change in population, patterns of telecommuting or sharing of office space, and employment growth (which creates demand for office space); |
| ● | the desirability of the area as a business location; and |
| ● | the strength and nature of the local economy, including labor costs and quality, tax environment and quality of life for employees. |
In the case of medical office properties, the performance of a medical office property may depend on (a) the proximity of such property to a hospital or other healthcare establishment, (b) reimbursements for patient fees from private or government sponsored insurers, (c) its ability to attract doctors and nurses to be on staff, and (d) its ability to afford and acquire the latest medical equipment. Issues related to reimbursement (ranging from nonpayment to delays in payment) from such insurers could adversely impact cash flow at medical office properties. Furthermore, the healthcare industry is highly regulated by federal, state and/or local authorities. Any change in applicable laws and regulations, as well as the costs and administrative burdens associated with complying with applicable laws and regulations, may adversely affect the operating income of medical office properties and the property values of such properties and the related borrower’s ability to make debt service payments on the related mortgage loan.
Moreover, the cost of refitting office space for a new tenant is often higher than the cost of refitting other types of properties for new tenants.
If one or more major tenants at a particular office property were to close or remain vacant, we cannot assure you that such tenants would be replaced in a timely manner or without incurring material additional costs to the related borrower and resulting in an adverse effect on the financial performance of the property.
Certain office tenants may operate co-working businesses through which they sublease their space to sublessees under subleases of varying duration. The ability of any such co-working tenants to make payments under their respective leases may depend on the availability of such sublessees and the ability of such sublessees to make payments under their respective subleases. Further, some of these subleases may be short-term, or may be to individuals or entities that are more susceptible to economic downturns, in which case their short-term nature, or the nature of the underlying sublessees, may lead to income volatility for any such co-working tenants. In addition, office tenants that operate co-working businesses may principally generate revenues through the sale of memberships, most of which have short-term commitments. In many cases, the members may terminate their membership agreements at any time upon as little notice as one calendar month. Demand for such memberships may be negatively affected by a number of factors, including geopolitical uncertainty, competition, cybersecurity incidents, decline in the co-working tenant’s reputation and saturation in the markets where the co-working tenant operates.
Certain of the office mortgaged properties may be leased to a tenant in the life science industry. Properties with life science tenants have unique risk factors that may affect their performance, revenues and/or value. Life science tenants are subject to a number of risks unique to the life science industry, including (but not limited to): (i) high levels of regulation; (ii) failures in the safety and efficacy of their products; (iii) significant funding requirements for product research and development; and (iv) changes in technology, patent expiration, and intellectual property protection. Such risks may adversely affect a life science tenant’s ability to make payments under its lease, and consequently, may materially adversely affect a borrower’s ability to make payments on the related mortgage loan.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Office Properties”.
Self-Storage Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of self-storage properties, including:
| ● | lack of proximity to apartment complexes or commercial users; |
| ● | apartment tenants moving to single family homes; |
| ● | decline in services rendered, including security; |
| ● | dependence on business activity ancillary to renting units; |
| ● | age of improvements; and |
| ● | competition or other factors. |
Self-storage properties are considered vulnerable to competition, because both acquisition costs and break-even occupancy are relatively low. The conversion of self-storage facilities to alternative uses would generally require substantial capital expenditures. Thus, if the operation of any of the self-storage properties becomes unprofitable, the liquidation value of that self-storage mortgaged property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the mortgage loan, than if the self-storage mortgaged property were readily adaptable to other uses.
Tenants at self-storage properties tend to require and receive privacy, anonymity and efficient access, each of which may heighten environmental and other risks related to such property as the borrower may be unaware of the contents in any self-storage unit. No environmental assessment of a self-storage mortgaged property included an inspection of the contents of the self-storage units at that mortgaged property, and we cannot assure you that all of the units included in the self-storage mortgaged properties are free from hazardous substances or other pollutants or contaminants or will remain so in the future.
Certain mortgage loans secured by self-storage properties may be affiliated with a franchise company through a franchise agreement. The performance of a self-storage property affiliated with a franchise company may be affected by the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor, the public perception of a service mark, and the duration of the franchise agreement. The transferability of franchise license agreements is restricted. In the event of a foreclosure, the lender or its agent would not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent. In addition, certain self-storage properties may derive a material portion of revenue from business activities ancillary to self-storage such as truck rentals, parking fees and similar activities which require special use permits or other discretionary zoning approvals.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans secured by self-storage properties may be specialized facilities, such as art storage facilities, that may be subject to certain risks that are different from those of other types of storage facilities, including the need to maintain climate controlled environments and enhanced security systems, increased risk of liability for loss, theft or destruction due to the value of the items stored, and lack of a large market for such facilities.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Self-Storage Properties”.
Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements
The management and operation of a condominium is generally controlled by a condominium board representing the owners of the individual condominium units, subject to the terms of the related condominium rules or by-laws. Generally, the consent of a majority of the board members is required for any actions of the condominium board and a unit owner’s ability to control decisions of the board are generally related to the number of units owned by such owner as a percentage of the total number of units in the condominium. In certain cases, the related borrower does not have a majority of votes on the condominium board, which result in the related borrower not having control of the related condominium or owners association.
The board of managers or directors of the related condominium generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium, and we cannot assure you that the related borrower under a mortgage loan secured by one or more interests in that condominium will have any control over decisions made by the related board of managers or directors. Even if a borrower or its designated board members, either through control of the appointment and voting of sufficient members of the related condominium board or by virtue of other provisions in the related condominium documents, has consent rights over actions by the related condominium associations or owners, we cannot assure you that the related condominium board will not take actions that would materially adversely affect the related borrower’s unit. Thus, decisions made by that board of managers or directors, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the condominium and many other decisions affecting the maintenance of that condominium, may have a significant adverse impact on the related mortgage loans in the issuing entity that are secured by mortgaged properties consisting of such condominium interests. We cannot assure you that the related board of managers or directors will always act in the best interests of the related borrower under the related mortgage loans.
The condominium board is generally responsible for administration of the affairs of the condominium, including providing for maintenance and repair of common areas, adopting rules and regulations regarding common areas, and obtaining insurance and repairing and restoring the common areas of the property after a casualty. Notwithstanding the insurance and casualty provisions of the related mortgage loan documents, the condominium board may have the right to control the use of casualty proceeds.
In addition, the condominium board generally has the right to assess individual unit owners for their share of expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the common elements. In the event that an owner of another unit fails to pay its allocated assessments, the related borrower may be required to pay such assessments in order to properly maintain and operate the common elements of the property. Although the condominium board generally may obtain a lien against any unit owner for common expenses that are not paid, such lien generally is extinguished if a lender takes possession pursuant to a foreclosure. Each unit owner is responsible for maintenance of its respective unit and retains essential operational control over its unit.
In addition, due to the nature of condominiums, a default on the part of the borrower with respect to such mortgaged properties will not allow the special servicer the same flexibility in realizing on the collateral as-is generally available with respect to commercial properties that are not condominium units. The rights of other unit or property owners, the documents governing the management of the condominium units and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units must be considered. In addition, in the event of a casualty with respect to a condominium, due to the possible existence of multiple loss payees on any insurance policy covering such property, there could be a delay in the allocation of related insurance proceeds, if any. Consequently, servicing and realizing upon the collateral described above could subject the certificateholders to a greater delay, expense and risk than with respect to a mortgage loan secured by a commercial property that is not a condominium unit.
Certain condominium declarations and/or local laws provide for the withdrawal of a property from a condominium structure under certain circumstances. For example, the New York Condominium Act provides for a withdrawal of the property from a condominium structure by vote of 80% of unit owners. If the condominium is terminated, the building will be subject to an action for partition by any unit owner or lienor as if owned in common. This could cause an early and unanticipated prepayment of the mortgage loan. We cannot assure you that the proceeds from partition would be sufficient to satisfy borrower’s obligations under the mortgage loan. See also “—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” for certain risks relating to use restrictions imposed pursuant to condominium declarations or other condominium especially in a situation where the mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium building.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Condominium Interests and Other Shared Interests”.
Master Leased Properties Have Special Risks
Properties subject to a master lease present special risks. In such cases, where the borrower owns the fee interest but does not operate the related improvements, such borrower will only receive the rental income from the master lease and not from the operation of any related improvements. Any default by the master lessee would adversely affect the borrower’s ability to make payments on the related mortgage loan. While master leases may contain certain restrictions on the use and operation of the related mortgaged property, the master lessee often enjoys certain of the rights and privileges of a fee owner, including the right to assign and sublet the master leasehold interest. However, the borrower has the same risk of interruptions in cash flow if such master lessee defaults under its lease as it would on another single tenant commercial property, without the control over the premises that it would ordinarily have as landlord. In addition, in the event of a condemnation, the landlord would only be entitled to an allocable share of the condemnation proceeds. Furthermore, the insurance requirements are often governed by the terms of the master lease and, in some cases, certain tenants or subtenants may be allowed to self-insure. The master lessee is commonly permitted to mortgage its master leasehold interest without restriction, and the leasehold lender will often have notice and cure rights with respect to material defaults under the master lease. In addition, master leased interests are less frequently purchased and sold than other interests in commercial real property. It may be difficult for the issuing entity, if it became a foreclosing lender, to sell the fee interests if the tenant and its improvements remains in place. Furthermore, master leased interests are generally subject to the same risks associated with the property type of the master lessee’s use of the premises because that use is a source of revenue for the payment of master lease rent.
Operation of a Mortgaged Property Depends on the Property Manager’s Performance
The successful operation of a real estate project depends upon the property manager’s performance and viability. The property manager is responsible for:
| ● | responding to changes in the local market; |
| ● | planning and implementing the rental structure; |
| ● | operating the property and providing building services; |
| ● | managing operating expenses; and |
| ● | assuring that maintenance and capital improvements are carried out in a timely fashion. |
Properties deriving revenues primarily from short-term sources, such as hotel guests or short-term or month to month leases, are generally more management intensive than properties leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term leases.
Certain of the mortgaged properties will be managed by affiliates of the related borrower. If a mortgage loan is in default or undergoing special servicing, such relationship could disrupt the management of the related mortgaged property, which may adversely affect cash flow. However, the related mortgage loans will generally permit, in the case of mortgaged properties managed by borrower affiliates, the lender to remove the related property manager upon the occurrence of an event of default under the related mortgage loan beyond applicable cure periods (or, in some cases, in the event of a foreclosure following such default), and in some cases a decline in cash flow below a specified level or the failure to satisfy some other specified performance trigger.
We make no representation or warranty as to the skills of any present or future managers. In many cases, the property manager will be an affiliate of the borrower and many not manage properties for non-affiliates. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the property managers will be in a financial condition to fulfill their management responsibilities throughout the terms of their respective management agreements. Further, certain individuals involved in the management or general business development at
certain mortgaged properties may engage in unlawful activities or otherwise exhibit poor business judgment that adversely affect operations and ultimately cash flow at such properties.
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses
The effect of mortgage pool loan losses will be more severe if the losses relate to mortgage loans that account for a disproportionately large percentage of the pool’s aggregate principal balance. As mortgage loans pay down or properties are released, the remaining mortgage loans may face a higher risk with respect to the diversity of property types and property characteristics and with respect to the number of borrowers.
See the table titled “Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity” on Annex A-2 for a stratification of the remaining terms to maturity of the mortgage loans. Because principal on the certificates is payable in sequential order of payment priority, and a class receives principal only after the preceding class(es) have been paid in full, classes that have a lower sequential priority are more likely to face these types of risk of concentration than classes with a higher sequential priority.
Several of the mortgage loans have cut-off date balances that are substantially higher than the average cut-off date balance. In general, concentrations in mortgage loans with larger-than-average balances can result in losses that are more severe, relative to the size of the mortgage loan pool, than would be the case if the aggregate balance of the mortgage loan pool were more evenly distributed.
A concentration of mortgage loans secured by the same mortgaged property types can increase the risk that a decline in a particular industry or business would have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans. Mortgaged property types representing at least 5.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are retail, multifamily, mixed used, industrial, hospitality, manufactured housing and office. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types” for information on the types of mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool.
Repayments by borrowers and the market value of the related mortgaged properties could be affected by economic conditions generally or specific to particular geographic areas or regions of the United States, and concentrations of mortgaged properties in particular geographic areas may increase the risk that conditions in the real estate market where the mortgaged property is located, or other adverse economic or other developments or natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, forest fires, tornadoes or hurricanes or changes in governmental rules or fiscal policies) affecting a particular region of the country, could increase the frequency and severity of losses on mortgage loans secured by those mortgaged properties.
Mortgaged properties securing approximately 5.0% or more of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are located in New York, Texas, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia and Nevada. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Geographic Concentrations”.
Some of the mortgaged properties are located in areas that, based on low population density, poor economic demographics (such as higher than average unemployment rates, lower than average annual household income and/or overall loss of jobs) and/or negative trends in such regards, would be considered secondary or tertiary markets.
A concentration of mortgage loans with the same borrower or related borrowers also can pose increased risks:
| ● | if a borrower that owns or controls several mortgaged properties (whether or not all of them secure mortgage loans in the mortgage pool) experiences financial difficulty at one mortgaged property, it could defer maintenance at another mortgaged property in order to satisfy current expenses with respect to the first mortgaged property; |
| ● | a borrower could also attempt to avert foreclosure by filing a bankruptcy petition that might have the effect of interrupting debt service payments on the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool secured by that borrower’s mortgaged properties (subject to the master servicer’s and the trustee’s obligation to make advances for monthly payments) for an indefinite period; and |
| ● | mortgaged properties owned by the same borrower or related borrowers are likely to have common management, common general partners and/or common managing members increasing the risk that financial or other difficulties experienced by such related parties could have a greater impact on the pool of mortgage loans. See “—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” below. |
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” for information on the composition of the mortgage pool by property type and geographic distribution and loan concentration.
Climate Change May Directly or Indirectly Have an Adverse Effect on the Mortgage Pool
Climate change and legal, technological and political developments related to climate change could have an adverse effect on the underlying mortgaged properties and borrowers and consequently on an investment in the certificates. Such developments include the adoption of local laws or regulations designed to improve energy efficiency or reduce greenhouse gas emissions that have been linked to climate change, which could require borrowers to incur significant costs to retrofit the related properties to comply or subject the borrowers to fines. For example, New York City Local Law 97 of 2019 generally requires, with some exceptions, that (i) buildings that exceed 25,000 gross square feet, (ii) two (2) or more buildings on the same tax lot that together exceed 50,000 square feet and (iii) two (2) or more buildings owned by a condominium association that are governed by the same board of managers and that together exceed 50,000 square feet meet new energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions limits by 2024, with stricter limits coming into effect in 2030. Noncompliant building owners may face fines starting in 2025, unless they are able to bring their building into timely compliance by retrofitting their buildings.
Also, properties that are less energy efficient or that produce higher greenhouse gas emissions may be at a competitive disadvantage to more efficient or cleaner properties in attracting potential tenants.
Similarly, tenants at certain properties may be in, or may be dependent upon, industries, such as oil and gas, that are or may become subject to heightened regulation due to climate change or the development of competing “green” technologies, which may have a material adverse effect on such tenants and lead to, among other things, vacancies or tenant bankruptcies at certain mortgaged properties.
Climate change may also have other effects, such as increasing the likelihood of extreme weather and natural disasters in certain geographic areas. See “—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses”.
We cannot assure you that any retrofitting of properties to comply with new laws or regulations or any change in tenant mix due to the characteristics of the mortgaged property will improve the operations at, or increase the value of, the related mortgaged property. However, failure to comply with any required retrofitting or a concentration of tenants in industries subject to heightened regulation or “green” competition could have a material negative impact on the related mortgaged property, which could affect the ability of the related borrower to repay the related mortgage loan.
Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses
The issuing entity could become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at an underlying mortgaged property. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay payments on the offered certificates.
Each of the mortgaged properties was either (i) subject to environmental site assessments prior to the time of origination of the related mortgage loan (or, in certain limited cases, after origination) including Phase I environmental site assessments or updates of previously performed Phase I environmental site assessments, or (ii) subject to a secured creditor environmental insurance policy or other environmental insurance policy. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations”.
We cannot assure you that the environmental assessments revealed all existing or potential environmental risks or that all adverse environmental conditions have been or will be completely abated or remediated or that any reserves, insurance or operations and maintenance plans will be sufficient to remediate the environmental conditions. Moreover, we cannot assure you that:
| ● | future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability; or |
| ● | the current environmental condition of the mortgaged properties will not be adversely affected by tenants or by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the mortgaged properties (such as underground storage tanks). |
We cannot assure you that any remediation plan or any projected remedial costs or time is accurate or sufficient to complete the remediation objectives, or that no additional contamination requiring environmental investigation or remediation will be discovered on any mortgaged property. Likewise, all environmental policies naming the lender as named insured cover certain risks or events specifically identified in the policy, but the coverage is limited by its terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions, and does not purport to cover all environmental conditions whatsoever affecting the applicable mortgaged property, and we cannot assure you that any environmental conditions currently known, suspected, or unknown and discovered in the future will be covered by the terms of the policy.
Before the trustee, the special servicer or the master servicer, as applicable, acquires title to a mortgaged property on behalf of the issuing entity or assumes operation of the property, it will be required to obtain an environmental assessment of such mortgaged property, or rely on a recent environmental assessment. This requirement is intended to mitigate the risk that the issuing entity will become liable under any environmental law. There is accordingly some risk that the mortgaged property will decline in value while this assessment is being obtained or remedial action is being taken. Moreover, we cannot assure you that this requirement will effectively insulate the issuing entity from potential liability under environmental laws. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay distributions to certificateholders.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations” for additional information on environmental conditions at mortgaged properties securing certain mortgage loans in the issuing entity. See also representation and warranty number (40) on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number (40) in Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans”.
See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Environmental Considerations”.
Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties
Certain of the mortgaged properties are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, expansion or renovation. To the extent applicable, we cannot assure you that any escrow or reserve collected, if any, will be sufficient to complete the current renovation or be otherwise sufficient to satisfy any tenant improvement expenses at a mortgaged property. Failure to complete those planned improvements may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at the mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the mortgage loan documents.
Certain of the hospitality properties securing the mortgage loans are currently undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property improvement plans (“PIPs”). In some circumstances, these renovations or PIPs may necessitate taking a portion of the available guest rooms temporarily offline, temporarily decreasing the number of available rooms and the revenue generating capacity of the related hospitality property. In other cases, these renovations may involve renovations of common spaces or external features of the related hospitality property, which may cause disruptions or otherwise decrease the attractiveness of the related hospitality property to potential guests. These PIPs may be required under the related franchise or management agreement and a failure to timely complete them may result in a termination or expiration of a franchise or management agreement and may be an event of default under the related mortgage loan.
Certain of the mortgaged properties are currently undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property expansions. Such renovations or expansions may be required under tenant leases and a failure to timely complete such renovations or expansions may result in a termination of such lease and may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at the mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the mortgage loan documents.
We cannot assure you that current or planned redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed at all, that such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed in the time frame contemplated, or that, when and if such redevelopment, expansion or renovation is completed, such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will improve the operations at, or increase the value of, the related mortgaged property. Failure of any of the foregoing to occur could have a material negative impact on the related mortgaged property, which could affect the ability of the related borrower to repay the related mortgage loan.
In the event the related borrower fails to pay the costs for work completed or material delivered in connection with such ongoing redevelopment, expansion or renovation, the portion of the mortgaged property on which there are renovations may be subject to mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens that may be senior to the lien of the related mortgage loan.
The existence of construction or renovation at a mortgaged property may take rental units or rooms or leasable space “off-line” or otherwise make space unavailable for rental, impair access or traffic at or near the mortgaged property, or, in general, make that mortgaged property less attractive to tenants or their customers, and accordingly could have a negative effect on net operating income. In addition, any such construction or renovation at a mortgaged property may temporarily interfere with the use and operation of any portion of such mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion” for information regarding mortgaged properties which are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, expansion or renovation. See also Annex A-3 for any additional information on redevelopment, renovation and expansion at the mortgaged properties securing the ten largest mortgage loans.
Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses
Certain mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans may have specialty use tenants and may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable for any reason.
For example, retail, mixed use or office properties may have theater tenants. Properties with theater tenants are exposed to certain unique risks. Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of a theater. In addition, decreasing attendance at a theater could adversely affect revenue of the theater, which may, in turn, cause the tenant to experience financial difficulties, resulting in downgrades in their credit ratings and, in certain cases, bankruptcy filings. In addition, because of unique construction requirements of theaters, any vacant theater space would not easily be converted to other uses.
Retail, mixed use or office properties may also have health clubs as tenants. Several factors may adversely affect the value and successful operation of a health club, including:
| ● | the physical attributes of the health club (e.g., its age, appearance and layout); |
| ● | the reputation, safety, convenience and attractiveness of the property to users; |
| ● | management’s ability to control membership growth and attrition; |
| ● | competition in the tenant’s marketplace from other health clubs and alternatives to health clubs; and |
| ● | adverse changes in economic and social conditions and demographic changes (e.g., population decreases or changes in average age or income), which may result in decreased demand. |
In addition, there may be significant costs associated with changing consumer preferences (e.g., multipurpose clubs from single-purpose clubs or varieties of equipment, classes, services and amenities). In addition, health clubs may not be readily convertible to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable for any reason. The liquidation value of any such health club consequently may be less than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to changing consumer preferences for other uses.
Certain retail, mixed use or office properties may be partially comprised of a parking garage. Parking garages and parking lots present risks not associated with other properties. The primary source of income for parking lots and garages is the rental fees charged for parking spaces.
Factors affecting the success of a parking lot or garage include:
| ● | the number of rentable parking spaces and rates charged; |
| ● | the location of the lot or garage and, in particular, its proximity to places where large numbers of people work, shop or live; |
| ● | the amount of alternative parking spaces in the area; |
| ● | the availability of mass transit; and |
| ● | the perceptions of the safety, convenience and services of the lot or garage. |
Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of a parking garage facility. Site characteristics that are valuable to a parking garage facility include location, clear ceiling heights, column spacing, zoning restrictions, number of spaces and overall functionality and accessibility.
In addition, because of the unique construction requirements of many parking garages and because a parking lot is often vacant paved land without any structure, a vacant parking garage facility or parking lot may not be easily converted to other uses.
Mortgaged properties may have other specialty use tenants, such as medical and dental offices, fitness centers, lab space, gas stations, dry cleaners, bank branches, data centers, urgent care facilities, schools, daycare centers and/or restaurants, as part of the mortgaged property. Re-tenanting certain specialty use tenants, such as gas stations and dry cleaners, may also involve substantial costs related to environmental remediation.
In the case of specialty use tenants such as restaurants and theaters, aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of such properties and other retailers at the mortgaged property. Decreasing patronage at such properties could adversely affect revenue of the property, which may, in turn, cause the tenants to experience financial difficulties, resulting in downgrades in their credit ratings, lease defaults and, in certain cases, bankruptcy filings. See “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” above. Additionally, receipts at such properties are also affected not only by objective factors but by subjective factors. For instance, restaurant receipts are affected by such varied influences as the current personal income levels in the community, an individual consumer’s preference for type of food, style of dining and restaurant atmosphere, the perceived popularity of the restaurant, food safety concerns related to personal health with the handling of food items at the restaurant or by food suppliers and the actions and/or behaviors of staff and management and level of service to the customers. In addition, because of unique construction requirements of such properties, any vacant space would not easily be converted to other uses.
Mortgaged properties with specialty use tenants may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason due to their unique construction requirements. In addition, converting commercial properties to alternate uses generally requires substantial capital expenditures and could result in a significant adverse effect on, or interruption of, the revenues generated by such properties.
In addition, a mortgaged property may not be readily convertible due to restrictive covenants related to such mortgaged property, including in the case of mortgaged properties that are subject to a condominium regime or subject to a ground lease, the use and other restrictions imposed by the condominium declaration and other related documents, especially in a situation where a mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium regime. See “—Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements” above.
Some of the mortgaged properties may be part of tax-reduction programs that apply only if the mortgaged properties are used for certain purposes. Such properties may be restricted from being converted to alternative uses because of such restrictions.
Some of the mortgaged properties have government tenants or other tenants which may have space that was “built to suit” that particular tenant’s uses and needs. For example, a government tenant may require enhanced security features that required additional construction or renovation costs and for which the related tenant may pay above market rent. However, such enhanced features may not be necessary for a new tenant (and such new tenant may not be willing to pay the higher rent associated with such features). While a government office building or government leased space may be usable as a regular office building or tenant space, the rents that may be collected in the event the government tenant does not renew its lease may be significantly lower than the rent currently collected.
Additionally, zoning, historical preservation or other restrictions also may prevent alternative uses. See “—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” below.
Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions
Certain of the mortgaged properties may not comply with current zoning laws, including density, use, parking, height, landscaping, open space and set back requirements, due to changes in zoning requirements after such mortgaged properties were constructed. These properties, as well as those for which variances or special permits were issued or for which non-conformity with current zoning laws is otherwise permitted, are considered to be a “legal non-conforming use” and/or the improvements are considered to be “legal non-conforming structures”. This means that the borrower is not required to alter its structure to comply with the existing or new law; however, the borrower may not be able to rebuild the premises “as-is” in the event of a substantial casualty loss. This may adversely affect the cash flow of the property following the loss. If a substantial casualty were to occur, we cannot assure you that insurance proceeds would be available to pay the mortgage loan in full. In addition, if a non-conforming use were to be discontinued and/or the property were repaired or restored in conformity with the current law, the value of the property or the revenue-producing potential of the property may not be equal to that before the casualty.
In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties that do not conform to current zoning laws may not be “legal non-conforming uses” or “legal non-conforming structures”. The failure of a mortgaged property to comply with zoning laws or to be a “legal non-conforming use” or “legal non-conforming structure” may adversely affect the market value of the mortgaged property or the borrower’s ability to continue to use it in the manner it is currently being used or may necessitate material additional expenditures to remedy non-conformities. In some cases, the related borrower has obtained law and ordinance insurance to cover additional costs that result from rebuilding the mortgaged property in accordance with current zoning requirements. However, if as a result of the applicable zoning laws the rebuilt improvements are smaller or less attractive to tenants than the original improvements, the resulting loss in income will generally not be covered by law and ordinance insurance. Zoning protection insurance will generally reimburse the lender for the difference between (i) the mortgage loan balance on the date of damage loss to the mortgaged property from an insured peril and (ii) the total insurance proceeds at the time of the damage to the mortgaged property if such mortgaged property cannot be rebuilt to its former use due to new zoning ordinances.
In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties may be subject to certain use restrictions, building restrictions and/or operational requirements imposed pursuant to development agreements, ground leases, restrictive covenants, reciprocal easement agreements or operating agreements or historical landmark designations or, in the case of those mortgaged properties that are condominiums, condominium declarations or other condominium use restrictions or regulations, especially in a situation where the mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium building. Such use restrictions could include, for example, limitations on the character of the improvements or the properties, limitations affecting noise and parking requirements, among other things, and limitations on the borrowers’ right to operate certain types of facilities within a prescribed radius. These limitations impose upon the borrower stricter requirements with respect to repairs and alterations, including following a casualty loss. These limitations could adversely affect the ability of the related borrower to lease the mortgaged property on favorable terms, thus adversely affecting the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan. In addition, any alteration, reconstruction, demolition, or new construction affecting a mortgaged property designated a historical landmark may require prior approval. Any such approval process, even if successful, could delay any redevelopment or alteration of a related property. The liquidation value of such property, to the extent subject to limitations of the kind described above or other limitations on convertibility of use, may be substantially less than would be the case if such property was readily adaptable to other uses or redevelopment. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Use Restrictions” for examples of mortgaged properties that are subject to restrictions relating to the use of the mortgaged properties.
Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards Set By New York City’s Local Law 97 May Adversely Affect Future Net Operating Income at Mortgaged Real Properties Located in New York City
With respect to any of the underlying mortgage loans secured by mortgaged real properties located in New York City, the related borrowers may face fines or retrofitting costs related to compliance with New
York City Local Law 97 of 2019 (“Local Law 97”). Local Law 97 generally requires, with some exceptions, that (i) buildings that exceed 25,000 gross square feet, (ii) two or more buildings on the same tax lot that together exceed 50,000 square feet and (iii) two or more buildings owned by a condominium association that are governed by the same board of managers and that together exceed 50,000 square feet meet new energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions limits by 2024, with stricter limits coming into effect in 2030. Noncompliant building owners may face fines starting in 2025, unless they are able to bring their building into timely compliance by retrofitting their buildings. We cannot assure you that fines or retrofitting costs as a result of Local Law 97 will not adversely affect the future net operating income at any of the mortgaged real properties located in New York City.
Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties
Licensed engineers or consultants inspected the mortgaged properties at or about the time of the origination of the mortgage loans to assess items such as structural integrity of the buildings and other improvements on the mortgaged property, including exterior walls, roofing, interior construction, mechanical and electrical systems and general condition of the site, buildings and other improvements. However, we cannot assure you that all conditions requiring repair or replacement were identified. No additional property inspections were conducted in connection with the issuance of the offered certificates.
Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations
A borrower may be required to incur costs to comply with various existing and future federal, state or local laws and regulations applicable to the related mortgaged property, for example, zoning laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, which requires all public accommodations to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by persons with disabilities. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Americans with Disabilities Act”. The expenditure of these costs or the imposition of injunctive relief, penalties or fines in connection with the borrower’s noncompliance could negatively impact the borrower’s cash flow and, consequently, its ability to pay its mortgage loan.
Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate
Although the mortgaged properties are required to be insured, or self-insured by a sole tenant of a related building or group of buildings, against certain risks, there is a possibility of casualty loss with respect to the mortgaged properties for which insurance proceeds may not be adequate or which may result from risks not covered by insurance. In addition, certain types of mortgaged properties have few or no insurable buildings or improvements and thus do not have casualty insurance or low limits of casualty insurance in comparison with the related mortgage loan balances.
Certain Risks Are Not Covered under Standard Insurance Policies
In general (other than where the mortgage loan documents permit the borrower to rely on a tenant (including a ground tenant) or other third party (such as a condominium association, if applicable) to obtain the insurance coverage on self-insurance provided by a tenant or on a tenant’s agreement to rebuild or continue paying rent), the master servicer and special servicer will be required to cause the borrower on each mortgage loan to maintain such insurance coverage in respect of the related mortgaged property as is required under the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Insurance Considerations”. In general, the standard form of fire and extended coverage policy covers physical damage to or destruction of the improvements of a property by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, and riot, strike and civil commotion, subject to the conditions and exclusions specified in each policy (windstorm is a common exclusion for properties located in certain locations). Most policies typically do not cover any physical damage resulting from, among other things:
| ● | nuclear, biological or chemical materials; |
| ● | floods and other water related causes; |
| ● | earth movement, including earthquakes, landslides, sinkholes and mudflows; |
Unless the related mortgage loan documents specifically require the borrower to insure against physical damage arising from such causes, then, the resulting losses may be borne by you as a holder of certificates.
Standard Insurance May Be Inadequate Even for Types of Losses That Are Insured Against
Even if a type of loss is covered by the insurance policies required to be in place at the mortgaged properties, the mortgaged properties may suffer losses for which the insurance coverage is inadequate. For example:
| ● | in a case where terrorism coverage is included under a policy, if the terrorist attack is for example, nuclear, biological or chemical in nature, the policy may include an exclusion that precludes coverage for such terrorist attack; |
| ● | in certain cases, particularly where land values are high, the insurable value (at the time of origination of the mortgage loan) of the mortgaged property may be significantly lower than the principal balance of the mortgage loan; |
| ● | with respect to mortgaged properties located in flood prone areas where flood insurance is required, the related mortgaged property may only have federal flood insurance (which only covers up to $500,000), not private flood insurance, and the related mortgaged property may suffer losses that exceed the amounts covered by the federal flood insurance; |
| ● | the mortgage loan documents may limit the requirement to obtain related insurance to where the premium amounts are “commercially reasonable” or a similar limitation; and |
| ● | if reconstruction or major repairs are required, changes in laws may materially affect the borrower’s ability to effect any reconstruction or major repairs and/or may materially increase the costs of the reconstruction or repairs and insurance may not cover or sufficiently compensate the insured. |
We Cannot Assure You That Required Insurance Will Be Maintained
We cannot assure you that borrowers have maintained or will maintain the insurance required under the mortgage loan documents or that such insurance will be adequate.
Even if the mortgage loan documents specify that the related borrower must maintain standard extended coverage casualty insurance or other insurance that covers acts of terrorism, the borrower may fail to maintain such insurance and the master servicer or the special servicer may not enforce such default or cause the borrower to obtain such insurance if the special servicer has determined, in accordance with the servicing standard and subject to the discussion under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder” and “—The Operating Advisor”, that either (a) such insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates and the subject hazards are not commonly insured against by
prudent owners of similar real properties located in or near the geographic region in which the mortgaged property is located (but only by reference to such insurance that has been obtained by such owners at current market rates), or (b) such insurance is not available at any rate. Additionally, if the related borrower fails to maintain such terrorism insurance coverage, neither the applicable master servicer nor the special servicer will be required to maintain such terrorism insurance coverage if the special servicer determines, in accordance with the servicing standard, that such terrorism insurance coverage is not available for the reasons set forth in (a) or (b) of the preceding sentence. Furthermore, at the time existing insurance policies are subject to renewal, we cannot assure you that terrorism insurance coverage will be available and covered under the new policies or, if covered, whether such coverage will be adequate. Most insurance policies covering commercial real properties such as the mortgaged properties are subject to renewal on an annual basis. If this coverage is not currently in effect, is not adequate or is ultimately not continued with respect to some of the mortgaged properties and one of those properties suffers a casualty loss as a result of a terrorist act, then the resulting casualty loss could reduce the amount available to make distributions on your certificates.
In addition, hazard insurance policies will typically contain co-insurance clauses that in effect require an insured at all times to carry insurance of a specified percentage, generally 80% to 90%, of the full replacement value of the improvements on the related mortgaged property in order to recover the full amount of any partial loss. As a result, even if insurance coverage is maintained, if the insured’s coverage falls below this specified percentage, those clauses generally provide that the insurer’s liability in the event of partial loss does not exceed the lesser of (1) the replacement cost of the improvements less physical depreciation and (2) that proportion of the loss as the amount of insurance carried bears to the specified percentage of the full replacement cost of those improvements.
Certain of the mortgaged properties may be located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 or 4). For example, five (5) mortgaged properties (6.2%) are located in an area with a high degree of seismic activity. Seismic reports were prepared for each of the mortgaged properties and no mortgaged property has a seismic expected loss (SEL) greater than 16%. Material damage to the mortgaged properties as a result of an earthquake could adversely affect the operations and revenues at the mortgaged properties, as well as the borrowers’ ability make payments with respect to the related mortgage loan. The borrowers have not obtained a separate earthquake insurance policy covering the mortgaged properties. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Geographic Concentrations”.
Furthermore, with respect to certain mortgage loans, the insurable value of the related mortgaged property as of the origination date of the related mortgage loan was lower than the principal balance of the related mortgage loan. In the event of a casualty when a borrower is not required to rebuild or cannot rebuild, we cannot assure you that the insurance required with respect to the related mortgaged property will be sufficient to pay the related mortgage loan in full and there is no “gap” insurance required under such mortgage loan to cover any difference. In those circumstances, a casualty that occurs near the maturity date may result in an extension of the maturity date of the mortgage loan if the master servicer, in accordance with the servicing standard, determines that such extension was in the best interest of certificateholders.
The mortgage loans do not all require flood insurance on the related mortgaged properties unless they are in a flood zone and flood insurance is available and, in certain instances, even where the related mortgaged property was in a flood zone and flood insurance was available, flood insurance was not required.
The National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”) is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2024. We cannot assure you if or when NFIP will be reauthorized by Congress. If NFIP is not reauthorized, it could have an adverse effect on the value of properties in flood zones or their ability to repair or rebuild after flood damage.
We cannot assure you that the borrowers will in the future be able to comply with requirements to maintain adequate insurance with respect to the mortgaged properties, and any uninsured loss could have a material adverse impact on the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan,
and consequently, the offered certificates. As with all real estate, if reconstruction (for example, following fire or other casualty) or any major repair or improvement is required to the damaged property, changes in laws and governmental regulations may be applicable and may materially affect the cost to, or ability of, the borrowers to effect such reconstruction, major repair or improvement. As a result, the amount realized with respect to the mortgaged properties, and the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan, and consequently, the offered certificates, could be reduced. In addition, we cannot assure you that the amount of insurance required or provided would be sufficient to cover damages caused by any casualty, or that such insurance will be available in the future at commercially reasonable rates. See representation and warranty number 16 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 16 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Inadequacy of Title Insurers May Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates
Title insurance for a mortgaged property generally insures a lender against risks relating to a lender not having a first lien with respect to a mortgaged property, and in some cases can insure a lender against specific other risks. The protection afforded by title insurance depends on the ability of the title insurer to pay claims made upon it. We cannot assure you that with respect to any mortgage loan:
| ● | a title insurer will have the ability to pay title insurance claims made upon it; |
| ● | the title insurer will maintain its present financial strength; or |
| ● | a title insurer will not contest claims made upon it. |
Certain of the mortgaged properties are either completing initial construction or undergoing renovation or redevelopment. Under such circumstances, there may be limitations to the amount of coverage or other exceptions to coverage that could adversely affect the issuing entity if losses are suffered.
Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties
The occurrence or the possibility of terrorist attacks could (1) lead to damage to one or more of the mortgaged properties if any terrorist attacks occur or (2) result in higher costs for security and insurance premiums or diminish the availability of insurance coverage for losses related to terrorist attacks, particularly for large properties, which could adversely affect the cash flow at those mortgaged properties.
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area, all forms of insurance were impacted, particularly from a cost and availability perspective, including comprehensive general liability and business interruption or rent loss insurance policies required by typical mortgage loans. To give time for private markets to develop a pricing mechanism for terrorism risk and to build capacity to absorb future losses that may occur due to terrorism, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 was enacted on November 26, 2002, establishing the Terrorism Insurance Program. The Terrorism Insurance Program was reauthorized on December 20, 2019 through December 31, 2027 pursuant to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (“TRIPRA”).
The Terrorism Insurance Program requires insurance carriers to provide terrorism coverage in their basic “all-risk” policies. Any commercial property and casualty terrorism insurance exclusion that was in force on November 26, 2002 is automatically void to the extent that it excluded losses that would otherwise be insured losses. Any state approval of those types of exclusions in force on November 26, 2002 is also void.
Under the Terrorism Insurance Program, the federal government shares in the risk of losses occurring within the United States resulting from acts committed in an effort to influence or coerce United States civilians or the United States government. The federal share of compensation for insured losses of an insurer will be equal to 80% of the portion of such insured losses that exceed a deductible equal to
20% of the value of the insurer’s direct earned premiums over the calendar year immediately preceding that program year. Federal compensation in any program year is capped at $100 billion (with insurers being liable for any amount that exceeds such cap), and no compensation is payable with respect to a terrorist act unless the aggregate industry losses relating to such act exceed $200 million. The Terrorism Insurance Program does not cover nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. Unless a borrower obtains separate coverage for events that do not meet the thresholds or other requirements above, such events will not be covered.
If the Terrorism Insurance Program is not reenacted after its expiration in 2027, premiums for terrorism insurance coverage will likely increase and the terms of such insurance policies may be materially amended to increase stated exclusions or to otherwise effectively decrease the scope of coverage available (perhaps to the point where it is effectively not available). In addition, to the extent that any insurance policies contain a “sunset clause” (i.e., clauses that void terrorism coverage if the federal insurance backstop program is not renewed), then such policies may cease to provide terrorism insurance upon the expiration of the Terrorism Insurance Program. We cannot assure you that the Terrorism Insurance Program or any successor program will create any long-term changes in the availability and cost of such insurance. Moreover, future legislation, including regulations expected to be adopted by the Treasury Department pursuant to TRIPRA, may have a material effect on the availability of federal assistance in the terrorism insurance market. To the extent that uninsured or underinsured casualty losses occur with respect to the related mortgaged properties, losses on the mortgage loans may result. In addition, the failure to maintain such terrorism insurance may constitute a default under the related mortgage loan.
Some of the mortgage loans may not require the related borrower to maintain terrorism insurance. In addition, most of the mortgage loans contain limitations on the related borrower’s obligation to obtain terrorism insurance, such as (i) waiving the requirement that such borrower maintain terrorism insurance if such insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates, (ii) providing that the related borrower is not required to spend in excess of a specified dollar amount (or in some cases, a specified multiple of what is spent on other insurance) in order to obtain such terrorism insurance, (iii) requiring coverage only for as long as the TRIPRA is in effect, or (iv) requiring coverage only for losses arising from domestic acts of terrorism or from terrorist acts certified by the federal government as “acts of terrorism” under the TRIPRA. See “Annex A-3—Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” for a summary of the terrorism insurance requirements under each of the ten largest mortgage loans.
Other mortgaged properties securing mortgage loans may also be insured under a blanket policy or self-insured or insured by a sole tenant. See “—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance” below.
We cannot assure you that all of the mortgaged properties will be insured against the risks of terrorism and similar acts. As a result of any of the foregoing, the amount available to make distributions on your certificates could be reduced.
Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance
Certain of the mortgaged properties are covered by blanket insurance policies, which also cover other properties of the related borrower or its affiliates (including certain properties in close proximity to the mortgaged properties). In the event that such policies are drawn on to cover losses on such other properties, the amount of insurance coverage available under such policies would thereby be reduced and could be insufficient to cover each mortgaged property’s insurable risks. In addition, with respect to some of the mortgaged properties, a sole or significant tenant is allowed to provide self-insurance against risks.
Additionally, if the mortgage loans that allow coverage under blanket insurance policies are part of a group of mortgage loans with related borrowers, then all of the related mortgaged properties may be covered under the same blanket policy, which may also cover other properties owned by affiliates of such borrowers.
Certain mortgaged properties may also be insured or self-insured by a sole or significant tenant, as further described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Insurance Considerations”.
Condemnation of a Mortgaged Property May Adversely Affect Distributions on Certificates
From time to time, there may be condemnations pending or threatened against one or more of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. The proceeds payable in connection with a total condemnation may not be sufficient to restore the related mortgaged property or to satisfy the remaining indebtedness of the related mortgage loan. The occurrence of a partial condemnation may have a material adverse effect on the continued use of, or income generated by, the affected mortgaged property. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the occurrence of any condemnation will not have a negative impact upon distributions on your offered certificates.
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty
Historical Information
Some of the mortgage loans that we intend to include in the issuing entity are secured in whole or in part by mortgaged properties for which limited or no historical operating information is available. As a result, you may find it difficult to analyze the historical performance of those mortgaged properties.
A mortgaged property may lack prior operating history or historical financial information because it is newly constructed or renovated, it is a recent acquisition by the related borrower or it is a single-tenant property that is subject to a triple net lease. In addition, a tenant’s lease may contain confidentiality provisions that restrict the sponsors’ access to or disclosure of such tenant’s financial information. The underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating income for such mortgaged properties are derived principally from current rent rolls or tenant leases and historical expenses, adjusted to account for inflation, significant occupancy increases and a market rate management fee. In some cases, underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating income for mortgaged properties are based all or in part on leases (or letters of intent) that are not yet in place (and may still be under negotiation) or on tenants that may have signed a lease (or letter of intent), or lease amendment expanding the leased space, but are not yet in occupancy and/or paying rent, which present certain risks described in “—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Failed Assumptions” below.
See Annex A-1 for certain historical financial information relating to the mortgaged properties, including net operating income for the most recent reporting period and prior three (3) calendar years, to the extent available.
Ongoing Information
The primary source of ongoing information regarding the offered certificates, including information regarding the status of the related mortgage loans and any credit support for the offered certificates, will be the periodic reports delivered to you. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. We cannot assure you that any additional ongoing information regarding the offered certificates will be available through any other source. The limited nature of the available information in respect of the offered certificates may adversely affect their liquidity, even if a secondary market for the offered certificates does develop.
We are not aware of any source through which pricing information regarding the offered certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis or on any particular date.
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Failed Assumptions
As described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”, underwritten net cash flow generally includes cash flow (including any cash flow from master leases) adjusted based on a number of assumptions used by the sponsors. We make no representation that the underwritten net cash flow set forth in this prospectus as of the cut-off date or any other date represents
actual future net cash flows. For example, with respect to certain mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, the occupancy of the related mortgaged property reflects tenants that (i) may not have yet actually executed leases (or letters of intent), (ii) have signed leases but have not yet taken occupancy and/or are not paying full contractual rent, (iii) are seeking or may in the future seek to sublet all or a portion of their respective spaces, (iv) are “dark” tenants but paying rent, or (v) are affiliates of the related borrower and are leasing space pursuant to a master lease or a space lease. Similarly, with respect to certain mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, the underwritten net cash flow may be based on certain tenants that have not yet executed leases or that have signed leases but are not yet in place and/or are not yet paying rent, or have a signed lease or lease amendment expanding the leased space, but are not yet in occupancy in all or a portion of their space and/or paying rent, or may assume that future contractual rent steps (during some or all of the remaining term of a lease) have occurred. In many cases, co-tenancy provisions were assumed to be satisfied and vacant space was assumed to be occupied and space that was due to expire was assumed to have been re-let, in each case at market rates that may have exceeded current rent. You should review these and other similar assumptions and make your own determination of the appropriate assumptions to be used in determining underwritten net cash flow.
In addition, underwritten or adjusted cash flows, by their nature, are speculative and are based upon certain assumptions and projections. The failure of these assumptions or projections in whole or in part could cause the underwritten net operating income (calculated as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”) to vary substantially from the actual net operating income of a mortgaged property.
In the event of the inaccuracy of any assumptions or projections use in connection with the calculation of underwritten net cash flow, the actual net cash flow could be significantly different (and, in some cases, may be materially less) than the underwritten net cash flow presented in this prospectus, and this would change other numerical information presented in this prospectus based on or derived from the underwritten net cash flow, such as the debt service coverage ratios or debt yield presented in this prospectus. We cannot assure you that any such assumptions or projections made with respect to any mortgaged property will, in fact, be consistent with that mortgaged property’s actual performance.
In addition, the debt service coverage ratios set forth in this prospectus for the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties vary, and may vary substantially, from the debt service coverage ratios for the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties as calculated pursuant to the definition of such ratios as set forth in the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus for additional information on certain of the mortgage loans in the issuing entity.
Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment
If you calculate the anticipated yield of your offered certificates based on a rate of default or amount of losses lower than that actually experienced on the mortgage loans and those additional losses result in a reduction of the total distributions on, or the certificate balance of, your offered certificates, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected and could be negative under certain extreme scenarios. The timing of any loss on a liquidated mortgage loan that results in a reduction of the total distributions on or the certificate balance of your offered certificates will also affect the actual yield to maturity of your offered certificates, even if the rate of defaults and severity of losses are consistent with your expectations. In general, the earlier a loss is borne by you, the greater the effect on your yield to maturity.
Delinquencies on the mortgage loans, if the delinquent amounts are not advanced, may result in shortfalls in distributions of interest and/or principal to the holders of the offered certificates for the current month. Furthermore, no interest will accrue on this shortfall during the period of time that the payment is delinquent. Additionally, in instances where the principal portion of any balloon payment scheduled with respect to a mortgage loan is collected by the master servicer following the end of the related collection period, no portion of the principal received on such payment will be passed through for distribution to the certificateholders until the subsequent distribution date, which may result in shortfalls in distributions of
interest to the holders of the offered certificates in the following month. Furthermore, in such instances no provision is made for the master servicer or any other party to cover any such interest shortfalls that may occur as a result. In addition, if interest and/or principal advances and/or property protection advances are made with respect to a mortgage loan after a default and the related mortgage loan is thereafter worked out under terms that do not provide for the repayment of those advances in full at the time of the workout, then any reimbursements of those advances prior to the actual collection of the amount for which the advance was made may also result in shortfalls in distributions of principal to the holders of the offered certificates with certificate balances for the current month. Even if losses on the mortgage loans are not allocated to a particular class of offered certificates with certificate balances, the losses may affect the weighted average life and yield to maturity of that class of offered certificates. In the case of any material monetary or material non-monetary default, the special servicer may accelerate the maturity of the related mortgage loan, which could result in an acceleration of principal distributions to the certificateholders. The special servicer may also extend or modify a mortgage loan, which could result in a substantial delay in principal distributions to the certificateholders. In addition, losses on the mortgage loans, even if not allocated to a class of offered certificates with certificate balances, may result in a higher percentage ownership interest evidenced by those offered certificates in the remaining mortgage loans than would otherwise have resulted absent the loss. The consequent effect on the weighted average life and yield to maturity of the offered certificates will depend upon the characteristics of those remaining mortgage loans in the issuing entity.
The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reviewed or Re-Underwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied With Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria
Although the sponsors have conducted a review of the mortgage loans to be sold to us for this securitization transaction, we, as the depositor for this securitization transaction, have neither originated the mortgage loans nor conducted a review or re-underwriting of the mortgage loans. Instead, we have relied on the representations and warranties made by the applicable sponsor and the remedies for breach of a representation and warranty as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” and each sponsor’s description of its underwriting criteria described under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”.
A description of the review conducted by each sponsor for this securitization transaction is set forth under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Review of GSMC Mortgage Loans”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—Review of CREFI Mortgage Loans”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—Review of 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Review of Barclays Mortgage Loans”, “—Bank of Montreal—Review of BMO Mortgage Loans” and “—German American Capital Corporation—Review of GACC Mortgage Loans”.
The representations and warranties made by the sponsors may not cover all of the matters that one would review in underwriting a mortgage loan and you should not view them as a substitute for re-underwriting the mortgage loans. Furthermore, these representations and warranties in some respects represent an allocation of risk rather than a confirmed description of the mortgage loans. If we had re-underwritten the mortgage loans, it is possible that the re-underwriting process may have revealed problems with a mortgage loan not covered by a representation or warranty or may have revealed inaccuracies in the representations and warranties. See “—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—The Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan” below, and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
As a result of the foregoing, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus and your own view of the mortgage pool.
Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool
As a result of the distinct nature of each pool of commercial mortgage loans, and the separate mortgage loans within the pool, this prospectus does not include disclosure concerning the delinquency and loss experience of static pools of periodic originations by any sponsor of assets of the type to be securitized (known as “static pool data”). In particular, static pool data showing a low level of delinquencies and defaults would not be indicative of the performance of this pool or any other pools of mortgage loans originated by the same sponsor or sponsors.
While there may be certain common factors affecting the performance and value of income-producing real properties in general, those factors do not apply equally to all income-producing real properties and, in many cases, there are unique factors that will affect the performance and/or value of a particular income-producing real property. Moreover, the effect of a given factor on a particular real property will depend on a number of variables, including but not limited to property type, geographic location, competition, sponsorship and other characteristics of the property and the related commercial mortgage loan. Each income-producing real property represents a separate and distinct business venture and, as a result, each of the mortgage loans requires a unique underwriting analysis. Furthermore, economic and other conditions affecting real properties, whether worldwide, national, regional or local, vary over time. The performance of a pool of mortgage loans originated and outstanding under a given set of economic conditions may vary significantly from the performance of an otherwise comparable mortgage pool originated and outstanding under a different set of economic conditions.
Therefore, you should evaluate this offering on the basis of the information set forth in this prospectus with respect to the mortgage loans, and not on the basis of any successful performance of other pools of securitized commercial mortgage loans.
Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property
Appraisals were obtained with respect to each of the mortgaged properties at or about the time of origination of the applicable mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) or at or around the time of the acquisition of the mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) by the related originator or sponsor. See Annex A-1 for the dates of the latest appraisals for the mortgaged properties. We have not obtained new appraisals of the mortgaged properties or assigned new valuations to the mortgage loans in connection with the offering of the offered certificates. The market values of the mortgaged properties could have declined since the origination of the related mortgage loans.
In general, appraisals represent the analysis and opinion of qualified appraisers and are not guarantees of present or future value. One appraiser may reach a different conclusion than that of a different appraiser with respect to the same property. The appraisals seek to establish the amount a typically motivated buyer would pay a typically motivated seller and, in certain cases, may have taken into consideration the purchase price paid by the borrower. The amount could be significantly higher than the amount obtained from the sale of a mortgaged property in a distress or liquidation sale.
Information regarding the appraised values of the mortgaged properties (including loan-to-value ratios) presented in this prospectus is not intended to be a representation as to the past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties. For example, in some cases, a borrower or its affiliate may have acquired the related mortgaged property for a price or otherwise for consideration in an amount that is less than the related appraised value specified on Annex A-1, including at a foreclosure sale or through acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Historical operating results of the mortgaged properties used in these appraisals, as adjusted by various assumptions, estimates and subjective judgments on the part of the appraiser, may not be comparable to future operating results. In addition, certain appraisals may be based on extraordinary assumptions, including without limitation, that certain tenants are in-place and paying rent when such tenants have not yet taken occupancy or that certain renovations or property
improvement plans have been completed. Such capital expenditures are not required and have not been reserved for under the mortgage loan documents, and we cannot assure you that they will be made. Additionally, certain appraisals with respect to mortgage loans secured by multiple mortgaged properties may have been conducted on a portfolio basis rather than on an individual property basis, and the sum of the values of the individual properties may be different from (and in some cases may be less than) the appraised value of the aggregate of such properties on a portfolio basis. In addition, other factors may impair the mortgaged properties’ value without affecting their current net operating income, including:
| ● | changes in governmental regulations, zoning or tax laws; |
| ● | potential environmental or other legal liabilities; |
| ● | the availability of refinancing; and |
| ● | changes in interest rate levels. |
In certain cases, appraisals may reflect “as-is” or other than “as-is” values. However, the appraised value reflected in this prospectus with respect to each mortgaged property, except as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”, reflects only the “as-is” value (or, in certain cases, may reflect the value other than “as-is” as a result of the satisfaction of the related conditions or assumptions unless otherwise specified), which may contain certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting or increased tenant occupancies. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”.
Additionally, with respect to the appraisals setting forth assumptions, particularly those setting forth extraordinary assumptions, as to the “as-is” and other than “as-is” values, we cannot assure you that those assumptions are or will be accurate or that the “as-stabilized” value will be the value of the related mortgaged property at the indicated stabilization date or at maturity. Any engineering report, site inspection or appraisal represents only the analysis of the individual consultant, engineer or inspector preparing such report at the time of such report, and may not reveal all necessary or desirable repairs, maintenance and capital improvement items. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” for additional information regarding the appraisals. We cannot assure you that the information set forth in this prospectus regarding the appraised values or loan-to-value ratios accurately reflects past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties or the amount that would be realized upon a sale of the related mortgaged property.
Seasoned Mortgage Loans Present Additional Risk of Repayment
Certain of the mortgage loans are seasoned mortgage loans. For example, with respect to the 500 Delaware (0.6%) mortgage loan, the mortgage loan was originated 28 months prior to the cut-off date. There are a number of risks associated with seasoned mortgage loans that are not present, or are present to a lesser degree, with more recently originated mortgage loans.
For example:
| ● | property values and surrounding areas have likely changed since origination; origination standards at the time the mortgage loans were originated may have been different than current origination standards; |
| ● | the business circumstances and financial condition of the related borrowers and tenants may have changed since the mortgage loans were originated; |
| ● | the environmental circumstances at the mortgaged properties may have changed since the mortgage loans were originated; |
| ● | the physical condition of the mortgaged properties or improvements may have changed since origination; and |
| ● | the circumstances of the mortgaged properties, the borrower and the tenants may have changed in other respects since the mortgage loans were originated. |
In addition, any seasoned mortgage loan may not satisfy all of the related sponsor’s underwriting standards. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”.
The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property
The operation and performance of a mortgage loan (or whole loan) will depend in part on the identity of the persons or entities who control the borrower and the mortgaged property. The performance of a mortgage loan (or whole loan) may be adversely affected if control of a borrower changes, which may occur, for example, by means of transfers of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower, or if the mortgage loan (or whole loan) is assigned to and assumed by another person or entity along with a transfer of the property to that person or entity.
Many of the mortgage loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, although some have current or permit future mezzanine or subordinate debt. We cannot assure you the ownership of any of the borrowers would not change during the term of the related mortgage loan and result in a material adverse effect on your certificates. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness” and “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions”.
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks
The borrowers are legal entities rather than individuals. Mortgage loans made to legal entities may entail greater risks of loss than those associated with mortgage loans made to individuals. For example, a legal entity, as opposed to an individual, may be more inclined to seek legal protection from its creditors under the bankruptcy laws. Unlike individuals involved in bankruptcies, most legal entities generally, but not in all cases, do not have personal assets and creditworthiness at stake.
The terms of certain of the mortgage loans require that the borrowers be single-purpose entities and, in most cases, such borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of the mortgage loans limit their activities to the ownership of only the related mortgaged property or mortgaged properties and limit the borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness. Such provisions are designed to mitigate the possibility that the borrower’s financial condition would be adversely impacted by factors unrelated to the related mortgaged property and mortgage loan. Such borrower may also have previously owned property other than the related mortgaged property or may be a so-called “recycled” single-purpose entity that previously had other business activities and liabilities. However, we cannot assure you that such borrowers have in the past complied, and will comply, with such requirements. Additionally, in some cases unsecured debt exists and/or is allowed in the future. Furthermore, in many cases such borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions which typically are required in order for such borrowers to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “single purpose entities”.
Although a borrower may currently be a single purpose entity, in certain cases the borrowers were not originally formed as single purpose entities, but at origination of the related mortgage loan (or whole loan, as applicable) their organizational documents were amended. That borrower may have previously owned
property other than the related mortgaged property and may not have observed all covenants that typically are required to consider a borrower a “single purpose entity” and thus may have liabilities arising from events prior to becoming a single purpose entity.
The organizational documents of a borrower or the direct or indirect managing partner or member of a borrower may also contain requirements that there be one or two (2) independent directors, managers or trustees (depending on the entity form of such borrower) whose vote is required before the borrower files a voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency petition or otherwise institutes insolvency proceedings. Generally, but not always, the independent directors, managers or trustees may only be replaced with certain other independent successors. Although the requirement of having independent directors, managers or trustees is designed to mitigate the risk of a voluntary bankruptcy filing by a solvent borrower, a borrower could file for bankruptcy without obtaining the consent of its independent director(s) (and we cannot assure you that such bankruptcy would be dismissed as an unauthorized filing), and in any case the independent directors, managers or trustees may determine that a bankruptcy filing is an appropriate course of action to be taken by such borrower. Although the independent directors, managers or trustees generally owe no fiduciary duties to entities other than the borrower itself, such determination might take into account the interests and financial condition of such borrower’s parent entities and such parent entities’ other subsidiaries in addition to those of the borrower. Consequently, the financial distress of an affiliate of a borrower might increase the likelihood of a bankruptcy filing by a borrower.
The bankruptcy of a borrower, or a general partner or managing member of a borrower, may impair the ability of the lender to enforce its rights and remedies under the related mortgage loan. Certain of the mortgage loans have been made to single purpose limited partnerships that have a general partner or general partners that are not themselves single purpose entities. Such loans are subject to additional bankruptcy risk. The organizational documents of the general partner in such cases do not limit it to acting as the general partner of the partnership. Accordingly there is a greater risk that the general partner may become insolvent for reasons unrelated to the mortgaged property. The bankruptcy of a general partner may dissolve the partnership under applicable state law. In addition, even if the partnership itself is not insolvent, actions by the partnership and/or a bankrupt general partner that are outside the ordinary course of their business, such as refinancing the related mortgage loan, may require prior approval of the bankruptcy court in the general partner’s bankruptcy case. The proceedings required to resolve these issues may be costly and time-consuming.
Any borrower, even an entity structured as a single purpose entity, as an owner of real estate, will be subject to certain potential liabilities and risks as an owner of real estate. We cannot assure you that any borrower will not file for bankruptcy protection or that creditors of a borrower or a corporate or individual general partner or managing member of a borrower will not initiate a bankruptcy or similar proceeding against such borrower or corporate or individual general partner or managing member.
Certain mortgage loans may have the benefit of a general payment guaranty of a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan. A payment guaranty for a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan that is greater than ten percent (10%) presents a risk for consolidation of the assets of a borrower and the guarantor. In addition, certain borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of certain mortgage loans may permit an affiliated property manager to maintain a custodial account on behalf of such borrower and certain affiliates of such borrower into which funds available to such borrower under the terms of the related mortgage loans and funds of such affiliates are held, but which funds are and will continue to be separately accounted for as to each item of income and expense for each related mortgaged property and each related borrower. A custodial account structure for affiliated entities, while common among certain REITs, institutions or independent owners of multiple properties, presents a risk for consolidation of the assets of such affiliates as commingling of funds is a factor a court may consider in considering a request by other creditors for substantive consolidation. Substantive consolidation is an equitable remedy that could result in an otherwise solvent company becoming subject to the bankruptcy proceedings of an insolvent affiliate, making its assets available to repay the debts of affiliated companies. A court has the discretion to order substantive consolidation in whole or in part and may include non-debtor affiliates of the bankrupt entity in the proceedings. In particular, consolidation may be ordered when corporate funds are commingled and used for a principal’s personal purposes, inadequate
records of transfers are made and corporate entities are deemed an alter ego of a principal. Strict adherence to maintaining separate books and records, avoiding commingling of assets and otherwise maintaining corporate policies designed to preserve the separateness of corporate assets and liabilities make it less likely that a court would order substantive consolidation, but we cannot assure you that the related borrowers, property managers or affiliates will comply with these requirements as set forth in the related mortgage loans.
Furthermore, with respect to any affiliated borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent. Consolidation of the assets of such borrowers would likely have an adverse effect on the funds available to make distributions on your certificates, and may lead to a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the ratings of your certificates.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
In addition, borrowers may own a mortgaged property as a Delaware statutory trust or as tenants-in-common. Delaware statutory trusts may be restricted in their ability to actively operate a property, and in the case of a mortgaged property that is owned by a Delaware statutory trust or by tenants-in-common, there is a risk that obtaining the consent of the holders of the beneficial interests in the Delaware statutory trust or the consent of the tenants-in-common will be time consuming and cause delays with respect to the taking of certain actions by or on behalf of the borrower, including with respect to the related mortgaged property. See “—Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery” below. See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans may have borrowers that are wholly or partially (directly or indirectly) owned by one or more crowd funding investor groups or other diversified ownership structures. Investments in the commercial real estate market through crowd funding investor groups are a relatively recent development and there may be certain unanticipated risks to this new ownership structure which may adversely affect the related mortgage loan. Typically, the crowd funding investor group is made up of a large number of individual investors who invest relatively small amounts in the group pursuant to a securities offering. With respect to an equity investment in the borrower, the crowd funding investor group in turn purchases a stake in the borrower. Accordingly, equity in the borrower is indirectly held by the individual investors in the crowd funding group. We cannot assure you that either the crowd funding investor group or the individual investors in the crowd funding investor group or other diversified ownership structure have relevant expertise in the commercial real estate market. Additionally, crowd funding investor groups are required to comply with various securities regulations related to offerings of securities and we cannot assure you that any enforcement action or legal proceeding regarding failure to comply with such securities regulations would not delay enforcement of the related mortgage loan. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that a bankruptcy proceeding by the crowd funding investor group or other diversified ownership structure will not delay enforcement of the related mortgage loan or otherwise impair the borrower’s ability to operate the related mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”. See “—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions”, “—Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment” and “—The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property”.
See representation and warranty number 31 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 31 on Annex E-1 and any identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans
Numerous statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Code and state laws affording relief to debtors, may interfere with and delay the ability of a secured mortgage lender to obtain payment of a loan, to realize upon collateral and/or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, and, often, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy proceeding. Also, under federal bankruptcy law, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior lien holder may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out such junior lien. Certain of the mortgage loans have borrower sponsors that have previously filed bankruptcy and we cannot assure you that such borrower sponsors will not be more likely than other borrower sponsors to utilize their rights in bankruptcy in the event of any threatened action by the mortgagee to enforce its rights under the related mortgage loan documents. As a result, the issuing entity’s recovery with respect to borrowers in bankruptcy proceedings may be significantly delayed, and the aggregate amount ultimately collected may be substantially less than the amount owed. See “—Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk” below, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Additionally, the courts of any state may refuse the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust when an acceleration of the indebtedness would be inequitable or unjust or the circumstances would render the action unconscionable. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure”.
See also “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” above.
Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions
There may be (and there may exist from time to time) pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or disputes with, the borrowers, the borrower sponsors and the managers of the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates arising out of their ordinary business. We have not undertaken a search for all legal proceedings that relate to the borrowers, borrower sponsors or managers for the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates. Potential investors are advised and encouraged to perform their own searches related to such matters to the extent relevant to their investment decision. Any such litigation or dispute may materially impair distributions to certificateholders if borrowers must use property income to pay judgments, legal fees or litigation costs. We cannot assure you that any litigation or dispute or any settlement of any litigation or dispute will not have a material adverse effect on your investment.
Additionally, a borrower or a principal of a borrower or affiliate may have been a party to a bankruptcy, foreclosure, litigation or other proceeding, particularly against a lender, or has been convicted of a crime in the past. In addition, certain of the borrower sponsors, property managers, affiliates of any of the foregoing and/or entities controlled thereby have been a party to bankruptcy proceedings, mortgage loan defaults and restructures, discounted payoffs, foreclosure proceedings or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions, or other material proceedings (including criminal proceedings) in the past, whether or not related to the mortgaged property securing a mortgage loan in this securitization transaction. In some cases, mortgaged properties securing certain of the mortgage loans may have previously secured other loans that had been in default, restructured or the subject of a discounted payoff, foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
Certain of the borrower sponsors may have a history of litigation or other proceedings against their lender, in some cases involving various parties to a securitization transaction. We cannot assure you that the borrower sponsors that have engaged in litigation or other proceedings in the past will not commence action against the issuing entity in the future upon any attempt by the special servicer to enforce the mortgage loan documents. Any such actions by the borrower or borrower sponsor may result in significant expense and potential loss to the issuing entity and a shortfall in funds available to make payments on the offered certificates. In addition, certain principals or borrower sponsors may have in the past been convicted of, or pled guilty to, a felony. We cannot assure you that the borrower or principal will not be more likely than other borrowers or principals to avail itself or cause a borrower to avail itself of its legal rights, under the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise, in the event of an action or threatened action by the lender or its servicer to enforce the related mortgage loan documents, or otherwise conduct its operations in a manner that is in the best interests of the lender and/or the mortgaged property. We cannot assure you that any such proceedings or actions will not have a material adverse effect upon distributions on your certificates. Further, borrowers, principals of borrowers, property managers and affiliates of such parties may, in the future, be involved in bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings or other material proceedings (including criminal proceedings), whether or not related to the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that any such proceedings will not negatively impact a borrower’s or borrower sponsor’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan and, as a result could have a material adverse effect upon your certificates.
Often it is difficult to confirm the identity of owners of all of the equity in a borrower, which means that past issues may not be discovered as to such owners. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations” and “—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” for additional information on certain mortgage loans in the issuing entity. However, we cannot assure you that there are no undisclosed bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure transaction and/or mortgage loan workout matters that involved one or more mortgage loans or mortgaged properties, and/or a guarantor, borrower sponsor or other party to a mortgage loan.
In addition, in the event the owner of a borrower experiences financial problems, we cannot assure you that such owner would not attempt to take actions with respect to the mortgaged property that may adversely affect the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations” for information regarding litigation matters with respect to certain mortgage loans.
Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk
When a borrower (or its constituent members) also has one or more other outstanding loans (even if they are pari passu, subordinated, mezzanine, preferred equity or unsecured loans or another type of equity pledge), the issuing entity is subjected to additional risk such as:
| ● | the borrower (or its constituent members) may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple financings; |
| ● | the existence of other financings will generally also make it more difficult for the borrower to obtain refinancing of the related mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) or sell the related mortgaged property and may thereby jeopardize repayment of the mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable); |
| ● | the need to service additional financings may reduce the cash flow available to the borrower to operate and maintain the mortgaged property and the value of the mortgaged property may decline as a result; |
| ● | if a borrower (or its constituent members) defaults on its mortgage loan and/or any other financing, actions taken by other lenders such as a suit for collection, foreclosure or an involuntary petition for bankruptcy against the borrower could impair the security available to the issuing entity, including the mortgaged property, or stay the issuing entity’s ability to foreclose during the course of the bankruptcy case; |
| ● | the bankruptcy of another lender also may operate to stay foreclosure by the issuing entity; and |
| ● | the issuing entity may also be subject to the costs and administrative burdens of involvement in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings or related litigation. |
Although the companion loans related to a serviced whole loan and any non-serviced mortgage loan are not assets of the issuing entity, each related borrower is still obligated to make interest and principal payments on such companion loans. As a result, the issuing entity is subject to additional risks, including:
| ● | the risk that the necessary maintenance of the related mortgaged property could be deferred to allow the borrower to pay the required debt service on these other obligations and that the value of the mortgaged property may fall as a result; and |
| ● | the risk that it may be more difficult for the borrower to refinance these loans or to sell the related mortgaged property for purposes of making any balloon payment on the entire balance of such loans and the related additional debt at maturity. |
With respect to mezzanine financing (if any), while a mezzanine lender has no security interest in the related mortgaged properties, a default under a mezzanine loan could cause a change in control of the related borrower. With respect to mortgage loans that permit mezzanine financing, the relative rights of the mortgagee and the related mezzanine lender will generally be set forth in an intercreditor agreement, which agreements typically provide that the rights of the mezzanine lender (including the right to payment) against the borrower and mortgaged property are subordinate to the rights of the mortgage lender and that the mezzanine lender may not take any enforcement action against the mortgage borrower and mortgaged property.
In addition, the mortgage loan documents related to certain mortgage loans may have or permit future “preferred equity” structures, where one or more special limited partners or members receive a preferred return in exchange for an infusion of capital or other type of equity pledge that may require payments of a specified return or of excess cash flow. Such arrangements can present risks that resemble mezzanine debt, including dilution of the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property, stress on the cash flow in the form of a preferred return or excess cash payments, and/or potential changes in the management of the related mortgaged property in the event the preferred return is not satisfied.
Additionally, the terms of certain mortgage loans permit or require the borrowers to post letters of credit and/or surety bonds for the benefit of the related mortgage loan, which may constitute a contingent reimbursement obligation of the related borrower or an affiliate. The issuing bank or surety will not typically agree to subordination and standstill protection benefiting the mortgagee.
In addition, borrowers under most of the mortgage loans are generally permitted to incur trade payables and equipment financing, which may not be limited or may be significant, in order to operate the related mortgaged properties. Also, with respect to certain mortgage loans the related borrower either has incurred or is permitted to incur unsecured debt from an affiliate of either the borrower or the borrower sponsor. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Other Unsecured Indebtedness”.
For additional information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery
Certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity have borrowers that own the related mortgaged properties as tenants-in-common. In general, with respect to a tenant-in-common ownership structure, each tenant-in-common owns an undivided share in the property and if such tenant-in-common desires to sell its interest in the property (and is unable to find a buyer or otherwise needs to force a partition) the tenant-in-common has the ability to request that a court order a sale of the property and distribute the proceeds to each tenant in common proportionally. As a result, if a tenant-in-common that has not waived its right of partition or similar right exercises a right of partition, the related mortgage loan may be subject to prepayment. The bankruptcy, dissolution or action for partition by one or more of the tenants-in-common could result in an early repayment of the related mortgage loan, significant delay in recovery against the tenant-in-common borrowers, particularly if the tenant-in-common borrowers file for bankruptcy separately or in series (because each time a tenant-in-common borrower files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court stay will be reinstated), a material impairment in property management and a substantial decrease in the amount recoverable upon the related mortgage loan. Not all tenants-in-common under the mortgage loans will be single purpose entities. Each tenant-in-common borrower has waived its right to partition, reducing the risk of partition. However, we cannot assure you that, if challenged, this waiver would be enforceable. In addition, in some cases, the related mortgage loan documents may provide for full recourse (or in an amount equal to its pro rata share of the debt) to the related tenant-in-common borrower or the guarantor if a tenant-in-common files for partition. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”.
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization
Cross-collateralization arrangements may be terminated in certain circumstances under the terms of the related mortgage loan documents. Cross-collateralization arrangements whereby multiple borrowers grant their respective mortgaged properties as security for one or more mortgage loans could be challenged as fraudulent conveyances by the creditors or the bankruptcy estate of any of the related borrowers.
Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by that borrower from the respective mortgage loan proceeds, as well as the overall cross-collateralization. If a court were to conclude that the granting of the liens was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, that court could subordinate all or part of the mortgage loan to other debt of that borrower, recover prior payments made on that mortgage loan, or take other actions such as invalidating the mortgage loan or the mortgages securing the cross-collateralization. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
In addition, when multiple real properties secure a mortgage loan, the amount of the mortgage encumbering any particular one of those properties may be less than the full amount of the related aggregate mortgage loan indebtedness, to minimize recording tax. This mortgage amount is generally established at 100% to 150% of the appraised value or allocated loan amount for the mortgaged property and will limit the extent to which proceeds from the property will be available to offset declines in value of the other properties securing the same mortgage loan.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” for a description of any mortgage loans that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other or that are secured by multiple properties owned by multiple borrowers.
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions
Provisions requiring yield maintenance charges, prepayment premiums or lockout periods may not be enforceable in some states and under federal bankruptcy law. Provisions requiring prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges also may be interpreted as constituting the collection of interest for usury purposes. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the obligation to pay a yield maintenance charge or
prepayment premium will be enforceable. Also, we cannot assure you that foreclosure proceeds will be sufficient to pay an enforceable yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium.
Additionally, although the collateral substitution provisions related to defeasance do not have the same effect on the certificateholders as prepayment, we cannot assure you that a court would not interpret those provisions as the equivalent of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium. In certain jurisdictions those collateral substitution provisions might therefore be deemed unenforceable or usurious under applicable law or public policy.
Risks Associated with One Action Rules
Several states (such as California) have laws that prohibit more than one “judicial action” to enforce a mortgage obligation, and some courts have construed the term “judicial action” broadly. Accordingly, the special servicer will be required to obtain advice of counsel prior to enforcing any of the issuing entity’s rights under any of the mortgage loans that include mortgaged properties where a “one action” rule could be applicable. In the case of a multi property mortgage loan which is secured by mortgaged properties located in multiple states, the special servicer may be required to foreclose first on properties located in states where “one action” rules apply (and where non judicial foreclosure is permitted) before foreclosing on properties located in states where judicial foreclosure is the only permitted method of foreclosure. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure”.
State Law Limitations on Assignments of Leases and Rents May Entail Risks
Generally mortgage loans included in an issuing entity secured by mortgaged properties that are subject to leases typically will be secured by an assignment of leases and rents pursuant to which the related borrower (or with respect to any indemnity deed of trust structure, the related property owner) assigns to the lender its right, title and interest as landlord under the leases of the related mortgaged properties, and the income derived from those leases, as further security for the related mortgage loan, while retaining a license to collect rents for so long as there is no default. If the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect rents. Some state laws may require that the lender take possession of the related property and obtain a judicial appointment of a receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents. In addition, if bankruptcy or similar proceedings are commenced by or in respect of the borrower, the lender’s ability to collect the rents may be adversely affected. In particular, with respect to properties that are master leased, state law may provide that the lender will not have a perfected security interest in the underlying rents (even if covered by an assignment of leases and rents), unless there is also a mortgage on the master tenant’s leasehold interest. Such a mortgage is not typically obtained. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Leases and Rents” and “—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Various Other Laws Could Affect the Exercise of Lender’s Rights
The laws of the jurisdictions in which the mortgaged properties are located (which laws may vary substantially) govern many of the legal aspects of the mortgage loans. These laws may affect the ability to foreclose on, and, in turn the ability to realize value from, the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. For example, state law determines:
| ● | what proceedings are required for foreclosure; |
| ● | whether the borrower and any foreclosed junior lienors may redeem the property and the conditions under which these rights of redemption may be exercised; |
| ● | whether and to what extent recourse to the borrower is permitted; and |
| ● | what rights junior mortgagees have and whether the amount of fees and interest that lenders may charge is limited. |
In addition, the laws of some jurisdictions may render certain provisions of the mortgage loans unenforceable or subject to limitations which may affect lender’s rights under the mortgage loans. Delays in liquidations of defaulted mortgage loans and shortfalls in amounts realized upon liquidation as a result of the application of these laws may create delays and shortfalls in payments to certificateholders. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans”.
For example, Florida statutes render unenforceable provisions that allow for acceleration and other unilateral modifications solely as a result of a property owner entering into an agreement for a property-assessed clean energy (“PACE”) financing. Consequently, given that certain remedies in connection therewith are not enforceable in Florida, we cannot assure you that any borrower owning assets in Florida will not obtain PACE financing notwithstanding any prohibition on such financing set forth in the related mortgage loan documents. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans”.
The Absence of Lockboxes Entails Risks That Could Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates
On March 10, 2023, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver for Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). To protect insured depositors, the FDIC ultimately transferred all the deposits and substantially all of the assets of SVB to Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A., a full-service bridge bank that will be operated by the FDIC as it stabilizes the institution and implements an orderly resolution. On March 12, 2023, Signature Bank was closed by the New York State Department of Financial Services, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. To protect depositors, the FDIC transferred all the deposits and substantially all of the assets of Signature Bank to Signature Bridge Bank, N.A. (“Bridge Bank”), a full-service bank that will be operated by the FDIC as it markets the institution to potential bidders. On March 20, 2023, the FDIC announced that it had entered into a purchase and assumption agreement for substantially all deposits and certain loan portfolios of Bridge Bank by Flagstar Bank, National Association (“Flagstar”). On May 1, 2023, the FDIC announced that it entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, to assume all of the deposits and substantially all of the assets of First Republic Bank. Other banks have also come under pressure as a result of the failure of SVB, Signature Bank and First Republic and we cannot assure you whether or not the FDIC will take similar or different actions with respect to other banking institutions. Under the related mortgage loan documents, all accounts, including the lockbox accounts, are required to be held at institutions meeting certain financial and ratings requirements. In many cases, Flagstar does not meet the requirements for an eligible institution to act as a lockbox bank under the applicable mortgage loan documents. Recently, a number of rating agencies have downgraded certain regional banks and other financial institutions and have put others on watch for possible downgrade. Such downgrades may trigger the obligation to transfer accounts held at certain institutions if any such downgrades cause them not to meet the requirements of the loan documents. Failure to meet those requirements could result in a default by the related borrower until the lockbox account is transferred to an institution meeting the necessary financial and ratings requirements. We cannot assure you that the operation of any lockbox accounts at Bridge Bank or Flagstar, or the transfer of those lockbox accounts (or other accounts held at other institutions) to other qualified institutions, if required, will not have an adverse impact on the operational cash flows from the related mortgaged properties or the related borrowers’ ability to meet their respective obligations under the mortgage loan documents during that time.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans may not require the related borrower to cause rent and other payments to be made into a lockbox account maintained on behalf of the mortgagee, although some of those mortgage loans do provide for a springing lockbox. If rental payments are not required to be made directly into a lockbox account, there is a risk that the borrower will divert such funds for other purposes. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that a springing lockbox will be able to be implemented in the future as may be required by the loan documents.
Borrower May Be Unable To Repay Remaining Principal Balance on Maturity Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk
Mortgage loans with substantial remaining principal balances at their stated maturity date involve greater risk than fully-amortizing mortgage loans. This is because the borrower may be unable to repay the mortgage loan at that time. In addition, fully amortizing mortgage loans which may pay interest on an “actual/360” basis but have fixed monthly payments may, in effect, have a small balloon payment due at maturity.
All of the mortgage loans that provide for amortization have amortization schedules that are significantly longer than their respective terms to maturity, and many of the mortgage loans require only payments of interest for part or all of their respective terms. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest”. A longer amortization schedule or an interest-only provision in a mortgage loan will result in a higher amount of principal outstanding under the mortgage loan at any particular time, including at the maturity date of the mortgage loan, than would have otherwise been the case had a shorter amortization schedule been used or had the mortgage loan had a shorter interest-only period or not included an interest-only provision at all. That higher principal amount outstanding could both (i) make it more difficult for the related borrower to make the required balloon payment at maturity and (ii) lead to increased losses for the issuing entity either during the loan term or at maturity if the mortgage loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan.
A borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage loan (or whole loan) on its stated maturity date typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan (or whole loan) or to sell the mortgaged property at a price sufficient to permit repayment. A borrower’s ability to achieve either of these goals will be affected by a number of factors, including:
| ● | the availability of, and competition for, credit for commercial or multifamily real estate projects, which fluctuate over time; |
| ● | the prevailing interest rates; |
| ● | the net operating income generated by the mortgaged property; |
| ● | the fair market value of the related mortgaged property; |
| ● | the borrower’s equity in the related mortgaged property; |
| ● | significant tenant rollover at the related mortgaged properties (see “—Office Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Retail Properties Have Special Risks” above); |
| ● | the borrower’s financial condition; |
| ● | the operating history and occupancy level of the mortgaged property; |
| ● | reductions in applicable government assistance/rent subsidy programs; |
| ● | prevailing general and regional economic conditions. |
With respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, the risks relating to balloon payment obligations are enhanced by the existence and amount of any related companion loans.
None of the sponsors, any party to the pooling and servicing agreement or any other person will be under any obligation to refinance any mortgage loan. However, in order to maximize recoveries on defaulted mortgage loans, the pooling and servicing agreement permits the special servicer (and each pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan may permit the
related special servicer) to extend and modify mortgage loans in a manner consistent with the servicing standard, subject to the limitations described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans” and “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”.
Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the ability to extend or modify a non-serviced mortgage loan because such mortgage loan is being serviced by a master servicer or the special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the applicable non-serviced whole loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
We cannot assure you that any extension or modification will increase the present value of recoveries in a given case. Whether or not losses are ultimately sustained, any delay in collection of a balloon payment that would otherwise be distributable on your certificates, whether such delay is due to borrower default or to modification of the related mortgage loan, will likely extend the weighted average life of your certificates.
In addition, compliance with legal requirements, such as the credit risk retention regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, could cause commercial real estate lenders to tighten their lending standards and reduce the availability of debt financing for commercial real estate borrowers. This, in turn, may adversely affect the borrower’s ability to refinance the mortgage loans or sell the mortgaged property on the stated maturity date. We cannot assure you that each borrower under a balloon loan will have the ability to repay the principal balance of such mortgage loan on the related maturity date.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics”.
Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests
With respect to certain mortgaged properties, the encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the mortgaged property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the mortgaged property, such portion is not material to the use or operation of the mortgaged property), or (ii) the mortgage loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the mortgaged property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related mortgaged property.
Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower. The most significant of these risks is that if the related borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the lender would lose its security in the leasehold interest. Generally, each related ground lease or a lessor estoppel requires the lessor to give the lender notice of the borrower’s defaults under the ground lease and an opportunity to cure them, permits the leasehold interest to be assigned to the lender or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, in some cases only upon the consent of the lessor, and contains certain other protective provisions typically included in a “mortgageable” ground lease, although not all these protective provisions are included in each case.
Upon the bankruptcy of a lessor or a lessee under a ground lease, the debtor has the right to assume or reject the lease. If a debtor lessor rejects the lease, the lessee has the right pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code to treat such lease as terminated by rejection or remain in possession of its leased premises for the rent otherwise payable under the lease for the remaining term of the ground lease (including renewals) and to offset against such rent any damages incurred due to the landlord’s failure to perform its obligations under the lease. If a debtor lessee/borrower rejects any or all of the lease, the leasehold lender could succeed to the lessee/borrower’s position under the lease only if the lease specifically grants the lender such right. If both the lessor and the lessee/borrower are involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the issuing entity may be unable to enforce the bankrupt lessee/borrower’s pre-petition agreement to refuse to treat a ground lease rejected by a bankrupt lessor as terminated. In such circumstances, a ground lease could be terminated notwithstanding lender protection provisions contained in the ground lease or in the mortgage.
Some of the ground leases securing the mortgage loans may provide that the ground rent payable under the related ground lease increases during the term of the mortgage loan. These increases may adversely affect the cash flow and net income of the related borrower.
A leasehold lender could lose its security unless (i) the leasehold lender holds a fee mortgage, (ii) the ground lease requires the lessor to enter into a new lease with the leasehold lender upon termination or rejection of the ground lease, or (iii) the bankruptcy court, as a court of equity, allows the leasehold lender to assume the ground lessee’s obligations under the ground lease and succeed to the ground lessee’s position. Although not directly covered by the 1994 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, such a result would be consistent with the purpose of the 1994 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code granting the holders of leasehold mortgages permitted under the terms of the lease the right to succeed to the position of a leasehold mortgagor. Although consistent with the Bankruptcy Code, such position may not be adopted by the applicable bankruptcy court.
Further, in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Precision Indus. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2003)) the court ruled with respect to an unrecorded lease of real property that where a sale of the fee interest in leased property occurs under the Bankruptcy Code upon the bankruptcy of a landlord, such sale terminates a lessee’s possessory interest in the property, and the purchaser assumes title free and clear of any interest, including any leasehold estates. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, a lessee may request the bankruptcy court to prohibit or condition the sale of the property so as to provide adequate protection of the leasehold interest; however, the court ruled that this provision does not ensure continued possession of the property, but rather entitles the lessee to compensation for the value of its leasehold interest, typically from the sale proceeds. While there are certain circumstances under which a “free and clear” sale under the Bankruptcy Code would not be authorized (including that the lessee could not be compelled in a legal or equitable proceeding to accept a monetary satisfaction of his possessory interest, and that none of the other conditions of the Bankruptcy Code otherwise permits the sale), we cannot assure you that those circumstances would be present in any proposed sale of a leased premises. As a result, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a sale of leased property pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the lessee will be able to maintain possession of the property under the ground lease. In addition, we cannot assure you that the lessee and/or the lender will be able to recoup the full value of the leasehold interest in bankruptcy court. Most of the ground leases contain standard protections typically obtained by securitization lenders. Certain of the ground leases with respect to a mortgage loan included in the issuing entity may not.
See representation and warranty number 34 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 34 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Except as noted in this prospectus, each of the ground leases has a term that extends at least 20 years beyond the maturity date of the mortgage loan (taking into account all freely exercisable extension options) and contains customary mortgagee protection provisions, including notice and cure rights and the right to enter into a new lease with the applicable ground lessor in the event a ground lease is rejected or terminated.
With respect to certain of the mortgage loans, the related borrower may have given to certain lessors under the related ground lease a right of first refusal in the event a sale is contemplated or an option to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property and these provisions, if not waived, may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure or adversely affect the foreclosure process.
See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds
Certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans have or may in the future have the benefit of reduced real estate taxes in connection with a local government “payment in lieu of taxes” program or other tax abatement arrangements. Upon expiration of such program or if such programs were otherwise terminated, the related borrower would be required to pay higher, and in some cases substantially higher, real estate taxes. Prior to expiration of such program, the tax benefit to the mortgaged property may decrease throughout the term of the expiration date until the expiration of such program. An increase in real estate taxes may impact the ability of the borrower to pay debt service on the mortgage loan.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations” for descriptions of real estate tax matters relating to certain mortgaged properties.
Collective Bargaining Activity May Disrupt Operations, Increase Labor Costs or Interfere with Business Strategies
A number of employees at certain of the mortgaged properties are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. If relationships with such employees or the unions that represent them become adverse, such mortgaged properties could experience labor disruptions such as strikes, lockouts, boycotts and public demonstrations. Labor disputes, which may be more likely when collective bargaining agreements are being negotiated, could harm relationships with employees, result in increased regulatory inquiries and enforcement by governmental authorities. Further, adverse publicity related to a labor dispute could harm such mortgaged properties’ reputation and reduce customer demand for related services. Labor regulation and the negotiation of new or existing collective bargaining agreements could lead to higher wage and benefit costs, changes in work rules that raise operating expenses, legal costs, and limitations on the related borrower’s ability to take cost saving measures during economic downturns. We cannot assure you that the related borrower will be able to control the negotiations of collective bargaining agreements covering unionized labor employed at such mortgaged properties.
State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds
Many jurisdictions impose recording taxes on mortgages which, if not paid at the time of the recording of the mortgage, may impair the ability of the lender to foreclose the mortgage. Such taxes, interest, and penalties could be significant in amount and would, if imposed, reduce the net proceeds realized by the issuing entity in liquidating the real property securing the related mortgage loan.
Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest
Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests
The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates (including certain of the underwriters) expect to derive ancillary benefits from this offering and their respective incentives may not be aligned with those of purchasers of the offered certificates. The sponsors originated or purchased the mortgage loans in order to securitize the mortgage loans by means of a transaction such as the offering of the offered certificates. The sponsors will sell the mortgage loans to the depositor (an affiliate of Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, one of the sponsors, and of Goldman Sachs Bank USA, one of the originators, and of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, one of the underwriters) on the closing date in exchange for cash, derived from the sale of the offered certificates to investors and/or in exchange for offered certificates. A completed offering would reduce the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans. The originators made the mortgage loans with a view toward securitizing them and distributing the exposure by means of a transaction such as this offering of offered certificates. The originators may also earn origination fees in connection with the origination of the mortgage loans to be included in the mortgage pool. In certain cases, additional upfront fees may be earned in connection with a reduction of the mortgage rate of the
related mortgage loan, in light of the other credit characteristics of such mortgage loan. In addition, certain mortgaged properties may have tenants that are affiliated with the related originator. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases”. This offering of offered certificates will effectively transfer the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans to purchasers of the offered certificates.
The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates expect to receive various benefits, including compensation, commissions, payments, rebates, remuneration and business opportunities, in connection with or as a result of this offering of offered certificates and their interests in the mortgage loans. The sponsors and their affiliates will effectively receive compensation, and may record a profit, in an amount based on, among other things, the amount of proceeds (net of transaction expenses) received from the sale of the offered certificates to investors relative to their investment in the mortgage loans. The benefits to the originators, the sponsors and their affiliates arising from the decision to securitize the mortgage loans may be greater than they would have been had other assets been selected.
Furthermore, the sponsors and/or their affiliates may benefit from a completed offering of the offered certificates because the offering would establish a market precedent and a valuation data point for securities similar to the offered certificates, thus enhancing the ability of the sponsors and their affiliates to conduct similar offerings in the future and permitting them to adjust the fair value of the mortgage loans or other similar assets or securities held on their balance sheet, including increasing the carrying value or avoiding decreasing the carrying value of some or all of such similar positions.
In some cases, the originators or their affiliates are the holders of the mezzanine loans and/or companion loans related to their mortgage loans. The originators and/or their respective affiliates may retain existing mezzanine loans and/or companion loans or originate future permitted mezzanine indebtedness with respect to the mortgage loans. These transactions may cause the originators and their affiliates or their clients or counterparties who purchase the mezzanine loans and/or companion loans, as applicable, to have economic interests and incentives that do not align with, and that may be directly contrary to, those of an investor in the offered certificates. In addition, these transactions or actions taken to maintain, adjust or unwind any positions in the future, may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on the market for the offered certificates (if any), including adversely affecting the value of the offered certificates, particularly in illiquid markets. The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates will have no obligation to take, refrain from taking or cease taking any action with respect to such companion loans or any existing or future mezzanine loans, based on the potential effect on an investor in the offered certificates, and may receive substantial returns from these transactions. In addition, the originators, the sponsors or any of their respective affiliates may benefit from certain relationships, including financial dealings, with any borrower, any non-recourse carveout guarantor or any of their respective affiliates, aside from the origination of mortgage loans or contribution of mortgage loans into this securitization. Conflicts may also arise because the sponsors and their respective affiliates intend to continue to actively acquire, develop, operate, finance and dispose of real estate-related assets in the ordinary course of their businesses. During the course of their business activities, the sponsors and their respective affiliates may acquire, sell or lease properties, or finance loans secured by properties, which may include the properties securing the mortgage loans or properties that are in the same markets as the mortgaged properties. Such other properties, similar to other third-party owned real estate, may compete with the mortgaged properties for existing and potential tenants. The sponsors may also, from time to time, be among the tenants at the mortgaged properties, and they should be expected to make occupancy-related decisions based on their self-interest and not that of the issuing entity. We cannot assure you that the activities of these parties with respect to such other properties will not adversely impact the performance of the mortgaged properties.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity may have been refinancings of debt previously held by a sponsor, an originator or one of their respective affiliates, or a sponsor, an originator or one of their respective affiliates may have or have had equity investments in the borrowers or mortgaged properties under certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. Each of the sponsors, the originators and their respective affiliates have made and/or may make loans to, or equity investments in, affiliates of the borrowers under the related mortgage loans. In the circumstances
described above, the interests of the sponsors, the originators and their respective affiliates may differ from, and compete with, the interests of the issuing entity.
Further, various originators, sponsors and their respective affiliates are acting in multiple capacities in or with respect to this transaction, which may include, without limitation, acting as one or more transaction parties or a subcontractor or vendor of such party, participating in or contracting for interim servicing and/or custodial services with certain transaction parties, providing warehouse financing to, or receiving warehouse financing from, certain other originators or sponsors prior to transfer of the related mortgage loans to the issuing entity, and/or conducting due diligence on behalf of an investor with respect to the mortgage loans prior to their transfer to the issuing entity.
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, a sponsor and originator, or an affiliate thereof, is expected to be appointed as the initial directing holder. See “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Holder and the Companion Holders” below. In addition, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, as retaining sponsor, is expected to retain (or cause its “majority owned affiliate” to retain) the HRR Certificates as described in “Credit Risk Retention”. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC is also an affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, the expected initial special servicer with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loans) and any related serviced companion loans (other than any excluded special servicer loan). In addition, pursuant to one or more limited subservicing agreements between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties with respect to certain of the mortgage loans.
For a description of certain of the foregoing relationships and arrangements that exist among the parties to this securitization, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships And Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties” and “Transaction Parties”.
These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as described in “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below. Each of the foregoing relationships and related interests should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.
The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan Will Shift to Other Servicers
The servicing of the Baybrook Mall whole loan, the servicing shift whole loan, is expected to be governed by the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization only temporarily, until such whole loan’s servicing shift securitization date. At that time, the servicing and administration of the servicing shift whole loan will shift to the master servicer and special servicer under the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement and will be governed exclusively by the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement and the related co-lender agreement. Neither the closing dates of such securitizations nor the identity of the servicing shift master servicer or servicing shift special servicer has been determined. In addition, the provisions of the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement have not yet been determined. Prospective investors should be aware that they will not have any control over the identity of the servicing shift master servicer or servicing shift special servicer, nor can we assure you as to the particular terms of the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement except to the extent of compliance with certain requirements set forth in the related co-lender agreements. Moreover, the controlling class representative for this securitization will not have any consent or consultation rights with respect to the servicing of the servicing shift whole loan other than those limited consent and consultation rights as are provided in the related co-lender agreement, and the holder of the related controlling companion loan or the controlling party in the related securitization of such controlling companion loan or such other party specified in the related co-lender agreement may have rights similar to, or more expansive than, those granted to the directing holder with regard to the other Serviced Mortgage Loans in this transaction. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests
The activities and interests of the underwriters and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Underwriter Entities”) will not align with, and may in fact be directly contrary to, those of the certificateholders. The Underwriter Entities are each part of separate global investment banking, securities and investment management firms that provide a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. As such, they actively make markets in and trade financial instruments for their own account and for the accounts of customers. These financial instruments include debt and equity securities, currencies, commodities, bank loans, indices, baskets and other products. The Underwriter Entities’ activities include, among other things, executing large block trades and taking long and short positions directly and indirectly, through derivative instruments or otherwise. The securities and instruments in which the Underwriter Entities take positions, or expect to take positions, include loans similar to the mortgage loans, securities and instruments similar to the offered certificates and other securities and instruments. Underwriter Entities hold or may hold companion loans and/or mezzanine loans related to a mortgage loan in this securitization. Market making is an activity where the Underwriter Entities buy and sell on behalf of customers, or for their own account, to satisfy the expected demand of customers. By its nature, market making involves facilitating transactions among market participants that have differing views of securities and instruments. Any short positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients through marketing or otherwise will increase in value if the related securities or other instruments decrease in value, while positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients in credit derivative or other derivative transactions with other parties, pursuant to which the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients sell or buy credit protection with respect to one or more classes of the offered certificates, may increase in value if the offered certificates default, are expected to default, or decrease in value.
The Underwriter Entities and their clients acting through them may execute such transactions, modify or terminate such derivative positions and otherwise act with respect to such transactions, and may exercise or enforce, or refrain from exercising or enforcing, any or all of their rights and powers in connection therewith, without regard to whether any such action might have an adverse effect on the offered certificates or the certificateholders. Additionally, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to disclose any of these securities or derivatives transactions to you in your capacity as a certificateholder. As a result, you should expect that the Underwriter Entities will take positions that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the investment objectives of investors in the offered certificates.
As a result of the Underwriter Entities’ various financial market activities, including acting as a research provider, investment advisor, market maker or principal investor, you should expect that personnel in various businesses throughout the Underwriter Entities will have and express research or investment views and make recommendations that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the objectives of investors in the offered certificates.
If an Underwriter Entity becomes a holder of any of the certificates, through market-making activity or otherwise, any actions that it takes in its capacity as a certificateholder, including voting, providing consents or otherwise will not necessarily be aligned with the interests of other holders of the same class or other classes of the certificates. We cannot assure you that any actions that such party takes in either such capacity will necessarily be aligned with the interests of the holders of other classes of any certificates. To the extent an Underwriter Entity makes a market in the certificates (which it is under no obligation to do), it would expect to receive income from the spreads between its bid and offer prices for the certificates. The price at which an Underwriter Entity may be willing to purchase certificates, if it makes a market, will depend on market conditions and other relevant factors and may be significantly lower than the issue price for the certificates and significantly lower than the price at which it may be willing to sell certificates.
In addition, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to monitor the performance of the certificates or the actions of the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement and will have no authority to advise any party to the pooling and servicing agreement or to direct their actions.
Furthermore, each Underwriter Entity expects that a completed offering will enhance its ability to assist clients and counterparties in the transaction or in related transactions (including assisting clients in additional purchases and sales of the certificates and hedging transactions). The Underwriter Entities expect to derive fees and other revenues from these transactions. In addition, participating in a successful offering and providing related services to clients may enhance the Underwriter Entities’ relationships with various parties, facilitate additional business development, and enable them to obtain additional business and generate additional revenue.
The Underwriter Entities are playing several roles in this transaction. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, the depositor, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, an originator and the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GS Bank” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”, and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a sponsor. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “CREFI” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”. Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “Barclays” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”. BMO Capital Markets Corp., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of BMO, a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “BMO” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of (i) DBR Investments Co. Limited, an originator and holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GACC” or “DBRI”, as applicable, in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General” and (ii) German American Capital Corporation, a sponsor. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer
The pooling and servicing agreement provides that the mortgage loans serviced thereunder are required to be administered in accordance with the servicing standard without regard to ownership of any certificate by the master servicer or the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standard”. Each pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan provides that such non-serviced whole loan is required to be administered in accordance with a servicing standard that is generally similar to the servicing standard set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer, a sub-servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates and, as it relates to servicing and administration of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the master servicer, a sub-servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan, may have interests when dealing with the mortgage loans that are in conflict with those of holders of the certificates, especially if the master servicer, a sub-servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates holds certificates or securities relating to any of the applicable companion loans, or has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower or a borrower sponsor.
Furthermore, nothing in the pooling and servicing agreement or otherwise will prohibit the master servicer or special servicer or an affiliate thereof from soliciting the refinancing of any of the mortgage loans. In the event that the master servicer or special servicer or an affiliate thereof refinances any of the mortgage loans included in the mortgage pool, an earlier than expected payoff of any such mortgage loan
could occur, which would result in a prepayment, which such prepayment could have an adverse effect on the yield of the certificates. See “—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors” in this prospectus.
In order to minimize the effect of certain of these conflicts of interest as they relate to the special servicer, for so long as the special servicer obtains knowledge that it is a borrower party with respect to a mortgage loan (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan) or serviced whole loan, the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer with respect to that mortgage loan or serviced whole loan (referred to in this prospectus as an “excluded special servicer loan”) and a separate special servicer that is not a borrower party (referred to in this prospectus as an “excluded special servicer”) will be appointed as special servicer for such excluded special servicer loan as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause”. Any excluded special servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the special servicer with respect to such excluded special servicer loan and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such excluded special servicer loan earned during such time as the related mortgage loan is an excluded special servicer loan. While the special servicer will have the same access to information related to the excluded special servicer loan as it does with respect to the other mortgage loans, the special servicer will covenant in the pooling and servicing agreement that it will not directly or indirectly provide any information related to any excluded special servicer loan to the related borrower party, any of the special servicer’s employees or personnel or any of its affiliates involved in the management of any investment in the related borrower party or the related mortgaged property or, to its actual knowledge, any non-affiliate that holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the related borrower party, and will maintain sufficient internal controls and appropriate policies and procedures in place in order to comply with those obligations. Notwithstanding those restrictions, we cannot assure you that the related borrower party will not obtain sensitive information related to the strategy of any contemplated workout or liquidation related to an excluded special servicer loan.
Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest. For instance, if the special servicer or its affiliate holds a subordinate class of certificates, the special servicer might seek to reduce the potential for losses allocable to those certificates from the mortgage loans by deferring acceleration in hope of maximizing future proceeds. However, that action could result in less proceeds to the issuing entity than would be realized if earlier action had been taken. The initial special servicer is an affiliate of the entity that is expected to be the holder of the “eligible horizontal residual interest” consisting of the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. In addition, no servicer is required to act in a manner more favorable to the offered certificates or any particular class of certificates than to the non-offered certificates, any serviced companion loan holder or the holder of any serviced companion loan securities. Additionally, in some cases, the master servicer or special servicer or their respective affiliates may be the holder of a mezzanine or subordinate loan related to a mortgage loan in the mortgage pool. Any such interest in a mezzanine or subordinate loan may result in economic interests and incentives that do not align with, and that may be directly contrary to, those of an investor in the offered certificates. In addition, these transactions or actions taken to maintain, adjust or unwind any positions in the future may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on the market for the offered certificates (if any), including adversely affecting the value of the offered certificates, particularly in illiquid markets. In any such instance, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have any obligation to take, refrain from taking or cease taking any action with respect to any existing or future mezzanine or subordinate loans based on the potential effect on an investor in the offered certificates, and may receive substantial returns from these transactions.
Each of the master servicer and the special servicer services and is expected to continue to service, in the ordinary course of its respective business, existing and new mortgage loans for third parties, including portfolios of mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. Consequently, personnel of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans at the same time as they are performing services, on behalf of other persons, with respect to other mortgage loans secured by properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage
loans. In addition, the mortgage loan sellers will determine who will service mortgage loans that the mortgage loan sellers originate in the future, and that determination may be influenced by the mortgage loan seller’s opinion of servicing decisions made by the master servicer or the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement including, among their things, the manner in which the master servicer or the special servicer enforces breaches of representations and warranties against the related mortgage loan seller. This may pose inherent conflicts for the master servicer or the special servicer.
The special servicer may enter into one or more arrangements with the controlling class representative, a controlling class certificateholder, a serviced companion loan holder or other certificateholders (or an affiliate or a third party representative of one or more of the preceding parties) to provide for a discount and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, the special servicer’s appointment (or continuance) as special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and/or the related co-lender agreement and limitations on the right of such person to replace the special servicer. See “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below.
It is expected that 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC or an affiliate thereof will be the initial directing holder (other than with respect to (i) any non-serviced mortgage loan, (ii) the servicing shift mortgage loan or (iii) any excluded loan). 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to be appointed by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC to act as the special servicer.
3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, the expected special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement, is an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, the entity that is expected to (i) retain (or cause its “majority owned affiliate” to retain) the “eligible horizontal residual interest”, (ii) be the initial controlling class representative and (iii) appoint itself or an affiliate as the initial directing holder with respect to each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan, the servicing shift mortgage loan and any applicable excluded loan) and any related serviced companion loans. Another affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC may also purchase one or more other classes of certificates.
Additionally, pursuant to one or more limited subservicing agreements between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties with respect to certain of the mortgage loans.
Although the master servicer and the special servicer will be required to service and administer the mortgage loan pool in accordance with the servicing standard and, accordingly, without regard to their rights to receive compensation under the pooling and servicing agreement and without regard to any potential obligation to repurchase or substitute a mortgage loan if the master servicer or the special servicer is a mortgage loan seller, the possibility of receiving additional servicing compensation in the nature of assumption and modification fees, the continuation of receiving fees to service or specially service a mortgage loan, or the desire to avoid a repurchase demand resulting from a breach of a representation and warranty or material document default may under certain circumstances provide the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, with an economic disincentive to comply with this standard.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Bank of Montreal or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by Bank of Montreal.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between German American Capital Corporation or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by German American Capital Corporation.
Pursuant to a certain interim servicing agreement between 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, a sponsor and mortgage loan seller, or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association acts as interim servicer with respect to certain 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC or one of its affiliates’ mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the mortgage loans contribute to this securitization by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC.
Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company, has been appointed as the initial operating advisor with respect to all of the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan). See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”. In the normal course of conducting its business, the initial operating advisor and its affiliates may have rendered services to, performed surveillance of, provided valuation services to, and negotiated with, numerous parties engaged in activities related to structured finance and commercial mortgage securitization. These parties may have included institutional investors, the depositor, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, the directing holder, collateral property owners or affiliates of any of those parties. These relationships may continue in the future. Each of these relationships, to the extent they exist, may continue in the future, and may involve a conflict of interest with respect to the initial operating advisor’s duties as operating advisor. We cannot assure you that the existence of these relationships and other relationships in the future will not impact the manner in which the initial operating advisor performs its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement.
In addition, the operating advisor and its affiliates may have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders, especially if the operating advisor or any of its affiliates holds certificates or has financial interests in or other financial dealings with any of the parties to this transaction, a borrower or a parent of a borrower.
Additionally, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates, in the ordinary course of their business, may in the future (a) perform for third parties contract underwriting services and advisory services as well as service or specially service mortgage loans and (b) acquire mortgage loans for their own account, including, in each such case, mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of Park Bridge Lender Services LLC may perform services,
on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity at the same time as they are performing services with respect to, or while Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates are holding, other mortgage loans secured by properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. Although the operating advisor is required to consider the servicing standard in connection with its activities under the pooling and servicing agreement, the operating advisor will not itself be bound by the servicing standard. In addition, the operating advisor and its affiliates may have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders, if the operating advisor or any of its affiliates holds certificates or has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower, a parent of a borrower, a borrower sponsor or any of their affiliates. Each of these relationships may pose inherent conflicts of interest for Park Bridge Lender Services LLC.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company, has been appointed as the initial asset representations reviewer with respect to all of the mortgage loans. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”. In the normal course of conducting its business, the initial asset representations reviewer and its affiliates may have rendered services to, performed surveillance of, provided valuation services to, and negotiated with, numerous parties engaged in activities related to structured finance and commercial mortgage securitization. These parties may have included institutional investors, the depositor, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, the directing holder, collateral property owners and their vendors or affiliates of any of those parties. These relationships may continue in the future. Each of these relationships, to the extent they exist, may involve a conflict of interest with respect to the initial asset representations reviewer’s duties as asset representations reviewer. We cannot assure you that the existence of these relationships and other relationships in the future will not impact the manner in which the initial asset representations reviewer performs its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement.
In addition, the asset representations reviewer and its affiliates may have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders, especially if the asset representations reviewer or any of its affiliates holds certificates or has financial interests in or other financial dealings with any of the parties to this transaction, a borrower or a parent of a borrower.
Additionally, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates, in the ordinary course of their business, may in the future (a) perform for third parties contract underwriting services and advisory services as well as service or specially service mortgage loans and (b) acquire mortgage loans for their own account, including, in each such case, mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of Park Bridge Lender Services LLC may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity at the same time as they are performing services with respect to, or while Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates are holding, other mortgage loans secured by properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. This may pose inherent conflicts of interest for Park Bridge Lender Services LLC.
In addition, the asset representations reviewer and its affiliates may have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders if the asset representations reviewer or any of its affiliates has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower, a parent of a borrower, a borrower sponsor or any of their affiliates. Each of these relationships may also create a conflict of interest.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Holder and the Companion Loan Holders
It is expected that 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (or its affiliate), will be appointed as the initial controlling class representative and, therefore, as the initial directing holder (other than with respect to (i) with respect to each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan, any servicing shift
mortgage loan or (ii) any applicable excluded loan) and any related serviced companion loans). The special servicer may, at the direction of the directing holder (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and other than with respect to any applicable excluded special servicer loan), take actions with respect to the specially serviced loans under the pooling and servicing agreement that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. The controlling class representative will be controlled by the majority of the controlling class certificateholders.
The controlling class certificateholders and the holders of the companion loans or securities backed by such companion loans may have interests in conflict with those of the other certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that the directing holder on behalf of the controlling class certificateholders (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and other than with respect to any applicable excluded loan and the servicing shift mortgage loan), or the directing holder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan, may direct the special servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement, as applicable, relating to the other securitization transaction, as the case may be, to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates.
The table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “Summary of Terms—The Mortgage Pool” provides the identity of the initial directing holder (or equivalent entity) for each non-serviced whole loan, the expected securitization trust or other entity holding the controlling note in such non-serviced whole loan and the trust and servicing agreement or pooling and servicing agreement, as applicable, under which it is expected to be serviced.
The special servicer, upon non-binding consultation with a serviced companion loan holder or its representative, may take actions with respect to the related serviced whole loan that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, to the extent described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. In connection with the whole loans serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization, the serviced companion loan holders do not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, and they may have interests in conflict with those of the certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that such non-binding consultation with a serviced companion loan holder (solely with respect to the related serviced whole loan) may advise the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. However, the special servicer is not permitted to take actions that are prohibited by law or violate the servicing standard or the terms of the mortgage loan documents. In addition, except as limited by certain conditions described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events”, the special servicer may be replaced by the directing holder for cause at any time and without cause (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and other than with respect to any applicable excluded loan). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder” and “—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events”.
Similarly, the applicable controlling class related to the securitization trust indicated in the chart above as the controlling noteholder (or, on and after the servicing shift securitization date, the securitization trust for the related controlling companion loan) has certain consent and/or consultation rights with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan under the pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of that related non-serviced whole loan and have similar conflicts of interest with the holders of other certificates backed by the companion loans. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
The directing holder and its affiliates (and the directing holder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of any non-serviced whole loan and their respective affiliates) may have interests that are in conflict with those of certain certificateholders, especially if the applicable directing holder or any of its affiliates holds certificates or companion loan securities, or has financial interests in or other financial dealings (as lender or otherwise) with a borrower or an affiliate of a borrower. In order to minimize the effect of certain of these conflicts of interest, for so long as any borrower party is the controlling class representative or the holder of the majority of the controlling class certificates (by certificate balance) (any such loan referred to
in this prospectus as an “excluded loan” as to such party), the directing holder will not have consent or consultation rights solely with respect to the related excluded loan (however, the directing holder will be provided certain notices and certain information relating to such excluded loan as described in the pooling and servicing agreement). In addition, for so long as any borrower party is the directing holder or a controlling class certificateholder, as applicable, the directing holder or such controlling class certificateholder, as applicable, will not be given access to any excluded information solely relating to the related excluded loan and/or the related mortgaged properties pursuant to the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement. Notwithstanding those restrictions, we cannot assure you that the directing holder or any controlling class certificateholder will not obtain sensitive information related to the strategy of any contemplated workout or liquidation related to the applicable excluded loan or otherwise seek to exert its influence over the special servicer in the event an applicable excluded loan becomes subject to a workout or liquidation. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information” in this prospectus. Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest.
The special servicer, in connection with obtaining the consent of, or upon consultation with, the directing holder or a serviced companion loan holder or its representative, may take actions with respect to the related serviced whole loan that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, to the extent described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. In connection with the serviced whole loan, the serviced companion loan holder does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, and it may have interests in conflict with those of the certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that the serviced companion loan holder may advise the special servicer to take actions with respect to the related serviced whole loan that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates.
Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans
The anticipated initial investor in the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates, which is referred to in this prospectus as the “B-piece buyer” (see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder—General”), was given the opportunity by the sponsors to perform due diligence on the mortgage loans originally identified by the sponsors for inclusion in the issuing entity, and to request the removal, re-sizing, decrease in the principal balance of the mortgage loan, reduction of the time during which the loan pays interest-only, increase in the amount of required reserves or change in the expected repayment dates or other features of some or all of the mortgage loans. The mortgage pool as originally proposed by the sponsors was adjusted based on certain of these requests. In addition, the B-piece buyer received or may receive price adjustments or cost mitigation arrangements in connection with accepting certain mortgage loans in the mortgage pool.
We cannot assure you that you or another investor would have made the same requests to modify the original pool as the B-piece buyer or that the final pool as influenced by the B-piece buyer’s feedback will not adversely affect the performance of your certificates and benefit the performance of the B-piece buyer’s certificates. Because of the differing subordination levels, the B-piece buyer has interests that may, in some circumstances, differ from those of purchasers of other classes of certificates, and may desire a portfolio composition that benefits the B-piece buyer but that does not benefit other investors. In addition, the B-piece buyer may enter into hedging or other transactions (except as may be restricted pursuant to the Credit Risk Retention Rules) or otherwise have business objectives that also could cause its interests with respect to the mortgage pool to diverge from those of other purchasers of the certificates. The B-piece buyer performed due diligence solely for its own benefit and has no liability to any person or entity for conducting its due diligence. The B-piece buyer is not required to take into account the interests of any other investor in the certificates in exercising remedies or voting or other rights in its capacity as owner of its certificates or in making requests or recommendations to the sponsors as to the selection of the mortgage loans and the establishment of other transaction terms. Investors are not entitled to rely on in any way the B-piece buyer’s acceptance of a mortgage loan. The B-piece buyer’s acceptance of a mortgage loan does not constitute, and may not be construed as, an endorsement of such mortgage loan, the underwriting for such mortgage loan or the originator of such mortgage loan.
The B-piece buyer will have no liability to any certificateholder for any actions taken by it as described in the preceding two (2) paragraphs and the pooling and servicing agreement will provide that each certificateholder, by its acceptance of a certificate, waives any claims against such buyers in respect of such actions.
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, or an affiliate thereof, will constitute the initial directing holder (other than with respect to (i) any non-serviced mortgage loan, (ii) any servicing shift mortgage loan or (iii) any excluded loan). The directing holder will have certain rights to direct and consult with the special servicer. In addition, the controlling class representative will generally have certain consultation rights with regard to the non-serviced mortgage loans under the trust and servicing agreements or pooling and servicing agreements, as applicable, governing the servicing of such non-serviced whole loans and the related co-lender agreements and with regard to the servicing shift whole loan following the servicing shift date, under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the servicing shift whole loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder”, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loan”.
3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, the expected special servicer for this transaction, is an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, the entity that is expected to (i) retain (or cause its “majority owned affiliate” to retain) the “eligible horizontal residual interest”, (ii) be the initial controlling class representative and (iii) appoint itself or an affiliate as the initial directing holder. Another affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC may also purchase one or more other classes of certificates. 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is also the initial special servicer with respect to the 500 Delaware whole loan pursuant to the 3650R 2022-PF2 pooling and servicing agreement. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (which is also an affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC) is also the initial directing holder and initial controlling representative under the 3650R 2022-PF2 pooling and servicing agreement.
Because the incentives and actions of the B-piece buyer may, in some circumstances, differ from or be adverse to those of purchasers of the offered certificates, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus and your own view of the mortgage pool and should not rely upon the B-piece buyer’s due diligence or investment decision (or due diligence or the investment decision of its affiliates).
Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Applicable Directing Holder To Terminate the Special Servicer of the Applicable Whole Loan
With respect to each whole loan, the directing holder exercising control rights over that whole loan will be entitled, under certain circumstances, to remove the special servicer under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of such whole loan and, in such circumstances, appoint a successor special servicer for such whole loan (or have certain consent rights with respect to such removal or replacement). The party with this appointment power may have special relationships or interests that conflict with those of the holders of one or more classes of certificates. In addition, that party does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, may act solely in its own interests, and will have no liability to any certificateholders for having done so. No certificateholder may take any action against the directing holder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization or under any pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of any non-serviced whole loan, or against any other parties for having acted solely in their respective interests. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” for a description of these rights to terminate the special servicer.
Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment
Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
The managers of the mortgaged properties and the borrowers may experience conflicts of interest in the management and/or ownership of the mortgaged properties because:
| ● | a substantial number of the mortgaged properties are managed by property managers affiliated with the respective borrowers; |
| ● | these property managers also may manage and/or franchise additional properties, including properties that may compete with the mortgaged properties; |
| ● | affiliates of the managers and/or the borrowers, or the managers and/or the borrowers themselves, also may own other properties, including properties that compete with the mortgaged property for tenants and/or customers; and |
| ● | tenants at the mortgaged property may have signed leases or letters of intent at a competing property controlled by the borrower sponsor. |
None of the borrowers, property managers or any of their affiliates or any employees of the foregoing has any duty to favor the leasing of space in the mortgaged properties over the leasing of space in other properties, one or more of which may be adjacent to or near the mortgaged properties.
Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates
The Certificates Are Limited Obligations
The certificates, when issued, will only represent ownership interests in the issuing entity. The certificates will not represent an interest in or obligation of, and will not be guaranteed by, the sponsors, the depositor, or any other person. The primary assets of the issuing entity will be the mortgage loans, and distributions on any class of certificates will depend solely on the amount and timing of payments and other collections in respect of the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that the cash flow from the mortgaged properties and the proceeds of any sale or refinancing of the mortgaged properties will be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest on, the mortgage loans or to distribute in full the amounts of interest and principal to which the certificateholders will be entitled. See “Description of the Certificates—General”.
The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline
Your certificates will not be listed on any national securities exchange or traded on any automated quotation systems of any registered securities association, and there is currently no secondary market for your certificates. While we have been advised by the underwriters that one or more of them, or one or more of their affiliates, currently intend to make a market in the certificates, none of the underwriters has any obligation to do so, any market-making may be discontinued at any time, and we cannot assure you than an active secondary market for the certificates will develop. In addition, the ability of the underwriters to make a market in the offered certificates may be impacted by changes in any regulatory requirements applicable to the marketing, holding and selling of, and issuing quotations with respect to, the offered certificates and other CMBS generally. Additionally, one or more investors may purchase substantial portions of one or more classes of certificates. Accordingly, you may not have an active or liquid secondary market for your certificates. Lack of liquidity could result in a substantial decrease in the market value of your certificates.
The market value of the certificates will also be influenced by the supply of and demand for CMBS generally. The supply of CMBS will depend on, among other things, the amount of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing mortgage loans, whether newly originated or held in portfolios, that are available for securitization. A number of factors will affect investors’ demand for CMBS, including:
| ● | the availability of alternative investments that offer higher yields or are perceived as being a better credit risk than CMBS, or as having a less volatile market value or being more liquid than CMBS; |
| ● | legal and other restrictions that prohibit a particular entity from investing in CMBS or limit the amount or types of CMBS that it may acquire or require it to maintain increased capital or reserves as a result of its investment in CMBS; |
| ● | accounting standards that may affect an investor’s characterization or treatment of an investment in CMBS for financial reporting purposes; |
| ● | increased regulatory compliance burdens imposed on CMBS or securitizations generally, or on classes of securitizers, that may make securitization a less attractive financing option for commercial mortgage loans; |
| ● | investors’ perceptions of commercial real estate lending or CMBS, which may be adversely affected by, among other things, a decline in real estate values or an increase in defaults and foreclosures on commercial mortgage loans; |
| ● | investors’ perceptions regarding the capital markets in general, which may be adversely affected by political, social and economic events completely unrelated to the commercial real estate markets; and |
| ● | the impact on demand generally for CMBS as a result of the existence or cancellation of government-sponsored economic programs. |
If you decide to sell any certificates, the ability to sell your certificates will depend on, among other things, whether and to what extent a secondary market then exists for these certificates, and you may have to sell at a discount from the price you paid for reasons unrelated to the performance of the certificates or the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that your certificates will not decline in value.
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded
Ratings assigned to the offered certificates by the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor:
| ● | are based on, among other things, the economic characteristics of the mortgaged properties and other relevant structural features of the transaction; |
| ● | do not represent any assessment of the yield to maturity that a certificateholder may experience; |
| ● | reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies as of the date such ratings were issued; |
| ● | may be reviewed, revised, suspended, downgraded, qualified or withdrawn entirely by the applicable rating agency as a result of changes in or unavailability of information; |
| ● | may have been determined based on criteria that included an analysis of historical mortgage loan data that may not reflect future experience; |
| ● | may reflect assumptions by such rating agencies regarding performance of the mortgage loans that are not accurate, as evidenced by the significant amount of downgrades, qualifications and withdrawals of ratings assigned to previously issued CMBS by the hired rating agencies and other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations during the recent credit crisis; and |
| ● | do not consider to what extent the offered certificates will be subject to prepayment or that the outstanding principal amount of any class of offered certificates will be prepaid. |
The nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that assign ratings to any class of offered certificates will establish the amount of credit support, if any, for such class of offered certificates based on, among other things, an assumed level of defaults, delinquencies and losses with respect to the related mortgage assets. Actual losses may, however, exceed the assumed levels. If actual losses on the related mortgage assets exceed the assumed levels, you may be required to bear the additional losses.
In addition, the rating of any class of offered certificates below an investment grade rating by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, whether upon initial issuance of such class of certificates or as a result of a ratings downgrade, could adversely affect the ability of an employee benefit plan or other investor to purchase or retain those offered certificates. See “Certain ERISA Considerations” and “Legal Investment”.
Nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that were not engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates, relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization on a class of the offered certificates that are lower than ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class.
As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the offered certificates, the depositor (or its affiliate) had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to five nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Based on preliminary feedback from those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations at that time, the depositor selected three (3) of those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate certain classes of the certificates and not the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, due in part to their initial subordination levels for the various classes of the certificates. If the depositor had selected the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the certificates, we cannot assure you that the ratings such other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations would have assigned to the certificates would not have been lower than the ratings assigned by the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor. Further, in the case of one nationally recognized statistical rating organization, engaged by the depositor, the depositor only requested ratings for certain classes of rated certificates, due in part to the final subordination levels provided by such nationally recognized statistical rating organization for the classes of certificates. If the depositor had selected such nationally recognized statistical rating organization to rate those other classes of rated certificates not rated by it, its ratings of those other certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to those certificates by the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged to rate such certificates. In addition, the decision not to engage one or more other rating agencies in the rating of certain classes of certificates to be issued in connection with this transaction may negatively impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of those classes of certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor. Neither the depositor nor any other person or entity will have any
duty to notify you if any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization issues, or delivers notice of its intention to issue, consolidated ratings on one or more classes of certificates after the date of this prospectus.
Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine that any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates no longer qualifies as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or is no longer qualified to rate the certificates or may no longer rate similar securities for a limited period as a result of an enforcement action, and that determination may also have an adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates. The Securities and Exchange Commission may also take other types of enforcement actions against any or all of such rating agencies. To the extent that the provisions of any mortgage loan or the pooling and servicing agreement condition any action, event or circumstance on the delivery of a rating agency confirmation, the pooling and servicing agreement will require delivery or deemed delivery of a rating agency confirmation only from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates or, in the case of a serviced whole loan, any related companion loan securities.
On September 29, 2020, a settlement was reached between Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC and the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with an investigation into the policies and procedures deployed by Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC to establish, maintain, enforce and document an effective internal control structure governing the implementation of and adherence to policies, procedures, and methodologies for determining credit ratings for conduit/fusion commercial mortgage-backed securities in accordance with Section 15E(c)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Securities and Exchange Commission found that Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC’s internal controls relating to its rating of conduit/fusion commercial mortgage-backed securities had deficiencies that resulted in material weaknesses in its internal control structure. Under the settlement, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC, without admitting or denying the findings of the Securities and Exchange Commission, agreed (a) to pay a civil penalty of $1.25 million, (b) to undertake, among other things, a review of the application of its internal processes, policies and procedures regarding the implementation of and adherence to procedures and methodologies for determining credit ratings, and (c) to take the necessary actions to ensure that such internal processes, policies and procedures accurately reflect the strictures of Section 15E(c)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act. Any change in Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC’s rating criteria or methodology could result in a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of any rating assigned to any class of certificates, despite the fact that such class might still be performing fully to the specifications described in this prospectus and set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement.
We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to the certificates, and the ratings initially assigned to the certificates by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates could change adversely as a result of changes affecting, among other things, the mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties, the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement, or as a result of changes to ratings criteria employed by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates. Although these changes would not necessarily be or result from an event of default on any mortgage loan, any adverse change to the ratings of the offered certificates would likely have an adverse effect on the market value, liquidity and/or regulatory characteristics of those certificates.
Further, certain actions provided for in loan agreements may require a rating agency confirmation be obtained from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates and, in the case of a serviced whole loan, any companion loan securities as a precondition to taking such action. In certain circumstances, this condition may be deemed to have been met or waived without such a rating agency confirmation being obtained. In the event such an action is taken without a rating agency confirmation being obtained, we cannot assure you that the applicable rating agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of the taking of such action. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions”, “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Rating Agency Confirmations” and “Ratings” for additional considerations regarding the ratings, including a description of the process of obtaining confirmations of ratings for the offered certificates.
Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors
General
The yield to maturity on each class of offered certificates will depend in part on the following:
| ● | the purchase price for the certificates; |
| ● | the rate and timing of principal payments on the mortgage loans (both voluntary and involuntary), and the allocation of principal prepayments to the respective classes of offered certificates with certificate balances; and |
| ● | the allocation of shortfalls and losses on the mortgage loans to the respective classes of offered certificates. |
For this purpose, principal payments include voluntary and involuntary prepayments, such as prepayments resulting from the application of loan reserves, property releases, casualty or condemnation, defaults and liquidations as well as principal payments resulting from repurchases due to material breaches of representations and warranties or material document defects or purchases by a companion loan holder or mezzanine lender (if any) pursuant to a purchase option or sales of defaulted mortgage loans.
Any changes in the weighted average lives of your principal balance certificates may adversely affect your yield. In general, if you buy a certificate at a premium or if you buy the Class X certificates, and principal distributions occur faster than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected. If principal distributions are very high, holders of certificates purchased at a premium or holders of the Class X certificates might not fully recover their initial investment. Conversely, if you buy a certificate at a discount other than a Class X certificate and principal distributions occur more slowly than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected.
Prepayments resulting in a shortening of weighted average lives of your principal balance certificates may be made at a time of low interest rates when you may be unable to reinvest the resulting payment of principal on your certificates at a rate comparable to the effective yield anticipated by you in making your investment in the certificates, while delays and extensions resulting in a lengthening of those weighted average lives may occur at a time of high interest rates when you may have been able to reinvest principal payments that would otherwise have been received by you at higher rates.
In addition, the extent to which prepayments on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity ultimately affect the weighted average life of the principal balance certificates will depend on the terms of the certificates, more particularly:
| ● | a class of certificates that entitles the holders of those certificates to a disproportionately larger share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the “call risk” or the likelihood of early retirement of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively fast; and |
| ● | a class of certificates that entitles the holders of the certificates to a disproportionately smaller share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the likelihood of “extension risk” or an extended average life of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively slow. |
The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield
We are not aware of any relevant publicly available or authoritative statistics with respect to the historical prepayment experiences of commercial mortgage loans. For this purpose, principal payments include both voluntary prepayments, if permitted, and involuntary prepayments, such as prepayments resulting from the application of loan reserves, property releases, casualty or condemnation, defaults and liquidations or repurchases upon breaches of representations and warranties or material document defects or purchases by a companion loan holder or mezzanine loan lender (if any) pursuant to a
purchase option or sales of defaulted mortgage loans. The rate at which voluntary prepayments occur on the mortgage loans will be affected by a variety of factors, including:
| ● | the terms of the mortgage loans, including, the length of any prepayment lockout period and the applicable yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums and the extent to which the related mortgage loan terms may be practically enforced; |
| ● | the level of prevailing interest rates; |
| ● | the availability of credit for commercial real estate; |
| ● | the master servicer’s or special servicer’s ability to enforce yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums; |
| ● | the failure to meet certain requirements for the release of escrows; |
| ● | the occurrence of casualties or natural disasters; and |
| ● | economic, demographic, tax, legal or other factors. |
Although a yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium provision of a mortgage loan is intended to create an economic disincentive for a borrower to prepay voluntarily a mortgage loan, we cannot assure you that mortgage loans that have such provisions will not prepay.
The extent to which the master servicer or the special servicer forecloses upon, takes title to and disposes of any mortgaged property related to a mortgage loan or sells defaulted mortgage loans will affect the weighted average lives of your certificates. If the master servicer or the special servicer forecloses upon a significant number of the related mortgage loans, and depending upon the amount and timing of recoveries from the related mortgaged properties or sells defaulted mortgage loans, your certificates may have a shorter weighted average life.
Delays in liquidations of defaulted mortgage loans and modifications extending the maturity of mortgage loans will tend to delay the payment of principal on the mortgage loans. The ability of the related borrower to make any required balloon payment typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan or to sell the related mortgaged property. A significant number of the mortgage loans require balloon payments at maturity and there is a risk that a number of those mortgage loans may default at maturity, or that the master servicer or the special servicer may extend the maturity of a number of those mortgage loans in connection with workouts. We cannot assure you as to the borrowers’ abilities to make mortgage loan payments on a full and timely basis, including any balloon payments at maturity. Bankruptcy of the borrower or adverse conditions in the market where the mortgaged property is located may, among other things, delay the recovery of proceeds in the case of defaults. Losses on the mortgage loans due to uninsured risks or insufficient hazard insurance proceeds may create shortfalls in distributions to certificateholders. Any required indemnification of a party to the pooling and servicing agreement in connection with legal actions relating to the issuing entity, the related agreements or the certificates may also result in shortfalls.
See “—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions” above and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments”.
In addition, if a sponsor repurchases a mortgage loan from the issuing entity due to a material breach of one or more of its representations or warranties or a material document defect, the repurchase price paid will be passed through to the holders of the certificates with the same effect as if the mortgage loan had been prepaid in part or in full, and no yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium would be payable. Additionally, any mezzanine lender (if any) or the holder of a subordinate companion loan may have the option to purchase the related mortgage loan after certain defaults, and the purchase price
may not include any yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums. As a result of such a repurchase or purchase, investors in the Class X certificates and any other certificates purchased at a premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. A repurchase, a prepayment or the exercise of a purchase option may adversely affect the yield to maturity on your certificates. In this respect, see “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans”.
The certificates with notional amounts will not be entitled to distributions of principal but instead will accrue interest on their respective notional amounts. Because the notional amount of the certificates indicated in the table below is based upon the outstanding certificate balances of the related class or classes of certificates, the yield to maturity on the indicated certificates will be extremely sensitive to the rate and timing of prepayments of principal, liquidations and principal losses on the mortgage loans to the extent allocated to the related certificate(s).
Interest-Only Class of Certificates | Related Class X Class(es) |
Class X-A | Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates |
Class X-B | Class B and Class C certificates |
Class X-D | Class D certificates |
A rapid rate of principal prepayments, liquidations and/or principal losses on the mortgage loans could result in the failure to recoup the initial investment in the Class X certificates. Investors in the Class X certificates should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of amortization, prepayment or other liquidation of the mortgage loans (in the case of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates) could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments. The yield to maturity of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates may be adversely affected by the prepayment of mortgage loans with higher net mortgage loan rates. See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations—Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts”.
Your Yield May Be Adversely Affected By Prepayments Resulting From Earnout Reserves
With respect to certain mortgage loans, earnout escrows may have been established at origination, which funds may be released to the related borrower upon satisfaction of certain conditions. If such conditions with respect to any such mortgage loan are not satisfied, the amounts reserved in such escrows are required to be applied to the payment of the mortgage loan, which would have the same effect on the offered certificates as a prepayment of the mortgage loan, except that such application of funds would not be accompanied by any prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”. The pooling and servicing agreement will provide that unless required by the mortgage loan documents, the master servicer will not apply such amounts as a prepayment if no event of default has occurred.
Losses and Shortfalls May Change Your Anticipated Yield
If losses on the mortgage loans exceed the aggregate certificate balance of the classes of certificates subordinated to a particular class, that class will suffer a loss equal to the full amount of the excess (up to the outstanding certificate balance of that class). Even if losses on the mortgage loans are not borne by your certificates, those losses may affect the weighted average life and yield to maturity of your certificates.
For example, certain shortfalls in interest as a result of involuntary prepayments may reduce the funds available to make payments on your certificates. In addition, if the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee reimburses itself (or a master servicer, special servicer, trustee or other party to a trust and servicing agreement or pooling and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of any non-serviced whole loan) out of general collections on the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity for any advance that it (or any such other party) has determined is not recoverable out of collections on the related mortgage loan, then to the extent that this reimbursement is made from collections of principal on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of
principal available to be distributed on the certificates and will result in a reduction of the certificate balance (or notional amount) of a class of certificates. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”. Likewise, if the master servicer or the trustee reimburses itself out of principal collections on the mortgage loans for any workout-delayed reimbursement amounts, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the certificates, on that distribution date. This reimbursement would have the effect of reducing current payments of principal on the offered certificates (other than the certificates with notional amounts) and extending the weighted average lives of the offered certificates with certificate balances. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”.
In addition, to the extent losses are realized on the mortgage loans, first to the Class J-RR certificates, then the Class G-RR certificates, then the Class F-RR certificates, then the Class E-RR certificates, then the Class D certificates, then the Class C certificates, then the Class B certificates, then the Class A-S certificates and, then pro rata, the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, based on their respective certificate balances, will bear such losses up to an amount equal to the respective outstanding certificate balance thereof. A reduction in the certificate balance of the Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates. A reduction in the certificate balance of the Class B or Class C certificates will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-B certificates. A reduction in the certificate balance of the Class D certificates will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-D certificates. No representation is made as to the anticipated rate or timing of prepayments (voluntary or involuntary) or rate, timing or amount of liquidations or losses on the mortgage loans or as to the anticipated yield to maturity of any such offered certificate. See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations”.
Risk of Early Termination
The issuing entity is subject to optional termination under certain circumstances. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”. In the event of this termination, you might receive some principal payments earlier than otherwise expected, which could adversely affect your anticipated yield to maturity.
Subordination of the Subordinated Certificates Will Affect the Timing of Distributions and the Application of Losses on the Subordinated Certificates
As described in this prospectus, the rights of the holders of the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates to receive payments of principal and interest otherwise payable on their certificates will be subordinated to such rights of the holders of the more senior certificates having an earlier alphabetical or alphanumeric class designation.
If you acquire Class A-S, Class B or Class C certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will be subordinated to those of the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates. The Class A-S certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. The Class B certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. The Class C certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. The Class D certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. As a result, investors in those classes of certificates that are subordinated in whole or part to other classes of certificates will generally bear the effects of losses on the mortgage loans and unreimbursed expenses of the issuing entity before the holders of those other classes of certificates. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions” and “—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”.
Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment
You Have Limited Voting Rights
Except as described in this prospectus, you and other certificateholders generally do not have a right to vote and do not have the right to make decisions with respect to the administration of the issuing entity and the mortgage loans. With respect to mortgage loans (other than mortgage loans that will be serviced under a separate pooling and servicing agreement), those decisions are generally made, subject to the express terms of the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction, by the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, subject to any rights of the directing holder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction and the rights of the holders of any related companion loans and mezzanine debt under the related co-lender agreement and/or intercreditor agreement. With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, you will generally not have any right to vote or make decisions with respect any non-serviced mortgage loan, and those decisions will generally be made by the master servicer or the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the related non-serviced mortgage loan and any related companion loan, subject to the rights of the directing holder appointed under such pooling and servicing agreement. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. In particular, with respect to the risks relating to a modification of a mortgage loan, see “—Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans” below.
In certain limited circumstances where certificateholders have the right to vote on matters affecting the issuing entity, in some cases, these votes are by certificateholders taken as a whole and in others the vote is by class. Your interests as an owner of certificates of a particular class may not be aligned with the interests of owners of one or more other classes of certificates in connection with any such vote. In all cases certificateholder voting is based on the outstanding certificate balance, which is reduced by realized losses. In certain cases with respect to the termination of the special servicer and the operating advisor, certain voting rights will also be reduced by appraisal reductions, as described below. These limitations on voting could adversely affect your ability to protect your interests with respect to matters voted on by certificateholders. See “Description of the Certificates—Voting Rights”. You will have no rights to vote on any servicing matters related to the mortgage loans that will be serviced under a trust and servicing agreement or pooling and servicing agreement, as applicable, governing the servicing of any non-serviced whole loan.
In general, a certificate beneficially owned by the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, the mortgage loan seller, a mortgagor, a Borrower Party or any affiliate of any of such persons will be deemed not to be outstanding and a holder of such certificate will not have the right to vote, subject to certain exceptions, as further described in the definition of “Certificateholder” under “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information” in this prospectus.
The Rights of the Directing Holder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment
The controlling class representative will have certain consent and consultation rights with respect to certain matters relating to the mortgage loans as the directing holder (other than with respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, the servicing shift mortgage loan and any excluded loan) and the right to replace the special servicer with or without cause, except that if a control termination event (i.e., an event in which the certificate balance of the most senior class of certificates that is eligible to be a controlling class, as reduced by the application of appraisal reductions and realized losses, is less than 25% of its initial certificate balance) is continuing, the controlling class representative will lose the consent rights and the right to replace the special servicer, and if a consultation termination event (i.e., an event in which the certificate balance of the most senior class of certificates that is eligible to be a controlling class (as reduced by the application of realized losses) is less than 25% of its initial certificate balance) is
continuing, then the controlling class representative will lose the consultation rights. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder”.
These actions and decisions with respect to which the controlling class representative has consent or consultation rights include, among others, certain modifications to the mortgage loans or serviced whole loans (other than the servicing shift whole loan), including modifications of monetary terms, foreclosure or comparable conversion of the related mortgaged properties, and certain sales of mortgage loans or REO properties for less than the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest, fees and expenses. As a result of the exercise of these rights by the directing holder, the special servicer may take actions with respect to a mortgage loan that could adversely affect the interests of investors in one or more classes of offered certificates.
Similarly, with respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan may, at the direction or upon the advice of the directing holder of the related securitization trust holding the controlling note for the related non-serviced whole loan, take actions with respect to such non-serviced mortgage loan and related companion loan that could adversely affect such non-serviced mortgage loan, and therefore, the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. The issuing entity (as the holder of a non-controlling note) will have limited consultation rights with respect to major decisions relating to a non-serviced whole loan and in connection with a sale of a defaulted loan, and such rights will be exercised by the directing holder for this transaction so long as no control termination event is continuing and by the special servicer if a control termination event is continuing. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Similarly, with respect to the servicing shift whole loan, prior to the servicing shift securitization date, the special servicer may, at the direction or upon the advice of the holder of the related controlling companion loan, take actions with respect to such whole loan that could adversely affect such whole loan, and therefore, the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates.
The issuing entity (as the holder of a non-controlling note) will have limited consultation rights with respect to major decisions relating to a non-serviced whole loan or the servicing shift whole loan and in connection with a sale of a defaulted loan, and such rights will be exercised by the controlling class representative for this transaction so long as no consultation termination event is continuing and by the special servicer if a consultation termination event is continuing. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder”.
Although the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and the special servicer for each non-serviced mortgage loan are not permitted to take actions which are prohibited by law or violate the servicing standard under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement or the terms of the related loan documents, it is possible that the directing holder (or equivalent entity) under such pooling and servicing agreement may direct or advise, as applicable, the related special servicer to take actions with respect to such mortgage loan that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates.
You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that the directing holder under this securitization transaction, as well as the directing holder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of each non-serviced mortgage loan:
(i) may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;
(ii) may act solely in the interests of the holders of the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan);
(iii) does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates other than the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan);
(iv) may take actions that favor the interests of the holders of the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan), over the interests of the holders of one or more other classes of certificates; and
(v) will have no liability whatsoever (other than to a controlling class certificateholder) for having so acted as set forth in clauses (i) – (iv) above, and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the directing holder under this securitization transaction, as well as the directing holder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan or any of their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, shareholders, members, partners, agents or principals for having so acted.
In addition, if an operating advisor consultation event has occurred and is continuing, the operating advisor will have certain consultation rights with respect to certain matters relating to the mortgage loans (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan). Further, the operating advisor will have the right to recommend a replacement of the special servicer, as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor” and “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote”. The operating advisor is generally required to act on behalf of the issuing entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the certificateholders and, with respect to any serviced whole loan (other than the servicing shift whole loan), for the benefit of the holders of any related companion loan (as a collective whole as if the certificateholders and companion loan holders constituted a single lender and taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any such related companion loan). We cannot assure you that any actions taken by the special servicer as a result of a recommendation or consultation by the operating advisor will not adversely affect the interests of investors in one or more classes of certificates. With respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, the operating advisor (if any) appointed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan will have similar rights and duties under such pooling and servicing agreement. Further, the operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan or any related REO property. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
You Have Limited Rights to Replace the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor or the Asset Representations Reviewer
In general, the directing holder will have the right to terminate and replace the special servicer with or without cause so long as no control termination event is continuing and other than in respect of any applicable excluded loan as described in this prospectus.
At any time a control termination event is continuing, the holders of the principal balance certificates may generally replace the special servicer without cause, as described in this paragraph. Holders of principal balance certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the voting rights (taking into account the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances) of all principal balance certificates on an aggregate basis may request a vote to replace the special servicer. The special servicer will be terminated and replaced upon receipt of approval by holders of principal balance certificates evidencing (i) at least 75% of a quorum of the certificateholders (which, for this purpose, is the holders of principal balance certificates evidencing at least 75% of the voting rights (taking into account the application of realized losses and the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances) of all principal balance certificates on an aggregate basis) or (ii) more than 50% of each class of “non-reduced interests” (each class of principal balance certificates outstanding that has not been reduced to less than 25% of its initial certificate balance through the application of appraisal reduction amounts and realized losses).
In addition, if at any time the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the pooling and servicing agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the servicing standard, and (2) the replacement of the special servicer would be in the best interest of the certificateholders as a collective whole, then the operating advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the special servicer and deliver a report supporting such recommendation in the manner described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote”. The operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer must be confirmed by an affirmative vote of holders of certificates representing a majority of the voting rights (taking into account the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances) of all principal balance certificates whose holders voted on the matter; provided that holders of principal balance certificates that so voted on the matter (i) hold principal balance certificates representing at least 20% of the voting rights (taking into account the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances) of all principal balance certificates on an aggregate basis, and (ii) consist of at least three (3) certificateholders or certificate owners that are not “risk retention affiliated” with each other.
The certificateholders will generally have no right to replace and terminate the master servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator without cause. The vote of the requisite percentage of voting rights may terminate the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer without cause. The vote of the requisite percentage of the voting rights will be required to replace the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer even for cause, and certain termination events may be waived by the vote of the requisite percentage of the voting rights. The certificateholders will have no right to replace the master servicer or the special servicer of the pooling and servicing agreement relating to any non-serviced mortgage loan. We cannot assure that your lack of control over the replacement of these parties will not have an adverse impact on your investment.
The Rights of Companion Loan Holders and Mezzanine Debt Could Adversely Affect Your Investment
The holders of a pari passu companion loan relating to the serviced mortgage loans will have certain consultation rights (on a non-binding basis) with respect to major decisions relating to the related whole loan under the related co-lender agreement. Such companion loan holder and its representative may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, and may advise the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates. Although any such consultation is non-binding and the special servicer is not obligated to consult with the companion loan holder if required under the servicing standard, we cannot assure you that the exercise of the rights of such companion loan holder will not delay any action to be taken by the special servicer and will not adversely affect your investment.
With respect to any mortgage loan that is subject to one or more subordinate companion loans, the holders of such companion loan(s) will generally have the right under limited circumstances to (i) cure certain defaults with respect to the related mortgage loan and to purchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) the related mortgage loan and (ii) prior to the occurrence and continuance of a “control appraisal period” or a “control termination event” applicable to such subordinate companion loan, approve certain modifications and consent to certain actions to be taken with respect to the related whole loan. The rights of the holder of a subordinate companion loan could adversely affect your ability to protect your interests with respect to matters relating to the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
With respect to mortgage loans that have mezzanine debt or permit mezzanine debt in the future, the related mezzanine lender will have the right under certain limited circumstances to (i) cure certain defaults with respect to, and under certain default scenarios, purchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) the related mortgage loan and (ii) so long as no event of default with respect to the related mortgage loan continues after the mezzanine lender’s cure right has expired, approve certain modifications and consent to certain actions to be taken with respect to the related
mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” and “—Additional Indebtedness”.
The purchase option that the holder of a subordinate companion loan or mezzanine debt holds pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement or co-lender agreement generally permits such holder to purchase its related defaulted mortgage loan for a purchase price generally equal to the outstanding principal balance of the related defaulted mortgage loan, together with accrued and unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest) on, and unpaid servicing expenses, protective advances and interest on advances related to, such defaulted mortgage loan. However, in the event such holder is not obligated to pay some or all of those fees and additional expenses, including any liquidation fee payable to the special servicer under the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, then the exercise of such holder’s rights under the intercreditor agreement or co-lender agreement to purchase the related mortgage loan from the issuing entity may result in a loss to the issuing entity in the amount of those fees and additional expenses. In addition, such holder’s right to cure defaults under the related defaulted mortgage loan could delay the issuing entity’s ability to realize on or otherwise take action with respect to such defaulted mortgage loan.
In addition, with respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, you will not have any right to vote with respect to any matters relating to the servicing and administration of any non-serviced mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that the companion loan holders:
| ● | may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates; |
| ● | may act solely in its own interests, without regard to your interests; |
| ● | do not have any duties to any other person, including the holders of any class of certificates; |
| ● | may take actions that favor its interests over the interests of the holders of one or more classes of certificates; and |
| ● | will have no liability whatsoever for having so acted and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the companion loan holder or its representative or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of the companion loan holder or its representative for having so acted. |
Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans
As delinquencies or defaults occur, the special servicer and any sub-servicer will be required to utilize an increasing amount of resources to work with borrowers to maximize collections on the mortgage loans serviced by it. This may include modifying the terms of such mortgage loans that are in default or whose default is reasonably foreseeable. At each step in the process of trying to bring a defaulted mortgage loan current or in maximizing proceeds to the issuing entity, the special servicer and any sub-servicer will be required to invest time and resources not otherwise required when collecting payments on performing mortgage loans. Modifications of mortgage loans implemented by the special servicer or any sub-servicer in order to maximize ultimate proceeds of such mortgage loans to issuing entity may have the effect of, among other things, reducing or otherwise changing the mortgage rate, forgiving or forbearing payments of principal, interest or other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, extending the final maturity date of the mortgage loan, capitalizing or deferring delinquent interest and other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, forbearing payment of a portion of the principal balance of the mortgage loan or any combination of these or other modifications.
Any modified mortgage loan may remain in the issuing entity, and the modification may result in a reduction in (or may eliminate) the funds received with respect of such mortgage loan. In particular, any modification to reduce or forgive the amount of interest payable on the mortgage loan will reduce the amount cash flow available to make distributions of interest on the certificates, which will likely impact the most subordinated classes of certificates that suffer the shortfall. To the extent the modification defers principal payments on the mortgage loan (including as a result of an extension of its stated maturity date), certificates entitled to principal distributions will likely be repaid more slowly than anticipated, and if principal payments on the mortgage loan are forgiven, the reduction will cause a write-down of the certificate balances of the certificates in reverse order of seniority. See “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”.
The ability to modify mortgage loans by the special servicer may be limited by several factors. First, if the special servicer has to consider a large number of modifications, operational constraints may affect the ability of the special servicer to adequately address all of the needs of the borrowers. Furthermore, the terms of the related servicing agreement may prohibit the special servicer from taking certain actions in connection with a loan modification, such as an extension of the loan term beyond a specified date such as a specified number of years prior to the rated final distribution date. You should consider the importance of the role of the special servicer in maximizing collections for the transaction and the impediments the special servicer may encounter when servicing delinquent or defaulted mortgage loans. In some cases, failure by the special servicer to timely modify the terms of a defaulted mortgage loan may reduce amounts available for distribution on the certificates in respect of such mortgage loan, and consequently may reduce amounts available for distribution to the related certificates. In addition, even if a loan modification is successfully completed, we cannot assure you that the related borrower will continue to perform under the terms of the modified mortgage loan.
Modifications that are designed to maximize collections in the aggregate may adversely affect a particular class of certificates. The pooling and servicing agreement obligates the special servicer not to consider the interests of individual classes of certificates. You should note that in connection with considering a modification or other type of loss mitigation, the special servicer may incur or bear related out-of-pocket expenses, such as appraisal fees, which would be reimbursed to the special servicer from the transaction as property protection advances and paid from amounts received on the modified loan or from other mortgage loans in the mortgage pool but in each case, prior to distributions being made on the certificates.
The Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan
Each sponsor is the sole warranting party in respect of the mortgage loans sold by such sponsor. Neither we nor any of our affiliates (except Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company in its capacity as a sponsor) is obligated to repurchase or substitute any mortgage loan or make any payment to compensate the issuing entity in connection with a breach of any representation or warranty of a sponsor or any document defect, if the related sponsor defaults on its obligation to do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, Barclays Capital Holdings Inc. will agree in the related mortgage loan purchase agreement to repurchase or replace defective Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. Mortgage Loans to the same extent as Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. in connection with any repurchase by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. We cannot assure you that the sponsors will effect such repurchases or substitutions or make such payment to compensate the issuing entity. Although a loss of value payment may only be made to the extent that the special servicer deems such amount to be sufficient to compensate the issuing entity for such material defect or material breach, we cannot assure you that such loss of value payment will fully compensate the issuing entity for such material defect or material breach in all respects. In addition, the sponsors (or Barclays Capital Holdings Inc., with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. to the same extent as Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.) may have various legal defenses available to them in connection with a repurchase or substitution obligation or an obligation to pay the loss of value payment. In particular, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan that is serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement entered
into in connection with the securitization of the related pari passu companion loan, the asset representations reviewer under that pooling and servicing agreement may review the diligence file relating to such pari passu companion loan concurrently with the review of the asset representations reviewer of the related mortgage loan for this transaction, and their findings may be inconsistent, and such inconsistency may allow the related mortgage loan seller to challenge the findings of the asset representations reviewer of the affected mortgage loan. Any mortgage loan that is not repurchased or substituted and that is not a “qualified mortgage” for a REMIC may cause the Trust REMICs to fail to qualify as REMICs or cause the issuing entity to incur a tax. See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
In addition, with respect to a mortgage loan that is comprised of more than one promissory note contributed to this securitization by more than one mortgage loan seller, each such mortgage loan seller will be obligated to take the above remedial actions as a result of a breach of any representation or warranty or any document defect only with respect to the related promissory note(s) sold by it to the depositor as if the notes contributed by each such mortgage loan seller and evidencing such mortgage loan was a separate mortgage loan. Accordingly, it is possible that, under certain circumstances, only one mortgage loan seller contributing a promissory note evidencing such mortgage loan will repurchase, or otherwise comply with any remedial obligations with respect to, its interest in such mortgage loan if there is a breach of any representation or warranty of or any document defect.
Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation
To the extent described in this prospectus, the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will each be entitled to receive interest on unreimbursed advances made by it at the “Prime Rate” (and solely with respect to the master servicer, subject to a floor rate of 2.0%), compounded annually, as published in The Wall Street Journal. This interest will generally accrue from the date on which the related advance is made or the related expense is incurred to the date of reimbursement. In addition, under certain circumstances, including delinquencies in the payment of principal and/or interest, a mortgage loan will be specially serviced and the special servicer will be entitled to compensation for special servicing activities. The right to receive interest on advances or special servicing compensation is senior to the rights of certificateholders to receive distributions on the offered certificates. The payment of interest on advances and the payment of compensation to the special servicer may lead to shortfalls in amounts otherwise distributable on your certificates.
Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer
The master servicer or the special servicer may be eligible to become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code or enter into receivership under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”). If a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, were to become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code or enter into receivership under the FDIA, although the pooling and servicing agreement provides that such an event would entitle the issuing entity to terminate the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, such an “ipso facto” provision would most likely not be enforceable. However, a rejection of the pooling and servicing agreement by a master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, in a bankruptcy proceeding or repudiation of the pooling and servicing agreement in a receivership under the FDIA would be treated as a breach of the pooling and servicing agreement and give the issuing entity a claim for damages and the ability to appoint a successor master servicer or special servicer, as applicable. An assumption under the Bankruptcy Code would require the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, to cure its pre-bankruptcy defaults, if any, and demonstrate that it is able to perform following assumption. The bankruptcy court may permit the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, to assume the servicing agreement and assign it to a third party. An insolvency by an entity governed by state insolvency law would vary depending on the laws of the particular state. We cannot assure you that a bankruptcy or receivership of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, would not adversely impact the servicing of the mortgage loans or the issuing entity would be entitled to terminate the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, in a timely manner or at all.
If any master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, becomes the subject of bankruptcy or similar proceedings, the issuing entity claim to collections in that master servicer or special servicer’s, as applicable, possession at the time of the bankruptcy filing or other similar filing may not be perfected. In this event, funds available to pay principal and interest on your certificates may be delayed or reduced.
Risks Relating to a Bankruptcy of an Originator, a Sponsor or the Depositor, or a Receivership or Conservatorship of Goldman Sachs Bank USA
In the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of an originator, a sponsor or the depositor, it is possible that the issuing entity’s right to payment from or ownership of certain of the mortgage loans could be challenged. If such challenge is successful, payments on the offered certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful, payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a sponsor, is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of GS Bank, a New York State chartered bank and an originator. The deposits of GS Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). If GS Bank were to become subject to receivership, the proceeding would be administered by the FDIC under the FDIA; likewise, if GS Bank were to become subject to conservatorship, the agency appointed as conservator would likely be the FDIC as well. The FDIA gives the FDIC the power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts to which a bank is party at the time of receivership or conservatorship and the performance of which the FDIC determines to be burdensome, in which case the counterparty to the contract has a claim for payment by the receivership or conservatorship estate of “actual direct compensatory damages” as of the date of receivership or conservatorship.
The FDIC has adopted a rule, substantially revised and effective January 1, 2011, establishing a safe harbor (the “FDIC Safe Harbor”) from its repudiation powers for securitizations meeting the requirements of the rule (12 C.F.R. § 360.6). The transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by GS Bank to Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, by DBR Investments Co. Limited to German American Capital Corporation and by the sponsors to the depositor is not expected to qualify for the FDIC Safe Harbor. The transfers by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, DBR Investments Co. Limited, Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., German American Capital Corporation, Bank of Montreal, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. and 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC are not transfers by a bank, and in any event, the FDIC Safe Harbor is non-exclusive. Additionally, in the case of GS Bank, DBR Investments Co. Limited, each sponsor and the depositor, an opinion of counsel will be rendered on the closing date, based on certain facts and assumptions and subject to certain qualifications, to the effect that the transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by GS Bank to Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, by DBR Investments Co. Limited to German American Capital Corporation, by a sponsor to the depositor and by the depositor to the issuing entity would generally be respected as a sale in the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency of GS Bank, DBR Investments Co. Limited, a sponsor or the depositor, as applicable.
A legal opinion is not a guaranty as to what any particular court would actually decide, but rather an opinion as to the decision a court would reach if the issues are competently presented and the court followed existing precedent as to legal and equitable principles applicable in bankruptcy or bank insolvency cases. In this regard, legal opinions on bankruptcy and bank insolvency law matters unavoidably have inherent limitations primarily because of the pervasive equity powers of bankruptcy courts, the overriding goal of reorganization to which other legal rights and policies may be subordinated, the potential relevance to the exercise of judicial discretion of future arising facts and circumstances, and the nature of the bankruptcy or bank insolvency process. As a result, the FDIC, a creditor, bankruptcy trustee or another interested party, including an entity transferring a mortgage loan, as debtor-in-possession, could still attempt to assert that the transfer of a mortgage loan was not a sale. If such party’s challenge is successful, payments on the offered certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.
In addition, since the issuing entity is a New York common law trust, it may not be eligible for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws, unless it can be characterized as a “business trust” for purposes of the federal bankruptcy laws. Bankruptcy courts look at various considerations in making this determination, so it is not possible to predict with any certainty whether or not the issuing entity would be characterized as a “business trust”. Regardless of whether a bankruptcy court ultimately determines that the issuing entity is a “business trust”, it is possible that payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while the court resolved the issue.
Bank of Montreal is a Schedule I bank under the Bank Act (Canada) and subject to Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency laws. The Superintendent of Financial Institutions and other Canadian regulatory authorities have broad powers under the Bank Act (Canada) and other applicable Canadian federal legislation to take control of BMO or its assets to protect the rights and interests of the depositors and creditors of BMO, including making an application for a winding-up of BMO or a restructuring of its assets under applicable Canadian federal legislation. There is considerable uncertainty about the scope of the powers afforded to these Canadian regulatory authorities and how they may choose to exercise such powers. Actions taken by such authorities may affect the ability of BMO to satisfy its ongoing obligations under the related mortgage loan purchase agreement and/or result in the cancellation, modification or conversion of certain unsecured liabilities of BMO under the transaction documents or in other modifications to such documents without BMO’s or your consent, which could in turn affect the ability of the issuing entity to meet its obligations in respect of the offered certificates.
Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act provides for an orderly liquidation authority (“OLA”) under which the FDIC can be appointed as receiver of certain systemically important non-bank financial companies and their direct or indirect subsidiaries in certain cases. We make no representation as to whether this would apply to any of the sponsors. In January 2011, the former acting general counsel of the FDIC issued a letter (the “Former Acting General Counsel’s Letter”) in which he expressed his view that, under then-existing regulations, the FDIC, as receiver under the OLA, would not, in the exercise of its OLA repudiation powers, recover as property of a financial company assets transferred by the financial company, provided that the transfer satisfies the conditions for the exclusion of assets from the financial company’s estate under the Bankruptcy Code. The letter further noted that, while the FDIC staff may be considering recommending further regulations under OLA, the former acting general counsel would recommend that such regulations incorporate a 90-day transition period for any provisions affecting the FDIC’s statutory power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts. If, however, the FDIC were to adopt a different approach than that described in the Former Acting General Counsel’s Letter, delays or reductions in payments on the offered certificates would occur.
The Requirement of the Special Servicer to Obtain FIRREA-Compliant Appraisals May Result in an Increased Cost to the Issuing Entity
Each appraisal obtained pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement is required to contain a statement, or is accompanied by a letter from the appraiser, to the effect that the appraisal was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), as in effect on the date such appraisal was obtained. Any such appraisal is likely to be more expensive than an appraisal that is not FIRREA compliant. Such increased cost could result in losses to the issuing entity. Additionally, FIRREA compliant appraisals are required to assume a value determined by a typically motivated buyer and seller, and could result in a higher appraised value than one not prepared assuming a forced liquidation or other distress situation. In addition, because a FIRREA compliant appraisal may result in a higher valuation than a non-FIRREA compliant appraisal, there may be a delay in calculating and applying appraisal reductions, which could result in the holders of a given class of certificates continuing to hold the full non-notionally reduced amount of such certificates or for a longer period of time than would be the case if a non-FIRREA compliant appraisal were obtained.
Realization on the Mortgage Loans That Are Part of a Serviced Whole Loan May Be Adversely Affected by the Rights of the Holder of the Related Serviced Companion Loan
If a serviced whole loan were to become defaulted, the related co-lender agreement requires the special servicer, in the event it determines to sell the related mortgage loan in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, to sell the related serviced companion loan(s) together with such defaulted mortgage loan. We cannot assure you that such a required sale of a defaulted serviced whole loan would not adversely affect the ability of the special servicer to sell such mortgage loan, or the price realized for such mortgage loan, following a default on the related serviced whole loan. Further, given that, pursuant to the co-lender agreements for the serviced whole loans, the related serviced companion loan holders will not be the related whole loan controlling noteholder, and the trust as holder of the related mortgage loan will be the controlling noteholder (with the right to consent to material servicing decisions and replace the special servicer, as described in this prospectus), with respect to each serviced whole loan, the related serviced companion loan(s) may not be as marketable as the related mortgage loan held by the issuing entity. Accordingly, if any such sale does occur with respect to a defaulted mortgage loan and the related serviced companion loans, then the net proceeds realized by the certificateholders in connection with such sale may be less than would be the case if only the related mortgage loan were subject to such sale.
Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment
Tax Considerations Relating to Foreclosure
If the issuing entity acquires a mortgaged property (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) subsequent to a default on the related mortgage loan (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan) or whole loan pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, the special servicer (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the related non-serviced special servicer) would be required to retain an independent contractor to operate and manage such mortgaged property. Among other limitations, the independent contractor generally will not be able to perform construction work other than repair, maintenance or certain types of tenant buildouts, unless the construction was more than 10% completed when the mortgage loan defaulted or when the default of the mortgage loan became imminent. Generally, any (i) net income from such operation (other than qualifying “rents from real property”), (ii) rental income based on the net profits of a tenant or sub-tenant or allocable to a service that is non-customary in the area and for the type of property involved and (iii) rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property, if the rent attributable to the personal property exceeds 15% of the total rent for the taxable year, will subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to federal tax (and possibly state or local tax) on such income at the corporate tax rate. No determination has been made whether any portion of the income from the mortgaged properties constitutes “rent from real property”. Any such imposition of tax will reduce the net proceeds available for distribution to certificateholders. The special servicer (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the related non-serviced special servicer) may permit the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to certificateholders and any related companion loan holders, as a collective whole, could reasonably be expected to be greater than under another method of operating or leasing the mortgaged property. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans”. In addition, if the issuing entity were to acquire one or more mortgaged properties (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, upon acquisition of those mortgaged properties (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property), the issuing entity may in certain jurisdictions, particularly in New York, be required to pay state or local transfer or excise taxes upon liquidation of such properties. Such state or local taxes may reduce net proceeds available for distribution to the certificateholders. In addition, proceeds received from any Mortgaged Property located in a foreign jurisdiction may be reduced by the application of the applicable foreign taxes. In most circumstances, the special servicer (or in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the related non-serviced special servicer) will be required to sell such mortgaged property prior to the close of the third calendar year beginning after the year of acquisition.
When foreclosing on a real estate mortgage, a REMIC is generally limited to taking only the collateral that will qualify as “foreclosure property” within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations. Foreclosure property includes only the real property (ordinarily the land and structures) securing the real estate mortgage and personal property incident to such real property.
Changes to REMIC Restrictions on Loan Modifications May Impact an Investment in the Certificates
Ordinarily, a REMIC that modifies a mortgage loan jeopardizes its tax status as a REMIC and risks having a 100% penalty tax being imposed on any income from the mortgage loan. A REMIC may avoid such adverse REMIC consequences, however, if such mortgage loan is in default, the default of such mortgage loan is “reasonably foreseeable” or other special circumstances apply.
The IRS has issued guidance easing the tax requirements for a servicer to modify a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing mortgage loan held in a REMIC by interpreting the circumstances when default is “reasonably foreseeable” to include those where the servicer reasonably believes that there is a “significant risk of default” with respect to the underlying mortgage loan upon maturity of the loan or at an earlier date, and that by making such modification the risk of default is substantially reduced. Accordingly, if the master servicer or the special servicer determined that a Mortgage Loan was at significant risk of default and permitted one or more modifications otherwise consistent with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any such modification may impact the timing of payments and ultimate recovery on the underlying mortgage loan, and likewise on one or more classes of certificates.
In addition, the IRS has issued final regulations under the REMIC provisions of the Code that modify the tax restrictions imposed on a servicer’s ability to modify the terms of the underlying mortgage loans held by a REMIC relating to changes in the collateral, credit enhancement and recourse features. The IRS has also issued Revenue Procedure 2010-30, describing circumstances in which it will not challenge the treatment of mortgage loans as “qualified mortgages” on the grounds that the underlying mortgage loan is not “principally secured by real property”, that is, has a real property loan-to-value ratio greater than 125% following a release of liens on some or all of the real property securing such underlying mortgage loan. The general rule is that a mortgage loan must continue to be “principally secured by real property” following any such lien release, unless the lien release is pursuant to a defeasance permitted under the original loan documents and occurs more than two (2) years after the startup day of the REMIC, all in accordance with the REMIC provisions of the Code. Revenue Procedure 2010-30 also allows lien releases in certain “grandfathered transactions” and transactions in which the release is part of a “qualified pay-down transaction” even if the underlying mortgage loan after the transaction might not otherwise be treated as principally secured by a lien on real property. If the value of the real property securing a mortgage loan were to decline, the need to comply with the rules of Revenue Procedure 2010-30 could restrict the servicers’ actions in negotiating the terms of a workout or in allowing minor lien releases in circumstances in which, after giving effect to the release, the underlying mortgage loan would not have a real property loan-to-value ratio of 125% or less (calculated as described above). This could impact the timing of payments and ultimate recovery on a Mortgage Loan, and likewise on one or more classes of certificates.
You should consider the possible impact on your investment of any existing REMIC restrictions as well as any potential changes to the REMIC rules.
REMIC Status
If an entity intended to qualify as a REMIC fails to satisfy one or more of the REMIC provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), during any taxable year, the Code provides that such entity will not be treated as a REMIC for such year and any year thereafter. In such event, the issuing entity, including the Upper-Tier REMIC and the Lower-Tier REMIC, would likely be treated as one or more separate associations taxable as corporations under Treasury regulations, and the offered certificates may be treated as stock interests in those associations and not as debt instruments.
Material Federal Tax Considerations Regarding Original Issue Discount
One or more classes of the offered certificates may be issued with “original issue discount” for federal income tax purposes, which generally would result in the holder recognizing taxable income in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to that income. Accordingly, investors must have sufficient sources of cash to pay any federal, state or local income taxes with respect to the original issue discount. In addition, such original issue discount will be required to be accrued and included in income based on the assumption that no defaults will occur and no losses will be incurred with respect to the mortgage loans. This could lead to the inclusion of amounts in ordinary income early in the term of the certificate that later prove uncollectible, giving rise to a bad debt deduction. In the alternative, the investor may be required to treat such uncollectible amount as a capital loss under Section 166 of the Code.
General Risk Factors
Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss
Although the various risks discussed in this prospectus are generally described separately, you should consider the potential effects of the interplay of multiple risk factors. Where more than one significant risk factor is present, the risk of loss to an investor in the certificates may be significantly increased.
The Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You
The certificates will not be suitable investments for all investors. In particular, you should not purchase any class of certificates unless you understand and are able to bear the risk that the yield to maturity and the aggregate amount and timing of distributions on the certificates will be subject to material variability from period to period and give rise to the potential for significant loss over the life of the certificates. The interaction of the foregoing factors and their effects are impossible to predict and are likely to change from time to time. As a result, an investment in the certificates involves substantial risks and uncertainties and should be considered only by sophisticated institutional investors with substantial investment experience with similar types of securities and who have conducted appropriate due diligence on the mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties and the certificates.
The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue To Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS
The real estate and securitization markets, including the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), have from time to time experienced significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility. We cannot assure you that another dislocation in CMBS will not occur.
Any economic downturn may adversely affect the financial resources of borrowers under commercial mortgage loans and may result in their inability to make payments on, or refinance, their outstanding mortgage debt when due or to sell their mortgaged properties for an aggregate amount sufficient to pay off the outstanding debt when due. As a result, distributions of principal and interest on your certificates, and the value of your certificates, could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, consumer and producer prices in the United States are experiencing steep increases. The general effects of inflation on the economy of the United States can be wide ranging, as evidenced by rising interest rates, wages and costs of goods and services. If a borrower’s operating income growth fails to keep pace with the rising costs of operating the related mortgaged property, then such borrower may have less funds available to make its mortgage payments. In addition, rising interest rates may hinder a borrower’s ability to refinance, and provide a borrower with less incentive to cure delinquencies and avoid foreclosure. The foregoing may have a material adverse impact on the amounts available to make payments on the mortgage loans, and consequently, the certificates.
Other Events May Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment
Moreover, other types of events, domestic or international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets:
| ● | Wars, revolts, terrorist attacks, armed conflicts, energy supply or price disruptions, political crises, natural disasters, civil unrest and/or protests and man-made disasters (including without limitation, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the economic sanctions triggered thereby and the military conflict between Israel and Hamas), may have an adverse effect on the mortgaged properties and/or your certificates; |
| ● | Trading activity associated with indices of CMBS may drive spreads on those indices wider than spreads on CMBS, thereby resulting in a decrease in value of such CMBS, including your certificates, and spreads on those indices may be affected by a variety of factors, and may or may not be affected for reasons involving the commercial and multifamily real estate markets and may be affected for reasons that are unknown and cannot be discerned; and |
| ● | The market value of your certificates also may be affected by many other factors, including the then-prevailing interest rates and market perceptions of risks associated with commercial mortgage lending. A change in the market value of the certificates may be disproportionately impacted by upward or downward movements in the current interest rates. |
You should consider that the foregoing factors may adversely affect the performance of the mortgage loans and accordingly the performance of the offered certificates.
Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates
We make no representation as to the proper characterization of the offered certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, financial reporting or other purposes, as to the ability of particular investors to purchase the offered certificates under applicable legal investment or other restrictions or as to the consequences of an investment in the offered certificates for such purposes or under such restrictions. Changes in federal banking and securities laws and other laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors, or other participants in the asset-backed securities markets including the CMBS market. While the general effects of such changes are uncertain, regulatory or legislative provisions applicable to certain investors may have the effect of limiting or restricting their ability to hold or acquire CMBS, which in turn may adversely affect the ability of investors in the offered certificates who are not subject to those provisions to resell their certificates in the secondary market. For example:
| ● | Investors should be aware, and in some cases are required to be aware, of the investor diligence requirements that apply in the EU (the “EU Due Diligence Requirements”) under the EU Securitization Regulation, and in the UK (the “UK Due Diligence Requirements”) under the UK Securitization Regulation, in addition to any other regulatory requirements that are (or may become) applicable to them and/or with respect to their investment in the certificates. |
| ● | The EU Due Diligence Requirements apply to “institutional investors” (as defined in the EU Securitization Regulation), being (subject to certain conditions and exceptions) (a) institutions for occupational retirement provision; (b) credit institutions (as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as amended (the “CRR”)); (c) alternative investment fund managers who manage and/or market alternative investment funds in the EU; (d) investment firms (as defined in the CRR); (e) insurance and reinsurance undertakings; and (f) management companies of UCITS funds (or internally managed UCITS); and the EU Due Diligence Requirements apply also to certain consolidated affiliates of such credit institutions and investment firms. Each such institutional investor and each relevant affiliate is referred to herein as an “EU Institutional Investor”. |
| ● | The UK Due Diligence Requirements apply to “institutional investors” (as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation) being (subject to certain conditions and exceptions): (a) insurance undertakings and reinsurance undertakings as defined in the FSMA; (b) occupational pension schemes as defined in the Pension Schemes Act 1993 that have their main administration in the UK, and certain fund managers of such schemes; (c) alternative investment fund managers as defined in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013 which market or manage alternative investment funds in the UK; (d) UCITS as defined in the FSMA, which are authorized open ended investment companies as defined in the FSMA, and management companies as defined in the FSMA; (e) FCA investment firms as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EUWA and as amended (the “UK CRR”); and (f) CRR firms as defined in the UK CRR; and the UK Due Diligence Requirements apply also to certain consolidated affiliates of such CRR firms. Each such institutional investor and each relevant affiliate is referred to herein as a “UK Institutional Investor”. |
| ● | EU Institutional Investors and UK Institutional Investors are referred to together as “Institutional Investors”. EU Securitization Regulation and UK Securitization Regulation are each a “Securitization Regulation” and EU Due Diligence Requirements and UK Due Diligence Requirements are each “Due Diligence Requirements”, and a reference to the “applicable Securitization Regulation” or “applicable Due Diligence Requirements” means, in relation to an Institutional Investor, as the case may be, the Securitization Regulation or the Due Diligence Requirements to which such Institutional Investor is subject. In addition, for the purpose of the following paragraph, a reference to a “third country” means (i) in respect of an EU Institutional Investor and the EU Securitization Regulation, a country other than an EU member state, or (ii) in respect of a UK Institutional Investor and the UK Securitization Regulation, a country other than the UK. |
| ● | The applicable Due Diligence Requirements restrict an Institutional Investor from investing in a securitization unless: |
(a) in each case, it has verified that the originator, sponsor or original lender will retain, on an ongoing basis, a material net economic interest of not less than five per cent. in the securitization, determined in accordance with Article 6 of the applicable Securitization Regulation, and the risk retention is disclosed to the Institutional Investor (the “Risk Retention Requirements”);
(b) in the case of an EU Institutional Investor, it has verified that the originator, sponsor or SSPE has, where applicable, made available the information required by Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation (the “EU Transparency Requirements”) in accordance with the frequency and modalities provided for thereunder. In its report to the European Parliament and Council on the functioning of the EU Securitization Regulation on October 10, 2022, the European Commission stated that it is of the view that an EU Institutional Investor assuming an exposure to any securitization (including where the SSPE and any originator and sponsor are outside of the European Union, as is the case in the transaction contemplated herein) is required to verify compliance in full by the relevant originator, sponsor or SSPE with Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation;
(c) in the case of a UK Institutional Investor, it has verified that the originator, sponsor or securitization special purpose entity:
(i) if established in the UK has, where applicable, made available the information required by Article 7 of the UK Securitization Regulation (the “UK Transparency Requirements”) in accordance with the frequency and modalities provided for thereunder; and
(ii) if established in a third country has, where applicable, made available information which is substantially the same as that which it would have made available under the UK Transparency Requirements if it had been established in the UK, and has done so with such frequency and modalities as are substantially the same as those with which it would have made information available if it had been established in the UK; and
(d) in each case, it has verified that, where the originator or original lender either (i) is not a credit institution or an investment firm (each as defined in the applicable Securitization Regulation) or (ii) is established in a third country, the originator or original lender grants all the credits giving rise to the underlying exposures on the basis of sound and well-defined criteria and clearly established processes for approving, amending, renewing and financing those credits and has effective systems in place to apply those criteria and processes in order to ensure that credit-granting is based on a thorough assessment of the obligor’s creditworthiness.
| ● | The applicable Due Diligence Requirements further require that an Institutional Investor carry out a due diligence assessment which enables it to assess the risks involved prior to investing, including but not limited to the risk characteristics of the individual investment position and the underlying assets and all the structural features of the securitization that can materially impact the performance of the investment. In addition, pursuant to the applicable Securitization Regulation, while holding an exposure to a securitization, an Institutional Investor is subject to various monitoring obligations in relation to such exposure, including but not limited to: (i) establishing appropriate written procedures to monitor compliance with the due diligence requirements and the performance of the investment and of the underlying assets; (ii) performing stress tests on the cash flows and collateral values supporting the underlying assets; (iii) ensuring internal reporting to its management body; and (iv) being able to demonstrate to its competent authorities, upon request, that it has a comprehensive and thorough understanding of the investment and underlying assets and that it has implemented written policies and procedures for the risk management and as otherwise required by the applicable Securitization Regulation. |
| ● | Failure on the part of an Institutional Investor to comply with the applicable Due Diligence Requirements may result in various penalties including, in the case of those investors subject to regulatory capital requirements, the imposition of a punitive capital charge in respect of the investment in the securitization acquired by the relevant investor. Aspects of the requirements and what is or will be required to demonstrate compliance to national regulators remain unclear. |
| ● | Prospective investors should make themselves aware of the applicable Due Diligence Requirements described above (and any corresponding implementing rules of their regulator), where applicable to them, in addition to any other applicable regulatory requirements with respect to their investment in the certificates. |
| ● | None of the sponsors, the depositor, nor any other party to the transaction described in this prospectus intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issuance of the certificates in a manner that would satisfy the either of the Risk Retention Requirements or to take any other action that may be required by Institutional Investors for the purposes of their compliance with any of the Due Diligence Requirements and no such person assumes (i) any obligation to so retain or take any such other action or (ii) any liability whatsoever in connection with any certificateholder’s non-compliance with the applicable Due Diligence Requirements. Consequently, the certificates are not a suitable investment for Institutional Investors. As a result, a certificateholder’s ability to transfer its certificates, or the price it may receive upon its sale of certificates, may be adversely affected. |
| ● | Changes in federal banking and securities laws, including those resulting from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in the United States, may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors or other participants in the asset-backed securities markets. In particular, capital regulations issued by the U.S. banking regulators in 2013 implement the increased capital requirements established under the Basel Accord and are being phased in over time. These capital regulations eliminate reliance on credit ratings and otherwise alter, and in most cases increase, the capital requirements imposed on depository institutions and their holding companies, including with respect to ownership of asset-backed securities such as CMBS. Further changes in capital |
requirements have been announced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and it is uncertain when such changes will be implemented in the United States. When fully implemented in the United States, these changes may have an adverse effect with respect to investments in asset-backed securities, including CMBS. As a result of these regulations, investments in CMBS such as the certificates by financial institutions subject to bank capital regulations may result in greater capital charges to these financial institutions and these new regulations may otherwise adversely affect the treatment of CMBS for their regulatory capital purposes.
| ● | Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (such statutory provision together with the implementing regulations, the “Volcker Rule”) generally prohibits “banking entities” (which is broadly defined to include U.S. banks and bank holding companies and many non-U.S. banking entities, together with their respective subsidiaries and other affiliates) from (i) engaging in proprietary trading, (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a “covered fund” and (iii) entering into certain relationships with such funds. Under the Volcker Rule, unless otherwise jointly determined otherwise by specified federal regulators, a “covered fund” does not include an issuer that may rely on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act other than the exclusions contained in Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. |
| ● | The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. Accordingly, the issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule. The general effects of the Volcker Rule remain uncertain. Any prospective investor in the certificates, including a U.S. or foreign bank or a subsidiary or other bank affiliate, should consult its own legal advisors regarding such matters and other effects of the Volcker Rule. |
| ● | The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted changes to the accounting standards for structured products. These changes, or any future changes, may affect the accounting for entities such as the issuing entity, could under certain circumstances require an investor or its owner generally to consolidate the assets of the issuing entity in its financial statements and record third parties’ investments in the issuing entity as liabilities of that investor or owner or could otherwise adversely affect the manner in which the investor or its owner must report an investment in CMBS for financial reporting purposes. |
| ● | For purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended, no class of certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities”. |
| ● | In addition, compliance with legal requirements, such as the credit risk retention regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, could cause commercial real estate lenders to tighten their lending standards and reduce the availability of debt financing for commercial real estate borrowers. This, in turn, may adversely affect the borrower’s ability to refinance the mortgage loan or sell the mortgaged property on the maturity date. We cannot assure you that the borrower will be able to generate sufficient cash from the sale or refinancing of the mortgaged property to make the balloon payment on the mortgage loan. |
Further changes in federal banking and securities laws and other laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors, or other participants in the asset-backed securities markets (including the CMBS market) and may have adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates.
Accordingly, all investors whose investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities should consult with their own legal, accounting and other advisors in determining whether, and to what extent, the offered certificates will constitute legal investments for them or are subject to investment or other restrictions, unfavorable accounting treatment, capital charges or reserve requirements. See “Legal Investment”.
In addition, this transaction is structured to comply with the Credit Risk Retention Rules as and to the extent set forth under “Credit Risk Retention”. We cannot assure you that the retaining sponsor will at times satisfy such credit risk retention requirements. At this time, it is unclear what effect a failure of the retaining sponsor to be in compliance with the Credit Risk Retention Rules at any time will have on the certificateholders or the market value or liquidity of the certificates.
The Master Servicer, any Sub-Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator or the Custodian May Have Difficulty Performing Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or a Related Sub-Servicing Agreement
The issuing entity relies on the ability of the master servicer, any sub-servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator and the custodian to perform their respective duties under the pooling and servicing agreement. Any economic downturn or recession may adversely affect the master servicer’s, any sub-servicer’s or special servicer’s ability to perform its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the related sub-servicing agreement, including, if applicable, performance as it relates to the making of debt service or property protection advances or the ability to effectively service the underlying mortgage loans. Any economic downturn or recession may similarly adversely affect the ability of the trustee, the certificate administrator and the custodian to perform their respective duties, including the duty of the trustee to make principal and interest advances in the event that the master servicer fails to make such advances and the duties of the certificate administrator relating to securities administration.
The performance of such parties may also be affected by future events that occur with respect to each such party.
Any of the above-described factors may adversely affect the performance of the underlying mortgage loans or the performance of the certificates.
Book-Entry Securities May Delay Receipt of Payment and Reports and Limit Liquidity and Your Ability to Pledge Certificates
If a trust or trust fund issues certificates in book-entry form, you may experience delays in receipt of your payments and/or reports, since payments and reports will initially be made to the book-entry depository or its nominee. In addition, the issuance of certificates in book-entry form may reduce the liquidity of certificates so issued in the secondary trading market, since some investors may be unwilling to purchase certificates for which they cannot receive physical certificates. Additionally, your ability to pledge certificates to persons or entities that do not participate in The Depository Trust Company system, or otherwise to take action in respect of the certificates, may be limited due to lack of a physical security representing the certificates.
Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be Recognized as a Holder of Record
Your certificates will be initially represented by one or more certificates registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee for The Depository Trust Company, and will not be registered in your name. As a result, you will not be recognized as a certificateholder, or holder of record of your certificates. See “Description of the Certificates—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination—Book-Entry Registration” in this prospectus and “Risk Factors—General Risk Factors—Book-Entry Securities May Delay Receipt of Payment and Reports and Limit Liquidity and Your Ability to Pledge Certificates” in this prospectus for a discussion of important considerations relating to not being a certificateholder of record.
Description of the Mortgage Pool
General
The assets of the issuing entity will consist of a pool of 32 fixed rate mortgage loans (the “Mortgage Loans” or, collectively, the “Mortgage Pool”) with an aggregate principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of approximately $892,116,230 (the “Initial Pool Balance”). The “Cut-off Date” means with respect to each Mortgage Loan and Whole Loan, the related Due Date in August 2024 (or with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan that has its first Due Date after August 2024, the date that would otherwise have been the related Due Date in August 2024 under the terms of that Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan if a monthly payment were scheduled to be due in that month).
Four (4) of the Mortgage Loans (15.9%), are each part of a larger whole loan, each of which is comprised of the related Mortgage Loan and one or more loans that are pari passu in right of payment to the related Mortgage Loan (collectively referred to in this prospectus as “Pari Passu Companion Loans”) and/or are subordinate in right of payment to the related Mortgage Loan (referred to in this prospectus as a “Subordinate Companion Loan”). Each Pari Passu Companion Loan and Subordinate Companion Loan is referred to as a “Companion Loan” in this prospectus. Each Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loans are collectively referred to as a “Whole Loan”. Each Companion Loan is secured by the same mortgage and the same single assignment of leases and rents securing the related Mortgage Loan. See “—The Whole Loans” below for more information regarding the rights of the holders of the Companion Loans and the servicing and administration of the Whole Loans that will not be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction.
The Mortgage Loans and Whole Loans were originated, co-originated or acquired (or, on or prior to the Closing Date, will be acquired) by the mortgage loan sellers set forth in the following chart and such entities will sell their respective Mortgage Loans to the depositor, which will in turn sell the Mortgage Loans to the issuing entity:
Sellers of the Mortgage Loans
Seller(1) | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of Mortgage Loans | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company | 3 | | $136,850,000 | | 15.3 | % |
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. | 7 | | 246,800,000 | | 27.7 | |
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 7 | | 201,700,000 | | 22.6 | |
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. | 8 | | 181,096,230 | | 20.3 | |
Bank of Montreal | 5 | | 69,170,000 | | 7.8 | |
German American Capital Corporation | 2 | | 56,500,000 | | 6.3 | |
Total | 32 | | $892,116,230 | | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Each Mortgage Loan was originated by its respective mortgage loan seller or its affiliate, except those certain Mortgage Loans that were acquired from unaffiliated third-party originators or are part of larger whole loan structures that were co-originated by the applicable mortgage loan seller or its affiliate with one or more other lenders. See “—Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans” below. |
Each of the Mortgage Loans or Whole Loans is evidenced by one or more promissory notes or similar evidence of indebtedness (each a “Mortgage Note”) and, in each case, secured by (or, in the case of an indemnity deed of trust, backed by a guaranty that is secured by) one or more mortgages, deeds of trust or other similar security instruments (each, a “Mortgage”) creating a first lien on a fee simple and/or leasehold interest in one or more commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing real properties (each, a “Mortgaged Property”).
The Mortgage Loans and Whole Loans are generally non-recourse loans. In the event of a borrower default on a non-recourse Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, recourse may be had only against the specific Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties and the other limited assets securing such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, and not against the related borrower’s other assets. The Mortgage Loans and Whole Loans are not insured or guaranteed by the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers or any other person or entity unrelated to the respective borrower. You should consider all of the Mortgage Loans and Whole Loans to be nonrecourse loans as to which recourse in the case of default will be limited to the specific property and other assets, if any, pledged to secure the related Mortgage Loan or Whole Loans.
Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans
The following Mortgage Loans are component promissory notes of whole loans co-originated by the related mortgage loan seller (or an affiliate) and another entity or were originated by an unaffiliated third party and transferred to the related mortgage loan seller:
| ● | The Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), for which Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company is the mortgage loan seller, is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Bank of America, N.A. and Societe Generale Financial Corporation. |
| ● | The Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan (2.8%), for which Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. is the mortgage loan seller, is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., Morgan Stanley Bank, National Association and Societe Generale Financial Corporation. |
| ● | The Columbus Business Park Mortgage Loan (2.6%), for which 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC is the mortgage loan seller, is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. |
Certain Calculations and Definitions
This prospectus sets forth certain information with respect to the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties. The sum in any column of the tables presented on Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. The information on Annex A-1 with respect to the Mortgage Loans (or Whole Loans, if applicable) and the Mortgaged Properties is based upon the pool of the Mortgage Loans as it is expected to be constituted as of the close of business on August 29, 2024 (the “Closing Date”), assuming that (i) all scheduled principal and interest payments due on or before the Cut-off Date will be made; and (ii) there will be no principal prepayments on or before the Closing Date
The statistics on Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 were primarily derived from information provided to the depositor by each sponsor, which information may have been obtained from the borrowers.
All percentages of the Mortgage Loans and Mortgaged Properties, or of any specified group of Mortgage Loans and Mortgaged Properties, referred to in this prospectus without further description are approximate percentages of the Initial Pool Balance by Cut-off Date Balances and/or the allocated loan amount allocated to such Mortgaged Properties as of the Cut-off Date.
All information presented in this prospectus with respect to each Mortgage Loan with one or more Pari Passu Companion Loans is calculated in a manner that reflects the aggregate indebtedness evidenced by that Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), unless otherwise indicated. All information presented in this prospectus with respect to each Mortgage Loan with one or more Subordinate Companion Loans is calculated without regard to such Subordinate Companion Loans, unless otherwise indicated.
Unless otherwise specified, (i) references to a Mortgaged Property (or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties) by name refer to such Mortgaged Property (or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (ii) references to a Mortgage Loan by name refer to such Mortgage Loan secured by the related Mortgaged Property (or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties) so identified on Annex A-1, (iii) any parenthetical with a percent next to a Mortgaged Property name (or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties name) indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan (or, if applicable, the allocated loan amount with respect to such Mortgaged Property) represents of the Initial Pool Balance, and (iv) any parenthetical with a percent next to a Mortgage Loan name or a group of Mortgage Loans indicates the approximate percent (or approximate aggregate percent) that the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan or the aggregate outstanding principal balance of such group of Mortgage Loans, as applicable, represents of the Initial Pool Balance.
A Mortgage Loan’s Mortgage Rate may be less than the interest rate initially proposed to the related borrower at the loan application stage. Such interest rate may have been reduced in connection with the payment of an upfront fee from the borrower to the related originator, in light of the other credit characteristics of the Mortgage Loan. See Annex A-1 for certain information regarding each Mortgage Loan that was considered in connection with its origination, as well as the descriptions of the underwriting standards for each mortgage loan seller under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”.
Definitions
For purposes of this prospectus, including the information presented in the Annexes, to this prospectus, the indicated terms have the meanings set forth below. In reviewing such definitions, investors should be aware that the appraisals for the Mortgaged Properties were prepared prior to origination, and generally have not been updated. Similarly, net operating income and occupancy information used in underwriting the Mortgage Loans may not reflect current conditions. As a result, appraised values, net operating income, occupancy, and related metrics, such as loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios and debt yields, may not accurately reflect the current conditions at the Mortgaged Properties. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property” and “—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Failed Assumptions.”
“ADR” means, for any hospitality property, average daily rate.
“Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount” means, in the case of Mortgage Loans secured by multiple Mortgaged Properties, the allocated Cut-off Date Balance for each Mortgaged Property based on an allocated loan amount that has been assigned to the related Mortgaged Properties based upon one or more of the related appraised values, the related underwritten net cash flow or prior allocations reflected in the related Mortgage Loan documents; provided that with respect to any Whole Loan secured by a portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, the Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount represents only the pro rata portion of the related Mortgage Loan principal balance amount relative to the related Whole Loan principal balance. Information presented in this prospectus with respect to the Mortgaged Properties expressed as a percentage of the Initial Pool Balance reflects the Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount allocated to such Mortgaged Property as of the Cut-off Date.
“Annual Debt Service” generally means, for any Mortgage Loan, 12 times the average of the principal and interest payments due for the first 12 payment periods of the Mortgage Loan following the Cut-off Date (but without regard to any leap year adjustments), provided that:
| ● | in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for scheduled amortization payments through maturity, Annual Debt Service (or “Annual Debt Service (P&I)” as shown on Annex A-1) means 12 times the monthly payment of principal and interest payable during the amortization period; |
| ● | in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for interest only payments through maturity, Annual Debt Service (or “Annual Debt Service (IO)” as shown on Annex A-1) means the aggregate interest payments scheduled to be due for the first 12 payment periods of the Mortgage Loan following the Cut-off Date; and |
| ● | in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for an initial interest-only period and provides for scheduled amortization payments after the expiration of such interest-only period, Annual Debt Service (or “Annual Debt Service (P&I)” as shown on Annex A-1) means 12 times the monthly payment of principal and interest payable during the amortization period. |
Debt service and debt service coverage ratios set forth in this prospectus are calculated using the aggregate of the principal and interest payments due for the first 12 payment periods of the Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, following the Cut-off Date (but without regard to any leap year adjustments), subject to the exceptions set forth in the prior sentence. In the case of any Whole Loan, debt service coverage ratios set forth in this prospectus are calculated with respect to the Mortgage Loan including any related Pari Passu Companion Loan but without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan.
“Appraised Value” means, for each of the Mortgaged Properties and any date of determination, the most current appraised value of such Mortgaged Property as determined by an appraisal of the Mortgaged Property and in accordance with Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) standards. With respect to each Mortgaged Property, the Appraised Value set forth on Annex A-1 to this prospectus is the “as-is” appraised value unless otherwise specified under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”, and is in each case as determined by an appraisal made not more than four (4) months from the origination date of the related Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan as described under “Appraisal Date” on Annex A-1 to this prospectus. The appraisals for certain of the Mortgaged Properties may state an appraised value based on hypothetical or other projected values as well as an “as-is” value for such Mortgaged Properties that assumes that certain events will occur with respect to the re-tenanting, construction, renovation or repairs or other repositioning of the Mortgaged Property or which in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation, and such “retrospective” or other similar values may, to the extent indicated, be reflected elsewhere in this prospectus, on Annex A-1 to this prospectus. For such Appraised Values and other values on a property-by-property basis, see Annex A-1 of this prospectus and the related footnotes. In certain cases, with respect to a Mortgage Loan secured by a portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, the Appraised Value represents the “as-is” value for the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties as a collective whole, which may be higher than the aggregate of the “as-is” appraised value of the individual Mortgaged Properties. In addition, for certain Mortgage Loans, the LTV Ratio at Maturity was calculated based on the “as stabilized” appraised value for the related Mortgaged Property. We cannot assure you that the value of any particular Mortgaged Property will not have declined from the Appraised Value shown on Annex A-1 to this prospectus. We make no representation that any Appraised Value presented in this prospectus would approximate either the value that would be determined in a current appraisal of the Mortgaged Property or the amount that would be realized upon a sale of Mortgaged Property as described under the definition of “LTV Ratio at Maturity”.
“Crossed Group” identifies each group of Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other. There are no Crossed Groups in the Mortgage Pool.
“Cut-off Date Balance” of any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, will be the unpaid principal balance of that Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as of the Cut-off Date after application of all payments due on or before that date, whether or not received.
“Cut-off Date LTV Ratio” or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” generally means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the ratio, expressed as a percentage of (1) the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan set forth on Annex A-1 to this prospectus divided by (2) the Appraised Value (which in certain cases, may reflect a portfolio premium valuation) of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties set forth on Annex A-1 to this prospectus, except as set forth below:
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) unless expressly stated otherwise. |
| ● | with respect to the Mortgage Loans listed in the following table, the respective Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated using the related values other than the “as-is” Appraised Values, each as set forth in the following table: |
Mortgage Loan Name | % of Initial Pool Balance | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (Other Than “As-Is”) | Appraised Value (Other Than “As-Is”) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (“As-Is”) | Appraised Value (“As-Is”) |
Quantico Corporate Center | 6.4% | 60.6% | $94,000,000 | | 62.3% | $91,500,000 | |
Baybrook Mall(1) | 2.8% | 56.0% | $392,659,260 | | 56.4% | $390,000,000 | |
Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0.9% | 70.0% | $12,000,000 | | 80.7% | $10,400,000 | |
| (1) | The Appraised Value (Other Than “As-Is”) of $392,659,260 assumes that $2,659,260.33 will be reserved for tenant improvements. The Appraised Value without the reserve is $390,000,000. Since the date of the appraisal, some of the outstanding tenant improvements had since been paid, and therefore at origination, in lieu of an upfront reserve, the outstanding tenant obligations of $1,984,193.66 was guaranteed by the guarantor. |
“Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow” or “Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten Net Cash Flow divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan, except as set forth below:
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) unless expressly stated otherwise. |
“Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income”, “UW NOI Debt Yield” or “Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten Net Operating Income divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan, except as set forth below:
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) unless expressly stated otherwise. |
“DSCR”, “Debt Service Coverage Ratio”, “Cut-off Date DSCR”, “UW NCF DSCR” or “Underwritten NCF DSCR” generally means, for any Mortgage Loan, the ratio of Underwritten Net Cash Flow produced by the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties to the aggregate amount of the Annual Debt Service, except as set forth below:
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of the DSCR is based on the aggregate Annual Debt Service that is due in connection with such Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) unless expressly stated otherwise. |
“Hard Lockbox” means that the borrower is required to direct the tenants to pay rents directly to a lockbox account controlled by the lender. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a hard lockbox if credit card receivables are required to be deposited directly into the lockbox account even though cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited by the manager of the related Mortgaged Property into the lockbox account controlled by the lender.
“In-Place Cash Management” means, for funds directed into a lockbox, such funds are generally not made immediately available to the related borrower, but instead are forwarded to a cash management account controlled by the lender and the funds are disbursed according to the related loan documents with any excess remitted to the related borrower (unless an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents or one or more specified trigger events have occurred and are outstanding) generally on a daily basis.
“Largest Tenant” means, with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the tenant occupying the largest amount of net rentable square feet.
“Largest Tenant Lease Expiration” means the date at which the applicable Largest Tenant’s lease is scheduled to expire.
“Loan Per Unit” means the principal balance per unit of measure as of the Cut-off Date.
“LTV Ratio at Maturity”, “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” or “Maturity Date LTV Ratio” with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the ratio, expressed as a percentage of (1) the Maturity Balance of such Mortgage Loan as adjusted to give effect to the amortization of the applicable Mortgage Loan as of its maturity date, assuming no prepayments or defaults, divided by (2) the Appraised Value (which, in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation) of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties shown on Annex A-1 to this prospectus, except as set forth below:
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of the LTV Ratio at Maturity is based on the aggregate Maturity Balance at maturity and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) unless expressly stated otherwise. |
| ● | with respect to the Mortgage Loans listed in the following table, the respective LTV Ratio at Maturity was calculated using the related values other than the “as-is” Appraised Values, each as set forth in the following table: |
Mortgage Loan Name | % of Initial Pool Balance | Maturity Date LTV Ratio (Other Than “As-Is”) | Appraised Value (Other Than “As-Is”) | Maturity Date LTV Ratio (“As-Is”) | Appraised Value (“As-Is”) |
Quantico Corporate Center | 6.4% | 60.6% | $94,000,000 | | 62.3% | $91,500,000 | |
Baybrook Mall(1) | 2.8% | 53.0% | $392,659,260 | | 53.3% | $390,000,000 | |
Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0.9% | 67.0% | $12,000,000 | | 77.4% | $10,400,000 | |
| (1) | The Appraised Value (Other Than “As-Is”) of $392,659,260 assumes that $2,659,260.33 will be reserved for tenant improvements. The Appraised Value without the reserve is $390,000,000. Since the date of the appraisal, some of the outstanding tenant improvements had since been paid, and therefore at origination, in lieu of an upfront reserve, the outstanding tenant obligations of $1,984,193.66 was guaranteed by the guarantor. |
“Maturity Balance” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, the principal balance scheduled to be due on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan at maturity assuming that all monthly debt service payments are timely received and there are no prepayments or defaults.
“Most Recent NOI” and “Trailing 12 NOI” (which is for the period ending as of the date specified on Annex A-1 to this prospectus) is the net operating income for a Mortgaged Property as established by information provided by the borrowers, except that in certain cases such net operating income has been adjusted by removing certain non-recurring expenses and revenue or by certain other normalizations. Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI do not necessarily reflect accrual of certain costs such as taxes and capital expenditures and do not reflect non-cash items such as depreciation or amortization. In some cases, capital expenditures may have been treated by a borrower as an expense or expenses treated as capital expenditures. Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI were not necessarily determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Moreover, Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI are not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of the results of a property’s operations or a substitute for cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of liquidity and in certain cases may reflect partial year annualizations.
“Occupancy” means, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, (i) in the case of multifamily, rental and mixed use (to the extent the related Mortgaged Property includes multifamily space) properties, the percentage of rental Units, rooms or beds, as applicable, that are rented as of the Occupancy Date; (ii) in the case of retail, office, industrial and mixed use (to the extent the related Mortgaged Property includes retail or office space) properties, the percentage of the net rentable square footage rented as of the Occupancy Date (subject to, in the case of certain Mortgage Loans, one or more of the additional leasing assumptions); and (iii) in the case of hospitality properties, the percentage of available Rooms occupied for the trailing 12-month period ending on the Occupancy Date. In some cases, occupancy was calculated based on assumptions regarding occupancy, such as the assumption that a certain tenant at the Mortgaged Property that has executed a lease, but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy on a future date generally expected to occur within twelve months of the Cut-off Date; assumptions regarding the renewal of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at the related Mortgaged Property; in some cases, assumptions regarding leases under negotiation being executed; in some cases, assumptions regarding tenants taking additional space in the future if currently committed to do so or, in some cases, the exclusion of dark tenants, tenants with material aged receivables, tenants that may have already given notice to vacate their space, bankrupt tenants that have not yet affirmed their lease and certain additional leasing assumptions. See footnotes to Annex A-1 to this prospectus for additional occupancy assumptions. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any Mortgaged Property will, in fact, be consistent with that Mortgaged Property’s actual occupancy. See “—Tenant Issues” below.
“Occupancy Date” means the date of determination of the Occupancy of a Mortgaged Property.
“Original Balance” means the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan as of the date of origination.
“Prepayment Penalty Description” or “Prepayment Provision” means the number of payments from the first due date through and including the maturity date for which a Mortgage Loan is, as applicable, (i) locked out from prepayment, (ii) provides for payment of a prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge in connection with a prepayment, (iii) permits defeasance and/or (iv) permits prepayment without a payment of a prepayment premium or a yield maintenance charge.
“Related Group” identifies each group of Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool with borrower sponsors affiliated with other borrower sponsors in the Mortgage Pool. Each Related Group is identified by a separate number on Annex A-1 to this prospectus.
“RevPAR” means, with respect to any hospitality property, revenues per available room.
“Soft Lockbox” means that the related borrower is required to deposit or cause the property manager to deposit all rents collected into a lockbox account. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a soft lockbox if credit card receivables, cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited into the lockbox account by the borrower or property manager.
“Square Feet”, “SF” or “Sq. Ft.” means, in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a retail center, office, industrial/warehouse facility, combination retail/office or other single purpose property, the square footage of the net rentable or leasable area.
“Springing Cash Management” means, until the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the Mortgage Loan documents, revenue from the lockbox is forwarded to an account controlled by the related borrower or is otherwise made available to the related borrower. Upon the occurrence of an event of default or such a trigger event, the Mortgage Loan documents require the related revenue to be forwarded to a cash management account controlled by the lender and the funds are disbursed according to the related loan documents.
“Springing Lockbox” means a lockbox that is not currently in place, but the related loan documents require the imposition of a lockbox account upon the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the loan documents. In certain cases, the account agreement establishing the lockbox account is required to be delivered upon the occurrence of such trigger event(s), rather than at origination.
“Underwritten Expenses” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means an estimate of operating expenses, as determined by the related originator and generally derived from historical expenses at the Mortgaged Property, the borrower’s budget or appraiser’s estimate, in some cases adjusted for significant occupancy increases and a market-rate management fee. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any Mortgaged Property will, in fact, be consistent with that Mortgaged Property’s actual performance.
The “Underwritten Net Cash Flow”, “Net Cash Flow” or “Underwritten NCF” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means cash flow available for debt service, generally equal to the Underwritten NOI decreased by an amount that the applicable mortgage loan seller has determined for tenant improvement and leasing commissions and / or replacement reserves for capital items. Underwritten NCF does not reflect debt service or non-cash items such as depreciation or amortization.
The Underwritten Net Cash Flow for each Mortgaged Property is calculated on the basis of numerous assumptions and subjective judgments (including, but not limited to, with respect to future occupancy and rental rates), which, if ultimately proved erroneous, could cause the actual net cash flow for the Mortgaged Property to differ materially from the Underwritten Net Cash Flow set forth in this prospectus. In some cases, historical net cash flow for a particular Mortgaged Property, and/or the net cash flow assumed by the applicable appraiser in determining the Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Property, may be less (and, perhaps, materially less) than the Underwritten Net Cash Flow shown in this prospectus for such Mortgaged Property. For certain of the investment grade-rated or institutional tenants at the Mortgaged Properties, Underwritten Net Cash Flow is based on the “straight line” rent of those tenants generally over the lesser of the term of the related lease (which, in certain cases, may be calculated through the date of an early termination option) and the term of the related Mortgage Loan.
“Underwritten Net Operating Income” or “Underwritten NOI” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means Underwritten Revenues less Underwritten Expenses, as both are determined by the applicable mortgage loan seller, based in part upon borrower supplied information (including but not limited to a rent roll, leases, operating statements and budget) for a recent period which is generally the 12 months prior to the origination date or acquisition date of the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable), adjusted for specific property, tenant and market considerations. Historical operating statements may not be available for newly constructed Mortgaged Properties, Mortgaged Properties with triple net leases, Mortgaged Properties that have recently undergone substantial renovations and/or newly acquired Mortgaged Properties.
The Underwritten NOI for each Mortgaged Property is calculated based on the basis of numerous assumptions and subjective judgments (including, but not limited to, with respect to future occupancy and rental rates), which, if ultimately proved erroneous, could cause the actual net operating income for the Mortgaged Property to differ materially from the Underwritten NOI set forth in this prospectus. In some cases, historical net operating income for a particular Mortgaged Property, and/or the net operating income assumed by the applicable appraiser in determining the Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Property, may be less (and, perhaps, materially less) than the Underwritten NOI shown in this prospectus for such Mortgaged Property. For certain of the investment grade-rated or institutional tenants at the Mortgaged Properties, Underwritten Net Operating Income is based on the “straight line” rent of those tenants generally over the lesser of the term of the related lease (which, in certain cases, may be calculated through the date of an early termination option) and the term of the related Mortgage Loan.
“Underwritten Revenues” or “Underwritten EGI” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means an estimate of operating revenues, as determined by the applicable mortgage loan seller and generally derived from the rental revenue based on leases in place, leases that have been executed but the tenant is not yet paying rent, leases that are being negotiated and expected to be signed, additional space that a tenant has committed to take and in certain cases contractual rent steps generally within 12 months past the Cut-off Date, in certain cases an appraiser’s estimates of rental income, and in some cases adjusted downward to market rates, with vacancy rates equal to the Mortgaged Property’s historical rate, current rate, market rate or an assumed vacancy as determined by the related mortgage loan seller; plus any additional recurring revenue fees. Additionally, in determining rental revenue for multifamily rental and self-storage properties, the applicable mortgage loan seller either reviewed rental revenue shown on the certified rolling 12-month operating statements or annualized the rental revenue and reimbursement of expenses shown on rent rolls or recent partial year operating statements with respect to the prior one- to 12-month periods or in some cases may have relied on information provided in the appraisal for market rental rates and vacancy. In some cases the applicable mortgage loan seller included revenue otherwise payable by a tenant but for the existence of an initial “free rent” period or a permitted rent abatement while the leased space is built out. See “—Tenant Issues” below.
“Units”, “Rooms” or “Pads” means (a) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as multifamily housing, the number of apartments, regardless of the size of or number of rooms in such apartment, (b) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a hospitality property, the number of guest rooms, (c) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a self-storage property, the number of units for self-storage, (d) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a student housing property, the number of beds leased to students or (e) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a manufactured housing property, the number of pads for manufactured homes.
“Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate” means the weighted average of the Mortgage Rates as of the Cut-off Date.
Mortgage Pool Characteristics
Overview
Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Characteristics
| All Mortgage Loans |
Initial Pool Balance(1) | $892,116,230 |
Number of Mortgage Loans | 32 |
Number of Mortgaged Properties | 74 |
Range of Cut-off Date Balances | $3,700,000 - $89,000,000 |
Average Cut-off Date Balance | $27,878,632 |
Range of Mortgage Rates(2) | 4.84000% to 8.00000% |
Weighted Average Mortgage Rate(2) | 6.71961% |
Range of original terms to maturity | 60 to 120 months |
Weighted average original term to maturity | 60 months |
Range of remaining terms to maturity | 57 to 93 months |
Weighted average remaining term to maturity | 60 months |
Range of original amortization terms(3) | 360 to 360 months |
Weighted average original amortization term(3) | 360 months |
Range of remaining amortization terms(3) | 359 to 360 months |
Weighted average remaining amortization term(3) | 360 months |
Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(2)(4) | 42.1% to 74.4% |
Weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2)(4) | 58.6% |
Range of Maturity Date LTV Ratios(2)(5) | 42.1% to 74.4% |
Weighted average Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2)(5) | 58.5% |
Range of UW NCF DSCR(2)(6) | 1.26x to 2.30x |
Weighted average UW NCF DSCR(2)(6) | 1.65x |
Range of UW NOI Debt Yield(2)(7) | 8.5% to 18.0% |
Weighted average UW NOI Debt Yield(2)(7) | 11.8% |
Percentage of Initial Pool Balance consisting of: | |
Interest-Only Balloon | 96.3% |
Full-Term Amortizing Balloon | 3.7% |
| (1) | Subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%. |
| (2) | With respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the related Pari Passu Companion Loan (but not any related Subordinate Companion Loan) are included for the purposes of calculating the Mortgage Rate, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date LTV Ratio, UW NCF DSCR and UW NOI Debt Yield unless otherwise expressly stated. Other than as specifically noted, the Mortgage Rate, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date LTV Ratio, UW NCF DSCR and UW NOI Debt Yield information for each Mortgage Loan is presented in this prospectus without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related Mortgaged Property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future, in order to present statistics for the related Mortgage Loan without combination with the other indebtedness. |
| (3) | Does not include Mortgage Loans that pay interest-only until their maturity dates. |
| (4) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value (which in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation). With respect to two (2) Mortgage Loans (3.7%), the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated based upon a valuation other than an “as-is” value of each related Mortgaged Property. The weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making any adjustments is 58.8%. |
| (5) | With respect to two (2) Mortgage Loans (3.7%), the respective Maturity Date LTV Ratios were calculated using a value other than “as-is” value of each related Mortgaged Property. The weighted average Maturity Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making such adjustments is 58.6%. |
| (6) | Unless otherwise indicated, the UW NCF DSCR is generally calculated using the average of the principal and interest payments for the first twelve payment periods of the mortgage loan following the cut-off date; provided that (i) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for interest-only payments through maturity, such items are calculated based on the interest payments scheduled to be due on the first due date following the cut-off date and the 11 due dates thereafter for such mortgage loan and (ii) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for an initial interest-only period that ends prior to maturity and provides for scheduled amortization payments thereafter, such items are calculated based on the monthly payment of principal and interest payable immediately following the expiration of the interest-only period. |
| (7) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI for each Mortgage Loan is the related Mortgaged Property’s Underwritten NOI divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of such Mortgage Loan. |
The issuing entity will include ten (10) Mortgage Loans (49.0%) that represent the obligations of multiple borrowers that are liable on a joint and several basis for the repayment of the entire indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Loan and/or represent separate obligations of each borrower that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other.
See also “—Certain Calculations and Definitions” above for important general and specific information regarding the manner of calculation of the underwritten debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. See also “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” below for important information relating to certain payment and other terms of the Mortgage Loans.
Property Types
The table below shows the property type concentrations of the Mortgaged Properties:
Property Type Distribution(1)
Property Types | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance(1) | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Retail | 7 | $223,639,000 | | 25.1 | % |
Super Regional Mall | 2 | 114,000,000 | | 12.8 | |
Anchored | 3 | 94,000,000 | | 10.5 | |
Unanchored | 2 | 15,639,000 | | 1.8 | |
Multifamily | 12 | $213,333,000 | | 23.9 | % |
Garden | 8 | 164,250,000 | | 18.4 | |
Student Housing | 1 | 33,000,000 | | 3.7 | |
Low Rise | 1 | 9,500,000 | | 1.1 | |
Mid Rise | 2 | 6,583,000 | | 0.7 | |
Mixed Use | 8 | $112,678,000 | | 12.6 | % |
Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage | 1 | 45,000,000 | | 5.0 | |
Multifamily/Retail | 5 | 32,917,000 | | 3.7 | |
Multifamily/Office/Retail | 1 | 32,200,000 | | 3.6 | |
Retail/Office | 1 | 2,561,000 | | 0.3 | |
Industrial | 6 | $106,200,000 | | 11.9 | % |
Warehouse/Distribution | 4 | 76,200,000 | | 8.5 | |
Warehouse | 2 | 30,000,000 | | 3.4 | |
Hospitality | 6 | $77,566,230 | | 8.7 | % |
Limited Service | 6 | 77,566,230 | | 8.7 | |
Manufactured Housing | 18 | $67,490,000 | | 7.6 | % |
Manufactured Housing | 18 | 67,490,000 | | 7.6 | |
Office | 3 | $66,000,000 | | 7.4 | % |
Suburban | 2 | 61,000,000 | | 6.8 | |
CBD | 1 | 5,000,000 | | 0.6 | |
Self Storage | 14 | $25,210,000 | | 2.8 | % |
Self Storage | 14 | 25,210,000 | | 2.8 | |
Total | 74 | $892,116,230 | | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not Mortgage Loans, the information for Mortgage Loans secured by more than one Mortgaged Property is based on allocated loan amounts as set forth on Annex A-1. |
Retail Properties
With respect to the retail properties and mixed use properties with retail components set forth in the above chart, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” and “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below.
Multifamily Properties
With respect to the multifamily properties and mixed use properties with multifamily components set forth in the above chart:
| ● | With respect to the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan (5.7%), approximately 27 out of 51 multifamily units at the 155 East 55th Street Mortgaged Property and 54 out of 95 multifamily units at the 210 East 58th Street Mortgaged Property are rent stabilized. Any increases in rent for such units are subject to applicable rent control and rent stabilization laws and regulations. |
| ● | With respect to the 48 West Mortgage Loan (3.7%), the related borrower has master leased 198 total bed spaces within 52 units at the Mortgaged Property to the Grand Valley State University (“GVSU”) to be occupied by GVSU students, affiliated faculty and/or staff for a term commencing on July 1, 2024 and ending on July 31, 2025. In addition, the remaining units at the Mortgaged Property are generally leased to students pursuant to leases that are generally for a term of 12 months and are on a per-bedroom basis. |
| ● | With respect to the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (3.7%), the related borrower sponsor or its affiliates own other multifamily properties within the related market that may compete with the Mortgaged Property. |
| ● | With respect to the Centric on 34th Mortgage Loan (2.0%), 15 units (12.5% of units) at the related Mortgaged Property are individually leased to Onyx Corporate Housing, which leases the units to local hospitals and businesses. |
| ● | With respect to the DH Holmes Mortgage Loan (1.1%), 21 of the 97 units at the Mortgaged Property (21.6% of total units) are occupied by tenants receiving Section 8 vouchers. If such tenants fail to receive the Section 8 subsidies or other government assistance program rental subsidies, it could result in delinquent rent payments and/or reduced occupancy rates at the Mortgaged Property. |
| ● | With respect to the 287-289 Maple Street Mortgage Loan (0.5%), all of the units at the Mortgaged Property are rent stabilized in connection with the Mortgaged Property’s compliance with a 421a tax exemption as described under “—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations”. In addition, five of the 13 units at the Mortgaged Property are affordable units, which are restricted to tenants with incomes at or below 130% of the area median income and are subject to additional rent restrictions. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks”.
Mixed Use Properties
With respect to the mixed-used properties set forth in the above chart, the mixed use Mortgaged Properties have one or more office, retail, multifamily and/or industrial components:
| ● | With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), 31 residential units at the related Mortgaged Properties are rent-stabilized and two residential units at such Mortgaged Properties are rent controlled. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Industrial Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Office Properties Have Special Risks”, as applicable.
Certain of the mixed use Mortgaged Properties may have specialty uses. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”.
Industrial Properties
With respect to the industrial properties and mixed use properties with industrial components set forth in the above chart:
| ● | With respect to the Columbus Business Park Mortgage Loan (2.6%), according to the related appraisal, the second floor of the Mortgaged Property, which contains approximately 1,546,217 square feet, is typically only usable by tenants occupying the first floor with an access ramp connecting the two floors, but is otherwise considered unleasable to standalone tenants because of limited access to the interior ramps and freight elevators and no direct truck dock access. The related appraisal report indicates that the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, Ford Motor Company, which currently leases approximately 909,287 square feet on the first floor of the Mortgaged Property, representing approximately 41.6% of the net rentable area, has an unsigned letter of intent to lease approximately 198,946 square feet on the second floor of the Mortgaged Property, which is underwritten as vacant rentable area and would represent approximately 9.1% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property. The remaining 1,347,271 square feet of space on the second floor was not included in the underwritten net rentable area. |
| ● | With respect to the 22 North 15th Street Mortgage Loan (1.3%), the Mortgaged Property has a rooftop billboard which is leased to Heritage Outdoor Media LLC pursuant to a lease agreement with a 16-year term through December 31, 2035. The billboard lease accounts for 16.5% of the Underwritten Net Operating Income of the Mortgaged Property. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Industrial Properties Have Special Risks”.
Hospitality Properties
With respect to the hospitality properties set forth in the above chart:
| ● | The following table shows the breakdown of each Mortgaged Property associated with a hotel brand through a license, franchise agreement, operating agreement or management agreement. If terminated, securing a new franchise license may require significant capital investment for renovations and upgrades necessary to satisfy a franchisor’s requirements. |
Mortgaged Property Name | Allocated Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Percentage (%) of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Expiration of Related License, Franchise Agreement, Operating Agreement or Management Agreement | Maturity Date of the related Mortgage Loan |
Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | $20,200,000 | | 2.3% | 5/31/2038 | 8/6/2029 |
Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | $13,130,000 | | 1.5% | 5/31/2038 | 8/6/2029 |
SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | $12,120,000 | | 1.4% | 11/19/2045 | 8/6/2029 |
Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | $12,120,000 | | 1.4% | 1/31/2039 | 8/6/2029 |
Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | $11,600,000 | | 1.3% | 5/31/2038 | 8/6/2029 |
Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn(1) | $8,396,230 | | 0.9% | 6/30/2039 | 7/6/2029 |
(1) See “—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion” below.
| ● | In each case described above, we cannot assure you the related franchise or management agreement will be renewed or will not be terminated. |
| ● | With respect to the Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe Mortgage Loan (2.3%), the appraisal identified (x) the Holiday Inn Express & Suites Charlotte hotel and (y) the Tru by Hilton Charlotte Tyvola I-77 hotel each under construction within five miles of the Hampton Inn Tru Charlotte Airport Mortgaged Property, which, as of the appraisal date, were anticipated to be completed or recently opened in September 2024 and May 2024, respectively, and are both expected to directly compete with the Hampton Inn Tru Charlotte Airport Mortgaged Property. |
| ● | With respect to the SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center Mortgage Loan (1.4%), the appraisal identified (x) the Element by Westin Charleston Airport hotel and (y) the Drury Plaza Hotel North Charleston each under construction within five miles of the SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center Mortgaged Property, which, as of the appraisal date, were anticipated to be completed in March 2025, and are both expected to partially compete with the SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center Mortgaged Property. |
Renovations, replacements and other work is ongoing at certain of the hospitality properties in connection with, among other things, franchise agreement and franchisor program requirements. See “—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion” below.
Certain of the hospitality Mortgaged Properties may have a parking garage or include restaurants (either as part of the hotel or as tenants). These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company” and “—Hospitality Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”.
Manufactured Housing Community Properties
With respect to the manufactured housing community properties set forth in the above chart:
| ● | With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), which is secured by 29 Mortgaged Properties, of which 18 are manufactured housing properties, approximately 242 of the 2,605 manufactured housing pads at the Mortgaged Properties are occupied by manufactured homes (the “Owned Mobile Homes”) that are owned by an affiliate of the borrower (the “Churchill Master Tenant”). The borrower leases the pads occupied by the Owned Mobile Homes to the Churchill Master Tenant under a master lease (the “Churchill Master Lease”) and the Churchill Master Tenant leases the Owned Mobile Homes to the occupants of such Owned Mobile Homes. The Churchill Master Lease provides that it is in place until the indefeasible payment in full of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the Churchill Master Lease, the Churchill Master Tenant pays the borrower (i) $578 per month for each pad on which an Owned Mobile Home is located and (ii) all income actually received by the Churchill Master Tenant from the Owned Mobile Homes. Pursuant to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the Churchill Master Tenant is permitted to acquire new manufactured housing units provided that (i) such Owned Mobile Homes do not exceed 25% of all manufactured housing units on the Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties (in the aggregate) and (ii) such additional Owned Mobile Homes are at all times located on pads that are subject to the Churchill Master Lease. The Churchill Master Tenant may sell Owned Mobile Homes to a third party resident meeting the borrower's resident leasing criteria who enters into a pad lease with the borrower at its then market rental rate (in which case such manufactured housing unit will no longer be subject to the Churchill Master Lease). Income from the Churchill Master Lease with respect to pad rent constitutes approximately 10.7% of underwritten base rent and approximately 10.1% of underwritten effective gross income, and income from the Churchill Master Lease with respect to rental of Owned Mobile Homes constitutes approximately 3.4% of underwritten effective gross income. The Churchill Master Lease provides that it is subordinate to the Mortgage Loan; provided that, unless otherwise elected by the lender, the Churchill Master Lease will stay in place following a foreclosure, and the lessor will attorn to the new owner of the Mortgaged Properties. The obligations of the Churchill Master Tenant under the Churchill Master Lease are guaranteed by the individual who is the non-recourse guarantor under the related Mortgage Loan. However, if the issuing entity takes title to the Mortgaged Properties, we cannot assure you that the Churchill Master Tenant, or such guarantor, will have the resources to, or will, perform its obligations under the Churchill Master Lease or such guaranty. Because the Owned Mobile Homes are not collateral for the Mortgage Loan, in the event that the Churchill Master Tenant, and its lease guarantor, did not perform their obligations under the Churchill Master Lease following the issuing entity taking title to the Mortgaged Property, the issuing entity would have no right to take possession of, to lease out, or to receive rental income from, the Owned Mobile Homes. In addition, the existence of the Churchill Master Lease, and the related lease guaranty, may increase the risk of consolidation of the borrower with the guarantor or the Churchill Master Tenant in a bankruptcy of the guarantor or Churchill Master Tenant. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Manufactured Housing Community Properties Have Special Risks”.
Office Properties
With respect to the office properties and mixed use properties with office components set forth in the above chart:
| ● | With respect to the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan (6.4%), the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, ManTech (representing approximately 43.6% of the net rentable area), is a cyber security and defense contracting firm that works primarily with major government agencies, including the Marine Corps, and their space is configured to be in compliance with the latest 2023 USMC Access Control and Screening protocol. In addition, ManTech occupies 72,500 of the 82,500 square feet of Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (“SCIF”) space at the Mortgaged Property, which conforms to ICD 705, enabling the uniform use across all government agencies and contractors. ICD 705 refers to the Intelligence Community Directive 705 which provides the physical and technical security standards for SCIFs. |
| ● | With respect to the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%), the second largest tenant, Morris James LLP, leasing approximately 18.5% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has notified the borrower that it does not intend to renew its related lease (which expires on May 31, 2026). The Mortgage Loan has entered into a lease sweep period in connection with such non-renewal, pursuant to which any excess cash will be swept into a lease sweep reserve account for qualified leasing expenses until, among other conditions, a qualified lease with a replacement tenant satisfying the conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents is executed. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Office Properties Have Special Risks”, “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” and “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below.
Self-Storage Properties
With respect to the self-storage properties set forth in the above chart:
| ● | Certain of the self-storage Mortgaged Properties also derive a portion of the Underwritten Revenue from one or more of (a) rent derived from retail or office operations and/or (b) the leasing of certain parking spaces located at the related Mortgaged Properties for purposes of recreational vehicle, other vehicle and/or boat storage. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Self-Storage Properties Have Special Risks”.
Specialty Use Concentrations
Certain Mortgaged Properties have one of the 5 largest tenants that operates its space as a specialty use that may not allow the space to be readily converted to be suitable for another type of tenant, as set forth in the following table.
Specialty Use | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Restaurant | 4 | 15.0% |
Medical, Dental, Physical Therapy or Veterinary Offices or Clinics, Outpatient Facilities, Research or Diagnostic Laboratories or Health Management Services and/or Health Professional Schools | 3 | 10.7% |
Entertainment Center | 1 | 9.98% |
Theater | 1 | 9.98% |
Grocery Store | 2 | 3.9% |
Gym, Fitness Center or Health Club | 1 | 3.2% |
Bank Branch | 1 | 1.1% |
Each of The Plaza at Milford and the 22 North 15th Mortgaged Properties (collectively, 4.5%) includes one or more tenants that operate all or a portion of its space as an on-site gas station and/or an automobile repair and servicing facility.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”.
Mortgage Loan Concentrations
Top 10 Mortgage Loans
The following table shows certain information regarding the 10 largest Mortgage Loans by Cut-off Date Balance:
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | Cut-off Date Balance per SF/Room/Unit (1) | UW NCF DSCR(1) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1) | Property Type |
Stonebriar Centre | $89,000,000 | | 9.98% | $232 | | 2.30x | 42.1% | Retail |
Churchill Portfolio | $85,000,000 | | 9.5% | $11,718 | | 1.82x | 51.1% | Various |
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | $75,000,000 | | 8.4% | $25 | | 1.55x | 55.8% | Various |
Quantico Corporate Center | $57,000,000 | | 6.4% | $139 | | 1.86x | 60.6% | Office |
NYC Multifamily Portfolio | $50,500,000 | | 5.7% | $345,890 | | 1.36x | 59.6% | Mixed Use |
Oasis Plaza | $45,000,000 | | 5.0% | $105 | | 1.36x | 64.3% | Mixed Use |
The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | $44,500,000 | | 5.0% | $127,874 | | 1.30x | 70.0% | Multifamily |
Towne Center at Webster | $43,000,000 | | 4.8% | $118 | | 1.27x | 66.7% | Retail |
48 West | $33,000,000 | | 3.7% | $35,870 | | 1.49x | 59.2% | Multifamily |
Liberties Walk | $33,000,000 | | 3.7% | $375,000 | | 1.53x | 60.3% | Multifamily |
Top 5 Total/Weighted Average | $356,500,000 | | 40.0% | | 1.82x | 52.6% | |
Top 10 Total/Weighted Average | $555,000,000 | | 62.2% | | 1.66x | 56.9% | |
| (1) | In the case of each of the Mortgage Loans that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of the Cut-off Date Balance Per SF/Room/Unit, UW NCF DSCR and Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for each such Mortgage Loan is calculated based on the principal balance, debt service payment and Underwritten Net Cash Flow for the Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) in the aggregate, but excludes the principal balance and debt service payment of any related Subordinate Companion Loan. |
See “—Assessments of Property Value and Condition” for additional information.
For more information regarding the ten largest Mortgage Loans and related Mortgaged Properties, see the individual Mortgage Loan and portfolio descriptions under “Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” on Annex A-3. Other than with respect to the top 10 Mortgage Loans identified in the table above, each of the other Mortgage Loans represents no more than 3.4% of the Initial Pool Balance.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses”.
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans and Related Borrower Mortgage Loans
The pool of Mortgage Loans will include six (6) Mortgage Loans (32.4%), set forth in the table below titled “Multi-Property Mortgage Loans”, which are each secured by two (2) or more properties.
The table below shows each individual Mortgage Loan that is secured by two (2) or more Mortgaged Properties.
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Loan/Property Portfolio Names | Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Churchill Portfolio | $85,000,000 | | 9.5 | % |
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 75,000,000 | | 8.4 | |
NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 50,500,000 | | 5.7 | |
The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 44,500,000 | | 5.0 | |
ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 30,000,000 | | 3.4 | |
Essential Storage Portfolio | 4,000,000 | | 0.4 | |
Total | $289,000,000 | | 32.4 | % |
In some cases, an individual Mortgaged Property may be comprised of two (2) or more parcels that may not be contiguous or may be owned by separate borrowers. For example, with respect to the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (3.7%), the related Mortgaged Property is comprised of more than one parcel.
Three (3) groups of Mortgage Loans (21.4%), set forth in the table below entitled “Related Borrower Loans”, are not cross-collateralized but have borrower sponsors related to each other, but no group of Mortgage Loans having borrower sponsors that are related to each other represents more than approximately 12.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. The following table shows each group of Mortgage Loans having borrowers that are related to each other. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses” in addition to Annex A-1.
Related Borrower Loans
Mortgage Loan | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Group 1: | | |
Stonebriar Centre | $89,000,000 | 9.9 | 8% |
Baybrook Mall | 25,000,000 | 2.8 | |
Total for Group 1: | $114,000,000 | 12.8 | % |
Group 2: | | |
Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | $20,200,000 | 2.3 | % |
Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 13,130,000 | 1.5 | |
SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 12,120,000 | 1.4 | |
Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 12,120,000 | 1.4 | |
Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 11,600,000 | 1.3 | |
Total for Group 2: | $69,170,000 | 7.8 | % |
Group 3: | | |
Essential Storage Portfolio | $4,000,000 | 0.4 | % |
Telegraph Budget Storage | 3,700,000 | 0.4 | |
Total for Group 3: | $7,700,000 | 0.9 | % |
Mortgage Loans with related borrowers are identified under “Related Group” on Annex A-1. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses” in addition to Annex A-1 and the related footnotes.
Geographic Concentrations
The following table shows the states that have concentrations of Mortgaged Properties that secure approximately 5.0% or more of the Initial Pool Balance:
Geographic Distribution(1)
State | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | % of Initial Pool Balance |
New York | 13 | $140,000,000 | 15.7 | % |
Texas | 7 | $138,690,000 | 15.5 | % |
Pennsylvania | 3 | $77,500,000 | 8.7 | % |
Virginia | 1 | $57,000,000 | 6.4 | % |
South Carolina | 5 | $52,190,000 | 5.9 | % |
Georgia | 5 | $50,086,230 | 5.6 | % |
Nevada | 1 | $45,000,000 | 5.0 | % |
| (1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not the Mortgage Loans, the information for any Mortgaged Property that is one of multiple Mortgaged Properties securing a particular Mortgage Loan is based on an allocated loan amount as stated on Annex A-1. |
The remaining Mortgaged Properties are located throughout nineteen (19) other states, with no more than approximately 4.9% of the Initial Pool Balance secured by Mortgaged Properties located in any such jurisdiction.
Repayments by borrowers and the market value of the related Mortgaged Properties could be affected by economic conditions generally or specific to particular geographic areas or the regions of the United States, and concentrations of Mortgaged Properties in particular geographic areas may increase the risk that conditions in the real estate market where the Mortgaged Property is located, or other adverse economic or other developments or natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, forest fires, tornadoes or hurricanes, terrorist attacks or changes in governmental rules or fiscal policies) affecting a particular region of the country, could increase the frequency and severity of losses on Mortgage Loans secured by those Mortgaged Properties. For example:
| ● | Mortgaged Properties located in Texas are more susceptible to certain hazards (such as earthquakes and/or wildfires) than properties in other parts of the country. |
| ● | Mortgaged Properties located in coastal states, which include Mortgaged Properties located in, for example, New York, Texas, Florida and Louisiana, among others, also may be more generally susceptible to floods or hurricanes than properties in other parts of the country. Hurricanes in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States and in the Gulf Coast region, have resulted in severe property damage as a result of the winds and the associated flooding. The Mortgage Loans do not require flood insurance on the related Mortgaged Properties unless they are in a flood zone and flood insurance is available. We cannot assure you that any hurricane damage would be covered by insurance. |
| ● | Mortgaged Properties located in an area covering the states that stretch from Texas to Canada, with its core centered in northern Texas, as well as in the southern United States, are prone to tornados. |
| ● | In addition, certain of the Mortgaged Properties are located in cities or states that are currently facing or may face a depressed real estate market, which is not due to any natural disaster but which may cause an overall decline in property values. |
| ● | Five (5) Mortgaged Properties (6.2%) are located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 or 4), and seismic reports were prepared with respect to these Mortgaged Properties, and based on those reports, no Mortgaged Property has a seismic expected loss greater than 16%. |
Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History
One of the mortgaged properties (3.4%) was constructed, in a lease-up period or was the subject of a major renovation that was completed within 12 calendar months prior to the cut-off date and, therefore, the related mortgaged property has no or limited prior operating history or the related mortgage loan seller did not take the operating history into account in the underwriting of the related mortgage loan.
Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership
Each of the Viera at Whitemarsh Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the Columbus Business Park Mortgage Loan (2.6%) and the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%) has one or more borrowers that own all or a portion of the related Mortgaged Property as tenants-in-common, and the respective tenants-in-common have agreed to a waiver of their rights of partition.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “—Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery”.
Condominium Interests and Other Shared Interests
Each of the Columbus Business Park Mortgage Loan (2.6%) and the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%) is secured, in part, by the related borrower’s interest in one or more units in a condominium. With respect to all such Mortgage Loans (other than as described below), the borrower generally controls the appointment and voting of the condominium board or the condominium owners cannot take actions or cause the condominium association to take actions that would affect the borrower’s unit without the borrower’s consent.
| ● | With respect to the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%), the Mortgaged Property constitutes 17 retail condominium units out of 453 overall units in a combined multifamily and commercial condominium comprised of a six story residential building with ground floor retail, a seventeen story residential building and an attached parking garage. The borrower has the right to appoint one of five condominium board members and has a 3.75276% overall interest in the condominium. Accordingly, the borrower does not control the condominium. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements”.
Fee & Leasehold Estates; Ground Leases
The table below shows the distribution of underlying interests encumbered by the mortgages related to the Mortgaged Properties:
Property Ownership Interest(1)
Property Ownership Interest | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Fee Simple(2) | 72 | $876,486,230 | 98.2 | % |
Leasehold | 1 | 9,500,000 | 1.1 | |
Fee / Leasehold | 1 | 6,130,000 | 0.7 | |
Total | 74 | $892,116,230 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not Mortgage Loans, the information for Mortgage Loans secured by more than one Mortgaged Property is based on allocated loan amounts as set forth on Annex A-1. |
| (2) | For purposes of this prospectus, an encumbered interest will be characterized as “fee” or “fee simple” and not a leasehold interest if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the Mortgaged Property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the Mortgaged Property, such portion is not, individually or in the aggregate, material to the use or operation of the Mortgaged Property), or (ii) the Mortgage Loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the Mortgaged Property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related Mortgaged Property. |
In general, unless the related fee interest is also encumbered by the related Mortgage, each of the ground leases, except as noted below or in the exceptions, if any, to representation and warranty number 34 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 34 on Annex E-1 located on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, (i) has a term that extends at least 20 years beyond the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan (taking into account all freely exercisable options) and (ii) contains customary mortgagee protection provisions, including notice and cure rights and the right to enter into a new lease with the applicable ground lessor in the event a ground lease is rejected or terminated.
With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), the Canby Regency Mortgaged Property (0.7%) is a manufactured housing property as to which the manufactured homes are located on land owned in fee by the borrower. However, a portion of the Canby Regency Mortgaged Property, which is used for a water well and pump infrastructure that provides water to the manufactured housing community, is a ground leasehold interest under a ground lease that expires on December 31, 2033, with no extension options. The ground lease provides for annual ground rent of approximately $22,924 and increases annually by 5% on January 1 of each year. Such ground lease does not have any of the following customary leasehold lender protections: lender rights to consent to amendments, lender rights to receive notices of default by the ground lessee, lender cure rights, lender rights to obtain a new ground lease following a termination of the ground lease, and lender rights with respect to casualty and condemnation proceeds.
With respect to the DH Holmes Mortgage Loan (1.1%), the Mortgaged Property is subject to: (i) that certain Eighth Amendment and Restatement of Apartments Lease Agreement, dated October 10, 2014, effective January 1, 2014, between New Orleans Building Corporation (“NOBC”), as lessor, and the related borrower, as lessee (the “Apartments Ground Lease”), (ii) that certain First Amendment and Restatement of Apartments Parking Lease Agreement, dated March 30, 1994, between NOBC, as lessor, and the related borrower, as lessee (the “Parking Sublease”) and (iii) that certain Third Amendment and Restatement of Lease Agreement, dated September 25, 1989, between Mercier Realty & Investment Company, as lessor, and NOBC, as lessee (the “Mercier Parking Lease”). Under the Apartments Ground Lease, the ground lessor has the right to amend, modify and terminate the ground lease without lender’s consent in the event a default by the related borrower beyond any applicable cure period under the Apartments Ground Lease has occurred and the lender has not cured such default. With respect to the Parking Sublease, an amendment, modification or termination of such lease without the lender’s consent will trigger full recourse, and with respect to the Mercier Parking Lease, a termination of such lease without lender’s consent will trigger loss recourse. In addition, Parking Sublease and the Mercier Ground Lease do not extend the cure period in order to acquire the applicable leasehold estate. With respect to the Mercier Parking Lease, the ground lease contains a new lease provision, but such provision does not include the broad right to a new lease for any termination of the Mercier Parking Lease or any specific language regarding rejection of the Mercier Parking Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding.
Mortgage loans secured by ground leases present certain bankruptcy and foreclosure risks not present with Mortgage Loans secured by fee simple estates. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests”, “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Environmental Considerations
An environmental report was prepared for each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan no more than six (6) months prior to the Cut-off Date (except the environmental report for the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%), which was prepared 28 months prior to the Cut-off Date). See Annex A-1 for the date of the environmental report for each Mortgaged Property. The environmental reports were generally prepared pursuant to the American Society for Testing and Materials standard for a “Phase I” environmental site assessment (the “ESA”). In addition to the Phase I standards, some of the environmental reports will include additional research, such as limited sampling for asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, radon or water damage with limited areas of potential or identified mold, and
such ESAs may have recommended continuing implementation of an operations and maintenance plan and, in some cases, minor abatements, additional testing and/or remediation depending on the property use and/or age. For some of the mortgaged real properties, the related ESAs may have noted that onsite underground storage tanks or leaking underground storage tanks previously had been removed or closed in place or other types of potential or actual spills or releases may have occurred, and based on criteria such as experience with past investigations, cleanups or other response actions, the quantities or types of hazardous materials involved, the absence of significant risk, tank test results or other records, and/or other circumstances including regulatory closure, the ESAs did not recommend any further investigation or other action. In some such cases, even where regulatory closure was documented for past incidents the ESAs may have reported that requests to governmental agencies for any related files are pending. However, those ESAs nevertheless concluded that such incidents were not likely to be significant at the time they were prepared. Additionally, as needed pursuant to American Society for Testing and Materials standards, supplemental “Phase II” site investigations have been completed for some Mortgaged Properties to further evaluate certain environmental issues, including certain recognized environmental conditions (each, a “REC”). A Phase II investigation generally consists of sampling and/or testing.
With respect to the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (8.4%), RECs were identified at two of the related Mortgaged Properties, as follows:
| ● | With respect to the Space Centre Industrial Park Mortgaged Property (2.0%), the Phase I ESA identifies as a REC for the Mortgaged Property oil staining at the base of a pad-mounted transformer near the northeast corner of the 3051-3133 Tranquility Drive address at the Mortgaged Property that had been newly installed by the utility company. The Phase I ESA consultant believed the staining was likely the result of the failure of the previous transformer at the same location and had not been addressed by the utility company during replacement with the new transformer. Given that the party responsible for the transformer appears to be the utility company, the Phase I ESA consultant did not recommend any further investigation; however, the consultant did recommend contacting the utility company to inspect the transformer and associated staining and to conduct any necessary cleanup. The Phase I ESA also notes that the Mortgaged Property is equipped with four aboveground storage tanks (“ASTs”) that are utilized for fueling operations and that are located on bare ground, but that are not provided with secondary containment. No releases were identified associated with these ASTs, but the consultant recommended installing secondary containment beneath the ASTs to contain any potential, future releases. The borrower is required under the Mortgage Loan documents (i) to provide evidence, or cause the applicable utility company to provide evidence, within 90 days of origination of the Mortgage Loan, that the transformer leak has been abated and cleared in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, provided that the lender may extend such deadline if the borrower is diligently pursuing completion of the same and (ii) to provide evidence within six months of origination that the borrower has installed secondary containment around the ASTs identified above in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. |
| ● | With respect to the 8800 Rostin Road Mortgaged Property (1.8%), the Phase I ESA identifies as a REC for the Mortgaged Property groundwater impacted by total petroleum hydrocarbons on the western adjoining property. The western adjoining property has been enrolled in the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) Voluntary Evaluation Program (“VEP”) with “MG88 Memphis Distribution LLC” identified as the potentially responsible party, and evaluation of the property is ongoing. Files requested from the MDEQ by the Phase I ESA consultant to determine whether impacted groundwater at the adjoining property may be affecting the Mortgaged Property had not been received as of the date of the Phase I ESA. However, given that a responsible party has been identified, that the adjoining property is under regulatory oversight within the VEP, that the presumed source of impact on the adjoining property is situated nearly 1,000 feet west of the Mortgaged Property, and that the groundwater flow has been measured to flow toward the south (and not toward the Mortgaged Property), the Phase I ESA consultant concluded that no additional investigation of the Mortgaged Property was warranted. |
At origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the borrower obtained a Pollution Legal Liability Plus (“PLLP”) insurance policy issued by Sirius Point, with the lender and its successors and assigns, as their interests may appear, as the named insured. The PLLP, which has a term of eight years, includes a limit of liability of $6.5 million (per claim and in the aggregate) and a $25,000 self-insured retention.
With respect to the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan (5.0%), the related ESA identified a controlled recognized environmental condition (“CREC”) at the Mortgaged Property in connection with historic dry cleaning operations that led to a release of chlorinated solvents into the soil and groundwater in February 1997. Thereafter, one monitoring well was installed immediately adjacent to and downgradient of the former dry cleaner tenant’s space. Eight monitoring events were conducted between 1997 and June 2003 that identified tetrachloroethylene in groundwater at concentrations that exceed the existing groundwater standards. Based upon the information reviewed, including the absence of groundwater production wells at or within 2,000 feet downgradient of the Mortgaged Property, the decommissioning of the dry cleaner facility and the expectation that the Mortgaged Property would remain office/warehouse use, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection issued regulatory closure. Based upon the regulatory closure and the expectation that the Mortgaged Property will be used for office/warehouse use, the former drycleaner tenant and the associated release case are considered to be a CREC and the ESA recommends no further action.
With respect to the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (3.7%), the related Phase I ESA identified a CREC at the Mortgaged Property in connection with residual soil and groundwater impacts, including concentrations of arsenic, chromium VI, pentachlorophenol, benzene, trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in excess of regulatory standards, resulting from prior tannery operations (including releases related to a former underground storage tank (“UST”)) at the Mortgaged Property. According to the ESA, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (the “PADEP”) declared the applicable portion of the Mortgaged Property a Special Industrial Area (“SIA”). Pursuant to a SIA agreement with the PADEP, dated November 26, 2002, natural attenuation of the contaminants at the Mortgaged Property is permitted subject to certain engineering controls, including a restriction on excavation deeper than eight feet below the ground surface to install a basement and a deed restriction requiring the owner of the Mortgaged Property to notify the PADEP of construction activities being completed so that the PADEP might evaluate remedial actions, if desired.
With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), RECs were identified at four of the related Mortgaged Properties, as follows:
| ● | With respect to the 670 9th Avenue Mortgaged Property (0.5%), the Phase I ESA identifies as a REC for the Mortgaged Property volatile organic compound (“VOC”) impacts identified in soil gas samples collected during a 2023 limited subsurface investigation, which appear to be associated with a dry-cleaning facility historically located onsite. These VOC impacts were identified as exceeding applicable screening thresholds in one sample, although they do not appear to have been reported to any regulatory authority. Indoor air was not tested during the 2023 investigation. Given the impacts to soil vapor historically documented at the Mortgaged Property, the Phase I ESA consultant recommended that a limited subsurface investigation be conducted at the Mortgaged Property to further assess these impacts and any conditions associated with them. The consultant estimated the cost to conduct such an investigation and to remediate any concerns identified, including installing a vapor mitigation system to address any vapor intrusion concerns, to be $150,200 to $255,500. |
| ● | With respect to the 228 East 51st Street Mortgaged Property (0.4%), the Phase I ESA identifies as RECs for the Mortgaged Property (i) its historic use as a “dyeing and cleaning” facility from at least 1927 through approximately 1950 and (ii) the presence of a concrete-sealed fill port embedded in the sidewalk at the front of the building along East 51st Street, which suggests the former use of a fuel oil storage tank at the Mortgaged Property. In relation to the historic dyeing and cleaning operations, no documentation was available concerning hazardous substance use, storage, or disposal. Similarly, no documentation was available |
concerning the presence of any former fuel oil storage tank (although there were records available approving installation of fuel oil at the Mortgaged Property), including documentation identifying whether fuel oil may have been stored in an aboveground tank or an UST or whether any fuel oil tank had ever been closed or removed from the Mortgaged Property. The Phase I ESA consultant recommended conducting a geophysical survey to determine whether there may be a UST on site. Should a UST be located, the consultant recommended a subsurface investigation to evaluate the potential environmental impact of the tank. A subsurface investigation was also recommended to evaluate any impact to the Mortgaged Property from the historical onsite dyeing and cleaning operations. The Phase I ESA consultant estimated the cost to conduct a geophysical survey, any subsurface investigations and any remediations, including closing and/or removing any UST and installing a vapor mitigation system to address any vapor intrusion concerns, to be $133,400 to $245,200.
| ● | With respect to the 49 West 71st Street Mortgaged Property (0.3%), the Phase I ESA identifies as a REC for the Mortgaged Property an approximately 1,000-gallon fuel oil storage tank, the age of which was not known, located in the basement of the Mortgaged Property. The tank is identified as currently operational and is reportedly used to fire the existing boiler. While no evidence of release was observed by the Phase I ESA consultant in the vicinity of the tank, the tank itself was enclosed within a concrete block vault making observation of the tank, as well as any visual monitoring for leaks, difficult; and thus, the possibility of a release from the tank could not be ruled out. Accordingly, the Phase I ESA consultant recommended that a tank tightness test be performed on the heating oil storage tank to assess the tank integrity. The consultant estimated the cost of a tank tightness test and any investigation required based on the results of such a tightness test to identify any historic release, plus tank removal and replacement, to be $84,000 to $158,000. |
| ● | With respect to the 289 East 149th Street Mortgaged Property (0.3%), the Phase I ESA identifies as a REC for the Mortgaged Property the presence of a concrete-sealed fill port embedded in the sidewalk at the front of the building along East 149th Street, which suggests the former use of a fuel oil storage tank at the Mortgaged Property. While records reviewed confirm the installation of a fuel oil tank in 1942, no information was available identifying the tank as an aboveground tank or an UST. Further, no documentation was available regarding closure or removal of any former fuel oil storage tank from the Mortgaged Property. The Phase I ESA consultant recommended conducting a geophysical survey to determine whether there may be a UST located onsite. Should a UST be identified, the consultant recommended a subsurface investigation to evaluate the potential environmental impact of such tank. The Phase I ESA consultant estimated the cost to conduct a geophysical survey, any subsurface investigation and any remediations, including closing and/or removing any UST, to be $57,000 to $120,000. |
At origination of the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan, in lieu of further subsurface and tank investigations, the borrower obtained a Premises Environmental Liability (“PEL”) insurance policy, issued by Beazley, with the lender and its successors and assigns, as their interests may appear, as the named insured. The PEL, which has a term of eight years, includes a limit of liability of $4 million (per claim and in the aggregate) and a $25,000 deductible.
With respect to the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%), an auto service station or gas station operated in the northwestern portion of the Mortgaged Property beginning in the 1950s. No gasoline tanks were identified on-site. However, five 550 gallon motor oil USTs and one 550 gallon heating oil UST were removed from the Mortgaged Property in 2005. Composite soil samples taken above tanks 2 & 3 identified petroleum impacts above state standards that were believed to be from the removal of tanks 1 & 3, which were noted to be full of motor oil at the time of removal. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (the “DNREC”) granted a conditional No Further Action letter (a “NFA”) on August 23, 2005, providing instructions for the reuse and/ or disposal of excavated soils and
providing that in case of future disturbance of site soils, a contaminated materials management plan must first be approved by the DNREC. In addition, one 1,000 gallon heating oil UST was removed in 2005. A grab sample taken during the excavation identified petroleum impacts exceeding Delaware state standards. Post excavation sampling conducted on March 1, 2006, however, did not identify impacts above regulatory standards. On April 20, 2006, the DNREC granted a conditional NFA, providing instructions for the reuse and/ or disposal of excavated soils and providing that in case of future disturbance of site soils, a contaminated materials management plan must first be approved by the DNREC. Given the removal of the former USTs and the regulatory closure subject to soils management during future disturbance, the former USTs and associated releases were identified by the related Phase I ESA as CRECs for the Mortgaged Property. The Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to promptly perform and/or observe all of the agreements and obligations required to be performed and observed by it pursuant to the August 23, 2005 and April 20, 2006 NFA, including the requirements that in the event of any future disturbance of site soils, a contaminated materials management plan must first be approved by the DNREC.
Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are properties which are currently undergoing or are expected to undergo redevelopment, renovation or expansion, including with respect to hospitality properties, executing property improvement plans (“PIPs”) required by the franchisors.
Below are descriptions of (a) certain of such Mortgaged Properties that are undergoing (or are required or expected to undergo) redevelopment, expansion and/or renovation where the approximate estimated cost thereof is equal to or greater than the lesser of $1,000,000 and 10% of the related Mortgage Loan’s principal balance and (b) certain of such Mortgaged Properties that are subject to material PIPs:
| ● | With respect to the Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn Mortgage Loan (0.9%), as of March 2024, the Mortgaged Property reported an “Unacceptable” quality assurance score based on Hilton's Brand Compliance Report, which refers to the Mortgaged Property's lack of compliance with brand standards and the overall condition of the Mortgaged Property. At origination, the borrower escrowed $1,600,000 into a PIP reserve for a change-of-ownership required PIP. The PIP is expected to include, among other things, the replacement of case and soft goods throughout the guestrooms, guest bathrooms, lobby and common areas. |
Certain risks related to redevelopment, renovation and expansion at a Mortgaged Property are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties”.
Assessments of Property Value and Condition
Appraisals
For each Mortgaged Property, the related mortgage loan seller or other originator obtained a current (within four (4) months of the origination date of the Mortgage Loan, except with respect to the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%), as to which the date set forth in the appraisal is March 3, 2022) full narrative appraisal conforming at least to the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”). See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”.
Engineering Reports
In connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan included in the trust, other than as identified below, the related mortgage loan seller or other originator obtained an engineering report with respect to the related Mortgaged Property with an engineering report dated within six (6) months of the Cut-off Date (except the engineering report for the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%) which was prepared 29 months prior to the Cut-off Date). See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance and Condemnation
In connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan included in the trust, the related mortgage loan seller or other originator generally examined whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral was in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property.
In addition, certain Mortgaged Properties may be legal non-conforming uses that may be restricted after certain events, such as casualties, at the Mortgaged Properties. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” and see representation and warranty number 24 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 24 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Litigation and Other Considerations
There may be pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or other past or present criminal or adverse regulatory circumstances experienced by, the borrowers, the borrower sponsors and managers of the Mortgaged Properties and their respective affiliates arising out of the ordinary business of the borrowers, their sponsors, managers and affiliates. In addition, the Mortgaged Properties may be subject to ongoing litigation or condemnation proceedings.
With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), the related borrower sponsor’s husband pleaded guilty to obstructing a 2000 IRS audit of the Mortgaged Properties by falsifying documents and was sentenced to 15 months in federal prison and ordered to pay $128,000 in back taxes and a $5,000 fine. The related borrower sponsor’s husband owns 49% of the related borrower’s parent entity, with the borrower sponsor owning the remaining 51%.
With respect to the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan (4.8%), in 2016 two of the five co-founders and then-direct owners of the related borrower, Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi, were found guilty in the Ciminelli case at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and/or making a false statement (i.e., by declaring his innocence of the charges) to state actors. The Ciminelli case centered around a request for proposal process for pre-approving “preferred developers” (the “RFP”), which preferred developers would then be eligible to bid on potential future projects in connection with a New York State public/private economic development program. The conviction was based on the fact that Mr. Aiello and Mr. Gerardi had advanced knowledge of / influence over the selection criteria for preferred developers prior to such RFP being made available to other prospective parties. In the related Percoco case, also at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Mr. Aiello was also separately found guilty of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud with respect to Joseph Percoco, a then private citizen and former aide to the governor of New York, to influence a state agency to drop certain requirements for a real estate development project. These judgments were initially upheld upon appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “2nd Circuit”), however, in May 2023 the Supreme Court of the United States (the “Supreme Court”) granted the Defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari for both cases and thereafter reversed and remanded the cases back to the Second Circuit, each case receiving 9-0 decisions. In so doing, the Supreme Court held in part that the legal argument upon which the Ciminelli indictments were brought cannot be the basis for a conviction under the applicable federal wire fraud statutes. Upon remand the cases remain pending before the 2nd Circuit and, although the United States Attorney has issued a letter to the court that it does not intend to retry Mr. Aiello in the Percoco case (the related charges against Mr. Percoco himself were vacated), it remains undetermined whether the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York will retry Mr. Aiello or Mr. Gerardi on any of the related criminal counts, under a different legal theory to the extent such exists. The related Mortgage Loan documents provide that if either Mr. Aiello or Mr. Gerardi is re-indicted or separately indicted related to these matters, in place cash management will be triggered and should either thereafter be found guilty of a felony in connection with either case, the Mortgage Loan documents further permit the lender to terminate the affiliated property manager. Neither Mr. Aiello nor Mr. Gerardi is a borrower sponsor or guarantor under the Mortgage Loan documents and in 2018 the 20% interest in the borrower then held by each was transferred into a separate trust related to which their respective spouses have authority, and as to which such trusts have limited voting rights with respect to certain major decisions, but otherwise exercise no control over the activities of the borrower. We cannot assure you that the foregoing litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the related Mortgaged Property, the related borrower or the related guarantors.
With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the borrower sponsor and nonrecourse carveout guarantor, Son (Sonny) Dinh Tran, owns multiple nail salon businesses and other real estate. Mr. Tran’s businesses and properties are subject to various landlord/tenant, labor/compensation, negligence, and other judgments/disputes. In addition, affiliates of the borrower were sued in a complaint filed in May 2024 alleging that they illegally deregulated rent stabilized apartments at four buildings owned and operated by them, and seeking monetary and injunctive relief.
With respect to the Union Point Apartments Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the related borrower sponsor is the subject of litigation involving a prior potential business partner. The plaintiff filed a complaint against the related borrower sponsor in February 2024 for breach of contract, seeking damages in the amount of $5,000,000 for not being made partner and thus not being able to share profits in connection with an investment opportunity for an office property in Hartford, Connecticut that the related borrower sponsor acquired in 2019. At origination of the Mortgage Loan, the related borrower sponsor had not yet received formal notice of said complaint.
With respect to the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%), there is ongoing litigation against one of the related borrower sponsors, Joshua Goldberg, in his personal capacity, in connection with a foreclosure on a collateralized loan obligation (CLO) loan on an office building owned by an affiliate of Mr. Goldberg. The litigation is seeking to enforce a guaranty by Mr. Goldberg of rent due under a master lease for a borrower-affiliated co-working space at such office property. Approximately $2,550,000 in master lease rent plus other charges due and owing under the master lease, and attorneys’ fees and costs is being sought.
With respect to the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%), the related borrower sponsors are involved in active litigation with the Cité at the Bay condominium association (the “Association”) regarding the Mortgaged Property’s share of annual Association dues. The related borrower sponsors have asserted five counts in their lawsuit against the Association: (i) breach of contract, based upon the Association’s breach of the condominium declaration by failing to properly allocate and assess expenses among the residential and commercial unit owners since November 2014; (ii) violation of the Florida Condominium Act, Section 718.111, which requires the Association to comply with the Florida Condominium Act and the Association’s declaration, which the Association failed to do based upon its improper allocation of expenses with respect to the residential unit owners; (iii) accounting; (iv) injunctive relief; and (v) breach of fiduciary duty, as the Association owed a duty to the owners pursuant to Florida statutory law to act in the borrower sponsors’ best interests and allegedly failed to do so by appointing their own person to fill an Association board seat that is reserved to be filled by a nominee of the owner of the Mortgaged Property between 2014 and 2019, and in the allocations and assessments described above. A motion for summary judgment was argued in early July, and the defense introduced new information, which will prolong the decision. At origination of the Mortgage Loan, a trial date had yet to be set for the case. The related borrower sponsors claim to be owed $1.5 million in connection with the counts set forth above.
With respect to the Essential Storage Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Telegraph Budget Storage Mortgage Loan (collectively, 0.9%), two of the related guarantors, George Thacker and Lawrence Charles Kaplan, and/or certain of their affiliates, are named defendants to (i) an action filed in 2018 by a former business partner (a) alleging (1) wrongful termination from the management of certain companies, (2) suspension of distributions of any income generated by such companies and (3) that the defendants paid themselves millions of dollars in unjustified and unearned compensation, used company assets for personal profit, diverted business opportunities and improperly diluted the plaintiff’s business interests and (b) seeking damages ranging between approximately $1.2 million and $68.0 million per claim, of which approximately $15.2 million in claims remains outstanding following the dismissal in October 2020 of any claims against Mr. Kaplan and Mr. Thacker in their individual capacities, which lawsuit was fully settled in November 2023, (ii) an action filed against an entity, CSG BSH Partners III, LLC (“CSB”), in which Mr. Kaplan holds a controlling ownership interest, (a) alleging certain violations of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with an alleged failure to disclose an ownership or financial interest in certain companies related an Internal Revenue Code rollover program that CSG was advising the plaintiffs on, including (1) fraudulent misrepresentation, (2) using manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities and (3) control person responsibility and (b) seeking damages of approximately $1.3 million, which action has been stayed pending its resolution pursuant to ongoing arbitration and (iii) an action (a) alleging (1) breach of contract, (2) unjust enrichment and (3) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with Mr. Kaplan’s alleged concealment of revenue collected from a company in order to deprive the plaintiff of his share of such revenue pursuant to a revenue sharing arrangement based on the plaintiff’s efforts to generate business for such company and (b) seeking (1) damages of at least $1.0 million for each claim and (2) a declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to receive 50% of the gross revenue generated by any transactions the plaintiff originated.
We cannot assure you that any such proceeding would not have an adverse effect on, or provide any indication of the future performance of the borrowers, borrower sponsors and managers related to, the Mortgage Loans.
With respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans, the related borrower, borrower sponsor, guarantor and/or their respective affiliates may be subject to multiple pending lawsuits, for claims related to, among other things, torts, negligence, personal injury, and premises liability. Such legal proceedings and other disputes may be covered by insurance. We cannot assure you that any such insurance will be adequate to cover litigation, disputes and related expenses. In addition, certain types of litigation may not be covered by insurance.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions”.
Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings
Loan Purpose
Twenty-seven (27) of the Mortgage Loans (92.8%) were, in whole or in part, originated in connection with the borrower’s refinancing of a previous mortgage loan secured by the Mortgaged Property.
Five (5) of the Mortgage Loans (7.2%) were, in whole or in part, originated in connection with the borrower’s acquisition of the related Mortgaged Property.
Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings
With respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans prior to the date of origination, (a) related borrowers, sponsors and/or key principals (or affiliates thereof) have previously sponsored, been a key principal with respect to, or been a payment or non-recourse carveout guarantor on mortgage loans secured by, real estate projects (including in some such cases, the particular Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties referenced above in this sentence) that became the subject of foreclosure proceedings or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, short sale, loan restructuring, forbearance agreement, or bankruptcy proceedings or directly or indirectly secured a real estate loan or a real estate related mezzanine loan that was the subject of a discounted payoff or (b) a Mortgaged Property was acquired by the related borrower or an affiliate thereof through foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, as part of an REO transaction, at a foreclosure sale or out of receivership or the related Mortgage Loan refinanced a prior loan secured by, or a mezzanine loan secured by interests in the owner of, the Mortgaged Property which prior loan was the subject of a maturity default, a maturity extension or a discounted payoff, short sale or other restructuring or provided acquisition financing for the related borrower’s purchase of the related Mortgaged Property at a foreclosure sale or after becoming an REO property. For example, within approximately the last 10 years, with respect to the 20 largest Mortgage Loans:
| ● | With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the related borrower sponsor has been the subject of loan foreclosure proceedings following the COVID-19 pandemic. The borrower sponsor also went into payment default on two CMBS loans and requested payment deferrals. The borrower sponsor reached an agreement with the related special servicer on a discounted payoff agreement. |
| ● | With respect to the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan (2.8%), affiliates of the related borrower sponsor (an affiliate of Brookfield Corporation) have experienced prior defaults, including a default in February 2023 on commercial mortgage loans secured by two office properties in downtown Los Angeles with existing debt of approximately $784 million. In addition, in or around April 2023, an affiliate of the borrower sponsor defaulted on a securitized commercial mortgage loan in the amount of approximately $161 million secured by multiple office buildings located mostly in the Washington, D.C. area. |
| ● | With respect to the Union Point Apartments Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the related borrower sponsor acquired an unrelated multifamily property located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and the property thereafter experienced two separate fire incidents in 2022 and 2023, followed by a tornado in 2023. These incidents resulted in severe damage to the premises, offline units and decreased occupancy. The related borrower sponsor eventually transferred the impacted property to the existing lender via a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. |
Three (3) of the Mortgage Loans (5.8%) (i) were refinancings in whole or in part of prior loans (or refinancings of bridge loans that in turn refinanced prior loans) that were secured by, or mezzanine loans that were secured by interests in the owner of, the related Mortgaged Property, which prior loan was in default at the time of refinancing and/or otherwise involved a discounted pay-off, maturity extension, short sale or other restructuring or (ii) provided acquisition financing for the related borrower’s purchase of the related Mortgaged Property at a foreclosure sale or after becoming an REO property, as described below:
| ● | With respect to the 48 West Mortgage Loan (3.7%), the Mortgaged Property previously secured a loan that went into default in May 2024 after the related borrower elected to defer debt service payments and apply such proceeds to fund operations and required maintenance at the Mortgaged Property in preparation for the upcoming loan maturity. Proceeds from the Mortgage Loan were used to pay off the prior loan in full on June 17, 2024. |
| ● | With respect to the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%), the Mortgage Loan refinanced a prior loan secured by the Mortgaged Property which matured on July 12, 2024. The current Mortgage Loan refinanced such prior loan in full on July 24, 2024, and accordingly, the prior loan was in maturity default at the time of refinancing. |
| ● | With respect to the DH Holmes Mortgage Loan (1.1%), a portion of the proceeds of the Mortgage Loan were used to pay off the remaining balance of a $68,735,000 loan secured by the Mortgaged Property and two other non-collateral properties, which previous loan went into maturity default on July 7, 2023. One of the non-collateral properties was sold by the borrower sponsor on June 18, 2024, and the other was sold by the borrower sponsor on August 1, 2024, with the proceeds of each sale used to pay off the remaining balance of debt allocated to each asset, with $3,600,000 in excess cash flow applied to the portion of the debt secured by the Mortgaged Property. In addition, Mortgage Loan proceeds in the amount of $13,660,501.45 were used to pay off the remaining portion of the debt secured by the Mortgaged Property. As of August 2, 2024, the prior loan has been paid in full. |
In addition, certain borrower sponsors of mortgage loans secured by office properties have been the subject of concentrated and material stress-related events with respect to their office properties in the recent past that, in the aggregate, pose a unique risk to such borrower sponsor.
We cannot assure you that there are no other bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions and/or mortgage loan workout matters that involved one or more Mortgage Loans or Mortgaged Properties, and/or a guarantor, borrower, borrower sponsor or other party to a Mortgage Loan.
Certain risks relating to bankruptcy proceedings are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans”, “—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Tenant Issues
Tenant Concentrations
The Mortgaged Properties have single tenants as set forth below:
| ● | Three (3) of the Mortgaged Properties (5.8%) securing, in whole or in part, two (2) Mortgage Loans, are leased to a single tenant. |
| ● | Excluding Mortgaged Properties that are part of a portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, no Mortgaged Property leased to a single tenant secures a Mortgage Loan representing more than approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance. |
With respect to certain of these Mortgaged Properties that are leased to a single tenant, the related leases may expire prior to, or soon after, the maturity dates of the Mortgage Loans or the related tenant may have the right to terminate the lease prior to the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan. If the current tenant does not renew its lease on comparable economic terms to the expired lease, if a single tenant terminates its lease or if a suitable replacement tenant does not enter into a new lease on similar economic terms, there could be a negative impact on the payments on the related Mortgage Loans.
The Mortgaged Properties have certain tenant concentrations (among the five (5) largest tenants (based on net rentable area)) across multiple Mortgaged Properties securing 5.0% or more of the Initial Pool Balance (based on allocated loan amount), as set forth below:
| ● | Dick's Sporting Goods is a tenant at each of the Towne Center at Webster and the Stonebriar Centre Mortgaged Properties (collectively, 14.8%). |
| ● | JCPenney is a tenant at each of the Stonebriar Centre and the Baybrook Mall Mortgaged Properties (collectively, 12.8%). |
| ● | Barnes & Noble is a tenant at each of the Towne Center at Webster and the Eastern Shore Centre Mortgaged Properties (collectively, 7.3%). |
See “—Lease Expirations and Terminations” below, “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks of Commercial, Multifamily and Manufactured Housing Lending Generally”, “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses” and “—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses”.
Lease Expirations and Terminations
Expirations
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to tenant leases that expire before the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. For tenant lease expiration information in the form of a lease rollover chart relating to each of the top 15 Mortgage Loans, see the related summaries attached as Annex A-3 to this prospectus. In addition, see Annex A-1 for tenant lease expiration dates for the five (5) largest tenants (based on net rentable area leased) at each retail, office, mixed use and industrial Mortgaged Property. Even if none of the top 5 tenants at a particular Mortgaged Property, as identified on Annex A-1, have leases that expire before, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, there may still be a significant percentage of leases at a particular Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year, a rolling 12-month period or prior to, or shortly after, the maturity of a Mortgage Loan. Furthermore, some of the Mortgaged Properties have significant leases or a significant concentration of leases that expire before, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan. Identified below are certain material lease expirations or concentrations of lease expirations with respect to the retail, office, mixed use (excluding any multifamily component) and industrial Mortgaged Properties:
| ● | In certain cases, the lease of a single tenant, major tenant or anchor tenant at a multi-tenanted Mortgaged Property expires prior to the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. |
| ● | With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured, in whole or in part, by the Mortgaged Properties identified in the table below, such Mortgaged Properties are occupied by a single tenant under a lease that expires prior to, or within one year of, the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. |
Mortgaged Property Name | % of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Lease Expiration Date | Mortgage Loan Maturity Date |
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio-8374 North 4000 Road | 2.6% | 12/31/2025 | 07/06/2029 |
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio-8800 Rostin Road | 1.8% | 02/28/2030 | 07/06/2029 |
| ● | With respect to the Mortgage Loans shown in the table below, one or more leases representing 50% or greater of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties (excluding Mortgaged Properties leased to a single tenant set forth in the bullet above) expire in a single calendar year prior to, or within one year of, the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. There may be other Mortgaged Properties as to which leases representing at least 50% or greater of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property expire over several calendar years prior to the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. |
Mortgaged Property Name | % of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | % of Leased SF Expiring | Calendar Year of Expiration | Mortgage Loan Maturity Date |
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 8.4% | 56.5% | 2025 | 07/06/2029 |
ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio-151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 0.7% | 67.2% | 2027 | 08/06/2029 |
ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio-289 East 149th Street | 0.3% | 57.4% | 2028 | 08/06/2029 |
| ● | In addition, with respect to certain other Mortgaged Properties, there are leases that represent in the aggregate a material portion (but less than 50%) of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year prior to, or shortly after, the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. |
Furthermore, tenants under certain leases included in the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, Underwritten Net Operating Income and/or Occupancy may be in financial distress, may have filed for bankruptcy or may be part of a chain that is in financial distress as a whole, or the tenant’s parent company may have implemented or expressed an intent to implement a plan to consolidate or reorganize its operations, close a number of stores in the chain, reduce exposure, relocate stores or otherwise reorganize its business to cut costs. In addition, certain shadow anchor tenants may be in financial distress or may be experiencing adverse business conditions, which could have a negative effect on the operations of certain tenants at the Mortgaged Properties. For example, in the case of the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), (i) the largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, JCPenney, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May 2020 and (ii) the related Mortgaged Property has a Macy’s, Inc. (“Macy’s”) store as a shadow anchor. On February 27, 2024, Macy’s announced the closure of approximately 150 locations through 2026 but did not identify the locations that would be closed. We cannot assure you that the JCPenney or Macy’s stores will remain open for business or that the closing of either or both will not trigger co-tenancy provisions or otherwise adversely impact the Mortgaged Property. The closure of the Macy’s store at the Mortgaged Property may trigger co-tenancy provisions of the applicable lease(s). Furthermore, commercial tenants having multiple leases may experience adverse business conditions that result in their deciding to close under-performing stores.
We cannot assure you that any other tenant or anchor tenant at a Mortgaged Property will not close stores, including stores at or near the Mortgaged Property.
Terminations
Certain Mortgage Loans have material lease early termination options. Leases often give tenants the right to terminate the related lease, abate or reduce the related rent, and/or exercise certain remedies against the related borrower for various reasons or upon various conditions, including (i) if the borrower for the applicable Mortgaged Property allows uses at the Mortgaged Property in violation of use restrictions in current tenant leases, (ii) if the borrower or any of its affiliates owns other properties within a certain radius of the Mortgaged Property and allows uses at those properties in violation of use restrictions, (iii) if the related borrower fails to provide a designated number of parking spaces, (iv) if there is construction at the related Mortgaged Property or an adjacent property (whether or not such adjacent property is owned or controlled by the borrower or any of its affiliates) that may interfere with visibility of, access to or a tenant’s use of the Mortgaged Property or otherwise violate the terms of a tenant’s lease, (v) upon casualty or condemnation with respect to all or a portion of the Mortgaged Property that renders such Mortgaged Property unsuitable for a tenant’s use or if the borrower fails to rebuild such Mortgaged Property, or the Mortgaged Property is not (or is estimated not to be) capable of being rebuilt, within a certain time, (vi) if a tenant’s use is not permitted by zoning or applicable law, (vii) if the tenant is unable to exercise an expansion right, (viii) if the landlord defaults on its obligations under the lease, (ix) if a landlord leases space at the mortgaged property or within a certain radius of the mortgaged property to a competitor, (x) if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time, (xi) if certain anchor or significant tenants at the subject property go dark or terminate their leases, (xii) if the landlord violates the tenant’s exclusive use rights for a specified period of time, or (xiii) based upon contingencies other than those set forth in this “—Lease Expirations and Terminations” section. In certain cases, compliance or satisfaction of landlord covenants may be the responsibility of a third party affiliated with the borrower or, in the event that partial releases of the applicable Mortgaged Property are permitted, an unaffiliated or affiliated third party. We cannot assure you that all or any of the borrowers will comply with their lease covenants or such third parties will act in a manner required to avoid any termination and/or abatement rights of the related tenant.
Identified below are certain termination rights or situations in which the tenant may no longer occupy its leased space rights or pay full rent.
In addition, certain of the tenant leases permit the related tenant, effective prior to (or within one year of) the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan, to unilaterally terminate its lease or otherwise reduce its leased space upon providing notice of such termination within a specified period prior to the termination date of the related lease. For example, among the 5 largest tenants by net rentable square footage at the Mortgaged Properties securing the largest 15 Mortgage Loans by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance, or those Mortgaged Properties with a tenant that leases at least 20% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property (in each case excluding government tenants, which are described further below):
| ● | With respect to the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan (6.4%), the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, ManTech (representing approximately 43.6% of the net rentable area), may terminate its lease: (i) with respect to its space in the 800 building (20,510 square feet), effective April 30, 2027, with notice by July 31, 2026, proof of government contract termination and payment of a termination fee of $111,877.00 plus unamortized leasing costs and free rent with interest at 8%; (ii) with respect to its space at the 925 building (42,762 square feet), effective December 31, 2025, with notice by March 31, 2025, proof of government contract termination and payment of a termination fee of $221,969.06 plus unamortized leasing costs with interest at 8%; and (iii) with respect to its space at the 1000 building (34,758 square feet), effective June 30, 2026, with notice by September 30, 2025, proof of government contract termination and payment of a termination fee of $293,531.31 plus unamortized leasing costs with interest at 9%. |
| ● | With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the largest and second largest commercial tenants at the 289 East 149th Street Mortgaged Property (0.3%), Expo Beauty and Little Amber Nails and Spa, representing approximately 57.4% and 42.6% of commercial net rentable square footage at such Mortgaged Property, respectively, each has a unilateral right to terminate its lease at any time upon (i) six months’ prior written notice and (ii) payment of two months’ of the applicable then-current rent. |
| ● | With respect to The Plaza at Milford Mortgage Loan (3.2%), the third largest tenant, Harbor Freight (representing approximately 7.3% of the net rentable area), may terminate its lease effective March 31, 2028 upon six months’ prior written notice and payment of a termination fee equal to 50% of the brokerage commission paid by the borrower sponsor for the lease. |
Certain of the tenant leases may permit the related tenant to terminate its lease and/or abate or reduce rent if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time. We cannot assure you that all or any of these tenants will meet the sales targets or business objectives required to avoid any termination and/or abatement rights.
Certain of the tenant leases for the Mortgaged Properties may permit affected tenants to terminate their leases and/or abate or reduce rent if another tenant at the Mortgaged Property or a tenant at an adjacent or nearby property terminates its lease or goes dark, or if a specified percentage of the Mortgaged Property is unoccupied. For example, taking into account the 5 largest tenants by net rentable square footage at those Mortgaged Properties securing the largest 15 Mortgage Loans by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance:
| ● | With respect to the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan (4.8%): |
| o | the second tenant, Dick's Sporting Goods, leasing approximately 13.7% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has the right to pay a substitute rent equal to the lesser of (a) the minimum rent otherwise payable under its lease, plus additional rent, or (b) 2% of its gross sales if less than 55% of the gross leasable area in the related shopping center (excluding any outparcels) is open for the operation of retail business by national or regional tenants of the types typically found in first class regional shopping centers for a period in excess of six months (the “Dick’s Co-Tenancy Violation”). If the Dick’s Co-Tenancy Violation continues for 12 months, Dick's Sporting Goods has the right to terminate its lease with 30 days’ notice. |
| o | the third largest tenant, TJ Maxx, leasing approximately 11.7% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has the right to pay a substitute rent equal to the lesser of either (a) the minimum rent otherwise payable under its lease, or (b) 2% of its gross sales if (i) both Kohl’s and Target (or, in either instance, replacement tenants satisfying conditions set forth in the related lease) are not open for business in the related shopping center in accordance with the conditions set forth in the related lease, and (ii) 55% of the gross leasable area of the portion of the related shopping center identified in the related lease as “In-Line Portion” is not open for retail purposes for more than 180 days (the “TJ Maxx Co-Tenancy Violation”). If the TJ Maxx Co-Tenancy Violation continues for more than 18 consecutive months in the aggregate, TJ Maxx has the right to terminate its lease at any time within 90 days after the end of such 18 month period. |
| o | the fourth largest tenant, Barnes & Noble, leasing approximately 6.8% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has the right to pay a substitute rent equal to 50% of the fixed rent and additional sums otherwise payable under its lease if the leasable square footage of the related shopping center is less than 50% actively occupied and open for business by other tenants for a period of greater than 12 months. Thereafter, Barnes & Noble may also terminate its lease upon 60 days’ written notice. |
| o | the fifth largest tenant, Homegoods, leasing approximately 6.3% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has the right to pay a substitute rent equal to the lesser of either (a) the minimum rent otherwise payable under its lease or (b) 2% of its gross sales if (i) less than 70% of the gross leasable area of the portion of the related shopping center identified in the related lease as “In-Line Portion” is not open and operating for retail purposes, restaurant uses and temporary stores and (ii) either (x) Target or (y) Kohl’s are not open and operating for business to the public in the related shopping center in accordance with the conditions set forth in the related lease for at least 40 hours per week for more than 180 days (the “Homegoods Co-Tenancy Violation”). If the Homegoods Violation continues for more than 18 consecutive months in the aggregate, TJ Maxx has the right to terminate its lease at any time within 90 days after the end of such 18 month period. |
| ● | With respect to The Plaza at Milford Mortgage Loan (3.2%), the third largest tenant, Harbor Freight (representing approximately 7.3% of the net rentable area), has the right to reduce its base rent by 50% if less than 50% of the total rentable area at the Mortgaged Property is occupied by tenants actively opened for business (the “Harbor Freight Co-Tenancy Violation”). If the Harbor Freight Co-Tenancy Violation continues for more than 12 consecutive months, Harbor Freight has the right to terminate its lease at any time within 30 days after the end of such 12-month period. In addition, the fourth largest tenant, Michaels (representing approximately 6.6% of the net rentable area), has the right to reduce its base rent by 50% if at least one of Harbor Freight or Aldi (or an acceptable replacement tenant) is not open for business (the “Michaels Co-Tenancy Violation”). If the Michaels Co-Tenancy Violation continues for more than 12 consecutive months, Michaels has the right to terminate its lease with 60 days’ prior written notice. |
In addition, certain of the tenant leases may permit a tenant to go dark at any time.
Certain Mortgaged Properties may have tenants or sub-tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on office space and other operating expenses.
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be leased in whole or in part by government sponsored tenants. Government sponsored tenants frequently have the right to cancel their leases at any time or after a specific time (in some cases after the delivery of notice) or for lack of appropriations. For example, set forth below are certain government leases that individually represent more than 5% of the base rent at the related Mortgaged Property and have these types of risks. In addition, one or more leases at certain Mortgaged Properties representing less than 5% of the base rent could also have these types of risks.
Mortgaged Property Name | % of Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Tenant(s) | % of Net Rentable Area | % of U/W Base Rent |
Quantico Corporate Center(1) | 6.4% | The Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command | 5.7 | % | 7.4 | % |
22 North 15th Street(2) | 1.3% | City of New York | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
500 Delaware(3) | 0.6% | General Services Administration | 6.9 | % | 8.5 | % |
| (1) | The third largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, The Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, may terminate its lease at any time after giving at least 90 days’ prior written notice. |
| (2) | The sole tenant, City of New York, has the right to terminate its lease at any time during the 10th, 13th and 16th lease years of the term (which commence on November 1, 2031, November 1, 2034 and November 1, 2037, respectively), in each case upon 365 days’ notice. |
| (3) | The fifth largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, General Services Administration, has the right to terminate either of its related leases, in whole or in part, at any time after giving at least 90 days’ prior written notice. |
Certain other tenants may have the right to terminate the related lease or abate or reduce the related rent if the related borrower violates covenants under the related lease or if third parties take certain actions that adversely affect such tenants’ business or operations.
Certain of the tenant leases may permit the related tenant to terminate its lease based upon contingencies other than those set forth above in this “—Terminations” section.
See “Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” on Annex A-3 to this prospectus for more information on material termination options relating to the largest 15 Mortgage Loans.
Other
Tenants under certain leases included in the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, Underwritten NOI and/or Occupancy may not be in physical occupancy, may not have begun paying rent or may be in negotiation or may be underwritten based on straight-line rents. For example, with respect to (i) tenants that are one of the 5 largest tenants by net rentable square footage at a Mortgaged Property securing one of the largest 15 Mortgage Loans by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance or (ii) tenants individually or in the aggregate representing more than 25% of the net rentable square footage at any Mortgaged Property:
| ● | With respect to the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan (6.4%), the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, ManTech (representing approximately 43.6% of the net rentable area), is entitled to $131,557 of free rent, with $38,869 to be released in August 2024 and $92,688 to be released in September 2024. |
| ● | With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the sole commercial tenant at the 543 East 6th St. Mortgaged Property, KS Architect, Inc., representing approximately 16.7% of underwritten effective gross income at the Mortgaged Property, executed a lease on June 3, 2024 and is in a free rent period until November 1, 2024. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Failed Assumptions”.
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may have tenants that sublet a portion of their space or have provided notice of their intent to sublet out a portion of their space in the future. For example, among the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable area) at the 15 largest Mortgage Loans or in cases where 10% or more of the aggregate net rentable area at a Mortgaged Property is sublet:
| ● | With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the largest commercial tenant at the 289 East 149th Street Mortgaged Property, Expo Beauty Supply, representing approximately 57.4% of net rentable square footage, subleases space out to 10 granular subtenants on 1-2 year subleases. |
See Annex A-3 for more information on other tenant matters relating to the largest 15 Mortgage Loans.
Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal
Below are certain purchase options, rights of first offer and rights of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of the Mortgaged Property with respect to certain of the Mortgaged Properties.
With respect to the 15 largest Mortgage Loans, we note the following:
| ● | With respect to the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan (4.8%), a tenant, Pizzeria Uno, leasing approximately 1.7% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has a right of first refusal to purchase its leased premises in the event of a proposed sale of such premises. Pursuant to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement, the right of first refusal is subject and subordinate to the Mortgage Loan and does not apply to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property in connection with a foreclosure, a deed-in-lieu of disclosure or the first subsequent transfer of the Mortgaged Property following the foregoing. |
In addition, with respect to the Mortgage Loans not included in the 15 largest Mortgage Loans, the 500 Delaware (0.6%) and the Telegraph Budget Storage (0.4%) Mortgaged Properties are each subject to a purchase option, a right of first refusal and/or a right of first offer, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, to purchase all or a portion of the related Mortgaged Property in the event the related borrower decides to sell the related Mortgaged Property or its leased premises. Such rights are held by certain tenants, subtenants, sellers, franchisors, property managers, ground lessors, developers or owners’ associations at such Mortgaged Properties or other parties. The related right generally does not apply in the context of a foreclosure, deed-in-lieu or other exercise of remedies under the Mortgage Loan documents, though such rights may apply to subsequent purchasers following a foreclosure, deed-in-lieu or other exercise of remedies under the mortgage loan documents.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure”.
Affiliated Leases
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be leased in whole or in part by borrowers or borrower affiliates. Set forth below are examples of Mortgaged Properties or portfolios of Mortgaged Properties at which at least 5.0% of (i) the gross income at the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties relates to leases between the borrower and an affiliate of the borrower or (ii) the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties is leased to an affiliate of the borrower:
| ● | With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), the related borrower has entered into the Churchill Master Lease with the affiliated Churchill Master Tenant as to manufactured housing pads on which Owned Mobile Homes are located, as described under “—Property Types—Manufactured Housing Properties”. |
| ● | With respect to the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (8.4%), the related borrower has entered into a master lease with the related non-recourse carveout guarantors relating to the following tenants: Transform Distribution Center Holdco LLC (27.5% of portfolio NRA, lease expiration date in December 2025), Nickey Warehouses, Inc. (23.9% of portfolio NRA, with lease expiration dates in May 2025 (as to 450,841 square feet) and August 2025 (as to 260,340 square feet)) and Terex Corporation (17.1% of portfolio NRA, lease expiration date in February 2030), and certain successor lessees of the spaces leased by such tenants. Pursuant to the master lease, the guarantors will be obligated to pay rent in the amount due from the above tenants as set forth in a schedule to such master lease (in each case to the extent that such tenant is not in fact paying and/or performing such obligations, and throughout the term of such master lease (which ends five years after the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan), regardless of whether the related underlying lease has expired or terminated). We cannot assure you that the guarantors will have the resources to, or will, perform such obligations. In addition, the existence of such guarantors’ obligation may increase the risk of consolidation of the borrower and a guarantor in a bankruptcy of such guarantor. |
Other Mortgaged Properties may have tenants that are affiliated with the related borrower but those tenants do not represent more than 5.0% of the gross income or net rentable area of the related Mortgaged Property.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks” and “—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease.”
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be leased in whole or in part by an originator and/or Sponsor or its affiliates. For example:
| ● | With respect to the 2001 Biscayne Boulevard Mortgage Loan (1.1%), the largest tenant, Citibank, N.A., representing 20.0% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, is an affiliate of CREFI, the originator and mortgage loan seller with respect to such Mortgage Loan. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks” and “—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease.”
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests”.
Insurance Considerations
The Mortgage Loans generally require that each Mortgaged Property be insured by a hazard insurance policy in an amount (subject to an approved deductible) at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan and 100% of the replacement cost of the improvements located on the related Mortgaged Property, and if applicable, that the related hazard insurance policy contain appropriate endorsements or have been issued in an amount sufficient to avoid the application of co-insurance and not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation; provided that, in the case of certain of the Mortgage Loans, the hazard insurance may be in such other amounts as was required by the related originators.
In general, the standard form of hazard insurance policy covers physical damage to, or destruction of, the improvements on the Mortgaged Property by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion, subject to the conditions and exclusions set forth in each policy. Each Mortgage Loan generally also requires the related borrower to maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the related Mortgaged Property in an amount generally equal to at least $1,000,000. Each Mortgage Loan generally further requires the related borrower to maintain business interruption insurance in an amount not less than approximately 100% of the projected gross rental income from the related Mortgaged Property for not less than 12 months. In general, the Mortgage Loans do not require earthquake insurance. Five (5) of the Mortgaged Properties (6.2%), are located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zone 3 or 4). Seismic reports were prepared with respect to these Mortgaged Properties, and based on those reports, no Mortgaged Property has a seismic expected loss greater than 16%.
In the case of forty-seven (47) Mortgaged Properties (60.7%) which secure in whole or in part fourteen (14) Mortgage Loans (60.7%), the related borrowers maintain insurance under blanket policies.
With respect to the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan and the SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center Mortgage Loan (collectively, 2.8%), the related Mortgage Loan documents for each such Mortgage Loan permit the related mortgagor to maintain coverage for windstorm with Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co., an insurance company that is rated by KBRA only, until the policy renewal date (April 1, 2025). The Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co. policy includes co-insurance with a coverage limit equal to the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis. Under the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents, the mortgagor is required to maintain a coverage limit equal to the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis during the current policy term, and upon renewal, the mortgagor is required to obtain a windstorm policy meeting the requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. In addition, with respect to the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to setbacks and parking, and such Mortgaged Property does not have law and ordinance insurance coverage with respect to windstorm or named storm because Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co. does not offer law and ordinance coverage. According to the
related zoning report obtained in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, the ability of the related mortgagor to rebuild the Mortgaged Property in the event of a windstorm or named storm casualty is not limited by a percentage of damage sustained by the Mortgaged Property. The Mortgaged Property may be replaced in-kind so long as a building permit is issued within 12 months of the date of damage and a certificate of occupancy is issued within 24 months of the date of the building permit issuance. The related non-recourse carveout guarantor for each Mortgage Loan has provided a guaranty in favor of the lender guaranteeing the payment of insurance proceeds under the existing windstorm policy in place at origination, until such time as the related mortgagor delivers a windstorm policy that satisfies the requirements set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. In addition, the non-recourse carveout guarantor for the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan has agreed to guarantee the payment of any additional costs to rebuild and/or repair the related Mortgaged Property to current zoning regulations in the event that the Mortgaged Property has sustained damage as a result of a windstorm or named storm, until such time as the related mortgagor obtains law and ordinance coverage required under the Mortgage Loan documents. In addition, upon renewal, the related mortgagor is required to obtain law and ordinance coverage meeting the requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents.
Many Mortgage Loans contain limitations on the obligation to obtain terrorism insurance. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties”.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance” and see representation and warranty number 16 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 16 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Use Restrictions
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to restrictions that restrict the use of such Mortgaged Properties to its current use, place other use restrictions on such Mortgaged Property or limit the related borrower’s ability to make changes to such Mortgaged Property.
Further, the Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loans may have zoning, building code, or other local law issues in addition to the issues described above. In addition, certain of the Mortgaged Properties are or may be subject to a temporary certificate of occupancy (the “TCO”). In such cases, the related Mortgage Loan documents require the related borrower to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the TCO, or cause the borrower sponsor of the Mortgage Loan to maintain the TCO, and to cause the TCO to be continuously renewed at all times until a permanent certificate of occupancy is obtained for the related Mortgaged Property or contain general covenants to similar effect.
With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the following Mortgaged Properties have neither a permanent nor a temporary certificate of occupancy (or such certificate has expired): (i) 228 East 51st Street; (ii) 73 2nd Avenue; (iii) 289 East 149th Street; (iv) 543 East 6th Street; and (v) 151-165 East Burnside Avenue. The Mortgage Loan documents require the related borrowers to apply for and obtain temporary certificates of occupancy for such Mortgaged Properties (or provide evidence in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the lender that the current certificate of occupancy is in accordance with all applicable legal requirements) within four months of the origination date, and apply for and obtain permanent certificates of occupancy (or provide evidence in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the lender that the current certificate of occupancy is in accordance with all applicable legal requirements) within six months of the origination date, provided that such deadlines must be reasonably extended by the lender so long as the borrowers demonstrate to the lender’s satisfaction that (x) the borrowers are diligently and continuously pursuing obtaining such certificates of occupancy and (y) each applicable Mortgaged Property has the necessary temporary certificates of occupancy in accordance with all applicable legal requirements.
In addition, (i) certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be subject to zoning violations relating to maintenance and inspection requirements with respect to the Mortgaged Properties, for which the related
Mortgage Loan documents generally require the related borrowers to reserve funds to remedy the violations, and (ii) certain of the Mortgaged Properties are legal non-conforming uses that may be restricted after certain events, such as casualties, or may restrict renovations at the Mortgaged Properties.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” and see representation and warranty numbers 24 and 25 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty numbers 24 and 25 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Appraised Value
The appraised values presented in this prospectus and used in the calculation of financial metrics presented in this prospectus are based on appraisals obtained on the dates specified on Annex A-1, and do not reflect any changes in economic circumstances after the respective dates of the appraisals. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
In certain cases, in addition to an “as-is” value, the appraisal states a value other than the “as-is” value that assumes that certain events will occur with respect to re-tenanting, construction, renovation or repairs at such Mortgaged Property or states an “as portfolio” value that assigns a premium to the value of the Mortgaged Properties as a whole, which value exceeds the sum of their individual appraised values. However, other than as set forth below, the Appraised Value reflected in this prospectus with respect to each Mortgaged Property reflects only the “as-is” value.
With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified in the definition of “Maturity Date LTV Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”, the related Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated using an Appraised Value other than the “as-is” Appraised Value. With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified in the definition of “Cut-off Date LTV Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”, the related Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated using an Appraised Value other than the “as-is” Appraised Value.
In addition, the Appraised Value may be based on certain “extraordinary assumptions”, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting, payment of tenant improvement or leasing commissions allowances, free or abated rent periods or increased tenant occupancies. For example:
| ● | With respect to the Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn Mortgage Loan (0.9%), the Appraised Value is the “as is (subject to an extraordinary assumption)” of $12,000,000 as of April 18, 2024, which is subject to the extraordinary assumption that approximately $1,600,000 has been reserved for property improvements. At origination, the borrower reserved $1,600,000 into a PIP reserve. The “as is” value without the extraordinary assumption is $10,400,000. |
| ● | With respect to the Telegraph Budget Storage Mortgage Loan (0.4%), there are 54 portable storage units at the Mortgaged Property and the related appraisal is based on the extraordinary assumption that the borrower will permanently fix such units to the collateral; however, due to their de minimis contribution to income at the Mortgaged Property, such units will remain unaffixed. Pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, (i) the borrower may not voluntarily remove any portable storage units unless (a)(1) no cash management trigger period exists, (2) such removal does not materially impact the borrower’s ability to maintain or operate the Mortgaged Property consistent with the maintenance and operation as of the origination date and (3) any removed portable unit is replaced with an item of equal or greater value or (b) the borrower obtains the express consent of the lender for replacement of the removed portable units with permanent improvements serving substantially the same or equivalent utility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the borrower may voluntarily remove portable units from the Mortgaged Property from time to time so long as, immediately after |
giving effect to such removal, at least 41 of the portable units, in the aggregate, remain in place and operational at the Mortgaged Property. There is loss recourse for the borrower’s failure to comply with the covenants regarding removal and replacement of the portable units.
Appraised Values are further calculated based on certain other assumptions and considerations set forth in the definition of “Appraised Value” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations
While the Mortgage Loans generally contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters, certain of the Mortgage Loans may not contain such carveouts or contain limitations to such carveouts. In general, the liquidity and net worth of a non-recourse guarantor under a Mortgage Loan will be less, and may be materially less, than the outstanding principal amount of that Mortgage Loan. In addition, certain Mortgage Loans have additional limitations to the non-recourse carveouts. See Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6 for additional information.
The non-recourse carveout provisions contained in certain of the Mortgage Loan documents may also limit the liability of the non-recourse carveout guarantor for certain monetary obligations or covenants related to the use and operation of the Mortgaged Property to the extent that there is sufficient cash flow generated by the Mortgaged Property and made available to the related borrower and/or non-recourse carveout guarantor to take or prevent such required action. In addition, certain Mortgage Loans may require the lender to seek payment from an environmental insurance policy prior to seeking payment under an environmental indemnity.
Consequently, payment prior to maturity is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income of the Mortgaged Property, whereas payment at maturity is primarily dependent upon the market value of the Mortgaged Property or the related borrower’s ability to refinance the Mortgage Loan. Moreover, the absence of a guarantor may increase likelihood that the related borrower will take actions triggering recourse liability under such non-recourse carveout provisions than if there was a guarantor that would become liable were such non-recourse carveout provisions triggered.
In addition, there may be impediments and/or difficulties in enforcing some or all of the non-recourse carveout liability obligations of individual guarantors depending on the domicile or citizenship of the guarantor.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed”.
Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations
Below are descriptions of real estate tax matters relating to certain Mortgaged Properties:
| ● | With respect to the 287-289 Maple Street Mortgaged Property (0.5%), the Mortgaged Property benefits from a 421a tax exemption. The exemption is effective for a period of 35 years and consists of a 100% exemption for the first 25 years and an exemption for the percentage of affordable units for the remaining 10 years. Approximately 30% of the units at the Mortgaged Property are affordable units. The Mortgaged Property is in the seventh year of the tax exemption. The appraisal of the Mortgaged Property estimated the net present value of the tax exemption over its remaining term to be $1,484,634. The Mortgage Loan was underwritten based on the five year average of estimated abated taxes of $3,765. The appraisal estimates full taxes for the 2024/2025 fiscal year to be $90,273. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds” and see representation and warranty number 17 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 17 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Delinquency Information
As of the Cut-off Date, none of the Mortgage Loans will be 30 days or more delinquent and none of the Mortgage Loans have been 30 days or more delinquent since origination. A Mortgage Loan will be treated as 30 days delinquent if the scheduled payment for a due date is not received from the related borrower by the immediately following due date.
Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans
Amortization of Principal
The Mortgage Loans provide for one or more of the following:
| ● | Thirty (30) Mortgage Loans (96.3%) are interest-only until the maturity date and therefore have an expected Maturity Balance at the related maturity date. |
| ● | Two (2) Mortgage Loans (3.7%) are amortizing until the maturity date and therefore have an expected Maturity Balance at the related maturity date. |
Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest
Subject in some cases to a next business day convention, all of the Mortgage Loans have due dates upon which scheduled payments of principal, interest or both are required to be made by the related borrower under the related Mortgage Note (each such date, a “Due Date”) that occur as described in the following table:
Overview of Due Dates
Due Date | Default Grace Period (Days) | Number of Mortgage Loans | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
1 | 0 | 2 | 12.8 | % |
1 | 5 | 1 | 5.0 | |
5 | 0 | 5 | 12.1 | |
6 | 0 | 24 | 70.0 | |
Total | | 32 | 100.0 | % |
As used in this prospectus, “grace period” is the number of days before a payment default is an event of default under the terms of each Mortgage Loan. See Annex A-1 for information on the number of days before late payment charges are due under the Mortgage Loans. The information on Annex A-1 regarding the number of days before a late payment charge is due is based on the express terms of the Mortgage Loans. Some jurisdictions may impose a statutorily longer period.
All of the Mortgage Loans are secured by first liens on fee simple and/or leasehold interests in the related Mortgaged Properties, subject to the permitted exceptions reflected in the related title insurance policy. All of the Mortgage Loans bear fixed interest rates.
All of the Mortgage Loans (100.0%) accrue interest on the basis of the actual number of days in a month, assuming a 360-day year (“Actual/360 Basis”).
Single Purpose Entity Covenants
With respect to the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), the borrowers funded $10,449,929 at origination, with the remaining $2,027,598 being guaranteed by the non-recourse carveout guarantor, as limited payment guarantor (the “Stonebriar Centre Payment Guaranty”). We cannot assure you that the Stonebriar Centre Payment Guaranty would not be considered by a bankruptcy court as a significant factor in determining whether to substantively consolidate the assets and liability of the borrower with those of the guarantor. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”. As provided in the Stonebriar Centre Payment Guaranty, the amounts guaranteed by such guaranty will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the aggregate amount of equity capital actually expended by the borrowers on upfront rollover expenditures and such guaranteed amount will be recalculated on the first day of every month to reduce the limited payment guarantor’s liability under the Stonebriar Centre Payment Guaranty.
With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), an affiliate of the borrower is the obligor under a master lease with respect to certain manufactured housing pads at the related Mortgaged Properties, and the related non-recourse carveout guarantor is the lease guarantor on such lease. We cannot assure you that such arrangements would not be considered by a bankruptcy court as a significant factor in determining whether to substantively consolidate the assets and liability of the borrower with those of the guarantor or master tenant. The non-consolidation opinion delivered to the lender at origination is based on the assumptions that such master lease is on arms’ length terms, that the rent paid under the master lease for the pads is consistent with prevailing rental rates charged by the borrower to other manufactured home owners within the applicable properties and that the rent paid under the master lease for the manufactured homes is consistent with market rates. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “Bankruptcy Laws”.
With respect to the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (8.4%), the Mortgage Loan documents provide full recourse to the related borrower and non-recourse carveout guarantor for an amount equal to 25% of the outstanding principal amount of the debt under the Mortgage Loan (the “Memphis and Chicago Payment Guaranty”). In addition, the related non-recourse carveout guarantor is the obligor under a master lease related to the Mortgaged Property. See “—Affiliated Leases”. We cannot assure you that the Memphis and Chicago Payment Guaranty or the affiliated master lease would not be considered by a bankruptcy court as a significant factor in determining whether to substantively consolidate the assets and liabilities of the borrower with those of the guarantor. The non-consolidation opinion delivered to the lender at origination expresses no opinion with respect to substantive consolidation of a borrower with its affiliates that is based in whole or part on the Memphis and Chicago Payment Guaranty. In addition, such non-consolidation opinion is based on the assumption that the master lease obligations, as well as guaranteed obligations to make “true up” payments with respect to certain reserve funds, will not exceed 10% of the original principal amount of the Mortgage Loan. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “Bankruptcy Laws”.
With respect to the Villas at Helen of Troy Mortgage Loan (1.6%), the Mortgage Loan documents provide full recourse to the related borrower and guarantor for the prompt and unconditional payment of the last $2,000,000 of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (which has an original principal balance of $14,000,000) (the “Helen of Troy Payment Guaranty”). We cannot assure you that the Helen of Troy Payment Guaranty would not be considered by a bankruptcy court as a significant factor in determining whether to substantively consolidate the assets and liability of the borrower with those of the guarantor. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
With respect to the Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn Mortgage Loan (0.9%), the related guarantor provided a partial payment guaranty (the “Hampton Inn Payment Guaranty”) of the outstanding principal balance due under the related Whole Loan (which has an original principal balance of $8,400,000) in an amount up to $1,680,000 (the “Guaranty Cap”); provided that, from and after July 6, 2027, if (i) the
Mortgaged Property achieves a minimum debt yield of 13.35% for the trailing twelve months and (ii) the borrower passes the immediately preceding quality assurance audit in accordance with the related franchise agreement as determined by the lender (the “Guaranty Cap Reduction Condition”), then the Guaranty Cap will be reduced to $840,000. We cannot assure you that the Hampton Inn Payment Guaranty would not be considered by a bankruptcy court as a significant factor in determining whether to substantively consolidate the assets and liability of the borrower with those of the guarantor. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks”.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks”, “—Additional Indebtedness”, “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws” and representation and warranty number 31 on Annex D-1 and representation and warranty number 31 on Annex E-1 and the identified exceptions to those representations and warranties, if any, on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, for additional information.
Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments
All of the Mortgage Loans have a degree of voluntary prepayment protection in the form of prepayment lockout, prepayment fee, defeasance and/or yield maintenance provisions. Voluntary prepayments, if permitted, generally require the payment of a yield maintenance charge or a prepayment premium unless the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) is prepaid within a specified period (ranging from approximately 3 to 7 payments) up to and including the stated maturity date. See Annex A-1 and Annex A-2 for more information on the prepayment protections attributable to the Mortgage Loans on a loan-by-loan basis and a pool basis.
Additionally, certain Mortgage Loans may provide that in the event of the exercise of a purchase option by a tenant or the sale of real property or the release of a portion of the Mortgaged Property, that the related Mortgage Loans may be prepaid in part prior to the expiration of a prepayment/defeasance lockout provision. See “—Partial Releases” below.
Generally, no yield maintenance charge will be required for prepayments in connection with a casualty or condemnation, unless, in the case of most of the Mortgage Loans, an event of default has occurred and is continuing. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions” in this prospectus. In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower, after a total or partial casualty or partial condemnation, to prepay the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or the allocated loan amount of the related Mortgaged Property (after application of the related insurance proceeds or condemnation award to pay the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan), which may not be accompanied by any prepayment consideration.
Certain of the Mortgage Loans are secured in part by letters of credit and/or cash reserves that in each such case:
| ● | will be released to the related borrower upon satisfaction by the related borrower of certain performance related conditions, which may include, in some cases, meeting debt service coverage ratio levels and/or satisfying leasing conditions; and |
| ● | if not so released, may, at the discretion of the lender, prior to loan maturity (or earlier loan default or loan acceleration), be drawn on and/or applied to prepay the subject Mortgage Loan if such performance related conditions are not satisfied within specified time periods. |
See Annex A-1 and Annex A-3 for more information on reserves relating to the Mortgage Loans.
Voluntary Prepayments
As of the Cut-off Date, the following prepayment restrictions and defeasance provisions applied to the Mortgage Loans:
One (1) Mortgage Loan (1.1%) permits the related borrower, after a lockout period of 24 payments following the origination date, to prepay the Mortgage Loan with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1%, as applicable, of the prepaid amount if such repayment occurs prior to the related open prepayment period.
With respect to three (3) Mortgage Loans (12.0%) (the “YM/Defeasance Loans”), the related Mortgage Loan documents permit the related borrower (i) to substitute U.S. government securities as collateral and obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property after a lockout period of at least two (2) years from the Closing Date and prior to the open prepayment period, or (ii) prepay the Mortgage Loan in whole or in part with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1% of the prepaid amount, subject to a lockout, and prior to the open prepayment period.
The Mortgage Loans that permit voluntary prepayment with yield maintenance have the following lock-out periods as indicated in the following table:
Mortgage Loan | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance | Lock-Out Period |
NYC Multifamily Portfolio | $50,500,000 | | 5.7% | 24 |
Liberties Walk | $33,000,000 | | 3.7% | 2 |
Columbus Business Park | $23,200,000 | | 2.6% | 24 |
2001 Biscayne Boulevard | $9,400,000 | | 1.1% | 24 |
The Mortgage Loans generally permit voluntary prepayment without payment of a yield maintenance charge or any prepayment premium during a limited “open period” immediately prior to and including the stated maturity date, as follows:
Prepayment Open Periods(1)
Open Periods (Payments) | Number of Mortgage Loans | % of Initial Pool Balance |
3 | 2 | 8.9 | % |
4 | 6 | 16.4 | |
5 | 4 | 17.5 | |
6 | 1 | 2.6 | |
7 | 19 | 54.5 | |
Total | 32 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | See Annex A-1 for specific criteria applicable to the Mortgage Loans. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions”.
“Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions
The Mortgage Loans generally contain “due-on-sale” and “due-on-encumbrance” clauses, which in each case permits the holder of the Mortgage Loan to accelerate the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan if the related borrower sells or otherwise transfers or encumbers (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents) the related Mortgaged Property or a controlling interest in the borrower without the consent of the mortgagee (which, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld). Many of the Mortgage Loans place certain restrictions (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents) on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations. The terms of the mortgages generally permit, subject to certain limitations, affiliate, estate planning and family transfers,
transfers at death, transfers of interest in a public company, the transfer or pledge of less than a controlling portion of the partnership, members’ or other equity interests in a borrower, the transfer or pledge of passive equity interests in a borrower (such as limited partnership interests and non-managing member interests in a limited liability company) and transfers to persons satisfying qualification criteria set forth in the related loan documents. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of direct or indirect ownership interests in the related borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in the related borrower by imposing a specific percentage, a control limitation or requiring the consent of the mortgagee to any such transfer. Generally, the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit transfers of non-controlling interests so long as no change of control results or, with respect to Mortgage Loans to tenant-in-common borrowers, transfers to new tenant-in-common borrowers. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.
Additionally, certain of the Mortgage Loans provide that transfers of the Mortgaged Property are permitted if certain conditions are satisfied, which may include one or more of the following:
| ● | no event of default has occurred; |
| ● | the proposed transferee is creditworthy and has sufficient experience in the ownership and management of properties similar to the Mortgaged Property; |
| ● | a Rating Agency Confirmation has been obtained from each of the Rating Agencies; |
| ● | the transferee has executed and delivered an assumption agreement evidencing its agreement to abide by the terms of the Mortgage Loan together with legal opinions and title insurance endorsements; and |
| ● | the assumption fee has been received (which assumption fee will be paid as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”, but will in no event be paid to the Certificateholders); however, certain of the Mortgage Loans allow the borrower to sell or otherwise transfer the related Mortgaged Property a limited number of times without paying an assumption fee. |
Transfers resulting from the foreclosure of a pledge of the collateral for a mezzanine loan (if any) will also result in a permitted transfer. See “—Additional Indebtedness” below.
Defeasance; Collateral Substitution
The terms of twenty-eight (28) of the Mortgage Loans (the “Defeasance Loans”) (87.0%) permit the applicable borrower at any time (provided that no event of default exists) after a specified period (the “Defeasance Lock-Out Period”) to obtain a release of a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage Loan (a “Defeasance Option”) in connection with a defeasance. With respect to all of the Defeasance Loans (other than the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan), the Defeasance Lock-Out Period ends at least two (2) years after the Closing Date.
With respect to the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan (0.6%), which is a Defeasance Loan, 3650 REIT Warehouse Facility Entity 2A LLC signed the REMIC declaration effective as of, and with a startup date of, April 7, 2023, and a Defeasance Option is permitted to be exercised beginning after April 7, 2025 (which is the second anniversary of the startup date of the 500 Delaware Loan REMIC).
As described under “—Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments” above, three (3) of the Mortgage Loans (collectively, 12.0%) are YM/Defeasance Loans.
Exercise of a Defeasance Option is also generally conditioned on, among other things, (a) the borrower providing the mortgagee with at least 30 days prior written notice of the date on which such defeasance will occur (such date, the “Release Date”), and (b) the borrower (A) paying on any Release Date (i) all accrued and unpaid interest on the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or, the related
Whole Loan) up to and including the Release Date, (ii) all other sums (excluding scheduled interest or principal payments due following the Release Date), due under the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) and under all other loan documents executed in connection with the Defeasance Option, and (iii) an amount (the “Defeasance Deposit”) that will be sufficient to (x) purchase non-callable obligations of, or backed by the full faith and credit of, the United States of America or, in certain cases, other “government securities” (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and otherwise satisfying REMIC requirements for defeasance collateral), that provide payments (1) on or prior to, but as close as possible to, all successive scheduled due dates occurring during the period from the Release Date to the related maturity date (or to the first day of the open period for such Mortgage Loan) (or Whole Loan, if applicable) and (2) in amounts equal to the scheduled payments due on such due dates under the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable), or under the defeased portion of the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) in the case of a partial defeasance, including in the case of a Mortgage Loan with a balloon payment due at maturity, the balloon payment, and (y) pay any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of such government securities, and (B) delivering a security agreement granting the issuing entity a first priority lien on the Defeasance Deposit and, in certain cases, the government securities purchased with the Defeasance Deposit and an opinion of counsel to such effect.
For additional information on Mortgage Loans that permit partial defeasance, see “—Partial Releases” below.
In general, if consistent with the related loan documents, a successor borrower established, designated or approved by the master servicer will assume the obligations of the related borrower exercising a Defeasance Option and the borrower will be relieved of its obligations under the Mortgage Loan. If a Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) is partially defeased, if consistent with the related loan documents, generally the related promissory note will be split and only the defeased portion of the borrower’s obligations will be transferred to the successor borrower.
Partial Releases
The Mortgage Loans described below permit the release of one or more of the Mortgaged Properties or a portion of a single Mortgaged Property in connection with a partial defeasance, a partial prepayment, a partial substitution, or for no consideration in the case of parcels that are vacant, non-income producing or were not taken into account in the underwriting of the Mortgage Loan, subject to the satisfaction of certain specified conditions, including the REMIC requirements. Additionally, certain Mortgage Loans may permit the addition of real property to the Mortgage Loan collateral.
Partial Releases; Partial Defeasance
With respect to the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), the borrowers may obtain the release of (A) one or more parcels (including “air rights” parcels) or outlots, or (B) any Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcels (as defined below) or Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcels (as defined below), including, if applicable, any Anchor Parcel (as defined in the related loan agreement), upon satisfaction of specified conditions, including, among others, that (i) no event of default exists as of the date of the release, (ii) the borrowers deliver evidence that the parcel subject to release is not necessary for the borrowers’ operation or use of the remaining Mortgaged Property and may be readily separated from the Mortgaged Property without a material diminution in value, (iii) the parcel subject to release has been legally subdivided and, after giving effect to such transfer, the release parcel and the remaining Mortgaged Property conform to legal requirements and constitute separate tax lots, (iv) the parcel subject to the release is not necessary for the remaining portion of the Mortgaged Property to comply with zoning or legal requirements, (v) the parcel subject to the release is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved or non-income producing and improved only by landscaping, utility facilities that are not required for the use of the remaining Mortgaged Property (or, if such utility facilities are required for the use of the remaining Mortgaged Property, such utility facilities continue to serve the remaining Mortgaged Property in place or be readily re-locatable), or non-income producing surface parking areas (provided that this condition does not apply to Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcels), (vi) the borrowers pay a fee in the amount of $10,000, (vii)
receipt of a rating agency confirmation from the applicable rating agencies (provided that such confirmation will not be required for release of a Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel or if the rating agency has waived review or failed to respond within 30 days to a request for such confirmation), and (viii) the release will not result in a loan-to-value ratio that does not comply with REMIC guidelines; provided that the borrowers may prepay the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan to meet such condition, with payment of a yield maintenance premium on such amount prepaid.
With respect to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan (9.5%), following the defeasance lockout period, the borrower is permitted to obtain the release of any of the individual Mortgaged Properties upon satisfaction of the following conditions, among others: (i) the defeasance of a release amount equal to the greater of 110% of the allocated loan amount with respect to the individual Mortgaged Property being released, or 100% of the applicable net sales proceeds of such individual Mortgaged Property, (ii) after the release, the debt service coverage ratio with respect to the remaining Mortgaged Properties is greater than the greater of (1) the debt service coverage ratio of all Mortgaged Properties immediately prior to the release and (2) 1.85x , (iii) after the release, the debt yield with respect to the remaining Mortgaged Properties is greater than the greater of (1) the debt yield of all Mortgaged Properties immediately prior to the release and (2) 10.54%, and (iv) conditions related to REMIC compliance.
With respect to The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan (5.0%), following the defeasance lockout period, the borrowers may obtain the release of either of the two related Mortgaged Properties, provided that, among other conditions, (i) the borrowers defease the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to the greater of (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount and (y) 100% of the net sales proceeds of the Mortgaged Property being released, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio after such release is no less than the greater of (x) 1.30x and (y) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to such release, (iii) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Property, as determined by a current or updated appraisal, is no more than the lesser of (x) 70.0% and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to such release and (iv) certain REMIC related conditions are satisfied.
With respect to the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (3.7%), on any business day that is later than 60 days following the Closing Date, the Mortgage Loan documents permit the borrowers to obtain the release of certain parcels of real property identified in the Mortgage Loan documents (which parcels collectively represent the entire Mortgaged Property) (each, a “Release Property”) in connection with a sale to a bona fide third-party or an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor pursuant to an arm’s-length agreement provided that, among other conditions, (i) the borrowers deliver evidence to the lender that simultaneously with any prepayment required under the Mortgage Loan, the related mezzanine borrower is making any prepayment required under the related mezzanine loan, (ii) the borrowers prepay the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to (x) in the event of a sale of such Release Property to a third party not affiliated with the borrowers or guarantor, the greater of (1) the applicable pro-rata share of 95% of the gross sales proceeds for such Release Property (e.g., assuming a mortgage loan of $80 and an outstanding principal balance of both the mortgage loan and the related mezzanine loan of $100, the pro rata share for the mortgage loan will be 80%) and (2)(a) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released and (b) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property to be released after the first release of a Release Property, and (y) in the event the sale of such Release Property is to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, (1) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released, and (2) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property after the first Release Property to be released to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, in each of the foregoing instances, together with any applicable yield maintenance premium, (iii) after giving effect to such sale and prepayment, (1) the combined debt service coverage ratio (based on both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan, as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) for the remaining Mortgaged Property is no less than the greater of (x) the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the related mezzanine loan has occurred) and (y) the combined debt service coverage ratio (on both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan, as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) as of the origination date, and (2) the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property is no greater than the lesser of (x) the combined loan-to-value ratio (based on the then aggregate outstanding balance of the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan) immediately
preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the mezzanine loan has occurred) and (y) the loan-to-value ratio (based on then aggregate outstanding principal balance of both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan) as of the origination date, provided that in each instance, the borrowers may prepay the Mortgage Loan (and the mezzanine borrower may prepay the related mezzanine loan) by an amount equal to the pro rata share applicable to the Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of the mezzanine borrower, the related mezzanine loan) in an amount sufficient to satisfy the foregoing debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value requirements, and (iv) the borrowers satisfy customary REMIC requirements.
With respect to the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the related borrower may obtain the release of (A) one or more parcels (including “air rights” parcels but excluding any portion of the Mortgaged Property occupied by an anchor tenant (each, an “Anchor Parcel”)) or outlots, or (B) one or more Baybrook Acquired Parcels or Expansion Parcels, including, if applicable, any Anchor Parcel that is an Expansion Parcel (each, a “Baybrook Release Parcel”), upon satisfaction of specified conditions including, among other things, that (i) there is no event of default, (ii) the Baybrook Release Parcel (unless it is an Expansion Parcel) is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved or non-income producing and improved only by landscaping, utility facilities that are either readily re-locatable or will continue to service the remaining Mortgaged Property or surface parking areas, (iii) the borrower delivers evidence that the parcel subject to release is not necessary for the borrower’s operation or use of the remaining Mortgaged Property and may be readily separated from the Mortgaged Property without a material diminution in value, (iv) the parcel subject to release has been legally subdivided from the Mortgaged Property and after giving effect to such transfer, the release parcel and the remaining Mortgaged Property conform to legal requirements and constitute separate tax lots (or all action has been taken to effectuate the same), (v) the parcel subject to the release is not necessary for the remaining portion of the Mortgaged Property to comply with zoning or legal requirements, (vi) receipt of a rating agency confirmation from the applicable rating agencies (provided that such confirmation will not be required for release of an Expansion Parcel or if the rating agency has waived review or failed to respond within 30 days to a request for such confirmation), and (vii) the release will not result in a loan-to-value ratio that does not comply with REMIC guidelines, provided that the borrower may prepay the related Whole Loan to meet such condition, with payment of a yield maintenance premium calculated based upon the amount prepaid, unless the lender receives an opinion of counsel that the issuing entity will not fail to maintain its status as a REMIC trust as a result of the release of the release parcel.
Furthermore, some of the Mortgage Loans permit the release or substitution of specified parcels of real estate or improvements that secure the Mortgage Loans but were not assigned any material value or considered a source of any material cash flow for purposes of determining the related Appraised Value or Underwritten Net Cash Flow or considered material to the use or operation of the property, or permit the general right to release as yet unidentified parcels if they are non-income producing so long as such release does not materially adversely affect the use or value of the remaining property, among other things. Such real estate may be permitted to be released, subject to certain REMIC rules, without payment of a release price and consequent reduction of the principal balance of the subject Mortgage Loan or substitution of additional collateral if zoning and other conditions are satisfied. We cannot assure you that the development of a release parcel, even if approved by the special servicer as having no material adverse effect to the remaining property, may not for some period of time either disrupt operations or lessen the value of the remaining property.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions”.
Substitutions
With respect to the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), the borrowers are is also permitted to obtain the release of collateral parcels (each, a “Stonebriar Centre Exchange Parcel”) from the lien of the mortgage in exchange for the substitution of a fee or leasehold interest in new parcels at or adjacent to the shopping center of which the Mortgaged Property is a part (each, a “Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel”) as collateral for the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others, that: (i) no event of default exists as of the date of the substitution,
(ii) the Stonebriar Centre Exchange Parcel is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved or improved only by landscaping, utility facilities that are readily re-locatable or that will continue to serve the Mortgaged Property or non-income producing surface parking areas (provided that this condition does not apply to Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcels), (iii) the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel is reasonably equivalent in value to the Stonebriar Centre Exchange Parcel, as established by a letter of value from the appraiser which appraised the Stonebriar Centre Mortgaged Property or an appraiser of comparable experience selected by the borrowers, (iv) the borrowers pay a fee in the amount of $10,000, and (v) with respect to the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel, the borrowers have delivered, among other things, (a) an environmental report indicating that the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel contains no hazardous substances except for nominal amounts (except as permitted under clause (d) below), (b) security documents creating a mortgage lien on the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel, and title insurance, (c) if the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel is improved, subject to certain exceptions, a property condition report indicating that the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel is in good condition, (d) if repairs are recommended by the property condition report or if the environmental report discloses the presence of hazardous materials at the Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel, and the cost of such repairs or remediation is likely to exceed $25,500,000, cash or an indemnity from the guarantor, certain of its affiliates, or an entity otherwise meeting ratings or financial tests set forth in the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents, in an amount equal to 125% of any estimated repairs or remediation costs, as applicable, (e) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining property (after giving effect to such substitution) is equal to or less than 125% (in compliance with REMIC guidelines); provided that the borrowers may prepay the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan in order to meet such condition, with payment of a yield maintenance premium on such amount prepaid, and (f) the lender has received a rating agency confirmation from the applicable rating agencies.
With respect to the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the related borrower is permitted to obtain the release of collateral parcels (each, a “Baybrook Exchange Parcel”) from the lien of the mortgage in exchange for the substitution of new parcels in which the borrower acquires a fee or leasehold interest (each, a “Baybrook Acquired Parcel”) as collateral for the related Whole Loan upon 20 days’ prior notice, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including among other things, that: (i) the Baybrook Exchange Parcel (unless it is an Expansion Parcel) is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved or improved only by landscaping, surface parking or utility facilities that are readily re-locatable or that will continue to serve the Mortgaged Property (and the borrower is able to make certain zoning representations as to the Baybrook Acquired Parcel to the same extent as made with respect to the Baybrook Exchange Parcel), (ii) the Baybrook Acquired Parcel is reasonably equivalent in value to the Baybrook Exchange Parcel, as established by a letter of value from the appraiser which appraised the Mortgaged Property or an appraiser of comparable experience selected by the borrower, (iii) with respect to the Baybrook Acquired Parcel, the borrower has delivered, among other things (a) unless the Baybrook Acquired Parcel is already covered by the environmental report delivered at origination, an environmental report indicating no presence of hazardous substances except for nominal amounts (except as permitted under clause (d) below), (b) security documents creating a mortgage lien on the Baybrook Acquired Parcel, and title insurance, (c) if the Baybrook Acquired Parcel is improved, subject to certain exceptions, a property condition report indicating that the Baybrook Acquired Parcel is in good condition, and (d) if repairs are recommended by the property condition report or if the environmental report discloses the presence of hazardous materials at the Baybrook Acquired Parcel, and the cost of such repairs or remediation is likely to exceed $11,750,000, cash or an indemnity from the guarantor, certain of its affiliates, or an entity otherwise meeting ratings or financial tests set forth in the related Whole Loan documents, in an amount equal to 125% of any estimated repairs or remediation costs, as applicable, (e) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining property (after giving effect to such substitution) is equal to or less than 125% (in compliance with REMIC guidelines), provided that the borrower may prepay the related Whole Loan in order to meet such condition, with payment of a yield maintenance premium calculated based upon the amount prepaid, unless the lender receives an opinion of counsel that the issuing entity will not fail to maintain its status as a REMIC trust as a result of the release of the substitution, and (f) the lender has received a rating agency confirmation from the applicable rating agencies.
Additional Collateral
With respect to the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), the borrowers also have the right, at their own expense, to acquire any parcel of land, together with any improvements on such land, that constitutes an integral part of, or adjoins, or is proximately located near the shopping center of which the Mortgaged Property is a part, which land was not owned by the borrowers on the origination date and is not a Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel (such acquired land, a “Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel”), to become additional collateral for the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan, upon satisfaction of specified conditions, including, among others, that (i) no event of default exists as of the date of the acquisition, (ii) the borrowers acquire a fee simple or leasehold interest in the applicable Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel, (iii) the borrowers pay a fee in the amount of $25,000, and (iv) the borrowers deliver, among other things (a) an environmental report indicating that the Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel contains no hazardous substances except for nominal amounts (except as permitted under clause (d) below), (b) security documents creating a mortgage lien on the Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel, and title insurance, (c) if the Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel is improved, subject to certain exceptions, a property condition report indicating that the Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel is in good condition and (d) if repairs are recommended by the property condition report or if the environmental report discloses the presence of hazardous materials at the Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel, and the cost of such repairs or remediation is reasonably likely to exceed $25,500,000, cash or an indemnity from the guarantor, certain of its affiliates, or an entity otherwise meeting ratings or financial tests set forth in the loan documents, in an amount equal to 125% of any estimated repair or remediation costs, as applicable.
With respect to the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the related borrower has the right, at its own expense, to acquire one or more parcels of land that constitute an integral part of, or adjoin or are proximately located near, the shopping center of which the Mortgaged Property is a part, including any anchor tenant premises, which land was not owned by the borrower on the origination date (such acquired land, an “Expansion Parcel”), to become additional collateral for the related Whole Loan, upon satisfaction of specified conditions including, among other things, that (i) there is no event of default, (ii) the borrower acquires a fee simple or leasehold interest in the applicable Expansion Parcel, and (iii) the borrower delivers, among other things, (a) unless the Expansion Parcel is already covered by the environmental report delivered at origination, an environmental report indicating no presence of hazardous substances except for nominal amounts (except as permitted under clause (d) below), (b) security documents creating a mortgage lien on the Expansion Parcel, and title insurance, (c) if the Expansion Parcel is improved, subject to certain exceptions, a property condition report indicating that the Expansion Parcel is in good condition and (d) if repairs are recommended by the property condition report or if the environmental report discloses the presence of hazardous materials at the Expansion Parcel, and the cost of such repairs or remediation is reasonably likely to exceed $11,750,000, cash or an indemnity from the guarantor, certain of its affiliates, or an entity otherwise meeting ratings or financial tests set forth in the loan documents, in an amount equal to 125% of any estimated repairs or remediation costs, as applicable.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions”.
Escrows
Thirty (30) of the Mortgage Loans (87.2%) provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover property taxes on the Mortgaged Properties.
Twenty-nine (29) of the Mortgage Loans (84.6%) provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover ongoing replacements and capital repairs.
Twelve (12) of the Mortgage Loans (92.8%), secured by retail, office, industrial or mixed use properties, provide for upfront or monthly escrows (or credit) for the full term or a portion of the term of the related Mortgage Loan to cover anticipated re-leasing costs, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions or other lease termination or occupancy issues. Such escrows are typically considered for retail, office, industrial and mixed use properties only.
Twenty (20) of the Mortgage Loans (45.8%) provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover insurance premiums on the Mortgaged Properties.
Certain of the Mortgage Loans described above permit the related borrower to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of maintaining cash reserves. In addition, in certain cases, the related borrower may not be required to maintain the escrows described above until the occurrence of a specified trigger.
Many of the Mortgage Loans provide for other escrows and reserves, including, in certain cases, reserves for debt service, operating expenses, vacancies at the related Mortgaged Property and other shortfalls or reserves to be released under circumstances described in the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Mortgaged Property Accounts
Lockbox Accounts
The Mortgage Loan documents prescribe the manner in which the related borrowers are permitted to collect rents from tenants at each Mortgaged Property. The following table sets forth the manner in which tenant rent is transferred to a lockbox account, in some cases, only upon the occurrence of a trigger event:
Lockbox Account Types
Lockbox Type | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance |
Hard | 11 | $ 410,600,000 | | 46.0 | % |
Springing | 18 | 378,166,230 | | 42.4 | |
Soft | 1 | 45,000,000 | | 5.0 | |
Hard (Commercial); Soft (Residential) | 1 | 33,000,000 | | 3.7 | |
None | 1 | 25,350,000 | | 2.8 | |
Total | 32 | $ 892,116,230 | | 100.0 | % |
The lockbox accounts will not be assets of the issuing entity. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions—Definitions” or Annex A-1 to this prospectus for a description of lockbox and cash management accounts.
With respect to the Viera at Whitemarsh Mortgage Loan (2.8%), the Mortgage Loan is structured without a lockbox. Pursuant to the related loan agreement, all revenue generated at the Mortgaged Property (other than tenant security deposits if required to be held in escrow accounts) and all other money received by the borrowers or related property manager with respect to the Mortgaged Property are required to be deposited into the operating account within one business day of receipt. So long as no event of default is continuing, the borrowers are permitted to withdraw amounts from the operating account for the purpose of paying bona fide property expenses incurred in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement; and provided that no event of default or trigger period is continuing, the borrowers are permitted to make equity distributions from amounts remaining therein after all property expenses that are then due and payable have been paid.
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines
See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines”, “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions to CREFI’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines”, “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”, “—Bank of Montreal—BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “—German American Capital Corporation—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions”.
Additional Indebtedness
General
The Mortgage Loans generally prohibit borrowers from incurring any additional debt secured by their Mortgaged Property without the consent of the lender. However:
| ● | substantially all of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower to incur limited indebtedness in the ordinary course of business that is not secured by the related Mortgaged Property; |
| ● | the borrowers under certain of the Mortgage Loans have incurred and/or may incur in the future unsecured debt other than in the ordinary course of business; |
| ● | any borrower that is not required pursuant to the terms of the applicable Mortgage Loan documents to meet single purpose entity criteria may not be restricted from incurring unsecured debt or mezzanine debt; |
| ● | the terms of certain Mortgage Loans permit the borrowers to post letters of credit and/or surety bonds for the benefit of the mortgagee under the Mortgage Loans, which may constitute a contingent reimbursement obligation of the related borrower or an affiliate. The issuing bank or surety will not typically agree to subordination and standstill protection benefiting the mortgagee; |
| ● | although the Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on incurring mezzanine debt by the pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents generally permit, subject to certain limitations, the pledge of the limited partnership or non-managing membership equity interests in a borrower or less than a controlling interest of any other equity interests in a borrower; and |
| ● | certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of ownership interests in the borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in a borrower by imposing limitations on transfer of control or a specific percentage of ownership interests. |
Whole Loans
Certain Mortgage Loans are subject to the rights of a holder of one or more related Companion Loans, as further described in “—The Whole Loans” below.
Mezzanine Indebtedness
The mezzanine loans related to the Mortgage Loans identified in the table below are each subject to an intercreditor agreement between the holder(s) of the related mezzanine loan(s) and the related lender under the related Mortgage Loan that sets forth the relative priorities between the related Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan(s). Each intercreditor agreement provides, among other things, generally that (a) all payments due under the related mezzanine loan(s) are subordinate after an event of default under the related Mortgage Loan (taking into account the cure rights of the mezzanine lender(s)), and in certain cases, only after the mezzanine lender(s) receive notice of such event of default to any and all payments required to be made under the related Mortgage Loan (except for any payments from funds other than the Mortgaged Property or proceeds of any enforcement upon the mezzanine loan collateral, or required redemptions thereof, and any mezzanine loan guarantees in respect of which the related mortgage lender does not own a corresponding claim or right), (b) so long as there is no event of default under the related Mortgage Loan, (taking into account the cure rights of the mezzanine lender(s)), the related mezzanine lender(s) may accept payments on and prepayments of the related mezzanine loan(s) prior to the prepayment in full of the Mortgage Loan, provided that, in most cases, such prepayment is from a source of funds other than the respective Mortgaged Property (unless such funds are derived from excess cash), (c) the related mezzanine lender(s) will have certain rights to receive notice of and cure defaults under the related Mortgage Loan prior to any acceleration or enforcement of the related Mortgage Loan, (d) the related mezzanine lender(s) may amend or modify the related mezzanine loan(s) in certain respects without the consent of the related mortgage lender, and the mortgage lender must obtain the consent of the mezzanine lender(s) to amend or modify the Mortgage Loan in certain respects, (e) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the related mezzanine loan documents and upon compliance with the terms and conditions in the applicable intercreditor agreement, the related mezzanine lender(s) may foreclose upon the pledged equity interests in the related Mortgage Loan borrower or, if applicable, the related senior mezzanine loan borrower, which could result in a change of control with respect to the related Mortgage Loan borrower or, if applicable, the related senior mezzanine loan borrower, and a change in the management of the related Mortgaged Properties and (f) if the related Mortgage Loan is accelerated or, in some cases, becomes specially serviced or if a monetary default (or, in some cases, a non-monetary default) occurs (and in some cases, continues for a specified period of time) or if the Mortgage Loan borrower becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy or if the related Mortgage Loan lender commences or exercises any enforcement action under the related Mortgage Loan documents with respect to the related Mortgage Loan borrower or the related Mortgaged Properties, the related mezzanine lender(s) has or have, as applicable, the right to purchase the related Mortgage Loan, in whole but not in part, for a price generally equal to the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due thereon, plus any advances made by the related Mortgage Loan lender or its servicer and any interest thereon plus, subject to certain limitations and exclusions, any Liquidation Fees, Workout Fees and Special Servicing Fees payable under the PSA, but generally excluding any late charges, default interest, exit fees, spread maintenance charges payable in connection with a prepayment or yield maintenance charges, liquidated damages and prepayment premiums. In addition, the mezzanine loan agreements provide that an event of default under the related Mortgage Loan will trigger an event of default under the related mezzanine loan.
Although the Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on incurring mezzanine debt by the pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, the terms of the Mortgages generally permit, subject to certain limitations, the pledge of less than a controlling portion of the limited partnership or non-managing membership equity interests in a borrower. Certain Mortgage Loans described below permit the incurrence of mezzanine debt subject to satisfaction of certain conditions including a certain maximum combined loan-to-value ratio and/or a minimum combined debt service coverage ratio, and in some cases mezzanine debt is already in place. Also, certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of ownership interests in the related borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in a borrower by imposing limitations on transfer of control or a specific percentage of ownership interests. In addition, in general, a borrower (or its direct or indirect owners) that does not meet single-purpose entity criteria may not be restricted in any way from incurring mezzanine debt.
As of the Cut-off Date, each sponsor has informed us that it is aware of the following existing mezzanine indebtedness with respect to the Mortgage Loans it is selling to the depositor:
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Mezzanine Debt Cut-off Date Balance | Cut-off Date Total Debt Balance(1) | Cut-off Date Wtd. Avg. Total Debt Interest Rate(1)(2) | Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan LTV Ratio(3) | Cut-off Date Total Debt LTV Ratio(1) | Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(3) | Cut-off Date Total Debt Underwritten NCF DSCR(1) |
Liberties Walk | $33,000,000 | NAP | NAP | $9,200,000 | $42,200,000 | 6.65403% | 60.3% | 77.1% | 1.53x | 1.08x |
| (1) | Calculated including the mezzanine debt and any related Companion Loan (including any related Subordinate Companion Loan). |
| (2) | The total debt interest rate for the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan to full precision is 6.65402843601896%. The related mezzanine loan, which is currently held by 3650 REIT or an affiliate, has an interest rate per annum equal to (i) 9.0% per annum for the period commencing at origination and ending on the day prior to the mezzanine loan monthly payment date occurring in September 2025, (ii) 10.0% per annum for the period commencing on the mezzanine loan monthly payment date occurring in September 2025 and ending on the day prior to the monthly payment date occurring in September 2026 and (iii) 11.0% per annum commencing on the mezzanine loan monthly payment date occurring in September 2026 and thereafter. |
| (3) | Calculated including any related Pari Passu Companion Loan (but without regard to any Subordinate Companion Loan or mezzanine debt). |
The mezzanine indebtedness identified above is coterminous with the related Mortgage Loan.
The Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations as described under “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions” above. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.
Generally, upon a default under a mezzanine loan, subject to the terms of any applicable intercreditor or subordination agreement, the holder of the mezzanine loan would be entitled to foreclose upon the equity in the related borrower, which has been pledged to secure payment of such debt. Although this transfer of equity may not trigger the due on sale clause under the related Mortgage Loan, it could cause a change in control of the borrower and/or cause the obligor under the mezzanine loan to file for bankruptcy, which could negatively affect the operation of the related Mortgaged Property and the related borrower’s ability to make payments on the related Mortgage Loan in a timely manner.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk”.
Other Secured Indebtedness
Some of the Mortgage Loans permit certain affiliates of the related borrower to pledge their indirect ownership interests in the borrower including, but not limited to, pledges to an institutional lender providing a corporate line of credit or corporate credit facility as collateral for such corporate line of credit or corporate credit facility. In connection with those pledges, the Mortgage Loan documents for such Mortgage Loans may: (i) contain limitations on the amounts that such collateral may secure and prohibit foreclosure of such pledges unless such foreclosure would represent a transfer otherwise permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents but do not prohibit a change in control in the event of a permitted foreclosure; or (ii) require that such financing be secured by all or substantially all of the pledgor’s assets or by at least a certain number of assets other than such ownership interests in the related borrower.
With respect to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan (3.4%), the managing members of two of the borrowers previously incurred loans from the United States Small Business Administration (the “SBA Loans”) in the amounts of $53,000 and $150,000, respectively, for which funds were escrowed to repay such SBA Loans at origination. The borrowers are required to diligently pursue termination of UCC-1 financing statements filed in connection with such SBA Loans.
Preferred Equity
Because preferred equity often provides for a higher rate of return to be paid to the holders of such preferred equity, preferred equity in some respects functions like mezzanine indebtedness, and reduces a principal’s economic stake in the related Mortgaged Property, reduces cash flow on the borrower’s Mortgaged Property after the payment of debt service and payments on the preferred equity and may increase the likelihood that the owner of a borrower will permit the value or income-producing potential of a Mortgaged Property to fall and may create a greater risk that a borrower will default on the Mortgage Loan secured by a Mortgaged Property whose value or income is relatively weak.
Other Unsecured Indebtedness
Certain Mortgage Loans permit the borrower (or an affiliate thereof) to incur certain other subordinate indebtedness as described below:
| ● | With respect to the Centric on 34th Mortgage Loan (2.0%), the related borrower is permitted to incur future secured or unsecured indebtedness, not to exceed (when aggregated with other permitted debt, such as trade payables) 3% of the outstanding principal amount of the debt under the Mortgage Loan, in the form of one or more loans from its general partner, that, in each case, (a) is fully subordinate to the Centric on 34th Mortgage Loan; (b) is non-recourse to the related borrower and any of its assets, including the Mortgaged Property, until the indefeasible repayment of the Mortgage Loan in full, and amounts payable pursuant to such loan will only be permitted to the extent that net cash flow is available after payment of all property-level expenses; (c) the holder of which will, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving the related borrower, vote in favor of any plan of reorganization proposed by the lender or in favor of which the lender has voted; (d) the holder of which will not take any action to enforce any of its rights or remedies to collect all or a portion of such loan until one year and one day after the Centric on 34th Mortgage Loan has been satisfied in full; and (e) is not evidenced by a promissory note. |
Certain risks relating to additional debt are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk”.
The Whole Loans
General
Each of the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan, the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan, the Columbus Business Park Mortgage Loan and the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan is part of a Whole Loan consisting of such Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) and/or in certain cases, the related Subordinate Companion Loan(s). In connection with each Whole Loan, the rights between the trustee on behalf of the issuing entity and the holder(s) of the related Companion Loan(s) (the “Companion Loan Holder” or “Companion Loan Holders”) are generally governed by a co-lender agreement (each, a “Co-Lender Agreement”). With respect to each of the Whole Loans, the related Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loan(s) are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
The following terms are used in reference to the Whole Loans:
“3650R 2022-PF2 PSA” means the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the 500 Delaware Whole Loan.
“Control Note” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the “Controlling Note” or other similar term or concept specified in the related Co-Lender Agreement. As of the Closing Date, the Control Note with respect to each Whole Loan will be the promissory note(s) listed as the “Control Note” in the column “Control Note/Non-Control Note” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Controlling Companion Loan” means, with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the Pari Passu Companion Loan related to which, upon the securitization of such Pari Passu Companion Loan, servicing is expected to shift to the Servicing Shift PSA entered into in connection with such securitization. Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. is currently the holder of the “Controlling Companion Loan” with respect to the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan.
“Controlling Holder” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holder of the related Control Note. As of the Closing Date, the Controlling Holder with respect to each Whole Loan will be the holder listed next to the related Control Note in the column “Note Holder” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Non-Control Note” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, any “Non-Controlling Note” or other similar term or concept specified in the related Co-Lender Agreement. As of the Closing Date, the Non-Control Notes with respect to each Whole Loan will be the promissory notes listed as the “Non-Control Notes” in the column “Control Note/Non-Control Note” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Non-Controlling Holder” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holder of a Non-Control Note. As of the Closing Date, the Non-Controlling Holders with respect to each Whole Loan will be the holders listed next to the related Non-Control Notes in the column “Note Holder” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the certificate administrator under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Co-Lender Agreement” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the related Co-Lender Agreement.
“Non-Serviced Companion Loan” means each of the Companion Loans identified as “Non-Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Non-Serviced Custodian” means with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the custodian (or its equivalent) under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Directing Holder” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the directing holder (or its equivalent) under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Master Servicer” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the master servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan” means each of the Mortgage Loans identified as “Non-Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below and, after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan.
“Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan” means each of the Companion Loans identified as “Non-Serviced” (or “Servicing Shift” after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date) under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” that is pari passu in right of payment with the related Mortgage Loan in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan” means each of the Whole Loans identified as “Non-Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” with one or more Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans and no Subordinate Companion Loans in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below and, after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
“Non-Serviced PSA” means each of the pooling and servicing agreements or trust and servicing agreements, as applicable, identified under the column titled “Non-Serviced PSA/TSA” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Non-Serviced Securitization Trust” means a securitization trust that is created and governed by a Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Special Servicer” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the special servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Trustee” means, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced Whole Loan” means each of the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans, the Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans and, after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
“Serviced Companion Loan” means each of the Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans.
“Serviced Mortgage Loan” means each of the Mortgage Loans identified as “Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below and, prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan.
“Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan” means each of the Companion Loans identified as “Serviced” (or “Servicing Shift” prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date) under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” that is pari passu in right of payment with the related Mortgage Loan in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan” means each Mortgage Loan related to a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan.
“Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan” means each of the Whole Loans identified as “Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” with one or more Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below and, prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
“Serviced Whole Loan” means each of the Whole Loans identified as “Serviced” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below and, prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
“Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan” means the Mortgage Loan identified as “Servicing Shift” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Servicing Shift PSA” means, with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan following the Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
“Servicing Shift Securitization Date” means, with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the closing date of the securitization of the Controlling Companion Loan.
“Servicing Shift Whole Loan” means the Whole Loan identified as “Servicing Shift” under the column titled “Mortgage Loan Type” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” below.
“Subordinate Companion Loan” means with respect to any AB Whole Loan, any related subordinated note not included in the issuing entity, which is generally subordinated in right of payment to the related Mortgage Loan to the extent set forth in the related Co-Lender Agreement.
“Whole Loan” means each of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan, the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan, the Columbus Business Park Whole Loan and the 500 Delaware Whole Loan, as the context may require and as applicable.
The table below provides certain information with respect to each Mortgage Loan that has a corresponding Companion Loan:
Whole Loan Summary
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | % of Initial Pool Balance | Aggregate Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Aggregate Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2) | Whole Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(3) | Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(2) | Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(3) |
Stonebriar Centre | $89,000,000 | 9.98% | $166,000,000 | N/A | 42.1% | 42.1% | 2.30x | 2.30x |
Baybrook Mall | $25,000,000 | 2.8% | $195,000,000 | N/A | 56.0% | 56.0% | 1.72x | 1.72x |
Columbus Business Park | $23,200,000 | 2.6% | $38,800,000 | N/A | 42.2% | 42.2% | 1.95x | 1.95x |
500 Delaware | $5,000,000 | 0.6% | $80,000,000 | N/A | 67.6% | 67.6% | 2.03x | 2.03x |
| (1) | With respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans identified above, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratios have been calculated using “as-stabilized”, “portfolio premium” or similar hypothetical values, as described under the definition of “Appraised Value” set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”. |
| (2) | Calculated including the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) but excluding the related Subordinate Companion Loan(s), any related mezzanine loan(s) and any other subordinate indebtedness. |
| (3) | Calculated including the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) and the related Subordinate Companion Loan(s) but excluding any related mezzanine loan(s) and any other subordinate indebtedness. |
Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes
Mortgage Loan | Mortgage Loan Type | Non-Serviced PSA/TSA(1) | Note Name | Control Note / Non-Control Note | Note Type | Note Cut-off Date Balance | Note Holder |
Stonebriar Centre | Serviced | NAP | A-1-1 | Control Note | Pari Passu | $25,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-1-2 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $20,000,000 | BMO 2024-5C5 |
A-1-3 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $16,000,000 | GSMC |
A-1-4 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $40,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-1-5 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $24,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-2-1 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $30,000,000 | Societe Generale Financial Corporation |
A-2-2 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $20,000,000 | BMO 2024-5C5 |
A-2-3 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $15,000,000 | Societe Generale Financial Corporation |
A-3-1 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $65,000,000 | BANK 2024-5YR8 |
Baybrook Mall | Servicing Shift | NAP(2) | A-1 | Control Note | Pari Passu | $60,000,000 | Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. |
A-2 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $28,000,000 | Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. |
A-3 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. |
A-4 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. |
A-5 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $25,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-6 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $18,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate |
A-7 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $8,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate |
A-8 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $5,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate |
A-9 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $30,000,000 | Societe Generale Financial Corporation |
A-10 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $16,000,000 | Societe Generale Financial Corporation |
A-11 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | Societe Generale Financial Corporation |
Columbus Business Park | Serviced | NAP | A-1 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $24,800,000 | BANK5 2024-5YR7 |
A-2-A | Control Note | Pari Passu | $23,200,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-2-B | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $14,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V7 |
500 Delaware | Non-Serviced | 3650R 2022-PF2 | A-1-1 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | 3650 REIT or an affiliate |
A-1-2 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | 3650 REIT or an affiliate |
A-1-3 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $5,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 |
A-2 | Control Note | Pari Passu | $20,000,000 | 3650R 2022-PF2 |
A-3 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $15,000,000 | BBCMS 2023-C21 |
A-4 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $15,000,000 | 3650 REIT or an affiliate |
A-5 | Non-Control Note | Pari Passu | $10,000,000 | 3650 REIT or an affiliate |
| (1) | The identification of a “Non-Serviced PSA/TSA” above indicates that we have identified a securitization trust that has closed or priced or as to which a preliminary prospectus or final prospectus has printed, or otherwise based on publicly available information, and that has included, or is expected to include, the related controlling note for such whole loan. |
| (2) | From and after the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Baybrook Mall Mortgage Loan will be serviced pursuant to the Servicing Shift PSA entered into in connection with the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan. |
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans will be serviced pursuant to the PSA in accordance with the terms of the PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be required to make a monthly payment advance on any Serviced Pari Passu
Companion Loan, but the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be required to (and the special servicer, at its option in emergency situations, may) make Property Protection Advances in respect of the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans unless such advancing party (or, even if it is not the advancing party, the special servicer) determines that such a Property Protection Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance.
The Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the PSA (and, accordingly, will be a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan) prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, after which such Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA (and, accordingly, will be a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan). With respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the discussion under this section only applies to the period prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
Co-Lender Agreement
The Co-Lender Agreement related to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan provides that:
| ● | The promissory notes comprising such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (and consequently, the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) are of equal priority with each other and none of such promissory notes (or mortgage loans) will have priority or preference over any other such promissory note (or mortgage loan). |
| ● | All payments, proceeds and other recoveries on the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be applied to the promissory notes comprising such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan on a pro rata and pari passu basis (subject, in each case, to (a) the allocation of certain amounts to escrows and reserves, certain repairs or restorations or payments to the applicable borrower required by the Mortgage Loan documents and (b) certain payment and reimbursement rights of the parties to the PSA, in accordance with the terms of the PSA). |
| ● | The transfer of up to 49% of the beneficial interest of a promissory note comprising the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is generally permitted. The transfer of more than 49% of the beneficial interest of any such promissory note is generally prohibited unless (i) the transferee is a large institutional lender or investment fund (other than, without the consent of the non-transferring noteholder or a rating agency, as applicable, a related borrower or an affiliate thereof) that satisfies minimum net worth and/or experience requirements or certain securitization vehicles that satisfy certain ratings and other requirements or (ii)(a) each non-transferring holder has consented to such transfer (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld), and (b) if any such non-transferring holder’s interest in the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is held in a securitization, a rating agency communication is provided to each applicable rating agency (or, in certain cases, a rating agency confirmation is obtained from each applicable rating agency). The foregoing restrictions do not apply to a sale of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan together with the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans in accordance with the terms of the PSA. |
With respect to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, certain costs, fees and expenses (such as a pro rata share of a Property Protection Advance) allocable to a related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the Mortgage Pool, subject to the issuing entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or from general collections with respect to any securitization of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Control Rights with respect to Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans Other than the Servicing Shift Whole Loan
With respect to any Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than the Servicing Shift Whole Loan), the related Control Note will be included in the issuing entity, and the Directing Holder will have certain consent rights (if no Control Termination Event is continuing) and consultation rights (during a Control Termination Event, but while no Consultation Termination Event is continuing) with respect to such Whole Loan as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder”.
Control Rights with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan
With respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the related Control Note will be held as of the Closing Date by the Controlling Holder listed in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” above under “—General”. The related Controlling Holder will be entitled (i) to direct the servicing of such Whole Loan in a manner that is substantially similar to the rights of the Directing Holder appointed by the Controlling Class pursuant to the PSA, (ii) to consent to certain servicing decisions in respect of such Whole Loan and actions set forth in a related asset status report and (iii) to replace the special servicer with respect to such Whole Loan with or without cause; provided that with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, in general, neither the related borrower nor an affiliate thereof will be entitled to exercise the rights of such “Controlling Holder” under the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder
With respect to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the holder of any related Non-Control Note (or if such Non-Control Note has been securitized, the directing holder (or equivalent party) with respect to such securitization or other designated party under the related pooling and servicing agreement) will be entitled to certain consent and consultation rights described below; provided that if such party or its representative is (or is an affiliate of) the related borrower or if all or a specified portion of the subject Non-Control Note is held by the borrower or an affiliate thereof, such party will not be entitled to exercise the right of a Non-Controlling Holder, and/or there will be deemed to be no such Non-Controlling Holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement with respect to such Non-Control Note. With respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, a related Non-Control Note will be included in the issuing entity, and, prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, pursuant to the PSA, the Controlling Class Representative appointed by the Controlling Class, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, or the special servicer (consistent with the Servicing Standard), following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, will be entitled to exercise the consultation rights, if any, of the Non-Controlling Holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement.
The master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, will be required to (i) provide each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative copies of any notice, information and report that it is required to provide to the Directing Holder with respect to the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an Asset Status Report relating to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any proposed action to be taken in respect of a Major Decision with respect to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (for this purpose, without regard to whether such items are actually required to be provided to the Directing Holder due to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event or Consultation Termination Event) and (ii) use reasonable efforts to consult each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative on a strictly non-binding basis (to the extent such party requests consultation after having received the aforementioned notices, information and reports) with respect to any such recommended actions outlined in an Asset Status Report by the special servicer or any proposed action to be taken by the special servicer in respect of such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan that constitutes a Major Decision, and consider on a non-binding basis alternative actions recommended by such Non-Controlling Holder.
Such consultation right will generally expire ten business days (or, in certain cases, with respect to an “acceptable insurance default”, 30 days) after the delivery to such Non-Controlling Holder of written notice of a proposed action (together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be delivered thereto) (unless the special servicer proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, in which case such ten business day (or 30-day) period will be deemed to begin anew). In no event will the special servicer be obligated to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by any Non-Controlling Holder (or its representative). In addition, if the special servicer determines that immediate action is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the promissory notes comprising a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, it may take, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, any action constituting a Major Decision with respect to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any action set forth in any applicable Asset Status Report before the expiration of the aforementioned ten business day period.
In addition to the aforementioned consultation right, each Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to attend annual meetings (which may be held telephonically) with the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan are discussed.
If a Servicer Termination Event has occurred with respect to the special servicer that affects a Non-Controlling Holder, such Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to direct the trustee to terminate the special servicer under the PSA solely with respect to the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, other than with respect to any rights such special servicer may have as a Certificateholder, entitlements to amounts payable to such special servicer at the time of termination, entitlements to indemnification amounts and any other entitlements of the terminated party that survive the termination.
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan
If any Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan, and if the special servicer decides to sell the related Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan, the special servicer will be required to sell such Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan together as interests evidencing one whole loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special servicer will not be permitted to sell a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan without the consent of each Non-Controlling Holder (provided that such consent will not be required if the related Non-Controlling Holder is a borrower or an affiliate thereof) unless special servicer has delivered to such holder (a) at least 15 business days prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, (b) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the special servicer in connection with any such proposed sale, a copy of the most recent appraisal and certain other supplementary documents (if requested by such Non-Controlling Holder), and (c) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Directing Holder) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and documents being provided to offerors or otherwise approved by the master servicer or special servicer in connection with the proposed sale.
The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans
Each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA in accordance with the terms of such Non-Serviced PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement. No Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Trustee will be required to make monthly payment advances on a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Trustee, as applicable, will be required to (and the Non-Serviced Special Servicer, at its option in certain cases, may) make property protection advances (or equivalent term) in respect of the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA unless such advancing party (or, in certain cases, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, even if it is not the advancing party) determines that such a property protection advance (or equivalent term) would be a nonrecoverable advance. Monthly payment advances on each Non-Serviced
Mortgage Loan will be made by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, to the extent provided under the PSA. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be obligated to make property protection advances (or equivalent term) with respect to a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” for a description of the material servicing terms of the Non-Serviced PSAs.
With respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the discussion under this “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” section only applies to the period on or after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
Co-Lender Agreement
The Co-Lender Agreement related to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan provides that:
| ● | The promissory notes comprising such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (and consequently, the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and each related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) are of equal priority with each other and none of such promissory notes (or mortgage loans) will have priority or preference over any other such promissory note (or mortgage loan). |
| ● | All payments, proceeds and other recoveries on the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be applied to the promissory notes comprising such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan on a pro rata and pari passu basis (subject, in each case, to (a) the allocation of certain amounts to escrows and reserves, certain repairs or restorations or payments to the applicable borrower required by the Mortgage Loan documents and (b) certain payment and reimbursement rights of the parties to the related Non-Serviced PSA, in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA). |
| ● | The transfer of up to 49% of the beneficial interest of a promissory note comprising the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is generally permitted. The transfer of more than 49% of the beneficial interest of any such promissory note is generally prohibited unless (i) the transferee is a large institutional lender or investment fund (other than, without the consent of the non-transferring noteholder or a rating agency, as applicable, a related borrower or an affiliate thereof) that satisfies minimum net worth and/or experience requirements or certain securitization vehicles that satisfy certain ratings and other requirements or (ii)(a) each non-transferring holder has consented to such transfer (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld), and (b) if any such non-transferring holder’s interest in the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is held in a securitization, a rating agency communication is provided to each applicable rating agency (or, in certain cases, a rating agency confirmation is obtained from each applicable rating agency). The foregoing restrictions do not apply to a sale of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan together with the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
| ● | Any losses, liabilities, claims, fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan that are not otherwise paid out of collections on such Whole Loan may, to the extent allocable to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, be payable or reimbursable out of general collections on the mortgage pool for this securitization. |
Control Rights
With respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than the Servicing Shift Whole Loan on or after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date), the related Control Note will be held as of the Closing Date by the Controlling Holder listed in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” above under “—General”. The related Controlling Holder (or a designated representative) will be entitled to (i) direct the servicing of such Whole Loan in a manner that is substantially similar to the rights of the directing holder (or equivalent party) under the related Non-Serviced PSA, (ii) consent to certain servicing decisions in respect of such Whole Loan and actions set forth in a related asset status report and (iii) replace the special servicer with respect to such Whole Loan with or without cause;
provided that with respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, if such holder (or its designated representative) is (or is an affiliate of) the related borrower or if all or a specified portion of the subject Control Note is held by the borrower or an affiliate thereof, such party will not be entitled to exercise the rights of the “Controlling Holder”, and/or there will be deemed to be no such “Controlling Holder” under the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder
With respect to any Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the holder of any related Non-Control Note (or if such Non-Control Note has been securitized, the directing holder (or equivalent party)) with respect to such securitization (or other designated party under the related Non-Serviced PSA) will be entitled to certain consent and consultation rights described below; provided that if such party or its representative is (or is an affiliate of) the related borrower or if all or a specified portion of the subject Non-Control Note is held by the borrower or an affiliate thereof, such party will not be entitled to exercise the rights of a Non-Controlling Holder, and/or there will be deemed to be no “Non-Controlling Holder” with respect to such Non-Control Note under the related Co-Lender Agreement. With respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (including the Servicing Shift Whole Loan on and after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date), one or more related Non-Control Notes will be included in the issuing entity, and the Controlling Class Representative, if no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, or the special servicer (consistent with the Servicing Standard), following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event will be entitled to exercise the consultation rights described below.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, will be required to (i) provide each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative copies of any notice, information and report that it is required to provide to the related Non-Serviced Directing Holder under the related Non-Serviced PSA with respect to the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any proposed action to be taken in respect of a major decision under the related Non-Serviced PSA with respect to such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (for this purpose, without regard to whether such items are actually required to be provided to the related Non-Serviced Directing Holder due to the occurrence and continuance of a “control termination event” or a “consultation termination event” (or analogous concepts) under such Non-Serviced PSA) and (ii) consult (or to use reasonable efforts to consult) each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative on a strictly non-binding basis (to the extent such party requests consultation after having received the aforementioned notices, information and reports) with respect to any such recommended actions outlined in an asset status report by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer or any proposed action to be taken by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, in respect of the applicable major decision.
Such consultation right will generally expire ten business days (or, in certain cases, with respect to an “acceptable insurance default”, 30 days) after the delivery to such Non-Controlling Holder of written notice of a proposed action (together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be delivered thereto), whether or not such Non-Controlling Holder has responded within such period (unless the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, in which case such ten business day (or 30-day) period will be deemed to begin anew). In no event will the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, be obligated to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by any Non-Controlling Holder (or its representative).
If the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, determines that immediate action is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the promissory notes comprising a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, it may take, in accordance with the servicing standard under the related Non-Serviced PSA, any action constituting a major decision with respect to such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any action set forth in any applicable asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned ten business day period.
In addition to the aforementioned consultation right, each Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to annual meetings (which may be held telephonically) with the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan are discussed.
If a special servicer termination event (or analogous term) under the related Non-Serviced PSA has occurred that affects a Non-Controlling Holder, such Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to direct the related Non-Serviced Trustee to terminate the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under such Non-Serviced PSA solely with respect to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, other than with respect to any rights such Non-Serviced Special Servicer may have as a certificateholder under such Non-Serviced PSA, entitlements to amounts payable to such Non-Serviced Special Servicer at the time of termination, entitlements to indemnification amounts and any other entitlements of the terminated party that survive the termination.
Custody of the Mortgage File
The related Non-Serviced Custodian is expected to be the custodian of the mortgage file with respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than any promissory notes not contributed to the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust).
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan
If any Non-Serviced Whole Loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, and if the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer decides to sell the related Control Note contributed to securitization trust created pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, such Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to sell the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan together as interests evidencing one whole loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan without the consent of each Non-Controlling Holder (or its representative under the related pooling and servicing agreement) (except, in certain cases, if the Non-Controlling Holder is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless it has delivered to such holder (a) at least 15 business days prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, (b) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale, a copy of the most recent appraisal and certain other supplementary documents (if requested by such Non-Controlling Holder), and (c) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the applicable Non-Serviced Directing Holder) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and documents being provided to offerors or otherwise approved by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale.
Additional Information
Each of the tables presented on Annex A-2 sets forth selected characteristics of the pool of Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date, if applicable. For a detailed presentation of certain additional characteristics of the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties on an individual basis, see Annex A-1. For a brief summary of the 15 largest Mortgage Loans in the pool of Mortgage Loans, see Annex A-3.
The description in this prospectus, including Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3, of the Mortgage Pool and the Mortgaged Properties is based upon the Mortgage Pool as expected to be constituted at the close of business on the Cut-off Date, as adjusted for the scheduled principal payments due on the Mortgage Loans on or before the Cut-off Date. Prior to the issuance of the Offered Certificates, a Mortgage Loan may be removed from the Mortgage Pool if the depositor deems such removal necessary or appropriate or if it is prepaid. This may cause the range of Mortgage Rates and maturities as well as the other characteristics of the Mortgage Loans to vary from those described in this prospectus.
A Form ABS-EE with the information required by Item 1125 of Regulation AB (17 CFR 2219.1125), Schedule AL – Asset-Level Information will be filed or caused to be filed by the depositor with respect to the issuing entity on or prior to the date of the filing of this prospectus and will provide such information for a reporting period commencing on the day after the hypothetical Determination Date in July 2024 and ending on the hypothetical Determination Date in August 2024. In addition, a Current Report on Form 8-K containing detailed information regarding the Mortgage Loans will be available to persons (including beneficial owners of the Offered Certificates) who receive this prospectus and will be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), together with the PSA, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or prior to the date of the filing of the final prospectus.
Transaction Parties
The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., German American Capital Corporation, Bank of Montreal, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. and 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC are sponsors and mortgage loan sellers in this securitization transaction.
None of the mortgage loan sellers nor any of their respective affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against any mortgage loan seller for any losses or other claims in connection with the certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the cure, repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by each mortgage loan seller in the related MLPA as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
For a description of certain affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the sponsors and the other transaction parties, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” and “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company
General
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (“GSMC”) is a New York limited partnership, is a sponsor and a mortgage loan seller. The respective Mortgage Loans that GSMC is selling to the depositor in this securitization transaction are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “GSMC Mortgage Loans”.
GSMC was formed in 1984. Its general partner is Goldman Sachs Real Estate Funding Corp. and its limited partner is Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GS Bank”). GSMC’s executive offices are located at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, telephone number (212) 902-1000. GSMC is an affiliate of the depositor, GS Bank, an originator, and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, an underwriter.
GS Bank is the originator (or co-originator) of all of the GSMC Mortgage Loans. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans” for additional information.
GSMC’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program
As a sponsor, GSMC originates and acquires fixed and floating rate commercial mortgage loans and either by itself or together with other sponsors or mortgage loan sellers, organizes and initiates the public and/or private securitization of such commercial mortgage loans by transferring the commercial mortgage loans to a securitization depositor, including GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II or another entity that acts in a similar capacity. In coordination with its affiliates, Goldman Sachs Commercial Mortgage Capital, L.P., GS Bank and other unaffiliated underwriters, GSMC works with rating agencies, investors, unaffiliated mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transaction.
From the beginning of its participation in commercial mortgage securitization programs in 1996 through December 31, 2023, GSMC originated or acquired approximately 3,325 fixed and floating rate commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with an aggregate original principal balance of approximately $165.7 billion. As of December 31, 2023, GSMC had acted as a sponsor and mortgage loan seller on approximately 438 fixed and floating-rate commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions. GSMC securitized approximately $2.165 billion, $4.636 billion, $6.586 billion, $5.098 billion, $6.284 billion, $6.972 billion, $11.730 billion, $8.548 billion, $9.960 billion, $6.823 billion, $14.906 billion, $7.173 billion and $5.857 billion of commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings in calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Review of GSMC Mortgage Loans
Overview. GSMC, in its capacity as the sponsor of the GSMC Mortgage Loans, has conducted a review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of one or more of GSMC’s affiliates or, in certain circumstances, are consultants engaged by or on behalf of GSMC (the “GSMC Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the GSMC Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the GSMC Deal Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each GSMC Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, third party reports, zoning reports, insurance policies, borrower supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Goldman Originator during the underwriting process. After origination of each GSMC Mortgage Loan, the GSMC Deal Team updated the information in the database with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the GSMC Deal Team.
A data tape (the “GSMC Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each GSMC Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The GSMC Data Tape was used by the GSMC Deal Team to provide certain numerical information regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. GSMC engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by GSMC, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
| ● | comparing certain information in the GSMC Data Tape against various source documents provided by GSMC that are described above under “—Database”; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the GSMC Data Tape; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the GSMC Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. GSMC engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the GSMC Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each GSMC Mortgage Loan, origination counsel prepared a loan and property summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from GSMC’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each GSMC Mortgage Loan reviewed GSMC’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-1 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the loan agreement relating to certain GSMC Mortgage Loans marked against the standard form document, (ii) a review of the loan and property summaries referred to above relating to the GSMC Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel and (iii) a review of a due diligence questionnaire completed by the GSMC Deal Team. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions, if any, for each GSMC Mortgage Loan with multiple Mortgaged Properties for compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code. In addition, for each GSMC Mortgage Loan originated by GSMC or its affiliates, GSMC prepared and delivered to its securitization counsel for review an asset summary, which summary includes important loan terms and certain property level information obtained during the origination process.
Based on their respective reviews of pertinent sections of the related Mortgage Loan documents, origination counsel or securitization counsel also assisted in the preparation of the Mortgage Loan summaries of those of the GSMC Mortgage Loans included in the ten largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, and the abbreviated Mortgage Loan summaries for those of the GSMC Mortgage Loans included in the next five (5) largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, which summaries are incorporated in “Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” on Annex A-3. The applicable borrowers and borrowers’ counsel reviewed these GSMC Mortgage Loan summaries as well.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any GSMC Mortgage Loan, GSMC requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. GSMC conducted a search with respect to each borrower under a GSMC Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy after origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loan. If GSMC became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing a GSMC Mortgage Loan, GSMC obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
The GSMC Deal Team also consulted with the Goldman Originator to confirm that the GSMC Mortgage Loans were originated in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “—Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, GSMC determined that the disclosure regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. GSMC also determined that the GSMC Mortgage Loans were originated or acquired in accordance with GSMC’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria except as described under “—Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below. GSMC attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
The Goldman Originator
GS Bank, an originator, is affiliated with GSMC, one of the sponsors, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, one of the underwriters, and the depositor. GS Bank is referred to as the “Goldman Originator” in this prospectus.
The primary business of the Goldman Originator is the underwriting and origination, either by itself or together with another originator, of mortgage loans secured by commercial or multifamily properties. The commercial mortgage loans originated by the Goldman Originator include both fixed and floating rate commercial mortgage loans and such commercial mortgage loans are often included in both public and private securitizations. Many of the commercial mortgage loans originated by GS Bank are acquired by GSMC and sold to securitizations in which GSMC acts as sponsor and/or loan seller.
Fixed Rate Commercial Mortgage Loans(1)
Year | Total Goldman Originator Fixed Rate Loans Originated (approximate) | Total Goldman Originator Fixed Rate Loans Securitized (approximate) |
2023 | $4.2 billion | $3.8 billion |
2022 | $770 million | $1.8 billion |
2021 | $4.2 billion | $2.6 billion |
2020 | $2.7 billion | $3.7 billion |
2019 | $6.0 billion | $5.3 billion |
2018 | $3.1 billion | $2.6 billion |
2017 | $7.3 billion | $7.7 billion |
2016 | $6.1 billion | $5.2 billion |
2015 | $6.2 billion | $6.0 billion |
2014 | $2.9 billion | $3.1 billion |
2013 | $5.0 billion | $5.3 billion |
2012 | $5.6 billion | $4.6 billion |
2011 | $2.3 billion | $2.2 billion |
2010 | $1.6 billion | $1.1 billion |
2009 | $400 million | $400 million |
| (1) | Represents origination for the Goldman Originator and affiliates of the Goldman Originator originating commercial mortgage loans. |
Floating Rate Commercial Mortgage Loans(1)
Year | Total Goldman Originator Floating Rate Loans Originated (approximate) | Total Goldman Originator Floating Rate Loans Securitized (approximate) |
2023 | $2.1 billion | $2.1 billion |
2022 | $4.8 billion | $5.4 billion |
2021 | $9.5 billion | $12.4 billion |
2020 | $4.8 billion | $3.1 billion |
2019 | $6.4 billion | $4.7 billion |
2018 | $8.1 billion | $5.9 billion |
2017 | $5.6 billion | $4.0 million |
2016 | $2.3 billion | $1.6 million |
2015 | $2.0 billion | $261.0 million |
2014 | $3.2 billion | $2.0 billion |
2013 | $777 million | $1.3 billion |
2012 | $1.9 billion | $0 |
2011 | $140 million | $0 |
2010 | $0 | $0 |
2009 | $40 million | $0 |
| (1) | Represents origination for the Goldman Originator and affiliates of the Goldman Originator originating commercial mortgage loans. |
Goldman Originator’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
The Goldman Originator’s commercial mortgage loans are primarily originated in accordance with the origination procedures and underwriting criteria described below. However, variations from these procedures and criteria may occur as a result of various conditions including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/sponsor, or any other pertinent information deemed material by the Goldman Originator. Therefore, this general description of the Goldman Originator’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it complies entirely with all procedures and criteria set forth below. For important information about the circumstances that have affected the underwriting of a GSMC Mortgage Loan in the mortgage pool, see “—Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below and “Annex D-2—Exceptions to Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Representations and Warranties”.
The underwriting process for each mortgage loan originated by the Goldman Originator is performed by an origination team comprised of real estate professionals which typically includes an originator, analyst, loan officer and commercial closer. This team conducts a review of the related mortgaged property, which typically includes an examination of historical operating statements (if available), rent rolls, certain tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third party reports pertaining to appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic/engineering. In certain cases, the Goldman Originator may engage an independent third party due diligence provider, pursuant to a program of specified procedures, to assist in the underwriting and preparation of analyses required by such procedures, subject to the oversight and ultimate review and approval by the Goldman Originator origination team.
A member of the Goldman Originator origination team performs or engages a third party to perform an inspection of the property in order to assess the physical quality of the collateral, confirm tenancy, and determine visibility and accessibility of the property as well as proximity to major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas, educational facilities and recreational areas. Such site inspections are also generally used to assess the submarket in which the property is located and to evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market.
The Goldman Originator origination team also performs a review of the financial status, credit history and background of the borrower and certain key principals of the borrower. Among the items generally reviewed are financial statements, independent credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches in select jurisdictions for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation.
After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the origination team finalizes its underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with the property specific cash flow underwriting guidelines of the Goldman Originator. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure around risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or up front reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management agreements or guarantees. A complete credit committee package is prepared to summarize all of the above referenced information.
All commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more credit committees which consist of senior real estate professionals, among others. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the loan, the committee may approve the loan as recommended or request additional due diligence, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.
The Goldman Originator’s underwriting guidelines generally require that a mortgage loan have, at origination, a minimum underwritten debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x for multifamily properties, 1.40x for hospitality properties and 1.25x for all other property types and maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% for multifamily properties and 75% for all other property types. However these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions may be made on the merits of each individual loan taking into account such factors as reserves, letters of credit and/ or guarantees, the Goldman Originator’s judgment of the property and/or market performance in the future. In addition, a Goldman Originator may in some instances have reduced the term interest rate that such Goldman Originator would otherwise charge on a mortgage loan based on the credit and collateral characteristics of the related mortgaged property and structural features of the mortgage loan by collecting an upfront fee from the related borrower on the origination date. The decrease in the interest rate would have correspondingly increased the debt service coverage ratio, and, in certain cases, may have increased the debt service coverage ratio sufficiently such that the related mortgage loan satisfied such Goldman Originator’s minimum debt service coverage ratio underwriting requirements for such mortgage loan.
Certain properties may also be encumbered by, or otherwise support payments on, subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower. It is possible that the Goldman Originator or an affiliate will be a lender on that additional debt, and may either sell such debt to an unaffiliated third party or hold it in inventory. When such additional debt is taken into account, the aggregate debt may not conform to the aforementioned debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio parameters.
The Goldman Originator may require borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves. In addition, the Goldman Originator may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items such as leasing-related matters, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, which escrows or holdbacks would be released upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. In some cases, the borrower may be allowed to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of a cash reserve, or provide periodic evidence of timely payment of a typical escrow item. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all commercial mortgage loans originated by the Goldman Originator.
Generally, the required escrows for GSMC Mortgage Loans are as follows:
| ● | Taxes—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy all taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional or high net-worth individual property sponsor or (ii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property in which the related tenant is required to pay taxes directly. |
| ● | Insurance—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy or (ii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant is required to obtain insurance directly or self-insures. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, including those required with respect to the roof and improvement structure. |
| ● | Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—Tenant improvement / leasing commission reserves may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term or (ii) where rent at the related mortgaged property is considered below market. |
| ● | Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property or (iii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property the tenant is responsible for the repairs. |
| ● | Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues or (ii) environmental insurance is obtained or already in place. |
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A-1.
The Goldman Originator and its origination counsel will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the property is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports, zoning reports and/or representations by the related borrower. In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In such cases, the Goldman Originator may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy and/or the acquisition of law and ordinance coverage in the casualty insurance policy with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild; or (ii) if the improvements are rebuilt in accordance with currently applicable law, the value and performance of the property would be acceptable; or (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring; or (iv) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement imposing recourse liability from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
The borrower is required to provide, and the Goldman Originator or its origination counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must meet the following requirements: (i) written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located, (ii) in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (iii) protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (iv) written on an American Land Title Association form or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located and (v) if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.
Except in certain instances where credit rated tenants are required to obtain insurance or may self-insure, the Goldman Originator typically requires that the related mortgaged property be insured by a hazard insurance policy with a customary deductible and in an amount at least equal to the lesser (x) of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan and (y) 100% of the full insurable replacement cost of the improvements located on the property. If applicable, the policy contains appropriate endorsements to avoid the application of coinsurance and does not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation, except that the policy may permit a deduction for depreciation in connection with a cash settlement after a casualty if the insurance proceeds are not being applied to rebuild or repair the damaged improvements.
Flood insurance, if available, must be in effect for any mortgaged property that at the time of origination included material improvements in any area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area. The flood insurance policy must meet the requirements of the then-current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration, be provided by a generally acceptable insurance carrier and be in an amount representing coverage not less than the least of: (i) the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan, (ii) the full insurable value of the property and (iii) the maximum amount of insurance available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, except in some cases where self-insurance is permitted.
The standard form of hazard insurance policy typically covers physical damage or destruction of the improvements on the mortgaged property caused by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion. The policies may contain some conditions and exclusions to coverage, including exclusions related to acts of terrorism. Generally, each of the mortgage loans requires that the related property have coverage for terrorism or terrorist acts, if such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates. In some cases, there is a cap on the amount that the related borrower will be required to expend on terrorism insurance.
Each mortgage typically also requires the borrower to maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the property in an amount customarily required by institutional lenders.
Each mortgage typically further requires the related borrower to maintain business interruption or rent loss insurance in an amount not less than 100% of the projected rental income from the related property for not less than twelve months.
Although properties are typically not insured for earthquake risk, a borrower will be required to obtain earthquake insurance if the seismic report indicates that the PML or SEL is greater than 20%.
In the course of originating the GSMC Mortgage Loans, the Goldman Originator generally considered the results of third party reports as described below:
| ● | Appraisal—The Goldman Originator obtains an appraisal or an update of an existing appraisal for each mortgaged property prepared by an appraisal firm approved in accordance with the Goldman Originator’s internal documented appraisal policy. The Goldman Originator origination team and a third party consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator typically reviews the appraisal. All appraisals are conducted by an independent appraiser that is state certified, an appraiser belonging to the Appraisal Institute, a member association of professional real estate appraisers, or any otherwise qualified appraiser. All appraisals are conducted in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. In addition, the appraisal report (or a separate letter) includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal. |
| ● | Environmental Report—The Goldman Originator obtains a Phase I site assessment or an update of a previously obtained site assessment for each mortgaged property prepared by an environmental firm approved by the Goldman Originator. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the Phase I site assessment, and the assessment is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator. The Goldman Originator origination team and a third party environmental consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator or the borrower typically reviews the Phase I site assessment to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when the Goldman Originator or the environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. In cases in which the Phase I site assessment identifies any potential adverse environmental conditions and no third party is identified as responsible for such condition, or the condition has not otherwise been satisfactorily mitigated, the Goldman Originator generally requires additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment on the related mortgaged property, an environmental insurance policy, the borrower to conduct remediation activities or to establish an operations and maintenance plan, or to place funds in escrow to be used to address any required remediation. |
| ● | Physical Condition Report—The Goldman Originator obtains a physical condition report (“PCR”) or an update of a previously obtained PCR for each mortgaged property prepared by |
a structural engineering firm approved by the Goldman Originator to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/ or mechanical and electrical systems. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the PCR, and the PCR is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator. The Goldman Originator and a third party structural consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator or the borrower typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property, and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, the Goldman Originator generally requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves.
| ● | Seismic—The Goldman Originator generally obtains a seismic report or an update of a previously obtained seismic report for all mortgaged properties located in seismic zone 3 or 4 to assess probable maximum loss (“PML”) or scenario expected loss (“SEL”) for the related mortgaged property. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the seismic report and the seismic report is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator. |
From time to time, the Goldman Originator originates mortgage loans together with other financial institutions. The resulting mortgage loans are evidenced by two or more promissory notes, at least one of which will reflect the Goldman Originator as the payee. GSMC has in the past and may in the future deposit such promissory notes for which the Goldman Originator is named as payee with one or more securitization trusts, while the co-originators have in the past and may in the future deposit such promissory notes for which they are named payee into other securitization trusts.
The Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%) was (together with any related Companion Loans) co-originated by GS Bank, Bank of America, National Association and Societe Generale Financial Corporation. Such Mortgage Loan and each related Companion Loan was co-originated in accordance with the underwriting guidelines described above.
Servicing
Interim servicing for all of GSMC’s loans prior to securitization is typically performed by a nationally recognized rated third party interim servicer. In addition, primary servicing is occasionally retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with GSMC, which firms may continue primary servicing certain loans following the securitization closing date. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.
Exceptions to Goldman Originator’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines
The Goldman Originator has disclosed generally its underwriting guidelines with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loans. However, one or more of the GSMC Mortgage Loans may vary from the specific Goldman Originator underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the GSMC Mortgage Loans, the Goldman Originator may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors. In certain cases, the Goldman Originator may have made exceptions and the underwriting of a particular mortgage loan did not comply with all aspects of the disclosed criteria.
The GSMC Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth above.
Certain characteristics of the GSMC Mortgage Loans can be found on Annex A-1.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
GSMC most recently filed a Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on August 13, 2024. GSMC’s Central Index Key is 0001541502. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2021 to and including June 30, 2024, GSMC has the following activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
% of principal balance | Check if Regis- tered | Name of Originator | Total Assets in ABS by Originator | Assets That Were Subject of Demand | Assets That Were Repurchased or Replaced | Assets Pending Repurchase or Replacement (due to expired cure period) | Demand in Dispute | Demand Withdrawn | Demand Rejected |
(a) | (b) | (c) | # (d) | $ (e) | % of principal balance (f) | # (g) | $ (h) | % of principal balance (i) | # (j) | $ (k) | % of principal balance (l) | # (m) | $ (n) | % of principal balance (o) | # (p) | $ (q) | % of principal balance (r) | # (s) | $ (t) | % of principal balance (u) | # (v) | $ (w) | % of principal balance (x) |
Asset Class: Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities |
GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-GCJ9 (CIK 0001560456) | X | Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company | 12 | 411,105,625 | 29.6 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. | 30 | 313,430,906 | 22.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Archetype Mortgage Funding I LLC | 14 | 137,272,372 | 9.9 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Jefferies LoanCore LLC | 18 | 527,119,321 | 38.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Total by Asset Class | 74 | 1,388,928,224 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the date of this prospectus, neither GSMC nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, GSMC and/or its affiliates may acquire in the future certain classes of certificates. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company” has been provided by GSMC.
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.
Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. (“CREFI”) is a sponsor and a mortgage loan seller. The respective Mortgage Loans that CREFI is selling to the depositor in this securitization transaction are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “CREFI Mortgage Loans”. CREFI originated or co-originated all of the CREFI Mortgage Loans.
CREFI is a New York corporation organized in 2014 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citibank, N.A., a national banking association, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citicorp LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc., a Delaware corporation. CREFI maintains its principal office at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Mortgage Finance Group, and its facsimile number is (212) 723-8604. CREFI is an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (one of the underwriters). CREFI makes, and purchases (or may purchase) from lenders, commercial and multifamily mortgage loans primarily for the purpose of securitizing them in CMBS transactions.
CREFI’s Commercial Mortgage Origination and Securitization Program
CREFI, directly or through correspondents or affiliates, originates multifamily and commercial mortgage loans throughout the United States. CREFI has been engaged in the origination of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans for securitization since January 2017, and in the securitization of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans since April 2017. The multifamily and commercial mortgage loans originated by CREFI may include both fixed rate loans and floating rate loans. CREFI is an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (“CGMRC”), which was engaged in the origination of multifamily
and commercial mortgage loans for securitization from 1996 to 2017. Many CREFI staff worked for CGMRC, and CREFI’s underwriting guidelines, credit committee approval process and loan documentation are substantially similar to CGMRC’s. CREFI securitized approximately $4.4 billion, $7.3 billion, $11.4 billion, $7.8 billion, $15.9 billion, $11.1 billion and $6.7 billion of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings during the calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.
In addition, in the normal course of its business, CREFI may also acquire multifamily and commercial mortgage loans from various third-party originators. These mortgage loans may have been originated using underwriting guidelines not established by CREFI.
In connection with the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates, CREFI generally transfers the subject mortgage assets to a depositor, who then transfers those mortgage assets to the issuing entity for the related securitization. In return for the transfer of the subject mortgage assets by the depositor to the issuing entity, the issuing entity issues commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are in whole or in part backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, those mortgage assets.
CREFI will generally act as a sponsor, originator and/or mortgage loan seller in the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates. In such transactions there may be a co-sponsor and/or other mortgage loan sellers and originators.
CREFI generally works with rating agencies, unaffiliated mortgage loan sellers, servicers, affiliates and underwriters in structuring a securitization transaction. Generally, CREFI and/or the related depositor contract with other entities to service the multifamily and commercial mortgage loans following their transfer into a trust fund in exchange for a series of certificates and, in certain cases, uncertificated interests.
Review of the CREFI Mortgage Loans
Overview. In connection with the preparation of this prospectus, CREFI conducted a review of the Mortgage Loans or portions thereof that it is selling to the depositor. The review was conducted as set forth below and was conducted with respect to each of the CREFI Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. First, CREFI created a database of information (the “CREFI Securitization Database”) obtained in connection with the origination of the CREFI Mortgage Loans, including:
| ● | certain information from the CREFI Mortgage Loan documents; |
| ● | certain information from the rent rolls and operating statements for, and certain leases relating to, the related Mortgaged Properties (in each case to the extent applicable); |
| ● | insurance information for the related Mortgaged Properties; |
| ● | information from third party reports such as the appraisals, environmental and property condition reports, seismic reports, zoning reports and other zoning information; |
| ● | bankruptcy searches with respect to the related borrowers; and |
| ● | certain information and other search results obtained by CREFI’s deal team for each of the CREFI Mortgage Loans during the underwriting process. |
CREFI also included in the CREFI Securitization Database certain updates to such information received by CREFI’s securitization team after origination, such as information from the interim servicer regarding loan payment status and current escrows, updated rent rolls and leasing activity information provided pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, and information otherwise brought to the attention of CREFI’s securitization team. Such updates were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of any CREFI Mortgage Loan.
Using the information in the CREFI Securitization Database, CREFI created a Microsoft Excel file (the “CREFI Data File”) and provided that file to the depositor for the inclusion in this prospectus (particularly in Annexes A-1, A-2 and A-3 to this prospectus) of information regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. CREFI engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by CREFI, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
| ● | comparing the information in the CREFI Data File against various source documents provided by CREFI that are described above under “—Database” above; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the CREFI Data File; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the CREFI Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. CREFI also reviewed and responded to a Due Diligence Questionnaire (as defined below) relating to the CREFI Mortgage Loans, which questionnaire was prepared by the depositor’s legal counsel for use in eliciting information relating to the CREFI Mortgage Loans and including such information in this prospectus to the extent material.
Although the Due Diligence Questionnaire may be revised from time to time, it typically contains various questions regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers, sponsors and tenants, and any related additional debt. For example, the due diligence questionnaire (a “Due Diligence Questionnaire”) may seek to elicit, among other things, the following information:
| ● | whether any mortgage loans were originated by third party originators and the names of such originators, and whether such mortgage loans were underwritten or re-underwritten in accordance with CREFI’s (or the applicable mortgage loan seller’s) criteria; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans are not first liens, or have a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans are 30 days or more delinquent with respect to any monthly debt service payment as of the Cut-off Date or have been 30 days or more delinquent at any time during the 12-month period immediately preceding the Cut-off Date; |
| ● | a description of any material issues with respect to any of the mortgage loans; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans permit, or have existing, mezzanine debt, additional debt secured by the related mortgaged properties or other material debt, and the material terms and conditions for such debt; |
| ● | whether any mortgaged properties have additional debt that is included in another securitization transaction and information related to such other securitization transaction; |
| ● | whether intercreditor agreements, subordination and standstill agreements or similar agreements are in place with respect to secured debt, mezzanine debt or additional debt and the terms of such agreements; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans are interest-only for their entire term or a portion of their term; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans permit prepayment or defeasance (in whole or in part), or provide for yield maintenance, and the types of prepayment lock-out provisions and prepayment charges that apply; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans permit the release of all or a portion of the related mortgaged properties, and the material terms of any partial release, substitution and condemnation/casualty provisions; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans are cross-collateralized or secured by multiple properties, or have related borrowers with other mortgage loans in the subject securitization; |
| ● | whether any mortgage loans have a right of first refusal or right of first offer or similar options, in favor of a tenant or any other party; |
| ● | whether there are post-close escrows or earn-out reserves that could be used to pay down the mortgage loan, or whether there are escrows or holdbacks that have not been fully funded; |
| ● | information regarding lockbox arrangements, grace periods interest accrual and amortization provisions, non-recourse carveouts, and any other material provisions with respect to the mortgage loan; |
| ● | whether the borrower or sponsor of any related borrower has been subject to bankruptcy proceedings, or has a past or present material criminal charge or record; |
| ● | whether any borrower is not a special purpose entity; |
| ● | whether any borrowers or sponsors of related borrowers have been subject to litigation or similar proceedings and the material terms thereof; |
| ● | whether any borrower under a mortgage loan is affiliated with a borrower under another mortgage loan to be included in the issuing entity; |
| ● | whether any of the mortgage loans is a leasehold mortgage, the terms of the related ground lease, and whether the term of the related ground lease extends at least 20 years beyond the stated loan maturity; |
| ● | a list of any related Mortgaged Properties for which a single tenant occupies over 50% of such property, and whether there are any significant lease rollovers at a particular Mortgaged Property; |
| ● | a list of any significant tenant concentrations or material tenant issues, e.g., dark tenants, subsidized tenants, government or student tenants, or Section 8 tenants, etc.; |
| ● | a description of any material leasing issues at the related Mortgaged Properties; |
| ● | whether any related Mortgaged Properties are subject to condemnation proceedings or litigation; |
| ● | a list of related Mortgaged Properties for which a Phase I environmental site assessment has not been completed, or for which a Phase II environmental site assessment was performed, and whether any environmental site assessment reveals any material adverse environmental condition or circumstance at any related Mortgaged Property except for those which will be remediated by the Cut-off Date; |
| ● | whether there is any terrorism, earthquake, tornado, flood, fire or hurricane damage with respect to any of the related Mortgaged Properties, or whether there are any zoning issues at the mortgaged properties; |
| ● | a list of Mortgaged Properties for which an engineering inspection has not been completed and whether any property inspection revealed material issues; and/or |
| ● | general information regarding property type, condition, use, plans for renovation, etc. |
CREFI also provided to origination counsel a set of mortgage loan representations and warranties substantially similar to those attached as Annex E-1 to this prospectus and requested that origination counsel identify exceptions to such representations and warranties. CREFI compiled and reviewed the draft exceptions received from origination counsel, engaged separate counsel to review the exceptions, revised the exceptions and provided them to the depositor for inclusion on Annex E-2 to this prospectus. In addition, for each CREFI Mortgage Loan originated by CREFI or one of its affiliates, CREFI prepared and delivered to its securitization counsel for review an asset summary, which summary includes important loan terms and certain property level information obtained during the origination process. The loan terms included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, the principal amount, the interest rate, the loan term, the interest calculation method, the due date, any applicable interest-only period, any applicable amortization period, a summary of any prepayment and/or defeasance provisions, a summary of any lockbox and/or cash management provisions, a summary of any release provisions, and a summary of any requirement for the related borrower to fund up-front and/or on-going reserves. The property level information obtained during the origination process included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, a description of the related Mortgaged Property (including property type, ownership structure, use, location, size, renovations, age and physical attributes), information relating to the commercial real estate market in which the Mortgaged Property is located, information relating to the related borrower and sponsor of the related borrower, an underwriter’s assessment of strengths and risks of the loan transaction, tenant analysis, and summaries of third party reports such as appraisal, environmental and property condition reports.
For each CREFI Mortgage Loan, if any, purchased by CREFI or its affiliates from a third-party originator of such CREFI Mortgage Loan, CREFI reviewed the purchase agreement and related representations and warranties, and exceptions to those representations and warranties, made by the seller of such CREFI Mortgage Loan to CREFI or its affiliates, reviewed certain provisions of the related Mortgage Loan documents and third party reports concerning the related Mortgaged Property provided by the originator of such CREFI Mortgage Loan, prepared exceptions to the representations and warranties in the MLPA based upon such review, and provided them to the depositor for inclusion on Annex E-2 to this prospectus. With respect to any CREFI Mortgage Loan that is purchased by CREFI or its affiliates from a third party originator, the representations and warranties made by the third party originator in the related purchase agreement between CREFI or its affiliates, on the one hand, and the third party originator, on the other hand, are solely for the benefit of CREFI or its affiliates. The rights, if any, that CREFI or its affiliates may have under such purchase agreement upon a breach of such representations and warranties made by the third party originator will not be assigned to the trustee for this securitization, and the Certificateholders and the trustee for this securitization will not have any recourse against the third party originator in connection with any breach of the representations and warranties made by such third party originator. As described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—General”, the substitution or repurchase obligation of, or the obligation to make a Loss of Value Payment on the part of, CREFI, as mortgage loan seller, with respect to the CREFI Mortgage Loans under the related MLPA constitutes the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders and the trustee for this securitization for any uncured material breach of any of CREFI’s representations and warranties
regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans, including any CREFI Mortgage Loans that were purchased by CREFI or its affiliates from a third party originator.
In addition, with respect to each CREFI Mortgage Loan, CREFI reviewed, and in certain cases requested that its counsel review, certain Mortgage Loan document provisions as necessary for disclosure of such provisions in this prospectus, such as property release provisions and other provisions specifically disclosed in this prospectus.
Certain Updates. Furthermore, CREFI requested the borrowers under the CREFI Mortgage Loans (or the borrowers’ respective counsel) for updates on any significant pending litigation that existed at origination. Moreover, if CREFI became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of a Mortgaged Property relating to a CREFI Mortgage Loan, CREFI requested information on the property status from the related borrower in order to confirm whether any material damage to the property had occurred.
Large Loan Summaries. Finally, CREFI prepared, and reviewed with origination counsel and/or securitization counsel, the Mortgage Loan summaries for those of the CREFI Mortgage Loans included in the ten largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, and the abbreviated Mortgage Loan summaries for those of the CREFI Mortgage Loans included in the next five (5) largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, which summaries are incorporated in “Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” on Annex A-3.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, CREFI found and concluded that the disclosure regarding the CREFI Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. CREFI also found and concluded that the CREFI Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with CREFI’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except for any material deviations described under “—CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions to CREFI’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below. CREFI attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
CREFI’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
General. CREFI’s commercial mortgage loans (including any co-originated mortgage loans) are primarily originated in accordance with the procedures and underwriting criteria described below. However, variations from the procedures and criteria described below may be implemented as a result of various conditions including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/sponsor or any other pertinent information deemed material by CREFI. Therefore, this general description of CREFI’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it or on its behalf complies entirely with all criteria set forth below.
Process. The credit underwriting process for each of CREFI’s loans is performed by a deal team comprised of real estate professionals which typically includes an originator, an underwriter, a commercial closer and a third party due diligence provider operating under the review of CREFI. This team conducts a thorough review of the related mortgaged property, which in most cases includes an examination of the following information, to the extent both applicable and available: historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third party reports pertaining to appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic condition/engineering (see “—Escrow Requirements”, “—Title Insurance Policy”, “—Property Insurance”, “—Third Party Reports—Appraisal”, “—Third Party Reports—Environmental Report” and “—Third Party Reports—Property Condition Report” below). In some cases (such as a property having a limited operating history or having been recently acquired by its current owner), historical operating statements may not be available. Rent rolls would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality properties or single tenant properties, and tenant leases would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality, self-storage, multifamily and manufactured housing community properties.
A member of CREFI’s deal team or one of its agents performs an inspection of the property as well as a review of the surrounding market environment, including demand generators and competing properties (if any), in order to confirm tenancy information, assess the physical quality of the collateral, determine visibility and access characteristics, and evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market.
CREFI’s deal team or one of its agents also performs a detailed review of the financial status, credit history, credit references and background of the borrower and certain key principals using financial statements, income tax returns, credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation. Circumstances may also warrant an examination of the financial strength and credit of key tenants as well as other factors that may impact the tenants’ ongoing occupancy or ability to pay rent.
After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the deal team finalizes its detailed underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with CREFI’s property-specific, cash flow underwriting guidelines. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure around risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or up-front reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management agreements or guarantees. A complete credit committee package is prepared to summarize all of the above referenced information.
Credit Approval. All commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more credit committees that include senior real estate professionals among others. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the loan, the committee may approve the loan as recommended or request additional due diligence, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio Requirements. CREFI’s underwriting standards generally require a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x and a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%. However, these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions are permitted under the guidelines on the merits of each individual loan, such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees and CREFI’s assessment of the property’s future prospects. Property and loan information is not updated for securitization unless CREFI determines that information in its possession has become stale.
Certain properties may also be encumbered by subordinate debt secured by such property and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower and, when such mezzanine or subordinate debt is taken into account, may result in aggregate debt that does not conform to the aforementioned debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio parameters.
Amortization Requirements. While CREFI’s underwriting guidelines generally permit a maximum amortization period of 30 years, certain loans may provide for interest-only payments through maturity or for a portion of the loan term. If the loan entails only a partial interest-only period, the monthly debt service, annual debt service and debt service coverage ratio set forth in this prospectus and Annex A-1 to this prospectus reflect a calculation on the future (larger) amortizing loan payment. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool” in this prospectus.
Escrow Requirements. CREFI may require borrowers to fund escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and replacement reserves. In addition, CREFI may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items to be released to the borrower upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Such escrows or holdbacks may cover tenant improvements/leasing commissions, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, among other things. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. In some cases, the borrower may be allowed to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of a cash reserve, or provide periodic evidence of timely payment of a typical escrow item. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all of CREFI’s commercial mortgage loans.
Generally, CREFI requires escrows as follows:
| ● | Taxes—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy all taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional sponsor or the sponsor is a high net worth individual or (ii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is required to pay taxes directly or reimburse the landlord for the real estate taxes paid. |
| ● | Insurance—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related borrower or an affiliate thereof maintains a blanket insurance policy, (ii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is obligated to maintain the insurance or is permitted to self-insure, or (iii) if and to the extent that another third party unrelated to the borrower (such as a condominium board, if applicable) is obligated to maintain the insurance. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the mortgaged property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements depending on the property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, including those required with respect to the roof and structure of the improvements. |
| ● | Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—In the case of retail, office and industrial properties, a tenant improvement / leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the term of the mortgage loan to cover anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs that might be associated with re-leasing certain space involving major tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term or (ii) if the rent for the space in question is considered below market. |
| ● | Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) if the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the related mortgaged property’s function, performance or value or (iii) if a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for the repairs. |
| ● | Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee wherein it agrees to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues, (ii) if environmental insurance is obtained or already in place or (iii) if a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party. |
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the CREFI Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A-1 to this prospectus.
Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and CREFI or its counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The provisions of the title insurance policy are required to comply with the mortgage loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (7) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that CREFI deems material.
Property Insurance. CREFI requires the borrower to provide, or authorizes the borrower to rely on a tenant or other third party to obtain, insurance policies meeting the requirements set forth in the mortgage loan representations and warranties in paragraphs (17) and (30) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that CREFI deems material (other than with respect to deductibles and allowing a tenant to self-insure).
Third Party Reports. In addition to or as part of applicable origination guidelines or reviews described above, in the course of originating the CREFI Mortgage Loans, CREFI generally considered the results of third party reports as described below. In many instances, however, one or more provisions of the guidelines were waived or modified in light of the circumstances of the relevant loan or property.
Appraisal
CREFI obtains an appraisal meeting the requirements described in the mortgage loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (42) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that CREFI deems material. In addition, the appraisal (or a separate letter) includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal.
Environmental Report
CREFI generally obtains a Phase I site assessment or an update of a previously obtained site assessment for each mortgaged property prepared by an environmental firm approved by CREFI. CREFI or its designated agent typically reviews the Phase I site assessment to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. In cases in which the Phase I site assessment identifies any such conditions, CREFI generally requires that the condition be addressed in a manner that complies with the mortgage loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (41) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that CREFI deems material.
Property Condition Report
CREFI generally obtains a current property condition report (a “PCR”) for each mortgaged property prepared by a structural engineering firm approved by CREFI. CREFI or an agent typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, CREFI often requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves. See “—Escrow Requirements” above.
Servicing
Interim servicing for all of CREFI’s loans prior to securitization is typically performed by a nationally recognized rated third party interim servicer. In addition, primary servicing is occasionally retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with CREFI, which firms may continue primary servicing certain loans following the securitization closing date. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.
Exceptions to CREFI’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines
One or more of the CREFI Mortgage Loans may vary from the specific CREFI underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the CREFI Mortgage Loans, CREFI may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors.
The CREFI Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth above.
Certain characteristics of the CREFI Mortgage Loans can be found on Annex A-1.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
CREFI most recently filed a Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 9, 2024. CREFI’s Central Index Key is 0001701238. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2021 to and including June 30, 2024, CREFI has no demand, repurchase or replacement history to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
Neither CREFI nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization, except that an affiliate of CREFI will purchase the Class R certificates. However, CREFI and/or its affiliates may acquire in the future other certificates. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—Citi Real Estate Funding Inc.” has been provided by CREFI.
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC
General
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (d/b/a 3650 REIT) (“3650 REIT”) is a Delaware limited liability company. 3650 REIT’s principal offices are located at 2977 McFarlane Rd., Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33133. 3650 REIT’s primary business is the origination, acquisition and sale of mortgage loans secured by commercial properties. 3650 REIT is the Retaining Sponsor and it (or its MOA) is expected to be the holder of the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates, and it (or its affiliate) will be appointed as the initial Directing Holder. 3650 REIT is an affiliate of 3650 REIT Servicing (the Special Servicer and a limited (non-cashiering) subservicer).
3650 REIT is a sponsor of this securitization and one of the mortgage loan sellers. 3650 REIT is the seller or co-seller of seven (7) Mortgage Loans (collectively, 22.6%) (the “3650 REIT Mortgage Loans”). 3650 REIT originated or co-originated all of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans. 3650 REIT and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association co-originated the Columbus Business Park Whole Loan. 3650 REIT, through certain of its affiliates, underwrote or re-underwrote all of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans.
3650 REIT or an affiliate thereof is also the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “3650 REIT or an affiliate” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
3650 REIT’s Securitization Program
This is the seventh (7th) commercial mortgage securitization into which 3650 REIT is contributing loans, and commonly-controlled affiliates of 3650 REIT have contributed loans into five (5) other commercial mortgage securitizations. 3650 REIT began originating and acquiring loans in 2021 and 3650 REIT’s commonly controlled affiliates began originating and acquiring loans in 2017. Neither 3650 REIT nor its affiliates have been involved in the securitization of any other types of financial assets. 3650 REIT originates fixed rate loans throughout the United States secured by, but not limited to, retail, multifamily, office, hospitality and self-storage properties.
In connection with this commercial mortgage securitization transaction, 3650 REIT will transfer the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans to the depositor, who will then transfer the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans to the issuing entity for this securitization. In return for the transfer by the depositor to the issuing entity of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans (together with the other mortgage loans being securitized), the issuing entity will issue commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are, in whole or in part, backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, the mortgage loans being securitized. In coordination with underwriters or initial purchasers and the depositor, 3650 REIT will work with rating agencies, the other mortgage loan sellers, servicers and investors and will participate in structuring the securitization transaction to maximize the overall value and capital structure, taking into account numerous factors, including without limitation geographic and property type diversity and rating agency criteria.
Pursuant to an MLPA, 3650 REIT will make certain representations and warranties, subject to certain exceptions set forth therein, and undertake certain loan document delivery requirements with respect to the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans; and, in the event of an uncured material breach of any such representation and warranty or an uncured material document defect or omission, 3650 REIT will generally be obligated to repurchase or replace the affected mortgage loan or, in some cases, pay an amount estimated to cover the approximate loss associated with such breach, defect or omission.
Neither 3650 REIT nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against 3650 REIT for any losses or other claims in connection with the certificates or the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by 3650 REIT in the related mortgage loan purchase agreement.
Review of 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans
Overview. 3650 REIT, in its capacity as a sponsor of the securitization described in this prospectus, has conducted a review of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans that it will be contributing to this securitization. The review of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of commercial real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of 3650 REIT or one or more of 3650 REIT’s affiliates, or, in certain circumstances, are consultants engaged by 3650 REIT (collectively, the “3650 REIT Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the 3650 REIT Deal Team updated its internal database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, third-party appraisals (as well as environmental reports, engineering assessments and seismic reports, if applicable and obtained), zoning reports, if applicable, evidence of insurance coverage or summaries of the same prepared by an outside insurance consultant, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by 3650 REIT or its affiliates during the underwriting process. After origination of each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan, the 3650 REIT Deal Team updated the information in the database with respect to such 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the applicable servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows,
updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the 3650 REIT Deal Team.
A data tape (the “3650 REIT Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The 3650 REIT Data Tape was used by the 3650 REIT Deal Team to provide the numerical information regarding the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. 3650 REIT engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed or provided by 3650 REIT relating to information in this prospectus regarding the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans. These procedures include:
| ● | comparing the information in the 3650 REIT Data Tape against various source documents provided by 3650 REIT that are described above under “—Database”; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the 3650 REIT Data Tape; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. 3650 REIT engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan, 3650 REIT’s origination counsel prepared a loan and property summary or a due diligence questionnaire that sets forth salient loan terms. In addition, origination counsel for each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan reviewed 3650 REIT’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-2 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of certain sections of the loan agreements relating to certain 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans, (ii) a review of the legal data records referred to above relating to the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel and (iii) a review of due diligence questionnaires completed by the 3650 REIT Deal Team. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions, if any, and condemnation provisions for each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan for compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code.
Securitization counsel also assisted in the preparation of the risk factors and Mortgage Loan summaries set forth on Annex A-3, based on their respective reviews of pertinent sections of the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Other Review Procedures. 3650 REIT confirmed with the applicable servicer that there has not been any recent material casualty to any improvements located on any Mortgaged Property securing a 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan. In addition, if 3650 REIT became aware of a significant natural disaster in the immediate vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing a 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan, 3650 REIT obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the applicable borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
The 3650 REIT Deal Team also conferred with 3650 REIT personnel responsible for the origination of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans to confirm that the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans were originated or acquired in material compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “—Exceptions to 3650 REIT’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, 3650 REIT determined that the disclosure regarding the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. 3650 REIT also determined that the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with 3650 REIT’s underwriting criteria in all material respects, except as described under “—Exceptions to 3650 REIT’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below. 3650 REIT attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. 3650 REIT will perform a review of any mortgage loan that it elects to substitute for a Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with a material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. 3650 REIT and, if appropriate, its legal counsel will review the Mortgage Loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it satisfies each of the criteria required under the terms of the related MLPA and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (collectively, the “3650 REIT Qualification Criteria”). 3650 REIT will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the 3650 REIT Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by 3650 REIT and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by 3650 REIT to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
General. Notwithstanding the discussion below, given the unique nature of commercial mortgaged properties, the underwriting and origination procedures and the credit analysis with respect to any particular commercial mortgage loan may significantly differ from one asset to another, and will be driven by circumstances particular to that property, including, among others, its type, current use, size, location, market conditions, reserve requirements and additional collateral, tenants and leases, borrower identity, sponsorship, performance history and/or other factors. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the underwriting of any particular commercial mortgage loan will conform to the general guidelines described below.
Set forth below is a discussion of certain general underwriting guidelines of 3650 REIT with respect to commercial mortgage loans originated or acquired by 3650 REIT, which in certain instances may be performed by affiliates of 3650 REIT.
Loan Analysis. 3650 REIT generally performs both a credit analysis and a collateral analysis with respect to each commercial mortgage loan. The credit analysis generally includes a review of reports obtained from third party servicers, including judgment, lien, bankruptcy and litigation searches with respect to the guarantor and certain borrower related parties (generally other than borrower related parties with ownership interests of less than 20% of any particular borrower). The collateral analysis generally includes an analysis, other than in the case of newly constructed mortgaged properties, of the historical property operating statements, rent rolls and a review of certain significant tenant leases. 3650 REIT’s credit underwriting also generally includes a review of third-party appraisal, environmental, building condition and seismic reports, if applicable. Generally, 3650 REIT performs or causes to be performed a site inspection to ascertain the overall quality, functionality and competitiveness of the property. 3650 REIT assesses the market in which the property is located to evaluate competitive or comparable properties as well as market trends, major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas and educational or recreational facilities.
Loan Approval. Prior to commitment or closing, all commercial mortgage loans to be originated or acquired by 3650 REIT must be approved by an investment committee, which includes senior personnel from 3650 REIT or its affiliates. The committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended (subject to stipulations and conditions), request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and LTV Ratio. 3650 REIT’s underwriting includes a calculation of the debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio in connection with the origination of a loan. In determining a debt service coverage ratio, 3650 REIT may review and make adjustments to the underwritten net cash flow based on, among other things, historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases and/or budgeted income and expense statements provided by the borrower.
The debt service coverage ratio will generally be calculated based on the underwritten net cash flow from the mortgaged property in question as determined by 3650 REIT and payments on the loan based on actual principal and/or interest due on the loan. However, determination of underwritten net cash flow is often a highly subjective process based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the applicable mortgaged property. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a commercial mortgage loan, 3650 REIT may utilize annual net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected future rental income, expenses and/or occupancy. There can be no assurance that the foregoing assumptions made with respect to any prospective commercial mortgage loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. In addition, 3650 REIT may in some instances have reduced the term interest rate that 3650 REIT would otherwise charge on a mortgage loan based on the credit and collateral characteristics of the related mortgaged property and structural features of the mortgage loan by collecting an upfront fee from the related borrower on the origination date. The decrease in the interest rate would have correspondingly increased the debt service coverage ratio, and, in certain cases, may have increased the debt service coverage ratio sufficiently such that the related mortgage loan satisfied 3650 REIT’s minimum debt service coverage ratio underwriting requirements for such mortgage loan. In addition, with respect to certain mortgage loans originated or acquired by 3650 REIT, there may exist subordinate mortgage debt or mezzanine debt. 3650 REIT may originate or acquire such subordinate mortgage debt or mezzanine debt and may sell such debt to other lenders. Such mortgage loans may have a lower debt service coverage ratio and/or a higher loan-to-value ratio if such subordinate and/or mezzanine debt is taken into account. Additionally, certain mortgage loans may provide for interest-only payments prior to maturity, or for an interest-only period during a portion of the term of the mortgage loan.
The loan-to-value ratio, in general, is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan divided by the estimated value of the related property based on a third-party appraisal.
Evaluation of Borrower, Principals and/or Borrower Sponsors. 3650 REIT evaluates the borrower, its principals and/or the borrower sponsors with respect to credit history and prior experience as an owner and operator of commercial real estate properties. This evaluation may include obtaining and reviewing indications of the borrower sponsor’s financial capacity, and obtaining and reviewing the principal’s and/or borrower sponsor’s prior real estate experience. Although commercial mortgage loans generally are nonrecourse in nature, in the case of certain mortgage loans, the borrower, certain principals of the borrower and/or certain borrower sponsors of the borrower may be required to assume legal responsibility for liabilities arising as a result of, among other things, fraud, misrepresentation, misappropriation or conversion of funds and/or breach of environmental or hazardous materials requirements. Notwithstanding the above described review process, there can be no assurance that a borrower, a principal and/or a borrower sponsor has the financial capacity to meet the obligations that may arise with respect to such liabilities.
Additional Debt. Certain mortgage loans may have or permit in the future certain additional subordinate or mezzanine debt, whether secured or unsecured. It is possible that 3650 REIT may be the lender on that additional debt and may sell such debt to other lenders.
The debt service coverage ratios described above may be lower based on the inclusion of the payments related to such additional debt and the loan-to-value ratios described above may be higher based on the inclusion of the amount of any such additional debt.
Third Party Reports. As part of the underwriting process, 3650 REIT will generally obtain the reports described below:
(i) Appraisals. 3650 REIT will require independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal in connection with the origination or acquisition of each mortgage loan that meets the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, or the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. Each appraisal obtained in connection with the origination of each 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal.
(ii) Environmental Assessment. In connection with the origination or acquisition process, 3650 REIT will, in most cases, require a current Phase I environmental assessment with respect to any mortgaged property. However, when circumstances warrant, 3650 REIT may utilize an update of a prior environmental assessment or a desktop review. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular mortgaged property will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when 3650 REIT or an environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. Based on the environmental assessment, 3650 REIT may (i) determine that another party with sufficient assets is responsible for taking remedial actions directed by an applicable regulatory authority and/or (ii) require the borrower to do one or more of the following: (A) carry out satisfactory remediation activities or other responses prior to the origination of the mortgage loan, (B) establish an operations and maintenance plan, (C) place sufficient funds in escrow or establish a letter of credit (or other financial assurance acceptable to 3650 REIT) at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such remediation within a specified period of time, or (D) obtain the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or a lender insurance policy.
(iii) Engineering Assessment. In connection with the origination or acquisition process, 3650 REIT will, in most cases, require that an engineering firm inspect the mortgaged property to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. Based on the resulting report, 3650 REIT will determine the appropriate response to any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements and any identified deferred maintenance.
(iv) Seismic Report. In connection with the origination or acquisition process, 3650 REIT may, on a case-by-case basis as determined by 3650 REIT and/or its consultants, require a seismic report for certain mortgaged properties.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination or acquisition of a mortgage loan, 3650 REIT will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the related mortgaged property is in material compliance with zoning, land use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to such mortgaged property. Evidence of compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering, zoning or consulting reports and/or representations by the applicable borrower.
Escrow Requirements. 3650 REIT may require borrowers to fund various escrows for, among other things, taxes, insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves, which reserves in many instances will be limited to certain capped amounts. In addition, 3650 REIT may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items such as lease-related matters, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, which escrows or holdbacks may be released upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all mortgage loans originated or acquired by 3650 REIT. The typical required escrows for mortgage loans originated or acquired by 3650 REIT are as follows:
| ● | Taxes – Generally, an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12th of the estimated annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide 3650 REIT with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant pays taxes directly (or 3650 REIT may waive the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that pays taxes for its portion of the mortgaged property directly); or (ii) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances (as defined below) exist. |
| ● | Insurance – Generally, an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12th of the estimated annual property insurance premium are required to provide 3650 REIT with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy; (ii) if the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant maintains the property insurance or self-insures (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that maintains property insurance for its portion of the mortgaged property or self-insures); and/or (iii) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves – Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the mortgaged property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from the property condition or engineering report or to certain minimum requirements by property type. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant repairs and maintains the mortgaged property (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that repairs and maintains its portion of the mortgaged property); and/or (ii) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
| ● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions – A tenant improvement/leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination, during the related mortgage loan term and/or springing upon the occurrence of certain events to cover anticipated leasing commissions, free rent periods and/or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space in the mortgaged property. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant), with a lease that extends beyond the loan term; and/or (ii) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
| ● | Deferred Maintenance – A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of certain material repairs or replacements identified in the property assessment/condition or engineering report. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the borrower sponsor delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs; (ii) if the deferred maintenance items do not materially impact the function, performance or value of the mortgaged property; (iii) if the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant), and the tenant is responsible for the repairs; and/or (iv) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
| ● | Environmental Remediation – An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report. 3650 REIT may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) if the borrower sponsor delivers a guarantee agreeing to complete the remediation; (ii) if environmental insurance is in place or obtained; and/or (iii) if any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
3650 REIT may determine that establishing any of the foregoing escrows or reserves is not warranted given any one or more of (collectively, the “Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances”): (i) the amounts involved are de minimis, (ii) 3650 REIT’s evaluation of the ability of the mortgaged property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve, (iii) the related mortgaged property maintaining a specified debt service coverage ratio, (iv) 3650 REIT having structured springing escrows that arise for identified risks, (v) 3650 REIT having an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve, such as a letter of credit, bond or other financial surety or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower; (vi) 3650 REIT’s belief that there are credit positive characteristics of the borrower, the borrower sponsor and/or the mortgaged property that would offset the need for the escrow or reserve; and/or (vii) such reserves are being collected and held by a third party, such as a management company, a franchisor, title company, or an association.
Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion under this caption “—3650 REIT’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, one or more of the Mortgage Loans contributed to this securitization by 3650 REIT may vary from, or may not comply with, 3650 REIT’s underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the Mortgage Loans contributed to this securitization by 3650 REIT, 3650 REIT may not have strictly applied these underwriting guidelines as the result of a case-by-case permitted exception based upon other compensating or mitigating factors.
Co-Originated or Third Party-Originated Mortgage Loans. One (1) of the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans was co-originated by 3650 REIT and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. In addition, from time to time, 3650 REIT may originate mortgage loans together with other financial institutions. The resulting mortgage loans will be evidenced by two or more promissory notes, at least one of which will reflect 3650 REIT as the payee. 3650 REIT may in the future deposit such promissory notes for which it is named as payee with one or more securitization trusts, while its co-originators may in the future deposit such promissory notes for which they are named payee into other securitization trusts. 3650 REIT may in the future acquire mortgage loans it has not originated and deposit the related promissory notes into one or more securitization trusts.
Exceptions to 3650 REIT’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines
We have disclosed generally our underwriting guidelines with respect to the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans. However, one or more of 3650 REIT’s Mortgage Loans may vary from the specific 3650 REIT underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of 3650 REIT’s Mortgage Loans, 3650 REIT may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors. In certain cases, we may have made exceptions and the underwriting of a particular Mortgage Loan did not comply with all aspects of the disclosed criteria.
In all material respects, the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth above.
Certain characteristics of these mortgage loans can be found on Annex A-1.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
3650 REIT most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the SEC pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 13, 2024. 3650 REIT’s CIK number is 0001840727. 3650 REIT has no
history as a securitizer with respect to any offerings settled prior to November 2021. With respect to the period from and including November 18, 2021 (the closing date of the first securitization into which 3650 REIT sold mortgage loans pursuant to which the underlying transaction documents provide a covenant to repurchase an underlying asset for breach of a representation or warranty) to and including June 30, 2024, 3650 REIT does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage loan securitizations.
3650 REIT’s commonly-owned affiliate, 3650 REIT Loan Funding 1 LLC, most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the SEC pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 13, 2024. 3650 REIT Loan Funding 1 LLC’s CIK number is 0001767304. 3650 REIT Loan Funding 1 LLC has no history as a securitizer with respect to any offerings settled prior to March 2019. With respect to the period from and including March 6, 2019 (the closing date of the first securitization into which 3650 REIT Loan Funding 1 LLC sold mortgage loans pursuant to which the underlying transaction documents provide a covenant to repurchase an underlying asset for breach of a representation or warranty) to and including June 30, 2024, 3650 REIT Loan Funding 1 LLC does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage loan securitizations.
3650 REIT’s commonly-owned affiliate, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 3 LLC, most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the SEC pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 13, 2024. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 3 LLC’s CIK number is 0001858334. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 3 LLC has no history as a securitizer with respect to any offerings settled prior to November 2023. With respect to the period from and including November 7, 2023 (the closing date of the first securitization into which 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 3 LLC sold mortgage loans pursuant to which the underlying transaction documents provide a covenant to repurchase an underlying asset for breach of a representation or warranty) to and including June 30, 2024, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 3 LLC does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage loan securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
3650 REIT will (a) purchase (or cause its MOA to purchase) the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR Certificates on the Closing Date, and (b) be the initial Directing Holder. Except as described above and with respect to any fees retained by 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 REIT, in its capacity as special servicer with respect to this transaction, neither 3650 REIT nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any Certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, 3650 REIT or its affiliates may own in the future interests in certain other Classes of Certificates and any such party will have the right to dispose of such Certificates (other than the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR Certificates) at any time.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC and Midland are expected to enter into a limited subservicing agreement in consideration of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC serving as limited (non-cashiering) sub-servicer with respect to certain provisions under the PSA related to certain of the Mortgage Loans. No subservicing fee will be payable to 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC related to such limited subservicing agreement.
The information set forth under “—3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC” has been provided by 3650 REIT.
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.
General
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Barclays”), a sponsor and a mortgage loan seller, is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters. Barclays is an indirect subsidiary of Barclays Capital Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Barclays Holdings”). The principal offices of Barclays in the United States are located at 745 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019, telephone number (212) 412-4000.
Barclays’ Securitization Program
As a sponsor, Barclays originates or acquires mortgage loans and initiates a securitization transaction by selecting the portfolio of mortgage loans to be securitized and transferring those mortgage loans to a securitization depositor who in turn transfers those mortgage loans to the issuing entity. In selecting a portfolio to be securitized, consideration is given to geographic concentration, property type concentration and rating agency models and criteria. Barclays’ role also includes leading and participating in the selection of third-party service providers such as the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator, and engaging the rating agencies. In coordination with the underwriters for the related offering, Barclays works with rating agencies, investors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transaction.
Barclays was engaged in commercial mortgage loan securitization in the United States from 2004 through 2008 and reengaged in commercial mortgage loan securitization in the United States in 2018. Certain affiliates of Barclays have been engaged in commercial mortgage loan securitization in the United States since 2011. The vast majority of commercial mortgage loans originated by Barclays are intended to be either sold through securitization transactions in which Barclays acts as a sponsor or sold to third parties in individual loan sale transactions. The following is a general description of the types of commercial mortgage loans that Barclays originates for securitization:
| ● | Fixed rate mortgage loans generally having maturities between five and ten years and secured by commercial real estate such as office, retail, hotel, multifamily, manufactured housing, healthcare, self storage and industrial properties. These loans are primarily originated for the purpose of securitization. |
| ● | Floating rate loans generally having shorter maturities and secured by stabilized and non-stabilized commercial real estate properties. These loans are primarily originated for securitization, though in certain cases only a senior interest in the loan is intended to be securitized. |
| ● | Subordinate mortgage loans and mezzanine loans. These loans are generally not originated for securitization and are sold in individual loan sale transactions. |
In general, Barclays does not hold the loans it originates until maturity.
Neither Barclays nor any of its affiliates act as servicer of the commercial mortgage loans in its securitization transactions. Instead, Barclays contracts with other entities to service the mortgage loans in the securitization transactions.
Barclays commenced selling commercial mortgage loans into U.S. securitizations in 2004. During the period commencing in 2004 and ending on July 31, 2024, Barclays or its affiliates were the loan sellers in approximately 227 commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions. Approximately $60.1 billion of the mortgage loans included in those transactions were originated or acquired by Barclays.
The following table sets forth information with respect to originations and securitizations of fixed rate and floating rate commercial and multifamily mortgage loans by Barclays or its affiliates for the years ending on December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and through July 31, 2024.
Fixed and Floating Rate Commercial Loans
Year | Aggregate Principal Balance of Fixed and Floating Rate Loans Securitized in CMBS by Barclays or its Affiliates (as loan seller) (approximate) |
2024* | $ | 4,027,143,554 | |
2023 | $ | 2,492,806,501 | |
2022 | $ | 5,480,581,529 | |
2021 | $ | 7,252,313,300 | |
2020 | $ | 3,115,245,750 | |
2019 | $ | 4,983,162,802 | |
2018 | $ | 3,937,789,900 | |
2017 | $ | 4,971,606,254 | |
2016 | $ | 3,031,242,500 | |
2015 | $ | 5,276,099,519 | |
2014 | $ | 3,351,106,750 | |
2013 | $ | 2,723,393,594 | |
2012 | $ | 2,056,096,250 | |
2011 | $ | 0 | |
2010 | $ | 0 | |
2009 | $ | 0 | |
2008 | $ | 196,399,012 | |
2007 | $ | 2,470,879,020 | |
* Through July 31, 2024.
Review of Barclays Mortgage Loans
Overview. Barclays has conducted a review of the Mortgage Loans (or portions thereof) for which Barclays is a sponsor in this securitization (the “Barclays Mortgage Loans”) in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the Barclays Mortgage Loans was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals at Barclays’ offices (in certain cases remotely) (the “Barclays Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the Barclays Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the Barclays Review Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each Barclays Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related loan documents, underwriting cash flow file, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, seismic studies, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Barclays Review Team during the underwriting process. After origination of each Barclays Mortgage Loan, the Barclays Review Team updated the information in the database with respect to such Barclays Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the Barclays Review Team.
A data tape (the “Barclays Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each Barclays Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The Barclays Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. Barclays and Barclays Capital Inc. engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures, the nature, extent and timing of which were designed by Barclays, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
| ● | comparing the information in the Barclays Data Tape against various source documents provided by Barclays that are described above under “—Database”; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the Barclays Data Tape; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. Barclays and the other originators of the Barclays Mortgage Loans engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the Barclays Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each Barclays Mortgage Loan, Barclays’ and the other originators’ origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties. Barclays’ and the other originators’ origination and underwriting staff also performed a review of the representations and warranties.
Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization to assist in the review of the Barclays Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of Barclays’ asset summary reports for each Barclays Mortgage Loan, (ii) a review of the representations and warranties and exception reports referred to above relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, (iii) the review and assistance in the completion by the Barclays Review Team of a due diligence questionnaire relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans, and (iv) the review of certain loan documents with respect to the Barclays Mortgage Loans.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any material pending litigation of which Barclays was aware at the origination of any Barclays Mortgage Loan, Barclays requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel.
The Barclays Review Team, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization, also reviewed the Barclays Mortgage Loans to determine whether any Barclays Mortgage Loan materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines set forth under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” below.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, Barclays determined that the disclosure regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. Barclays also determined that the Barclays Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with Barclays’ origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except as described under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” below. Barclays attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. Barclays will perform a review of any mortgage loan that it elects to substitute for a mortgage loan in the pool in connection with a material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. Barclays, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related mortgage loan purchase agreement and the pooling and servicing agreement (“Barclays’ Qualification Criteria”). Barclays will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Barclays’ Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by Barclays and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by Barclays to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
After review and participation in the pre-closing due diligence and closing process by Barclays, each of the Barclays Mortgage Loans was generally originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below. Additionally, Barclays reviews the underwriting guidelines of the applicable originator for any Barclays Mortgage Loans that were acquired by Barclays to ensure that each acquired Barclays Mortgage Loan was underwritten pursuant to the underwriting criteria described below. Each lending situation is unique, however, and the facts and circumstances surrounding a particular mortgage loan, such as the quality and location of the real estate collateral, the sponsorship of the borrower and the tenancy of the collateral, will impact the extent to which the general guidelines below are applied to that specific loan. These underwriting criteria are general, and we cannot assure you that every loan will comply in all respects with the guidelines. For additional information with respect to exceptions to the underwriting guidelines, see “—Exceptions” below. Barclays originates mortgage loans principally for securitization.
General. Barclays originates commercial mortgage loans from its headquarters in New York and its West Coast office. Barclays may use table funding arrangements through third party origination platforms that have origination offices in additional locations. Bankers at Barclays and at any table funded lenders focus on sourcing, structuring, underwriting and performing due diligence on their loans. Structured finance bankers work closely with the loans’ originators to ensure that the loans are suitable for securitization and satisfy rating agency criteria. All mortgage loans, including any originated by table funded lenders, must be approved by Barclays’ credit department, as described below under “—Loan Approval”.
Loan Analysis. Generally, Barclays performs both a credit analysis and collateral analysis with respect to a loan applicant and the real estate that will secure a mortgage loan. In general, the analysis of a borrower includes a review of anti-money laundering or OFAC checks, as well as background checks and the analysis of its loan sponsor includes a review of money laundering and background checks, third-party credit reports, bankruptcy and lien searches, general banking references and commercial mortgage related references. In general, the analysis of the collateral includes a site visit (in certain cases by a third party) and a review of the property’s historical operating statements (if available), independent market research, an appraisal with an emphasis on rental and sales comparables, engineering and environmental reports, the property’s historic and current occupancy, financial strengths of tenants, the duration and terms of tenant leases and the use of the property. Each report is reviewed for acceptability by a real estate finance loan underwriter. The borrower’s and property manager’s experience and presence in the subject market are also reviewed. Consideration is also given to anticipated changes in cash flow that may result from changes in lease terms or market considerations.
Borrowers are generally required to be single purpose entities although they are generally not required to be structured to reduce the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt unless the loan has a principal balance of greater than $20 million, in which case additional limitations including the requirement that the borrower have at least one independent director are generally required.
Loan Approval. All mortgage loans originated or table funded by Barclays must be approved by a credit committee. The credit committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and LTV Ratio. Barclays’ underwriting standards generally mandate minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum loan-to-value ratios. A loan to value ratio, generally based upon the appraiser’s determination of value as well as the value derived using a stressed capitalization rate, is considered. The debt service coverage ratio is based upon the underwritten net cash flow and is given particular importance. However, notwithstanding such guidelines, in certain circumstances the actual debt service coverage ratios, loan-to-value ratios and amortization periods for the mortgage loans originated by Barclays may vary from these guidelines.
In addition, Barclays may in some instances have reduced the term interest rate that Barclays would otherwise charge on a Barclays mortgage loan based on the credit and collateral characteristics of the related mortgaged property and structural features of the Barclays mortgage loan by collecting an upfront fee from the related borrower on the origination date. The decrease in the interest rate would have correspondingly increased the debt service coverage ratio, and, in certain cases, may have increased the debt service coverage ratio sufficiently such that the related Barclays mortgage loan satisfied Barclays’ minimum debt service coverage ratio underwriting requirements for such Barclays mortgage loan.
Escrow Requirements. Generally, Barclays requires most borrowers to fund escrows for expenses such as taxes and insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves, in some cases upon the occurrence of a trigger event. In the case of certain hotel loans, FF&E reserves may be held by the franchisor or manager rather than the lender. Generally, the required escrows for mortgage loans originated or acquired by Barclays are as follows (see Annex A-1 for instances in which reserves were not taken):
| ● | Taxes—Typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12 of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances including, but not limited to, (i) where a tenant is required to pay the taxes directly, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (iv) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Insurance—If the property is insured under an individual policy (i.e., the property is not covered by a blanket policy), typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12 of the annual property insurance premium are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a property is covered by a blanket insurance policy maintained by the borrower or loan sponsor, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iii) where an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is responsible for paying all insurance premiums, (iv) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant maintains the property insurance or self-insures (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that maintains property insurance for its portion of the Mortgaged Property),(v) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (vi) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan plus two years. Barclays relies on information provided by an independent engineer to make this determination. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is responsible for replacements under the terms of its lease, (ii) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant repairs and maintains the Mortgaged Property (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that repairs and maintains its portion of the Mortgaged Property), (iii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iv) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (v) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Completion Repair/Environmental Remediation—Typically, a completion repair or remediation reserve is required where an environmental or engineering report suggests that such reserve is necessary. Upon funding of the applicable mortgage loan, Barclays generally requires that at least 100% – 125% of the estimated costs of repairs or replacements be reserved and generally requires that repairs or replacements be completed within a year after the funding of the applicable mortgage loan. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement |
under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a secured creditor insurance policy or borrower insurance policy is in place, (ii) where an investment grade or creditworthy party has agreed to take responsibility, and pay, for any required repair or remediation, (iii) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant is responsible for the repairs, (iv) the amount recommended is less than $50,000, (v) a repair or replacement item that does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property or (vi) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances.
| ● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions—In most cases, various tenants have lease expirations within the mortgage loan term. To mitigate this risk, special reserves may be required to be funded either at origination of the mortgage loan and/or during the mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (ii) where tenant improvement costs are the responsibility of tenants, (iii) where rents at the Mortgaged Property are considered to be sufficiently below market, (iv) where no material leases expire within the mortgage loan term, or the lease roll is not concentrated,(v) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (vi) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | For certain mortgage loans, Barclays requires reserves only upon the occurrence of certain trigger events, such as debt service coverage ratios or tenant-specific tests or occurrences. |
| ● | Other Factors—Other factors that are considered in the origination of a commercial mortgage loan include current operations, occupancy and tenant base. |
Barclays may determine that establishing any of the foregoing escrows or reserves is not warranted in one or more of the following instances (collectively, the “Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances”): (i) the amounts involved are de minimis, (ii) Barclays’ evaluation of the ability of the Mortgaged Property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve, (iii) based on the Mortgaged Property maintaining a specified debt service coverage ratio, (iv) Barclays has structured springing escrows that arise for identified risks, (v) Barclays has an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower; (vi) Barclays believes there are credit positive characteristics of the borrower, the sponsor of the borrower and/or the Mortgaged Property that would offset the need for the escrow or reserve; or (vii) the reserves are being collected and held by a third party, such as a management company, a franchisor, or an association.
Servicing. Interim servicing for all loans originated or acquired by Barclays prior to securitization is typically performed by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association.
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the discussion under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes” above, one or more of the Barclays Mortgage Loans may vary from, or do not comply with, Barclays underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the Barclays Mortgage Loans, Barclays may not have strictly applied the underwriting guidelines described above as the result of a case by case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors. On a case-by-case basis, the lender may be adjusting underwritten rent to reflect these situations. None of the Barclays Mortgage Loans have exceptions to the related underwriting criteria.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
Barclays has most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on August 13, 2024 in connection with it being a securitizer of certain types of mortgage loans. Barclays’ Central Index Key is 0001549574. As of June 30, 2024, it has no history of repurchases or repurchase requests required to be reported by Barclays under Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act, as amended, with respect to breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage loan securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
Neither Barclays nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, Barclays and/or its affiliates may acquire in the future certain classes of certificates. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
Neither Barclays nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against Barclays for any losses or other claims in connection with the certificates or the mortgage loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by Barclays in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”. Barclays Holdings will agree to repurchase or substitute Barclays Mortgage Loans with material document defects or material breaches of representations and warranties to the same extent as Barclays. Notwithstanding the existence of any such agreement, we cannot assure you that Barclays or Barclays Holdings will have the financial ability to effect or cause any such repurchase or substitution and no other entity will be responsible for doing so if Barclays and Barclays Holdings fail with respect to such obligations.
From time to time, Barclays is engaged in various legal and/or regulatory matters, which may include legal proceedings by or against Barclays, enquiries and examinations, requests for information, audits, investigations and legal and other proceedings by regulators, governmental and other public bodies in connection with areas of banking and business activities in which Barclays is or has been engaged.
The information set forth under “—Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc.” has been provided by Barclays.
Bank of Montreal
General
Bank of Montreal (“BMO”) started its business in Montreal in 1817 and was incorporated in 1821 by an Act of Lower Canada as the first Canadian chartered bank. Since 1871, BMO has been a chartered bank under the Bank Act (Canada) (the “Bank Act”), and is named in Schedule I of the Bank Act. The Bank Act is the charter of BMO and governs its operations. BMO is a registered bank holding company and is a financial holding company under the United States Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. BMO’s head office is located at 129 rue Saint Jacques, Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1L6. Its executive offices are located at 100 King Street West, 1 First Canadian Place, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1A1. BMO offers a broad range of products and services directly and through Canadian and non-Canadian subsidiaries, offices, and branches. BMO has bank branches in Canada and the United States and operates internationally in major financial markets and trading areas through its offices in other jurisdictions, including the United States.
BMO originated, co-originated or acquired all of the Mortgage Loans or portions thereof that it is contributing to this securitization (the “BMO Mortgage Loans”), and funded the origination or acquisition of such BMO Mortgage Loans through its Chicago branch. BMO originates, and may purchase from other lenders, commercial and multifamily mortgage loans primarily for the purpose of securitizing them in CMBS transactions. Since 1984, BMO’s Chicago branch has been chartered as a United States branch of the Bank of Montreal with the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (“IDFPR”) and, accordingly, is regulated by the IDFPR and the Federal Reserve Board under the United States International Banking Act. BMO’s Chicago branch maintains its principal office at 320 South Canal Street, 8th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
In addition to CMBS, BMO has been engaged in the securitization of other asset classes, including auto leases and/or auto loans, consumer installment loans, credit card receivables, student loans, and residential mortgages, among others.
BMO is an affiliate of BMO Capital Markets Corp., one of the underwriters and a wholly-owned subsidiary of BMO Financial Corp. (“BMO Financial”). BMO Financial is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BMO. As a financial holding company, BMO Financial is subject to the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. BMO Financial and its subsidiaries provide retail and commercial financial products and services through more than 1,000 banking offices located throughout the United States. BMO Financial is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board reports and other information regarding its business operations and business operations of its subsidiaries.
BMO’s Commercial Mortgage Origination and Securitization Program
BMO, directly or through correspondents or affiliates, originates or co-originates multifamily and commercial mortgage loans throughout the United States. Although BMO did not originate multifamily and commercial mortgage loans prior to 2021, BMO is an affiliate of BMO Bank, N.A. (“BBNA”), which has been engaged in the origination of multifamily and commercial mortgage for over ten years. In addition, since 2019, BBNA has originated or co-originated several large commercial mortgage loans that were contributed to single asset single borrower (SASB) securitizations, and BBNA acted as loan seller and sponsor in such securitizations. Many BMO staff – such as members of the BMO Credit and Corporate Banking teams – provide services on an enterprise level, including to both BBNA and BMO. Further, BMO’s securitization financing guidelines, underwriting guidelines, and credit approval process are substantially similar to those utilized for other securitization programs within the BMO enterprise.
The total amount of loans securitized by BMO from December 17, 2019 through March 31, 2024 is approximately $10.3 billion.
In addition, in the normal course of its business, BMO may also acquire multifamily and commercial mortgage loans from various third-party originators. These mortgage loans may have been originated using underwriting guidelines not established by BMO.
The multifamily and commercial mortgage loans originated, co-originated or acquired by BMO include both fixed rate and floating-rate loans and both smaller “conduit” loans and large loans.
In connection with the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates, BMO generally transfers the subject mortgage assets to a depositor, who then transfers those mortgage assets to the issuing entity for the related securitization. In return for the transfer of the subject mortgage assets by the depositor to the issuing entity, the issuing entity issues commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are in whole or in part backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, those mortgage assets.
BMO will generally act as a sponsor, originator and/or mortgage loan seller in the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates. In such transactions there may be a co-sponsor and/or other mortgage loan sellers and originators.
BMO generally works with rating agencies, unaffiliated mortgage loan sellers, servicers, affiliates and underwriters in structuring a securitization transaction. Generally BMO and/or the related depositor contract with other entities to service the multifamily and commercial mortgage loans following their transfer into a trust fund in exchange for a series of certificates and, in certain cases, uncertificated interests.
Review of the BMO Mortgage Loans
General. In connection with the preparation of this prospectus, BMO conducted a review of the Mortgage Loans that it is selling to the depositor. The review was conducted as set forth below and was conducted with respect to each of the BMO Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. First, BMO created a database of information (the “BMO Securitization Database”) obtained in connection with the origination or acquisition of the BMO Mortgage Loans, including:
| ● | certain information from the BMO Mortgage Loan documents; |
| ● | certain information from the rent rolls and operating statements for, and certain leases relating to, the related Mortgaged Properties (in each case to the extent applicable); |
| ● | insurance information for the related Mortgaged Properties; |
| ● | information from third party reports such as the appraisals, environmental and property condition reports, seismic reports, zoning reports and other zoning information; |
| ● | bankruptcy searches with respect to the related borrowers; and |
| ● | certain information and other search results obtained by BMO’s deal team for each of the BMO Mortgage Loans during the underwriting process. |
BMO also included in the BMO Securitization Database certain updates to such information received by BMO’s securitization team after origination or acquisition, such as information from the interim servicer regarding loan payment status and current escrows, updated rent rolls and leasing activity information provided pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, and information otherwise brought to the attention of BMO’s securitization team. Such updates were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of any BMO Mortgage Loan.
Using the information in the BMO Securitization Database, BMO created a Microsoft Excel file (the “BMO Data File”) and provided that file to the depositor for the inclusion in this prospectus (particularly in Annexes A, B and C to this prospectus) of information regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. BMO engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by BMO, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
| ● | comparing the information in the BMO Data File against various source documents provided by BMO that are described above under “—Database”; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the BMO Data File; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the BMO Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. BMO also reviewed and responded to a due diligence questionnaire (a “Due Diligence Questionnaire”) relating to the BMO Mortgage Loans, which questionnaire was prepared by the depositor’s legal counsel for use in eliciting information relating to the BMO Mortgage Loans and including such information in this prospectus to the extent material.
Although the Due Diligence Questionnaire may be revised from time to time, it typically contains various questions regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers, sponsors and tenants, and any related additional debt.
BMO also provided to origination counsel a set of mortgage loan representations and warranties substantially similar to those attached as Annex E-1 to this prospectus and requested that origination counsel identify exceptions to such representations and warranties. BMO compiled and reviewed the draft exceptions received from origination counsel, engaged separate counsel to review the exceptions, revised the exceptions and provided them to the depositor for inclusion on Annex E-5 to this prospectus. In addition, for each BMO Mortgage Loan originated by BMO or one of its affiliates, BMO prepared and
delivered to its securitization counsel for review an asset summary, which summary includes important loan terms and certain property level information obtained during the origination process. The loan terms included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, the principal amount, the interest rate, the loan term, the interest calculation method, the due date, any applicable interest-only period, any applicable amortization period, a summary of any prepayment and/or defeasance provisions, a summary of any lockbox and/or cash management provisions, a summary of any release provisions, and a summary of any requirement for the related borrower to fund up-front and/or on-going reserves. The property level information obtained during the origination process included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, a description of the related Mortgaged Property (including property type, ownership structure, use, location, size, renovations, age and physical attributes), information relating to the commercial real estate market in which the Mortgaged Property is located, information relating to the related borrower and sponsor of the related borrower, an underwriter’s assessment of strengths and risks of the loan transaction, tenant analysis, and summaries of third party reports such as appraisal, environmental and property condition reports.
For each BMO Mortgage Loan, if any, purchased by BMO or its affiliates from a third-party originator of such Mortgage Loan, BMO reviewed the purchase agreement and related representations and warranties, and exceptions to those representations and warranties, made by the seller of such BMO Mortgage Loan to BMO or its affiliates, reviewed certain provisions of the related Mortgage Loan documents and third party reports concerning the related mortgaged property provided by the originator of such BMO Mortgage Loan, prepared exceptions to the representations and warranties in the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement based upon such review, and provided them to the depositor for inclusion on Annex E-5 to this prospectus. With respect to any BMO Mortgage Loan that is purchased by BMO or its affiliates from a third party originator, the representations and warranties made by the third party originator in the related purchase agreement between BMO or its affiliates, on the one hand, and the third party originator, on the other hand, are solely for the benefit of BMO or its affiliates. The rights, if any, that BMO or its affiliates may have under such purchase agreement upon a breach of such representations and warranties made by the third party originator will not be assigned to the Trustee, and none of the Certificateholders or the Trustee will have any recourse against the third party originator in connection with any breach of the representations and warranties made by such third party originator. As described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—General”, the substitution or repurchase obligation of, or the obligation to make a Loss of Value Payment on the part of, BMO, as Mortgage Loan Seller, with respect to the BMO Mortgage Loans under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement constitutes the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders and the Trustee for any uncured material breach of any BMO’s representations and warranties regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans, including any BMO Mortgage Loan that is purchased by BMO or its affiliates from a third party originator.
In addition, with respect to each BMO Mortgage Loan, BMO reviewed, and in certain cases requested that its counsel review, certain Mortgage Loan document provisions as necessary for disclosure of such provisions in this prospectus, such as property release provisions and other provisions specifically disclosed in this prospectus.
Certain Updates. Furthermore, BMO requested the borrowers under the BMO Mortgage Loans (or the borrowers’ respective counsel) for updates on any significant pending litigation that existed at origination. Moreover, if BMO became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of a mortgaged property relating to a BMO Mortgage Loan, BMO requested information on the property status from the related borrower in order to confirm whether any material damage to the property had occurred.
Large Loan Summaries. Finally, BMO prepared, and reviewed with origination counsel and/or securitization counsel, the loan summaries for those of the BMO Mortgage Loans included in the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the mortgage pool, and the abbreviated loan summaries for those of the BMO Mortgage Loans included in the next 5 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the mortgage pool, which loan summaries and abbreviated loan summaries are incorporated in the “Description of the Top 15 Mortgage Loans” in Annex A-3 to this prospectus.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, BMO found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the disclosure regarding the BMO Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. BMO also found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the BMO Mortgage Loans were originated (or acquired and reunderwritten) in accordance with BMO’s origination procedures and underwriting guidelines, except for any material deviations described under “—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” below. BMO attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
BMO’s Origination Procedures and Underwriting Guidelines
General. BMO’s commercial mortgage loans (including any co-originated mortgage loans) are primarily originated in accordance with the origination procedures and underwriting guidelines described below. Furthermore, with respect to the BMO Mortgage Loans that were acquired by BMO, BMO reviewed such BMO Mortgage Loans to ensure that each such BMO Mortgage Loan complied with the underwriting guidelines described below. However, variations from these origination procedures and underwriting guidelines may be implemented as a result of various conditions including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/sponsor or any other pertinent information deemed material by BMO. Therefore, this general description of BMO’s origination procedures and underwriting guidelines is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it or on its behalf complies entirely with all procedures and guidelines set forth below.
Process. The credit underwriting process for each of the BMO Mortgage Loans is performed by a deal team comprised of real estate professionals which typically includes an originator, an underwriter, a commercial closer and a third party due diligence provider operating under the review of BMO or an affiliate thereof. This team conducts a thorough review of the related mortgaged property, which in most cases includes an examination of the following information, to the extent both applicable and available: historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third party reports pertaining to appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic condition/engineering (see “—Escrow Requirements”, “—Title Insurance Policy”, “—Property Insurance”, “—Third Party Reports—Appraisal”, “—Third Party Reports—Environmental Report” and “—Third Party Reports—Property Condition Report” below). In some cases (such as a property having a limited operating history or having been recently acquired by its current owner), historical operating statements may not be available. Rent rolls would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality properties or single tenant properties, and tenant leases would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality, self-storage, multifamily and manufactured housing community properties.
A member of BMO’s deal team or one of its agents or designees performs an inspection of the property as well as a review of the surrounding market environment, including demand generators and competing properties (if any), in order to confirm tenancy information, assess the physical quality of the collateral, determine visibility and access characteristics, and evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market. In the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, a member of BMO’s deal team or one of its agents or designees will either perform an inspection of the property or review a third party inspection report.
BMO’s deal team or one of its agents or designees also performs a detailed review of the financial status, credit history, credit references and background of the borrower and certain key principals using financial statements, income tax returns, credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation. Circumstances may also warrant an examination of the financial strength and credit of key tenants as well as other factors that may impact the tenants’ ongoing occupancy or ability to pay rent.
After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the deal team finalizes its detailed underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with BMO’s property-specific, cash flow underwriting guidelines. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure in a manner to mitigate risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or up-front reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management agreements or guarantees. A complete credit approval package is prepared to summarize all of the above referenced information.
Credit Approval. As part of the mortgage loan approval process, all commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more senior real estate professionals (which may consist of the group head, the securitization finance head, and/or representatives from underwriting, securitization, capital markets or closing) for review. After a review of the credit package and/or term sheet and a discussion of the loan, the designated reviewer(s) may approve the loan as recommended or request additional due diligence or loan structure, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio Requirements. BMO’s underwriting guidelines generally require a minimum debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.20x and a maximum loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 80%. However, these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions are permitted under the guidelines on the merits of each individual loan, such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees and BMO’s assessment of the property’s future prospects. Property and loan information is not updated for securitization unless BMO determines that information in its possession has become stale.
In addition, BMO may in some instances have reduced the term interest rate that BMO would otherwise charge on a BMO mortgage loan based on the credit and collateral characteristics of the related mortgaged property and structural features of the BMO mortgage loan by collecting an upfront fee from the related borrower on the origination date. The decrease in the interest rate would have correspondingly increased the debt service coverage ratio, and, in certain cases, may have increased the debt service coverage ratio sufficiently such that the related BMO mortgage loan satisfied BMO’s minimum debt service coverage ratio underwriting requirements for such BMO mortgage loan.
Certain properties may also be encumbered by subordinate debt secured by such property and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower and when such mezzanine or subordinate debt is taken into account, may result in aggregate debt that does not conform to the aforementioned DSCR and LTV parameters.
Amortization Requirements. While BMO’s underwriting guidelines generally permit a maximum amortization period of 30 years, certain loans may provide for interest-only payments through maturity or for a portion of the loan term. If the loan entails only a partial interest-only period, the monthly debt service, annual debt service and DSCR set forth in this prospectus and Annex A-1 to this prospectus reflect a calculation on the future (larger) amortizing loan payment. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
Escrow Requirements. BMO may require borrowers to fund escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and replacement reserves. In addition, BMO may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items to be released to the borrower upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Such escrows or holdbacks may cover tenant improvements/leasing commissions, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, among other things. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. In some cases, the borrower may be allowed to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of a cash reserve, or provide periodic evidence of timely payment of a typical escrow item. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all of BMO’s commercial mortgage loans.
Generally, subject to the discussion in the prior paragraph, BMO requires escrows as follows:
| ● | Taxes—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy real estate taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or the sponsor is a high net-worth individual or (ii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is required to pay taxes directly or to reimburse the landlord for real estate taxes paid. |
| ● | Insurance—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or the sponsor is a high net-worth individual, (ii) if the related borrower or an affiliate thereof maintains a blanket insurance policy, (iii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is obligated to maintain the insurance or is permitted to self-insure, or (iv) if and to the extent that another third party unrelated to the borrower (such as a condominium board, if applicable) is obligated to maintain the insurance. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the mortgaged property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements depending on the property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, including those required with respect to the roof and structure of the improvements. |
| ● | Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—In the case of retail, office, mixed use and industrial properties, a tenant improvement / leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the term of the mortgage loan to cover anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs that might be associated with re-leasing certain space involving major tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term or (ii) if the rent for the space in question is considered below market. |
| ● | Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) if the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the related mortgaged property’s function, performance or value or (iii) if a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for the repairs. |
| ● | Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee wherein it agrees to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues, (ii) if environmental insurance is obtained or already in place or (iii) if a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party. |
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the BMO Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A-1 to this prospectus.
Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and BMO or its counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The provisions of the title insurance policy are required to comply with the Mortgage Loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (6) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that BMO deems material.
Property Insurance. BMO requires the borrower to provide, or authorizes the borrower to rely on a tenant or other third party to obtain, insurance policies meeting the requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan representations and warranties in paragraphs (16) and (29) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that BMO deems material (other than with respect to deductibles and allowing a tenant to self-insure).
Third Party Reports. In addition to or as part of applicable origination guidelines or reviews described above, in the course of originating the BMO Mortgage Loans, BMO generally considered the results of third party reports as described below. In many instances, however, one or more provisions of the guidelines were waived or modified in light of the circumstances of the relevant loan or property.
Appraisal. BMO (or, in the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, the related originator) obtains an appraisal meeting the requirements described in the Mortgage Loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (41) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that BMO deems material. In addition, the appraisal (or a separate letter) includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal.
Environmental Report. BMO (or, in the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, the related originator) generally obtains a Phase I site assessment or an update of a previously obtained site assessment for each mortgaged property prepared by an environmental firm approved by BMO. BMO or its designated agent (or, in the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, the related originator) typically reviews the Phase I site assessment to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. In cases in which the Phase I site assessment identifies any such conditions, BMO generally requires that the condition be addressed in a manner that complies with the Mortgage Loan representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (40) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus without any exceptions that BMO deems material.
Property Condition Report. BMO (or, in the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, the related originator) generally obtains a current property condition report (a “PCR”) for each mortgaged property prepared by a structural engineering firm approved by BMO. BMO or an agent (or, in the case of a mortgage loan acquired by BMO from a third party originator, the related originator) typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, BMO often requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves. See “—Escrow Requirements” above.
Servicing. Interim servicing for all BMO’s mortgage loans prior to securitization is typically performed by a nationally recognized rated third party interim servicer. In addition, primary servicing is occasionally retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with BMO, which firms may continue primary servicing certain loans following the securitization closing date. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines. One or more of the BMO Mortgage Loans may vary from the specific BMO underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the BMO Mortgage Loans, BMO may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors.
With respect to the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan (1.5%) and SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center (1.4%), each such Mortgage Loan was originated with certain exceptions to BMO’s underwriting guidelines with respect to property insurance and BMO decided to include those Mortgage Loans in the pool based on certain compensating factors, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Insurance Considerations”.
Except as set forth above, the BMO Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the related underwriting guidelines set forth above.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
BMO most recently filed a Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 12, 2024. BMO’s Central Index Key is 0000927971. As of June 30, 2024, BMO had no demand, repurchase or replacement history to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
Neither BMO nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization as of the Closing Date. However, BMO and/or its affiliates may acquire in the future certain classes of certificates. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—Bank of Montreal” has been provided by BMO.
German American Capital Corporation
General. German American Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“GACC”), is a sponsor, an originator and a mortgage loan seller in this securitization transaction. GACC or DBR Investments Co. Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“DBRI”), an affiliate of GACC, originated or co-originated (either directly or, in some cases, through table funding arrangements) all of the GACC Mortgage Loans, except with respect to the Mortgage Loans set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Co-Originated or Unaffiliated Third-Party Originated Mortgage Loans” for which GACC is identified as a Mortgage Loan Seller.
GACC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp., which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, a German bank. GACC is an affiliate of (i) DBRI, an originator and (ii) Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., an underwriter. The principal offices of GACC are located at 1 Columbus Circle, New York, New York 10019. It is expected that GACC or DBRI will be the holder of the companion loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GACC” or “DBRI”, as applicable, in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General” after the Closing Date in the ordinary course of business and such Companion Loans may be securitized in one or more future securitization transactions or otherwise transferred at any time.
Deutsche Bank AG (together with certain affiliates, “Deutsche Bank”) filed a Form 6-K with the SEC on December 23, 2016. The Form 6-K states that Deutsche Bank “has reached a settlement in principle with the Department of Justice in the United States (“DOJ”) regarding civil claims that the DOJ considered in connection with the bank’s issuance and underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and related securitization activities between 2005 and 2007. Under the terms of the settlement
agreement, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of US dollar 3.1 billion and to provide US dollar 4.1 billion in consumer relief in the United States. The consumer relief is expected to be primarily in the form of loan modifications and other assistance to homeowners and borrowers, and other similar initiatives to be determined, and delivered over a period of at least five years.” On January 17, 2017, the DOJ issued a press release officially announcing a $7.2 billion settlement with Deutsche Bank “resolving federal civil claims that Deutsche Bank misled investors in the packaging, securitization, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) between 2006 and 2007… The settlement requires Deutsche Bank to pay a $3.1 billion civil penalty under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). Under the settlement, Deutsche Bank will also provide $4.1 billion in relief to underwater homeowners, distressed borrowers and affected communities.”
GACC’s Securitization Program. GACC has been engaged as an originator and/or seller/contributor of loans into CMBS securitizations for more than ten years.
GACC has been a seller of loans into securitization programs including (i) the “COMM” program, in which its affiliate Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation (“DMARC”) is the depositor, (ii) the “CD” program in which DMARC is the depositor on a rotating basis with Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., (iii) the “Benchmark” program in which DMARC is the depositor on a rotating basis with Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. and GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II and (iv) programs where third party entities, including affiliates of General Electric Capital Corporation, Capmark Finance Inc. (formerly GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation) and others, have acted as depositors.
Under the COMM name, GACC has had two primary securitization programs, the “COMM FL” program, into which large floating rate commercial mortgage loans were securitized, and the “COMM Conduit/Fusion” program, into which both fixed rate conduit loans and large loans were securitized.
GACC acquires both fixed rate and floating rate commercial mortgage loans backed by a range of commercial real estate properties including office buildings, apartments, shopping malls, hotels, and industrial/warehouse properties. The total amount of loans securitized by GACC from October 1, 2010 through June 30, 2024 is approximately $111.498 billion.
GACC or its affiliates have purchased loans for securitization in the past and it may elect to purchase loans for securitization in the future. If GACC or its affiliates purchase loans for securitization, GACC or such affiliate will either reunderwrite the mortgage loans it purchases, or perform other procedures to ascertain the quality of such loans, which procedures will be subject to approval by credit risk management officers.
In coordination with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and other underwriters or initial purchasers, GACC works with NRSROs, other loan sellers, servicers and investors in structuring a securitization transaction to maximize the overall value and capital structure, taking into account numerous factors, including without limitation geographic and property type diversity and NRSRO criteria.
For the most part, GACC and its affiliates rely on independent rated third parties to service loans held pending sale or securitization. It maintains interim servicing agreements with large, institutional commercial mortgage loan servicers who are highly rated by the NRSROs. Periodic financial review and analysis, including monitoring of ratings, of each of the servicers with which GACC and its affiliates have servicing arrangements is conducted under the purview of loan underwriting personnel.
Pursuant to an MLPA, GACC will make certain representations and warranties, subject to certain exceptions set forth therein (and in Annex E-6), to the depositor and will covenant to provide certain documents regarding the Mortgage Loans it is selling to the depositor (the “GACC Mortgage Loans”) and, in connection with certain breaches of such representations and warranties or certain defects with respect to such documents, which breaches or defects are determined to have a material adverse effect on the value of the subject GACC Mortgage Loans or such other standard as is described in the related MLPA, may have an obligation to repurchase such Mortgage Loan, cure the subject defect or breach, replace the subject Mortgage Loan with a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan or make a Loss of Value Payment, as
the case may be. The depositor will assign certain of its rights under each MLPA to the issuing entity. In addition, GACC has agreed to indemnify the depositor, the underwriters and/or certain of their respective affiliates with respect to certain liabilities arising in connection with the issuance and sale of the certificates. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Assignment of the Mortgage Loans”.
Review of GACC Mortgage Loans.
Overview. GACC, in its capacity as the sponsor and the mortgage loan seller of the GACC Mortgage Loans, has conducted a review of the GACC Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. GACC determined the nature, extent and timing of the review and the level of assistance provided by any third parties. The review of the GACC Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of one or more of GACC’s affiliates (the “GACC Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the GACC Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Data Tape. To prepare for securitization, members of the GACC Deal Team created a data tape (the “GACC Data Tape”) containing detailed loan-level and property-level information regarding each GACC Mortgage Loan. The GACC Data Tape was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, appraisals, environmental reports, seismic reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance policies, borrower supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the DB Originators during the underwriting process. After origination of each GACC Mortgage Loan, the GACC Deal Team updated the information in the GACC Data Tape with respect to the GACC Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related loan servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the GACC Deal Team. The GACC Data Tape was used by the GACC Deal Team to provide the numerical information regarding the GACC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. GACC engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by GACC relating to information in this prospectus regarding the GACC Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
| ● | comparing the information in the GACC Data Tape against various source documents provided by GACC that are described above under “—Data Tape”; |
| ● | comparing numerical information regarding the GACC Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the GACC Data Tape; and |
| ● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the GACC Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. GACC engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the GACC Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of securitization of each GACC Mortgage Loan originated by the applicable DB Originator, origination counsel prepared a loan summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from GACC’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each GACC Mortgage Loan reviewed GACC’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex E-1 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties set forth on Annex E-6.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the GACC Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the loan documents with respect to certain of the GACC Mortgage Loans that deviate materially from GACC’s standard form document, (ii) a review of the loan summaries referred to above relating to the GACC Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, and (iii) a review of a due diligence questionnaire completed by the origination counsel. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions (other than the partial
defeasance provisions), if any, for each GACC Mortgage Loan with multiple Mortgaged Properties or, to the extent identified by origination counsel, for each GACC Mortgage Loan with permitted outparcel releases or similar releases for compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code.
GACC prepared, and reviewed with origination counsel and/or securitization counsel, the loan summaries for those of the GACC Mortgage Loans included in the 10 largest Mortgage Loans in the mortgage pool, and the abbreviated loan summaries for those of the GACC Mortgage Loans included in the next 5 largest Mortgage Loans in the mortgage pool, which loan summaries and abbreviated loan summaries are incorporated in Annex A-3.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any GACC Mortgage Loan, GACC requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. In connection with the origination of each GACC Mortgage Loan, GACC, together with origination counsel, conducted a search with respect to each borrower under the related GACC Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy. If GACC became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing a GACC Mortgage Loan, GACC obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
With respect to the GACC Mortgage Loans originated by a DB Originator, the GACC Deal Team also consulted with the applicable GACC Mortgage Loan origination team to confirm that the GACC Mortgage Loans were originated in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “—Exceptions” below.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, GACC determined that the disclosure regarding the GACC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. GACC also determined that the GACC Mortgage Loans were originated (or acquired and re-underwritten) in accordance with the applicable DB Originator’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except as described below under “—Exceptions”. GACC attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes.
General. DBRI is an originator and is affiliated with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., one of the underwriters. DBRI is referred to as the “DB Originator” in this prospectus. Each DB Originator originates loans located in the United States that are secured by retail, multifamily, office, hotel and industrial/warehouse properties. All of the mortgage loans originated by a DB Originator generally are originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below. However, each lending situation is unique, and the facts and circumstance surrounding the mortgage loan, such as the quality and location of the real estate, the sponsorship of the borrower and the tenancy of the property, will impact the extent to which the general guidelines below are applied to a specific loan. This underwriting criteria is general, and we cannot assure you that every mortgage loan will conform in all respects with the guidelines.
Loan Analysis. In connection with the origination of mortgage loans, the applicable DB Originator conducts an extensive review of the related mortgaged property, including an analysis of the appraisal, environmental report, property operating statements, financial data, rent rolls, sales where applicable and related information or statements of occupancy rates provided by the borrower and, with respect to the mortgage loans secured by retail and office properties, certain major tenant leases and the tenant’s credit. Generally, borrowers are required to be single purpose entities which do not have a credit history; therefore, the financial strength and character of certain of the borrower’s key principals are examined prior to approval of the mortgage loan through a review of available financial statements and public records searches. A member of the applicable DB Originator’s underwriting or due diligence team, or a consultant or other designee, visits the mortgaged property for a site inspection to confirm the occupancy rates of the mortgaged property, and analyzes the mortgaged property’s sub-market and the utility of the mortgaged property within the sub-market. Unless otherwise specified in this prospectus, all financial,
occupancy and other information contained in this prospectus is based on such information and we cannot assure you that such financial, occupancy and other information remains accurate.
Cash Flow Analysis. The applicable DB Originator reviews, among other things, historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases and/or budgeted income and expense statements provided by the borrower and makes adjustments in order to determine a debt service coverage ratio, including taking into account the benefits of any governmental assistance programs. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Information”.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio. The underwriting includes a calculation of the debt service coverage ratio and the loan-to-value ratio in connection with the origination of each loan.
The debt service coverage ratio will generally be calculated based on the ratio of the underwritten net cash flow from the property in question as determined by the applicable DB Originator and payments on the loan based on actual principal and/or interest due on the loan. However, underwritten net cash flow is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property collateral. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, annual net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected future rental income, expenses and/or occupancy may be utilized. We cannot assure you that the foregoing assumptions made with respect to any prospective multifamily or commercial mortgage loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. For specific discussions on the particular assumptions and adjustments, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool” and Annex A-1 and Annex A-3. The loan-to-value ratio, in general, is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan divided by the estimated value of the related property based on an appraisal obtained in accordance with the guidelines described under “—Appraisal and Loan-to-Value Ratio” below. In addition, a DB Originator may in some instances have reduced the term interest rate that such DB Originator would otherwise charge on a mortgage loan based on the credit and collateral characteristics of the related mortgaged property and structural features of the mortgage loan by collecting an upfront fee from the related borrower on the origination date. The decrease in the interest rate would have correspondingly increased the debt service coverage ratio, and, in certain cases, may have increased the debt service coverage ratio sufficiently such that the related mortgage loan satisfied such DB Originator’s minimum debt service coverage ratio underwriting requirements for such mortgage loan. In addition, with respect to certain mortgage loans, there may exist subordinate mortgage debt or mezzanine debt. Such mortgage loans will have a lower combined debt service coverage ratio and/or a higher combined loan-to-value ratio when such subordinate or mezzanine debt is taken into account. Additionally, certain mortgage loans may provide for interest only payments prior to maturity, or for an interest-only period during a portion of the term of the mortgage loan.
Appraisal and Loan-to-Value Ratio. For each Mortgaged Property, the applicable DB Originator obtains (or, in connection with the applicable DB Originator’s acquisition and reunderwriting of a mortgage loan, the related originator obtains and the applicable DB Originator relies upon) a current (within 6 months of the origination date of the mortgage loan) comprehensive narrative appraisal conforming to the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) and Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Foundation. The appraisal is based on the “as-is” market value of the Mortgaged Property as of the date of value in its then-current condition, and in accordance with the Mortgaged Property’s highest and best use as determined within the appraisal. In certain cases, the applicable DB Originator may also obtain prospective or hypothetical values on an “as-stabilized”, “as-complete” and/or “hypothetical as-is” basis, reflecting stipulated assumptions including, but not limited to, leasing, occupancy, income normalization, construction, renovation, restoration and/or repairs at the Mortgaged Property. The applicable DB Originator then determines the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage loan for origination or, if applicable, in connection with its acquisition of the mortgage loan, in each case based on the value and effective value dates set forth in the appraisal. In connection with the applicable DB Originator’s acquisition and reunderwriting of a mortgage loan, the applicable DB Originator relies upon the appraisal(s) obtained by the related originator. Such appraisal(s) may reflect a value for a particular Mortgaged Property that varies from an
opinion of value of the applicable DB Originator. The information in this prospectus regarding such acquired mortgage loans, including, but not limited to, appraised values and loan-to-value ratios, reflects the information contained in such originator’s appraisal. We cannot assure you that the information set forth in this prospectus regarding the appraised values or loan-to-value ratios of such acquired mortgage loans would not be different if a DB Originator had originated such mortgage loans. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
Evaluation of Borrower. The applicable DB Originator evaluates the borrower and its principals with respect to credit history and prior experience as an owner and operator of commercial real estate properties. The evaluation will generally include obtaining and reviewing a credit report or other reliable indication of the borrower’s financial capacity; obtaining and verifying credit references and/or business and trade references; and obtaining and reviewing certifications provided by the borrower as to prior real estate experience and current contingent liabilities. Finally, although the mortgage loans generally are non-recourse in nature, in the case of certain mortgage loans, the borrower and certain principals of the borrower may be required to assume legal responsibility for liabilities as a result of, among other things, fraud, misrepresentation, misappropriation or conversion of funds and breach of environmental or hazardous materials requirements. The applicable DB Originator evaluates the financial capacity of the borrower and such principals to meet any obligations that may arise with respect to such liabilities.
Environmental Site Assessment. Prior to origination, the applicable DB Originator either (i) obtains or updates (or, in connection with the applicable DB Originator’s acquisition and reunderwriting of a mortgage loan, the related originator obtains or updates and the applicable DB Originator relies upon) an environmental site assessment (“ESA”) for a Mortgaged Property prepared by a qualified environmental firm or (ii) obtains (or, in connection with the applicable DB Originator’s acquisition and reunderwriting of a mortgage loan, the related originator obtains or updates and the applicable DB Originator relies upon) an environmental insurance policy for a Mortgaged Property. If an ESA is obtained or updated, the applicable DB Originator reviews the ESA to verify the absence of reported violations of applicable laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and hazardous materials or other material adverse environmental condition or circumstance. In cases in which the ESA identifies conditions that would require cleanup, remedial action or any other response estimated to cost in excess of 5% of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan, the applicable DB Originator either (i) determines that another party with sufficient assets is responsible for taking remedial actions directed by an applicable regulatory authority or (ii) requires the borrower to do one of the following: (A) carry out satisfactory remediation activities or other responses prior to the origination of the mortgage loan, (B) establish an operations and maintenance plan, (C) place sufficient funds in escrow or establish a letter of credit at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such remediation within a specified period of time, (D) obtain an environmental insurance policy for the Mortgaged Property, (E) provide or obtain an indemnity agreement or a guaranty with respect to such condition or circumstance, or (F) receive appropriate assurances that significant remediation activities or other significant responses are not necessary or required.
Certain of the mortgage loans may also have environmental insurance policies. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Insurance Considerations”.
Physical Assessment Report. Prior to origination, the applicable DB Originator obtains (or, in connection with the applicable DB Originator’s acquisition and reunderwriting of a mortgage loan, the related originator obtains and the applicable DB Originator relies upon) a physical assessment report (“PAR”) for each Mortgaged Property prepared by a qualified structural engineering firm. The applicable DB Originator reviews the PAR to verify that the property is reported to be in satisfactory physical condition, and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure needs over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PAR identifies material repairs or replacements needed immediately, the applicable DB Originator generally requires the borrower to carry out such repairs or replacements prior to the origination of the mortgage loan, or, in many cases, requires the borrower to place sufficient funds in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements within not more than twelve months. In
certain instances, the applicable DB Originator may waive such escrows but require the related borrower to complete such repairs within a stated period of time in the related mortgage loan documents.
Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and the applicable DB Originator reviews, a title insurance policy for each Mortgaged Property. The title insurance policy must meet the following requirements: (a) the policy must be written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the Mortgaged Property is located; (b) the policy must be in an amount equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan; (c) the protection and benefits must run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns; (d) the policy should be written on a standard policy form of the American Land Title Association or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the Mortgaged Property is located; and (e) the legal description of the Mortgaged Property in the title policy must conform to that shown on the survey of the Mortgaged Property, where a survey has been required.
Property Insurance. The borrower is required to provide, and the applicable DB Originator reviews, certificates of required insurance with respect to the Mortgaged Property. Such insurance may include: (1) commercial general liability insurance for bodily injury or death and property damage; (2) a fire and extended perils insurance policy providing “special” form coverage including coverage against loss or damage by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion; (3) if applicable, boiler and machinery coverage; (4) if the Mortgaged Property is located in a flood hazard area, flood insurance; and (5) such other coverage as the applicable DB Originator may require based on the specific characteristics of the Mortgaged Property.
Seismic Report. A seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, the originator will examine whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: a zoning report, legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports and/or representations by the related borrower.
Escrow Requirements. The applicable DB Originator may require borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves, which reserves in many instances will be limited to certain capped amounts. In addition, the applicable DB Originator may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items such as leasing-related matters, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, which escrows or holdbacks would be released upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all commercial mortgage loans originated by a DB Originator. The typical required escrows for mortgage loans originated by a DB Originator are as follows:
| ● | Taxes – An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12th of the estimated annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide the applicable DB Originator with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant pays taxes directly (or the applicable DB Originator may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that pays taxes for its portion of the Mortgaged Property directly); or (ii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Insurance – An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12th of the estimated annual property insurance premium are required to provide the applicable DB Originator with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy; (ii) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant maintains the property insurance or self-insures (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that maintains property insurance for its portion of the Mortgaged Property or self-insures); or (iii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Replacement Reserves – Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant repairs and maintains the Mortgaged Property (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that repairs and maintains its portion of the Mortgaged Property); or (ii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions – A tenant improvement/leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term and/or springing upon certain tenant events to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions, free rent periods or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant), with a lease that extends beyond the loan term; or (ii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Deferred Maintenance – A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs; (ii) the deferred maintenance items do not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property; (iii) the deferred maintenance cost does not exceed $50,000; (iv) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant), and the tenant is responsible for the repairs; or (v) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
| ● | Environmental Remediation – An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report. The applicable DB Originator may waive this escrow requirement in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to: (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to complete the remediation; (ii) environmental insurance is in place or obtained; or (iii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
The applicable DB Originator may determine that establishing any of the foregoing escrows or reserves is not warranted in one or more of the following instances (collectively, the “Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances”): (i) the amounts involved are de minimis, (ii) the applicable DB Originator’s evaluation of the ability of the Mortgaged Property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve, (iii) based on the Mortgaged Property maintaining a specified debt service coverage ratio, (iv) the applicable DB Originator has structured springing escrows that arise for identified risks, (v) the applicable DB
Originator has an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower; (vi) the applicable DB Originator believes there are credit positive characteristics of the borrower, the sponsor of the borrower and/or the Mortgaged Property that would offset the need for the escrow or reserve; or (vii) the reserves are being collected and held by a third party, such as a management company, a franchisor, or an association.
Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion under this caption “—DB Originators’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, one or more of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by GACC may vary from, or may not comply with, the applicable DB Originator’s underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the mortgage loans contributed to this securitization by GACC, the applicable DB Originator may not have strictly applied these underwriting guidelines as the result of a case-by-case permitted exception based upon other compensating or mitigating factors.
Exceptions. Disclosed above are the applicable DB Originator’s general underwriting guidelines with respect to the GACC Mortgage Loans. One or more GACC Mortgage Loans may vary from the specific DB Originator underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more GACC Mortgage Loans, the applicable DB Originator may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors. In certain cases set forth below, the applicable DB Originator made exceptions and the underwriting of a particular GACC Mortgage Loan did not comply with all aspects of the disclosed criteria.
Except as set forth below, the GACC Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth above.
With respect to The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan (5.0%), the Mortgage Loan was originated with an exception to the DB Originator’s underwriting guidelines, because such guidelines generally require a Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio of not greater than 65% on a multifamily interest-only mortgage loan, and such Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio of 70.0%. In determining to include such Mortgage Loan in the Mortgage Pool, GACC took into account certain compensating factors, including the historical occupancy rates of the Mortgaged Properties, which have a five-year average occupancy of 97.3%, the submarket vacancy rate, which was 4.3% as of the first quarter of 2024, the borrower’s investment of $8.8 million in capital improvements to the Mortgaged Properties since their acquisition in 2012, and the experience of the sponsorship, which has a portfolio of approximately 2,000 owned and/or managed residential units across 22 communities.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act. GACC most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), on February 12, 2024. GACC’s “Central Index Key” number is 0001541294. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2021 to and including June 30, 2024, GACC did not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization. Neither GACC nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, GACC and/or its affiliates may acquire or own in the future certain classes of certificates issued by the issuing entity. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—German American Capital Corporation” has been provided by GACC.
Compensation of the Sponsors
In connection with the offering and sale of the certificates contemplated by this prospectus, the sponsors (including affiliates of the sponsors) will be compensated for the sale of their respective percentage interest in the Mortgage Loans in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of:
(a) the sum of any proceeds received from the sale of the certificates to investors and the sale of servicing rights to Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association for the servicing of the Mortgage Loans, over
(b) the sum of the costs and expense of originating or acquiring the Mortgage Loans and the costs and expenses related to the issuance, offering and sale of the certificates as described in this prospectus.
The mortgage servicing rights were sold to the master servicer for a price based on the value of the Servicing Fee to be paid to the master servicer with respect to each Mortgage Loan and, which may include, among other things, the value of the right to earn income on investments on amounts held by the master servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans.
The Depositor
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, the depositor, is a Delaware corporation and was formed in 1995 for the purpose of engaging in the business, among other things, of acquiring and depositing mortgage assets in trusts in exchange for certificates evidencing interests in the trusts and selling or otherwise distributing the certificates. The sole shareholder of the depositor is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS). The depositor’s executive offices are located at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, telephone number (212) 902-1000. The depositor will not have any material assets. The depositor is an affiliate of GSMC, a sponsor, mortgage loan seller, GS Bank, an originator, and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, an underwriter.
After establishing the issuing entity, the depositor will have minimal ongoing duties with respect to the certificates and the Mortgage Loans. The depositor’s ongoing duties will include: (i) appointing a successor trustee or certificate administrator in the event of the removal of the trustee or certificate administrator, (ii) paying any ongoing fees (such as surveillance fees) of the Rating Agencies, (iii) promptly delivering to the certificate administrator any document that comes into the depositor’s possession that constitutes part of the mortgage file or servicing file for any mortgage loan, (iv) upon discovery of a breach of any of the representations and warranties of the master servicer, the special servicer or the operating advisor which materially and adversely affects the interests of the Certificateholders, giving prompt written notice of such breach to the affected parties, (v) providing information in its possession with respect to the certificates to the certificate administrator to the extent necessary to perform REMIC administration, (vi) indemnifying the issuing entity, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the master servicer and the special servicer for any loss, liability or reasonable expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by such parties arising from the depositor’s willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud and/or negligence in the performance of its duties contained in the PSA or by reason of negligent disregard of its obligations and duties under the PSA, and (vii) signing any annual report on Form 10-K, including the required certification in Form 10-K under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any distribution reports on Form 10-D and Current Reports on Form 8-K required to be filed by the issuing entity.
The depositor purchases commercial mortgage loans and interests in commercial mortgage loans for the purpose of selling those assets to trusts created in connection with the securitization of pools of assets and does not engage in any activities unrelated to those securitizations. On the Closing Date, the depositor will acquire the mortgage loans from the mortgage loan sellers and will simultaneously transfer them, without recourse, to the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders.
The depositor remains responsible under the PSA for providing the master servicer, the special servicer, certificate administrator and trustee with certain information and other assistance requested by those parties and reasonably necessary to performing their duties under the PSA. The depositor also remains responsible for mailing notices to the Certificateholders upon the appointment of certain successor entities under the PSA.
The Issuing Entity
The issuing entity, Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust, will be a New York common law trust, formed on the Closing Date pursuant to the PSA.
The only activities that the issuing entity may perform are those set forth in the PSA, which are generally limited to owning and administering the Mortgage Loans and any REO Property (which includes, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the trust’s interest in any REO Property acquired with respect to such Non-Serviced Whole Loan pursuant to the applicable pooling and servicing agreement, but does not include the Serviced Companion Loan’s pro rata interest in any such REO Property), disposing of defaulted mortgage loans and REO Property, issuing the certificates, making distributions, providing reports to Certificateholders and other activities described in this prospectus. Accordingly, the issuing entity may not issue securities other than the certificates, or invest in securities, other than investing of funds in the Collection Account and other accounts maintained under the PSA in certain short-term high-quality investments. The issuing entity may not lend or borrow money, except that the master servicer and the trustee may make advances of delinquent monthly debt service payments to the issuing entity, and the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee may make property protection advances to the issuing entity, but in each case only to the extent it deems such advances to be recoverable from the related mortgage loan; such advances are intended to provide liquidity, rather than credit support. The PSA may be amended as set forth under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment” in this prospectus. The issuing entity administers the mortgage loans through the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer. A discussion of the duties of the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer, including any discretionary activities performed by each of them, is set forth under “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator”, “—The Master Servicer”, “—The Special Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
The only assets of the issuing entity other than the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties (which includes, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the trust’s interest in any REO property acquired with respect to such Non-Serviced Whole Loan pursuant to the applicable pooling and servicing agreement but does not include the Serviced Companion Loan’s pro rata interest in any such REO Property) are the Distribution Accounts and other accounts maintained pursuant to the PSA and the short-term investments in which funds in the Collection Account and other accounts are invested. The issuing entity has no present liabilities, but has potential liability relating to ownership of the mortgage loans and any REO Properties, including, with respect to the Non-Serviced Whole Loans, the trust’s interest in any REO Property acquired pursuant to the applicable pooling and servicing agreement and the other activities described in this prospectus, and indemnity obligations to the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer and the operating advisor and various related persons. The fiscal year of the issuing entity is the calendar year. The issuing entity has no executive officers or board of directors and acts through the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer.
The depositor will be contributing the mortgage loans to the issuing entity. The depositor will be purchasing the mortgage loans from the mortgage loan sellers, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
The Trustee and Certificate Administrator
Computershare Trust Company, National Association (“Computershare Trust Company”) will act as trustee, certificate administrator and custodian under the PSA. Computershare Trust Company is a national banking association and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Computershare Limited (“Computershare Limited”), an Australian financial services company with approximately $6.1 billion (USD) in assets as of December 31, 2023. Computershare Limited and its affiliates have been engaging in financial service activities, including stock transfer related services, since 1997, and corporate trust related services since 2000. Computershare Trust Company provides corporate trust, custody, securities transfer, cash management, investment management and other financial and fiduciary services, and has been engaged in providing financial services, including corporate trust services, since 2000. The transaction parties may maintain commercial relationships with Computershare Trust Company and its affiliates. Computershare Trust Company maintains corporate trust offices at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951 (among other locations), and its office for correspondence related to certificate transfer services is located at 1505 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108.
On November 1, 2021, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”) and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, N.A. (together with Wells Fargo Bank, collectively “Wells Fargo”) sold substantially all of its Corporate Trust Services (“CTS”) business to Computershare Limited, Computershare Trust Company, and Computershare Delaware Trust Company (collectively, “Computershare”). Virtually all CTS employees of Wells Fargo, along with most existing CTS systems, technology, and offices transferred to Computershare as part of the sale. On and after November 1, 2021, Wells Fargo has been transferring its roles, duties, rights, and liabilities under the relevant transaction agreements to Computershare. For any transaction where the roles of Wells Fargo have not yet transferred to Computershare, Computershare, as of November 1, 2021, performs all or virtually all of the obligations of Wells Fargo as its agent as of such date.
Computershare Trust Company will act as trustee pursuant to the PSA. Computershare Trust Company has provided corporate trust related services since 2000 through its predecessors and affiliates. Computershare Trust Company provides trustee services for a variety of transactions and asset types, including corporate and municipal bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations. As of December 31, 2023, Computershare Trust Company was acting in some cases as the named trustee or indenture trustee, and in most cases as agent for the named trustee or indenture trustee, on approximately 500 commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $274 billion (USD).
In its capacity as trustee on commercial mortgage securitizations, Computershare Trust Company is generally required to make an advance if the related master servicer or special servicer fails to make a required advance. In the past three years, neither Computershare Trust Company, nor the CTS business it acquired from Wells Fargo Bank, has been required to make an advance on a commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction.
Under the terms of the PSA, Computershare Trust Company is responsible for securities administration, which includes pool performance calculations, distribution calculations, and the preparation of monthly distribution reports. As certificate administrator, Computershare Trust Company is responsible for the preparation and filing of all REMIC tax returns on behalf of the Trust REMICs and, to the extent required under the PSA, the preparation of monthly reports on Form 10-D, certain current reports on Form 8-K, and annual reports on Form 10-K that are required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the issuing entity. With its acquisition of the CTS business from Wells Fargo Bank on November 1, 2021, Computershare Trust Company acquired a business that has been engaged in the business of securities administration since June 30, 1995. As of December 31, 2023, Computershare Trust Company was acting in some cases as the certificate administrator, and in most cases as agent for the certificate administrator, on approximately 1,237 commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of more than $706 billion (USD).
As a result of Computershare Trust Company not being a deposit-taking institution, any cash credited to the accounts that the certificate administrator is required to maintain pursuant to the PSA will be held by one or more institutions in a manner satisfying the requirements of the PSA, including any applicable eligibility criteria for account banks set forth in the PSA.
Computershare Trust Company is acting as the custodian of the mortgage loan files pursuant to the PSA. In that capacity, Computershare Trust Company is responsible to hold and safeguard the mortgage notes and other contents of the mortgage files on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders. Computershare Trust Company maintains each mortgage loan file in a separate file folder marked with a unique bar code to assure loan-level file integrity and to assist in inventory management. Files are segregated by transaction or investor. With its acquisition of the CTS business from Wells Fargo Bank on November 1, 2021, Computershare Trust Company acquired a business that has been engaged in the mortgage document custody business for more than 25 years. As of December 31, 2023, when it acquired the CTS business from Wells Fargo Bank, Computershare Trust Company was acting in some cases as custodian, and in most case as agent for the custodian, for approximately 427,700 commercial mortgage loan files.
Computershare Trust Company, through the CTS business acquired from Wells Fargo Bank, serves or may have served within the past two years as loan file custodian or the agent of the loan file custodian for various mortgage loans owned by the sponsors or an affiliate of the sponsors and anticipates that one or more of those mortgage loans may be included in the issuing entity. The terms of any custodial agreement under which those services are provided are customary for the mortgage-backed securitization industry and provide for the delivery, receipt, review, and safekeeping of mortgage loan files.
For two CMBS transactions, Computershare Trust Company disclosed transaction-level material noncompliance related to its CMBS bond administration function on its 2023 Annual Statement of Compliance furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB for each such transaction (each, a “Subject 2023 Computershare CMBS Annual Statement of Compliance”).
For one CMBS transaction, the related Subject 2023 Computershare CMBS Annual Statement of Compliance disclosed that certain classes were underpaid and other classes overpaid for two consecutive months. The payment error was caused by an administrative error relating to the reimbursement of non-recoverable advances. Computershare Trust Company corrected the error in the next month.
For one CMBS transaction, the related Subject 2023 Computershare CMBS Annual Statement of Compliance disclosed an administrative error processing the servicer’s report where funds received in connection with a principal adjustment on a liquidated loan were not distributed to holders resulting in an underpayment to one class. Computershare Trust Company revised the distribution to correct the payment error three months after the payment error occurred.
For each of the two CMBS transactions, the related Subject 2023 Computershare CMBS Annual Statement of Compliance states that Computershare Trust Company has reinforced its policies or implemented necessary changes to its procedures and controls in an effort to prevent a reoccurrence of the errors.
Neither Computershare Trust Company nor any of its affiliates will retain any economic interest in this securitization, including without limitation any certificates issued by the issuing entity. However, each of Computershare Trust Company and its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
The foregoing information regarding Computershare Trust Company set forth under this heading “—The Trustee and Certificate Administrator” has been provided by Computershare Trust Company. None of the depositor, the underwriters or any other person, other than Computershare Trust Company, makes any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between Computershare Trust Company and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
The trustee and certificate administrator will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of the obligations specifically imposed by the PSA. For further information regarding the duties, responsibilities, rights and obligations of the trustee and the certificate administrator under the PSA, including those related to indemnification, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the trustee’s and the certificate administrator’s removal, replacement or resignation are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator” in this prospectus.
The Master Servicer
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, a national banking association (“Midland”), is expected to be the master servicer and in this capacity will initially be responsible for the master servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any Serviced Companion Loans pursuant to the PSA and will generally review, evaluate and provide consent to Master Servicer Major Decisions. Certain servicing and administrative functions may also be provided by one or more primary servicers that previously serviced the Mortgage Loans for the applicable mortgage loan seller.
Midland’s principal servicing office is located at 10851 Mastin Street, Building 82, Suite 300, Overland Park, Kansas 66210.
Midland is a commercial financial services company that provides loan servicing, asset management and technology solutions for large pools of commercial and multifamily real estate assets. Midland is approved as a master servicer, special servicer and primary servicer for investment-grade commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) by S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings, Inc., DBRS, Inc. (“Morningstar DBRS”) and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC. Midland has received rankings as a master, primary and special servicer of real estate assets under U.S. CMBS transactions from S&P, Fitch and Morningstar DBRS. For each category, S&P ranks Midland as “Strong”. Morningstar DBRS ranks Midland as “MOR CS2” for master servicer, “MOR CS1” for primary servicer, and “MOR CS1” for special servicer. Fitch ranks Midland as “CMS2+” for master servicer, “CPS2+” for primary servicer, and “CSS2+” for special servicer. Midland is also a HUD/FHA-approved mortgagee and a Fannie Mae-approved multifamily loan servicer.
Midland has detailed operating procedures across the various servicing functions to maintain compliance with its servicing obligations and the servicing standards under Midland’s servicing agreements, including procedures for managing delinquent and specially serviced loans. The policies and procedures are reviewed annually and centrally managed. Furthermore, Midland’s business continuity and disaster recovery plans are reviewed and tested annually. Midland’s policies, operating procedures and business continuity plan anticipate and provide the mechanism for some or all of Midland’s personnel to work remotely as determined by management to comply with changes in federal, state or local laws, regulations, executive orders, other requirements and/or guidance, to address health and/or other concerns related to a pandemic or other significant event or to address market or other business purposes.
In accordance with the PSA, Midland has engaged (or may in the future engage) one or more third-party vendors and/or affiliates to support Midland’s performance of certain duties and/or obligations under the PSA, including, but not limited to, with respect to one or more of the following tasks:
| ● | converting and de-converting loans to or from the servicing system and setting up any applicable cash management waterfall; |
| ● | calculating certain amounts such as principal and interest payments, default interest, deferred interest, rent escalations, financial statement penalty fees, payoff amounts and other ad hoc items; |
| ● | calculating remittances and allocated loan and appraisal reduction amounts and preparing remittance reports and other related reports, including Schedule AL; |
| ● | administering certain aspects relating to reserve account disbursement requests; |
| ● | assisting with the collection of financial/operating statements and rent rolls and performing operating statement and rent roll spreading activities; |
| ● | monitoring covenant compliance and occupancy and tenant-related triggers, completing certain covenant calculations, tests and related analyses and identifying loans for Midland to proceed with cash management implementation; |
| ● | UCC, tax and insurance-related researching, monitoring, filing, reporting, collecting and tracking, and lien release filing and tracking; |
| ● | performing property inspections and preparing the related property inspection reports; |
| ● | updating of the servicing system periodically with certain information, such as with respect to borrower, collateral, loan terms, escrows, reserves, covenants, loan-level transactions (i.e., amendments, assumptions, defeasances, etc.) and servicing fees; |
| ● | processing loan and bring current statements and updating receivables; |
| ● | per Midland’s requirements, generating certain correspondence including hello letters, missed payment letters, financial statement demand letters and event of default letters; and |
| ● | one or more additional tasks assigned by Midland; provided, however, such tasks will not include holding or collecting funds or performing asset management (other than document review and preparation in support of Midland’s asset managers’ processing of certain asset management transactions). |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Midland will remain responsible for Midland’s duties and/or obligations under the PSA. Midland monitors and oversees its third-party vendors in compliance with its internal procedures, the PSA and applicable law.
Midland will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the underlying Mortgage Loans or Serviced Companion Loans. Midland may from time to time have custody of certain of such documents as necessary for enforcement actions involving particular Mortgage Loans, Serviced Companion Loans or otherwise. To the extent that Midland has custody of any such documents for any such servicing purposes, such documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the servicing standard.
No securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which Midland was acting as master servicer, primary servicer or special servicer has experienced a servicer event of default as a result of any action or inaction of Midland as master servicer, primary servicer or special servicer, as applicable, including as a result of Midland’s failure to comply with the applicable servicing criteria in connection with any securitization transaction. Midland has made all advances required to be made by it under the servicing agreements on the commercial and multifamily mortgage loans serviced by Midland in securitization transactions.
From time-to-time Midland is a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as a loan servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course of business. Midland does not believe that any such lawsuits or legal proceedings would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business or its ability to service loans pursuant to the PSA.
Midland currently maintains an Internet-based investor reporting system, CMBS Investor Insight®, that contains performance information at the portfolio, loan and property levels on the various commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions that it services. Certificateholders, prospective transferees of the certificates and other appropriate parties may obtain access to CMBS Investor Insight through Midland’s website at www.pnc.com/midland. Midland may require registration and execution of an access agreement in connection with providing access to CMBS Investor Insight.
Midland will acquire the right to act as master servicer and/or primary servicer (and the related right to receive and retain the excess servicing strip) with respect to the Mortgage Loans sold to the issuing entity by the sponsor pursuant to one or more servicing rights appointment agreements entered into on the Closing Date. The “excess servicing strip” means a portion of the Servicing Fee payable to Midland that accrues at a per annum rate initially equal to the applicable Servicing Fee Rate minus (A) with respect to the Serviced Mortgage Loans (i) if no primary servicing fee rate or subservicing fee rate is payable to a party other than Midland, 0.00125% or (ii) if a primary servicing fee rate or subservicing fee rate is payable to a party other than Midland, 0.000625% plus any such primary servicing fee rate or subservicing fee rate payable to a party other than Midland; or (B) with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, 0.000625%, but in each case which may be reduced under circumstances as provided in the PSA.
Midland is also the master servicer of the 500 Delaware Whole Loan, which is serviced under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA.
From time to time, Midland and/or its affiliates may purchase or sell securities, including certificates issued in this offering in the secondary market.
As of June 30, 2024, Midland was master and primary servicing approximately 19,980 commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with a principal balance of approximately $445 billion. The collateral for such loans may be located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, US Virgin Islands and Canada. Approximately 13,838 of such loans, with a total principal balance of approximately $342 billion, pertain to commercial and multifamily mortgage-backed securities. The related loan pools include multifamily, office, retail, hospitality and other income-producing properties.
Midland has been servicing mortgage loans in CMBS transactions since 1992. The table below contains information on the size of the portfolio of commercial and multifamily loans and leases in CMBS and other servicing transactions for which Midland has acted as master and/or primary servicer from 2021 to 2023.
Portfolio Size – Master/Primary Servicing | Calendar Year End (Approximate amounts in billions) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
CMBS | $302 | $328 | $336 |
Other | $301 | $315 | $244 |
Total | $603 | $642 | $580 |
As of June 30, 2024, Midland was named the special servicer in approximately 308 commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $118 billion. With respect to such commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions as of such date, Midland was administering approximately 185 assets with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $4.6 billion.
Midland has acted as a special servicer for commercial and multifamily mortgage loans in CMBS transactions since 1992. The table below contains information on the size of the portfolio of specially
serviced commercial and multifamily loans, leases and REO properties that have been referred to Midland as special servicer in CMBS transactions from 2021 to 2023.
Portfolio Size –Special Servicing | Calendar Year End (Approximate amounts in billions) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Total | $163 | $162 | $119 |
Midland may enter into one or more arrangements with the Directing Holder, a Controlling Class Certificateholder, any directing certificateholder, any Companion Loan Holder, the other Certificateholders (or an affiliate or a third-party representative of one or more of the preceding) or any other person with the right to appoint or remove and replace the special servicer to provide for (i) a discount, waiver and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation and/or (ii) certain services, in each case in consideration of, among other things, Midland’s appointment (or continuance) as special servicer under the PSA and any related co-lender agreement and limitations on the right of such person to remove the special servicer.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between GSMC and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between CREFI and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between GACC and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between BMO and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Barclays and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between 3650 REIT and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to a certain limited subservicing agreement between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, and Midland, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties with respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain other limited subservicing agreements between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 REIT, and Midland, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC currently serves as limited (non-cashiering) sub-servicer with respect to certain other mortgage loans.
PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”), and its affiliates may use some of the same service providers (e.g., legal counsel, accountants and appraisal firms) as are retained on behalf of the issuing entity. In some cases, fee rates, amounts or discounts may be offered to PNC Bank and its affiliates by a third party vendor which differ from those offered to the issuing entity as a result of scheduled or ad hoc rate changes, differences in the scope, type or nature of the service or transaction, alternative fee arrangements, and negotiation by PNC Bank or its affiliates other than Midland.
The foregoing information concerning the master servicer has been provided by Midland. Midland does not make any representations as to the validity or sufficiency of the PSA (other than as to it being a
valid obligation of Midland as master servicer), the certificates, the Mortgage Loans, this prospectus (other than as to the accuracy of the information provided by Midland) or any related documents.
Midland will have various duties under the PSA. Certain duties and obligations of Midland are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”, “—Enforcement of ‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions”, “—Inspections”, “—Collection of Operating Information” and “—Appraisal Reduction Amounts” in this prospectus. The ability of a master servicer to waive or modify any terms, fees, penalties or payments on the underlying Mortgage Loans and the effect of that ability on the potential cash flows from the underlying Mortgage Loans are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments” below. The master servicer’s obligations as the servicer to make advances, and the interest or other fees charged for those advances and the terms of the master servicer’s recovery of those advances, are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”.
The master servicer will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the Mortgage Loans or the Serviced Companion Loans. On occasion, the master servicer may have custody of certain of such documents as are necessary for enforcement actions involving the Mortgage Loans or the Serviced Companion Loans or otherwise. To the extent master servicer performs custodial functions as a servicer, documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.
Midland, in its capacity as master servicer, will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of the obligations specifically imposed by the PSA. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the master servicer’s removal, replacement, resignation or transfer are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”, “—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” and “—Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event”. Midland’s rights and obligations with respect to indemnification, and certain limitations on Midland’s liability under the PSA are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the master servicer and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
The Special Servicer
3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“3650 Servicing”) is expected to be appointed to act as the special servicer under the PSA (the “Special Servicer”). In such capacity, the special servicer will be responsible for the servicing and administration of the Specially Serviced Loans (other than any Excluded Special Servicer Loan) and REO Properties pursuant to the PSA.
3650 Servicing maintains its principal servicing office at 2977 McFarlane Road, Suite #300 Miami, FL 33133.
3650 Servicing has been engaged in the servicing of commercial mortgage loans since approximately 2017. 3650 Servicing currently has a commercial mortgage-backed securities special servicer rating of “CSS2-” by Fitch, and is also an approved Special Servicer by KBRA, Moody’s, S&P and Morningstar DBRS.
3650 Servicing is an affiliate of 3650 REIT, the Retaining Sponsor, a mortgage loan seller, an originator, the anticipated holder (or the parent of the anticipated holder) of the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates, the initial Directing Holder, and the holder of the companion loans for which the noteholder is identified as “3650 REIT or an affiliate” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes" under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
3650 REIT Holding Company LLC, together with its subsidiary 3650 Servicing, had approximately 75 employees as of June 30, 2024 and is headquartered in Miami with offices located in New York City, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Dallas and Nashville.
3650 Servicing has detailed operating policies and procedures which, pursuant to such policies and procedures are scheduled to be reviewed at least annually and updated as appropriate. These policies and procedures for the performance of its special servicing obligations are, among other things, in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act. 3650 Servicing has developed strategies and procedures for managing delinquent loans, loans subject to bankruptcies of the borrowers and other breaches by borrowers of the underlying loan documents that are designed to maximize value from the assets for the benefit of certificateholders. These strategies and procedures vary on a case by case basis, and include, but are not limited to, liquidation of the underlying collateral, note sales, discounted payoffs, and borrower negotiation or workout in accordance with the related servicing standard. The strategy pursued by 3650 Servicing for any particular mortgage loan depends upon, among other things, the terms and provisions of the underlying loan documents, the jurisdiction where the underlying property is located and the condition and type of underlying property. Standardization and automation have been pursued, and continue to be pursued, wherever possible so as to provide for continued accuracy, efficiency, transparency, monitoring and controls.
3650 Servicing is subject to an annual external audit. Pursuant to 3650 Servicing’s policies and procedures the annual external audit occurred in January 2024.
3650 Servicing maintains a cloud-based surveillance and asset management system that contains performance information at the portfolio, loan and property levels on the various loans that it services, which system also has the capacity to aggregate performance information on any REO assets that it may service. Additionally, 3650 Servicing has a formal, documented disaster recovery and business continuity plan.
The table below sets forth information about 3650 Servicing’s portfolio of specially serviced commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and REO properties in commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions as of the date indicated:
CMBS Transactions | As of 06/30/2024 |
Number of CMBS Transactions Named Special Servicer | 17 |
Approximate Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance(1) | $14.1 billion |
Approximate Number of Specially Serviced Loans or REO Loans(2) | 3 |
Approximate Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance of Specially Serviced Loans or REO Loans(2) | $124 million |
| (1) | Includes all commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and related REO Loans in 3650 Servicing’s portfolio for which 3650 Servicing is the named special servicer, regardless of whether such mortgage loans and related REO Loans are, as of the specified date, specially serviced by 3650 Servicing. |
| (2) | Includes only those commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and related REO Loans in 3650 Servicing’s portfolio for which 3650 Servicing is the named special servicer that are, as of the specified date, specially serviced by 3650 Servicing. Does not include any resolutions during the specified year. |
In its capacity as the Special Servicer, 3650 Servicing will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the Mortgage Loans. 3650 Servicing may from time to time have custody of certain of such documents as necessary for enforcement actions involving the Mortgage Loans (other than the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) or otherwise. To the extent that 3650 Servicing has custody of any such documents for any such servicing purposes, such documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.
3650 Servicing does not have any material advancing rights or obligations with respect to the commercial mortgage-backed securities pools as to which it anticipates acting as special servicer. In certain instances 3650 Servicing may have the right to make property related servicing advances in emergency situations with respect to certain commercial mortgage-backed securities pools as to which it acts as special servicer. Generally, 3650 Servicing’s servicing functions under pooling and servicing agreements will not include collection on the pool assets, however 3650 Servicing will maintain certain operating accounts with respect to REO mortgage loans in accordance with the terms of the applicable pooling and servicing agreements and consistent with the servicing standard set forth in each of such pooling and servicing agreements.
There are, to the actual current knowledge of 3650 Servicing, no special or unique factors of a material nature involved in special servicing the particular types of assets included in this transaction, as compared to the types of assets included in other commercial mortgage-backed securitization pools generally. 3650 Servicing’s processes and procedures with respect to this transaction will not materially differ from the processes and procedures to be employed by 3650 Servicing in connection with its special servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securitization pools generally. There have not been any material changes to the policies or procedures of 3650 Servicing in the servicing function it will perform under the PSA for assets of the same type included in this transaction since the update of such policies and procedures effective in December 2023. 3650 Servicing periodically reviews and revises its policies and procedures.
No securitization transaction in which 3650 Servicing was acting as special servicer has experienced a servicer event of default as a result of any action or inaction of 3650 Servicing as special servicer, including as a result of a failure by 3650 Servicing to comply with the applicable servicing criteria in connection with any securitization transaction. 3650 Servicing has not been terminated as special servicer in any securitization, either due to a servicing default or the application of a servicing performance test or trigger. 3650 Servicing has not yet been required to make an advance with respect to any securitization transaction. There has been no previous disclosure of material noncompliance with the applicable servicing criteria by 3650 Servicing in connection with any securitization in which 3650 Servicing was acting as special servicer.
3650 Servicing does not believe that its financial condition will have any adverse effect on the performance of its duties under the PSA and, accordingly, 3650 Servicing believes that its financial condition will not have any material impact on Mortgage Loan performance or the performance of the certificates.
From time to time 3650 Servicing may be a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as a loan servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course of business. 3650 Servicing does not believe that any such lawsuits or legal proceedings would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business or its ability to service the Mortgage Loans pursuant to the PSA. There are currently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities, against 3650 Servicing or of which any of its property is the subject, that are material to the Certificateholders.
3650 Servicing may occasionally engage consultants to perform property inspections and to provide surveillance on a property and its local market; it currently does not have any plans to engage sub-servicers to perform on its behalf any of its duties with respect to this transaction with the exception of possibly outsourcing some base servicing functions.
In the commercial mortgage-backed securitizations in which 3650 Servicing acts as special servicer, 3650 Servicing may enter into one or more arrangements with any party entitled to appoint or remove and replace the special servicer to provide for a discount and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, 3650 Servicing’s appointment as special servicer under the applicable servicing agreement and limitations on such person’s right to replace 3650 Servicing as the special servicer.
Except as described above and except with respect to any fees 3650 Servicing will receive in its capacity as the Special Servicer, neither 3650 Servicing nor any of its affiliates expects to retain any Certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, 3650 Servicing or its affiliates may, in the future, own interests in certain other Classes of Certificates. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such Certificates at any time, except as described under “Credit Risk Retention”. 3650 Servicing or an affiliate assisted 3650 REIT and/or one or more of its affiliates with its due diligence of the Mortgage Loans prior to the Closing Date.
Except as disclosed herein and except for 3650 Servicing acting as Special Servicer and a limited (non-cashiering) subservicer for this transaction, there are no specific relationships that are material involving or relating to this transaction or the Mortgage Loans between 3650 Servicing or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the issuing entity, the sponsors, the trustee, the certificate administrator, any originator, the master servicer, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two years. In addition, other than as disclosed herein, there are no business relationships, agreements, arrangements, transactions or understandings that have been entered into outside the ordinary course of business or on terms other than would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third party – apart from this transaction – between 3650 Servicing or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the issuing entity, the sponsors, the trustee, the certificate administrator, any originator, the master servicer, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two years and that are material to an investor’s understanding of the certificates.
The foregoing information regarding 3650 Servicing under the heading “—The Special Servicer” has been provided by 3650 Servicing.
Certain duties and obligations of the special servicer and the provisions of the PSA are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. The special servicer’s ability to waive or modify any terms, fees, penalties or payments on the Mortgage Loans and the potential effect of that ability on the potential cash flows from the Mortgage Loans are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”.
The special servicer may be terminated, with respect to the Mortgage Loans serviced under the PSA (a) with or without cause by the Directing Holder, (b) for cause at any time, and (c) otherwise without cause as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause”, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the PSA. The special servicer may resign under the PSA as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Resignation of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer”. The special servicer and various related persons and entities will be entitled to be indemnified by the issuing entity for certain losses and liabilities incurred by the special servicer as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”.
The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (“Park Bridge Lender Services”), a New York limited liability company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC (“Park Bridge Financial”), will act as operating advisor under the PSA with respect to each Serviced Mortgage Loan. Park Bridge Lender Services will also act as asset representations reviewer under the PSA with respect to each Mortgage Loan and each Serviced Whole Loan. Park Bridge Lender Services has an address at 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor, New York, New York 10016 and its telephone number is (212) 230-9090.
Park Bridge Financial is a privately held commercial real estate finance advisory firm headquartered in New York, New York. Since its founding in 2009, Park Bridge Financial and its affiliates have been engaged by commercial banks (community, regional and multi-national), opportunity funds, REITs, investment banks, insurance companies, entrepreneurs and hedge funds on a wide variety of advisory assignments. These engagements have included: mortgage brokerage, loan syndication, contract underwriting, valuations, risk assessments, surveillance, litigation support, expert testimony, loan restructures as well as the disposition of commercial mortgages and related collateral.
Park Bridge Financial’s technology platform is server-based with back-up, disaster-recovery and encryption services performed by vendors and data centers that comply with industry and regulatory standards.
As of June 30, 2024, Park Bridge Lender Services was acting as operating advisor or trust advisor for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions or other similar transactions with an approximate aggregate initial principal balance of $378.8 billion issued in 440 transactions.
As of June 30, 2024, Park Bridge Lender Services was acting as asset representations reviewer for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an approximate aggregate initial principal balance of $166.9 billion issued in 187 transactions.
There are no legal proceedings pending against Park Bridge Lender Services, or to which any property of Park Bridge Lender Services is subject, that are material to the Certificateholders, nor does Park Bridge Lender Services have actual knowledge of any proceedings of this type contemplated by governmental authorities.
The foregoing information under this heading “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” has been provided by Park Bridge Lender Services.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
The operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of their respective obligations specifically imposed by the PSA, and no implied duties or obligations may be asserted against the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer. For further information regarding the duties, responsibilities, rights and obligations of the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer, as the case may be, under the PSA, including those related to indemnification, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”, “—The Asset Representations Reviewer” and “—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the operating advisor’s or the asset representations reviewer’s, as the case may be, removal, replacement, resignation or transfer are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor” and “—The Asset Representations Reviewer”.
Credit Risk Retention
General
This transaction is required to comply with the Credit Risk Retention Rules. 3650 REIT has been designated by the sponsors to act as the “retaining sponsor” (as such term is defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) (in such capacity, the “Retaining Sponsor”) and intends to satisfy the credit risk retention requirements of the Credit Risk Retention Rules as follows:
| ● | The Retaining Sponsor (or its MOA) (in such capacity, the “Retaining Party”) will purchase the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates (collectively, the “HRR Certificates”), with an aggregate initial Certificate Balance of $79,220,230, representing approximately 5.102% of the aggregate fair value of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates). The HRR Certificates will constitute an “eligible horizontal residual interest” (as such term is defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules). |
“Credit Risk Retention Rules” means Regulation RR, 12 C.F.R. Part 244.
“MOA” means a “majority-owned affiliate” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules).
Qualifying CRE Loans
The sponsors have determined that for purposes of this transaction 0.0% of the Initial Pool Balance (the “Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage”) is comprised of mortgage loans that are “qualifying CRE loans” as such term is described in §244.17 of the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
The total required credit risk retention percentage (the “Required Risk Retention Percentage”) for this transaction is 5.0%. The Required Risk Retention Percentage is equal to the product of (i) 1 minus the Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage (expressed as a decimal) and (ii) 5%; subject to a minimum Required Risk Retention Percentage of no less than 2.50% if the issuing entity includes any non-qualifying CRE loans.
HRR Certificates
General
The aggregate purchase price and fair value of the HRR Certificates is equal to approximately $46,709,007, representing approximately 5.102% of the aggregate fair value of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates). The aggregate fair value of all the certificates (other than the Class R certificates) is approximately $915,547,426 (excluding accrued interest).
The Retaining Sponsor estimates that, if it had relied solely on retaining an “eligible horizontal residual interest” in order to meet the credit risk retention requirements of the Credit Risk Retention Rules with respect to this securitization transaction, it would have retained an eligible horizontal residual interest with an aggregate fair value dollar amount of approximately $45,777,371 representing 5% of the aggregate fair value, as of the Closing Date, of all of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates).
As of the date of this prospectus, there are no material differences between (a) the valuation methodology or any of the key inputs and assumptions that were used in calculating the fair value or range of fair values disclosed in the preliminary prospectus under the heading “Credit Risk Retention” prior to the pricing of the certificates and (b) the valuation methodology or the key inputs and assumptions that were used in calculating the fair value set forth above under this “Credit Risk Retention” section.
A reasonable time after the Closing Date, the Retaining Sponsor will be required to disclose to, or cause to be disclosed to, Certificateholders the following: (a) the fair value of the HRR Certificates that will be retained by the Retaining Party based on actual sale prices and finalized tranche sizes and (b) the fair value of the “eligible horizontal residual interest” (as such term is defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) that the Retaining Sponsor would have been required to retain under the Credit Risk Retention Rules. Any such notice from the Retaining Sponsor of such disclosures are expected to be posted on the certificate administrator’s website on the “U.S. Risk Retention Special Notices” tab.
While the Retaining Sponsor will initially satisfy its risk retention requirements through the purchase by the Retaining Party of the HRR Certificates, the Retaining Sponsor is permitted under the Credit Risk Retention Rules under certain circumstances to transfer the HRR Certificates to a “third party purchaser” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) (for so long as it holds such HRR Certificates, a “Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser”) at any time after August 29, 2029. Any such transfer will be subject to the satisfaction of all applicable provisions under the Credit Risk Retention Rules. See “—Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions” below.
Retaining Party
For a description of any material conflicts of interest or material potential conflicts of interest between the Retaining Party and another party to this securitization, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer,” “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Holder and the Companion Loan Holders” and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans.”
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (or its MOA) is expected to be the retaining party of the HRR Certificates and is expected to appoint itself as the initial controlling class representative and, therefore, as the initial Directing Holder with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan and any applicable Excluded Loan). 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is expected to act as the special servicer with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and any Excluded Special Servicer Loan). 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is also the initial special servicer with respect to the 500 Delaware Whole Loan pursuant to the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (which is an affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC) is also the initial directing holder and initial controlling class representative under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA.
Solely for its own purposes and benefit, the Retaining Party has completed an independent review of the credit risk of each mortgage loan consisting of a review of the sponsors’ underwriting standards, the collateral and expected cash flows. Such review was based on the mortgage loan files and information regarding the mortgage loans provided by or on behalf of the sponsors. The Retaining Party has no liability to any person or entity for the manner in which it conducted its due diligence or the extent of such due diligence. The Retaining Party is not required to take into account the interests of any other investor in the certificates or any other party in conducting its due diligence or in exercising remedies or voting or other rights in its capacity as owner of its certificates or in making requests or recommendations to the sponsors as to the selection of the mortgage loans and the establishment of other transaction terms. The Retaining Party’s acceptance of a mortgage loan does not constitute, and may not be construed as, an endorsement or approval of any such mortgage loan, the underwriting for such mortgage loan or of the originator of such mortgage loan. Each Certificateholder will acknowledge and agree, by its acceptance of its certificates, that the Retaining Party may have special relationships or interests that conflict with those of the holders of one or more classes of certificates. In addition, the Retaining Party does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, may act solely in its own interests, and will have no liability to any Certificateholders for having done so, and no Certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the Retaining Party or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of the Retaining Party for having so acted.
Any review by the Retaining Party and its affiliates of the credit risk of the securitized assets is solely for its own benefit, may not be relied upon by any other person, and is not intended to be, and may not be, construed as an approval or endorsement of the sponsors’ underwriting standards or any loan-level disclosure in this prospectus. The Retaining Party makes no representations or warranties with respect to any such underwriting standards or disclosure and the Retaining Party has not independently verified the truth or accuracy of any representations or warranties of any of the sponsors or any other party to this transaction or any related documents.
Material Terms
For a description of the material terms of the classes of certificates that comprise the HRR Certificates, see “Description of the Certificates” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. You are strongly urged to review this prospectus in its entirety.
Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions
The Retaining Party will agree to certain hedging, transfer and financing restrictions that are applicable to a “third-party purchaser” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules).
These restrictions will include an agreement by the Retaining Party not to transfer the HRR Certificates, except to an MOA (in accordance with the Credit Risk Retention Rules) or, on and after the date that is 5 years following the Closing Date or such earlier or later date that such transfer is first permitted under the Credit Risk Retention Rules then in effect, to a subsequent third-party purchaser.
In addition, the Retaining Party and its affiliates will not be permitted to enter into any hedging, financing, pledging, hypothecation or any other similar transaction or activity with respect to the HRR Certificates unless such transaction complies with the Credit Risk Retention Rules (as then in effect).
Unless stated otherwise, the restrictions described under this heading “—Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions” will expire on the earliest of (i) the date that is the latest of (a) the date on which the total unpaid principal balance of the Mortgage Loans has been reduced to 33% of the total unpaid principal balance of the Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date; (b) the date on which the total outstanding Certificate Balance of the certificates has been reduced to 33% of the total outstanding Certificate Balance of the certificates as of the Closing Date; or (c) two years after the Closing Date, (ii) the date on which all of the Mortgage Loans have been defeased in accordance with the risk retention requirements set forth in §244.7(b)(8)(i) of the Credit Risk Retention Rules, or (iii) the date on which the Credit Risk Retention Rules applicable to the Retaining Party are modified, amended, withdrawn or repealed such that the Credit Risk Retention Rules are no longer applicable to the HRR Certificates or the Retaining Party, as determined by the Retaining Sponsor in its good faith discretion (collectively, the “HRR Transfer Restriction End Date”).
In the event that any restriction or limitation under the Credit Risk Retention Rules applicable to the Retaining Party (including those restrictions and limitations described in this prospectus) is withdrawn, repealed, modified or amended to be less restrictive, the parties to the underlying risk retention agreement have agreed to modify any corresponding terms of such agreement to reflect any such withdrawal, repeal or modification.
Operating Advisor
The operating advisor for this securitization transaction will be Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The operating advisor will be required to be an Eligible Operating Advisor. For information regarding the operating advisor and a description of how the operating advisor satisfies the requirements of an Eligible Operating Advisor, see “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”. For a description of the material terms of the PSA with respect to the operating advisor and the operating advisor’s compensation, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor” and “—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Operating Advisor Compensation”. For a description of any material conflicts of interest or material potential conflicts of interest between the Operating Advisor and another party to this securitization transaction, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor”.
Representations and Warranties
Each of GSMC, CREFI, 3650 REIT, BCREI, BMO and GACC will make the representations and warranties identified on Annex D-1 or Annex E-1, as applicable, to this prospectus with respect to the Mortgage Loans, subject to certain exceptions to such representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-2 and Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6, respectively, to this prospectus.
At the time of its decision to include the GSMC Mortgage Loans in this transaction, GSMC determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by GSMC that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by GSMC that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which GSMC
based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable GSMC Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of its decision to include the CREFI Mortgage Loans in this transaction, CREFI determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex E-2 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by CREFI that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by CREFI that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which CREFI based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable CREFI Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of its decision to include the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans in this transaction, 3650 REIT determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex E-3 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by 3650 REIT that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by 3650 REIT that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which 3650 REIT based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of its decision to include the BCREI Mortgage Loans in this transaction, BCREI determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex E-4 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors,
including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by BCREI that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by BCREI that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which BCREI based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable BCREI Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of its decision to include the BMO Mortgage Loans in this transaction, BMO determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex E-5 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by BMO that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by BMO that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which BMO based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable BMO Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of its decision to include the GACC Mortgage Loans in this transaction, GACC determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex E-6 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by GACC that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by GACC that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged
Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which GACC based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable GACC Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
Description of the Certificates
General
The Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2024-V9 will be issued pursuant to a pooling and servicing agreement, among the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer (the “PSA”) and will consist of the following classes to be designated as set forth in the table below:
One or more of such classes will also be collectively referred to as follows:
Designation | Classes |
“Offered Certificates” | The Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-D, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates |
“Senior Certificates” | The Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates |
“Subordinate Certificates” | The Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates |
“Principal Balance Certificates” | The Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates |
“Class X Certificates” | The Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D and certificates |
“HRR Certificates” | The Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates |
“Regular Certificates” | The Senior Certificates and the Subordinate Certificates |
“Residual Certificates” | The Class R certificates |
The certificates will represent in the aggregate the entire ownership interest in the issuing entity. The assets of the issuing entity will consist of: (1) the Mortgage Loans and all payments under and proceeds of the Mortgage Loans received after the Cut-off Date (exclusive of payments of principal and/or interest due on or before the Cut-off Date and interest relating to periods prior to, but due after, the Cut-off Date); (2) any REO Property but, with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in such Whole Loan; (3) those funds or assets as from time to time are deposited in the accounts discussed in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Accounts” (such accounts collectively, the “Securitization Accounts”) (but, with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in such Whole Loan), if established; (4) the rights of the mortgagee under all insurance policies with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in such Whole Loan; (5) certain rights of the depositor under each MLPA relating to Mortgage Loan document delivery requirements and the representations and warranties of each mortgage loan seller regarding the Mortgage Loans it sold to the depositor; and (6) the “regular interests” in the Lower-Tier REMIC.
As further described in this prospectus, the primary source for payments of principal and interest on the certificates will be amounts received by the issuing entity in respect of the Mortgage Loans.
Upon initial issuance, the Principal Balance Certificates will have the respective Certificate Balances, and the Class X Certificates will have the respective Notional Amounts, shown below (in each case, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%):
Class | Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount |
Class A-1 | $1,595,000 |
Class A-3 | $622,886,000 |
Class X-A | $722,614,000(1) |
Class X-B | $75,828,000(1) |
Class X-D | $14,454,000(1) |
Class A-S | $98,133,000 |
Class B | $43,490,000 |
Class C | $32,338,000 |
Class D | $14,454,000 |
Class E-RR | $13,424,000 |
Class F-RR | $17,844,000 |
Class G-RR | $10,037,000 |
Class J-RR | $37,915,230 |
The “Certificate Balance” of any class of Principal Balance Certificates outstanding at any time represents the maximum amount that its holders are entitled to receive as distributions allocable to principal from the cash flow on the Mortgage Loans and the other assets in the issuing entity, all as described in this prospectus. On each Distribution Date, the Certificate Balance of each class of Principal Balance Certificates will be reduced by any distributions of principal actually made on, and by any Realized Losses actually allocated to, such class of certificates on that Distribution Date and increased by the amount of any subsequent recovery of Nonrecoverable Advances that was added to the Certificate Balance of such class for such Distribution Date. In the event that Realized Losses previously allocated to a class of certificates, in reduction of its Certificate Balance are recovered subsequent to such Certificate Balance being reduced to zero, holders of such class of certificates may receive distributions in respect of such recoveries in accordance with the distribution priorities described under “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” below.
The Residual Certificates will not have a Certificate Balance or entitle their holders to distributions of principal or interest.
The Class X Certificates will not have Certificate Balances, nor will they entitle their holders to distributions of principal, but the Class X Certificates will represent the right to receive distributions of interest in an amount equal to the aggregate interest accrued on their respective notional amounts (each, a “Notional Amount”). The Notional Amounts of the Class X Certificates will be equal to the aggregate certificate balances of the related class(es) of certificates (the “Related Class X Class”) indicated below:
Interest-Only Class of Certificates | Class Notional Amount | Related Class X Class(es) |
Class X-A | | $722,614,000 | | Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates |
Class X-B | | $75,828,000 | | Class B and Class C certificates |
Class X-D | | $14,454,000 | | Class D certificates |
Distributions
Method, Timing and Amount
Distributions on the certificates are required to be made by the certificate administrator, to the extent of available funds as described in this prospectus, on the 4th business day following each Determination Date (each, a “Distribution Date”). The “Determination Date” will be the 11th day of each calendar month (or, if the 11th calendar day of that month is not a business day, then the next business day) commencing in September 2024.
All distributions to Certificateholders (other than the final distribution on any certificate) are required to be made to the Certificateholders in whose names the certificates are registered at the close of business on each Record Date. With respect to any Distribution Date, the “Record Date” will be the last business day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that Distribution Date occurs. These distributions to Certificateholders are required to be made by wire transfer in immediately available funds to the account specified by the Certificateholder at a bank or other entity having appropriate facilities to accept such funds, if the Certificateholder has provided the certificate administrator with written wiring instructions no less than five (5) business days prior to the related Record Date (which wiring instructions may be in the form of a standing order applicable to all subsequent distributions) or otherwise by check mailed to the Certificateholder. The final distribution on any certificate is required to be made in like manner, but only upon presentation and surrender of the certificate at the location that will be specified in a notice of the pendency of the final distribution. All distributions made with respect to a class of certificates will be allocated pro rata among the outstanding certificates of that class based on their respective Percentage Interests.
The “Percentage Interest” evidenced by any certificate (other than a Class R certificate) will equal its initial denomination as of the Closing Date divided by the initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, of the related class.
Available Funds
The aggregate amount available for distribution to holders of the certificates on each Distribution Date (the “Available Funds”) will, in general, equal the sum of the following amounts (without duplication):
(a) the aggregate amount of all cash received on the Mortgage Loans (in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, only to the extent received by the issuing entity pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) and any REO Property that is on deposit in the Collection Account (in each case, exclusive of any amount on deposit in or credited to any portion of the Collection Account that is held for the benefit of the holder of any related Companion Loan), as of the Master Servicer Remittance Date, exclusive of (without duplication):
| ● | all Periodic Payments that are due on a Due Date after the end of the related Collection Period, excluding interest relating to periods prior to, but due after, the Cut-off Date; |
| ● | all unscheduled payments of principal (including prepayments), unscheduled interest, liquidation proceeds, net insurance proceeds and net condemnation proceeds and other unscheduled recoveries received subsequent to the related Determination Date (or, with respect to voluntary prepayments of principal of each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring after the related Determination Date, subsequent to the related Due Date) allocable to the Mortgage Loans; |
| ● | all amounts in the Collection Account that are due or reimbursable to any person other than the Certificateholders; |
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is an Actual/360 Loan and any Distribution Date occurring in each February and in any January occurring in a year that is not a leap year (unless such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the Withheld Amounts related to the Mortgage Loans to the extent those funds are on deposit in the Collection Account; |
| ● | all yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums; |
| ● | all amounts deposited in the Collection Account in error; and |
| ● | any late payment charges or accrued interest on a Mortgage Loan allocable to the default interest rate for such Mortgage Loan, to the extent permitted by law, excluding any interest calculated at the Mortgage Rate for the related Mortgage Loan; |
(b) if and to the extent not already included in clause (a), the aggregate amount transferred from the applicable REO Account allocable to the Mortgage Loans to the Collection Account for such Distribution Date;
(c) all Compensating Interest Payments made by the master servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans with respect to such Distribution Date and P&I Advances on the Mortgage Loans made by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, with respect to the Distribution Date (net of certain amounts that are due or reimbursable to persons other than the Certificateholders); and
(d) with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is an Actual/360 Loan and any Distribution Date occurring in each March (or February, if such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the Withheld Amounts related to the Mortgage Loans as required to be deposited in the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account pursuant to the PSA.
The “Collection Period” for each Distribution Date and any Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan will be the period commencing on the day immediately following the Due Date for such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan in the month preceding the month in which that Distribution Date occurs or the date that would have been the Due Date if such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan had a Due Date in such preceding month and ending on and including the Due Date for such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan occurring in the month in which that Distribution Date occurs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the last day of a Collection Period (or applicable grace period) is not a business day, any Periodic Payments received with respect to Mortgage Loans or Whole Loans relating to such Collection Period on the business day immediately following such day will be deemed to have been received during such Collection Period and not during any other Collection Period.
“Due Date” means, with respect to each Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, the date on which scheduled payments of principal, interest or both are required to be made by the related borrower.
“Periodic Payment” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or the related Companion Loan, the scheduled monthly payment of principal and/or interest on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, including any balloon payment, which is payable by a borrower from time to time under the related Mortgage Note and applicable law, without regard to any acceleration of principal of such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan by reason of a default.
Priority of Distributions
On each Distribution Date, for so long as the Certificate Balances or Notional Amounts of the certificates have not been reduced to zero, the certificate administrator is required to apply amounts on deposit in the Distribution Account, to the extent of the Available Funds, in the following order of priority:
First, to the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the respective Interest Distribution Amounts for those classes;
Second, to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, in reduction of the Certificate Balances of those classes, in the following priority:
(i) prior to the Cross-Over Date,
(a) to the Class A-1 certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Balance of the Class A-1 certificates is reduced to zero; and
(b) to the Class A-3 certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after the distributions specified in clause (a) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Balance of the Class A-3 certificates is reduced to zero.
(ii) on or after the Cross-Over Date, to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, pro rata (based upon their respective Certificate Balance), in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates are reduced to zero;
Third, to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to, and pro rata based upon, the aggregate unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to each such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Fourth, to the Class A-S certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Fifth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class A-S certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Sixth, to the Class A-S certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Seventh, to the Class B certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Eighth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class B certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Ninth, to the Class B certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Tenth, to the Class C certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Eleventh, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S and Class B certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class C certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Twelfth, to the Class C certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Thirteenth, to the Class D certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Fourteenth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class D certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Fifteenth, to the Class D certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Sixteenth, to the Class E-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Seventeenth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class E-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Eighteenth, to the Class E-RR certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Nineteenth, to the Class F-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twentieth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class F-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Twenty-first, to the Class F-RR certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Twenty-second, to the Class G-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twenty-third, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR and Class F-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class G-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Twenty-fourth, to the Class G-RR certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for
such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed;
Twenty-fifth, to the Class J-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twenty-sixth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class G-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class J-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until the Certificate Balance of such class is reduced to zero;
Twenty-seventh, to the Class J-RR certificates, first (i) up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then (ii) up to an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the amount set forth in clause (i) at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class until the date such Realized Loss is reimbursed; and
Twenty-eighth, to the Class R certificates, any remaining amounts.
The “Cross-Over Date” means the Distribution Date on which the Certificate Balances of all the Subordinate Certificates are (or are expected to be) reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to those certificates.
Reimbursement of previously allocated Realized Losses will not constitute distributions of principal for any purpose and will not result in an additional reduction in the Certificate Balance of the class of certificates in respect of which a reimbursement is made.
Pass-Through Rates
The interest rate (the “Pass-Through Rate”) applicable to each class of certificates (other than the Class R certificates) for any Distribution Date will equal the rates set forth below:
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-1 certificates is a per annum rate equal to 4.84942%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-3 certificates is a per annum rate equal to 5.60190%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-S certificates is a per annum rate equal to the lesser of 6.06412% and the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class B certificates is a per annum rate equal to the lesser of 6.46569% and the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class C certificates is a per annum rate equal to the lesser of 6.45331% and the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class D certificates is a per annum rate equal to 4.50000%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class E-RR certificates is a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class F-RR certificates is a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class G-RR certificates is a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class J-RR certificates is a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate for each class of Class X Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any of (a) the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date, over (b) the weighted average of the Pass-Through Rates on the Related Class X Class (or the Pass-Through Rate on the Related Class X Class, if only one) for such Distribution Date, weighted on the basis of their respective Certificate Balances immediately prior to that Distribution Date.
The “WAC Rate” with respect to any Distribution Date is equal to the weighted average of the applicable Net Mortgage Rates of the Mortgage Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and REO Loan (other than the portion of the REO Loan related to any Companion Loan) as of their respective Due Dates in the month preceding the month in which such Distribution Date occurs, weighted on the basis of their respective Stated Principal Balances immediately following the Distribution Date (or, if applicable, the Closing Date) in such preceding month.
The “Net Mortgage Rate” for each Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and REO Loan (other than the portion of the REO Loan related to any Companion Loan) is equal to the related Mortgage Rate then in effect, less the related Administrative Cost Rate; provided, however, that for purposes of calculating Pass-Through Rates and Withheld Amounts, the Net Mortgage Rate for any Mortgage Loan will be determined without regard to any modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of the related Mortgage Loan, whether agreed to by the master servicer, the special servicer or resulting from a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding involving the related borrower or otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Mortgage Loans that accrue interest on an Actual/360 Basis, then, solely for purposes of calculating the Pass-Through Rate on the Regular Certificates, the Net Mortgage Rate of any Mortgage Loan for any one-month period preceding a related Due Date will be the annualized rate at which interest would have to accrue in respect of the Mortgage Loan on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months in order to produce the aggregate amount of interest actually required to be paid in respect of the Mortgage Loan during the one-month period at the related Net Mortgage Rate; provided, however, that with respect to each Actual/360 Loan, the Net Mortgage Rate for the one-month period (1) prior to the Due Dates in January and February in any year which is not a leap year or in February in any year which is a leap year (in either case, unless the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date) will be determined exclusive of Withheld Amounts and (2) prior to the Due Date in March (or February, if the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date) in any year, will be determined inclusive of Withheld Amounts for the immediately preceding February and January, as applicable. With respect to any REO Loan, the Net Mortgage Rate will be calculated as described above, as if the predecessor Mortgage Loan had remained outstanding.
“Administrative Cost Rate” as of any date of determination will be a per annum rate equal to the sum of the Servicing Fee Rate, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate.
“Mortgage Rate” with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), REO Loan, Companion Loan or Whole Loan, is the annual rate at which interest accrues on such Mortgage Loan, REO Loan, Companion Loan or Whole Loan during such period (in the absence of a default), as stated in the related Mortgage Note, promissory note or componentization notice evidencing such Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), REO Loan, Companion Loan or Whole Loan without giving effect to any default rate.
Interest Distribution Amount
The “Interest Distribution Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and each class of Regular Certificates will equal (A) the sum of (i) the Interest Accrual Amount with respect to such class for such Distribution Date and (ii) the Interest Shortfall, if any, with respect to such class for such Distribution Date, less (B) any Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall allocated to such class on such Distribution Date.
The “Interest Accrual Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and any class of Regular Certificates is equal to the interest for the related Interest Accrual Period accrued at the Pass-Through Rate for such class on the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, for such class immediately prior to that Distribution Date. Calculations of interest for each Interest Accrual Period will be made on 30/360 Basis.
An “Interest Shortfall” with respect to any Distribution Date for any class of Regular Certificates is the sum of (a) the portion of the Interest Distribution Amount for such class remaining unpaid as of the close of business on the preceding Distribution Date, and (b) to the extent permitted by applicable law, (i) in the case of Principal Balance Certificates, one month’s interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the Pass-Through Rate applicable to such class for the current Distribution Date and (ii) in the case of the Class X Certificates, one-month’s interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the WAC Rate for such Distribution Date.
The “Interest Accrual Period” for each Distribution Date will be the calendar month prior to the month in which that Distribution Date occurs.
Principal Distribution Amount
The “Principal Distribution Amount” for any Distribution Date will be equal to the sum of the following amounts:
(a) the Principal Shortfall for that Distribution Date,
(b) the Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount for that Distribution Date, and
(c) the Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount for that Distribution Date;
provided that the Principal Distribution Amount for any Distribution Date will be reduced, to not less than zero, by the amount of any reimbursements of:
(A) Nonrecoverable Advances (including any property protection advance with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA reimbursed out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans), with interest on such Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, that are paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, and
(B) Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date,
provided, further, that in the case of clauses (A) and (B) above, if any of the amounts that were reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (including REO Loans) are subsequently recovered on the related Mortgage Loan (or REO Loan), such recovery will increase the Principal Distribution Amount for the Distribution Date related to the period in which such recovery occurs.
The “Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount” for each Distribution Date will equal the aggregate of the principal portions of (a) all Periodic Payments (excluding balloon payments) with respect to the Mortgage Loans due during or, if and to the extent not previously received or advanced and distributed to Certificateholders on a preceding Distribution Date, prior to the related Collection Period and all Assumed Scheduled Payments with respect to the Mortgage Loans for the related Collection Period, in each case to the extent paid by the related borrower as of the related Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring, or a grace period ending, after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date or, last day of such grace period, as applicable, to the extent received by the master servicer as of the business day preceding the Master Servicer Remittance Date) or advanced by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, and (b) all balloon payments with respect to the Mortgage
Loans to the extent received on or prior to the related Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring, or a grace period ending, after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date or, last day of such grace period, as applicable, to the extent received by the master servicer as of the business day preceding the Master Servicer Remittance Date), and to the extent not included in clause (a) above. The Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount from time to time will include all late payments of principal made by a borrower with respect to the Mortgage Loans, including late payments in respect of a delinquent balloon payment, received by the times described above in this definition, except to the extent those late payments are otherwise available to reimburse the master servicer or the trustee, as the case may be, for prior Advances, as described above.
The “Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount” for each Distribution Date will equal the aggregate of the following: (a) all prepayments of principal received on the Mortgage Loans on or prior to the related Determination Date; and (b) the principal portions of all Liquidation Proceeds, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds and, if applicable, income, rents, and profits from REO Property or otherwise, received with respect to such Mortgage Loan and any REO Loan on or prior to the related Determination Date, but in each case only to the extent that such principal portion represents a recovery of principal for which no advance was previously made pursuant to “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in respect of a preceding Distribution Date; provided that all such Liquidation Proceeds and Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds will be reduced by any Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees, accrued interest on Advances and other additional expenses of the issuing entity incurred in connection with the related Mortgage Loan.
The “Assumed Scheduled Payment” for any Collection Period and with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is delinquent in respect of its balloon payment or any REO Loan (excluding, for purposes of any P&I Advances, the portion allocable to any related Companion Loan), is an amount equal to the sum of (a) the principal portion of the Periodic Payment that would have been due on such Mortgage Loan or REO Loan on the related Due Date based on the constant payment required by such related Mortgage Note or the original amortization schedule of the Mortgage Loan (as calculated with interest at the related Mortgage Rate), if applicable, assuming the related balloon payment has not become due, after giving effect to any reduction in the principal balance occurring in connection with a modification of such Mortgage Loan in connection with a default or a bankruptcy modification (or similar proceeding), and (b) interest on the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan or REO Loan (excluding, for purposes of any P&I Advances, the portion allocable to any related Companion Loan) at its Mortgage Rate (net of interest at the applicable rate at which the Servicing Fee is calculated).
The “Principal Shortfall” for any Distribution Date means the amount, if any, by which (1) the Principal Distribution Amount for the preceding Distribution Date exceeds (2) the aggregate amount actually distributed on the preceding Distribution Date in respect of such Principal Distribution Amount.
Certain Calculations with Respect to Individual Mortgage Loans
The “Stated Principal Balance” of each Mortgage Loan will initially equal its Cut-off Date Balance (or in the case of a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan, the unpaid principal balance of such Mortgage Loan after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not received) and, on each Distribution Date, will be reduced by the amount of principal payments received on such Mortgage Loan or advanced for such Distribution Date. With respect to any other Companion Loan on any date of determination, the Stated Principal Balance will equal the unpaid principal balance of such Companion Loan as of such date. With respect to any Whole Loan on any date of determination, the Stated Principal Balance of such Whole Loan will be the sum of the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan and each related Companion Loan on such date. The Stated Principal Balance of a Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan may also be reduced in connection with any modification that reduces the principal amount due on such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as the case may be, or any forced reduction of its actual unpaid principal balance imposed by a court presiding over a bankruptcy proceeding in which the related borrower is the debtor. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans”. If any Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan is paid in full or the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan (or any Mortgaged Property acquired in respect of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan) is otherwise
liquidated, then, as of the first Distribution Date that follows the end of the Collection Period in which that payment in full or liquidation occurred and notwithstanding that a loss may have occurred in connection with any liquidation, the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan will be zero.
For purposes of calculating allocations of, or recoveries in respect of, Realized Losses, as well as for purposes of calculating the Servicing Fee and Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee payable each month, each REO Property (including any REO Property with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan held pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) will be treated as if there exists with respect to such REO Property an outstanding Mortgage Loan and, if applicable, each related Companion Loan (an “REO Loan”), and all references to Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan and pool of Mortgage Loans in this prospectus, when used in that context, will be deemed to also be references to or to also include, as the case may be, any REO Loans. Each REO Loan will generally be deemed to have the same characteristics as its actual predecessor Mortgage Loan (including related Companion Loan), including the same fixed Mortgage Rate (and, accordingly, the same Net Mortgage Rate) and the same unpaid principal balance and Stated Principal Balance. Amounts due on the predecessor Mortgage Loan (including related Companion Loan) including any portion of it payable or reimbursable to the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator or the trustee, as applicable, will continue to be “due” in respect of the REO Loan; and amounts received in respect of the related REO Property, net of payments to be made, or reimbursement to the master servicer or the special servicer for payments previously advanced, in connection with the operation and management of that property, generally will be applied by the master servicer as if received on the predecessor Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan.
With respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, no amounts relating to the related REO Property or REO Loan allocable to any related Companion Loan will be available for amounts due to the Certificateholders or to reimburse the issuing entity, other than in the limited circumstances related to Property Protection Advances, indemnification, Special Servicing Fees and other reimbursable expenses related to such Serviced Whole Loan incurred with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan in accordance with the PSA.
With respect to an AB Whole Loan, no amounts relating to the related REO Property or REO Loan allocable to a Subordinate Companion Loan will be available for amounts due to the holders of the certificates, other than indirectly in the limited circumstances related to reimbursement of Property Protection Advances, indemnification, Special Servicing Fees and other reimbursable expenses related to an AB Whole Loan incurred with respect to an AB Whole Loan in accordance with the PSA.
Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections
Absent express provisions in the related Mortgage Loan documents (and, with respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, the related Co-Lender Agreement), all amounts collected by or on behalf of the issuing entity in respect of any Mortgage Loan in the form of payments from the related borrower, Liquidation Proceeds, condemnation proceeds or insurance proceeds (excluding, if applicable, in the case of each Serviced Whole Loan, any amounts payable to the holder of any related Companion Loan(s) pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement) will be deemed to be allocated for purposes of collecting amounts due under the Mortgage Loan, pursuant to the PSA, in the following order of priority:
First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances (including any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and unpaid interest at the Reimbursement Rate on such Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid expenses of the issuing entity (including Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees and Workout Fees previously paid by the issuing entity from general collections) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan;
Second, as a recovery of Nonrecoverable Advances and any interest on those Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, to the extent previously paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (as described in the first proviso in the definition of Principal Distribution Amount);
Third, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan (exclusive of default interest) to the extent of the excess of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan at the related Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time through and including the end of the applicable Mortgage Loan interest accrual period in which such collections are received by or on behalf of the issuing entity, over (ii) the sum of (a) (x) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to clause Fifth below on earlier dates) or (y) with respect to any accrued and unpaid interest that was not advanced due to a determination that the related P&I Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, the amount of interest that (absent such determination of nonrecoverability preventing such P&I Advance from being made) would not have been advanced because of the reductions in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that would have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts, and (b) Accrued AB Loan Interest;
Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of principal of such Mortgage Loan then due and owing, including by reason of acceleration of such Mortgage Loan following a default thereunder (or, if the Mortgage Loan has been liquidated, as a recovery of principal to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance);
Fifth, as a recovery of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts or would have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts but for such P&I Advance not having been made as a result of a determination by the master servicer that such P&I Advance would have been a Nonrecoverable Advance and (ii) Accrued AB Loan Interest (in each of clause (i) and (ii), to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to this clause Fifth on earlier dates);
Sixth, as a recovery of amounts to be currently allocated to the payment of, or escrowed for the future payment of, real estate taxes, assessments and insurance premiums and similar items relating to such Mortgage Loan;
Seventh, as a recovery of any other reserves to the extent then required to be held in escrow with respect to such Mortgage Loan;
Eighth, as a recovery of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Ninth, as a recovery of any late payment charges and default interest then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Tenth, as a recovery of any assumption fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Eleventh, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan other than remaining unpaid principal (if both consent fees and Operating Advisor Consulting Fees are due and owing, first, allocated to consent fees and then, allocated to Operating Advisor Consulting Fees); and
Twelfth, as a recovery of any remaining principal of such Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance;
provided that, to the extent required under the REMIC provisions of the Code, payments or proceeds received (or receivable by exercise of the lender’s rights under the related Mortgage Loan documents) with respect to any partial release of a Mortgaged Property (including in connection with a condemnation) at a time when the loan-to-value ratio of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan exceeds
125%, or would exceed 125% following any partial release (based solely on the value of real property and excluding personal property and going concern value, if any) must be collected and allocated to reduce the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan in the manner permitted by such REMIC provisions.
“Accrued AB Loan Interest” means, with respect to any AB Modified Loan and any date of determination, accrued and unpaid interest that remains unpaid with respect to the junior note(s) of such AB Modified Loan.
Collections by or on behalf of the issuing entity in respect of any REO Property (exclusive of the amounts to be allocated to the payment of the costs of operating, managing, leasing, maintaining and disposing of such REO Property and, if applicable, in the case of each Serviced Whole Loan, exclusive of any amounts payable to the holder of any related Companion Loan(s), as applicable, pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement) will be deemed to be allocated for purposes of collecting amounts due under the Mortgage Loan, pursuant to the PSA, in the following order of priority:
First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances (including any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and interest at the Reimbursement Rate on all Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid expenses of the issuing entity (including Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees and Workout Fees previously paid by the issuing entity from general collections) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan;
Second, as a recovery of Nonrecoverable Advances and any interest on those Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, to the extent previously paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (as described in the first proviso in the definition of Principal Distribution Amount);
Third, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan (exclusive of default interest) to the extent of the excess of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan at the applicable Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time through and including the end of the applicable Mortgage Loan interest accrual period in which such collections are received by or on behalf of the issuing entity, over (ii) the sum of (a) (x) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to clause Fifth below or clause Fifth of the prior waterfall under this “—Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections” above on earlier dates) or (y) with respect to any accrued and unpaid interest that was not advanced due to a determination that the related P&I Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, the amount of interest that (absent such determination of nonrecoverability preventing such P&I Advance from being made) would not have been advanced because of the reductions in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that would have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts, and (b) Accrued AB Loan Interest;
Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of principal of such Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire unpaid principal balance;
Fifth, as a recovery of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts or would have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts but for such P&I Advance not having been made as a result of a determination by the master servicer that such P&I Advance would have been a Nonrecoverable Advance and (ii) Accrued AB Loan Interest (in each of clause (i) and (ii), to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to this clause Fifth or clause Fifth of the prior waterfall under this “—Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections” above on earlier dates);
Sixth, as a recovery of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Seventh, as a recovery of any late payment charges and default interest then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Eighth, as a recovery of any assumption fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan; and
Ninth, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan other than remaining unpaid principal (if both consent fees and Operating Advisor Consulting Fees are due and owing, first, allocated to consent fees and then, allocated to Operating Advisor Consulting Fees).
Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums
On each Distribution Date, prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges collected as of the related Determination Date are required to be distributed to the holders of the classes of certificates as described below.
On each Distribution Date, any yield maintenance charge collected on the Mortgage Loans during the one-month period ending on the related Determination Date is required to be distributed as follows: (a) pro rata, between (i) the group (“YM Group A”) of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A and Class A-S certificates, (ii) the group (“YM Group B”) of the Class X-B, Class B and Class C certificates, (iii) the group (“YM Group D”) of the Class X-D and Class D certificates and (iv) the group (together with YM Group A, YM Group B and YM Group D, the “YM Groups”) of the Class E-RR certificates based upon the aggregate amount of principal distributed to the classes of Principal Balance Certificates in each YM Group on such Distribution Date; and (b) as among the respective classes of Principal Balance Certificates in each YM Group in the following manner: (i) each class of Principal Balance Certificates in such YM Group will be entitled to receive on each Distribution Date the portion of such yield maintenance charge in an amount equal to the product of (x) a fraction whose numerator is the amount of principal distributed to such class of Principal Balance Certificates on such Distribution Date and whose denominator is the total amount of principal distributed to all of the Principal Balance Certificates in such YM Group on such Distribution Date, (y) the Base Interest Fraction for the related principal prepayment and such class of certificates, and (z) the aggregate amount of such yield maintenance charge allocated to such YM Group and (ii) the portion of such yield maintenance charge allocated to such YM Group remaining after such distributions to the applicable classes of Principal Balance Certificates, will be distributed to the class of Class X Certificates in such YM Group. If there is more than one class of Principal Balance Certificates in either YM Group entitled to distributions of principal on any particular Distribution Date on which yield maintenance charges are distributable to such classes, the aggregate amount of such yield maintenance charges will be allocated among all such classes of Principal Balance Certificates up to, and on a pro rata basis in accordance with, their respective entitlements in those yield maintenance charges in accordance with the first sentence of this paragraph.
No prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges will be distributed to holders of the Class R certificates. Instead, after the Notional Amounts of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, and the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, all prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges with respect to Mortgage Loans allocated to the Certificateholders will be distributed by the certificate administrator pro rata to holders of the Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates (based on their respective Certificate Balances).
The “Base Interest Fraction” with respect to any principal prepayment on any Mortgage Loan and with respect to any class of Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates is a fraction (a) whose numerator is the amount, if any, by which (i) the Pass-Through Rate on such class of certificates exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related loan documents in calculating the yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment and (b) whose denominator is the amount, if any, by which the (i) Mortgage Rate on such Mortgage Loan
exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related loan documents in calculating the yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment; provided, however, that under no circumstances will the Base Interest Fraction be greater than one. However, if such discount rate is greater than or equal to the lesser of (x) the Mortgage Rate on such Mortgage Loan and (y) the Pass-Through Rate described in the preceding sentence, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal zero; provided that if such discount rate is greater than or equal to the Mortgage Rate on such Mortgage Loan, but less than the Pass-Through Rate described in the preceding sentence, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal one.
If a prepayment premium is imposed in connection with a prepayment rather than a yield maintenance charge, then the prepayment premium so collected will be allocated as described above. For this purpose, the discount rate used to calculate the Base Interest Fraction will be the discount rate used to determine the yield maintenance charge for Mortgage Loans that require payment at the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a minimum amount equal to a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or, for Mortgage Loans that only have a prepayment premium based on a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, such other discount rate as may be specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents.
For a description of yield maintenance charges, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments”.
Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date
The “Assumed Final Distribution Date” with respect to any class of certificates is the Distribution Date on which the aggregate Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of that class of certificates would be reduced to zero based on the assumptions set forth below. The Assumed Final Distribution Date with respect to each class of Offered Certificates will in each case be as follows:
Class Designation | Assumed Final Distribution Date |
Class A-1 | April 2029 |
Class A-3 | August 2029 |
Class X-A | August 2029 |
Class X-B | August 2029 |
Class X-D | August 2029 |
Class A-S | August 2029 |
Class B | August 2029 |
Class C | August 2029 |
Class D | August 2029 |
The Assumed Final Distribution Dates set forth above were calculated without regard to any delays in the collection of balloon payments and without regard to delinquencies, defaults or liquidations. Accordingly, in the event of defaults on the Mortgage Loans, the actual final Distribution Date for one or more classes of the Offered Certificates may be later, and could be substantially later, than the related Assumed Final Distribution Date(s).
In addition, the Assumed Final Distribution Dates set forth above were calculated on the basis of a 0% CPY prepayment rate and the Modeling Assumptions. Since the rate of payment (including prepayments) of the Mortgage Loans may exceed the scheduled rate of payments, and could exceed the scheduled rate by a substantial amount, the actual final Distribution Date for one or more classes of the Offered Certificates may be earlier, and could be substantially earlier, than the related Assumed Final Distribution Date(s). The rate of payments (including prepayments) on the Mortgage Loans will depend on the characteristics of the Mortgage Loans, as well as on the prevailing level of interest rates and other economic factors, and we cannot assure you as to actual payment experience.
The “Rated Final Distribution Date” for each class of Offered Certificates will be the Distribution Date in August 2057. See “Ratings”.
Prepayment Interest Shortfalls
If a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan in whole or in part, after the due date but on or before the Determination Date in any calendar month, the amount of interest (net of related Servicing Fees) accrued on such prepayment from such due date to, but not including, the date of prepayment (or any later date through which interest accrues) will, to the extent actually collected (without regard to any prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge actually collected) constitute a “Prepayment Interest Excess”. Conversely, if a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (with such prepayment allocated between the related Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement) in whole or in part after the Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, as applicable, with a due date occurring after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date) in any calendar month and does not pay interest on such prepayment through the following Due Date, then the shortfall in a full month’s interest (net of related Servicing Fees) on such prepayment will constitute a “Prepayment Interest Shortfall”. Prepayment Interest Shortfalls for each Distribution Date with respect to each AB Whole Loan will generally be allocated first, to the related Subordinate Companion Loans in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement and then, pro rata to the related Mortgage Loan and any related Pari Passu Companion Loan. Prepayment Interest Excesses (to the extent not offset by Prepayment Interest Shortfalls or required to be paid as Compensating Interest Payments) collected on the Mortgage Loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan, will be retained by the master servicer as additional servicing compensation.
The master servicer will be required to deliver to the certificate administrator for deposit in the Distribution Account (other than the portion of any Compensating Interest Payment described below that is allocable to a Serviced Companion Loan and is required to be made to the holder of such Serviced Companion Loan) on each Master Servicer Remittance Date, without any right of reimbursement thereafter, a cash payment (a “Compensating Interest Payment”) in an amount, with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, equal to the lesser of:
(i) the aggregate amount of Prepayment Interest Shortfalls incurred in connection with voluntary principal prepayments received in respect of the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (in each case other than a Specially Serviced Loan or if the special servicer allowed a prepayment on such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan on a date other than the applicable Due Date) for the related Distribution Date, and
(ii) the aggregate of (A) a portion of the master servicer’s Servicing Fees to be paid under the PSA for the related Distribution Date calculated at a per annum rate equal to (1) 0.00125% for each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), Serviced Companion Loan and related REO Loan without an initial sub-servicer, and (2) 0.000625% for each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), Serviced Companion Loan and the related REO Loan where servicing functions are performed by an initial sub-servicer, (B) all Prepayment Interest Excesses received by the master servicer during such Collection Period with respect to the Mortgage Loans (other than the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) (and, so long as a Whole Loan is serviced under the PSA, any related Serviced Whole Loan) subject to such prepayment and (C) to the extent earned on principal prepayments, net investment earnings payable to the master servicer for such Collection Period received by the master servicer during such Collection Period with respect to the Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) (and, so long as a Whole Loan is serviced under the PSA, any related Serviced Whole Loan), as applicable, subject to such prepayment. In no event will the rights of the Certificateholders to the offset of the aggregate Prepayment Interest Shortfalls be cumulative.
If a Prepayment Interest Shortfall occurs with respect to a Mortgage Loan as a result of the master servicer allowing the related borrower to deviate (a “Prohibited Prepayment”) from the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents regarding principal prepayments (other than (v) any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, (w) subsequent to a default under the related Mortgage Loan documents or if the Mortgage Loan is
a Specially Serviced Loan, (x) pursuant to applicable law or a court order or otherwise in such circumstances where the master servicer is required to accept such principal prepayment in accordance with the Servicing Standard, (y) at the request or with the consent of the special servicer or, so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, and only with respect to the Mortgage Loans other than any applicable Excluded Loan or the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, the Directing Holder or (z) in connection with the payment of any insurance proceeds or condemnation awards, unless the master servicer did not apply the proceeds thereof in accordance with the terms of the related loan documents and such failure causes the shortfall), then for purposes of calculating the Compensating Interest Payment for the related Distribution Date, master servicer will pay, without regard to clause (ii) above, the aggregate amount of Prepayment Interest Shortfalls with respect to such Mortgage Loan otherwise described in clause (i) above in connection with such Prohibited Prepayments.
Compensating Interest Payments with respect to the Serviced Whole Loans will be allocated among the related Mortgage Loan and the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, pro rata, in accordance with their respective principal amounts, and the master servicer will be required to pay the portion of such Compensating Interest Payments allocable to the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan to the applicable master servicer under the related other pooling and servicing agreement.
The aggregate of any Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall allocated to the Mortgage Loans for any Distribution Date will be allocated on such Distribution Date among each class of Regular Certificates, pro rata in accordance with their respective Interest Accrual Amounts for that Distribution Date.
“Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall” means, with respect to any Distribution Date, the aggregate of any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls resulting from any principal prepayments made on the Mortgage Loans to be included in the Available Funds for such Distribution Date that are not covered by the master servicer’s Compensating Interest Payment for such Distribution Date and the portion of the compensating interest payments allocable to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan to the extent received from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer.
Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses
The rights of holders of the Subordinate Certificates to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on the Mortgage Loans will be subordinated, to the extent described in this prospectus, to the rights of holders of the Senior Certificates. In particular, the rights of the holders of the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates to receive distributions of interest and principal, as applicable, will be subordinated to such rights of the holders of the Senior Certificates. The Class A-S certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. The Class B certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates. The Class C certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates.
This subordination will be effected in two (2) ways: (i) by the preferential right of the holders of a class of certificates to receive on any Distribution Date the amounts of interest and/or principal distributable to them prior to any distribution being made on such Distribution Date in respect of any classes of certificates subordinate to that class (as described above under “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”) and (ii) by the allocation of Realized Losses to classes of Principal Balance Certificates that are subordinate to more senior classes, as described below.
Other than the subordination of certain classes of certificates, as described above, no other form of credit support will be available for the benefit of the Offered Certificates.
Prior to the Cross-Over Date, allocation of principal allocable to the certificates on any Distribution Date will be made as described under “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” above. On or after the Cross-Over Date, allocation of principal will be made to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates that are still outstanding, pro rata, until their Certificate Balances have been reduced to zero. See “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” above.
Allocation to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, for so long as they are outstanding, of the entire Principal Distribution Amount for each Distribution Date will have the effect of reducing the aggregate Certificate Balance of the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates at a proportionately faster rate than the rate at which the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans will decline. Therefore, as principal is distributed to the holders of the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, the percentage interest in the issuing entity evidenced by the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates will be decreased (with a corresponding increase in the percentage interest in the issuing entity evidenced by the Subordinate Certificates), thereby increasing, relative to their respective Certificate Balances, the subordination afforded to the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates by the Subordinate Certificates.
Following retirement of the Class A-1 and Class A-3 certificates, the successive allocation on each Distribution Date of the remaining Principal Distribution Amount to the Class A-S certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates, the Class D certificates, the Class E-RR certificates, the Class F-RR certificates, the Class G-RR certificates and the Class J-RR certificates, in that order, for so long as they are outstanding, will provide a similar, but diminishing benefit to those certificates as to the relative amount of subordination afforded by the outstanding classes of certificates with later sequential designations.
On each Distribution Date, immediately following the distributions to be made to the Certificateholders on that date, the certificate administrator is required to calculate the Realized Loss for such Distribution Date.
The “Realized Loss” with respect to any Distribution Date is the amount, if any, by which (i) the aggregate Certificate Balance of the Principal Balance Certificates, after giving effect to distributions of principal on such Distribution Date, exceeds (ii) the aggregate Stated Principal Balance (for purposes of this calculation only, the aggregate Stated Principal Balance will not be reduced by the amount of principal payments received on the Mortgage Loans that were used to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee from general collections of principal on the Mortgage Loans for Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts, to the extent those amounts are not otherwise determined to be Nonrecoverable Advances) of the Mortgage Loans, including any REO Loans (but in each case, excluding any Companion Loan) as of the end of the last day of the related Collection Period.
The certificate administrator will be required to allocate any Realized Losses among the respective classes of Principal Balance Certificates in the following order, until the Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero:
first, to the Class J-RR certificates;
second, to the Class G-RR certificates;
third, to the Class F-RR certificates;
fourth, to the Class E-RR certificates;
fifth, to the Class D certificates;
sixth, to the Class C certificates;
seventh, to the Class B certificates; and
eighth, to the Class A-S certificates.
Following the reduction of the Certificate Balances of all classes of Subordinate Certificates to zero, the certificate administrator will be required to allocate Realized Losses among the Senior Certificates (other than the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates), pro rata, based upon their respective Certificate Balances, until their respective Certificate Balances have been reduced to zero.
Realized Losses will not be allocated to the Class R certificates and will not be directly allocated to the Class X Certificates. However, the Notional Amounts of the classes of Class X Certificates will be reduced if any Related Class X Class is reduced by such Realized Losses.
In general, Realized Losses could result from the occurrence of: (1) losses and other shortfalls on or in respect of the Mortgage Loans, including as a result of defaults and delinquencies on the related Mortgage Loans, Nonrecoverable Advances made in respect of the Mortgage Loans, the payment to the special servicer of any compensation as described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”, and the payment of interest on Advances and certain servicing expenses; and (2) certain unanticipated, non-Mortgage Loan specific expenses of the issuing entity, including certain reimbursements to the certificate administrator or trustee as described under “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and Certificate Administrator” or “—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”, and certain federal, state and local taxes, and certain tax-related expenses, payable out of the issuing entity, as described under “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
A class of Regular Certificates will be considered outstanding until its Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, is reduced to zero. However, notwithstanding a reduction of its Certificate Balance to zero, reimbursements of any previously allocated Realized Losses are required thereafter to be made to a class of Principal Balance Certificates in accordance with the payment priorities set forth in “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information
Certificate Administrator Reports
On each Distribution Date, the certificate administrator will be required to prepare and make available to each Certificateholder of record a Distribution Date Statement based in part on the information delivered to it by the master servicer in the form of Annex B (the “Distribution Date Statement”) and providing all information required under Regulation AB relating to distributions made on that date for the relevant class and the recent status of the Mortgage Loans. The certificate administrator will include on each Distribution Date statement a statement that each Certificateholder may access such notices via the certificate administrator’s website and that each Certificateholder may register to receive electronic mail notifications when such notices are posted thereon.
In addition, the certificate administrator will include (to the extent it receives such information) (i) the identity of any Mortgage Loans permitting additional secured debt, identifying (A) the amount of any additional secured debt incurred during the related Collection Period, (B) the total debt service coverage ratio calculated on the basis of the mortgage loan and such additional secured debt and (C) the aggregate loan-to-value ratio calculated on the basis of the mortgage loan and the additional secured debt in each applicable Form 10-D filed on behalf of the issuing entity and (ii) the beginning and ending account balances for each of the Securitization Accounts (for the applicable period) in each Form 10-D filed on behalf of the issuing entity.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the certificate administrator is required to furnish to each person or entity who at any time during the calendar year was a holder of a certificate, a statement containing information as to (i) the amount of the distribution on each Distribution Date in reduction of the Certificate Balance of the certificates, and (ii) the amount of the distribution on each Distribution Date of the applicable Interest Accrual Amount, in each case, as to the applicable class, aggregated for the related calendar year or applicable partial year during which that person was a Certificateholder, together with any other information that the certificate administrator deems necessary or desirable, or that a Certificateholder or a Certificate Owner reasonably requests, to enable Certificateholders to prepare their tax returns for that calendar year. This obligation of the certificate administrator will be deemed to have been satisfied to the extent that substantially comparable information will be provided by the certificate administrator pursuant to any requirements of the Code as from time to time are in force.
In addition, the certificate administrator will make available on its website (www.ctslink.com), to the extent received from the applicable person, on each Distribution Date to each Privileged Person the following reports (other than clause (1) below, the “CREFC® Reports”) prepared by the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the special servicer, as applicable, substantially in the form provided in the PSA, in the case of the Distribution Date Statement (which form is subject to change) and as required under the PSA in the case of the CREFC® Reports, and including substantially the following information:
(1) a report as of the close of business on the immediately preceding Determination Date, containing some categories of information regarding the Mortgage Loans provided on Annex A-2, calculated, where applicable, on the basis of the most recent relevant information provided by the borrowers to the master servicer and by the master servicer to the certificate administrator, and presented in a loan-by-loan and tabular format substantially similar to the formats utilized on Annex B;
(2) a Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (“CREFC®”) delinquent loan status report;
(3) a CREFC® historical loan modification and corrected loan report;
(4) a CREFC® advance recovery report;
(5) a CREFC® total loan report;
(6) a CREFC® operating statement analysis report;
(7) a CREFC® comparative financial status report;
(8) a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet;
(9) a CREFC® real estate owned status report;
(10) a CREFC® servicer watch list;
(11) a CREFC® loan level reserve and letter of credit report;
(12) a CREFC® property file;
(13) a CREFC® financial file;
(14) a CREFC® loan setup file; and
(15) a CREFC® loan periodic update file.
The master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, may omit any information from these reports that the master servicer or the special servicer regards as confidential, so long as such information is not required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 1125 of Regulation AB. Subject to any potential liability for willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”, none of the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator will be responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any information supplied to it by a borrower, a mortgage loan seller or another party to the PSA or a party under a Non-Serviced PSA that is included in any reports, statements, materials or information prepared or provided by it. Some information will be made available to Certificateholders by electronic transmission as may be agreed upon between the depositor and the certificate administrator.
Before each Distribution Date, the master servicer will deliver to the certificate administrator by electronic means, as required under the PSA:
| ● | a CREFC® financial file; |
| ● | a CREFC® loan setup file; |
| ● | a CREFC® loan periodic update file; and |
| ● | a CREFC® appraisal reduction amount template (if any Appraisal Reduction Amount has been calculated). |
No later than two (2) business days following each Distribution Date, the master servicer will deliver to the certificate administrator by electronic means a CREFC® Schedule AL file.
In addition, the master servicer (with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan) or special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans and REO Properties), as applicable, is also required to prepare the following for each Mortgaged Property and REO Property:
| ● | Within 30 days after receipt of a quarterly operating statement, if any, commencing for the quarter ending December 31, 2024, a CREFC® operating statement analysis report but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, for the Mortgaged Property or REO Property as of the end of that calendar quarter, provided, however, that any analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter of each year will not be required to the extent provided in the then current applicable CREFC® guidelines (it being understood that as of the date of this prospectus, the applicable CREFC® guidelines provide that such analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter (in each year) is not required for a Mortgaged Property unless such Mortgaged Property is analyzed on a trailing 12 month basis, or if the related Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan is on the CREFC® servicer watch list). The master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans and REO Properties), as applicable, will deliver to the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and each holder of a Serviced Companion Loan by electronic means the operating statement analysis upon request. |
| ● | Within 30 days after receipt by the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans and REO Properties) or the master servicer (with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan) of any annual operating statements or rent rolls commencing for the calendar year ending December 31, 2024, a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet, but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, presenting the computation made in accordance with the methodology described in the PSA to “normalize” the full year net operating income and debt service coverage numbers used by the master servicer to satisfy its obligation to deliver the CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet described above. The special servicer or the master servicer will deliver to the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and each holder of a related Serviced Companion Loan by electronic means the CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet upon request. |
Certificate Owners and any holder of a Serviced Companion Loan who are also Privileged Persons may also obtain access to any of the certificate administrator reports upon request and pursuant to the provisions of the PSA. Otherwise, until the time Definitive Certificates are issued to evidence the certificates, the information described above will be available to the related Certificate Owners only if DTC and its participants provide the information to the Certificate Owners. See “Risk Factors—General Risk Factors—Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be Recognized as a Holder of Record”.
“Privileged Person” includes the depositor and its designees, the initial purchasers, the underwriters, the sponsors, the master servicer, the special servicer, any Excluded Special Servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, any additional servicer designated by the master servicer or the special servicer, the operating advisor, any affiliate of the operating advisor designated by the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, any holder of a Companion Loan who provides an Investor Certification, any
person (including the Directing Holder or the Controlling Class Representative) who provides the certificate administrator with an Investor Certification and any nationally recognized statistical rating organization within the meaning of Section 3(a)(62) of the Exchange Act (“NRSRO”), including any Rating Agency, that delivers an NRSRO Certification to the certificate administrator, which Investor Certification and NRSRO Certification may be submitted electronically via the certificate administrator’s website; provided that in no event may a Borrower Party (other than a Borrower Party that is special servicer) be entitled to receive (i) if such party is the Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, any Excluded Information via the certificate administrator’s website (unless a loan-by-loan segregation is later performed by the certificate administrator in which case such access will only be prohibited with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan(s)), and (ii) if such party is not the Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, any information other than the Distribution Date Statement; provided, however, that, if the special servicer obtains knowledge that it is a Borrower Party, the special servicer will nevertheless be a Privileged Person; provided, further, however, that the special servicer may not directly or indirectly provide any information related to any Excluded Special Servicer Loan (which may include any asset status reports, Final Asset Status Reports (or summaries thereof), and such other information as may be specified in the PSA pertaining to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan) to the related Borrower Party, any of the special servicer’s employees or personnel or any of its affiliates involved in the management of any investment in the related Borrower Party or the related Mortgaged Property or, to its actual knowledge, any non-affiliate that holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the related Borrower Party, and will maintain sufficient internal controls and appropriate policies and procedures in place in order to comply with those obligations; provided, further, however, that any Excluded Controlling Class Holder will be permitted to reasonably request and obtain, in accordance with terms of the PSA, any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is not a Borrower Party (if such Excluded Information is not otherwise available to such Excluded Controlling Class Holder via the certificate administrator’s website on account of it constituting Excluded Information) from the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this prospectus, neither the master servicer nor the certificate administrator will have any obligation to take separate action to restrict access by the special servicer or any Excluded Special Servicer to any information related to any Excluded Special Servicer Loan solely because it is an Excluded Special Servicer Loan.
In determining whether any person is an additional servicer or an affiliate of the operating advisor, the certificate administrator may rely on a certification by the master servicer, the special servicer, a mortgage loan seller or the operating advisor, as the case may be.
“Borrower Party” means a borrower, a manager of a Mortgaged Property, a Restricted Mezzanine Holder or a Borrower Party Affiliate.
“Borrower Party Affiliate” means, with respect to a borrower, a manager of a Mortgaged Property or a Restricted Mezzanine Holder, (a) any other person controlling or controlled by or under common control with such borrower, manager or Restricted Mezzanine Holder, as applicable, or (b) any other person owning, directly or indirectly, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the beneficial interests in such borrower, manager or Restricted Mezzanine Holder, as applicable. For the purposes of this definition, “control” when used with respect to any specified person means the power to direct the management and policies of such person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise and the terms “controlling” and “controlled” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
“Excluded Controlling Class Loan” means a Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan with respect to which, as of any date of determination, the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, as applicable, is a Borrower Party.
“Excluded Information” means, with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan, any information solely related to such Excluded Controlling Class Loan and/or the related Mortgaged Properties, which may include any asset status reports, Final Asset Status Reports (or summaries thereof), and such other information as may be specified in the PSA pertaining to such Excluded Controlling Class Loan and/or the related Mortgaged Properties, other than any such information with respect to such Excluded Controlling
Class Loan that is aggregated with information of other Mortgage Loans at a pool level and other than CREFC® Reports (other than the CREFC® special servicer loan file for the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan).
“Excluded Loan” means with respect to the Controlling Class Representative, any Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan with respect to which the Controlling Class Representative or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class (by Certificate Balance) is a Borrower Party.
“Investor Certification” means a certificate (which may be in electronic form), substantially in the form attached to the PSA or in the form of an electronic certification contained on the certificate administrator’s website (which may be a click through confirmation), representing (i) that such person executing the certificate is a Certificateholder or the Directing Holder (in each case, to the extent such person is not a Certificateholder), a beneficial owner of a certificate, a Companion Loan Holder or a prospective purchaser of a certificate (or any investment advisor or manager of the foregoing), (ii) that either (a) such person is not a Borrower Party, in which case such person will have access to all the reports and information made available to Certificateholders via the certificate administrator’s website under the PSA, or (b) such person is a Borrower Party, in which case (1) if such person is the Directing Holder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person will have access to all the reports and information made available to Certificateholders via the certificate administrator’s website under the PSA other than any Excluded Information relating to an Excluded Controlling Class Loan applicable to such party as set forth in the PSA or (2) if such person is not the Directing Holder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person will only receive access to the Distribution Date Statements prepared by the certificate administrator, (iii) such person has received a copy of the final prospectus and (iv) such person agrees to keep any Privileged Information confidential and will not violate any securities laws; provided, however, that any Excluded Controlling Class Holder (i) will be permitted to obtain, upon request in accordance with terms of PSA, any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is not a Borrower Party (if such Excluded Information is not otherwise available to such Excluded Controlling Class Holder via the certificate administrator’s website on account of it constituting Excluded Information) from the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, and (ii) will be considered a Privileged Person for all other purposes, except with respect to its ability to obtain information with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Loan.
“Restricted Mezzanine Holder” means a holder of a related mezzanine loan that has been accelerated or as to which the mezzanine lender has initiated foreclosure or enforcement proceedings against the equity collateral pledged to secure such mezzanine loan.
A “Certificateholder” is the person in whose name a certificate is registered in the certificate register or any beneficial owner thereof; provided, however, that solely for the purposes of giving any consent, approval, waiver or taking any action pursuant to the PSA, any certificate registered in the name of or beneficially owned by the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, a mortgage loan seller, a mortgagor, a Borrower Party or any affiliate of any of such persons will be deemed to be not outstanding (provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, any Controlling Class certificates owned by an Excluded Controlling Class Holder will be deemed to be not outstanding as to such Excluded Controlling Class Holder solely with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Loan; and provided, further, that any Controlling Class certificates owned by the special servicer or an affiliate thereof will be deemed to be not outstanding as to the special servicer or such affiliate solely with respect to any related Excluded Special Servicer Loan), and the Voting Rights to which it is entitled will not be taken into account in determining whether the requisite percentage of Voting Rights necessary to effect any such consent, approval, waiver or take any such action has been obtained; provided, however, that the foregoing restrictions will not apply in the case of the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, the mortgage loan sellers or any affiliate of any of such persons unless such consent, approval or waiver sought from such party would in any way increase its compensation or limit its obligations in the named capacities under the PSA or waive a Servicer Termination Event or trigger an Asset Review with respect to such Mortgage Loan; provided, further, that so long as there is no Servicer Termination Event
with respect to the master servicer or special servicer, the master servicer and the special servicer or such affiliate of either will be entitled to exercise such Voting Rights with respect to any issue which could reasonably be believed to adversely affect such party’s compensation or increase its obligations or liabilities under the PSA; and provided, further, that such restrictions will not apply to (i) the exercise of the special servicer’s, the master servicer’s or the related mortgage loan seller’s rights, if any, or any of their affiliates as a member of the Controlling Class or (ii) any affiliate of the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator that has provided an Investor Certification in which it has certified as to the existence of certain policies and procedures restricting the flow of information between it and the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable.
“NRSRO Certification” means a certification (a) executed by an NRSRO or (b) provided electronically and executed by such NRSRO by means of a “click-through” confirmation on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in favor of the 17g-5 Information Provider that states that such NRSRO is a Rating Agency as such term is defined in the PSA or that such NRSRO has provided the depositor with the appropriate certifications pursuant to paragraph (e) of Rule 17g-5 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 17g-5”), that such NRSRO has access to the depositor’s 17g-5 website, and that such NRSRO will keep such information confidential except to the extent such information has been made available to the general public.
Under the PSA, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, is required to provide to the holders of any Companion Loan (or their designee including any master servicer or any special servicer) certain other reports, copies and information relating to the related Serviced Whole Loan to the extent required under the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Certain information concerning the Mortgage Loans and the certificates, including the Distribution Date Statements, CREFC® Reports and supplemental notices with respect to such Distribution Date Statements and CREFC® Reports, may be provided by the certificate administrator at the direction of the depositor (which may be in the form of a standing order) to certain market data providers, such as Bloomberg Financial Markets, L.P., Trepp, LLC, Intex Solutions, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, CMBS.com, Inc., BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., Markit Group Limited, RealINSIGHT, Thomson Reuters Corporation, Intercontinental Exchange | ICE Data Services, KBRA Analytics, LLC, DealView Technologies Ltd. and CRED iQ (each, a “Financial Market Publisher”), pursuant to the terms of the PSA.
Upon the reasonable request of any Certificateholder that is a Privileged Person identified to the master servicer’s reasonable satisfaction, the master servicer may provide (or forward electronically) at the expense of such Certificateholder copies of any appraisals, operating statements, rent rolls and financial statements obtained by the master servicer; provided, that in connection with such request, the master servicer may require a written confirmation executed by the requesting person substantially in such form as may be reasonably acceptable to the master servicer, generally to the effect that such person is a Certificateholder or a Certificate Owner and a Privileged Person, will keep such information confidential and will use such information only for the purpose of analyzing asset performance and evaluating any continuing rights the Certificateholder may have under the PSA. Certificateholders will not, however, be given access to or be provided copies of, any Mortgage Files or Diligence Files.
Information Available Electronically
The certificate administrator will make available to any Privileged Person via the certificate administrator’s website and will make available to the general public this prospectus, Distribution Date Statements, the PSA, each MLPA and the SEC EDGAR filings referred to below:
| ● | the following “deal documents”: |
| o | the PSA, each sub-servicing agreement delivered to the certificate administrator from and after the Closing Date, if any, and each MLPA and any amendments and exhibits to those agreements; |
| o | the CREFC® loan setup file delivered to the certificate administrator by the master servicer; |
| ● | the following “SEC EDGAR filings”: |
| o | any reports on Forms 10-D, 10-K, 8-K and ABS-EE that have been filed by the certificate administrator with respect to the issuing entity through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval (EDGAR) system; |
| ● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “periodic reports”: |
| o | the Distribution Date Statements; |
| o | the CREFC® bond level files; |
| o | the CREFC® collateral summary files; |
| o | the CREFC® Reports, other than the CREFC® loan setup file and CREFC® special servicer loan file (provided that they are received by the certificate administrator); |
| o | the CREFC® appraisal reduction amount template; |
| o | the annual reports prepared by the operating advisor; |
| ● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “additional documents”: |
| o | the summary of any Final Asset Status Report as provided by the special servicer; |
| o | any property inspection reports, any environmental reports and appraisals delivered to the certificate administrator in electronic format; |
| o | any notice or documents provided to the certificate administrator by the depositor, the master servicer or the special servicer directing the certificate administrator to post to the “additional documents” tab; |
| ● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “special notices”: |
| o | notice of any release based on an environmental release under the PSA; |
| o | notice of any waiver, modification or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan; |
| o | notice of final payment on the certificates; |
| o | all notices of the occurrence of any Servicer Termination Event received by the certificate administrator or any notice to Certificateholders of the termination of the master servicer or the special servicer; |
| o | any notice of resignation or termination of the master servicer or the special servicer; |
| o | notice of resignation of the trustee or the certificate administrator, and notice of the acceptance of appointment by the successor trustee or the successor certificate administrator, as applicable; |
| o | any notice of any request by requisite percentage of Voting Rights for a vote to terminate the special servicer, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer; |
| o | any notice to Certificateholders of the operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer and the related report prepared by the operating advisor in connection with such recommendation; |
| o | notice of resignation or termination of the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer and notice of the acceptance of appointment by the successor operating advisor or the successor asset representations reviewer; |
| o | notice of the certificate administrator’s determination that an Asset Review Trigger has occurred and a copy of any Asset Review Report Summary received by the certificate administrator; |
| o | officer’s certificates supporting any determination that any Advance was (or, if made, would be) a Nonrecoverable Advance; |
| o | any notice of the termination of the issuing entity; |
| o | any notice that a Control Termination Event or an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred or is terminated or that a Consultation Termination Event has occurred; |
| o | any notice of the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Termination Event; |
| o | any notice of the occurrence of an Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event; |
| o | any Proposed Course of Action Notice; |
| o | any assessment of compliance delivered to the certificate administrator; |
| o | any Attestation Reports delivered to the certificate administrator; |
| o | any document provided by the master servicer or the depositor directing the certificate administrator to post same; |
| o | any “special notices” requested by a Certificateholder to be posted on the certificate administrator’s website described under “—Certificateholder Communication” below; |
| ● | the “Investor Q&A Forum”; |
| ● | solely to Certificateholders and Certificate Owners that are Privileged Persons, the “Investor Registry”; and |
| ● | the “U.S. Risk Retention Special Notices” tab; |
provided that with respect to a Control Termination Event or a Consultation Termination Event deemed to exist due solely to the existence of any applicable Excluded Loan, the certificate administrator will only be required to make available such notice of the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event or the notice of the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event to the extent the certificate administrator has been notified of such Excluded Loan.
The certificate administrator will be required to, in addition to posting the applicable notices on the “U.S. Risk Retention Special Notices” tab described above, provide email notification to any Privileged Person (other than Financial Market Publishers) that has registered to receive access to the certificate administrator’s website that a notice has been posted to the “U.S. Risk Retention Special Notices” tab.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, as applicable, is a Borrower Party with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Loan (such party, an “Excluded Controlling Class Holder”), such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is required to promptly notify each of the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the trustee and the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA and provide a new Investor Certification pursuant to the PSA and will not be entitled to access any Excluded Information (unless a loan-by-loan segregation is later performed by the certificate administrator in which case such access will only be prohibited with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan(s)) made available on the certificate administrator’s website for so long as it is an Excluded Controlling Class Holder. The PSA will require each Excluded Controlling Class Holder in such new Investor Certification to certify that it acknowledges and agrees that it is prohibited from accessing and reviewing (and it agrees not to access and review) any Excluded Information. In addition, if the Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder is not an Excluded Controlling Class Holder, such person will certify and agree that they will not share any Excluded Information with any Excluded Controlling Class Holder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing set forth in the PSA will prohibit the Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder from receiving, requesting or reviewing any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which the Directing Holder or such Controlling Class Certificateholder is not a Borrower Party and, if such Excluded Information is not available to such Excluded Controlling Class Holder via the certificate administrator’s website on account of it constituting Excluded Information, such Directing Holder or Controlling Class Certificateholder that is not a Borrower Party with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan will be permitted to reasonably request and obtain such information in accordance with terms of the PSA and the master servicer and the special servicer, as applicable, may require and rely on certifications and other reasonable information prior to releasing any such information.
To the extent the Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder receives access pursuant to the PSA to any Excluded Information on the certificate administrator’s website or otherwise receives access to such Excluded Information, such Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder will be deemed to have agreed that it (i) will not directly or indirectly provide any such Excluded Information to (A) the related Borrower Party, (B) any related Excluded Controlling Class Holder, (C) any employees or personnel of such Directing Holder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder or any of its affiliates involved in the management of any investment in the related Borrower Party or the related Mortgaged Property or (D) to its actual knowledge, any non-affiliate that holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the related Borrower Party, and (ii) will maintain sufficient internal controls and appropriate policies and procedures in place in order to comply with the obligations described in clause (i) above.
Any reports on Form 10-D filed by the certificate administrator will contain (i) the information required by Rule 15Ga-1(a) concerning all Mortgage Loans held by the issuing entity that were the subject of a demand to repurchase or replace due to a breach or alleged breach of one or more representations and warranties made by the related mortgage loan seller, (ii) a reference to the most recent Form ABS-15G filed by the depositor and the mortgage loan sellers, if applicable, and the SEC’s assigned “Central Index Key” for each such filer and (iii) certain account balances to the extent available to the certificate administrator.
The certificate administrator will not make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any report, document or other information made available on the certificate administrator’s website or its filing of such information pursuant to the PSA, including, but not limited to, filing via EDGAR, and will assume no responsibility for any such report, document or other information, other than with respect to such reports, documents or other information prepared by the certificate administrator. In addition, the certificate administrator may disclaim responsibility for any information distributed by it or filed by it, as applicable, for which it is not the original source.
In connection with providing access to the certificate administrator’s website (other than with respect to access provided to the general public in accordance with the PSA), the certificate administrator may require registration and the acceptance of a disclaimer, including an agreement to keep certain nonpublic information made available on the website confidential, as required under the PSA. The certificate administrator will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the PSA.
The certificate administrator will make the “Investor Q&A Forum” available to Privileged Persons via the certificate administrator’s website under a tab or heading designated “Investor Q&A Forum”, where (i) Certificateholders and beneficial owners that are Privileged Persons may submit inquiries to (a) the certificate administrator relating to the Distribution Date Statements, (b) the master servicer or the special servicer relating to servicing reports, the Mortgage Loans (excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the related Mortgaged Properties or (c) the operating advisor relating to annual or other reports prepared by the operating advisor or actions by the special servicer referenced in such reports, and (ii) Privileged Persons may view previously submitted inquiries and related answers. The certificate administrator will forward such inquiries to the appropriate person and, in the case of an inquiry relating to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the applicable party under the related Non-Serviced PSA. The certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer or the operating advisor, as applicable, will be required to answer each inquiry, unless such party determines (i) the question is beyond the scope of the topics detailed above, (ii) that answering the inquiry would not be in the best interests of the issuing entity and/or the Certificateholders, (iii) that answering the inquiry would be in violation of applicable law, the PSA (including requirements in respect of non-disclosure of Privileged Information) or the Mortgage Loan documents, (iv) that answering the inquiry would materially increase the duties of, or result in significant additional cost or expense to, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer or the operating advisor, as applicable, (v) that answering the inquiry would require the disclosure of Privileged Information (subject to the Privileged Information Exception) or (vi) that answering the inquiry is otherwise, for any reason, not advisable. In addition, no party will post or otherwise disclose any direct communications with the Directing Holder as part of its responses to any inquiries. In the case of an inquiry relating to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the certificate administrator is required to make reasonable efforts to obtain an answer from the applicable party under the related Non-Serviced PSA; provided that the certificate administrator will not be responsible for the content of such answer, or any delay or failure to obtain such answer. The certificate administrator will be required to post the inquiries and related answers, if any, on the Investor Q&A Forum, subject to and in accordance with the PSA. The Investor Q&A Forum may not reflect questions, answers and other communications that are not submitted through the certificate administrator’s website. Answers posted on the Investor Q&A Forum will be attributable only to the respondent, and will not be deemed to be answers from any of the depositor, the underwriters or any of their respective affiliates. None of the underwriters, depositor, any of their respective affiliates or any other person will certify as to the accuracy of any of the information posted in the Investor Q&A Forum and no such person will have any responsibility or liability for the content of any such information.
The certificate administrator will make the “Investor Registry” available to any Certificateholder and beneficial owner that is a Privileged Person via the certificate administrator’s website. Certificateholders and beneficial owners may register on a voluntary basis for the “Investor Registry” and obtain contact information for any other Certificateholder or beneficial owner that has also registered, provided that they comply with certain requirements as provided for in the PSA.
The certificate administrator’s website will initially be located at “www.ctslink.com”. Access will be provided by the certificate administrator to such persons upon receipt by the certificate administrator from such person of an Investor Certification or NRSRO Certification in the form(s) attached to the PSA, which form(s) will also be located on and may be submitted electronically via the certificate administrator’s website. The parties to the PSA will not be required to provide that certification. In connection with providing access to the certificate administrator’s website, the certificate administrator may require registration and the acceptance of a disclaimer. The certificate administrator will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the terms of the PSA. The certificate administrator will make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such documents and will assume no responsibility for them. In addition, the certificate administrator may disclaim responsibility for
any information distributed by the certificate administrator for which it is not the original source. Assistance in using the certificate administrator’s website can be obtained by calling the certificate administrator’s customer service desk at 866-846-4526.
The certificate administrator is responsible for the preparation of tax returns on behalf of the issuing entity and the preparation of Distribution Reports on Form 10-D (based on information included in each monthly Distribution Date Statement and other information provided by other transaction parties) and Annual Reports on Form 10-K and certain other reports on Form 8-K that are required to be filed with the SEC on behalf of the issuing entity.
“17g-5 Information Provider” means the certificate administrator.
The PSA will require the master servicer and the special servicer, subject to certain restrictions (including execution and delivery of a confidentiality agreement) set forth in the PSA, to provide certain of the reports or, in the case of the master servicer and the Controlling Class Certificateholder, access to the reports available as set forth above, as well as certain other information received by the master servicer, to any Privileged Person so identified by a Certificate Owner or an underwriter, that requests reports or information. However, the master servicer and the special servicer will be permitted to require payment of a sum sufficient to cover the reasonable costs and expenses of providing copies of these reports or information (which such amounts in any event are not reimbursable as additional trust fund expenses), except that, other than for extraordinary or duplicate requests, prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder will be entitled to reports and information free of charge. Except as otherwise set forth in this paragraph, until the time definitive certificates are issued, notices and statements required to be mailed to Certificateholders will be available to Certificate Owners of certificates only to the extent they are forwarded by or otherwise available through DTC and its Participants. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Participants, and by Participants to Certificate Owners, will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Except as otherwise set forth in this paragraph, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator and the depositor are required to recognize as Certificateholders only those persons in whose names the certificates are registered on the books and records of the certificate registrar. The initial registered holder of the Offered Certificates will be Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC.
Voting Rights
At all times during the term of the PSA, the voting rights for the certificates (the “Voting Rights”) will be allocated among the respective classes of Certificateholders as follows:
(1) 1% in the case of the Class X Certificates, allocated pro rata, based upon their respective Notional Amounts as of the date of determination, and
(2) 99% in the case of the Principal Balance Certificates, allocated among the holders of such respective classes of certificates in proportion to the Certificate Balances of their certificates (and solely in connection with certain votes relating to the replacement of the special servicer and the operating advisor as described in this prospectus, taking into account any notional reduction in the Certificate Balance for Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to such certificates).
The Voting Rights of any class of certificates are required to be allocated among Certificateholders of such class in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests.
The Class R certificates will not be entitled to any Voting Rights.
Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination
The Offered Certificates (other than the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates) will be issued, maintained and transferred in the book-entry form only in minimum denominations of $10,000 initial Certificate Balance, and in multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates will be issued, maintained and transferred only in minimum denominations of authorized initial Notional Amounts of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000.
Book-Entry Registration
The Offered Certificates will initially be represented by one or more global certificates for each such class registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). The depositor has been informed by DTC that DTC’s nominee will be Cede & Co. No holder of an Offered Certificate will be entitled to receive a certificate issued in fully registered, certificated form (each, a “Definitive Certificate”) representing its interest in such class, except under the limited circumstances described under “―Definitive Certificates” below. Unless and until Definitive Certificates are issued, all references to actions by holders of the Offered Certificates will refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions received from holders of Offered Certificates through its participating organizations (together with Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg (“Clearstream”) and Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System (“Euroclear”) participating organizations, the “Participants”), and all references in this prospectus to payments, notices, reports, statements and other information to holders of Offered Certificates will refer to payments, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede & Co., as the registered holder of the Offered Certificates, for distribution to holders of Offered Certificates through its Participants in accordance with DTC procedures; provided, however, that to the extent that the party to the PSA responsible for distributing any report, statement or other information has been provided in writing with the name of the Certificate Owner of such an Offered Certificate (or the prospective transferee of such Certificate Owner), such report, statement or other information will be provided to such Certificate Owner (or prospective transferee).
Until Definitive Certificates are issued in respect of the Offered Certificates, interests in the Offered Certificates will be transferred on the book-entry records of DTC and its Participants. The certificate administrator will initially serve as certificate registrar for purposes of recording and otherwise providing for the registration of the Offered Certificates.
Holders of Offered Certificates may hold their certificates through DTC (in the United States) or Clearstream or Euroclear (in Europe) if they are Participants of such system, or indirectly through organizations that are participants in such systems. Clearstream and Euroclear will hold omnibus positions on behalf of the Clearstream Participants and the Euroclear Participants, respectively, through customers’ securities accounts in Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s names on the books of their respective depositaries (collectively, the “Depositaries”), which in turn will hold such positions in customers’ securities accounts in the Depositaries’ names on the books of DTC. DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its Participants and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Participants through electronic computerized book-entries, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Participants (“DTC Participants”) include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations. Indirect access to the DTC system also is available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”).
Transfers between DTC Participants will occur in accordance with DTC Rules. Transfers between Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants will occur in accordance with the applicable rules and operating procedures of Clearstream and Euroclear.
Cross-market transfers between persons holding directly or indirectly through DTC, on the one hand, and directly through Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants, on the other, will be effected in DTC in accordance with DTC Rules on behalf of the relevant European international clearing system by its Depositary; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to the relevant European international clearing system by the counterparty in such system in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its established deadlines (European time). The relevant European international clearing system will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its Depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving securities in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants may not deliver instructions directly to the Depositaries.
Because of time-zone differences, credits of securities in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of a transaction with a DTC Participant will be made during the subsequent securities settlement processing, dated the business day following the DTC settlement date, and such credits or any transactions in such securities settled during such processing will be reported to the relevant Clearstream Participant or Euroclear Participant on such business day. Cash received in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of sales of securities by or through a Clearstream Participant or a Euroclear Participant to a DTC Participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Clearstream or Euroclear cash account only as of the business day following settlement in DTC.
The holders of Offered Certificates that are not Participants or Indirect Participants but desire to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other interests in, such Offered Certificates may do so only through Participants and Indirect Participants. In addition, holders of Offered Certificates in global form (“Certificate Owners”) will receive all distributions of principal and interest through the Participants who in turn will receive them from DTC. Under a book-entry format, holders of such Offered Certificates may experience some delay in their receipt of payments, since such payments will be forwarded by the certificate administrator to Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward such payments to its Participants, which thereafter will forward them to Indirect Participants or the applicable Certificate Owners. Certificate Owners will not be recognized by the trustee, the certificate administrator, the certificate registrar, the operating advisor, the special servicer or the master servicer as holders of record of certificates and Certificate Owners will be permitted to receive information furnished to Certificateholders and to exercise the rights of Certificateholders only indirectly through DTC and its Participants and Indirect Participants, except that Certificate Owners will be entitled to receive or have access to notices and information and to exercise certain rights as holders of beneficial interests in the certificates through the certificate administrator and the trustee to the extent described in “—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”, “—Certificateholder Communication” and “—List of Certificateholders” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”, “—The Asset Representations Reviewer”, “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote”, “—Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding”, “—Termination; Retirement of Certificates” and “—Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator”.
Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and affecting DTC and its operations (the “DTC Rules”), DTC is required to make book-entry transfers of Offered Certificates in global form among Participants on whose behalf it acts with respect to such Offered Certificates and to receive and transmit distributions of principal of, and interest on, such Offered Certificates. Participants and Indirect Participants with which the Certificate Owners have accounts with respect to the Offered Certificates similarly are required to make book-entry transfers and receive and transmit such payments on behalf of their respective Certificate Owners. Accordingly, although the Certificate Owners will not possess the Offered Certificates, the DTC Rules provide a mechanism by which Certificate Owners will receive payments on Offered Certificates and will be able to transfer their interest.
Because DTC can only act on behalf of Participants, who in turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks, the ability of a holder of Offered Certificates in global form to pledge such Offered Certificates to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or to otherwise act with respect to such Offered Certificates, may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate for such Offered Certificates.
DTC has advised the depositor that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of an Offered Certificate under the PSA only at the direction of one or more Participants to whose accounts with DTC such certificate is credited. DTC may take conflicting actions with respect to other undivided interests to the extent that such actions are taken on behalf of Participants whose holdings include such undivided interests.
Clearstream is incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg and is a global securities settlement clearing house. Clearstream holds securities for its participating organizations (“Clearstream Participants”) and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Clearstream Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of Clearstream Participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Transactions may be settled in Clearstream in numerous currencies, including United States dollars. Clearstream provides to its Clearstream Participants, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Clearstream interfaces with domestic markets in several countries. Clearstream is regulated as a bank by the Luxembourg Monetary Institute. Clearstream Participants are recognized financial institutions around the world, including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to Clearstream is also available to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Clearstream Participant, either directly or indirectly.
Euroclear was created in 1968 to hold securities for participants of the Euroclear system (“Euroclear Participants”) and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear Participants through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Transactions may now be settled in any of numerous currencies, including United States dollars. The Euroclear system includes various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described above. Euroclear is operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (the “Euroclear Operator”). All operations are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities clearance accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator. Euroclear Participants include banks (including central banks), securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to the Euroclear system is also available to other firms that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear Participant, either directly or indirectly.
Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the Euroclear Operator are governed by the Terms and Conditions Governing Use of Euroclear and the related operating procedures of the Euroclear System and applicable Belgian law (collectively, the “Terms and Conditions”). The Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within the Euroclear system, withdrawal of securities and cash from the Euroclear system, and receipts of payments with respect to securities in the Euroclear system. All securities in the Euroclear system are held on a fungible basis without attribution of specific certificates to specific securities clearance accounts. The Euroclear Operator acts under the Terms and Conditions only on behalf of Euroclear Participants and has no record of or relationship with persons holding through Euroclear Participants.
Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have implemented the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of interests in book-entry securities among Participants of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, they are under no obligation to perform or to continue to comply with such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time. None of the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer or the underwriters will have any responsibility for
the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective direct or indirect Participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
Definitive Certificates
Owners of beneficial interests in book-entry certificates of any class will not be entitled to receive physical delivery of Definitive Certificates unless: (i) DTC advises the certificate registrar in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its responsibilities as depository with respect to the book-entry certificates of such class or ceases to be a clearing agency, and the certificate administrator and the depositor are unable to locate a qualified successor within 90 days of such notice or (ii) the trustee has instituted or has been directed to institute any judicial proceeding to enforce the rights of the Certificateholders of such class and the trustee has been advised by counsel that in connection with such proceeding it is necessary or appropriate for the trustee to obtain possession of the certificates of such class.
Until the HRR Transfer Restriction End Date, the HRR Certificates may only be issued as Definitive Certificates and held by the custodian on behalf of the related investor pursuant to the PSA. Any request for release of an HRR Certificate must be consented to by the Retaining Sponsor and may be subject to any additional requirements pursuant to the PSA.
Certificateholder Communication
Access to Certificateholders’ Names and Addresses
Upon the written request of any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner that has delivered an executed Investor Certification to the trustee or the certificate administrator, the certificate administrator (in its capacity as certificate registrar) will promptly furnish or cause to be furnished to such requesting party a list of the names and addresses of the Certificateholders as of the most recent Record Date as they appear in the certificate register, at the expense of the requesting party.
Requests to Communicate
The PSA will require that the certificate administrator include on any Form 10–D any request received prior to the Distribution Date to which such Form 10-D relates (and on or after the Distribution Date preceding such Distribution Date) from a Certificateholder or Certificate Owner to communicate with other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners related to Certificateholders or Certificate Owners exercising their rights under the terms of the PSA. Any Form 10-D containing such disclosure regarding the request to communicate is required to include the following and no more than the following: (i) the name of the Certificateholder or Certificate Owner making the request, (ii) the date the request was received, (iii) a statement to the effect that the certificate administrator has received such request, stating that such Certificateholder or Certificate Owner is interested in communicating with other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners with regard to the possible exercise of rights under the PSA, and (iv) a description of the method other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners may use to contact the requesting Certificateholder or Certificate Owner.
Any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner wishing to communicate with other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners regarding the exercise of its rights under the terms of the PSA (such party, a “Requesting Investor”) should deliver a written request (a “Communication Request”) signed by an authorized representative of the Requesting Investor to the certificate administrator at the address below:
Computershare Trust Company, National Association
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration Group – Benchmark 2024-V9
with a copy to: trustadministrationgroup@computershare.com
Any Communication Request must contain the name of the Requesting Investor and the method other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners should use to contact the Requesting Investor, and, if the Requesting Investors is not the registered holder of a class of certificates, then the Communication Request must contain (i) a written certification from the Requesting Investor that it is a beneficial owner of a class of certificates, and (ii) one of the following forms of documentation evidencing its beneficial ownership in such class of certificates: (A) a trade confirmation, (B) an account statement, (C) a medallion stamp guaranteed letter from a broker or dealer stating the Requesting Investor is the beneficial owner, or (D) a document acceptable to the certificate administrator that is similar to any of the documents identified in clauses (A) through (C). The certificate administrator will not be permitted to require any information other than the foregoing in verifying a certificateholder’s or certificate owner’s identity in connection with a Communication Request. Requesting Investors will be responsible for their own expenses in making any Communication Request, but will not be required to bear any expenses of the certificate administrator.
List of Certificateholders
Upon the written request of any Certificateholder, which is required to include a copy of the communication the Certificateholder proposes to transmit, that has provided an Investor Certification, which request is made for purposes of communicating with other holders of certificates of the same series with respect to their rights under the PSA or the certificates, the certificate registrar or other specified person will, within 10 business days after receipt of such request afford such Certificateholder (at such Certificateholder’s sole cost and expense) access during normal business hours to the most recent list of Certificateholders related to the class of certificates.
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements
General
On the Closing Date, the depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from each mortgage loan seller pursuant to a separate mortgage loan purchase agreement (each, an “MLPA”), between the applicable mortgage loan seller and the depositor.
Under the applicable MLPA, the depositor will require each mortgage loan seller to deliver (or cause to be delivered) to the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian, among other things, the following documents (except that the documents with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan (other than the original promissory note) will be held by the custodian under the related Non-Serviced PSA) with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by such mortgage loan seller (collectively, as to each Mortgage Loan, the “Mortgage File”):
(i) the original executed Mortgage Note for such Mortgage Loan, endorsed (without recourse, representation or warranty, express or implied) to the order of the trustee for the benefit of the registered Certificateholders or in blank, and further showing a complete, unbroken chain of endorsement from the originator (if such originator is not the applicable mortgage loan seller) (or, alternatively, if the original executed Mortgage Note has been lost, a lost note affidavit and indemnity with a copy of such Mortgage Note), and in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, a copy of the executed Mortgage Note for any related Companion Loan;
(ii) an original or copy of the Mortgage, together with an original or copy of any intervening assignments of the Mortgage, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office;
(iii) an original or copy of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage), together with originals or copies of any intervening assignments thereof, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office;
(iv) an original executed assignment, in recordable form (except for missing recording information not yet available if the instrument being assigned has not been returned from the applicable recording office), of (A) the Mortgage and (B) any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage), in favor of the trustee, for the benefit of the registered Certificateholders and the holder of any related Companion Loan, as their interests may appear or a copy of such assignment (if the applicable mortgage loan seller or its designee, rather than the trustee or certificate administrator, is responsible for the recording thereof);
(v) an original or copy of the assignment of all unrecorded documents relating to the Mortgage Loan, in favor of the trustee, for the benefit of the registered holders of the certificates and the holder of any related Companion Loan, as their interests may appear;
(vi) originals or copies of final written modification, consolidation, assumption, written assurance and substitution agreements in those instances where the terms or provisions of the Mortgage Note for such Mortgage Loan (or, if applicable, any Mortgage Note of a Whole Loan) or the related Mortgage have been modified or the Mortgage Loan has been assumed or consolidated, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon if the instrument being modified is a recordable document;
(vii) the original (which may be in the form of an electronically issued title policy) or a copy of the policy or certificate of lender’s title insurance issued in connection with such Mortgage Loan or the related Serviced Whole Loan (or, if such policy has not been issued, a “marked up” pro forma title policy marked as binding and countersigned by the title insurer or its authorized agent, or an irrevocable, binding commitment to issue such title insurance policy);
(viii) an original or copy of the related ground lease relating to such Mortgage Loan (or the related Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable), if any, and any ground lessor estoppel;
(ix) an original or copy of the related Mortgage Loan agreement, if any;
(x) an original of any guaranty under such Mortgage Loan or the related Whole Loan, if any;
(xi) an original or copy of the environmental indemnity from the related mortgagor, if any;
(xii) an original or copy of the related escrow agreement and the related security agreement (in each case, if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) and, if applicable, the originals or copies of any intervening assignments thereof;
(xiii) an original assignment of the related security agreement (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage and if such item is not included in the assignment described in clause (v)), in favor of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders and the holder of the related Companion Loan, as their interests may appear;
(xiv) any filed copies (bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any UCC financing statements in favor of the originator of such Mortgage Loan or the related Whole Loan or in favor of any assignee prior to the trustee, and an original UCC-3 assignment thereof, in form suitable for filing, in favor of the trustee (or, in each case, a copy thereof, certified to be the copy of such assignment submitted or to be submitted for filing);
(xv) an original or copy of the lockbox agreement or cash management agreement relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xvi) in the case of any Mortgage Loan or the related Whole Loan as to which there exists a related mezzanine loan, an original or a copy of any related mezzanine intercreditor agreement;
(xvii) an original or copy of any related environmental insurance policy or environmental guaranty relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xviii) a copy of any letter of credit relating to such Mortgage Loan or the related Whole Loan and any related assignment thereof (with the original to be delivered to the master servicer);
(xix) copies of any franchise agreement, property management agreement or hotel management agreement and related comfort letters (together with (i) copies of any notices of transfer that are necessary to transfer or assign to the issuing entity or the trustee the benefits of such comfort letter or (ii) if the related comfort letter contemplates that a request be made of the related franchisor to issue a replacement comfort letter for the benefit of the issuing entity or trustee, a copy of the notice requesting the issuance of such replacement comfort letter (the copy of such notice is required to be delivered by the applicable mortgage loan seller to the custodian for inclusion in the Mortgage File within the time period set forth in the PSA and/or estoppel letters relating to such Mortgage Loan or the related Serviced Whole Loan and any related assignment thereof));
(xx) in the case of a Whole Loan, an original or a copy of the related Co-Lender Agreement; and
(xxi) in the case of the Loan REMIC, a copy of the related REMIC declaration;
provided that with respect to (A) any Mortgage Loan which is a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan on the Closing Date, the foregoing documents (other than the documents described in clause (i) above) will be delivered to and held by the custodian under the related Non-Serviced PSA on or prior to the Closing Date and (B) the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, the foregoing documents will be delivered to the custodian on or prior to the Closing Date and such documents (other than the documents described in clause (i) above) will be transferred to the custodian related to the securitization that includes the related Controlling Companion Loan on or about the Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
In addition, each mortgage loan seller will be required to deliver or cause to be delivered an electronic copy of the Diligence File for each of its Mortgage Loans within 60 days after the Closing Date to the depositor and the depositor will deliver to the certificate administrator an electronic copy of such Diligence Files to be posted to the secure data room.
“Diligence File” means with respect to each Mortgage Loan, if applicable, generally the following documents in electronic format:
(a) A copy of each of the following documents:
(i) (A) for each Mortgage Loan, the Mortgage Note, endorsed on its face or by allonge attached thereto, without recourse, to the order of the trustee or in blank (or, if the original Mortgage Note has been lost, an affidavit to such effect from the applicable mortgage loan seller or another prior holder, together with a copy of the Mortgage Note), and (B) if such Mortgage is part of a Serviced Whole Loan, the executed promissory note for each related Serviced Companion Loan;
(ii) the Mortgage, together with any intervening assignments of the Mortgage, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office (if in the possession of the related mortgage loan seller);
(iii) any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) and any intervening assignments of such assignment of leases, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office (if in the possession of the related mortgage loan seller);
(iv) final written modification agreements in those instances in which the terms or provisions of the Mortgage or the Mortgage Note have been modified, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon if the instrument being modified is a recordable document;
(v) the policy or certificate of lender’s title insurance issued in connection with such Mortgage Loan (or the related Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) or, if such policy has not been issued or located, an irrevocable, binding commitment (which may be a marked version of the policy that has been executed by an authorized representative of the title company or an agreement to provide the same pursuant to binding escrow instructions executed by an authorized representative of the title company) to issue such title insurance policy;
(vi) the related ground lease, if any, and any ground lessor estoppel;
(vii) the related loan agreement, if any;
(viii) the guaranty under such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable), if any;
(ix) the related lockbox agreement or cash management agreement, if any;
(x) the environmental indemnity from the related borrower, if any;
(xi) the related escrow agreement and the related security agreement (in each case, if such item is a document separate from the related Mortgage) and, if applicable, any intervening assignments thereof;
(xii) in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is a part of a Whole Loan, the related Co-Lender Agreement;
(xiii) any filed copies (bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any UCC financing statements in favor of the originator of such Mortgage Loan (or the related Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) or in favor of any assignee prior to the trustee and UCC-3 assignment financing statements in favor of the trustee (or, in each case, a copy thereof certified to be the copy of such assignment submitted or to be submitted for filing), if in the possession of the related mortgage loan seller;
(xiv) any mezzanine loan intercreditor agreement;
(xv) any related environmental insurance policy;
(xvi) any related letter of credit and any related assignment thereof; and
(xvii) any related franchise agreement, property management agreement or hotel management agreement and related comfort letters and/or estoppel letters, and any related assignment thereof.
(b) a copy of any engineering reports or property condition reports;
(c) other than with respect to a hotel property (except with respect to tenanted commercial space within a hotel property), copies of a rent roll;
(d) for any office, retail, industrial or warehouse property, a copy of all leases and estoppels and subordination and non-disturbance agreements delivered to the related mortgage loan seller;
(e) a copy of all legal opinions (excluding attorney-client communications between the related mortgage loan seller, and its counsel that are privileged communications or constitute legal or other due diligence analyses), if any, delivered in connection with the closing of the related Mortgage Loan;
(f) a copy of all mortgagor’s certificates of hazard insurance and/or hazard insurance policies or other applicable insurance policies (to the extent not previously included as part of this definition), if any, delivered in connection with the origination of the related Mortgage Loan;
(g) a copy of the appraisal for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
(h) for any Mortgage Loan that the related Mortgaged Property is leased to a single tenant, a copy of the lease;
(i) a copy of the applicable mortgage loan seller’s asset summary;
(j) a copy of all surveys for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
(k) a copy of all zoning reports;
(l) a copy of financial statements of the related mortgagor;
(m) a copy of operating statements for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
(n) a copy of all UCC searches;
(o) a copy of all litigation searches;
(p) a copy of all bankruptcy searches;
(q) a copy of origination settlement statement;
(r) a copy of insurance summary report;
(s) a copy of organizational documents of the related mortgagor and any guarantor;
(t) a copy of escrow statements related to the escrow account balances as of the Mortgage Loan origination date, if not included in the origination settlement statement;
(u) the original or a copy of all related environmental reports that were received by the related mortgage loan seller;
(v) unless already included as part of the environmental reports, a copy of any closure letter (environmental); and
(w) unless already included as part of the environmental reports, a copy of any environmental remediation agreement for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties,
in each case, to the extent that the related mortgage loan seller received such documents or information in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan. In the event any of the items identified above were not received in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan (other than documents that would not be included in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan because such document is inapplicable to the origination of the Mortgage Loan of that structure or type, taking into account whether or not such Mortgage Loan has any additional debt), the Diligence File will be required to include a statement to that effect. No information that is proprietary to the mortgage loan sellers or any draft documents, privileged or internal communications, credit underwriting or due diligence analysis will
constitute part of the Diligence File. It is generally not required to include any of the same items identified above again if such items have already been included under another clause of the definition of Diligence File, and the Diligence File will be required to include a statement to that effect. Each mortgage loan seller may, without any obligation to do so, include such other documents or information as part of the Diligence File that such mortgage loan seller believes should be included to enable the asset representations reviewer to perform the Asset Review on a Mortgage Loan; provided that such documents or information are clearly labeled and identified.
Each MLPA will contain certain representations and warranties of the related mortgage loan seller with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by such mortgage loan seller. Those representations and warranties with respect to the Mortgage Loans are set forth on Annex D-1 and Annex E-1, and will be made as of the Closing Date, or as of another date specifically provided in the representation and warranty, subject to certain exceptions to such representations and warranties as set forth on Annex D-2, Annex E-2, Annex E-3, Annex E-4, Annex E-5 and Annex E-6.
If the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator or the operating advisor (solely in its capacity as operating advisor) discovers or receives notice alleging that any of the documents required to be included by (or on behalf of) the related mortgage loan seller in the Mortgage File for any Mortgage Loan is missing from the Mortgage File or defective or if there is a breach of a representation or warranty relating to any Mortgage Loan, then such party is required to give notice of such omission, breach or defect to each other party to the PSA and the applicable mortgage loan seller. The master servicer (with respect to a non-Specially Serviced Loan) or special servicer (with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan), as applicable, will be required to determine whether such omission, breach or defect materially and adversely affects the value of the related Mortgage Loan, the value of the related REO Property or the interests of the trustee or any Certificateholders in the Mortgage Loan or REO Property or causes the Mortgage Loan to be other than a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage (a “Material Defect”). The master servicer or the special servicer may (but will not be obligated to) consult with the master servicer or the special servicer regarding any determination of a Material Defect for a non-Specially Serviced Loan. The Enforcing Servicer will be required to give notice of any such Material Defect to the other parties to the PSA, the applicable mortgage loan seller and (for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing), the Directing Holder.
The applicable mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) will be required to, no later than 90 days following:
(x) the earlier of (i) the mortgage loan seller’s discovery of the Material Defect and (ii) the mortgage loan seller’s receipt of notice of the Material Defect from any party listed above and receipt of a demand to take action with respect to such Material Defect, except in the case of the following clause (y); or
(y) in the case of such Material Defect relating to a Mortgage Loan not being a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage, the discovery by any party to the PSA of such Material Defect,
(1) cure such Material Defect in all material respects, at its own expense,
(2) repurchase the affected Mortgage Loan or REO Loan at the Purchase Price, or
(3) substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to the Whole Loans, as applicable, for which no substitution will be permitted) for such affected Mortgage Loan, and pay a shortfall amount in connection with such substitution; provided that no such substitution may occur on or after the second anniversary of the Closing Date;
provided, however, that the applicable mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) will generally have an additional 90-day period to cure such Material Defect (or, failing such cure, to repurchase the affected Mortgage Loan or REO Loan or, if applicable, substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to the Whole Loans, for which no substitution will be permitted)), if it is diligently proceeding toward that cure, and has delivered to the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee and the operating advisor, an officer’s certificate that describes the reasons such Material Defect was not cured within the initial 90-day period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there will be no such 90-day extension, if such Material Defect would cause the related Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage.
No delay in either the discovery of a Material Defect or in providing notice of such Material Defect will relieve the applicable mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) of its obligation to repurchase the related Mortgage Loan unless (i) such mortgage loan seller did not otherwise discover or have knowledge of such Material Defect, (ii) such delay is the result of the failure by a party to the PSA to promptly provide prompt notice as required by the terms of the PSA after such party has actual knowledge of such defect or breach (knowledge will not be deemed to exist by reason of the custodian’s exception report) and such delay precludes the related mortgage loan seller from curing such Material Defect and (iii) such Material Defect did not relate to a Mortgage Loan not being a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective obligation to be treated as a qualified mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Mortgage Loan is not secured by a Mortgaged Property that is, in whole or in part, a hotel, restaurant (operated by a borrower), healthcare facility, nursing home, assisted living facility, theater or fitness center (operated by a borrower), then the failure to deliver copies of the UCC financing statements with respect to such Mortgage Loan will not be a Material Defect.
If there is a Material Defect with respect to one or more Mortgaged Properties with respect to a Mortgage Loan, the applicable mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) will not be obligated to repurchase the Mortgage Loan if (i) the affected Mortgaged Property may be released pursuant to the terms of any partial release provisions in the related Mortgage Loan documents (and such Mortgaged Property is, in fact, released), (ii) the remaining Mortgaged Property(ies) satisfy the requirements, if any, set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents and the related mortgage loan seller provides an opinion of counsel to the effect that such release would not (A) cause each Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or (B) result in the imposition of a tax upon each Trust REMIC or the issuing entity and (iii) each applicable Rating Agency has provided a Rating Agency Confirmation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of a mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) repurchasing, substituting or curing such Material Defect, to the extent that such mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of Barclays, Barclays Holdings to the same extent as Barclays) and the special servicer (with the consent of the Directing Holder in respect of any Mortgage Loan that is not an applicable Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing) are able to agree upon a cash payment payable by the related mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of Barclays, Barclays Holdings to the same extent as Barclays) to the issuing entity that would be deemed sufficient to compensate the issuing entity for such Material Defect (a “Loss of Value Payment”), the related mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of Barclays, Barclays Holdings to the same extent as Barclays) may elect, in its sole discretion, to pay such Loss of Value Payment. The special servicer will determine the amount of any applicable Loss of Value Payment (with the consent of the Directing Holder in respect of any Mortgage Loan that is not an applicable Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing) and, in the case of any PSA Party Repurchase Request with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans prior to the occurrence of a Resolution Failure, will communicate such amount to the master servicer for its enforcement action with the related mortgage loan seller. In connection with any such determination with respect to any non-
Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will promptly provide the special servicer, but in any event within the time frame and in the manner provided in the PSA, with the servicing file and all information, documents and records (including records stored electronically on computer tapes, magnetic discs and the like) relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan and, if applicable, the related Serviced Companion Loan, either in the master servicer’s possession or otherwise reasonably available to the master servicer without undue burden or expense, and reasonably requested by the special servicer to the extent set forth in the PSA in order to permit the special servicer to calculate the Loss of Value Payment as set forth in the PSA. Upon its making such payment, the applicable mortgage loan seller will be deemed to have cured such Material Defect in all respects. A Loss of Value Payment may not be made with respect to any such Material Defect that would cause the applicable Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage.
In addition, each MLPA provides that, with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, if a material document defect exists under the related Non-Serviced PSA, and the related mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) repurchases the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan from the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust, such seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) is required to repurchase the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan; provided, however, that no such repurchase obligation will apply to any material document defect related solely to the promissory notes for any Pari Passu Companion Loan contained in the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust.
With respect to any Mortgage Loan, the “Purchase Price” equals the sum of (1) the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan (or related REO Loan (excluding, for the purposes of a repurchase pursuant to the related MLPA, any related Companion Loan)), as of the date of purchase, (2) all accrued and unpaid interest on the Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Loan (excluding, for such purpose, any related Companion Loan)) at the related Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time (excluding any portion of such interest that represents default interest), to, but not including, the due date immediately preceding or coinciding with the Determination Date for the Collection Period of purchase, (3) all related unreimbursed Property Protection Advances (including any Property Protection Advances and advance interest amounts that were reimbursed out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans) (or, in the case of any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the pro rata portion of any comparable amounts allocable to such Mortgage Loan and payable with respect thereto pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement), (4) all accrued and unpaid advance interest amounts in respect of related Advances (or, in the case of any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, all comparable amounts with respect to P&I Advances related to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and, with respect to outstanding Property Protection Advances, the pro rata portion of any comparable amounts payable with respect thereto pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement), (5) any unpaid Special Servicing Fees and any other unpaid additional trust fund expenses outstanding (which, for the avoidance of doubt, include any unpaid Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) or previously incurred in respect of the related Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the pro rata portion of any comparable amounts allocable to such Mortgage Loan and payable with respect thereto pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement), and if such Mortgage Loan is being purchased by a mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays) pursuant to the related MLPA, all expenses incurred or to be incurred by the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer, the depositor, the certificate administrator and the trustee in respect of the breach or document defect giving rise to the repurchase or substitution obligation (to the extent not otherwise included in the amount described in clause (3) above), (6) if the applicable mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays, to the same extent as Barclays) repurchases or substitutes for such Mortgage Loan, any related Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee to the extent not previously paid by such mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to Barclays), and (7) if a mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Holdings, with respect to Barclays) repurchases or substitutes for such Mortgage Loan more than 90 days following the earlier of the responsible party’s discovery or receipt of notice of the subject material breach or material document defect, as the case may be, a Liquidation Fee.
A “Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan” is a substitute mortgage loan (other than with respect to the Whole Loans, for which no substitution will be permitted) replacing a Mortgage Loan with respect to which a material breach or document defect exists that must, on the date of substitution:
(a) have an outstanding principal balance, after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not received, not in excess of the Stated Principal Balance of the removed Mortgage Loan as of the due date in the calendar month during which the substitution occurs;
(b) have a Mortgage Rate not less than the Mortgage Rate of the removed Mortgage Loan (determined without regard to any prior modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of the removed Mortgage Loan);
(c) have the same due date and a grace period no longer than that of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(d) accrue interest on the same basis as the removed Mortgage Loan (for example, on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months);
(e) have a remaining term to stated maturity not greater than, and not more than two (2) years less than, the remaining term to stated maturity of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(f) have a then-current loan-to-value ratio equal to or less than the lesser of (i) the loan-to-value ratio for the removed Mortgage Loan as of the Closing Date and (ii) 75%, in each case using a “value” for the Mortgaged Property as determined using an appraisal conducted by an appraiser who is an MAI prepared in accordance with the requirements of the FIRREA;
(g) comply (except in a manner that would not be adverse to the interests of the Certificateholders) as of the date of substitution in all material respects with all of the representations and warranties set forth in the related MLPA;
(h) have an environmental report that indicates no material adverse environmental conditions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property and that will be delivered as a part of the related Mortgage File;
(i) have a then-current debt service coverage ratio at least equal to the greater of (i) the original debt service coverage ratio of the removed Mortgage Loan as of the Closing Date and (ii) 1.25x;
(j) constitute a “qualified replacement mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(4) as evidenced by an opinion of counsel (provided at the applicable mortgage loan seller’s expense);
(k) not have a maturity date or an amortization period that extends to a date that is after the date two (2) years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date;
(l) have comparable prepayment restrictions to those of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(m) not be substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan unless the trustee and the certificate administrator have received a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies (the cost, if any, of obtaining such Rating Agency Confirmation to be paid by the applicable mortgage loan seller);
(n) have been approved, so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing and the affected Mortgage Loan is not an applicable Excluded Loan, by the Directing Holder;
(o) prohibit defeasance within two (2) years of the Closing Date;
(p) not be substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan if it would result in the termination of the REMIC status of any Trust REMIC or the imposition of tax on any Trust REMIC or the issuing entity other than a tax on income expressly permitted or contemplated to be imposed by the terms of the PSA, as determined by an opinion of counsel;
(q) have an engineering report that indicates no material adverse property condition or deferred maintenance with respect to the related Mortgaged Property that will be delivered as a part of the related servicing file; and
(r) be current in the payment of all scheduled payments of principal and interest then due.
In the event that more than one Mortgage Loan is substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan, then (x) the amounts described in clause (a) are required to be determined on the basis of aggregate principal balances and (y) each such proposed Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan must individually satisfy each of the requirements specified in clauses (b) through (r) of the preceding sentence, except (z) the rates described in clause (b) above and the remaining term to stated maturity referred to in clause (e) above are required to be determined on a weighted average basis, provided that no individual Mortgage Rate (net of the Servicing Fee Rate, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate and, in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related primary servicing fee rate) may be lower than the highest fixed Pass-Through Rate (not based on or subject to a cap equal to the WAC Rate) of any class of Principal Balance Certificates having a principal balance then-outstanding. When a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan is substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan, the applicable mortgage loan seller will be required to certify that the Mortgage Loan meets all of the requirements of the above definition and send the certification to the trustee the certificate administrator and, prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder.
The cure, repurchase and substitution obligations or the obligation to pay the Loss of Value Payment described above will constitute the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders in connection with a material breach of any representation or warranty or a material document defect with respect to any Mortgage Loan. None of the depositor, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator or any other person will be obligated to repurchase or replace any affected Mortgage Loan or make a Loss of Value Payment in connection with a breach of any of the representations and warranties or a document defect if the applicable mortgage loan seller defaults on its obligations to do so. We cannot assure you that a mortgage loan seller will have sufficient assets to repurchase or substitute a Mortgage Loan if required to do so.
Dispute Resolution Provisions
Each mortgage loan seller will be subject to the dispute resolution provisions described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Dispute Resolution Provisions” to the extent those provisions are triggered with respect to any mortgage loan sold to the depositor by the related mortgage loan seller and will be obligated under the related MLPA to comply with all applicable provisions and to take part in any mediation or arbitration proceedings that may result.
Asset Review Obligations
Each mortgage loan seller will be obligated to perform its obligations described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Asset Representations Reviewer—Asset Review” relating to any Asset Reviews performed by the asset representations reviewer, and each mortgage loan seller will have the rights described under that heading.
Pooling and Servicing Agreement
General
The servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties (including any interest of the holder of any Companion Loan in the REO Property acquired with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan) will be governed by the PSA and any related Co-Lender Agreement.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, any related Non-Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties (including the issuing entity’s interest in any REO Property acquired with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan) will be serviced by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in accordance with such Non-Serviced PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement. Unless otherwise specifically stated and except where the context otherwise indicates (such as with respect to P&I Advances), discussions in this section or in any other section of this prospectus regarding the servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans should be deemed to include the servicing and administration of any related Serviced Companion Loans but do not include any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, any related Non-Serviced Companion Loan and any related REO Property.
The following summaries describe certain provisions of the PSA relating to the servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans (excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Companion Loans and any related REO Properties. In the case of the Serviced Whole Loans, certain provisions of the related Co-Lender Agreement are described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
Certain provisions of each Non-Serviced PSA relating to the servicing and administration of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan and the related REO Properties and the related Co-Lender Agreement are summarized under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
As to particular servicing matters, the discussion under this heading “Pooling and Servicing Agreement” is applicable with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan only while the PSA governs the servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan. As described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan Will Shift to Other Servicers”, on or after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the Servicing Shift PSA, and the provisions of the Servicing Shift PSA may be different than the terms of the PSA, although the Servicing Shift Whole Loan will still need to be serviced in compliance with the requirements of the related Co-Lender Agreement, as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”.
The PSA does not include an obligation for any party of the PSA to advise a Certificateholder with respect to its rights and protections relative to the issuing entity.
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans
The depositor will purchase the Mortgage Loans to be included in the issuing entity on or before the Closing Date from each of the mortgage loan sellers pursuant to separate MLPAs. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers” and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
On the Closing Date, the depositor will sell, transfer or otherwise convey, assign or cause the assignment of the Mortgage Loans, without recourse, together with the depositor’s rights and remedies against the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs, to the trustee, for the benefit of the holders of the certificates. On or prior to the Closing Date, the depositor will require each mortgage loan seller to deliver to the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian, the Mortgage Notes and certain other
documents and instruments with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan. The custodian will hold such documents in trust for the benefit of the holders of the certificates. The custodian is obligated to review certain documents for each Mortgage Loan within 60 days of the Closing Date and report any missing documents or certain types of document defects to the parties to the PSA and the Directing Holder (so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing and other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan) and the mortgage loan seller.
In addition, pursuant to the related MLPA, each mortgage loan seller will be required to deliver (or cause to be delivered) an electronic copy of the Diligence Files for each of its Mortgage Loans within 60 days after the Closing Date to the depositor by uploading such Diligence Files to the designated Intralinks website, and the depositor will deliver to the certificate administrator an electronic copy of such Diligence Files to be posted to the secure data room.
Pursuant to the PSA, the depositor will assign to the trustee for the benefit of Certificateholders the representations and warranties made by the mortgage loan sellers to the depositor in the MLPAs and any rights and remedies that the depositor has against the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs with respect to any Material Defect. See “—Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA” below and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
Servicing Standard
The master servicer and the special servicer will each be required to diligently service and administer the Mortgage Loans (excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Serviced Companion Loans and the related REO Properties (other than any REO Property related to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), for which it is responsible in accordance with applicable law, the terms of the PSA, the Mortgage Loan documents, and the related Co-Lender Agreements and, to the extent consistent with the foregoing, in accordance with the higher of the following standards of care:
(1) the same manner in which, and with the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, services and administers similar mortgage loans for other third-party portfolios, and
(2) the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, services and administers similar mortgage loans owned by the master servicer or the special servicer,
as the case may be, with a view to: (A) the timely recovery of all payments of principal and interest under the Mortgage Loans or Serviced Whole Loans or (B) in the case of a Specially Serviced Loan or an REO Property, the maximization of timely recovery of principal and interest on a net present value basis on the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loans, and the best interests of the issuing entity and the Certificateholders (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders constituted a single lender) (and, in the case of any Whole Loan, the best interests of the issuing entity, the Certificateholders and the holder of any related Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and the holder or holders of any related Companion Loan constituted a single lender), taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan) as determined by the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, in its reasonable judgment, in either case giving due consideration to the customary and usual standards of practice of prudent, institutional commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing mortgage loan servicers, but without regard to any conflict of interest arising from:
(A) any relationship that the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, or any of their respective affiliates, as the case may be, may have with any of the underlying borrowers, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, any party to the PSA or any affiliate of the foregoing;
(B) the ownership of any certificate (or any interest in any Companion Loan, mezzanine loan or subordinate debt relating to a Mortgage Loan) by the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, or any of their respective affiliates;
(C) the obligation, if any, of the master servicer to make Advances;
(D) the right of the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates to receive compensation or reimbursement of costs under the PSA generally or with respect to any particular transaction;
(E) the ownership, servicing or management for others of (i) any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and any related Non-Serviced Companion Loan or (ii) any other mortgage loans, subordinate debt, mezzanine loans or properties not covered by the PSA or held by the issuing entity by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates;
(F) any debt that the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates, has extended to any underlying borrower or an affiliate of any borrower (including, without limitation, any mezzanine financing);
(G) any option to purchase any Mortgage Loan or any related Companion Loan the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of their affiliates, may have; and
(H) any obligation of the master servicer, the special servicer, or one of their respective affiliates, to repurchase or substitute for a Mortgage Loan as a mortgage loan seller (if the master servicer or the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates is a mortgage loan seller) (the foregoing, collectively referred to as the “Servicing Standard”).
All net present value calculations and determinations made under the PSA with respect to any Mortgage Loan, Mortgaged Property or REO Property (including for purposes of the definition of “Servicing Standard” set forth above) will be made in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents or, in the event the Mortgage Loan documents are silent, by using a discount rate (i) for principal and interest payments on the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan or sale of a Defaulted Loan, the highest of (1) the rate determined by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, that approximates the market rate that would be obtainable by the related borrower on similar non-defaulted debt of the related borrower as of such date of determination, (2) the Mortgage Rate and (3) the yield on 10-year U.S. treasuries as of such date of determination and (ii) for all other cash flows, including property cash flow, the “discount rate” set forth in the most recent appraisal (or updated appraisal) of the related Mortgaged Property.
In the case of any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the master servicer and the special servicer will be required to act in accordance with the Servicing Standard with respect to any action required to be taken regarding such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to their respective obligations under the PSA.
Subservicing
The master servicer may delegate and/or assign some or all of its servicing obligations and duties with respect to some or all of the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any Serviced Companion Loan to one or more third-party sub-servicers provided that the master servicer will remain obligated under the PSA. A sub-servicer may be an affiliate of the depositor, the master servicer or the special servicer.
Each sub-servicing agreement between the master servicer and a sub-servicer (a “Sub-Servicing Agreement”) will generally be required to provide that (i) if for any reason the master servicer is no longer acting in that capacity (including, without limitation, by reason of a Servicer Termination Event), the trustee or any successor master servicer may assume or terminate such party’s rights and obligations under such Sub-Servicing Agreement and (ii) the sub-servicer will be in default under such Sub-Servicing Agreement and such Sub-Servicing Agreement will be terminated (following the expiration of any
applicable grace period) if the sub-servicer fails (A) to deliver by the due date any Exchange Act reporting items required to be delivered to the master servicer pursuant to the PSA or such Sub-Servicing Agreement or to the master servicer under any other pooling and servicing agreement that the depositor is a party to, (B) to perform in any material respect any of its covenants or obligations contained in such Sub-Servicing Agreement regarding creating, obtaining or delivering any Exchange Act reporting items required in order for any party to the PSA to perform its obligations under the PSA or under the Exchange Act reporting requirements of any other pooling and servicing agreement that the depositor is a party to or (C) to perform other covenants and obligations set forth in such Sub-Servicing Agreement in accordance with the terms of such Sub-Servicing Agreement. The master servicer will be required to monitor the performance of sub-servicers retained by it and will have the right to remove a sub-servicer retained by it (other than any sub-servicer retained by it at the request of a mortgage loan seller, which is only removable for cause) at any time it considers removal to be in the best interests of Certificateholders. However, no sub-servicer will be permitted under any Sub-Servicing Agreement to make material servicing decisions, such as loan modifications or determinations as to the manner or timing of enforcing remedies under the Mortgage Loan documents, without the consent of the master servicer. The master servicer’s consent may also be required for certain other servicing decisions as provided in the related Sub-Servicing Agreement.
Generally, the master servicer will be solely liable for all fees owed by it to any sub-servicer retained by the master servicer, without regard to whether the master servicer’s compensation pursuant to the PSA is sufficient to pay those fees. Each sub-servicer will be required to be reimbursed by the master servicer for certain expenditures which such sub-servicer makes, generally to the same extent the master servicer would be reimbursed under the PSA.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, each of the initial master servicer and any initial special servicer may delegate certain of its duties and obligations under the PSA to an affiliate of the master servicer or a special servicer, as applicable. Such delegation will not be considered a sub-servicing agreement under the PSA, and the requirements and obligations set forth in the PSA applicable to sub-servicing agreements, sub-servicers or servicing function participants will not be applicable to such arrangement. Notwithstanding any such delegation, the master servicer and a special servicer, as applicable, will remain obligated and liable for the performance of their respective obligations and duties under the PSA in accordance with the provisions thereof to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as if each alone were servicing and administering the Mortgage Loan as required by the PSA.
Advances
P&I Advances
On the business day immediately preceding each Distribution Date (the “Master Servicer Remittance Date”), except as otherwise described below, the master servicer will be obligated, unless determined to be nonrecoverable as described below, to make advances (each, a “P&I Advance”) out of its own funds or, subject to the replacement of those funds as provided in the PSA, certain funds held in the Collection Account that are not required to be part of the Available Funds for that Distribution Date, in an amount equal to (but subject to reduction as described below) the aggregate of:
(1) all Periodic Payments (other than balloon payments) (net of any applicable Servicing Fees) that were due on the Mortgage Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) and any REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) during the related Collection Period and not received as of the business day preceding the Master Servicer Remittance Date; and
(2) in the case of each Mortgage Loan delinquent in respect of its balloon payment as of the Master Servicer Remittance Date (including any REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) as to which the balloon payment would have been past due), an amount equal to its Assumed Scheduled Payment.
The master servicer’s obligations to make P&I Advances in respect of any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) will continue, except if a determination as to non-recoverability is made, through and up to liquidation of the Mortgage Loan or disposition of the REO Property, as the case may be. For the avoidance of doubt, the master servicer will make P&I Advances on the basis of the original terms of any Mortgage Loan, including Mortgage Loans subject to forbearance agreements or other temporary deferrals or payment accommodations, unless (a) the terms of the Mortgage Loan have been permanently modified to change or forgive a monetary obligation or (b) such advance has been determined to be non-recoverable. However, no interest will accrue on any P&I Advance made with respect to a Mortgage Loan unless the related Periodic Payment is received after the related Due Date has passed and any applicable grace period has expired or if the related Periodic Payment is received after the Determination Date but on or prior to the Master Servicer Remittance Date. To the extent that the master servicer fails to make a P&I Advance that it is required to make under the PSA, the trustee will be required to make the required P&I Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
If an Appraisal Reduction Amount has been assessed with respect to any Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, an appraisal reduction has been made in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA and the master servicer has notice of such appraisal reduction amount), then the interest portion of any P&I Advance in respect of that Mortgage Loan for the related Distribution Date will be reduced (there will be no reduction in the principal portion, if any, of such P&I Advance) to equal the product of (x) the amount of the interest portion of the P&I Advance for that Mortgage Loan for the related Distribution Date without regard to this sentence, and (y) a fraction, expressed as a percentage, the numerator of which is equal to the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan immediately prior to the related Distribution Date, net of the related Appraisal Reduction Amount (or, in the case of any Whole Loan, the portion of such Appraisal Reduction Amount allocated to the related Mortgage Loan), if any, and the denominator of which is equal to the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan immediately prior to the related Distribution Date.
Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will make or be permitted to make a P&I Advance for balloon payments, default interest, late payment charges, yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums, or with respect to any Companion Loan.
Advances are intended to maintain a regular flow of scheduled interest and principal payments to holders of the class or classes of certificates entitled thereto, and are not credit support for the certificates and will not act to guarantee or insure against losses on the mortgage loans or otherwise.
Property Protection Advances
In addition to P&I Advances, except as otherwise described under “—Recovery of Advances” below and except in certain limited circumstances described below, the master servicer will also be obligated (subject to the limitations described in this prospectus), to make advances (“Property Protection Advances” and, collectively with P&I Advances, “Advances”) in connection with the servicing and administration of any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and related Companion Loan, as applicable, in respect of which a default, delinquency or other unanticipated event has occurred or is reasonably foreseeable, or, in connection with the servicing and administration of any Mortgaged Property or REO Property, in order to pay delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums and to cover other similar costs and expenses necessary to preserve the priority of or enforce the related Mortgage Loan documents or to protect, lease, manage and maintain the related Mortgaged Property. To the extent that the master servicer fails to make a Property Protection Advance that it is required to make under the PSA and the trustee has received notice or otherwise has actual knowledge of this failure, the trustee will be required to make the required Property Protection Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
However, none of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will make or be permitted to make any Property Protection Advance in connection with the exercise of any cure rights or purchase rights granted to the holder of a Serviced Companion Loan under the related Co-Lender Agreement or the PSA.
The special servicer will have no obligation to make any Property Protection Advances. However, in an urgent or emergency situation requiring the making of a Property Protection Advance, the special servicer, in its sole discretion, may make such Property Protection Advance, and the master servicer will be required to reimburse the special servicer for such Advance (with interest on that Advance) within a specified number of days as set forth in the PSA, unless such Advance is determined to be nonrecoverable by the master servicer in its reasonable judgment (in which case it will be reimbursed out of the collection account). Once the special servicer is reimbursed, the master servicer will be deemed to have made the special servicer’s Property Protection Advance as of the date made by the special servicer, and will be entitled to reimbursement with interest on that Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
No Property Protection Advances will be made with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan if the related Mortgage Loan is no longer held by the issuing entity or if such Serviced Whole Loan is no longer serviced under the PSA and no Property Protection Advances will be made for any Non-Serviced Whole Loan under the PSA. Any requirement of the master servicer or the trustee to make an Advance in the PSA is intended solely to provide liquidity for the benefit of the Certificateholders and not as credit support or otherwise to impose on any such person the risk of loss with respect to one or more Mortgage Loans or any related Companion Loan.
The master servicer will also be obligated to make Property Protection Advances with respect to Serviced Whole Loans. With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the applicable servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA will be obligated to make property protection advances with respect to such Non-Serviced Whole Loan. See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
Nonrecoverable Advances
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be obligated to make any Advance that the master servicer or the special servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, or the trustee, in its good faith business judgment, determines would, if made, be non-recoverable (including recovery of interest on the Advance) out of Related Proceeds (a “Nonrecoverable Advance”); provided, however, that the special servicer may, at its option, make a determination in accordance with the Servicing Standard that any P&I Advance or Property Protection Advance, if made, would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, and if it makes such a determination, must deliver to the master servicer (and, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, to any master servicer or special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing any securitization trust into which the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan is deposited, and, with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related master servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA), the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the 17g-5 Information Provider notice of such determination. Any such determination (other than by the special servicer) will be not binding upon (but may be conclusively relied upon by) the master servicer and the trustee, and any such determination by the special servicer will be conclusive and binding upon the master servicer and the trustee (but this statement will not be construed to entitle the special servicer to reverse the determination of the master servicer or the trustee or to prohibit the master servicer or the trustee from making a determination that a P&I Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance). No special servicer will have any obligation to make an affirmative determination that any P&I Advance or Property Protection Advance is, or would be, recoverable or non-recoverable. In the absence of a determination by the special servicer that such an Advance is non-recoverable, each such decision will remain with the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable. If the special servicer makes a determination that only a portion, and not all, of any previously made or proposed P&I Advance or Property Protection Advance is non-recoverable, the master servicer
and the trustee will have the right to make its own subsequent determination that any remaining portion of any such previously made or proposed P&I Advance or Property Protection Advance is non-recoverable.
In making such non-recoverability determination, each person will be entitled to consider (among other things): (a) the obligations of the borrower under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, as it may have been modified, (b) the related Mortgaged Properties in their “as-is” or then-current conditions and occupancies, as modified by such party’s assumptions regarding the possibility and effects of future adverse change with respect to such Mortgaged Properties, (c) estimated future expenses and (d) estimated timing of recoveries, and will be entitled to give due regard to the existence of any Nonrecoverable Advances which, at the time of such consideration, the recovery of which are being deferred or delayed by the master servicer or the trustee, in light of the fact that Related Proceeds are a source of recovery not only for the Advance under consideration but also a potential source of recovery for such delayed or deferred Advance. In addition, any such person may update or change its recoverability determinations (but not reverse any other person’s determination that an Advance is non-recoverable) at any time and may obtain, promptly upon request, from the special servicer at the expense of the issuing entity any analysis, appraisals or market value estimates or other information for such purposes. Absent bad faith, any non-recoverability determination described in this paragraph will be conclusive and binding on the Certificateholders, and will be binding upon, the master servicer and the trustee. Nonrecoverable Advances will represent a portion of the losses to be borne by the Certificateholders.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, if any servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA determines that a principal and interest advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan, if made, would be non-recoverable, such determination will not be binding on the master servicer and the trustee as it relates to any proposed P&I Advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan; provided, however, the master servicer and the trustee may rely on the non-recoverability determination of the other master servicer or other trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA. Similarly, with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if the master servicer or the special servicer determines that any P&I Advance with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if made, would be non-recoverable, such determination will not be binding on the related master servicer and related trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA as such determination relates to any proposed P&I Advance with respect to any related Non-Serviced Companion Loan (unless the related Non-Serviced PSA provides otherwise); provided, however, the other master servicer and other trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA may rely on the non-recoverability determination of the master servicer or the trustee.
Recovery of Advances
The master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to recover (a) any Property Protection Advance made out of its own funds from any amounts collected in respect of a Mortgage Loan (or, consistent with the related Co-Lender Agreement, a Serviced Whole Loan) or REO Loan as to which such Property Protection Advance was made, and (b) any P&I Advance made out of its own funds from any amounts collected in respect of a Mortgage Loan (including a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or REO Loan as to which such P&I Advance was made, whether in the form of late payments, insurance and condemnation proceeds, liquidation proceeds or otherwise from the related Mortgage Loan (“Related Proceeds”). Each of the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to recover any Advance by it that it subsequently determines to be a Nonrecoverable Advance out of general collections relating to the Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool on deposit in the Collection Account (first from principal collections and then from any other collections). Amounts payable in respect of each Serviced Companion Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement will not be available for distributions on the certificates or for the reimbursement of Nonrecoverable Advances that are P&I Advances of principal or interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan. However, amounts payable in respect of each Serviced Companion Loan will be available, in accordance with the PSA and related Co-Lender Agreement, for the reimbursement of any Property Protection Advances with respect to the related Serviced Whole Loan. Notwithstanding the above, with respect to a Property Protection Advance on a Serviced Whole Loan the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to reimbursement first, out of amounts allocable to any Subordinate Companion Loan(s), then,
from amounts that would have been allocable to the holder of the related Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, on a pro rata basis (based on each such loan’s outstanding principal balance), and then, if the Property Protection Advance is a Nonrecoverable Advance, from general collections of the issuing entity; provided that the master servicer will be required, after receiving payment from amounts on deposit in the Collection Account, if any, to (i) promptly notify the holder of any related Companion Loan and (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to exercise on behalf of the issuing entity the rights of the issuing entity under the related Co-Lender Agreement to obtain reimbursement for a pro rata portion of such amount allocable to any related Pari Passu Companion Loans from the holders of such Companion Loans.
If the funds in the Collection Account relating to the Mortgage Loans allocable to principal on the Mortgage Loans are insufficient to fully reimburse the party entitled to reimbursement, then such party as an accommodation may elect, on a monthly basis, at its sole option and discretion to defer reimbursement of the portion that exceeds such amount allocable to principal (in which case interest will continue to accrue on the unreimbursed portion of the advance) for a time as required to reimburse the excess portion from principal for a consecutive period up to 12 months (provided that, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan, any such deferral exceeding 6 months will require, prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event, the consent of the Directing Holder) and any election to so defer will be deemed to be in accordance with the Servicing Standard; provided that no such deferral may occur at any time to the extent that amounts otherwise distributable as principal are available for such reimbursement.
In connection with a potential election by the master servicer or the trustee to refrain from the reimbursement of all or a portion of a particular Nonrecoverable Advance during the one month collection period ending on the related Determination Date for any Distribution Date, the master servicer or the trustee will be authorized to wait for principal collections on the Mortgage Loans to be received until the end of such collection period before making its determination of whether to refrain from the reimbursement of all or a portion of a particular Nonrecoverable Advance; provided, however, that if, at any time the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, elects, in its sole discretion, not to refrain from obtaining such reimbursement or otherwise determines that the reimbursement of a Nonrecoverable Advance during a one month collection period will exceed the full amount of the principal portion of general collections deposited in the Collection Account for such Distribution Date, then the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be required to use its reasonable efforts to give the 17g-5 Information Provider 15 days’ notice of such determination for posting on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website, unless extraordinary circumstances make such notice impractical, and thereafter will be required to deliver copies of such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider as soon as practical. Notwithstanding the foregoing, failure to give such notice will in no way affect the master servicer’s or the trustee’s election whether to refrain from obtaining such reimbursement.
Each of the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to recover any Advance that is outstanding at the time that a Mortgage Loan is modified but is not repaid in full by the borrower in connection with such modification but becomes an obligation of the borrower to pay such amounts in the future (such Advance, together with interest on that Advance, a “Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount”) out of principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in the Collection Account.
Any amount that constitutes all or a portion of any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount may in the future be determined to constitute a Nonrecoverable Advance and thereafter will be recoverable as any other Nonrecoverable Advance.
In connection with its recovery of any Advance, each of the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to be paid, out of any amounts relating to the Mortgage Loans then on deposit in the Collection Account, interest at the Prime Rate (and solely with respect to the master servicer and the special servicer, subject to a floor rate of 2.0%), compounded annually (the “Reimbursement Rate”), accrued on the amount of the Advance from the date made to, but not including, the date of reimbursement. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be entitled to interest on P&I Advances that accrues before the related due date has passed and any applicable grace period has expired. The “Prime Rate” will be the prime rate, for any day, set forth in The Wall Street Journal, New York edition.
See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” for reimbursements of property protection advances made in respect of each Non-Serviced Whole Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
Accounts
Under the PSA, the master servicer will be required to establish and maintain one or more accounts (collectively, the “Loss of Value Reserve Fund”) for the purposes of holding Loss of Value Payments. Additionally, the master servicer is required to establish and maintain, or cause to be established and maintained, one or more accounts and subaccounts (collectively, the “Collection Account”) in its own name on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders. The master servicer is required to deposit in the Collection Account (and in no event later than the 2nd business day following receipt of properly identified and available funds) all properly identified payments and collections due after the Cut-off Date and other amounts received or advanced with respect to the Mortgage Loans (including, without limitation, all proceeds (the “Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds”) received under any hazard, title or other insurance policy that provides coverage with respect to a Mortgaged Property or the related Mortgage Loan or in connection with the full or partial condemnation of a Mortgaged Property (other than proceeds applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the related borrower in accordance with the Servicing Standard (or, if applicable, the special servicer) and/or the terms and conditions of the related Mortgage) and all other amounts received and retained in connection with the liquidation of any Mortgage Loan that is defaulted and any related defaulted Companion Loans or property acquired by foreclosure or otherwise (the “Liquidation Proceeds”) together with the net operating income (less reasonable reserves for future expenses) derived from the operation of any REO Properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the collections on the Whole Loans deposited into the Collection Account will be limited to the portion of such amounts that are payable to the holder of the related Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement.
The master servicer will also be required to establish and maintain a segregated custodial account (the “Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account”) with respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, which may be a sub-account or ledger account of the Collection Account, and deposit amounts collected in respect of each Serviced Whole Loan in the related Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account. The issuing entity will only be entitled to amounts on deposit in a Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account to the extent these funds are not otherwise payable to the holder of a related Serviced Companion Loan or payable or reimbursable to any party to the PSA. Any amounts in a Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account to which the issuing entity is entitled will be transferred on a monthly basis to the Collection Account.
With respect to each Distribution Date, on the related Master Servicer Remittance Date, the master servicer will be required to disburse from the Collection Account and remit to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account in respect of the related Mortgage Loans, to the extent of funds on deposit in the Collection Account, the Available Funds for such Distribution Date and any yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums received as of the related Determination Date. The certificate administrator is required to establish and maintain various accounts, including a “Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account” and an “Upper-Tier REMIC Distribution Account”, each of which may be sub-accounts of a single account (collectively, the “Distribution Accounts”), in its own name on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders.
On each Distribution Date, the certificate administrator is required to apply amounts on deposit in the Upper Tier REMIC Distribution Account (which will include all funds that were remitted by the master servicer from the Collection Account), plus, among other things, any related P&I Advances less amounts, if any, distributable to the Class R certificates as set forth in the PSA generally to make distributions of interest and principal from Available Funds to the holders of the Regular Certificates, as described under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”.
The certificate administrator is also required to establish and maintain an account (the “Interest Reserve Account”) which may be a sub-account of the Distribution Account, in its own name on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. On the Master Servicer Remittance Date occurring each February and on any Master Servicer Remittance Date occurring in any January which occurs in a year that is not a leap year (in each case, unless the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the certificate administrator will be required to deposit amounts remitted by the master servicer or P&I Advances made on the related Mortgage Loans into the Interest Reserve Account during the related interest period, in respect of the Mortgage Loans that accrue interest on an Actual/360 Basis (collectively, the “Actual/360 Loans”), in an amount equal to one day’s interest at the Net Mortgage Rate for each such Actual/360 Loan on its Stated Principal Balance and as of the Distribution Date in the month preceding the month in which the Master Servicer Remittance Date occurs, to the extent a Periodic Payment or P&I Advance or other deposit is made in respect of the Mortgage Loans (all amounts so deposited in any consecutive January (if applicable) and February, “Withheld Amounts”). On the Master Servicer Remittance Date occurring each March (or February, if the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the certificate administrator will be required to withdraw from the Interest Reserve Account an amount equal to the Withheld Amounts from the preceding January (if applicable) and February, if any, and deposit that amount into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account.
The certificate administrator may be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account”), which may be a sub-account of the Distribution Account, in its own name on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Certificates. To the extent that any gains are realized on sales of Mortgaged Properties (or, with respect to any Whole Loan, the portion of such amounts that are payable on the related Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement), such gains will be deposited into the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account.
Amounts in the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account will be applied on each Distribution Date to reimburse the Principal Balance Certificates up to an amount equal to all Realized Losses, if any, previously deemed allocated to them and unreimbursed after application of the Available Funds for such Distribution Date. To the extent not so applied, such gains will be held and applied to offset future Realized Losses, if any (as determined by the special servicer). Upon termination of the issuing entity, any remaining amounts in the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account will be distributed on the Class R certificates.
Other accounts to be established pursuant to the PSA are one or more segregated custodial accounts (the “REO Account”) for collections from REO Properties. Each REO Account will be maintained by the special servicer in its own name on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders.
The Collection Account, the Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account, the Distribution Accounts, the Interest Reserve Account, the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account and the REO Account are collectively referred to as the “Securitization Accounts” (but with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in the Whole Loan). Each of the foregoing accounts will be held at a depository institution or trust company meeting the requirements of the PSA.
The party maintaining any of the foregoing accounts is authorized (but not required) to direct the investment of amounts on deposit in such account into certain United States government securities and other investments meeting the requirements of the PSA (“Permitted Investments”). Interest or other income earned on funds in the accounts maintained by the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the special servicer, as the case may be, will be payable to such person as additional compensation, and such person will be required to bear any losses resulting from their investment of such funds, except as set forth in the PSA.
Withdrawals from the Collection Account
The master servicer may, from time to time, make withdrawals from the Collection Account (or the applicable subaccount of the Collection Account, exclusive of the Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account that may be a subaccount of the Collection Account) for any of the following purposes, in each
case only to the extent permitted under the PSA and with respect to the Serviced Whole Loan, subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, without duplication (the order set forth below not constituting an order of priority for such withdrawals):
(i) to remit on each Master Servicer Remittance Date (A) to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account certain portions of the Available Funds and any prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges attributable to the Mortgage Loans on the related Distribution Date or (B) to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Interest Reserve Account an amount required to be withheld as described above under “—Accounts”;
(ii) to pay or reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the PSA for Advances made by any of them and interest on Advances (the master servicer’s, the special servicer’s or the trustee’s respective right, as applicable, to reimbursement for items described in this clause (ii) being limited as described above under “—Advances”) (provided that with respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, such reimbursements are subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement);
(iii) to pay to the master servicer and the special servicer, as compensation, the aggregate unpaid servicing compensation;
(iv) to pay to the operating advisor the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee (but only to the extent actually received from the related borrower) or the Operating Advisor Fee;
(v) to pay to the asset representations reviewer the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee and any unpaid Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee to the extent payable as a trust fund expense;
(vi) to reimburse the trustee, the special servicer and the master servicer, as applicable, for Nonrecoverable Advances or Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts;
(vii) to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, for any unreimbursed expenses reasonably incurred with respect to each related Mortgage Loan that has been repurchased or substituted by such person pursuant to the PSA or otherwise;
(viii) to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer or the trustee for any unreimbursed expenses reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the enforcement of the applicable mortgage loan seller’s obligations under the applicable section of the related MLPA;
(ix) to pay for any unpaid costs and expenses incurred by the issuing entity;
(x) to pay the master servicer and the special servicer, as applicable, as additional servicing compensation, (A) interest and investment income earned in respect of amounts relating to the issuing entity held in the Collection Account and the Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account (but only to the extent of the net investment earnings during the applicable one month period ending on the related Distribution Date), (B) certain penalty charges and default interest and (C) the difference, if positive, between Prepayment Interest Excess and Prepayment Interest Shortfalls collected on the Mortgage Loans (other than the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) and any Serviced Companion Loan, during the related Collection Period to the extent not required to be paid as Compensating Interest Payments;
(xi) to recoup any amounts deposited in the Collection Account in error;
(xii) to the extent not reimbursed or paid pursuant to any of the above clauses, (A) to reimburse or pay the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the depositor or any of their respective directors, officers, members, managers, employees and agents, unpaid additional expenses of the issuing entity and certain
other unreimbursed expenses incurred by such person pursuant to and to the extent reimbursable under the PSA and to satisfy any indemnification obligations of the issuing entity under the PSA and (B) to reimburse or pay any party to the PSA any unpaid expenses specifically reimbursable from the Collection Account under the PSA;
(xiii) to pay for the cost of the opinions of counsel or the cost of obtaining any extension to the time in which the issuing entity is permitted to hold REO Property;
(xiv) to pay any applicable federal, state or local taxes imposed on each Trust REMIC or any of their assets or transactions, together with all incidental costs and expenses, to the extent that none of the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator or the trustee is liable under the PSA;
(xv) to pay the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee;
(xvi) to reimburse the certificate administrator out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties for legal expenses incurred by and reimbursable to it by the issuing entity of any administrative or judicial proceedings related to an examination or audit by any governmental taxing authority;
(xvii) to pay the applicable mortgage loan seller or any other person, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, if any, previously purchased or replaced by such person pursuant to the PSA, all amounts received thereon subsequent to the date of purchase or replacement relating to periods after the date of purchase or replacement;
(xviii) to remit to the companion paying agent for deposit into the Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account the amounts required to be deposited pursuant to the PSA; and
(xix) to clear and terminate the Collection Account pursuant to a plan for termination and liquidation of the issuing entity.
No amounts payable or reimbursable to the parties to the PSA out of general collections that do not specifically relate to a Serviced Whole Loan may be reimbursable from amounts that would otherwise be payable to any related Companion Loan.
Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of any related Property Protection Advances) allocable to the Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is part of a Serviced Whole Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the other Mortgage Loans, subject to the issuing entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on any related Companion Loan or from general collections with respect to the securitization of any related Companion Loan. If the master servicer makes, with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, any reimbursement or payment out of the Collection Account to cover the related Serviced Companion Loan’s share of any cost, expense, indemnity, Property Protection Advance or interest on such Property Protection Advance, or fee with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan, then the master servicer must use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to collect such amount out of collections on such Serviced Companion Loan or, if and to the extent permitted under the related Co-Lender Agreement, from the holder of the related Serviced Companion Loan.
The master servicer will also be entitled to make withdrawals, from time to time, from the Collection Account of amounts necessary for the payments or reimbursements required to be paid to the parties to the applicable Non-Serviced PSA, pursuant to the applicable Non-Serviced Co-Lender Agreement and the applicable Non-Serviced PSA. See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
If a P&I Advance is made with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is part of a Whole Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest on such P&I Advance, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on that Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “—Advances” above, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan. Likewise, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee, the Operating Advisor Fee and the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee that accrue with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is part of a Whole Loan and any other amounts payable to the operating advisor may only be paid out of payments and other collections on such Mortgage Loan and/or the Mortgage Pool generally, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses
General
The parties to the PSA other than the depositor will be entitled to payment of certain fees as compensation for services performed under the PSA. Below is a summary of the fees payable to the parties to the PSA from amounts that the issuing entity is entitled to receive. In addition, CREFC® will be entitled to a license fee for use of their names and trademarks, including a collection of reports specified by the CREFC® from time to time as described in the PSA (the “CREFC® Investor Reporting Package”). Certain additional fees and costs payable by the related borrowers are allocable to the parties to the PSA other than the depositor, but such amounts are not payable from amounts that the issuing entity is entitled to receive.
The amounts available for distribution on the certificates on any Distribution Date will generally be net of the following amounts:
Type/Recipient(1) | Amount(1) | Source(1) | Frequency |
Fees | | | |
Master Servicing Fee / Master Servicer | With respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loans, the product of the monthly portion of the related annual Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan. | Out of recoveries of interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loans) or if unpaid after final recovery on the related Mortgage Loan, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
Special Servicing Fee / Special Servicer | With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are a Specially Serviced Loan, the product of the monthly portion of the related annual Special Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of such Specially Serviced Loan. | First, from liquidation proceeds, insurance and condemnation proceeds, and collections in respect of the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loans), and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
Type/Recipient(1) | Amount(1) | Source(1) | Frequency |
Workout Fee / Special Servicer(2) | With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are a Corrected Loan, the Workout Fee Rate multiplied by all payments of interest and principal received on such Mortgage Loan and the related Serviced Companion Loan for so long as they remain a Corrected Loan. | Out of each collection of interest, principal, and prepayment consideration received on the related Mortgage Loan (and each related Serviced Companion Loan) and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Time to time |
Liquidation Fee / Special Servicer(2) | With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are a Specially Serviced Loan for which the special servicer obtains a full, partial or discounted payoff or any liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds and condemnation proceeds an amount calculated by application of a Liquidation Fee Rate to the related payment or proceeds (exclusive of default interest). | From any liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds and any other revenues received with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and each related Serviced Companion Loan) and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Time to time |
Additional Servicing Compensation / Master Servicer and/or Special Servicer(3) | All modification fees, assumption application fees, defeasance fees, assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, late payment charges, default interest, loan service transaction fees, review fees and other similar fees actually collected on the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and related Serviced Companion Loans. | Related payments made by borrowers with respect to the related Mortgage Loans and related Serviced Companion Loans. | Time to time |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee/Certificate Administrator | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan. | Out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account. | Monthly |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee/Trustee | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the monthly portion of the annual Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee | Out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account. | Monthly |
Type/Recipient(1) | Amount(1) | Source(1) | Frequency |
Operating Advisor Fee / Operating Advisor | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Operating Advisor Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan. | First, out of recoveries of interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and then, if the related Mortgage Loan has been liquidated, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
Operating Advisor Consulting Fee / Operating Advisor | $10,000 for each Major Decision made with respect to a Mortgage Loan (or, such lesser amount as the related borrower pays with respect to such Mortgage Loan). | Payable by the related borrower. | Time to time |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee / Asset Representations Reviewer | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan. | Out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account. | Monthly |
Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee | The sum of: (i) $21,150 multiplied by the number of Subject Loans, plus (ii) $2,125 per Mortgaged Property relating to the Subject Loans in excess of one Mortgaged Property per Subject Loan, plus (iii) $2,800 per Mortgaged Property relating to a Subject Loan subject to a ground lease, plus (iv) $1,550 per Mortgaged Property relating to a Subject Loan subject to a franchise agreement, hotel management agreement or hotel license agreement, subject, in the case of each of clauses (i) through (iv), to adjustments on the basis of the year-end Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, or other similar index if the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers is no longer calculated for the year of the Closing Date and for the year of the occurrence of the Asset Review. | By the mortgage loan seller; provided, however, that if the mortgage loan seller is insolvent, such fee will become an expense of the issuing entity. | Upon the completion of each Asset Review with respect to a Delinquent Loan. |
Type/Recipient(1) | Amount(1) | Source(1) | Frequency |
Property Protection Advances / Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Trustee | To the extent of funds available, the amount of any Property Protection Advances. | First, from funds collected with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loans), and with respect to any Nonrecoverable Advance or a Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount, then out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account, subject to certain limitations. | Time to time |
Interest on Property Protection Advances / Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Trustee | At a rate per annum equal to the Reimbursement Rate, compounded annually, calculated on the number of days the related Advance remains unreimbursed. | First, out of late payment charges and default interest on the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loans), and then, after or at the same time that advance is reimbursed, out of any other amounts then on deposit in the Collection Account, subject to certain limitations. | Time to time |
P&I Advances on the Mortgage Loans / Master Servicer and Trustee | To the extent of funds available, the amount of any P&I Advances. | First, from funds collected with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and then, with respect to a Nonrecoverable Advance or a Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | Time to time |
Interest on P&I Advances on the Mortgage Loans/ Master Servicer and Trustee | At a rate per annum equal to the Reimbursement Rate calculated on the number of days the related Advance remains unreimbursed. | First, out of default interest and late payment charges on the related Mortgage Loan and then, after or at the same time that advance is reimbursed, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
Indemnification Expenses / Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Depositor, Master Servicer, Operating Advisor, Asset Representations Reviewer or Special Servicer and any director, officer, employee or agent of any of the foregoing parties | Amount to which such party is entitled for indemnification under the PSA. | Out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account (and, under certain circumstances, from collections on Serviced Companion Loans) | Time to time |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee / CREFC® | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate multiplied by the outstanding principal amount of each Mortgage Loan. | Out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | Monthly |
Type/Recipient(1) | Amount(1) | Source(1) | Frequency |
Expenses of the issuing entity not advanced (which may include reimbursable expenses incurred by the Operating Advisor or Asset Representations Reviewer, expenses relating to environmental remediation or appraisals, expenses of operating REO Property and expense incurred by any independent contractor hired to operate REO Property) | Based on third party charges. | First from collections on the related Mortgage Loan (income on the related REO Property), if applicable, and then from general collections, in the Collection Account (and custodial account with respect to a Serviced Companion Loan, if applicable), subject to certain limitations. | Time to time |
| (1) | With respect to any Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan (or any Specially Serviced Loan) in respect of which an REO Property was acquired, and all references to Mortgage Loan, Companion Loan, and Specially Serviced Loan in this table will be deemed to also be references to or to also include any REO Loans. |
With respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related master servicer, special servicer, certificate administrator, trustee, operating advisor and/or asset representations reviewer under the related Non-Serviced PSA governing the servicing of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be entitled to receive similar fees and reimbursements with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan in amounts, from sources and at frequencies that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described above and, in certain cases (for example, with respect to unreimbursed special servicing fees and property protection advances with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan), such amounts may be reimbursable from general collections on the other Mortgage Loans to the extent not recoverable from the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan.
In connection with the servicing and administration of each Serviced Whole Loan pursuant to the terms of the PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement, the master servicer and the special servicer will be entitled to servicing compensation, without duplication, with respect to any related Serviced Companion Loan as well as the related Mortgage Loan to the extent consistent with the PSA and not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement.
| (2) | Subject to certain offsets as described below. Circumstances as to when a Liquidation Fee is not payable are set forth in this “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses” section. |
| (3) | Allocable between the master servicer and the special servicer as provided in the PSA. |
Master Servicing Compensation
The fee of the master servicer including the fee of any primary or other sub-servicer (the “Servicing Fee”) will be payable monthly from amounts allocable in respect of interest received in respect of each Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (to the extent not prohibited under the related Co-Lender Agreement), and will accrue at a rate (the “Servicing Fee Rate”) on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, equal to a per annum rate ranging from 0.00250% to 0.03125%. The Servicing Fee payable to the master servicer with respect to each Serviced Companion Loan will be payable, subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, from amounts payable in respect of any related Companion Loan or if unpaid after final recovery on the related Mortgage Loan, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans.
In addition to the Servicing Fee, the master servicer will be entitled to retain, as additional servicing compensation (other than with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the following amounts to the extent collected from the related borrower:
| ● | 100% of Excess Modification Fees related to any modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Mortgage Loans (that are not Specially Serviced Loans) and any related Serviced Companion Loan to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement; provided that such transactions are Master Servicer Decisions; |
| ● | 100% of all assumption application fees and other similar items received on any Mortgage Loans solely to the extent the master servicer is processing the underlying transaction (including any related Serviced Companion Loan to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement) (whether or not the consent of the special servicer is required); |
| ● | 100% of any fee actually paid by a borrower in connection with the defeasance of a Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan (provided, however, that 50% of the portion of any Excess Modification Fee or waiver fee payable solely in connection with any modification, waiver, amendment or consent executed in connection with a defeasance transaction for which the consent, processing or approval of the special servicer is required under item (xiii) of the Major Decisions listed in this prospectus (and specifically excluding any defeasance fees), must be paid by the master servicer to the special servicer); |
| ● | 100% of assumption, waiver, consent, loan service transaction and earnout fees and other similar fees (other than assumption application fees and defeasance fees) pursuant to the PSA on any Mortgage Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (including any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement), provided that such transactions qualify as Master Servicer Decisions; |
| ● | 50% of all Excess Modification Fees and assumption, waiver, consent, loan service transaction and earnout fees and other similar fees (other than assumption application and defeasance fees), in each case, with respect to all Mortgage Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (including any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement), provided that such transaction qualifies as a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision; |
| ● | with respect to accounts held by the master servicer, 100% of charges by the master servicer collected for checks returned for insufficient funds; |
| ● | 100% of charges for beneficiary statements or demands actually paid by the related borrowers under such Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) to the extent such beneficiary statements or demands were prepared by the master servicer; |
| ● | any Prepayment Interest Excesses arising from any principal prepayments on such Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan; |
| ● | late payment charges and default interest paid by the borrowers (that were accrued while the related Mortgage Loans or any related Serviced Companion Loan (to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement) were not Specially Serviced Loans), but only to the extent such late payment charges and default interest are not needed to pay interest on Advances or certain additional trust fund expenses incurred with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or, if provided under the related Co-Lender Agreement, any related Serviced Companion Loan since the Closing Date; and |
| ● | 50% of any fees related to a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision on a non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than assumption application fees, defeasance fees, liquidation fees, workout fees and any other fees separately addressed herein or in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement). |
For the avoidance of doubt, (A) the master servicer will be entitled to that portion, if any, of a penalty charge collected on a Specially Serviced Loan to the extent accrued prior to the related Special Servicing Transfer Event and (B) if the special servicer has partially waived any penalty charge (part of which accrued prior to the related Special Servicing Transfer Event), any collections in respect of such penalty charge will be shared pro rata by the master servicer and the special servicer based on the respective portions of such penalty charge to which each would otherwise have been entitled (provided that neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to waive only the penalty charges to which the other would be entitled, but not waive penalty charges to which it is entitled).
With respect to any of the preceding fees (other than penalty charges) as to which both the master servicer and the special servicer are entitled to receive a portion thereof, the master servicer and the special servicer will each have the right in their sole discretion, but not any obligation, to reduce or elect not to charge only its respective portion of such fee; provided that (A) neither the master servicer nor the
special servicer will have the right to reduce or elect not to charge the portion of any such fee due to the other and (B) to the extent either the master servicer or the special servicer exercises its right to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion in any such fee, the party that reduced or elected not to charge its respective portion of such fee will not have any right to share in any part of the other party’s portion of such fee. If the master servicer decides not to charge any fee (other than penalty charges), the special servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the special servicer would have been entitled if the master servicer had charged a fee, and the master servicer will not be entitled to any of such fee charged by the special servicer. Similarly, if the special servicer decides not to charge any fee (other than penalty charges), the master servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the master servicer would have been entitled if the special servicer had charged a fee, and the special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of such fee charged by the master servicer.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be entitled to charge any borrower for and retain reasonable review fees in connection with any borrower request to the extent such fees are (i) not prohibited under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) not charged in lieu of any fee that is otherwise to be split between the master servicer and special servicer, and (iii) actually paid by or on behalf of the related borrower. In addition, the master servicer also is authorized but not required to invest or direct the investment of funds held in the Collection Account and any Loss of Value Reserve Fund in Permitted Investments, and the master servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on those funds and will bear any losses resulting from the investment of these funds, except as set forth in the PSA. The master servicer also is entitled to retain any interest earned on any servicing escrow account, to the extent the interest is not required to be paid to the related borrowers.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Servicer and Special Servicer may not charge a fee in lieu of any fee that is otherwise to be split between the Servicer and Special Servicer.
See “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”.
“Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Companion Loans, any and all fees with respect to a modification, extension, waiver or amendment that modifies, extends, amends or waives any term of such Mortgage Loan documents and/or related Serviced Companion Loan documents (as evidenced by a signed writing) agreed to by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable (other than all assumption fees, assumption application fees, consent fees, defeasance fees, Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees or Workout Fees).
With respect to each of the master servicer and the special servicer, the Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such person from the related borrower (taken in the aggregate with any other Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such person from the related borrower within the prior 12-months of the collection of the current Excess Modification Fees) will be subject to a cap equal to the greater of (i) 1.0% of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan after giving effect to such transaction and (ii) $25,000.
The Servicing Fee is calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and each related Serviced Companion Loan in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans. The Servicing Fee for each Mortgage Loan is included in the Administrative Cost Rate listed for that Mortgage Loan on Annex A-1. Any Servicing Fee Rate calculated on an Actual/360 Basis will be recomputed on the basis of twelve 30-day months, assuming a 360-day year (“30/360 Basis”) for purposes of calculating the Net Mortgage Rate.
Pursuant to the terms of the PSA, Midland will be entitled to retain a portion of the Servicing Fee with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and, to the extent provided for in the related Co-Lender Agreement, each Serviced Companion Loan notwithstanding any termination or resignation of Midland as master servicer; provided that Midland may not retain any portion of the
Servicing Fee to the extent that portion of the Servicing Fee is required to appoint a successor master servicer. In addition, Midland will have the right to assign and transfer its rights to receive that retained portion of its Servicing Fee to another party.
The master servicer will be required to pay its overhead and any general and administrative expenses incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities under the PSA. The master servicer will not be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses incurred by it except as expressly provided in the PSA. The master servicer will be responsible for all fees payable to any sub-servicers. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount”.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and pursuant to the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA, the primary servicer of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be entitled to a primary servicing fee accruing at a rate equal to the rate set forth under the table titled “Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” under “Summary of Terms”.
Special Servicing Compensation
The principal compensation to be paid to the special servicer in respect of its special servicing activities will be the Special Servicing Fee, the Workout Fee and the Liquidation Fee.
The “Special Servicing Fee” will accrue with respect to each Specially Serviced Loan and each REO Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) on a loan-by-loan basis at the Special Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the basis of the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan and Companion Loan (including any REO Loan), as applicable, and in the same manner as interest is calculated on the Specially Serviced Loans, and will be payable monthly, first from Liquidation Proceeds, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds, and collections in respect of the related REO Property or Specially Serviced Loan and then from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties. The Non-Serviced Whole Loans will be subject to a similar special servicing fee pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA. For further detail, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
“Special Servicing Fee Rate” means (a) 0.25% per annum or (b) if such rate in clause (a) would result in a Special Servicing Fee with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property (other than any interest in REO Property acquired with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan) that would be less than $3,500 in any given month, then the Special Servicing Fee Rate for such month for such Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property will be the higher per annum rate as would result in a Special Servicing Fee equal to $3,500 for such month with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property.
The “Workout Fee” will generally be payable with respect to each Corrected Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Whole Loan) and will be calculated by application of a “Workout Fee Rate” equal to the lesser of (a) 1.00% to each collection (other than penalty charges) of interest and principal (other than any amount for which a Liquidation Fee would be paid) (including scheduled payments, prepayments, balloon payments, and payments at maturity) received on the Corrected Loan for so long as it remains a Corrected Loan and (b) such lower rate as would result in a Workout Fee of $1,000,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest) on any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, as applicable, from the date such Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the related maturity date (or if the rate in clause (a) above would result in a Workout Fee that would be less than $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest) on the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) from the date such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then related maturity date, then the Workout Fee Rate will be a rate equal to such higher rate as would result in a Workout Fee equal to $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest) on the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) from the date such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then related maturity date); provided that no Workout Fee will be payable by the issuing entity with respect to any Corrected Loan if and to the extent that the Corrected Loan became a
Specially Serviced Loan under clause (5) or clause (7) of the definition of “Special Servicing Transfer Event” (and no other clause of that definition) and no event of default actually occurs, unless the related Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan is modified by the special servicer in accordance with the terms of the PSA; provided, further that if a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan only because of an event described in clause (1) of the definition of “Special Servicing Transfer Event” as a result of a payment default at maturity and the related collection of interest and principal is received within 90 days following the related maturity date in connection with the full and final pay-off or refinancing of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, the special servicer will not be entitled to collect a Workout Fee, but may collect and retain commercially reasonable fees from the related borrower in connection with such workout. The Workout Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan that becomes a Corrected Loan will be reduced by any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan as described in the definition of “Excess Modification Fees”, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee.
The Non-Serviced Whole Loans will be subject to a similar workout fee pursuant to the Non-Serviced PSA. For further details, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
The Workout Fee with respect to any Corrected Loan will cease to be payable if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan but will become payable again if and when the Mortgage Loan (including a Serviced Companion Loan) again becomes a Corrected Loan. The Workout Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan that becomes a Corrected Loan will be reduced by any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to a related Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan or REO Loan and received by the special servicer as compensation within the prior 18 months, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee.
If the special servicer is terminated (other than for cause) or resigns, it will retain the right to receive any and all Workout Fees payable with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan that became a Corrected Loan during the period that it acted as special servicer and remained a Corrected Loan at the time of that termination or resignation, except that such Workout Fees will cease to be payable if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan. The successor special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of those Workout Fees. If the special servicer resigns or is terminated (other than for cause), it will receive any Workout Fees payable on Specially Serviced Loans for which the resigning or terminated special servicer had determined to grant a forbearance or cured the event of default through a modification, restructuring or workout negotiated by the special servicer and evidenced by a signed writing, but which had not as of the time the special servicer resigned or was terminated become a Corrected Loan solely because the borrower had not made three (3) consecutive timely Periodic Payments and which subsequently becomes a Corrected Loan as a result of the borrower making such three (3) consecutive timely Periodic Payments.
A “Liquidation Fee” will be payable to the special servicer with respect to (i) each Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property (except with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) as to which the special servicer receives (a) a full, partial or discounted payoff from the related borrower or (b) any Liquidation Proceeds or Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds (including with respect to any related Companion Loan, if applicable), and (ii) except as otherwise described below, any Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan (with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan, only to the extent that (i) the special servicer is enforcing the applicable mortgage loan seller’s obligations under the applicable mortgage loan purchase agreement with respect to such Serviced Companion Loan and (ii) the related Liquidation Fee is not otherwise required to be paid to the special servicer engaged with respect to such Serviced Companion Loan securitization trust or otherwise prohibited from being paid to the special servicer (in each case, under the related pooling and servicing agreement for the securitization trust that owns such Serviced Companion Loan)) for which the special servicer is the Enforcing Servicer and either (A) such Mortgage Loan (and Serviced Companion Loan, if applicable) is repurchased or substituted for by the applicable mortgage loan seller or (B) a Loss of Value Payment has been made with respect to
such Mortgage Loan (and Serviced Companion Loan, if applicable). The Liquidation Fee for each such repurchased or substituted Mortgage Loan, Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property will be payable from, and will be calculated by application of the Liquidation Fee Rate, to the related payment or proceeds; provided that the Liquidation Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property will be reduced by the amount of any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to the Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property as described in the definition of “Excess Modification Fees”, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee; provided, however, that any such fee payable with respect to the Serviced Companion Loan will be payable solely from proceeds on such Serviced Companion Loan; provided, further, that except as contemplated by each of the immediately preceding provisos and the second following paragraph, no Liquidation Fee will be less than $25,000.
The “Liquidation Fee Rate” will be a rate equal to the lesser of (a) such rate as would result in a Liquidation Fee of $1,000,000 and (b) 1.00% with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including with respect to any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent provided in the definition of “Liquidation Fee”) repurchased, substituted or for which a Loss of Value Payment has been made, each Specially Serviced Loan and each REO Property.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary described above, no Liquidation Fee will be payable based upon, or out of, Liquidation Proceeds received in connection with:
(i) (A) the repurchase of, or substitution for, any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan by a mortgage loan seller for a breach of representation or warranty or for defective or deficient Mortgage Loan documentation within the initial 90 day time period (as may be extended) provided for such repurchase or substitution if such repurchase or substitution occurs prior to the termination of such extended period, or (B) the payment of a Loss of Value Payment in connection with any such breach or document defect within the initial 90-day time period (as may be extended) provided for the Loss of Value Payment, if such Loss of Value Payment occurs prior to the termination of such extended period,
(ii) the purchase of (A) any Specially Serviced Loan that is an AB Whole Loan or related REO Property by the holder of a Subordinate Companion Loan or (B) any Specially Serviced Loan or an REO Property that is subject to mezzanine indebtedness by the holder of the related mezzanine loan, in each case described in clause (ii)(A) or (B) above, within 90 days of such holder’s purchase option first becoming exercisable during the period prior to such Mortgage Loan becoming a Corrected Loan,
(iii) the purchase of all of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties, in connection with an optional termination of the issuing entity,
(iv) with respect to a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, (A) a repurchase of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan by the related mortgage loan seller for a breach of representation or warranty or for defective or deficient Mortgage Loan documentation under the pooling and servicing agreement for the securitization trust that owns such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan within the time period (or extension of such time period) provided for such repurchase if such repurchase occurs prior to the termination of such extended period provided in such pooling and servicing agreement or (B) a purchase of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan by an applicable party to a pooling and servicing agreement pursuant to a clean-up call or similar liquidation of another securitization entity,
(v) the purchase of any Specially Serviced Loan by the special servicer or its affiliate (except if such affiliate purchaser is the Directing Holder or its affiliate; provided, however, that if no Control Termination Event is continuing, such affiliated Directing Holder or its affiliate purchases any Specially Serviced Loan within 90 days after the special servicer delivers to such Directing Holder for approval the initial asset status report with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer will not be entitled to a liquidation fee in connection with such purchase by the Directing Holder or its affiliates), or
(vi) if a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan only because of an event described in clause (1) of the definition of “Special Servicing Transfer Event” under the heading “—Special Servicing Transfer Event” and the related Liquidation Proceeds are received within 90 days following the related maturity date as a result of the related Mortgage Loan or the Serviced Whole Loan being refinanced or otherwise repaid in full. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that a liquidation fee is not payable due to the application of clause (i) above through this clause (vi), the special servicer may still collect and retain commercially reasonable fees from the related borrower to the extent provided for in, or not prohibited by, the related Mortgage Loan documents. The Non-Serviced Whole Loans will be subject to a similar liquidation fee pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA. For further detail, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
The special servicer will also be entitled to additional servicing compensation relating to each Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) in the form of:
(i) (A) 100% of Excess Modification Fees related to modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Specially Serviced Loans, (B) 50% of Excess Modification Fees related to modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans, provided that such transaction qualifies as a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision, and (C) 0% of Excess Modification Fees related to modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans, provided that such transaction qualifies as a Master Servicer Decision;
(ii) 100% of assumption application fees and other similar items received with respect to Mortgage Loans for which the special servicer is processing the underlying assumption-related transaction;
(iii) 50% of the portion of any Excess Modification Fees or waiver fees payable solely in connection with any modification, waiver, amendment or consent executed in connection with a defeasance transaction for which the consent, processing or approval of the special servicer is required (and specifically excluding any defeasance fees), provided that such transaction qualifies as a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision;
(iv) 100% of all assumption, waiver, consent, loan service transaction and earnout fees on any Specially Serviced Loan or certain other similar fees paid by the related borrower;
(v) (A) 50% of all waiver fees, assumption fees, consent fees, loan service transaction fees and earnout fees received with respect to all Mortgage Loans (including the Serviced Companion Loans, to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreements, if applicable) that are not Specially Serviced Loans, provided that such transaction qualifies as a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision and (B) 0% of all assumption fees, consent fees and earnout fees received with respect to all Mortgage Loans (including the Serviced Companion Loans, to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreements, if applicable) that are not Specially Serviced Loans, provided that such transaction qualifies as a Master Servicer Decision;
(vi) 100% of charges for beneficiary statements or demands actually paid by the related borrowers to the extent such beneficiary statements or demands were prepared by the special servicer;
(vii) with respect to the accounts held by the special servicer, 100% of charges by the special servicer collected for checks returned for insufficient funds;
(viii) late payment charges and default interest, paid by the borrowers (that were accrued while the related Mortgage Loans or any related Serviced Companion Loan (to the extent not prohibited by the related Co-Lender Agreement) were Specially Serviced Loans), but only to the extent such late payment charges and default interest are not needed to pay interest on
Advances or certain additional trust fund expenses incurred with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or, if provided under the related Co-Lender Agreement, any related Serviced Companion Loan since the Closing Date; and
(ix) 50% of any fees related to a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision on a non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than assumption application fees, defeasance fees, liquidation fees, workout fees and any other fees separately addressed herein or in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).
For the avoidance of doubt, (A) the special servicer will be entitled to that portion, if any, of a penalty charge collected on a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan to the extent accrued subsequent to a special servicing transfer event and prior to the date such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan became a Corrected Loan and (B) if the master servicer has partially waived any penalty charge (part of which accrued subsequent to the occurrence of a special servicing transfer event and prior to the date such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan became a Corrected Loan), any collections in respect of such penalty charge will be shared pro rata by the master servicer and the special servicer based on the respective portions of such penalty charge to which each would otherwise have been entitled (provided that neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to waive only the penalty charges to which the other would be entitled, but not waive penalty charges to which it is entitled).
The special servicer also is authorized but not required to invest or direct the investment of funds held in the REO Accounts in Permitted Investments, and the special servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on those funds and will bear any losses resulting from the investment of these funds, except as set forth in the PSA.
With respect to any of the preceding fees (other than penalty charges) as to which both the master servicer and the special servicer are entitled to receive a portion thereof, the master servicer and the special servicer will each have the right in their sole discretion, but not any obligation, to reduce or elect not to charge only its respective portion of such fee; provided that (A) neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the right to reduce or elect not to charge the portion of any such fee due to the other and (B) to the extent either the master servicer or the special servicer exercises its right to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion in any such fee, the party that reduced or elected not to charge its respective portion of such fee will not have any right to share in any part of the other party’s portion of such fee. If the master servicer decides not to charge any fee (other than penalty charges), the special servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the special servicer would have been entitled if the master servicer had charged a fee and the master servicer will not be entitled to any of such fee charged by the special servicer. Similarly if the special servicer decides not to charge any fee (other than penalty charges), the master servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the master servicer would have been entitled if the special servicer had charged a fee and the special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of such fee charged by the master servicer.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Servicer and Special Servicer may not charge a fee in lieu of any fee that is otherwise to be split between the Servicer and Special Servicer.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is serviced under the related Non-Serviced PSA (including those occasions under the related Non-Serviced PSA when the servicing of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan has been transferred from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer to the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer). Accordingly, in its capacity as special servicer under the PSA, the special servicer will not be entitled to receive any special servicing compensation for any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan. Only the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be entitled to special servicing compensation on the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and only the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be entitled to special servicing compensation on the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be entitled to charge any borrower for and retain reasonable review fees in connection with any borrower request to the extent such fees are (i) not prohibited under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) not charged in lieu of any fee that is otherwise to be split between the master servicer and special servicer, and (iii) actually paid by or on behalf of the related borrower.
“Excess Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable (but not with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the sum of (A) the excess of (i) any and all Modification Fees with respect to a modification, waiver, extension or amendment of any of the terms of the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable), over (ii) all unpaid or unreimbursed Advances and additional expenses of the issuing entity (including, without limitation, interest on Advances to the extent not otherwise paid or reimbursed by or on behalf of the borrower (including indirect reimbursement from penalty charges or otherwise) with respect to such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable), but excluding (1) Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees and (2) borrower delayed reimbursements) outstanding or previously incurred on behalf of the issuing entity with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) and reimbursed from such Modification Fees (which additional expenses will be reimbursed from such Modification Fees) and (B) expenses previously paid or reimbursed from Modification Fees as described in the preceding clause (A), which expenses have been recovered from the related borrower as penalty charges, specific reimbursements or otherwise. All Excess Modification Fees earned by the special servicer will be required to offset any future Workout Fees or Liquidation Fees payable with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan) or REO Property; provided that if the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) ceases being a Corrected Loan, and is subject to a subsequent modification, any Excess Modification Fees earned by the special servicer prior to such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) ceasing to be a Corrected Loan will no longer be offset against future Liquidation Fees and Workout Fees unless such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) ceased to be a Corrected Loan within 18 months of it becoming a modified Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan). If such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) ceases to be a Corrected Loan, the special servicer will be entitled to a Liquidation Fee or Workout Fee (to the extent not previously offset) with respect to the new modification, waiver, extension or amendment or future liquidation of the Specially Serviced Loan or related REO Property (including in connection with a repurchase, sale, refinance, discounted or final payoff or other liquidation); provided that any Excess Modification Fees earned and paid to the special servicer in connection with such subsequent modification, waiver, extension or amendment will be applied to offset such Liquidation Fee or Workout Fee to the extent described above. Within any prior 12-month period, all Excess Modification Fees earned by the master servicer or the special servicer (after taking into account any offset described above applied during such prior 12-month period) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) will be subject to a cap equal to the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) after giving effect to such transaction, and (ii) $25,000.
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees
The PSA will provide that the special servicer and its affiliates will be prohibited from receiving or retaining any Disclosable Special Servicer Fees in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan, the management or disposition of any REO Property, or the performance of any other special servicing duties under the PSA. The PSA will also provide that, with respect to each Distribution Date, the special servicer must deliver or cause to be delivered to the master servicer within two (2) business days following the Determination Date, and the master servicer must deliver, to the extent it has received, to the certificate administrator, without charge and on the same day as the master servicer is required to deliver the CREFC® Investor Reporting Package for such Distribution Date, an electronic report which discloses and contains an itemized listing of any Disclosable Special Servicer Fees received by the special servicer or any of its affiliates with respect to such Distribution Date, provided that no such report will be due in any month during which no Disclosable Special Servicer Fees were received.
“Disclosable Special Servicer Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), Serviced Whole Loan or REO Property (other than any interest in REO Property acquired with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any compensation and other remuneration (including, without limitation, in the form of commissions, brokerage fees and rebates) received or retained by the special servicer or any of its affiliates that is paid by any person or entity (including, without limitation, the issuing entity, any borrower, any property manager, any guarantor or indemnitor in respect of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and any purchaser of the related Mortgage Loan, Serviced Whole Loan or REO Property) in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable), the management or disposition of the related REO Property, and the performance by the special servicer or any such affiliate of any other special servicing duties under the PSA other than (1) any compensation which is payable to the special servicer under the PSA or (2) any Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees.
“Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees” means any commercially reasonable treasury management fees, banking fees, title insurance and/or other insurance commissions and fees and title agency fees received or retained by the special servicer or any of its affiliates in connection with any services performed by such party with respect to any Mortgage Loan, Serviced Whole Loan or REO Property, in each case, in accordance with the PSA.
The special servicer will be required to pay its overhead and any general and administrative expenses incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities under the PSA. The special servicer will not be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses incurred by it except as expressly provided in the PSA. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount.”
Certificate Administrator and Trustee Compensation
As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be paid a fee (collectively, the “Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee”); provided that the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee includes the trustee fee. The Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of the Mortgage Loans will be equal to the product of a rate equal to 0.01023% per annum (the “Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate”) and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but not any Companion Loan) and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans. The Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee includes the trustee fee.
Operating Advisor Compensation
The fee of the operating advisor (the “Operating Advisor Fee”) will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan but not any Companion Loan), and will accrue at a rate (the “Operating Advisor Fee Rate”), equal to a per annum rate of 0.001757%, and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans.
An “Operating Advisor Consulting Fee” will be payable to the operating advisor with respect to each Major Decision on which the operating advisor has consultation obligations and performed its duties with respect to that Major Decision. The Operating Advisor Consulting Fee will be a fee for each such Major Decision equal to $10,000 (or such lesser amount as the related borrower pays with respect to such Mortgage Loan) (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan); provided that the operating advisor may in its sole discretion reduce the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee with respect to any Major Decision; provided, further, that the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will each be permitted to waive or reduce the amount of any such Operating Advisor Consulting Fee payable by the related borrower if it determines that such full or partial waiver is in accordance with the Servicing Standard, but may in no event take any enforcement action with respect to the collection of such Operating Advisor Consulting Fee other than requests for collection (provided that the master servicer or the special
servicer, as applicable, will be required to consult, on a non-binding basis, with the operating advisor prior to any such waiver or reduction).
Each of the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee will be payable from funds on deposit in the Collection Account out of amounts otherwise available to make distributions on the Offered Certificates as described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”, but with respect to the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee only as and to the extent that such fee is actually received from the related borrower. If the operating advisor has consultation rights with respect to a Major Decision, the PSA will require the master servicer or the special servicer processing the Major Decision, to use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to collect the applicable Operating Advisor Consulting Fee from the related borrower in connection with such Major Decision (taking into account whether or not such fees are provided for in the related loan agreement), but only to the extent not prohibited by the related Mortgage Loan documents.
In addition to the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee, the operating advisor will be entitled to reimbursement of Operating Advisor Expenses in accordance with the terms of the PSA. “Operating Advisor Expenses” for each Distribution Date will equal any unreimbursed indemnification amounts or additional trust fund expenses payable to the operating advisor pursuant to the PSA (other than the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee).
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation
As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the asset representations reviewer will be paid a fee (the “Asset Representations Reviewer Fee”), payable monthly from amounts received in respect of the Mortgage Loans and will be equal to the product of a rate equal to 0.00028% per annum (the “Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate”) and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but not any Companion Loan) and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans. Upon the completion of any Asset Review with respect to each Delinquent Loan (in such case, a “Subject Loan”), the asset representations reviewer will be required to be paid a fee equal to the sum of: (i) $21,150 multiplied by the number of Subject Loans, plus (ii) $2,125 per Mortgaged Property relating to the Subject Loans in excess of one Mortgaged Property per Subject Loan, plus (iii) $2,800 per Mortgaged Property relating to a Subject Loan subject to a ground lease, plus (iv) $1,550 per Mortgaged Property relating to a Subject Loan subject to a franchise agreement, hotel management agreement or hotel license agreement, subject, in the case of each of clauses (i) through (iv), to adjustments on the basis of the year-end “Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers” as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, or other similar index if the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers is no longer calculated, for the year of the Closing Date and for the year of the occurrence of the Asset Review (any such fee, the “Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee”).
The Asset Representations Reviewer Fee will be payable from funds on deposit in the Collection Account out of amounts otherwise available to make distributions on the certificates as described above in “—Withdrawals from the Collection Account”. The Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee with respect to each Delinquent Loan will be required to be paid by the mortgage loan sellers; provided, however, that if the related mortgage loan seller is insolvent, such fee will become an expense of the issuing entity following delivery by the asset representations reviewer of evidence reasonably satisfactory to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, of such insolvency; provided, further, that notwithstanding any payment of such fee by the issuing entity to the asset representations reviewer, such fee will remain an obligation of the related mortgage loan seller and the Enforcing Servicer will be required to pursue remedies against such mortgage loan seller in accordance with the servicing standard in order to seek recovery of such amounts from such mortgage loan seller or its insolvency estate. The Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee with respect to a Delinquent Loan is required to be included in the Purchase Price for any Mortgage Loan that was the subject of a completed Asset Review and that is repurchased by the related mortgage loan seller to the extent such fee was not already paid by such mortgage loan seller, and such portion of the Purchase Price received will be used to reimburse the trust for such fees paid to the asset representations reviewer pursuant to the terms of the PSA.
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee will be paid to CREFC® on a monthly basis.
“CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee” with respect to each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan (other than the portion of an REO Loan related to any Serviced Companion Loan) and for any Distribution Date is the amount accrued during the related Interest Accrual Period at the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan or REO Loan as of the close of business on the Distribution Date in such Interest Accrual Period; provided that such amounts will be computed for the same period and on the same interest accrual basis respecting which any related interest payment due or deemed due on the related Mortgage Loan or REO Loan is computed and will be prorated for partial periods. The CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee is a fee payable to CREFC® for a license to use the CREFC® Investor Reporting Package in connection with the servicing and administration, including delivery of periodic reports to the Certificateholders, of the issuing entity pursuant to the PSA. No CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee will be paid on any Companion Loan.
“CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate” with respect to each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan is a rate equal to 0.00050% per annum.
Appraisal Reduction Amounts
After an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or a Serviced Whole Loan, an Appraisal Reduction Amount is required to be calculated. An “Appraisal Reduction Event” will occur on the earliest of:
(1) the date on which a reduction in the amount of Periodic Payments on the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan, as applicable, or a change in any other material economic term of the Mortgage Loan or the related Companion Loan, as applicable, (other than an extension of its maturity), becomes effective as a result of a modification of the related Mortgage Loan or the related Companion Loan, as applicable, by the special servicer;
(2) the 60th day after an uncured delinquency (without regard to the application of any grace period), other than any uncured delinquency in respect of a balloon payment, occurs in respect of the Mortgage Loan or a related Companion Loan, as applicable;
(3) solely in the case of a delinquent balloon payment, (A) the date on which that balloon payment was due (except as described in clause B below) or (B) if the related borrower has delivered to the master servicer (and the master servicer will be required to promptly deliver a copy of such document to the special servicer, if it is not evident that a copy has been delivered to the special servicer), on or prior to the related maturity date, a written and fully executed (subject only to customary final closing conditions) commitment, letter of intent, or otherwise binding application for refinancing or similar document that is, in each case, binding upon an acceptable lender or signed purchase agreement, in each case reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the master servicer and (for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing) the Directing Holder, which provides that such refinancing or purchase will occur within 120 days of such related maturity date, the date occurring 120 days after the date on which that balloon payment was due (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due during which the refinancing or purchase is scheduled to occur pursuant to the commitment for refinancing or signed purchase agreement or on which such commitment or signed purchase agreement terminates);
(4) the date on which the related Mortgaged Property became an REO Property;
(5) the 60th day after a receiver or similar official is appointed (and continues in that capacity) in respect of the related Mortgaged Property;
(6) the 60th day after the date the related borrower or the tenant at a single tenant property is subject to a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings (if not dismissed within those 60 days); and
(7) the date on which the Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) remains outstanding 5 years following any extension of its maturity date pursuant to the PSA.
No Appraisal Reduction Event may occur at any time when the Certificate Balances of all classes of Subordinate Certificates have been reduced to zero.
The “Appraisal Reduction Amount” for any Distribution Date and for any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any Serviced Whole Loan as to which any Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred, will be an amount, calculated by the special servicer in consultation with the Directing Holder (for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing and only with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan), and in consultation with the operating advisor (during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), as of the first Determination Date that is at least 10 business days following the later of (i) the date the special servicer receives an appraisal or conducts a valuation described below and (ii) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event equal to the excess of:
(a) the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be, over
(b) the excess of
| a) | 90% of the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property as determined (A) by one or more MAI appraisals obtained by the special servicer with respect to that Mortgage Loan (together with any other Mortgage Loan cross-collateralized with such Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan with an outstanding principal balance equal to or in excess of $2,000,000 (the costs of which will be paid by the master servicer as an Advance), or (B) by an internal valuation performed by the special servicer with respect to any Mortgage Loan (together with any other Mortgage Loan cross-collateralized with such Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan with an outstanding principal balance less than $2,000,000, minus with respect to any MAI appraisals such downward adjustments as the special servicer may make (without implying any obligation to do so) based upon its review of the appraisals and any other information it deems relevant, and |
| b) | all escrows, letters of credit and reserves in respect of that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan as of the date of calculation; over |
| 2. | the sum as of the Due Date occurring in the month of the date of determination of |
| a) | to the extent not previously advanced by the master servicer or the trustee, all unpaid interest due on that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan at a per annum rate equal to the Mortgage Rate (and any accrued and unpaid interest on any Subordinate Companion Loan), |
| b) | all P&I Advances on the related Mortgage Loan and all Property Protection Advances on the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan not reimbursed from the proceeds of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and interest on those Advances at the Reimbursement Rate in respect of that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, |
| c) | all currently due and unpaid real estate taxes and assessments, insurance premiums and ground rents, unpaid Special Servicing Fees and all other amounts due and unpaid (including any capitalized interest whether or not then due and payable) with respect to such Mortgage Loan, Serviced Whole Loan (which tax, premiums, ground rents and other amounts have not been the subject of an Advance by the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable); and |
| d) | any other unpaid additional expenses of the issuing entity in respect of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan. |
Each Serviced Whole Loan will be treated as a single Mortgage Loan for purposes of calculating an Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan and Companion Loan(s), as applicable, that comprise such Serviced Whole Loan. Any Appraisal Reduction Amount in respect of any Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be allocated, pro rata, between the related Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan based upon their respective Stated Principal Balances. For a summary of the provisions in the related Non-Serviced PSA relating to appraisal reductions, see “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
The special servicer will be required to order an appraisal or conduct a valuation, promptly upon the occurrence of an Appraisal Reduction Event (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan). On the first Determination Date occurring on or after the tenth business day following the later of (a) receipt of the MAI appraisal or the completion of the valuation and (b) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event, the special servicer will be required to calculate and report to the master servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and, prior to the occurrence of any Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder, the Appraisal Reduction Amount, taking into account the results of such appraisal or valuation and receipt of information requested by the special servicer from such master servicer reasonably necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount. Such report will also be forwarded by the special servicer, to the extent the related Serviced Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, to the master servicer of such securitization into which the related Serviced Companion Loan has been sold, or to the holder of any related Serviced Companion Loan.
In the event that the special servicer has not received any required MAI appraisal within 120 days after the event described in the definition of “Appraisal Reduction Event” (without regard to the time periods set forth in the definition), then solely for purposes of determining the amounts of the P&I Advances, the Appraisal Reduction Amount will be deemed to be an amount equal to 25% of the current Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) until an MAI appraisal is received by the special servicer. The Appraisal Reduction Amount is calculated as of the first Determination Date that is at least 10 business days after the later of (a) the special servicer’s receipt of such MAI appraisal or the completion of the valuation and (b) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event. The master servicer will provide (via electronic delivery) the special servicer with any information in its possession that is reasonably required to determine, redetermine, calculate or recalculate any Appraisal Reduction Amount pursuant to its definition using reasonable efforts to deliver such information within 4 business days of the special servicer’s reasonable request; provided, however, that the special servicer’s failure to timely make such a request will not relieve the master servicer of its obligation to use reasonable efforts to provide such information to the special servicer within 4 business days following the special servicer’s reasonable request. The master servicer will not calculate Appraisal Reduction Amounts.
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and each Serviced Whole Loan as to which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred (unless the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan has remained current for three (3) consecutive Periodic Payments, and with respect to which no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred with respect to that Mortgage Loan during the preceding 3 months (for such purposes taking into account any amendment or modification of such Mortgage Loan, any related Serviced Companion Loan or Serviced Whole Loan)), the special servicer is required (i) within 30 days of the end of each 9-month period following the related Appraisal Reduction Event and (ii) upon its determination that the value of the related Mortgaged Property has
materially changed, to notify the master servicer of the occurrence of such 9-month period or determination and to order an appraisal (which may be an update of a prior appraisal), the cost of which will be paid by the master servicer as a Property Protection Advance (or to the extent it would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, an expense of the issuing entity paid out of the Collection Account), or to conduct an internal valuation, as applicable. Based upon the appraisal or valuation and receipt of information reasonably requested by the special servicer from the master servicer necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount, the special servicer is required to determine or redetermine, as applicable, and report to the master servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder, the calculated or recalculated amount of the Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as applicable. Such report will also be forwarded to the holder of any related Companion Loan by the master servicer (or the special servicer if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan). With respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the special servicer will consult with the Directing Holder, with respect to any appraisal, valuation or downward adjustment in connection with an Appraisal Reduction Amount. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special servicer will not be required to obtain an appraisal or valuation with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is the subject of an Appraisal Reduction Event to the extent the special servicer has obtained an appraisal or valuation with respect to the related Mortgaged Property within the 9-month period prior to the occurrence of the Appraisal Reduction Event. Instead, the special servicer may use the prior appraisal or valuation in calculating any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, provided that the special servicer has no knowledge of any material change to the Mortgaged Property that has occurred that would affect the validity of the appraisal or valuation.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is subject to the provisions in the related Non-Serviced PSA relating to appraisal reductions that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to the provisions described above, and appraisal reduction amounts calculated under the related Non-Serviced PSA will be applied to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan in a manner that is similar to the provisions described above. The existence of an appraisal reduction under the related Non-Serviced PSA in respect of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will proportionately reduce the master servicer’s or the trustee’s, as the case may be, obligation to make P&I Advances on such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and will generally have the effect of reducing the amount otherwise available for distributions to the Certificateholders. Pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be treated, together with the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan, as a single mortgage loan for purposes of calculating an appraisal reduction amount with respect to the loans that comprise a Non-Serviced Whole Loan. Any appraisal reduction calculated with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan will generally be allocated first to any related Subordinate Companion Loan and then to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and any related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, on a pro rata basis based upon their respective Stated Principal Balances.
If any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any Serviced Whole Loan previously subject to an Appraisal Reduction Amount becomes a Corrected Loan, and with respect to which no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred and is continuing, then such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan will no longer be subject to an Appraisal Reduction Amount and the related Appraisal Reduction Event will cease to exist. Similarly, when a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is no longer subject to appraisal reduction amounts under the related Non-Serviced PSA, then such appraisal reduction amounts will no longer be applied to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
As a result of calculating one or more Appraisal Reduction Amounts (and, in the case of any Whole Loan, to the extent allocated in the related Mortgage Loan), the amount of any required P&I Advance with respect to the related Mortgage Loan will be reduced, which will have the effect of reducing the amount of interest available to the most subordinate class of certificates then-outstanding (i.e., first, to the Class J-RR certificates; then, to the Class G-RR certificates; then, to the Class F-RR certificates; then, to the Class E-RR certificates; then, to the Class D certificates; then, to the Class C certificates; then, to the
Class B certificates; then, to the Class A-S certificates, and finally, pro rata based on their respective interest entitlements, to the Senior Certificates). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”.
As of the first Determination Date following a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) becoming an AB Modified Loan, the special servicer will be required to calculate whether a Collateral Deficiency Amount exists with respect to such AB Modified Loan, taking into account the most recent appraisal obtained by the special servicer with respect to such Mortgage Loan and all other information relevant to a Collateral Deficiency Amount determination. The master servicer will be required to provide (via electronic delivery) the special servicer with any information in its possession that is reasonably required to determine, redetermine, calculate or recalculate any Collateral Deficiency Amount for any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any Serviced Companion Loan using reasonable efforts to deliver such information within 4 business days of the special servicer’s reasonable request. Upon obtaining knowledge that a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan has become an AB Modified Loan, the master servicer will be required to promptly request from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and Non-Serviced Special Servicer the collateral deficiency amount for the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan (including the collateral deficiency amount allocable to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) calculated by such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the applicable Non-Serviced PSA. The Collateral Deficiency Amount for such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be (i) the collateral deficiency amount allocable to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan that was calculated by such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, if any, or (ii) if such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, only calculated the collateral deficiency amount allocable to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan or a Companion Loan (but did not calculate the collateral deficiency amount allocable to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the amount allocable to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan as determined by the master servicer (solely in reliance upon the collateral deficiency amount allocable to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan or a Companion Loan that was calculated by such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable). The master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the operating advisor and the certificate administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on such collateral deficiency amount calculation of the Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, and will not be responsible for making or verifying such calculation. Upon obtaining knowledge or receipt of notice by any other party to the PSA that a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan has become an AB Modified Loan, such party will be required to promptly notify the master servicer thereof. None of the master servicer, the special servicer (solely with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans), the trustee, the operating advisor or the certificate administrator will calculate or verify any Collateral Deficiency Amount, other than as set forth above.
“AB Modified Loan” means any Corrected Loan (1) that became a Corrected Loan (which includes for purposes of this definition any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan that became a “corrected loan” (or any term substantially similar thereto) pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) due to a modification thereto that resulted in the creation of an A/B note structure (or similar structure) and as to which the new junior note(s) did not previously exist or the principal amount of the new junior note(s) was previously part of either an A note held by the issuing entity or the original unmodified Mortgage Loan and (2) as to which an Appraisal Reduction Amount is not in effect.
“Collateral Deficiency Amount” means, with respect to any AB Modified Loan as of any date of determination, the excess of (i) the Stated Principal Balance of such AB Modified Loan (taking into account the related junior note(s)), over (ii) the sum of (in the case of a Whole Loan, solely to the extent allocable to the subject Mortgage Loan) (x) the most recent appraised value for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, plus (y) solely to the extent not reflected or taken into account in such appraised value and to the extent on deposit with, or otherwise under the control of, the lender as of the date of such determination, any capital or additional collateral contributed by the related borrower at the time the Mortgage Loan became (and as part of the modification related to) such AB Modified Loan for the benefit of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties (provided that in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the amounts set forth in this clause (y) will be taken into account solely to the extent relevant information is received by the master servicer), plus (z) any other escrows or reserves (in addition to any amounts set forth in the immediately preceding clause (y)) held by the lender in respect
of such AB Modified Loan as of the date of such determination. The certificate administrator, the master servicer and the operating advisor will be entitled to conclusively rely on the special servicer’s calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan). The certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the master servicer and the special servicer will be entitled to conclusively rely on the Non-Serviced Master Servicer’s, Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s or Non-Serviced Trustee’s, as applicable, calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans.
A “Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount” with respect to each Mortgage Loan as of any date of determination is equal to the sum of (i) all Appraisal Reduction Amounts then in effect, and (ii) with respect to any AB Modified Loan, any Collateral Deficiency Amount then in effect. The certificate administrator and the master servicer will be entitled to conclusively rely on the special servicer’s calculation or determination of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan). With respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the special servicer, the master servicer and the certificate administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s calculation of any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and on the Non-Serviced Master Servicer’s, Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s or Non-Serviced Trustee’s, as applicable, calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
For purposes of determining the Non-Reduced Interests, the Controlling Class and the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, the Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to a Mortgage Loan will be allocated to each class of Principal Balance Certificates in reverse sequential order to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance thereof until the related Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero (i.e., first, to the Class J-RR certificates, then, to the Class G-RR certificates, then, to the Class F-RR certificates, then, to the Class E-RR certificates, then, to the Class D certificates, then, to the Class C certificates; then, to the Class B certificates; then, to the Class A-S certificates, and finally, pro rata based on their respective interest entitlements, to the Senior Certificates). In addition, for purposes of determining the Controlling Class and the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, Collateral Deficiency Amounts allocated to a related Mortgage Loan that is an AB Modified Loan will be allocated to each class of Control Eligible Certificates in reverse sequential order to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance thereof until the related Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero (i.e., first, to the Class J-RR certificates, then, to the Class G-RR certificates and then, to the Class F-RR certificates;). For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of determining the Controlling Class and the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, any class of Control Eligible Certificates will be allocated both applicable Appraisal Reduction Amounts and applicable Collateral Deficiency Amounts, as described in this paragraph.
The appraised value of any applicable Mortgaged Property is required to be determined on an “as-is” basis for purposes of determining all Appraisal Reduction Amounts. The special servicer (in the case of a Mortgage Loan other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the master servicer (in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will be required to promptly notify the special servicer or the master servicer, as applicable, and the certificate administrator of (i) any Appraisal Reduction Amount, (ii) any Collateral Deficiency Amount, and (iii) any resulting Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount, and the certificate administrator will be required to promptly post notice of such Appraisal Reduction Amount, as applicable, to the certificate administrator’s website.
Any class of Control Eligible Certificates, the Certificate Balance of which (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts or Collateral Deficiency Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of such class) has been reduced to less than 25% of its initial Certificate Balance, is referred to as an “Appraised-Out Class”. The holders of the majority (by Certificate Balance) of an Appraised-Out Class will have the right, at their sole expense, to require the special servicer to order (or, with respect to a Collateral Deficiency Amount calculation for a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, require the master servicer to request from the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer) a second appraisal of any related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) for which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred or as to which there exists a Collateral Deficiency Amount (such holders, the “Requesting Holders”). With respect to any such Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or
Serviced Whole Loan, the special servicer will use its reasonable efforts to cause such appraisal to be (i) delivered within 30 days from receipt of the Requesting Holders’ written request and (ii) prepared on an “as-is” basis by an MAI appraiser. With respect to any such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the master servicer will be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such second appraisal from the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer. Upon receipt of such supplemental appraisal, the master servicer (for Collateral Deficiency Amounts on Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans), the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer (for Appraisal Reduction Amounts on Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans to the extent provided for in the applicable Non-Serviced PSA and applicable Co-Lender Agreement) and the special servicer (for Mortgage Loans other than Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) will be required to determine, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, whether, based on its assessment of such supplemental appraisal, any recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, as applicable, is warranted and, if so warranted will recalculate such Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, as applicable, based upon such supplemental appraisal and (for Mortgage Loans (other than Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) or Serviced Whole Loans) receipt of information requested by the special servicer from the master servicer as described above. If required by any such recalculation, the applicable Appraised-Out Class will be reinstated as the Controlling Class and each other Appraised-Out Class will, if applicable, have its related Certificate Balance notionally restored to the extent required by such recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, if applicable.
In addition, the holders of certificates representing the majority of the Certificate Balance of any Appraised-Out Class will have the right, at their sole expense, to require the special servicer to order an additional appraisal of any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan for which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred or as to which there exists a Collateral Deficiency Amount if an event has occurred at or with regard to the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties that would have a material effect on its appraised value, and the special servicer is required to use its reasonable efforts to cause such appraisal to be (i) delivered within 30 days from receipt of the Requesting Holders’ written request and (ii) prepared on an “as-is” basis by an MAI appraiser; provided that the special servicer will not be required to obtain such appraisal if it determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that no events at or with regard to the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties have occurred that would have a material effect on the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties.
Any Appraised-Out Class for which the Requesting Holders are challenging the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s, as applicable, Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount determination may not exercise any direction, control, consent and/or similar rights of the Controlling Class, until such time, if any, as such class is reinstated as the Controlling Class. The rights of the Controlling Class will be exercised by the next most senior Control Eligible Certificates, if any, during such period.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related directing holder will be subject to provisions similar to those described above. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. With respect to an AB Whole Loan, the holder of the related Subordinate Companion Loan may in certain circumstances post collateral to avoid a change of control as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
Maintenance of Insurance
To the extent permitted by the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and required by the Servicing Standard, the master servicer (with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan, but excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause each borrower to maintain, and the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a related Non-Serviced Whole Loan and subject to the conditions set forth in the following sentence) will maintain, for the related Mortgaged Property all insurance coverage required by the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents; provided, however, that the master servicer (with respect to Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans) will
not be required to cause the borrower to maintain and the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties) will not be required to maintain terrorism insurance to the extent that the failure of the related borrower to do so is an Acceptable Insurance Default (as defined below) or if the trustee does not have an insurable interest. Insurance coverage is required to be in the amounts (which, in the case of casualty insurance, is generally equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan and the replacement cost of the related Mortgaged Property), and from an insurer meeting the requirements, set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. If the borrower does not maintain such coverage, the master servicer (with respect to such Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan) or the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a related Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as the case may be, will be required to maintain such coverage to the extent such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates and the trustee has an insurable interest, as determined ((i) prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event and (ii) other than with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan, any determination that such insurance coverage is not available or not available at commercially reasonable rates to be made with the consent of the Directing Holder) by the master servicer (with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan) or special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a related Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as applicable, in accordance with the Servicing Standard; provided that the master servicer will be obligated to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause the borrower to maintain (or to itself maintain) insurance against property damage resulting from terrorist or similar acts unless the borrower’s failure is an Acceptable Insurance Default as determined by the special servicer with a notice to the master servicer with (in respect of any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan and unless a Control Termination Event is continuing) the consent of the Directing Holder. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties”.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision above, the master servicer will not be required to maintain, and will not be in default for failing to obtain, any earthquake or environmental insurance on any Mortgaged Property unless (other than with respect to a Mortgaged Property securing any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) such insurance was required at the time of origination of the related Mortgage Loan, the trustee has an insurable interest and such insurance is currently available at commercially reasonable rates. In addition, the master servicer and special servicer will be entitled to rely on insurance consultants (at the applicable servicer’s expense) in determining whether any insurance is available at commercially reasonable rates. After the master servicer determines that a Mortgaged Property other than the Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is located in an area identified as a federally designated special flood hazard area (and flood insurance has been made available), the master servicer will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard (1) to cause each borrower to maintain (to the extent required by the related Mortgage Loan documents), and (2) if the borrower does not so maintain, to itself maintain to the extent the trustee, as mortgagee, has an insurable interest in the Mortgaged Property and such insurance is available at commercially reasonable rates (as determined by the master servicer in accordance with the Servicing Standard) a flood insurance policy in an amount representing coverage not less than the lesser of (x) the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) and (y) the maximum amount of insurance which is available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, plus such additional excess flood coverage with respect to the Mortgaged Property, if any, in an amount consistent with the Servicing Standard, but only to the extent that the related Mortgage Loan permits the lender to require the coverage and maintaining coverage is consistent with the Servicing Standard.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan, that either (x) require the borrower to maintain “all-risk” property insurance (and do not expressly permit an exclusion for terrorism) or (y) contain provisions generally requiring the applicable borrower to maintain insurance in types and against such risks as the holder of such Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan reasonably requires from time to time in order to protect its interests, the master servicer will be required to, consistent with the Servicing Standard, (A) monitor in accordance with the Servicing Standard whether the insurance policies for the related Mortgaged Property contain exclusions in addition to those
customarily found in insurance policies for mortgaged properties similar to the Mortgaged Properties on or prior to September 11, 2001 (“Additional Exclusions”), (B) request the borrower to either purchase insurance against the risks specified in the Additional Exclusions or provide an explanation as to its reasons for failing to purchase such insurance, and (C) notify the special servicer if it has knowledge that any insurance policy contains Additional Exclusions or if it has knowledge that any borrower fails to purchase the insurance requested to be purchased by the master servicer pursuant to clause (B) above. If the special servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such failure is not an Acceptable Insurance Default, then the special servicer will be required to notify the master servicer of its determination (if applicable) and the master servicer will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause such insurance to be maintained following such determination by the special servicer. If the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, determines that such failure is an Acceptable Insurance Default, it will be required to promptly deliver such conclusions in writing to the 17g-5 Information Provider for posting to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website for those Mortgage Loans that (i) have one of the 10 highest outstanding principal balances of the Mortgage Loans then included in the issuing entity or (ii) comprise more than 5% of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loans then included in the issuing entity.
“Acceptable Insurance Default” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, a default under the related Mortgage Loan documents arising by reason of (i) any failure on the part of the related borrower to maintain with respect to the related Mortgaged Property specific insurance coverage with respect to, or an all-risk casualty insurance policy that does not specifically exclude, terrorist or similar acts, and/or (ii) any failure on the part of the related borrower to maintain with respect to the related Mortgaged Property, insurance coverage with respect to damages or casualties caused by terrorist or similar acts upon terms not materially less favorable than those in place as of the Closing Date, in each case, as to which default the master servicer and the special servicer may forbear taking any enforcement action; provided that, subject to the consent or consultation rights of the Directing Holder and/or the consultation rights of the holder of any Companion Loan as described under “—The Directing Holder—Major Decisions”, the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) has determined in its reasonable judgment based on inquiry consistent with the Servicing Standard that either (a) such insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates and that such hazards are not at the time commonly insured against for properties similar to the related Mortgaged Property and located in or around the region in which such related Mortgaged Property is located, or (b) such insurance is not available at any rate.
During the period that the master servicer or the special servicer is evaluating the availability of such insurance, or waiting for a response from the Directing Holder, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be liable for any loss related to its failure to require the borrower to maintain such insurance and neither will be in default of its obligations as a result of such failure unless the master servicer or the special servicer is required to take any immediate action pursuant to the Servicing Standard and other servicing requirements under the PSA as described under “—The Directing Holder—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” and “—Servicing Override”.
The special servicer will be required to maintain (or cause to be maintained), fire and hazard insurance on each REO Property (other than any REO Property with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), to the extent obtainable at commercially reasonable rates and the trustee has an insurable interest, in an amount that is at least equal to the lesser of (1) the full replacement cost of the improvements on the REO Property, and (2) the outstanding principal balance owing on the related REO Loan, and in any event, the amount necessary to avoid the operation of any co-insurance provisions. In addition, if the REO Property is located in an area identified as a federally designated special flood hazard area, the special servicer will be required to cause to be maintained, to the extent available at commercially reasonable rates (as determined by the special servicer (with the consent of the Directing Holder (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event and other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan) and in accordance with the Servicing Standard)), a flood insurance policy meeting the requirements of the current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration in an
amount representing coverage not less than the maximum amount of insurance that is available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended.
The PSA provides that the master servicer may satisfy its obligation to cause each borrower to maintain a hazard insurance policy and the master servicer or the special servicer may satisfy their respective obligation to maintain hazard insurance by maintaining a blanket or master single interest or force-placed policy insuring against hazard losses on the Mortgage Loans and related Serviced Companion Loan and REO Properties (other than the Mortgaged Property securing the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as applicable. Any losses incurred with respect to Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) or REO Properties due to uninsured risks (including earthquakes, mudflows and floods) or insufficient hazard insurance proceeds may adversely affect payments to Certificateholders. Any cost incurred by the master servicer or the special servicer in maintaining a hazard insurance policy, if the borrower defaults on its obligation to do so, will be advanced by the master servicer as a Property Protection Advance and will be charged to the related borrower. Generally, no borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to maintain earthquake insurance on any Mortgaged Property and the special servicer will not be required to maintain earthquake insurance on any REO Properties. Any cost of maintaining that kind of required insurance or other earthquake insurance obtained by the special servicer will be paid out of the applicable REO Account or advanced by the master servicer as a Property Protection Advance.
The costs of the insurance may be recovered by the master servicer or the trustee, as the case may be, from reimbursements received from the borrower or, if the borrower does not pay those amounts, as a Property Protection Advance as set forth in the PSA. All costs and expenses incurred by the special servicer in maintaining the insurance described above on REO Properties will be paid out of the related REO Account or, if the amount in such account is insufficient, such costs and expenses will be advanced by the master servicer to the special servicer as a Property Protection Advance to the extent that such Property Protection Advance is not determined to be a Nonrecoverable Advance.
No pool insurance policy, special hazard insurance policy, bankruptcy bond, repurchase bond or certificate guarantee insurance will be maintained with respect to the Mortgage Loans, nor will any Mortgage Loan be subject to FHA insurance.
Modifications, Waivers and Amendments
Except as otherwise set forth in this section, the special servicer may not waive, modify or amend (or consent to waive, modify or amend) any provision of a Mortgage Loan and/or Serviced Companion Loan that is not in default or as to which default is not reasonably foreseeable except for (1) the waiver of any due-on-sale clause or due-on-encumbrance clause to the extent permitted in the PSA, and (2) any waiver, modification or amendment more than three (3) months after the Closing Date that would not be a “significant modification” of the Mortgage Loan and/or Serviced Companion Loan within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(b) or otherwise (i) cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or (ii) result in the imposition of a tax upon any Trust REMIC or the issuing entity. The master servicer will not be permitted under the PSA to provide any consent or make any decision, including agreeing to any modifications, waivers and amendments, unless such consent or decision constitutes a Master Servicer Decision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision, the master servicer and the special servicer may mutually agree that the master servicer will process such Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision, but in all events will obtain the prior consent of the special servicer, which consent will be deemed received by the master servicer if the special servicer does not respond within ten (10) days of delivery to the special servicer of the master servicer’s written recommendation and analysis, and all information in the master servicer’s possession that is reasonably requested by the special servicer in order to grant or withhold such consent, plus the time period provided to a holder of a Companion Loan under a related Co-Lender Agreement to consent to such Major Decision; provided that the master servicer will, without the need for any such mutual agreement between the master servicer and the special servicer, process any Major Decision described in subclauses (A) and (B) of clause (xiii) of the definition of “Major Decision” with respect to any non-
Specially Serviced Loan, in each case subject to the consent (or deemed consent) of the special servicer as obtained pursuant to the PSA.
“Special Servicer Decision” means any decision or borrower request with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or a Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Major Decision or a Master Servicer Decision.
“Master Servicer Decision” means, with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or a Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan:
| (a) | any decision or borrower request with respect to: |
| (ii) | collections, record keeping, reporting, payment processing and companion paying agent functions, |
| (iii) | inspections of Mortgaged Properties, |
| (iv) | property insurance and tax matters, |
| (v) | subjecting the related Mortgaged Property to an easement, right of way or similar agreement for utilities, access, parking, public improvements, or another purpose that, in each case, does not materially affect the use or value of the Mortgaged Property or the borrower’s ability to make payments with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (including a consent to subordination of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan to such easement, right of way or similar agreement), |
| (vi) | Advances (including nonrecoverability determinations), and |
| (vii) | any note-splitting amendment to an Co-Lender Agreement, and |
| (b) | any decision the master servicer is to make under the PSA with respect to: |
| (i) | notices of a material default, Material Defect, or Repurchase Request, |
| (ii) | general servicing of the Serviced Mortgage Loans or Serviced Whole Loans other than: |
| (1) | any borrower request not specified in the immediately preceding clause (a), including approving any requests for the funding or disbursement of amounts from any escrow accounts, reserve funds or letters of credit (including the funding or disbursement of any such amounts with respect to any of the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties specifically identified in the PSA), unless such request relates to: |
| (a) | customary tax and insurance releases, |
| (b) | any other routine and/or customary escrow and reserve fundings or disbursements of amounts less than $175,000 and for which the satisfaction of performance-related criteria is not required pursuant to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents, or |
| (c) | any request for a funding or disbursement as mutually agreed upon by the master servicer and the special servicer; |
| (2) | approving leases, lease modifications or amendments or any requests for subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreements or other similar agreements for (i) all ground leases, including any determination whether to cure any borrower defaults relating to any ground lease, and (ii) all other leases in excess of the lesser (individually or in the |
aggregate based on all leases with the same tenant at the applicable Mortgaged Property) of (y) 30,000 square feet and (z) 30% of the net rentable area at the related Mortgaged Property so long as it is reviewable by the lender under the related Mortgage Loan documents;
| (3) | a decision to modify or take action (or to refrain from taking action) under any provisions regarding cash trap and lease sweep triggers, removal of a property manager or allocation of casualty or condemnation proceeds; |
| (4) | the calculation of loan-to-value ratio in connection with any principal prepayment or property release or substitution; |
| (5) | unless required by the related Mortgage Loan documents, a decision to modify any covenant setting reserve level requirements or a decision that a borrower has failed to increase reserve requirements as required by the related Mortgage Loan documents; |
| (6) | any approval of any casualty insurance settlements (unless such casualty insurance settlements are less than the threshold specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents and there is no lender discretion provided for in the related Mortgage Loan documents, including determining whether any conditions precedent have been satisfied) or condemnation settlements (unless such condemnation settlements are immaterial and there is no lender discretion provided for in the related Mortgage Loan documents, including determining whether any conditions precedent have been satisfied), and any determination to apply casualty proceeds or condemnation awards to the reduction of the debt rather than to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property; or |
| (7) | any decision or borrower request related to approving annual budgets or operating expenses for the related Mortgaged Property; |
| (iii) | investment of funds held in accounts held by the master servicer, |
| (iv) | the master servicer’s compensation, including waivers of compensation due the master servicer, |
| (v) | administration of the master servicer’s website, |
| (vi) | whether a special servicing transfer event has occurred with respect to such Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, |
| (vii) | consulting with Companion Holders, and |
| (viii) | certain other administrative functions typically performed by the master servicer as described in the PSA. |
In addition, the special servicer will be entitled to review and approve any calculations (including, but not limited to, debt yield and debt service coverage ratio calculations) made by the master servicer that would result in (i) the commencement or termination of a cash trap or lease sweep period with respect to any Mortgage Loan, (ii) the removal of a property manager of a Mortgaged Property, (iii) the allocation of casualty or condemnation proceeds, or (iv) the release of any reserve to a borrower if such release would constitute a Major Decision. In connection with the foregoing, the master servicer will be required to forward any such calculation to the special servicer and provide any information that the special servicer reasonably requests in order to recalculate and review such calculation. With respect to any such calculation, if the special servicer fails to respond within ten (10) business days after receipt of such calculation and requested information (if any) referred to above, then such calculation will be deemed to have been approved by the special servicer. In the event the special servicer disagrees with any such calculation made by the master servicer (including any inputs), then the master servicer and the special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to reconcile their calculations; provided that, if the
master servicer and the special servicer are unable to reconcile their calculations within five (5) business days after identifying such disagreement, then the special servicer’s calculation will control.
The special servicer will be entitled to 100% of any Excess Modification Fees, consent fees, ancillary fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), review fees, assumption fees, transfer fees, earnout fees and similar fees (other than defeasance fees) with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan. The master servicer and special servicer will each be entitled to 50% of any Excess Modification Fees, consent fees, ancillary fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), review fees, assumption fees, transfer fees, earnout fees and similar fees (other than defeasance fees) related to any Major Decision with respect to a non-Specially Serviced Loan. The master servicer will be entitled to 100% of Excess Modifications Fees, consent fees, ancillary fees, review fees, assumption fees, transfer fees, earnout fees and similar fees related to a Master Servicer Decision with respect to a non-Specially Serviced Loan.
If, and only if, the special servicer determines that a modification, waiver or amendment (including the forgiveness or deferral of interest or principal or the substitution or release of collateral or the pledge of additional collateral) of the terms of a Specially Serviced Loan with respect to which a payment default or other material default has occurred or a payment default or other material default is, in the special servicer’s judgment, reasonably foreseeable, is reasonably likely to produce a greater recovery on a net present value basis (the relevant discounting to be performed at the related Mortgage Rate) to the issuing entity and, if applicable, the holders of any applicable Companion Loan, than liquidation of such Specially Serviced Loan, then the special servicer may, but is not required to, agree to a modification, waiver or amendment of the Specially Serviced Loan, subject to (w) the restrictions and limitations described below, (x) with respect to any Major Decision, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the approval of the Directing Holder (or after the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to a Consultation Termination Event, upon consultation with the Controlling Class Representative), as provided in the PSA and described in this prospectus, (y) with respect to any Major Decision, after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, consultation with the operating advisor and (z) with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the rights of the holder of the related Serviced Companion Loan, as applicable, to advise or consult with the special servicer with respect to, or consent to, such modification, waiver or amendment, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and, with respect to a Mortgage Loan that has mezzanine debt, the rights of the mezzanine lender, if any, to consent to such modification, waiver or amendment, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the related intercreditor agreement.
The master servicer, prior to taking any action with respect to any Major Decision or any Special Servicer Decision, will be required to refer the request to the special servicer. Generally, the special servicer will process the request directly. However, the master servicer and special servicer may mutually agree that the master servicer will process such request, in which case the master servicer will prepare and submit its written analysis and recommendation to the special servicer with all information reasonably available to the master servicer that the special servicer may reasonably request in order to withhold or grant its consent, and in all cases the special servicer will be entitled (subject to the discussion under “—The Directing Holder” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” above) to approve or disapprove any modification, waiver or amendment that constitutes such a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Decision.
In connection with (i) the release of a Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or any portion of a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related Mortgage or (ii) the taking of a Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or any portion of a Mortgaged Property by exercise of the power of eminent domain or condemnation, if the related Mortgage Loan documents require the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, to calculate (or to approve the calculation of the related borrower of) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties or the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, for purposes of REMIC qualification of the related Mortgage Loan, then such calculation will, unless then permitted by
the REMIC provisions, exclude the value of personal property and going concern value, if any, as determined by an appropriate third party.
The special servicer is required to use its reasonable efforts to the extent reasonably possible to fully amortize a modified Mortgage Loan prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date. The special servicer may not agree to a modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Specially Serviced Loan if that modification, waiver or amendment would:
(1) extend the maturity date of the Specially Serviced Loan to a date occurring later than the earlier of (A) five (5) years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date and (B) if the Specially Serviced Loan is secured solely or primarily by a leasehold estate and not the related fee interest, the date occurring twenty years or, to the extent consistent with the Servicing Standard giving due consideration to the remaining term of the ground lease and (A) prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, with the consent of the Directing Holder (other than with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is an applicable Excluded Loan as to such party), and (B) after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, after consulting with the operating advisor, ten years, prior to the end of the current term of the ground lease, plus any options to extend exercisable unilaterally by the borrower; or
(2) provide for the deferral of interest unless interest accrues on the Mortgage Loan or the Serviced Whole Loans, generally, at the related Mortgage Rate.
If the special servicer gives notice of any modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or related Companion Loan, the special servicer will be required to notify the master servicer, the holder of any related Companion Loan, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Directing Holder (other than following the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event and with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan), the operating advisor and the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will thereafter post any such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. If the master servicer gives notice of any modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any such Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan, the master servicer will be required to notify the certificate administrator, trustee, the special servicer, the Directing Holder (other than following the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event and with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan), the holder of any related Companion Loan and the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will be required to thereafter post any such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. The party providing notice will be required to deliver to the custodian for deposit in the related Mortgage File, an original counterpart of the agreement related to the modification, waiver or amendment, promptly following the execution of that agreement, and if required, a copy to the master servicer and to the holder of any related Companion Loan, all as set forth in the PSA. Copies of each agreement whereby the modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan is effected are required to be available for review during normal business hours at the offices of the custodian. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”.
The modification, waiver or amendment of a Serviced Whole Loan or a Mortgage Loan that has a related mezzanine loan will be subject to certain limitations set forth in the related intercreditor agreement. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk”.
Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to enter into any modification, waiver, amendment, work-out, consent or approval with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, restructure any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, or restructure any borrower equity (in each case, including, without limitation, by way of the application of credits, discounts, forgiveness or otherwise) in a manner that would have the effect of placing amounts payable as compensation, or otherwise reimbursable, to the master servicer or special servicer in a higher priority than that which is provided in the allocation and payment priorities described under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections” or in the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Any modification, extension, waiver or amendment of the payment terms of any Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be required to be structured so as to be consistent with the Servicing Standard and the allocation and payment priorities in the related loan documents and the related Co-Lender Agreement, such that neither the issuing entity as holder of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan nor any holder of any related Companion Loan gains a priority over the other holder that is not reflected in the related loan documents and the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Enforcement of “Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions
The special servicer will be required to determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard (or, if mutually agreed to by the master servicer and the special servicer, the master servicer will be required to determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard and subject to the consent of the special servicer), whether to (a) exercise any right it may have with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan containing a “due-on-sale” clause (1) to accelerate the payments on that Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loan, as applicable, or (2) to grant or withhold its consent to any sale or transfer, consistent with the Servicing Standard or (b) waive its right to exercise such rights;
provided, however, that if such matter is a Major Decision (i)(x) prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event and other than with respect to an Excluded Loan with respect to the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class, the special servicer has obtained the prior written consent (or deemed consent) of the Directing Holder, which consent will be deemed given 10 days after the Directing Holder’s receipt of the special servicer’s written recommendation and analysis with respect to such waiver and all information reasonably requested by the Directing Holder, and reasonably available to the special servicer with respect to such proposed waiver or proposed granting of consent, (y) after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event and other than with respect to an Excluded Loan with respect to the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class, the special servicer has consulted with the Directing Holder or (z) after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer has consulted with the operating advisor, and (ii) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (either alone or, if applicable, with other related Mortgage Loans) that exceeds specified size thresholds (either actual or relative), or that fails to satisfy certain other applicable conditions imposed by the Rating Agencies, a Rating Agency Confirmation is received by the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, from each Rating Agency and a confirmation of any applicable rating agency that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Companion Loan (if any).
With respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan with a “due-on-encumbrance” clause, the special servicer will determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, whether (a) to exercise any right it may have with respect to a Mortgage Loan containing a “due-on-encumbrance” clause (1) to accelerate the payments thereon, or (2) to withhold its consent to the creation of any additional lien or other encumbrance, consistent with the Servicing Standard or (b) to waive its right to exercise such rights, provided, however, that if such matter is a Major Decision (i) (x) prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event, the special servicer has obtained the prior written consent (or deemed consent) of the Directing Holder (other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan as to such party), which consent will be deemed given 10 days after the Directing Holder’s receipt of the special servicer’s written recommendation and analysis, which may be in the form of an Asset Status Report, with respect to such waiver and all information reasonably requested by the Directing Holder, and reasonably available to the special servicer with respect to such proposed waiver or proposed granting of consent, (y) after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the special servicer has consulted with the Directing Holder (other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan as to such party) or (z) after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer has consulted with the operating advisor and (ii) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (either alone
or, if applicable, with other related Mortgage Loans) that exceeds specified size thresholds (either actual or relative), or that fails to satisfy certain other applicable conditions imposed by the Rating Agencies, the applicable master servicer or the special servicer has received a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency and a confirmation of any applicable rating agency that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (if any).
Upon receiving a request for any matter described in the first two paragraphs of this section that constitutes a consent or waiver with respect to a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will be required to promptly forward such request to the special servicer and the special servicer will be required to process such request (including, without limitation, interfacing with the borrower) (unless the master servicer and special servicer mutually agree with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan that the master servicer will process such request with respect to a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Decision) and except as provided in the next sentence, the master servicer will have no further obligation with respect to such request or due-on-sale or due-on-encumbrance. The master servicer will continue to cooperate with the special servicer by delivering any additional information in the master servicer’s possession requested by the special servicer relating to such consent or waiver with respect to a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause. Unless the master servicer and special servicer mutually agree that the master servicer will process such request with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will not be permitted to process any request relating to such consent or waiver with respect to a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause and will not be required to interface with the borrower or provide a written recommendation and analysis with respect to any such request. If the master servicer and special servicer mutually agree that the master servicer will process a Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan that is a non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will be required to obtain the special servicer’s prior consent (or deemed consent) to the Major Decision or Special Servicer Decision, as applicable.
Any modification, extension, waiver or amendment of the payment terms of a Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be required to be structured so as to be consistent with the servicing standard under the related Non-Serviced PSA and the allocation and payment priorities in the related mortgage loan documents and the related Co-Lender Agreement, such that neither the issuing entity as holder of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan nor any holder of any related Non-Serviced Companion Loan gains a priority over the other holder that is not reflected in the related mortgage loan documents and the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Inspections
The master servicer will be required to perform (at its own expense) or cause to be performed (at its own expense) physical inspections of each Mortgaged Property relating to a Mortgage Loan (other than the Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, which is subject to inspection pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, and other than a Specially Serviced Loan) with a Stated Principal Balance of (A) $2,000,000 or more at least once every 12 months and (B) less than $2,000,000 at least once every 24 months, in each case commencing in the calendar year 2025 unless a physical inspection has been performed by the special servicer within the previous 12 months and the master servicer has no knowledge of a material change in the Mortgaged Property since such physical inspection; provided that if any scheduled payment becomes more than 60 days delinquent on the related Mortgage Loan, the special servicer is required to inspect or cause to be inspected the related Mortgaged Property as soon as practicable after the Mortgage Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan and annually thereafter for so long as the Mortgage Loan remains a Specially Serviced Loan (the cost of which inspection, to the extent not paid by the related borrower, will be reimbursed first from default interest and late charges on the related Mortgage Loan (but with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, only amounts available for such purpose under the related Co-Lender Agreement) and then from the Collection Account as an expense of the issuing entity, and in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, as an expense of the holders of the related
Mortgage Loan and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, pro rata and pari passu, to the extent provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement). The special servicer or the master servicer, as applicable, will be required to prepare or cause to be prepared a written report of the inspection describing, among other things, the condition of and any damage to the Mortgaged Property to the extent evident from the inspection and specifying the existence of any vacancies in the Mortgaged Property of which it has knowledge and deems material, of any sale, transfer or abandonment of the Mortgaged Property of which it has knowledge or that is evident from the inspection, of any adverse change in the condition of the Mortgaged Property of which the preparer of such report has knowledge or that is evident from the inspection, and that the preparer of such report deems material, or of any material waste committed on the Mortgaged Property to the extent evident from the inspection.
Copies of the inspection reports referred to above that are delivered to the certificate administrator will be posted to the certificate administrator’s website for review by Privileged Persons pursuant to the PSA. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”.
Collection of Operating Information
With respect to each Mortgage Loan that requires the borrower to deliver operating statements, the special servicer or the master servicer, as applicable, is also required to use reasonable efforts to collect and review the annual operating statements beginning with calendar year end 2024 of the related Mortgaged Property. Most of the Mortgage Loan documents obligate the related borrower to deliver annual property operating statements. However, we cannot assure you that any operating statements required to be delivered will in fact be delivered, nor is the special servicer or the master servicer likely to have any practical means of compelling the delivery in the case of an otherwise performing Mortgage Loan.
Special Servicing Transfer Event
The Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) any related Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties will be serviced by the special servicer under the PSA in the event that the servicing responsibilities of the master servicer are transferred to the special servicer as described below. Such Mortgage Loans and related Serviced Companion Loans (including those loans that have become REO Properties) serviced by the special servicer are referred to in this prospectus collectively as the “Specially Serviced Loans”. The master servicer will be required to transfer certain of the servicing responsibilities to the special servicer with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any related Serviced Companion Loan) for which the master servicer is responsible for servicing (each, a “Special Servicing Transfer Event”):
(1) as to which a payment default has occurred at its original maturity date, or, if the original maturity date has been extended, at its extended maturity date; and in the case of a balloon payment, if the balloon payment is delinquent and the related borrower has not provided the master servicer or the special servicer (and in either such case, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will be required to promptly forward a copy of such document to the other servicer, if it is not evident that a copy has been delivered to such other servicer), on or prior to the related maturity date, with (a) a written and fully executed (subject only to customary final closing conditions) commitment, letter of intent, or otherwise binding application for refinancing or similar document that is, in each case, binding upon an acceptable lender or (b) a signed purchase agreement, in the case of clause (a) or (b), reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the master servicer and (for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing) the Directing Holder, which provides that such refinancing or purchase will occur within 120 days of such related maturity date; provided that such Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loan will become a Specially Serviced Loan immediately if the related borrower fails to diligently pursue such financing or purchase or to pay any Assumed Scheduled Payment on the related due date (subject to any applicable grace period) at any time before the refinancing or purchase or, if such refinancing or purchase does not occur, such Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loan at the end of such 120-day period (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which the related balloon payment was due within which the refinancing or purchase is scheduled to occur pursuant to the
commitment for refinancing or signed purchase agreement or on which such commitment or signed purchase agreement terminates);
(2) as to which any Periodic Payment is more than 60 days delinquent;
(3) as to which (i) the borrower has entered into or consented to bankruptcy, appointment of a receiver or conservator or a similar insolvency proceeding, (ii) the borrower has become the subject of a decree or order for that proceeding and it has not been stayed or discharged or dismissed within 60 days (or a shorter period if the master servicer or the special servicer (and, in the case of the special servicer, with the consent of the Directing Holder, unless a Control Termination Event is continuing) determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that the circumstances warrant that the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (or REO Loan) be transferred to special servicing), or (iii) the related borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, has admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations;
(4) as to which the master servicer or special servicer has received notice of the commencement of foreclosure or foreclosure or proposed foreclosure or similar proceedings of any lien other than the Mortgage on the Mortgaged Property;
(5) as to which, in the judgment of the master servicer or special servicer (in the case of the special servicer, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, with the consent of the Directing Holder in accordance with the provisions under “—The Directing Holder—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event”), a payment default is imminent or reasonably foreseeable and is not likely to be cured by the borrower within 30 days;
(6) as to which a default that the master servicer or special servicer has notice (other than a failure by the related borrower to pay principal or interest) and which the master servicer or special servicer (in the case of the special servicer, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, with the consent of the Directing Holder in accordance with the provisions under “—The Directing Holder—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event”) determines, in its good faith reasonable judgment, may materially and adversely affect the interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holders of any related Companion Loan, as a collective whole (taking into account the subordinate or pari passu or subordinate nature of any Companion Loan, as applicable)), has occurred and remains unremedied for the applicable grace period specified in the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan documents, other than in certain circumstances the failure to maintain terrorism insurance (or if no grace period is specified for events of default that are capable of cure, 30 days); or
(7) as to which the master servicer or special servicer (in the case of the special servicer, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, with the consent of the Directing Holder in accordance with the provisions under “—The Directing Holder—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event”) determines that (i) a default (other than as described in clause (5) above) under the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan is imminent or reasonably foreseeable, (ii) such default will materially impair the value of the corresponding Mortgaged Property as security for the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan or otherwise materially adversely affect the interests of Certificateholders (and, with respect to a Whole Loan, the holders of any related Companion Loan as a collective whole (taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any Companion Loans)), and (iii) the default will continue unremedied for the applicable cure period under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan, or, if no cure period is specified and the default is capable of being cured, for 30 days (provided that such 30-day grace period does not apply to a default that gives rise to immediate acceleration without application of a grace period under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan); provided that any determination that a special servicing transfer event has occurred under this clause (7) with respect to any Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan solely by reason of the failure (or imminent failure) of the related borrower to maintain or cause to be maintained insurance coverage against damages or losses arising from acts of terrorism may only be made by the master servicer (and with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than any applicable
Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event, with the consent of the Directing Holder) as described under “—Maintenance of Insurance” above.
However, the master servicer will be required to continue to (x) receive payments on the Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) (including amounts collected by the special servicer), (y) make certain calculations with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan and (z) make remittances and prepare certain reports to the Certificateholders with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan. Additionally, the master servicer will continue to receive the Servicing Fee in respect of the Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) and any related REO Loan at the Servicing Fee Rate.
If the related Mortgaged Property is acquired in respect of any Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) (upon acquisition, an “REO Property”) whether through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, the special servicer will continue to be responsible for its operation and management. If any Serviced Companion Loan becomes specially serviced, then the related Mortgage Loan will also become a Specially Serviced Loan. If any Mortgage Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan, then the related Serviced Companion Loan will also become a Specially Serviced Loan. The master servicer will have no responsibility for the performance by the special servicer of its duties under the PSA. Any Mortgage Loan (excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), that is or becomes a cross-collateralized Mortgage Loan and is cross-collateralized with a Specially Serviced Loan will become a Specially Serviced Loan.
If any Specially Serviced Loan, in accordance with its original terms or as modified in accordance with the PSA, becomes performing for at least three (3) consecutive Periodic Payments (provided that no additional event of default is foreseeable in the reasonable judgment of the special servicer and no other event or circumstance exists that causes such Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan to otherwise constitute a Specially Serviced Loan), the special servicer will be required to transfer servicing of such Specially Serviced Loan (a “Corrected Loan”) to the master servicer.
Asset Status Report
The special servicer will be required to prepare a report (an “Asset Status Report”) for each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and, if applicable, any Serviced Whole Loan that becomes a Specially Serviced Loan upon the earlier of (i) 60 days after the servicing of such Mortgage Loan is transferred to the special servicer and (ii) prior to taking action with respect to any Major Decision (or making a determination not to take action with respect to a Major Decision) with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan (the “Initial Delivery Date”) and will be required to prepare one or more additional Asset Status Reports with respect to any such Specially Serviced Loan subsequent to the issuance of a Final Asset Status Report to the extent that during the course of the resolution of such Specially Serviced Loan changes in strategy reflected in the initial Asset Status Report (or subsequent Final Asset Status Report) are necessary to reflect the then current recommendation as to how the Specially Serviced Loan might be returned to performing status or otherwise liquidated in accordance with the Servicing Standard (each such report a “Subsequent Asset Status Report”). Each Asset Status Report will be required to be delivered in electronic form to:
| ● | the Directing Holder (but only with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan and for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing); |
| ● | with respect to any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent such Serviced Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, to the master servicer of such securitization into which such Serviced Companion Loan has been sold or, to the extent such Serviced Companion Loan has not been included in a securitization transaction, to the holder of such Serviced Companion Loan; |
| ● | the operating advisor (but, other than with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan, only after the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event); |
| ● | the master servicer; and |
| ● | the 17g-5 Information Provider, which will be required to post such report to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. |
A summary of each Final Asset Status Report will be provided to the certificate administrator and the trustee.
An Asset Status Report prepared for each Specially Serviced Loan will be required to include, among other things, the following information:
| ● | summary of the status of such Specially Serviced Loan and any negotiations with the related borrower; |
| ● | a discussion of the legal and environmental considerations reasonably known to the special servicer, consistent with the Servicing Standard, that are applicable to the exercise of remedies and to the enforcement of any related guaranties or other collateral for the related Specially Serviced Loan and whether outside legal counsel has been retained; |
| ● | the most current rent roll and income or operating statement available for the related Mortgaged Property; |
| ● | (A) the special servicer’s recommendations on how such Specially Serviced Loan might be returned to performing status (including the modification of a monetary term, and any workout, restructure or debt forgiveness) and returned to the master servicer for regular servicing or foreclosed or otherwise realized upon (including any proposed sale of a Defaulted Loan or REO Property), (B) a description of any such proposed or taken actions, and (C) the alternative courses of action that were or are being considered by the special servicer in connection with the proposed or taken actions; |
| ● | the status of any foreclosure actions or other proceedings undertaken with respect to the Specially Serviced Loan, any proposed workouts and the status of any negotiations with respect to such workouts, and an assessment of the likelihood of additional defaults under the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan; |
| ● | a description of any amendment, modification or waiver of a material term of any ground lease (or any space lease or air rights lease, if applicable) or franchise agreement; |
| ● | the decision that the special servicer made, or intends or proposes to make, including a narrative analysis setting forth the special servicer’s rationale for its proposed decision, including its rejection of the alternatives; |
| ● | an analysis of whether or not taking such proposed action is reasonably likely to produce a greater recovery on a present value basis than not taking such action, setting forth (x) the basis on which the special servicer made such determination and (y) the net present value calculation and all related assumptions; |
| ● | the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property (and a copy of the last obtained appraisal of such Mortgaged Property) together with a description of any adjustments to the valuation of such Mortgaged Property made by the special servicer together with an explanation of those adjustments; and |
| ● | such other information as the special servicer deems relevant in light of the Servicing Standard. |
With respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, other than any applicable Excluded Loan, if no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder will have the right to disapprove the Asset Status Report prepared by the special servicer with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan within 10 business days after receipt of the Asset Status Report. If the Directing Holder does not disapprove an Asset Status Report within 10 days (or, in the case of an Asset Status Report prepared prior to making a determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default, 20 days) or if the special servicer makes a determination, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that the disapproval by the Directing Holder (communicated to the special servicer within 10 days) is not in the best interest of all the Certificateholders (taken as a collective whole), the special servicer will be required to implement the recommended action as outlined in the Asset Status Report. If the Directing Holder disapproves the Asset Status Report within the 10 business day period (or, in the case of an Asset Status Report prepared prior to making a determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default, 20 days) and the special servicer has not made the affirmative determination described above, the special servicer will be required to revise the Asset Status Report as soon as practicable thereafter, but in no event later than 30 days after the disapproval. The special servicer will be required to continue to revise the Asset Status Report until the Directing Holder fails to disapprove the revised Asset Status Report or until the special servicer makes a determination, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that the disapproval is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders (taken as a collective whole); provided that, if the Directing Holder has not approved the Asset Status Report for a period of 60 business days following the first submission of an Asset Status Report, the special servicer may act upon the most recently submitted form of Asset Status Report, if consistent with the Servicing Standard. The procedures described in this paragraph are collectively referred to as the “Directing Holder Approval Process”.
A “Final Asset Status Report” means, with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, the initial Asset Status Report, together with such other data or supporting information provided by the special servicer to the Directing Holder that does not include any communication (other than the Final Asset Status Report) between the special servicer and the Directing Holder with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan required to be delivered by the special servicer by the Initial Delivery Date or any Subsequent Asset Status Report, in each case, in the form fully approved or deemed approved, if applicable, by the Directing Holder pursuant to the Directing Holder Approval Process or following completion of the ASR Consultation Process, as applicable. For the avoidance of doubt, the special servicer may issue more than one Final Asset Status Report with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan in accordance with the procedures described above.
The special servicer will be required to notify the operating advisor of whether any Asset Status Report delivered to the operating advisor is a Final Asset Status Report, which notification may be satisfied by (i) delivery of an Asset Status Report that is either signed by the Directing Holder or that otherwise includes an indication that such Asset Status Report is deemed approved due to the passage of any required consent or consultation time period or (ii) such other method as reasonably agreed to by the operating advisor and the special servicer.
Prior to an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer will be required to promptly deliver each Final Asset Status Report to the operating advisor after the completion of the Directing Holder Approval Process.
While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event is continuing, the operating advisor will be required to provide comments to the special servicer in respect of each Asset Status Report, if any, within 10 business days following the later of (i) receipt of such asset status report or (ii) such related additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor, and propose possible alternative courses of action to the extent it determines such alternatives to be in the best interest of the Certificateholders (including any Certificateholders that are holders of the Controlling Class certificates), as a collective whole. The special servicer will be required to consider such alternative courses of action on a non-binding basis, if any, and any other feedback provided by the operating advisor (and for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder) in connection with the special servicer’s preparation of any asset status report that is provided while an Operating Advisor Consultation Event is continuing. The special servicer may revise the asset status report as it deems necessary to take
into account any input and/or comments from the operating advisor (and for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder), to the extent the special servicer determines that the operating advisor’s and/or Directing Holder’s input and/or recommendations are consistent with the Servicing Standard and in the best interest of the Certificateholders, as a collective whole. If the special servicer determines to revise any asset status report to take into account any input and/or comments from the operating advisor or the Directing Holder, the special servicer will be required to promptly deliver to the operating advisor and the Directing Holder the revised asset status report (until a Final Asset Status Report is issued). The procedures described in this paragraph are collectively referred to as the “ASR Consultation Process”. For additional information, see “—The Operating Advisor—Additional Duties of the Operating Advisor While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event Is Continuing”.
The special servicer will not be required to take or to refrain from taking any action because of any proposal, objection or comment by the operating advisor or, during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Holder, or a recommendation of the operating advisor or, during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Holder.
During the continuance of a Control Termination Event but for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder (except with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan) will be entitled to consult on a non-binding basis with the special servicer and propose alternative courses of action and provide other feedback in respect of any Asset Status Report. In addition, during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the operating advisor will consult on a non-binding basis with the special servicer and propose alternative courses of action and provide other feedback in respect of any Asset Status Report. After the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder will have no right to consult with the special servicer with respect to Asset Status Reports and the special servicer will send the Asset Status Report to the operating advisor and will only be obligated to consult with the operating advisor with respect to any Asset Status Report as described above. The special servicer may choose to revise the Asset Status Report as it deems reasonably necessary in accordance with the Servicing Standard to take into account any input and/or recommendations of the operating advisor or the Directing Holder during the applicable periods described above, but is under no obligation to follow any particular recommendation of the operating advisor or the Directing Holder.
The special servicer will implement the Final Asset Status Report.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related directing holder under the related Non-Serviced PSA will have approval and consultation rights with respect to any asset status report prepared by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA that are substantially similar, but not identical, to the approval and consultation rights of the Directing Holder with respect to the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Whole Loans. See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Realization Upon Mortgage Loans
If a payment default or material non-monetary default on a Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan has occurred and such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan, then, pursuant to the PSA, the special servicer, on behalf of the trustee, may, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the PSA, at any time institute foreclosure proceedings, exercise any power of sale contained in the related Mortgage, obtain a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise acquire title to the related Mortgaged Property, by operation of law or otherwise. The special servicer is not permitted, however, to cause the trustee to acquire title to any Mortgaged Property, have a receiver of rents appointed with respect to any Mortgaged Property or take any other action with respect to any Mortgaged Property that would cause the trustee, for the benefit of the Certificateholders, or any other specified person to be considered to hold title to, to be a “mortgagee-in-possession” of, or to be an “owner” or an “operator” of such Mortgaged Property within the meaning of certain federal environmental laws, unless the special servicer has determined in accordance with the Servicing Standard, based on an updated environmental assessment report prepared by a person who
regularly conducts environmental audits and performed within six (6) months prior to any such acquisition of title or other action (which report will be an expense of the issuing entity subject to the terms of the PSA) that:
(a) such Mortgaged Property is in compliance with applicable environmental laws or, if not, after consultation with an environmental consultant, that it would be in the best economic interest of the Certificateholders (and with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, the holder of each related Serviced Companion Loan), as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, Serviced Companion Loan holders constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan, to take such actions as are necessary to bring such Mortgaged Property in compliance with such laws, and
(b) there are no circumstances present at such Mortgaged Property relating to the use, management or disposal of any hazardous materials for which investigation, testing, monitoring, containment, clean-up or remediation could be required under any currently effective federal, state or local law or regulation, or that, if any such hazardous materials are present for which such action could be required, after consultation with an environmental consultant, it would be in the best economic interest of the Certificateholders (and with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, the holder of each related Serviced Companion Loan), as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, the Serviced Companion Loan holders constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan, to take such actions with respect to the affected Mortgaged Property.
Such requirement precludes enforcement of the security for the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan until a satisfactory environmental site assessment is obtained (or until any required remedial action is taken), but will decrease the likelihood that the issuing entity will become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at the Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the requirements of the PSA will effectively insulate the issuing entity from potential liability for a materially adverse environmental condition at any Mortgaged Property.
If title to any Mortgaged Property is acquired by the issuing entity (directly or through a single member limited liability company established for that purpose), the special servicer will be required to sell the Mortgaged Property prior to the close of the third calendar year beginning after the year of acquisition, unless (1) the IRS grants (or has not denied) an extension of time to sell the property or (2) the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee receive an opinion of independent counsel to the effect that the holding of the property by the Lower-Tier REMIC longer than the above-referenced three (3) year period will not result in the imposition of a tax on any Trust REMIC or cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC under the Code at any time that any certificate is outstanding. Subject to the foregoing and any other tax-related limitations, pursuant to the PSA, the special servicer will generally be required to attempt to sell any Mortgaged Property so acquired in accordance with the Servicing Standard. The special servicer will also be required to cause any Mortgaged Property acquired by the issuing entity to be administered so that it constitutes “foreclosure property” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(8) at all times, and that the sale of the property does not result in the receipt by the issuing entity of any income from nonpermitted assets as described in Code Section 860F(a)(2)(B). If the Lower-Tier REMIC acquires title to any Mortgaged Property, the special servicer, on behalf of the Lower-Tier REMIC, will retain, at the expense of the issuing entity, an independent contractor to manage and operate the property. The independent contractor generally will be permitted to perform construction (including renovation) on a foreclosed property only if the construction was more than 10% completed at the time default on the related Mortgage Loan became imminent. The retention of an independent contractor, however, will not relieve the special servicer of its obligation to manage the Mortgaged Property as required under the PSA.
In general, the special servicer will be obligated to cause any Mortgaged Property acquired as an REO Property to be operated and managed in a manner that would, in its reasonable judgment and in accordance with the Servicing Standard, maximize the issuing entity’s net after-tax proceeds from such property. Generally, none of the Trust REMICs will be taxable on income received with respect to a Mortgaged Property acquired by the issuing entity to the extent that it constitutes “rents from real
property”, within the meaning of Code Section 856(d) and Treasury regulations under the Code. Rents from real property include fixed rents and rents based on the gross receipts or sales of a tenant but do not include the portion of any rental based on the net income or profit of any tenant or sub-tenant. No determination has been made whether rent on any of the Mortgaged Properties meets this requirement. Rents from real property include charges for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real property, whether or not the charges are separately stated. Services furnished to the tenants of a particular building will be considered as customary if, in the geographic market in which the building is located, tenants in buildings which are of similar class are customarily provided with the service. No determination has been made whether the services furnished to the tenants of the Mortgaged Properties are “customary” within the meaning of applicable regulations. It is therefore possible that a portion of the rental income with respect to a Mortgaged Property owned by the issuing entity would not constitute rents from real property, or that none of such income would qualify if a separate charge is not stated for such non-customary services or they are not performed by an independent contractor. Rents from real property also do not include income from the operation of a trade or business on the Mortgaged Property, such as a hospitality property, or rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property if the rent attributable to personal property exceeds 15% of the total net rent for the taxable year. Any of the foregoing types of income may instead constitute “net income from foreclosure property”, which would be taxable to the Lower-Tier REMIC at the federal corporate rate (which, currently, is 21%) and may also be subject to state or local taxes. The PSA provides that the special servicer will be permitted to cause the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to Certificateholders is greater than another method of operating or net leasing the Mortgaged Property. Because these sources of income, if they exist, are already in place with respect to the Mortgaged Properties, it is generally viewed as beneficial to Certificateholders to permit the issuing entity to continue to earn them if it acquires a Mortgaged Property, even at the cost of this tax. These taxes would be chargeable against the related income for purposes of determining the proceeds available for distribution to holders of certificates. See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC—Prohibited Transactions”.
Under the PSA, the special servicer is required to establish and maintain one or more REO Accounts, to be held on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders and with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the holder of each related Serviced Companion Loan, for the retention of revenues and insurance proceeds derived from each REO Property. The special servicer is required to use the funds in the applicable REO Account to pay for the proper operation, management, maintenance and disposition of any REO Property, but only to the extent of amounts on deposit in the applicable REO Account relate to such REO Property. To the extent that amounts in the applicable REO Account in respect of any REO Property are insufficient to make such payments, the master servicer is required to make a Property Protection Advance, unless it determines such Property Protection Advance would be nonrecoverable. On the later of the date that is (x) on or prior to the Determination Date or (y) 2 business days after such amounts are received and properly identified and determined to be available, the special servicer is required to deposit (or remit to the master servicer for it to deposit) all amounts received in respect of each REO Property during such Collection Period, net of any amounts withdrawn to make any permitted disbursements, to the Collection Account; provided that the special servicer may retain in the applicable REO Account permitted reserves.
Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties
If the special servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that it would be in the best economic interests of the Certificateholders or, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, Certificateholders and any holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and Serviced Companion Loan holder constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan) to attempt to sell a Defaulted Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan,) and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan as described below, the special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for each Defaulted Loan on behalf of the Certificateholders and the holder of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan in such manner as will be reasonably likely to maximize the value
of the Defaulted Loan on a net present value basis. In the case of certain Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans, under certain limited circumstances permitted under the related Co-Lender Agreement, to the extent that such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is not sold together with the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan by the special servicer for the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the special servicer will be entitled to sell (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan, with the consent of the Directing Holder, if no Control Termination Event is continuing) such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan if it determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such action would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders. The special servicer is required to accept the first cash offer received from any person that constitutes a fair price for the Defaulted Loan. If multiple offers are received during the period designated by the special servicer for receipt of offers, the special servicer is required to select the highest offer. The special servicer is generally required to give the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the operating advisor and (other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan) the Directing Holder not less than 10 business days’ prior written notice of its intention to sell any such Defaulted Loan. Neither the trustee nor any of its affiliates may make an offer for or purchase any Defaulted Loan. “Defaulted Loan” means a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan that is a Specially Serviced Loan and (i) that is delinquent at least 60 days in respect of its Periodic Payments or delinquent in respect of its balloon payment, if any; provided that in respect of a balloon payment, such period will be 120 days after the related maturity date (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which the related balloon payment was due within which the refinancing or purchase referred to below is scheduled to occur pursuant to the commitment for refinancing or signed purchase agreement or on which such commitment or signed purchase agreement terminates) if the related borrower has provided the master servicer (and the master servicer will be required to promptly forward a copy of such document to the special servicer, if it is not evident that a copy has been delivered to the special servicer), on or prior to the related maturity date, with (a) a written and fully executed (subject only to customary final closing conditions) commitment, letter of intent, or otherwise binding application for refinancing or similar document that is, in each case, binding upon an acceptable lender or (b) a signed purchase agreement, in the case of clause (a) or (b), reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the master servicer and (for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing) the Directing Holder, which provides that such refinancing or purchase will occur within 120 days of such related maturity date; and, in either case, such delinquency is to be determined without giving effect to any grace period permitted by the related Mortgage or Mortgage Note and without regard to any acceleration of payments under the related Mortgage and Mortgage Note or (ii) as to which the master servicer or the special servicer has, by written notice to the related borrower, accelerated the maturity of the indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Note.
The special servicer will be required to determine whether any cash offer constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Loan if the highest offeror is a person other than an Interested Person. In determining whether any offer from a person other than an Interested Person constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Loan, the special servicer will be required to take into account (in addition to the results of any appraisal, updated appraisal or narrative appraisal that it may have obtained pursuant to the PSA within the prior 9 months), among other factors, the period and amount of the occupancy level and physical condition of the related Mortgaged Property and the state of the local economy.
If the highest offeror is an Interested Person (provided that the trustee may not be a offeror), then the trustee, subject to any additional conditions in an applicable Co-Lender Agreement, will be required to determine whether the cash offer constitutes a fair price; provided, however, that no offer from an Interested Person will constitute a fair price unless (A) it is the highest offer received and (B) if the offer is less than the applicable Purchase Price, at least two (2) other offers are received from independent third parties. In determining whether any offer received from an Interested Person represents a fair price for any such Defaulted Loan, the trustee will be supplied with and will be required to rely on the most recent appraisal or updated appraisal conducted in accordance with the PSA within the preceding 9-month period or, in the absence of any such appraisal, on a new appraisal. Except as provided in the following paragraph, the cost of any appraisal will be covered by, and will be reimbursable as, a Property Protection Advance by the master servicer.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding paragraph to the contrary, if the trustee is required to determine whether a cash offer by an Interested Person constitutes a fair price, the trustee may (at its option and at the expense of the Interested Person) designate an independent third party expert in real estate or commercial mortgage loan matters with at least 5 years’ experience in valuing or investing in loans similar to the subject Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be, that has been selected with reasonable care by the trustee to determine if such cash offer constitutes a fair price for such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan. If the trustee designates such a third party to make such determination, the trustee will be entitled to rely conclusively upon such third party’s determination. The reasonable costs of all appraisals, inspection reports and broker opinions of value incurred by any such third party pursuant to this paragraph will be covered by, and will be paid in advance of any such determination by the Interested Person; provided that the trustee will not engage a third party expert whose fees exceed a commercially reasonable amount as determined by the trustee.
The special servicer is required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for each REO Property on behalf of the Certificateholders and any related holders(s) of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (if applicable) and to sell each REO Property in the same manner as with respect to a Defaulted Loan.
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing paragraphs, the special servicer will not be required to accept the highest cash offer for a Defaulted Loan or REO Property if the special servicer determines (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan, in consultation with the Directing Holder (unless a Consultation Termination Event exists), and, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, any related Companion Loan Holder(s)), in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a sale of a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, any related Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan), and the special servicer may accept a lower offer (from any person other than itself or an affiliate) if it determines, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that acceptance of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, any related Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any related Companion Loan).
An “Interested Person” is the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Directing Holder, any borrower sponsor, any Borrower Party, any independent contractor engaged by the special servicer or any known affiliate of any of the preceding entities, and, with respect to a Whole Loan if it is a Defaulted Loan, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer (or any independent contractor engaged by the special servicer), or the trustee for the securitization of a Companion Loan, and each related Companion Loan Holder or its representative, any holder of a related mezzanine loan, or any known affiliate of any such party described above.
With respect to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement(s), if such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan, and if the special servicer determines to sell the related Mortgage Loan in accordance with the discussion in this “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties” section, then the special servicer will be required to sell any related Pari Passu Companion Loan together with such Mortgage Loan as one whole loan. The special servicer will not be permitted to sell the related Mortgage Loan together with the related Pari Passu Companion Loan if such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan without the consent of the holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan, unless the special servicer complies with certain notice and delivery requirements set forth in the PSA. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans.”
In addition, with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if such Mortgage Loan has become a defaulted loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will generally have the right to sell such Mortgage Loan together with any related Companion Loan as notes evidencing one whole loan. The issuing entity, as the holder of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will have the right to consent to such sale, provided that the Non-Serviced Special Servicer may sell the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan without such consent if the required notices and information regarding such sale are provided to the issuing entity in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement. The Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise such consent right so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, and if a Control Termination Event is continuing, the special servicer will exercise such consent rights. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder”.
In addition, with respect to the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, if the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan, the special servicer (or, on or after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the special servicer under the Servicing Shift PSA) will be required to sell such Mortgage Loan together with the related Companion Loans as notes evidencing one whole loan, in accordance with the provisions of the related Co-Lender Agreement and the PSA or the Servicing Shift PSA, as the case may be.
To the extent that Liquidation Proceeds collected with respect to any Mortgage Loan are less than the sum of (1) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, (2) interest accrued thereon and (3) the aggregate amount of outstanding reimbursable expenses (including any (i) unpaid servicing compensation, (ii) unreimbursed Property Protection Advances, (iii) accrued and unpaid interest on all Advances and (iv) additional expenses of the issuing entity) incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan, the issuing entity will realize a loss in the amount of the shortfall. The trustee, the master servicer and/or the special servicer will be entitled to reimbursement out of the Liquidation Proceeds recovered on any Mortgage Loan, prior to the distribution of those Liquidation Proceeds to Certificateholders, of any and all amounts that represent unpaid servicing compensation in respect of the related Mortgage Loan, certain unreimbursed expenses incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan and any unreimbursed Advances (including interest on Advances) made with respect to the Mortgage Loan. In addition, amounts otherwise distributable on the certificates will be further reduced by interest payable to the master servicer, the special servicer or trustee on these Advances.
The Directing Holder
General
Subject to the rights of the holder of any related Companion Loan under the related Co-Lender Agreement as described under “—Rights of Holders of Companion Loans” below, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder (a) will be entitled to advise (1) the special servicer, with respect to all Specially Serviced Loans (other than any applicable Excluded Loan or the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) as to all Major Decisions, (2) the special servicer, with respect to Major Decisions relating to non-Specially Serviced Loans other than any applicable Excluded Loan or the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, and (3) generally, the special servicer with respect to all Mortgage Loans for which an extension of maturity is being considered by the special servicer, and (b) will have the right to replace the special servicer with or without cause and have certain other rights under the PSA, each as described below. With respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan with respect to the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class, upon the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Holder will have certain consultation rights only, and upon the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder will not have any consent or consultation rights, as further described below.
The “Controlling Class Representative” will be the Controlling Class Certificateholder (or its representative) selected by more than 50% of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, by Certificate Balance, as determined by the certificate registrar from time to time; provided, however, that
(1) absent that selection, or
(2) until a Controlling Class Representative is so selected, or
(3) upon receipt of a notice from a majority of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, by Certificate Balance, that a Controlling Class Representative is no longer designated, then the Controlling Class Certificateholder that represents that it owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class (with evidence of ownership), or its representative, will be the Controlling Class Representative;
provided, however, that (i) in the case of clause (3), in the event no one holder owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class, then there will be no Controlling Class Representative until appointed in accordance with the terms of the PSA, and (ii) the certificate administrator and the other parties to the PSA will be entitled to assume that the identity of the Controlling Class Representative has not changed until such parties receive written notice of a replacement of the Controlling Class Representative from a party holding the requisite interest in the Controlling Class, or the resignation of the then-current Controlling Class Representative.
The initial Controlling Class Representative is expected to be 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (or an affiliate thereof).
The initial Controlling Class Representative, and any subsequent Controlling Class Representative, is hereby deemed to have agreed and acknowledged by virtue of its purchase of a Control Eligible Certificate (or beneficial ownership interest in such certificate) that its identity will be reported monthly by the certificate administrator in the Distribution Date Statement.
The “Directing Holder” means (1) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, any applicable Excluded Loan and the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan (other than the Servicing Shift Whole Loan), the Controlling Class Representative and (2) with respect to the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, prior to the occurrence of the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the related Loan-Specific Directing Holder.
The “Loan-Specific Directing Holder” means, with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the “controlling holder”, the “directing certificateholder”, the “directing holder”, “directing lender” or any analogous concept under the related Co-Lender Agreement.
Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the “Loan-Specific Directing Holder” with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan will initially be the holder of the related Controlling Companion Loan, which is Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. with respect to the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan. On or after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, there will be no Loan-Specific Directing Holder under the PSA with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
A “Controlling Class Certificateholder” is each holder (or Certificate Owner, if applicable) of a certificate of the Controlling Class as determined by the certificate registrar from time to time, upon request by any party to the PSA.
The “Controlling Class” will be, as of any time of determination, the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates then-outstanding that has an aggregate Certificate Balance (as notionally reduced by any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocable to such class) at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class; provided that if, at any time, the Certificate Balances of all Control Eligible Certificates, as notionally reduced by any Appraisal Reduction Amounts (but without regard to any Collateral Deficiency Amount) allocable to such classes, have been reduced to zero, the Controlling Class will be the most senior class of Control Eligible Certificates that has a principal balance greater than
zero; provided, further that if at any time the Certificate Balance of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans, then the “Controlling Class” will be the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates that has an aggregate Certificate Balance greater than zero without regard to the application of Appraisal Reduction Amounts (or any Collateral Deficiency Amount) to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of such Class. The Controlling Class as of the Closing Date will be the Class J-RR certificates.
The “Control Eligible Certificates” will be the Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates.
The master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator, the trustee or any Certificateholder may request that the certificate registrar determine which class of Control Eligible Certificates is the then-current Controlling Class and the certificate registrar must thereafter provide such information to the requesting party. The depositor, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and, for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Controlling Class Representative, may request that the certificate administrator provide, and the certificate administrator must so provide, a list of the holders (or Certificate Owners, if applicable) of the Controlling Class. The trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer and the operating advisor may each rely on any such list so provided.
In the event that no Directing Holder has been appointed or identified to the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, and the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, has attempted to obtain such information from the certificate administrator and no such entity has been identified to the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, then until such time as the new Directing Holder is identified, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will have no duty to consult with, provide notice to, or seek the approval or consent of any such Directing Holder, as the case may be.
With respect to any matter for which the consent or consultation of the Directing Holder is required, to the extent no specific time period for deemed consent or deemed waiver of consultation rights is expressly stated in the PSA, in the event no response from the Directing Holder is received within ten (10) days following the written request for input or any required consent or consultation, the Directing Holder will be deemed to have consented to or approved the specific matter; provided, however, that the failure of the Directing Holder to respond will not affect any future matters with respect to the applicable Mortgage Loan or any other Mortgage Loan.
Major Decisions
Except as otherwise described under “—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” and “—Servicing Override” below and subject to the rights of the holder of any related Companion Loan under the related Co-Lender Agreement as described under “—Rights of Holders of Companion Loans” below, (a) the master servicer will not be permitted to take any action that constitutes a Special Servicer Decision or a Major Decision unless it has obtained the consent of the special servicer, who will have 10 days (or 20 days with respect to the determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default) (from the date that the special servicer receives the information from the master servicer) to analyze and make a recommendation regarding any of the following actions (subject, however, to the right of the special servicer to process directly any of the following actions as set forth in the PSA) (provided that, in the event that the special servicer and the master servicer have mutually agreed that the master servicer will determine and process the request with respect to the subject following action, if the special servicer does not consent, or notify the master servicer that it will not consent, to any of the following actions within the required 10 days or 20 days, as applicable, the special servicer will be deemed to have consented to the subject following action) and (b) prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the special servicer will not be permitted to take any action that constitutes a Major Decision and the special servicer will not be permitted to consent to the master servicer’s taking of any Major Decisions as to which the Directing Holder has objected in writing within 10 days (or in the case of a determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default, 20 days) after
receipt of the Major Decision Reporting Package from the special servicer and all information reasonably requested by the Directing Holder in order to grant or withhold such consent and reasonably available to the special servicer (provided that if such written objection has not been received by the special servicer within such 10 day (or 20-day) period, the Directing Holder will be deemed to have approved such action); provided that the foregoing consent rights of the Directing Holder will not apply to any Excluded Loan as to the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class.
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, and with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan solely to the extent explicitly stated below, each of the following is a “Major Decision”:
(i) any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion (which may include acquisition of an REO Property) of the ownership of properties securing any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and Serviced Companion Loan that comes into and continues in default;
(ii) initiation of judicial, bankruptcy or similar proceedings under the related Mortgage Loan documents or with respect to the related borrower or Mortgaged Property following a default or event of default with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan or any acceleration of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be;
(iii) any modification, consent to a modification or waiver of any monetary term (including, without limitation, reserve amounts and cash flow triggers, but excluding late fees and default interest) or material non-monetary term (including, without limitation, the timing of payments, acceptance of discounted payoffs, provisions governing the type, nature or amount of insurance coverage required to be obtained and maintained by the related borrower and provisions regarding the receipt of financial statements (other than an immaterial timing waiver including late financial statements); but excluding waivers of default interest or late payment charges) of a Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan as expressly permitted pursuant to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents;
(iv) following a default or an event of default with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, any exercise of remedies, including the acceleration of the Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan or initiation of any proceedings, judicial or otherwise, under the related Mortgage Loan documents;
(v) any sale of a Defaulted Loan and any related defaulted Companion Loan, or any REO Property (other than in connection with the termination of the issuing entity as described under “—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”) or a defaulted Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan that the special servicer is permitted to sell in accordance with the PSA, in each case, for less than the applicable Purchase Price (excluding any expenses incurred by the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator and the trustee in respect of the breach or document defect giving rise to a repurchase or substitution obligation under an MLPA);
(vi) any determination to bring an REO Property into compliance with applicable environmental laws or to otherwise address hazardous material located at an REO Property;
(vii) approving requests for any release of collateral or any acceptance of substitute or additional collateral for a Mortgage Loan if lender discretion is required (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are satisfied); provided that, in any case, Major Decisions will not include (A) grants of easements or rights of way that do not materially affect the use or value of the Mortgaged Property or the borrower’s ability to make any payments with respect to the Mortgage Loan; (B) the release, substitution or addition of collateral securing any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan in connection with a
defeasance of such collateral; or (C) requests that are related to any condemnation action that is pending, or threatened in writing, and would affect a non-material portion of the Mortgaged Property;
(viii) any waiver of a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or a Serviced Whole Loan if lender consent is required, or any consent to such a waiver or consent to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property or interests in the borrower or consent to the incurrence of additional debt, other than any such transfer or incurrence of debt as may be effected without the consent of the lender under the related loan agreement or related to an immaterial easement, right of way or similar agreement;
(ix) any property management company changes with respect to a Mortgage Loan, including, without limitation, approval of the termination of a manager and appointment of a new property manager, in each case, if the replacement property manager is a Borrower Party or the Mortgage Loan has an outstanding principal balance equal to or greater than $10,000,000;
(x) any franchise changes with respect to a Mortgage Loan for which the lender is required to consent or approve such changes under the related Mortgage Loan documents;
(xi) any acceptance of an assumption agreement or any other agreement permitting a transfer of interests in a borrower or guarantor releasing a borrower or guarantor from liability under a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan other than pursuant to the specific terms of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;
(xii) any modification, amendment, consent to a modification or waiver of any term of any intercreditor, co-lender or similar agreement with any mezzanine lender, subordinate debt holder or Pari Passu Companion Loan holder related to a Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan (which will not include any amendments to split or re-size notes consistent with the terms of any Co-Lender Agreement as to which the consent of the issuing entity is not required), or any action to enforce rights (or decision not to enforce rights) with respect thereto; provided, however, that any such modification or amendment that would adversely impact the master servicer will additionally require the consent of the master servicer as a condition to its effectiveness;
(xiii) agreeing to any modification, waiver, consent or amendment of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan in connection with a defeasance if such proposed modification, waiver, consent or amendment is with respect to (A) waiver of a mortgage loan event of default (but excluding non-monetary events of default other than defaults relating to transfers of interest in the borrower or the existing collateral or material modifications of the existing collateral), (B) a modification of the type of defeasance collateral required under the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan documents such that defeasance collateral other than direct, non-callable obligations of the United States would be permitted or (C) a modification that would permit a principal prepayment instead of defeasance if the applicable Mortgage Loan documents do not otherwise permit such principal prepayment;
(xiv) approving rights of way and easements that materially affect the use or value of a Mortgaged Property or the borrower’s ability to make payments with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and approving consent to subordination of the related Mortgage Loan to such rights of way and easements;
(xv) approving any transfers of an interest in the borrower under a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), unless such transfer (i) is allowed under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents without the exercise of any lender approval or discretion other than confirming the satisfaction of the other conditions to the transfer set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents that do not include any other approval or exercise of discretion, including a consent to transfer to any subsidiary or affiliate of such borrower or to a person acquiring less
than a majority interest in such borrower and (ii) does not involve incurring new mezzanine financing or a change in control of the borrower;
(xvi) any determination of Acceptable Insurance Default; and
(xvii) any consent to incurrence of additional debt by a borrower or mezzanine debt by a direct or indirect parent of a borrower, in circumstances where no lender discretion is required other than confirming that the conditions in the related Mortgage Loan documents have been satisfied (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are satisfied).
However, if the special servicer determines that emergency action is necessary to protect the related Mortgaged Property or the interests of the Certificateholders and any related Serviced Companion Noteholder, or if a failure to take any such action at such time would be inconsistent with the Servicing Standard, the special servicer may take actions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property before the expiration of the related consent or consultation period if the special servicer reasonably determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that failure to take such actions before the expiration of the relevant period would materially and adversely affect the interest of the Certificateholders and the related Serviced Companion Noteholder (if applicable) and the special servicer has made a reasonable effort, if no Control Termination Event is continuing and other than if an Excluded Loan is involved, to contact the Directing Holder.
“Serviced Companion Noteholder” means a holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, with respect to each Whole Loan, the master servicer and special servicer will have no rights beyond than the rights granted to the holder of the related Mortgage Loan pursuant to the Co-Lender Agreement. With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan or the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the rights of the master servicer, special servicer and Directing Holder will be limited as described in “—Rights of the Directing Holder with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Servicing Shift Whole Loan”.
In connection with any Major Decision processed by the special servicer, the special servicer will provide any final Major Decision Reporting Package prepared by it to the master servicer and the operating advisor promptly after the Directing Holder’s approval of such final Major Decision Reporting Package. During the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event (whether or not a Control Termination Event is continuing), the special servicer will be required to provide each Major Decision Reporting Package to the operating advisor simultaneously with the special servicer’s written request for the operating advisor’s input regarding the related Major Decision (which written request and Major Decision Reporting Package may be delivered in one notice), as set forth under “—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” below. With respect to any particular Major Decision and/or related Major Decision Reporting Package or any Asset Status Report required to be delivered by the special servicer to the operating advisor, the special servicer will be required to make available to the operating advisor a servicing officer with the relevant knowledge regarding the applicable Mortgage Loan and such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report in order to address reasonable questions that the operating advisor may have relating to, among other things, such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Holder will remain entitled to receive any notices, reports or information to which it is entitled, and the special servicer and any other applicable party will be required to consult (on a non-binding basis) with the Directing Holder (other than with respect to any Excluded Loan as to the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class) in connection with any action to be taken or refrained from being taken in accordance with the PSA. After the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event (and at any time with respect to any Excluded Loan with respect the Directing Holder or the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class), the Directing Holder will have no direction, consultation or consent rights and no right to receive any notices, reports or information (other
than notices, reports or information required to be delivered to all Certificateholders) or any other rights as Directing Holder.
“Major Decision Reporting Package” means, with respect to any Major Decision which it is processing, a written report by the master servicer or the special servicer (which, in the discretion of the special servicer, may be in the form of an Asset Status Report), as applicable, describing in reasonable detail (i) the background and circumstances requiring action of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, and (ii) the proposed course of action recommended.
Asset Status Report
So long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder will have the right to disapprove the Asset Status Report prepared by the special servicer with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan. If a Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Controlling Class Representative will have no right to consult with the special servicer with respect to the Asset Status Reports.
Replacement of Special Servicer
So long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder will have the right to replace the special servicer with or without cause as described under “—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause” and “—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” below.
Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event
If a Control Termination Event is continuing, but for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be required to obtain the consent of the Directing Holder with respect to any of the Major Decisions or Asset Status Reports, but will be required to consult with the Directing Holder in connection with any Major Decision that it is processing or, in the case of the special servicer, any Asset Status Report (or any other matter for which the consent of the Directing Holder would have been required or for which the Directing Holder would have the right to direct the master servicer or the special servicer if no Control Termination Event was continuing) and to consider alternative actions recommended by the Directing Holder in respect of such Major Decision or Asset Status Report (or such other matter). Such consultation will not be binding on the master servicer or the special servicer. In the event the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, receives no response from the Directing Holder within 10 days following the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s written request for input (which initial request is required to include the related Major Decision Reporting Package) on any required consultation, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will not be obligated to consult with the Directing Holder on the specific matter; provided, however, that the failure of the Directing Holder to respond will not relieve the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, from consulting with the Directing Holder on any future matters with respect to the applicable Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan or any other Mortgage Loan. With respect to any Excluded Special Servicer Loan (that is not also an applicable Excluded Loan), if any, the Directing Holder (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) will be required to select an Excluded Special Servicer with respect to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan. During the continuance of a Control Termination Event or if at any time the applicable Excluded Special Servicer Loan is also an applicable Excluded Loan, the resigning special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to select the related Excluded Special Servicer. The resigning special servicer will not have any liability with respect to the actions or inactions of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer or with respect to the identity of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer.
In addition, if an Operating Advisor Consultation Event is continuing, the special servicer will also be required to consult with the operating advisor in connection with any Major Decision that it is processing or for which its consent is required (and such other matters that are subject to consultation rights of the operating advisor pursuant to the PSA) and to consider alternative actions recommended by the operating advisor in respect of such Major Decision; provided that such consultation is on a non-binding basis. In the event the special servicer receives no response from the operating advisor within 10 days following the later of (i) its written request for input (which request is required to include the related Major Decision Reporting Package) on any required consultation and (ii) delivery of all such additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor that is in possession of the special servicer related to the subject matter of such consultation, the special servicer will not be obligated to consult with the operating advisor on the specific matter; provided, however, that the failure of the operating advisor to respond will not relieve the special servicer from consulting with the operating advisor on any future matters with respect to the applicable Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan or any other Mortgage Loan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this prospectus, with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan related to the Controlling Class Representative (regardless of whether an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing), the special servicer or the related Excluded Special Servicer, as applicable, will be required to consult with the operating advisor, on a non-binding basis, in connection with the related transactions involving proposed Major Decisions that it is processing or for which its consent is required and consider alternative actions recommended by the operating advisor, in respect thereof, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the PSA for consulting with the operating advisor.
If a Consultation Termination Event is continuing, no class of certificates will act as the Controlling Class, and the Controlling Class Representative will have no consultation or consent rights under the PSA and will have no right to receive any notices, reports or information (other than notices, reports or information required to be delivered to all Certificateholders) or any other rights as Controlling Class Representative under the PSA. The special servicer will nonetheless be required to consult with the operating advisor in connection with Major Decisions that it is processing or for which its consent is required, asset status reports and other material special servicing actions to the extent set forth in the PSA, and no Controlling Class Certificateholder will be recognized or have any right to approve or be consulted with respect to asset status reports or material special servicer actions.
A “Control Termination Event” will occur with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, in each case excluding the Servicing Shift Whole Loan (and the Mortgage Loan and Companion Loans, if applicable, composing each such Whole Loan), when one or more of the following is true: (i) the Class F-RR certificates have a Certificate Balance (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of such class) of less than 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class or (ii) when such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan is an applicable Excluded Loan; provided, further, that no Control Termination Event may occur with respect to the applicable Loan-Specific Directing Holder related to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan and the term “Control Termination Event” will not be applicable to such Loan-Specific Directing Holder related to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan; provided further, that, if at any time, the Certificate Balance of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans, then no Control Termination Event will be deemed to occur.
A “Consultation Termination Event” will occur with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, in each case excluding the Servicing Shift Whole Loan (and the Mortgage Loan and Companion Loans, if applicable, composing each such Whole Loan), when one or more of the following is true: (i) there is no class of Control Eligible Certificates that has a then-outstanding Certificate Balance at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class, in each case, without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts or (ii) when such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan is an applicable Excluded Loan; and provided, further, that, no Consultation Termination Event may occur with respect to the applicable Loan-Specific Directing Holder related to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan and the term “Consultation Termination Event” will not be applicable to such Loan-Specific Directing Holder related to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan; provided further, that if at any time, the Certificate Balance of
the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans, then no Consultation Termination Event will be deemed to occur.
With respect to any applicable Excluded Loan, the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder will not have any consent or consultation rights with respect to the servicing of such Excluded Loan and a Control Termination Event and Consultation Termination Event will be deemed to have occurred with respect to such Excluded Loan.
For a description of certain restrictions on any modification, waiver or amendment to the Mortgage Loan documents, see “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments” above.
Servicing Override
In the event that the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, determines that immediate action with respect to any Major Decision (or any other matter requiring consent of the Directing Holder with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event in the PSA (or any matter requiring consultation with the Directing Holder or the operating advisor)) is necessary to protect the interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the interest of the Certificateholders and the holders of any related Serviced Companion Loan), as a collective whole (taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any Companion Loans), the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, may take any such action without waiting for the Directing Holder’s response (or without waiting to consult with the Directing Holder or the operating advisor, as the case may be); provided that the special servicer or master servicer, as applicable, provides the Directing Holder (or the operating advisor, if applicable) with prompt written notice following such action including a reasonably detailed explanation of the basis for such action.
In addition, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer (i) will be required to take or refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions or objections from the Directing Holder or Controlling Class Representative or (ii) may follow any advice or consultation provided by the Directing Holder or Controlling Class Representative or the holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (or its representative) that would (1) cause it to violate any applicable law, the related Mortgage Loan documents, any related Co-Lender Agreement, the PSA, including the Servicing Standard, or the REMIC provisions, (2) expose the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the issuing entity or the trustee to liability, (3) materially expand the scope of responsibilities of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, under the PSA or (4) cause the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, to act, or fail to act, in a manner which in the reasonable judgment of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, subject to the rights of the holders of any related Companion Loan, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”).
Rights of Holders of Companion Loans
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan or Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the Controlling Class Representative will not be entitled to exercise the rights described above, but such rights, or rights substantially similar to those rights, will be exercisable by the related directing holder under the related Non-Serviced PSA. The issuing entity, as the holder of each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, has non-binding consultation rights with respect to certain major decisions relating to each Non-Serviced Whole Loan or the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, as applicable, and, other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan, so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise such consultation rights of the issuing entity pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. In the event a Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the special servicer will be required to exercise such consultation rights of the issuing entity pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. See also “Description of
the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
With respect to a Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan that is subject to a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the holder of the Pari Passu Companion Loan has non-binding consultation rights with respect to certain major decisions and certain rights in connection with the sale of such Serviced Whole Loan if it has become a Defaulted Loan, as provided in the applicable Co-Lender Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”.
Limitation on Liability of Directing Holder
The Directing Holder will not be liable to the issuing entity or the Certificateholders for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action, or for errors in judgment. However, the Directing Holder will not be protected against any liability to the Controlling Class Certificateholders that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of duties or by reason of reckless disregard of obligations or duties owed to the Controlling Class Certificateholders.
Each Certificateholder will acknowledge and agree, by its acceptance of its certificates, that the Directing Holder:
(a) may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;
(b) may act solely in the interests of the Controlling Class Certificateholders;
(c) does not have any liability or duties to the holders of any class of certificates other than the Controlling Class;
(d) may take actions that favor the interests of the Controlling Class Certificateholders over the interests of the holders of one or more other classes of certificates; and
(e) will have no liability whatsoever (other than to a Controlling Class Certificateholder, to the extent the Controlling Class Representative is the Directing Holder) for having so acted as set forth in (a) through (d) above, and no Certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the Directing Holder or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of the Directing Holder for having so acted.
The taking of, or refraining from taking, any action by the master servicer or special servicer in accordance with the direction of or approval of the Directing Holder, which does not violate the terms of any Mortgage Loan, any law or the Servicing Standard or the provisions of the PSA or the related Co-Lender Agreement, will not result in any liability on the part of the master servicer or the special servicer.
Each Certificateholder will acknowledge and agree, by its acceptance of its certificates, that the Loan-Specific Directing Holder and the holders of the Non-Serviced Companion Loan(s) or a Companion Loan that is part of a Servicing Shift Whole Loan or their respective designees (e.g. the related directing holder under the related Non-Serviced PSA) will have limitations on liability with respect to actions taken in connection with the related Mortgage Loan similar to the limitations of the Directing Holder described above pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and the related Non-Serviced PSA. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
The Operating Advisor
General
The operating advisor will act solely as a contracting party to the extent set forth in the PSA, and in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard, and will have no fiduciary duty to any party. The operating advisor’s duties will be limited to its specific duties under the PSA, and the operating advisor will have no duty or liability to any particular class of certificates or any Certificateholder. The operating advisor is not the special servicer, the master servicer or a sub-servicer and will not be charged with changing the outcome on any particular decision with respect to a Mortgage Loan. By purchasing a certificate, potential investors acknowledge and agree that there could be a variety of activities or decisions made with respect to, or multiple strategies to resolve a Mortgage Loan and that the goal of the operating advisor’s participation is to provide additional oversight with respect to the special servicer’s compliance with the Servicing Standard in making its determinations as to which strategy to execute.
Potential investors should note that the operating advisor is not an “advisor” for any purpose other than as specifically set forth in the PSA and is not an advisor to any person, including without limitation any Certificateholder. For the avoidance of doubt, the operating advisor is not an “investment adviser” within the meaning of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or a “broker” or “dealer” within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment”.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights as operating advisor under the PSA for this transaction with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan (each of which will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) or any related REO Properties.
In addition and for the avoidance of doubt, although the operating advisor may have certain consultation duties with the special servicer with respect to certain Major Decisions processed by the master servicer (as later described), the operating advisor will have no obligations or responsibility at any time to review or assess the actions of the master servicer for compliance with the Servicing Standard, and the operating advisor will not be required to consider such master servicer actions in connection with any Operating Advisor Annual Report. Meanwhile, the operating advisors or equivalent parties (if any) under the applicable Non-Serviced PSA have certain obligations and consultation rights with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan. Furthermore, the operating advisor will have no obligation or responsibility at any time to review or assess the actions of the master servicer for compliance with the Servicing Standard, and the operating advisor will not be required to consider such master servicer actions in connection with any annual report.
Duties of Operating Advisor In General
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, the operating advisor’s obligations will generally consist of the following:
(a) reviewing (i) the actions of the special servicer with respect to a Mortgage Loan when it is a Specially Serviced Loan and (ii) during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the actions of the special servicer with respect to Major Decisions relating to a Mortgage Loan when it is not a Specially Serviced Loan and processed by the special servicer or for which the special servicer’s consent is required, as described in “—The Directing Holder—Major Decisions” above;
(b) reviewing (i) all reports by the special servicer made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website and (ii) each Asset Status Report (during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event) and Final Asset Status Report;
(c) promptly recalculating the accuracy of the mathematical calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portion of the applicable formulas required to be utilized in connection with: (1) any Appraisal Reduction Amount or (2) net present value calculations used in the special servicer’s determination of what course of action to take in connection with the workout or liquidation of a Mortgage Loan when it is a Specially Serviced Loan; and
(d) preparing an annual report (if, at any time during the prior calendar year (i) a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan was a Specially Serviced Loan or (ii) the operating advisor was entitled to consult with the special servicer with respect to a Major Decision) generally in the form attached to this prospectus as Annex C, to be provided to the trustee, the master servicer, the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) and the certificate administrator (and made available through the certificate administrator’s website) in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard, as described in “—Annual Report”.
In connection with the performance of the duties described in clause (c) above:
(i) after the calculation has been finalized (and if an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing prior to the utilization by the special servicer), the special servicer will be required to deliver the foregoing calculations together with information and support materials (including such additional information that is reasonably requested by the operating advisor to confirm the mathematical accuracy of such calculations, but not including any Privileged Information) to the operating advisor;
(ii) if the operating advisor does not agree with the mathematical calculations or the application of the applicable non-discretionary portions of the formula required to be utilized for such calculation in any material respect, the operating advisor and the special servicer will be required to consult with each other in order to resolve any material inaccuracy in the mathematical calculations or the application of the non-discretionary portions of the related formula in arriving at those mathematical calculations or any disagreement; and
(iii) if the operating advisor and the special servicer are not able to resolve such matters, the operating advisor will be required to promptly notify the certificate administrator and the certificate administrator will be required to examine the calculations and supporting materials provided by the special servicer and the operating advisor and determine which calculation is to apply and will provide such parties prompt written notice of its determination.
Prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the operating advisor review will be limited to an after-the-action review of the reports and material described above (together with any additional information and material reviewed by the operating advisor), and, therefore, it will have no involvement with respect to collateral substitutions, assignments, workouts, modifications, consents, waivers, lockbox management, insurance policies, borrower substitutions, lease changes, additional borrower debt, defeasances, property management changes, releases from escrow, assumptions and other similar actions that the special servicer may perform under the PSA and will have no obligations at any time with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan. In addition, with respect to the operating advisor's review of net present value and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations as described above, the operating advisor's recalculation will not take into account the reasonableness of the special servicer's property and borrower performance assumptions or other similar discretionary portions of the net present value calculation and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculation.
With respect to the determination of whether an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, or has terminated, the operating advisor is entitled to rely solely on its receipt from the certificate administrator of notice pursuant to the PSA (which includes notices posted to the certificate administrator’s website), and, with respect to any obligations of the operating advisor that are performed only after the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the operating advisor will have no obligation to perform any such duties until the receipt of such notice or actual knowledge of the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event.
The “Operating Advisor Standard” means the requirement that the operating advisor must act solely on behalf of the issuing entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the Certificateholders and, with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan for the benefit of the holders of any related Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and Companion Loan Holders constituted a single lender, taking into account the pari passu nature of any related Pari Passu Companion Loan and the subordinate nature of any related Subordinate Companion Loan), and not to holders of any particular class of certificates (as determined by the operating advisor in the exercise of its good faith and reasonable judgment), but without regard to any conflict of interest arising from any relationship that the operating advisor or any of its affiliates may have with any of the underlying borrowers, property managers, any sponsor, any mortgage loan seller, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer, the Directing Holder, any Certificateholder or any of their respective affiliates.
Annual Report
Based on the operating advisor’s review of any Assessment of Compliance, any Attestation Report, any Major Decision Reporting Package and/or Asset Status Report (in each case, during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), any Final Asset Status Report and other reports by the special servicer made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website during the prior calendar year, the operating advisor will (if, at any time during the prior calendar year (i) any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) was a Specially Serviced Loan or (ii) the operating advisor was entitled to consult with the special servicer with respect to any Major Decision) prepare an annual report substantially in the form attached to this prospectus as Annex C (the “Operating Advisor Annual Report”) to be provided to the depositor, the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) and the certificate administrator for the benefit of the Certificateholders (and made available through the certificate administrator’s website) within 120 days of the end of the prior calendar year that (a) sets forth whether the operating advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the special servicer is operating in compliance with the Servicing Standard with respect to its performance of its duties under the PSA with respect to Specially Serviced Loans (and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, with respect to Major Decisions on non-Specially Serviced Loans and Serviced Companion Loans in each case processed by the Special Servicer or for which its consent is required) during the prior calendar year on an “asset-level basis”, and (b) identifies (1) which, if any, standards the operating advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, the special servicer has failed to comply and (2) any deviations from the special servicer’s obligations under the PSA with respect to the resolution or liquidation of any Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property (other than with respect to any REO Property related to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan); provided, however, that in the event the special servicer is replaced, the Operating Advisor Annual Report will only relate to the entity that was acting as special servicer as of December 31 in the prior calendar year and is continuing in such capacity through the date of such Operating Advisor Annual Report. In preparing any Operating Advisor Annual Report, the operating advisor (i) will not be required to report on instances of non-compliance with, or deviations from, the Servicing Standard or the special servicer’s obligations under the PSA that the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, to be immaterial, and (ii) will not be required to provide or obtain a legal opinion, legal review or legal conclusion. Only as used in connection with the Operating Advisor Annual Report, the term “asset-level basis” refers to the special servicer’s performance of its duties as they relate to the resolution and/or liquidation of Specially Serviced Loans taking into account the special servicer’s specific duties under the PSA as well as the extent to which those duties were performed in accordance with the Servicing Standard, with reasonable consideration by the operating advisor of any Assessment of Compliance, Attestation Report, Major Decision Reporting Package, Asset Status Report (during an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), Final Asset Status Report and other information, in each case, delivered to the operating advisor by the special servicer or made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website during the prior calendar year (together with any additional information and material reviewed by the operating advisor) (other than any communications between the Directing Holder and the special servicer that would be Privileged Information) pursuant to the PSA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no annual report will be required from the operating advisor with respect to the special servicer, if during the
prior calendar year, no Final Asset Status Report was prepared by the special servicer in connection with a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property.
The special servicer must be given an opportunity to review any Operating Advisor Annual Report at least 5 business days prior to such Operating Advisor Annual Report’s delivery to the certificate administrator and the 17g-5 Information Provider; provided that the operating advisor will have no obligation to adopt any comments to such Operating Advisor Annual Report that are provided by the special servicer.
Each Operating Advisor Annual Report will be required to comply with the confidentiality requirements, subject to certain exceptions, each as described in this prospectus and as provided in the PSA regarding Privileged Information.
The ability to perform the duties of the operating advisor and the quality and the depth of any Operating Advisor Annual Report will be dependent upon the timely receipt of information prepared or made available by others and the accuracy and the completeness of such information. In addition, in no event will the operating advisor have the power to compel any transaction party to take, or refrain from taking, any action. It is possible that the lack of access to Privileged Information may limit or prohibit the operating advisor from performing its duties under the PSA, in which case any Operating Advisor Annual Report will describe any resulting limitations, and the operating advisor will not be subject to any liability arising from such limitations or prohibitions. The operating advisor will be entitled to conclusively rely on the accuracy and completeness of any information it is provided without liability for any such reliance thereunder.
Additional Duties of the Operating Advisor While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event Has Occurred and is Continuing
While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, in addition to the duties described above, the operating advisor will be required to perform the following additional duties:
(a) to consult (on a non-binding basis) with the special servicer (in person or remotely via electronic, telephonic or other mutually agreeable communication) in respect of any Asset Status Reports in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard, as described under “—Asset Status Report”; and
(b) to consult (on a non-binding basis) with the special servicer to the extent it has received a Major Decision Reporting Package, as applicable, (in person or remotely via electronic, telephonic or other mutually agreeable communication) in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard with respect to any Major Decisions processed by the special servicer or for which the special servicer’s consent is required as described under “—The Directing Holder—Major Decisions”.
To facilitate the consultation described above, the special servicer will be required to send to the operating advisor an Asset Status Report or Major Decision Reporting Package, as applicable, before the action is implemented.
An “Operating Advisor Consultation Event” will occur when either (i) the aggregate Certificate Balance of the HRR Certificates (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of any class of HRR Certificates) is 25% or less of the initial aggregate Certificate Balance of the HRR Certificates or (ii) with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing (or a Control Termination Event would occur and be continuing if not for the last proviso in the definition thereof).
Recommendation of the Replacement of the Special Servicer
If at any time the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the PSA or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard and (2) the replacement of the special servicer would be in the
best interest of the Certificateholders as a collective whole, then the operating advisor may recommend the replacement of the special servicer and deliver a report supporting such recommendation in the manner described in “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote”.
Eligibility of Operating Advisor
The operating advisor will be required to be an Eligible Operating Advisor at all times during the term of the PSA. “Eligible Operating Advisor” means an entity:
(i) that is a special servicer or operating advisor on a commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction rated by the Rating Agencies (including, in the case of the operating advisor, this transaction) but has not been special servicer or operating advisor on a transaction for which any Rating Agency has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of, one or more classes of certificates for such transaction citing servicing concerns with the special servicer or operating advisor as the sole or a material factor in such rating action;
(ii) that can and will make the representations and warranties of the operating advisor set forth in the PSA, including to the effect that it possesses sufficient financial strength to fulfill its duties and responsibilities pursuant to the PSA over the life of the issuing entity;
(iii) that is not (and is not Risk Retention Affiliated with) the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, a sponsor, any Borrower Party, the Retaining Party, a Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser, the Controlling Class Representative, the Directing Holder or a depositor, a trustee, a certificate administrator, a master servicer or a special servicer with respect to the securitization of a Companion Loan, or any of their respective Risk Retention Affiliates;
(iv) that has not been paid by the special servicer or successor special servicer any fees, compensation or other remuneration (x) in respect of its obligations under the PSA or (y) for the appointment or recommendation for replacement of a successor special servicer to become the special servicer;
(v) that (x) has been regularly engaged in the business of analyzing and advising clients in commercial mortgage-backed securities matters and has at least five (5) years of experience in collateral analysis and loss projections, and (y) has at least five (5) years of experience in commercial real estate asset management and experience in the workout and management of distressed commercial real estate assets; and
(vi) that does not directly or indirectly, through one or more affiliates or otherwise, own or have derivative exposure in any interest in any certificates, any Mortgage Loan or otherwise have any financial interest in the securitization transaction to which the PSA relates, other than in fees from its role as operating advisor and asset representations reviewer (to the extent it also acts as the asset representations reviewer).
“Risk Retention Affiliate” or “Risk Retention Affiliated” means “affiliate of” or “affiliated with”, as such terms are defined in 12 C.F.R. 244.2 of the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
Other Obligations of Operating Advisor
At all times, subject to the Privileged Information Exception, the operating advisor and its affiliates will be obligated to keep confidential any information appropriately labeled as “Privileged Information” received from the special servicer or Directing Holder in connection with the Directing Holder’s exercise of any rights under the PSA (including, without limitation, in connection with any Asset Status Report) or otherwise in connection with the transaction, except under the circumstances described below. As used in this prospectus, “Privileged Information” means (i) any correspondence between the Directing Holder and the special servicer related to any Specially Serviced Loan (other than with respect to any applicable
Excluded Loan) or the exercise of the Directing Holder’s consent or consultation rights under the PSA, (ii) any strategically sensitive information that the special servicer has reasonably determined (and has labeled, identified or otherwise communicated as privileged or confidential information) could compromise the issuing entity’s position in any ongoing or future negotiations with the related borrower or other interested party, (iii) any Asset Status Report or Final Asset Status Report and (iv) information subject to attorney-client privilege (and which has been labeled, identified or otherwise communicated as privileged information).
The operating advisor is required to keep all such labeled Privileged Information confidential and may not, without the prior written consent of the special servicer and (for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing) the Directing Holder (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than a Non-Serviced Whole Loan and any applicable Excluded Loan), disclose such Privileged Information to any person (including Certificateholders other than the Controlling Class Representative), other than (1) to the extent expressly required by the PSA, to the other parties to the PSA with a notice indicating that such information is Privileged Information, (2) pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception, or (3) where necessary to support specific findings or conclusions concerning allegations of deviations from the Servicing Standard or the Special Servicer’s obligations under the PSA (i) in the Operating Advisor Annual Report or (ii) in connection with a recommendation by the operating advisor to replace the special servicer. Each party to the PSA that receives Privileged Information from the operating advisor with a notice stating that such information is Privileged Information may not without the prior written consent of the special servicer and, unless a Consultation Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than a Non-Serviced Whole Loan and any applicable Excluded Loan) and the Controlling Class Representative, disclose such Privileged Information to any person other than pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. In addition and for the avoidance of doubt, while the operating advisor may serve in a similar capacity with respect to other securitizations that involve the same parties or borrowers involved in this securitization, any experience or knowledge gained by the operating advisor from such other engagements may not be imputed to the operating advisor or its employees for this transaction; provided, however, the operating advisor may consider such experience or knowledge as pertinent information for discussion with the special servicer during its periodic meetings.
“Privileged Information Exception” means, with respect to any Privileged Information, at any time (a) such Privileged Information becomes generally available and known to the public other than as a result of a disclosure directly or indirectly by the party restricted from disclosing such Privileged Information (the “Restricted Party”), (b) it is reasonable and necessary for the Restricted Party to disclose such Privileged Information in working with legal counsel, auditors, arbitration parties, taxing authorities or other governmental agencies, (c) such Privileged Information was already known to such Restricted Party and not otherwise subject to a confidentiality obligation and/or (d) the Restricted Party is (in the case of the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator and the trustee, as evidenced by written advice of counsel (which will be an additional expense of the issuing entity) delivered to each of the master servicer, the special servicer, the Directing Holder (other than with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan), the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator and the trustee), required by law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree to disclose such information.
Delegation of Operating Advisor’s Duties
The operating advisor may delegate its duties to agents or subcontractors in accordance with the PSA to the extent such agents or subcontractors satisfy clauses (iii), (iv) and (vi) of the definition of “Eligible Operating Advisor”; provided, however, the operating advisor will remain obligated and primarily liable for any actions required to be performed by it under the PSA without diminution of such obligation or liability or related obligation or liability by virtue of such delegation or arrangements or by virtue of indemnification from any person acting as its agents or subcontractor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as if the operating advisor alone were performing its obligations under the PSA.
Termination of the Operating Advisor With Cause
The following constitute operating advisor termination events under the PSA (each, an “Operating Advisor Termination Event”), whether any such event is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body:
| (a) | any failure by the operating advisor to observe or perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements or the material breach of any of its representations or warranties under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA or to the operating advisor, the certificate administrator and the trustee by the holders of certificates evidencing greater than 25% of the aggregate Voting Rights; provided that with respect to any such failure that is not curable within such 30 day period, the operating advisor will have an additional cure period of 30 days to effect such cure so long as it has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30 day period and has provided the trustee and the certificate administrator with an officer’s certificate certifying that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, such cure; |
| (b) | any failure by the operating advisor to perform in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given in writing to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA; |
| (c) | any failure by the operating advisor to be an Eligible Operating Advisor, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given in writing to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA; |
| (d) | a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding up or liquidation of its affairs, is entered against the operating advisor, and such decree or order remains in force undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days; |
| (e) | the operating advisor consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator or liquidation committee in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities, voluntary liquidation, or similar proceedings of or relating to the operating advisor or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or |
| (f) | the operating advisor admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations. |
Upon receipt by the certificate administrator of notice of the occurrence of any Operating Advisor Termination Event, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders electronically by posting such notice on its internet website and by mail, unless the certificate administrator has received notice that such Operating Advisor Termination Event has been remedied.
Rights Upon Operating Advisor Termination Event
After the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Termination Event, the trustee may, and upon the written direction of holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the classes of certificates), the trustee will, promptly terminate the operating advisor for cause and appoint a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor; provided that no such termination will be effective until a successor operating advisor has been appointed and has assumed all of the obligations of the operating advisor under the PSA. The trustee may rely on a certification by the replacement operating advisor that it is an Eligible Operating Advisor. If the trustee is unable to find a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor within 30 days of the termination of the operating advisor, the depositor will be permitted to find a replacement.
Upon any termination of the operating advisor and appointment of a successor operating advisor, the trustee will, as soon as possible, be required to give written notice of the termination and appointment to the special servicer, the master servicer, the certificate administrator, the depositor, the Controlling Class Representative (for any Mortgage Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan and only for so long as no Consultation Termination Event is continuing), any Companion Loan noteholder, the Certificateholders and the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website).
Waiver of Operating Advisor Termination Event
The holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights affected by any Operating Advisor Termination Event may waive such Operating Advisor Termination Event within twenty (20) days of the receipt of notice from the certificate administrator of the occurrence of such Operating Advisor Termination Event. Upon any such waiver of an Operating Advisor Termination Event, such Operating Advisor Termination Event will cease to exist and will be deemed to have been remedied. Upon any such waiver of an Operating Advisor Termination Event, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with enforcement action taken with respect to such Operating Advisor Termination Event prior to such waiver from the issuing entity.
Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause
Upon (i) the written direction of holders of Non-Reduced Interests evidencing not less than 15% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Interests requesting a vote to terminate and replace the operating advisor with a proposed successor operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor, and (ii) payment by such holders to the certificate administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote, the certificate administrator will promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders and the operating advisor of such request by posting such notice on its internet website, and by mailing such notice to all Certificateholders and the operating advisor.
Upon the written direction of holders of Non-Reduced Interests evidencing more than 50% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Interests that exercise their right to vote (provided that holders of Non-Reduced Interests evidencing at least 50% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Interests exercise their right to vote), the trustee will terminate all of the rights and obligations of the operating advisor under the PSA (other than any rights or obligations that accrued prior to the date of such termination (including accrued and unpaid compensation) and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination)) by written notice to the operating advisor, and the proposed successor operating advisor will be appointed.
The certificate administrator will include on each Distribution Date Statement a statement that each Certificateholder and beneficial owner may access such notices on the certificate administrator’s website and each Certificateholder and beneficial owner may register to receive email notifications when such notices are posted on the website. The certificate administrator will be entitled to reimbursement from the requesting Certificateholders for the reasonable expenses of posting notices of such requests.
Resignation of the Operating Advisor
The operating advisor may resign upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the asset representations reviewer and the Controlling Class Representative, if the operating advisor has secured a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor and such replacement operating advisor has accepted its appointment as the replacement operating advisor and receipt by the trustee of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency. If no successor operating advisor has been so appointed and accepted the appointment within 30 days after the notice of resignation, the resigning operating advisor may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor. The resigning operating advisor must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
Operating Advisor Compensation
Certain fees will be payable to the operating advisor, and the operating advisor will be entitled to be reimbursed for certain expenses, as described under “—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Operating Advisor Compensation”.
In the event the operating advisor resigns or is terminated for any reason it will remain entitled to any accrued and unpaid fees and reimbursement of Operating Advisor Expenses and any rights to indemnification provided under the PSA with respect to the period for which it acted as operating advisor.
The operating advisor will be entitled to reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by the operating advisor in the event that the operating advisor is terminated without cause. See “—Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause” above.
The Asset Representations Reviewer
Asset Review
Asset Review Trigger
On or prior to each Distribution Date, based on the CREFC® delinquent loan status report and/or the CREFC® loan periodic update file delivered by the master servicer for such Distribution Date, the certificate administrator will be required to determine if an Asset Review Trigger has occurred. If an Asset Review Trigger is determined to have occurred, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide notice to the asset representations reviewer, the master servicer, the special servicer, the Controlling Class Representative, all Certificateholders in accordance with the terms of the PSA. On each Distribution Date after providing such notice to Certificateholders, the certificate administrator, based on information provided to it by the master servicer, will be required to determine whether (1) any additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan, (2) any Mortgage Loan has ceased to be a Delinquent Loan and (3) an Asset Review Trigger has ceased to exist, and, if there is an occurrence of any of the events or circumstances identified in clauses (1), (2) and/or (3), deliver written notice of such information (which may be via email) within 2 business days of such determination to the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer. An “Asset Review Trigger” will occur when either (1) Mortgage Loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of 25% or more of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan in the case of a Whole Loan) held by the issuing entity) as of the end of the applicable Collection Period are Delinquent Loans as of the end of the related Collection Period or (2) at least 15 Mortgage Loans are Delinquent Loans as of the end of the related Collection Period and the outstanding principal balance of such Delinquent Loans in the aggregate constitutes at least 20% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan in the case of a Whole Loan)) held by the issuing entity as of the end of the applicable Collection Period. The PSA will require that the certificate administrator include in the
Distribution Date Statement on Form 10-D relating to the distribution period in which the Asset Review Trigger occurred a description of the events that caused the Asset Review Trigger to occur.
We believe this Asset Review Trigger is appropriate considering the unique characteristics of pools of Mortgage Loans underlying CMBS. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool”. While we do not believe static pool information is relevant to CMBS transactions as a general matter, as a point of relative context, with respect to the 82 prior pools of commercial mortgage loans for which GSMC (or its predecessors) was a sponsor in a public offering of CMBS with a securitization closing date on or after August 1, 2014, the highest percentage of a particular pool of loans (by outstanding principal balance) that were delinquent at least 60 days at the end of any reporting period between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2024 was approximately 76.8%.
This pool of Mortgage Loans is not homogeneous or granular, and there are individual Mortgage Loans that each represent a significant percentage, by outstanding principal balance, of the Mortgage Pool. For example, the two (2) largest Mortgage Loans in the pool represent approximately 19.5% of the Initial Pool Balance. Given this mortgage pool composition and the fact that CMBS pools as a general matter include a small relative number of larger mortgage loans, we believe it would not be appropriate for the delinquency of the two (2) largest Mortgage Loans, in the case of this mortgage pool, to cause the Asset Review Trigger to be met, as that would not necessarily be indicative of the overall quality of the Mortgage Pool. On the other hand, a significant number of Delinquent Loans by loan count, but representing a smaller percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loans than the percentage set forth in clause (1) of the definition of “Asset Review Trigger”, could indicate an issue with the quality of the Mortgage Pool. As a result, we believe it would be appropriate to have the alternative test as set forth in clause (2) of the definition of “Asset Review Trigger”, namely to have the Asset Review Trigger be met if 15 Mortgage Loans are Delinquent Loans, assuming those Delinquent Loans represent at least 20% of aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan in the case of a Whole Loan)) held by the issuing entity as of the end of the applicable Collection Period.
CMBS as an asset class has historically not had a large number of claims for, or repurchases based on, breaches of representations and warranties. While the Asset Review Trigger we have selected is less than this historical peak, we feel it remains at a level that avoids a trigger based on market variability while providing an appropriate threshold to capture delinquencies that may have resulted from an underlying deficiency in a mortgage loan seller’s Mortgage Loans that could be the basis for claims against the related mortgage loan seller based on breaches of the representations and warranties.
“Delinquent Loan” means a Mortgage Loan that is delinquent at least 60 days in respect of its Periodic Payments or balloon payment, if any, in either case such delinquency to be determined without giving effect to any grace period.
Asset Review Vote
If holders of certificates evidencing not less than 5.0% of the Voting Rights deliver to the certificate administrator, within 90 days after the filing of the Form 10-D reporting the occurrence of an Asset Review Trigger, a written direction requesting a vote to commence an Asset Review (an “Asset Review Vote Election”), the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice of such direction to the asset representations reviewer and all Certificateholders, and to conduct a solicitation of votes to authorize an Asset Review. Upon the affirmative vote to authorize an Asset Review evidencing at least a majority of the votes cast but in any event at least a majority of an Asset Review Quorum within 150 days of the receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election (an “Affirmative Asset Review Vote”), the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice of such Affirmative Asset Review Vote to all parties to the PSA, the underwriters, the mortgage loan sellers, the Controlling Class Representative and the Certificateholders. In the event an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has not occurred within such 150-day period following the receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election, no Certificateholder may request a vote or cast a vote for an Asset Review and the asset representations reviewer will not be required to
review any Delinquent Loan unless and until (A) an additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan after the expiration of such 150-day period, (B) an additional Asset Review Trigger has occurred as a result or an Asset Review Trigger is otherwise in effect, (C) the certificate administrator has timely received an Asset Review Vote Election after the occurrence of the events described in clauses (A) and (B) above and (D) an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has occurred within 150 days after the Asset Review Vote Election described in clause (C) above. After the occurrence of any Asset Review Vote Election or an Affirmative Asset Review Vote, no Certificateholder may make any additional Asset Review Vote Election except as described in the immediately preceding sentence. Any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote will be paid as an expense of the issuing entity from the Collection Account.
An “Asset Review Quorum” means, in connection with any solicitation of votes to authorize an Asset Review as described above, the holders of certificates evidencing at least 5.0% of the aggregate Voting Rights.
Review Materials
Upon receipt of notice from the certificate administrator of an Affirmative Asset Review Vote (the “Asset Review Notice”), the custodian (with respect to clauses (i) through (v) below for non-Specially Serviced Loans), the master servicer (with respect to clauses (vi) and (vii) below for non-Specially Serviced Loans) and the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans), in each case to the extent in such party’s possession, will be required to promptly, but in no event later than 10 business days (except with respect to clause (vii)) after receipt of such notice from the certificate administrator, provide, or make available, the following materials for each Delinquent Loan (in electronic format) to the asset representations reviewer (collectively, with the Diligence Files, any notice of a breach of a representation or warranty relating to any Delinquent Loan received by the asset representations reviewer from any other party to the PSA, a copy of the prospectus, a copy of the applicable MLPA and a copy of the PSA, the “Review Materials”):
(i) a copy of an assignment of the Mortgage in favor of the trustee, with evidence of recording thereon, for each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(ii) a copy of an assignment of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) in favor of the trustee, with evidence of recording thereon, related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(iii) a copy of the assignment of all unrecorded documents relating to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review, if not already covered pursuant to items (i) or (ii) above;
(iv) a copy of all filed copies (bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any UCC financing statements related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(v) a copy of an assignment in favor of the trustee of any financing statement executed and filed in the relevant jurisdiction related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(vi) a copy of any notice previously delivered by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, of any alleged defect or breach with respect to any Delinquent Loan; and
(vii) any other related documents that were entered into or delivered in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan that are necessary in connection with the asset representations reviewer’s completion of any Asset Review and that are requested (in writing in accordance with the PSA) by the asset representations reviewer, in the time frames and as otherwise described below.
In addition, in the event that, as part of an Asset Review of any Delinquent Loan, the asset representations reviewer determines that the Review Materials provided to it with respect to such Delinquent Loan are missing any documents that are required to be part of the Review Materials for such Mortgage Loan or which were entered into or delivered in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan that, in either case, are necessary in connection with its completion of any Test in connection with such Asset Review, the asset representations reviewer will promptly, but in no event later than 10 business days after receipt of the Review Materials, notify the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable, of such missing documents, and request the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, promptly, but in no event later than 10 business days after receipt of such notification from the asset representations reviewer, to deliver to the asset representations reviewer such missing documents to the extent in its possession. In the event any missing documents are not provided by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, within such 10-business day period, the asset representations reviewer will request such documents from the related mortgage loan seller. Each mortgage loan seller will be required under each MLPA to deliver such additional documents only to the extent such documents are in the possession of such mortgage loan seller.
In addition, with respect to any Delinquent Loan that is a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the extent any documents required by the asset representations reviewer to complete a Test are missing or have not been received from the related mortgage loan seller, the asset representations reviewer will request such document(s) from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer (if such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is being serviced by a Non-Serviced Master Servicer) or the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer (if such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is being serviced by a Non-Serviced Special Servicer).
The asset representations reviewer may, but is under no obligation to, consider and rely upon information furnished to it by a person that is not a party to the PSA or the related mortgage loan seller, and will do so only if such information can be independently verified (without unreasonable effort or expense to the asset representations reviewer) and is determined by the asset representations reviewer in its good faith and sole discretion to be relevant to the Asset Review (any such information, “Unsolicited Information”), as described below.
Asset Review
Upon its receipt of the Asset Review Notice and access to the Diligence Files posted to the secure data room with respect to a Delinquent Loan, the asset representations reviewer, as an independent contractor, will be required to commence a review of the compliance of each Delinquent Loan with the representations and warranties related to that Delinquent Loan (such review, the “Asset Review”). An Asset Review of each Delinquent Loan will consist of the application of a set of pre-determined review procedures (the “Tests”) for each representation and warranty made by the related mortgage loan seller with respect to such Delinquent Loan, provided, however, the asset representations reviewer may, but is under no obligation to, modify any Test and/or associated Review Materials if, and only to the extent, the asset representations reviewer determines pursuant to the Asset Review Standard that it is necessary to modify such Test and/or such associated Review Materials in order to facilitate its Asset Review in accordance with the Asset Review Standard. Once an Asset Review of a Mortgage Loan is completed, no further Asset Review will be required of or performed on that Mortgage Loan notwithstanding that such Mortgage Loan may continue to be a Delinquent Loan or become a Delinquent Loan again at the time when a new Asset Review Trigger occurs and a new Affirmative Asset Review Vote is obtained subsequent to the occurrence of such Asset Review Trigger.
“Asset Review Standard” means the performance by the asset representations reviewer of its duties under the PSA in good faith subject to the express terms of the PSA. All determinations or assumptions made by the asset representations reviewer in connection with an Asset Review are required to be made in the asset representations reviewer’s good faith discretion and judgment based on the facts and circumstances known to it at the time of such determination or assumption.
No Certificateholder will have the right to change the scope of the asset representations reviewer’s review, and the asset representations reviewer will not be required to review any information other than (i) the Review Materials and (ii) if applicable, Unsolicited Information.
The asset representations reviewer may, absent manifest error and subject to the Asset Review Standard, (i) assume, without independent investigation or verification, that the Review Materials are accurate and complete in all material respects and (ii) conclusively rely on such Review Materials.
In the event that the asset representations reviewer determines that the Review Materials are insufficient to complete a Test and such missing documentation is not delivered to the asset representations reviewer by the applicable mortgage loan seller, the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) to the extent in the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s possession within 10 business days upon request as described above, the asset representations reviewer will list such missing documents in a preliminary report setting forth the preliminary results of the application of the Tests and the reasons why such missing documents are necessary to complete a Test and (if the asset representations reviewer has so concluded) that the absence of such documents will be deemed to be a failure of such Test (the “Preliminary Asset Review Report”). The asset representations reviewer will be required to provide such Preliminary Asset Review Report to the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) and the applicable mortgage loan seller no later than 60 days after the date on which access to the Diligence Files in the secure data room is made available to the asset representations reviewer by the certificate administrator. If the Preliminary Asset Review Report indicates that any of the representations and warranties fails or is deemed to fail any Test, the applicable mortgage loan seller will have 90 days from receipt of the Preliminary Asset Review Report (the “Cure/Contest Period”) to remedy or otherwise refute the failure. Any information and documents provided or explanations given to support the applicable mortgage loan seller’s claim that the representation and warranty has not failed a Test or that any missing documents in the Review Materials are not required to complete a Test will be required to be promptly delivered by such mortgage loan seller to the asset representations reviewer. For avoidance of doubt, the asset representations reviewer will not be required to prepare a Preliminary Asset Review Report in the event the asset representations reviewer determines that there is no Test failure with respect to the related Delinquent Loan.
The asset representations reviewer will be required, within the later of (x) 60 days after the date on which access to the Diligence Files posted to the secure data room is provided to the asset representations reviewer by the certificate administrator or (y) 10 days after the expiration of the Cure/Contest Period to complete an Asset Review with respect to each Delinquent Loan and deliver (i) a report setting forth the asset representations reviewer’s findings and conclusions as to whether or not it has determined there is any evidence of a failure of any Test based on the Asset Review and a statement that the asset representations reviewer’s findings and conclusions set forth in such report were not influenced by any third party (an “Asset Review Report”) to each party to the PSA and the related mortgage loan seller, and (ii) a summary of the asset representations reviewer’s conclusions included in such Asset Review Report (an “Asset Review Report Summary”) to the trustee and certificate administrator. The period of time by which the Asset Review Report must be completed and delivered may be extended by up to an additional 30 days, upon written notice to the parties to the PSA and the related mortgage loan seller, if the asset representations reviewer determines pursuant to the Asset Review Standard that such additional time is required due to the characteristics of the Delinquent Loans and/or the Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties. In no event may the asset representations reviewer determine whether any Test failure constitutes a Material Defect, or whether the issuing entity should enforce any rights it may have against the related mortgage loan seller (or Barclays Capital Holdings Inc., with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations of Barclays to the same extent as Barclays), which, in each such case, will be the responsibility of the Enforcing Servicer. See “—Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA” below. In addition, in the event that the asset representations reviewer does not receive any documentation that it requested from the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans), the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) or the related mortgage loan seller in sufficient time to allow the asset representations reviewer to complete its Asset Review and deliver an Asset Review Report, the asset representations
reviewer will be required to prepare the Asset Review Report solely based on the documentation received by the asset representations reviewer with respect to the related Delinquent Loan, and the asset representations reviewer will have no responsibility to independently obtain any such documentation from any party to the PSA or otherwise. The PSA will require that the certificate administrator (i) include the Asset Review Report Summary in the Distribution Date Statement on Form 10–D relating to the distribution period in which such Asset Review Report Summary was received by the certificate administrator, and (ii) post such Asset Review Report Summary to the certificate administrator’s website not later than 2 business days after receipt of such Asset Review Report Summary from the asset representations reviewer.
Eligibility of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer will be required to represent and warrant in the PSA that it is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. The asset representations reviewer is required to be at all times an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. If the asset representations reviewer ceases to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, the asset representations reviewer is required to immediately notify the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator, the Controlling Class Representative and the Directing Holder of such disqualification and immediately resign under the PSA as described under the “—Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer” below.
An “Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer” is an entity that (i) is a special servicer, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer on a transaction rated by any of DBRS, Inc. (“Morningstar DBRS”), Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”), Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (“KBRA”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and that has not been the special servicer, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer on a transaction for which Morningstar DBRS, Fitch, KBRA, Moody’s or S&P has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of, one or more classes of certificates for such transaction citing servicing or other relevant concerns with the special servicer, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action, (ii) can and will make the representations and warranties of the asset representations reviewer set forth in the PSA, (iii) is not (and is not Risk Retention Affiliated with) a sponsor, a mortgage loan seller, the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Retaining Party, a Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser, the Controlling Class Representative, the Directing Holder or any of their respective Risk Retention Affiliates, (iv) has not performed (and is not affiliated with any party hired to perform) any due diligence, loan underwriting, brokerage, borrower advisory or similar services with respect to any Mortgage Loan or any related Companion Loan prior to the Closing Date for or on behalf of a sponsor, a mortgage loan seller, any underwriter, any party to the PSA, the Controlling Class Representative or the Directing Holder or any of their respective affiliates, or have been paid any fees, compensation or other remuneration by any of them in connection with any such services and (v) that does not directly or indirectly, through one or more affiliates or otherwise, own any interest in any certificates, any Mortgage Loans, any Companion Loan or any securities backed by a Companion Loan or otherwise have any financial interest in the securitization transaction to which the PSA relates, other than in fees from its role as asset representations reviewer (or as operating advisor, if applicable) and except as otherwise set forth in the PSA.
Other Obligations of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer and its affiliates are required to keep confidential any information appropriately labeled as “Privileged Information” received from any party to the PSA or any sponsor under the PSA (including, without limitation, in connection with the review of the Mortgage Loans) and not disclose such Privileged Information to any person (including Certificateholders), other than (1) to the extent expressly required by the PSA in an Asset Review Report or otherwise, to the other parties to the PSA with a notice indicating that such information is Privileged Information or (2) pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. Each party to the PSA that receives such Privileged Information from the asset representations reviewer with a notice stating that such information is Privileged Information may not
disclose such Privileged Information to any person without the prior written consent of the special servicer other than pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. In addition, the asset representations reviewer will be required to keep all documents received by the asset representations reviewer in connection with an Asset Review that are provided by the applicable mortgage loan seller, the master servicer and the special servicer confidential and will not be permitted to disclose such documents except (i) for purposes of complying with its duties and obligations under the PSA, (ii) if such documents become generally available and known to the public other than as a result of a disclosure directly or indirectly by the asset representations reviewer, (iii) if it is reasonable and necessary for the asset representations reviewer to disclose such documents in working with legal counsel, auditors, taxing authorities or other governmental agencies, (iv) if such documents or information was already known to the asset representations reviewer and not otherwise subject to a confidentiality obligation and/or (v) if the asset representations reviewer is required by law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree to disclose such document.
Neither the asset representations reviewer nor any of its affiliates may make any investment in any class of certificates; provided, however, that such prohibition will not apply to (i) riskless principal transactions effected by a broker dealer affiliate of the asset representations reviewer or (ii) investments by an affiliate of the asset representations reviewer if the asset representations reviewer and such affiliate maintain policies and procedures that (A) segregate personnel involved in the activities of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA from personnel involved in such affiliate’s investment activities and (B) prevent such affiliate and its personnel from gaining access to information regarding the issuing entity and the asset representations reviewer and its personnel from gaining access to such affiliate’s information regarding its investment activities.
Delegation of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Duties
The asset representations reviewer may delegate its duties to agents or subcontractors in accordance with the PSA, however, the asset representations reviewer will remain obligated and primarily liable for any Asset Review required in accordance with the provisions of the PSA without diminution of such obligation or liability by virtue of such delegation or arrangements or by virtue of indemnification from any person acting as its agents or subcontractor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as if the asset representations reviewer alone were performing its obligations under the PSA.
Assignment of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Rights and Obligations
The asset representations reviewer may assign its rights and obligations under the PSA in connection with the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of its asset representations reviewer portfolio, provided that: (i) the purchaser or transferee accepting such assignment and delegation (A) is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer resulting from a merger, consolidation or succession that is permitted under the PSA, (B) assumes in writing each covenant and condition to be performed or observed by the asset representations reviewer under the PSA and (C) is not a prohibited party under the PSA; (ii) the asset representations reviewer will not be released from its obligations under the PSA that arose prior to the effective date of such assignment and delegation; (iii) the rate at which each of the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee and the Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee (or any component thereof) is calculated may not exceed the rate then in effect and (iv) the resigning asset representations reviewer will be required to be responsible for the reasonable costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA and the Rating Agencies in connection with such transfer. Upon acceptance of such assignment and delegation, the purchaser or transferee will be required to provide notice to each party to the PSA and then will be the successor asset representations reviewer under the PSA.
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Events
The following constitute asset representations reviewer termination events under the PSA (each, an “Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event”) whether any such event is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body:
(i) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to observe or perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements or the material breach of any of its representations or warranties under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by the trustee or to the asset representations reviewer and the trustee by the holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights;
(ii) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to perform its obligations set forth in the PSA in accordance with the Asset Review Standard in any material respect, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by any party to the PSA;
(iii) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by any party to the PSA;
(iv) a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding-up or liquidation of its affairs, has been entered against the asset representations reviewer, and such decree or order has remained in force undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days;
(v) the asset representations reviewer consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator or liquidation committee in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities, voluntary liquidation, or similar proceedings of or relating to the asset representations reviewer or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or
(vi) the asset representations reviewer admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations.
Upon receipt by the certificate administrator of written notice of the occurrence of any Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders electronically by posting such notice on its internet website and by mail, unless the certificate administrator has received notice that such Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event has been remedied.
Rights Upon Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event
If an Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event occurs, and in each and every such case, so long as such Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event has not been remedied, then either the trustee (i) may or (ii) upon the written direction of holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights (without regard to the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts) will be required to, terminate all of the rights and obligations of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA, other than rights and obligations accrued prior to such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out
of events occurring prior to such termination), by written notice to the asset representations reviewer. The asset representations reviewer is required to bear all reasonable costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA in connection with its termination for cause.
Termination of the Asset Representations Reviewer Without Cause
Upon (i) the written direction of holders of certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights (without regard to the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts) requesting a vote to terminate and replace the asset representations reviewer with a proposed successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, and (ii) payment by such holders to the certificate administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote, the certificate administrator will promptly provide notice to all Certificateholders and the asset representations reviewer of such request by posting such notice on its internet website, and by mailing to all Certificateholders and the asset representations reviewer. Upon the written direction of holders of Principal Balance Certificates evidencing at least 75% of a Quorum (without regard to the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts), the trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA (other than any rights or obligations that accrued prior to the date of such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination)) by written notice to the asset representations reviewer, and the proposed successor asset representations reviewer will be appointed.
In the event that holders of the Principal Balance Certificates evidencing at least 75% of a Quorum (without regard to the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts) elect to remove the asset representations reviewer without cause and appoint a successor, the successor asset representations reviewer will be responsible for all expenses necessary to effect the transfer of responsibilities from its predecessor.
Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer may at any time resign by giving written notice to the other parties to the PSA. In addition, the asset representations reviewer will at all times be required to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, and will be required to resign if it fails to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer by giving written notice to the other parties. Upon such notice of resignation, the depositor will be required to promptly appoint a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. No resignation of the asset representations reviewer will be effective until a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer has been appointed and accepted the appointment. If no successor asset representations reviewer has been so appointed and accepted the appointment within 30 days after the notice of resignation, the resigning asset representations reviewer may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. The resigning asset representations reviewer must pay all costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA and each Rating Agency in connection with its resignation and the transfer of its duties.
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation
Certain fees will be payable to the asset representations reviewer, and the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to be reimbursed for certain expenses, as described under “—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”.
Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause
Except as limited by certain conditions described in this prospectus and subject to the rights of the holder of any related Companion Loan under the related Co-Lender Agreement, the special servicer may generally be replaced, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, at any
time and without cause, by the Directing Holder so long as, among other things, the Directing Holder appoints a replacement special servicer that meets the requirements of the PSA, including that the trustee and the certificate administrator receive a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency and that such replacement special servicer may not be the asset representations reviewer or any of its affiliates. The reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of any such termination incurred by the Directing Holder without cause (including the costs of obtaining a Rating Agency Confirmation) will be paid by the holders of the Controlling Class.
If at any time a Control Termination Event is continuing, the holders of the Principal Balance Certificates may generally replace the special servicer without cause, as described in this paragraph. Upon (i) the written direction of holders of Principal Balance Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of such certificates) of the Principal Balance Certificates on an aggregate basis requesting a vote to replace the special servicer with a new special servicer, (ii) payment by such holders to the certificate administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses (including any legal fees and any Rating Agency fees and expenses) to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote (which fees and expenses will not be additional trust fund expenses), and (iii) delivery by such holders to the certificate administrator and the trustee of Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency (such Rating Agency Confirmation will be obtained at the expense of those holders requesting such vote), the certificate administrator will be required to post notice of the same on the certificate administrator’s website and concurrently by mail and conduct the solicitation of votes of all Voting Rights in such regard, which requisite affirmative votes must be received within 180 days of the posting of such notice. Upon the written direction of holders of certificates evidencing at least 75% of a Quorum or holders of certificates evidencing more than 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights of each class of Non-Reduced Interests on an aggregate basis, the trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the special servicer under the PSA and appoint the successor special servicer (which must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer) designated by such holders, subject to indemnification, right to outstanding fees, reimbursement of Advances and other rights set forth in the PSA, which survive such termination.
The certificate administrator will include on each Distribution Date Statement a statement that each Certificateholder may access such notices via the certificate administrator’s website and that each Certificateholder may register to receive electronic mail notifications when such notices are posted thereon.
A “Quorum” means, in connection with any solicitation of votes in connection with the replacement of the special servicer or the asset representations reviewer described above, the holders of Voting Rights evidencing at least 75% of the aggregate Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Realized Losses and, other than with respect to the termination of the asset representations reviewer, the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the certificates) of all Principal Balance Certificates on an aggregate basis.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the special servicer obtains knowledge that it is a Borrower Party with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (any such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, an “Excluded Special Servicer Loan”), the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer of that Excluded Special Servicer Loan. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Holder will be entitled to select a successor special servicer that is not a Borrower Party in accordance with the terms of the PSA (the “Excluded Special Servicer”) for the related Excluded Special Servicer Loan, unless such Excluded Special Servicer Loan is also an applicable Excluded Loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event or if at any time the Excluded Special Servicer Loan is also an applicable Excluded Loan, the resigning special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to select the related Excluded Special Servicer. The special servicer will not have any liability with respect to the actions or inactions of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer or with respect to the identity of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer. It will be a condition to any such appointment that (i) the Rating Agencies confirm that the appointment would not result in a qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of any of their then current ratings of the
certificates and the equivalent from each NRSRO hired to provide ratings with respect to any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, (ii) the applicable Excluded Special Servicer is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer and (iii) the applicable Excluded Special Servicer delivers to the depositor and the certificate administrator and any applicable depositor and applicable certificate administrator of any other securitization, if applicable, that contains a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, the information, if any, required pursuant to Item 6.02 of the Form 8-K regarding itself in its role as Excluded Special Servicer.
If at any time the special servicer is no longer a Borrower Party (including, without limitation, as a result of the related Mortgaged Property becoming an REO Property) with respect to an Excluded Special Servicer Loan, (1) the related Excluded Special Servicer will be required to resign, (2) the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan will no longer be an Excluded Special Servicer Loan, (3) the special servicer will become the special servicer again for such related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and (4) the special servicer will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan earned during such time on and after such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan is no longer an Excluded Special Servicer Loan.
The applicable Excluded Special Servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the special servicer for the related Excluded Special Servicer Loan and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan earned during such time as the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan is an Excluded Special Servicer Loan (provided that the special servicer will remain entitled to all other special servicing compensation with respect to all Mortgage Loans and Serviced Whole Loans that are not Excluded Special Servicer Loans during such time).
“Non-Reduced Interests” means any class of Principal Balance Certificates then-outstanding for which (a)(1) the initial Certificate Balance of such class of certificates, minus (2) the sum (without duplication) of (x) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) distributed to the Certificateholders of such class of certificates, (y) any Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to such class of certificates, and (z) any Realized Losses previously allocated to such class of certificates, is equal to or greater than (b) 25% of the remainder of (1) the initial Certificate Balance of such class of certificates, less (2) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) previously distributed to the Certificateholders of such class of certificates.
A “Qualified Replacement Special Servicer” is a replacement special servicer that (i) satisfies all of the eligibility requirements applicable to special servicers in the PSA, (ii) is not the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or an affiliate of the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer, (iii) is not obligated to pay the operating advisor (x) any fees or otherwise compensate the operating advisor in respect of its obligations under the PSA, or (y) for the appointment of the successor special servicer or the recommendation by the operating advisor for the replacement special servicer to become a special servicer, (iv) is not entitled to receive any compensation from the operating advisor other than compensation that is not material and is unrelated to the operating advisor’s recommendation that such party be appointed as the replacement special servicer, (v) is not entitled to receive any fee from the operating advisor for its appointment as successor special servicer, in each case, unless expressly approved by 100% of the Certificateholders, (vi) currently has a special servicer rating of at least “CSS3” from Fitch, (vii) (a) has been appointed and currently serves as a special servicer on a “transaction level” basis on a CMBS transaction currently rated by Moody’s that currently has securities outstanding and (b) is not a special servicer that has been publicly cited by Moody’s as having servicing concerns as the sole or material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities rated by Moody’s in a CMBS transaction serviced by the applicable replacement special servicer prior to the time of determination and (viii) is not a special servicer that has been cited by KBRA as having servicing concerns as the sole or a material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in a transaction serviced by the applicable servicer prior to the time of determination.
Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote
If at any time the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the PSA or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard and (2) the replacement of the special servicer would be in the best interest of the Certificateholders as a collective whole, then the operating advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the special servicer. In such event, the operating advisor will be required to deliver to the trustee and the certificate administrator, with a copy to the special servicer, a written recommendation detailing the reasons supporting its position (provided that the operating advisor will not be permitted to recommend the replacement of the special servicer for any Whole Loan so long as the holder of the related Companion Loan is the Directing Holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement) (along with relevant information justifying its recommendation) and recommending a suggested replacement special servicer (which must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer). The certificate administrator will be required to promptly notify each Certificateholder of the recommendation and post such notice and report on the certificate administrator’s website, and to conduct the solicitation of votes with respect to such recommendation.
The operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer must be confirmed within 180 days of after the notice is posted to the certificate administrator’s website by an affirmative vote of holders of certificates representing at least a majority of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the respective Certificate Balances) of all Principal Balance Certificates whose holders voted on the matter; provided that holders of Principal Balance Certificates that so voted on the matter (i) hold Principal Balance Certificates representing at least 20% of the aggregate Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the respective Certificate Balances) of all Principal Balance Certificates on an aggregate basis, and (ii) consist of at least three (3) Certificateholders or Certificate Owners that are not Risk Retention Affiliated with each other.
In the event the holders of such Principal Balance Certificates evidencing the requisite Voting Rights elect to remove and replace the special servicer (which requisite affirmative votes must be received within 180 days of the posting of the notice of the operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer to the certificate administrator’s website), the certificate administrator will be required to receive a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies at that time. In the event the certificate administrator receives such a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies (and the successor special servicer agrees to be bound by the terms of the PSA), the trustee (upon receipt of written confirmation from the certificate administrator, if the certificate administrator and the trustee are different entities) will then be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the special servicer under the PSA and to appoint the successor special servicer approved by the Certificateholders, provided that such successor special servicer is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer, subject to the terminated special servicer’s rights to indemnification, payment of outstanding fees, reimbursement of Advances and other rights set forth in the PSA that survive termination. The reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses associated with obtaining such Rating Agency Confirmations and administering the vote of the applicable holders of the Principal Balance Certificates and the operating advisor’s identification of a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer will be an additional trust fund expense.
In any case, the trustee will notify the outgoing special servicer promptly of the effective date of its termination. Any replacement special servicer recommended by the operating advisor must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer.
In the event the special servicer is terminated as a result of the recommendation of the operating advisor described in this “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Investor Vote”, the Directing Holder may not subsequently reappoint as special servicer such terminated special servicer or any Risk Retention Affiliate of such terminated special servicer.
No appointment of a special servicer will be effective until the depositor or the depositor for the securitization of a Companion Loan has filed any required Exchange Act filings related to the removal and replacement of the special servicer.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer may be removed, and a successor special servicer appointed at any time by the related directing holder appointed under the related Non-Serviced PSA (and not by the Controlling Class Representative for this transaction) to the extent set forth in the related Non-Serviced PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement for such Non-Serviced Whole Loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause
Servicer Termination Events
A “Servicer Termination Event” under the PSA with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, will include, without limitation:
(a) (i) any failure by the master servicer to make a required deposit to the Collection Account, to the companion paying agent for deposit into the related Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account or to a holder of a Companion Loan, on the day and by the time such deposit or remittance was first required to be made, which failure is not remedied within one business day, or (ii) any failure by the master servicer to deposit into, or remit to the certificate administrator for deposit into, the Distribution Account any amount required to be so deposited or remitted, which failure is not remedied by 11:00 a.m. New York City time on the relevant Distribution Date;
(b) any failure by the special servicer to deposit into the applicable REO Account within two (2) business days after the day such deposit is required to be made, or to remit to the master servicer for deposit in the Collection Account, or any other account required under the PSA, any such deposit or remittance required to be made by the special servicer pursuant to, and at the time specified by, the PSA;
(c) any failure by the master servicer or the special servicer duly to observe or perform in any material respect any of its other covenants or obligations under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for 30 days (or (i) 5 business days in the case of certain of the master servicer’s or special servicer’s, as applicable, obligations regarding the Exchange Act reporting required under the PSA (except as otherwise provided under clause (i) of this definition of “Servicer Termination Event”), (ii) 10 days in the case of the master servicer’s failure to make a Property Protection Advance or (iii) 15 days in the case of a failure to pay the premium for any property insurance policy required to be maintained under the PSA) after written notice of the failure has been given to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, by any other party to the PSA, or to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, with a copy to each other party to the related PSA, by the holders of certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights or, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan if affected by such failure, by the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan; provided, however, that if that failure is capable of being cured and the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, is diligently pursuing that cure, that such period will be extended an additional 30 days; provided, further, however, that such extended period will not apply to the obligations regarding Exchange Act reporting;
(d) any breach on the part of the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, of any representation or warranty in the PSA that materially and adversely affects the interests of any class of Certificateholders or holders of any Serviced Companion Loan and which continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which notice of that breach, requiring the same to be remedied, will have been given to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, by the depositor, the certificate administrator or the trustee, or to the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator and the trustee by the holders of certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights or, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan if
affected by such breach, by the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan; provided, however, that if that breach is capable of being cured and the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, is diligently pursuing that cure, that 30-day period will be extended an additional 30 days;
(e) certain events of insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings in respect of or relating to the master servicer or the special servicer, and certain actions by or on behalf of the master servicer or the special servicer indicating its insolvency or inability to pay its obligations;
(f) the master servicer or the special servicer is no longer rated at least “CMS3” or “CSS3”, respectively, by Fitch and such master servicer or special servicer is not reinstated to at least that rating within 60 days of the delisting;
(g) either of Moody’s or KBRA (or, in the case of serviced companion loan securities, any companion loan rating agency) (i) has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more classes of certificates or one or more classes of serviced companion loan securities, or (ii) has placed one or more classes of certificates or one or more classes of serviced companion loan securities on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal (and in the case of clause (i) and (ii), such action has not been withdrawn by Moody’s or KBRA (or, in the case of serviced companion loan securities, any companion loan rating agency) within 60 days of such event) and, in the case of either of clauses (i) or (ii), publicly citing servicing concerns with the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, as the sole or a material factor in such rating action; or
(h) any failure by the master servicer or the special servicer to deliver (a) any Exchange Act reporting items required to be delivered by the master servicer or the special servicer to the trustee or the certificate administrator under the PSA (other than items to be delivered by a sub-servicer retained by a mortgage loan seller) by the time required under the PSA after any applicable grace periods or (b) any Exchange Act reporting items that a primary servicer, sub-servicer or servicing function participant retained by the master servicer is required to deliver (any such primary servicer, sub-servicer or servicing function participant will be terminated if it defaults in accordance with the provision of this clause (i)), which failure (other than in the case of Form 8-K reporting requirements) is not remedied within 3 business days.
Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event
If a Servicer Termination Event occurs with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer under the PSA, then, so long as the Servicer Termination Event remains unremedied, the depositor or the trustee will be authorized, and at the written direction of (i) the holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights, or (ii) for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder (solely with respect to the special servicer and other than with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan), the trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the defaulting party as master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be; provided, however, that rights in respect of indemnification, entitlement to be paid any outstanding servicing or special servicing compensation and entitlement to reimbursement of amounts due, including Advances and interest thereon, will survive such termination under the PSA. The trustee will then succeed to all of the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the defaulting party as master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA and will be entitled to similar compensation arrangements. If the trustee is unwilling or unable to so act, it may (or, at the written direction of the holders of certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights, or for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing and other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan, the Directing Holder will be required to) appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint, a loan servicing institution or other entity, subject to the trustee’s receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, that has been approved by the Controlling Class Representative which approval may not be
unreasonably withheld. In addition, none of the asset representations reviewer, the operating advisor and their respective affiliates may be appointed as a successor master servicer or special servicer.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section described above, if a Servicer Termination Event on the part of the special servicer remains unremedied and affects the holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, and the special servicer has not otherwise been terminated, the holder of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (or, if applicable, the related trustee, acting at the direction of the related directing holder (or similar entity)) will be entitled to direct the trustee to terminate the special servicer solely with respect to the related Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan. The appointment (or replacement) of the special servicer with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan will in any event be subject to Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency. A replacement special servicer will be selected by the trustee or, prior to a Control Termination Event, by the Controlling Class Representative; provided, however, that any successor special servicer appointed to replace the special servicer with respect to a Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan cannot at any time be the person (or an affiliate of such person) that was terminated at the direction of the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, without the prior written consent of such holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section described above, if a servicer termination event on the part of a Non-Serviced Special Servicer remains unremedied and affects the holder of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, and such Non-Serviced Special Servicer has not otherwise been terminated, the trustee (or, prior to a Control Termination Event, the trustee acting at the direction of the Controlling Class Representative) will generally be entitled to direct the related Non-Serviced Trustee to terminate such Non-Serviced Special Servicer solely with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan(s), and a successor will be appointed in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA.
In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section described above, if the master servicer receives notice of termination solely due to a Servicer Termination Event described in clauses (f) or (g) under “—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” above, and prior to being replaced as described in the third preceding paragraph, the master servicer will have 45 days after receipt of the notice of termination to find, and sell its rights and obligations to, a successor master servicer that meets the requirements of a master servicer under the PSA; provided that the Rating Agencies have each provided a Rating Agency Confirmation. The termination of the master servicer will be effective when such successor master servicer has succeeded the terminated master servicer, as successor master servicer and such successor master servicer has assumed the terminated master servicer’s servicing obligations and responsibilities under the PSA. If a successor has not entered into the PSA as successor master servicer within 45 days after notice of the termination of the master servicer, the master servicer will be replaced by the trustee as described above.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) if any Servicer Termination Event on the part of the master servicer affects a Serviced Companion Loan, the related holder of a Serviced Companion Loan or the rating on any class of certificates backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Companion Loan, and if the master servicer is not otherwise terminated, or (2) if a Servicer Termination Event on the part of the master servicer affects only a Serviced Companion Loan, the related holder of a Serviced Companion Loan or the rating on any class of certificates backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Companion Loan, then the master servicer may not be terminated by or at the direction of the related holder of such Serviced Companion Loan or the holders of any certificates backed, wholly or partially, by such Serviced Companion Loan, but upon the written direction of the related holder of such Serviced Companion Loan, the master servicer will be required to appoint a sub-servicer that will be responsible for servicing the related Serviced Whole Loan.
Further, if replaced as a result of a Servicer Termination Event, the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, will be responsible for the costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
In addition, the depositor may terminate each of the master servicer and the special servicer upon five (5) business days’ notice if the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, fails to comply with certain of its reporting obligations under the PSA.
Waiver of Servicer Termination Event
A Servicer Termination Event may be waived by the holders of certificates evidencing not less than (a) 66 2/3% of the aggregate Voting Rights of the certificates (and, if such Servicer Termination Event is on the part of the special servicer with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan only, by the related Serviced Companion Loan holder). Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) a Servicer Termination Event under clause (a) or (b) under “—Servicer Termination Events” above may be waived only with the consent of all of the Certificateholders of the affected classes and any Serviced Companion Loan holder affected by such Servicer Termination Event, and (2) a Servicer Termination Event under clause (c) or clause (i) under “—Servicer Termination Events” above may be waived only with the consent of the depositor and any Serviced Companion Loan holder affected by such Servicer Termination Event. Upon any such waiver of a Servicer Termination Event by Certificateholders, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with an enforcement action taken with respect to such Servicer Termination Event prior to such waiver from the issuing entity.
Resignation of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer
The PSA permits the master servicer and the special servicer to resign from their respective obligations only upon (a) the appointment of, and the acceptance of the appointment by, a successor and receipt by the certificate administrator and the trustee of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Serviced Companion Loan (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation required under the PSA may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus); and, as to the special servicer only, for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the approval of such successor by the Directing Holder, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or (b) a determination that their respective obligations are no longer permissible with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, under applicable law or are in material conflict by reason of applicable law with any other activities carried on by it. In the event that the master servicer or the special servicer resigns as a result of the determination that their respective obligations are no longer permissible under applicable law or are in material conflict by reason of applicable law with any other activities carried on by it, the trustee will then succeed to all of the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the resigning party as master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA and will be entitled to similar compensation arrangements. If the trustee is unwilling or unable to so act, it may appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint, a loan servicing institution or other entity, subject to the trustee’s receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies.
No resignation will become effective until the trustee or other successor has assumed the obligations and duties of the resigning master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA. Further, the resigning master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties; provided, however, that rights in respect of indemnification, entitlement to be paid any outstanding servicing or special servicing compensation and entitlement to reimbursement of amounts due, including Advances and interest thereon, will survive such resignation under the PSA. Other than as described under “—Termination of Master Servicer and Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” above, in no event will the master servicer or the special servicer have the right to appoint any successor master servicer or special servicer if such master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is terminated or removed pursuant to the PSA. In addition, the PSA will prohibit the appointment of the asset representations reviewer, the operating advisor or one of their respective affiliates as successor to the master servicer or the special servicer.
Resignation of Master Servicer, Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Operating Advisor or Asset Representations Reviewer Upon Prohibited Risk Retention Affiliation
Under the Credit Risk Retention Rule, any Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser is prohibited from being Risk Retention Affiliated with, among other persons, the master servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer. As long as the prohibition exists, upon the occurrence of (i) a servicing officer of the master servicer or a responsible officer of the certificate administrator or the trustee, as applicable, obtaining actual knowledge that the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the trustee, as applicable, is or has become Risk Retention Affiliated with or a Risk Retention Affiliate of any Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser (in such case, an “Impermissible TPP Affiliate”), (ii) the master servicer, certificate administrator or the trustee receiving written notice by any other party to the PSA, any Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser, any sponsor or any underwriter or initial purchaser that the master servicer, certificate administrator or the trustee, as applicable, is or has become an Impermissible TPP Affiliate, or (iii) the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer obtaining actual knowledge that it is or has become a Risk Retention Affiliate of any Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser or any other party to the PSA (in such case, an “Impermissible Operating Advisor Affiliate” and “Impermissible Asset Representations Reviewer Affiliate”, respectively; and either of an Impermissible TPP Affiliate, an Impermissible Operating Advisor Affiliate and an Impermissible Asset Representations Reviewer Affiliate being an “Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate”), such Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate is required to promptly notify the sponsors and the other parties to the PSA and resign in accordance with the terms of the PSA. The resigning Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate will be required to bear all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA, the issuing entity and each Rating Agency in connection with such resignation as and to the extent required under the PSA; provided, however, if the affiliation causing an Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate is the result of a Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser acquiring an interest in such Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate or an affiliate of such Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate, then such costs and expenses will be an expense of the issuing entity.
Limitation on Liability; Indemnification
The PSA will provide that none of the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or any partner, shareholder, member, manager, director, officer, employee or agent of any of them will be under any liability to the issuing entity, Certificateholders or holders of any related Companion Loan for any action taken, or not taken, in good faith pursuant to the PSA or for errors in judgment; provided, however, that none of the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or similar person will be protected against any breach of a representation or warranty made by such party, as applicable, in the PSA or any liability that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of such party’s obligations or duties under the PSA or by reason of negligent disregard of such obligations and duties. The PSA will also provide that the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and their respective affiliates and any partner, shareholder, member, manager, director, officer, employee or agent of any of them will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity against any claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, reasonable legal fees and related costs, judgments, and other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with any legal action or claim that relates to the PSA, the Mortgage Loans, any related Companion Loan or the certificates; provided, however, that the indemnification will not extend to any loss, liability or expense incurred in connection with any breach of a representation or warranty made by such party, as applicable, in the PSA or incurred by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of such party’s obligations or duties under the PSA, by reason of negligent disregard of such party’s obligations or duties, or in the case of the depositor and any of its partners, shareholders, directors, officers, members, managers, employees and agents, any violation by any of them of any state or federal securities law. In addition, absent actual fraud (as determined by a final non-appealable court order), neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator (including in its capacity as custodian) will be liable for special, punitive, indirect or consequential loss or
damage of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits), even if the trustee or the certificate administrator has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action. The PSA will also provide that any related master servicer, depositor, special servicer, operating advisor (or the equivalent), asset representations reviewer, certificate administrator or trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA with respect to a Non-Serviced Companion Loan and any partner, director, officer, shareholder, member, manager, employee or agent of any of them and the applicable Non-Serviced Securitization Trust will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity and held harmless against the issuing entity’s pro rata share of any and all claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, legal fees and related costs, judgments and any other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with servicing and administration of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and the related non-serviced Mortgaged Property under the related Non-Serviced PSA or the PSA (as and to the same extent the securitization trust formed under the related Non-Serviced PSA is required to indemnify such parties in respect of other mortgage loans in the securitization trust formed under the related Non-Serviced PSA pursuant to the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA).
In addition, the PSA will provide that none of the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loans), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer will be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action that is not incidental to its respective responsibilities under the PSA or that in its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability not reimbursed by the issuing entity. However, each of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer will be permitted, in the exercise of its discretion, to undertake any action that it may deem necessary or desirable with respect to the enforcement and/or protection of the rights and duties of the parties to the PSA and the interests of the Certificateholders (and, in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, the rights of the Certificateholders and the holders of the related Serviced Companion Loan (as a collective whole), taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of such Serviced Companion Loan) under the PSA; provided, however, that if a Serviced Whole Loan and/or the holder of any related Companion Loan are involved, such expenses, costs and liabilities will be payable out of funds related to such Serviced Whole Loan in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement and will also be payable out of the other funds in the Collection Account if amounts on deposit with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan are insufficient therefor. If any such expenses, costs or liabilities relate to a Mortgage Loan, Companion Loan, then any subsequent recovery on that Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, will be used to reimburse the issuing entity for any amounts advanced for the payment of such expenses, costs or liabilities. In that event, the legal expenses and costs of the action, and any liability resulting from the action, will be expenses, costs and liabilities of the issuing entity, and the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loans), the special servicer, the depositor, the asset representations reviewer or the operating advisor, as the case may be, will be entitled to be reimbursed out of the Collection Account for the expenses.
Pursuant to the PSA, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be required to maintain a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy or their equivalent that provides coverage against losses that may be sustained as a result of an officer’s or employee’s misappropriation of funds or errors and omissions, subject to certain limitations as to amount of coverage, deductible amounts, conditions, exclusions and exceptions permitted by the PSA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer and the special servicer will be allowed to self-insure with respect to an errors and omissions policy and a fidelity bond so long as certain conditions set forth in the PSA are met.
Any person into which the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor, asset representations reviewer may be merged or consolidated, or any person resulting from any merger or consolidation to which the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer is a party, or any person succeeding to the business of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, will be the successor of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, as the case may be, under the PSA. The master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer may have other normal business relationships with the depositor or the depositor’s affiliates.
The trustee and the certificate administrator make no representations as to the validity or sufficiency of the PSA (other than as to it being a valid obligation of the trustee and the certificate administrator), the certificates, the Mortgage Loans, this prospectus (other than as to the accuracy of the information provided by the trustee and the certificate administrator as set forth above) or any related documents and will not be accountable for the use or application by or on behalf of the master servicer or the special servicer of any funds paid to the master servicer or the special servicer in respect of the certificates or the Mortgage Loans, or any funds deposited into or withdrawn from the Collection Account or any other account by or on behalf of the master servicer or the special servicer. The PSA provides that no provision of such agreement will be construed to relieve the trustee and the certificate administrator from liability for their own negligent action, their own negligent failure to act or their own willful misconduct or bad faith.
The PSA provides that neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator, as applicable, will be liable for an error of judgment made in good faith by a responsible officer of the trustee or the certificate administrator, unless it is proven that the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts. In addition, neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator, as applicable, will be liable with respect to any action taken, suffered or omitted to be taken by it in good faith in accordance with the direction of holders of certificates entitled to greater than 25% of the percentage interest of each affected class, or of the aggregate Voting Rights of the certificates, relating to the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee and the certificate administrator, or exercising any trust or power conferred upon the trustee and the certificate administrator, under the PSA (unless a higher percentage of Voting Rights is required for such action).
The trustee and the certificate administrator and any director, officer, employee, representative or agent of the trustee and the certificate administrator, will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity, to the extent of amounts held in the Collection Account or the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account from time to time, for any loss, liability, damages, claims or unanticipated expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising out of or incurred by the trustee or the certificate administrator in connection with their participation in the transaction and any act or omission of the trustee or the certificate administrator relating to the exercise and performance of any of the powers and duties of the trustee and the certificate administrator (including in any capacities in which they serve, e.g., paying agent, REMIC administrator, authenticating agent, custodian, certificate registrar and the 17g-5 Information Provider) under the PSA. However, the indemnification will not extend to any loss, liability or expense that constitutes a specific liability imposed on the trustee or the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA, or to any loss, liability or expense incurred by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence on the part of the trustee or the certificate administrator in the performance of their obligations and duties under the PSA, or by reason of their negligent disregard of those obligations or duties, or as may arise from a breach of any representation or warranty of the trustee or the certificate administrator made in the PSA.
For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to any indemnification provisions in the PSA providing that the issuing entity or a party to the PSA is required to indemnify another party to the PSA for costs, fees and expenses, such costs, fees and expenses are intended to include costs (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses) of the enforcement of such indemnity.
Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA
In the event the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator or the operating advisor (solely in its capacity as operating advisor) receives a request or demand from a Requesting Investor to the effect that a Mortgage Loan should be repurchased or replaced due to a Material Defect, or if such party to the PSA determines that a Mortgage Loan should be repurchased or replaced due to a Material Defect, that party to the PSA will be required to promptly forward such request or demand to the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, which will in turn be required to promptly forward it to the applicable mortgage loan seller. The Enforcing Servicer will be required to enforce the obligations of the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs pursuant to the terms of the PSA and the MLPA. These obligations include obligations resulting from a Material Defect.
Subject to the provisions of the applicable MLPA relating to the dispute resolutions as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, such enforcement, including, without limitation, the legal prosecution of claims, if any, will be required to be carried out in such form, to such extent and at such time as the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, would require were it, in its individual capacity, the owner of the affected Mortgage Loan.
Within 45 days after receipt of an Asset Review Report with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the Enforcing Servicer will be required to determine whether at that time, based on the Servicing Standard, there exists a Material Defect with respect to such Mortgage Loan. If the Enforcing Servicer will be required to enforce the obligations of the applicable mortgage loan seller under the MLPA with respect to such Material Defect as discussed in the preceding paragraph. See “—The Asset Representations Reviewer—Asset Review” above.
Any costs incurred by the Enforcing Servicer with respect to the enforcement of the obligations of a mortgage loan seller under the applicable MLPA will be deemed to be Property Protection Advances, to the extent not recovered from the related mortgage loan seller or the Requesting Investor. See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—Dispute Resolution Provisions”.
Dispute Resolution Provisions
Certificateholder’s Rights When a Repurchase Request is Initially Delivered by a Certificateholder
In the event an Initial Requesting Certificateholder delivers a written request to the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the certificate registrar, the operating advisor (solely in its capacity as the operating advisor) or the custodian that a Mortgage Loan be repurchased by the applicable mortgage loan seller alleging the existence of a Material Defect with respect to such Mortgage Loan and setting forth the basis for such allegation (a “Owner Repurchase Request”), the receiving party will be required to promptly forward that Owner Repurchase Request to the master servicer and the special servicer. The Enforcing Servicer will then be required to promptly forward that Owner Repurchase Request to the applicable mortgage loan seller and each other party to the PSA. An “Initial Requesting Certificateholder” is the first Certificateholder or Certificate Owner to deliver an Owner Repurchase Request as described above with respect to a Mortgage Loan, and there may not be more than one Initial Requesting Certificateholder with respect to any Mortgage Loan. Subject to the provisions described below under this heading “—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, the Enforcing Servicer will be the Enforcing Party with respect to the Owner Repurchase Request.
The “Enforcing Servicer” will be (a) with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer, and (b) with respect to a non-Specially Serviced Loan, (i) in the case of a Repurchase Request made by the special servicer, the Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, the master servicer, and (ii) in the case of a Repurchase Request made by any person other than the special servicer, the Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, (A) prior to the Resolution Failure relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer, and (B) from and after a Resolution Failure relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer.
An “Enforcing Party” is the person obligated to or that elects pursuant to the terms of the PSA to enforce the rights of the issuing entity against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to a Repurchase Request.
Repurchase Request Delivered by a Party to the PSA
In the event that the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator or the operating advisor (solely in its capacity as operating advisor) has knowledge of a Material Defect with respect to a Mortgage Loan, that party will be required to deliver prompt written notice of such Material Defect to each other party to the PSA, identifying the applicable Mortgage Loan and setting forth the basis for such allegation (a “PSA Party Repurchase Request” and, each of an Owner Repurchase Request or a PSA Party Repurchase Request, a “Repurchase Request”), and the Enforcing
Servicer will be required to promptly send the PSA Party Repurchase Request to the related mortgage loan seller. The Enforcing Servicer will be required to act as the Enforcing Party and enforce the rights of the issuing entity against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the PSA Party Repurchase Request. However, if a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to the PSA Party Repurchase Request, the provisions described below under “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will apply.
In the event the Repurchase Request is not Resolved within 180 days after the applicable mortgage loan seller receives the Repurchase Request as described in “—Certificateholder’s Rights When a Repurchase Request is Initially Delivered by a Certificateholder” or “—Repurchase Request Delivered by a Party to the PSA” above, a “Resolution Failure” will be deemed to have occurred. Receipt of the Repurchase Request will be deemed to occur 2 business days after the Repurchase Request is sent to the applicable mortgage loan seller. “Resolved” means, with respect to a Repurchase Request, that (i) the related Material Defect has been cured, (ii) the related Mortgage Loan has been repurchased in accordance with the related MLPA, (iii) a mortgage loan has been substituted for the related Mortgage Loan in accordance with the related MLPA, (iv) the applicable mortgage loan seller has made the Loss of Value Payment, (v) a contractually binding agreement is entered into between the Enforcing Servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity, and the related mortgage loan seller that settles the related mortgage loan seller’s obligations under the related MLPA or (vi) the related Mortgage Loan is no longer property of the issuing entity as a result of a sale or other disposition in accordance with the PSA.
Resolution of a Repurchase Request
Within 2 business days after a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to a Repurchase Request made by any person other than the special servicer, the Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Class Certificateholder relating to a non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will be required to send a written notice (a “Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice”) to the special servicer, indicating the master servicer’s analysis and recommended course of action with respect to such Repurchase Request. The master servicer will also be required to deliver to the special servicer the servicing file and all information, documents and records (including records stored electronically on computer tapes, magnetic discs and the like) relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan and, if applicable, the related Serviced Companion Loan, either in the master servicer’s possession or otherwise reasonably available to the master servicer without undue burden or expense, and reasonably requested by the special servicer to the extent set forth in the PSA for such non-Specially Serviced Loan. Upon receipt of such Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice and such servicing file, information, documents and records, the special servicer will become the Enforcing Servicer with respect to such Repurchase Request.
After a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to a Repurchase Request regarding a Mortgage Loan (whether the Repurchase Request was initiated by an Initial Requesting Certificateholder or by a party to the PSA), the Enforcing Servicer will be required to send a notice (a “Proposed Course of Action Notice”) to the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, at the address specified in the Initial Requesting Certificateholder’s Repurchase Request, and to the certificate administrator. The certificate administrator will be required to make the Proposed Course of Action available to all other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners by posting such notice on the certificate administrator’s website, indicating the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action with respect to the Repurchase Request (the “Proposed Course of Action”).
The Proposed Course of Action will be required to include (a) a request to Certificateholders to indicate their agreement with or dissent from such Proposed Course of Action by clearly marking “agree” or “disagree” to the Proposed Course of Action on such notice within 30 days of the date of such notice and a disclaimer that responses received after such 30-day period will not be taken into consideration, (b) a statement that if any Certificateholder disagrees with the Proposed Course of Action, the Enforcing Servicer will be compelled to follow (either as the Enforcing Party or as the Enforcing Servicer in circumstances where a Certificateholder is acting as the Enforcing Party) the course of action agreed to and/or proposed by the majority, by Certificate Balance of the responding Certificateholders that involves referring the matter to mediation or arbitration, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures
described below relating to the delivery of Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notices and Final Dispute Resolution Election Notices, (c) a statement that responding Certificateholders will be required to certify their holdings in connection with such response, (d) a statement that only responses clearly marked “agree” or “disagree” with such Proposed Course of Action will be taken into consideration and (e) instructions for responding Certificateholders to send their responses to the Enforcing Servicer and the certificate administrator. Within three (3) business days after the expiration of the 30-day response period, the certificate administrator will be required to tabulate the responses received from the Certificateholders and share the results with the Enforcing Servicer. The certificate administrator will only count responses timely received that clearly indicate agreement or dissent with the related Proposed Course of Action and additional verbiage or qualifying language will not be taken into consideration for purposes of determining whether the applicable Certificateholder agrees or disagrees with the Proposed Course of Action. The certificate administrator will be under no obligation to answer questions from Certificateholders regarding such Proposed Course of Action. For the avoidance of doubt, the certificate administrator’s obligations in connection with this heading “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will be limited solely to tabulating Certificateholder responses of “agree” or “disagree” to the Proposed Course of Action, and such obligation will not be construed to impose any enforcement obligation on the certificate administrator. The Enforcing Servicer may conclusively rely (without investigation) on the certificate administrator’s tabulation of the majority, by Certificate Balance of the responding Certificateholders.
If (a) the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action with respect to the Repurchase Request does not involve pursuing further action to exercise rights against the applicable mortgage loan seller with respect to the Repurchase Request and the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner wishes to exercise its right to refer the matter to mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration, as discussed below under “—Mediation and Arbitration Provisions”, or (b) the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action is to pursue further action to exercise rights against the applicable mortgage loan seller with respect to the Repurchase Request but the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner does not agree with the dispute resolution method selected by the Enforcing Servicer, then the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or such other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner may deliver to the Enforcing Servicer a written notice (a “Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice”) within 30 days after the date the Proposed Course of Action Notice is posted on the certificate administrator’s website (the “Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date”) indicating its intent to exercise its right to refer the matter to either mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration. In the event that (a) the Enforcing Servicer’s initial Proposed Course of Action indicated a recommendation to undertake mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration, (b) any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner delivers a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice and (c) the Enforcing Servicer also received responses from other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners supporting the Enforcing Servicer’s initial Proposed Course of Action, such additional responses from other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners will also be considered Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notices supporting such Proposed Course of Action for purposes of determining the course of action approved by the majority, by Certificate Balance, of Certificateholders.
If neither the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, nor any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner delivers a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice prior to the Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date, no Certificateholder or Certificate Owner will have the right to refer the Repurchase Request to mediation or arbitration, and the Enforcing Servicer, as the Enforcing Party, will be the sole party obligated and entitled to determine a course of action, including but not limited to, enforcing the issuing entity’s rights against the related mortgage loan seller, subject to any consent or consultation rights of the Directing Holder.
Promptly and in any event within 10 business days following receipt of a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice from (i) the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or (ii) any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner (each of clauses (i) or (ii), a “Requesting Certificateholder”), the Enforcing Servicer will be required to consult with each Requesting Certificateholder regarding such Requesting Certificateholder’s intention to elect either mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or
arbitration as the dispute resolution method with respect to the Repurchase Request (the “Dispute Resolution Consultation”) so that such Requesting Certificateholder may consider the views of the Enforcing Servicer as to the claims underlying the Repurchase Request and possible dispute resolution methods, such discussions to occur and be completed no later than 10 business days following the Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date. The Enforcing Servicer will be entitled to establish procedures the Enforcing Servicer deems in good faith to be in accordance with the Servicing Standard relating to the timing and extent of such consultations. No later than 5 business days after completion of the Dispute Resolution Consultation, a Requesting Certificateholder may provide a final notice to the Enforcing Servicer indicating its decision to exercise its right to refer the matter to either mediation or arbitration (“Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice”).
If, following the Dispute Resolution Consultation, no Requesting Certificateholder timely delivers a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then the Enforcing Servicer will continue to act as the Enforcing Party and remain obligated under the PSA to determine a course of action, including but not limited to, enforcing the rights of the issuing entity with respect to the Repurchase Request and no Certificateholder, Certificate Owner will have any further right to elect to refer the matter to mediation or arbitration.
If a Requesting Certificateholder timely delivers a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then such Requesting Certificateholder will become the Enforcing Party and must promptly submit the matter to mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration. If there is more than one Requesting Certificateholder that timely delivers a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice, then such Requesting Certificateholders will collectively become the Enforcing Party, and the holder or holders of a majority of the Voting Rights among such Requesting Certificateholders will be entitled to make all decisions relating to such mediation or arbitration. If, however, no Requesting Certificateholder commences arbitration or mediation pursuant to the terms of the PSA within 30 days after delivery of its Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then (i) the rights of a Requesting Certificateholder to act as the Enforcing Party will terminate and no Certificateholder or Certificate Owner will have any further right to elect to refer the matter to mediation or arbitration; (ii) if the Proposed Course of Action Notice indicated that the Enforcing Servicer will take no further action with respect to the Repurchase Request, then the related Material Defect will be deemed waived for all purposes under the PSA and the related MLPA; provided, however, that such Material Defect will not be deemed waived with respect to a Requesting Certificateholder, any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner or the Enforcing Servicer to the extent there is a material change in the facts and circumstances known to such party; and (iii) if the Proposed Course of Action Notice had indicated a course of action other than the course of action under clause (ii), then the Enforcing Servicer will again become the Enforcing Party and, as such, will be the sole party obligated and entitled to determine a course of action, including but not limited to, enforcing the issuing entity’s rights against the related mortgage loan seller.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the dispute resolution provisions described under this heading “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will not apply, and the Enforcing Servicer will remain the Enforcing Party, if the Enforcing Servicer has commenced litigation with respect to the Repurchase Request, or determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that it is in the best interest of Certificateholders to commence litigation with respect to the Repurchase Request to avoid the running of any applicable statute of limitations.
In the event a Requesting Certificateholder becomes the Enforcing Party, the Enforcing Servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity, will remain a party to any proceedings against the related mortgage loan seller as further described below. For the avoidance of doubt, none of the depositor, the mortgage loan seller with respect to the subject mortgage loan or any of their respective affiliates (except for any holders of the Controlling Class) will be entitled to be an Initial Requesting Certificateholder or a Requesting Certificateholder to act as a Certificateholder for purposes of delivering any Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice or Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice or otherwise to vote certificates owned by it or such affiliate(s) with respect to a course of action proposed or undertaken pursuant to the procedures described under this “—Dispute Resolution Provisions” heading.
Mediation and Arbitration Provisions
If the Enforcing Party elects mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration, the mediation or arbitration will be administered by a nationally recognized arbitration or mediation organization selected by the related mortgage loan seller. A single mediator or arbitrator will be selected by the mediation or arbitration organization from a list of neutrals maintained by it according to its mediation or arbitration rules then in effect. The mediator or arbitrator must be impartial, an attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York and have at least 15 years of experience in commercial litigation and either commercial real estate finance or commercial mortgage-backed securitization matters or other complex commercial transactions.
The expenses of any mediation will be allocated among the parties to the mediation including, if applicable, between the Enforcing Party and Enforcing Servicer, as mutually agreed by the parties as part of the mediation.
In any arbitration, the arbitrator will be required to resolve the dispute in accordance with the MLPA and PSA, and may not modify or change those agreements in any way or award remedies not consistent with those agreements. The arbitrator will not have the power to award punitive or consequential damages. In its final determination, the arbitrator will determine and award the costs of the arbitration to the parties to the arbitration in its reasonable discretion. In the event a Requesting Certificateholder is the Enforcing Party, the Requesting Certificateholder will be required to pay any expenses allocated to the Enforcing Party in the arbitration proceedings or any expenses that the Enforcing Party agrees to bear in the mediation proceedings.
The final determination of the arbitrator will be final and non-appealable, except for actions to confirm or vacate the determination permitted under federal or state law, and may be entered and enforced in any court with jurisdiction over the parties and the matter. By selecting arbitration, the Enforcing Party would be waiving its right to sue in court, including the right to a trial by jury.
In the event a Requesting Certificateholder is the Enforcing Party, the agreement with the arbitrator or mediator, as the case may be, will be required under the PSA to contain an acknowledgment that the issuing entity, or the Enforcing Servicer on its behalf, will be a party to any arbitration or mediation proceedings solely for the purpose of being the beneficiary of any award in favor of the Enforcing Party; provided that the degree and extent to which the Enforcing Servicer actively prepares for and participates in such proceeding will be determined by such Enforcing Servicer in consultation with the Directing Holder, provided that no Consultation Termination Event is continuing and any applicable Excluded Loan is not involved, and in accordance with the Servicing Standard. All amounts recovered by the Enforcing Party will be required to be paid to the issuing entity, or the Enforcing Servicer on its behalf, and deposited in the Collection Account. The agreement with the arbitrator or mediator, as the case may be, will provide that in the event a Requesting Certificateholder is allocated any related costs and expenses pursuant to the terms of the arbitrator’s decision or the agreement reached in mediation, neither the issuing entity nor the Enforcing Servicer acting on its behalf will be responsible for any such costs and expenses allocated to the Requesting Certificateholder.
The issuing entity (or the Enforcing Servicer or the trustee, acting on its behalf), the depositor or any mortgage loan seller will be permitted to redact any personally identifiable customer information included in any information provided for purposes of any mediation or arbitration. Each party to the proceedings will be required to agree to keep confidential the details related to the Repurchase Request and the dispute resolution identified in connection with such proceedings; provided, however, the Certificateholders and Certificate Owners will be permitted to communicate prior to the commencement of any such proceedings to the extent described under “Description of the Certificates—Certificateholder Communication”.
For avoidance of doubt, in no event will the exercise of any right of a Requesting Certificateholder to refer a Repurchase Request to mediation or arbitration or participation in such mediation or arbitration affect in any manner the ability of the Enforcing Servicer to perform its obligations with respect to a Mortgage Loan or the exercise of any rights of a Directing Holder.
Any out-of-pocket expenses required to be borne by or allocated to the Enforcing Servicer in a mediation or arbitration will be reimbursable as trust fund expenses.
Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan
General
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is expected to be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA and the related Co-Lender Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”.
The servicing terms of each such Non-Serviced PSA are expected to be similar in all material respects to the servicing terms of the PSA applicable to the Serviced Mortgage Loans; however, the servicing arrangements under such agreements will differ in certain respects. For example:
| ● | Each Non-Serviced Master Servicer and Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to service the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to a servicing standard set forth in the related Non-Serviced PSA that is substantially similar to, but may not be identical to, the Servicing Standard. |
| ● | Any party to the related Non-Serviced PSA that makes a property protection advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be entitled to reimbursement for that advance, with interest at the prime rate, in a manner substantially similar to the reimbursement of Property Protection Advances under the PSA. The issuing entity, as holder of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will be responsible for its pro rata share of any such advance reimbursement amounts (including out of general collections on the Benchmark 2024-V9 mortgage pool, if necessary). |
| ● | Pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, the liquidation fee, the special servicing fee and the workout fee with respect to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan are similar to the corresponding fees payable under the PSA, except that caps, floors and offsets may differ or not apply. |
| ● | The extent to which modification fees or other fee items with respect to the related Whole Loan may be applied to offset interest on advances, servicer expenses and servicing compensation may, in certain circumstances, be less than is the case under the PSA. |
| ● | Items with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan that are the equivalent of assumption application fees, defeasance fees, assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, late payment charges, default interest and/or modification fees and that constitute additional servicing compensation under the related Non-Serviced PSA will not be payable to the master servicer or the special servicer under the PSA and one or more of such items will be allocated between the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in proportions that may be different than the allocation of similar fees under the PSA between the master servicer and the special servicer for this transaction. |
| ● | The Non-Serviced Directing Holder under the related Non-Serviced PSA will have or is expected to have rights substantially similar to the Directing Holder under the PSA with respect to the servicing and administration of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan, including consenting to the substantial equivalent of Major Decisions under such Non-Serviced PSA proposed by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, and reviewing and consenting to asset status reports prepared by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer in respect of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan. “Major Decisions” under the related Non-Serviced PSA may differ in certain respects from those actions that constitute Major Decisions under the PSA, and therefore the specific types of |
servicer actions with respect to which the applicable Non-Serviced Directing Holder will be permitted to consent may correspondingly differ. The related Non-Serviced PSA also provides or is expected to provide for the removal of the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer by the related Non-Serviced Directing Holder under such Non-Serviced PSA under certain conditions that are similar to the conditions under which the Directing Holder is permitted to replace the special servicer under the PSA.
| ● | The termination events that will result in the termination of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer are or are expected to be substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, the Servicer Termination Events under the PSA applicable to the master servicer and special servicer, as applicable. |
| ● | Servicing transfer events under the related Non-Serviced PSA that would cause the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan to become specially serviced will be or are expected to be substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, the corresponding provisions under the PSA. |
| ● | The servicing decisions which the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer will perform, and in certain cases for which the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer must obtain the related Non-Serviced Directing Holder’s or Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s consent, may differ in certain respects from those decisions that constitute Master Servicer Decisions and Major Decisions, respectively, under the PSA. |
| ● | The related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to take actions with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan if it becomes the equivalent of a defaulted mortgage loan, which actions are or are expected to be substantially similar, but not necessarily identical, to the actions described under “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”. |
| ● | Appraisal reduction amounts in respect of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be calculated by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or the Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in a manner substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, calculations of such amounts by the special servicer under the PSA in respect of Serviced Mortgage Loans. |
| ● | The requirement of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer to make compensating interest payments in respect of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is similar, but not necessarily identical, to the requirement of the master servicer to make Compensating Interest Payments in respect of the Serviced Mortgage Loans under the PSA (although the portion of the servicing fee to be applied to make such payments may be less). |
| ● | The servicing provisions under the related Non-Serviced PSA relating to performing inspections and collecting operating information are or are expected to be substantially similar but not necessarily identical to those of the PSA. |
| ● | While the special servicer under the PSA and the Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA must each resign as special servicer with respect to a mortgage loan if it obtains knowledge that it has (or, in certain cases, if it has) become affiliated with the related borrower under such mortgage loan, the particular types of affiliations that trigger such resignation obligation, as well as the parties that are entitled to appoint a successor special servicer, may differ as between the PSA and the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
| ● | The parties to the related Non-Serviced PSA (and their related directors, officers and other agents) will be entitled to reimbursement and/or indemnification for losses, liabilities, costs and expenses associated with the servicing of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan under such Non-Serviced PSA to the same extent that parties to the PSA performing similar functions (and their related directors, officers and other agents) are entitled to reimbursement |
and/or indemnification for losses, liabilities, costs and expenses associated with their obligations under the PSA. The issuing entity, as holder of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will be responsible for its pro rata share of any such indemnification amounts (including out of general collections on the Benchmark 2024-V9 mortgage pool, if necessary).
| ● | The matters as to which notice or rating agency confirmation with respect to the rating agencies under the related Non-Serviced PSA are required are or are expected to be similar, but not necessarily identical to, similar matters with respect to the Rating Agencies under the PSA (and such agreements may differ as to whether it is notice or rating agency confirmation that is required and whether a notice to, or a confirmation from, the rating agencies under the related Non-Serviced PSA in connection with an action involving the subject Non-Serviced Whole Loan would also be required to be made to or obtained from the Rating Agencies under the PSA). |
| ● | With respect to non-specially serviced mortgage loans, the related Non-Serviced PSA may differ with respect to whether the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be responsible for conducting or managing certain litigation related to such mortgage loans. |
| ● | Each of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be liable in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA only to the extent of its obligations specifically imposed by that agreement. Accordingly, in general, each of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will not be liable for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action, in good faith pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA or for errors in judgment; provided that neither such party will be protected against any breach of representations or warranties made by it in the related Non-Serviced PSA or against any liability which would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of duties or by reason of negligent disregard of obligations and duties under the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
| ● | With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan as to which the related lead securitization that includes the controlling Pari Passu Companion Loan involves the issuance of “eligible vertical interests” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules), the related Non-Serviced PSA may provide for “risk retention consultation parties” with certain consultation rights. |
| ● | The provisions of the related Non-Serviced PSA may also vary from the PSA with respect to one or more of the following: timing, control or consultation triggers or thresholds, terminology, allocation of ministerial duties between multiple servicers or other service providers or certificateholder or investor voting or consent thresholds, master servicer and special servicer termination events, rating requirements for accounts and permitted investments, eligibility requirements applicable to servicers and other service providers, and the circumstances under which approvals, consents, consultation, notices or rating agency confirmations may be required. |
The master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee under the PSA have no obligation or authority to (a) supervise any related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer, Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator or Non-Serviced Trustee or (b) make servicing advances with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan. The obligation of the master servicer to provide information and collections and make P&I Advances to the certificate administrator for the benefit of the Certificateholders with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is dependent on its receipt of the corresponding information and/or collections from the applicable Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan is expected to be governed by the PSA only temporarily, until the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan. Thereafter, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced by the related master servicer and, if and to
the extent necessary, the related special servicer under and pursuant to the terms of the Servicing Shift PSA governing such future securitization. Although, in the case of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the related Co-Lender Agreement imposes some requirements regarding the terms of the Servicing Shift PSA governing such future securitization, the securitization to which the Controlling Companion Loan is to be contributed has not been determined, and accordingly, the servicing terms of such future Servicing Shift PSA are unknown and may not be consistent with the description of Non-Serviced PSAs above.
Rating Agency Confirmations
The PSA will provide that, notwithstanding the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or other provisions of the PSA, if any action under such Mortgage Loan documents or the PSA requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies as a condition precedent to such action, if the party (the “Requesting Party”) required to obtain such Rating Agency Confirmations has made a request to any Rating Agency for such Rating Agency Confirmation and, within 10 business days of such request being posted to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website, such Rating Agency has not replied to such request or has responded in a manner that indicates that such Rating Agency is neither reviewing such request nor waiving the requirement for Rating Agency Confirmation, then such Requesting Party will be required to confirm (through direct communication and not by posting any confirmation on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) that the applicable Rating Agency has received the Rating Agency Confirmation request, and, if it has not, promptly request the related Rating Agency Confirmation again. The circumstances described in the preceding sentence are referred to in this prospectus as a “RAC No-Response Scenario”.
If there is no response to either such Rating Agency Confirmation request within 5 business days of such second request in a RAC No-Response Scenario or if such Rating Agency has responded in a manner that indicates such Rating Agency is neither reviewing such request nor waiving the requirement for Rating Agency Confirmation, then (x) with respect to any condition in any Mortgage Loan document requiring such Rating Agency Confirmation, or with respect to any other matter under the PSA relating to the servicing of the Mortgage Loans (other than as set forth in clause (y) below), the requirement to obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation will be deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) with respect to such Rating Agency, and the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, may then take such action if the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, confirms its original determination (made prior to making such request) that taking the action with respect to which it requested the Rating Agency Confirmation would still be consistent with the Servicing Standard, and (y) with respect to a replacement of the master servicer or the special servicer, such condition will be deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) if (i) (a) it has been appointed and currently serves as a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, on a transaction-level basis on a CMBS transaction currently rated by Moody’s that currently has securities outstanding and (b) it is not a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, that has been publicly cited by Moody’s as having servicing concerns as the sole or material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a rating downgrade or withdrawal) of securities rated by Moody’s in a CMBS transaction serviced by the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer prior to the time of determination, if Moody’s is the non-responding Rating Agency, (ii) the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer is rated at least “CMS3” (in the case of the master servicer) or “CSS3” (in the case of the special servicer), if Fitch is the non-responding Rating Agency, or (iii) KBRA has not publicly cited servicing concerns of the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer as the sole or a material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in any other commercial mortgage-backed securitization transaction serviced by the master servicer or special servicer prior to the time of determination, if KBRA is the non-responding Rating Agency. Promptly following the master servicer’s or special servicer’s determination to take any action discussed above following any requirement to obtain Rating Agency Confirmation being deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) as described in clause (x) above, the master servicer or the special servicer will be required to provide electronic written notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website pursuant to the PSA, of the action taken.
For all other matters or actions not specifically discussed above, the applicable Requesting Party will be required to obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies. In the event an action otherwise requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies, in absence of such Rating Agency Confirmation, we cannot assure you that any Rating Agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of any such action taken by the master servicer or the special servicer in accordance with the procedures discussed above.
As used above, “Rating Agency Confirmation” means, with respect to any matter, confirmation in writing (which may be in electronic form) by each applicable Rating Agency that a proposed action, failure to act or other event specified in this prospectus will not, in and of itself, result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current rating assigned to any class of certificates (if then rated by the Rating Agency); provided that a written waiver or acknowledgment from the Rating Agency indicating its decision not to review the matter for which the Rating Agency Confirmation is sought will be deemed to satisfy the requirement for the Rating Agency Confirmation from the Rating Agency with respect to such matter. The “Rating Agencies” mean each of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”) and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (“KBRA”).
Any Rating Agency Confirmation requests made by the master servicer, the special servicer, certificate administrator, or trustee, as applicable, pursuant to the PSA, will be required to be made in writing, which writing must contain a cover page indicating the nature of the Rating Agency Confirmation request, and must contain all back-up material necessary for the Rating Agency to process such request. Such written Rating Agency Confirmation requests must be provided in electronic format to the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will be required to post such request on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the PSA).
The master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee will be permitted (but not obligated) to orally communicate with the Rating Agencies regarding any of the Mortgage Loan documents or any matter related to the Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers or any other matters relating to the PSA or any related Co-Lender Agreement; provided that such party summarizes the information provided to the Rating Agencies in such communication in writing and provides the 17g-5 Information Provider with such written summary the same day such communication takes place; provided, further, that the summary of such oral communications will not identify with which Rating Agency the communication was. The 17g-5 Information Provider will be required to post such written summary on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the provisions of the PSA. All other information required to be delivered to the Rating Agencies pursuant to the PSA or requested by the Rating Agencies, will first be provided in electronic format to the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will be required to post such information to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the PSA. The operating advisor will have no obligation or authority to communicate directly with the Rating Agencies, but may deliver required information to the Rating Agencies to the extent set forth in this prospectus.
The PSA will provide that the PSA may be amended to change the procedures regarding compliance with Rule 17g-5 without any Certificateholder consent; provided that notice of any such amendment must be provided to the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) and to the certificate administrator (which will post such report to the certificate administrator’s website).
To the extent required under the PSA, in the event a rating agency confirmation is required by the applicable rating agencies that any action under any Mortgage Loan documents or the PSA will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of any such rating agency’s then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, then such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as described above with respect to any Rating Agency Confirmation from a Rating Agency.
Evidence as to Compliance
Each of the master servicer, the special servicer (regardless of whether the special servicer has commenced special servicing of a Mortgage Loan), the custodian, the trustee (provided, however, that the trustee will not be required to deliver an assessment of compliance with respect to any period during which there was no relevant servicing criteria applicable to it) and the certificate administrator will be required to furnish (and each such party will be required, with respect to each sub-servicer (required to provide such officer’s certificate under Regulation AB) with which it has entered into a servicing relationship with respect to the Mortgage Loans, to cause (or, in the case of a sub-servicer (required to provide such officer’s certificate under Regulation AB) that a mortgage loan seller requires the master servicer to retain, to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) such sub-servicer to furnish) to the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee and the 17g-5 Information Provider, an officer’s certificate of the officer responsible for the servicing activities of such party stating, as to the signer thereof, among other things, that (i) a review of that party’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion of that year and of performance under the PSA or any sub-servicing agreement in the case of an additional master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, has been made under such officer’s supervision and (ii) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on the review, such party has fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA or the sub-servicing agreement in the case of an additional master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in all material respects throughout the preceding calendar year or portion of such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status of the failure.
In addition, each of the master servicer, the special servicer (regardless of whether the special servicer has commenced special servicing of any Mortgage Loan), the trustee (provided, however, that the trustee will not be required to deliver an assessment of compliance with respect to any period during which there was no relevant servicing criteria applicable to it), the custodian, the certificate administrator and the operating advisor, each at its own expense, will be required to furnish (and each such party will be required, with respect to each servicing function participant with which it has entered into a servicing relationship with respect to the Mortgage Loans to cause (or, in the case of a sub-servicer that is also a servicing function participant that a mortgage loan seller requires the master servicer to retain, to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) such servicing function participant to furnish) to the trustee, the certificate administrator, the 17g-5 Information Provider and the depositor (and, with respect to the special servicer, also to the operating advisor) a report (an “Assessment of Compliance”) assessing compliance by that party with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (as described below) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) that contains the following:
| ● | a statement of the party’s responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 of Regulation AB applicable to it; |
| ● | a statement that the party used the criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria; |
| ● | the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the fiscal year, covered by the Form 10-K required to be filed pursuant to the PSA setting forth any material instance of noncompliance identified by the party, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status of such failure; and |
| ● | a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report (an “Attestation Report”) on the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the prior fiscal year. |
Each party that is required to deliver an Assessment of Compliance will also be required to simultaneously deliver an Attestation Report of a registered public accounting firm, prepared in accordance with the standards for attestation engagements issued or adopted by the public company accounting oversight board, that expresses an opinion, or states that an opinion cannot be expressed (and the reasons for this), concerning the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan, each of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, the related Non-Serviced Trustee and the related Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator will have obligations under the related Non-Serviced PSA similar to those described above.
“Regulation AB” means subpart 229.1100 – Asset Backed Securities (Regulation AB), 17 C.F.R. §§229.1100–229.1125, as such may be amended from time to time, and subject to such clarification and interpretation as have been provided by the SEC or by the staff of the SEC, or as may be provided by the SEC or its staff from time to time.
Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding
Other than with respect to any rights to deliver an Owner Repurchase Request and exercise the rights described under “—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, no Certificateholder will have any right under the PSA to institute any proceeding with respect to the PSA or with respect to the certificates, unless the holder previously has given to the trustee and the certificate administrator written notice of default and the continuance of the default and unless the holders of certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the aggregate Percentage Interests constituting the class have made written request upon the trustee to institute a proceeding in its own name (as trustee) and have offered to the trustee indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it, and the trustee for 60 days after receipt of the request and indemnity has neglected or refused to institute the proceeding. However, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the trusts or powers vested in it by the PSA or the certificates or to institute, conduct or defend any related litigation at the request, order or direction of any of the Certificateholders, unless the Certificateholders have offered to the trustee reasonable security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred as a result.
Termination; Retirement of Certificates
The obligations created by the PSA will terminate upon payment (or provision for payment) to all Certificateholders of all amounts held by the certificate administrator on behalf of the trustee and required to be paid on the Distribution Date following the earlier of (1) the final payment (or related Advance) or other liquidation of the last Mortgage Loan and REO Property (as applicable) subject to the PSA, (2) the voluntary exchange of all the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class R certificates) for the Mortgage Loans and each REO Property remaining in the issuing entity (provided, however, that (a) the aggregate certificate balance of the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates and the Notional Amounts of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates have been reduced to zero, (b) there is only one holder (or multiple holders acting unanimously) of the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class R certificates) and (c) the master servicer is paid a fee equal to (i) the product of (x) the Prime Rate, (y) the aggregate Certificate Balance of the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class X Certificates and Class R certificates) as of the date of the exchange and (z) three (3), divided by (ii) 360) or (3) the purchase or other liquidation of all of the assets of the issuing entity as described below by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates, in that order of priority. Written notice of termination of the PSA will be given by the certificate administrator to each Certificateholder and the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website). The final distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the certificates at the office of the certificate registrar or other location specified in the notice of termination.
The holders of the Controlling Class representing greater than 50% of the Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer and the holders of the Class R certificates representing greater than 50% of the Percentage Interest of such class (in that order) will have the right to purchase all of the assets of the issuing entity. This purchase of all the Mortgage Loans and other assets in the issuing entity is required to be made at a price equal to (a) the sum of (1) the aggregate Purchase Price of all the Mortgage Loans (exclusive of REO Loans) then included in the issuing entity, (2) the appraised value of the issuing entity’s portion of all REO Properties then included in the issuing entity (which fair market value for any REO Property may be less than the Purchase Price for the corresponding
REO Loan), as determined by an appraiser selected by the master servicer and approved by certain classes of certificates, (3) the reasonable out of pocket expenses of the master servicer and special servicer related to such purchase, unless the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is the purchaser and (4) if the Mortgaged Property secures a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and is an REO Property under the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA, the pro rata portion of the fair market value of the related property, as determined by the Non-Serviced Master Servicer in accordance with clause (2) above, less (b) solely in the case where the master servicer is exercising such purchase right, the aggregate amount of unreimbursed Advances, and interest thereon, and unpaid Servicing Fees remaining outstanding and payable solely to the master servicer (which items will be deemed to have been paid or reimbursed to the master servicer in connection with such purchase). This purchase will effect early retirement of the then-outstanding certificates, but the rights of the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates to effect the termination is subject to the requirements that the then aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans remaining in the issuing entity is less than 1.0% of the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of all of the Mortgage Loans. The voluntary exchange of certificates (other than the Class R certificates), for the remaining Mortgage Loans is not subject to the above described percentage limits but is limited to each such class of outstanding certificates being held by one Certificateholder (or group of Certificateholders acting unanimously) who must voluntarily participate.
On the applicable Distribution Date, the aggregate amount paid by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates, as the case may be, for the Mortgage Loans and other applicable assets in the issuing entity, together with all other amounts on deposit in the Collection Account and not otherwise payable to a person other than the Certificateholders, will be applied generally as described above under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
Amendment
The PSA may be amended by the parties to the PSA, without the consent of any of the Certificateholders or holders of any Companion Loan:
(a) to correct any defect or ambiguity in the PSA in order to address any manifest error in any provision of the PSA;
(b) to cause the provisions in the PSA to conform or be consistent with or in furtherance of the statements made in the prospectus (or in an offering document for any related non-offered certificates) with respect to the certificates, the issuing entity or the PSA or to correct or supplement any of its provisions which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provisions in the PSA or to correct any error;
(c) to change the timing and/or nature of deposits in the Collection Account, the Distribution Accounts or any REO Account, provided that (A) the Master Servicer Remittance Date will in no event be later than the business day prior to the related Distribution Date and (B) the change would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced in writing by an opinion of counsel at the expense of the party requesting such amendment or as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies with respect to such amendment;
(d) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to the extent as will be necessary to maintain the qualification of any Trust REMIC as a REMIC under the relevant provisions of the Code at all times that any certificate is outstanding, or to avoid or minimize the risk of imposition of any tax on the issuing entity or any Trust REMIC; provided that the trustee and the certificate administrator have received an opinion of counsel (at the expense of the party requesting the amendment) to the effect that (1) the action is necessary or desirable to maintain such qualification or to avoid or minimize the risk of imposition of any such tax and (2) the action will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder or holder of a Companion Loan;
(e) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to restrict (or to remove any existing restrictions with respect to) the transfer of the Residual Certificates; provided that the depositor has determined that the amendment will not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, give rise to any federal tax with respect to the transfer of the Residual Certificates to a non-permitted transferee;
(f) to revise or add any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the PSA or any other change, provided that the required action will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder or any holder of a Serviced Companion Loan not consenting to such revision or addition, as evidenced in writing by an opinion of counsel at the expense of the party requesting such amendment or as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies with respect to such amendment or supplement and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus);
(g) to amend or supplement any provision of the PSA to the extent necessary to maintain the then-current ratings assigned to each class of Offered Certificates by each Rating Agency, as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus); provided that such amendment or supplement would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder not consenting to such amendment or supplement, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel;
(h) to modify the provisions of the PSA with respect to reimbursement of Nonrecoverable Advances and Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts if (a) the depositor, the master servicer, the trustee and, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than any applicable Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event is continuing, the Directing Holder, determine that the commercial mortgage-backed securities industry standard for such provisions has changed, in order to conform to such industry standard, (b) such modification does not adversely affect the status of any Trust REMIC as a REMIC under the relevant provisions of the Code, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel and (c) a Rating Agency Confirmation and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus);
(i) to modify the procedures set forth in the PSA relating to compliance with Rule 17g-5, provided that the change would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced by (A) an opinion of counsel or (B) if any certificate is then rated, receipt of Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency rating such certificates; and provided, further, that the certificate administrator must give notice of any such amendment to the 17g-5 Information Provider for posting on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website and the certificate administration must post such notice to its website;
(j) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to such extent as will be necessary to comply with the requirements for use of Form SF-3 in registered offerings to the extent provided in CFR 239.45(b)(1)(ii), (iii) or (iv); or
(k) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions (i) to such extent as will be necessary to comply with the requirements of the Credit Risk Retention Rules, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, or (ii) in the event the Credit Risk Retention Rules or any other regulations applicable to the
risk retention requirements for this securitization transaction are amended or repealed, to the extent required to comply with any such amendment or to modify or eliminate the risk retention requirements in the event of such repeal, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel; provided that no such modification, elimination or addition may change in any manner the rights or obligations of the Retaining Party under the PSA or the related risk retention agreement without the consent of the Retaining Party.
The PSA may also be amended by the parties to the PSA with the consent of the holders of certificates of each class affected by such amendment evidencing, in the case of Certificateholders, a majority of the aggregate Percentage Interests constituting the class for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the PSA or of modifying in any manner the rights of the holders of the certificates, except that the amendment may not directly (1) reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, payments received on the Mortgage Loans that are required to be distributed on a certificate of any class without the consent of the holder of such certificate or which are required to be distributed to a holder of a Companion Loan without the consent of such holder, (2) reduce the aforesaid percentage of certificates of any class the holders of which are required to consent to the amendment or remove the requirement to obtain consent of any holder of a Companion Loan, without the consent of the holders of all certificates of that class then-outstanding or such holder of any related Companion Loan, (3) adversely affect the Voting Rights of any class of certificates, without the consent of the holders of all certificates of that class then-outstanding, (4) change in any manner any defined term used in any MLPA or the obligations or rights of a mortgage loan seller under the related MLPA without the consent of such mortgage loan seller, or (5) amend the Servicing Standard without, in each case, the consent of 100% of the holders of certificates or a Rating Agency Confirmation by each Rating Agency and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment to the PSA may be made that changes in any manner the obligations of a mortgage loan seller under the related MLPA or the rights of such mortgage loan seller, including as a third party beneficiary, under the PSA, without the consent of such mortgage loan seller. In addition, no amendment to the PSA may be made that changes any provisions specifically required to be included in the PSA by any Non-Serviced Co-Lender Agreement without the consent of the holder of the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan.
Also, notwithstanding the foregoing, no party will be required to consent to any amendment to the PSA without the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer and the operating advisor having first received an opinion of counsel (at the issuing entity’s expense) to the effect that the amendment does not conflict with the terms of the PSA, and that the amendment or the exercise of any power granted to the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or any other specified person in accordance with the amendment will not result in the imposition of a tax on any portion of the issuing entity or cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC under the relevant provisions of the Code.
Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator
Each of the trustee and the certificate administrator will at all times be, and will be required to resign if it fails to be, (i) a corporation, national bank, national banking association or a trust company, organized and doing business under the laws of any state or the United States of America, authorized under such laws to exercise corporate trust powers and to accept the trust conferred under the PSA, having a combined capital and surplus of at least $100,000,000, subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority, an entity that is not on the depositor’s “prohibited party” list, and (ii)(A) in the case of the trustee (1) will not be an affiliate of the master servicer or the special servicer (except during any period when the trustee is acting as, or has become successor to, the master servicer or the special servicer, as
the case may be) and (2) an institution whose long-term senior unsecured debt rating or issuer credit rating is at least (x) “A2” by Moody’s or which has a long-term counterparty risk assessment of at least “A2(cr)” by Moody’s (provided, however, that the trustee may maintain a long-term senior unsecured debt rating or an issuer credit rating of at least “Baa3” by Moody’s if the master servicer is an institution whose long-term senior unsecured debt is rated at least “A2” by Moody’s or whose long-term counterparty risk assessment is rated at least “A2(cr)” by Moody’s), (y) “A” by Fitch (or short-term debt rating of “F1” by Fitch) (provided, however, that the trustee may maintain a rating of “BBB-” by Fitch if the master servicer has a long-term rating of at least “A” by Fitch or a short term rating of “F1” by Fitch) and (z) if rated by KBRA, a long term senior unsecured debt rating or issuer credit rating of at least “BBB-” by KBRA (or if not rated by KBRA, then at least an equivalent rating by two (2) other NRSROs, which may include Moody’s and Fitch), (B) in the case of the certificate administrator, an institution whose long-term senior unsecured debt or issuer credit rating is rated at least “BBB-” by KBRA (or an investment grade rating by any other NRSRO, which may include Moody’s or Fitch) or (C) in the case of each of the certificate administrator and the trustee, as otherwise acceptable to each Rating Agency as evidenced by the receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation.
The trustee and the certificate administrator will be also permitted at any time to resign from their obligations and duties under the PSA by giving 30 days’ prior written notice (which notice will be posted to the certificate administrator’s website pursuant to the PSA) to the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, all Certificateholders, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website). Upon receiving this notice of resignation, the depositor will be required to use its reasonable best efforts to promptly appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator. If no successor trustee or certificate administrator has accepted an appointment within 120 days after the giving of notice of resignation, the resigning trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, may petition any court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and such petition will be an expense of the issuing entity.
If at any time the trustee or certificate administrator ceases to be eligible to continue as trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, under the PSA, and fails to resign after written request therefor by the depositor or the master servicer, or if at any time the trustee or certificate administrator becomes incapable of acting, or if certain events of, or proceedings in respect of, bankruptcy or insolvency occur with respect to the trustee or certificate administrator, or if the trustee or certificate administrator fails to timely publish any report to be delivered, published, or otherwise made available by the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA, and such failure continues unremedied for a period of 5 days, or if the certificate administrator fails to make distributions required pursuant to the PSA, the depositor will be authorized to remove the trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator reasonably acceptable to the master servicer.
In addition, holders of certificates entitled to at least 50% of the Voting Rights may at any time upon 30 days’ written notice, with or without cause, remove the trustee or certificate administrator under the PSA and appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator. In the event that holders of certificates entitled to at least 50% of the Voting Rights elect to remove the trustee or certificate administrator without cause and appoint a successor, the successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, will be responsible for all expenses necessary to effect the transfer of responsibilities from its predecessor.
Any resignation or removal of the trustee or certificate administrator and appointment of a successor trustee or certificate administrator will not become effective until (i) acceptance of appointment by the successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and (ii) the certificate administrator files any required Form 8-K. Further, the resigning trustee or certificate administrator, as the case may be, must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
The trustee or certificate administrator will be required to bear all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA and each Rating Agency in connection with any removal for cause or resignation of such trustee or certificate administrator as and to the extent required under the PSA.
The PSA will prohibit the appointment of the asset representations reviewer or one of its affiliates as successor to the trustee or certificate administrator.
Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial; and Consent to Jurisdiction
The PSA will be governed by the laws of the State of New York. Each party to the PSA will waive its respective right to a jury trial for any claim or cause of action based upon or arising out of or related to the PSA or certificates. Additionally each party to the PSA will consent to the jurisdiction of any New York State and Federal courts sitting in New York City with respect to matters arising out of or related to the PSA.
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans
The following discussion contains general summaries of certain legal aspects of mortgage loans secured by commercial, multifamily residential and manufactured housing properties. Because such legal aspects are governed by applicable local law (which laws may differ substantially), the summaries do not purport to be complete, to reflect the laws of any particular jurisdiction, or to encompass the laws of all jurisdictions in which the security for the mortgage loans is situated.
New York
Thirteen (13) Mortgaged Properties (15.7%) are located in New York. Mortgage loans in New York are generally secured by mortgages on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a mortgage is usually accomplished in judicial proceedings. After an action for foreclosure is commenced, and if the lender secures a ruling that is entitled to foreclosure ordinarily by motion for summary judgment, the court then appoints a referee to compute the amount owed together with certain costs, expenses and legal fees of the action. The lender then moves to confirm the referee’s report and enter a final judgment of foreclosure and sale. Public notice of the foreclosure sale, including the amount of the judgment, is given for a statutory period of time, after which the mortgaged real estate is sold by a referee at public auction. There is no right of redemption after the foreclosure of sale. In certain circumstances, deficiency judgments may be obtained. Under mortgages containing a statutorily sanctioned covenant, the lender has a right to have a receiver appointed without notice and without regard to the adequacy of the mortgaged real estate as security for the amount owed.
Texas
Seven (7) Mortgaged Properties (15.5%) are located in Texas. Commercial mortgage loans in Texas are generally secured by deeds of trust on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a deed of trust in Texas may be accomplished by either a non-judicial trustee’s sale under a specific power-of-sale provision set forth in the deed of trust or by judicial foreclosure. Due to the relatively short period of time involved in a non-judicial foreclosure, the judicial foreclosure process is rarely used in Texas. A judicial foreclosure action must be initiated, and a non-judicial foreclosure must be completed, within four years from the date the cause of action accrues. The cause of action for the unpaid balance of the indebtedness accrues upon the maturity of the indebtedness (by acceleration or otherwise).
Unless expressly waived in the deed of trust, the lender must provide the debtor with a written demand for payment, a notice of intent to accelerate the indebtedness, and a notice of acceleration prior to commencing any foreclosure action. It is customary practice in Texas for the demand for payment to be combined with the notice of intent to accelerate the indebtedness. In addition, with respect to a non-judicial foreclosure sale and notwithstanding any waiver by debtor to the contrary, the lender is statutorily required to (i) provide each debtor obligated to pay the indebtedness a notice of foreclosure sale via certified mail, postage prepaid and addressed to each debtor at such debtor’s last known address at least 21 days before the date of the foreclosure sale; (ii) post a notice of foreclosure sale at the courthouse of each county in which the property is located; and (iii) file a notice of foreclosure sale with the county clerk of each county in which the property is located. Such 21 day period includes the entire calendar day on
which the notice is deposited with the United States mail and excludes the entire calendar day of the foreclosure sale. The statutory foreclosure notice may be combined with the notice of acceleration of the indebtedness and must contain the location of the foreclosure sale and a statement of the earliest time at which the foreclosure sale will begin. To the extent the note or deed of trust contains additional notice requirements, the lender must comply with such requirements in addition to the statutory requirements set forth above.
The trustee’s sale must be performed pursuant to the terms of the deed of trust and statutory law and must take place between the hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the first Tuesday of the month, in the area designated for such sales by the county commissioners’ court of the county in which the property is located, and must begin at the time set forth in the notice of foreclosure sale or not later than three hours after that time. If the property is located in multiple counties, the sale may occur in any county in which a portion of the property is located. Under Texas law applicable to the subject property, the debtor does not have the right to redeem the property after foreclosure. Any action for deficiency must be brought within two years of the foreclosure sale. If the foreclosure sale price is less than the fair market value of the property, the debtor or any obligor (including any guarantor) may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency in the amount by which the fair market value of the property, less the amount of any claim, indebtedness, or obligation of any kind that is secured by a lien or encumbrance on the real property that was not extinguished by the foreclosure, exceeds the foreclosure sale price.
General
Each mortgage loan will be evidenced by a promissory note and secured by an instrument granting a security interest in real property, which may be a mortgage, deed of trust or a deed to secure debt, depending upon the prevailing practice and law in the state in which the related Mortgaged Property is located. Mortgages, deeds of trust and deeds to secure debt are in this prospectus collectively referred to as “mortgages”. A mortgage creates a lien upon, or grants a title interest in, the real property covered thereby, and represents the security for the repayment of the indebtedness customarily evidenced by a promissory note. The priority of the lien created or interest granted will depend on the terms of the mortgage and, in some cases, on the terms of separate subordination agreements or co-lender agreements with others that hold interests in the real property, the knowledge of the parties to the mortgage and, generally, the order of recordation of the mortgage in the appropriate public recording office. However, the lien of a recorded mortgage will generally be subordinate to later-arising liens for real estate taxes and assessments and other charges imposed under governmental police powers.
Types of Mortgage Instruments
There are two (2) parties to a mortgage: a mortgagor (the borrower and usually the owner of the applicable property) and a mortgagee (the lender). In contrast, a deed of trust is a three-party instrument, among a trustor (the equivalent of a borrower), a trustee to whom the real property is conveyed, and a beneficiary (the lender) for whose benefit the conveyance is made. Under a deed of trust, the trustor grants the property, irrevocably until the debt is paid, in trust and generally with a power of sale, to the trustee to secure repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by the related note. A deed to secure debt typically has two (2) parties, pursuant to which the borrower, or grantor, conveys title to the real property to the grantee, or lender generally with a power of sale, until such time as the debt is repaid. In a case where the borrower is a land trust, there would be an additional party because legal title to the property is held by a land trustee under a land trust agreement for the benefit of the borrower. At origination of a mortgage loan involving a land trust, the borrower may execute a separate undertaking to make payments on the promissory note. The land trustee would not be personally liable for the promissory note obligation. The mortgagee’s authority under a mortgage, the trustee’s authority under a deed of trust and the grantee’s authority under a deed to secure debt are governed by the express provisions of the related instrument, the law of the state in which the real property is located, certain federal laws and, in some deed of trust transactions, the directions of the beneficiary.
Leases and Rents
Mortgages that encumber income-producing property often contain an assignment of rents and leases, and/or may be accompanied by a separate assignment of rents and leases, pursuant to which the borrower assigns to the lender the borrower’s right, title and interest as landlord under each lease and the income derived from the lease, while (unless rents are to be paid directly to the lender) retaining a revocable license to collect the rents for so long as there is no default. If the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect the rents. Local law may require that the lender take possession of the property and/or obtain a court-appointed receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents.
In most states, hospitality property and motel room rates are considered accounts receivable under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). In cases where hospitality properties or motels constitute loan security, the revenues are generally pledged by the borrower as additional security for the loan. In general, the lender must file financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in the room revenues and must file continuation statements, generally every five (5) years, to maintain perfection of such security interest. In certain cases, mortgage loans secured by hospitality properties or motels may be included in the issuing entity even if the security interest in the room revenues was not perfected. Even if the lender’s security interest in room revenues is perfected under applicable nonbankruptcy law, it will generally be required to commence a foreclosure action or otherwise take possession of the property in order to enforce its rights to collect the room revenues following a default. In the bankruptcy setting, however, the lender will be stayed from enforcing its rights to collect room revenues, but those room revenues constitute “cash collateral” and therefore generally cannot be used by the bankruptcy debtor without a hearing or lender’s consent or unless the lender’s interest in the room revenues is given adequate protection (e.g., cash payment for otherwise encumbered funds or a replacement lien on unencumbered property, in either case in value equivalent to the amount of room revenues that the debtor proposes to use, or other similar relief). See “—Bankruptcy Laws” below.
Personalty
In the case of certain types of mortgaged properties, such as hospitality properties, motels, nursing homes and manufactured housing, personal property (to the extent owned by the borrower and not previously pledged) may constitute a significant portion of the property’s value as security. The creation and enforcement of liens on personal property are governed by the UCC. Accordingly, if a borrower pledges personal property as security for a mortgage loan, the lender generally must file UCC financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in that personal property, and must file continuation statements, generally every five years, to maintain that perfection. Certain mortgage loans secured in part by personal property may be included in the issuing entity even if the security interest in such personal property was not perfected.
Foreclosure
General
Foreclosure is a legal procedure that allows the lender to recover its mortgage debt by enforcing its rights and available legal remedies under the mortgage. If the borrower defaults in payment or performance of its obligations under the promissory note or mortgage, the lender has the right to institute foreclosure proceedings to sell the real property at public auction to satisfy the indebtedness.
Foreclosure Procedures Vary from State to State
Two (2) primary methods of foreclosing a mortgage are judicial foreclosure, involving court proceedings, and nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to a power of sale granted in the mortgage instrument. Other foreclosure procedures are available in some states, but they are either infrequently used or available only in limited circumstances.
A foreclosure action is subject to most of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if defenses are raised or counterclaims are interposed, and sometimes requires several years to complete.
Judicial Foreclosure
A judicial foreclosure proceeding is conducted in a court having jurisdiction over the mortgaged property. Generally, the action is initiated by the service of legal pleadings upon all parties having a subordinate interest of record in the real property and all parties in possession of the property, under leases or otherwise, whose interests are subordinate to the mortgage. Delays in completion of the foreclosure may occasionally result from difficulties in locating defendants. When the lender’s right to foreclose is contested, the legal proceedings can be time-consuming. Upon successful completion of a judicial foreclosure proceeding, the court generally issues a judgment of foreclosure and appoints a referee or other officer to conduct a public sale of the mortgaged property, the proceeds of which are used to satisfy the judgment. Such sales are made in accordance with procedures that vary from state to state.
Equitable and Other Limitations on Enforceability of Certain Provisions
United States courts have traditionally imposed general equitable principles to limit the remedies available to lenders in foreclosure actions. These principles are generally designed to relieve borrowers from the effects of mortgage defaults perceived as harsh or unfair. Relying on such principles, a court may alter the specific terms of a loan to the extent it considers necessary to prevent or remedy an injustice, undue oppression or overreaching, or may require the lender to undertake affirmative actions to determine the cause of the borrower’s default and the likelihood that the borrower will be able to reinstate the loan. In some cases, courts have substituted their judgment for the lender’s and have required that lenders reinstate loans or recast payment schedules in order to accommodate borrowers who are suffering from a temporary financial disability. In other cases, courts have limited the right of the lender to foreclose in the case of a nonmonetary default, such as a failure to adequately maintain the mortgaged property or an impermissible further encumbrance of the mortgaged property. Finally, some courts have addressed the issue of whether federal or state constitutional provisions reflecting due process concerns for adequate notice require that a borrower receive notice in addition to statutorily-prescribed minimum notice. For the most part, these cases have upheld the reasonableness of the notice provisions or have found that a public sale under a mortgage providing for a power of sale does not involve sufficient state action to trigger constitutional protections.
In addition, some states may have statutory protection such as the right of the borrower to reinstate a mortgage loan after commencement of foreclosure proceedings but prior to a foreclosure sale.
Nonjudicial Foreclosure/Power of Sale
In states permitting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings, foreclosure of a deed of trust is generally accomplished by a nonjudicial trustee’s sale pursuant to a power of sale typically granted in the deed of trust. A power of sale may also be contained in any other type of mortgage instrument if applicable law so permits. A power of sale under a deed of trust allows a nonjudicial public sale to be conducted generally following a request from the beneficiary/lender to the trustee to sell the property upon default by the borrower and after notice of sale is given in accordance with the terms of the mortgage and applicable state law. In some states, prior to such sale, the trustee under the deed of trust must record a notice of default and notice of sale and send a copy to the borrower and to any other party who has recorded a request for a copy of a notice of default and notice of sale. In addition, in some states the trustee must provide notice to any other party having an interest of record in the real property, including junior
lienholders. A notice of sale must be posted in a public place and, in most states, published for a specified period of time in one or more newspapers. The borrower or junior lienholder may then have the right, during a reinstatement period required in some states, to cure the default by paying the entire actual amount in arrears (without regard to the acceleration of the indebtedness), plus the lender’s expenses incurred in enforcing the obligation. In other states, the borrower or the junior lienholder is not provided a period to reinstate the loan, but has only the right to pay off the entire debt to prevent the foreclosure sale. Generally, state law governs the procedure for public sale, the parties entitled to notice, the method of giving notice and the applicable time periods.
Public Sale
A third party may be unwilling to purchase a mortgaged property at a public sale because of the difficulty in determining the exact status of title to the property (due to, among other things, redemption rights that may exist) and because of the possibility that physical deterioration of the mortgaged property may have occurred during the foreclosure proceedings. Potential buyers may also be reluctant to purchase mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale as a result of the 1980 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Durrett v. Washington National Insurance Co., 621 F.2d 2001 (5th Cir. 1980) and other decisions that have followed its reasoning. The court in Durrett held that even a non-collusive, regularly conducted foreclosure sale was a fraudulent transfer under the Bankruptcy Code and, thus, could be rescinded in favor of the bankrupt’s estate, if (1) the foreclosure sale was held while the debtor was insolvent and not more than one year prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition and (2) the price paid for the foreclosed property did not represent “fair consideration”, which is “reasonably equivalent value” under the Bankruptcy Code. Although the reasoning and result of Durrett in respect of the Bankruptcy Code was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531 (1994), the case could nonetheless be persuasive to a court applying a state fraudulent conveyance law which has provisions similar to those construed in Durrett. Therefore, it is common for the lender to purchase the mortgaged property for an amount equal to the secured indebtedness and accrued and unpaid interest plus the expenses of foreclosure, in which event the borrower’s debt will be extinguished, or for a lesser amount in order to preserve its right to seek a deficiency judgment if such is available under state law and under the terms of the mortgage loan documents. Thereafter, subject to the borrower’s right in some states to remain in possession during a redemption period, the lender will become the owner of the property and have both the benefits and burdens of ownership, including the obligation to pay debt service on any senior mortgages, to pay taxes, to obtain casualty insurance and to make such repairs as are necessary to render the property suitable for sale. Frequently, the lender employs a third-party management company to manage and operate the property. The costs of operating and maintaining a property may be significant and may be greater than the income derived from that property. The costs of management and operation of those mortgaged properties which are hotels, motels, restaurants, nursing or convalescent homes, hospitals or casinos may be particularly significant because of the expertise, knowledge and, with respect to certain property types, regulatory compliance, required to run those operations and the effect which foreclosure and a change in ownership may have on the public’s and the industry’s, including franchisors’, perception of the quality of those operations. The lender also will commonly obtain the services of a real estate broker and pay the broker’s commission in connection with the sale or lease of the property. Depending upon market conditions, the ultimate proceeds of the sale of a property may not equal the lender’s investment in the property. Moreover, a lender commonly incurs substantial legal fees and court costs in acquiring a mortgaged property through contested foreclosure and/or bankruptcy proceedings. Because of the expenses associated with acquiring, owning and selling a mortgaged property, a lender could realize an overall loss on a mortgage loan even if the mortgaged property is sold at foreclosure, or resold after it is acquired through foreclosure, for an amount equal to the full outstanding principal amount of the loan plus accrued interest.
Furthermore, an increasing number of states require that any environmental contamination at certain types of properties be cleaned up before a property may be resold. In addition, a lender may be responsible under federal or state law for the cost of cleaning up a mortgaged property that is environmentally contaminated. See “—Environmental Considerations” below.
The holder of a junior mortgage that forecloses on a mortgaged property does so subject to senior mortgages and any other prior liens, and may be obliged to keep senior mortgage loans current in order to avoid foreclosure of its interest in the property. In addition, if the foreclosure of a junior mortgage triggers the enforcement of a “due-on-sale” clause contained in a senior mortgage, the junior mortgagee could be required to pay the full amount of the senior mortgage indebtedness or face foreclosure.
Rights of Redemption
The purposes of a foreclosure action are to enable the lender to realize upon its security and to bar the borrower, and all persons who have interests in the property that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender, from exercise of their “equity of redemption”. The doctrine of equity of redemption provides that, until the property encumbered by a mortgage has been sold in accordance with a properly conducted foreclosure and foreclosure sale, those having interests that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender have an equity of redemption and may redeem the property by paying the entire debt with interest. Those having an equity of redemption must generally be made parties and joined in the foreclosure proceeding in order for their equity of redemption to be terminated.
The equity of redemption is a common-law (nonstatutory) right which should be distinguished from post-sale statutory rights of redemption. In some states, after sale pursuant to a deed of trust or foreclosure of a mortgage, the borrower and foreclosed junior lienors are given a statutory period in which to redeem the property. In some states, statutory redemption may occur only upon payment of the foreclosure sale price. In other states, redemption may be permitted if the former borrower pays only a portion of the sums due. The effect of a statutory right of redemption is to diminish the ability of the lender to sell the foreclosed property because the exercise of a right of redemption would defeat the title of any purchaser through a foreclosure. Consequently, the practical effect of the redemption right is to force the lender to maintain the property and pay the expenses of ownership until the redemption period has expired. In some states, a post-sale statutory right of redemption may exist following a judicial foreclosure, but not following a trustee’s sale under a deed of trust.
Anti-Deficiency Legislation
Some or all of the mortgage loans are nonrecourse loans, as to which recourse in the case of default will be limited to the mortgaged property and such other assets, if any, that were pledged to secure the mortgage loan. However, even if a mortgage loan by its terms provides for recourse to the borrower’s other assets, a lender’s ability to realize upon those assets may be limited by state law. For example, in some states a lender cannot obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower following foreclosure or sale under a deed of trust.
A deficiency judgment is a personal judgment against the former borrower equal to the difference between the net amount realized upon the public sale of the real property and the amount due to the lender. Other statutes may require the lender to exhaust the security afforded under a mortgage before bringing a personal action against the borrower. In certain other states, the lender has the option of bringing a personal action against the borrower on the debt without first exhausting that security; however, in some of those states, the lender, following judgment on that personal action, may be deemed to have elected a remedy and thus may be precluded from foreclosing upon the security. Consequently, lenders in those states where such an election of remedy provision exists will usually proceed first against the security. Finally, other statutory provisions, designed to protect borrowers from exposure to large deficiency judgments that might result from bidding at below-market values at the foreclosure sale, limit any deficiency judgment to the excess of the outstanding debt over the fair market value of the property at the time of the sale.
Leasehold Considerations
Mortgage loans may be secured by a mortgage on the borrower’s leasehold interest in a ground lease. Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower. The most significant of these risks is that if the borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the leasehold mortgagee would lose its security. This risk may be lessened if the ground lease requires the lessor to give the leasehold mortgagee notices of lessee defaults and an opportunity to cure them, permits the leasehold estate to be assigned to and by the leasehold mortgagee or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, and contains certain other protective provisions typically included in a “mortgageable” ground lease. Certain mortgage loans, however, may be secured by ground leases which do not contain these provisions.
In addition, where a lender has as its security both the fee and leasehold interest in the same property, the grant of a mortgage lien on its fee interest by the land owner/ground lessor to secure the debt of a borrower/ground lessee may be subject to challenge as a fraudulent conveyance. Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by the land owner/ground lessor from the loan. If a court concluded that the granting of the mortgage lien was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, it might take actions detrimental to the holders of the offered certificates, including, under certain circumstances, invalidating the mortgage lien on the fee interest of the land owner/ground lessor.
Cooperative Shares
Mortgage loans may be secured by a security interest on the borrower’s ownership interest in shares, and the related proprietary leases, allocable to cooperative dwelling units that may be vacant or occupied by non-owner tenants. Such loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of a borrower in real property. Such a loan typically is subordinate to the mortgage, if any, on the cooperative’s building which, if foreclosed, could extinguish the equity in the building and the proprietary leases of the dwelling units derived from ownership of the shares of the cooperative. Further, transfer of shares in a cooperative are subject to various regulations as well as to restrictions under the governing documents of the cooperative, and the shares may be cancelled in the event that associated maintenance charges due under the related proprietary leases are not paid. Typically, a recognition agreement between the lender and the cooperative provides, among other things, the lender with an opportunity to cure a default under a proprietary lease.
Under the laws applicable in many states, “foreclosure” on cooperative shares is accomplished by a sale in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the UCC and the security agreement relating to the shares. Article 9 of the UCC requires that a sale be conducted in a “commercially reasonable” manner, which may be dependent upon, among other things, the notice given the debtor and the method, manner, time, place and terms of the sale. Article 9 of the UCC provides that the proceeds of the sale will be applied first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale and then to satisfy the indebtedness secured by the lender’s security interest. A recognition agreement, however, generally provides that the lender’s right to reimbursement is subject to the right of the cooperative to receive sums due under the proprietary leases.
Bankruptcy Laws
Operation of the Bankruptcy Code and related state laws may interfere with or affect the ability of a lender to obtain payment of a loan, realize upon collateral and/or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition, and, usually, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy case. The delay and the consequences of a delay caused by an automatic stay can be significant. For example, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior mortgage lien holder may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out such junior lien. At a minimum, the senior lender would suffer delay due to
its need to seek bankruptcy court approval before taking any foreclosure or other action that could be deemed in violation of the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy trustee, or a borrower as debtor-in-possession, may under certain circumstances sell the related mortgaged property or other collateral free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests, which liens would then attach to the proceeds of such sale, despite the provisions of the related mortgage or other security agreement to the contrary. Such a sale may be approved by a bankruptcy court even if the proceeds are insufficient to pay the secured debt in full.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, provided certain substantive and procedural safeguards for a lender are met, the amount and terms of a mortgage or other security agreement secured by property of a debtor may be modified under certain circumstances. Pursuant to a confirmed plan of reorganization, lien avoidance or claim objection proceeding, the secured claim arising from a loan secured by real property or other collateral may be reduced to the then-current value of the property (with a corresponding partial reduction of the amount of lender’s security interest), thus leaving the lender a secured creditor to the extent of the then current value of the property and a general unsecured creditor for the difference between such value and the outstanding balance of the loan. Such general unsecured claims may be paid less than 100% of the amount of the debt or not at all, depending upon the circumstances. Other modifications may include the reduction in the amount of each scheduled payment, which reduction may result from a reduction in the rate of interest and/or the alteration of the repayment schedule (with or without affecting the unpaid principal balance of the loan), and/or an extension (or reduction) of the final maturity date. Some courts have approved bankruptcy plans, based on the particular facts of the reorganization case, that effected the curing of a mortgage loan default by paying arrearages over a number of years. Also, under the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy court may permit a debtor through its plan of reorganization to reinstate the loan even though the lender accelerated the mortgage loan and final judgment of foreclosure had been entered in state court prior to the filing of the debtor’s petition (provided no sale of the property had yet occurred). This may be done even if the plan of reorganization does not provide for payment of the full amount due under the original loan. Thus, the full amount due under the original loan may never be repaid. Other types of significant modifications to the terms of a mortgage loan may be acceptable to the bankruptcy court, such as making distributions to the mortgage holder of property other than cash, or the substitution of collateral which is the “indubitable equivalent” of the real property subject to the mortgage, or the subordination of the mortgage to liens securing new debt (provided that the lender’s secured claim is “adequately protected” as such term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code), often depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the specific case.
Federal bankruptcy law may also interfere with or otherwise adversely affect the ability of a secured mortgage lender to enforce an assignment by a borrower of rents and leases (which “rents” may include revenues from hotels and other lodging facilities specified in the Bankruptcy Code) related to a mortgaged property if the related borrower is in a bankruptcy proceeding. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a lender may be stayed from enforcing the assignment, and the legal proceedings necessary to resolve the issue can be time consuming and may result in significant delays in the receipt of the rents. Rents (including applicable hotel and other lodging revenues) and leases may also escape such an assignment, among other reasons, (i) if the assignment is not fully perfected under state law prior to commencement of the bankruptcy proceeding, (ii) to the extent such rents and leases are used by the borrower to maintain the mortgaged property, or for other court authorized expenses, (iii) to the extent other collateral may be substituted for the rents and leases, (iv) to the extent the bankruptcy court determines that the lender is adequately protected, or (v) to the extent the court determines based on the equities of the case that the post-petition rents are not subject to the lender’s pre-petition security interest.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, a security interest in real property acquired before the commencement of the bankruptcy case does not extend to income received after the commencement of the bankruptcy case unless such income is a proceed, product or rent of such property. Therefore, to the extent a business conducted on the mortgaged property creates accounts receivable rather than rents or results from payments under a license rather than payments under a lease, a valid and perfected pre-bankruptcy
lien on such accounts receivable or license income generally would not continue as to post-bankruptcy accounts receivable or license income.
The Bankruptcy Code provides that a lender’s perfected pre-petition security interest in leases, rents and hotel revenues continues in the post-petition leases, rents and hotel revenues, unless a bankruptcy court orders to the contrary “based on the equities of the case”. Thus, unless a court orders otherwise, revenues from a mortgaged property generated after the date the bankruptcy petition is filed will constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code. Debtors may only use cash collateral upon obtaining the lender’s consent or a prior court order finding that the lender’s interest in the mortgaged hotel, motel or other lodging property and the cash collateral is “adequately protected” as the term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code. In addition to post-petition rents, any cash held by a lender in a lockbox or reserve account generally would also constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code. So long as the lender is adequately protected, a debtor’s use of cash collateral may be for its own benefit or for the benefit of any affiliated entity group that is also subject to bankruptcy proceedings, including use as collateral for new debt. It should be noted, however, that the court may find that the lender has no security interest in either pre-petition or post-petition revenues if the court finds that the loan documents do not contain language covering accounts, room rents, or other forms of personalty necessary for a security interest to attach to such revenues.
The Bankruptcy Code provides generally that rights and obligations under an unexpired lease of the debtor/lessee may not be terminated or modified at any time after the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code solely because of a provision in the lease providing for the termination or modification of such rights or obligations upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the occurrence of certain other similar events. This prohibition on so-called “ipso facto” clauses could limit the ability of a lender to exercise certain contractual remedies with respect to the leases on any mortgaged property. In addition, section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code operates as an automatic stay of, among other things, any act to obtain possession of property from a debtor’s estate, which may delay a lender’s exercise of those remedies, including foreclosure, in the event that a lessee becomes the subject of a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a lessee of a mortgaged property would result in a stay against the commencement or continuation of any state court proceeding for past due rent, for accelerated rent, for damages or for a summary eviction order with respect to a default under the related lease that occurred prior to the filing of the lessee’s petition. While relief from the automatic stay to enforce remedies may be requested by a creditor and granted by a bankruptcy court in certain circumstances, it can be denied for a number of reasons, including where the collateral is “necessary to an effective reorganization” for the debtor, and if a debtor’s case has been administratively consolidated with those of its affiliates, the court may also consider whether the property is “necessary to an effective reorganization” of the debtor and its affiliates, taken as a whole.
The Bankruptcy Code generally provides that a trustee in bankruptcy or debtor-in-possession may, with respect to an unexpired lease of non-residential real property under which the debtor is a lessee, before the earlier of (i) 120 days after the filing of a bankruptcy case or (ii) the entry of an order confirming a plan, subject to approval of the court, (a) assume the lease and retain it or assign it to a third party or (b) reject the lease. If the trustee or debtor-in-possession fails to assume or reject the lease within the time specified in the preceding sentence, subject to any extensions by the bankruptcy court, the lease will be deemed rejected and the property will be surrendered to the lessor. The bankruptcy court may for cause shown extend the 120-day period up to 90 days for a total of 210 days. If the lease is assumed, the trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of the lessee, or the lessee as debtor-in-possession, or the assignee, if applicable, must cure any defaults under the lease, compensate the lessor for its losses and provide the lessor with “adequate assurance” of future performance. These remedies may be insufficient, however, as the lessor may be forced to continue under the lease with a lessee that is a poor credit risk or an unfamiliar tenant (if the lease was assigned), and any assurances provided to the lessor may, in fact, be inadequate. If the lease is rejected, the rejection generally constitutes a breach of the executory contract or unexpired lease as of the date immediately preceding the filing date of the bankruptcy petition. As a consequence, the other party or parties to the lease, such as the borrower, as lessor under a lease, generally would have only an unsecured claim against the debtor, as lessee, for damages resulting from the breach, which could adversely affect the security for the related mortgage loan. In addition, under the
Bankruptcy Code, a lease rejection damages claim is limited to the “(a) rent reserved by the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed three (3) years, of the remaining term of such lease, following the earlier of the date of the bankruptcy petition and the date on which the lessor regained possession of the real property, (b) plus any unpaid rent due under such lease, without acceleration, on the earlier of such dates.”
If a trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of a lessor, or a lessor as debtor-in-possession, rejects an unexpired lease of real property, the lessee may treat the lease as terminated by the rejection or, in the alternative, the lessee may remain in possession of the leasehold for the balance of the term and for any renewal or extension of the term that is enforceable by the lessee under applicable non-bankruptcy law. The Bankruptcy Code provides that if a lessee elects to remain in possession after a rejection of a lease, the lessee may offset against rents reserved under the lease for the balance of the term after the date of rejection of the lease, and the related renewal or extension of the lease, any damages occurring after that date caused by the nonperformance of any obligation of the lessor under the lease after that date.
Similarly, there is risk associated with a borrower ground lessee or ground lessor becoming a debtor in a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code. In general, upon the bankruptcy of a lessor or a lessee under a lease of nonresidential real property, including a ground lease, that has not been terminated prior to the bankruptcy filing date, the debtor entity has the statutory right to assume or reject the lease. Given that the Bankruptcy Code generally invalidates clauses that terminate contracts automatically upon the filing by one of the parties of a bankruptcy petition or that are conditioned on a party’s insolvency, following the filing of a bankruptcy petition, a debtor would ordinarily be required to perform its obligations under such lease until the debtor decides whether to assume or reject the lease. The Bankruptcy Code provides certain additional protections with respect to non-residential real property leases, such as establishing a specific timeframe in which a debtor must determine whether to assume or reject the lease. Additionally, the Bankruptcy Code requires a debtor lessee to timely perform any obligations under a non-residential real property lease arising after the petition date, until the debtor determines whether to assume or reject the lease. The bankruptcy court may defer the time for the debtor lessee to perform under the lease until 60 days following the petition date for cause shown. Even if the agreements were terminated prior to bankruptcy, a bankruptcy court may determine that the agreement was improperly terminated and therefore remains part of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. The debtor also can seek bankruptcy court approval to assume and assign the lease to a third party, and to modify the lease in connection with such assignment. In order to assume the lease, the debtor or assignee generally will have to cure outstanding defaults and provide “adequate assurance of future performance” in addition to satisfying other requirements imposed under the Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code, subject to certain exceptions, once a lease is rejected by a debtor lessee, it is deemed breached, and the non-debtor lessor will have a claim for lease rejection damages, as described above.
If the ground lessor files for bankruptcy, it may wait until the confirmation of its plan of reorganization to determine whether to reject the ground lease. On request of any party to the lease, the bankruptcy court may order the debtor to determine within a specific period of time whether to assume or reject the lease or to comply with the terms of the lease pending its decision to assume or reject. In the event of rejection, the non-debtor lessee will have the right to treat the lease as terminated by virtue of its terms, applicable nonbankruptcy law, or any agreement made by the lessee. The non-debtor lessee may also, if the lease term has begun, retain its rights under the lease, including its rights to remain in possession of the leased premises under the rent reserved in the lease for the balance of the term of the lease (including renewals). The term “lessee” includes any “successor, assign or mortgagee permitted under the terms of such lease”. If, pre-petition, the ground lessor had specifically granted the leasehold mortgagee such right, the leasehold mortgagee may have the right to succeed to the lessee/borrower’s position under the lease.
In the event of concurrent bankruptcy proceedings involving the ground lessor and the lessee/borrower, actions by creditors against the lessee/borrower debtor would be subject to the automatic stay, and a lender may be unable to enforce both the bankrupt lessee/borrower’s pre-petition agreement to refuse to treat a ground lease rejected by a bankrupt lessor as terminated and any agreement by the ground lessor to grant the lender a new lease upon such termination. In such
circumstances, a lease could be terminated notwithstanding lender protection provisions contained in that lease or in the mortgage. A lender could lose its security unless the lender holds a fee mortgage or the bankruptcy court, as a court of equity, allows the mortgagee to assume the ground lessee’s obligations under the ground lease and succeed to the ground lessee’s position. Although consistent with the Bankruptcy Code, such position may not be adopted by the bankruptcy court.
Further, in an appellate decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Precision Indus. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537 (7th Cir, 2003)), the court ruled with respect to an unrecorded lease of real property that where a sale of leased property occurs under the Bankruptcy Code upon the bankruptcy of a landlord, that sale terminates a lessee’s possessory interest in the property, and the purchaser assumes title free and clear of any interest, including any leasehold estates. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, a lessee may request the bankruptcy court to prohibit or condition the sale of the property so as to provide adequate protection of the leasehold interest; however, the court ruled that, at least where a memorandum of lease had not been recorded, this provision does not ensure continued possession of the property, but rather entitles the lessee to compensation for the value of its leasehold interest, typically from the sale proceeds. As a result, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a sale of leased property pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the lessee would be able to maintain possession of the property under the ground lease. In addition, we cannot assure you that a leasehold mortgagor and/or a leasehold mortgagee (to the extent it has standing to intervene) would be able to recover the full value of the leasehold interest in bankruptcy court.
Because of the possible termination of the related ground lease, whether arising from a bankruptcy, the expiration of a lease term or an uncured defect under the related ground lease, lending on a leasehold interest in a real property is riskier than lending on the fee interest in the property.
Although the borrowers under the Mortgage Loans may be special purpose entities, special purpose entities can become debtors in bankruptcy under various circumstances. For example, in the bankruptcy case of General Growth Properties, notwithstanding that such subsidiaries were special purpose entities with independent directors, numerous property-level, special purpose subsidiaries were filed for bankruptcy protection by their parent entity. Nonetheless, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied various lenders’ motions to dismiss the special purpose entity subsidiaries’ cases as bad faith filings. In denying the motions, the bankruptcy court stated that the fundamental and bargained for creditor protections embedded in the special purpose entity structures at the property level would remain in place during the pendency of the chapter 11 cases. Those protections included adequate protection of the lenders’ interest in their collateral and protection against the substantive consolidation of the property-level debtors with any other entities.
The moving lenders in the General Growth Properties case had argued that the 21 property-level bankruptcy filings were premature and improperly sought to restructure the debt of solvent entities for the benefit of equity holders. However, the Bankruptcy Code does not require that a voluntary debtor be insolvent or unable to pay its debts currently in order to be eligible for relief and generally a bankruptcy petition will not be dismissed for bad faith if the debtor has a legitimate rehabilitation objective. Accordingly, after finding that the relevant debtors were experiencing varying degrees of financial distress due to factors such as cross defaults, a need to refinance in the near term (i.e., within 1 to 4 years), and other considerations, the bankruptcy court noted that it was not required to analyze in isolation each debtor’s basis for filing. In the court’s view, the critical issue was whether a parent company that had filed its bankruptcy case in good faith could include in the filing subsidiaries that were necessary for the parent’s reorganization. As demonstrated in the General Growth Properties bankruptcy case, although special purpose entities are designed to mitigate the bankruptcy risk of a borrower, special purpose entities can become debtors in bankruptcy under various circumstances.
Generally, pursuant to the doctrine of substantive consolidation, a bankruptcy court, in the exercise of its broad equitable powers, has the authority to order that the assets and liabilities of a borrower be substantively consolidated with those of an affiliate (i.e., even a non-debtor), including for the purposes of making distributions under a plan of reorganization or liquidation. Thus, property that is ostensibly the property of a borrower may become subject to the bankruptcy case of an affiliate, the automatic stay applicable to such bankrupt affiliate may be extended to a borrower, and the rights of creditors of a
borrower may become impaired. Substantive consolidation is generally viewed as an equitable remedy that could result in an otherwise solvent company becoming subject to the bankruptcy proceedings of an insolvent affiliate, making the solvent company’s assets available to repay the debts of affiliated companies. A court has the discretion to order substantive consolidation in whole or in part and may include nondebtor affiliates of the bankrupt entity in the proceedings. The interrelationship among a borrower and other affiliates may pose a heightened risk of substantive consolidation and other bankruptcy risks in the event that any one or more of them were to become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code. In the event of the bankruptcy of the applicable parent entities of any borrower, the assets of such borrower may be treated as part of the bankruptcy estates of such parent entities. In addition, in the event of the institution of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceedings involving a borrower and certain of its affiliates, to serve judicial economy, it is likely that a court would jointly administer the respective bankruptcy proceedings. Furthermore, with respect to any affiliated borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to substantively consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving a borrower, action may be taken seeking the recovery as a preferential transfer of any payments made by such borrower, or made directly by the related lessee, under the related mortgage loan to the issuing entity. Payments on long-term debt may be protected from recovery as preferences if they qualify for the “ordinary course” exception under the Bankruptcy Code or if certain other defenses in the Bankruptcy Code are applicable. Whether any particular payment would be protected depends upon the facts specific to a particular transaction.
In addition, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving any borrower or an affiliate, action may be taken to avoid the transaction (or any component of the transaction, such as joint and several liability on the related mortgage loan) as an actual or constructive fraudulent conveyance under state or federal law. Any payment by a borrower in excess of its allocated share of the loan could be challenged as a fraudulent conveyance by creditors of that borrower in an action outside a bankruptcy case or by the representative of the borrower’s bankruptcy estate in a bankruptcy case. Generally, under most fraudulent conveyance statutes, the incurrence of an obligation or the transfer of property by a person will be subject to avoidance under certain circumstances if the person transferred such property with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud its creditors or the person did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such obligation or transfer and (i) was insolvent or was rendered insolvent by such obligation or transfer, (ii) was engaged in business or a transaction, or was about to engage in business or a transaction, for which any property remaining with the person constituted unreasonably small capital, or (iii) intended to, believed or reasonably should have believed that it would, incur debts that would be beyond the person’s ability to pay as such debts matured. The measure of insolvency will vary depending on the law of the applicable jurisdiction. However, an entity will generally be considered insolvent if the present fair salable value of its assets is less than (x) the sum of its debts or (y) the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they become absolute and matured. Under certain fraudulent transfer statutes, a debtor that is generally not paying its debts as they become due other than as a result of a bona fide dispute is presumed to be insolvent. Accordingly, a lien granted by a borrower to secure repayment of the loan in excess of its allocated share could be avoided if a court were to determine that (i) such borrower was insolvent at the time of granting the lien, was rendered insolvent by the granting of the lien, was left with inadequate capital, or intended to, believed or reasonably should have believed that it would incur debts that would render it unable to pay its debts as they matured and (ii) the borrower did not, when it allowed its property to be encumbered by a lien securing the entire indebtedness represented by the loan, receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for pledging such property for the equal benefit of each other borrower.
A bankruptcy court may, under certain circumstances, authorize a debtor to obtain credit after the commencement of a bankruptcy case, secured by, among other things, senior, equal or junior liens on property that is already subject to a lien. In the bankruptcy case of General Growth Properties filed on April 16, 2009, the debtors initially sought approval of a debtor-in-possession loan to the corporate parent entities guaranteed by the property-level single purpose entities and secured by second liens on their properties. Although the debtor-in-possession loan subsequently was modified to eliminate the subsidiary
guarantees and second liens, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a bankruptcy of the borrower sponsor, the borrower sponsor would not seek approval of a similar debtor-in-possession loan, or that a bankruptcy court would not approve a debtor-in-possession loan that included such subsidiary guarantees and second liens on such subsidiaries’ properties.
Certain of the borrowers may be partnerships. The laws governing limited partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to a general partner will cause a person to cease to be a general partner of the limited partnership, unless otherwise provided in writing in the limited partnership agreement. This provision may be construed as an “ipso facto” clause and, in the event of the general partner’s bankruptcy, may not be enforceable. Certain limited partnership agreements of the borrowers may provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the related general partner constitutes an event of withdrawal (assuming the enforceability of the clause is not challenged in bankruptcy proceedings or, if challenged, is upheld) that might trigger the dissolution of the limited partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets, unless (i) at the time there was at least one other general partner and the written provisions of the limited partnership permit the business of the limited partnership to be carried on by the remaining general partner and that general partner does so or (ii) the written provisions of the limited partnership agreement permit the limited partners to agree within a specified time frame (often 60 days) after the withdrawal to continue the business of the limited partnership and to the appointment of one or more general partners and the limited partners do so. In addition, the laws governing general partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code or state bankruptcy laws with respect to a general partner of the partnership triggers the dissolution of the partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets. Those state laws, however, may not be enforceable or effective in a bankruptcy case. Limited liability companies may be subjected to similar treatment as that described in this prospectus with respect to limited partnerships. The dissolution of a borrower, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets could result in an acceleration of its payment obligation under the borrower’s mortgage loan, which may reduce the yield on the Offered Certificates in the same manner as a principal prepayment.
In addition, the bankruptcy of the general or limited partner of a borrower that is a partnership, or the bankruptcy of a member of a borrower that is a limited liability company or the bankruptcy of a shareholder of a borrower that is a corporation may provide the opportunity in the bankruptcy case of the partner, member or shareholder to obtain an order from a court consolidating the assets and liabilities of the partner, member or shareholder with those of the mortgagor pursuant to the doctrines of substantive consolidation or piercing the corporate veil. In such a case, the respective mortgaged property, for example, would become property of the estate of the bankrupt partner, member or shareholder. Not only would the mortgaged property be available to satisfy the claims of creditors of the partner, member or shareholder, but an automatic stay would apply to any attempt by the trustee to exercise remedies with respect to the mortgaged property. However, such an occurrence should not affect a lender’s status as a secured creditor with respect to the mortgagor or its security interest in the mortgaged property.
A borrower that is a limited partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have a single purpose entity as its sole general partner, and a borrower that is a general partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have as its general partners only entities that are single purpose entities. A borrower that is a limited liability company may be required by the loan documents to have a single purpose member or a springing member. All borrowers that are tenants-in-common may be required by the loan documents to be single purpose entities. These provisions are designed to mitigate the risk of the dissolution or bankruptcy of the borrower partnership or its general partner, a borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common. However, we cannot assure you that any borrower partnership or its general partner, or any borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common, will not dissolve or become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.
A debtor in possession or trustee in a bankruptcy proceeding may in some cases be entitled to collect its costs and expenses in preserving or selling the mortgaged property ahead of payment to a secured mortgage lender. Moreover, the laws of certain states also give priority to certain tax liens over the lien of a mortgage or deed of trust. Under the Bankruptcy Code, if the court finds that actions of mortgagees have been inequitable, the claims of the mortgagees may be subordinated to the claims of other creditors and the liens securing the mortgagees’ claims may be transferred to the debtor’s estate.
Environmental Considerations
General
A lender may be subject to environmental risks when taking a security interest in real property. Of particular concern may be properties that are or have been used for industrial, manufacturing, military or disposal activity. Such environmental risks include the possible diminution of the value of a contaminated property or, as discussed below, potential liability for clean-up costs or other remedial actions that could exceed the value of the property or the amount of the lender’s loan. In certain circumstances, a lender may decide to abandon a contaminated mortgaged property as collateral for its loan rather than foreclose and risk liability for clean-up costs.
Superlien Laws
Under the laws of many states, contamination on a property may give rise to a lien on the property for clean-up costs. In several states, such a lien has priority over all existing liens, including those of existing mortgages. In these states, the lien of a mortgage may lose its priority to such a “superlien.”
CERCLA
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), imposes strict liability on present and past “owners” and “operators” of contaminated real property for the costs of clean-up. A secured lender may be liable as an “owner” or “operator” of a contaminated mortgaged property if agents or employees of the lender have participated in the management or operation of such mortgaged property. Such liability may exist even if the lender did not cause or contribute to the contamination and regardless of whether the lender has actually taken possession of a mortgaged property through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise. Moreover, such liability is not limited to the original or unamortized principal balance of a loan or to the value of the property securing a loan. Excluded from CERCLA’s definition of “owner” or “operator”, however, is a person “who, without participating in the management of the facility, holds indicia of ownership primarily to protect his security interest”. This is the so called “secured creditor exemption.”
The Asset Conservation, Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1996 (the “1996 Act”) amended, among other things, the provisions of CERCLA with respect to lender liability and the secured creditor exemption. The 1996 Act offers protection to lenders by defining the activities in which a lender can engage and still have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption. In order for a lender to be deemed to have participated in the management of a mortgaged property, the lender must actually participate in the operational affairs of the property of the borrower. The 1996 Act provides that “merely having the capacity to influence, or unexercised right to control” operations does not constitute participation in management. A lender will lose the protection of the secured creditor exemption if it exercises decision-making control over the borrower’s environmental compliance and hazardous substance handling or disposal practices, or assumes day-to-day management of environmental or substantially all other operational functions of the mortgaged property. The 1996 Act also provides that a lender will continue to have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption even if it forecloses on a mortgaged property, purchases it at a foreclosure sale or accepts a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure provided that the lender seeks to sell the mortgaged property at the earliest practicable commercially reasonable time on commercially reasonable terms.
Certain Other Federal and State Laws
Many states have statutes similar to CERCLA, and not all of those statutes provide for a secured creditor exemption. In addition, under federal law, there is potential liability relating to hazardous wastes and underground storage tanks under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Some federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the management, removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. These laws, as well as common law standards, may impose liability for releases of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, and provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injuries associated with those releases.
Federal legislation requires owners of residential housing constructed prior to 1978 to disclose to potential residents or purchasers any known lead-based paint hazards and will impose treble damages for any failure to disclose. In addition, the ingestion of lead-based paint chips or dust particles by children can result in lead poisoning. If lead-based paint hazards exist at a property, then the owner of that property may be held liable for injuries and for the costs of removal or encapsulation of the lead-based paint.
In a few states, transfers of some types of properties are conditioned upon clean-up of contamination prior to transfer. In these cases, a lender that becomes the owner of a property through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, may be required to clean-up the contamination before selling or otherwise transferring the property.
Beyond statute-based environmental liability, there exist common law causes of action (for example, actions based on nuisance or on toxic tort resulting in death, personal injury or damage to property) related to hazardous environmental conditions on a property. While it may be more difficult to hold a lender liable under common law causes of action, unanticipated or uninsured liabilities of the borrower may jeopardize the borrower’s ability to meet its loan obligations or may decrease the re-sale value of the collateral.
Additional Considerations
The cost of remediating hazardous substance contamination at a property can be substantial. If a lender becomes liable, it can bring an action for contribution against the owner or operator who created the environmental hazard, but that individual or entity may be without substantial assets. Accordingly, it is possible that such costs could become a liability of the issuing entity and occasion a loss to the certificateholders.
If a lender forecloses on a mortgage secured by a property, the operations on which are subject to environmental laws and regulations, the lender will be required to operate the property in accordance with those laws and regulations. Such compliance may entail substantial expense, especially in the case of industrial or manufacturing properties.
In addition, a lender may be obligated to disclose environmental conditions on a property to government entities and/or to prospective buyers (including prospective buyers at a foreclosure sale or following foreclosure). Such disclosure may decrease the amount that prospective buyers are willing to pay for the affected property, sometimes substantially, and thereby decrease the ability of the lender to recover its investment in a loan upon foreclosure.
Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions
Certain of the mortgage loans may contain “due-on-sale” and “due-on-encumbrance” clauses that purport to permit the lender to accelerate the maturity of the loan if the borrower transfers or encumbers the related mortgaged property. The Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 (the “Garn Act”) generally preempts state laws that prohibit the enforcement of due-on-sale clauses and permits lenders to enforce these clauses in accordance with their terms, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the Garn
Act and related regulations. Accordingly, a lender may nevertheless have the right to accelerate the maturity of a mortgage loan that contains a “due-on-sale” provision upon transfer of an interest in the property, without regard to the lender’s ability to demonstrate that a sale threatens its legitimate security interest.
Subordinate Financing
The terms of certain of the mortgage loans may not restrict the ability of the borrower to use the mortgaged property as security for one or more additional loans, or such restrictions may be unenforceable. Where a borrower encumbers a mortgaged property with one or more junior liens, the senior lender is subjected to additional risk. First, the borrower may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple loans. Moreover, if the subordinate financing permits recourse to the borrower (as-is frequently the case) and the senior loan does not, a borrower may have more incentive to repay sums due on the subordinate loan. Second, acts of the senior lender that prejudice the junior lender or impair the junior lender’s security may create a superior equity in favor of the junior lender. For example, if the borrower and the senior lender agree to an increase in the principal amount of or the interest rate payable on the senior loan, the senior lender may lose its priority to the extent any existing junior lender is harmed or the borrower is additionally burdened. Third, if the borrower defaults on the senior loan and/or any junior loan or loans, the existence of junior loans and actions taken by junior lenders can impair the security available to the senior lender and can interfere with or delay the taking of action by the senior lender. Moreover, the bankruptcy of a junior lender may operate to stay foreclosure or similar proceedings by the senior lender.
Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments
Promissory notes and mortgages may contain provisions that obligate the borrower to pay a late charge or additional interest if payments are not timely made, and in some circumstances, may prohibit prepayments for a specified period and/or condition prepayments upon the borrower’s payment of prepayment fees or yield maintenance penalties. In certain states, there are or may be specific limitations upon the late charges which a lender may collect from a borrower for delinquent payments. Certain states also limit the amounts that a lender may collect from a borrower as an additional charge if the loan is prepaid. In addition, the enforceability of provisions that provide for prepayment fees or penalties upon an involuntary prepayment is unclear under the laws of many states.
Applicability of Usury Laws
Title V of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“Title V”) provides that state usury limitations will not apply to certain types of residential (including multifamily) first mortgage loans originated by certain lenders after March 31, 1980. Title V authorized any state to reimpose interest rate limits by adopting, before April 1, 1983, a law or constitutional provision that expressly rejects application of the federal law. In addition, even where Title V is not so rejected, any state is authorized by the law to adopt a provision limiting discount points or other charges on mortgage loans covered by Title V. Certain states have taken action to reimpose interest rate limits and/or to limit discount points or other charges.
Statutes differ in their provisions as to the consequences of a usurious loan. One group of statutes requires the lender to forfeit the interest due above the applicable limit or impose a specified penalty. Under this statutory scheme, the borrower may cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust upon paying its debt with lawful interest, and the lender may foreclose, but only for the debt plus lawful interest. A second group of statutes is more severe. A violation of this type of usury law results in the invalidation of the transaction, thereby permitting the borrower to cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust without any payment or prohibiting the lender from foreclosing.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and related regulations (collectively, the “ADA”), in order to protect individuals with disabilities, public accommodations (such as hospitality properties, restaurants, shopping centers, hospitals, schools and social service center establishments) must remove architectural and communication barriers which are structural in nature from existing places of public accommodation to the extent “readily achievable”. In addition, under the ADA, alterations to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility are to be made so that, to the maximum extent feasible, such altered portions are readily accessible to and usable by disabled individuals. The “readily achievable” standard takes into account, among other factors, the financial resources of the affected site, owner, landlord or other applicable person. In addition to imposing a possible financial burden on the borrower in its capacity as owner or landlord, the ADA may also impose such requirements on a foreclosing lender who succeeds to the interest of the borrower as owner or landlord. Furthermore, since the “readily achievable” standard may vary depending on the financial condition of the owner or landlord, a foreclosing lender who is financially more capable than the borrower of complying with the requirements of the ADA may be subject to more stringent requirements than those to which the borrower is subject.
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
Under the terms of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act as amended (the “Relief Act”), a borrower who enters military service after the origination of such borrower’s mortgage loan (including a borrower who was in reserve status and is called to active duty after origination of the mortgage loan), upon notification by such borrower, will not be charged interest, including fees and charges, in excess of 6% per annum during the period of such borrower’s active duty status. In addition to adjusting the interest, the lender must forgive any such interest in excess of 6% unless a court or administrative agency orders otherwise upon application of the lender. The Relief Act applies to individuals who are members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, Reserves, Coast Guard and officers of the U.S. Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration assigned to duty with the military. Because the Relief Act applies to individuals who enter military service (including reservists who are called to active duty) after origination of the related mortgage loan, no information can be provided as to the number of loans with individuals as borrowers that may be affected by the Relief Act. Application of the Relief Act would adversely affect, for an indeterminate period of time, the ability of a master servicer or special servicer to collect full amounts of interest on certain of the mortgage loans. Any shortfalls in interest collections resulting from the application of the Relief Act would result in a reduction of the amounts distributable to the holders of certificates, and would not be covered by advances or, any form of credit support provided in connection with the certificates. In addition, the Relief Act imposes limitations that would impair the ability of a lender to foreclose on an affected mortgage loan during the borrower’s period of active duty status, and, under certain circumstances, during an additional three-month period thereafter.
Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery
Many jurisdictions have adopted wide-ranging anti-money laundering, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, and regulations (collectively, the “Requirements”). Any of the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA could be requested or required to obtain certain assurances from prospective investors intending to purchase certificates and to retain such information or to disclose information pertaining to them to governmental, regulatory or other authorities or to financial intermediaries or engage in due diligence or take other related actions in the future. Failure to honor any request by the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA to provide requested information or take such other actions as may be necessary or advisable for the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA to comply with any Requirements, related legal process or appropriate requests (whether formal or informal) may result in, among other things, a forced sale to another investor of such investor’s certificates. In addition, it is expected that each of the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters and the other parties to the PSA will comply with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (also known as the “Patriot
Act”) and any other anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws, and regulations of the United States and other countries, and will disclose any information required or requested by authorities in connection with such compliance.
Potential Forfeiture of Assets
Federal law provides that assets (including property purchased or improved with assets) derived from criminal activity or otherwise tainted, or used in the commission of certain offenses, is subject to the blocking requirements of economic sanctions laws and regulations, and can be blocked and/or seized and ordered forfeited to the United States of America. The offenses that can trigger such a blocking and/or seizure and forfeiture include, among others, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, the anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism, economic sanctions, and anti-bribery laws and regulations, including the Patriot Act and the regulations issued pursuant to that act, as well as the narcotic drug laws. In many instances, the United States may seize the property even before a conviction occurs.
In the event of a forfeiture proceeding, a lender may be able to establish its interest in the property by proving that (a) its mortgage was executed and recorded before the commission of the illegal conduct from which the assets used to purchase or improve the property were derived or before the commission of any other crime upon which the forfeiture is based, or (b) the lender, at the time of the execution of the mortgage, “did not know or was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture”. However, we cannot assure you that such a defense will be successful.
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving
Transaction Parties
GSMC and its affiliates are playing several roles in this transaction. GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II is the depositor and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GSMC. GSMC, a sponsor, is an affiliate of GS Bank, an originator, and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates. GS Bank currently holds the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GS Bank” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
CREFI, an originator and a sponsor, is an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates. CREFI currently holds the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “CREFI” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
3650 REIT, a sponsor, an originator, the Retaining Sponsor, a mortgage loan seller, and the expected initial Controlling Class Representative, is an affiliate of (i) the initial holder of the HRR Certificates, as the “majority-owned affiliate” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) of 3650 REIT, and (ii) 3650 Servicing, the initial special servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans (other than the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) and Serviced Whole Loans (other than any Excluded Special Servicer Loan) and a limited (non-cashiering) subservicer.
Barclays, an originator and a sponsor, is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates. Barclays currently holds the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “Barclays” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
BMO, a sponsor, is an affiliate of BMO Capital Markets Corp., an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates. BMO currently holds the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “BMO” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
GACC, a sponsor, is an affiliate of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates, DBRI, an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GACC” or “DBRI”, as applicable, in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”.
Pursuant to certain limited subservicing agreements between 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, an affiliate of 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, on the one hand, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, on the other hand, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC (i) is expected to have limited (non-cashiering) subservicing duties with respect to six (6) of the Mortgage Loans (22.0%) (with an aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of approximately $196,700,000) and (ii) currently serves as a limited (non-cashiering) sub-servicer with respect to one (1) Mortgage Loan (0.6%) (with a Cut-off Date Balance of approximately $5,000,000).
Midland is also the master servicer of the 500 Delaware Whole Loan, which is serviced under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA.
3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC is expected to purchase the Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates and is expected to be appointed as the initial Controlling Class Representative and, therefore, the initial Directing Holder with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan and any applicable Excluded Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan. 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC is also the initial special servicer with respect to the 500 Delaware Whole Loan pursuant to the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA. 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC (which is also an affiliate of 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC) is also the initial directing holder and initial controlling class representative under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA.
BMO has provided warehouse financing to 3650 REIT for certain Mortgage Loans originated by 3650 REIT, four (4) of which are being contributed to this securitization. The Cut-off Date Balance of such Mortgage Loans that are (or, as of the Closing Date, is expected to be) subject to the related warehouse facility is projected to equal approximately $149,700,000. Proceeds received by 3650 REIT in connection with this securitization transaction will be used, in part, to repurchase, through its subsidiary, from BMO, the 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans subject to such warehouse facility, which Mortgage Loans will be transferred to the depositor free and clear of any liens.
Computershare Trust Company, National Association, the trustee, certificate administrator and custodian, is also the trustee, the certificate administrator and the custodian under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA with respect to the 500 Delaware Whole Loan.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between GSMC and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between CREFI and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between 3650 REIT and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Barclays and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between BMO and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between GACC and certain of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the Mortgage Loans.
3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC acts as interim servicer with respect to five (5) of the Mortgage Loans (19.4%) with a Cut-off Date Balance of approximately $173,500,000 to be contributed to this securitization transaction by 3650 REIT.
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, the operating advisor and asset representations reviewer, is also the operating advisor and asset representations reviewer under the 3650R 2022-PF2 PSA with respect to the 500 Delaware Whole Loan.
Computershare Trust Company, National Association acts as interim custodian of the loan documents with respect to all the GSMC Mortgage Loans, the CREFI Mortgage Loans, the GACC Mortgage Loans, the BMO Mortgage Loans, the Barclays Mortgage Loans and 3650 REIT Mortgage Loans except for the related Mortgage File with respect to any GSMC Mortgage Loan, CREFI Mortgage Loan, GACC Mortgage Loan, Barclays Mortgage Loan, BMO Mortgage Loan or 3650 REIT Mortgage Loan that is currently (or becomes prior to the Closing Date) a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Holder and the Companion Loan Holders” and “—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks”. For a description of certain other affiliations, relationships and related transactions, to the extent known and material, among the transaction parties, see the individual descriptions of the transaction parties under “Transaction Parties”.
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties
While the sponsors have been involved in, and are currently involved in, certain litigation or potential litigation, including actions relating to repurchase claims, there are no legal proceedings pending, or any proceedings known to be contemplated by any governmental authorities, against the sponsors that are material to Certificateholders.
For a description of certain other material legal proceedings pending against the transaction parties, see the individual descriptions of the transaction parties under “Transaction Parties”.
Use of Proceeds
Certain of the net proceeds from the sale of the Offered Certificates, together with the net proceeds from the sale of the other certificates not being offered by this prospectus, will be used by the depositor to purchase the mortgage loans from the mortgage loan sellers and to pay certain expenses in connection with the issuance of the certificates.
Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations
Yield Considerations
General
The yield to maturity on the Offered Certificates will depend upon the price paid by the investors, the rate and timing of the distributions in reduction of the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of the applicable class of Offered Certificates, the extent to which yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums allocated to the class of Offered Certificates are collected, and the rate, timing and severity of
losses on the Mortgage Loans and the extent to which such losses are allocable in reduction of the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of the class of Offered Certificates, as well as prevailing interest rates at the time of payment or loss realization.
Rate and Timing of Principal Payments
The rate and amount of distributions in reduction of the Certificate Balance of any class of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates and the yield to maturity of any class of Offered Certificates will be directly related to the rate of payments of principal (both scheduled and unscheduled) on the Mortgage Loans, as well as borrower defaults and the severity of losses occurring upon a default and the resulting rate and timing of collections made in connection with liquidations of Mortgage Loans due to these defaults. Principal payments on the Mortgage Loans will be affected by their amortization schedules, lockout periods, defeasance provisions, provisions relating to the release and/or application of earnout reserves, provisions requiring prepayments in connection with the release of real property collateral, requirements to pay yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums in connection with principal payments, the dates on which balloon payments are due, property release provisions, provisions relating to the application or release of earnout reserves, and any extensions of maturity dates by the master servicer or the special servicer. While voluntary prepayments of some Mortgage Loans are generally prohibited during applicable prepayment lockout periods, effective prepayments may occur if a sufficiently significant portion of a mortgaged property is lost due to casualty or condemnation. In addition, such distributions in reduction of Certificate Balances of the respective classes of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates may result from repurchases of, or substitutions for, Mortgage Loans made by the sponsors due to missing or defective documentation or breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the Mortgage Loans as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”, purchases of the Mortgage Loans in the manner described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”, or the exercise of purchase options by the holder of a Subordinate Companion Loan or mezzanine loan, if any. To the extent a Mortgage Loan requires payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium in connection with a voluntary prepayment, any such yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium generally is not due in connection with a prepayment due to casualty or condemnation, is not included in the purchase price of a Mortgage Loan purchased or repurchased due to a breach of a representation or warranty or otherwise, and may not be enforceable or collectible upon a default.
Because the certificates with Notional Amounts are not entitled to distributions of principal, the yield on such certificates will be extremely sensitive to prepayments received in respect of the Mortgage Loans to the extent distributed to reduce the related Notional Amount of the applicable class of certificates.
The extent to which the yield to maturity of any class of Offered Certificates may vary from the anticipated yield will depend upon the degree to which the certificates are purchased at a discount or premium and when, and to what degree, payments of principal on the Mortgage Loans are in turn distributed on the certificates or, in the case of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, applied to reduce their Notional Amounts. An investor should consider, in the case of any certificate (other than a certificate with a Notional Amount) purchased at a discount, the risk that a slower than anticipated rate of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield and, in the case of any certificate purchased at a premium and certificates with Notional Amounts, the risk that a faster than anticipated rate of principal payments could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield. In general, the earlier a payment of principal on the Mortgage Loans is distributed or otherwise results in reduction of the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of a certificate purchased at a discount or premium, the greater will be the effect on an investor’s yield to maturity. As a result, the effect on an investor’s yield of principal payments distributed on an investor’s certificates occurring at a rate higher (or lower) than the rate anticipated by the investor during any particular period would not be fully offset by a subsequent like reduction (or increase) in the rate of principal payments.
The yield on each of the classes of certificates that have a Pass-Through Rate equal to, limited by, or based on, the WAC Rate could (or in the case of any class of certificates with a Pass-Through Rate equal
to, or based on, the WAC Rate, would) be adversely affected if the Mortgage Loans with higher Mortgage Rates prepay faster than the Mortgage Loans with lower Mortgage Rates. The Pass-Through Rates on these classes of certificates may be adversely affected by a decrease in the WAC Rate even if principal prepayments do not occur.
Losses and Shortfalls
The Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of any class of Offered Certificates may be reduced without distributions of principal as a result of the occurrence and allocation of Realized Losses, reducing the maximum amount distributable in respect of principal on the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates as well as the amount of interest that would have otherwise been payable on the Offered Certificates in the absence of such reduction. In general, a Realized Loss occurs when the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan is reduced without an equal distribution to applicable Certificateholders in reduction of the Certificate Balances of the Principal Balance Certificates. Realized Losses may occur in connection with a default on a Mortgage Loan, acceptance of a discounted pay-off, the liquidation of the related Mortgaged Properties, a reduction in the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan by a bankruptcy court or pursuant to a modification, a recovery by the master servicer or trustee of a Nonrecoverable Advance on a Distribution Date or the incurrence of certain unanticipated or default-related costs and expenses (such as interest on Advances, Workout Fees, Liquidation Fees and Special Servicing Fees). Any reduction of the Certificate Balances of the class or classes of certificates indicated in the table below as a result of the application of Realized Losses will also reduce the Notional Amount of the related certificates.
Interest-Only Class of Certificates | Class Notional Amount | Related Class X Class(es) |
Class X-A | $722,614,000 | Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates |
Class X-B | $75,828,000 | Class B and Class C certificates |
Class X-D | $14,454,000 | Class D certificates |
Certificateholders are not entitled to receive distributions of Periodic Payments when due except to the extent they are either covered by a P&I Advance or actually received. Consequently, any defaulted Periodic Payment for which no such P&I Advance is made will tend to extend the weighted average lives of the Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates, whether or not a permitted extension of the due date of the related Mortgage Loan has been completed.
Losses and shortfalls on any AB Whole Loan and Prepayment Interest Shortfalls for each Distribution Date with respect to an AB Whole Loan will generally be allocated first to the related Subordinate Companion Loan and then to the related Mortgage Loan (and correspondingly to the certificates to the extent not covered by the master servicer’s Compensating Interest Payment for such Distribution Date in the case of any Prepayment Interest Shortfall) and any Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata basis.
Certain Relevant Factors Affecting Loan Payments and Defaults
The rate and timing of principal payments and defaults and the severity of losses on the Mortgage Loans may be affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation, the availability of credit for commercial or multifamily real estate, prevailing interest rates, the terms of the Mortgage Loans (for example, due-on-sale clauses, lockout periods or yield maintenance charges, release of property provisions and amortization terms that require balloon payments), the demographics and relative economic vitality of the areas in which the Mortgaged Properties are located and the general supply and demand for rental properties in those areas, the quality of management of the Mortgaged Properties, the servicing of the Mortgage Loans, possible changes in tax laws and other opportunities for investment. See “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
The rate of prepayment on the pool of Mortgage Loans is likely to be affected by prevailing market interest rates for Mortgage Loans of a comparable type, term and risk level as the Mortgage Loans. When the prevailing market interest rate is below a mortgage interest rate, a borrower may have an increased incentive to refinance its Mortgage Loan. Although the Mortgage Loans contain provisions designed to mitigate the likelihood of an early loan repayment, we cannot assure you that the related borrowers will refrain from prepaying their Mortgage Loans due to the existence of these provisions, or that involuntary prepayments will not occur. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”.
With respect to certain Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgage Loan documents allow for the sale of individual properties and the severance of the related debt and the assumption by the transferee of such portion of the Mortgage Loan as-is allocable to the individual property acquired by that transferee, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In addition, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgage Loan documents allow for partial releases of individual Mortgaged Properties during a lockout period or during such time as a yield maintenance charge would otherwise be payable, which could result in a prepayment of a portion of the initial principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium. Additionally, in the case of a partial release of an individual Mortgaged Property, the related release amount in many cases is greater than the allocated loan amount for the Mortgaged Property being released, which would result in a greater than proportionate paydown of the Mortgage Loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Partial Releases”.
Depending on prevailing market interest rates, the outlook for market interest rates and economic conditions generally, some borrowers may sell Mortgaged Properties in order to realize their equity in the Mortgaged Property, to meet cash flow needs or to make other investments. In addition, some borrowers may be motivated by federal and state tax laws (which are subject to change) to sell Mortgaged Properties prior to the exhaustion of tax depreciation benefits.
We make no representation as to the particular factors that will affect the rate and timing of prepayments and defaults on the Mortgage Loans, as to the relative importance of those factors, as to the percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loans that will be prepaid or as to which a default will have occurred as of any date or as to the overall rate of prepayment or default on the Mortgage Loans.
Delay in Payment of Distributions
Because each monthly distribution is made on each Distribution Date, which is at least 12 days after the end of the related Interest Accrual Period for the certificates, the effective yield to the holders of such certificates will be lower than the yield that would otherwise be produced by the applicable Pass-Through Rates and purchase prices (assuming the prices did not account for the delay).
Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts
The yield to maturity of the certificates with Notional Amounts will be highly sensitive to the rate and timing of reductions made to the Certificate Balances of the related class or classes of certificates indicated in the table below, including by reason of prepayments and principal losses on the Mortgage Loans and other factors described above.
Interest-Only Class of Certificates | Class Notional Amount | Related Class X Classes |
Class X-A | $722,614,000 | Class A-1, Class A-3 and Class A-S certificates |
Class X-B | $75,828,000 | Class B and Class C certificates |
Class X-D | $14,454,000 | Class D certificates |
Any optional termination by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates would result in prepayment in full of the Offered Certificates and would have an adverse effect on the yield of a class of the certificates with Notional Amounts because a termination would have an effect similar to a principal prepayment in full of the
Mortgage Loans and, as a result, investors in these certificates and any other Offered Certificates purchased at premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”.
Investors in the certificates with Notional Amounts should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of prepayment or other liquidation of the Mortgage Loans could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments.
Weighted Average Life
The weighted average life of a Principal Balance Certificate refers to the average amount of time that will elapse from the date of its issuance until each dollar allocable to principal of the certificate is distributed to the related investor. The weighted average life of a Principal Balance Certificate will be influenced by, among other things, the rate at which principal on the Mortgage Loans is paid or otherwise received, which may be in the form of scheduled amortization, voluntary prepayments, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds. Distributions among the various classes of certificates will be made as set forth under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
Prepayments may be measured by a prepayment standard or model. The “Constant Prepayment Rate” or “CPR” model represents an assumed constant annual rate of prepayment each month, expressed as a per annum percentage of the then-scheduled principal balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans. The “CPY” model represents an assumed CPR prepayment rate after any applicable lockout period, any applicable period in which defeasance is permitted and any applicable yield maintenance period has expired. The model used in this prospectus is the CPY model. As used in each of the following tables, the column headed “0% CPY” assumes that none of the Mortgage Loans is prepaid before its maturity date. The columns headed “25% CPY”, “50% CPY”, “75% CPY” and “100% CPY” assume prepayments on the Mortgage Loans at those levels of CPR following the expiration of any applicable lockout period, any applicable period in which defeasance is permitted and any applicable yield maintenance period (except as described below). We cannot assure you, however, that prepayments of the Mortgage Loans will conform to any level of CPY, and we make no representation that the Mortgage Loans will prepay at the levels of CPY shown or at any other prepayment rate.
The following tables indicate the percentage of the initial Certificate Balance of each class of the Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates that would be outstanding after each of the dates shown at various CPYs and the corresponding weighted average life of each class of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates. The tables have been prepared on the basis of the following assumptions (the “Modeling Assumptions”), among others:
| ● | scheduled Periodic Payments including payments due at maturity of principal and/or interest on the Mortgage Loans will be received on a timely basis and will be distributed on the 15th day (each assumed to be a business day) of the related month, beginning in September 2024; |
| ● | the Mortgage Rate in effect for each Mortgage Loan as of the Cut-off Date will remain in effect to the related maturity date and will be adjusted, if necessary, as required pursuant to the definition of Mortgage Rate; |
| ● | there are no delinquencies; |
| ● | the mortgage loan sellers will not be required to repurchase any Mortgage Loan, and none of the holders of the Controlling Class (or any other Certificateholder), the special servicer or the master servicer will exercise its option to purchase all the Mortgage Loans and thereby cause an early termination of the issuing entity and no holder of any mezzanine debt or other indebtedness will exercise its option to purchase the related Mortgage Loan; |
| ● | any principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans will be received on their respective Due Dates after the expiration of any applicable lockout period, any applicable period in which defeasance is permitted, and any applicable yield maintenance period, in each case, at the respective levels of CPY set forth in the tables (without regard to any limitations in such Mortgage Loans on partial voluntary principal prepayment); |
| ● | all prepayments are assumed to be voluntary prepayments and will not include, without limitation, Liquidation Proceeds, condemnation proceeds, insurance proceeds, proceeds from the purchase of a Mortgage Loan from the issuing entity or any prepayment that is accepted by the master servicer or the special servicer pursuant to a workout, settlement or loan modification; |
| ● | no Prepayment Interest Shortfalls are incurred and no prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges are collected; |
| ● | the Closing Date occurs on August 29, 2024; |
| ● | the Pass-Through Rates, initial Certificate Balances and initial Notional Amounts of the respective classes of Offered Certificates are as described in this prospectus; |
| ● | the Administrative Cost Rate is calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and in the same manner as interest is calculated on the Mortgage Loans; |
| ● | no reserves, earnouts, holdbacks, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds are applied to prepay any related Mortgage Loan in whole or in part; |
| ● | no additional trust fund expenses are incurred; |
| ● | no property releases (or yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium or related re-amortizations) occur; |
| ● | the optional termination is not exercised; |
| ● | there are no modifications or maturity date extensions in respect of the Mortgage Loans; and |
| ● | with respect to each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan that includes one or more Subordinate Companion Loan, for purposes of assumed CPR prepayment rates, prepayments are determined on the basis of the principal balance of that Mortgage Loan only, without regard to the related Subordinate Companion Loan(s). |
To the extent that the Mortgage Loans have characteristics that differ from those assumed in preparing the tables set forth below, a class of Offered Certificates that is also a Principal Balance Certificate may mature earlier or later than indicated by the tables. The tables set forth below are for illustrative purposes only and it is highly unlikely that the Mortgage Loans will actually prepay at any constant rate until maturity or that all the Mortgage Loans will prepay at the same rate. In addition, variations in the actual prepayment experience and the balance of the Mortgage Loans that prepay may increase or decrease the percentages of initial Certificate Balances (and weighted average lives) shown in the following tables. These variations may occur even if the average prepayment experience of the Mortgage Loans were to equal any of the specified CPY percentages. Investors should not rely on the prepayment assumptions set forth in this prospectus and are urged to conduct their own analyses of the rates at which the Mortgage Loans may be expected to prepay, based on their own assumptions. Based on the foregoing assumptions, the following tables indicate the resulting weighted average lives of each class of Offered Certificates that is also a Principal Balance Certificate and set forth the percentage of the initial Certificate Balance of each class of Offered Certificates that is also a Principal Balance Certificate that would be outstanding after each of the dates shown at the indicated CPYs.
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class A-1 certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 81% | 81% | 81% | 81% | 81% |
August 2026 | 61% | 61% | 61% | 61% | 61% |
August 2027 | 39% | 39% | 39% | 39% | 39% |
August 2028 | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 2.47 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 |
First Principal Payment Date | September 2024 | September 2024 | September 2024 | September 2024 | September 2024 |
Last Principal Payment Date | April 2029 | December 2028 | December 2028 | December 2028 | December 2028 |
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class A-3 certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2028 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 4.90 | 4.86 | 4.81 | 4.74 | 4.45 |
First Principal Payment Date | April 2029 | December 2028 | December 2028 | December 2028 | December 2028 |
Last Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | April 2029 |
| | | | | |
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class A-S certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2028 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.64 |
First Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | April 2029 |
Last Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
| | | | | |
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class B certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2028 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.71 |
First Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
Last Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
| | | | | |
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class C certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2028 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.71 |
First Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
Last Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
| | | | | |
Percentages of the Initial Certificate Balance of
the Class D certificates at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Distribution Date | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2028 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
August 2029 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (in years) | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.71 |
First Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
Last Principal Payment Date | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | August 2029 | May 2029 |
| | | | | |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity Tables
The following tables indicate the approximate pre-tax yield to maturity on a corporate bond equivalent basis on the Offered Certificates for the specified CPYs based on the assumptions set forth under “—Weighted Average Life” above. It was further assumed that the purchase price of the Offered Certificates is as specified in the tables below, expressed as a percentage of the initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, plus accrued interest from August 1, 2024 to the Closing Date.
The yields set forth in the following tables were calculated by determining the monthly discount rates that, when applied to the assumed streams of cash flows to be paid on the applicable class of Offered Certificates, would cause the discounted present value of such assumed stream of cash flows to equal the assumed purchase price of such class, and by converting such monthly rates to semi-annual corporate bond equivalent rates. Such calculations do not take into account shortfalls in collection of interest due to prepayments (or other liquidations) of the Mortgage Loans or the interest rates at which investors may be able to reinvest funds received by them as distributions on the applicable class of certificates (and, accordingly, do not purport to reflect the return on any investment in the applicable class of Offered Certificates when such reinvestment rates are considered).
The characteristics of the Mortgage Loans may differ from those assumed in preparing the tables below. In addition, we cannot assure you that the Mortgage Loans will prepay in accordance with the above assumptions at any of the rates shown in the tables or at any other particular rate, that the cash flows on the applicable class of Offered Certificates will correspond to the cash flows shown in this prospectus or that the aggregate purchase price of such class of Offered Certificates will be as assumed. In addition, it is unlikely that the Mortgage Loans will prepay in accordance with the above assumptions at any of the specified CPYs until maturity or that all the Mortgage Loans will so prepay at the same rate. Timing of changes in the rate of prepayments may significantly affect the actual yield to maturity to investors, even if the average rate of principal prepayments is consistent with the expectations of investors. Investors must make their own decisions as to the appropriate prepayment assumption to be used in deciding whether to purchase any class of Offered Certificates.
For purposes of this prospectus, prepayment assumptions with respect to the Mortgage Loans are presented in terms of the CPY model described under “—Weighted Average Life” above.
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-1 certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class A-1 certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
94.99999 | 7.1356% | 7.1498% | 7.1498% | 7.1498% | 7.1498% |
95.99999 | 6.6562% | 6.6675% | 6.6675% | 6.6675% | 6.6675% |
96.99999 | 6.1846% | 6.1929% | 6.1929% | 6.1929% | 6.1929% |
97.99999 | 5.7206% | 5.7259% | 5.7259% | 5.7259% | 5.7259% |
98.99999 | 5.2639% | 5.2663% | 5.2663% | 5.2663% | 5.2663% |
99.99999 | 4.8144% | 4.8138% | 4.8138% | 4.8138% | 4.8138% |
100.99999 | 4.3718% | 4.3683% | 4.3683% | 4.3683% | 4.3683% |
101.99999 | 3.9360% | 3.9296% | 3.9296% | 3.9296% | 3.9296% |
102.99999 | 3.5068% | 3.4976% | 3.4976% | 3.4976% | 3.4976% |
103.99999 | 3.0840% | 3.0719% | 3.0719% | 3.0719% | 3.0719% |
104.99999 | 2.6674% | 2.6525% | 2.6525% | 2.6525% | 2.6525% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-3 certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class A-3 certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
97.99998 | 6.0988% | 6.1019% | 6.1059% | 6.1118% | 6.1366% |
98.99998 | 5.8557% | 5.8571% | 5.8588% | 5.8614% | 5.8722% |
99.99998 | 5.6156% | 5.6152% | 5.6147% | 5.6140% | 5.6110% |
100.99998 | 5.3783% | 5.3762% | 5.3735% | 5.3696% | 5.3529% |
101.99998 | 5.1438% | 5.1400% | 5.1352% | 5.1280% | 5.0978% |
102.99998 | 4.9121% | 4.9066% | 4.8996% | 4.8894% | 4.8458% |
103.99998 | 4.6831% | 4.6759% | 4.6668% | 4.6534% | 4.5967% |
104.99998 | 4.4566% | 4.4479% | 4.4367% | 4.4202% | 4.3504% |
105.99998 | 4.2328% | 4.2225% | 4.2092% | 4.1896% | 4.1070% |
106.99998 | 4.0115% | 3.9995% | 3.9842% | 3.9617% | 3.8662% |
107.99998 | 3.7926% | 3.7791% | 3.7618% | 3.7362% | 3.6282% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class X-A certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Notional Amount of Class X-A certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
4.00805 | 13.7194% | 13.4551% | 13.1179% | 12.6239% | 10.3736% |
4.10805 | 12.5636% | 12.2960% | 11.9542% | 11.4536% | 9.1724% |
4.20805 | 11.4517% | 11.1807% | 10.8347% | 10.3276% | 8.0164% |
4.30805 | 10.3808% | 10.1066% | 9.7564% | 9.2430% | 6.9028% |
4.40805 | 9.3483% | 9.0710% | 8.7167% | 8.1973% | 5.8289% |
4.50805 | 8.3519% | 8.0716% | 7.7134% | 7.1880% | 4.7923% |
4.60805 | 7.3894% | 7.1061% | 6.7441% | 6.2131% | 3.7907% |
4.70805 | 6.4588% | 6.1727% | 5.8070% | 5.2704% | 2.8222% |
4.80805 | 5.5583% | 5.2695% | 4.9002% | 4.3582% | 1.8848% |
4.90805 | 4.6862% | 4.3948% | 4.0220% | 3.4748% | 0.9769% |
5.00805 | 3.8411% | 3.5470% | 3.1709% | 2.6185% | 0.0968% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class X-B certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Notional Amount of Class X-B certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
0.86829 | 30.2556% | 30.2440% | 30.2255% | 30.1882% | 28.7360% |
0.96829 | 24.2973% | 24.2845% | 24.2643% | 24.2236% | 22.6473% |
1.06829 | 19.2754% | 19.2616% | 19.2399% | 19.1963% | 17.5097% |
1.16829 | 14.9608% | 14.9462% | 14.9231% | 14.8768% | 13.0917% |
1.26829 | 11.1962% | 11.1807% | 11.1564% | 11.1077% | 9.2337% |
1.36829 | 7.8693% | 7.8531% | 7.8277% | 7.7767% | 5.8220% |
1.46829 | 4.8978% | 4.8810% | 4.8545% | 4.8016% | 2.7732% |
1.56829 | 2.2198% | 2.2024% | 2.1749% | 2.1202% | 0.0242% |
1.66829 | -0.2124% | -0.2304% | -0.2587% | -0.3152% | -2.4736% |
1.76829 | -2.4363% | -2.4548% | -2.4839% | -2.5420% | -4.7582% |
1.86829 | -4.4815% | -4.5005% | -4.5304% | -4.5899% | -6.8600% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class X-D certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Notional Amount of Class X-D certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
9.02968 | 9.3809% | 9.3786% | 9.3749% | 9.3675% | 7.4588% |
9.12968 | 8.8946% | 8.8922% | 8.8885% | 8.8811% | 6.9611% |
9.22968 | 8.4165% | 8.4141% | 8.4103% | 8.4029% | 6.4718% |
9.32968 | 7.9464% | 7.9440% | 7.9402% | 7.9327% | 5.9907% |
9.42968 | 7.4841% | 7.4817% | 7.4779% | 7.4703% | 5.5175% |
9.52968 | 7.0293% | 7.0269% | 7.0231% | 7.0155% | 5.0520% |
9.62968 | 6.5819% | 6.5795% | 6.5757% | 6.5680% | 4.5940% |
9.72968 | 6.1417% | 6.1392% | 6.1354% | 6.1277% | 4.1433% |
9.82968 | 5.7084% | 5.7059% | 5.7020% | 5.6943% | 3.6997% |
9.92968 | 5.2818% | 5.2793% | 5.2754% | 5.2676% | 3.2630% |
10.02968 | 4.8618% | 4.8593% | 4.8554% | 4.8476% | 2.8330% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-S certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class A-S certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
97.99998 | 6.5690% | 6.5690% | 6.5690% | 6.5690% | 6.5943% |
98.99998 | 6.3253% | 6.3253% | 6.3253% | 6.3253% | 6.3362% |
99.99998 | 6.0847% | 6.0847% | 6.0847% | 6.0847% | 6.0813% |
100.99998 | 5.8469% | 5.8469% | 5.8469% | 5.8469% | 5.8295% |
101.99998 | 5.6120% | 5.6120% | 5.6120% | 5.6120% | 5.5807% |
102.99998 | 5.3798% | 5.3798% | 5.3798% | 5.3798% | 5.3347% |
103.99998 | 5.1504% | 5.1504% | 5.1504% | 5.1504% | 5.0917% |
104.99998 | 4.9236% | 4.9236% | 4.9236% | 4.9236% | 4.8515% |
105.99998 | 4.6994% | 4.6994% | 4.6994% | 4.6994% | 4.6140% |
106.99998 | 4.4777% | 4.4777% | 4.4777% | 4.4777% | 4.3792% |
107.99998 | 4.2585% | 4.2585% | 4.2585% | 4.2585% | 4.1470% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class B certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class B certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
97.99998 | 6.9821% | 6.9821% | 6.9821% | 6.9821% | 7.0014% |
98.99998 | 6.7358% | 6.7358% | 6.7358% | 6.7358% | 6.7440% |
99.99998 | 6.4924% | 6.4924% | 6.4924% | 6.4924% | 6.4897% |
100.99998 | 6.2520% | 6.2520% | 6.2520% | 6.2520% | 6.2385% |
101.99998 | 6.0145% | 6.0145% | 6.0145% | 6.0145% | 5.9903% |
102.99998 | 5.7798% | 5.7798% | 5.7798% | 5.7798% | 5.7450% |
103.99998 | 5.5479% | 5.5479% | 5.5479% | 5.5479% | 5.5026% |
104.99998 | 5.3187% | 5.3187% | 5.3187% | 5.3187% | 5.2630% |
105.99998 | 5.0920% | 5.0920% | 5.0920% | 5.0920% | 5.0262% |
106.99998 | 4.8680% | 4.8680% | 4.8680% | 4.8680% | 4.7921% |
107.99998 | 4.6465% | 4.6465% | 4.6465% | 4.6465% | 4.5606% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class C certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class C certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
94.99998 | 7.7269% | 7.7269% | 7.7269% | 7.7269% | 7.7804% |
95.99998 | 7.4712% | 7.4712% | 7.4712% | 7.4712% | 7.5131% |
96.99998 | 7.2187% | 7.2187% | 7.2187% | 7.2187% | 7.2492% |
97.99998 | 6.9693% | 6.9693% | 6.9693% | 6.9693% | 6.9887% |
98.99998 | 6.7231% | 6.7231% | 6.7231% | 6.7231% | 6.7313% |
99.99998 | 6.4798% | 6.4798% | 6.4798% | 6.4798% | 6.4771% |
100.99998 | 6.2395% | 6.2395% | 6.2395% | 6.2395% | 6.2260% |
101.99998 | 6.0021% | 6.0021% | 6.0021% | 6.0021% | 5.9779% |
102.99998 | 5.7675% | 5.7675% | 5.7675% | 5.7675% | 5.7327% |
103.99998 | 5.5356% | 5.5356% | 5.5356% | 5.5356% | 5.4904% |
104.99998 | 5.3065% | 5.3065% | 5.3065% | 5.3065% | 5.2509% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class D certificates
at the Respective CPYs Set Forth Below:
| Prepayment Assumption (CPY) |
Assumed Price (% of Initial Certificate Balance of Class D certificates) | 0% CPY | 25% CPY | 50% CPY | 75% CPY | 100% CPY |
81.27744 | 9.3437% | 9.3437% | 9.3437% | 9.3437% | 9.5719% |
82.27744 | 9.0528% | 9.0528% | 9.0528% | 9.0528% | 9.2671% |
83.27744 | 8.7660% | 8.7660% | 8.7660% | 8.7660% | 8.9667% |
84.27744 | 8.4834% | 8.4834% | 8.4834% | 8.4834% | 8.6706% |
85.27744 | 8.2047% | 8.2047% | 8.2047% | 8.2047% | 8.3786% |
86.27744 | 7.9298% | 7.9298% | 7.9298% | 7.9298% | 8.0907% |
87.27744 | 7.6588% | 7.6588% | 7.6588% | 7.6588% | 7.8068% |
88.27744 | 7.3914% | 7.3914% | 7.3914% | 7.3914% | 7.5267% |
89.27744 | 7.1276% | 7.1276% | 7.1276% | 7.1276% | 7.2504% |
90.27744 | 6.8673% | 6.8673% | 6.8673% | 6.8673% | 6.9777% |
91.27744 | 6.6104% | 6.6104% | 6.6104% | 6.6104% | 6.7086% |
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations
General
The following is a general discussion of the anticipated material federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the certificates. The discussion below does not purport to address all federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to particular categories of investors (such as banks, insurance companies, securities dealers, foreign persons, investors whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar, investors subject to the alternative minimum tax and investors that hold the certificates as part of a “straddle” or “conversion transaction”), some of which may be subject to special rules. The authorities on which this discussion is based are subject to change or differing interpretations, and any such change or interpretation could apply retroactively. This discussion reflects the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as regulations (the “REMIC Regulations”) promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors in determining the federal, state, local or any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the certificates.
Two (2) separate real estate mortgage investment conduit (“REMIC”) elections will be made with respect to designated portions of the issuing entity (the “Lower-Tier REMIC” and the “Upper-Tier REMIC”, and, together, the “Trust REMICs”). The Lower-Tier REMIC will hold the Mortgage Loans, the Loan REMIC Regular Interest and certain other assets and will issue (i) certain classes of regular interests (the “Lower-Tier Regular Interests”) to the Upper-Tier REMIC and (ii) an uncertificated interest represented by the Class R certificates as the sole class of “residual interests” in the Lower-Tier REMIC. In addition, the 500 Delaware Loan REMIC, created pursuant to a REMIC declaration effective as of April 7, 2023, holds the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan and other related assets and has issued a class of uncertificated regular interests (of which the trust will own an approximately 15.4% interest) (such regular interests, the “Loan REMIC Regular Interest”) and a single residual interest (of which the trust will own a 0.0% interest). The Certificate Administrator will not be responsible for any tax administration relating to the Loan REMIC.
The Upper-Tier REMIC will hold the Lower-Tier Regular Interests and will issue (i) the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-D, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class G-RR and Class J-RR certificates (collectively, the “Regular Interests”), each of which represents a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC and (ii) an uncertificated interest represented by the Class R certificates as the sole class of “residual interests” in the Upper-Tier REMIC.
Qualification as a REMIC requires ongoing compliance with certain conditions. Assuming (i) the making of appropriate elections, (ii) compliance with the PSA and each Co-Lender Agreement, (iii) compliance with the provisions of each Non-Serviced PSA and any amendments thereto and the REMIC declaration and the continued qualification of the REMICs formed under each Non-Serviced PSA and the REMIC declaration and (iv) compliance with any changes in the law, including any amendments to the Code or applicable Treasury regulations thereunder, in the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, special tax counsel to the depositor, (a) each Trust REMIC will qualify as a REMIC on the Closing Date and thereafter, (b) each of the Lower-Tier Regular Interests will constitute a “regular interest” in the Lower-Tier REMIC, (c) each of the Regular Interests will constitute a “regular interest” in the Upper-Tier REMIC and (d) the Class R certificates will evidence the sole class of “residual interests” in each Trust REMIC.
Qualification as a REMIC
In order for each Trust REMIC to qualify as a REMIC, there must be ongoing compliance on the part of such Trust REMIC with the requirements set forth in the Code. Each Trust REMIC must fulfill an asset test, which requires that no more than a de minimis portion of the assets of such Trust REMIC, as of the close of the third calendar month beginning after the Closing Date (which for purposes of this discussion is the date of the issuance of the Regular Interests, the “Startup Day”) and at all times thereafter, may consist of assets other than “qualified mortgages” and “permitted investments”. The REMIC Regulations provide a safe harbor pursuant to which the de minimis requirements will be met if at all times the aggregate adjusted basis of the nonqualified assets is less than 1% of the aggregate adjusted basis of all such Trust REMIC’s assets. Each Trust REMIC also must provide “reasonable arrangements” to prevent its residual interest from being held by “disqualified organizations” or their agents and must furnish applicable tax information to transferors or agents that violate this restriction. The PSA will provide that no legal or beneficial interest in the Class R certificates may be transferred or registered unless certain conditions, designed to prevent violation of this restriction, are met. It is expected that each Trust REMIC will qualify as a REMIC at all times that any of the Regular Interests are outstanding.
A qualified mortgage is any obligation that is principally secured by an interest in real property and that is either transferred to a REMIC on the Startup Day or is purchased by a REMIC within a three (3) month period thereafter pursuant to a fixed price contract in effect on the Startup Day. Qualified mortgages include (i) whole mortgage loans or split note interests in such mortgage loans, such as the Mortgage Loans; provided that, in general, (a) the fair market value of the real property security (including buildings and structural components of the real property security and reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property security that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on the real property security that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) is at least 80% of the aggregate principal balance of such Mortgage Loan either at origination or as of the Startup Day (a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 125% with respect to the real property security) or (b) substantially all the proceeds of the Mortgage Loan or the underlying mortgages were used to acquire, improve or protect an interest in real property that, at the date of origination, was the only security for the Mortgage Loan, and (ii) regular interests in another REMIC, such as the Lower-Tier Regular Interests that will be held by the Upper-Tier REMIC. If a Mortgage Loan was not in fact principally secured by real property or is otherwise not a qualified mortgage, it must be disposed of within 90 days of discovery of such defect, or otherwise ceases to be a qualified mortgage after such 90-day period.
Permitted investments include “cash flow investments”, “qualified reserve assets” and “foreclosure property”. A cash flow investment is an investment, earning a return in the nature of interest, of amounts received on or with respect to qualified mortgages for a temporary period, not exceeding 13 months, until the next scheduled distribution to holders of interests in the REMIC. A qualified reserve asset is any intangible property held for investment that is part of any reasonably required reserve maintained by the REMIC to provide for payments of expenses of the REMIC or amounts due on its regular or residual interests in the event of defaults (including delinquencies) on the qualified mortgages, lower than expected reinvestment returns, Prepayment Interest Shortfalls and certain other contingencies. The Trust REMICs will not hold any qualified reserve assets. Foreclosure property is real property acquired by a REMIC in connection with the default or imminent default of a qualified mortgage and maintained by the REMIC in compliance with applicable rules and personal property that is incidental to such real property; provided that the mortgage loan sellers had no knowledge or reason to know, as of the Startup Day, that such a default had occurred or would occur. Foreclosure property may generally not be held after the close of the third calendar year beginning after the date the issuing entity acquires such property, with one extension that may be granted by the IRS.
A mortgage loan held by a REMIC will fail to be a qualified mortgage if it is “significantly modified” unless default is “reasonably foreseeable” or where the servicer believes there is a “significant risk of default” upon maturity of the mortgage loan or at an earlier date, and that by making such modification the risk of default is substantially reduced. A mortgage loan held by a REMIC will not be considered to have been “significantly modified” following the release of the lien on a portion of the real property collateral if (a) the release is pursuant to a defeasance permitted under the mortgage loan documents that occurs more than two (2) years after the startup day of the REMIC or (b) following the release the loan-to-value ratio for the mortgage loan is not more than 125% with respect to the real property security. Furthermore, if the release is not pursuant to a defeasance and following the release the loan-to-value ratio for the mortgage loan is greater than 125%, the mortgage loan will continue to be a qualified mortgage if the release is part of a “qualified paydown transaction” in accordance with Revenue Procedure 2010-30.
In addition to the foregoing requirements, the various interests in a REMIC also must meet certain requirements. All of the interests in a REMIC must be either of the following: (i) one or more classes of regular interests or (ii) a single class of residual interests on which distributions, if any, are made pro rata. A regular interest is an interest in a REMIC that is issued on the Startup Day with fixed terms, is designated as a regular interest, and unconditionally entitles the holder to receive a specified principal amount (or other similar amount), and provides that interest payments (or other similar amounts), if any, at or before maturity either are payable based on a fixed rate or a qualified variable rate, or consist of a specified, nonvarying portion of the interest payments on the qualified mortgages. The rate on the specified portion may be a fixed rate, a variable rate, or the difference between one fixed or qualified variable rate and another fixed or qualified variable rate. The specified principal amount of a regular interest that provides for interest payments consisting of a specified, nonvarying portion of interest
payments on qualified mortgages may be zero. An interest in a REMIC may be treated as a regular interest even if payments of principal with respect to such interest are subordinated to payments on other regular interests or the residual interest in the REMIC, and are dependent on the absence of defaults or delinquencies on qualified mortgages or permitted investments, lower than reasonably expected returns on permitted investments, expenses incurred by the REMIC or Prepayment Interest Shortfalls. A residual interest is an interest in a REMIC other than a regular interest that is issued on the Startup Day that is designated as a residual interest. Accordingly, the Loan REMIC Regular Interest will constitute a regular interest in the Loan REMIC, each class of Lower-Tier Regular Interests will constitute a class of regular interests in the Lower-Tier REMIC, each class of Regular Interests will constitute a class of regular interests in the Upper-Tier REMIC, and the Class R certificates will represent the sole class of residual interests in each Trust REMIC.
If an entity fails to comply with one or more of the ongoing requirements of the Code for status as a REMIC during any taxable year, the Code provides that the entity or applicable portion of it will not be treated as a REMIC for such year and thereafter. In this event, any entity with debt obligations with two (2) or more maturities, such as the Trust REMICs, may be treated as a separate association taxable as a corporation under Treasury regulations, and the certificates may be treated as equity interests in such an association. The Code, however, authorizes the Treasury Department to issue regulations that address situations where failure to meet one or more of the requirements for REMIC status occurs inadvertently and in good faith. Investors should be aware, however, that the Conference Committee Report to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the “1986 Act”) indicates that the relief may be accompanied by sanctions, such as the imposition of a corporate tax on all or a portion of a REMIC’s income for the period of time in which the requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied.
Status of Offered Certificates
Offered Certificates held by a real estate investment trust will constitute “real estate assets” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), and interest (including original issue discount) on the Offered Certificates will be considered “interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(3)(B) in the same proportion that, for both purposes, the assets of the issuing entity would be so treated. For purposes of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), payments of principal and interest on the Mortgage Loans that are reinvested pending distribution to holders of Offered Certificates qualify for such treatment. Offered Certificates held by a domestic building and loan association will be treated as “loans . . . secured by an interest in real property which is . . . residential real property” within the meaning of Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v) or as other assets described in Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C) only to the extent the applicable loans are secured by residential real property. As of the Cut-off Date, eighteen (18) of the Mortgaged Properties (31.2%) securing eleven (11) Mortgage Loans (in whole or in part) are multifamily properties or mixed use properties with a multifamily component. Holders of Offered Certificates should consult their tax advisors whether the foregoing percentage or some other percentage applies to their Offered Certificates. If at all times 95% or more of the assets of the issuing entity qualify for each of the foregoing treatments, the Offered Certificates will qualify for the corresponding status in their entirety. For the purposes of the foregoing determinations, the Trust REMICs will be treated as a single REMIC. In addition, the Mortgage Loans that have been defeased with government securities will not qualify for such treatment. Offered Certificates will be “qualified mortgages” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3) for another REMIC if transferred to that REMIC within a prescribed time period in exchange for regular or residual interests in that REMIC. Moreover, Offered Certificates held by certain financial institutions will constitute an “evidence of indebtedness” within the meaning of Code Section 582(c)(1).
Taxation of Regular Interests
General
Each class of Regular Interests represents a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC. The Regular Interests will represent newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes. In general, interest, original issue discount and market discount on a Regular Interest will be treated as ordinary
income to the holder of a Regular Interest (a “Regular Interestholder”), and principal payments on a Regular Interest will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the Regular Interestholder’s basis in the Regular Interest. Regular Interestholders must use the accrual method of accounting with regard to the Regular Interests, regardless of the method of accounting otherwise used by such Regular Interestholders.
Original Issue Discount
Holders of Regular Interests issued with original issue discount generally must include original issue discount in ordinary income for federal income tax purposes as it accrues in accordance with the constant yield method, which takes into account the compounding of interest, in advance of receipt of the cash attributable to such income. The following discussion is based in part on temporary and final Treasury regulations (the “OID Regulations”) under Code Sections 1271 through 1273 and 1275 and in part on the provisions of the 1986 Act. Regular Interestholders should be aware, however, that the OID Regulations do not adequately address certain issues relevant to prepayable securities, such as the Regular Interests. To the extent such issues are not addressed in the OID Regulations, the certificate administrator will apply the methodology described in the Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act. We cannot assure you that the IRS will not take a different position as to those matters not currently addressed by the OID Regulations. Moreover, the OID Regulations include an anti-abuse rule allowing the IRS to apply or depart from the OID Regulations if necessary or appropriate to ensure a reasonable tax result in light of the applicable statutory provisions. A tax result will not be considered unreasonable under the anti-abuse rule, however, in the absence of a substantial effect on the present value of a taxpayer’s tax liability. Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the discussion in this prospectus and the appropriate method for reporting interest and original issue discount with respect to the Regular Interests.
Each Regular Interest will be treated as a single installment obligation for purposes of determining the original issue discount includible in a Regular Interestholder’s income. The total amount of original issue discount on a Regular Interest is the excess of the “stated redemption price at maturity” of the Regular Interest over its “issue price”. The issue price of a class of Regular Interests is the first price at which a substantial amount of Regular Interests of such class is sold to investors (excluding bond houses, brokers and underwriters). Although unclear under the OID Regulations, the certificate administrator will treat the issue price of Regular Interests for which there is no substantial sale as of the issue date as the fair market value of such Regular Interests as of the issue date. The issue price of the Regular Interests also includes the amount paid by an initial Regular Interestholder for accrued interest that relates to a period prior to the issue date of such class of Regular Interests. The stated redemption price at maturity of a Regular Interest is the sum of all payments provided by the debt instrument other than any qualified stated interest payments. Under the OID Regulations, qualified stated interest generally means interest payable at a single fixed rate or a qualified variable rate; provided that such interest payments are unconditionally payable at intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the obligation. Because there is no penalty or default remedy in the case of nonpayment of interest with respect to a Regular Interest, it is possible that no interest on any class of Regular Interests will be treated as qualified stated interest. However, because the Mortgage Loans provide for remedies in the event of default, the certificate administrator will treat all payments of stated interest on the Regular Interests (other than the Class X Certificates) as qualified stated interest (other than accrued interest distributed on the first Distribution Date for the number of days that exceed the interval between the Closing Date and the first Distribution Date). Based upon the anticipated issue price of each such class and a stated redemption price equal to the par amount of each such class (plus such excess interest accrued thereon), it is anticipated that the Class D certificates will be issued with original issue discount for federal income tax purposes.
It is anticipated that the certificate administrator will treat each class of Class X Certificates as having no qualified stated interest. Accordingly, such classes will be considered to be issued with original issue discount in an amount equal to the excess of all distributions of interest expected to be received on such classes over their respective issue prices (including interest accrued prior to the Closing Date). Any “negative” amounts of original issue discount on such classes attributable to rapid prepayments with
respect to the Mortgage Loans will not be deductible currently. The holder of a Class X Certificate may be entitled to a deduction for a loss, which may be a capital loss, to the extent it becomes certain that such holder will not recover a portion of its basis in such class, assuming no further prepayments.
Under a de minimis rule, original issue discount on a Regular Interest will be considered to be zero if such original issue discount is less than 0.25% of the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest multiplied by the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest. For this purpose, the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest is computed as the sum of the amounts determined by multiplying the number of full years (i.e., rounding down partial years) from the issue date until each distribution in reduction of stated redemption price at maturity is scheduled to be made by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of each distribution included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest and the denominator of which is the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that the schedule of such distributions should be determined in accordance with the assumed rate of prepayment on the Mortgage Loans used in pricing the transaction, i.e., the assumption that subsequent to the date of any determination the mortgage loans will prepay at a rate equal to a CPY of 0% (the “Prepayment Assumption”). See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations—Weighted Average Life”. Holders generally must report de minimis original issue discount pro rata as principal payments are received, and such income will be capital gain if the Regular Interest is held as a capital asset. Under the OID Regulations, however, Regular Interestholders may elect to accrue all de minimis original issue discount, as well as market discount and premium, under the constant yield method. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below.
A holder of a Regular Interest issued with original issue discount generally must include in gross income for any taxable year the sum of the “daily portions”, as defined below, of the original issue discount on the Regular Interest accrued during an accrual period for each day on which it holds the Regular Interest, including the date of purchase but excluding the date of disposition. With respect to each such Regular Interest, a calculation will be made of the original issue discount that accrues during each successive full accrual period that ends on the day prior to each Distribution Date with respect to the Regular Interests, assuming that prepayments and extensions with respect to the Mortgage Loans will be made in accordance with the Prepayment Assumption. The original issue discount accruing in a full accrual period will be the excess, if any, of (i) the sum of (a) the present value of all of the remaining distributions to be made on the Regular Interest as of the end of that accrual period and (b) the distributions made on the Regular Interest during the accrual period that are included in the Regular Interest’s stated redemption price at maturity, over (ii) the adjusted issue price of the Regular Interest at the beginning of the accrual period. The present value of the remaining distributions referred to in the preceding sentence is calculated based on (i) the yield to maturity of the Regular Interest as of the Startup Day, (ii) events (including actual prepayments) that have occurred prior to the end of the accrual period, and (iii) the assumption that the remaining payments will be made in accordance with the original Prepayment Assumption. For these purposes, the adjusted issue price of a Regular Interest at the beginning of any accrual period equals the issue price of the Regular Interest, increased by the aggregate amount of original issue discount with respect to the Regular Interest that accrued in all prior accrual periods and reduced by the amount of distributions included in the Regular Interest’s stated redemption price at maturity that were made on the Regular Interest that were attributable to such prior periods. The original issue discount accruing during any accrual period (as determined in this paragraph) will then be divided by the number of days in the period to determine the daily portion of original issue discount for each day in the period.
Under the method described above, the daily portions of original issue discount required to be included as ordinary income by a Regular Interestholder (other than a holder of a Class X Certificate) generally will increase to take into account prepayments on the Regular Interests as a result of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans that exceed the Prepayment Assumption, and generally will decrease (but not below zero for any period) if the prepayments are slower than the Prepayment Assumption. Due to the unique nature of interest-only certificates, the preceding sentence may not apply in the case of the Class X Certificates.
Acquisition Premium
A purchaser of a Regular Interest at a price greater than its adjusted issue price and less than its remaining stated redemption price at maturity will be required to include in gross income the daily portions of the original issue discount on the Regular Interest reduced pro rata by a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of its purchase price over such adjusted issue price and the denominator of which is the excess of the remaining stated redemption price at maturity over the adjusted issue price. Alternatively, such a purchaser may elect to treat all such acquisition premium under the constant yield method, as described under the heading “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below.
Market Discount
A purchaser of a Regular Interest also may be subject to the market discount rules of Code Sections 1276 through 1278. Under these Code sections and the principles applied by the OID Regulations in the context of original issue discount, “market discount” is the amount by which the purchaser’s original basis in the Regular Interest (i) is exceeded by the remaining outstanding principal payments and non-qualified stated interest payments due on the Regular Interest, or (ii) in the case of a Regular Interest having original issue discount, is exceeded by the adjusted issue price of such Regular Interest at the time of purchase. Such purchaser generally will be required to recognize ordinary income to the extent of accrued market discount on such Regular Interest as distributions includible in its stated redemption price at maturity are received, in an amount not exceeding any such distribution. Such market discount would accrue in a manner to be provided in Treasury regulations and should take into account the Prepayment Assumption. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that until such regulations are issued, such market discount would accrue, at the election of the holder, either (i) on the basis of a constant interest rate or (ii) in the ratio of interest accrued for the relevant period to the sum of the interest accrued for such period plus the remaining interest after the end of such period, or, in the case of classes issued with original issue discount, in the ratio of original issue discount accrued for the relevant period to the sum of the original issue discount accrued for such period plus the remaining original issue discount after the end of such period. Such purchaser also generally will be required to treat a portion of any gain on a sale or exchange of the Regular Interest as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount accrued to the date of disposition under one of the foregoing methods, less any accrued market discount previously reported as ordinary income as partial distributions in reduction of the stated redemption price at maturity were received. Such purchaser will be required to defer deduction of a portion of the excess of the interest paid or accrued on indebtedness incurred to purchase or carry the Regular Interest over the interest (including original issue discount) distributable on the Regular Interest. The deferred portion of such interest expense in any taxable year generally will not exceed the accrued market discount on the Regular Interest for such year. Any such deferred interest expense is, in general, allowed as a deduction not later than the year in which the related market discount income is recognized or the Regular Interest is disposed of. As an alternative to the inclusion of market discount in income on the foregoing basis, the Regular Interestholder may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues, in which case the interest deferral rule will apply. The election, if made, will apply to all market discount instruments acquired by such Regular Interestholder as of the first day of the taxable year for which the election is made and to all market discount instruments acquired thereafter. It is irrevocable except with the approval of the IRS. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below regarding making the election under Code Section 1276 and an alternative manner in which such election may be deemed to be made.
Market discount with respect to a Regular Interest will be considered to be zero if such market discount is less than 0.25% of the remaining stated redemption price at maturity of such Regular Interest multiplied by the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest remaining after the date of purchase. For this purpose, the weighted average maturity is determined by multiplying the number of full years (i.e., rounding down partial years) from the issue date until each distribution in reduction of stated redemption price at maturity is scheduled to be made by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of each such distribution included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest and the denominator of which is the total stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest. It appears
that de minimis market discount would be reported pro rata as principal payments are received. Treasury regulations implementing the market discount rules have not yet been proposed, and investors should therefore consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules as well as the advisability of making any of the elections with respect to such rules. Investors should also consult Revenue Procedure 92-67 concerning the elections to include market discount in income currently and to accrue market discount on the basis of the constant yield method.
Premium
A Regular Interest purchased upon initial issuance or in the secondary market at a cost greater than its remaining stated redemption price at maturity generally is considered to be purchased at a premium. If the Regular Interestholder holds such Regular Interest as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Code Section 1221, the Regular Interestholder may elect under Code Section 171 to amortize such premium under the constant yield method. The election, if made, will apply to all premium debt instruments (other than those paying tax exempt interest) held by such Regular Interestholder on the first day of the taxable year to which the election applies and to all taxable, premium debt instruments acquired thereafter. It is irrevocable except with the approval of the IRS. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below regarding making the election under Code Section 171 and an alternative manner in which the Code Section 171 election may be deemed to be made. Final Treasury regulations under Code Section 171 do not, by their terms, apply to prepayable obligations such as the Regular Interests. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act indicates a Congressional intent that the same rules that will apply to the accrual of market discount on installment obligations will also apply to amortizing bond premium under Code Section 171 on installment obligations such as the Regular Interests, although it is unclear whether the alternatives to the constant interest method described above under “—Market Discount” are available. Amortizable bond premium will be treated as an offset to interest income on a Regular Interest rather than as a separate deduction item. It is anticipated that the Class A-1, Class A-3, Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates will be issued at a premium for federal income tax purposes.
Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method
A holder of a debt instrument such as a Regular Interest may elect to treat all interest that accrues on the instrument using the constant yield method, with none of the interest being treated as qualified stated interest. For purposes of applying the constant yield method to a debt instrument subject to such an election, (i) “interest” includes stated interest, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market discount and de minimis market discount, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or acquisition premium and (ii) the debt instrument is treated as if the instrument were issued on the holder’s acquisition date in the amount of the holder’s adjusted basis immediately after acquisition. It is unclear whether, for this purpose, the initial Prepayment Assumption would continue to apply or if a new prepayment assumption as of the date of the holder’s acquisition would apply. A holder generally may make such an election on an instrument by instrument basis or for a class or group of debt instruments. However, if the holder makes such an election with respect to a debt instrument with amortizable bond premium or with market discount, the holder is deemed to have made elections to amortize bond premium or to report market discount income currently as it accrues under the constant yield method, respectively, for all taxable premium bonds held or acquired or market discount bonds acquired by the holder on the first day of the year of the election or thereafter. The election is made on the holder’s federal income tax return for the year in which the debt instrument is acquired and is irrevocable except with the approval of the IRS. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the advisability of making such an election.
Treatment of Losses
Holders of the Regular Interests will be required to report income with respect to the Regular Interests on the accrual method of accounting, without giving effect to delays or reductions in distributions attributable to defaults or delinquencies on the Mortgage Loans, except to the extent it can be established that such losses are uncollectible. Accordingly, a Regular Interestholder may have income, or may incur a diminution in cash flow as a result of a default or delinquency, but may not be able to take a deduction
(subject to the discussion below) for the corresponding loss until a subsequent taxable year. In this regard, investors are cautioned that while they generally may cease to accrue interest income if it reasonably appears that the interest will be uncollectible, the IRS may take the position that original issue discount must continue to be accrued in spite of its uncollectibility until the debt instrument is disposed of in a taxable transaction or becomes worthless in accordance with the rules of Code Section 166. The following discussion does not apply to holders of Class X Certificates. Under Code Section 166, it appears that the holders of Regular Interests that are corporations or that otherwise hold the Regular Interests in connection with a trade or business should in general be allowed to deduct as an ordinary loss any such loss sustained (and not previously deducted) during the taxable year on account of any such Regular Interests becoming wholly or partially worthless, and that, in general, the Regular Interestholders that are not corporations and do not hold the Regular Interests in connection with a trade or business will be allowed to deduct as a short-term capital loss any loss with respect to principal sustained during the taxable year on account of such Regular Interests becoming wholly worthless. Although the matter is not free from doubt, such non-corporate holders of Regular Interests should be allowed a bad debt deduction at such time as the principal balance of any class of such Regular Interests is reduced to reflect losses on the Mortgage Loans below such holder’s basis in the Regular Interests. The IRS, however, could take the position that non-corporate holders will be allowed a bad debt deduction to reflect such losses only after the classes of Regular Interests have been otherwise retired. The IRS could also assert that losses on a class of Regular Interests are deductible based on some other method that may defer such deductions for all holders, such as reducing future cash flow for purposes of computing original issue discount. This may have the effect of creating “negative” original issue discount that, with the possible exception of the method discussed in the following sentence, would be deductible only against future positive original issue discount or otherwise upon termination of the applicable class. Although not free from doubt, a holder of Regular Interests with negative original issue discount may be entitled to deduct a loss to the extent that its remaining basis would exceed the maximum amount of future payments to which such holder was entitled, assuming no further prepayments. No bad debt losses will be allowed with respect to the Class X Certificates. Regular Interestholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the appropriate timing, amount and character of any loss sustained with respect to such Regular Interests. Special loss rules are applicable to banks and thrift institutions, including rules regarding reserves for bad debts. Such taxpayers are advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the treatment of losses on the Regular Interests.
Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums
Yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums actually collected on the Mortgage Loans will be distributed to the certificates as described in “Description of the Certificates—Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums”. It is not entirely clear under the Code when the amount of prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges so allocated should be taxed to the holder of an Offered Certificate, but it is not expected, for federal income tax reporting purposes, that prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges will be treated as giving rise to any income to the holder of an Offered Certificate prior to the master servicer’s actual receipt of a prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge. Prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges, if any, may be treated as paid upon the retirement or partial retirement of an Offered Certificate. The IRS may disagree with these positions. Certificateholders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the treatment of prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges.
Sale or Exchange of Regular Interests
If a Regular Interestholder sells or exchanges a Regular Interest, such Regular Interestholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the amount received and its adjusted basis in the Regular Interest. The adjusted basis of a Regular Interest generally will equal the cost of the Regular Interest to the seller, increased by any original issue discount, market discount or other amounts previously included in the seller’s gross income with respect to the Regular Interest and reduced by amounts included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest that were previously received by the seller, by any amortized premium, and by any deductible losses on the Regular Interest.
Except as described above with respect to market discount, and except as provided in this paragraph, any gain or loss on the sale or exchange of a Regular Interest realized by an investor that holds the Regular Interest as a capital asset will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term or short-term depending on whether the Regular Interest has been held for the long-term capital gain holding period (more than one year). Such gain will be treated as ordinary income: (i) if the Regular Interest is held as part of a “conversion transaction” as defined in Code Section 1258(c), up to the amount of interest that would have accrued on the Regular Interestholder’s net investment in the conversion transaction at 120% of the appropriate applicable federal rate under Code Section 1274(d) in effect at the time the taxpayer entered into the transaction minus any amount previously treated as ordinary income with respect to any prior disposition of property that was held as part of such transaction; (ii) in the case of a non-corporate taxpayer, to the extent such taxpayer has made an election under Code Section 163(d)(4) to have net capital gains taxed as investment income at ordinary income rates; or (iii) to the extent that such gain does not exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount that would have been includible in the gross income of the Regular Interestholder if his yield on such Regular Interest were 110% of the applicable federal rate as of the date of purchase, over (b) the amount of income actually includible in the gross income of such Regular Interestholder with respect to the Regular Interest. In addition, gain or loss recognized from the sale or exchange of a Regular Interest by certain banks or thrift institutions will be treated as ordinary income or loss pursuant to Code Section 582(c). Long-term capital gains of certain non-corporate taxpayers generally are subject to a lower maximum tax rate than ordinary income of such taxpayers for property held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate for corporations is the same with respect to both ordinary income and capital gains.
Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC
Prohibited Transactions
Income from certain transactions by each Trust REMIC, called prohibited transactions, will not be part of the calculation of income or loss includible in the federal income tax returns of holders of the Class R certificates, but rather will be taxed directly to the Trust REMIC at a 100% rate. Prohibited transactions generally include (i) the disposition of a qualified mortgage other than for (a) substitution within two (2) years of the Startup Day for a defective (including a defaulted) obligation (or repurchase in lieu of substitution of a defective (including a defaulted) obligation at any time) or for any qualified mortgage within three (3) months of the Startup Day, (b) foreclosure, default or imminent default of a qualified mortgage, (c) bankruptcy or insolvency of the REMIC, or (d) a qualified (complete) liquidation, (ii) the receipt of income from assets that are not the type of mortgages or investments that the REMIC is permitted to hold, (iii) the receipt of compensation for services or (iv) the receipt of gain from disposition of cash flow investments other than pursuant to a qualified liquidation. Notwithstanding (i) and (iv), it is not a prohibited transaction to sell REMIC property to prevent a default on regular interests as a result of a default on qualified mortgages or to facilitate a qualified liquidation or a clean-up call. The REMIC Regulations indicate that the modification of a mortgage loan generally will not be treated as a disposition if it is occasioned by a default or reasonably foreseeable default, an assumption of a mortgage loan or the waiver of a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause. It is not anticipated that the Trust REMICs will engage in any prohibited transactions.
Contributions to a REMIC After the Startup Day
In general, a REMIC will be subject to a tax at a 100% rate on the value of any property contributed to the REMIC after the Startup Day. Exceptions are provided for cash contributions to the REMIC (i) during the three (3) months following the Startup Day, (ii) made to a qualified reserve fund by a holder of a Class R certificate, (iii) in the nature of a guarantee, (iv) made to facilitate a qualified liquidation or clean-up call, and (v) as otherwise permitted in Treasury regulations yet to be issued. It is not anticipated that there will be any taxable contributions to the Trust REMICs.
Net Income from Foreclosure Property
The Lower-Tier REMIC will be subject to federal income tax at the corporate rate on “net income from foreclosure property”, determined by reference to the rules applicable to real estate investment trusts. Generally, property acquired by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure would be treated as “foreclosure property” until the close of the third calendar year beginning after the Lower-Tier REMIC’s acquisition of an REO Property with a possible extension. Net income from foreclosure property generally means gain from the sale of a foreclosure property that is inventory property and gross income from foreclosure property other than qualifying rents and other qualifying income for a real estate investment trust.
In order for a foreclosed property to qualify as foreclosure property, any operation of the foreclosed property by the Lower-Tier REMIC generally must be conducted through an independent contractor. Further, such operation, even if conducted through an independent contractor, may give rise to “net income from foreclosure property”, taxable at the corporate rate. Payment of such tax by the Lower-Tier REMIC would reduce amounts available for distribution to Certificateholders.
The special servicer will be required to determine generally whether the operation of foreclosed property in a manner that would subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to such tax would be expected to result in higher after-tax proceeds than an alternative method of operating such property that would not subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to such tax.
REMIC Partnership Representative
A “partnership representative” (as defined in Section 6223 of the Code) will represent each Trust REMIC in connection with any IRS and judicial proceeding relating to the REMIC and the PSA will designate the certificate administrator as such representative. Under the audit rules applicable to REMICs, (1) unless a REMIC elects otherwise, taxes arising from IRS audit adjustments are required to be paid by the REMIC rather than by its residual interestholders, (2) the partnership representative acts as a REMIC’s sole representative and its actions, including agreeing to adjustments to REMIC taxable income, are binding on the residual interestholders and (3) if the IRS makes an adjustment to a REMIC’s taxable year, the holders of residual interests for the audited taxable year may have to take the adjustment into account for the taxable year in which the adjustment is made rather than for the audited taxable year.
The partnership representative will be directed to utilize any election or other exception available to make the holders of the Class R certificates, rather than the Trust REMICs, liable for any taxes arising from audit adjustments to the related Trust REMIC’s taxable income. It is unclear how any such elections may affect the procedural rules available to challenge any audit adjustment that would otherwise be available in the absence of any such elections. Investors should discuss with their own tax advisors the possible effect of these rules on them.
Taxation of Certain Foreign Investors
Interest, including original issue discount, distributable to the Regular Interestholders that are nonresident aliens, foreign corporations or other Non-U.S. Tax Persons will be considered “portfolio interest” and, therefore, generally will not be subject to a 30% United States withholding tax; provided that such Non-U.S. Tax Person (i) is not a “10-percent shareholder” within the meaning of Code Section 871(h)(3)(B) or a “controlled foreign corporation” described in Code Section 881(c)(3)(C) with respect to the Trust REMICs and (ii) provides the certificate administrator, or the person that would otherwise be required to withhold tax from such distributions under Code Section 1441 or 1442, with an appropriate statement, signed under penalties of perjury, identifying the beneficial owner and stating, among other things, that the beneficial owner of the Regular Interest is a Non-U.S. Tax Person. The appropriate documentation includes IRS Form W-8BEN-E or W-8BEN, if the Non-U.S. Tax Person is an entity (such as a corporation) or individual, respectively, eligible for the benefits of the portfolio interest exemption or an exemption based on a treaty; IRS Form W-8ECI if the Non-U.S. Tax Person is eligible for an exemption on the basis of its income from the Regular Interest being effectively connected to a United States trade or business; IRS Form W-8BEN-E or W-8IMY if the Non-U.S. Tax Person is a trust,
depending on whether such trust is classified as the beneficial owner of the Regular Interest; and Form W-8IMY, with supporting documentation as specified in the Treasury regulations, required to substantiate exemptions from withholding on behalf of its partners, if the Non-U.S. Tax Person is a partnership. With respect to IRS Forms W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8IMY and W-8ECI, each (other than IRS Form W-8IMY) expires after three (3) full calendar years or as otherwise provided by applicable law. An intermediary (other than a partnership) must provide IRS Form W-8IMY, revealing all required information, including its name, address, taxpayer identification number, the country under the laws of which it is created, and certification that it is not acting for its own account. A “qualified intermediary” must certify that it has provided, or will provide, a withholding statement as required under Treasury Regulations Section 1.1441-1(e)(5)(v), but need not disclose the identity of its account holders on its IRS Form W-8IMY, and may certify its account holders’ status without including each beneficial owner’s certification. A “non-qualified intermediary” must additionally certify that it has provided, or will provide, a withholding statement that is associated with the appropriate IRS Forms W-8 and W-9 required to substantiate exemptions from withholding on behalf of its beneficial owners. The term “intermediary” means a person acting as a custodian, a broker, nominee or otherwise as an agent for the beneficial owner of a Regular Interest. A “qualified intermediary” is generally a foreign financial institution or clearing organization or a non-U.S. branch or office of a U.S. financial institution or clearing organization that is a party to a withholding agreement with the IRS.
If such statement, or any other required statement, is not provided, 30% withholding will apply unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty or unless the interest on the Regular Interest is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by such Non-U.S. Tax Person. In the latter case, such Non-U.S. Tax Person will be subject to United States federal income tax at regular rates. Investors that are Non-U.S. Tax Persons should consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of owning a Regular Interest.
A “Non-U.S. Tax Person” is a person other than a U.S. Tax Person.
A “U.S. Tax Person” is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation or partnership (except to the extent provided in applicable Treasury regulations) or other entity created or organized in, or under the laws of, the United States, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia, including any entity treated as a corporation or partnership for federal income tax purposes, an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust, and one or more such U.S. Tax Persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust (or, to the extent provided in applicable Treasury regulations, certain trusts in existence on August 20, 1996 that have elected to be treated as U.S. Tax Persons).
FATCA
Under the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” (“FATCA”) provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, a 30% withholding tax is generally imposed on certain payments, including payments of U.S.-source interest to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other foreign financial entities if those foreign entities fail to comply with the requirements of FATCA. The certificate administrator will be required to withhold amounts under FATCA on payments made to holders who are subject to the FATCA requirements and who fail to provide the certificate administrator with proof that they have complied with such requirements. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of FATCA to their certificates.
Backup Withholding
Distributions made on the certificates, and proceeds from the sale of the certificates to or through certain brokers, may be subject to a “backup” withholding tax under Code Section 3406 on “reportable payments” (including interest distributions, original issue discount and, under certain circumstances, principal distributions) unless the Certificateholder (i) is a U.S. Tax Person and provides IRS Form W-9 with the correct taxpayer identification number, or (ii) other than a holder of a Class R certificate, is a
Non-U.S. Tax Person and provides IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable, identifying the Non-U.S. Tax Person and stating that the beneficial owner is not a U.S. Tax Person or can be treated as an exempt recipient within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.6049-4(c)(1)(ii). Any amounts to be withheld from distribution on the certificates would be refunded by the IRS or allowed as a credit against the Certificateholder’s federal income tax liability. Information reporting requirements may also apply regardless of whether withholding is required. Holders are urged to contact their own tax advisors regarding the application to them of backup withholding and information reporting.
Information Reporting
Holders who are individuals (and certain domestic entities that are formed or availed of for purposes of holding, directly or indirectly, “specified foreign financial assets”) may be subject to certain foreign financial asset reporting obligations with respect to their certificates held through a financial account maintained by a foreign financial institution if the aggregate value of their certificates and their other “specified foreign financial assets” exceeds $50,000. Significant penalties can apply if a holder fails to disclose its specified foreign financial assets. We urge you to consult your tax advisor with respect to this and other reporting obligations with respect to your certificates.
3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income”
Certain non-corporate U.S. holders will be subject to an additional 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income”, which may include the interest payments and any gain realized with respect to the certificates, to the extent of their net investment income that, when added to their other modified adjusted gross income, exceeds $200,000 for an unmarried individual, $250,000 for a married taxpayer filing a joint return (or a surviving spouse), or $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return. The 3.8% Medicare tax is determined in a different manner than the regular income tax. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to their consequences with respect to the 3.8% Medicare tax.
Reporting Requirements
Each Trust REMIC will be required to maintain its books on a calendar year basis and to file federal income tax returns in a manner similar to a partnership. The form for such returns is IRS Form 1066, U.S. Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC) Income Tax Return. The trustee will be required to sign each Trust REMIC’s returns.
Reports of accrued interest, original issue discount, if any, and information necessary to compute the accrual of any market discount on the Regular Interests will be made annually to the IRS and to individuals, estates, non-exempt and non-charitable trusts, and partnerships that are either Regular Interestholders or beneficial owners that own Regular Interests through a broker or middleman as nominee. All brokers, nominees and all other nonexempt Regular Interestholders (including corporations, non-calendar year taxpayers, securities or commodities dealers, placement agents, real estate investment trusts, investment companies, common trusts, thrift institutions and charitable trusts) may request such information for any calendar quarter by telephone or in writing by contacting the person designated in IRS Publication 938 with respect to the Trust REMICs. Holders through nominees must request such information from the nominee.
Treasury regulations require that, in addition to the foregoing requirements, information must be furnished annually to the residual interest holders and filed annually with the IRS concerning the percentage of each Trust REMIC’s assets meeting the qualified asset tests described under “—Qualification as a REMIC” above.
DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE RULES AND THE CURRENT UNCERTAINTY AS TO THE MANNER OF THEIR APPLICATION TO THE ISSUING ENTITY AND CERTIFICATEHOLDERS, IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT POTENTIAL INVESTORS CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX TREATMENT OF THEIR ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF THE CERTIFICATES.
Certain State and Local and Foreign Tax Considerations
In addition to the federal income tax consequences described in “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations” above, purchasers of Offered Certificates should consider the state and local and foreign income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Offered Certificates. State and local and foreign income tax law may differ substantially from the corresponding federal law, and this discussion does not purport to describe any aspect of the income tax laws of any state, locality or foreign jurisdiction.
It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may attempt to tax nonresident holders of Offered Certificates solely by reason of the location in that jurisdiction of the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, a sponsor, a related borrower or a mortgaged property or on some other basis, may require nonresident holders of certificates to file returns in such jurisdiction or may attempt to impose penalties for failure to file such returns; and it is possible that any such jurisdiction will ultimately succeed in collecting such taxes or penalties from nonresident holders of Offered Certificates. We cannot assure you that holders of Offered Certificates will not be subject to tax in any particular state, local, foreign or other taxing jurisdiction.
You should consult with your tax advisor with respect to the various state, local and foreign, and any other, tax consequences of an investment in the Offered Certificates.
Method of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”), among the depositor and the underwriters, the depositor has agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters have severally, but not jointly, agreed to purchase from the depositor the respective Certificate Balance or the Notional Amount, as applicable, of each class of Offered Certificates set forth below subject in each case to a variance of 5%.
Class | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | Barclays Capital Inc. | BMO Capital Markets Corp. | Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. |
Class A-1 | $605,288 | $441,250 | $323,779 | $123,668 | $101,015 |
Class A-3 | $236,379,575 | $172,318,650 | $126,443,509 | $48,295,304 | $39,448,962 |
Class X-A | $274,225,444 | $199,907,960 | $146,687,917 | $56,027,689 | $45,764,990 |
Class X-B | $28,776,037 | $20,977,480 | $15,392,798 | $5,879,304 | $4,802,381 |
Class X-D | $5,485,162 | $3,998,635 | $2,934,107 | $1,120,687 | $915,409 |
Class A-S | $37,240,581 | $27,148,059 | $19,920,629 | $7,608,717 | $6,215,014 |
Class B | $16,504,060 | $12,031,316 | $8,828,306 | $3,371,986 | $2,754,332 |
Class C | $12,271,978 | $8,946,164 | $6,564,492 | $2,507,318 | $2,048,048 |
Class D | $5,485,162 | $3,998,635 | $2,934,107 | $1,120,687 | $915,409 |
Class | Academy Securities, Inc. | CastleOak Securities, L.P. |
Class A-1 | $0 | $0 |
Class A-3 | $0 | $0 |
Class X-A | $0 | $0 |
Class X-B | $0 | $0 |
Class X-D | $0 | $0 |
Class A-S | $0 | $0 |
Class B | $0 | $0 |
Class C | $0 | $0 |
Class D | $0 | $0 |
The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters will be subject to certain conditions precedent and that the underwriters will be obligated to purchase all Offered Certificates if any are purchased. In the event of a default by any underwriter, the Underwriting Agreement provides that, in certain circumstances, purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriter(s) may be increased or the Underwriting Agreement may be terminated.
The parties to the PSA have severally agreed to indemnify the underwriters, and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify the depositor and controlling persons of the depositor, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and have agreed, if required, to contribute to payments required to be made in respect of these liabilities.
The depositor has been advised by the underwriters that they propose to offer the Offered Certificates to the public from time to time in one or more negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at varying prices to be determined at the time of sale. Proceeds to the depositor from the sale of Offered Certificates will be approximately 106.9% of the initial aggregate Certificate Balance of the Offered Certificates, plus accrued interest on the Offered Certificates from August 1, 2024, before deducting expenses payable by the depositor. The underwriters may effect the transactions by selling the Offered Certificates to or through dealers, and the dealers may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters. In connection with the purchase and sale of the Offered Certificates, the underwriters and dealers may be deemed to have received compensation from the depositor in the form of underwriting discounts and commissions.
Expenses payable by the depositor are estimated at approximately $5,800,000, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions.
We anticipate that the Offered Certificates will be sold primarily to institutional investors. Purchasers of Offered Certificates, including dealers, may, depending on the facts and circumstances of those purchases, be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with reoffers and resales by them of Offered Certificates. If you purchase Offered Certificates, you should consult with your legal advisors in this regard prior to any reoffer or resale. The underwriters expect to make, but are not obligated to make, a secondary market in the Offered Certificates. The ability of the underwriters to make a market in the Offered Certificates may be impacted by changes in any regulatory requirements applicable to the marketing, holding and selling of, and issuing quotations with respect to, the Offered Certificates or CMBS generally. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline”.
The primary source of ongoing information available to investors concerning the Offered Certificates will be the monthly statements discussed under “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. We cannot assure you that any additional information regarding the Offered Certificates will be available through any other source. In addition, we are not aware of any source through which price information about the Offered Certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis. The limited nature of that information regarding the Offered Certificates may adversely affect the liquidity of the Offered Certificates, even if a secondary market for the Offered Certificates becomes available.
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of the depositor, an affiliate of GSMC (a sponsor), and an affiliate of GS Bank (an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GS Bank” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”).
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of CREFI (a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “CREFI” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”).
Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Barclays (a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “Barclays” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”).
BMO Capital Markets Corp., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of BMO (a sponsor, an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “BMO” in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”).
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of (i) GACC (a sponsor) and (ii) DBRI (an originator and the holder of the Companion Loans (if any) for which the noteholder is identified as “GACC” or “DBRI”, as applicable, in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—General”).
A substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering (after the payment of underwriting compensation and transaction expenses) is intended to be directed to affiliates of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., which are underwriters for this offering. That flow of funds will occur by means of the collective effect of the payment by the underwriters to the depositor, an affiliate of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, of the purchase price for the Offered Certificates, and the following payments: (i) the payment by the depositor to GSMC, an affiliate of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by GSMC, (ii) the payment by the depositor to CREFI, an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by CREFI, (iii) the payment by the depositor to 3650 REIT, in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by 3650 REIT, (iv) the payment by the depositor to Barclays, an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by Barclays, (v) the payment by the depositor to BMO, an affiliate of BMO Capital Markets Corp., in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by BMO and (vi) the payment by the depositor to GACC, an affiliate of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., in its capacity as a sponsor, of the purchase price for the mortgage loans (or portions thereof) to be sold to the depositor by GACC. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”.
As a result of the circumstances described above in this paragraph and the prior paragraph, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. each have a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of Rule 5121 of the consolidated rules of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. In addition, other circumstances exist that result in the underwriters or their affiliates having conflicts of interest, notwithstanding that such circumstances may not constitute a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of such Rule 5121. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests”.
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference
All reports filed or caused to be filed by the depositor with respect to the issuing entity before the termination of this offering pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that relate to the Offered Certificates (other than Annual Reports on Form 10-K) will be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus, except that if a Non-Serviced PSA is entered into after termination of this offering, any Current Report on Form 8-K filed after termination of this offering that includes as an exhibit such Non-Serviced PSA will be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
In addition, the disclosures filed as exhibits to the most recent Form ABS-EE filed on or prior to the date of the filing of this prospectus by or on behalf of the depositor with respect to the issuing entity (file number 333-261764-04) – in accordance with Item 601(b)(102) and Item 601(b)(103) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. 601(b)(102) and 601(b)(103)) – are hereby incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
The depositor will provide or cause to be provided without charge to each person to whom this prospectus is delivered in connection with this offering (including beneficial owners of the Offered Certificates), upon written or oral request of that person, a copy of any or all documents or reports incorporated in this prospectus by reference, in each case to the extent the documents or reports relate to the Offered Certificates, other than the exhibits to those documents (unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in those documents). Requests to the depositor should be directed in writing to its principal executive offices at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, Attention: Scott Epperson, or by telephone at (212) 902-1000.
Where You Can Find More Information
The depositor has filed a Registration Statement on Form SF-3 (SEC File No. 333-261764) (the “Registration Statement”) relating to multiple series of CMBS, including the Offered Certificates, with the SEC. This prospectus will form a part of the Registration Statement, but the Registration Statement includes additional information. Copies of the Registration Statement and other materials filed with or furnished to the SEC, including Distribution Reports on Form 10-D, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Forms ABS-15G, and any amendments to these reports may be accessed electronically at “http://www.sec.gov” at which you can view and download copies of reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed or furnished electronically through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system.
The depositor has met the registrant requirements of Section I.A.1. of the General Instructions to the Registration Statement.
Copies of all reports of the issuing entity on Forms 10-D, 10-K, 8-K and ABS-EE will also be made available on the website of the certificate administrator as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC through the EDGAR system.
Financial Information
The issuing entity will be newly formed and will not have engaged in any business activities or have any assets or obligations prior to the issuance of the Offered Certificates. Accordingly, no financial statements with respect to the issuing entity are included in this prospectus.
The depositor has determined that its financial statements will not be material to the offering of the Offered Certificates.
Certain ERISA Considerations
General
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, (“ERISA”), and Code Section 4975 impose certain requirements on retirement plans, and on certain other employee benefit plans and arrangements, including individual retirement accounts and annuities, Keogh plans, collective investment funds, insurance company separate accounts and some insurance company general accounts in which those plans, accounts or arrangements are invested that are subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA or to Code Section 4975 (all of which are referred to as “Plans”), and on persons who are fiduciaries with respect to Plans, in connection with the investment of Plan assets. Certain employee benefit plans, such as governmental plans (as defined in ERISA Section 3(32)), and, if no election has been made under Code Section 410(d), church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA)
are not subject to ERISA requirements. However, those plans may be subject to the provisions of other applicable federal, state or local law (“Similar Law”) materially similar to the foregoing provisions of ERISA or the Code. Moreover, those plans, if qualified and exempt from taxation under Code Sections 401(a) and 501(a), are subject to the prohibited transaction rules set forth in Code Section 503.
ERISA generally imposes on Plan fiduciaries certain general fiduciary requirements, including those of investment prudence and diversification and the requirement that a Plan’s investments be made in accordance with the documents governing the Plan. In addition, ERISA and the Code prohibit a broad range of transactions involving assets of a Plan and persons (“Parties in Interest”) who have certain specified relationships to the Plan, unless a statutory, regulatory or administrative exemption is available. Certain Parties in Interest that participate in a prohibited transaction may be subject to an excise tax imposed pursuant to Code Section 4975, unless a statutory, regulatory or administrative exemption is available. These prohibited transactions generally are set forth in Section 406 of ERISA and Code Section 4975. Special caution should be exercised before the assets of a Plan are used to purchase an offered certificate if, with respect to those assets, the depositor, any servicer or the trustee or any of their affiliates, either: (a) has investment discretion with respect to the investment of those assets of that Plan; (b) has authority or responsibility to give, or regularly gives, investment advice with respect to those assets for a fee; or (c) is an employer maintaining or contributing to the Plan.
Before purchasing any Offered Certificates with Plan assets, a Plan fiduciary should consult with its counsel and determine whether there exists any prohibition to that purchase under the requirements of ERISA or Code Section 4975, whether any prohibited transaction class exemption or any individual administrative prohibited transaction exemption (as described below) applies, including whether the appropriate conditions set forth in those exemptions would be met, or whether any statutory prohibited transaction exemption is applicable. Fiduciaries of plans subject to a Similar Law should consider the need for, and the availability of, an exemption under such applicable Similar Law.
With respect to the Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (9.98%), one of the borrower sponsors is the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Persons who have an ongoing relationship with the New York State Common Retirement Fund should consult with counsel regarding whether such a relationship would affect their ability to purchase and hold Certificates.
Plan Asset Regulations
A Plan’s investment in Offered Certificates may cause the assets of the issuing entity to be deemed Plan assets. Section 2510.3-101 of the regulations of the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”), as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA, provides that when a Plan acquires an equity interest in an entity, the Plan’s assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless certain exceptions not applicable to this discussion apply, or unless the equity participation in the entity by “benefit plan investors” (that is, Plans and entities whose underlying assets include plan assets) is not “significant”. For this purpose, in general, equity participation in an entity will be “significant” on any date if, immediately after the most recent acquisition of any certificate, 25% or more of any class of certificates is held by benefit plan investors.
In general, any person who has discretionary authority or control respecting the management or disposition of Plan assets, and any person who provides investment advice with respect to those assets for a fee, is a fiduciary of the investing Plan. If the assets of the issuing entity constitute Plan assets, then any party exercising management or discretionary control regarding those assets, such as a master servicer, a special servicer or any sub-servicer, may be deemed to be a Plan “fiduciary” with respect to the investing Plan, and thus subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Code Section 4975. In addition, if the assets of the issuing entity constitute Plan assets, the purchase of Offered Certificates by a Plan, as well as the operation of the issuing entity, may constitute or involve a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code.
Administrative Exemptions
The U.S. Department of Labor has issued to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC an individual prohibited transaction exemption, Prohibited Transaction Exemption 89-88 (October 17, 1989) as amended by PTE 2013-08 (July 9, 2013) (the “Exemption”). The Exemption generally exempts from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of Sections 406 and 407 of ERISA, and the excise taxes imposed on prohibited transactions pursuant to Code Sections 4975(a) and (b), certain transactions, among others, relating to the servicing and operation of pools of mortgage loans, such as the pool of mortgage loans held by the issuing entity, and the purchase, sale and holding of mortgage pass-through certificates, such as the Offered Certificates, underwritten by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, provided that certain conditions set forth in the Exemption are satisfied. The depositor expects that the Exemption generally will apply to the Offered Certificates.
The Exemption sets forth five general conditions that must be satisfied for a transaction involving the purchase, sale and holding of the Offered Certificates to be eligible for exemptive relief. First, the acquisition of the Offered Certificates by a Plan must be on terms (including the price paid for the Offered Certificates) that are at least as favorable to the Plan as they would be in an arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated party. Second, the Offered Certificates at the time of acquisition by the Plan must be rated in one of the four (4) highest generic rating categories by at least one NRSRO that meets the requirements of the Exemption (an “Exemption Rating Agency”). Third, the trustee cannot be an affiliate of any other member of the Restricted Group other than an underwriter. The “Restricted Group” consists of any underwriter, the depositor, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, any sub-servicer, any entity that provides insurance or other credit support to the issuing entity and any borrower with respect to mortgage loans constituting more than 5% of the aggregate unamortized principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates, and any affiliate of any of the foregoing entities. Fourth, the sum of all payments made to and retained by the underwriters must represent not more than reasonable compensation for underwriting the Offered Certificates, the sum of all payments made to and retained by the depositor pursuant to the assignment of the mortgage loans to the issuing entity must represent not more than the fair market value of the mortgage loans and the sum of all payments made to and retained by the master servicer, the special servicer and any sub-servicer must represent not more than reasonable compensation for that person’s services under the PSA and reimbursement of the person’s reasonable expenses in connection therewith. Fifth, the investing Plan must be an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
It is a condition of the issuance of the Offered Certificates that they have the ratings described above required by the Exemption and the depositor believes that each of the Rating Agencies qualifies as an Exemption Rating Agency. Consequently, the second general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates as of the Closing Date. As of the Closing Date, the third general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates. In addition, the depositor believes that the fourth general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing an Offered Certificate in the secondary market must make its own determination that, at the time of purchase, the Offered Certificates continue to satisfy the second general condition set forth above. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing an Offered Certificate, whether in the initial issuance of the Offered Certificates or in the secondary market, must make its own determination that the first and fifth general conditions set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the related Offered Certificate.
The Exemption also requires that the issuing entity meet the following requirements: (1) the issuing entity must consist solely of assets of the type that have been included in other investment pools; (2) certificates in those other investment pools must have been rated in one of the four (4) highest categories by at least one of the Exemption Rating Agencies for at least one year prior to the Plan’s acquisition of Offered Certificates; and (3) certificates in those other investment pools must have been purchased by investors other than Plans for at least one year prior to any Plan’s acquisition of Offered Certificates.
The depositor believes that the conditions to the applicability of the Exemption will generally be met with respect to the Offered Certificates, other than those conditions which are dependent on facts
unknown to the depositor or which it cannot control, such as those relating to the circumstances of the Plan purchaser or the Plan fiduciary making the decision to purchase any such Offered Certificates.
If the general conditions of the Exemption are satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a) and 407(a) of ERISA (as well as the excise taxes imposed by Code Sections 4975(a) and (b) by reason of Code Sections 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D)) in connection with (1) the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of Offered Certificates in the initial issuance of certificates between the depositor or the underwriters and a Plan when the depositor, any of the underwriters, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, a sub-servicer or a borrower is a party in interest with respect to the investing Plan, (2) the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of the Offered Certificates by a Plan and (3) the holding of Offered Certificates by a Plan. However, no exemption is provided from the restrictions of Sections 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2) and 407 of ERISA for the acquisition or holding of an Offered Certificate on behalf of an “Excluded Plan” by any person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the assets of the Excluded Plan. For purposes of this prospectus, an “Excluded Plan” is a Plan sponsored by any member of the Restricted Group.
If certain specific conditions of the Exemption are also satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of ERISA and the taxes imposed by Code Section 4975(c)(1)(E) in connection with (1) the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of Offered Certificates in the initial issuance of certificates between the depositor or the underwriters and a Plan when the person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the investment of Plan assets in those certificates is (a) a borrower with respect to 5% or less of the fair market value of the mortgage loans or (b) an affiliate of that person, (2) the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of Offered Certificates by a Plan and (3) the holding of Offered Certificates by a Plan.
Further, if certain specific conditions of the Exemption are satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a), 406(b) and 407(a) of ERISA, and the taxes imposed by Code Sections 4975(a) and (b) by reason of Code Section 4975(c) for transactions in connection with the servicing, management and operation of the pool of mortgage loans.
A fiduciary of a Plan should consult with its counsel with respect to the applicability of the Exemption. The fiduciary of a plan not subject to ERISA or Code Section 4975, such as a governmental plan, should determine the need for and availability of exemptive relief under applicable Similar Law. A purchaser of an Offered Certificate should be aware, however, that even if the conditions specified in one or more exemptions are satisfied, the scope of relief provided by an exemption may not cover all acts which might be construed as prohibited transactions.
Insurance Company General Accounts
Sections I and III of Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 95-60 exempt from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of Sections 406(a), 406(b) and 407(a) of ERISA and Code Section 4975 transactions in connection with the acquisition of a security (such as a certificate issued by the issuing entity) as well as the servicing, management and operation of a trust (such as the issuing entity) in which an insurance company general account has an interest as a result of its acquisition of certificates issued by the issuing entity, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. If these conditions are met, insurance company general accounts investing assets that are treated as assets of Plans would be allowed to purchase certain classes of certificates which do not meet the ratings requirements of the Exemption. All other conditions of the Exemption would have to be satisfied in order for PTCE 95-60 to be available. Before purchasing any class of Offered Certificates, an insurance company general account seeking to rely on Sections I and III of PTCE 95-60 should itself confirm that all applicable conditions and other requirements have been satisfied.
Section 401(c) of ERISA provides certain exemptive relief from the provisions of Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and Code Section 4975, including the prohibited transaction restrictions imposed by ERISA and the related excise taxes imposed by the Code, for transactions involving an insurance company general
account. Pursuant to Section 401(c) of ERISA, the DOL issued regulations (“401(c) Regulations”), generally effective July 5, 2001, to provide guidance for the purpose of determining, in cases where insurance policies supported by an insurance company’s general account are issued to or for the benefit of a Plan on or before December 31, 1998, which general account assets constitute Plan assets. Any assets of an insurance company general account which support insurance policies issued to a Plan after December 31, 1998 or issued to Plans on or before December 31, 1998 for which the insurance company does not comply with the 401(c) Regulations may be treated as Plan assets. In addition, because Section 401(c) of ERISA does not relate to insurance company separate accounts, separate account assets are still generally treated as Plan assets of any Plan invested in that separate account. Insurance companies contemplating the investment of general account assets in the Offered Certificates should consult with their counsel with respect to the applicability of Section 401(c) of ERISA.
Each purchaser of Offered Certificates that is a Plan will be deemed to have represented and warranted that (i) none of the depositor, the issuing entity, the sponsors, the underwriters, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or any of their respective affiliated entities, has provided any investment recommendation or investment advice to the Plan or the fiduciary making the investment decision for the Plan in connection with the decision to acquire Offered Certificates, and they are not otherwise acting as a fiduciary (within the meaning of Section 3(21) of ERISA or Section 4975(e)(3) of the Code) to the Plan in connection with the Plan’s acquisition of Offered Certificates (except where an exemption applies (all of the conditions of which are satisfied) or it would not otherwise result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code), and (ii) the Plan fiduciary making the decision to acquire the Offered Certificates is exercising its own independent judgment in evaluating the investment in the Offered Certificates.
Due to the complexity of these rules and the penalties imposed upon persons involved in prohibited transactions, it is particularly important that potential investors who are Plan fiduciaries or who are investing Plan assets consult with their counsel regarding the consequences under ERISA and the Code of their acquisition and ownership of certificates.
THE SALE OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO A PLAN IS IN NO RESPECT A REPRESENTATION BY THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS THAT THIS INVESTMENT MEETS ANY RELEVANT LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO INVESTMENTS BY PLANS GENERALLY OR ANY PARTICULAR PLAN, OR THAT THIS INVESTMENT IS APPROPRIATE FOR PLANS GENERALLY OR ANY PARTICULAR PLAN.
Legal Investment
No class of Offered Certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended (“SMMEA”). Generally, the only classes of Offered Certificates which will qualify as “mortgage related securities” will be those that (1) are rated in one of the two (2) highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO; and (2) are part of a series evidencing interests in a trust consisting of loans originated by certain types of originators specified in SMMEA and secured by first liens on real estate.
Although Section 939(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act amended SMMEA, effective July 21, 2012, so as to require the SEC to establish creditworthiness standards by that date in substitution for the foregoing ratings test, the SEC has neither proposed nor adopted a rule establishing new creditworthiness standards for purposes of SMMEA as of the date of this prospectus. However, the SEC has issued a transitional interpretation (Release No. 34-67448 (effective July 20, 2012)), which provides that, until such time as final rules establishing new standards of creditworthiness become effective, the standard of creditworthiness for purposes of the definition of the term “mortgage related security” is a security that is rated in one of the two (2) highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO. Depending on the standards of creditworthiness that are ultimately established by the SEC, it is possible that certain classes of Offered Certificates specified to be “mortgage related securities” for purposes of SMMEA may no longer qualify as such as of the time such new standards are effective.
The appropriate characterization of the Offered Certificates under various legal investment restrictions, and thus the ability of investors subject to those restrictions to purchase the Offered Certificates, are subject to significant interpretive uncertainties. We make no representation as to the proper characterization of the Offered Certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, or other purposes, or as to the ability of particular investors to purchase any Offered Certificates under applicable legal investment restrictions. Further, any ratings downgrade of a class of Offered Certificates by an NRSRO to less than an “investment grade” rating (i.e., lower than the top four (4) rating categories) may adversely affect the ability of an investor to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the regulatory characteristics of, that class. The uncertainties described above (and any unfavorable future determinations concerning the legal investment or financial institution regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates) may adversely affect the liquidity and market value of the Offered Certificates.
Accordingly, if your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, you should consult with your own legal advisors in determining whether and to what extent the Offered Certificates constitute legal investments or are subject to investment, capital, or other regulatory restrictions.
The issuing entity will not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Legal Matters
The validity of the Offered Certificates and certain federal income tax matters will be passed upon for the depositor by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, New York, New York. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriters by Sidley Austin LLP, New York, New York.
Ratings
It is a condition to their issuance that the Offered Certificates receive investment grade credit ratings from each of the Rating Agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the Offered Certificates.
We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to any class of Offered Certificates. Changes affecting the Mortgage Loans, the Mortgaged Properties, the parties to the PSA or another person may have an adverse effect on the ratings of the Offered Certificates, and thus on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates, although such adverse changes would not necessarily be an event of default under the applicable Mortgage Loan.
The ratings address the likelihood of full and timely receipt by the Certificateholders of all distributions of interest at the applicable Pass-Through Rate on the Offered Certificates to which they are entitled on each distribution date and, except in the case of the Class X-A, Class X-B and Class X-D certificates, the ultimate payment in full of the Certificate Balance of each class of Offered Certificates on a date that it not later than the Rated Final Distribution Date with respect to such class of certificates. The Rated Final Distribution Date for the Offered Certificates will be the distribution date in August 2057. See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. Any ratings of each Offered Certificates should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities.
The ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, a measure of asset value or an indication of the suitability of an investment, and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by any Rating Agency. In addition, these ratings do not address: (a) the likelihood, timing, or frequency of prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary) and their impact on interest payments or the degree to which such prepayments might differ from those originally anticipated, (b) the possibility that a
Certificateholder might suffer a lower than anticipated yield, (c) the likelihood of receipt of yield maintenance charges, prepayment charges, prepayment premiums, prepayment fees or penalties or default interest, (d) the likelihood of experiencing any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls, an assessment of whether or to what extent the interest payable on any class of Offered Certificates may be reduced in connection with any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls, or of receiving Compensating Interest Payments, (e) the tax treatment of the Offered Certificates or effect of taxes on the payments received, (f) the likelihood or willingness of the parties to the respective documents to meet their contractual obligations or the likelihood or willingness of any party or court to enforce, or hold enforceable, the documents in whole or in part, (g) an assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience, (h) the likelihood, timing or receipt of any payments of interest to the holders of the Offered Certificates resulting from an increase in the interest rate on any Mortgage Loan in connection with a Mortgage Loan modification, waiver or amendment or (i) other non-credit risks, including, without limitation, market risks or liquidity.
The ratings take into consideration the credit quality of the underlying Mortgaged Properties and the Mortgage Loans, structural and legal aspects associated with the Offered Certificates, and the extent to which the payment stream of the Mortgage Loans is adequate to make payments required under the Offered Certificates. However, as noted above, the ratings do not represent an assessment of the likelihood, timing or frequency of principal prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary) by the borrowers, or the degree to which such prepayments might differ from those originally anticipated. In general, the ratings address credit risk and not prepayment risk. Ratings are forward-looking opinions about credit risk and express an agency’s opinion about the ability and willingness of an issuer of securities to meet its financial obligations in full and on time. Ratings are not indications of investment merit. In addition, the ratings do not represent an assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience or the possibility that investors might not fully recover their initial investment in the event of delinquencies or defaults or rapid prepayments on the Mortgage Loans (including both voluntary and involuntary prepayments) or the application of any realized losses. In the event that holders of such certificates do not fully recover their investment as a result of rapid principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the ratings assigned to such certificates. As indicated in this prospectus, holders of the certificates with Notional Amounts are entitled only to payments of interest on the related Mortgage Loans. If the Mortgage Loans were to prepay in the initial month, with the result that the holders of the certificates with Notional Amounts receive only a single month’s interest and therefore, suffer a nearly complete loss of their investment, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the rating received on those certificates. The Notional Amounts of the certificates with Notional Amounts on which interest is calculated may be reduced by the allocation of realized losses and prepayments, whether voluntary or involuntary. The ratings do not address the timing or magnitude of reductions of such Notional Amount, but only the obligation to pay interest timely on the Notional Amount, as so reduced from time to time. Therefore, the ratings of the certificates with Notional Amounts should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations”.
Although the depositor will prepay fees for ongoing rating surveillance by certain of the Rating Agencies, the depositor has no obligation or ability to ensure that any Rating Agency performs ratings surveillance. In addition, a Rating Agency may cease ratings surveillance if the information furnished to that Rating Agency is insufficient to allow it to perform surveillance.
Any of the three (3) NRSROs that we hired may issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of certificates that we did not hire it to rate. Additionally, other NRSROs that we have not engaged to rate the certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of certificates relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from those ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies. The issuance of unsolicited ratings of a class of the certificates that are lower than the ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class. As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the certificates, the depositor (or its affiliate) had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to five NRSROs.
Based on preliminary feedback from those NRSROs at that time, the depositor hired three (3) of the NRSROs to rate certain classes of the certificates and not the other NRSROs due, in part, to their initial subordination levels for the various classes of certificates. Had the depositor selected such other NRSROs to rate the certificates, we cannot assure you as to the ratings that such other NRSROs would ultimately have assigned to the certificates. Further, in the case of one NRSRO hired by the depositor, the depositor only requested ratings for certain classes of rated certificates, due in part to the final subordination levels provided by that NRSRO for those classes of certificates. If the depositor had selected such NRSRO to rate those other classes of certificates not rated by it, its ratings of those other certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to those certificates by the other NRSROs engaged to rate such certificates. In addition, the decision not to engage one or more other rating agencies in the rating of certain classes of certificates to be issued in connection with this transaction may negatively impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of those classes of certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any NRSRO, an NRSRO might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor.
Index of Defined Terms
1 | |
17g-5 Information Provider | 308 |
1986 Act | 461 |
1996 Act | 442 |
2 | |
2nd Circuit | 173 |
3 | |
30/360 basis | 33 |
30/360 Basis | 341 |
3650 REIT | 230 |
3650 REIT Data Tape | 232 |
3650 REIT Deal Team | 231 |
3650 REIT Mortgage Loans | 230 |
3650 REIT Qualification Criteria | 233 |
3650 Servicing | 270 |
3650R 2022-PF2 PSA | 202 |
4 | |
401(c) Regulations | 478 |
5 | |
500 Delaware Loan REMIC | 52 |
A | |
AB Modified Loan | 354 |
Acceptable Insurance Default | 358 |
Accrued AB Loan Interest | 292 |
Actual/360 Basis | 33, 188 |
Actual/360 Loans | 332 |
ADA | 445 |
Additional Exclusions | 358 |
Administrative Cost Rate | 287 |
ADR | 149 |
Advances | 327 |
Affirmative Asset Review Vote | 395 |
Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount | 149 |
Anchor Parcel | 195 |
Annual Debt Service | 149 |
Apartments Ground Lease | 167 |
Appraisal Reduction Amount | 351 |
Appraisal Reduction Event | 350 |
Appraised Value | 150 |
Approved Exchange | 19 |
ASR Consultation Process | 371 |
Assessment of Compliance | 423 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee | 349 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee | 349 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate | 349 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event | 401 |
Asset Review | 397 |
Asset Review Notice | 396 |
Asset Review Quorum | 396 |
Asset Review Report | 398 |
Asset Review Report Summary | 398 |
Asset Review Standard | 397 |
Asset Review Trigger | 394 |
Asset Review Vote Election | 395 |
Asset Status Report | 368 |
Association | 174 |
Assumed Final Distribution Date | 294 |
Assumed Scheduled Payment | 289 |
ASTs | 168 |
Attestation Report | 423 |
Available Funds | 282 |
B | |
Bank Act | 245 |
Bankruptcy Code | 62 |
Barclays | 239 |
Barclays Data Tape | 240 |
Barclays Holdings | 239 |
Barclays Mortgage Loans | 240 |
Barclays Review Team | 240 |
Barclays’ Qualification Criteria | 241 |
Base Interest Fraction | 293 |
Baybrook Acquired Parcel | 196 |
Baybrook Exchange Parcel | 196 |
Baybrook Release Parcel | 195 |
BBNA | 246 |
BMO | 245 |
BMO Data File | 247 |
BMO Financial | 246 |
BMO Mortgage Loans | 245 |
BMO Securitization Database | 247 |
Borrower Party | 301 |
Borrower Party Affiliate | 301 |
B-piece buyer | 120 |
Bridge Bank | 106 |
C | |
CERCLA | 442 |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee | 348 |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate | 348 |
Certificate Balance | 281 |
Certificate Owners | 310 |
Certificateholder | 302 |
CGMRC | 221 |
Churchill Master Lease | 161 |
Churchill Master Tenant | 161 |
Class X certificates | 3 |
Class X Certificates | 280 |
Clearstream | 309 |
Clearstream Participants | 311 |
Closing Date | 148 |
CMBS | 141, 266 |
CNBV | 21 |
Code | 140, 459 |
Co-Lender Agreement | 202 |
Collateral Deficiency Amount | 354 |
Collection Account | 331 |
Collection Period | 283 |
Communication Request | 312 |
Companion Loan | 147 |
Companion Loan Holder | 202 |
Companion Loan Holders | 202 |
companion loans | 44 |
Compensating Interest Payment | 295 |
Computershare | 264 |
Computershare Limited | 264 |
Computershare Trust Company | 264 |
Constant Prepayment Rate | 452 |
Consultation Termination Event | 383 |
Control Eligible Certificates | 378 |
Control Note | 202 |
Control Termination Event | 383 |
Controlling Class | 377 |
Controlling Class Certificateholder | 377 |
Controlling Class Representative | 28, 377 |
Controlling Companion Loan | 203 |
Controlling Holder | 203 |
corrected loan | 34 |
Corrected Loan | 368 |
CPR | 452 |
CPY | 452 |
CREC | 169 |
Credit Risk Retention Rules | 274 |
CREFC® | 299 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee | 350 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate | 350 |
CREFC® Investor Reporting Package | 335 |
CREFC® Reports | 299 |
CREFI | 221 |
CREFI Data File | 223 |
CREFI Mortgage Loans | 221 |
CREFI Securitization Database | 222 |
Crossed Group | 150 |
Cross-Over Date | 286 |
CRR | 142 |
CSB | 174 |
CTS | 264 |
Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount | 355 |
Cure/Contest Period | 398 |
Cut-off Date | 147 |
Cut-off Date Balance | 150 |
Cut-off Date DSCR | 151 |
Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio | 151 |
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | 151 |
D | |
DBRI | 253 |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 151 |
Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF | 151 |
Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow | 151 |
Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income | 151 |
Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI | 151 |
Defaulted Loan | 374 |
Defeasance Deposit | 193 |
Defeasance Loans | 192 |
Defeasance Lock-Out Period | 192 |
Defeasance Option | 192 |
Definitive Certificate | 309 |
Delegated Directive | 14 |
Delinquent Loan | 395 |
Depositaries | 309 |
Determination Date | 281 |
Deutsche Bank | 253 |
Dick’s Co-Tenancy Violation | 180 |
Diligence File | 315 |
Directing Holder | 377 |
Directing Holder Approval Process | 370 |
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees | 348 |
Dispute Resolution Consultation | 416 |
Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date | 415 |
Distribution Accounts | 331 |
Distribution Date | 281 |
Distribution Date Statement | 298 |
Distributor | 14, 15 |
DMARC | 254 |
DNREC | 170 |
Dodd-Frank Act | 144 |
DOJ | 253 |
DOL | 475 |
DSCR | 151 |
DTC | 309 |
DTC Participants | 309 |
DTC Rules | 310 |
Due Date | 188, 283 |
Due Diligence Questionnaire | 223, 247 |
Due Diligence Requirements | 143 |
E | |
EDGAR | 474 |
EEA | 14 |
Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer | 399 |
Eligible Operating Advisor | 390 |
Enforcing Party | 413 |
Enforcing Servicer | 413 |
ERISA | 474 |
ESA | 167, 258 |
Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances | 237, 244, 260 |
EU Due Diligence Requirements | 142 |
EU Institutional Investor | 142 |
EU PRIIPs Regulation | 14 |
EU Prospectus Regulation | 14 |
EU Securitization Regulation | 16 |
EU Transparency Requirements | 143 |
Euroclear | 309 |
Euroclear Operator | 311 |
Euroclear Participants | 311 |
EUWA | 14, 16 |
Excess Modification Fees | 347 |
Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall | 296 |
Exchange Act | 212, 261 |
Excluded Controlling Class Holder | 306 |
Excluded Controlling Class Loan | 301 |
Excluded Information | 301 |
Excluded Loan | 302 |
Excluded Special Servicer | 403 |
excluded special servicer loan | 26 |
Excluded Special Servicer Loan | 403 |
Exemption | 476 |
Exemption Rating Agency | 476 |
Expansion Parcel | 197 |
F | |
FATCA | 469 |
FDIA | 136 |
FDIC | 137 |
FDIC Safe Harbor | 137 |
FETL | 19 |
FIEL | 20 |
Final Asset Status Report | 370 |
Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice | 416 |
Financial Market Publisher | 303 |
Financial Promotion Order | 17 |
FIRREA | 138, 171, 257 |
Fitch | 399, 422 |
Former Acting General Counsel’s Letter | 138 |
FPO Persons | 17 |
FSMA | 14, 16 |
G | |
GACC | 253 |
GACC Data Tape | 255 |
GACC Deal Team | 255 |
GACC Mortgage Loans | 254 |
Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account | 332 |
Garn Act | 443 |
Goldman Originator | 214 |
GS Bank | 212 |
GSMC | 212 |
GSMC Data Tape | 213 |
GSMC Deal Team | 213 |
GSMC Mortgage Loans | 212 |
Guaranty Cap | 189 |
Guaranty Cap Reduction Condition | 190 |
GVSU | 158 |
H | |
Hampton Inn Payment Guaranty | 189 |
Harbor Freight Co-Tenancy Violation | 181 |
Hard Lockbox | 152 |
Helen of Troy Payment Guaranty | 189 |
Homegoods Co-Tenancy Violation | 181 |
HRR Certificates | 274, 280 |
HRR Transfer Restriction End Date | 277 |
HSTP Act | 70 |
I | |
IDFPR | 245 |
Impermissible Asset Representations Reviewer Affiliate | 410 |
Impermissible Operating Advisor Affiliate | 410 |
Impermissible Risk Retention Affiliate | 410 |
Impermissible TPP Affiliate | 410 |
Indirect Participants | 309 |
Initial Delivery Date | 368 |
Initial Pool Balance | 147 |
Initial Requesting Certificateholder | 413 |
In-Place Cash Management | 152 |
Institutional Investor | 19 |
Institutional Investors | 143 |
Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds | 331 |
Interest Accrual Amount | 288 |
Interest Accrual Period | 288 |
Interest Distribution Amount | 287 |
Interest Reserve Account | 332 |
Interest Shortfall | 288 |
Interested Person | 375 |
Investor Certification | 302 |
J | |
Japanese Retention Requirement | 20 |
JRR Rule | 20 |
K | |
KBRA | 399, 422 |
L | |
Largest Tenant | 152 |
Largest Tenant Lease Expiration | 152 |
Liquidation Fee | 343 |
Liquidation Fee Rate | 344 |
Liquidation Proceeds | 331 |
Loan Per Unit | 152 |
Loan REMIC | 52 |
Loan REMIC Regular Interest | 52, 459 |
Loan-Specific Directing Holder | 377 |
Local Law 97 | 88 |
Loss of Value Payment | 319 |
Loss of Value Reserve Fund | 331 |
Lower-Tier Regular Interests | 459 |
lower-tier REMIC | 52 |
Lower-Tier REMIC | 459 |
Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account | 331 |
LTV Ratio at Maturity | 152 |
M | |
Macy’s | 178 |
MAI | 150 |
Major Decision Reporting Package | 382 |
MAS | 19 |
Master Servicer Decision | 360 |
Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice | 414 |
Master Servicer Remittance Date | 326 |
Material Defect | 318 |
Maturity Balance | 152 |
Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio | 152 |
Maturity Date LTV Ratio | 152 |
MDEQ | 168 |
Memphis and Chicago Payment Guaranty | 189 |
Mercier Parking Lease | 167 |
Michaels Co-Tenancy Violation | 181 |
Midland | 266 |
MiFID II | 14, 15 |
MLPA | 313 |
MOA | 274 |
Modeling Assumptions | 452 |
Modification Fees | 341 |
Moody’s | 399 |
Morningstar DBRS | 266, 399 |
Mortgage | 147 |
Mortgage File | 313 |
mortgage loan | 44 |
mortgage loan sellers | 23 |
Mortgage Loans | 147 |
Mortgage Note | 147 |
Mortgage Pool | 147 |
Mortgage Rate | 287 |
Mortgaged Property | 147 |
Most Recent NOI | 153 |
N | |
Net Cash Flow | 154 |
Net Mortgage Rate | 287 |
NFA | 170 |
NFIP | 90 |
NI 33-105 | 21 |
NOBC | 167 |
Non-Control Note | 203 |
Non-Controlling Holder | 203 |
non-offered certificates | 32 |
Nonrecoverable Advance | 328 |
Non-Reduced Interests | 404 |
Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator | 203 |
Non-Serviced Co-Lender Agreement | 203 |
non-serviced companion loan | 45 |
Non-Serviced Companion Loan | 203 |
non-serviced companion loans | 45 |
Non-Serviced Custodian | 203 |
Non-Serviced Directing Holder | 203 |
Non-Serviced Master Servicer | 203 |
Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan | 203 |
Non-Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan | 203 |
Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan | 203 |
Non-Serviced PSA | 203 |
Non-Serviced Securitization Trust | 204 |
Non-Serviced Special Servicer | 204 |
Non-Serviced Trustee | 204 |
non-serviced whole loan | 45 |
Non-Serviced Whole Loan | 204 |
Non-U.S. Tax Person | 469 |
Notional Amount | 281 |
NRSRO | 301 |
NRSRO Certification | 303 |
O | |
Occupancy | 153 |
Occupancy Date | 153 |
Offered Certificates | 280 |
OID Regulations | 462 |
OLA | 138 |
Operating Advisor Annual Report | 388 |
Operating Advisor Consultation Event | 389 |
Operating Advisor Consulting Fee | 348 |
Operating Advisor Expenses | 349 |
Operating Advisor Fee | 348 |
Operating Advisor Fee Rate | 348 |
Operating Advisor Standard | 388 |
Operating Advisor Termination Event | 392 |
Original Balance | 153 |
Owned Mobile Homes | 161 |
Owner Repurchase Request | 413 |
P | |
P&I Advance | 326 |
PACE | 106 |
PADEP | 169 |
PAR | 258 |
pari passu companion loan | 44 |
Pari Passu Companion Loans | 147 |
Park Bridge Financial | 273 |
Park Bridge Lender Services | 273 |
Parking Sublease | 167 |
Participants | 309 |
Parties in Interest | 475 |
Pass-Through Rate | 286 |
Patriot Act | 446 |
PCR | 219, 229, 252 |
PEL | 170 |
Percentage Interest | 282 |
Periodic Payment | 283 |
Permitted Investments | 332 |
Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees | 348 |
PIPs | 84, 171 |
Plans | 474 |
PLLP | 169 |
PML | 220 |
PNC Bank | 269 |
PRC | 18 |
Preliminary Asset Review Report | 398 |
Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice | 415 |
Prepayment Assumption | 463 |
Prepayment Interest Excess | 295 |
Prepayment Interest Shortfall | 295 |
Prepayment Penalty Description | 153 |
Prepayment Provision | 153 |
Prime Rate | 43, 330 |
principal balance certificates | 3 |
Principal Balance Certificates | 280 |
Principal Distribution Amount | 288 |
Principal Shortfall | 289 |
Privileged Information | 390 |
Privileged Information Exception | 391 |
Privileged Person | 300 |
Prohibited Prepayment | 295 |
Promotion Of Collective Investment Schemes Exemptions Order | 17 |
Property Protection Advances | 327 |
Proposed Course of Action | 414 |
Proposed Course of Action Notice | 414 |
PSA | 280 |
PSA Party Repurchase Request | 413 |
PTCE | 477 |
Purchase Price | 320 |
Q | |
Qualified Replacement Special Servicer | 404 |
Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan | 321 |
Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage | 275 |
Quorum | 403 |
R | |
RAC No-Response Scenario | 421 |
Rated Final Distribution Date | 294 |
Rating Agencies | 422 |
Rating Agency Confirmation | 422 |
REA | 67 |
Realized Loss | 297 |
REC | 168 |
Record Date | 282 |
Registration Statement | 474 |
Regular Certificates | 280 |
Regular Interestholder | 462 |
Regular Interests | 459 |
Regulation AB | 424 |
Reimbursement Rate | 330 |
related Class X class | 3 |
Related Class X Class | 281 |
Related Group | 153 |
Related Proceeds | 329 |
Release Date | 192 |
Release Property | 194 |
Relevant Persons | 17 |
Relief Act | 445 |
REMIC | 3, 459 |
REMIC Regulations | 459 |
REO Account | 332 |
REO Loan | 290 |
REO Property | 368 |
Repurchase Request | 413 |
Requesting Certificateholder | 415 |
Requesting Holders | 355 |
Requesting Investor | 312 |
Requesting Party | 421 |
Required Risk Retention Percentage | 275 |
Requirements | 445 |
Residual Certificates | 280 |
Resolution Failure | 414 |
Resolved | 414 |
Restricted Group | 476 |
Restricted Mezzanine Holder | 302 |
Restricted Party | 391 |
Retaining Party | 274 |
Retaining Sponsor | 274 |
Review Materials | 396 |
RevPAR | 153 |
RFP | 173 |
Risk Retention Affiliate | 390 |
Risk Retention Affiliated | 390 |
Risk Retention Requirements | 143 |
RNV | 21 |
Rooms | 155 |
Rule 17g-5 | 303 |
S | |
S&P | 266, 399 |
SBA Loans | 201 |
Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount | 288 |
SCIF | 162 |
SEC | 212, 261 |
Securities Act | 423 |
Securitization Accounts | 280, 332 |
Securitization Regulation | 143 |
SEL | 220 |
Senior Certificates | 280 |
serviced companion loan | 45 |
Serviced Companion Loan | 204 |
Serviced Companion Noteholder | 381 |
Serviced Mortgage Loan | 204 |
serviced pari passu companion loan | 45 |
Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan | 204 |
Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan | 204 |
Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan | 204 |
serviced whole loan | 45 |
Serviced Whole Loan | 204 |
Serviced Whole Loan Custodial Account | 331 |
Servicer Termination Event | 406 |
Servicing Fee | 339 |
Servicing Fee Rate | 339 |
Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan | 204 |
servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement | 45 |
Servicing Shift PSA | 204 |
servicing shift securitization date | 29, 45 |
Servicing Shift Securitization Date | 204 |
servicing shift whole loan | 45 |
Servicing Shift Whole Loan | 204 |
Servicing Standard | 325 |
SF | 154 |
SFA | 19 |
SFO | 18 |
SIA | 169 |
Similar Law | 475 |
SMMEA | 478 |
Soft Lockbox | 154 |
Special Servicer | 270 |
Special Servicer Decision | 360 |
Special Servicing Fee | 342 |
Special Servicing Fee Rate | 342 |
Special Servicing Transfer Event | 366 |
Specially Serviced Loans | 366 |
Springing Cash Management | 154 |
Springing Lockbox | 154 |
Sq. Ft. | 154 |
Square Feet | 154 |
Startup Day | 459 |
Stated Principal Balance | 289 |
static pool data | 96 |
Stonebriar Centre Acquired Parcel | 195 |
Stonebriar Centre Exchange Parcel | 195 |
Stonebriar Centre Expansion Parcel | 197 |
Stonebriar Centre Payment Guaranty | 189 |
Subject 2023 Computershare CMBS Annual Statement of Compliance | 265 |
Subject Loan | 349 |
Subordinate Certificates | 280 |
subordinate companion loan | 44 |
Subordinate Companion Loan | 147, 204 |
Subsequent Asset Status Report | 368 |
Subsequent Third-Party Purchaser | 275 |
Sub-Servicing Agreement | 325 |
Supreme Court | 173 |
SVB | 106 |
T | |
TCO | 185 |
Terms and Conditions | 311 |
Tests | 397 |
Title V | 444 |
TJ Maxx Co-Tenancy Violation | 180 |
Trailing 12 NOI | 153 |
TRIPRA | 91 |
trust REMIC | 52 |
Trust REMICs | 459 |
U | |
U.S. Tax Person | 469 |
UCC | 431 |
UK | 14, 15 |
UK CRR | 143 |
UK Due Diligence Requirements | 142 |
UK Institutional Investor | 143 |
UK MIFIR Product Governance Rules | 15 |
UK PRIIPs Regulation | 15 |
UK Prospectus Regulation | 14 |
UK Retail Investor | 14 |
UK Securitization Regulation | 16 |
UK Transparency Requirements | 143 |
Underwriter Entities | 113 |
Underwriting Agreement | 471 |
Underwritten EGI | 155 |
Underwritten Expenses | 154 |
Underwritten NCF | 154 |
Underwritten NCF DSCR | 151 |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow | 154 |
Underwritten Net Operating Income | 154 |
Underwritten NOI | 154 |
Underwritten Revenues | 155 |
Units | 155 |
Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount | 289 |
Unsolicited Information | 397 |
upper-tier REMIC | 52 |
Upper-Tier REMIC | 459 |
Upper-Tier REMIC Distribution Account | 331 |
UST | 169 |
UW NCF DSCR | 151 |
UW NOI Debt Yield | 151 |
V | |
VEP | 168 |
VOC | 169 |
Volcker Rule | 145 |
Voting Rights | 308 |
W | |
WAC Rate | 287 |
Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate | 155 |
Wells Fargo | 264 |
Wells Fargo Bank | 264 |
whole loan | 44 |
Whole Loan | 147, 204 |
Withheld Amounts | 332 |
Workout Fee | 342 |
Workout Fee Rate | 342 |
Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount | 330 |
Y | |
YM Group A | 293 |
YM Group B | 293 |
YM Group D | 293 |
YM Groups | 293 |
YM/Defeasance Loans | 191 |
ANNEX A-1
CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS
AND MORTGAGED PROPERTIES
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | % of Initial Pool Balance | % of Loan Balance | Mortgage Loan Originator | Mortgage Loan Seller | Related Group | Crossed Group |
| | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 9.98% | 100.0% | GSBI, BANA, SGFC | GSMC | Group 1 | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 9.5% | | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 1.0% | 10.0% | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 0.8% | 8.7% | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 0.7% | 7.2% | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 0.6% | 6.6% | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 0.6% | 6.5% | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 0.6% | 6.2% | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 0.5% | 5.7% | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 0.5% | 5.5% | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 0.4% | 4.7% | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 0.4% | 4.0% | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 0.4% | 3.8% | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 0.3% | 3.5% | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 0.3% | 2.8% | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 0.2% | 2.4% | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 0.2% | 2.4% | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 0.2% | 2.1% | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 0.2% | 2.1% | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 0.2% | 2.1% | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 0.2% | 1.8% | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 0.2% | 1.7% | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 0.2% | 1.6% | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 0.2% | 1.6% | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 0.1% | 1.4% | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 0.1% | 1.4% | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 0.1% | 1.3% | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 0.1% | 1.2% | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 0.1% | 1.2% | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 0.1% | 0.6% | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 0.0% | 0.1% | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 8.4% | | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 2.6% | 30.7% | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 2.0% | 24.0% | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 1.8% | 22.0% | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 1.5% | 18.0% | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 0.4% | 5.3% | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 6.4% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | NAP | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 5.7% | | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 3.6% | 63.8% | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | 2.1% | 36.2% | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 5.0% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | NAP | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 5.0% | | DBRI | GACC | NAP | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 2.8% | 56.4% | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 2.2% | 43.6% | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 4.8% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 3.7% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 3.7% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 3.4% | | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 0.7% | 20.8% | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | 0.5% | 15.9% | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | 0.4% | 11.7% | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | 0.4% | 11.6% | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | 0.4% | 10.8% | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | 0.3% | 10.3% | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | 0.3% | 10.3% | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | 0.3% | 8.5% | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 3.2% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | NAP | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 2.8% | 100.0% | GSBI | GSMC | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 2.8% | 100.0% | MSBNA, BCREI, SGFC | Barclays | Group 1 | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 2.8% | 100.0% | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 2.6% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC, JPMCB | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 2.5% | 100.0% | GSBI | GSMC | NAP | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 2.3% | 100.0% | BMO | BMO | Group 2 | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 2.0% | 100.0% | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 1.6% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 1.5% | 100.0% | BMO | BMO | Group 2 | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 1.4% | 100.0% | BMO | BMO | Group 2 | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 1.4% | 100.0% | BMO | BMO | Group 2 | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 1.3% | 100.0% | DBRI | GACC | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 1.3% | 100.0% | BMO | BMO | Group 2 | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 1.1% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 1.1% | 100.0% | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0.9% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | % of Initial Pool Balance | % of Loan Balance | Mortgage Loan Originator | Mortgage Loan Seller | Related Group | Crossed Group |
| | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 0.6% | 100.0% | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | NAP | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 0.5% | 100.0% | CREFI | CREFI | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 0.4% | | BCREI | Barclays | Group 3 | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 0.3% | 56.9% | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 0.2% | 43.1% | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 0.4% | 100.0% | BCREI | Barclays | Group 3 | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Address | City | County | State | Zip Code |
| | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 2601 Preston Road | Frisco | Collin | Texas | 75033 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 1702 East Highway 44 | Rapid City | Pennington | South Dakota | 57703 |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 7520 County Road 203 | Durango | La Plata | Colorado | 81301 |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 10038 South New Era Road | Canby | Clackamas | Oregon | 97013 |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 2395 Downing Avenue | Savannah | Chatham | Georgia | 31404 |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 3221 McKown Road | Douglasville | Douglas | Georgia | 30134 |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 306 Ryan Drive | Saint Marys | Camden | Georgia | 31558 |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 1834 Post Road | San Marcos | Hays | Texas | 78666 |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 50 Reliance Road | Rock Springs | Sweetwater | Wyoming | 82901 |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 100 Skeetfield Road | Oxford | Oxford | Maine | 04270 |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 432 Mechanic Street, 431 Gratiot Avenue and 1423 Franklin Street | Detroit | Wayne | Michigan | 48226; 48207; 48226 |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 2928 Alpine Road | Columbia | Richland | South Carolina | 29223 |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 136 Brannon Drive | Dickson | Dickson | Tennessee | 37055 |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 8528 Highway 146 and 7524 FM 3180 | Baytown | Chambers | Texas | 77523 |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 954 Frankie Lane | Mora | Kanabec | Minnesota | 55051 |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 650 Interstate 10 South | Beaumont | Jefferson | Texas | 77707 |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 203 Highway 90 | Waveland | Hancock | Mississippi | 39576 |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 87 White Frost Drive | Montgomery | Montgomery | Alabama | 36116 |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 8056 Highway 49 North | Gulfport | Harrison | Mississippi | 39501 |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 120 North I Road | San Juan | Hidalgo | Texas | 78589 |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 4101 East Gordon Road | Sioux City | Woodbury | Iowa | 51106 |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 4455 Oak Crest Hill Southeast | Iowa City | Johnson | Iowa | 52240 |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 1120 Pass Road and 9470 Creosote Road | Gulfport | Harrison | Mississippi | 39501 |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 401 30th Street Northwest | Willmar | Kandiyohi | Minnesota | 56201 |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 8990 and 11140 Moffet Road | Semmes, Wilmer | Mobile | Alabama | 36575 |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 133 Country Manor Road | Eagle Lake | Blue Earth | Minnesota | 56024 |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 4271 Raleigh Lagrange Road | Memphis | Shelby | Tennessee | 38128 |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 5061 Oak Grove Road | Evansville | Vanderburgh | Indiana | 47715 |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 840 South Main Street | Old Town | Penobscot | Maine | 04468 |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 3301 Highway 90 | Gautier | Jackson | Mississippi | 39553 |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 8374 North 4000 East Road | Manteno | Kankakee | Illinois | 60950 |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 234 Titan Road, 247 and 371 Saturn Drive, 255 and 440 East Brooks Road and 3389 Gemini Drive | Memphis | Shelby | Tennessee | 38109 |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 8800 Rostin Road | Southaven | DeSoto | Mississippi | 38671 |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 2900-4114 Willow Lake Boulevard, 4477 Winchester Road and 422 Gragson Drive | Memphis | Shelby | Tennessee | 38118; 38106 |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 3021-3105 East 98th Street | Carmel | Hamilton | Indiana | 46280 |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive | Stafford | Stafford | Virginia | 22554 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Various | New York | New York | New York | 10022 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 155 East 55th Street | New York | New York | New York | 10022 |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | 210 East 58th Street | New York | New York | New York | 10022 |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 3301 Spring Mountain Road | Las Vegas | Clark | Nevada | 89102 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Various | Bethlehem | Northampton | Pennsylvania | Various |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 3310 East Boulevard | Bethlehem | Northampton | Pennsylvania | 18017 |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 2140 Johnston Drive | Bethlehem | Northampton | Pennsylvania | 18020 |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 1028 Ridge Road | Webster | Monroe | New York | 14580 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 10897 48th Avenue | Allendale | Ottawa | Michigan | 49401 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 1030 & 1040 North 2nd Street, 1019-1035 North 3rd Street and 1022-1026 North 3rd Street | Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19123 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | New York | Various |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | Bronx | Bronx | New York | 10453 |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | 670 9th Avenue | New York | New York | New York | 10036 |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | 73 2nd Avenue | New York | New York | New York | 10003 |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | 425 East 6th Street | New York | New York | New York | 10009 |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | 228 East 51st Street | New York | New York | New York | 10022 |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | 543 East 6th Street | New York | New York | New York | 10009 |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | 49 West 71st Street | New York | New York | New York | 10023 |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | 289 East 149th Street | Bronx | Bronx | New York | 10451 |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 678 North Dupont Boulevard | Milford | Kent | Delaware | 19963 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 2 Johnny Mercer Boulevard | Savannah | Chatham | Georgia | 31410 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 500 Baybrook Mall | Friendswood | Harris | Texas | 77546 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 4104 South 130th East Avenue | Tulsa | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74134 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 4545 Fisher Road | Columbus | Franklin | Ohio | 43228 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 30500 Highway 181 | Spanish Fort | Baldwin | Alabama | 36527 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 2227 Cascade Pointe Boulevard | Charlotte | Mecklenburg | North Carolina | 28208 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 3415 Southwest 39th Boulevard | Gainesville | Alachua | Florida | 32608 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 1325 Northwestern Drive | El Paso | El Paso | Texas | 79912 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 1651 Midtown Avenue | Mount Pleasant | Charleston | South Carolina | 29464 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 3454 West Montague Avenue | North Charleston | Charleston | South Carolina | 29418 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 4751 Sunset Boulevard | Lexington | Lexington | South Carolina | 29072 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 22 North 15th Street | Brooklyn | Kings | New York | 11222 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 739 Citadel Road | Orangeburg | Orangeburg | South Carolina | 29118 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 810 Bienville Street | New Orleans | Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | Miami | Miami-Dade | Florida | 33137 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 7790 Ella Lane | Fairburn | Fulton | Georgia | 30213 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Address | City | County | State | Zip Code |
| | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 500 Delaware Avenue | Wilmington | New Castle | Delaware | 19801 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 287-289 Maple Street | Brooklyn | Kings | New York | 11225 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | Various | Jackson | Jackson | Michigan | Various |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 1245 East McDevitt Avenue | Jackson | Jackson | Michigan | 49203 |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 2537 Shirley Drive | Jackson | Jackson | Michigan | 49201 |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 21516 Telegraph Road | Brownstown Charter | Wayne | Michigan | 48183 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | General Property Type | Detailed Property Type | Year Built | Year Renovated | Number of Units | Unit of Measure | Loan Per Unit ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | Retail | Super Regional Mall | 2000 | NAP | 1,096,880 | SF | 232.48 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | NAP | 7,254 | Pads/Units | 11,717.67 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1997 | NAP | 207 | Pads | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1973 | NAP | 128 | Pads | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1972 | NAP | 121 | Pads | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1973 | NAP | 135 | Pads | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1960 | NAP | 169 | Pads | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1990 | NAP | 180 | Pads | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1965 | NAP | 133 | Pads | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1973 | NAP | 161 | Pads | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1970 | NAP | 133 | Pads | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1916, 1919 | NAP | 851 | Units | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1970 | NAP | 132 | Pads | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1968 | NAP | 80 | Pads | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1987 | NAP | 527 | Units | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1968 | NAP | 124 | Pads | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | Self Storage | Self Storage | 2002, 2005 | NAP | 539 | Units | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1982, 2006 | NAP | 444 | Units | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1972, 1988 | NAP | 122 | Pads | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1986 | NAP | 407 | Units | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1979, 1990, 2005 | NAP | 292 | Units | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1950 | NAP | 196 | Pads | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1971 | NAP | 230 | Pads | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1970 | NAP | 379 | Units | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1972 | NAP | 109 | Pads | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1999 | NAP | 303 | Units | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1967 | NAP | 132 | Pads | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1987 | NAP | 323 | Units | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1977 | NAP | 409 | Units | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 1970 | NAP | 113 | Pads | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1981 | NAP | 175 | Units | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | NAP | 2,977,028 | SF | 25.19 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 2002 | NAP | 819,960 | SF | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | Industrial | Warehouse | 1956-1973 | NAP | 1,088,244 | SF | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1974 | NAP | 508,700 | SF | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1972, 1986, 1989, 1995 | NAP | 444,382 | SF | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | Office | Suburban | 1986, 2003 | NAP | 115,742 | SF | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | Office | Suburban | 2007-2012 | NAP | 409,134 | SF | 139.32 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Mixed Use | Various | Various | Various | 146 | Units | 345,890.41 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Office/Retail | 1961 | 2022-2023 | 51 | Units | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1959 | 1983 | 95 | Units | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | Mixed Use | Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage | 1974 | NAP | 430,156 | SF | 104.61 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Multifamily | Garden | Various | NAP | 348 | Units | 127,873.56 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | Multifamily | Garden | 1975, 2014 | NAP | 192 | Units | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | Multifamily | Garden | 1988 | NAP | 156 | Units | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | Retail | Anchored | 2004 | NAP | 365,760 | SF | 117.56 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | Multifamily | Student Housing | 2008 | NAP | 920 | Beds | 35,869.57 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | Multifamily | Garden | 2004, 2005, 2008, 2010 | NAP | 88 | Units | 375,000.00 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | Various | 55 | Units | 545,454.55 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | Retail | Unanchored | 1989 | NAP | 14,800 | SF | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1920 | 2023 | 8 | Units | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1900 | 2023 | 9 | Units | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | Multifamily | Mid Rise | 1920 | 2023 | 17 | Units | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1900 | 2023 | 2 | Units | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1930 | 2023 | 9 | Units | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | Multifamily | Mid Rise | 1910 | 2023 | 10 | Units | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | Mixed Use | Retail/Office | 1931 | 2016 | 9,400 | SF | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | Retail | Anchored | 1966 | 2019 | 213,177 | SF | 133.69 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | Multifamily | Garden | 1984 | 2015 | 208 | Units | 121,875.00 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | Retail | Super Regional Mall | 1978 | 2016 | 540,986 | SF | 406.66 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | Multifamily | Garden | 1982 | 2022 | 400 | Units | 62,500.00 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1976 | 2012-2023 | 2,183,325 | SF | 28.40 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | Retail | Anchored | 2004 | NAP | 432,082 | SF | 52.07 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2020 | NAP | 219 | Rooms | 92,237.44 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | Multifamily | Garden | 2000 | 2022 | 120 | Units | 149,166.67 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | Multifamily | Garden | 2013 | NAP | 108 | Units | 129,629.63 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2019 | NAP | 124 | Rooms | 105,887.10 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2020 | NAP | 115 | Rooms | 105,391.30 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2020 | NAP | 114 | Rooms | 106,315.79 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | Industrial | Warehouse | 1931 | NAP | 35,210 | SF | 340.81 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2019 | NAP | 93 | Rooms | 124,731.18 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | Multifamily | Low Rise | 1919 | 2016 | 97 | Units | 97,938.14 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | Retail | Unanchored | 2004 | NAP | 17,919 | SF | 524.58 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2005 | 2017 | 99 | Rooms | 84,810.41 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | General Property Type | Detailed Property Type | Year Built | Year Renovated | Number of Units | Unit of Measure | Loan Per Unit ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | Office | CBD | 2006 | 2020 | 371,222 | SF | 228.97 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | Multifamily | Garden | 2017 | NAP | 13 | Units | 346,153.85 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | Self Storage | Self Storage | Various | Various | 83,031 | SF | 48.17 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1995 | NAP | 37,616 | SF | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1985 | 2000 | 45,415 | SF | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1969 | 1995 | 50,816 | SF | 72.81 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Original Balance ($) | Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Maturity/ARD Balance ($) | Interest Rate % | Administrative Fee Rate % | Net Mortgage Rate % | Monthly Debt Service (P&I) ($) | Monthly Debt Service (IO) ($) | Annual Debt Service (P&I) ($) |
| | | | | | | | | 1 | | 2 | | 2 |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 89,000,000 | 89,000,000 | 89,000,000 | 6.99900% | 0.01527% | 6.98373% | NAP | 526,302.12 | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 85,000,000 | 85,000,000 | 85,000,000 | 5.71000% | 0.01527% | 5.69473% | NAP | 410,075.81 | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 8,480,000 | 8,480,000 | 8,480,000 | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 7,430,000 | 7,430,000 | 7,430,000 | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 6,130,000 | 6,130,000 | 6,130,000 | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 5,570,000 | 5,570,000 | 5,570,000 | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 5,490,000 | 5,490,000 | 5,490,000 | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 5,280,000 | 5,280,000 | 5,280,000 | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 4,840,000 | 4,840,000 | 4,840,000 | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 4,700,000 | 4,700,000 | 4,700,000 | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 3,970,000 | 3,970,000 | 3,970,000 | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 3,430,000 | 3,430,000 | 3,430,000 | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 3,220,000 | 3,220,000 | 3,220,000 | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 2,970,000 | 2,970,000 | 2,970,000 | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 2,350,000 | 2,350,000 | 2,350,000 | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 2,030,000 | 2,030,000 | 2,030,000 | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,800,000 | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 1,790,000 | 1,790,000 | 1,790,000 | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 1,770,000 | 1,770,000 | 1,770,000 | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 1,430,000 | 1,430,000 | 1,430,000 | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 1,370,000 | 1,370,000 | 1,370,000 | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 1,370,000 | 1,370,000 | 1,370,000 | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 1,170,000 | 1,170,000 | 1,170,000 | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 1,120,000 | 1,120,000 | 1,120,000 | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 1,020,000 | 1,020,000 | 1,020,000 | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 470,000 | 470,000 | 470,000 | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 75,000,000 | 75,000,000 | 75,000,000 | 6.78000% | 0.01527% | 6.76473% | NAP | 429,635.42 | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 23,000,000 | 23,000,000 | 23,000,000 | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 18,000,000 | 18,000,000 | 18,000,000 | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 16,500,000 | 16,500,000 | 16,500,000 | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 13,500,000 | 13,500,000 | 13,500,000 | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 57,000,000 | 57,000,000 | 57,000,000 | 7.10000% | 0.01527% | 7.08473% | NAP | 341,934.03 | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 50,500,000 | 50,500,000 | 50,500,000 | 6.21500% | 0.01527% | 6.19973% | NAP | 265,180.53 | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 32,200,000 | 32,200,000 | 32,200,000 | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | 18,300,000 | 18,300,000 | 18,300,000 | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 45,000,000 | 45,000,000 | 45,000,000 | 6.70000% | 0.01527% | 6.68473% | NAP | 254,739.58 | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 44,500,000 | 44,500,000 | 44,500,000 | 6.25300% | 0.01527% | 6.23773% | NAP | 235,102.67 | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 25,118,711 | 25,118,711 | 25,118,711 | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 19,381,289 | 19,381,289 | 19,381,289 | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 43,000,000 | 43,000,000 | 43,000,000 | 7.33500% | 0.01527% | 7.31973% | NAP | 266,488.02 | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 33,000,000 | 33,000,000 | 33,000,000 | 7.20000% | 0.01527% | 7.18473% | NAP | 200,750.00 | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 33,000,000 | 33,000,000 | 33,000,000 | 6.00000% | 0.01527% | 5.98473% | NAP | 167,291.67 | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | 7.05000% | 0.01527% | 7.03473% | NAP | 178,697.92 | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 6,239,000 | 6,239,000 | 6,239,000 | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | 4,771,000 | 4,771,000 | 4,771,000 | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | 3,499,000 | 3,499,000 | 3,499,000 | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | 3,492,000 | 3,492,000 | 3,492,000 | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | 3,245,000 | 3,245,000 | 3,245,000 | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | 3,102,000 | 3,102,000 | 3,102,000 | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | 3,091,000 | 3,091,000 | 3,091,000 | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | 2,561,000 | 2,561,000 | 2,561,000 | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 28,500,000 | 28,500,000 | 28,500,000 | 7.19300% | 0.01527% | 7.17773% | NAP | 173,206.44 | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 25,350,000 | 25,350,000 | 25,350,000 | 6.58200% | 0.03527% | 6.54673% | NAP | 140,975.93 | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | 23,628,488 | 6.81600% | 0.01652% | 6.79948% | 163,247.83 | NAP | 1,958,973.96 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | 6.40000% | 0.04402% | 6.35598% | NAP | 135,185.19 | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 23,200,000 | 23,200,000 | 23,200,000 | 7.04000% | 0.01527% | 7.02473% | NAP | 137,997.04 | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 22,500,000 | 22,500,000 | 22,500,000 | 7.14000% | 0.01527% | 7.12473% | NAP | 135,734.38 | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 20,200,000 | 20,200,000 | 20,200,000 | 7.13000% | 0.01527% | 7.11473% | NAP | 121,688.63 | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 17,900,000 | 17,900,000 | 17,900,000 | 6.34000% | 0.01527% | 6.32473% | NAP | 95,885.16 | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | 6.42500% | 0.01527% | 6.40973% | NAP | 75,999.42 | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 13,130,000 | 13,130,000 | 13,130,000 | 7.13000% | 0.01527% | 7.11473% | NAP | 79,097.61 | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 12,120,000 | 12,120,000 | 12,120,000 | 7.13000% | 0.01527% | 7.11473% | NAP | 73,013.18 | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 12,120,000 | 12,120,000 | 12,120,000 | 7.13000% | 0.01527% | 7.11473% | NAP | 73,013.18 | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 12,000,000 | 6.54200% | 0.01527% | 6.52673% | NAP | 66,328.61 | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 11,600,000 | 11,600,000 | 11,600,000 | 7.13000% | 0.01527% | 7.11473% | NAP | 69,880.60 | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 9,500,000 | 9,500,000 | 9,500,000 | 7.95200% | 0.01527% | 7.93673% | NAP | 63,827.69 | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 9,400,000 | 9,400,000 | 9,400,000 | 7.31000% | 0.01527% | 7.29473% | NAP | 58,056.97 | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 8,400,000 | 8,396,230 | 8,044,709 | 8.00000% | 0.01527% | 7.98473% | 61,636.22 | NAP | 739,634.64 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Original Balance ($) | Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Maturity/ARD Balance ($) | Interest Rate % | Administrative Fee Rate % | Net Mortgage Rate % | Monthly Debt Service (P&I) ($) | Monthly Debt Service (IO) ($) | Annual Debt Service (P&I) ($) |
| | | | | | | | | 1 | | 2 | | 2 |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | 4.84000% | 0.01527% | 4.82473% | NAP | 20,446.76 | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 6.74000% | 0.01527% | 6.72473% | NAP | 25,626.04 | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 6.18000% | 0.01527% | 6.16473% | NAP | 20,886.11 | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 2,275,000 | 2,275,000 | 2,275,000 | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 1,725,000 | 1,725,000 | 1,725,000 | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 3,700,000 | 3,700,000 | 3,700,000 | 6.77200% | 0.01527% | 6.75673% | NAP | 21,170.34 | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Annual Debt Service (IO) ($) | Amortization Type | ARD Loan (Yes / No) | Interest Accrual Method | Original Interest-Only Period (Mos.) | Remaining Interest-Only Period (Mos.) | Original Term To Maturity / ARD (Mos.) | Remaining Term To Maturity / ARD (Mos.) | Original Amortization Term (Mos.) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 6,315,625.44 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 4,920,909.72 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 5,155,625.04 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 4,103,208.36 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 3,182,166.36 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 3,056,874.96 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 2,821,232.04 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 3,197,856.24 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 2,409,000.00 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 2,007,500.04 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 2,144,375.04 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 2,078,477.28 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 1,691,711.16 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | NAP | Amortizing Balloon | No | Actual/360 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 360 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 1,622,222.28 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 1,655,964.48 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 57 | 60 | 57 | 0 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 1,628,812.56 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 1,460,263.56 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 1,150,621.92 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 911,993.04 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 949,171.32 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 876,158.16 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 876,158.16 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 795,943.32 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 838,567.20 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 765,932.28 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 696,683.64 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | Amortizing Balloon | No | Actual/360 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 59 | 360 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Annual Debt Service (IO) ($) | Amortization Type | ARD Loan (Yes / No) | Interest Accrual Method | Original Interest-Only Period (Mos.) | Remaining Interest-Only Period (Mos.) | Original Term To Maturity / ARD (Mos.) | Remaining Term To Maturity / ARD (Mos.) | Original Amortization Term (Mos.) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 245,361.12 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 120 | 93 | 120 | 93 | 0 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 307,512.48 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 250,633.32 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 254,044.08 | Interest Only | No | Actual/360 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Remaining Amortization Term (Mos.) | Origination Date | Seasoning (Mos.) | Payment Due Date | First Payment Date | First P&I Payment Date | Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date | Final Maturity Date | Grace Period - Late Fee (Days) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 0 | 7/1/2024 | 1 | 1 | 8/1/2024 | NAP | 7/1/2029 | NAP | 0 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 0 | 7/3/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 0 | 7/2/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 0 | 7/19/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 5 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 0 | 7/10/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 0 | 7/29/2024 | 0 | 1 | 9/1/2024 | NAP | 8/1/2029 | NAP | 0 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 0 | 7/25/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 0 | 6/17/2024 | 1 | 5 | 8/5/2024 | NAP | 7/5/2029 | NAP | 0 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 0 | 8/5/2024 | 0 | 5 | 9/5/2024 | NAP | 8/5/2029 | NAP | 0 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 0 | 7/25/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 0 | 7/9/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 0 | 7/12/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 360 | 7/19/2024 | 0 | 1 | 9/1/2024 | 9/1/2024 | 8/1/2029 | NAP | 0 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 0 | 7/5/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 0 | 4/19/2024 | 3 | 5 | 6/5/2024 | NAP | 5/5/2029 | NAP | 0 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 0 | 6/17/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 0 | 7/19/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 0 | 7/16/2024 | 0 | 5 | 9/5/2024 | NAP | 8/5/2029 | NAP | 0 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 0 | 7/3/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 0 | 7/30/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 0 | 7/25/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 0 | 7/24/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 359 | 6/18/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | 8/6/2024 | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Remaining Amortization Term (Mos.) | Origination Date | Seasoning (Mos.) | Payment Due Date | First Payment Date | First P&I Payment Date | Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date | Final Maturity Date | Grace Period - Late Fee (Days) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 0 | 4/7/2022 | 27 | 5 | 6/5/2022 | NAP | 5/5/2032 | NAP | 0 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 0 | 7/18/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 0 | 7/18/2024 | 0 | 6 | 9/6/2024 | NAP | 8/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 0 | 6/26/2024 | 1 | 6 | 8/6/2024 | NAP | 7/6/2029 | NAP | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Grace Period - Default (Days) | Prepayment Provision | Most Recent EGI ($) | Most Recent Expenses ($) | Most Recent NOI ($) | Most Recent NOI Date | Most Recent Description | Second Most Recent EGI ($) |
| | | | | | 3 | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 59,253,463 | 15,561,540 | 43,691,924 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 59,426,990 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 16,184,648 | 7,423,923 | 8,760,725 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 15,856,168 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | 1,135,619 | 316,177 | 819,442 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 1,116,745 |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | 1,050,567 | 323,840 | 726,727 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 1,026,467 |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | 1,015,605 | 424,559 | 591,046 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 993,679 |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | 702,295 | 143,307 | 558,987 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 684,796 |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | 963,003 | 418,327 | 544,676 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 922,088 |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | 1,188,022 | 666,506 | 521,516 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 1,155,323 |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | 804,272 | 268,670 | 535,602 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 808,687 |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | 720,727 | 257,397 | 463,329 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 700,596 |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | 714,652 | 288,797 | 425,855 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 686,777 |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | 701,092 | 349,623 | 351,469 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 704,550 |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | 520,088 | 209,464 | 310,624 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 512,630 |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | 379,171 | 89,818 | 289,352 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 366,175 |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | 424,274 | 201,621 | 222,653 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 400,154 |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | 519,762 | 274,149 | 245,613 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 505,349 |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | 573,708 | 311,793 | 261,915 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 555,590 |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | 420,189 | 213,087 | 207,102 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 434,337 |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | 375,483 | 211,686 | 163,797 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 366,815 |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | 408,679 | 223,088 | 185,591 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 409,968 |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | 424,490 | 153,995 | 270,495 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 419,659 |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | 388,410 | 230,849 | 157,562 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 388,706 |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | 488,132 | 398,261 | 89,871 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 456,237 |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | 299,180 | 170,938 | 128,242 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 308,938 |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | 296,794 | 184,811 | 111,984 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 286,130 |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | 274,023 | 159,063 | 114,960 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 278,200 |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | 310,797 | 200,750 | 110,047 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 292,489 |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | 309,594 | 195,545 | 114,050 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 306,214 |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | 249,004 | 113,689 | 135,314 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 254,661 |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | 358,143 | 282,825 | 75,318 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 337,428 |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | 168,874 | 141,287 | 27,587 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 176,779 |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 0 | L(25),D(32),O(3) | 10,174,766 | 2,243,435 | 7,931,332 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 10,294,603 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | 2,581,191 | 269,842 | 2,311,349 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 2,650,760 |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | 3,014,089 | 677,123 | 2,336,966 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 3,019,118 |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | 1,322,620 | 39,679 | 1,282,941 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 1,322,620 |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | 1,842,608 | 433,246 | 1,409,362 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 1,743,853 |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | 1,414,258 | 823,545 | 590,714 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 1,558,252 |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 10,269,933 | 2,927,636 | 7,342,297 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 10,484,646 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 0 | L(24),D(1),DorYM1(30),O(5) | 8,627,411 | 4,733,016 | 3,894,395 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 8,187,953 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 5 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 4,896,112 | 1,769,683 | 3,126,429 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 4,754,824 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 0 | L(24),D(32),O(4) | 6,053,664 | 2,329,083 | 3,724,581 | 6/30/2024 | T-12 | 5,773,455 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | 3,480,195 | 1,395,701 | 2,084,495 | 6/30/2024 | T-12 | 3,340,440 |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | 2,573,469 | 933,383 | 1,640,086 | 6/30/2024 | T-12 | 2,433,014 |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 0 | L(24),D(31),O(5) | 6,845,811 | 2,493,064 | 4,352,747 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 7,066,607 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 0 | L(25),D(31),O(4) | 5,584,662 | 3,347,492 | 2,237,170 | 3/31/2024 | T-12 | 5,754,065 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 0 | L(2),YM1(22),DorYM1(31),O(5) | 3,701,173 | 930,879 | 2,770,293 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 3,602,411 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 0 | L(24),D(31),O(5) | 3,262,818 | 925,251 | 2,337,567 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | 695,244 | 130,190 | 565,054 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | 614,559 | 177,903 | 436,656 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | 489,572 | 156,982 | 332,590 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | 410,343 | 121,484 | 288,860 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | 248,023 | 118,418 | 129,605 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | 225,131 | 50,406 | 174,726 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | 291,946 | 107,128 | 184,818 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | 288,000 | 62,741 | 225,259 | 4/30/2024 | T-9 Ann | NAV |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 3,433,803 | 539,515 | 2,894,288 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 3,100,190 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 3,573,225 | 1,800,885 | 1,772,340 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 3,470,610 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 0 | L(24),D(32),O(4) | 41,668,756 | 11,820,364 | 29,848,392 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 42,147,608 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 3,769,046 | 1,246,371 | 2,522,675 | 3/31/2024 | T-12 | 3,654,302 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 0 | L(24),YM1(3),DorYM1(27),O(6) | 11,447,223 | 3,456,686 | 7,990,537 | 1/31/2024 | T-12 | 11,265,521 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 4,669,489 | 585,683 | 4,083,806 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 4,799,387 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 9,072,415 | 5,508,167 | 3,564,248 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 8,867,663 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 0 | L(24),D(32),O(4) | 1,819,417 | 1,142,080 | 677,337 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | NAV |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 0 | L(24),D(32),O(4) | 1,898,539 | 756,105 | 1,142,434 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 1,909,378 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 4,958,967 | 2,930,133 | 2,028,834 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 4,894,923 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 4,970,478 | 2,960,204 | 2,010,274 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 4,901,517 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 4,901,508 | 2,969,389 | 1,932,119 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 4,900,753 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 0 | L(25),D(31),O(4) | 1,632,765 | 223,134 | 1,409,631 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 1,814,737 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 4,127,348 | 2,339,239 | 1,788,109 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 4,250,399 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 2,602,901 | 1,615,659 | 987,242 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 2,554,388 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 0 | L(24),YM1(29),O(7) | 1,314,833 | 390,851 | 923,982 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 1,441,667 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 2,882,116 | 1,669,512 | 1,212,604 | 3/31/2024 | T-12 | 2,916,528 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Grace Period - Default (Days) | Prepayment Provision | Most Recent EGI ($) | Most Recent Expenses ($) | Most Recent NOI ($) | Most Recent NOI Date | Most Recent Description | Second Most Recent EGI ($) |
| | | | | | 3 | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 0 | L(35),D(78),O(7) | 12,649,769 | 4,872,778 | 7,776,991 | 3/31/2024 | T-12 | 12,566,170 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 0 | L(24),D(33),O(3) | 454,130 | 59,925 | 394,205 | 5/31/2024 | T-12 | 450,011 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 0 | L(24),D(29),O(7) | 635,761 | 176,532 | 459,229 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 657,517 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | 356,140 | 92,421 | 263,719 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 360,271 |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | 279,621 | 84,111 | 195,511 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 297,246 |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 0 | L(25),D(28),O(7) | 618,331 | 313,208 | 305,123 | 4/30/2024 | T-12 | 615,475 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Second Most Recent Expenses ($) | Second Most Recent NOI ($) | Second Most Recent NOI Date | Second Most Recent Description | Third Most Recent EGI ($) | Third Most Recent Expenses ($) | Third Most Recent NOI ($) | Third Most Recent NOI Date | Third Most Recent Description |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 15,869,494 | 43,557,495 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 56,031,261 | 16,837,781 | 39,193,479 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 7,245,316 | 8,610,852 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 14,848,807 | 6,781,400 | 8,067,407 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 294,028 | 822,717 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,030,416 | 263,544 | 766,872 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 298,475 | 727,992 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 980,427 | 295,441 | 684,986 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 407,065 | 586,614 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 949,507 | 352,666 | 596,841 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 138,951 | 545,844 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 656,976 | 130,401 | 526,575 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 406,605 | 515,483 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 774,998 | 384,022 | 390,976 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 657,067 | 498,256 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,051,921 | 588,805 | 463,116 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 343,531 | 465,156 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 758,074 | 369,253 | 388,821 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 251,398 | 449,198 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 705,209 | 263,600 | 441,609 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 260,551 | 426,225 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 588,087 | 203,305 | 384,783 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 336,219 | 368,330 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 687,019 | 348,010 | 339,009 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 229,883 | 282,747 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 415,116 | 312,856 | 102,260 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 81,160 | 285,016 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 363,831 | 88,380 | 275,451 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 198,907 | 201,247 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 367,290 | 206,216 | 161,073 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 260,867 | 244,482 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 400,999 | 191,569 | 209,430 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 299,673 | 255,916 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 573,709 | 268,272 | 305,437 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 223,809 | 210,529 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 515,744 | 235,013 | 280,731 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 207,515 | 159,300 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 364,983 | 179,179 | 185,804 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 211,244 | 198,724 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 388,470 | 152,574 | 235,895 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 143,631 | 276,028 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 387,254 | 145,542 | 241,712 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 218,678 | 170,029 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 390,136 | 160,351 | 229,785 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 380,531 | 75,706 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 354,370 | 263,147 | 91,223 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 160,836 | 148,103 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 304,916 | 178,459 | 126,457 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 213,880 | 72,250 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 274,673 | 234,316 | 40,357 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 161,150 | 117,050 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 282,427 | 148,209 | 134,219 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 180,269 | 112,220 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 253,898 | 154,606 | 99,292 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 191,191 | 115,023 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 302,733 | 192,420 | 110,313 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 120,526 | 134,134 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 270,617 | 114,221 | 156,396 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 223,336 | 114,092 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 281,666 | 222,439 | 59,227 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 144,339 | 32,440 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 173,341 | 134,583 | 38,758 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 2,380,452 | 7,914,151 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 9,690,206 | 2,168,969 | 7,521,237 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 320,023 | 2,330,737 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 2,410,520 | 168,668 | 2,241,852 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 670,586 | 2,348,532 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 3,054,464 | 644,452 | 2,410,011 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 39,679 | 1,282,941 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,322,620 | 39,679 | 1,282,941 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 424,035 | 1,319,818 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,390,099 | 399,174 | 990,925 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 926,129 | 632,123 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,512,503 | 916,997 | 595,507 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 2,948,861 | 7,535,784 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 9,854,531 | 2,612,135 | 7,242,395 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 4,745,986 | 3,441,967 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 1,684,045 | 3,070,779 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 5,410,344 | 1,524,552 | 3,885,792 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 2,269,353 | 3,504,102 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 5,455,152 | 2,231,412 | 3,223,741 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 1,344,711 | 1,995,730 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 3,116,442 | 1,336,585 | 1,779,857 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 924,642 | 1,508,372 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 2,338,710 | 894,827 | 1,443,883 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 2,794,594 | 4,272,014 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 6,917,246 | 2,999,458 | 3,917,788 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 3,397,446 | 2,356,618 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 5,754,156 | 3,444,359 | 2,309,796 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 903,945 | 2,698,466 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 541,338 | 2,558,852 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 2,615,653 | 571,356 | 2,044,297 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 1,702,181 | 1,768,429 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 3,108,244 | 1,350,195 | 1,758,049 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 12,227,638 | 29,919,970 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 40,539,309 | 11,947,424 | 28,591,885 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 1,217,977 | 2,436,325 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 3,405,931 | 7,859,590 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 8,717,178 | 3,254,004 | 5,463,174 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 583,272 | 4,216,115 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 4,864,939 | 657,352 | 4,207,587 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 5,474,845 | 3,392,819 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 8,013,951 | 4,823,104 | 3,190,847 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 903,692 | 1,005,687 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 2,939,267 | 1,955,656 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 4,648,857 | 2,643,132 | 2,005,725 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 2,946,312 | 1,955,205 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 4,535,114 | 2,772,935 | 1,762,179 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 2,878,529 | 2,022,224 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 4,378,506 | 2,645,442 | 1,733,064 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 398,803 | 1,415,934 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,204,002 | 438,523 | 765,479 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 2,320,050 | 1,930,349 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 3,538,867 | 2,120,630 | 1,418,237 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 1,630,848 | 923,540 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 2,571,991 | 1,587,900 | 984,090 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 390,467 | 1,051,200 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 1,237,389 | 446,726 | 790,663 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 1,643,760 | 1,272,768 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 2,702,362 | 1,617,053 | 1,085,309 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Second Most Recent Expenses ($) | Second Most Recent NOI ($) | Second Most Recent NOI Date | Second Most Recent Description | Third Most Recent EGI ($) | Third Most Recent Expenses ($) | Third Most Recent NOI ($) | Third Most Recent NOI Date | Third Most Recent Description |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 4,712,188 | 7,853,982 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 11,996,082 | 4,131,135 | 7,864,947 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 60,421 | 389,590 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 407,705 | 62,406 | 345,299 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 222,728 | 434,789 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 685,828 | 226,680 | 459,148 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 122,670 | 237,601 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 385,775 | 136,999 | 248,776 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 100,058 | 197,188 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 300,053 | 89,681 | 210,372 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 325,769 | 289,706 | 12/31/2023 | T-12 | 608,561 | 293,763 | 314,797 | 12/31/2022 | T-12 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Underwritten Economic Occupancy (%) | Underwritten EGI ($) | Underwritten Expenses ($) | Underwritten Net Operating Income ($) | Underwritten Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($) | Underwritten TI / LC ($) | Underwritten Net Cash Flow ($) | Underwritten NOI DSCR (x) | Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | 4 |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 95.0% | 58,468,101 | 15,644,476 | 42,823,625 | 219,376 | 1,038,756 | 41,565,493 | 2.37 | 2.30 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 76.2% | 16,689,688 | 7,484,405 | 9,205,283 | 243,352 | 0 | 8,961,932 | 1.87 | 1.82 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 98.5% | 1,178,647 | 300,132 | 878,514 | 9,869 | 0 | 868,646 | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 100.0% | 1,088,880 | 333,360 | 755,520 | 9,704 | 0 | 745,816 | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 100.0% | 1,047,706 | 434,643 | 613,063 | 6,276 | 0 | 606,788 | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 100.0% | 721,125 | 132,156 | 588,969 | 9,186 | 0 | 579,784 | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 80.7% | 987,677 | 386,980 | 600,697 | 4,476 | 0 | 596,222 | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 74.9% | 1,209,653 | 613,048 | 596,605 | 3,478 | 0 | 593,127 | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 93.3% | 876,549 | 264,510 | 612,038 | 3,386 | 0 | 608,653 | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 85.9% | 741,505 | 249,191 | 492,314 | 8,332 | 0 | 483,981 | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 94.2% | 712,742 | 269,525 | 443,217 | 12,382 | 0 | 430,835 | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 68.2% | 725,991 | 418,062 | 307,929 | 24,429 | 0 | 283,500 | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 76.7% | 543,409 | 200,591 | 342,818 | 13,481 | 0 | 329,336 | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 85.7% | 392,934 | 77,610 | 315,324 | 7,671 | 0 | 307,652 | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 65.4% | 442,628 | 229,152 | 213,476 | 4,750 | 0 | 208,726 | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 67.2% | 532,029 | 252,653 | 279,376 | 7,786 | 0 | 271,591 | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 83.2% | 590,754 | 354,263 | 236,491 | 28,959 | 0 | 207,532 | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 70.6% | 422,898 | 230,413 | 192,486 | 3,529 | 0 | 188,957 | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 76.5% | 405,227 | 199,935 | 205,292 | 9,450 | 0 | 195,842 | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 84.5% | 409,027 | 256,005 | 153,022 | 5,864 | 0 | 147,157 | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 91.9% | 455,786 | 149,356 | 306,431 | 9,541 | 0 | 296,890 | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 34.8% | 378,902 | 213,286 | 165,616 | 3,743 | 0 | 161,873 | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 40.5% | 528,661 | 349,914 | 178,747 | 6,379 | 0 | 172,369 | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 71.1% | 305,709 | 190,133 | 115,576 | 5,893 | 0 | 109,683 | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 56.9% | 313,936 | 168,195 | 145,740 | 7,500 | 0 | 138,240 | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 78.6% | 289,687 | 191,469 | 98,218 | 3,157 | 0 | 95,061 | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 44.1% | 316,968 | 185,807 | 131,160 | 6,624 | 0 | 124,536 | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 77.9% | 317,374 | 234,698 | 82,676 | 13,429 | 0 | 69,248 | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 70.0% | 247,927 | 150,493 | 97,434 | 2,814 | 0 | 94,620 | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 65.8% | 340,066 | 279,235 | 60,831 | 3,694 | 0 | 57,136 | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 80.0% | 165,291 | 169,590 | (4,299) | 7,571 | 0 | (11,870) | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 86.4% | 10,588,465 | 2,165,703 | 8,422,762 | 446,554 | 0 | 7,976,208 | 1.63 | 1.55 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 100.0% | 2,757,806 | 268,830 | 2,488,976 | 122,994 | 0 | 2,365,982 | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 70.0% | 2,452,893 | 593,811 | 1,859,082 | 163,237 | 0 | 1,695,846 | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 100.0% | 1,835,515 | 55,065 | 1,780,450 | 76,305 | 0 | 1,704,145 | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 93.9% | 2,024,237 | 433,414 | 1,590,823 | 66,657 | 0 | 1,524,166 | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 75.7% | 1,518,013 | 814,582 | 703,431 | 17,361 | 0 | 686,069 | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 81.5% | 11,123,854 | 3,021,349 | 8,102,506 | 81,827 | 401,932 | 7,618,746 | 1.97 | 1.86 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 95.0% | 9,294,020 | 4,909,544 | 4,384,476 | 29,200 | 42,727 | 4,312,549 | 1.38 | 1.36 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 94.0% | 6,401,246 | 1,976,405 | 4,424,841 | 133,348 | 120,503 | 4,170,990 | 1.45 | 1.36 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 95.0% | 6,047,666 | 2,285,527 | 3,762,139 | 87,000 | 0 | 3,675,139 | 1.33 | 1.30 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 95.0% | 3,454,021 | 1,329,060 | 2,124,961 | 48,000 | 0 | 2,076,961 | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 95.0% | 2,593,645 | 956,467 | 1,637,178 | 39,000 | 0 | 1,598,178 | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 95.0% | 6,814,966 | 2,513,628 | 4,301,338 | 73,152 | 174,320 | 4,053,866 | 1.35 | 1.27 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 90.0% | 7,165,012 | 3,441,202 | 3,723,810 | 134,320 | 0 | 3,589,490 | 1.55 | 1.49 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 98.3% | 3,953,216 | 853,599 | 3,099,617 | 17,600 | 14,554 | 3,067,463 | 1.54 | 1.53 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 96.1% | 4,016,807 | 1,031,977 | 2,984,830 | 19,837 | 66,303 | 2,898,691 | 1.39 | 1.35 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 95.0% | 750,077 | 125,926 | 624,150 | 2,664 | 18,633 | 602,854 | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | 96.4% | 657,718 | 177,913 | 479,805 | 2,644 | 16,160 | 461,002 | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | 96.2% | 530,643 | 179,693 | 350,951 | 2,723 | 10,115 | 338,113 | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | 97.0% | 478,863 | 137,783 | 341,079 | 3,638 | 0 | 337,441 | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | 96.2% | 467,130 | 143,067 | 324,063 | 1,083 | 9,426 | 313,554 | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | 96.7% | 369,341 | 63,741 | 305,600 | 2,439 | 3,463 | 299,698 | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | 97.0% | 419,130 | 117,645 | 301,485 | 2,860 | 0 | 298,625 | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | 95.0% | 343,906 | 86,209 | 257,698 | 1,786 | 8,507 | 247,405 | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 90.5% | 3,367,723 | 569,250 | 2,798,473 | 31,977 | 50,542 | 2,715,955 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 94.6% | 3,740,980 | 1,447,932 | 2,293,049 | 52,000 | 0 | 2,241,049 | 1.36 | 1.32 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 95.4% | 41,481,121 | 11,271,177 | 30,209,945 | 232,624 | 324,592 | 29,652,729 | 1.75 | 1.72 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 94.5% | 3,756,754 | 1,363,873 | 2,392,881 | 101,700 | 0 | 2,291,181 | 1.48 | 1.41 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 92.6% | 12,831,872 | 3,531,569 | 9,300,303 | 218,333 | 467,930 | 8,614,040 | 2.10 | 1.95 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 81.5% | 4,894,767 | 1,318,558 | 3,576,209 | 77,775 | 267,846 | 3,230,588 | 2.20 | 1.98 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 79.0% | 9,048,759 | 5,417,196 | 3,631,563 | 361,950 | 0 | 3,269,612 | 2.49 | 2.24 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 95.0% | 2,592,956 | 1,038,888 | 1,554,068 | 30,000 | 0 | 1,524,068 | 1.35 | 1.32 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 95.0% | 2,108,456 | 728,967 | 1,379,489 | 21,600 | 0 | 1,357,889 | 1.51 | 1.49 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 76.0% | 4,945,757 | 2,871,677 | 2,074,080 | 197,830 | 0 | 1,876,250 | 2.19 | 1.98 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 79.6% | 4,957,445 | 2,968,149 | 1,989,296 | 198,298 | 0 | 1,790,998 | 2.27 | 2.04 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 80.8% | 4,888,384 | 2,973,651 | 1,914,733 | 195,535 | 0 | 1,719,198 | 2.19 | 1.96 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 99.0% | 1,717,673 | 507,400 | 1,210,273 | 16,197 | 0 | 1,194,076 | 1.52 | 1.50 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 80.2% | 4,127,348 | 2,342,048 | 1,785,300 | 165,094 | 0 | 1,620,206 | 2.13 | 1.93 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 90.0% | 2,662,959 | 1,634,637 | 1,028,323 | 24,250 | 2,489 | 1,001,584 | 1.34 | 1.31 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 90.0% | 1,350,368 | 441,080 | 909,288 | 6,630 | 0 | 902,658 | 1.31 | 1.30 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 68.4% | 2,882,116 | 1,645,310 | 1,236,806 | 115,285 | 0 | 1,121,521 | 1.67 | 1.52 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Underwritten Economic Occupancy (%) | Underwritten EGI ($) | Underwritten Expenses ($) | Underwritten Net Operating Income ($) | Underwritten Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($) | Underwritten TI / LC ($) | Underwritten Net Cash Flow ($) | Underwritten NOI DSCR (x) | Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | 4 |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 92.4% | 12,638,328 | 3,972,284 | 8,666,045 | 74,244 | 108,995 | 8,482,805 | 2.08 | 2.03 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 97.0% | 445,445 | 55,437 | 390,008 | 3,250 | 0 | 386,758 | 1.27 | 1.26 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 74.7% | 635,761 | 218,658 | 417,103 | 8,303 | 0 | 408,800 | 1.66 | 1.63 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 82.5% | 356,140 | 113,408 | 242,732 | 3,762 | 0 | 238,970 | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 66.7% | 279,621 | 105,250 | 174,371 | 4,542 | 0 | 169,830 | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 91.5% | 618,331 | 294,746 | 323,585 | 4,002 | 0 | 319,583 | 1.27 | 1.26 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) | Underwritten NCF Debt Yield (%) | Appraised Value ($) | Appraised Value Type | Appraisal Date | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | LTV Ratio at Maturity / ARD (%) | Leased Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 5 |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 16.8% | 16.3% | 605,000,000 | As Is | 5/13/2024 | 42.1% | 42.1% | 96.7% |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 10.8% | 10.5% | 166,400,000 | As Is | Various | 51.1% | 51.1% | 75.1% |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | 13,900,000 | As Is | 5/9/2024 | | | 98.6% |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | 14,700,000 | As Is | 5/1/2024 | | | 100.0% |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | 11,900,000 | As Is | 5/15/2024 | | | 100.0% |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | 9,300,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 100.0% |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | 10,200,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 82.8% |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | 11,300,000 | As Is | 4/30/2024 | | | 73.9% |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | 7,800,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 94.0% |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | 9,400,000 | As Is | 5/14/2024 | | | 87.6% |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | 7,300,000 | As Is | 5/15/2024 | | | 94.7% |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | 6,080,000 | As Is | 4/30/2024 | | | 67.0% |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | 5,510,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 78.8% |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | 4,900,000 | As Is | 5/9/2024 | | | 86.3% |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | 4,270,000 | As Is | 5/1/2024 | | | 63.9% |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | 4,400,000 | As Is | 5/13/2024 | | | 71.8% |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | 3,410,000 | As Is | 5/1/2024 | | | 82.9% |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | 3,120,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 70.3% |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | 3,510,000 | As Is | 5/9/2024 | | | 77.9% |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | 3,260,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 85.0% |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | 2,440,000 | As Is | 5/3/2024 | | | 91.8% |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | 6,000,000 | As Is | 5/9/2024 | | | 40.3% |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | 6,000,000 | As Is | 5/14/2024 | | | 43.5% |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | 2,410,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 70.7% |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | 2,330,000 | As Is | 5/13/2024 | | | 58.7% |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | 1,930,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 78.5% |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | 3,470,000 | As Is | 5/13/2024 | | | 47.7% |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | 1,770,000 | As Is | 5/8/2024 | | | 75.9% |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | 1,680,000 | As Is | 5/10/2024 | | | 68.7% |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | 3,230,000 | As Is | 5/15/2024 | | | 70.8% |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | 880,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | | | 79.4% |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 11.2% | 10.6% | 134,300,000 | As Is | Various | 55.8% | 55.8% | 89.0% |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | 41,900,000 | As Is | 5/30/2024 | | | 100.0% |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | 41,000,000 | As Is | 6/5/2024 | | | 74.8% |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | 24,400,000 | As Is | 6/5/2024 | | | 100.0% |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | 20,500,000 | As Is | 6/5/2024 | | | 94.6% |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | 6,500,000 | As Is | 6/14/2024 | | | 75.2% |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 14.2% | 13.4% | 94,000,000 | As Is | 5/21/2024 | 60.6% | 60.6% | 81.5% |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 8.7% | 8.5% | 84,700,000 | As Is | 6/7/2024 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 95.9% |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | 54,500,000 | As Is | 6/7/2024 | | | 96.1% |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | 30,200,000 | As Is | 6/7/2024 | | | 95.8% |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 9.8% | 9.3% | 70,000,000 | As Is | 5/22/2024 | 64.3% | 64.3% | 97.3% |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 8.5% | 8.3% | 63,600,000 | As Is | 5/29/2024 | 70.0% | 70.0% | 98.3% |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | 35,900,000 | As Is | 5/29/2024 | | | 97.9% |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | 27,700,000 | As Is | 5/29/2024 | | | 98.7% |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 10.0% | 9.4% | 64,500,000 | As Is | 5/22/2024 | 66.7% | 66.7% | 96.6% |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 11.3% | 10.9% | 55,700,000 | As Is | 5/21/2024 | 59.2% | 59.2% | 100.0% |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 9.4% | 9.3% | 54,700,000 | As Is | 6/26/2024 | 60.3% | 60.3% | 98.9% |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 9.9% | 9.7% | 49,000,000 | As Is | Various | 61.2% | 61.2% | 98.2% |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | 10,000,000 | As Is | 6/17/2024 | | | 97.3% |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | 8,200,000 | As Is | 6/12/2024 | | | 100.0% |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | 5,300,000 | As Is | 6/12/2024 | | | 100.0% |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | 5,700,000 | As Is | 6/12/2024 | | | 100.0% |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | 5,700,000 | As Is | 6/17/2024 | | | 100.0% |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | 4,800,000 | As Is | 6/12/2024 | | | 88.9% |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | 5,000,000 | As Is | 6/13/2024 | | | 100.0% |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | 4,300,000 | As Is | 6/17/2024 | | | 100.0% |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 9.8% | 9.5% | 43,000,000 | As Is | 6/13/2024 | 66.3% | 66.3% | 92.6% |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 9.0% | 8.8% | 40,700,000 | As Is | 6/20/2024 | 62.3% | 62.3% | 100.0% |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 13.7% | 13.5% | 392,659,260 | As Is with Escrow Reserve | 6/4/2024 | 56.0% | 53.0% | 95.4% |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 9.6% | 9.2% | 34,900,000 | As Is | 3/28/2024 | 71.6% | 71.6% | 95.5% |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 15.0% | 13.9% | 147,000,000 | As Is | 2/13/2024 | 42.2% | 42.2% | 88.2% |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 15.9% | 14.4% | 33,200,000 | As Is | 5/18/2024 | 67.8% | 67.8% | 85.7% |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 18.0% | 16.2% | 38,500,000 | As Is | 5/8/2024 | 52.5% | 52.5% | 85.2% |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 8.7% | 8.5% | 25,200,000 | As Is | 5/21/2024 | 71.0% | 71.0% | 99.2% |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 9.9% | 9.7% | 18,825,000 | As Is | 3/19/2024 | 74.4% | 74.4% | 93.5% |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 15.8% | 14.3% | 22,000,000 | As Is | 5/7/2024 | 59.7% | 59.7% | 82.4% |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 16.4% | 14.8% | 20,500,000 | As Is | 5/8/2024 | 59.1% | 59.1% | 87.0% |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 15.8% | 14.2% | 20,500,000 | As Is | 5/8/2024 | 59.1% | 59.1% | 80.4% |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 10.1% | 10.0% | 21,000,000 | As Is | 5/14/2024 | 57.1% | 57.1% | 100.0% |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 15.4% | 14.0% | 19,000,000 | As Is | 5/8/2024 | 61.1% | 61.1% | 82.8% |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 10.8% | 10.5% | 19,200,000 | As Is | 4/17/2024 | 49.5% | 49.5% | 89.7% |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 9.7% | 9.6% | 15,000,000 | As Is | 5/17/2024 | 62.7% | 62.7% | 90.1% |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 14.7% | 13.4% | 12,000,000 | As Is (Extraordinary Assumption) | 4/18/2024 | 70.0% | 67.0% | 68.4% |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) | Underwritten NCF Debt Yield (%) | Appraised Value ($) | Appraised Value Type | Appraisal Date | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | LTV Ratio at Maturity / ARD (%) | Leased Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 5 |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 10.2% | 10.0% | 125,700,000 | As Is | 3/3/2022 | 67.6% | 67.6% | 91.5% |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 8.7% | 8.6% | 7,150,000 | As Is | 6/19/2024 | 62.9% | 62.9% | 100.0% |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 10.4% | 10.2% | 5,900,000 | As Is | 4/26/2024 | 67.8% | 67.8% | 69.9% |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | 3,240,000 | As Is | 4/26/2024 | | | 78.0% |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | 2,660,000 | As Is | 4/26/2024 | | | 63.2% |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 8.7% | 8.6% | 5,700,000 | As Is | 5/30/2024 | 64.9% | 64.9% | 85.5% |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Occupancy Date | Single Tenant (Y/N) | Largest Tenant | Largest Tenant SF | Largest Tenant % of NRA | Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date |
| | | | | | | | | | 6 |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 4/30/2024 | No | JCPenney | 162,347 | 14.8% | 12/31/2040 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | | | | | | |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | 5/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | | | | | |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | 8/6/2024 | Yes | Transform Distribution Center Holdco LLC | 819,960 | 100.0% | 12/31/2025 |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 5/1/2024 | No | Nickey Warehouses, Inc. | 711,181 | 65.4% | 5/31/2025 |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | 8/6/2024 | Yes | Terex Corporation | 508,700 | 100.0% | 2/28/2030 |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 5/1/2024 | No | K & C Warehouse, LLC | 146,881 | 33.1% | 8/31/2028 |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 7/1/2024 | No | Market Street Wealth Management Advisors, LLC | 5,777 | 5.0% | 5/31/2029 |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 5/22/2024 | No | ManTech | 178,463 | 43.6% | 10/31/2026 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | | | | | | |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 5/31/2024 | No | RESTAURANT SHUN LEE PALACE | 4,668 | 6.1% | 8/31/2029 |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | 5/31/2024 | No | Ocean Recovery East LLC | 5,638 | 67.3% | 6/30/2033 |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 7/1/2024 | No | Las Vegas Medical Plaza | 24,000 | 5.6% | 8/31/2025 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | | | | | | |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 6/18/2024 | No | Kohl's | 88,408 | 24.2% | 1/31/2035 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 5/3/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 7/19/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | | | | | | |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 7/11/2024 | No | Alfredo Floresmoreo | 5,000 | 33.8% | 11/30/2027 |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | 7/11/2024 | No | Mr. Green Laundry | 3,600 | 100.0% | 6/29/2026 |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | 7/11/2024 | No | La La Bakeshop NYC Inc. | 800 | 59.3% | 7/31/2029 |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | 7/11/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | 7/11/2024 | No | Hunter Convenience Shop | 1,500 | 100.0% | 6/30/2029 |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | 7/11/2024 | No | KS Architect, Inc. | 600 | 100.0% | 6/30/2029 |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | 7/11/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | 7/11/2024 | No | Expo Beauty Supply | 5,400 | 57.4% | 3/31/2028 |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 5/14/2024 | No | Aldi Inc. | 22,288 | 10.5% | 3/31/2033 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 7/8/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 6/30/2024 | No | JCPenney | 96,605 | 17.9% | 1/31/2026 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 4/24/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 2/28/2024 | No | Ford Motor Company | 909,287 | 41.6% | 4/30/2028 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 6/14/2024 | No | Belk | 96,577 | 22.4% | 3/3/2026 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 5/1/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 8/6/2024 | Yes | City of New York | 35,210 | 100.0% | 10/31/2042 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 7/9/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 6/1/2024 | No | CitiBank, N. A. | 3,590 | 20.0% | 3/31/2025 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 3/31/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Occupancy Date | Single Tenant (Y/N) | Largest Tenant | Largest Tenant SF | Largest Tenant % of NRA | Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date |
| | | | | | | | | | 6 |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 3/31/2023 | No | Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB | 81,154 | 21.9% | 12/31/2025 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 6/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | | | |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | 4/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | 4/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 4/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Second Largest Tenant | Second Largest Tenant SF | Second Largest Tenant % of NRA | Second Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Third Largest Tenant | Third Largest Tenant SF | Third Largest Tenant % of NRA |
| | | | | | | | 6 | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | AMC Theatres | 94,560 | 8.6% | 9/30/2028 | DICK'S Sporting Goods | 77,411 | 7.1% |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | | | | | | | |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | | | | | | |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | Spa Parts Plus Ltd. | 48,840 | 4.5% | 2/28/2025 | Hackbarth Delivery Service | 37,492 | 3.4% |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | Elegant Granite and Cabinet Inc. | 66,891 | 15.1% | 2/28/2030 | Jacob Tubing LP | 50,232 | 11.3% |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | UFCW Local 700 | 5,258 | 4.5% | 9/30/2026 | Senex Services Corp | 4,885 | 4.2% |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | MITRE | 35,303 | 8.6% | 2/28/2029 | Alexandria Insights | 24,748 | 6.0% |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | | | | | | | |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | B A SILVER & CO INC. | 4,431 | 5.7% | 8/31/2027 | ORTHOPRO SERVICES | 3,712 | 4.8% |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | Waterbox New York LLC | 2,743 | 32.7% | 12/31/2034 | NAP | NAP | NAP |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | Work Lounge LLC | 21,040 | 4.9% | 2/28/2030 | Al Bravo Films, LLC | 16,862 | 3.9% |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | Dick's Sporting Goods | 50,000 | 13.7% | 1/31/2026 | TJ Maxx | 42,775 | 11.7% |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | | | | | | | |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | JY Burnside 99C | 4,950 | 33.4% | 10/31/2027 | M & W Organic And Exotic Deli Corp | 1,000 | 6.8% |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | Convenience on 2nd Ave Corporation | 550 | 40.7% | 2/28/2033 | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | Little Amber Nails & Spa | 4,000 | 42.6% | 3/31/2033 | NAP | NAP | NAP |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | Planet Fitness | 16,264 | 7.6% | 8/31/2027 | Harbor Freight | 15,473 | 7.3% |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | Forever 21 | 81,772 | 15.1% | 12/31/2026 | Foot Locker | 18,376 | 3.4% |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | Redhawk Global | 409,599 | 18.8% | 7/1/2027 | US 1 Logistics LLC | 169,871 | 7.8% |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | Shoe Station | 29,503 | 6.8% | 12/31/2025 | Barnes & Noble | 22,500 | 5.2% |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | Meltzer Management Corp | 3,082 | 17.2% | 3/31/2026 | Domino's Pizza LLC | 1,935 | 10.8% |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Second Largest Tenant | Second Largest Tenant SF | Second Largest Tenant % of NRA | Second Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Third Largest Tenant | Third Largest Tenant SF | Third Largest Tenant % of NRA |
| | | | | | | | 6 | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | Morris James LLP | 68,553 | 18.5% | 5/31/2026 | Sargent & Lundy, LLC | 47,441 | 12.8% |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | | | | |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Third Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Fourth Largest Tenant | Fourth Largest Tenant SF | Fourth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fourth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Fifth Largest Tenant | Fifth Largest Tenant SF |
| | | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 1/31/2027 | Kidzania | 60,000 | 5.5% | 11/30/2046 | Haverty's Furniture | 60,000 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | | | | | | | |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | | | | | | |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 4/30/2025 | Earnest Parker, Jr. | 11,325 | 1.0% | 10/31/2025 | W&T Contracting Corp. | 5,424 |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 6/30/2031 | Stericycle, Inc. | 39,883 | 9.0% | 5/31/2028 | Staples Contract & Commercial LLC | 34,220 |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 12/31/2026 | Bierman Aba, Inc. | 4,859 | 4.2% | 4/30/2025 | Richard J. Stuart, D.D.S. | 4,813 |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 1/31/2027 | NAVFAC | 23,438 | 5.7% | 9/23/2029 | Digital Cloak | 18,049 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | | | | | | | |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 11/31/2024 | Alliance Management Systems | 3,475 | 4.5% | 10/31/2026 | Hildreth Real Estate | 2,998 |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 8/1/2026 | Ryerson Concrete, LLC | 11,880 | 2.8% | 11/30/2025 | Alternative Plan, Inc. | 10,353 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 1/31/2026 | Barnes & Noble | 25,000 | 6.8% | 1/31/2031 | Homegoods | 23,012 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | | | | | | | |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 9/30/2032 | Rita Egharevba | 750 | 5.1% | 10/30/2026 | Monster Barber Shop | 700 |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 7/31/2033 | Michaels | 14,145 | 6.6% | 10/31/2033 | Goodwill | 13,583 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 4/30/2032 | H&M | 17,510 | 3.2% | 1/31/2032 | Victoria's Secret | 14,115 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 7/31/2027 | PECO Pallet | 116,643 | 5.3% | 10/31/2024 | Lexington Logistics | 110,995 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 4/30/2029 | Direct Furniture II | 21,366 | 4.9% | 11/30/2025 | Stock and Trade | 16,294 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 12/31/2025 | Nail Salon - Nguyen Khan Inc. | 1,717 | 9.6% | 3/31/2025 | Smoothie King Co., Inc. | 1,519 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Third Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Fourth Largest Tenant | Fourth Largest Tenant SF | Fourth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fourth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Fifth Largest Tenant | Fifth Largest Tenant SF |
| | | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 10/31/2027 | United States Postal Service | 33,526 | 9.0% | 1/31/2027 | General Services Administration | 25,684 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | | | | |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Fifth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fifth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Environmental Phase I Report Date | Environmental Phase II Report Date | Engineering Report Date | Seismic Report Date | PML or SEL (%) | Flood Zone | Ownership Interest | Ground Lease Expiration Date |
| | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 5.5% | 1/31/2026 | 4/15/2024 | NAP | 4/16/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | 6/25/2024 | 10% | No | Fee / Leasehold | 12/31/2033 |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | NAP | NAP | 6/4/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | NAP | NAP | 6/3/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | 5/30/2024 | 7% | No | Fee | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/20/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | 0.5% | 3/31/2025 | 6/27/2024 | NAP | 6/20/2024 | 6/20/2024 | 16% | No | Fee | NAP |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/20/2024 | 6/20/2024 | 12% | No | Fee | NAP |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | 7.7% | 4/30/2029 | 6/24/2024 | NAP | 6/20/2024 | 6/20/2024 | 12%; 10% | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | 4.2% | 12/31/2034 | 6/24/2024 | NAP | 6/20/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 4.4% | 9/30/2032 | 5/28/2024 | NAP | 5/28/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | 3.9% | 9/30/2027 | 6/7/2024 | NAP | 6/7/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAP | NAP | 6/7/2024 | NAP | 6/7/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 2.4% | 8/31/2025 | 6/27/2024 | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | | |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | 6/11/2024 | NAP | 6/10/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | 6/11/2024 | NAP | 6/11/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 6.3% | 11/30/2026 | 6/6/2024 | NAP | 6/6/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | 6/14/2024 | NAP | 5/24/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | 6/3/2024 | NAP | 6/3/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | 4.7% | 4/30/2025 | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 6.4% | 6/16/2029 | 6/19/2024 | NAP | 6/18/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | 6/26/2024 | NAP | 6/26/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 2.6% | 1/31/2032 | 5/20/2024 | NAP | 5/20/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | 4/8/2024 | NAP | 4/2/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 5.1% | 1/6/2025 | 3/5/2024 | NAP | 2/29/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 3.8% | 1/31/2027 | 3/28/2024 | NAP | 3/27/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/14/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | 5/30/2024 | NAP | 5/29/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | 4/2/2024 | NAP | 4/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | 5/10/2024 | NAP | 5/10/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - AE | Fee | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/21/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | 4/18/2024 | NAP | 4/18/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Leasehold | 12/31/2112 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 8.5% | 5/31/2029 | 5/22/2024 | NAP | 5/22/2024 | NAP | NAP | Yes - VE | Fee | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | 5/3/2024 | NAP | 4/26/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Fifth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fifth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration Date | Environmental Phase I Report Date | Environmental Phase II Report Date | Engineering Report Date | Seismic Report Date | PML or SEL (%) | Flood Zone | Ownership Interest | Ground Lease Expiration Date |
| | | | | | 6 | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 6.9% | 6/14/2034 | 3/8/2022 | NAP | 3/8/2022 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | 6/25/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | NAP | NAP | 5/3/2024 | NAP | 5/3/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | NAP | NAP | 5/3/2024 | NAP | 5/3/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | 5/24/2024 | NAP | 5/24/2024 | NAP | NAP | No | Fee | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Ground Lease Extension Terms | Annual Ground Lease Payment as of the Cut-off Date ($) | Annual Ground Rent Increases (Y/N) | Upfront RE Tax Reserve ($) | Monthly RE Tax Reserve ($) | Upfront Insurance Reserve ($) | Monthly Insurance Reserve ($) | Upfront Replacement / PIP Reserve ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | 0 | Springing | 0 | Springing | 0 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | | | | 362,285 | 90,571 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | None | 22,924 | Yes | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | | | | 212,145 | 33,885 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | 102,951 | 51,475 | 22,163 | 11,082 | 0 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | | | | 497,888 | 165,963 | 0 | 31,435 | 0 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | NAP | NAP | NAP | 40,229 | 20,114 | 287,054 | 41,008 | 0 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | | | | 70,676 | 70,676 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | NAP | NAP | NAP | 823,214 | 57,408 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | 689,003 | 80,344 | 0 | 14,778 | 0 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | 235,958 | 40,113 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | | | | 155,125 | 51,708 | 39,318 | 9,830 | 0 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | NAP | NAP | NAP | 179,725 | 17,973 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | 130,991 | 32,748 | 45,848 | 22,924 | 0 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | NAP | NAP | NAP | 0 | Springing | 0 | Springing | 0 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | 127,185 | 14,132 | 77,846 | 25,949 | 0 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | 89,418 | 15,350 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | 118,392 | 14,799 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | NAP | 141,935 | 15,771 | 21,073 | 3,512 | 0 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | 312,438 | 31,244 | 59,486 | 9,914 | 0 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | 201,510 | 33,585 | 0 | 3,671 | 65,000 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | NAP | 116,981 | 14,623 | 54,136 | 9,023 | 0 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | 153,379 | 19,172 | 50,001 | 8,333 | 0 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | NAP | 186,415 | 23,302 | 24,241 | 4,040 | 0 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | 33,724 | 33,724 | 25,672 | 3,856 | 0 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | NAP | 97,558 | 12,195 | 19,008 | 3,168 | 0 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | None | 497,280 | Yes | 56,877 | 8,125 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | NAP | NAP | NAP | 76,331 | 7,633 | 58,089 | 8,298 | 0 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | NAP | 86,081 | 12,297 | 3,868 | 3,868 | 57,392 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Ground Lease Extension Terms | Annual Ground Lease Payment as of the Cut-off Date ($) | Annual Ground Rent Increases (Y/N) | Upfront RE Tax Reserve ($) | Monthly RE Tax Reserve ($) | Upfront Insurance Reserve ($) | Monthly Insurance Reserve ($) | Upfront Replacement / PIP Reserve ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | NAP | NAP | NAP | 831,885 | 108,403 | 0 | Springing | 0 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | 587 | 294 | 6,572 | 548 | 0 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | 5,134 | 5,134 | 3,716 | 1,858 | 85,000 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | 46,645 | 4,665 | 13,541 | 1,128 | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Monthly Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($) | Replacement Reserve Caps ($) | Upfront TI/LC Reserve ($) | Monthly TI/LC Reserve ($) | TI/LC Caps ($) | Upfront Debt Service Reserve ($) | Monthly Debt Service Reserve ($) | Debt Service Reserve Cap ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | Springing | 438,752 | 0 | 91,407 | 2,193,760 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 20,079 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 37,213 | 1,500,000 | 2,500,000 | Springing | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 6,819 | 0 | 2,500,000 | 68,189 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 2,433 | 0 | 0 | 3,561 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 11,112 | 0 | 400,000 | Springing | 250,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 7,250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 6,100 | 0 | 1,000,000 | 23,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 11,193 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 1,467 | 66,000 | 0 | 1,213 | 43,662 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 3,906 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 2,665 | 0 | 1,200,000 | Springing | 511,625 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 4,333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | Springing | 270,493 | 0 | Springing | 1,081,972 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 8,475 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45,480 | 2,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 7,201 | 0 | 400,000 | 36,007 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 30,163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 2,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | Springing | 65,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 16,486 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 16,525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 16,295 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 1,350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 13,758 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 2,228 | 0 | 0 | Springing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 553 | 0 | 250,000 | Springing | 250,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 4,804 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Monthly Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($) | Replacement Reserve Caps ($) | Upfront TI/LC Reserve ($) | Monthly TI/LC Reserve ($) | TI/LC Caps ($) | Upfront Debt Service Reserve ($) | Monthly Debt Service Reserve ($) | Debt Service Reserve Cap ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 7,734 | 464,040 | 2,779,031 | 46,403 | 3,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 271 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 692 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 514 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Upfront Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($) | Upfront Other Reserve ($) | Monthly Other Reserve ($) | Other Reserve Description |
| | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 0 | 12,477,527 | 0 | Rollover Reserve ($11,720,606), Gap Rent Reserve ($756,921) |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 3,580,309 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 143,750 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 0 | 5,312,913 | 0 | Outstanding TI/LC Reserve ($5,150,813), Free Rent Reserve ($135,735), Landlord Work Reserve ($26,365) |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 75,000 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 52,210 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 11,000 | 42,000 | 0 | Radon Testing Reserve |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 0 | 59,125 | 0 | Free Rent Reserve |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 123,954 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 146,188 | 342,000 | 0 | K.S. Architect Ic. Gap Rent Reserve ($60,000); Hunter Convenience Shop Gap Rent Reserve ($180,000); La La Bakery Gap Rent Reserve ($102,000) |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 24,438 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 130,563 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 0 | 862,381 | 0 | Outstanding TI/LC Reserve ($567,233.09), Free Rent Reserve ($295,147.85) |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 0 | 0 | Springing | PIP Reserve |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 0 | 0 | Springing | PIP Reserve |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 0 | 0 | Springing | PIP Reserve |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 0 | 0 | Springing | PIP Reserve |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 13,063 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 0 | 0 | Springing | PIP Reserve |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 3,600 | 470,663 | 0 | Force Place Insurance Reserve ($240,540), Outstanding TI Reserve ($135,750), Monthly Ground Rent Static Reserve ($82,908), Annual Ground Rent Static Reserve ($11,465) |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 0 | 76,009 | Springing | Rent Reserve (Upfront: $44,119); Condominium Assessments Reserve (Upfront: $31,889.80); Designated Tenant Reserve (Monthly: Springing) |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0 | 1,600,000 | 0 | PIP Reserve |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Upfront Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($) | Upfront Other Reserve ($) | Monthly Other Reserve ($) | Other Reserve Description |
| | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 0 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 36,750 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 51,125 | 0 | 0 | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Other Reserve Cap ($) | Holdback/ Earnout Amount ($) | Holdback/ Earnout Description | Lockbox Type | Cash Management | Excess Cash Trap Triggered by DSCR and/or Debt Yield Test (Y/N) | Tenant Specific Excess Cash Trap Trigger (Y/N) | Pari Passu (Y/N) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | No | No | No |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 0 | 0 | NAP | Soft | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard (Commercial); Soft (Residential) | In-Place | Yes | No | No |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | In-Place | Yes | No | No |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 0 | 0 | NAP | None | None | Yes | No | No |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | No | Yes |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | No | No |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | No | No | No |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | No |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Other Reserve Cap ($) | Holdback/ Earnout Amount ($) | Holdback/ Earnout Description | Lockbox Type | Cash Management | Excess Cash Trap Triggered by DSCR and/or Debt Yield Test (Y/N) | Tenant Specific Excess Cash Trap Trigger (Y/N) | Pari Passu (Y/N) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 0 | 0 | NAP | Hard | Springing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | 0 | 0 | NAP | Springing | Springing | Yes | No | No |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Pari Passu in Trust Controlling (Y/N) | Trust Pari Passu Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) | Total Trust and Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) | Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Subordinate Companion Loan Interest Rate | Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Whole Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | Yes | 89,000,000 | 166,000,000 | 981,642.15 | 1,507,944.27 | NAP | NAP | 255,000,000 | 1,507,944.27 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | No | 25,000,000 | 195,000,000 | 1,273,333.08 | 1,436,580.91 | NAP | NAP | 220,000,000 | 1,436,580.91 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | Yes | 23,200,000 | 38,800,000 | 230,788.15 | 368,785.19 | NAP | NAP | 62,000,000 | 368,785.19 |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Pari Passu in Trust Controlling (Y/N) | Trust Pari Passu Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) | Total Trust and Non-Trust Pari Passu Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) | Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Subordinate Companion Loan Interest Rate | Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Whole Loan Monthly Debt Service ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | No | 5,000,000 | 80,000,000 | 327,148.15 | 347,594.91 | NAP | NAP | 85,000,000 | 347,594.91 |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Whole Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) | Whole Loan Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) | Mezzanine Debt Cut-off Date Balance($) | Mezzanine Debt Interest Rate (%) | Total Debt Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Total Debt Monthly Debt Service ($) | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | Total Debt Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) | Total Debt Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) |
| | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | 4 | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 42.1% | 2.30 | 16.8% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | 9,200,000 | 9.00000% | 42,200,000 | 237,250.00 | 77.1% | 1.08 | 7.3% |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 56.0% | 1.72 | 13.7% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | 42.2% | 1.95 | 15.0% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Whole Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) | Whole Loan Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) | Mezzanine Debt Cut-off Date Balance($) | Mezzanine Debt Interest Rate (%) | Total Debt Cut-off Date Balance ($) | Total Debt Monthly Debt Service ($) | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%) | Total Debt Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) | Total Debt Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%) |
| | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | 4 | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | 67.6% | 2.03 | 10.2% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Future Additional Debt Permitted (Y/N) | Future Debt Permitted Type | Sponsor |
| | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | No | NAP | GGP/Homart II L.L.C., Brookfield Properties Retail Holding LLC and New York State Common Retirement Fund |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | No | NAP | Barbi Benton Gradow |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | No | NAP | Olymbec USA LLC and Olymbec Investments Inc. |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | No | NAP | Joseph Matthew Cassin, Jr. and David Taylor |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | No | NAP | Benjamin London, Michael Palin, Jerome Sachs, Arlene Sachs, Michael Sachs, Meryl Kantro, Francine Silver and Marlene Siegel |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | No | NAP | Oasis Global Partners |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | No | NAP | David B. Gardner |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | No | NAP | Paul G. Joynt, Jeffrey L. Aiello, Lori A. Aiello Family Trust and Laurie R. Gerardi Family Trust |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | No | NAP | David Brecher, Jonathan Krasner and Gregory Olbrys |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | No | NAP | Matthew Pestronk and Michael Pestronk |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | No | NAP | Son Dinh Tran |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | No | NAP | Angela Tsionas and Georgia Halakos |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | No | NAP | Samantha Wells and David Iglewicz |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | No | NAP | Brookfield Properties Retail Holding LLC and SMRF Baybrook Investor Member LLC |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | No | NAP | Moshe Wechsler |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | No | NAP | ICP & IRG |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | No | NAP | Blake R. Berg and Samuel H. Heide |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | No | NAP | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | No | NAP | Steven Green |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | No | NAP | Harshad Dharod |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | No | NAP | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | No | NAP | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | No | NAP | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | No | NAP | Samuel Brach |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | No | NAP | Nikhil Patel, Amar Patel and Sudhir D. Patel |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | No | NAP | HRI Properties, LLC |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | No | NAP | Joshua Goldberg |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | No | NAP | Munira Kapadia and Faysal Kapadia |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Future Additional Debt Permitted (Y/N) | Future Debt Permitted Type | Sponsor |
| | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | No | NAP | David Pollin, Robert Buccini and Christopher Buccini |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | No | NAP | Jacob Schwimmer |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | No | NAP | Lawrence Charles Kaplan, George Thacker, Peter J. Veltri and Richard Schontz |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | No | NAP | Lawrence Charles Kaplan, George Thacker, Peter J. Veltri and Richard Schontz |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Non-Recourse Carveout Guarantor | Delaware Statutory Trust (Y/N) | Tenants-in-common (Y/N) |
| | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | GGP/Homart II L.L.C. | No | No |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | Barbi Benton Gradow | No | No |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Olymbec USA LLC and Olymbec Investments Inc. | No | No |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | Joseph Matthew Cassin, Jr. and David Taylor | No | No |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Benjamin London, Michael Palin, Jerome Sachs, Arlene Sachs, Michael Sachs, Meryl Kantro, Francine Silver and Marlene Siegel | No | No |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | Eric Chen | No | No |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | David B. Gardner | No | No |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | Paul G. Joynt, Jeffrey L. Aiello, Lori A. Aiello Family Trust and Laurie R. Gerardi Family Trust | No | No |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | David Brecher and Jonathan Krasner | No | No |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | Matthew Pestronk and Michael Pestronk | No | No |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Son Dinh Tran | No | No |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | Angela Tsionas and Georgia Halakos | No | No |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | Samantha Wells and David Iglewicz | No | Yes |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | BPR Nimbus LLC | No | No |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | Moshe Wechsler | No | No |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | Stuart Lichter, Christopher Semarjian and John A. Mase. | No | Yes |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | WPCM Relative Value Fund II, LLC | No | No |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel | No | No |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | Steven Green | No | No |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | Harshad Dharod | No | No |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel | No | No |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel | No | No |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | Nikhil Patel and Amar Patel | No | No |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | Samuel Brach | No | No |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | Nikhil Patel, Amar Patel and Sudhir D. Patel | No | No |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | HRI Properties, LLC | No | No |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | Joshua Goldberg and Jeffrey Gault | No | Yes |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | Munira Kapadia and Faysal Kapadia | No | No |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Non-Recourse Carveout Guarantor | Delaware Statutory Trust (Y/N) | Tenants-in-common (Y/N) |
| | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | David Pollin, Robert Buccini and Christopher Buccini | No | No |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | Jacob Schwimmer | No | No |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | Lawrence Charles Kaplan, George Thacker, Peter J. Veltri and Richard Schontz | No | No |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | Lawrence Charles Kaplan, George Thacker, Peter J. Veltri and Richard Schontz | No | No |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Loan Purpose | Property Located Within a Qualified Opportunity Zone (Y/N) | Sources: Loan Amount ($) | Sources: Principal's New Cash Contribution ($) | Sources: Subordinate Debt ($) | Sources: Other Sources ($) | Sources: Total Sources ($) | Uses: Loan Payoff ($) | Uses: Purchase Price ($) |
| | | | | | 7 | | 8 | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | Refinance | No | 255,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255,000,000 | 242,815,054 | 0 |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | Refinance | | 85,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85,000,000 | 53,640,491 | 0 |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | No | | | | | | | |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | No | | | | | | | |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | No | | | | | | | |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | No | | | | | | | |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | No | | | | | | | |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | No | | | | | | | |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | No | | | | | | | |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | No | | | | | | | |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | No | | | | | | | |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | No | | | | | | | |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | No | | | | | | | |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | No | | | | | | | |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Refinance | | 75,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75,000,000 | 45,686,099 | 0 |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | No | | | | | | | |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | No | | | | | | | |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | No | | | | | | | |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | No | | | | | | | |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | No | | | | | | | |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | Refinance | No | 57,000,000 | 5,430,563 | 0 | 0 | 62,430,563 | 53,869,227 | 0 |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Refinance | | 50,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50,500,000 | 44,294,231 | 0 |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | No | | | | | | | |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | No | | | | | | | |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | Refinance | No | 45,000,000 | 4,050,286 | 0 | 0 | 49,050,286 | 45,110,009 | 0 |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Refinance | | 44,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44,500,000 | 33,994,962 | 0 |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | No | | | | | | | |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | No | | | | | | | |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | Refinance | No | 43,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43,000,000 | 39,780,055 | 0 |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | Refinance | No | 33,000,000 | 6,226,810 | 0 | 0 | 39,226,810 | 36,077,078 | 0 |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | Refinance | No | 33,000,000 | 1,255,517 | 9,200,000 | 0 | 43,455,517 | 39,138,991 | 0 |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Refinance | | 30,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30,000,000 | 23,988,593 | 0 |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | No | | | | | | | |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | No | | | | | | | |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | No | | | | | | | |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | No | | | | | | | |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | No | | | | | | | |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | No | | | | | | | |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | No | | | | | | | |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | No | | | | | | | |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | Refinance | No | 28,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28,500,000 | 18,369,920 | 0 |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | Acquisition | No | 25,350,000 | 15,202,517 | 0 | 0 | 40,552,517 | 0 | 39,000,000 |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | Refinance | No | 220,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220,000,000 | 213,488,234 | 0 |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | Refinance | No | 25,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,000,000 | 21,888,606 | 0 |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | Acquisition | No | | | | | | | |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | Acquisition | No | | | | | | | |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Loan Purpose | Property Located Within a Qualified Opportunity Zone (Y/N) | Sources: Loan Amount ($) | Sources: Principal's New Cash Contribution ($) | Sources: Subordinate Debt ($) | Sources: Other Sources ($) | Sources: Total Sources ($) | Uses: Loan Payoff ($) | Uses: Purchase Price ($) |
| | | | | | 7 | | 8 | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | Refinance | No | | | | | | | |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | Acquisition | | | | | | | | |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | No | | | | | | | |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | No | | | | | | | |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | Acquisition | No | | | | | | | |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Uses: Closing Costs ($) | Uses: Reserves ($) | Uses: Principal Equity Distribution ($) | Uses: Other Uses ($) | Uses: Total Uses ($) | Franchise Agreement Expiration | Underwritten ADR ($) | Underwritten RevPAR ($) | Underwritten Hotel Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | 811,504 | 10,449,929 | 923,513 | 0 | 255,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | 8,188,131 | 3,942,594 | 19,228,783 | 0 | 85,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 2,075,252 | 2,855,895 | 24,382,755 | 0 | 75,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | 623,309 | 7,938,027 | 0 | 0 | 62,430,563 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | 2,297,500 | 572,888 | 3,335,382 | 0 | 50,500,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | 3,160,785 | 779,493 | 0 | 0 | 49,050,286 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | 2,068,185 | 123,676 | 8,313,177 | 0 | 44,500,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | 1,322,701 | 1,882,339 | 14,906 | 0 | 43,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | 2,336,774 | 812,957 | 0 | 0 | 39,226,810 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | 4,080,568 | 235,958 | 0 | 0 | 43,455,517 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | 932,734 | 682,631 | 4,396,042 | 0 | 30,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | 339,643 | 1,404,163 | 8,386,275 | 0 | 28,500,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | 1,375,678 | 176,839 | 0 | 0 | 40,552,517 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | 1,474,030 | 0 | 5,037,736 | 0 | 220,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | 1,790,369 | 335,594 | 985,431 | 0 | 25,000,000 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | | | | | | 5/31/2038 | 136.71 | 108.02 | 79.0% |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | | | | | | 5/31/2038 | 140.20 | 106.53 | 76.0% |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | | | | | | 11/19/2045 | 142.40 | 113.34 | 79.6% |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | | | | | | 1/31/2039 | 142.53 | 115.12 | 80.8% |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | | | | | | 5/31/2038 | 144.65 | 116.01 | 80.2% |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | | | | | | 6/30/2039 | 114.51 | 78.36 | 68.4% |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Uses: Closing Costs ($) | Uses: Reserves ($) | Uses: Principal Equity Distribution ($) | Uses: Other Uses ($) | Uses: Total Uses ($) | Franchise Agreement Expiration | Underwritten ADR ($) | Underwritten RevPAR ($) | Underwritten Hotel Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | | | | | | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Most Recent ADR ($) | Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) | Second Most Recent ADR ($) | Second Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Second Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) | Third Most Recent ADR ($) | Third Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Third Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | Loan | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 | 1 | Stonebriar Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2 | Loan | 15, 16, 17, 18 | 29 | Churchill Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.01 | Property | | 1 | Rapid City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.02 | Property | | 1 | Durango Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.03 | Property | | 1 | Canby Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.04 | Property | | 1 | Savannah Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.05 | Property | | 1 | Douglasville Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.06 | Property | | 1 | Saint Marys Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.07 | Property | | 1 | San Marcos Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.08 | Property | | 1 | Rock Springs Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.09 | Property | | 1 | Oxford Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.10 | Property | | 1 | Detroit | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.11 | Property | | 1 | Alpine Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.12 | Property | | 1 | Dickson Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.13 | Property | | 1 | Baytown | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.14 | Property | | 1 | Mora Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.15 | Property | | 1 | Beaumont | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.16 | Property | | 1 | Waveland | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.17 | Property | | 1 | Montgomery Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.18 | Property | | 1 | Hwy 49 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.19 | Property | | 1 | San Juan | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.20 | Property | | 1 | Sioux City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.21 | Property | | 1 | Iowa City Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.22 | Property | | 1 | Pass Rd. | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.23 | Property | | 1 | Willmar West Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.24 | Property | | 1 | Semmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.25 | Property | | 1 | Eagle Lake Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.26 | Property | | 1 | Memphis | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.27 | Property | | 1 | Evansville | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.28 | Property | | 1 | Old Town Regency | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
2.29 | Property | | 1 | Gautier | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3 | Loan | 19, 20, 21 | 5 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.01 | Property | | 1 | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.02 | Property | | 1 | Space Centre Industrial Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.03 | Property | | 1 | 8800 Rostin Road | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.04 | Property | | 1 | Southaven Industrial Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
3.05 | Property | | 1 | Keystone Office Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
4 | Loan | 22, 23, 24 | 1 | Quantico Corporate Center | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5 | Loan | 25 | 2 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.01 | Property | | 1 | 155 East 55th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
5.02 | Property | | 1 | 210 East 58th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
6 | Loan | 26, 27, 28, 29 | 1 | Oasis Plaza | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7 | Loan | 30, 31 | 2 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.01 | Property | | 1 | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
7.02 | Property | | 1 | The Hills at Lehigh Valley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
8 | Loan | | 1 | Towne Center at Webster | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
9 | Loan | 32, 33 | 1 | 48 West | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
10 | Loan | 34, 35, 36 | 1 | Liberties Walk | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11 | Loan | 37, 38, 39, 40 | 8 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.01 | Property | | 1 | 151-165 East Burnside Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.02 | Property | | 1 | 670 9th Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.03 | Property | | 1 | 73 2nd Avenue | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.04 | Property | | 1 | 425 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.05 | Property | | 1 | 228 East 51st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.06 | Property | | 1 | 543 East 6th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.07 | Property | | 1 | 49 West 71st Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
11.08 | Property | | 1 | 289 East 149th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
12 | Loan | 41, 42 | 1 | The Plaza at Milford | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
13 | Loan | | 1 | Viera at Whitemarsh | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
14 | Loan | 9, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 | 1 | Baybrook Mall | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
15 | Loan | | 1 | Union Point Apartments | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
16 | Loan | 9, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | 1 | Columbus Business Park | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
17 | Loan | | 1 | Eastern Shore Centre | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
18 | Loan | 54, 55 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites and Tru by Hilton Charlotte Airport Lake Pointe | 136.71 | 108.02 | 79.0% | 134.19 | 105.83 | 78.9% | 133.89 | 96.03 | 71.7% |
19 | Loan | 56, 57 | 1 | Centric on 34th | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
20 | Loan | 58 | 1 | Villas at Helen of Troy | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
21 | Loan | 59 | 1 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | 140.20 | 106.53 | 76.0% | 141.09 | 105.45 | 74.7% | 140.77 | 100.53 | 71.4% |
22 | Loan | 60 | 1 | SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | 142.40 | 113.34 | 79.6% | 142.94 | 112.25 | 78.5% | 140.64 | 105.38 | 74.9% |
23 | Loan | 61 | 1 | Hampton Inn & Suites Lexington Columbia | 142.53 | 115.12 | 80.8% | 142.03 | 115.62 | 81.4% | 131.75 | 103.27 | 78.4% |
24 | Loan | 62, 63 | 1 | 22 North 15th Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
25 | Loan | 64 | 1 | Tru By Hilton Orangeburg | 144.65 | 116.01 | 80.2% | 145.15 | 120.19 | 82.8% | 130.23 | 101.80 | 78.2% |
26 | Loan | 65, 66 | 1 | DH Holmes | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
27 | Loan | 67, 68, 69 | 1 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
28 | Loan | 70 | 1 | Hampton Inn Atlanta-Fairburn | 114.51 | 78.36 | 68.4% | 113.24 | 79.24 | 70.0% | 105.52 | 70.61 | 70.0% |
Benchmark 2024-V9 Annex A-1
Loan ID Number | Loan / Property Flag | Footnotes (for Loan and Property Information) | # of Properties | Property Name | Most Recent ADR ($) | Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) | Second Most Recent ADR ($) | Second Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Second Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) | Third Most Recent ADR ($) | Third Most Recent RevPAR ($) | Third Most Recent Hotel Occupancy (%) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
29 | Loan | 9, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 | 1 | 500 Delaware | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
30 | Loan | | 1 | 287-289 Maple Street | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31 | Loan | 77, 78 | 2 | Essential Storage Portfolio | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.01 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Vandercook | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
31.02 | Property | | 1 | Essential Storage Shirley | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
32 | Loan | | 1 | Telegraph Budget Storage | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Footnotes to Annex A-1 |
| |
(1) | The Administrative Fee Rate % includes the Servicing Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate applicable to each Mortgage Loan. |
| |
(2) | The Monthly Debt Service (P&I) and Annual Debt Service (P&I) ($) shown for Mortgage Loans with a partial interest-only period reflects the amount payable after the expiration of the interest-only period. |
| |
(3) | The open period is inclusive of the Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date. |
| |
(4) | Underwritten NOI DSCR (x), Underwritten NCF DSCR (x), Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) and Total Debt Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) is calculated based on amortizing debt service payments (except for interest-only loans). |
| |
(5) | Leased Occupancy (%) reflects tenants that have signed leases, but are not yet in occupancy or may not be paying rent. |
| |
(6) | The lease expirations shown are based on full lease terms; however, in some instances, the tenant may have the option to terminate its lease prior to the expiration date shown. In addition, in some instances, a tenant may have the right to assign its lease or sublease the leased premises and be released from its obligations under the lease. |
| |
(7) | Property Located Within a Qualified Opportunity Zone (Y/N) reflects Mortgaged Properties that are located in qualified opportunity zones ("QOZs") under Internal Revenue Code § 1400Z-2 - Notice 2018-48 and Notice 2019-42. According to the Internal Revenue Service, (1) a QOZ is an economically distressed community where new investments, under certain conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax treatment, and (2) localities qualify as QOZs if they have been nominated for that designation by a state, the District of Columbia, or a U.S. territory and that nomination has been certified by the Secretary of the Treasury via his delegation of authority to the Internal Revenue Service. No representation is made as to whether any Mortgaged Properties located in QOZs or the related borrowers are eligible for such preferential tax treatment or whether any qualifying investment has been made in a QOZ. |
| |
(8) | If the purpose of the Mortgage Loan was to finance an acquisition of the Mortgaged Property, the field "Sources: Principal's New Cash Contribution ($)" reflects the cash investment by one or more of the equity owners in the borrower in connection with such acquisition. If the purpose of the Mortgage Loan was to refinance the Mortgaged Property, the field "Sources: Principal's New Cash Contribution ($)" reflects the cash contributed to the borrower by one or more of the equity owners at the time the Mortgage Loan was originated. |
| |
(9) | The Mortgage Loan is part of a whole loan structure. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%), LTV Ratio at Maturity / ARD (%), Underwritten NOI DSCR (x), Underwritten NCF DSCR (x), Underwritten NOI Debt Yield (%), Underwritten NCF Debt Yield (%) and Loan Per Unit ($) calculations are based on the Mortgage Loan and any related Pari Passu Companion Loans, if applicable, but exclude any related Subordinate Companion Loans. |
| |
(10) | Defeasance of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is permitted at any time after the earlier of (i) July 1, 2027 and (ii) two years from the closing date of the securitization that includes the last pari passu note of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan to be securitized. The assumed lockout period of 25 payments is based on the expected Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization closing date in August 2024. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
| |
(11) | Other Reserves consist of an Upfront Rollover Reserve ($11,720,606) and an Upfront Gap Rent Reserve ($756,921). The borrowers funded $10,449,929 into such reserves at origination, with the remaining $2,027,598 being guaranteed by the borrower sponsors. |
| |
(12) | During the continuance of a reserve trigger period or cash management period, the borrower is required to deposit $18,281.33 each month as the replacement reserve monthly deposit, which monthly deposit will be suspended during any period when the amount on deposit equals or exceeds $438,752.00. |
| |
(13) | The borrower is required to deposit $91,406.67 each month as the rollover reserve monthly deposit, which monthly deposit will be suspended during any period when the amount on deposit equals or exceeds $2,193,760.00. During the continuance of a reserve trigger period or cash management period, if sufficient funds are available pursuant to the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan cash management agreement, then no actual rollover reserve monthly deposit will be required. |
| |
(14) | If an anchor trigger event has occurred with respect to any single anchor tenant, the borrower is required to make a monthly deposit an amount equal to all initial excess cash flow with respect to any particular interest period, which monthly deposit will be suspended to the extent the Individual Anchor Threshold Amount, which is an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) $50 by (y) the aggregate amount of gross leasable square footage of the applicable Anchor Parcel, has been deposited for any such anchor tenant trigger event then continuing. |
| |
(15) | The Churchill Portfolio is a 29-property portfolio consisting of 18 manufactured housing Mortgaged Properties with 2,605 pads representing 80.5% of Net Operating Income and 11 self storage Mortgaged Properties with 4,649 Units equating to 798,392 SF representing 19.5% of Net Operating Income. |
| |
(16) | Approximately 242 of the 2,605 manufactured housing pads at the Churchill Portfolio Properties are occupied by manufactured homes (the “Owned Mobile Homes”) that are owned by an affiliate of the borrower (the “Churchill Master Tenant”). The borrower leases the pads occupied by the Owned Mobile Homes to the Churchill Master Tenant under a master lease (the “Churchill Master Lease”) and the Churchill Master Tenant leases the Owned Mobile Homes to the occupants of such Owned Mobile Homes. The Churchill Master Lease provides that it is in place until the indefeasible payment in full of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the Churchill Master Lease the Churchill Master Tenant pays the borrower (i) $578 per month for each pad on which an Owned Mobile Home is located and (ii) all income actually received by the Churchill Master Tenant from the Owned Mobile Homes. Pursuant to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the Churchill Master Tenant is permitted to acquire new mobile home units provided that (i) such Owned Mobile Homes do not exceed 25% of all mobile homes on the Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties (in the aggregate) and (ii) such additional Owned Mobile Homes are at all times located on pads that are subject to the Churchill Master Lease. The Churchill Master Tenant may sell Owned Mobile Homes to a third party resident meeting the borrower’s resident leasing criteria who enters into a pad lease with the borrower at its then market rental rate (in which case such mobile home will no longer be subject to the Churchill Master Lease). Underwritten Income from the Churchill Master Lease with respect to pad rent constitutes approximately 10.7% of underwritten base rent and approximately 10.1% of underwritten Effective Gross Income, and income from the Churchill Master Lease with respect to the rental of Owned Mobile Homes constitutes approximately 3.4% of underwritten Effective Gross Income. |
| |
(17) | The borrower is permitted to obtain the release of any of the individual Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties upon satisfaction of the following conditions, among others: (i) the defeasance of a release amount equal to the greater of 110% of the allocated loan amount with respect to the individual Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Property being released, or 100% of the applicable net sales proceeds of such individual Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Property, (ii) after the release, the debt service coverage ratio with respect to the remaining Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties is greater than the greater of (1) the debt service coverage ratio of all Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties immediately prior to the release and (2) 1.85x, (iii) after the release, the debt yield with respect to the remaining Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties is greater than the greater of (1) the debt yield of all Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Properties immediately prior to the release and (2) 10.54%, and (iv) conditions related to REMIC compliance. |
| |
(18) | The individual Churchill Portfolio Mortgaged Property known as Canby Regency is a manufactured housing property as to which the manufactured homes are located on land owned in fee by the borrower. However, a portion of the Canby Regency Mortgaged Property, which is used for a water well and pump infrastructure that provides water to the manufactured housing community, is a ground leasehold interest under a ground lease that expires on December 31, 2033. The ground lease provides for annual ground rent of approximately $22,924 and increases annually by 5% on January 1 of each year. |
| |
(19) | The Largest Tenant of the Space Centre Industrial Park Mortgaged Property, Nickey Warehouse, Inc. has multiple leases with 260,340 SF expiring August 31, 2025 and 450,841 SF expiring May 31, 2025. |
| |
(20) | At origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, a master lease agreement was executed by the guarantors, as tenant, and the borrowers, as landlord, pursuant to which the guarantors will be obligated to pay rent in the amount due the tenants Transform Distribution Center Holdco LLC, Nickey Warehouses, Inc. and Terex Corporation as set forth in a schedule to such master lease (in each case to the extent that such tenant is not in fact paying and/or performing such obligations, and throughout the term of such master lease (which ends five years after the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan), regardless of whether the related underlying lease has expired or terminated). |
| |
(21) | The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio is comprised of four industrial properties totaling 2,861,286 SF and an office property totaling 115,742 SF. |
| |
(22) | The Largest Tenant, ManTech, has 80,433 square feet of space expiring on October 31, 2026, 42,762 square feet of space expiring on December 31, 2027, 20,510 square feet of space expiring on April 30, 2029 and 34,758 square feet of space expiring on August 31, 2029. |
| |
(23) | The Fourth Largest Tenant, NAVFAC, has 19,998 square feet of space expiring on September 23, 2029 and 3,440 square feet of space expiring on March 31, 2027. |
| |
(24) | The Largest Tenant, ManTech, has a right to terminate the 1000-2023 lease with respect to the 1000-2023 expansion premises effective June 30, 2026, subject to, among other things, (i) delivery of a written notice to the landlord on or before September 30, 2025, (ii) delivery of a written affidavit from an authorized representative of ManTech certifying that the government contract serviced by ManTech from the 1000-2023 expansion premises has terminated or will terminate prior to June 30, 2026, and (iii) a payment of termination fee equal to (a) $293,531.31 plus (b) the unamortized amount, as of June 30, 2026, of the sum of: (x) the amount of the 1000-2023 allowance, and (y) the amount of the commissions paid by landlord in connection with the amendment as of March 22, 2024, plus (c) interest accruing on such unamortized amounts at the rate of 9% per annum from January 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. |
| |
(25) | The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan is secured by (i) the 155 East 55th Street Mortgaged Property, which is comprised of 51 multifamily units, 66,507 SF of office space, 10,563 SF of retail space, and a 42-space parking garage and (ii) the 210 East 58th Street Mortgaged Property, which is comprised of 95 multifamily units and two ground floor retail spaces totaling 6,560 SF. |
| |
(26) | The Mortgaged Property has 335,957 square feet of office and retail space and 94,199 square feet of self-storage space. |
| |
(27) | The borrower is required to deposit $13,998 each month into the rollover reserve account if the amount on deposit in such reserve is less than $250,000. |
| |
(28) | The Third Largest Tenant, Al Bravo Films, LLC, has 10,982 square feet of space expiring on August 1, 2026, 4,390 square feet of space expiring on November 30, 2025 and 1,490 square feet of space expiring on January 31, 2026. |
| |
(29) | The Fifth Largest Tenant, Alternative Plan, Inc., has 3,893 square feet of space expiring on August 31, 2025, 3,250 square feet of space expiring on April 30, 2025, and 3,210 square feet of space expiring on December 31, 2024. |
| |
(30) | The Mortgaged Properties are located in radon zone 1. A first round of testing identified elevated levels of radon in 17 units at The Meadows at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property with levels ranging from 4.1 pico curies per liter of air (pCi/L) to 12.3 pCi/L, and in four units at The Hills at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property with levels ranging from 4.1 pCi/L to 5.3 pCi/L. In addition, the third floor units at The Hills at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property were not tested for radon levels (together with the units with elevated radon levels, the “Radon Affected Units”). $42,000 was reserved at origination for the potential remediation of the Radon Affected Units. On and after December 6, 2024, the borrower has the right to request $2,000 per Radon Affected Unit from such reserve either (i) if the Radon Affected Unit tested or retested at radon levels at or above 4.0 pCi/L, to be used for remediation of such unit, or (ii) if the Radon Affected Unit tested or retested at radon levels below 4.0 pCi/L, to be released to the borrower, in each case upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including (x) provision of satisfactory evidence to the lender that the Radon Affected Unit was tested or retested by an environmental engineer reasonably acceptable to the lender, and (y) if the Radon Affected Unit tested at or above 4.0 pCi/L, an officer’s certificate of the borrower, certifying among other things that such disbursement has been used for radon remediation. |
| |
(31) | The borrower may obtain the release of either of the two individual Mortgaged Properties upon defeasance of an amount equal to the greater of (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount of the Mortgaged Property being released and (y) 100% of the net sales proceeds of the Mortgaged Property being released, among other conditions, as described in the Prospectus under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Partial Releases". |
| |
(32) | The 48 West Mortgaged Property is comprised of 262 multifamily units (of which 100% are leased to students) and 3,801 SF of retail space, which includes three ground floor retail tenants including a restaurant, a coffee/smoothie shop, and a convenience store. |
| |
(33) | Grand Valley State University executed an 11.5 month master lease for an occupancy date commencing on August 20, 2024 and expiring on July 31, 2025. The tenant occupies 198 beds (52 units) at the Mortgaged Property for the total sum of $1,597,248 to be paid in ten equal monthly payments of $159,724.80. |
| |
(34) | On any business day that is later than 60 days following the closing date, the Mortgage Loan documents permit the borrowers to obtain the release of certain parcels of real property identified in the Mortgage Loan documents (which parcels collectively represent the entire Mortgaged Property) (each, a “Release Property”) in connection with a sale to a bona fide third-party or an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor pursuant to an arm’s-length agreement provided that, among other conditions, (i) the borrowers deliver evidence to the lender that simultaneously with any prepayment required under the Mortgage Loan, the related mezzanine borrower is making any prepayment required under the related mezzanine loan, (ii) the borrowers prepay the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to (x) in the event of a sale of such Release Property to a third party not affiliated with the borrowers or guarantor, the greater of (1) the applicable pro-rata share of 95% of the gross sales proceeds for such Release Property (e.g., assuming a mortgage loan of $80 and an outstanding principal balance of both the mortgage loan and the related mezzanine loan of $100, the pro rata share for the mortgage loan will be 80%) and (2)(a) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released and (b) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property to be released after the first release of a Release Property, and (y) in the event the sale of such Release Property is to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, (1) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released, and (2) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property after the first Release Property to be released to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, in each of the foregoing instances, together with any applicable yield maintenance premium, (iii) after giving effect to such sale and prepayment, (1) the combined debt service coverage ratio (based on both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan, as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) for all of the remaining Mortgaged Property is no less than the greater of (x) the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the related mezzanine loan has occurred) and (y) the combined debt service coverage ratio (on both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan, as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) as of the origination date, and (2) the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property is no greater than the lesser of (x) the combined loan-to-value ratio (based on the then aggregate outstanding balance of the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan) immediately preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the mezzanine loan has occurred) and (y) the loan-to-value ratio (based on then aggregate outstanding principal balance of both the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan) as of the origination date, provided that in each instance, the borrowers may prepay the Mortgage Loan (and the mezzanine borrower may prepay the related mezzanine loan) by an amount equal to the pro rata share applicable to the Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of the mezzanine borrower, the related mezzanine loan) in an amount sufficient to satisfy the foregoing debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value requirements, and (iv) the borrowers satisfy customary REMIC requirements. |
| |
(35) | Concurrently with the funding of the Mortgage Loan, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC funded a mezzanine loan in the amount of $9.2 million (the "Mezzanine Loan”). The Mezzanine Loan is secured by the direct equity interests in the borrowers. The Mezzanine Loan is coterminous with the Mortgage Loan and accrues interest at a rate of 9.00000% in the first year, 10.00000% in the second year and 11.00000% for the remaining three years. Based on the Mortgage Loan and the Mezzanine Loan, the cumulative Cut-off Date loan-to-value ratio is 77.1%, the cumulative UW NCF debt service coverage ratio is 1.08x and the cumulative UW NCF debt yield is 7.3%. The rights of the mezzanine lender under the Mezzanine Loan are further described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Mezzanine Indebtedness” in the Prospectus. |
| |
(36) | The Liberties Walk Mortgaged Property is comprised of 88 multifamily units and 29,108 SF of retail space. |
| |
(37) | The Largest Tenant of the 289 East 149th Street Mortgaged Property, Expo Beauty Supply, occupies floors 2-4 of the building (5,400 SF) and subleases its space to 10 subtenants. |
| |
(38) | The ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio Mortgage Loan is comprised of eight properties including two multifamily assets, one retail asset, and five mixed-use assets located throughout New York City. The Mortgaged Properties include 55 residential units (37,955 SF) which are 98.2% occupied and 17 commercial units (31,250 SF) which are 98.7% occupied. The multifamily component comprises 56.9% of portfolio Effective Gross Income and the commercial component comprises 43.1% of portfolio Effective Gross Income. |
| |
(39) | Historical cash flows are unavailable as the borrower sponsor acquired three of the Mortgaged Properties in 2023. Due to acquisition timing, the consolidated portfolio cash flow presented for all mortgaged properties includes the trailing nine months ending 4/30/24, annualized. |
| |
(40) | The increase in Underwritten NOI of more than 10% over Most Recent NOI can be attributed to the borrower renovating six of the mortgaged properties in 2023 and subsequently leasing up the multifamily portion along with signing three new commercial leases in 2024. |
| |
(41) | The borrower is required to deposit $14,212.80 each month into the rollover reserve account if the amount on deposit in such reserve is less than $511,624.80. |
| |
(42) | The Third Largest Tenant, Harbor Freight Tools, has one-time right to terminate its lease as of the last day of the 60th full calendar month following the rent commencement date, subject to, among other things, (i) delivery of a written notice to the landlord on or before the 54th full calendar month following the rent commencement date and (ii) a termination payment equal to 50% of the brokerage commission paid by the landlord to the brokers. |
| |
(43) | The Mortgage Loan is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., and Societe Generale Financial Corporation. |
| |
(44) | The lockout period will be at least 24 months beginning with and including the first payment date on September 1, 2024. Defeasance of the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan in full is permitted at any time after the date that is the earlier of (i) two years from the closing date of the securitization that includes the last pari passu note to be securitized and (ii) July 19, 2027. The assumed lockout period of 24 payments is based on the expected Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization closing date in August 2024. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
| |
(45) | During a cash management period, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to one twelfth of $0.25 per owned leasable square foot at the Mortgaged Property (initially $11,270.54) each month as the replacement reserve monthly deposit, subject to a cap of $270,493. |
| |
(46) | During a cash management period, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to one twelfth of $1.00 per owned leasable square foot at the Mortgaged Property (initially $45,082.17) each month as the rollover reserve monthly deposit, subject to a cap of $1,081,972. |
| |
(47) | The Third Largest Tenant, Foot Locker, has 13,936 square feet of space expiring on April 30, 2032 and 4,440 square feet of space expiring on May 31, 2027. |
| |
(48) | The Mortgage Loan is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC. |
| |
(49) | The borrowers own the related Mortgaged Property as tenants-in-common. |
| |
(50) | The lockout period will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date on June 5, 2024. Defeasance of the Columbus Business Park Whole Loan is permitted at any time after the earlier to occur of (a) the end of the two-year period commencing on the closing date of the securitization of the last promissory note representing a portion of the Columbus Business Park Whole Loan to be securitized and (b) April 19, 2027. The assumed defeasance lockout period of 27 payments is based on the expected Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization closing date in August 2024. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
| |
(51) | According to the related appraisal, the second floor of the Mortgaged Property, which contains approximately 1,546,217 SF, is typically only usable by tenants occupying the first floor with an access ramp connecting the two floors, but is otherwise considered unleasable to standalone tenants because of limited access to the interior ramps and freight elevators and no direct truck dock access. The related appraisal report indicates that the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, Ford Motor Company, which currently leases approximately 909,287 SF on the first floor of the Mortgaged Property, representing approximately 41.6% of the net rentable area, has an unsigned letter of intent to lease approximately 198,946 SF on the second floor of the Mortgaged Property, which is underwritten as vacant rentable area and would represent approximately 9.1% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property. The remaining 1,347,271 SF of space on the second floor was not included in the underwritten net rentable area. |
| |
(52) | The Third Largest Tenant, US 1 Logistics, has a one-time termination option as of July 31, 2025. The lease expires on July 31, 2027. |
| |
(53) | The Upfront Other Reserve ($) consists of approximately $862,381, of which approximately $567,233 is allocated for TI/LC and approximately $295,148 for free rent. |
| |
(54) | The Monthly Other Reserve ($) includes a springing PIP reserve. Once a PIP is imposed by the franchisor pursuant to the franchise agreement, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to 110% of the sum required to pay for such PIP into the PIP reserve account on the date that is the earlier to occur of (i) 30 days from the date of finalization of the PIP and (ii) 60 days after receipt of notice from the franchisor with respect to such PIP work. |
| |
(55) | Historical financials prior to 2022 are not available as the seller did not provide historical financials. |
| |
(56) | Historical cash flows are not available as the borrower acquired the Mortgaged Property in March of 2022 and did not begin lease-up until March 2023. The Mortgaged Property was acquired as a student housing property and upon completion of the 2022/2023 school year, the borrower initiated a full-scale renovation program to reposition the Mortgaged Property as a traditional multifamily asset. |
| |
(57) | The increase in Underwritten NOI of more than 10% over Most Recent NOI is primarily attributable to the borrower's repositioning of the Mortgaged Property from student housing to multifamily in 2023 and the subsequent lease up. The increase is primarily attributable to the borrower's full-scale renovation program to reposition the Mortgaged Property as a multifamily asset. |
| |
(58) | On each payment date, if and to the extent the amount contained in the replacement reserve ($) account is less than $65,000, the borrower is required to deposit into the replacement reserve ($) account an amount equal to $1,800.00. |
| |
(59) | The Monthly Other Reserve ($) includes a springing PIP reserve. Once a PIP is imposed by the franchisor pursuant to the franchise agreement, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to 110% of the sum required to pay for such PIP into the PIP reserve account on the date that is the earlier to occur of (i) 30 days from the date of finalization of the PIP and (ii) 60 days after receipt of notice from the franchisor with respect to such PIP work. |
| |
(60) | The Monthly Other Reserve ($) includes a springing PIP reserve. Once a PIP is imposed by the franchisor pursuant to the franchise agreement, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to 110% of the sum required to pay for such PIP into the PIP reserve account on the date that is the earlier to occur of (i) 30 days from the date of finalization of the PIP and (ii) 60 days after receipt of notice from the franchisor with respect to such PIP work. |
| |
(61) | The Monthly Other Reserve ($) includes a springing PIP reserve. Once a PIP is imposed by the franchisor pursuant to the franchise agreement, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to 110% of the sum required to pay for such PIP into the PIP reserve account on the date that is the earlier to occur of (i) 30 days from the date of finalization of the PIP and (ii) 60 days after receipt of notice from the franchisor with respect to such PIP work. |
| |
(62) | The Sole Tenant, City of New York, has the right to terminate its lease at any time during the 10th, 13th and 16th lease years of the term (which commence on November 1, 2031, November 1, 2034 and November 1, 2037, respectively), in each case upon 365 days’ notice. |
| |
(63) | The Mortgaged Property includes a rooftop static billboard which is affixed to the building and leased to Heritage Outdoor Media LLC pursuant to a lease agreement that expires December 31, 2035 . The billboard lease accounts for 16.5% of the Underwritten Net Operating Income of the Mortgaged Property. The tenant is responsible for obtaining the permits for, and maintaining, the billboard at the tenant’s sole cost and expense. The tenant has certain termination options in connection with the withdrawal, revocation or termination of the permits, as well as if any of the following occur: (i) the sign location becomes entirely or partially obstructed or destroyed through the borrower’s fault, (ii) the sign location is or becomes unsafe for maintenance of the sign through no fault, act or omission of the tenant, (iii) the tenant is prevented by any future law, regulation or ordinance from constructing, installing, displaying or maintaining advertising displays on the sign, or (iv) the value of the location, for advertising purposes, is or becomes diminished for reasons such as change in traffic patterns, closure of road, or the sight line becomes entirely or partially obstructed. Additionally, if the permits fail to be issued for any reason except for the tenant’s fault, or if the permit gets revoked by the City of New York due to no fault of the tenant, the borrower is required to return a prorated portion of the $110,000 permit fee. |
| |
(64) | The Monthly Other Reserve ($) includes a springing PIP reserve. Once a PIP is imposed by the franchisor pursuant to the franchise agreement, the borrower is required to deposit an amount equal to 110% of the sum required to pay for such PIP into the PIP reserve account on the date that is the earlier to occur of (i) 30 days from the date of finalization of the PIP and (ii) 60 days after receipt of notice from the franchisor with respect to such PIP work. |
| |
(65) | The Mortgaged Property has 97 multifamily units, including 21 Section 8 units, and three ground floor retail tenants. |
| |
(66) | During an event of default or during any period commencing on the last day of a calendar quarter in which the debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.15x, the borrower is required to deposit $1,382.58 each month into the rollover reserve account. |
| |
(67) | The Mortgaged Property is a 17,919 SF ground floor retail condominium located within a 453-unit mid-rise condominium building. The Mortgaged Property represents 3.75276% of the condo association. The borrower |
| |
| owns 17 units of the total 453 units in the condominium and is entitled to one vote per unit owned, and to appoint one member of a five-member board of directors. |
| |
(68) | The borrowers are required to deposit a one-time payment of $200,000 into the Designated Tenant Reserve Account upon the occurrence of a Designated Tenant Reserve Deposit Event (as defined below).
“Designated Tenant Reserve Deposit Event” means the occurrence of either of the following: (i) October 2, 2024, if as of such date the Citibank tenant has not delivered to the borrower written notice of its intent to renew or extend its lease pursuant to the terms thereof or (ii) at any time after delivery to the borrower by the Citibank tenant of written notice of its intent to renew or extend its lease pursuant to the terms thereof, such tenant delivers to the borrower any written notification of its intention or desire to not renew or extend such lease. |
| |
(69) | The Rent Reserve for the Mortgaged Property will be released to the extent either or both of the related tenants, Corongo and Hitrade, have paid all delinquent rent and are current on their leases, or the applicable space has been retenanted. |
| |
(70) | The borrower is required to deposit into the replacement reserve each month an amount equal to one-twelfth of: (a) 2% of the projected annual gross income from operations of the Mortgaged Property as set forth in the approved annual budget during the first and second year of the term of the Mortgage Loan; and (b) 4% of the projected annual gross income from operations of the Mortgaged Property as set forth in the approved annual budget from and after the second year of the term of the Mortgage Loan, the lender may reassess and increase the replacement reserve monthly deposit in its sole discretion. The replacement reserve monthly deposit as of the first payment date is $4,803.53. |
| |
(71) | The lockout period will be at least 35 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date in June 2022. The 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan may be defeased beginning on April 7, 2025, which is the second anniversary of the startup date of the REMIC formed in connection with the REMIC declaration made on April 7, 2023. |
| |
(72) | The Fifth Largest Tenant, General Services Administration, leases 18,511 SF of space that expire in August 2024 and 7,173 SF of space that expire in June 2034. |
| |
(73) | A $262,227 credit for the $2,779,031 tenant improvement and leasing commissions escrow was underwritten on the 500 Delaware Mortgage Loan. The $2,779,031 initial deposit was placed into a reserve and disbursements can be made for tenant improvements and leasing commissions. |
| |
(74) | The borrower is required to deposit, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of an amount which would be sufficient to pay insurance premiums for the renewal of coverages; provided the monthly escrow for insurance will be waived for insurance premiums paid directly by any tenant(s) at the Mortgaged Property, so long as (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (ii) the policies maintained by the borrower covering the Mortgaged Property are part of a blanket or umbrella policy approved by the lender, including, without limitation, approval of the schedule of locations and values, (iii) the borrower provides the lender evidence of renewal of such policies, (iv) the borrower provides the lender paid receipts for the payment of the insurance premiums by no later than 10 business days prior to the expiration dates of the policies, and (v) if law & ordinance coverage is not maintained as part of the blanket or umbrella policy approved by the lender, the borrower is required to (x) maintain a separate law & ordinance policy for the Mortgaged Property in an amount acceptable to the lender, (y) provide the lender with paid receipts for the payment of the insurance premiums for such policy by no later than 10 business days prior to the expiration date of such policy, and (z) provide the lender with evidence of renewal of such policy. The borrower is required to commence making the monthly insurance deposit within five days of receipt of notice from the lender of the borrower’s failure to comply with the above-mentioned requirements. |
| |
(75) | The borrower is required to deposit on any monthly payment date occurring (x) prior to a lease sweep extension event, the sum of $46,403, and (y) subsequent to a lease sweep lease extension event, the sum of $31,000 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions that may be incurred. The borrower is also required to deliver to the lender, for transfer into the leasing reserve, all lease termination payments. Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing and provided further that a lease sweep lease extension event has occurred, the borrower will not be required to make the leasing reserve monthly deposit on any monthly payment date when the leasing reserve funds then on deposit in the leasing reserve are equal to or exceed $3,000,000. |
| |
(76) | The Largest Tenant, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, has 4,113 SF of retail space, 72,439 SF of office space and 4,602 SF of storage space. |
| |
(77) | The Essential Storage Vandercook Mortgaged Property has 34,016 square feet of self-storage space and 3,600 square feet of parking space, and the Essential Storage Shirley Mortgaged Property has 32,315 square feet of self-storage space, 11,500 square feet of parking space and two residential units totaling 1,600 square feet. |
| |
(78) | The Fourth Most Recent cash flows are not available as they were not required by the lender. |
ANNEX A-2
MORTGAGE POOL INFORMATION
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Distribution of Loan Purpose |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Loan Purpose | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
Refinance | 27 | $ | 828,170,000 | 92.8 | % | $ | 30,672,963 | 1.65x | 6.702% | 60 | 58.1% | 58.0% |
Acquisition | 5 | | 63,946,230 | 7.2 | | $ | 12,789,246 | 1.59x | 6.950% | 59 | 65.7% | 65.3% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Amortization Types(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Amortization Type | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
Interest Only | 30 | $ | 858,720,000 | 96.3 | % | $ | 28,624,000 | 1.65x | 6.704% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.6% |
Amortizing (30 Years) | 2 | | 33,396,230 | 3.7 | | $ | 16,698,115 | 1.67x | 7.114% | 60 | 59.5% | 56.5% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity date. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Cut-off Date Balances |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Range of Cut-off Date | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Balances ($) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
3,700,000 - 19,999,999 | 14 | $ | 137,366,230 | 15.4 | % | $ | 9,811,874 | 1.63x | 6.893% | 61 | 63.4% | 63.2% |
20,000,000 - 29,999,999 | 7 | | 169,750,000 | 19.0 | | $ | 24,250,000 | 1.67x | 6.894% | 59 | 60.2% | 59.8% |
30,000,000 - 49,999,999 | 6 | | 228,500,000 | 25.6 | | $ | 38,083,333 | 1.37x | 6.750% | 60 | 64.1% | 64.1% |
50,000,000 - 79,999,999 | 3 | | 182,500,000 | 20.5 | | $ | 60,833,333 | 1.59x | 6.724% | 60 | 58.4% | 58.4% |
80,000,000 - 89,000,000 | 2 | | 174,000,000 | 19.5 | | $ | 87,000,000 | 2.07x | 6.369% | 59 | 46.5% | 46.5% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | $3,700,000 | | | | | | | | |
Max | $89,000,000 | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | $27,878,632 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
Distribution of Underwritten NCF DSCR Ratios(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Range of Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
1.26 - 1.40 | 12 | $ | 311,850,000 | 35.0 | % | $ | 25,987,500 | 1.32x | 6.752% | 60 | 64.3% | 64.3% |
1.41 - 1.60 | 7 | | 200,396,230 | 22.5 | | $ | 28,628,033 | 1.51x | 6.685% | 59 | 61.0% | 60.9% |
1.61 - 2.00 | 9 | | 253,550,000 | 28.4 | | $ | 28,172,222 | 1.86x | 6.594% | 59 | 55.9% | 55.6% |
2.01 - 2.30 | 4 | | 126,320,000 | 14.2 | | $ | 31,580,000 | 2.25x | 6.947% | 61 | 46.4% | 46.4% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 1.26x | | | | | | | | |
Max | 2.30x | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 1.65x | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio for each mortgage loan is calculated by dividing the Underwritten Net Cash Flow from the related mortgaged property or mortgaged properties by the annual debt service for such mortgage loan, as adjusted in the case of mortgage loans with a partial interest only period by using the first 12 amortizing payments due instead of the actual interest only payment. |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Mortgage Interest Rates |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Range of Mortgage | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Interest Rates (%) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
4.840 - 6.000 | 3 | $ | 123,000,000 | 13.8 | % | $ | 41,000,000 | 1.75x | 5.752% | 61 | 54.2% | 54.2% |
6.001 - 6.500 | 6 | | 155,900,000 | 17.5 | | $ | 25,983,333 | 1.36x | 6.288% | 60 | 67.3% | 67.3% |
6.501 - 7.000 | 8 | | 279,550,000 | 31.3 | | $ | 34,943,750 | 1.74x | 6.811% | 59 | 53.7% | 53.4% |
7.001 - 7.500 | 13 | | 315,770,000 | 35.4 | | $ | 24,290,000 | 1.68x | 7.157% | 60 | 60.4% | 60.4% |
7.501 - 8.000 | 2 | | 17,896,230 | 2.0 | | $ | 8,948,115 | 1.41x | 7.975% | 60 | 59.1% | 57.7% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 4.840% | | | | | | | | |
Max | 8.000% | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 6.720% | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios (%) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
42.1 - 50.0 | 3 | $ | 121,700,000 | 13.6 | % | $ | 40,566,667 | 2.16x | 7.081% | 59 | 42.7% | 42.7% |
50.1 - 60.0 | 10 | | 338,070,000 | 37.9 | | $ | 33,807,000 | 1.68x | 6.521% | 59 | 55.8% | 55.5% |
60.1 - 65.0 | 9 | | 219,550,000 | 24.6 | | $ | 24,394,444 | 1.53x | 6.784% | 60 | 61.8% | 61.8% |
65.1 - 70.0 | 7 | | 155,896,230 | 17.5 | | $ | 22,270,890 | 1.44x | 6.898% | 61 | 68.0% | 67.8% |
70.1 - 74.4 | 3 | | 56,900,000 | 6.4 | | $ | 18,966,667 | 1.40x | 6.387% | 60 | 72.1% | 72.1% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 42.1% | | | | | | | | |
Max | 74.4% | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 58.6% | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value (which in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation). With respect to two mortgage loans representing 3.7% of the initial pool balance, the respective Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated based upon a valuation other than an “as-is” appraised value of each related mortgaged property or the cut-off date principal balance of a mortgage loan less a reserve taken at origination. The weighted average Cut off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making such adjustments is 58.8%. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Maturity Date LTV Ratios(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Range of Maturity Date LTV Ratios (%) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
42.1 - 50.0 | 3 | $ | 121,700,000 | 13.6 | % | $ | 40,566,667 | 2.16x | 7.081% | 59 | 42.7% | 42.7% |
50.1 - 60.0 | 10 | | 338,070,000 | 37.9 | | $ | 33,807,000 | 1.68x | 6.521% | 59 | 55.8% | 55.5% |
60.1 - 65.0 | 9 | | 219,550,000 | 24.6 | | $ | 24,394,444 | 1.53x | 6.784% | 60 | 61.8% | 61.8% |
65.1 - 70.0 | 7 | | 155,896,230 | 17.5 | | $ | 22,270,890 | 1.44x | 6.898% | 61 | 68.0% | 67.8% |
70.1 - 74.4 | 3 | | 56,900,000 | 6.4 | | $ | 18,966,667 | 1.40x | 6.387% | 60 | 72.1% | 72.1% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 42.1% | | | | | | | | |
Max | 74.4% | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 58.5% | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value (which in certain cases may reflect a portfolio premium valuation). With respect to two mortgage loans representing 3.7% of the initial pool balance, the respective Maturity Date LTV Ratio was calculated based upon a valuation other than an “as-is” appraised value of each related mortgaged property or the cut-off date principal balance of mortgage loan less a reserve taken at origination. The weighted average Maturity Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making such adjustments is 58.6%. |
Distribution of Original Terms to Maturity(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Original | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Terms to Maturity (Mos) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
60 | 31 | $ | 887,116,230 | 99.4 | % | $ | 28,616,653 | 1.65x | 6.730% | 59 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
120 | 1 | | 5,000,000 | 0.6 | | $ | 5,000,000 | 2.03x | 4.840% | 93 | 67.6% | 67.6% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 60 months | | | | | | | | |
Max | 120 months | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 60 months | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity date. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity(1) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Range of Remaining | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Terms to Maturity (Mos) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
57 - 59 | 11 | $ | 405,296,230 | 45.4 | % | $ | 36,845,112 | 1.78x | 6.697% | 59 | 54.1% | 54.0% |
60 | 20 | | 481,820,000 | 54.0 | | $ | 24,091,000 | 1.53x | 6.759% | 60 | 62.4% | 62.2% |
93 | 1 | | 5,000,000 | 0.6 | | $ | 5,000,000 | 2.03x | 4.840% | 93 | 67.6% | 67.6% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 57 months | | | | | | | | |
Max | 93 months | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 60 months | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity date. | | | | | | |
Distribution of Original Amortization Terms |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Original Amortization | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Terms (Mos) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
Interest Only | 30 | $ | 858,720,000 | 96.3 | % | $ | 28,624,000 | 1.65x | 6.704% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.6% |
360 | 2 | | 33,396,230 | 3.7 | | $ | 16,698,115 | 1.67x | 7.114% | 60 | 59.5% | 56.5% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 360 months | | | | | | | | |
Max | 360 months | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 360 months | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Remaining Amortization Terms |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Range of Remaining Amortization | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Terms (Mos) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
Interest Only | 30 | $ | 858,720,000 | 96.3 | % | $ | 28,624,000 | 1.65x | 6.704% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.6% |
359 - 360 | 2 | | 33,396,230 | 3.7 | | $ | 16,698,115 | 1.67x | 7.114% | 60 | 59.5% | 56.5% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 359 months | | | | | | | | |
Max | 360 months | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 360 months | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Original Partial Interest Only Periods |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Original Partial Interest Only | Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Periods (Mos) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
None | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
Distribution of Prepayment Provisions |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Prepayment Provisions | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
Defeasance | 28 | $ | 776,016,230 | 87.0 | % | $ | 27,714,865 | 1.67x | 6.766% | 60 | 59.0% | 58.8% |
Yield Maintenance or Defeasance | 3 | | 106,700,000 | 12.0 | | $ | 35,566,667 | 1.54x | 6.328% | 59 | 56.0% | 56.0% |
Yield Maintenance | 1 | | 9,400,000 | 1.1 | | $ | 9,400,000 | 1.30x | 7.310% | 60 | 62.7% | 62.7% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Underwritten NOI Debt Yields |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Range of Underwritten NOI Debt Yields (%) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
8.5 - 9.0 | 6 | $ | 146,450,000 | 16.4 | % | $ | 24,408,333 | 1.32x | 6.336% | 60 | 64.9% | 64.9% |
9.1 - 10.0 | 8 | | 227,900,000 | 25.5 | | $ | 28,487,500 | 1.37x | 6.802% | 60 | 65.4% | 65.4% |
10.1 - 12.0 | 7 | | 223,500,000 | 25.1 | | $ | 31,928,571 | 1.64x | 6.418% | 60 | 54.8% | 54.8% |
12.1 - 16.0 | 8 | | 172,946,230 | 19.4 | | $ | 21,618,279 | 1.87x | 7.106% | 59 | 58.7% | 58.1% |
16.1 - 18.0 | 3 | | 121,320,000 | 13.6 | | $ | 40,440,000 | 2.26x | 7.034% | 59 | 45.5% | 45.5% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 8.5% | | | | | | | | |
Max | 18.0% | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 11.8% | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Underwritten NCF Debt Yields |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Range of Underwritten NCF Debt Yields (%) | Loans | Balance | Balance | Balance | Ratio | Interest Rate | Maturity (Mos) | LTV | LTV |
8.3 - 9.0 | 6 | $ | 146,450,000 | 16.4 | % | $ | 24,408,333 | 1.32x | 6.336% | 60 | 64.9% | 64.9% |
9.1 - 10.0 | 10 | | 244,900,000 | 27.5 | | $ | 24,490,000 | 1.39x | 6.749% | 60 | 65.0% | 65.0% |
10.1 - 12.0 | 5 | | 206,500,000 | 23.1 | | $ | 41,300,000 | 1.64x | 6.449% | 59 | 54.4% | 54.4% |
12.1 - 15.0 | 9 | | 185,066,230 | 20.7 | | $ | 20,562,914 | 1.88x | 7.108% | 59 | 58.7% | 58.2% |
15.1 - 16.3 | 2 | | 109,200,000 | 12.2 | | $ | 54,600,000 | 2.29x | 7.023% | 59 | 44.0% | 44.0% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,878,632 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Min | 8.3% | | | | | | | | |
Max | 16.3% | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average | 11.3% | | | | | | | | |
Distribution of Lockbox Types |
| | | |
| | | Percentage of |
| Number of | | Aggregate |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date |
Lockbox Type | Loans | Balance | Balance |
Hard | 11 | $ | 410,600,000 | 46.0 | % |
Springing | 18 | | 378,166,230 | 42.4 | |
Soft | 1 | | 45,000,000 | 5.0 | |
Hard (Commercial); Soft (Residential) | 1 | | 33,000,000 | 3.7 | |
None | 1 | | 25,350,000 | 2.8 | |
Total | 32 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
Distribution of Escrows |
| | | |
| | | Percentage of |
| Number of | | Aggregate |
| Mortgage | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date |
Escrow Type | Loans | Balance | Balance |
Replacement Reserves(1) | 29 | $ | 754,916,230 | 84.6% |
Real Estate Tax | 30 | $ | 778,116,230 | 87.2% |
TI/LC(2) | 12 | $ | 478,100,000 | 92.8% |
Insurance | 20 | $ | 408,916,230 | 45.8% |
| | | |
(1) Includes mortgage loans with FF&E reserves. | |
(2) Percentage of total retail, office, mixed use and industrial properties only. | |
Distribution of Property Types |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
| Mortgaged | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Property Types | Properties | Balance(1) | Balance | Balance | Ratio(2) | Interest Rate(2) | Maturity (Mos)(2) | LTV(2) | LTV(2) |
Retail | 7 | $ | 223,639,000 | 25.1% | $ | 31,948,429 | 1.81x | 7.097% | 59 | 55.5% | 55.1% |
Super Regional Mall | 2 | | 114,000,000 | 12.8 | $ | 57,000,000 | 2.17x | 6.959% | 59 | 45.1% | 44.5% |
Anchored | 3 | | 94,000,000 | 10.5 | $ | 31,333,333 | 1.45x | 7.245% | 59 | 66.8% | 66.8% |
Unanchored | 2 | | 15,639,000 | 1.8 | $ | 7,819,500 | 1.32x | 7.206% | 60 | 62.1% | 62.1% |
Multifamily | 12 | $ | 213,333,000 | 23.9% | $ | 17,777,750 | 1.40x | 6.546% | 60 | 65.1% | 65.1% |
Garden | 8 | | 164,250,000 | 18.4 | $ | 20,531,250 | 1.38x | 6.313% | 60 | 67.4% | 67.4% |
Student Housing | 1 | | 33,000,000 | 3.7 | $ | 33,000,000 | 1.49x | 7.200% | 59 | 59.2% | 59.2% |
Low Rise | 1 | | 9,500,000 | 1.1 | $ | 9,500,000 | 1.31x | 7.952% | 60 | 49.5% | 49.5% |
Mid Rise | 2 | | 6,583,000 | 0.7 | $ | 3,291,500 | 1.35x | 7.050% | 60 | 61.2% | 61.2% |
Mixed Use | 8 | $ | 112,678,000 | 12.6% | $ | 14,084,750 | 1.36x | 6.536% | 60 | 61.7% | 61.7% |
Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage | 1 | | 45,000,000 | 5.0 | $ | 45,000,000 | 1.36x | 6.700% | 60 | 64.3% | 64.3% |
Multifamily/Retail | 5 | | 32,917,000 | 3.7 | $ | 6,583,400 | 1.36x | 6.586% | 60 | 60.3% | 60.3% |
Multifamily/Office/Retail | 1 | | 32,200,000 | 3.6 | $ | 32,200,000 | 1.36x | 6.215% | 60 | 59.6% | 59.6% |
Retail/Office | 1 | | 2,561,000 | 0.3 | $ | 2,561,000 | 1.35x | 7.050% | 60 | 61.2% | 61.2% |
Industrial | 6 | $ | 106,200,000 | 11.9% | $ | 17,700,000 | 1.63x | 6.810% | 59 | 53.0% | 53.0% |
Warehouse/Distribution | 4 | | 76,200,000 | 8.5 | $ | 19,050,000 | 1.67x | 6.859% | 58 | 51.7% | 51.7% |
Warehouse | 2 | | 30,000,000 | 3.4 | $ | 15,000,000 | 1.53x | 6.685% | 59 | 56.3% | 56.3% |
Hospitality | 6 | $ | 77,566,230 | 8.7% | $ | 12,927,705 | 2.00x | 7.224% | 60 | 59.0% | 58.6% |
Limited Service | 6 | | 77,566,230 | 8.7 | $ | 12,927,705 | 2.00x | 7.224% | 60 | 59.0% | 58.6% |
Manufactured Housing | 18 | $ | 67,490,000 | 7.6% | $ | 3,749,444 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Manufactured Housing | 18 | | 67,490,000 | 7.6 | $ | 3,749,444 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Office | 3 | $ | 66,000,000 | 7.4% | $ | 22,000,000 | 1.85x | 6.909% | 62 | 60.8% | 60.8% |
Suburban | 2 | | 61,000,000 | 6.8 | $ | 30,500,000 | 1.84x | 7.079% | 60 | 60.3% | 60.3% |
CBD | 1 | | 5,000,000 | 0.6 | $ | 5,000,000 | 2.03x | 4.840% | 93 | 67.6% | 67.6% |
Self Storage | 14 | $ | 25,210,000 | 2.8% | $ | 1,800,714 | 1.71x | 5.940% | 59 | 55.8% | 55.8% |
Self Storage | 14 | | 25,210,000 | 2.8 | $ | 1,800,714 | 1.71x | 5.940% | 59 | 55.8% | 55.8% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 74 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0% | $ | 12,055,625 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property. | | |
(2) Weighted average based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property. | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Geographic Distribution |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Weighted | | Weighted | | |
| | | Percentage of | | Average Debt | Weighted | Average | Weighted | Weighted |
| Number of | | Aggregate | Average | Service | Average | Remaining | Average | Average |
Geographic Distribution | Mortgaged | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Coverage | Mortgage | Terms to | Cut-off Date | Maturity Date |
Property Location | Properties | Balance(1) | Balance | Balance | Ratio(2) | Interest Rate(2) | Maturity (Mos)(2) | LTV(2) | LTV(2) |
New York | 13 | $ | 140,000,000 | 15.7 | % | $ | 10,769,231 | 1.34x | 6.783% | 60 | 62.0% | 62.0% |
Texas | 7 | | 138,690,000 | 15.5 | | $ | 19,812,857 | 2.08x | 6.809% | 59 | 48.6% | 48.0% |
Pennsylvania | 3 | | 77,500,000 | 8.7 | | $ | 25,833,333 | 1.40x | 6.145% | 60 | 65.9% | 65.9% |
Virginia | 1 | | 57,000,000 | 6.4 | | $ | 57,000,000 | 1.86x | 7.100% | 60 | 60.6% | 60.6% |
South Carolina | 5 | | 52,190,000 | 5.9 | | $ | 10,438,000 | 1.97x | 7.042% | 60 | 59.2% | 59.2% |
Georgia | 5 | | 50,086,230 | 5.6 | | $ | 10,017,246 | 1.52x | 6.535% | 60 | 59.9% | 59.4% |
Nevada | 1 | | 45,000,000 | 5.0 | | $ | 45,000,000 | 1.36x | 6.700% | 60 | 64.3% | 64.3% |
Michigan | 5 | | 44,130,000 | 4.9 | | $ | 8,826,000 | 1.51x | 6.956% | 59 | 59.8% | 59.8% |
Tennessee | 4 | | 35,490,000 | 4.0 | | $ | 8,872,500 | 1.58x | 6.660% | 59 | 55.3% | 55.3% |
Delaware | 2 | | 33,500,000 | 3.8 | | $ | 16,750,000 | 1.42x | 6.842% | 64 | 66.5% | 66.5% |
Florida | 2 | | 27,300,000 | 3.1 | | $ | 13,650,000 | 1.31x | 6.674% | 60 | 68.1% | 68.1% |
Alabama | 3 | | 25,460,000 | 2.9 | | $ | 8,486,667 | 1.96x | 6.974% | 59 | 65.9% | 65.9% |
Oklahoma | 1 | | 25,000,000 | 2.8 | | $ | 25,000,000 | 1.41x | 6.400% | 59 | 71.6% | 71.6% |
Ohio | 1 | | 23,200,000 | 2.6 | | $ | 23,200,000 | 1.95x | 7.040% | 57 | 42.2% | 42.2% |
Illinois | 1 | | 23,000,000 | 2.6 | | $ | 23,000,000 | 1.55x | 6.780% | 59 | 55.8% | 55.8% |
Mississippi | 5 | | 21,540,000 | 2.4 | | $ | 4,308,000 | 1.61x | 6.530% | 59 | 54.7% | 54.7% |
North Carolina | 1 | | 20,200,000 | 2.3 | | $ | 20,200,000 | 2.24x | 7.130% | 60 | 52.5% | 52.5% |
Louisiana | 1 | | 9,500,000 | 1.1 | | $ | 9,500,000 | 1.31x | 7.952% | 60 | 49.5% | 49.5% |
South Dakota | 1 | | 8,480,000 | 1.0 | | $ | 8,480,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Colorado | 1 | | 7,430,000 | 0.8 | | $ | 7,430,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Oregon | 1 | | 6,130,000 | 0.7 | | $ | 6,130,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Indiana | 2 | | 5,000,000 | 0.6 | | $ | 2,500,000 | 1.60x | 6.566% | 59 | 54.9% | 54.9% |
Wyoming | 1 | | 4,700,000 | 0.5 | | $ | 4,700,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Maine | 2 | | 4,440,000 | 0.5 | | $ | 2,220,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Minnesota | 3 | | 4,350,000 | 0.5 | | $ | 1,450,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Iowa | 2 | | 2,800,000 | 0.3 | | $ | 1,400,000 | 1.82x | 5.710% | 59 | 51.1% | 51.1% |
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg. | 74 | $ | 892,116,230 | 100.0 | % | $ | 12,055,625 | 1.65x | 6.720% | 60 | 58.6% | 58.5% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property. | | |
(2) Weighted average based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property. | | |
ANNEX A-3
DESCRIPTION OF THE TOP 15 MORTGAGE LOANS
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | GSMC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Retail – Super Regional Mall |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | GGP/Homart II L.L.C., Brookfield Properties Retail Holding LLC and New York State Common Retirement Fund | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Stonebriar Mall, LLC and Stonebriar Anchor Acquisition II LLC | | Location: | Frisco, TX |
Original Balance(1): | $89,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 2000 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $89,000,000 | | Property Management: | Brookfield Properties Retail Inc. |
% by Initial UPB: | 9.98% | | Size(5): | 1,096,880 SF |
Interest Rate: | 6.99900% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $605,000,000 / $552 |
Note Date: | July 1, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 13, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 96.7% (as of April 30, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $42,823,625 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $41,565,493 |
First Payment Date: | August 1, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 1, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type(1): | Pasi Passu | | Most Recent NOI: | $43,691,924 (TTM April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance(1): | $166,000,000 | | 2023 NOI: | $43,557,495 |
Call Protection(2): | L(25),D(28),O(7) | | 2022 NOI: | $39,193,479 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $35,383,290 |
|
Reserves(3) | | Financial Information(1) |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $232 |
Taxes: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $232 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 42.1% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | Springing | $438,752 | | Maturity Date LTV: | 42.1% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $91,407 | $2,193,760 | | UW NOI DY: | 16.8% |
Gap Rent Reserve(4): | $756,921 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.30x |
Rollover Reserve(4): | $11,720,606 | $0 | NAP | | | |
|
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Whole Loan | $255,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff: | $242,815,054 | 95.2% |
| | | | Reserves(4): | $10,449,929 | 4.1% |
| | | | Return of Equity: | $923,513 | 0.4% |
| | | | Closing Costs: | $811,504 | 0.3% |
Total Sources | $255,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses: | $255,000,000 | 100.0% |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | The Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan (as defined below), which is evidenced by nine pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $255,000,000. The Financial Information presented above is based on the aggregate original principal balance of the promissory notes comprising the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan. |
| (2) | Defeasance of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is permitted at any time after the earlier to occur of (a) the end of the two-year period commencing on the closing date of the securitization of the last portion of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan to be securitized and (b) July 1, 2027. The assumed defeasance lockout period of 25 payments is based on the closing date of this transaction in August 2024. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
| (3) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve information. |
| (4) | Initial Reserves consist of an upfront rollover reserve ($11,720,606) and an upfront gap Rent reserve ($756,921). The borrowers funded $10,449,929 into such reserves at origination, with the remaining $2,027,598 being guaranteed by the borrower sponsors. |
| (5) | The Stonebriar Centre Property (as defined below) is part of a larger retail development consisting of 1,812,610 square feet (“SF”), including non-collateral tenants such as Dillard’s (206,133 SF), Macy’s (200,544 SF), Nordstrom (134,150 SF) and a vacant former Sears (162,903 SF).
|
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
The Loan. The largest mortgage loan (the “Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan”) that is evidenced by nine pari passu promissory notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $255,000,000 and secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering a 1,096,880 SF super regional mall located in Frisco, Texas (the “Stonebriar Centre Property”). The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan was co-originated on July 1, 2024 by Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GSBI”), Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) and Societe Generale Financial Corporation (“SGFC”). The Stonebriar Centre Mortgage Loan is evidenced by the controlling Note A-1-1 and the non-controlling Notes A-1-4 and A-1-5, with an aggregate original principal balance of $89,000,000. The relationship between the holders of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is governed by a co-lender agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” in the Prospectus. The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the Benchmark 2024-V9 pooling and servicing agreement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement” in the Prospectus.
The table below identifies the promissory notes that comprise the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan:
Whole Loan Summary |
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
A-1-1 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 | Yes |
A-1-2 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | BMO 2024-5C5 | No |
A-1-3(1) | $16,000,000 | $16,000,000 | GSMC | No |
A-1-4 | $40,000,000 | $40,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 | No |
A-1-5 | $24,000,000 | $24,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 | No |
A-2-1(1) | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | SGFC | No |
A-2-2 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | BMO 2024-5C5 | No |
A-2-3(1) | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | SGFC | No |
A-3-1 | $65,000,000 | $65,000,000 | BANK 2024-5YR8 | No |
Whole Loan | $255,000,000 | $255,000,000 | | |
| (1) | Expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization trusts. |
The Property. The Stonebriar Centre Property is a 1,096,880 SF super regional mall located in Frisco, Texas. The Stonebriar Centre Property opened in 2000 and is anchored by non-collateral tenants Dillard’s, Macy’s and Nordstrom and collateral tenants JCPenney, AMC Theatres, DICK’S Sporting Goods, Kidzania, Dave & Buster’s, Zara, and Barnes & Noble Bookseller, and has many other national tenants. Additionally, the Stonebriar Centre Property has a diverse mix of dining offerings, with operators such as Chick-Fil-A, Sonic Drive In, Popeye’s and Panda Express. The Stonebriar Centre Property also has a Hyatt Regency on-site (non-collateral).
The Stonebriar Centre Property has a granular rent roll, with no collateral tenant occupying more than 14.8% of total rentable SF or contributing greater than 6.5% of the total underwritten rent. The top 10 tenants at the Stonebriar Centre Property represent 56.0% of total SF and generate 24.8% of total underwritten rent. The Stonebriar Centre Property was 96.7% occupied as of April 30, 2024 by 147 unique tenants. The Stonebriar Centre Property has maintained an average occupancy (excluding anchors) of 94.8% since 2019. Since 2023, the borrower sponsors have executed 33 new and renewal leases comprising 145,115 SF (13.2% of the collateral SF). Since 2019, the borrower sponsors have invested approximately $45.8 million in capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Over the trailing-12 months ending February 29, 2024, the Stonebriar Centre Property generated total sales of approximately $322 million. Over the same time period, inline tenants (less than 10,000 SF) generated sales of approximately $744 PSF (occupancy cost of 13.7%).
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the sales history for the Stonebriar Centre Property:
Sales History(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM February 2024 |
Gross Mall Sales(2) | $266,600,050 | $292,372,796 | $323,546,061 | $321,739,441 |
Estimated JCPenney Sales(3) | $18,300,000 | $19,100,000 | $18,200,000 | $18,200,000 |
Estimated Dillard’s Sales(3) | $33,400,000 | $37,300,000 | $36,800,000 | $36,800,000 |
Estimated Macy’s Sales(3) | $35,400,000 | $46,900,000 | $37,700,000 | $37,700,000 |
Estimated Nordstrom Sales(3) | $49,000,000 | $55,500,000 | $56,300,000 | $56,300,000 |
Sales PSF (Inline < 10,000 SF) | $645 | $706 | $731 | $744 |
Occupancy Cost (Inline < 10,000 SF) | 13.0% | 13.7% | 13.9% | 13.7% |
| (1) | Information is as of February 29, 2024, as provided by the borrower sponsors, and only includes tenants reporting sales. |
| (2) | Excludes estimated sales for JCPenney and the non-collateral tenants, Dillard’s, Macy’s and Nordstrom. |
| (3) | Represents estimated sales as provided by the borrower sponsors. TTM February 2024 sales are shown as of year-end 2023. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the anchor and major tenant sales history at the Stonebriar Centre Property:
Major Tenant Sales History(1) |
Tenant | SF | 2021 Sales PSF/Screen | 2022 Sales PSF/Screen | 2023 Sales PSF/Screen | February 2024 TTM Sales PSF/Screen |
AMC Theatres(2) | 94,560 | $127,975 | $383,080 | $453,432 | $453,432 |
Kidzania | 60,000 | $63 | $83 | $100 | $105 |
Dave & Buster's | 49,784 | $157 | $191 | $187 | $189 |
Barnes & Noble Bookseller | 34,272 | $147 | $236 | $268 | $268 |
H&M | 26,576 | $275 | $316 | $246 | $250 |
Banana Republic | 10,862 | $189 | $215 | $191 | $199 |
Pottery Barn | 10,580 | $640 | $638 | $480 | $460 |
The Cheesecake Factory | 10,567 | $1,007 | $1,137 | $1,144 | $1,161 |
Altar'd State | 10,200 | $513 | $572 | $580 | $597 |
Anthropologie | 10,115 | NAV | $557 | $533 | $535 |
| (1) | Information is as of February 29, 2024, as provided by the borrower sponsors, and only includes tenants reporting sales. |
| (2) | AMC Theatres sales are based on 24 screens. |
Major Tenants.
AMC Theatres (94,560 SF, 8.6% of NRA, 6.5% of underwritten base rent): AMC Theatres is the largest theatrical exhibitor in the United States and in the world. AMC Theatres has amenities including AMC Signature Recliners, varied food and beverage menus, premium presentation experiences and an industry-leading rewards program. AMC Theatres currently operates approximately 10,000 total screens at 900 locations. AMC Theatres has been a tenant at the Stonebriar Centre Property since 2000 and recently renewed its lease in 2023. AMC Theatres currently has a lease expiration date of September 30, 2028, with two, 5-year and one, 3-year renewal options remaining. AMC Theatres currently pays a base rent of $27.07 PSF. AMC Theatres has 24 screens at the Stonebriar Centre Property and reported sales of $453,432 per screen for the trailing-12 months ended February 29, 2024. Estimated sales per screen were $453,432, $383,080, and $127,975 for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. AMC Theatres has no termination options.
Dave & Buster's (49,784 SF, 4.5% of NRA, 2.9% of underwritten base rent): Dave & Busters is an American restaurant and entertainment center that was founded in Dallas, Texas in 1982 and has 210 total stores with approximately 69 million annual visits. Dave & Buster’s at the Stonebriar Centre Property has a January 31, 2037 lease expiration and reported February 2024 TTM sales of approximately $9.4 million. Dave & Buster’s has no termination options.
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
JCPenney (162,347 SF, 14.8% of NRA, 2.6% of underwritten base rent): JCPenney was founded in Wyoming in 1902 and has been one of the United States’ largest retailers of apparel, home, jewelry, and beauty merchandise with a growing portfolio of national brands. JCPenney has more than 650 stores across the United States and Puerto Rico and employs more than 50,000 people worldwide. JCPenney has been a tenant at the Stonebriar Centre Property since 2021. JCPenney has a current lease expiration of December 31, 2040, with no renewal options. JCPenney currently pays a base rent of $6.17 PSF, which increases to $6.30 PSF in December 2024. Reported sales for JCPenney at Stonebriar Centre Property were $18,200,000, $19,100,000, and $18,300,000 for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. JCPenney has no termination options.
The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants at the Stonebriar Centre Property:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch)(2) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Total U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
Non-Collateral Anchor Tenants(3) | | | | | | | | | |
Dillard's | Baa3/BB+/BBB- | 206,133 | 38.1 | % | NAP | NAP | NAP | 12/31/2050 | N | None |
Macy's | Ba1/BB+/BBB- | 200,544 | 37.1 | | NAP | NAP | NAP | 12/31/2050 | N | None |
Nordstrom | Ba2/BB+/BBB- | 134,150 | 24.8 | | NAP | NAP | NAP | 12/31/2050 | N | None |
Total / Wtd. Avg.(3) | | 540,827 | 100.0 | % | NAP | NAP | NAP | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Collateral Anchors | | | | | | | | | |
AMC Theatres | Caa1/CCC+/NR | 94,560 | 8.6 | % | $2,559,336 | $27.07 | 6.5% | 9/30/2028 | N | 2 x 5 yr, 1 x 3 yr |
Dave & Buster's | B1/B/NR | 49,784 | 4.5 | | $1,165,941 | $23.42 | 2.9% | 1/31/2027 | N | 2 x 5 yr |
JCPenney | NR/NR/NR | 162,347 | 14.8 | | $1,022,505 | $6.30 | 2.6% | 12/31/2040 | N | None |
Kidzania | NR/NR/NR | 60,000 | 5.5 | | $840,000 | $14.00 | 2.1% | 11/30/2046 | N | 2 x 5 yr, |
Dick's Sporting Goods | Baa3/BBB/NR | 77,411 | 7.1 | | $799,810 | $10.33 | 2.0% | 1/31/2027 | N | 3 x 5 yr, |
Barnes & Noble Bookseller | NR/NR/NR | 34,272 | 3.1 | | $736,030 | $21.48 | 1.9% | 1/31/2025 | N | 1 x 3 yr |
Zara(4) | NR/NR/NR | 34,678 | 3.2 | | $700,000 | $20.19 | 1.8% | 11/30/2034 | Y | 1 x 5 yr |
Collateral Anchors Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | | 513,052 | 46.8 | % | $7,823,622 | $15.25 | 19.8% | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Major Tenants | | | | | | | | | |
H&M | NR/BBB/NR | 26,576 | 2.4 | % | $1,101,464 | $41.45 | 2.8% | 1/31/2027 | N | 2 x 5 yr |
Haverty’s Furniture | NR/NR/NR | 60,000 | 5.5 | | $468,372 | $7.81 | 1.2% | 1/31/2026 | N | 3 x 5 yr |
Bassett Home Furnishings | NR/NR/NR | 15,020 | 1.4 | | $406,591 | $27.07 | 1.0% | 9/30/2028 | N | 2 x 5 yr |
Anchor and Major Owned Tenants | | 101,596 | 9.3 | % | $1,976,428 | $19.45 | 5.0% | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 445,734 | 40.6 | % | $29,727,327 | $66.69 | 75.2% | | | |
Total Occupied | | 1,060,382 | 96.7 | % | $39,527,376 | $37.28 | 100.0% | | | |
Vacant | | 36,498 | 3.3 | | | | | | | |
Total | | 1,096,880 | 100.0 | % | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated April 30, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through July 2025 and overage rent as of TTM February 2024 sales for certain tenants. Non-Collateral Anchors only pay expense reimbursements. |
| (2) | In certain instances, ratings provided are those of the parent company of the entity shown, whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
| (3) | Non-collateral anchors do not pay rent but reimburse common area and maintenance charges to the borrower sponsors. |
| (4) | Zara has two, one-time options to terminate its lease effective November 30, 2029 and May 31, 2032, with payment of a termination fee. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Stonebriar Centre Property, based on the initial lease expiration dates:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | U/W Base Rent | % of Total U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
2024 & MTM | 31,769 | 2.9% | | 2.9% | | $2,054,163 | 5.2% | | $64.66 | 13 |
2025 | 63,453 | 5.8% | | 8.7% | | $3,114,736 | 7.9% | | $49.09 | 16 |
2026 | 171,311 | 15.6% | | 24.3% | | $6,336,923 | 16.0% | | $36.99 | 31 |
2027 | 188,972 | 17.2% | | 41.5% | | $6,033,662 | 15.3% | | $31.93 | 19 |
2028 | 151,950 | 13.9% | | 55.4% | | $5,894,407 | 14.9% | | $38.79 | 17 |
2029 | 55,111 | 5.0% | | 60.4% | | $3,483,959 | 8.8% | | $63.22 | 13 |
2030 | 19,971 | 1.8% | | 62.2% | | $2,063,949 | 5.2% | | $103.35 | 7 |
2031 | 22,684 | 2.1% | | 64.3% | | $2,466,836 | 6.2% | | $108.75 | 7 |
2032 | 13,638 | 1.2% | | 65.5% | | $1,071,906 | 2.7% | | $78.60 | 6 |
2033 | 44,730 | 4.1% | | 69.6% | | $1,992,861 | 5.0% | | $44.55 | 7 |
2034 | 62,610 | 5.7% | | 75.3% | | $2,539,666 | 6.4% | | $40.56 | 8 |
2035 & Thereafter | 234,183 | 21.3% | | 96.6% | | $2,474,308 | 6.3% | | $10.57 | 3 |
Vacant | 36,498 | 3.3% | | 100.0% | | NAP | 0.0% | | $0.00 | NAP |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 1,096,880 | 100.0% | | | $39,527,376 | 100.0% | | $37.28 | 147 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated April 30, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through July 2025 and overage rent as of TTM February 2024 sales for certain tenants. |
| (2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the stated expiration date of the subject lease or leases that are not considered in the Lease Expiration Schedule. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Stonebriar Centre Property:
Cash Flow Analysis |
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM 4/30/2024 | U/W(1)(2) | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent(1) | $33,466,820 | $32,265,221 | $29,270,542 | $32,672,509 | $35,937,602 | $36,232,917 | $36,660,035 | $33.42 |
Overage / Percent Rent(2) | 639,506 | 364,234 | 1,577,498 | 3,446,220 | 3,565,330 | 3,192,719 | 2,867,342 | 2.61 |
Kiosks / Temporary / Specialty | 5,397,242 | 3,867,530 | 4,954,494 | 5,079,672 | 5,369,340 | 5,121,469 | 4,900,367 | 4.47 |
Other Rental Revenue | 312,458 | 178,210 | 208,753 | 143,343 | 240,242 | 241,710 | 234,952 | 0.21 |
Total Commercial Reimbursement Revenue(3) | 15,279,668 | 13,816,106 | 12,482,394 | 13,584,525 | 13,788,050 | 13,787,111 | 13,568,569 | 12.37 |
Market Revenue from Vacant Units | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,098,248 | 2.82 |
Other Revenue | 1,654,665 | 409,603 | 2,197,712 | 453,822 | 1,469,163 | 1,430,605 | 410,199 | 0.37 |
Potential Gross Revenue | $56,750,359 | $50,900,904 | $50,691,394 | $55,380,091 | $60,369,727 | $60,006,531 | $61,739,711 | $56.29 |
(Vacancy & Bad Debt) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (3,098,248) | (2.82) |
(Commercial Credit Loss) | (147,545) | (3,215,405) | (191,687) | 651,169 | (942,737) | (753,068) | (173,362) | (0.16) |
Effective Gross Income | $56,602,814 | $47,685,499 | $50,499,707 | $56,031,261 | $59,426,990 | $59,253,463 | $58,468,101 | $53.30 |
Real Estate Taxes | 5,499,182 | 7,003,890 | 6,237,278 | 6,094,576 | 5,640,789 | 5,341,718 | 6,394,183 | 5.83 |
Insurance | 153,277 | 177,438 | 235,683 | 299,456 | 373,208 | 405,536 | 412,822 | 0.38 |
Management Fee | 2,631,271 | 2,050,265 | 2,450,555 | 2,530,760 | 2,746,975 | 2,675,070 | 1,000,000 | 0.91 |
Other Expenses | 6,097,531 | 5,696,812 | 6,192,901 | 7,912,988 | 7,108,522 | 7,139,215 | 7,837,471 | 7.15 |
Total Expenses | 14,381,261 | 14,928,406 | 15,116,418 | 16,837,781 | 15,869,494 | 15,561,540 | 15,644,476 | $14.26 |
Net Operating Income | $42,221,553 | $32,757,094 | $35,383,290 | $39,193,479 | $43,557,495 | $43,691,924 | $42,823,625 | $39.04 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $219,376 | $0.20 |
TI/LC | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,038,756 | $0.95 |
Net Cash Flow | $42,221,553 | $32,757,094 | $35,383,290 | $39,193,479 | $43,557,495 | $43,691,924 | $41,565,493 | $37.89 |
| | | | | | | | |
Occupancy | 99.3% | 96.5% | 94.8% | 95.9% | 97.7% | 96.7%(4) | 94.7%(5) | |
NCF DSCR(6) | 2.33x | 1.81x | 1.96x | 2.17x | 2.41x | 2.41x | 2.30x | |
NOI Debt Yield(6) | 16.6% | 12.8% | 13.9% | 15.4% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 16.8% | |
| (1) | U/W Base Rent is based on the underwritten rent roll dated April 30, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through July 2025. |
| (2) | Overage / Percent Rent is based on February TTM sales and contractual breakpoint and includes breakpoint steps through July 31, 2025 |
| (3) | Total Commercial Reimbursement Revenue is based on the in-place rent roll as of April 30, 2024 with contractual CAM steps through July 2025. |
| (4) | Represents occupancy per the underwritten rent roll dated April 30, 2024. |
| (5) | Based on the economic vacancy of 5.0%. The Stonebriar Centre Property was 96.7% occupied as of April 30, 2024. |
| (6) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan. |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Stonebriar Centre Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $605,000,000 as of May 13, 2024. The table below shows the appraisal’s “as-is” conclusions.
Property | Appraised Value(1) | Capitalization Rate(1) |
Stonebriar Centre | $605,000,000 | 6.75% |
Environmental Matters. The Phase I environmental assessment of the Stonebriar Centre Property dated April 15, 2024 identified no recognized environmental conditions, controlled environmental conditions or significant data gaps.
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
The Market. The Stonebriar Centre Property is located in Frisco, Texas, which is in the broader Dallas market. The Stonebriar Centre Property can primarily be accessed by State Route 121, which is an east-west highway offering connectivity through major destinations, including business centers, residential areas, and shopping districts. The Stonebriar Centre Property is situated approximately 25 minutes from the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport and approximately 35 minutes from the Dallas Business District.
The Dallas-Fort Worth- Arlington, TX MSA is home to over 4 million employees over many different sectors with services, retail trade, and finance/insurance/real estate being the largest. The market has a low unemployment rate of 3.9% as of March 2024. The Dallas submarket is expected to continuously grow with a high concentration of corporate headquarters, technology businesses, and financial services, in addition to population growth contributing to an above-average performance. The Stonebriar Centre Property is located in Frisco, Texas, which has of a population of approximately 226,065 residents with an average household income of $175,658. According to the U.S. Census, the Dallas-Fort Worth metro experienced the largest population growth of any metropolitan area in the country in 2023, adding approximately 152,000 residents. The surge in population growth in the area has coincided with a wave of new corporate headquarters and regional offices. Frisco has welcomed 16 new corporations and is poised to generate over 5,600 jobs in the community in the coming years. Some of the notable corporations include the Dallas Cowboys, FedEx Office, Frito-Lay North America, Inc., JCPenney Corporate, Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc., and PGA of America.
According to the appraisal, the 2023 population within a one-, three- and five-mile radius of the Stonebriar Centre Property was 11,962, 109,387 and 320,450, respectively. The 2023 average household income within the same radii was $119,821, $150,091 and $162,421, respectively.
The following table presents information regarding certain competitive properties to the Stonebriar Centre Property:
Competitive Property Summary(1) |
| Stonebriar Centre | Legacy West | The Shops at Willow Bend | Allen Premium Outlets | Galleria Dallas | Firewheel Town Center |
Year Built/ Renovated | 2000 / NAP | 2017 / NAP | 2001 / 2004 | 2000 / 2017 | 1982 / 2005 | 2005 / NAP |
Total GLA (SF) | 1,096,880(2) | 335,000 | 1,300,000 | 548,000 | 1,400,000 | 996,000 |
Ownership | Brookfield Properties and New York State Common Retirement Fund | Kite Realty Group | Centennial Real Estate | Simon Property Group | UBS Realty | Simon Property Group |
Distance to Property (miles) | N/A | 2.0 | 5.0 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 21.0 |
Occupancy % | 96.7%(2) | 95.0% | 50.0% | 95.0% | 95.0% | 93.0% |
Inline Sales PSF | $744(3) | $1,200 | $400 | $418 | $1,043 | $404 |
Anchors | Dillard’s; Macy’s; JCPenney; Nordstrom | Louis Vuitton; Nike; Sephora | Dillard's; Macy's; Neiman Marcus | Nike Outlet; Tory Burch; Polo Ralph Lauren | Macy's; Nordstrom; Gucci; Louis Vuitton | Dillard's; Macy's; Barnes & Noble; AMC Theaters |
| (1) | Source: Third party report. |
| (2) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll dated April 30, 2024. |
| (3) | Represents sales PSF as of February 2024 as provided by the borrower sponsors. |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers are Stonebriar Mall, LLC and Stonebriar Anchor Acquisition II LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity with two independent directors. Legal counsel to the borrowers provided a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantor is GGP/HOMART II L.L.C.
The borrower sponsors are a joint venture between GGP/Homart II L.L.C. and Brookfield Properties Retail Holding LLC (50.0%) and New York State Common Retirement Fund (50.0%). Brookfield Properties is a subsidiary of Brookfield Corporation (“Brookfield”), a diversified global real estate company that owns, operates and develops office, retail, multifamily, logistics and hospitality assets. Brookfield owns more than 175 retail assets across eight countries, totaling over 130 million SF.
The New York State Common Retirement Fund is one of the largest public pension plans in the United States, providing retirement security for over one million New York State and Local Retirement System members, retirees, and beneficiaries. As of December 31, 2023, the fund had assets under management of $267.7 billion.
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
Property Management. The Stonebriar Centre Property is currently managed by Brookfield Properties Retail Inc., an affiliate of the borrowers.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan, the borrower deposited: (i) $11,720,606 into a TI/LC reserve and (ii) $756,921 into a gap rent reserve.
Upfront TI/LC Reserve – The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents provide for an upfront reserve of $11,720,606 for outstanding tenant improvement allowances and leasing commissions.
With regard to the landlord obligations reserve and the gap rent reserve, the borrowers funded $10,449,929 at origination, with the remaining $2,027,598 being guaranteed by the non-recourse carveout guarantor, as limited payment guarantor. As provided in the limited payment guaranty, the amounts guaranteed by such guaranty will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the aggregate amount of equity capital actually expended by the borrowers on upfront rollover expenditures and such guaranteed amount will be recalculated on the first day of every month to reduce the limited payment guarantor’s liability under such guaranty.
Real Estate Taxes – During a Reserve Trigger Period (as defined below) or a Cash Management Period (as defined below), the borrowers are required to deposit monthly to a real estate tax reserve 1/12 of the annual estimated real estate taxes.
Insurance – During a Reserve Trigger Period or a Cash Management Period, the borrowers are required to deposit monthly 1/12 of the annual estimated insurance premiums to an insurance reserve unless the Stonebriar Centre Property is maintained under a blanket policy.
Replacement Reserve – During a Reserve Trigger Period or a Cash Management Period, the borrowers are required to deposit monthly approximately $18,281 to a reserve for replacements to the Stonebriar Centre Property, subject to a cap of $438,752.
TI/LC Reserve – The borrowers are required to make monthly deposits into the TI/LC reserve in an amount equal to approximately $91,407, subject to a cap of $2,193,760, which monthly deposit will be suspended during the continuance of a Reserve Trigger Period or Cash Management Period, if sufficient funds are available pursuant to the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan cash management agreement.
Anchor Reserve – During the continuance of an Anchor Trigger Event (as defined below), the borrowers are required to deposit into an anchor reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to the anchor reserve monthly deposit for tenant improvement and leasing commission, construction costs, required landlord work and other related costs associated with re-tenanting the Anchor Tenant (as defined below) premises, which monthly deposit will be suspended to the extent the individual anchor threshold amount (an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying (x) $50 by (y) the aggregate amount of gross leasable square footage of the applicable Anchor Tenant parcel) has been deposited for any such Anchor Trigger Event then continuing.
Excess Cash Flow Reserve – During the continuance of a Cash Management Period, the borrowers are required to deposit all excess cash flow into the excess cash flow reserve fund.
A “Reserve Trigger Period” will commence when the debt yield of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is less than 11.0% for two consecutive calendar quarters and will expire on the date that the debt yield of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is 11.0% or greater for two consecutive calendar quarters.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. All rents from the Stonebriar Centre Property are required to be deposited directly to the lockbox by tenants upon delivery of a tenant direction letter. During a Cash Management Period, funds will be transferred to the lender-controlled cash management account on each business day and disbursed according to the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents. During a Cash Management Period, all excess cash is required to be held by the lender as additional security for the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan; provided that excess cash will be disbursed at the direction of the borrower in the event of shortfalls in certain monthly expense items, so long as no event of default is continuing for which the lender has initiated an enforcement action.
A “Cash Management Period” will occur during the existence of any of: (i) an event of default, (ii) a Debt Yield Event (as defined below), or (iii) an Anchor Trigger Event.
A “Debt Yield Event” will commence when the debt yield of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is less than 10.25% for two consecutive calendar quarters and will expire on the date that the debt yield of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan is 10.25% or greater for two consecutive calendar quarters.
An “Anchor Trigger Event” will commence when any Anchor Tenant: (i) (A) has “gone dark”, other than a temporary closure in connection with (x) restoration, repair or renovation, (y) compliance with applicable law, regulations and/or governmental mandates or (z) an event of force majeure for any reason not to exceed 60 days or (B) has vacated its anchor parcel; (ii) is the subject of a bankruptcy action; (iii) terminates, surrenders or cancels its lease; or (iv) fails to renew its lease 12 months prior to expiration and will expire (a) with respect to a trigger under clause (i) above, such Anchor Tenant operates the demised premises (to the extent not subject to any permitted subletting)
Retail – Super Regional Mall 2601 Preston Road Frisco, TX 75033 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 Stonebriar Centre | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $89,000,000 42.1% 2.30x 16.8% |
for a period of no less than 30 consecutive operating days; (b) with respect to a trigger under clause (ii) above, (x) if the premises occupied by the Anchor Tenant are owned by such tenant, such bankruptcy action is dismissed or the Anchor Tenant has emerged from such bankruptcy action and is continuing to occupy its premises or a substantial portion thereof or (y) if the premises occupied by the Anchor Tenant are leased by such tenant from the borrowers, such lease is accepted and affirmed by the Anchor Tenant in the bankruptcy action; (c) with respect to a trigger under clause (iii) above, such Anchor Tenant rescinds its notice of cancellation, termination or non-renewal in writing, (d) with respect to a trigger under clause (iv) above, such Anchor Tenant renews and/or extends its lease pursuant to the terms thereof, (e) for any Anchor Trigger Event, if such parcel is owned by the borrowers, the entire parcel or not less than 75% of the aggregate gross leasable square footage of the Anchor’s parcel (as set forth on a schedule to the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan agreement) becomes owned or leased by one or more replacement tenants pursuant to leases entered into in accordance with the terms of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents or otherwise in each case reasonably approved by the lender (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), or (f) for any Anchor Trigger Event, the borrowers have satisfied the conditions set forth in the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents with respect to the applicable parcel.
An “Anchor Tenant” includes (i) non-collateral anchors, Dillard’s, Macy’s and Nordstrom, (ii) collateral anchors, JCPenney and AMC Theatres, (iii) any tenant who occupies at least 75% of the space currently occupied by the foregoing after an acquisition of such space by the borrowers or one of their respective affiliates, and (iv) any replacement of either of the foregoing.
An “Acquired Parcel” is a fee simple or leasehold interest in a parcel at or adjacent to the shopping center of which the Stonebriar Centre Property is a part that is acquired in a substitution in accordance with the Stonebriar Centre Property Whole Loan documents.
An “Acquired Expansion Parcel” means any parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon located, (a) constituting an integral part of, or adjoining to, or proximately located near, the shopping center of which the Stonebriar Centre Property is a part, (b) that is not owned by the borrowers on the origination date of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan and (c) is not an Acquired Parcel and is acquired by the borrowers after the origination date of the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan.
Substitution. The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan permits the release of one or more portions of the Stonebriar Centre Property (an “Exchange Parcel”) and the corresponding acquisition of an Acquired Parcel (such action, a “Substitution”), subject to the satisfaction of certain requirements including (but not limited to) (i) no event of default exists, (ii) the Exchange Parcel is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved (unless waived by the lender), provided that this condition will not apply to any Exchange Parcel which is an Acquired Expansion Parcel, (iii) simultaneously with the substitution, the borrowers acquire the fee or leasehold interest in an Acquired Parcel that is reasonably equivalent in value to the Exchange Parcel (as evidenced by a letter of value provided by the borrowers) and is at or adjacent to the Stonebriar Centre Property, (iv) the borrowers deliver to the lender an officer’s certificate stating that certain of the representations and warranties in the Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan agreement are true and correct with respect to the Acquired Parcel, (v) the borrowers deliver such other restrictive covenants in recordable form to be recorded against the Exchange Parcel which would be satisfactory to a prudent lender acting reasonably, which restrict the use of the Release Parcel such that none of the exclusive use rights granted to any tenants pursuant to any of the leases are violated but only to the extent such exclusive use rights apply to the Exchange Parcel following the release of the same, (vi) the borrowers deliver a rating agency confirmation for such Substitution and (vii) satisfaction of customary REMIC requirements.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Partial Release. The Stonebriar Centre Whole Loan documents permit the release of (i) one or more parcels (including “air rights” parcels), (ii) one or more Acquired Parcels (as defined below) or Acquired Expansion Parcels (as defined below) (each, a “Release Parcel”) provided that, among other things, (a) no event of default exists, (b) the borrowers deliver evidence reasonably satisfactory to the lender that the Release Parcel (x) has been legally subdivided (or that the borrowers have taken all action required to be taken in order for the Release Parcel to be legally subdivided), (y) is a separate tax lot (or the borrowers have taken all action required for the Release Parcel to be a separate tax lot), and (z) is not necessary for compliance with zoning, building, land use, parking or other legal requirements applicable to the Stonebriar Centre Property and (c) the Release Parcel is vacant, non-income producing and unimproved (unless waived by the lender), provided that this condition described in this clause (c) will not apply to any Release Parcel which is an Acquired Expansion Parcel.
Ground Lease. None.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | CREFI | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype(2): | Various - Various |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Barbi Benton Gradow | | Collateral(3): | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Regency MHC Holdings LLC | | Location(2): | Various, Various |
Original Balance: | $85,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated(2): | Various / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $85,000,000 | | Property Management: | The Churchill Group, Inc. |
% by Initial UPB: | 9.5% | | Size: | 7,254 Pads/Units |
Interest Rate: | 5.71000% | | Appraised Value (As Is) / Per Unit: | $166,400,000 / $22,939 |
Note Date: | July 3, 2024 | | Appraisal Date(4): | Various |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 75.1% (as of May 31, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 76.2% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $9,205,283 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $8,961,932 |
First Payment Date: | August 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $8,760,725 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $8,610,852 |
Call Protection: | L(25),D(28),O(7) | | 2022 NOI: | $8,067,407 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Springing / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | NAV |
Reserves(1) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $11,718 |
Taxes: | $362,285 | $90,571 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $11,718 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 51.1% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $20,079 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 51.1% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $0 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 10.8% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $3,580,309 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.82x |
| | | | | | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $85,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $53,640,491 | 63.1 | % |
| | | | Return of Equity | 19,228,783 | 22.6 | |
| | | | Closing Costs(5) | 8,188,131 | 9.6 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 3,942,594 | 4.6 | |
Total Sources | $85,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $85,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Please refer to “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
| (2) | See “Portfolio Summary” below. |
| (3) | The Churchill Portfolio Properties (as defined below) are owned in fee simple interest by the borrower, except that the borrower has a ground leasehold interest in a portion of the Canby Regency property comprising a water well and pump infrastructure. The ground lease has an annual payment of approximately $22,924 and expires on December 31, 2033. See “Ground Lease” below. |
| (4) | Appraisal Dates are between April 30, 2024 and May 15, 2024. |
| (5) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $4,887,500. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
The Loan. The second largest mortgage loan (the “Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in a portfolio of 18 manufactured housing properties and 11 self storage properties totaling 7,254 units located across 15 states (the “Churchill Portfolio Properties”). The Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan is evidenced by two promissory notes with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $85,000,000. The Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan was originated on July 3, 2024 by CREFI and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 5.71000% per annum. The Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan is the payment date that occurs on July 6, 2029.
The Properties. The Churchill Portfolio Properties consist of 29 properties across 15 states consisting of 18 manufactured housing communities totaling 2,605 pads located across 12 states and 11 self storage facilities totaling 4,649 units located across six states. As of the underwritten rent rolls dated May 31, 2024, the Churchill Portfolio Properties were 75.1% occupied.
The following table presents certain information relating to the Churchill Portfolio Properties:
Portfolio Summary |
Property Name | Location(1) | Property Type(1) | Pads / Units(2) | Occupancy(2) | Year Built(1) | Allocated Cut-off Date Balance | Appraised Value | UW NOI(2) | % of UW NOI(2) |
Rapid City Regency | Rapid City, SD | Manufactured Housing | 207 | 98.6% | 1997 | $8,480,000 | $13,900,000 | $878,514 | 9.5% | |
Durango Regency | Durango, CO | Manufactured Housing | 128 | 100.0% | 1973 | 7,430,000 | 14,700,000 | $755,520 | 8.2% | |
Canby Regency | Canby, OR | Manufactured Housing | 121 | 100.0% | 1972 | 6,130,000 | 11,900,000 | $613,063 | 6.7% | |
Savannah Regency | Savannah, GA | Manufactured Housing | 135 | 100.0% | 1973 | 5,570,000 | 9,300,000 | $588,969 | 6.4% | |
Douglasville Regency | Douglasville, GA | Manufactured Housing | 169 | 82.8% | 1960 | 5,490,000 | 10,200,000 | $600,697 | 6.5% | |
Saint Marys Regency | Saint Marys, GA | Manufactured Housing | 180 | 73.9% | 1990 | 5,280,000 | 11,300,000 | $596,605 | 6.5% | |
San Marcos Regency | San Marcos, TX | Manufactured Housing | 133 | 94.0% | 1965 | 4,840,000 | 7,800,000 | $612,038 | 6.6% | |
Rock Springs Regency | Rock Springs, WY | Manufactured Housing | 161 | 87.6% | 1973 | 4,700,000 | 9,400,000 | $492,314 | 5.3% | |
Oxford Regency | Oxford, ME | Manufactured Housing | 133 | 94.7% | 1970 | 3,970,000 | 7,300,000 | $443,217 | 4.8% | |
Alpine Regency | Columbia, SC | Manufactured Housing | 132 | 78.8% | 1970 | 3,220,000 | 5,510,000 | $342,818 | 3.7% | |
Dickson Regency | Dickson, TN | Manufactured Housing | 80 | 86.3% | 1968 | 2,970,000 | 4,900,000 | $315,324 | 3.4% | |
Mora Regency | Mora, MN | Manufactured Housing | 124 | 71.8% | 1968 | 2,030,000 | 4,400,000 | $279,376 | 3.0% | |
Montgomery Regency | Montgomery, AL | Manufactured Housing | 122 | 77.9% | 1972, 1988 | 1,790,000 | 3,510,000 | $205,292 | 2.2% | |
Sioux City Regency | Sioux City, IA | Manufactured Housing | 196 | 40.3% | 1950 | 1,430,000 | 6,000,000 | $165,616 | 1.8% | |
Iowa City Regency | Iowa City, IA | Manufactured Housing | 230 | 43.5% | 1971 | 1,370,000 | 6,000,000 | $178,747 | 1.9% | |
Willmar West Regency | Willmar, MN | Manufactured Housing | 109 | 58.7% | 1972 | 1,200,000 | 2,330,000 | $145,740 | 1.6% | |
Eagle Lake Regency | Eagle Lake, MN | Manufactured Housing | 132 | 47.7% | 1967 | 1,120,000 | 3,470,000 | $131,160 | 1.4% | |
Old Town Regency | Old Town, ME | Manufactured Housing | 113 | 70.8% | 1970 | 470,000 | 3,230,000 | $60,831 | 0.7% | |
Subtotal (MHC) | | | 2,605 | 76.6% | | $67,490,000 | $135,150,000 | $7,405,844 | 80.5% | |
Detroit | Detroit, MI | Self Storage | 851 | 67.0% | 1916, 1919 | $3,430,000 | $6,080,000 | $307,929 | 3.3% | |
Baytown | Baytown, TX | Self Storage | 527 | 63.9% | 1987 | 2,350,000 | 4,270,000 | $213,476 | 2.3% | |
Beaumont | Beaumont, TX | Self Storage | 539 | 82.9% | 2002, 2005 | 2,000,000 | 3,410,000 | $236,491 | 2.6% | |
Waveland | Waveland, MS | Self Storage | 444 | 70.3% | 1982, 2006 | 1,800,000 | 3,120,000 | $192,486 | 2.1% | |
Hwy 49 | Gulfport, MS | Self Storage | 407 | 85.0% | 1986 | 1,770,000 | 3,260,000 | $153,022 | 1.7% | |
San Juan | San Juan, TX | Self Storage | 292 | 91.8% | 1979, 1990, 2005 | 1,500,000 | 2,440,000 | $306,431 | 3.3% | |
Pass Rd. | Gulfport, MS | Self Storage | 379 | 70.7% | 1970 | 1,370,000 | 2,410,000 | $115,576 | 1.3% | |
Semmes | Semmes, Wilmer, AL | Self Storage | 303 | 78.5% | 1999 | 1,170,000 | 1,930,000 | $98,218 | 1.1% | |
Memphis | Memphis, TN | Self Storage | 323 | 75.9% | 1987 | 1,020,000 | 1,770,000 | $82,676 | 0.9% | |
Evansville | Evansville, IN | Self Storage | 409 | 68.7% | 1977 | 1,000,000 | 1,680,000 | $97,434 | 1.1% | |
Gautier | Gautier, MS | Self Storage | 175 | 79.4% | 1981 | 100,000 | 880,000 | ($4,299) | 0.0% | |
Subtotal (SS) | | | 4,649 | 74.2% | | $17,510,000 | $31,250,000 | $1,799,439 | 19.5% | |
Total | | | 7,254 | 75.1% | | $85,000,000 | $166,400,000 | $9,205,283 | 100.0% | |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated May 31, 2024. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Churchill Portfolio Properties:
Unit Mix |
Property Name | Property Type | Pads / Units | % of Total | Occupied Pads / Units(1) | Occupancy | Average Monthly Rental Rate |
Rapid City Regency | Manufactured Housing | 207 | 2.9% | 204 | 98.6% | $467 |
Durango Regency | Manufactured Housing | 128 | 1.8% | 128 | 100.0% | $709 |
Canby Regency | Manufactured Housing | 121 | 1.7% | 121 | 100.0% | $720 |
Savannah Regency | Manufactured Housing | 135 | 1.9% | 135 | 100.0% | $441 |
Douglasville Regency | Manufactured Housing | 169 | 2.3% | 140 | 82.8% | $481 |
Saint Marys Regency(2) | Manufactured Housing | 180 | 2.5% | 133 | 73.9% | $685 |
San Marcos Regency | Manufactured Housing | 133 | 1.8% | 125 | 94.0% | $506 |
Rock Springs Regency | Manufactured Housing | 161 | 2.2% | 141 | 87.6% | $434 |
Oxford Regency | Manufactured Housing | 133 | 1.8% | 126 | 94.7% | $468 |
Alpine Regency | Manufactured Housing | 132 | 1.8% | 104 | 78.8% | $398 |
Dickson Regency | Manufactured Housing | 80 | 1.1% | 69 | 86.3% | $452 |
Mora Regency | Manufactured Housing | 124 | 1.7% | 89 | 71.8% | $396 |
Montgomery Regency | Manufactured Housing | 122 | 1.7% | 95 | 77.9% | $341 |
Sioux City Regency | Manufactured Housing | 196 | 2.7% | 79 | 40.3% | $387 |
Iowa City Regency | Manufactured Housing | 230 | 3.2% | 100 | 43.5% | $430 |
Willmar West Regency | Manufactured Housing | 109 | 1.5% | 64 | 58.7% | $408 |
Eagle Lake Regency | Manufactured Housing | 132 | 1.8% | 63 | 47.7% | $385 |
Old Town Regency | Manufactured Housing | 113 | 1.6% | 80 | 70.8% | $354 |
Subtotal (MHC) | | 2,605 | 35.9% | 1,996 | 76.6% | $484 |
Detroit | Self Storage | 851 | 11.7% | 570 | 67.0% | $102 |
Baytown | Self Storage | 527 | 7.3% | 337 | 63.9% | $103 |
Beaumont | Self Storage | 539 | 7.4% | 447 | 82.9% | $104 |
Waveland | Self Storage | 444 | 6.1% | 312 | 70.3% | $109 |
Hwy 49 | Self Storage | 407 | 5.6% | 346 | 85.0% | $93 |
San Juan | Self Storage | 292 | 4.0% | 268 | 91.8% | $135 |
Pass Rd. | Self Storage | 379 | 5.2% | 268 | 70.7% | $89 |
Semmes | Self Storage | 303 | 4.2% | 238 | 78.5% | $95 |
Memphis | Self Storage | 323 | 4.5% | 245 | 75.9% | $102 |
Evansville | Self Storage | 409 | 5.6% | 281 | 68.7% | $70 |
Gautier | Self Storage | 175 | 2.4% | 139 | 79.4% | $94 |
Subtotal (SS) | | 4,649 | 64.1% | 3,451 | 74.2% | $100 |
Total | | 7,254 | 100.0% | 5,447 | 75.1% | $241 |
| (1) | Approximately 242 of the 2,605 manufactured housing pads at the Churchill Portfolio Properties are occupied by manufactured homes (the “Owned Mobile Homes”) that are owned by an affiliate of the borrower (the “Churchill Master Tenant”). The borrower leases the pads occupied by the Owned Mobile Homes to the Churchill Master Tenant under a master lease (the “Churchill Master Lease”) and the Churchill Master Tenant leases the Owned Mobile Homes to the occupants of such Owned Mobile Homes. The Churchill Master Lease provides that it is in place until the indefeasible payment in full of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the Churchill Master Lease the Churchill Master Tenant pays the borrower (i) $578 per month for each pad on which an Owned Mobile Home is located and (ii) all income actually received by the Churchill Master Tenant from the Owned Mobile Homes. Pursuant to the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the Churchill Master Tenant is permitted to acquire new manufactured housing units provided that (i) such manufactured housing units do not exceed 25% of all manufactured housing units on the Churchill Portfolio Properties (in the aggregate) and (ii) such additional manufactured housing units are at all times located on pads that are subject to the Churchill Master Lease. The Churchill Master Tenant may sell Owned Mobile Homes to a third party resident meeting the borrower’s resident leasing criteria who enters into a pad lease with the borrower at its then market rental rate (in which case such manufactured housing unit will no longer be subject to the Churchill Master Lease). |
| (2) | The Saint Mary’s Regency property is primarily a rental property with substantially all the manufactured housing units at the property being Owned Mobile Homes. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Churchill Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2022 | 2023 | TTM 5/31/2024 | U/W | U/W Per Unit |
Base Rent | $14,180,856 | $15,019,266 | $15,313,852 | $15,753,643(2) | $2,172 |
Potential Income from Vacant Space | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,913,304 | $677 |
Gross Potential Rent | $14,180,856 | $15,019,266 | $15,313,852 | $20,666,947 | $2,849 |
Other Income(3) | 667,951 | 836,902 | 870,795 | 936,045 | $129 |
Total Gross Income | $14,848,807 | $15,856,168 | $16,184,648 | $21,602,992 | $2,978 |
(Vacancy / Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (4,913,304) | ($677) |
Effective Gross Income | $14,848,807 | $15,856,168 | $16,184,648 | $16,689,688 | $2,301 |
Management Fee | 445,464 | 475,685 | 485,539 | 500,691 | $69 |
Real Estate Taxes | 1,094,036 | 1,091,168 | 1,112,166 | 1,088,516 | $150 |
Insurance | 615,306 | 580,708 | 592,887 | 825,129 | $114 |
Other Expenses(4) | 4,626,594 | 5,097,755 | 5,233,331 | 5,070,069 | $699 |
Total Expenses | $6,781,400 | $7,245,316 | $7,423,923 | $7,484,405 | $1,032 |
Net Operating Income | $8,067,407 | $8,610,852 | $8,760,725 | $9,205,283 | $1,269 |
Replacement Reserves | 0 | 0 | 0 | 243,352 | $34 |
Net Cash Flow | $8,067,407 | $8,610,852 | $8,760,725 | $8,961,932 | $1,235 |
| | | | | |
Occupancy (%) | 76.4% | 76.6% | 75.1%(5) | 76.2%(6) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.64x | 1.75x | 1.78x | 1.82x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 9.5% | 10.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
| (2) | U/W Base Rent includes $1,679,707 of rent payable for mobile home pads rented from the borrower by the Churchill Master Tenant under the Churchill Master Lease. |
| (3) | Other Income includes income for home rental and lease-to-own income, late/insufficient funds charges, laundry and pet income, and miscellaneous income. Underwritten Other Income includes $565,455 of rent payable by the Churchill Master Tenant for the Owned Mobile Homes under the Churchill Master Lease. |
| (4) | Other Expenses are comprised of payroll and benefits, repairs and maintenance, utilities, advertising and marketing, general and administrative, legal and professional, ground rent, and other miscellaneous expenses. |
| (5) | Represents most recent occupancy as of May 31, 2024. |
| (6) | U/W Occupancy represents economic occupancy. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
Appraisal. According to the appraisals dated between April 30, 2024 and May 15, 2024, the Churchill Portfolio Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $166,400,000. Based on the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $166,400,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the Churchill Portfolio Loan are 51.1%.
Churchill Portfolio Appraised Value(1) |
Property | Value | Capitalization Rate |
Rapid City Regency | $13,900,000 | 6.00% |
Durango Regency | 14,700,000 | 5.50% |
Canby Regency | 11,900,000 | 5.50% |
Savannah Regency | 9,300,000 | 6.00% |
Douglasville Regency | 10,200,000 | 6.00% |
Saint Marys Regency | 11,300,000 | 6.75% |
San Marcos Regency | 7,800,000 | 6.00% |
Rock Springs Regency | 9,400,000 | 6.00% |
Oxford Regency | 7,300,000 | 6.50% |
Alpine Regency | 5,510,000 | 6.75% |
Dickson Regency | 4,900,000 | 6.25% |
Mora Regency | 4,400,000 | 6.75% |
Montgomery Regency | 3,510,000 | 6.75% |
Sioux City Regency | 6,000,000 | 7.00% |
Iowa City Regency | 6,000,000 | 7.00% |
Willmar West Regency | 2,330,000 | 7.00% |
Eagle Lake Regency | 3,470,000 | 7.00% |
Old Town Regency | 3,230,000 | 7.00% |
Subtotal (MHC) | $135,150,000 | 6.23% |
Detroit | $6,080,000 | 7.00% |
Baytown | 4,270,000 | 7.00% |
Beaumont | 3,410,000 | 7.00% |
Waveland | 3,120,000 | 7.00% |
Hwy 49 | 3,260,000 | 7.00% |
San Juan | 2,440,000 | 7.00% |
Pass Rd. | 2,410,000 | 7.00% |
Semmes | 1,930,000 | 7.00% |
Memphis | 1,770,000 | 7.00% |
Evansville | 1,680,000 | 7.00% |
Gautier | 880,000 | 7.00% |
Subtotal (SS) | $31,250,000 | 7.00% |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | $166,400,000 | 6.37% |
Environmental Matters. According to the Phase I environmental reports, dated between May 30, 2024 and June 4, 2024, there was no evidence of any recognized environmental conditions at the Churchill Portfolio Properties.
The Market. The 29 properties comprising the Churchill Portfolio Properties are located across 15 states and have the following state concentrations: Georgia (three properties, 19.4% of UW NOI), Texas (four properties, 14.9% of UW NOI), South Dakota (one property, 9.5% of UW NOI), Colorado (one property, 8.2% of UW NOI), Oregon (one property, 6.7% of UW NOI), Minnesota (three properties, 6.0% of UW NOI), Maine (two properties, 5.5% of UW NOI), Wyoming (one property, 5.3% of UW NOI), Mississippi (four properties, 5.0% of UW NOI), Tennessee (two properties, 4.3% of UW NOI), South Carolina (one property, 3.7% of UW NOI), Iowa (two properties, 3.7% of UW NOI), Alabama (two properties, 3.3% of UW NOI), Michigan (one property, 3.3% of UW NOI) and Indiana (one property, 1.1% of UW NOI).
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
The following table includes information regarding the demographics of each immediate trade area for the individual Churchill Portfolio Properties:
Demographic Summary(1) |
| | | Population | Average Household Income |
Property Name | Property Type | Location | 3-Mile | 5-Mile | 3-Mile | 5-Mile |
Rapid City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Rapid City, SD | 50,350 | 76,135 | $72,675 | $80,359 |
Durango Regency | Manufactured Housing | Durango, CO | 3,084 | 4,153 | $123,980 | $119,204 |
Canby Regency | Manufactured Housing | Canby, OR | 21,523 | 75,137 | $122,577 | $128,073 |
Savannah Regency | Manufactured Housing | Savannah, GA | 62,932 | 119,599 | $89,075 | $87,033 |
Douglasville Regency | Manufactured Housing | Douglasville, GA | 34,344 | 99,314 | $75,946 | $86,639 |
Saint Marys Regency | Manufactured Housing | Saint Marys, GA | 22,856 | 37,883 | $89,937 | $91,827 |
San Marcos Regency | Manufactured Housing | San Marcos, TX | 47,046 | 77,569 | $50,499 | $61,470 |
Rock Springs Regency | Manufactured Housing | Rock Springs, WY | 4,295 | 14,091 | $99,693 | $95,216 |
Oxford Regency | Manufactured Housing | Oxford, ME | 3,244 | 9,064 | $76,219 | $77,739 |
Alpine Regency | Manufactured Housing | Columbia, SC | 43,060 | 104,150 | $83,936 | $87,641 |
Dickson Regency | Manufactured Housing | Dickson, TN | 14,913 | 23,094 | $74,639 | $82,581 |
Mora Regency | Manufactured Housing | Mora, MN | 5,385 | 6,931 | $78,331 | $81,395 |
Montgomery Regency | Manufactured Housing | Montgomery, AL | 58,015 | 119,996 | $68,373 | $78,112 |
Sioux City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Sioux City, IA | 45,437 | 95,974 | $78,019 | $79,585 |
Iowa City Regency | Manufactured Housing | Iowa City, IA | 22,305 | 82,136 | $80,489 | $86,943 |
Willmar West Regency | Manufactured Housing | Willmar, MN | 18,152 | 24,082 | $74,666 | $78,339 |
Eagle Lake Regency | Manufactured Housing | Eagle Lake, MN | 3,991 | 19,414 | $103,464 | $99,250 |
Old Town Regency | Manufactured Housing | Old Town, ME | 18,125 | 21,887 | $71,467 | $75,281 |
Detroit | Self Storage | Detroit, MI | 69,267 | 165,366 | $65,998 | $59,782 |
Baytown | Self Storage | Baytown, TX | 15,726 | 46,290 | $136,217 | $134,023 |
Beaumont | Self Storage | Beaumont, TX | 53,990 | 105,027 | $81,194 | $83,265 |
Waveland | Self Storage | Waveland, MS | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV |
Hwy 49 | Self Storage | Gulfport, MS | 28,116 | 74,158 | $54,042 | $68,119 |
San Juan | Self Storage | San Juan, TX | 92,659 | 203,716 | $63,990 | $67,585 |
Pass Rd. | Self Storage | Gulfport, MS | 34,804 | 82,046 | $73,144 | $70,218 |
Semmes | Self Storage | Semmes, Wilmer, AL | NAV | 36,497 | $75,774 | $74,140 |
Memphis | Self Storage | Memphis, TN | 68,962 | 185,529 | $62,251 | $70,866 |
Evansville | Self Storage | Evansville, IN | 56,391 | 124,679 | $75,894 | $74,160 |
Gautier | Self Storage | Gautier, MS | 14,335 | 25,102 | $76,104 | $87,721 |
Wtd. Avg. (based on UW NOI)(2) | | | 33,362 | 70,411 | $85,113 | $88,181 |
| (2) | Weighted Averages exclude properties where information is not available. |
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is Regency MHC Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity having at least one independent director in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan. The borrower sponsor and non-recourse carveout guarantor is Barbi Benton Gradow of The Churchill Group, Inc. (“Churchill Group”). The Churchill Group owns and operates manufactured housing communities and self storage properties across the United States.
Property Management. The Churchill Portfolio Properties are managed by The Churchill Group, Inc., an affiliate of the borrower sponsor.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the borrower deposited: (i) $3,580,309 into an immediate repairs reserve and (ii) approximately $362,285 into a tax reserve.
Tax Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $90,571).
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Churchill Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $85,000,000 51.1% 1.82x 10.8% |
Insurance Reserve – At the option of the lender, if the liability or casualty policies covering the Churchill Portfolio Properties are not approved blanket or umbrella policies, the borrower will be required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the amount which will be sufficient to pay the insurance premiums due for the renewal of coverage afforded by such policies.
Replacement Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $20,079.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan is structured with a springing lockbox and springing cash management. Upon the first occurrence of a Trigger Period (as defined below), the borrower is required to establish a lender-controlled lockbox account, and is thereafter required to deposit, or cause the property manager to deposit, immediately upon receipt, all revenue received by the borrower or the property manager into such lockbox. Upon the first occurrence of a Trigger Period, the borrower is required to deliver a notice to all credit card companies and credit card banks with which the borrower or property manager has entered into a merchant’s agreement with respect to the Churchill Portfolio Properties directing them to remit all payments into the lender-controlled lockbox account. In addition, upon the first occurrence of a Trigger Period, the lender is required to establish a lender-controlled cash management account. All funds deposited into the lockbox account are required to be transferred on each business day to or at the direction of the borrower, unless a Trigger Period exists, in which case such funds will be required to be transferred to such lender-controlled cash management account, to be applied and disbursed in accordance with the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, and all excess cash flow funds remaining in the cash management account after the application of such funds in accordance with the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents are required to be held by the lender in an excess cash flow reserve account as additional collateral for the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Upon the cure of the applicable Trigger Period, so long as no other Trigger Period exists, the lender is required to return any amounts remaining on deposit in the excess cash flow reserve account to the borrower. On not more than one occasion during the term of the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan, if a Trigger Period ceases to exist, the borrower may deactivate the lockbox account; provided that if a Trigger Period again occurs, the borrower will be required to take the same actions to establish a lockbox account that it was required to take with respect to the first Trigger Period. Upon an event of default under the Churchill Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the lender may apply funds in the accounts to the debt in such priority as it may determine.
A “Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earlier of (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, and (ii) the debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.20x (on an interest-only basis), and (B) expiring upon (a) with regard to any Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (i) above, the cure (if applicable) of such event of default, and (b) with regard to any Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (ii) above, the date that the debt service coverage ratio is equal to or greater than 1.25x (on an interest-only basis) for two consecutive calendar quarters.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Following the date that is two years after the closing date of the Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization, the borrower is permitted to obtain the release of one or more individual Churchill Portfolio Properties upon satisfaction of the following conditions, among others: (i) the defeasance of a release amount equal to the greater of (a) 110% of the allocated loan amount of the individual Churchill Portfolio Property being released or (b) 100% of the applicable net sales proceeds of such individual Churchill Portfolio Property, (ii) after the release, the debt service coverage ratio with respect to the remaining Churchill Portfolio Properties is greater than the greater of (a) the debt service coverage ratio of all Churchill Portfolio Properties immediately prior to the release and (b) 1.85x, (iii) after the release, the debt yield with respect to the remaining Churchill Portfolio Properties is greater than the greater of (a) the debt yield of all Churchill Portfolio Properties immediately prior to the release and (b) 10.54%, and (iv) conditions related to REMIC compliance.
Ground Lease. The individual Churchill Portfolio Property known as Canby Regency is a manufactured housing property as to which the manufactured homes are located on land owned in fee by the borrower. However, a portion of the Canby Regency property, which is used for a water well and pump infrastructure that provides water to the manufactured housing community, is a ground leasehold interest under a ground lease that expires on December 31, 2033. The ground lease provides for annual ground rent of approximately $22,924 and increases annually by 5% on January 1 of each year. Such ground lease lacks certain customary leasehold lender protections. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Fee & Leasehold Interests; Ground Leases” in the Prospectus for additional information.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | CREFI | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Various - Various |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Olymbec USA LLC and Olymbec Investments Inc. | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Olymbec Southaven LLC, Olymbec Keystone LLC and Olymbec Space Center LLC | | Location(2): | Various, Various |
Original Balance: | $75,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated(2): | Various / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $75,000,000 | | Property Management(3): | Various |
% by Initial UPB: | 8.4% | | Size: | 2,977,028 SF |
Interest Rate: | 6.78000% | | Appraised Value (As Is) / Per SF: | $134,300,000 / $45 |
Note Date: | July 2, 2024 | | Appraisal Date(4): | Various |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy(5): | 89.0% (as of Various) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 86.4% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $8,422,762 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $7,976,208 |
First Payment Date: | August 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $7,931,332 (TTM April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $7,914,151 |
Call Protection: | L(25),D(32),O(3) | | 2022 NOI: | $7,521,237 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $7,429,127 |
Reserves(1) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $25 |
Taxes: | $212,145 | $33,885 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $25 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 55.8% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $37,213 | $1,500,000 | | Maturity Date LTV: | 55.8% |
TI / LC: | $2,500,000 | Springing | $500,000 | | UW NOI DY: | 11.2% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $143,750 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.55x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of T | otal |
Mortgage Loan | $75,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $45,686,099 | 60.9 | % |
| | | | Borrower Sponsor Equity | 24,382,755 | 32.5 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 2,855,895 | 3.8 | |
| | | | Closing Costs(6) | 2,075,252 | 2.8 | |
Total Sources | $75,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $75,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Please refer to “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
| (2) | See “Portfolio Summary” below. |
| (3) | The 8374 North 4000 East Road, Space Centre Industrial Park, 8800 Rostin Road and Southaven Industrial Park properties are self-managed. The Keystone Office Park property is managed by Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., a third-party property management company. |
| (4) | Appraisal Dates are between May 30, 2024 and June 14, 2024. |
| (5) | Occupancy is based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024. |
| (6) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $750,000. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
The Loan. The third largest mortgage loan (the “Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrowers’ fee interest in a portfolio of four industrial properties and one office property totaling 2,977,028 square feet located in Tennessee, Illinois, Mississippi and Indiana (the “Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties”). The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $75,000,000. The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan was originated on July 2, 2024 by CREFI and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.78000% per annum. The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan is the payment date that occurs on July 6, 2029.
The Properties. The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties are comprised of four industrial properties totaling 2,861,286 square feet and an office property totaling 115,742 square feet. The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties are located in Tennessee, Illinois, Mississippi and Indiana. As of the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024, the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties were 89.0% occupied by 54 tenants.
At origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, a master lease agreement was executed by the guarantors, as tenant, and the borrowers, as landlord, pursuant to which the guarantors will be obligated to pay rent in the amount of at least the underwritten gross rent for the tenants TransformCo (as defined below), Nickey Warehouses, Inc. and Terex Corporation (in each case to the extent that such tenant is not in fact paying and/or performing such obligations, and throughout the term of such master lease which ends July 6, 2034, regardless of whether the related underlying lease has expired or terminated).
The following table presents certain information relating to the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Portfolio Summary |
Property Name | Location | Year Built / Renovated(1) | Sq. Ft.(2) | Occupancy(2) | Allocated Cut-off Date Balance | % of Allocated Cut-off Date Balance | Appraised Value(1) | U/W NOI(2) | % of U/W NOI(2) |
8374 North 4000 East Road | Manteno, IL | 2002 / NAP | 819,960 | 100.0% | 23,000,000 | 30.7% | 41,900,000 | $2,488,976 | 29.6% |
Space Centre Industrial Park | Memphis, TN | 1956-1973 / NAP | 1,088,244 | 74.8% | 18,000,000 | 24.0% | 41,000,000 | 1,859,082 | 22.1% |
8800 Rostin Road | Southaven, MS | 1974 / NAP | 508,700 | 100.0% | 16,500,000 | 22.0% | 24,400,000 | 1,780,450 | 21.1% |
Southaven Industrial Park | Memphis, TN | 1972, 1986, 1989, 1995 / NAP | 444,382 | 94.6% | 13,500,000 | 18.0% | 20,500,000 | 1,590,823 | 18.9% |
Keystone Office Park | Carmel, IN | 1986, 2003 / NAP | 115,742 | 75.2% | 4,000,000 | 5.3% | 6,500,000 | 703,431 | 8.4% |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | | | 2,977,028 | 89.0% | $75,000,000 | 100.0% | $134,300,000 | $8,422,762 | 100.0% |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024. |
8374 North 4000 East Road
The 8374 North 4000 East Road property is an 819,960 square foot, single-story, warehouse/distribution center located in Manteno, Illinois. The property was built in 2002 and is situated on a 115.0-acre site approximately 52 miles south of Chicago, Illinois. The building contains 35-foot clear heights, 142 dock-high doors, and two drive in doors. As of August 6, 2024, the 8374 North 4000 East Road property was 100.0% occupied by TransformCo with a lease expiring December 31, 2025.
Space Centre Industrial Park
The Space Centre Industrial Park property is comprised of eight single-story warehouse buildings with an aggregate of 1,088,244 square feet, located in Memphis, Tennessee. The property was built in phases from 1956 to 1973 and is situated on a 61.3-acre site. The buildings contain 18 to 20-foot clear heights, 326 dock-high doors, and 17 drive in doors. As of May 1, 2024, the Space Centre Industrial Park property was 74.8% occupied by five tenants. Top tenants at the Space Centre Industrial Park property include Nickey Warehouses, Spa Parts Plus Ltd. and Hackbarth Delivery Service.
8800 Rostin Road
The 8800 Rostin Road property is a 508,700 square foot, single-story, warehouse/distribution center located in Southaven, Mississippi. The property was built in 1974 and is situated on an approximately 24.8-acre site approximately 14 miles south of Memphis, Tennessee. The building contains 32-foot clear heights, 47 dock-high doors, and two drive in doors. As of August 6, 2024, the 8800 Rostin Road property was 100.0% occupied by Terex Corporation, which has been at the 8800 Rostin Road property since March 2010 and has a current lease term through February 2030.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
Southaven Industrial Park
The Southaven Industrial Park property is comprised of four single story warehouse/distribution buildings with an aggregate of 444,382 square feet, located in Memphis, Tennessee. The property was built in phases from 1972 to 1995 and is situated on an approximately 31.3-acre site. The buildings contain 18 to 24-foot clear heights, 93 dock-high doors, and 17 drive in doors. As of May 1, 2024, the Southaven Industrial Park property was 94.6% occupied by 11 tenants. Top tenants at the Southaven Industrial Park property include K & C Warehouse, LLC, Jacob Tubing LP, and Elegant Granite and Cabinet Inc.
Keystone Office Park
The Keystone Office Park property is a 115,742 square foot office park comprised of three two-story and two-one story buildings located in Carmel, Indiana. The property was built in phases from 1986 to 2003 and is situated on an approximately 12.7-acre site. As of July 1, 2024, the Keystone Office Park property was 75.2% occupied by 36 tenants, with no tenant accounting for more than 5.0% of property net rentable area. Top tenants at the Keystone Office Park Property include Market Street Wealth Management Advisors, LLC, UFCW Local 700 and Senex Services Corp.
Major Tenants. The three largest tenants based on underwritten base rent are Transform Distribution Center Holdco LLC (“TransformCo”), Nickey Warehouses, Inc. (“Nickey Warehouses”) and Terex Corporation.
TransformCo (819,960 square feet; 27.5% of portfolio net rentable area; 24.9% of portfolio underwritten base rent) TransformCo is a distributor for Transform SR Brands LLC dba TransformCo. TransformCo is an integrated retailer focused on connecting the digital and physical shopping experiences. The privately held company was established in 2019 to acquire some of the assets of Sears Holdings Corporation, with its current subsidiaries consisting of Sears, Kmart, Shop Your Way, and Kenmore. TransformCo has been at the 8374 North 4000 East Road property since December 2020 and has a current lease term through December 2025 with one, five-year renewal option and no termination options.
Nickey Warehouses (711,181 square feet; 23.9% of portfolio net rentable area; 19.5% of portfolio underwritten base rent) Founded in 1940, Nickey Warehouses is a third-party logistics provider with over three million square feet of warehousing space across Memphis, Tennessee and Mobile, Alabama. Nickey Warehouses has been at the Space Centre Industrial Park property since December 2003 and currently leases 450,841 square feet of space that expires in May 2025 and 260,340 square feet of space that expires in August 2025 with no renewal options and no termination options.
Terex Corporation (508,700 square feet; 17.1% of portfolio net rentable area; 17.8% of portfolio underwritten base rent) Founded in 1933, Terex Corporation is a manufacturer of materials processing machinery and aerial work platforms that designs, builds, and supports products used in construction, maintenance, manufacturing, energy, recycling, minerals, and materials management applications. Terex Corporation has been at the 8800 Rostin Road property since March 2010 and has a current lease term through February 2030 with no renewal or termination options.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the largest tenants at the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Property | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch)(2) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Portfolio Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Portfolio U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Option |
TransformCo(3) | 8374 North 4000 East Road | NR/NR/NR | 819,960 | 27.5 | % | $2,488,976 | $3.04 | 24.9% | 12/31/2025 | N | 1 x 5 Yr |
Nickey Warehouses(3)(4) | Space Centre Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 711,181 | 23.9 | | 1,953,227 | $2.75 | 19.5 | Various | N | None |
Terex Corporation(3) | 8800 Rostin Road | Ba3/BB/NR | 508,700 | 17.1 | | 1,780,450 | $3.50 | 17.8 | 2/28/2030 | N | None |
K & C Warehouse, LLC | Southaven Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 146,881 | 4.9 | | 599,275 | $4.08 | 6.0 | 8/31/2028 | N | 1 x 3 Yr |
Jacob Tubing LP | Southaven Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 50,232 | 1.7 | | 213,486 | $4.25 | 2.1 | 6/30/2031 | N | 2 x 3 Yr |
Elegant Granite and Cabinet Inc. | Southaven Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 66,891 | 2.2 | | 200,613 | $3.00 | 2.0 | 2/28/2030 | N | None |
Spa Parts Plus Ltd. | Space Centre Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 48,840 | 1.6 | | 200,244 | $4.10 | 2.0 | 2/28/2025 | N | 2 x 3 Yr |
Stericycle, Inc. | Southaven Industrial Park | NR/BB/BB | 39,883 | 1.3 | | 197,421 | $4.95 | 2.0 | 5/31/2028 | N | None |
Staples Contract & Commercial LLC | Southaven Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 34,220 | 1.1 | | 155,701 | $4.55 | 1.6 | 4/30/2029 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Hackbarth Delivery Service | Space Centre Industrial Park | NR/NR/NR | 37,492 | 1.3 | | 134,971 | $3.60 | 1.3 | 4/30/2025 | N | 1 x 2 Yr |
Largest Tenants | | | 2,464,280 | 82.8 | % | $7,924,364 | $3.22 | 79.2% | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | | 186,248 | 6.3 | | 2,074,897 | $11.14 | 20.8 | | | |
Total Occupied | | | 2,650,528 | 89.0 | % | $9,999,261 | $3.77 | 100.0% | | | |
Vacant | | | 326,500 | 11.0 | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 2,977,028 | 100.0 | % | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024, with rent steps through July 1, 2025. |
| (2) | In certain instances, ratings provided are those of the parent company of the entity shown, whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
| (3) | At origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, a master lease agreement was executed by the guarantors, as tenant, and the borrowers, as landlord, pursuant to which the guarantors will be obligated to pay rent in the amount of at least the underwritten gross rent for the tenants TransformCo, Nickey Warehouses and Terex Corporation as set forth in a schedule to such master lease (in each case to the extent that such tenant is not in fact paying and/or performing such obligations, and throughout the term of such master lease which ends July 6, 2034, regardless of whether the related underlying lease has expired or terminated). |
| (4) | Nickey Warehouses leases 450,841 SF of space that expires in May 2025 and 260,340 SF of space that expires in August 2025. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties, based on initial lease expiration dates:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | UW Base Rent | % of Total UW Base Rent | UW Base Rent $ per SF | Number of Leases Expiring |
MTM | 4,304 | 0.1% | 0.1% | 74,362 | 0.7% | $17.28 | 2 |
2024 | 11,986 | 0.4 | 0.5% | 112,855 | 1.1 | $9.42 | 2 |
2025 | 1,682,123 | 56.5 | 57.1% | 5,320,248 | 53.2 | $3.16 | 16 |
2026 | 31,452 | 1.1 | 58.1% | 453,362 | 4.5 | $14.41 | 8 |
2027 | 23,278 | 0.8 | 58.9% | 201,201 | 2.0 | $8.64 | 6 |
2028 | 207,603 | 7.0 | 65.9% | 1,005,201 | 10.1 | $4.84 | 6 |
2029 | 51,286 | 1.7 | 67.6% | 461,585 | 4.6 | $9.00 | 8 |
2030 | 575,591 | 19.3 | 86.9% | 1,981,063 | 19.8 | $3.44 | 2 |
2031 | 53,784 | 1.8 | 88.7% | 261,438 | 2.6 | $4.86 | 2 |
2032 | 3,171 | 0.1 | 88.8% | 42,809 | 0.4 | $13.50 | 1 |
2033 | 0 | 0.0 | 88.8% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2034 | 5,950 | 0.2 | 89.0% | 85,138 | 0.9 | $14.31 | 2 |
2035 & Beyond | 0 | 0.0 | 89.0% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
Vacant | 326,500 | 11.0 | 100.0% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Total | 2,977,028 | 100.0% | | $9,999,261 | 100.0% | $3.77 | 55 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024, with contractual rent steps through July 1, 2025. |
| (2) | Certain leases may have termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the lease and that are not considered in this Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM 4/2024 | U/W | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent | $9,197,411 | $9,243,289 | $9,633,403 | $9,644,038 | $9,393,468 | $3.16 |
Contractual Rent Steps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 605,793 | 0.20 |
Potential Income from Vacant Space | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,667,644 | 0.56 |
Gross Potential Rent | $9,197,411 | $9,243,289 | $9,633,403 | $9,644,038 | $11,666,906 | $3.92 |
Reimbursements | 303,074 | 446,917 | 661,200 | 530,728 | 589,204 | 0.20 |
Total Gross Income | $9,500,486 | $9,690,206 | $10,294,603 | $10,174,766 | $12,256,109 | $4.12 |
(Vacancy / Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,667,644) | (0.56) |
Effective Gross Income | $9,500,486 | $9,690,206 | $10,294,603 | $10,174,766 | $10,588,465 | $3.56 |
Management Fee | 297,519 | 302,050 | 320,525 | 315,850 | 329,039 | 0.11 |
Real Estate Taxes | 647,005 | 641,221 | 644,917 | 638,222 | 638,222 | 0.21 |
Insurance | 165,498 | 257,283 | 473,035 | 424,941 | 334,020 | 0.11 |
Other Expenses(2) | 961,337 | 968,415 | 941,975 | 864,422 | 864,422 | 0.29 |
Total Expenses | $2,071,359 | $2,168,969 | $2,380,452 | $2,243,435 | $2,165,703 | $0.73 |
| | | | | | |
Net Operating Income | $7,429,127 | $7,521,237 | $7,914,151 | $7,931,332 | $8,422,762 | $2.83 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 446,554 | 0.15 |
Net Cash Flow | $7,429,127 | $7,521,237 | $7,914,151 | $7,931,332 | $7,976,208 | $2.68 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy (%)(3)(4) | 96.6% | 96.9% | 93.3% | 89.0% | 86.4% | |
NCF DSCR | 1.44x | 1.46x | 1.54x | 1.54x | 1.55x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 9.9% | 10.0% | 10.6% | 10.6% | 11.2% | |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024, with contractual rent steps through July 1, 2025. |
(2) | Other Expenses are comprised of general operating expenses, repairs and maintenance, utilities and general and administrative. |
(3) | TTM 4/2024 Occupancy represents the current occupancy of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024. |
(4) | U/W Occupancy represents economic occupancy. |
Appraisals. According to the appraisals, the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $134,300,000, as of various dates between May 30, 2024 and June 14, 2024. Based on the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $134,300,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Loan are 55.8%.
Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Appraised Value(1) |
Property | Value | Capitalization Rate |
8374 North 4000 East Road | $41,900,000 | 6.75 | % |
Space Centre Industrial Park | 41,000,000 | 6.25 | |
8800 Rostin Road | 24,400,000 | 7.25 | |
Southaven Industrial Park | 20,500,000 | 7.75 | |
Keystone Office Park | 6,500,000 | 9.00 | |
Wtd. Avg./Total | $134,300,000 | 6.95 | % |
Environmental Matters. The Phase I environmental reports, dated between June 24, 2024 and June 27, 2024, identified recognized environmental conditions at the 8800 Rostin Road and Space Center Industrial Park properties. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations” in the Prospectus.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
The Market. The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties are located in the Memphis Industrial Market (three properties, 68.6% of net rentable area, 62.1% of UW NOI), Chicago Industrial Market (one property, 27.5% of net rentable area, 29.6% of UW NOI) and the Indianapolis Office Market (one property, 3.9% of net rentable area, 8.4% of UW NOI).
The following table presents information relating to the submarkets of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Market Analysis(1) |
Property Name / Address | Market | Submarket | Submarket Inventory | Submarket Vacancy | Market Rent (PSF) | UW Base Rent PSF(2) |
8374 North 4000 East Road Manteno, IL 60950 | Chicago | Kankakee County | 13,360,718 SF | 5.2% | $5.99 | $3.04 |
Space Centre Industrial Park Various Memphis, TN 38109 | Memphis | Southwest Memphis | 46,843,933 SF | 4.0% | $4.60 | $2.93 |
8800 Rostin Road Southaven, MS 38671 | Memphis | DeSoto | 74,531,802 SF | 9.0% | $5.12 | $3.50 |
Southaven Industrial Park Various Memphis, TN 38118; 38106 | Memphis | Southeast Memphis | 114,653,709 SF | 6.0% | $4.36 | $4.37 |
Keystone Office Park 3021-3105 East 98th Street, Carmel, IN 46280 | Indianapolis | Keystone Crossing | 5,751,152 SF | 18.3% | $23.14 | $17.34 |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated from May 1, 2024 to August 6, 2024. |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers are Olymbec Southaven LLC, Olymbec Keystone LLC and Olymbec Space Center LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity having at least one independent director in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan. The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carveout guarantors are Olymbec USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Olymbec Investments Inc., a Quebec corporation (collectively, the “Guarantor”). Founded in 1975, Olymbec Investments Inc. is a fully integrated Canadian-based real estate firm that owns and manages a diverse portfolio of industrial, office, retail, and residential properties located throughout Canada and the United States.
Property Management. The 8374 North 4000 East Road, Space Centre Industrial Park, 8800 Rostin Road and Southaven Industrial Park properties are self-managed. The Keystone Office Park property is managed by Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., a third-party property management company.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the borrowers deposited: (i) approximately $212,145 into a tax reserve, (ii) $2,500,000 into a TI/LC reserve, and (iii) $143,750 into an immediate repairs reserve.
Tax Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $33,885); provided that the borrower will not be required to make such deposit with respect to any individual property so long as (i) no event of default is continuing, (ii) the applicable Specified Tenant (as defined below) lease is in full force and effect with no defaults and covers the entire applicable property and (iii) the applicable Specified Tenant continues to make the payments (directly to the taxing authority) for which the tax reserve was established and the borrower delivers evidence of the same by no later than 10 business days following the last date when the same were due.
Insurance Reserve – At the option of the lender, if the liability or casualty policies covering the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties (or any portion of them) are not approved blanket or umbrella policies, the borrowers will be required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12 of the amount which will be sufficient to pay the insurance premiums due for the renewal of coverage afforded by such policies.
Replacement Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $37,213, subject to a cap of $1,500,000.
TI / LC Reserve – At such time as the balance of the TI/LC reserve falls below $500,000, the borrowers are required to deposit into the TI/LC reserve, on a monthly basis, the amount of $24,809, subject to a cap of $500,000.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
Lockbox / Cash Management The Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The borrowers are required to, and are required to cause the property manager to, promptly deposit all rents directly into a lender approved lockbox account. Within ten business days of origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the borrowers were required to deliver a notice to the tenants at the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties directing them to remit all payments under the applicable lease directly to the lender-controlled lockbox account. In addition, to the extent not otherwise received pursuant to the foregoing terms, the borrowers are required to cause all Master Lease Payments (as defined below) to be made into the lockbox account. All funds deposited into the lockbox account are required to be transferred on each business day to or at the direction of the borrowers unless a Trigger Period (as defined below) exists. Upon the first occurrence of a Trigger Period, the lender is required to establish a lender controlled cash management account. During the continuance of a Trigger Period, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept on each business day to such cash management account to be applied and disbursed in accordance with the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, and all excess cash flow funds remaining in the cash management account after the application of such funds in accordance with the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents are required to be held by the lender in an excess cash flow reserve account as additional collateral for the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Upon the cure of the applicable Trigger Period, so long as no other Trigger Period exists, the lender is required to return any amounts remaining on deposit in the excess cash flow reserve account to the borrowers, except if needed to satisfy the Specified Tenant Excess Cash Flow Condition (as defined below); provided that any such retained funds may be released upon satisfaction of certain stabilization conditions. Upon an event of default under the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the lender may apply funds in the accounts to the debt in such priority as it may determine.
A “Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.20x (on an interest-only basis), and (iii) the occurrence of Specified Tenant Trigger Period (as defined below), and (B) expiring upon (a) with regard to any Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (i) above, the cure (if applicable) of such event of default, (b) with regard to any Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (ii) above, the date that the debt service coverage ratio is equal to or greater than 1.20x (on an interest-only basis) for two consecutive calendar quarters, and (c) with regard to any Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (iii) above, a Specified Tenant Trigger Period ceasing to exist.
A “Specified Tenant” means, as applicable, (i) Nickey Warehouse, together with any successor and/or assigns in accordance with the terms of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan agreement, (ii) TransformCo, together with any successor and/or assigns in accordance with the terms of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan agreement, (iii) Terex Corporation, together with any successor and/or assigns in accordance with the terms of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan agreement, (iv) any other lessee(s) of the space demised to a Specified Tenant as of the origination date (or any portion thereof); provided, that, such replacement tenants will only be considered a “Specified Tenant” if such replacement tenant’s total rental income comprises 20% or more of the gross rentable income of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Properties and (v) any guarantor(s) of the applicable related Specified Tenant lease(s) or parent company that provides credit support therefor.
A “Specified Tenant Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) Specified Tenant being in monetary default or material non-monetary default under the applicable Specified Tenant lease beyond applicable notice and cure periods, (ii) Specified Tenant failing to be in actual, physical possession of 75% or more of the Specified Tenant space, or Specified Tenant failing to be open for business during customary hours and/or “going dark” in 25% or more of the Specified Tenant space, (iii) Specified Tenant giving notice that it is terminating its lease for 25% or more of the Specified Tenant space, (iv) any termination or cancellation of 25% or more of the Specified Tenant space (including, without limitation, rejection in any bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceeding) and/or any Specified Tenant lease failing to otherwise be in full force and effect, (v) any bankruptcy or similar insolvency of Specified Tenant, and (vi) Specified Tenant failing to renew or extend its lease on or prior to 12 months prior to expiration, and (B) expiring upon the first to occur of the lender’s receipt of evidence reasonably acceptable to the lender of (1) the satisfaction of the applicable Specified Tenant Cure Conditions (as defined below); or (2) the borrowers leasing the Specified Tenant space for a minimum of two years pursuant to one or more leases in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, the applicable tenant(s) under such lease(s) being in actual, physical occupancy of the space demised, each lease having commenced and a rent commencement date having been established, and, in the lender’s judgment, the applicable Specified Tenant Excess Cash Flow Condition (as defined below) has been satisfied in connection therewith.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Specified Tenant Trigger Period will occur if the Master Lease (as defined below) is in place and Master Lease Payments are made as and when due thereunder.
Various – Various Various Various, Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $75,000,000 55.8% 1.55x 11.2% |
“Specified Tenant Cure Conditions” means each of the following, as applicable; (i) the lender’s receipt of reasonably satisfactory evidence that the Specified Tenant has cured all defaults under the applicable Specified Tenant lease, (ii) the applicable Specified Tenant is in actual, physical possession of the Specified Tenant space (or applicable portion thereof) and open for business during customary hours and not “dark” in the Specified Tenant space (or applicable portion thereof), (iii) the applicable Specified Tenant has revoked or rescinded all termination or cancellation notices with respect to the applicable Specified Tenant lease and has re-affirmed the applicable Specified Tenant lease as being in full force and effect, (iv) if the Specified Tenant Trigger Period is due to the failure of the Specified Tenant to renew or extend its lease on or prior to 12 months prior to expiration, the applicable Specified Tenant has renewed or extended its lease for at least two years and the applicable Specified Tenant Excess Cash Flow Condition is satisfied in connection therewith, (v) if applicable, the Specified Tenant is no longer insolvent or subject to any bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings and has affirmed the applicable Specified Tenant lease pursuant to final, non-appealable order of a court of competent jurisdiction, and (vi) the applicable Specified Tenant is paying full, unabated rent under the applicable Specified Tenant lease.
“Specified Tenant Excess Cash Flow Condition” means, with respect to curing any Specified Tenant Trigger Period by re-tenanting the applicable Specified Tenant space or renewal/extension of any Specified Tenant lease, sufficient funds have been accumulated in the excess cash flow account (during the continuance of the subject Specified Tenant Trigger Period) to cover all anticipated leasing commissions, tenant improvement costs, tenant allowances, free rent periods, and/or rent abatement periods to be incurred in connection with any such re-tenanting or renewal/extension.
“Master Lease” means that certain Master Lease Agreement executed by the Guarantor, as tenant, and the borrowers, as landlord, in connection with the origination of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, pursuant to which the Guarantor will be obligated to pay and perform the obligations of each Specified Tenant under the related Specified Tenant lease (in each case to the extent that such Specified Tenant is not in fact paying and/or performing such obligations).
“Master Lease Payments” means all rent, additional rent and other amounts due and payable to the borrowers pursuant to the Master Lease, including, without limitation, any such rent and other amounts which accrue after the occurrence of a default by the respective Specified Tenant under its lease and/or any such rent and other amounts which are not actually paid to and received by borrowers as and when due by the applicable Specified Tenant or any replacement tenant acceptable to the lender pursuant to a lease in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan agreement. For purposes of the Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan agreement, the Master Lease Payments will be deemed to continue to be due and payable each month for so long as the debt remains outstanding, but only if, for any reason, a Specified Tenant or any such replacement tenant (i) fails or is not obligated to pay all base rent, additional rent and any and all other sums, charges, assessments and other amounts due to the respective borrower pursuant to the terms of its lease (as such amounts may increase from time to time in accordance with the terms of the lease) or (ii) otherwise defaults in the performance of any of its material obligations under the respective Specified Tenant lease (in each case regardless of whether due to the occurrence of a default under, or as a result of the termination, expiration, rejection, surrender or cancellation of, or vacancy with respect to, such Specified Tenant lease or the premises demised thereunder as of the date hereof), then Guarantor covenants and agrees to pay such amounts to the respective borrower as and when same would be due and payable under the respective Specified Lease.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not permitted.
Ground Lease. None.
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller(s): | Barclays | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type - Subtype: | Office – Suburban |
Borrower Sponsors: | Joseph Matthew Cassin, Jr. and David Taylor | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | 800 Corporate Owner LLC and 1000 Corporate Owner LLC | | Location: | Stafford, VA |
Original Balance: | $57,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 2007-2012 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $57,000,000 | | Property Management: | Acram Group Property Management LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 6.4% | | Size: | 409,134 SF |
Interest Rate: | 7.10000% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $94,000,000 / $230 |
Note Date: | July 19, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 21, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 81.5% (as of May 22, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 81.5% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $8,102,506 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $7,618,746 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $7,342,297 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $7,535,784 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(29),O(7) | | 2022 NOI: | $7,242,395 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $7,179,306 |
Reserves(1) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | | |
Taxes: | $102,951 | $51,475 | NAP | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $139 |
Insurance: | $22,163 | $11,082 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $139 |
Replacement Reserve: | $0 | $6,819 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 60.6% |
TI/LC: | $2,500,000 | $68,189 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 60.6% |
Other: | $5,312,913 | $0 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 14.2% |
| | | | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.86x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $57,000,000 | 91.3 | % | | Loan Payoff | $53,869,227 | 86.3 | % |
Borrower Sponsor Equity | 5,430,563 | 8.7 | | | Upfront Reserves | 7,938,027 | 12.7 | |
| | | | Closing Costs | 623,309 | 1.0 | |
Total Sources | $62,430,563 | 100.0 | % | | Total Uses | $62,430,563 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
The Loan. The fourth largest mortgage loan (the “Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrowers’ fee interest in a 409,134 square foot suburban office property located in Stafford, Virginia (the “Quantico Corporate Center Property”). The Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan was originated on July 19, 2024 by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. (“Barclays”) and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 7.10000% per annum. The Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan is August 6, 2029.
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
The Property. The Quantico Corporate Center Property is a three-building, 409,134 square foot Class A office complex located in Stafford, Virginia, approximately 35 miles southwest of Washington D.C. The Quantico Corporate Center Property was constructed in stages from 2007 to 2012. The buildings are located on an 85-acre campus, Quantico Corporate Center at Stafford, which is approximately 1.5 miles to the United States Marine Corps Base Quantico. Given the proximity to United States Marine Corps Base Quantico, many tenants are government or quasi-government agencies or providers of services for government agencies. The Quantico Corporate Center Property contains dark fiber optic infrastructure that enables secure transfer of data from the Quantico Corporate Center at Stafford campus to points across the Washington D.C. metropolitan statistical area. The dark fibers are encrypted from end-to-end allowing secure information to run through the network. According to the borrower sponsor, the dark fibers at the Quantico Corporate Center Property support eight government programs and are used by tenants such as ManTech and Digital Cloak. The Quantico Corporate Center Property contains 1,696 parking spaces (approximately 4.1 per 1,000 square feet). The overall campus includes six Class A office buildings, two hotels, a university, a data center and retail shops. The Quantico Corporate Center Property was 81.5% occupied as of May 22, 2024.
Major Tenants. The three largest tenants based on underwritten base rent are ManTech, MITRE and NAVFAC.
ManTech (178,463 square feet; 43.6% of NRA, 52.4% of underwritten base rent): ManTech provides advanced technology services to the United States government in defense, intelligence, law enforcement, science, administration and other fields. ManTech supports more than 60 different government agencies under 1,000 active contracts. ManTech has been a tenant at the Quantico Corporate Center Property since 2007 and has expanded and/or extended multiple times, currently occupying space in all three of the buildings at the Quantico Corporate Center Property. ManTech utilizes the sensitive compartmented information facility space at the Quantico Corporate Center Property, which allows uniform use across government agencies and contractors. ManTech has various termination options linked to government contract termination as detailed in the “Tenant Summary” table below.
MITRE (35,303 square feet; 8.6% of NRA, 10.3% of underwritten base rent): MITRE is a company that operates federally funded research and development centers. Focus areas include aerospace, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, defense and intelligence, government innovation, health, homeland security, telecom and transportation. MITRE has been a tenant at the Quantico Corporate Center Property since 2007 and expanded by 8,754 square feet in 2023. MITRE has no termination options and one, five-year extension option remaining.
NAVFAC (23,438 square feet; 5.7% of NRA, 7.4% of underwritten base rent): NAVFAC stands for Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command and delivers life-cycle technical and acquisition solutions aligned to fleet and Marine Corps priorities. NAVFAC has been a tenant at the Quantico Corporate Center Property since 2009 and expanded by 3,440 square feet in 2017. NAVFAC has the option to terminate its lease with 90 days’ notice.
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical occupancy at the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Historical and Current Occupancy |
2021(1)(2) | 2022(1)(2) | 2023(1) | Current(3) |
74.1% | 79.4% | 80.1% | 81.5% |
| (1) | Historical occupancy is based on the average quarterly occupancy of the respective year. |
| (2) | The increase in occupancy from 2021 to 2022 is due to five new leases or lease expansions totaling 25,578 square feet commencing in 2022. |
| (3) | Based on the underwritten rent roll as of May 22, 2024. |
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants at the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/S&P/Fitch) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Total U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
ManTech | NR/NR/NR | 178,463 | 43.6 | % | $5,760,879 | $32.28 | 52.4 | % | Various(2) | Y(3) | Various(4) |
MITRE | NR/NR/NR | 35,303 | 8.6 | | 1,136,777 | $32.20 | 10.3 | | 2/28/2029 | N | 1, 5-year |
NAVFAC | Aaa/AA+/AA+ | 23,438 | 5.7 | | 815,345 | $34.79 | 7.4 | | Various(5) | Y(6) | NAP |
Alexandria Insights | NR/NR/NR | 24,748 | 6.0 | | 803,067 | $32.45 | 7.3 | | 1/31/2027 | N | 1, 5-year |
Digital Cloak | NR/NR/NR | 18,049 | 4.4 | | 610,633 | $33.83 | 5.6 | | 9/30/2032 | N | 1, 5-year |
Largest Tenants | | 280,001 | 68.4 | % | $9,126,701 | $32.60 | 83.1 | % | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 53,390 | 13.0 | | 1,858,547 | $34.81 | 16.9 | | | | |
Total Occupied | | 333,391 | 81.5 | % | $10,985,248 | $32.95 | 100.0 | % | | | |
Vacant | | 75,743 | 18.5 | | | | | | | |
Total | | 409,134 | 100.0 | % | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 22, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | ManTech has various lease expiration dates: 80,433 square feet expire on October 31, 2026, 42,762 square feet expire on December 31, 2027, 20,510 square feet expire on April 30, 2029 and 34,758 square feet expire on August 31, 2029. |
| (3) | ManTech has various termination options. Regarding its space in the 800 building, ManTech may terminate its lease for 20,510 square feet of space effective April 30, 2027 with notice by July 31, 2026, proof of government contract termination and a payment of termination fee of $111,877 plus unamortized leasing costs with 8% interest. Regarding its space in the 925 building, ManTech may terminate its lease of 42,762 square feet effective December 31, 2025 with notice by March 31, 2025, proof of government contract termination and payment of a termination fee of $221,969 plus unamortized leasing costs with 8% interest. Regarding a portion of its space at the 1000 building, ManTech may terminate its leases for and 34,758 square feet effective June 30, 2026 with notice by September 30, 2025, proof of government contract termination and a payment of a termination fee of $293,531 plus unamortized leasing costs with 9% interest. |
| (4) | ManTech’s has various lease renewal options ranging from two, three-year options to two, five-year options depending on the suite. |
| (5) | NAVFAC has various lease expiration dates: 3,440 square feet expire on March 31, 2027 and 19,998 square feet expire on September 23, 2029. |
| (6) | NAVFAC may terminate its lease with 90 days’ notice. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | UW Base Rent | % of Total UW Base Rent | UW Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
MTM | 0 | 0.0 | % | 0.0% | | $0 | | 0.0% | | $0.00 | 0 |
2024 | 2,587 | 0.6 | | 0.6% | | 84,181 | | 0.8 | | $32.54 | 1 |
2025 | 1,943 | 0.5 | | 1.1% | | 61,540 | | 0.6 | | $31.67 | 1 |
2026 | 80,433 | 19.7 | | 20.8% | | 2,632,927 | | 24.0 | | $32.73 | 1 |
2027 | 81,081 | 19.8 | | 40.6% | | 2,606,878 | | 23.7 | | $32.15 | 4 |
2028 | 2,400 | 0.6 | | 41.2% | | 81,378 | | 0.7 | | $33.91 | 1 |
2029 | 131,844 | 32.2 | | 73.4% | | 4,331,194 | | 39.4 | | $32.85 | 7 |
2030 | 7,527 | 1.8 | | 75.2% | | 258,267 | | 2.4 | | $34.31 | 1 |
2031 | 7,527 | 1.8 | | 77.1% | | 318,250 | | 2.9 | | $42.28 | 1 |
2032 | 18,049 | 4.4 | | 81.5% | | 610,633 | | 5.6 | | $33.83 | 1 |
2033 | 0 | 0.0 | | 81.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2034 | 0 | 0.0 | | 81.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2035 & Thereafter | 0 | 0.0 | | 81.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
Vacant | 75,743 | 18.5 | | 100.0% | | NAP | | NAP | | NAP | NAP |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 409,134 | 100.0 | % | | $10,985,2 | 48 | 100.0% | | $32.95 | 18 |
| (1) | Based on underwritten rent roll dated May 22, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | Certain leases may have termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the lease and that are not considered in this Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Quantico Corporate Center Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $94,000,000 as of May 21, 2024.
Appraisal Approach | Appraised Value | Capitalization Rate |
Income Capitalization Approach | $94,000,000 | 8.50% |
Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report dated May 28, 2024, there are no recognized environmental conditions or recommendations for further action at the Quantico Corporate Center Property.
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM May 2024 | U/W | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent(2) | $9,640,256 | $9,629,376 | $10,261,640 | $10,119,053 | $10,985,248 | $26.85 |
Gross Up Vacancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,499,519 | 6.11 |
Gross Potential Rent | $9,640,256 | $9,629,376 | $10,261,640 | $10,119,053 | $13,484,767 | $32.96 |
Total Reimbursements | 296,944 | 219,321 | 223,006 | 150,880 | 138,606 | 0.34 |
Other Revenue | 16,124 | 5,833 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Net Rental Income | $9,953,324 | $9,854,531 | $10,484,646 | $10,269,933 | $13,623,373 | $33.30 |
Vacancy/Credit Loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (2,499,519) | (6.11) |
Effective Gross Income | $9,953,324 | $9,854,531 | $10,484,646 | $10,269,933 | $11,123,854 | $27.19 |
Taxes | 592,499 | 515,339 | 571,797 | 590,451 | 617,705 | 1.51 |
Insurance | 86,059 | 85,384 | 86,339 | 87,138 | 127,980 | 0.31 |
Management Fees | 298,600 | 295,222 | 314,539 | 308,098 | 333,716 | 0.82 |
Repairs and Maintenance | 95,160 | 319,470 | 580,343 | 450,352 | 450,352 | 1.10 |
Utilities | 453,979 | 564,029 | 598,820 | 615,835 | 615,835 | 1.51 |
Janitorial | 574,591 | 402,736 | 414,406 | 427,069 | 427,069 | 1.04 |
Grounds and Pest Control | 0 | 78,942 | 71,000 | 103,729 | 103,729 | 0.25 |
General and Administrative | 550,461 | 335,580 | 304,827 | 336,566 | 336,566 | 0.82 |
Professional Fees | 122,669 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Security | 0 | 15,433 | 6,789 | 8,398 | 8,398 | 0.02 |
Total Expenses | $2,774,018 | $2,612,135 | $2,948,861 | $2,927,636 | $3,021,349 | $7.38 |
Net Operating Income(5) | $7,179,306 | $7,242,395 | $7,535,784 | $7,342,297 | $8,102,506 | $19.80 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81,827 | 0.20 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 401,932 | 0.98 |
Net Cash Flow | $7,179,306 | $7,242,395 | $7,535,784 | $7,342,297 | $7,618,746 | $18.62 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy(3) | 74.1% | 79.4% | 80.1% | 81.0% | 81.5%(4) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.75x | 1.77x | 1.84x | 1.79x | 1.86x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 12.6% | 12.7% | 13.2% | 12.9% | 14.2% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 22, 2024. |
| (2) | U/W Base Rent includes contractual rent steps through August 2025. |
| (3) | Represents the average quarterly occupancy for each year and Q1 2024 occupancy for the TTM May 2024 period. |
| (4) | U/W occupancy is based on economic occupancy. |
| (5) | The increase in Net Operating Income from TTM May 2024 to U/W is largely due to 34,758 square feet of the ManTech expansion space being in a free rent period. Outstanding free rent was reserved at loan origination. |
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
The Market. The Quantico Corporate Center Property is located in Stafford, Virginia in the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metropolitan statistical area. The Quantico Corporate Center Property is located along the I-95 corridor approximately 25 miles south of the Capital Beltway and approximately 35 miles southeast of Washington D.C. The major demand driver in the area is the Quantico United States Marine Corps Reservation, which is located approximately 1.5 miles from the Quantico Corporate Center Property. The base is comprised of 6,900 civilian employees and 6,700 military personnel and is home to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Academy and Laboratory and many of the bureau’s other units.
As of the first quarter of 2024, the Washington, D.C. market vacancy rate was 16.7% and the Stafford submarket vacancy rate was 9.7%. Average asking rents were $39.16 in the Washington, D.C. market and $28.08 for the Stafford submarket as of the first quarter of 2024. According to the appraisal, the Stafford submarket has had zero completions since 2020, signaling sparse new supply in the submarket.
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable sales to the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Comparable Sales(1) |
Property Name City, State | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Year Built / Renovated | Class | Sale Date | Adjusted Sale Price | Adjusted Sale Price / SF | Cap Rate | NOI / SF | Occupancy |
Quantico Corporate Center Stafford, VA | 409,134(2) | 2007 - 2012 / NAP | A | Various | NAV | NAV | NAV | NAV | 81.5%(2) |
Westwood Center IV Vienna, VA | 87,545 | 1989 / 2020 | B+ | Oct-23 | $17,380,000 | $198.53 | 8.25% | $16.38 | 88.0% |
Reston Metro Center Two Reston, VA | 64,319 | 1985 / 2018 | A | Sep-23 | $18,500,000 | $287.63 | 7.84% | $22.55 | 100.0% |
Dulles Station West Building I Herndon, VA | 178,291 | 2007 / NAP | A | Dec-22 | $51,500,000 | $288.85 | 8.50% | $24.55 | 98.0% |
Fair Oaks Plaza Fairfax, VA | 183,810 | 1986 / 2010 | B+ | Sep-22 | $26,850,000 | $146.07 | 7.36% | $10.74 | 67.0% |
Reston Corner Reston, VA | 294,031 | 1982 / 2021 | B | Apr-22 | $61,500,000 | $209.16 | 8.13% | $17.01 | 65.0% |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 22, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the demographics of the Quantico Corporate Center Property:
Demographics Summary(1) |
Property Name | City, State | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | 1-mile Population | 3-mile Population | 5-mile Population | 1-mile Avg Household Income | 3-mile Avg Household Income | 5-mile Avg Household Income |
Quantico Corporate Center | Stafford, VA | $57,000,000 | 1,323 | 13,925 | 64,082 | $121,924 | $131,226 | $131,026 |
| (1) | Source: Third party report. Demographics statistics is based on year-end 2023. |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers for the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan are 800 Corporate Owner LLC and 1000 Corporate Owner LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity with two independent directors. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan.
The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carveout guarantors of the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan are Joseph Matthew Cassin, Jr. and David Taylor, both executives at Acram Group. Founded as JMC Holdings in 2011 and rebranded in 2021, Acram Group focuses on the acquisition, development and management of various assets including covered land, flex industrial, multifamily and office properties throughout the United States. The group’s portfolio consists of approximately $1.8 billion assets under management in eleven cities across the United States.
Property Management. The Quantico Corporate Center Property is managed by Acram Group Property Management LLC, an affiliate of the borrower sponsors, and sub-managed by CBRE, Inc., a third-party management company.
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan, the borrowers deposited (i) approximately $102,951 for real estate taxes, (ii) approximately $22,163 for insurance premiums, (iii) $26,365 for upfront replacement reserves, (iv) $2,500,000 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions, (v) $5,150,813 for outstanding tenant improvements and gap rent for ManTech and MITRE and (vi) $135,735 for free and gap rent for ManTech and Alexandria Insights.
Tax Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrowers are required to escrow 1/12th of the annual estimated tax payments payable during the next ensuing 12 months (initially equal to approximately $51,475).
Insurance Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrowers are required to escrow 1/12th of the annual estimated insurance payments (initial equal to approximately $11,082).
Replacement Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrowers are required to deposit with the lender 1/12th of $0.20 per rentable square foot for annual capital expenditures (initially equal to approximately $6,819 per month).
TI/LC Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrowers are required to deposit with the lender 1/12th of $2.00 per rentable square foot for annual approved leasing expenses (initially equal to approximately $68,189 per month).
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The borrowers and property manager are required to direct the tenants to pay rent directly into the lockbox account, and to deposit into such account any rents otherwise received within one business day of receipt. During the continuance of a Trigger Period (as defined below) all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept on each business day to a lender-controlled cash management account. All excess cash flow funds remaining in the cash management account after the application of such funds in accordance with the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan documents are required to be held by the lender in an excess cash flow reserve account as additional collateral for the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan during the continuance of a Trigger Period.
A “Trigger Period” means the period commencing upon the occurrence of (i) an event of default, (ii) a net cash flow debt service coverage ratio (“NCF DSCR”) less than 1.25x at the end of any calendar quarter, and (iii) the occurrence of Major Tenant Trigger Event (as defined below). A Trigger Period will end upon (a) the case of clause (i) above, a cure of such event of default is accepted by the lender, (b) with regard to clause (ii) above, achievement of NCF DSCR greater than or equal to 1.30x at the end of any calendar quarter, and (c) with regard to clause (iii) above, the occurrence of a Major Tenant Trigger Event Cure (as defined below).
A ”Major Tenant Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) the occurrence of a ManTech Roll Event (as defined below), (ii) the borrowers failing to satisfy the Major Tenant Renewal Criteria (as defined below) on or before the date by which a Major Tenant (as defined below) is required to give notice of its lease renewal or extension under the terms of its lease, (iii) a Major Tenant giving notice of its intent to terminate or not renew its lease, (iv) a Major Tenant going dark in (A) the ManTech space and (B) with respect to any other Major Tenant, 10% or more of its space or vacating or abandoning all or a portion of its space, (v) the bankruptcy of a Major Tenant, its parent company or guarantor of its lease, or (vi) a monetary or material non-monetary event of default of a Major Tenant.
A ”Major Tenant Trigger Event Cure” will occur, (I) with respect to clause (i) above, upon either (a) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Renewal Criteria (as defined below) with respect to the ManTech space or (b) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria (as defined below) with respect to the ManTech space such that there is less than 40,000 square feet of the ManTech space that is vacant or unoccupied or is expiring within 12 months following the date of determination, (II) with respect to clauses (ii) and (iii) above, upon the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria, (III) with respect to clause (iv) above, upon either (a) satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria or (b) the Major Tenant resuming occupancy of its premises and delivery of a satisfactory estoppel, (IV) with respect to clause (v) above, upon either (a) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria or (b) the Major Tenant emerging from bankruptcy and (V) with respect to clause (vi) above, upon either (a) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria or (b) the cure of such event of default.
A “ManTech Roll Event” will occur when 40,000 square feet or more of the ManTech space is either (i) vacant or unoccupied or (ii) expires within the immediately succeeding 12 month period to the extent that the ManTech space has not satisfied either (a) the Major Tenant Renewal Criteria or (b) the Major Tenant Replacement Criteria.
The “Major Tenant Renewal Criteria” means the lender has received (i) evidence satisfactory to the lender that the Major Lease (as defined below) has (a) renewed its lease for a term not less than three years, (b) with respect to the ManTech space, such that there is less than 40,000 square feet of the ManTech space that is vacant or unoccupied or is expiring within 12 months from the determination date and (c) satisfied the lease criteria in the Quantico Corporate Center Mortgage Loan documents and (ii) an updated tenant estoppel satisfactory to the lender.
A “Major Tenant” means ManTech or any replacement tenant for ManTech.
The “Major Tenant Replacement Criteria” means (i) the execution of a replacement tenant lease for a term of at least three years and, with respect to a ManTech Roll Event, there is no more than 40,000 square feet of the ManTech space that is vacant or unoccupied or is
Office - Suburban 800, 925 and 1000 Corporate Drive Stafford, VA 22554 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Quantico Corporate Center | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $57,000,000 60.6% 1.86x 14.2% |
expiring within 12 months from the determination date, (ii) the replacement tenant is in physical occupancy, is open for business and is paying full contractual rent and (iii) the lender has been provided with the replacement lease and other documentation.
A “Major Lease” means the ManTech lease or any Major Tenant replacement lease.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not permitted.
Ground Lease. None.
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Properties Information |
Loan Seller: | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype(3): | Mixed Use – Various |
Borrower Sponsor(s)(1): | Various | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | 210 East Property Owner LLC and 155 East Property Owner LLC | | Location: | New York, NY |
Original Balance: | $50,500,000 | | Year Built / Renovated(3): | Various / Various |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $50,500,000 | | Property Management: | J&M Realty Services Corp. |
% by Initial UPB: | 5.7% | | Size(3): | 146 Units |
Interest Rate: | 6.21500% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit(3): | $84,700,000 / $580,137 |
Note Date: | July 10, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | June 7, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy(3): | 95.9% (as of May 31, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $4,384,476 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $4,312,549 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $3,894,395 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $3,441,967 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(1),DorYM1(30),O(5) | | 2022 NOI(4): | NAV |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Springing / Springing | | 2021 NOI(4): | NAV |
Reserves(2) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $345,890 |
Taxes: | $497,888 | $165,963 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $345,890 |
Insurance: | $0 | $31,435 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 59.6% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $2,433 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 59.6% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $3,561 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 8.7% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $75,000 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.36x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $50,500,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $44,294,231 | 87.7 | % |
| | | | Return of Equity | 3,335,382 | 6.6 | |
| | | | Closing Costs(5) | 2,297,500 | 4.5 | |
| | | | Reserves | 572,888 | 1.1 | |
Total Sources | $50,500,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $50,500,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | The borrower sponsors are Benjamin London, Michael Palin, Jerome Sachs, Arlene Sachs, Michael Sachs, Meryl Kantro, Francine Silver and Marlene Siegel. |
| (2) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
| (3) | See “Portfolio Summary” below. |
| (4) | Historical financial information is not available because the 155 East 55th Street Property was under renovation from 2022 to 2023. |
| (5) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $1,767,500. |
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
The Loan. The fifth largest mortgage loan (the “NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrowers’ fee interests in two mixed-use properties consisting of 146 multifamily units and 85,451 square feet of office and retail space located in New York, New York (the “NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties”). The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $50,500,000. The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan was originated on July 10, 2024 by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.21500% per annum. The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan is August 6, 2029.
The Properties. The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties consist of two mixed-use properties totaling 146 multifamily units and 85,451 square feet of office and retail space located at 155 East 55th Street and 210 East 58th Street in New York, New York. The portfolio, which consists of two buildings located three blocks apart, is currently 95.9% occupied as of May 31, 2024. The borrower sponsors have owned the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties since 1981 and have invested approximately $3.5 million over the past two years for capital expenditures including lobby renovations, elevator upgrades, hallway renovations, apartment renovations, unit combinations, garage repairs, a new laundry room and professionals/consultant charges.
The 155 East 55th Street property (the “155 East 55th Street Property”) is a mixed-use building containing 51 multifamily units, 66,507 square feet of office space, 10,563 square feet of retail space and a 42-space parking garage. The 155 East 55th Street Property was constructed in 1961 and most recently renovated between 2022 and 2023. The office space is 68.9% occupied by 22 tenants and accounts for 16.9% of the total portfolio underwritten effective gross income. The ground floor retail is occupied by Sherwin-William Company (“Sherwin Williams”) and Restaurant Shun Lee Palace (“Shun Lee Palace”). Sherwin Williams has been a tenant at the 155 East 55th Street Property since 2013 occupying 2,926 square feet at $106.07 per square foot under a lease expiring on July 31, 2028. Shun Lee Palace has been a tenant at the 155 East 55th Street Property since 1970 and occupies 4,668 square feet at $59.60 per square foot under a lease expiring August 31, 2029. Both retail tenants executed renewals in 2022 and 2021, respectively. There are 27 rent stabilized units, 23 free market units and one employee-occupied unit. The multifamily units at the 155 East 55th Street Property consist of 11 studios, 24 one-bedroom units, nine two-bedroom units, four three-bedroom units and two four-bedroom units. Each multifamily unit contains a dishwasher, stainless steel appliances, refrigerator, stove, oven, microwave, floor covering (wood), floor covering (tile) and private balconies. Floors two through six contain 36 office suites with an average suite size of 1,847 square feet. One of the borrower sponsors, Michael Sachs, has offices at the 155 East 55th Street Property, occupying 2,254 square feet comprising approximately 3.4% of the total office space. The 42 garage parking spaces are leased to a third-party operator.
The 210 East 58th Street property (the “210 East 58th Street Property”) is a mixed-use building with 95 multifamily units and two retail spaces. The building was constructed in 1959 and renovated in 1983. The ground floor retail is occupied by Waterbox New York LLC (“Waterbox”) and Ocean Recovery East LLC (“Ascendant”). Waterbox, a showroom displaying plumbing fixtures and fittings for bathrooms and kitchens, occupies 2,743 square feet at $111.56 per square foot under a lease that expires on December 31, 2034. Ascendant, an outpatient recovery center for people who have completed a detox or inpatient program which offers group therapy and individual therapy sessions, occupies 5,638 square feet at $60.29 per square foot under a lease that expires on June 30, 2033. Of the 95 multifamily units, there are 54 rent stabilized units, 40 free market units and one employee-occupied unit. The multifamily units at the 210 East 58th Street Property are comprised of 61 studios, 23 one-bedroom units, nine two-bedroom units, one three-bedroom unit and one four-bedroom unit. Each multifamily unit contains a dishwasher, stainless steel appliances, refrigerator, stove/oven, microwave, floor covering (wood) and floor covering (tile).
The following table presents certain information relating to the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties:
Portfolio Summary |
Property Name | City, State | Property Type- Subtype(2) | Total Residential Units(1) | Residential Occupancy | Commercial Occupancy | Year Built / Renovated(2) | As-is Appraised Value(2) | Allocated Loan Amount |
155 East 55th Street | New York, NY | Mixed Use – Multifamily/Office/Retail | 51 | 96.1% | 69.3% | 1961 / 2022-2023 | $54,500,000 | $32,200,000 |
210 East 58th Street | New York, NY | Mixed Use – Multifamily/Retail | 95 | 95.8% | 100.0% | 1959 / 1983 | $30,200,000 | $18,300,000 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | | | 146 | 95.9% | 72.3% | | $84,700,000 | $50,500,000 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties:
Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | No. of Units | Occupied Units | % of Occupied Units | Unit Size SF | Total SF | In-Place Rent / Month | Market Rent |
155-Stabilized | 27 | 27 | 19.3% | 903 | 24,372 | $3,506 | $3,488 |
155-Fair Market | 23 | 22 | 15.7% | 1,026 | 23,600 | $4,885 | $5,168 |
210-Stabilized | 54 | 52 | 37.1% | 730 | 39,419 | $3,264 | $3,220 |
210-Fair Market | 40 | 39 | 27.9% | 647 | 25,887 | $3,505 | $3,818 |
Super | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 1,218 | 2,436 | $0 | $5,500 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 146 | 140 | 100.0% | 793 | 115,714 | $3,633 | $3,772 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis(1)(2) |
| 2023 | TTM 5/31/2024 | UW | UW Per Unit |
Base Rent | $6,049,770 | $6,180,419 | $6,407,123 | $43,884 |
Potential Income from Vacant Units | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gross Potential Income | $6,049,770 | $6,180,419 | $6,407,123 | $43,884 |
Total Reimbursements | 66,443 | 69,357 | 69,357 | 475 |
Commercial Income | 2,286,939 | 2,511,002 | 2,801,789 | 19,190 |
Parking Income | 223,545 | 219,771 | 226,013 | 1,548 |
Other Income | 80,900 | 110,094 | 110,094 | 754 |
Residential Vacancy | (519,642) | (463,233) | (320,356) | (2,194) |
Effective Gross Income | $8,187,953 | $8,627,411 | $9,294,020 | $63,658 |
Management Fee | 240,421 | 252,544 | 279,236 | 1,913 |
Real Estate Taxes | 1,780,335 | 1,774,719 | 1,785,330 | 12,228 |
Insurance | 227,806 | 239,996 | 379,220 | 2,597 |
Other Expenses | 2,497,424 | 2,465,758 | 2,465,758 | 16,889 |
Total Expenses | $4,745,986 | $4,733,016 | $4,909,544 | $33,627 |
| | | | |
Net Operating Income | $3,441,967 | $3,894,395 | $4,384,476(3) | $30,031 |
Capital Expenditures | 26,261 | 17,150 | 29,200 | 200 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 42,727 | 293 |
Net Cash Flow | $3,415,706 | $3,877,245 | $4,312,549 | $29,538 |
| | | | |
Occupancy | 91.4% | 92.5% | 95.0%(4) | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.8% | 7.7% | 8.7% | |
NCF DSCR | 1.07x | 1.22x | 1.36x | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
| (2) | Historical financial information is not available because the 155 East 55th Street Property was under renovation from 2022 to 2023. |
| (3) | The increase in UW Net Operating Income over TTM 5/31/2024 Net Operating Income reflects in-place rent increases due to increased occupancy and commercial rent at the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties. |
| (4) | UW occupancy is based on economic occupancy. |
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
Appraisals. According to the appraisals, the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $84,700,000 as of June 7, 2024. Based on the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $84,700,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the NYC Multifamily Portfolio are 59.6%
NYC Multifamily Portfolio Appraised Value(1) |
Property | As-Is Value | Capitalization Rate |
155 East 55th Street | $54,500,000 | 6.00% |
210 East 58th Street | $30,200,000 | 5.50% |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | $84,700,000 | 5.82% |
Environmental Matters. According to the Phase I environmental reports dated June 7, 2024, there was no evidence of any recognized environmental conditions at the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties.
The Market. The 210 East 58th Street Property is located 150 feet east of Third Avenue, a heavily trafficked retail corridor. The 155 East 55th Street Property is located between Third Avenue and Lexington Avenue. The 155 East 55th Street Property and 210 East 58th Street Properties are in close proximity to the 4, 5, and 6 trains, which can be accessed at the 59th Street station along Lexington Avenue.
Multifamily Market: The 155 East 55th Street Property and the 210 East 58th Street Property are in the Midtown East Multifamily submarket of the New York Multifamily Market. According to the appraisal, as of the first quarter of 2024, the New York Multifamily Market had an inventory of 1,555,472 units with 40,960 units of vacant space, indicating a vacancy rate of 2.6%. A total of 5,061 units were completed and delivered, and 67,815 units were under construction, while the market experienced a positive net absorption of 4,764 units. The asking rental rate for that same period was $2,929 per unit. According to the appraisal, as of the first quarter of 2024, the Midtown East Submarket had an inventory of 15,255 units with 325 units of vacant space, indicating a vacancy rate of 2.1%. No units were completed and delivered, and 291 units were under construction, while the submarket experienced a positive net absorption of seven units. The asking rental rate for that same period was $4,842 per unit.
Office Market: The 155 East 55th Street Property is in the Plaza District submarket of the New York Office Market. According to the appraisal, as of the first quarter of 2024, the New York Office Market had an inventory of 977,787,509 square feet with 138,182,099 square feet of vacant space, indicating a vacancy rate of 14.1%. A total of 570,067 square feet were delivered and 10,345,871 square feet were under construction. The market experienced a negative net absorption of 3,084,630 square feet. The asking rental rate for that same period was $41.95 per square foot. According to the appraisal, as of the first quarter of 2024, the Plaza District Office Submarket had an inventory of 91,312,206 square feet, with 12,418,591 square feet of vacant space indicating a vacancy rate of 13.6%. There was no new space delivered and 2,699,000 square feet were under construction. The submarket experienced a negative net absorption of 246,705 square feet. The asking rental rate for that same period was $90.32 per square foot.
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable office properties to the 155 East 55th Street Property:
Comparable Office Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Base Rent (PSF) | Adjusted Base Rent PSF | Lease Type |
155 East 55th Street | New York, NY | B A Silver & Co Inc. | 4,431(2) | Sep-02(2) | 25.0(2) | $21.67(2) | $21.67(2) | Modified Gross |
59 East 54th Street | New York, NY | ACA Acupuncture & Wellness | 2,400 | Jan-24 | 10.0 | $52.00 | $46.80 | Modified Gross |
136 East 57th Street | New York, NY | New York City Podiatry | 1,631 | Sep-23 | 5.1 | $49.18 | $44.26 | Modified Gross |
12 East 46th Street | New York, NY | Midtown East PT PC | 2,555 | Jan-23 | 5.0 | $50.00 | $42.50 | Modified Gross |
12 East 49th Street | New York, NY | Holden | 2,500 | Nov-22 | 5.0 | $45.00 | $42.75 | Modified Gross |
16 West 46th Street | New York, NY | Milano Diamond Gallery | 4,400 | Aug-22 | -- | $52.00 | $49.40 | Modified Gross |
The Look Building | New York, NY | Kudman Trachten Aloe Posner (KTAP) | 10,593 | Feb-23 | 5.4 | $50.00 | $42.50 | Modified Gross |
| (1) | Source: Appraisals, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable retail properties to the 155 East 55th Street Property and 210 East 58th Street Properties.
Comparable Retail Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Base Rent (PSF) | Lease Type |
155 East 55th Street | New York, NY | Restaurant Shun Lee Palace | 4,668(2) | Sep-70(2) | 59.0(2) | $57.87(2) | Gross |
210 East 58th Street | New York, NY | Ocean Recovery East LLC | 5,638(2) | Jul-23(2) | 8.9(2) | $58.53(2) | Modified Gross |
120 East 34th Street | New York, NY | Utopia Bagels | 3,655 | Jan-24 | 15.0 | $97.42 | Modified Gross |
223 East 58th Street | New York, NY | Strond Salon | 2,500 | Dec-23 | 5.0 | $88.00 | Modified Gross |
122 East 55th Street | New York, NY | Not Disclosed | 1,400 | Aug-23 | 10.0 | $102.86 | Modified Gross |
111 East 56th Street | New York, NY | Reserve Cut | 10,000 | Sep-23 | 10.0 | $95.00 | Modified Gross |
169 East 69th Street | New York, NY | Bone & Joint | 2,951 | Jun-23 | 10.0 | $122.00 | Modified Gross |
14 East 58th Street | New York, NY | Global Wine Market | 6,000 | Oct-22 | 15.0 | $85.31 | Modified Gross |
| (1) | Source: Appraisals, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 31, 2024. |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers are 210 East Property Owner LLC and 155 East Property Owner LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company. Each borrower is a single purpose entity having at least two independent directors in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan.
The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carveout guarantors are Benjamin London, Michael Palin, Jerome Sachs, Arlene Sachs, Michael Sachs, Meryl Kantro, Francine Silver and Marlene Siegel. Jerome Sachs and Michael Sachs are the managing principals of the Sachs Companies. Headquartered in New York City, Sachs Companies is a family real estate holding and asset management organization. Sachs Companies owns a nationwide portfolio encompassing residential, office, retail and hospitality properties and is active in all aspects of the real estate spectrum with an emphasis on development of multifamily communities.
Property Management. The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Properties are managed by J&M Realty Services Corp., a third-party property management company.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the borrowers deposited approximately (i) $497,888 into a reserve account for real estate taxes and (ii) $75,000 into a reserve account for deferred maintenance, representing 125% of the estimated cost of immediate repairs.
Mixed Use - Various Various New York, NY, 10022 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 NYC Multifamily Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $50,500,000 59.6% 1.36x 8.7% |
Tax Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $165,963 per month).
Insurance Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the insurance premiums that the lender estimates will be payable for the renewal of the coverage afforded by the related policies (initially estimated to be approximately $31,435 per month).
Replacement Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $2,433 for replacements.
TI/LC Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a TI/LC reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $3,561 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The NYC Multifamily Portfolio Mortgage Loan is structured with a springing lockbox and springing cash management. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, at the lender’s option, within 30 days of the date of such occurrence of an event of default and the lender’s notice to the borrowers, the borrowers and the property manager are required to (i) open a lockbox account and a cash management account, each at an eligible institution and (ii) enter into a clearing account agreement and a cash management agreement in form and substance acceptable to the lender.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not Permitted.
Ground Lease. None.
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | Barclays | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type - Subtype: | Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Oasis Global Partners | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Pacific Place Site LLC | | Location: | Las Vegas, NV |
Original Balance: | $45,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1974 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $45,000,000 | | Property Management: | Talon Commercial Real Estate, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 5.0% | | Size: | 430,156 SF |
Interest Rate: | 6.70000% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $70,000,000 / $163 |
Note Date: | July 29, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 22, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy(2): | 97.3% (as of July 1, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 94.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $4,424,841 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $4,170,990 |
First Payment Date: | September 1, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 1, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $3,126,429 (TTM April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $3,070,779 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(29),O(7) | | 2022 NOI: | $3,885,792 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Soft / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $3,341,219 |
Reserves(1) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $105 |
Taxes: | $40,229 | $20,114 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $105 |
Insurance: | $287,054 | $41,008 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 64.3% |
Replacement Reserve: | $0 | $11,112 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 64.3% |
TI/LC: | $400,000 | Springing | $250,000 | | UW NOI DY: | 9.8% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $52,210 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.36x |
| | | | | | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $45,000,000 | 91.7 | % | | Loan Payoff | $45,110,009 | 92.0 | % |
Borrower Sponsor Equity | 4,050,286 | 8.3 | | | Closing Costs(3) | 3,160,785 | 6.4 | |
| | | | Reserves | 779,493 | 1.6 | |
Total Sources | $49,050,286 | 100.0 | % | | Total Uses | $49,050,286 | 100 | .0% |
| (1) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
| (2) | Occupancy includes 7,081 square feet leased to month-to-month tenants (“MTM Tenants”). Excluding the MTM Tenants, occupancy at the Oasis Plaza Property (as defined below) is 95.6%. |
| (3) | Closing costs include an interest rate buydown of $1.8 million. |
The Loan. The sixth largest mortgage loan (the “Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in a 430,156 square foot mixed use property located in Las Vegas, Nevada (the “Oasis Plaza Property”). The Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan was originated on July 29, 2024 by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. (“Barclays”) and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.70000% per annum. The Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan is the payment date that occurs on August 1, 2029.
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
The Property. The Oasis Plaza Property is an approximately 26-acre mixed-use commercial plaza including industrial, office, retail and self storage space located in Las Vegas, Nevada, approximately 0.5 miles away from the Las Vegas Strip. The Oasis Plaza Property contains 192,520 square feet of industrial flex space, 123,770 square feet of office space, 19,667 square feet of retail space and 94,199 square feet of self storage space. The Oasis Plaza Property is leased to a variety of tenants with approximately 186 total leases. According to the appraisal, the Oasis Plaza Property has an approximate parking ratio of three stalls per 1,000 square feet. The Oasis Plaza Property was 97.3% occupied as of July 1, 2024 (95.6% occupied excluding month-to-month tenants). The Oasis Plaza Property also benefits from being adjacent to the busiest off-Strip thoroughfare in Las Vegas, with 56,500 vehicles per day.
Property Breakout(1) |
Property Type | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % Net Rentable Area (SF) | U/W Base Rent | % U/W Base Rent | Occupancy |
Industrial | 192,520 | 44.8% | $2,438,317 | 38.5% | 97.5% |
Office | 123,770 | 28.8% | $2,473,504 | 39.1% | 97.2% |
Self Storage | 94,199 | 21.9% | $1,071,828 | 16.9% | 81.8% |
Retail | 19,667 | 4.6% | $345,664 | 5.5% | 83.0% |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024. |
Major Tenants. The three largest tenants based on underwritten base rent are Work Lounge LLC, State of Nevada – Welfare and Al Bravo Films, LLC.
Work Lounge LLC (21,040 square feet; 4.9% of NRA, 16.9% of underwritten commercial base rent): Work Lounge LLC is owned and operated by LVREIS Inc., which is a company that issues private real estate loans in the state of Nevada. In 2016, the LVREIS Inc. founders started “The Coop Cowork” after acquiring and operating a property with co-working space. Work Lounge LLC at the Oasis Plaza Property blends industrial co-working with executive lounge spaces suitable for evening social events and benefits from proximity to the Las Vegas Strip (approximately 0.5 miles from the Oasis Plaza Property). Work Lounge has been a tenant at the Oasis Plaza Property since August 2023 and in July 2024, expanded its square feet from approximately 15,000 SF to 21,040 SF, and extended its lease term by an additional 26 months to February 2030.
State of Nevada - Welfare (8,153 square feet; 1.9% of NRA, 5.0% of underwritten base rent): State of Nevada – Welfare provides public assistance benefits to all who qualify and support for children with absentee parents. State of Nevada – Welfare has been a tenant at the Oasis Plaza Property since January 2014, and its current lease expires in February 2027.
Al Bravo Films, LLC (16,862 square feet; 3.9% of NRA, 4.7% of underwritten base rent): Al Bravo Films, LLC is a full service production company working with name actors and distribution companies. Al Bravo Films, LLC has leased three spaces at the Oasis Plaza Property with the first lease commencing in November 2023. Al Bravo Films, LLC has various lease expiration dates: 10,982 square feet expire on August 1, 2026, 4,390 square feet expire on November 30, 2025 and 1,490 square feet expire on January 31, 2026.
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical occupancy at the Oasis Plaza Property:
Historical and Current Occupancy |
2021(1) | 2022(1) | 2023(1) | Current(2) |
91.0% | 88.6% | 97.3% | 97.3% |
| (1) | Historical occupancy is based on the year end occupancy for each year excluding the 3355 Spring Mountain Road building, which was taken offline due to renovations. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll as of July 1, 2024, including self storage space and including MTM Tenants. |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants at the Oasis Plaza Property based on underwritten base rent:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/S&P/Fitch) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent(2) | U/W Base Rent Per SF(2) | % of Total U/W Base Rent(2) | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
Work Lounge LLC | NR/NR/NR | 21,040 | 4.9 | % | $886,956 | $42.16 | 16.9 | % | 2/28/2030 | N | NAP |
State of Nevada – Welfare | NR/NR/NR | 8,153 | 1.9 | | 260,978 | $32.01 | 5.0 | | 2/28/2027 | N | NAP |
Al Bravo Films, LLC | NR/NR/NR | 16,862 | 3.9 | | 244,649 | $14.51 | 4.7 | | Various(3) | N | NAP |
Eight Thirty Restaurants | NR/NR/NR | 3,300 | 0.8 | | 128,700 | $39.00 | 2.4 | | 2/28/2027 | N | NAP |
Las Vegas Medical Plaza | NR/NR/NR | 24,000 | 5.6 | | 126,000 | $5.25 | 2.4 | | 8/31/2025 | N | NAP |
Largest Tenants | | 73,355 | 17.1 | % | $1,647,283 | $22.46 | 31.3 | % | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 243,858 | 56.7 | | 3,552,860 | $14.57 | 67.6 | | | | |
MTM Tenants | | 7,081 | 1.6 | % | 57,342 | $8.10 | 1.1 | | | | |
Total Industrial/Office/Retail Occupied | | 324,294 | 75.4 | % | $5,257,485 | $16.21 | 100.0% | | | | |
Self Storage Component | | 94,199 | 21.9 | % | | | | | | |
Total Occupied | | 418,493 | 97.3 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | 11,663 | 2.7 | % | | | | | | |
Total | | 430,156 | 100.0 | % | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | U/W Base Rent, U/W Base Rent Per SF and % of Total U/W Base Rent include commercial tenants and excludes underwritten self storage income of $1,071,828. |
| (3) | Al Bravo Films, LLC leases three spaces with various lease expiration dates: 10,982 square feet expire on August 1, 2026, 4,390 square feet expire on November 30, 2025 and 1,490 square feet expire on January 31, 2026. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Oasis Plaza Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | UW Base Rent | % of Total UW Base Rent | UW Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
MTM | 7,081 | 2.1 | % | 2.1% | | $57,342 | | 1.1% | | $8.10 | 17 |
2024 | 47,085 | 14.0 | | 16.1% | | 628,780 | | 12.0 | | $13.35 | 30 |
2025 | 144,941 | 43.1 | | 59.3% | | 1,832,949 | | 34.9 | | $12.65 | 81 |
2026 | 86,636 | 25.8 | | 85.1% | | 1,319,114 | | 25.1 | | $15.23 | 52 |
2027 | 15,521 | 4.6 | | 89.7% | | 466,450 | | 8.9 | | $30.05 | 3 |
2028 | 0 | 0.0 | | 89.7% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2029 | 0 | 0.0 | | 89.7% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2030 | 21,040 | 6.3 | | 95.9% | | 886,956 | | 16.9 | | $42.16 | 1 |
2031 | 1,990 | 0.6 | | 96.5% | | 65,894 | | 1.3 | | $33.11 | 2 |
2032 | 0 | 0 | | 96.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2033 | 0 | 0 | | 96.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2034 | 0 | 0 | | 96.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2035 & Thereafter | 0 | 0 | | 96.5% | | 0 | | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
Vacant | 11,663 | 3.5 | | 100.0% | | NAP | | NAP | | NAP | NAP |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 335,957 | 100.0 | % | | $5,257,4 | 85 | 100.0% | | $16.21 | 186 |
| (1) | Based on underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024, excluding self storage space, inclusive of rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | Certain leases may have termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the lease and that are not considered in this Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Oasis Plaza Property has an “as-is” appraised value of $70,000,000 as of May 22, 2024. The appraiser also concluded a land value at highest and best use of $138,000,000. Based on the highest and best use value, the Cut-off Date LTV is 32.6%.
Appraisal Approach | Appraised Value | Capitalization Rate |
Income Capitalization Approach | $70,000,000 | 6.50% |
Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report dated June 27, 2024, there are no recognized environmental conditions or recommendations for further action at the Oasis Plaza Property. The report did identify a controlled recognized environmental condition at the Oasis Plaza Property. Please see “Description of the Mortgage Loan—Environmental Considerations” in the Prospectus.
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Oasis Plaza Property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM April 2024 | U/W | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent(2) | $3,806,760 | $4,215,272 | $3,603,137 | $3,767,954 | $5,257,485 | $12.22 |
Self Storage Income | 777,852 | 937,992 | 871,996 | 859,116 | 1,071,828 | 2.49 |
Gross Up Vacancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 194,308 | 0.45 |
Gross Potential Rent | $4,584,612 | $5,153,264 | $4,475,133 | $4,627,070 | $6,523,621 | $15.17 |
Total Reimbursements | 131,278 | 137,183 | 140,363 | 137,735 | 137,735 | 0.32 |
Other Revenue | 156,228 | 119,897 | 139,328 | 131,307 | 131,307 | 0.31 |
Net Rental Income | $4,872,118 | $5,410,344 | $4,754,824 | $4,896,112 | $6,792,663 | $15.79 |
Vacancy/Credit Loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (391,417) | (0.91) |
Effective Gross Income | $4,872,118 | $5,410,344 | $4,754,824 | $4,896,112 | $6,401,246 | $14.88 |
Taxes | 196,260 | 182,342 | 221,976 | 225,124 | 241,372 | 0.56 |
Insurance | 92,871 | 94,549 | 339,700 | 346,772 | 492,092 | 1.14 |
Repairs and Maintenance | 540,370 | 571,788 | 418,339 | 475,834 | 475,834 | 1.11 |
Other Expenses | 701,398 | 675,873 | 704,030 | 721,953 | 767,107 | 1.78 |
Total Expenses | $1,530,899 | $1,524,552 | $1,684,045 | $1,769,683 | $1,976,405 | $4.59 |
Net Operating Income(3) | $3,341,219 | $3,885,792 | $3,070,779 | $3,126,429 | $4,424,841 | $10.29 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 133,348 | 0.31 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120,503(4) | 0.28 |
Net Cash Flow | $3,341,219 | $3,885,792 | $3,070,779 | $3,126,429 | $4,170,990 | $9.70 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy(5) | 91.0% | 88.6% | 97.3% | 96.4% | 94.0%(6) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.09x | 1.27x | 1.00x | 1.02x | 1.36x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 7.4% | 8.6% | 6.8% | 7.0% | 9.8% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024. |
| (2) | U/W Base Rent includes contractual rent steps through August 2025. |
| (3) | The increase in Net Operating Income from TTM April 2024 to U/W is due to 19,092 square feet of leases commencing following the TTM April 2024 period. |
| (4) | U/W TI/LC includes a $40,000 credit, which represents10% of the $400,000 upfront TI/LC reserve. |
| (5) | Represents the year-end occupancy for each year excluding the 3355 Spring Mountain Road building, which was taken offline for renovations. |
| (6) | U/W occupancy is based on economic occupancy. |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
The Market. The Oasis Plaza Property is located approximately 0.5 miles away from the Las Vegas Strip on the busiest off-Strip thoroughfare in Las Vegas (56,500 vehicles per day). The Oasis Plaza Property also benefits from close access to Interstate 15, with a vehicle count of approximately 243,000 per day. According to the appraisal, the area is transitioning from mainly industrial into a mixed-use, high-density residential and commercial district. The appraiser considered the current improvements to be an interim use and concluded that the highest and best use would be redevelopment into a gaming/resort property or more modern mixed use property due to its desired commercial resort zoning.
The Oasis Plaza Property is located in the Las Vegas industrial market and West Las Vegas industrial submarket. As of the first quarter of 2024, the occupancy rate in the Las Vegas industrial market was approximately 94.3% with asking rents of $14.46, and for the West Las Vegas submarket was approximately 96.3% and asking rents were $15.93.
The Oasis Plaza Property is located in the Las Vegas retail market and the Central West Las Vegas submarket. As of the first quarter of 2024, the occupancy rate of the Las Vegas retail market was approximately 94.9% with asking rents of $31.80, and the occupancy rate of the Central West Las Vegas retail submarket was approximately 96.0% with asking rents of $24.87.
The appraiser did not provide self storage market or submarket statistics for the Oasis Plaza Property.
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable sales to the office/retail portion of the Oasis Plaza Property:
Comparable Sales – Office/Retail(1) |
Property Name City, State | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Year Built / Renovated | Sale Date | Sale Price | Sale Price / SF | Cap Rate | NOI / SF | Occupancy |
Oasis Plaza Las Vegas, NV | 430,156(2) | 1974 / NAP | Jan-18 | NAV | NAV | 6.50% | NAV | 97.3%(2) |
Plaza Los Arcos Las Vegas, NV | 15,856 | 1979 / NAP | Mar-24 | $3,465,000 | $218.53 | 6.90% | $15.07 | 100.0% |
Decatur Square Las Vegas, NV | 16,515 | 1989 / NAP | Aug-23 | $3,420,000 | $207.08 | 7.12% | $14.74 | 100.0% |
Rainbow Office Park Las Vegas, NV | 50,019 | 1998 / NAP | Jul-23 | $11,700,000 | $233.91 | 7.58% | $17.73 | 100.0% |
Laborers Union Building Las Vegas, NV | 29,226 | 1999 / NAP | Jan-23 | $8,500,000 | $290.84 | 7.08% | $20.59 | 100.0% |
3175 East Tropicana Avenue Las Vegas, NV | 13,761 | 1991 / NAP | Nov-22 | $3,260,000 | $236.90 | NAV | NAV | 93.0% |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable sales to the flex industrial portion of the Oasis Plaza Property:
Comparable Sales – Flex Industrial(1) |
Property Name City, State | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Year Built / Renovated | Sale Date | Sale Price | Sale Price / SF | Cap Rate | NOI / SF | Occupancy |
Oasis Plaza Las Vegas, NV | 430,156(2) | 1974 / NAP | Jan-18 | NAV | NAV | 6.50% | NAV | 97.3%(2) |
3355 Aldebaran Avenue Las Vegas, NV | 10,000 | 1975 / NAP | Jan-24 | $2,200,000 | $220.00 | NAV | NAV | 0.0% |
Cheyenne West Corporate Center North Las Vegas, NV | 20,846 | 2004 / NAP | Mar-23 | $3,250,000 | $155.91 | 5.62% | $8.76 | 100.0% |
3711 Regulus Avenue Las Vegas, NV | 12,000 | 1988 / NAP | Nov-22 | $3,120,000 | $260.00 | NAV | NAV | 0.0% |
4347 West Sunset Road Las Vegas, NV | 10,457 | 2002 / NAP | Sep-22 | $2,950,000 | $282.11 | 3.21% | $9.04 | 100.0% |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024. |
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable sales to the self-storage portion of the Oasis Plaza Property:
Comparable Sales – Self Storage(1) |
Property Name City, State | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Year Built / Renovated | Sale Date | Sale Price | Sale Price / SF | Cap Rate | NOI / SF | Occupancy |
Oasis Plaza Las Vegas, NV | 430,156(2) | 1974 / NAP | Jan-18 | NAV | NAV | 6.50% | NAV | 97.3%(2) |
Florence Mini Storage Florence, AZ | 10,800 | 2001 / NAP | Jul-23 | $1,090,000 | $100.93 | 5.68% | $5.73 | 100.0% |
Public Storage Mesa, AZ | 120,310 | 2008 / NAP | Jun-23 | $14,600,000 | $121.35 | NAV | NAV | 100.0% |
Sunrise Boat & RV Storage Las Vegas, NV | 129,846 | 1992 / NAP | Oct-22 | $12,250,000 | $94.34 | 5.70% | $5.38 | 90.0% |
Arizona Storage Inns Mesa, AZ | 27,790 | 1983 / NAP | Sep-22 | $4,575,000 | $164.63 | 6.09% | $10.03 | 95.0% |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 1, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the demographics of the Oasis Plaza Property:
Demographics Summary(1) |
Property Name | City, State | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | 1-mile Population | 3-mile Population | 5-mile Population | 1-mile Avg Household Income | 3-mile Avg Household Income | 5-mile Avg Household Income |
Oasis Plaza | Las Vegas, NV | $45,000,000 | 14,646 | 152,448 | 413,628 | $48,364 | $65,914 | $68,022 |
| (1) | Source: Third party report. Demographics statistics is based on year-end 2024 estimates. |
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower for the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan is Pacific Place Site LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity with one independent director. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan.
The borrower sponsor is Oasis Global Partners (“Oasis”) and the non-recourse carveout guarantor is Eric Chen, the co-founder and president of Oasis. Founded in 2009, Oasis is a real estate investment firm that operates seven funds and invests in a mix of global real estate, equity and commodity assets. In 2010, Oasis made pilot investments in residential and commercial foreclosures across Phoenix and Las Vegas under an entity named Cactus Fund Inc. and soon after formed its first formal partnership, Land Partners Inc, which focused on acquiring parcels that publicly-traded home builders could use for subdivision development. In 2017, Oasis formed its private equity arm, LVSM Incorporated, to acquire approximately $86 million in blue-chip parcels adjacent to the Las Vegas Strip. The non-recourse carveout guarantor is subject to active litigation related to his private law practice.
Property Management. The Oasis Plaza Property is managed by Talon Commercial Real Estate, LLC, a third party management company.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan, the borrower deposited (i) approximately $40,229 for real estate taxes, (ii) approximately $287,054 for insurance premiums, (iii) $52,210 for immediate repairs and (iv) $400,000 for general tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Tax Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow 1/12th of the annual estimated tax payments payable during the next ensuing 12 months (initially equal to approximately $20,114).
Insurance Reserve – On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow 1/12th of the annual estimated insurance payments (initially equal to approximately $41,008).
Replacement Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit with the lender $11,112 per month.
TI/LC Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit with the lender approximately $13,998 per month when the balance of the TI/LC reserve falls below $250,000.
Mixed Use – Industrial/Office/Retail/Self Storage 3301 Spring Mountain Road Las Vegas, NV 89102 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Oasis Plaza | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $45,000,000 64.3% 1.36x 9.8% |
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan is structured with a soft lockbox and springing cash management. Prior to the occurrence of a Trigger Period (as defined below), the borrower or the property manager must transfer to the lockbox account any rents or operating income in its possession on the 10th day of each month, and, during the occurrence and continuance of a Trigger Period, must deposit all rents and operating income into the lockbox account within five business days of receipt, provided that any lease termination payments will be directly deposited into the TI/LC reserve. All excess cash flow funds remaining in the cash management account after the application of such funds in accordance with the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan documents are required to be held by the lender in an excess cash flow reserve account as additional collateral for the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan during the continuance of a Trigger Period.
A “Trigger Period” means the period commencing upon the occurrence of (i) an event of default, (ii) a debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) less than 1.20x, (iii) the bankruptcy of the borrower or principal or (iv) a Major Tenant Trigger Event (as defined below). A Trigger Period will end upon (a) with regard to clause (i) above, a cure of such event of default is accepted by the lender, (b) with regard to clause (ii) above, upon achievement of a DSCR greater than or equal to 1.25x for two consecutive calendar quarters, (c) with regard to clause (iii) above, upon the cure of such bankruptcy event and (d) with regard to clause (iv) above, upon the occurrence of a Major Tenant Trigger Event Cure (as defined below).
A ”Major Tenant Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) the borrower’s failure to satisfy the Major Tenant Renewal Criteria (as defined below) on or before the earlier of (x) the date 12 months’ prior to the expiration date of Work Lounge LLC’s lease and (y) the date by which Work Lounge LLC is required to deliver notice of its lease renewal or extension under its lease, (ii) Work Lounge LLC giving notice of its intent to terminate or not renew its lease, (iii) Work Lounge LLC going dark or vacating all or any portion of its space at the Oasis Plaza Property, (iv) Work Lounge LLC, its parent company and/or the guarantor of its lease filing for bankruptcy or (v) Work Lounge LLC defaulting under the terms of its lease.
A ”Major Tenant Trigger Event Cure” will occur, with respect to clause (i) or (ii) of the definition of Major Tenant Trigger above, either (a) upon the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Renewal Criteria or (b) upon the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Lease Criteria (as defined below), with respect to clause (iii) above, either (a) upon the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Lease Criteria or (b) upon Work Lounge LLC resuming occupancy in its space and resuming normal operations, with respect to clause (iv) above, upon either (a) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Lease Criteria or (b) the borrower providing reasonable evidence that the respective entity is no longer subject to bankruptcy proceedings and with respect to clause (v) above, upon either (a) the satisfaction of the Major Tenant Replacement Lease Criteria or (b) the borrower providing reasonable evidence that the event of default has been cured and the tenant is in occupancy and resuming normal operations.
The ”Major Tenant Renewal Criteria” means the lender has received evidence that Work Lounge LLC or any replacement tenant for Work Lounge LLC has renewed its lease with a term of at least five years, delivery of an updated tenant estoppel and evidence that the tenant is occupying its full space, is open for business and is paying full contractual rent.
The “Major Tenant Replacement Lease Criteria” means (i) the borrower enters into one or more replacement leases for the space of Work Lounge LLC or its replacement tenant(s), (ii) the replacement tenant is in physical occupancy, open for business and is paying full contractual rent and (iii) the borrower provides the lender with required documentation under the Oasis Plaza Mortgage Loan documents evidencing the lease(s).
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not permitted.
Ground Lease. None.
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | GACC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Multifamily – Garden |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | David B. Gardner | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | The Meadows at Lehigh Valley, LP; The Hills at Lehigh Valley, LP | | Location: | Bethlehem, PA |
Original Balance: | $44,500,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1975, 1988, 2014 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $44,500,000 | | Property Management: | Larken Associates, A Limited Partnership |
% by Initial UPB: | 5.0% | | Size: | 348 Units |
Interest Rate: | 6.25300% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | $63,600,000 / $182,759 |
Note Date: | July 30, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 29, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 98.3% (as of June 30, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $3,762,139 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $3,675,139 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $3,724,581 (TTM June 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $3,504,102 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(32),O(4) | | 2022 NOI: | $3,223,741 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Springing / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $3,059,724 |
Reserves(1) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $127,874 |
Taxes: | $70,676 | $70,676 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $127,874 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 70.0% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $7,250 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 70.0% |
Other: | $53,000 | $0 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 8.5% |
| | | | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.30x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $44,500,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $33,994,962 | 76.4 | % |
| | | | Return of Equity | 8,313,177 | 18.7 | |
| | | | Closing Costs | 2,068,185 | 4.6 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 123,676 | 0.3 | |
Total Sources | $44,500,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $44,500,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
The Loan. The seventh largest mortgage loan (“The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in two garden-style multifamily properties totaling 348 units in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (“The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties”). The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $44,500,000. The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan was originated on July 30, 2024 by DBR Investments Co. Limited and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.25300% per annum. The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan is August 6, 2029.
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
The Property. The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties consist of two garden-style multifamily properties totaling 348 units in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (approximately one mile apart from each other). Since 2012, the borrower sponsor has completed approximately $8.9 million in capital improvements at both of the properties, including new construction, roofing, siding and hallway and kitchen renovations, among other capital improvements. As of June 30, 2024, The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties were 98.3% occupied.
Portfolio Summary(1) |
Property Name | Address | City, State | # of Units | Year Built | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.)(2) | Appraised Value(2) | ALA |
The Hills at Lehigh Valley | 2140 Johnston Drive | Bethlehem, PA | 156 | 1988 | 98.7% | 879 | $27,700,000 | $19,381,289 |
The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | 3310 East Boulevard | Bethlehem, PA | 192 | 1975, 2014 | 97.9% | 923 | $35,900,000 | $25,118,711 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | | | 348 | | 98.3% | | $63,600,000 | $44,500,000 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024. |
The Meadows at Lehigh Valley: The Meadows at Lehigh Valley (“Meadows”) is a 192-unit multifamily garden property located at 3310 East Boulevard in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The Meadows property consists of 18 predominantly two-story apartment buildings situated on an 18.58-acre site. The improvements consist of 13 buildings known as The Meadows Apartments and Townhomes built in 1975, four buildings known as East Hills Townhomes built in 2014 and one leasing office. Since acquisition, the borrower sponsor has spent approximately $2.9 million in capital improvements to Meadows. In 2014, the borrower sponsor spent approximately $3.7 million to build 16 new townhome units at the Meadows, increasing the unit count by 9.1% to 192 units. Between the capital improvements and new units, approximately $6.6 million in capital expenditures has been spent at the Meadows property.
The unit mix includes 73 one-bedroom/one-bathroom units, 2 two-bedroom/one-bathroom units, 93 two-bedroom/two-bathroom units, 8 three-bedroom/one and a half bathroom units and 16 three-bedroom townhomes. Unit amenities include washer/dryer in select units, air conditioning, upgraded cabinetry and appliances including dishwasher, walk-in closets, wall-to-wall carpeting, hardwood in living/dining rooms, cable ready, and balcony or patio in select units. The bathrooms within each unit feature a combination tub/shower. Community amenities include 24-hour emergency service, laundry room in each building, on-site management, and 397 parking spaces (2.07 spaces per unit).
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Meadows property:
The Meadows - Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | # of Units | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | Average Market Rent Per Unit(2) | Average Monthly Rent Per Unit | Average Monthly Rent PSF |
1BR/1BA | 73 | 38.0% | 98.6% | 700 | $1,300 | $1,244 | $1.78 |
2BR/1BA | 2 | 1.0% | 100.0% | 950 | $1,400 | $1,351 | $1.42 |
2BR/2BA | 93 | 48.4% | 96.8% | 950 | $1,475 | $1,431 | $1.51 |
3BR/1.5BA | 8 | 4.2% | 100.0% | 1178 | $2,250 | $1,863 | $1.58 |
3BR/2BA | 16 | 8.3% | 100.0% | 1656 | NAV | $2,294 | $1.39 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 192 | 100.0% | 97.9% | 923 | | $1,449 | $1.60 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024. |
The Hills at Lehigh Valley: The Hills at Lehigh Valley (“Hills”) is a 156-unit multifamily garden property located at 2140 Johnston Drive in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The Hills property consists of seven predominantly three-story apartment buildings constructed between 1985 and 1988 that are situated on a 10.17-acre site. Since acquisition in 2012, the borrower sponsor has invested approximately $2.25 million in capital improvements at the Hills property.
The unit mix includes 44 one-bedroom/one-bathroom units and 112 two-bedroom/two-bathroom units. Unit amenities include washer/dryers in select units, air conditioning, upgraded cabinetry and appliances including dishwasher, walk-in closets, wall-to-wall carpeting, hardwood in living/dining rooms, cable ready, and balcony or patio in select units. The bathrooms within each unit feature a combination tub/shower. Community amenities include 24-hour emergency service, laundry room in each building, on-site management, and 263 parking spaces (1.69 spaces per unit).
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Hills property:
| The Hills - Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | # of Units | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | Average Market Rent Per Unit(2) | Average Monthly Rent Per Unit | Average Monthly Rent PSF |
1BR/1BA | 44 | 28.2% | 97.7% | 700 | $1,300 | $1,238 | $1.77 |
2BR/2BA | 112 | 71.8% | 99.1% | 950 | $1,400 | $1,376 | $1.45 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 156 | 100.0% | 98.7% | 879 | $1,372 | $1,337 | $1.54 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM 6/30/2024 | U/W | U/W Per Unit |
Gross Potential Rent | $4,924,774 | $5,168,872 | $5,477,236 | $5,707,538 | $5,840,944 | $16,784 |
Vacancy | (93,951) | (74,510) | (149,249) | (111,158) | (292,047) | (839) |
Bad Debt | (35,756) | (44,840) | (19,611) | (26,769) | 0 | 0 |
Concessions | (15,547) | (13,448) | (14,119) | (14,717) | 0 | 0 |
Net Rental Income | $4,779,520 | $5,036,075 | $5,294,258 | $5,554,895 | $5,548,897 | $15,945 |
Other Income(1) | 418,318 | 419,078 | 479,197 | 498,769 | 498,769 | 1,433 |
Effective Gross Income | $5,197,838 | $5,455,152 | $5,773,455 | $6,053,664 | $6,047,666 | $17,378 |
| | | | | | |
Real Estate Taxes | 826,098 | 823,044 | 820,581 | 820,877 | 840,217 | 2,414 |
Insurance | 151,827 | 165,726 | 182,495 | 178,783 | 151,780 | 436 |
Management Fee | 156,814 | 161,907 | 170,848 | 186,697 | 181,430 | 521 |
Other Expenses(2) | 1,003,375 | 1,080,735 | 1,095,429 | 1,142,727 | 1,112,100 | 3,196 |
Total Expenses | $2,138,114 | $2,231,412 | $2,269,353 | $2,329,083 | $2,285,527 | $6,568 |
| | | | | | |
Net Operating Income | $3,059,724 | $3,223,741 | $3,504,102 | $3,724,581 | $3,762,139 | $10,811 |
Replacement Reserves | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87,000 | 250 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Net Cash Flow | $3,059,724 | $3,223,741 | $3,504,102 | $3,724,581 | $3,675,139 | $10,561 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy | 97.4% | 97.9% | 97.2% | 98.3% | 95.0% | |
NCF DSCR | 1.08x | 1.14x | 1.24x | 1.32x | 1.30x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.9% | 7.2% | 7.9% | 8.4% | 8.5% | |
| (1) | Other Income consists of pet income, laundry income, trash income and general other income. |
| (2) | Other Expenses consists of payroll and benefits, repairs and maintenance, utilities and general and administrative expenses. |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $63,600,000 as of May 29, 2024. Based on the aggregate “as-is” value of $63,600,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan are 70.0%.
The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley |
Property | Appraised Value(1) | Capitalization Rate |
The Meadows at Lehigh Valley | $35,900,000 | 5.75% |
The Hills at Lehigh Valley | $27,700,000 | 5.75% |
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
Environmental Matters. The Phase I environmental assessments dated June 11, 2024 did not identify any evidence of recognized environmental conditions at The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties. An initial round of radon testing identified seventeen units at the Meadows property with elevated levels of radon exceeding the action limit of 4.0 pico curies per liter of air (pCi/L), ranging from 4.1 pCi/L to 12.3 pCi/L and four units at the Hills property with elevated levels of radon, ranging from 4.1 pCi/L to 5.3 pCi/L. In addition, the third floor units at the Hills property were not tested for radon (together with the units with elevated radon levels (the “Radon Affected Units”). At origination, $42,000 was reserved for potential remediation of the Radon Affected Units. The borrower has covenanted to retest the Radon Affected Units no later than December 6, 2024, and remediate them to bring radon levels below 4.0 pCi/L. On and after such date, the borrower may request $2,000 per Radon Affected Unit from the radon reserve if either (i) the Radon Affected Unit tested or retested at radon levels at or above 4.0 pCi/L, to be used for remediation of such unit, or (ii) the Radon Affected Unit tested or retested at radon levels below 4.0 pCi/L, to be released to the borrower, in each case upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
The Market.
The Meadows at Lehigh Valley: The Meadows property is situated at the intersection of East Boulevard and Chester Road, and is less than a quarter-mile from Linden Street (a major thoroughfare) and a mile from US Route 22 (Lehigh Valley Thruway). Located near popular restaurants and shopping, the Meadows property is just minutes from Wind Creek Bethlehem, Steel Stacks, and St. Luke’s Hospital, and is in walking distance from East Hills Middle School and Freedom High School. The Meadows property also benefits from access to the Route 78/22 Corridor, Route 33 and Route 91.
According to the appraisal, the 2023 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Meadows property is 11,962, 73,590, and 152,357, respectively. The 2023 median household income within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Meadows property is $87,107, $85,714, and $77,211, respectively.
The Hills at Lehigh Valley: The Hills property is situated at the intersection of Bonnie Burn Road and Johnston Drive, and is less than a quarter-mile from US Route 22 (Lehigh Valley Thruway).
According to the appraisal, the 2023 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Hills property is 12,314, 64,422, and 151,970, respectively. The 2023 median household income within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Hills property is $92,284, $89,305, and $78,783, respectively.
According to the appraisal, The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties are located within the Bethlehem/Easton multifamily submarket which as of the first quarter of 2024, had total inventory of 21,683 units, a vacancy rate of 4.4% and effective rent of $1,723 per unit.
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable multifamily properties to The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties:
Multifamily Rent Comparables(1) |
Property Name | Distance from Subject (miles) | Year Built / Renovated | Occupancy | # of Units | Unit Type | Average Unit Size | Average Rent Per Unit |
Hills | N/A | 1988 / NAP | 98.7%(2) | 156(2) | 1BR / 1BA | 700 | $1,238 |
2BR / 2BA | 950 | $1,376 |
Meadows | N/A | 1975, 2014 / NAP | 97.9%(2) | 192(2) | 1BR / 1BA | 700 | $1,244 |
2BR / 2BA | 950 | $1,431 |
Lehigh Plaza | 3.7 | 1967 / NAP | 100.0% | 121 | 1BR / 1BA | 650 | $1,365 - $1,415 |
2BR / 2BA | 820 - 965 | $1,510 |
The Landings by OneWall | 4.0 | 1972 / NAP | 98.0% | 384 | 1BR / 1BA | 760 | $1,568 |
2BR / 2BA | 1,052 | $1,904 |
Congress Apartments | 5.6 | 1969 / NAP | 100.0% | 548 | 1BR / 1BA | 564 - 659 | $1,125 |
2BR / 2BA | 800 | $1,480 |
River Pointe Townhomes | 1.7 | 1968 / NAP | 100.0% | 211 | 1BR / 1BA | 605 | $1,310 - $1,549 |
2BR / 2BA | 960 | $1,834 - $2,059 |
Sanbrook Apartments | 5.9 | 1968 / NAP | 100.0% | 48 | 1BR / 1BA | 645 | $1,294 - $1,494 |
2BR / 2BA | 750 | $1,524 - $1,724 |
Madison Farms | 2.3 | 2015 / NAP | 100.0% | 570 | 1BR / 1BA | 803 - 1,005 | $1,790 - $1,915 |
2BR / 2BA | 1,152 - 1,275 | $2,040 - $2,090 |
Sherwood Apartments | 0.7 | 1967 / 2019 | 98.0% | 320 | 1BR / 1BA | 696 - 719 | $1,245 - $1,260 |
2BR / 2BA | 970 | $1,441 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024. |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers are The Hills at Lehigh Valley, LP and The Meadows at Lehigh Valley, LP, each a Pennsylvania limited partnership and single purpose entity having at least one independent director in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan.
The borrower sponsor and non-recourse carveout guarantor is David B. Gardner. David B. Gardner is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Larken Associates, A Limited Partnership (“Larken”). Larken is a family-owned owner/developer of residential and commercial real estate, and through its affiliated group of companies, Larken provides a fully integrated real estate services firm that provides services including development, leasing, property management, and investment. The Larken portfolio consists of nearly 3 million SF and 800 tenants across office, industrial, retail and mixed-use properties and approximately 2,000 owned and/or managed residential units across 22 communities.
Property Management. The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Properties are managed by Larken, an affiliate of the borrower.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan, the borrower deposited approximately (i) $70,676 into a reserve account for real estate taxes, (ii) $42,000 into a reserve account for radon mitigation and (iii) $11,000 into an immediate repairs reserve account.
Tax Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $70,676).
Insurance Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the amount which will be sufficient to pay the insurance premiums due for the renewal of coverage afforded by such policies (provided that such requirement is waived so long as an acceptable blanket policy is in place). At origination of The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan, an acceptable blanket policy was in place.
Multifamily – Garden 3310 East Boulevard & 2140 Johnston Drive Bethlehem, PA Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $44,500,000 70.0% 1.30x 8.5% |
Replacement Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $7,250.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan is structured with a springing lockbox and springing cash management. Upon the occurrence of the first Trigger Period (as defined below), the borrower is required to establish a lender-controlled lockbox account and is thereafter required to deposit, or cause the property manager to deposit, within three business days of receipt, all revenue received by the borrower or the property manager into such lockbox. So long as a Cash Sweep Event Period (as defined below) has not occurred and is not continuing, all amounts on deposit in the lockbox account will be swept on a daily basis into the borrower’s account. Upon the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Sweep Event Period, all amounts on deposit in the lockbox account will be required to be transferred on a daily basis into a lender controlled cash management account and will be applied as provided in The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan documents to make the required deposits to the tax and insurance reserves, if any, pay debt service on The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan, make the required deposit to the replacement reserve, pay operating expenses as set forth in the annual budget (which must be approved by the lender during a Cash Sweep Event Period) and lender-approved extraordinary expenses, and to deposit the remainder into an excess cash flow account, to be held as additional collateral during the continuance of such Cash Sweep Event Period.
“Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default under The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio being less than 1.25x, (iii) the bankruptcy or insolvency of any affiliated property manager or (iv) certain bankruptcy or insolvency events of the borrower.
“Cash Sweep Event Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default under The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio being less than 1.20x, (iii) the bankruptcy or insolvency of any affiliated property manager or (iv) certain bankruptcy or insolvency events of the borrower; and (B) expiring upon (x) with regard to clause (i) above, the cure (if applicable) of such event of default, (y) with regard to clause (ii) above, (a) the date that the debt service coverage ratio is equal to or greater than 1.25x for two consecutive calendar quarters or (b) the borrower has delivered to the lender either funds or a letter of credit in an amount which, if applied to prepay the then outstanding principal balance of The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan, would result in a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.25x, and (z) with regard to clause (iii) above, if the property manager is replaced with a non-affiliated property manager approved by the lender under a replacement management agreement approved by the lender.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Provided that no event of default is continuing under The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley Mortgage Loan documents, at any time after the date that is two years after the closing date of the Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization, the borrowers may deliver defeasance collateral and obtain release of one of the properties, provided that, among other conditions, (i) the borrowers defease an amount equal to the greater of (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount and (y) 100% of the net sales proceeds, of the property being released, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio after such release is no less than the greater of (x) 1.30x and (y) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to such release (iii) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining property, as determined by a current or updated appraisal, is no more than the lesser of (x) 70.0% and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to such release and (iv) certain REMIC related conditions are satisfied.
Ground Lease. None.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Retail - Anchored |
Borrower Sponsor(s)(1): | Various | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | COR Route 104 Company, LLC | | Location: | Webster, NY |
Original Balance: | $43,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 2004 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $43,000,000 | | Property Management: | COR Property Services Company, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 4.8% | | Size: | 365,760 SF |
Interest Rate: | 7.33500% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $64,500,000 / $176 |
Note Date: | July 25, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 22, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 96.6% (as of June 18, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $4,301,338 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $4,053,866 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $4,352,747 (TTM April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $4,272,014 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(31),O(5) | | 2022 NOI: | $3,917,788 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $4,593,670 |
Reserves(2) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $118 |
Taxes: | $823,214 | $57,408 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $118 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 66.7% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $6,100 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 66.7% |
TI / LC: | $1,000,000 | $23,000 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 10.0% |
Other: | $59,125 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.27x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $43,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $39,780,055 | 92.5 | % |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 1,882,339 | 4.4 | |
| | | | Closing Costs(3) | 1,322,701 | 3.1 | |
| | | | Return of Equity | 14,906 | 0.0 | |
Total Sources | $43,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $43,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | The borrower sponsors for the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan (as defined below) are Paul G. Joynt, Jeffrey L. Aiello, Lori A. Aiello Family Trust and Laurie R. Gerardi Family Trust. |
| (2) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
| (3) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $645,000. |
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
The Loan. The eighth largest mortgage loan (the “Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in a retail property totaling 365,760 square feet located in Webster, New York (the “Towne Center at Webster Property”). The Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $43,000,000. The Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan was originated on July 25, 2024 by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 7.33500% per annum. The Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan is the payment date that occurs on August 6, 2029.
The Property. The Towne Center at Webster Property is a 365,760 square foot, multi-tenant retail center situated on a 47.65-acre site located in Webster, New York. The improvements feature seven, single-story buildings completed in 2004. Per a third-party market research report, the Towne Center at Webster Property received 5.8 million visits over the past year. The Towne Center at Webster Property is shadow anchored by a corporate owned Target (non-collateral), which is part of the larger development. According to a third-party market research report, over the past year, Target attracted approximately 1.5 million visits placing it 38th among all Target stores in New York. The Towne Center at Webster Property is also anchored by Kohl’s, Barnes & Noble, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Five Below, HomeGoods, Michael’s, Old Navy, PetSmart, and TJ Maxx. As of June 18, 2024, the Towne Center at Webster Property was 96.6% occupied. Fourteen of the 19 existing tenants at the Towne Center at Webster Property, or 82.1% of the existing tenancy by revenue and 78.6% of square footage, have occupied the Towne Center at Webster Property for over 15 years. Parking is provided via 2,100 on-site surface parking spaces, resulting in a parking ratio of 5.74 per 1,000 square feet of net rentable area.
The Towne Center at Webster Property was developed by the borrower sponsors in 2004 on land acquired from the Wegman family. The Towne Center at Webster Property is located directly across the street from a family-owned Wegmans (non-collateral). Per a third-party market research report, over the past year Wegmans attracted approximately 2.4 million visits, placing it ninth among all Wegmans stores in New York and nationwide.
Major Tenants. The three largest tenants based on underwritten base rent are Kohls, Dick’s Sporting Goods and TJ Maxx.
Kohls (88,408 square feet, 24.2% of net rentable area, 15.9% of underwritten base rent) (Moody’s: Ba2, Fitch: BB and S&P: BB). Kohl’s operates department stores in the United States. Kohl’s, through its brick-and-mortar locations as well as through e-commerce, sells moderately-priced private and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty, and home products. According to a third-party market research report, Kohl’s hosted approximately 548,500 visitors over the past year at the Towne Center at Webster Property. Kohl’s has been in occupancy since October 2004 and exercised a ten-year extension option in February 2024. Kohls has eight, five-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
Dick’s Sporting Goods (50,000 square feet, 13.7% of net rentable area, 12.0% of underwritten base rent) (Moody’s: Baa3; Fitch: NR; S&P: BBB). Dick’s Sporting Goods (“Dick’s”) together with its subsidiaries, operates as an omni-channel sporting goods retailer. The company offers an assortment of authentic sports equipment, apparel, footwear, and accessories. The company also owns and operates Golf Galaxy and Field & Stream stores, as well as GameChanger, a youth sports mobile app. According to a third-party market research report, Dick’s hosted roughly 418,500 visits over the past year at the Towne Center at Webster Property. Dick’s has been in occupancy since August 2005 and exercised its second extension option in 2021. Dick’s has three, five-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
TJ Maxx (42,775 Square Feet; 11.7% of net rentable area, 10.7% of underwritten base rent). (Moody’s: A2, Fitch: NR and S&P: A) TJ Maxx is a subsidiary of the TJX Companies, Inc, which operates as an off-price apparel and home fashion retailer in the United States and worldwide. TJ Maxx sells brand-name family apparel, accessories, shoes, domestics, giftware, and jewelry at discount prices. According to a third-party market research report, TJ Maxx hosted roughly 561,500 visits over the past year at the Towne Center at Webster Property. TJ Maxx has been in occupancy since October 2005 and exercised its second extension option in 2021. TJ Maxx has two, five-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the largest tenants at the Towne Center at Webster Property:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch)(2) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Total U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
Kohl's | Ba2/BB/BB | 88,408 | 24.2% | $764,729 | $8.65 | 15.9% | 1/31/2035 | N | 8 x 5 Yr |
Dick's Sporting Goods | Baa3/BBB/NR | 50,000 | 13.7 | 575,000 | $11.50 | 12.0 | 1/31/2026 | N | 3 x 5 Yr |
TJ Maxx | A2/A/NR | 42,775 | 11.7 | 513,300 | $12.00 | 10.7 | 1/31/2026 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Barnes & Noble | NR/NR/NR | 25,000 | 6.8 | 350,000 | $14.00 | 7.3 | 1/31/2031 | N | 1 x 5 Yr |
PetSmart | B1/B+/NR | 18,827 | 5.1 | 271,862 | $14.44 | 5.7 | 5/31/2025 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Michael's | B3/B-/NR | 22,136 | 6.1 | 271,166 | $12.25 | 5.7 | 5/31/2027 | N | 4 x 5 Yr |
Ulta | NR/NR/NR | 10,000 | 2.7 | 260,100 | $26.01 | 5.4 | 12/31/2027 | N | 1 x 5 Yr |
Old Navy | NR/NR/NR | 19,180 | 5.2 | 230,160 | $12.00 | 4.8 | 9/30/2026 | N | None |
HomeGoods | NR/NR/NR | 23,012 | 6.3 | 218,614 | $9.50 | 4.6 | 11/30/2026 | N | 4 x 5 Yr |
Five Below | NR/NR/NR | 11,995 | 3.3 | 160,613 | $13.39 | 3.3 | 4/30/2027 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Largest Tenants | | 311,333 | 85.1% | $3,615,544 | $11.61 | 75.4% | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 42,163 | 11.5 | 1,179,440 | 27.97 | 24.6 | | | |
Total Occupied | | 353,496 | 96.6% | $4,794,984 | $13.56 | 100.0% | | | |
Vacant | | 12,264 | 3.4% | | | | | | |
Total | | 365,760 | 100.0% | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024, inclusive of $17,664 of straight line rent steps through January 1, 2025. |
| (2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Towne Center at Webster Property, based on initial lease expiration date:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | U/W Base Rent | % of Total U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
MTM | 0 | 0.0 | % | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0 | % | $0.00 | 0 |
2024 | 0 | 0.0 | | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2025 | 30,030 | 8.2 | | 8.2% | 564,737 | 11.8 | | $18.81 | 3 |
2026 | 137,995 | 37.7 | | 45.9% | 1,627,914 | 34.0 | | $11.80 | 5 |
2027 | 53,999 | 14.8 | | 60.7% | 932,985 | 19.5 | | $17.28 | 6 |
2028 | 6,110 | 1.7 | | 62.4% | 204,050 | 4.3 | | $33.40 | 2 |
2029 | 5,603 | 1.5 | | 63.9% | 194,144 | 4.0 | | $34.65 | 1 |
2030 | 6,351 | 1.7 | | 65.6% | 156,425 | 3.3 | | $24.63 | 1 |
2031 | 25,000 | 6.8 | | 72.5% | 350,000 | 7.3 | | $14.00 | 1 |
2032 | 0 | 0.0 | | 72.5% | 0 | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2033 | 0 | 0.0 | | 72.5% | 0 | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2034 | 0 | 0.0 | | 72.5% | 0 | 0.0 | | $0.00 | 0 |
2035 & Thereafter | 88,408 | 24.2 | | 96.6% | 764,729 | 15.9 | | $8.65 | 1 |
Vacant | 12,264 | 3.4 | | 100.0% | NAP | NAP | | NAP | NAP |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 365,760 | 100.0 | % | | $4,794,984 | 100.0 | % | $13.56 | 20 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024 inclusive of $17,664 of straight line rent steps through January 1, 2025. |
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Towne Center at Webster Property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM 4/30/2024 | U/W | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent | $5,326,606 | $4,791,577 | $4,929,034 | $4,815,121 | $4,777,320 | $13.06 |
Contractual Rent Steps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17,664 | 0.05 |
Potential Income from Vacant Space | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 242,850 | 0.66 |
Bad Debt | 0 | (4,885) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gross Potential Rent | $5,326,606 | $4,786,691 | $4,929,034 | $4,815,121 | $5,037,834 | $13.77 |
Total Reimbursements | 2,207,836 | 1,998,217 | 2,040,412 | 1,928,613 | 2,030,551 | 5.55 |
Total Gross Income | $7,534,442 | $6,784,908 | $6,969,446 | $6,743,734 | $7,068,385 | $19.33 |
Other Income | 68,713 | 132,337 | 97,162 | 102,077 | 100,000 | 0.27 |
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (353,419) | (0.97) |
Effective Gross Income | $7,603,154 | $6,917,246 | $7,066,607 | $6,845,811 | $6,814,966 | $18.63 |
Management Fee | 126,700 | 111,147 | 111,833 | 109,304 | 204,449 | 0.56 |
Real Estate Taxes | 1,818,361 | 1,587,261 | 1,553,652 | 1,384,086 | 1,370,120 | 3.75 |
Insurance | 122,013 | 124,036 | 121,042 | 99,647 | 103,327 | 0.28 |
Other Expenses(2) | 942,410 | 1,177,014 | 1,008,066 | 900,027 | 835,732 | 2.28 |
Total Expenses | $3,009,484 | $2,999,458 | $2,794,594 | $2,493,064 | $2,513,628 | $6.87 |
Net Operating Income | $4,593,670 | $3,917,788 | $4,272,014 | $4,352,747 | $4,301,338 | $11.76 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 73,152 | 0.20 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174,320 | 0.48 |
Net Cash Flow | $4,593,670 | $3,917,788 | $4,272,014 | $4,352,747 | $4,053,866 | $11.08 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy (%) | 96.7% | 96.7% | 96.7% | 96.6%(3) | 95.0%(4) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.44x | 1.23x | 1.34x | 1.36x | 1.27x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.9% | 10.1% | 10.0% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024, inclusive of $17,664 of straight line rent steps through January 1, 2025. |
| (2) | Other Expenses include common area maintenance, repairs and maintenance, utilities, marketing, payroll and general and administrative expenses. |
| (3) | Represents occupancy per the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024. |
| (4) | Represents economic occupancy. |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Towne Center at Webster Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $64,500,000 as of May 22, 2024, resulting in a Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan of 66.7%.
Towne Center at Webster Appraised Value(1) |
Property | Value | Capitalization Rate |
Towne Center at Webster | $64,500,000 | 6.77% |
Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report dated June 6, 2024, there was no evidence of any recognized environmental conditions at the Towne Center at Webster Property.
The Market. The Towne Center at Webster Property is located in Webster, New York, within the Rochester Core-Based Statistical Area, which is located along the south shore of Lake Ontario in the western portion of the Upstate New York market area. Single-family residential infill is located to the south and west. Just north of the Towne Center at Webster Property is the Irondequoit- Wayne County Expressway (State Route 104), which is the primary east-west high-speed arterial that serves the local market. This thoroughfare provides access to a variety of complementary retail, office, and institutional establishments.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
According to a third-party market research report, the Northeast retail submarket in Rochester has a 6.3% vacancy rate, down 0.6% from last year, and saw a net absorption of 60,100 square feet. Rental rates are up by 2.1% year-over-year, now at $16.95 per square foot. The past year recorded 20 property sales, totaling approximately $49.1 million for 580,000 square feet. Vacancy rates vary by asset type, from 2.0% in general retail to 13.9% in power centers. Rental rates range from $15.16 to $19.62 per square foot, with rent growth of 1.5% in general retail buildings, 2.4% in malls, 2.7% in power centers, 2.2% in strip centers, and 2.6% in neighborhood centers. The three-year average vacancy rate is consistent, but above Rochester’s 4.5%. Rent growth over the past three years is 10.4%, exceeding Rochester’s 9.5%. The submarket had 74 sales in the past three years, with $126 million in sales and 1.5 million square feet traded. The cap rate averaged 8.0% over the past three years, with the current rate at 8.1%. The submarket’s total inventory is approximately 9.7 million square feet.
The following table presents information relating to comparable retail leases for the Towne Center at Webster Property:
Small Shops Comparable Retail Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Rent (PSF) | Rent Steps | Lease Type |
Towne Center at Webster | Webster, NY | Bath & Body Works | 2,806(2) | Nov-16(2) | 10.4(2) | $21.00(2) | N/A | NNN |
Whole Foods Plaza | Rochester, NY | Crumbl Cookies | 1,636 | Nov-23 | 10.0 | $42.50 | 10% Every 5 Yrs | Net |
Good Feet | 1,870 | Sep-23 | 5.0 | $39.99 | 2.5% Annually | Net |
Zoom Tan | 2,997 | Jun-23 | 10.0 | $39.00 | 10% Every 5 Yrs | Net |
Tranquility Now | 1,316 | Dec-22 | 10.0 | $38.00 | 2% Annually | Net |
Perinton Square Mall | Fairport, NY | Bocaccini's | 5,800 | May-23 | 10.0 | $20.00 | 3% per annum | Net |
Zoom Fit | 2,140 | Jan-23 | 7.0 | $22.00 | Yr. 5: $24.20 | Net |
Strip Center | Irondequoit, NY | Jersey Mike's | 1,770 | Oct-22 | 10.0 | $33.50 | Yr. 6: 10% Inc. | Net |
Verizon Wireless | 5,849 | Jan-22 | 5.0 | $31.00 | Flat | Net |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024. Rent (PSF) does not include rent steps. |
Big Box Comparable Retail Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Rent (PSF) | Rent Steps | Lease Type |
Towne Center at Webster | Webster, NY | Barnes & Noble | 25,000 (2) | Jul-05(2) | 25.5(2) | $14.00(2) | N/A | NNN |
Neighborhood Center | Rochester, NY | O'Reilly Auto Parts | 30,892 | Apr-24 | 10.0 | $11.00 | 8% Every 5 Years | Net |
North Plaza | Syracuse, NY | Dollar General | 11,114 | Nov-23 | 10.0 | $10.44 | Flat | Net |
Towne Center at Fayetteville | Fayetteville, NY | Walgreens | 15,456 | Feb-22 | 25.0 | $11.32 | 10% Year 10, 15, & 20 | Net |
Springville Plaza | Springville, NY | TJ Maxx | 21,567 | May-21 | 10.0 | $8.00 | Flat | Net |
Perinton Square Mall | Fairport, NY | LA Fitness | 34,125 | Mar-21 | 15.0 | $18.00 | 10% Every Five Years | Net |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024. Rent (PSF) does not include rent steps. |
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
Anchor Comparable Retail Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Rent (PSF) | Rent Steps | Lease Type |
Towne Center at Webster | Webster, NY | Kohl's | 88,408(2) | Oct-04(2) | 30.3(2) | $8.65(2) | N/A | NNN |
Station Twelve | Amherst, NY | At Home | 79,860 | Jul-22 | 10.0 | $9.00 | 10% in Year 6 | Net |
Union Road Plaza | Cheektowaga, NY | Lake Effect Furniture & Mattress | 83,472 | Jul-22 | 10.0 | $6.50 | 2% annual | Net |
Oakdale Commons | Johnson City, NY | Dick's House of Sports | 135,488 | Apr-22 | 12.0 | $12.85 | After 6 yrs. | Net |
Shoppes at South Hills | Poughkeepsie, NY | At Home | 84,180 | Aug-21 | 10.0 | $5.88 | Flat for initial term; 10% increases | Net |
Webster Square | Webster, NY | BJ's Wholesale Club | 120,660 | Apr-21 | 10.0 | $9.23 | 5% Every Fifth Year | Net |
BJ's Wholesale Club | Rochester, NY | BJ's Wholesale Club | 122,968 | Jan-21 | 10.0 | $7.12 | 5% Every Fifth Year | Net |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024. Rent (PSF) does not include rent steps. |
Ground Lease Retail Rental Summary(1) |
Property Name | Location | Tenant | Suite Size (SF) | Lease Commencement | Lease Term (Yrs) | Rent (PSF) | Rent Steps | Lease Type |
Towne Center at Webster | Webster, NY | Pizzeria Uno | 6,203(2) | Mar-05(2) | 20.2(2) | $26.82(2) | N/A | NNN |
Chick-Fil-A (Ground Lease) | Dewitt, NY | Chick-Fil-A | 5,000 | Mar-24 | 20.0 | $25.00 | 10% Every 5 Years | Net |
Burger King Ground Lease | Fairport, NY | Burger King | 3,500 | Nov-21 | 20.0 | $42.29 | 5% Every Five Years | Net |
Burger King | Rochester, NY | Burger King | 2,600 | Jun-21 | 20.0 | $55.77 | Yr. 10: $59.62 | Net |
M&T Bank | Greece, NY | M&T Bank | 4,112 | Jul-20 | 10.0 | $46.94 | Flat | Net |
Chick-fil-A | Greece, NY | Chick-Fil-A | 5,033 | Feb-18 | 20.0 | $25.23 | 10% Every Fifth Year | Net |
| (1) | Source: Appraisal, unless otherwise indicated. |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 18, 2024. Rent (PSF) does not include rent steps. |
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is COR Route 104 Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with two independent directors. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan. The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carveout guarantors are Paul G. Joynt, Jeffrey L. Aiello, Lori A. Aiello Family Trust and Laurie R. Gerardi Family Trust. Paul G. Joynt and Jeffrey L. Aiello are co-founders of COR Development Company, LLC (“COR”). COR is a Syracuse-based real estate development company that was established in 1998. Since its inception, COR has developed, constructed and managed a portfolio of commercial and residential space contributing to the upstate New York economy. COR’s primary focus is on retail assets, but it also owns multifamily properties as well as industrial warehouses. COR has developed multi-faceted projects such as office, retail, commercial, industrial, high-tech facilities, mixed-use residential apartments, and affordable housing. In addition to real estate development, COR offers construction management and property management services.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
In 2016 two of the five co-founders and then-direct owners of the related borrower, Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi, were found guilty in the Ciminelli case at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and/or making a false statement (i.e., by declaring his innocence of the charges) to state actors. The Ciminelli case centered around a request for proposal process for pre-approving “preferred developers” (the “RFP”), which preferred developers would then be eligible to bid on potential future projects in connection with a New York State public/private economic development program. The conviction was based on the fact that Mr. Aiello and Mr. Gerardi had advanced knowledge of / influence over the selection criteria for preferred developers prior to such RFP being made available to other prospective parties. In the related Percoco case, also at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Mr. Aiello was also separately found guilty of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud with respect to Joseph Percoco, a then private citizen and former aide to the governor of New York, to influence a state agency to drop certain requirements for a real estate development project. These judgments were initially upheld upon appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “2nd Circuit”), however, in May 2023 the Supreme Court of the United States (the “Supreme Court”) granted the Defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari for both cases and thereafter reversed and remanded the cases back to the Second Circuit, each case receiving 9-0 decisions. In so doing, the Supreme Court held in part that the legal argument upon which the Ciminelli indictments were brought cannot be the basis for a conviction under the applicable federal wire fraud statutes. Upon remand the cases remain pending before the 2nd Circuit and, although the United States Attorney has issued a letter to the court that it does not intend to retry Mr. Aiello in the Percoco case (the related charges against Mr. Percoco himself were vacated), it remains undetermined whether the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York will retry Mr. Aiello or Mr. Gerardi on any of the related criminal counts, under a different legal theory to the extent such exists. The related Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents provide that if either Mr. Aiello or Mr. Gerardi is re-indicted or separately indicted related to these matters, in place cash management will be triggered and should either thereafter be found guilty of a felony in connection with either case, the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents further permit the lender to terminate the affiliated property manager. See “Lockbox / Cash Management” below. Neither Mr. Aiello nor Mr. Gerardi is a borrower sponsor or guarantor under the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents and in 2018 the 20% interest in the borrower then held by each was transferred into a separate trust related to which their respective spouses have authority, and as to which such trusts have limited voting rights with respect to certain major decisions, but otherwise exercise no control over the activities of the borrower. We cannot assure you that the foregoing litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Towne Center at Webster Property, the related borrower or the related guarantors.
Property Management. The Towne Center at Webster Property is managed by COR Property Services Company, LLC, an affiliate of the borrower sponsor.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan, the borrower deposited approximately: (i) $823,214 into a tax reserve (ii) $59,125 into a free rent reserve and (iii) $1,000,000 into a leasing reserve.
Tax Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $57,408).
Insurance Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the insurance premiums that the lender estimates will be payable for the renewal of coverage afforded by the related insurance policies; provided, however, that such insurance reserve has been conditionally waived so long as the borrower maintains a blanket policy meeting the requirements of the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents.
TI/LC Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a leasing reserve, on a monthly basis, $23,000 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Replacement Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, $6,100 for replacements.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to deliver or cause the property manager to deliver a notice to all tenants at the Towne Center at Webster Property directing them to remit all payments under their respective leases directly to the lender-controlled lockbox account. The borrower is required to cause all revenue received by the borrower or the property manager from the Towne Center at Webster Property to be deposited into such lockbox account no later than two business days after receipt. During the continuance of a Cash Management Period (as defined below), all funds on deposit in the lockbox account are required to be swept on a daily basis into a lender-controlled cash management account and applied on each payment date and disbursed in accordance with the Towne Center at Webster Loan documents. During the continuance of a Cash Management Period caused by a Cash Trap Event Period (as defined below), all excess cash flow after the payment of debt service, required reserves and operating expenses will be deposited (A) during the continuance of a Cash Trap Event Period continuing solely as the result of Lease Sweep Period (as defined below), into a lease sweep reserve account to be used for qualified leasing expenses and (B) otherwise, into an excess cash flow account. If no Cash Trap Event Period is continuing, all excess cash flow will be distributed to the borrower.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
A “Cash Management Period” means a period commencing upon the earlier to occur of either or both of Joseph B. Gerardi or Steven F. Aiello being newly indicted or re-indicted in connection with the proceedings described under “The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor,” above (an “Indictment Event”), or (ii) a Cash Trap Event Period, and ending (A) with respect to any Cash Management Period commenced in connection with clause (i) above, upon either a dismissal of all charges or indictments or a court of competent jurisdiction entering a non-guilty verdict or vacating any remaining charges or indictments which gave rise to the Indictment Event, or (B) with regard to any Cash Management Period commenced in connection with clause (ii) above, upon such Cash Trap Event Period having expired pursuant to the terms thereof (provided that, no other Cash Trap Event Period has occurred and is continuing during and at the time of the expiration of such period).
A “Cash Trap Event Period” means a period that commences on the occurrence of any of the following: (i) an event of default under the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) the failure to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x, (iii) if the borrower fails to comply with the covenants under the Towne Center at Webster Mortgage Loan related to the lender's option to create one or more mezzanine loans or (iv) the commencement of a Lease Sweep Period (as defined below).
A “Lease Sweep Period” will commence on the first monthly payment date following the occurrence of any of the following (A) (i) 12 months prior to the earliest stated expiration (including the stated expiration of any renewal term) of a Lease Sweep Lease (as defined below); (ii) upon the date required under a Lease Sweep Lease by which the tenant thereunder is required to give notice of its exercise of a renewal option thereunder (if at that time such renewal has not been so exercised); and (iii) the date that any tenant under a Lease Sweep Lease gives notice of its intention not to renew or extend its Lease Sweep Lease; (B) the receipt by the borrower or the property manager of notice from any tenant under a Lease Sweep Lease exercising its right to terminate its Lease Sweep Lease; (C) the date that a Lease Sweep Lease (or any material portion thereof) is surrendered, cancelled or terminated prior to its then-current expiration date or the receipt by the borrower or the property manager of notice from any tenant under a Lease Sweep Lease of its intent to surrender, cancel or terminate the Lease Sweep Lease (or any material portion thereof) prior to its then current expiration date; (D) the date that any tenant under a Lease Sweep Lease (x) discontinues its business (i.e., “goes dark”) in its Lease Sweep Space at the Towne Center at Webster Property (or any material portion thereof), unless such tenant continues to pay all required rents, taxes, insurance and other associated costs required under the Lease Sweep Lease, is not in default under the Lease Sweep Lease and continues to secure, manage, and maintain its space at the Towne Center at Webster Property consistent with its obligations under the Lease Sweep Lease but ceases operations at the Towne Center at Webster Property in connection with repairs and/or other improvements to the Towne Center at Webster Property consistent with the Lease Sweep Lease or (y) vacates or ceases occupying its Lease Sweep Space (as defined below) at the Towne Center at Webster Property (or any material portion thereof) or gives notice that it intends to do any of the foregoing; (E) upon a monetary or material non-monetary default under a Lease Sweep Lease by the tenant thereunder that continues beyond any applicable notice and cure period; or (F) the occurrence of a Lease Sweep Tenant Party Insolvency Proceeding (as defined below).
A “Lease Sweep Lease” means (i) individually and/or collectively, the Kohl’s lease, the Dick’s lease, the TJ Maxx lease and the HomeGoods lease or (ii) any renewal or replacement lease with respect to all or a portion of any Lease Sweep Space that constitutes a qualified lease.
A “Lease Sweep Lease Space” means the space demised under the applicable Lease Sweep Lease.
A “Lease Sweep Tenant Party Insolvency Proceeding” means (A) the admission in writing by any Lease Sweep Tenant Party (as defined below) of its inability to pay its debts generally, or the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or the instituting by any Lease Sweep Tenant Party of any proceeding seeking to adjudicate it insolvent or seeking a liquidation or dissolution, or the taking advantage by any Lease Sweep Tenant Party of any Insolvency Law (as defined below), or the commencement by any Lease Sweep Tenant Party of a case or other proceeding naming it as debtor under any Insolvency Law or the instituting of a case or other proceeding against or with respect to any Lease Sweep Tenant Party under any Insolvency Law or (B) the instituting of any proceeding against or with respect to any Lease Sweep Tenant Party seeking liquidation of its assets or the appointment of (or if any Lease Sweep Tenant Party consents to or acquiesces in the appointment of) a receiver, liquidator, conservator, trustee or similar official in respect of it or the whole or any substantial part of its properties or assets or the taking of any corporate, partnership or limited liability company action in furtherance of any of the foregoing.
A “Lease Sweep Tenant Party” means a tenant under a Lease Sweep Lease (or its direct or indirect parent company (if any)) or the lease guarantor under any Lease Sweep Lease.
“Insolvency Law” means the Bankruptcy Code, or any other applicable domestic or foreign liquidation, conservatorship, bankruptcy, receivership, insolvency, reorganization, or any similar debtor relief laws affecting the rights, remedies, powers, privileges and benefits of creditors generally.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not Permitted.
Retail – Anchored 1028 Ridge Road Webster, NY 14580 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 Towne Center at Webster | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $43,000,000 66.7% 1.27x 10.0% |
Ground Lease. None.
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Multifamily – Student Housing |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | David Brecher, Jonathan Krasner and Gregory Olbrys | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Alden GV Owner, LLC | | Location: | Allendale, MI |
Original Balance: | $33,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 2008 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $33,000,000 | | Property Management: | PropCo AP JV, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 3.7% | | Size: | 920 Beds |
Interest Rate: | 7.20000% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | $55,700,000 / $60,543 |
Note Date: | June 17, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | May 21, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 100.0% (as of May 3, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 90.0% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $3,723,810 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCFs: | $3,589,490 |
First Payment Date: | August 5, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 5, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $2,237,170 (TTM March 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $2,356,618 |
Call Protection: | L(25),D(31),O(4) | | 2022 NOI: | $2,309,796 |
Lockbox / Cash Management(1): | Hard (Commercial); Soft (Residential) / In-Place | | 2021 NOI: | $2,287,330 |
Reserves(2) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $35,870 |
Taxes: | $689,003 | $80,344 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $35,870 |
Insurance: | $0 | $14,778 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 59.2% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $11,193 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 59.2% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $0 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 11.3% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $123,954 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.49x |
| | | | | | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $33,000,000 | 84.1 | % | | Loan Payoff | $36,077,078 | 92.0 | % |
Total Equity | $6,226,810 | 15.9 | % | | Closing Costs(3) | $2,336,774 | 6.0 | |
| | | | Reserves | $812,957 | 2.1 | |
Total Sources | $39,226,810 | 100.0 | % | | Total Uses | $39,226,810 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | See “Lockbox / Cash Management” below. |
| (2) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
| (3) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $1,650,000. |
The Loan. The ninth largest mortgage loan (the “48 West Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in a 262 unit and 920-bed, three-story multifamily student housing property located in Allendale, Michigan (the “48 West Property”). The 48 West Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $33,000,000. The 48 West Mortgage Loan was originated on June 17, 2024, by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 7.20000% per annum. The 48 West Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the 48 West Mortgage Loan is July 5, 2029.
The Property. The 48 West Property is a 262 unit, 920-bed multifamily student housing property situated on a 34.69-acre site in Allendale, Michigan. The improvements feature 36 three-story buildings (27 apartment buildings and 9 common areas) built in 2008. The 48 West Property also contains 3,801 square feet of retail space, which includes three ground floor retail tenants in the complex including a restaurant, coffee/smoothie shop, and a convenience store. The borrower sponsors purchased the 48 West Property in 2016 for $51.25 million and have invested approximately $3.8 million in capital improvements, including renovating the common area spaces (gym and clubhouse), the pool, the HVAC systems, unit appliances, parking lot / sidewalks and flooring.
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
The unit mix at the 48 West Property consists of 16 one-bedroom / one-bathroom units, four two-bedroom / one-bathroom units, 36 two-bedroom / two-bathroom units, two four-bedroom / two-bathroom units, and 204 four-bedroom / four-bathroom units. Unit amenities at the 48 West Property include a microwave, dishwasher, garbage disposal, washer/dryer in-unit, refrigerator/freezer, and open parking. As of May 3, 2024, the 48 West Property was 100.0% occupied. The borrower sponsors have entered into a master lease agreement with Grand Valley State University (“GSVU”) to lease 198 beds (52 units), which commences on August 20, 2024, and ends July 31, 2025. GVSU has the option to extend the master lease for a period of one year with a 180-day notice period.
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the 48 West Property:
Unit Mix(1)(2) |
Unit Type | # of Units | # of Beds | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | Average Monthly Rent Per Bed | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Bed | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Unit(3) |
1A | 16 | 16 | 1.7% | 100.0% | 725 | $1,252 | $824 | $824 |
2x1B | 4 | 8 | 0.9 | 100.0 | 834 | $797 | $513 | $1,026 |
2x2 T | 28 | 56 | 6.1 | 100.0 | 1,142 | $798 | $505 | $1,011 |
2x2C | 8 | 16 | 1.7 | 100.0 | 1,152 | $860 | $606 | $1,211 |
4x2B | 2 | 8 | 0.9 | 100.0 | 1,672 | $512 | $399 | $1,597 |
4x4B2 | 2 | 8 | 0.9 | 100.0 | 1,764 | $562 | $513 | $2,052 |
4x4A | 70 | 280 | 30.4 | 100.0 | 1,672 | $602 | $593 | $2,373 |
4x4B | 58 | 232 | 25.2 | 100.0 | 1,764 | $608 | $756 | $3,026 |
4x4D | 74 | 296 | 32.2 | 100.0 | 1,716 | $601 | $534 | $2,136 |
Total / Wtd Avg. | 262 | 920 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 1,645 | $631 | $611 | $2,146 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 3, 2024. |
(3) | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Unit is based on occupied units. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the 48 West Property:
Cash Flow Analysis |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | TTM 3/31/2024 | U/W(3) | U/W Per Bed |
Base Rent | $6,184,545 | $6,407,023 | $6,514,536 | $6,614,066 | $6,971,568 | $7,578 |
Other Income(1) | 306,971 | 362,889 | 322,583 | 335,515 | 335,515 | $365 |
Gross Potential Rent | $6,491,516 | $6,769,912 | $6,837,119 | $6,949,581 | $7,307,083 | $7,942 |
Total Reimbursements | 438,612 | 532,225 | 559,790 | 555,086 | 555,086 | $603 |
Vacancy Residential | (1,077,576) | (1,547,981) | (1,642,844) | (1,920,005) | (697,157) | ($758) |
Effective Gross Income | $5,852,551 | $5,754,156 | $5,754,065 | $5,584,662 | $7,165,012 | $7,788 |
| | | | | | |
Real Estate Taxes | 861,688 | 882,856 | 917,341 | 910,820 | 935,687 | $1,017 |
Insurance | 113,577 | 128,696 | 146,050 | 154,632 | 177,333 | $193 |
Management Fee | 179,533 | 185,976 | 160,900 | 168,808 | 214,950 | $234 |
Other Expenses(2) | 2,410,424 | 2,246,831 | 2,173,156 | 2,113,232 | 2,113,232 | $2,297 |
Total Expenses | $3,565,222 | $3,444,359 | $3,397,446 | $3,347,492 | $3,441,202 | $3,740 |
| | | | | | |
Net Operating Income | $2,287,330 | $2,309,796 | $2,356,618 | $2,237,170 | $3,723,810 | $4,048 |
Replacement Reserves | 75,435 | 204,452 | 197,833 | 206,713 | 134,320 | $146 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,211,895 | $2,105,344 | $2,158,785 | $2,030,457 | $3,589,490 | $3,902 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy | 80.0% | 94.5% | 80.3% | 81.5% | 90.0%(4) | |
NCF DSCR | 0.92x | 0.87x | 0.90x | 0.84x | 1.49x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.9% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 11.3% | |
| (1) | Other Income includes commercial income, parking income, and other income. |
| (2) | Other Expenses include repairs and maintenance, utilities, marketing, payroll and general and administrative expenses. |
| (3) | The increase in U/W Net Operating Income from TTM 3/31/2024 Net Operating Income is due to lower vacancy projections. |
| (4) | Represents economic occupancy. |
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the 48 West Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $55,700,000 as of May 21, 2024. Based on the “as-is” value of $55,700,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the 48 West Mortgage Loan are 59.2%.
48 West Appraised Value(1) |
Property | Value | Capitalization Rate |
48 West | $55,700,000 | 6.00% |
Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report dated June 14, 2024, there was no evidence of any recognized environmental conditions at the 48 West Property.
The Market. The 48 West Property is located in Allendale, Michigan and forms part of the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area (the “Grand Rapids MSA”), which had a 2023 population of 1,096,872 with 414,388 households. The Grand Rapids MSA is home to several colleges and universities including Davenport University, Grand Rapids Community College and Calvin College. According to the appraisal, the 2023 population within a 1-, 3- and 5-mile radius of the 48 West Property was 11,939, 27,460 and 53,525, respectively. The 2023 average household income within the same radii was $64,864, $79,685 and $102,483, respectively.
The local economy benefits from the presence of GSVU, a public university with an annual enrollment as of 2024 of 22,269 students, of which 19,243 are undergraduates. GSVU offers 146 degrees of which 101 are undergraduate degrees. In the Fall of 2023, GVSU reported a record size incoming class (5,290 students), a 2.9% increase from the prior year. The 48 West Property is located just a few steps west of the GSVU campus. Per a third-party market research report, GVSU’s student housing occupancy as of the second quarter of 2024 was 96.4%. The outlying Ottawa County multifamily submarket had a vacancy of 5.5% and average asking rents of $1,424 or $1.37 per square foot.
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable multifamily student housing properties to the 48 West Property:
Multifamily Rent Comparables(1) |
Property Name / Address | Distance from Subject | Year Built / Renovated | Occupancy | Number of Units | Unit Type | No of Units | Average Unit Size | Average Rent Per Unit |
48 West / 10897 48th Avenue | – | 2008 / NAP | 100.0%(2) | 262(2) | 1A | 16 | 725 (2) | 824 |
2x1B | 4 | 834 (2) | 1,026 |
2x2T | 28 | 1,142 (2) | 1,011 |
2x2C | 8 | 1,152 (2) | 1,211 |
4x2B | 2 | 1,672 (2) | 1,597 |
4x4B2 | 2 | 1,764 (2) | 2,052 |
4x4A | 70 | 1,672 (2) | 2,373 |
4x4B | 58 | 1,764 (2) | 3,026 |
4x4D | 74 | 1,716 (2) | 2,136 |
Enclave / 4926 Becker Drive | 0.6 miles | 2015 / NAP | 97.00% | 80 | 2 BD / 2.5 BA | 20 | 1,195 | $1,598 |
3 BD / 3.5 BA | 20 | 1,518 | $2,097 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 2 | 1,802 | $2,676 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 18 | 1,720 | $2,556 |
5 BD / 5.5 BA | 20 | 2,072 | $3,495 |
Canvas Townhomes / 10295 48th Avenue | 0.9 miles | 2006 / NAP | 97.20% | 288 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 32 | 650 | $1,099 |
2 BD / 2.5 BA | 32 | 1,300 | $1,758 |
3 BD / 3.5 BA | 26 | 1,700 | $2,025 |
3 BD / 3.5 BA | 62 | 2,000 | $2,265 |
4 BD / 4 BA | 134 | 2,000 | $2,560 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 2 | 2,000 | $2,720 |
Locale Allendale / 4967 Pierce Street | 0.6 miles | 2016 / NAP | 100.00% | 224 | 2 BD / 2 BA | 72 | 910 | $1,540 |
3 BD / 3 BA | 144 | 1,142 | $2,085 |
3 BD / 3 BA | 8 | 1,357 | $2,130 |
Meadows Crossing / 10745 48th Avenue | 0.2 miles | 2007 / NAP | 99.00% | 189 | 2 BD / 2.5 BA | 4 | 1,004 | $1,618 |
4 BD / 4 BA | 3 | 1,400 | $2,609 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 2 | 1,400 | $2,896 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 1 | 1,441 | $2,636 |
4 BD / 4.5 BA | 179 | 1,574 | $2,596 |
The Alpine at Allendale / 10452 Lodge Drive | 0.6 miles | 2017 / NAP | 100.00% | 108 | 4 BD / 4 BA | 108 | 1,567 | $2,678 |
The Lodge at Allendale / 5068 W Campus Drive | 0.4 miles | 2017 / NAP | 98.00% | 192 | 2 BD / 2 BA | 96 | 918 | $1,630 |
4 BD / 4 BA | 96 | 1,418 | $2,460 |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 3, 2024. |
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is Alden GV Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and single purpose entity having at least two independent directors in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the 48 West Mortgage Loan. The borrower sponsors are David Brecher, Jonathan Krasner and Gregory Olbrys. The non-recourse carveout guarantors are Jonathan Krasner and David Brecher. Jonathan Krasner and Gregory Olbrys are responsible for the overall strategy, investment, asset management, asset disposition execution, and operations for Alden Street. Alden Street is a real estate investment company focused on student housing. The borrower sponsors have worked together since 2011 and have collectively deployed more than $1 billion in investment capital across 62 investments nationwide.
Property Management. The 48 West Property is managed by PropCo AP JV, LLC, a third-party management company.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the 48 West Mortgage Loan, the borrower deposited approximately (i) $689,003 into a reserve account for real estate taxes and (ii) $123,954 into a reserve for deferred maintenance.
Tax Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-months (initially estimated to be approximately $80,344).
Insurance Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the insurance premiums that the lender estimated will be payable for the renewal of the coverage afforded by the related policies (initially estimated to be approximately $14,778).
Replacement Reserve – The borrower is required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $11,193 for replacements.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The 48 West Mortgage Loan is structured with (i) a hard lockbox for any rents from a tenant under a Major Lease (as defined below) and (ii) a soft lockbox for any tenants under a residential lease not representing a Major Lease and in-place cash management. Commencing on the origination date and at all times thereafter, (a) the borrower is required to cause all rents to be transmitted directly by any tenants under any Major Lease at the 48 West Property into a lender-controlled lockbox account, (b) the borrower is required to deposit all rents received by any tenants under a residential lease not representing a Major Lease into the lockbox account within one business day of receipt, and (c) the borrower is required to deliver tenant direction notices to each existing tenant under a Major Lease at the 48 West Property directing each such tenant to remit its rent checks directly into the lockbox account. The funds deposited into the lockbox account will be swept on a daily basis into a lender-controlled cash management account and disbursed in accordance with the 48 West Mortgage Loan documents. During a Cash Trap Event Period (as defined below), all available cash will be paid to the lender, which amounts will be transferred by the lender into an excess cash flow account to be held by the lender as cash collateral for the 48 West Mortgage Loan. Following the second anniversary of the origination date of the 48 West Mortgage Loan, at any time after the occurrence of the Initial Cash Trap Cure (as defined below), provided no event of default is continuing, any cash collateral funds on deposit in the excess cash flow account as a result of the Initial Cash Trap Event Period (as defined below) will be disbursed to the borrower upon the first date thereafter that (a) the debt yield and (b) the trailing 12-month debt yield (in each instance, as calculated under the 48 West Mortgage Loan documents) both equal or exceed 12%.
A “Major Lease” means (i) the master lease with GVSU (the “University Lease”) or any renewal or replacement of the University Lease, (ii) any lease of five or more units at the 48 West Property to the same tenant or its affiliates, (iii) any instrument guaranteeing or providing credit support for any lease meeting the requirements of clause (i) or (ii) above, and (iv) any lease that is entered into with a tenant that is an affiliate of the borrower, any borrower sponsor or the guarantor.
“Cash Trap Event Period” means either the Initial Cash Trap Event Period or the Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period (as defined below).
“Initial Cash Trap Event Period” means the period commencing upon the funding of the 48 West Mortgage Loan and continuing until the Initial Cash Trap Cure.
“Initial Cash Trap Cure” means, following the second anniversary of the origination date, the date that (i) the net debt yield and (ii) the net trailing 12-month debt yield (in each instance, as calculated under the 48 West Mortgage Loan documents) both equal or exceed 12%.
Multifamily – Student Housing 10897 48th Avenue Allendale, MI 49401 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 48 West | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 59.2% 1.49x 11.3% |
“Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period” means, following the occurrence of an Initial Cash Trap Cure, a period commencing upon the earlier of (i) the occurrence of an event of default or (ii) the trailing 12-month debt yield (as calculated under the 48 West Mortgage Loan documents) being less than 11%, which such Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period will expire (A) with regard to any Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period commenced in connection with clause (i) above, upon the lender’s acceptance of the cure (if applicable) of such event of default and (B) with regard to any Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period commenced in connection with clause (ii) above, upon the date that (i) the debt yield and (ii) the trailing 12-month debt yield in each instance, as calculated under the 48 West Mortgage Loan documents, both equal or exceed 12% for two consecutive calendar quarters (provided that, in each instance, no other Loan Term Cash Trap Event Period has occurred and is continuing during and at the time of the expiration of such period).
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. None.
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. Not permitted.
Ground Lease. None.
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Multifamily – Garden |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Matthew Pestronk and Michael Pestronk | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s)(1): | Various | | Location: | Philadelphia, PA |
Original Balance: | $33,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 2004, 2005, 2008, 2010 / NAP |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $33,000,000 | | Property Management: | Post Commercial Real Estate, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 3.7% | | Size: | 88 Units |
Interest Rate: | 6.00000% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | $54,700,000 / $621,591 |
Note Date: | August 5, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | June 26, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 98.9% (7/19/2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 98.3% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $3,099,617 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $3,067,463 |
First Payment Date: | September 5, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 5, 2029 | | Historical NOI(4) |
Additional Debt Type(2): | Mezzanine | | Most Recent NOI: | $2,770,293 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance(2): | $9,200,000 | | 2023 NOI: | $2,698,466 |
Call Protection(3): | L(2),YM1(22),DorYM1(31),O(5) | | 2022 NOI(4): | NAV |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / In Place | | 2021 NOI(4): | NAV |
Reserves(5) | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $375,000 | $479,545 |
Taxes: | $235,958 | $40,113 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $375,000 | $479,545 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 60.3% | 77.1% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $1,467 | $66,000 | | Maturity Date LTV: | 60.3% | 77.1% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $1,213 | $43,662 | | UW NOI DY: | 9.4% | 7.3% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $0 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.53x | 1.08x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $33,000,000 | 75.9 | % | | Loan Payoff | $39,138,991 | 90.1 | % |
Mezzanine Loan | $9,200,000 | 21.2 | | | Closing Costs(6) | $4,080,568 | 9.4 | |
Borrower Equity | $1,255,517 | 2.9 | | | Reserves | $235,958 | 0.5 | |
Total Sources | $43,455,517 | 100.0 | % | | Total Uses | $43,455,517 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | The borrowers for the Liberties Walk Property (as defined below) are Liberties Walk Associates, LLC, LW Partners III, LLC, LW Townhome Partners, LLC and George Street Partners, LLC. |
| (2) | The Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan (as defined below) accrues interest at an initial rate of 9.00000% per annum. |
| (3) | See “Release of Collateral” below. |
| (4) | Historical financial information is not available because the borrower sponsors purchased the Liberties Walk Property and the neighboring Piazza property together and such properties had combined financials. |
| (5) | See “Initial and Ongoing Reserves” below. |
| (6) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $ 1,567,500. |
The Loan. The tenth largest mortgage loan (the “Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan”) is secured by the borrower’s fee interest in an 88 unit, multi-family property, located in the Northern Liberties neighborhood of Philadelphia (the “Liberties Walk Property”). The Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a single promissory note with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $33,000,000. The Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan was originated on August 5, 2024 by 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.00000% per annum. The Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan has an initial term of five-years and is interest-only for the full term. The scheduled maturity date of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan is August 5, 2029.
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
The Property. The Liberties Walk Property is an 88 unit multifamily property situated across 2.5 acres located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The improvements feature 22 three-story buildings constructed in 2004, 2005, 2008 and 2010. The Liberties Walk Property features 70 traditional apartment units, 18 townhouse units and 23 commercial spaces. Each unit is equipped with an electric oven/range combination, dishwasher, a laundry closet with a washer/dryer unit and refrigerator/freezer. There is an easement agreement in place with the neighboring Piazza property, which is also owned by the borrower sponsors, to access an outdoor luxury pool, state of the art fitness facility inclusive of a sauna, steam room and hydro massage beds, among other amenities. The Liberties Walk Property is served by a total of 116 surface and garage parking spaces. Of the 98 surface parking spaces, four are designed for ownership’s leasing office, six are designated ADA parking spaces and the remaining 88 spaces are offered for lease to tenants for a monthly rental rate.
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Liberties Walk Property:
Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | # of Units | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | Average Monthly Rent Per Unit | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Unit(2) |
One Bed | 4 | 4.5 | % | 100.0% | 750 | $1,897 | $1,985 |
Two Bed | 58 | 65.9 | | 100.0 | 922 | $2,368 | $2,410 |
Three Bed | 25 | 28.4 | | 96.0 | 1,879 | $3,554 | $3,672 |
Five Bed | 1 | 1.1 | | 100.0 | 3,200 | $5,549 | $5,715 |
Total / Wtd Avg. | 88 | 100.0 | % | 98.9% | 1,212 | $2,710 | $2,787 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 19, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Liberties Walk Property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2023 | TTM 5/31/2024 | U/W | U/W Per Unit |
Base Rent | $2,760,955 | $2,819,884 | $2,877,516 | $32,699 |
Gross Potential Rent | $2,760,955 | $2,819,884 | $2,877,516 | $32,699 |
Commercial Income | 793,880 | 769,799 | 796,390 | 9,050 |
Parking Income | 233,023 | 241,503 | 267,007 | 3,034 |
Other Income | 61,779 | 60,843 | 60,843 | 691 |
Vacancy Residential | (247,225) | (190,856) | (48,540) | (552) |
Effective Gross Income | $3,602,411 | $3,701,173 | $3,953,216 | $44,923 |
| | | | |
Real Estate Taxes | 457,887 | 463,581 | 463,581 | 5,268 |
Insurance | 72,549 | 74,115 | 93,344 | 1,061 |
Management Fee | 135,612 | 141,017 | 59,298 | 674 |
Other Expenses(2) | 237,898 | 252,166 | 237,375 | 2,697 |
Total Expenses | $903,945 | $930,879 | $853,599 | $9,700 |
| | | | |
Net Operating Income | $2,698,466 | $2,770,293 | $3,099,617(3) | $35,223 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 5,305 | 17,600 | 200 |
TI/LC | 22,787 | 30,249 | 14,554 | 165 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,675,678 | $2,734,739 | $3,067,463 | $34,858 |
| | | | |
Occupancy | 91.0% | 93.2% | 98.9%(4) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.33x | 1.36x | 1.53x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 8.2% | 8.4% | 9.4% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 19, 2024. |
| (2) | Other Expenses include payroll and benefits, repairs and maintenance, utilities and general and administrative expenses. |
| (3) | The increase in UW Net Operating Income over TTM 5/31/2024 Net Operating Income reflects in place rent increases due to increased occupancy and commercial rent at the Liberties Walk Property. |
| (4) | Represents occupancy as of the rent roll dated July 19, 2024. |
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Liberties Walk Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $54,700,000 as of June 26, 2024. Based on the “as-is” value of $54,700,000, the Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV for the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan are 60.3%.
Liberties Walk Appraised Value(1) |
Property | Value | Capitalization Rate |
Liberties Walk | $54,700,000 | 5.50% |
Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report dated June 3, 2024, there was no evidence of any recognized environmental conditions at the Liberties Walk Property.
The Market. The Liberties Walk Property is located Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and forms part of the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington MSA, which is the largest in Pennsylvania and the sixth largest in the United States. According to the appraisal, the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington MSA had a 2023 total population of 6,241,978 with 2,463,809 households. The 2023 median household income for the metropolitan area was $87,507. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of April 2024, the unemployment rate in the MSA was 3.2%, compared to the state and national rate of 2.9% and 3.5% respectively.
According to the appraisal, the Liberties Walk Property is located in the Northeast Philadelphia submarket of the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington metro market. As of the first quarter of 2024, the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington metro market had an inventory of 414,251 units, with an occupancy rate of 95.2%. The market experienced a positive net absorption of 1,425 units. A total of 2,185 units were completed and delivered and 18,804 units were under construction of which 13,648 units were expected to be delivered within the next four quarters. As of the first quarter of 2024, the Northeast Philadelphia submarket had an inventory of 39,709 units, with an occupancy rate of 95.9%. The submarket experienced a positive net absorption of 138 units. A total of 361 units were completed and delivered and 3,566 units were under construction of which 2,538 units were expected to be delivered within the next four quarters.
According to the appraisal, the 2023 population within a 1-, 3- and 5-mile radius of the Liberties Walk Property was 45,950, 465,644 and 956,768, respectively. The 2023 average household income within the same radii was $131,511, $104,010 and $88,074, respectively.
The following table presents certain information relating to comparable multifamily properties to the Liberties Walk Property:
Multifamily Rent Comparables(1) |
Property Name | Distance from Subject | Year Built / Renovated | Occupancy | Number of Units | Unit Type | No. of Units | Average Unit Size | Average Rent Per Unit |
Liberties Walk Property | -- | 2004, 2005, | 98.9 | %(2) | 88(2) | One Bed | 4 | 750(2) | $1,897(2) |
| | 2008, 2010 | | | Two Bed | 58 | 922(2) | $2,368(2) |
| | / NAP | | | Three Bed | 23 | 1,879(2) | $3,554(2) |
| | | | | Five Bed | 1 | 3,200(2) | $5,549(2) |
Liberty Square | 0.2 Miles | 2018 | 96.0 | % | 95 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 20 | 807 | $2,313 |
| | | | | 2 BD / 2 BA | 20 | 1,005 | $3,100 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 2 BA | 13 | 1,495 | $3,900 |
| 0.6 Miles | 2021 | 90.0 | % | 285 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 185 | 779 | $2,258 |
The Poplar | | | | | 2 BD / 1 BA | 25 | 1,278 | $3,985 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 3 BA | 8 | 1,620 | $4,493 |
Dwell | 0.3 Miles | 2020 | 90.0 | % | 198 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 80 | 738 | $2,125 |
| | | | | 2 BD / 2 BA | 68 | 1,054 | $2,955 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 2 BA | 10 | 1,363 | $3,515 |
The Luxe | 0.7 Miles | 2023 | 91.0 | % | 179 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 92 | 689 | $1,902 |
| | | | | 2 BD / 2 BA | 14 | 952 | $2,650 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 2 BA | 43 | 1,127 | $3,000 |
1018 Germantown Ave | 0.2 Miles | 2020 | 97.9 | % | 49 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 21 | 733 | $1,505 |
| | | | | 2 BD / 2 BA | 15 | 1,032 | $2,446 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 2 BA | 3 | 1,363 | $2,992 |
The Residences at 1 Brown | 0.4 Miles | 2012 | 90.0 | % | 230 | 1 BD / 1 BA | 135 | 821 | $1,675 |
| | | | | 2 BD / 2 BA | 80 | 1,332 | $2,060 |
| | | | | 3 BD / 2 BA | 12 | 1,577 | $3,400 |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 19, 2024. |
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowers are Liberties Walk Associates, LLC, LW Partners III, LLC, LW Townhome Partners, LLC and George Street Partners, LLC, each a single purpose entity having one independent director in its organizational structure. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan. The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carveout guarantors are Michael Pestronk and Matthew Pestronk.
The borrower sponsors are Michael Pestronk and Matthew Pestronk, the founders of Post Brothers. Post Brothers is a developer, owner and manager of Class A apartments, generally focusing on the development and creation of Class A apartment buildings in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area. Post Brothers is a vertically-integrated company, with approximately 200 employees, providing in-house expertise in design, construction leasing and management. Since its founding in 2006, Post Brothers has developed more than 30 properties totaling approximately 8,000 apartments and 700,000 square feet of complimentary office space, with a focus in the greater Philadelphia area and New Jersey. Michael Pestronk has over 20 years of experience in the multifamily real estate industry, having previously worked for NWJ Companies and Historic Landmarks for Living, as well as being a principal of Iron Stone Real Estate Group, where he was responsible for the repositioning, operations and capitalization of over $300 million of real estate. Matthew Pestronk has worked in real estate acquisitions and finance for his entire career of approximately 20 years. Prior to co-founding Post Brothers, Matthew was a real estate financing executive in New York City.
Property Management. The Liberties Walk Property is managed by Post Commercial Real Estate, LLC, an affiliate of the borrower sponsors.
Initial and Ongoing Reserves. At origination of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan, the borrowers deposited approximately $235,958 into a reserve account for real estate taxes.
Tax Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a real estate tax reserve, on a monthly basis, 1/12th of the taxes that the lender reasonably estimates will be payable over the next-ensuing 12-month period (initially estimated to be approximately $40,113).
Insurance Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into an insurance reserve, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to 1/12th of the insurance premiums that the lender estimates will be payable for the renewal of coverage afforded by the related insurance policies; provided, however, that such insurance reserve has been conditionally waived so long as the borrowers maintain a blanket policy meeting the requirements of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents.
Replacement Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a replacement reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $1,467 for the replacements until the balance of the replacement reserve equals at least $66,000 (the “Replacement Reserve Cap”). In the event the balance of funds in the replacement reserve falls below the Replacement Reserve Cap, the replacement reserve monthly deposit is required to recommence until funds in the account equal the Replacement Reserve Cap.
TI/LC Reserve – The borrowers are required to deposit into a leasing reserve, on a monthly basis, approximately $1,213 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions until the balance of the leasing reserve equals at least $43,662 (the “Leasing Reserve Cap”). In the event the balance of funds in the leasing reserve subaccount falls below the Leasing Reserve Cap, the leasing reserve monthly deposit is required to recommence until funds in the account equal the Leasing Reserve Cap.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in place cash management. The borrowers are required to deposit all rents from the Liberties Walk Property into a lender-controlled lockbox account within two business days after receipt. The borrowers are required to deliver a notice to all non-residential tenants at the Liberties Walk Property directing them to remit rent and all other sums due under the applicable lease directly to the lockbox account. All funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept on a daily basis to a lender-controlled cash management account to be applied and disbursed in accordance with the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents.
Current Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness.
Concurrently with the funding of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan, 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC funded a mezzanine loan in the amount of $9.2 million (the “Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan”). The Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan is secured by the direct equity interests in the borrowers. The Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan is coterminous with the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and accrues interest at an initial rate of 9.00000% per annum. Based on the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan, the cumulative Cut-off Date loan-to-value is 77.1%, the cumulative UW NCF debt service coverage ratio is 1.08x and the cumulative UW NCF debt yield is 7.3%. The rights of the mezzanine lender under the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan are further described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Mezzanine Indebtedness” in the Prospectus.
Multifamily – Garden Various Philadelphia, PA 19123 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Liberties Walk | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $33,000,000 60.3% 1.53x 9.4% |
Permitted Future Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.
Release of Collateral. On any business day that is later than 60 days following the Closing Date, the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents permit the borrowers to obtain the release of certain parcels of real property identified in the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents (which parcels collectively represent the entire Liberties Walk Property) (each, a “Release Property”) in connection with a sale to a bona fide third-party or an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor pursuant to an arm’s-length agreement provided that, among other conditions, (i) the borrowers deliver evidence to the lender that simultaneously with any prepayment required under the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan, the related mezzanine borrower is making any prepayment required under the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan, (ii) the borrowers prepay the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to (x) in the event of a sale of such Release Property to a third party not affiliated with the borrowers or guarantor, the greater of (1) the applicable pro-rata share of 95% of the gross sales proceeds for such Release Property (e.g., assuming a Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan of $80 and an outstanding principal balance of both the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan of $100, the pro rata share for the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan will be 80%) and (2)(a) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released and (b) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property to be released after the first release of a Release Property, and (y) in the event the sale of such Release Property is to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, (1) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the first Release Property to be released, and (2) 120% of the allocated loan amount for each and every Release Property after the first Release Property to be released to an affiliate of the borrowers or guarantor, in each of the foregoing instances, together with any applicable yield maintenance premium, (iii) after giving effect to such sale and prepayment, (1) the combined debt service coverage ratio (based on both the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan, as calculated under the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents) for all of the remaining Liberties Walk Property is no less than the greater of (x) the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan has occurred) and (y) the combined debt service coverage ratio (on both the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan, as calculated under the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan documents) as of the origination date, and (2) the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Liberties Walk Property is no greater than the lesser of (x) the combined loan-to-value ratio (based on the then aggregate outstanding balance of the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan) immediately preceding such sale (assuming for purposes of such calculation that no related prepayment of the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan has occurred) and (y) the loan-to-value ratio (based on then aggregate outstanding principal balance of both the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan and the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan) as of the origination date, provided that in each instance, the borrowers may prepay the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (and the related mezzanine borrower may prepay the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan) by an amount equal to the pro rata share applicable to the Liberties Walk Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of the mezzanine borrower, the Liberties Walk Mezzanine Loan) in an amount sufficient to satisfy the foregoing debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value requirements, and (iv) the borrowers satisfy customary REMIC requirements.
Ground Lease. None.
Various – Various Various Various, NY Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $30,000,000 61.2% 1.35x 9.9% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | CREFI | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype(3): | Various - Various |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Son Dinh Tran | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | 425 East 6th Street Owner LLC, 543 East 6th Street Owner LLC, 73 Second Avenue Owner LLC, 670 9th Avenue Owner LLC, 49 West 71 Street Owner LLC, 289 East 149th Street Owner LLC, 228 East 51 Street Owner LLC and 151-165 Burnside Ave Owner LLC | | Location(2): | Various, NY |
Original Balance: | $30,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated(3): | Various / Various |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $30,000,000 | | Property Management: | Self-Managed |
% by Initial UPB: | 3.4% | | Size(4): | 55 Units |
Interest Rate: | 7.05000% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | $49,000,000 / $890,909 |
Note Date: | July 25, 2024 | | Appraisal Date(5): | Various |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 98.2% (as of July 11, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 96.1% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI(6): | $2,984,830 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCFs: | $2,898,691 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI(6): | $2,337,567 (T-9 Ann. April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI(7): | NAV |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(31),O(5) | | 2022 NOI(7): | NAV |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Springing / Springing | | 2021 NOI(7): | NAV |
Reserves | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $545,455 |
Taxes: | $155,125 | $51,708 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $545,455 |
Insurance: | $39,318 | $9,830 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 61.2% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $1,653 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 61.2% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $3,906 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 9.9% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $146,188 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.35x |
Other(1): | $342,000 | $0 | NAP | | | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $30,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $23,988,593 | 80.0 | % |
| | | | Borrower Sponsor Equity | 4,396,042 | 14.7 | |
| | | | Closing Costs | 932,734 | 3.1 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 682,631 | 2.3 | |
Total Sources | $30,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $30,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Other Reserves consists of an upfront (i) $180,000 Hunter Convenience Shop gap rent reserve, (ii) $102,000 La La Bakery gap rent reserve, and (iii) $60,000 K.S. Architect Inc. gap rent reserve. |
| (2) | The ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties are located in Manhattan and the Bronx. |
| (3) | See “Portfolio Summary” below. |
| (4) | Units represent multifamily units. The ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties also include 31,250 square feet of commercial space. |
| (5) | Appraisal Dates are between June 12, 2024 and June 17, 2024. |
| (6) | Increase from Most Recent NOI to Underwritten NOI is primarily attributable to renovations to six of eight of the ST NYC-Mixed Use Portfolio properties in 2023 and subsequent lease-up. |
| (7) | 2021 NOI, 2022 NOI, and 2023 NOI information are not available because six of the eight ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties were renovated in 2023. |
Various – Various Various Various, NY Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $30,000,000 61.2% 1.35x 9.9% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties:
Portfolio Summary |
Property Name | Property Type(1) | Multifamily Units(2) | Commercial SF(2) | Occupancy(2) | Year Built(1) | Allocated Cut-off Date Balance | Appraised Value(1) | UW NOI(2) | % of UW NOI(2) |
151-165 East Burnside Avenue | Retail | NAP | 14,800 | 97.3% | 1989 | $6,239,000 | $10,000,000 | $624,150 | 20.9% |
670 9th Avenue | Mixed Use | 8 | 3,600 | 100.0% | 1920 | 4,771,000 | 8,200,000 | 479,805 | 16.1% |
73 2nd Avenue | Mixed Use | 9 | 1,350 | 100.0% | 1900 | 3,499,000 | 5,300,000 | 350,951 | 11.8% |
425 East 6th Street | Multifamily | 17 | NAP | 100.0% | 1920 | 3,492,000 | 5,700,000 | 341,079 | 11.4% |
228 East 51st Street | Mixed Use | 2 | 1,500 | 100.0% | 1900 | 3,245,000 | 5,700,000 | 324,063 | 10.9% |
543 East 6th Street | Mixed Use | 9 | 600 | 88.9% | 1930 | 3,102,000 | 4,800,000 | 305,600 | 10.2% |
49 West 71st Street | Multifamily | 10 | NAP | 100.0% | 1910 | 3,091,000 | 5,000,000 | 301,485 | 10.1% |
289 East 149th Street | Mixed Use | NAP | 9,400 | 100.0% | 1931 | 2,561,000 | 4,300,000 | 257,698 | 8.6% |
Total | | 55 | 31,250 | 98.2% | | $30,000,000 | $49,000,000 | $2,984,830 | 100.0% |
| (2) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated July 11, 2024. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the multifamily unit mix at the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties:
Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | # of Units | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (SF) | Average Monthly Rent Per Unit | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Unit(2) |
670 9th Avenue |
2BR/1BA – Rent Stabilized | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 700 | $958 | $4,500 |
2BR/1BA – Market Rate | 4 | 7.3% | 100.0% | 663 | $4,399 | $4,500 |
3BR/2BA – Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 850 | $6,000 | $6,000 |
4BR/2BA – Market Rate | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 1,000 | $8,250 | $8,000 |
Property Total | 8 | 14.5% | 100.0% | 775 | $5,132 | $5,563 |
425 East 6th Street | | | | | | |
1BR/1BA – Rent Stabilized | 13 | 23.6% | 100.0% | 525 | $1,388 | $3,200 |
2BR/2BA – Rent Stabilized | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 550 | $4,000 | $4,800 |
2BR/2BA – Market Rate | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 538 | $3,550 | $4,800 |
4BR/3BA – Rent Stabilized | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 1,000 | $12,000 | $8,900 |
Property Total | 17 | 30.9% | 100.0% | 556 | $2,420 | $3,818 |
73 2nd Avenue | | | | | | |
2BR/1BA - Rent Controlled | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 750 | $139 | $3,000 |
2BR/1BA – Rent Stabilized | 4 | 7.3% | 100.0% | 713 | $1,336 | $5,850 |
3BR/2BA – Market Rate | 3 | 5.5% | 100.0% | 800 | $7,000 | $6,850 |
Property Total | 9 | 16.4% | 100.0% | 750 | $2,958 | $5,550 |
49 West 71st Street | | | | | | |
1BR/1BA – Rent Stabilized | 4 | 7.3% | 100.0% | 488 | $1,302 | $3,800 |
1BR/1BA – Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 500 | $3,800 | $3,800 |
2BR/1BA (D) – Rent Stabilized | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 548 | $5,500 | $5,500 |
2BR/1BA (D) – Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 707 | $7,500 | $6,500 |
2BR/1BA – Market Rate | 3 | 5.5% | 100.0% | 517 | $4,667 | $4,700 |
Property Total | 10 | 18.2% | 100.0% | 526 | $3,601 | $4,510 |
228 East 51st Street | | | | | | |
4BR/3BA – Market Rate | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 1,500 | $12,500 | $12,075 |
Property Total | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 1,500 | $12,500 | $12,075 |
543 East 6th Street | | | | | | |
1BR/1BA – Rent Stabilized | 3 | 5.5% | 100.0% | 600 | $832 | $3,200 |
2BR/1BA - Rent Stabilized | 2 | 3.6% | 100.0% | 800 | $970 | $4,800 |
2BR/1BA– Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 0.0% | 400 | $0 | $4,800 |
3BR/1BA – Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 1,200 | $5,250 | $5,800 |
3BR/2BA – Market Rate | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 800 | $6,000 | $5,800 |
5BR/2BA - Rent Stabilized | 1 | 1.8% | 100.0% | 1,500 | $8,000 | $8,000 |
Property Total | 9 | 16.4% | 88.9% | 811 | $2,961 | $4,844 |
Portfolio Total / Wtd Avg. | 55 | 100.0% | 98.2% | 690 | $3,584 | $4,949 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated July 11, 2024. Average Monthly Rent Per Unit is based on occupied units. |
Various – Various Various Various, NY Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $30,000,000 61.2% 1.35x 9.9% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the largest commercial tenants at the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Property | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Portfolio Commercial Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Portfolio Commercial U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Option |
JY Burnside 99C | 151-156 East Burnside Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 4,950 | 15.8% | $254,616 | $51.44 | 14.8% | 10/31/2027 | N | None |
Mr. Green Laundry | 670 9th Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 3,600 | 11.5 | 186,000 | $51.67 | 10.8 | 6/29/2026 | N | None |
Hunter Convenience Shop | 228 East 51st Street | NR/NR/NR | 1,500 | 4.8 | 185,400 | $123.60 | 10.8 | 6/30/2029 | N | None |
Little Amber Nails & Spa(2) | 289 East 149th Street | NR/NR/NR | 4,000 | 12.8 | 152,770 | $38.19 | 8.9 | 3/31/2033 | Y | None |
Expo Beauty Supply(3)(4) | 289 East 149th Street | NR/NR/NR | 5,400 | 17.3 | 152,770 | $28.29 | 8.9 | 3/31/2028 | Y | None |
Alfredo Floresmoreo | 151-156 East Burnside Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 5,000 | 16.0 | 127,308 | $25.46 | 7.4 | 11/30/2027 | N | None |
Convenience on 2nd Ave Corporation | 73 2nd Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 550 | 1.8 | 127,308 | $231.47 | 7.4 | 2/28/2033 | N | None |
La La Bakeshop NYC Inc. | 73 2nd Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 800 | 2.6 | 105,060 | $131.33 | 6.1 | 7/31/2029 | N | 1 x 5 Yr |
M & W Organic And Exotic Deli Corp | 151-156 East Burnside Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 1,000 | 3.2 | 96,000 | $96.00 | 5.6 | 9/30/2032 | N | None |
Kuchuplum Corp | 151-156 East Burnside Avenue | NR/NR/NR | 650 | 2.1 | 62,400 | $96.00 | 3.6 | 10/31/2030 | N | None |
Largest Tenants | | | 27,450 | 87.8% | $1,449,631 | $52.81 | 84.1% | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | | 3,400 | 10.9 | 274,275 | $80.67 | 15.9 | | | |
Total Occupied | | | 30,850 | 98.7% | $1,723,906 | $55.88 | 100.0% | | | |
Vacant | | | 400 | 1.3 | | | | | | |
Total | | | 31,250 | 100.0% | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated July 11, 2024, with rent steps through August 1, 2025. |
| (2) | Little Amber Nails & Spa has a unilateral option to terminate its lease upon six months’ prior written notice and payment of two months of the then-current rent. |
| (3) | Expo Beauty Supply has a unilateral option to terminate its lease upon six months’ prior written notice and payment of two months of the then-current rent. |
| (4) | Expo Beauty Supply subleases its space to ten subtenants on one to two-year subleases. |
Various – Various Various Various, NY Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $30,000,000 61.2% 1.35x 9.9% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule for the commercial tenants at the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties, based on initial lease expiration dates:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | UW Base Rent | % of Total UW Base Rent | UW Base Rent $ per SF | Number of Leases Expiring |
MTM | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | 0 |
2024 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2025 | 700 | 2.2 | 2.2% | 59,532 | 3.5 | $85.05 | 1 |
2026 | 5,050 | 16.2 | 18.4% | 292,617 | 17.0 | $57.94 | 3 |
2027 | 9,950 | 31.8 | 50.2% | 381,924 | 22.2 | $38.38 | 2 |
2028 | 5,400 | 17.3 | 67.5% | 152,770 | 8.9 | $28.29 | 1 |
2029 | 2,900 | 9.3 | 76.8% | 352,260 | 20.4 | $121.47 | 3 |
2030 | 1,300 | 4.2 | 81.0% | 108,726 | 6.3 | $83.64 | 2 |
2031 | 0 | 0.0 | 81.0% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2032 | 1,000 | 3.2 | 84.2% | 96,000 | 5.6 | $96.00 | 1 |
2033 | 4550 | 14.6 | 98.7% | 280,078 | 16.2 | $61.56 | 2 |
2034 | 0 | 0.0 | 98.7% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2035 & Beyond | 0 | 0.0 | 98.7% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
Vacant | 400 | 1.3 | 100.0% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Total | 31,250 | 100.0% | | $1,723,906 | 100.0% | $55.88 | 15 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent rolls dated July 11, 2024, with contractual rent steps through August 1, 2025. |
(2) | Certain leases may have termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the lease and that are not considered in this Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Various – Various Various Various, NY Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $30,000,000 61.2% 1.35x 9.9% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| T-9 Ann. 4/30/2024 | U/W | U/W Per Unit(2) |
Base Rent | $1,901,396 | $2,322,112 | $3,518 |
Potential Income from Vacant Units | 0 | 36,000 | $55 |
Gross Potential Income – Apts. | $1,901,396 | $2,358,112 | $3,573 |
Vacancy Residential | 0 | (70,743) | ($107) |
Effective Gross Income – Apts. | $1,901,396 | $2,287,368 | $3,466 |
| | | |
Commercial Rental Income | 1,357,582 | 1,723,906 | $55.16 |
Potential Income from Vacant Space | 0 | 30,000 | $0.96 |
Other Commercial Income(3) | 3,839 | 66,556 | $2.13 |
Gross Potential Income – Commercial | $1,361,421 | $1,820,462 | $58.25 |
Vacancy Commercial | 0 | -91,023 | ($2.91) |
Effective Gross Income – Commercial | $1,361,421 | $1,729,439 | $55.34 |
| | | |
Total Effective Gross Income | $3,262,818 | $4,016,807 | $6,086 |
| | | |
Real Estate Taxes | 545,708 | 584,926 | $886 |
Insurance | 94,601 | 112,338 | $170 |
Management Fee | 97,885 | 120,504 | $183 |
Other Expenses(4) | 187,058 | 214,209 | $325 |
Total Expenses | $925,251 | $1,031,977 | $1,564 |
| | | |
Net Operating Income | $2,337,567 | $2,984,830 | $4,522 |
Replacement Reserves – Apts. | 0 | 14,329 | $22 |
Replacement Reserves - Commercial | 0 | 5,508 | $0.18 |
TI/LC | 0 | 66,303 | $100 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,337,567 | $2,898,691 | $4,392 |
| | | |
Occupancy | 98.2%(5) | 97.0%(6) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.09x | 1.35x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 7.8% | 9.9% | |
| | | |
| (1) | Historical financial information before 2023 is not available because six of the eight ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties were renovated in 2023. Increase from T-9 Ann. 4/30/2024 Net Operating Income to U/W Net Operating Income is primarily attributable to renovations to six of eight of the ST NYC-Mixed Use Portfolio properties in 2023 and subsequent lease-up. |
| (2) | U/W Per Unit is based on 55 multifamily units at the ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio properties. Commercial fields are based on 31,250 square feet. |
| (3) | Other Commercial Income includes real estate tax expense reimbursements from the ST NYC Mixed Use Portfolio properties’ commercial tenants. |
| (4) | Other Expenses include repairs and maintenance, utilities, and general and administrative expenses. |
| (5) | Represents current occupancy as of July 11, 2024. |
| (6) | Represents economic occupancy. |
Retail – Anchored 678 North Dupont Boulevard Milford, DE 19963 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 The Plaza at Milford | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $28,500,000 66.3% 1.31x 9.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | Barclays | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Retail – Anchored |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Angela Tsionas and Georgia Halakos | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Milford Plaza SPE, LLC | | Location: | Milford, DE |
Original Balance: | $28,500,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1966 / 2019 |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $28,500,000 | | Property Management: | Tsionas Management Co. Inc. |
% by Initial UPB: | 3.2% | | Size: | 213,177 SF |
Interest Rate: | 7.19300% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $43,000,000 / $202 |
Note Date: | July 9, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | June 13, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 92.6% (as of May 14, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 90.5% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $2,798,473 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $2,715,955 |
First Payment Date: | August 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $2,894,288 (TTM April 30, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI(4): | $2,558,852 |
Call Protection: | L(25),D(28),O(7) | | 2022 NOI(4): | $2,044,297 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $2,042,261 |
Reserves | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $134 |
Taxes: | $179,725 | $17,973 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $134 |
Insurance(1): | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 66.3% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $2,665 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 66.3% |
TI / LC: | $1,200,000 | Springing(2) | $511,625 | | UW NOI DY: | 9.8% |
Other(3): | $24,438 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.31x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $28,500,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $18,369,920 | 64.5 | % |
| | | | Return of Equity | 8,386,275 | 29.4 | |
| | | | Reserves | 1,404,163 | 4.9 | |
| | | | Closing Costs | 339,643 | 1.2 | |
Total Sources | $28,500,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $28,500,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | The insurance reserve has been conditionally waived so long as the borrower maintains a blanket policy meeting the requirements of The Plaza at Milford mortgage loan documents. |
| (2) | The borrower will be required to make monthly deposits of $14,212 to the TI/LC reserve if the balance of the reserve falls below $511,625. |
| (3) | Other Reserves include immediate repairs. |
| (4) | The increase from 2022 NOI to 2023 NOI is due to five leases totaling 47,718 square feet and $536,955 in underwritten base rent being executed at The Plaza at Milford property. |
Retail – Anchored 678 North Dupont Boulevard Milford, DE 19963 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 The Plaza at Milford | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $28,500,000 66.3% 1.31x 9.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants (certain of which tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at The Plaza at Milford property:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch)(2) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Total U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
Goodwill | NR/NR/NR | 13,583 | 6.4 | | $214,270 | $15.77 | 7.7 | | 6/16/2029 | N | None |
Aldi, Inc. | NR/NR/NR | 22,288 | 10.5 | % | $200,592 | $9.00 | 7.2 | % | 3/31/2033 | N | 5 x 5 Yr |
Michaels | NR/NR/NR | 14,145 | 6.6 | | $155,595 | $11.00 | 5.6 | | 10/31/2033 | Y(4) | 3 x 5 Yr |
Planet Fitness | NR/NR/NR | 16,264 | 7.6 | | $144,750 | $8.90 | 5.2 | | 8/31/2027 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Fresenius Medical Care | Baa3/BBB-/BBB- | 12,200 | 5.7 | | $139,324 | $11.42 | 5.0 | | 2/28/2025 | N | 3 x 5 Yr |
Milford Discount Liquors | NR/NRNR | 6,400 | 3.0 | | $134,400 | $21.00 | 4.9 | | 12/31/2031 | N | 1 x 3 Yr |
La Tonalteca | NR/NR/NR | 8,500 | 4.0 | | $132,600 | $15.60 | 4.8 | | 8/31/2028 | N | None |
Harbor Freight | B1/BB-/NR | 15,473 | 7.3 | | $93,000 | $6.01 | 3.4 | | 7/31/2033 | Y(3) | 5 x 5 Yr |
Dollar General | Baa2/BBB/NR | 8,000 | 3.8 | | $94,160 | $11.77 | 3.4 | | 12/31/2027 | N | 1 x 5 Yr |
Sherwin Williams | Baa2/BBB/BBB | 10,800 | 5.1 | | $62,626 | $5.80 | 2.3 | | 9/30/2032 | N | 2 x 5 Yr |
Largest Tenants | | 127,653 | 59.9 | % | $1,371,317 | $10.74 | 49.5 | % | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 69,724 | 32.7 | | 1,399,322 | $20.07 | 50.5 | | | | |
Total Occupied | | 197,377 | 92.6 | % | $2,770,639 | $14.04 | 100.0 | % | | | |
Vacant | | 15,800 | 7.4 | | | | | | | |
Total | | 213,177 | 100.0 | % | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 14, 2024, inclusive of contractual rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
| (3) | Harbor Freight has the option to terminate its lease starting in March 2028 with payment of a termination fee of 50% of the brokerage commission paid by the borrower sponsor for the lease. Harbor Freight also has a co-tenancy clause that requires 50% of The Plaza at Milford property to be open and operating or Harbor Freight’s rent will be reduced by 50%. If the co-tenancy is not satisfied for a period of 12 months, Harbor Freight has the option to terminate its lease. |
| (4) | Michaels has a co-tenancy clause that states that at least one of Harbor Freight or Aldi must be open for business or the Michaels rent will be reduced by 50%. If the co-tenancy is not satisfied for 12 months, Michaels has the option to terminate its lease. |
Retail – Anchored 678 North Dupont Boulevard Milford, DE 19963 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 The Plaza at Milford | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $28,500,000 66.3% 1.31x 9.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at The Plaza at Milford property, based on the initial lease expiration dates:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2)(3) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | U/W Base Rent | % of Total U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
2024 & MTM | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | 0 |
2025 | 23,306 | 10.9 | 10.9% | 446,013 | 16.1 | $19.14 | 6 |
2026 | 11,502 | 5.4 | 16.3% | 166,305 | 6.0 | $14.46 | 4 |
2027 | 42,589 | 20.0 | 36.3% | 572,403 | 20.7 | $13.44 | 7 |
2028 | 17,775 | 8.3 | 44.6% | 327,384 | 11.8 | $18.42 | 5 |
2029 | 26,687 | 12.5 | 57.2% | 426,683 | 15.4 | $15.99 | 6 |
2030 | 1,937 | 0.9 | 58.1% | 46,488 | 1.7 | $24.00 | 1 |
2031 | 6,400 | 3.0 | 61.1% | 134,400 | 4.9 | $21.00 | 1 |
2032 | 10,800 | 5.1 | 66.1% | 62,626 | 2.3 | $5.80 | 1 |
2033 | 56,381 | 26.4 | 92.6% | 588,337 | 21.2 | $10.44 | 5 |
2034 | 0 | 0.0 | 92.6% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2035 | 0 | 0.0 | 92.6% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
2036 & Thereafter | 0 | 0.0 | 92.6% | 0 | 0.0 | $0.00 | 0 |
Vacant | 15,800 | 7.4 | 100.0% | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 213,177 | 100.0% | | $2,770,639 | 100.0% | $14.04 | 36 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 14, 2024, inclusive of contractual rent steps through August 2025. |
| (2) | Lease Rollover Schedule is based on the lease expiration dates of all direct leases in place. |
| (3) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the related lease and are not considered in the Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Retail – Anchored 678 North Dupont Boulevard Milford, DE 19963 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 The Plaza at Milford | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $28,500,000 66.3% 1.31x 9.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at The Plaza at Milford property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022(2) | 2023(2) | April 2024 TTM | U/W | U/W Per SF |
Base Rent(1) | $2,226,924 | $2,239,794 | $2,482,478 | $2,739,586 | $2,735,907 | $12.83 |
Credit Tenant Rent Steps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34,732 | 0.16 |
Gross Up Vacancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 290,400 | 1.36 |
Gross Potential Rent | $2,226,924 | $2,239,794 | $2,482,478 | $2,739,586 | $3,061,039 | $14.36 |
Total Reimbursements | 255,015 | 295,481 | 465,365 | 568,782 | 458,192 | 2.15 |
Other Income | 56,117 | 80,378 | 152,347 | 125,436 | 138,891 | 0.65 |
Net Rental Income | $2,538,056 | $2,615,653 | $3,100,190 | $3,433,803 | $3,658,123 | $17.16 |
Vacancy/Credit Loss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (290,400) | (1.36) |
Effective Gross Income | $2,538,056 | $2,615,653 | $3,100,190 | $3,433,803 | $3,367,723 | $15.80 |
Management Fee | 76,142 | 78,470 | 93,006 | 103,014 | 101,032 | 0.47 |
Real Estate Taxes | 196,853 | 202,100 | 220,199 | 219,633 | 204,676 | 0.96 |
Insurance | 36,068 | 5,143 | 43,380 | 61,537 | 48,892 | 0.23 |
Other Expenses | 186,731 | 285,643 | 184,753 | 155,330 | 214,650 | 1.01 |
Total Expenses | $495,794 | $571,356 | $541,338 | $539,515 | $569,250 | $2.67 |
Net Operating Income | $2,042,261 | $2,044,297 | $2,558,852 | $2,894,288 | $2,798,473 | $13.13 |
Capital Expenditures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31,977 | 0.15 |
TI/LC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50,542 | 0.24 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,042,261 | $2,044,297 | $2,558,852 | $2,894,288 | $2,715,955 | $12.74 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy | 84.0% | 97.0% | 98.0% | NAV | 90.5% | |
NCF DSCR | 0.98x | 0.98x | 1.23x | 1.39x | 1.31x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 7.2% | 7.2% | 9.0% | 10.2% | 9.8% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated May 14, 2024. |
| (2) | The increase from 2022 NOI to 2023 NOI is due to five leases totaling 47,718 square feet and $536,955 in underwritten base rent being executed at The Plaza at Milford property. |
Multifamily – Garden 2 Johnny Mercer Boulevard Savannah, GA 31410 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 13 Viera at Whitemarsh | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,350,000 62.3% 1.32x 9.0% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | GSMC | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | | Property Type - Subtype: | Multifamily – Garden |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Samantha Wells and David Iglewicz | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Viera Lake City 208 LLC, Seattle House DE, LLC, Whitehouse-Starlett, LLC and OOJ Properties, LLC | | Location: | Savannah, GA |
Original Balance: | $25,350,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1984 / 2015 |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $25,350,000 | | Property Management: | Lake City, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 2.8% | | Size: | 208 Units |
Interest Rate: | 6.58200% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | $40,700,000 / $195,673 |
Note Date: | July 12, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | June 20, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 100.0% (as of July 8, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 94.6% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $2,293,049 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCF: | $2,241,049 |
First Payment Date: | September 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $1,772,340 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $1,768,429 |
Call Protection: | L(24),D(29),O(7) | | 2022 NOI: | $1,758,049 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | None / None | | 2021 NOI: | $1,604,738 |
Reserves | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | | |
Taxes: | $130,991 | $32,748 | NAP | | Cut-off Date Loan Per Unit: | $121,875 |
Insurance: | $45,848 | $22,924 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan Per Unit: | $121,875 |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $4,333 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 62.3% |
| | | | | Maturity Date LTV: | 62.3% |
| | | | | UW NOI DY: | 9.0% |
| | | | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.32x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $25,350,000 | 62.5 | % | | Purchase Price | $39,000,000 | 96.2 | % |
Equity Contribution | 15,202,517 | 37.5 | | | Closing Costs(1) | 1,375,678 | 3.4 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 176,839 | 0.4 | |
Total Sources | $40,552,517 | 100.0 | % | | Total Uses | $40,552,517 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | Closing costs include a rate buydown fee of $507,000. |
Multifamily – Garden 2 Johnny Mercer Boulevard Savannah, GA 31410 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 13 Viera at Whitemarsh | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,350,000 62.3% 1.32x 9.0% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Viera at Whitemarsh property, as provided by the appraisal:
Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Mix/Type | No. Units | Percent of Total | Unit Size (SF) | NRA (SF) |
1BD/1BA | 23 | 11.1 | % | 700 | $16,100 |
1BD/1BA - Upgrade | 17 | 8.2 | | 700 | $11,900 |
2BD/2BA | 83 | 39.9 | | 900 | $74,700 |
2BD/2BA - Upgrade | 61 | 29.3 | | 900 | $54,900 |
3BD/2BA | 12 | 5.8 | | 1,100 | $13,200 |
3BD/2BA - Upgrade | 12 | 5.8 | | 1,100 | $13,200 |
Total/Average | 208 | 100.0 | % | 885 | $184,000 |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Viera at Whitemarsh property:
Cash Flow Analysis |
| 2022 | 2023 | TTM May 2024 | U/W(2) | U/W Per Unit |
Base Rent | $3,076,231 | $3,516,190 | $3,641,576 | $3,716,893 | $17,870 |
Other Revenue | 182,637 | 209,025 | 239,517 | 239,215 | 1,150 |
Utility Reimbursement | 32,641 | 27,875 | 40,784 | 40,784 | 196 |
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | (174,239) | (257,060) | (325,769) | (231,852) | ($1,115) |
(Concessions) | (9,025) | (25,419) | (22,883) | (24,060) | (116) |
Effective Gross Income | $3,108,244 | $3,470,610 | $3,573,225 | $3,740,980 | $17,985 |
Real Estate Taxes | 306,916 | 532,017 | 528,346 | 411,275 | 1,977 |
Insurance | 203,523 | 297,819 | 353,044 | 275,086 | 1,323 |
Utilities | 43,300 | 46,016 | 53,141 | 53,141 | 255 |
Repairs & Maintenance | 257,559 | 258,362 | 257,991 | 231,865 | 1,115 |
Payroll | 327,651 | 333,003 | 347,823 | 240,000 | 1,154 |
Management Fee | 91,998 | 101,468 | 102,387 | 93,525 | 450 |
Other Expenses(1) | 119,249 | 133,495 | 158,153 | 143,040 | 688 |
Total Expenses | $1,350,195 | $1,702,181 | $1,800,885 | $1,447,932 | $6,961 |
Net Operating Income | $1,758,049 | $1,768,429 | $1,772,340 | $2,293,049 | $11,024 |
Replacement Reserves | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52,000 | 250 |
Net Cash Flow | $1,758,049 | $1,768,429 | $1,772,340 | $2,241,049 | $10,774 |
| | | | | |
Occupancy | 96.2% | 93.5% | 91.9% | 100.0% | |
NCF DSCR | 1.04x | 1.05x | 1.05x | 1.32x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.9% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% | |
| (1) | Other Expenses include advertising, general, administrative and trash expenses. |
| (2) | The increase in U/W NOI from TTM May 2024 NOI is primarily driven by an increase in gross potential rent and decreases in tax expense, insurance expense and payroll expense. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 500 Baybrook Mall Drive Friendswood, TX 77546 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Baybrook Mall | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 56.0% 1.72x 13.7% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller(s): | Barclays | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type - Subtype: | Retail – Super Regional Mall |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Brookfield Properties Retail Holding LLC and SMRF Baybrook Investor Member LLC | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Baybrook Mall, LLC | | Location: | Friendswood, TX |
Original Balance(1): | $25,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1978 / 2016 |
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $25,000,000 | | Property Management: | Brookfield Properties Retail Inc. |
% by Initial UPB: | 2.8% | | Size(3): | 540,986 SF |
Interest Rate: | 6.81600% | | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $392,659,260 / $726 |
Note Date: | July 19, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | June 4, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 95.4% (as of June 30, 2024) |
Amortization: | Amortizing Balloon | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.4% |
Original Amortization: | 360 | | Underwritten NOI: | $30,209,945 |
Interest Only Period: | None | | Underwritten NCF: | $29,652,729 |
First Payment Date: | September 1, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | August 1, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type(1): | Pari Passu | | Most Recent NOI: | $29,848,392 (TTM May 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance(1): | $195,000,000 | | 2023 NOI: | $29,919,970 |
Call Protection(2): | L(24),D(32),O(4) | | 2022 NOI: | $28,591,885 |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Hard / Springing | | 2021 NOI: | $25,944,427 |
Reserves | | Financial Information(1) |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan Per SF: | $407 |
Taxes: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan Per SF: | $384 |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV | 56.0% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | Springing | $270,493 | | Maturity Date LTV: | 53.0% |
TI/LC: | $0 | Springing | $1,081,972 | | UW NOI DY: | 13.7% |
| | | | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.72x |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Whole Loan | $220,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $213,488,234 | 97.0 | % |
| | | | Return of Equity | $5,037,736 | 2.3 | |
| | | | Closing Costs | $1,474,030 | 0.7 | |
Total Sources | $220,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $220,000,000 | 100.00 | % |
| (1) | The Cut-off Date Balance of $25,000,000 represents the non-controlling note A-5, being contributed by Barclays, and is part of a whole loan that is comprised of 11 pari passu notes with an aggregate original principal balance and Cut-off Date Balance of $220,000,000 (the “Baybrook Mall Whole Loan”). The Baybrook Mall Whole Loan was co-originated by Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A. (“MS”), Barclays and Societe Generale Financial Corporation (“SGFC”). The Financial Information in the chart above is based on the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan. |
| (2) | The lockout period will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date on September 1, 2024. Defeasance of the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan in whole (but not in part) is permitted at any time following the earlier to occur of (i) January 19, 2027 or (ii) the date that is two years from the closing date of the securitization that includes the last pari passu note to be securitized. The assumed lockout period of 24 payments is based on the expected Benchmark 2024-V9 securitization trust closing date in August 2024. The actual lockout period may be longer. The Baybrook Mall Whole Loan may be partially prepaid at any time to cure a cash management period or a cash sweep period due to the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan's debt yield being less than 11.0% for a cash management period or 10.0% for a cash sweep period as of the end of any two consecutive quarters, provided that any prepayment prior to the payment date occurring in May 2029 will be subject to payment of a yield maintenance premium. |
| (3) | The Baybrook Mall property is the collateral portion of a larger mall containing 1,261,917 square feet.
|
Retail – Super Regional Mall 500 Baybrook Mall Drive Friendswood, TX 77546 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Baybrook Mall | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 56.0% 1.72x 13.7% |
The table below summarizes the promissory notes that comprise the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan. The relationship between the holders of the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan will be governed by a co-lender agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” in the Prospectus.
Whole Loan Summary |
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
A-1(1) | $60,000,000 | $60,000,000 | MS | Yes |
A-2(1) | 28,000,000 | 28,000,000 | MS | No |
A-3(1) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | MS | No |
A-4(1) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | MS | No |
A-5 | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | Benchmark 2024-V9 | No |
A-6(1) | 18,000,000 | 18,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate | No |
A-7(1) | 8,000,000 | 8,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate | No |
A-8(1) | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | Barclays or an affiliate | No |
A-9(1) | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | SGFC | No |
A-10(1) | 16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | SGFC | No |
A-11(1) | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | SGFC | No |
Whole Loan | $220,000,000 | $220,000,000 | | |
| (1) | Expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may otherwise be transferred at any time. |
The following table presents inline sales history at the Baybrook Mall property:
Tenant Sales PSF(1) |
Tenant Type | 2021 Sales | 2021 Sales PSF | 2022 Sales | 2022 Sales PSF | 2023 Sales | 2023 Sales PSF | TTM 5/31/2024 Sales | TTM 5/31/2024 Sales PSF |
Inline (<10,000 SF) | $189,773,031 | $976 | $203,360,206 | $881 | $203,295,153 | $855 | $206,637,422 | $863 |
Occupancy Cost(2) | 15.5% | | 14.4% | | 14.4% | | 14.2% | |
Inline (<10,000 SF Excluding Apple) | $148,088,487 | $782 | $156,222,056 | $692 | $164,350,170 | $706 | $168,012,667 | $717 |
Occupancy Cost (Excluding Apple)(2) | 19.5% | | 18.5% | | 17.6% | | 17.2% | |
| (1) | Information is based on sales information provided by the borrower sponsor. |
| (2) | Occupancy Cost is based on the sum of underwritten base rent, percentage rent, overage rent and underwritten reimbursements. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 500 Baybrook Mall Drive Friendswood, TX 77546 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Baybrook Mall | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 56.0% 1.72x 13.7% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Baybrook Mall property:
Tenant Summary(1) |
Tenant | Credit Rating (Moody’s/ S&P/Fitch)(2) | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Net Rentable Area | U/W Base Rent | U/W Base Rent Per SF | % of Total U/W Base Rent | Lease Expiration | Termination Option (Y/N) | Renewal Options |
Anchor Tenants | | | | | | | | | |
JCPenney | NR/NR/NR | 96,605 | 17.9 | % | $325,000 | $3.36 | 1.3% | 1/31/2026 | N | 6 x 5 years |
Macy’s (non-collateral) | Ba2/BB+/BBB- | 0 | 0.0 | % | $0 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Dillard’s (non-collateral) | Baa3/BB+/ BBB- | 0 | 0.0 | % | $0 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Living Spaces (non-collateral) | NR / NR / NR | 0 | 0.0 | % | $0 | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | | 96,605 | 17.9 | % | $325,000 | $3.36 | 1.3% | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Major Tenants | | | | | | | | | |
Foot Locker(3) | Ba3/BB/NR | 18,376 | 3.4 | % | $1,383,569 | $75.29 | 5.7% | Various | N | None |
Victoria’s Secret | B1/BB-/NR | 14,115 | 2.6 | | 904,630 | $64.09 | 3.7 | 1/31/2032 | N | None |
H&M(4) | NR/BBB/NR | 17,510 | 3.2 | | 728,241 | $41.59 | 3.0 | 1/31/2032 | Y | 2 x 3 years |
American Eagle Outfitters | NR/NR/NR | 6,723 | 1.2 | | 721,311 | $107.29 | 3.0 | 3/31/2032 | Y | None |
Zales Jewelers | NR/NR/NR | 1,821 | 0.3 | | 624,494 | $342.94 | 2.6 | 6/30/2024 | N | None |
Helzberg Diamonds | NR/NR/NR | 2,074 | 0.4 | | 580,927 | $280.10 | 2.4 | 5/31/2027 | N | None |
The Cheesecake Factory | NR/NR/NR | 11,393 | 2.1 | | 517,698 | $45.44 | 2.1 | 1/31/2033 | N | 2 x 5 years |
Sephora | NR/NR/NR | 5,876 | 1.1 | | 505,336 | $86.00 | 2.1 | 1/31/2028 | N | None |
Finish Line | NR/NR/NR | 9,000 | 1.7 | | 479,970 | $53.33 | 2.0 | 1/31/2028 | N | None |
Largest Tenants | | 86,888 | 16.1 | % | $6,446,176 | $74.19 | 26.7% | | | |
Remaining Occupied | | 332,792 | 61.5 | % | $17,374,137 | $52.21 | 72.0% | | | |
Total Occupied | | 516,285 | 95.4 | % | $24,145,313 | $46.77 | 100.0% | | | |
Vacant | | 24,701 | 4.6 | % | | | | | | |
Total | | 540,986 | 100.0 | 0% | | | | | | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through July 19, 2025. |
| (2) | In certain instances, ratings provided are those of the parent company of the entity shown, whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
| (3) | Foot Locker occupies two separate suites at the Baybrook Mall property. One suite, covering 13,936 square feet, has a lease expiration date of April 30, 2032 and the second suite, covering 4,440 square feet, has a lease expiration date of May 31, 2027. |
| (4) | H&M has the right to terminate its lease upon 365 days‘ notice if the tenant’s net sales fail to exceed $5,440,386 between January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026, or $5,984,425 between January 1, 2028 through December 31, 2028. H&M is required to pay a termination fee equal to 50% of the then unamortized portion of its construction allowance. H&M’s sales for the TTM May 2024 period were $4,596,073. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 500 Baybrook Mall Drive Friendswood, TX 77546 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Baybrook Mall | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 56.0% 1.72x 13.7% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Baybrook Mall property:
Top Tenants by Total Sales(1) |
Tenant Name | Tenant SF | 2022 Sales | 2021 Sales PSF | 2023 Sales | 2023 Sales PSF | TTM 5/31/2024 Sales | TTM 5/31/2024 Sales PSF | TTM 5/31/2024 Occupancy Cost(2) |
Dillard’s(3) | 299,681 | $51,500,000 | $172 | $51,200,000 | $171 | $51,200,000 | $171 | 0.2% |
Macy’s(3) | 254,000 | $57,100,000 | $225 | $48,500,000 | $191 | $48,500,000 | $191 | 0.2% |
Apple | 5,176 | $47,138,150 | $9,107 | $38,944,983 | $7,524 | $38,624,755 | $7,462 | 1.1% |
Sephora | 5,876 | $9,194,514 | $1,565 | $12,049,893 | $2,051 | $12,789,992 | $2,177 | 8.3% |
Foot Locker(4) | 18,376 | $11,908,582 | $648 | $12,329,184 | $671 | $12,452,889 | $678 | 14.3% |
JC Penney | 96,605 | $11,700,000 | $121 | $11,300,000 | $117 | $11,300,000 | $117 | 2.9% |
Victoria’s Secret | 14,115 | $9,186,162 | $651 | $10,320,677 | $731 | $10,210,080 | $723 | 15.7% |
The Cheesecake Factory | 11,393 | $9,806,788 | $861 | $9,899,056 | $869 | $9,845,401 | $864 | 5.8% |
Forever 21 | 81,772 | $7,596,815 | $93 | $6,230,995 | $76 | $6,496,805 | $79 | 8.0% |
H&M | 17,510 | $6,099,815 | $348 | $5,413,053 | $309 | $4,596,073 | $262 | 17.0% |
| (1) | Based on sales information provided by the borrower sponsor. |
| (2) | Occupancy cost is based on the sum of underwritten base rent, percentage rent, overage rent and underwritten reimbursements. |
| (3) | Not part of the Baybrook Mall property collateral. |
| (4) | Includes 13,936 square feet of Foot Locker space and 4,440 square feet of Kids Foot Locker space. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Baybrook Mall property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) |
Year Ending December 31 | Expiring Owned GLA | % of Owned GLA | Cumulative % of Owned GLA | UW Base Rent | % of Total UW Base Rent | UW Base Rent $ per SF | # of Expiring Leases |
Vacant | 24,701 | 4.6% | 4.6% | | NAP | NAP | | NAP | NAP |
MTM | 5,896 | 1.1% | 5.7% | | $308,043 | 1.3% | | $52.25 | 4 |
2024 | 8,611 | 1.6% | 7.2% | | 1,005,321 | 4.2 | | $116.75 | 8 |
2025 | 21,559 | 4.0% | 11.2% | | 1,816,951 | 7.5 | | $84.28 | 18 |
2026 | 240,690 | 44.5% | 55.7% | | 4,458,740 | 18.5 | | $18.52 | 24 |
2027 | 43,312 | 8.0% | 63.7% | | 4,177,820 | 17.3 | | $96.46 | 22 |
2028 | 54,663 | 10.1% | 73.8% | | 3,321,909 | 13.8 | | $60.77 | 21 |
2029 | 42,280 | 7.8% | 81.6% | | 2,640,420 | 10.9 | | $62.45 | 15 |
2030 | 11,461 | 2.1% | 83.8% | | 833,557 | 3.5 | | $72.73 | 7 |
2031 | 1,208 | 0.2% | 84.0% | | 214,791 | 0.9 | | $177.81 | 2 |
2032 | 54,798 | 10.1% | 94.1% | | 3,511,886 | 14.5 | | $64.09 | 6 |
2033 | 28,476 | 5.3% | 99.4% | | 1,645,052 | 6.8 | | $57.77 | 7 |
2034 & Beyond | 3,331 | 0.6% | 100.0% | | 210,822 | 0.9 | | $63.29 | 7 |
Total / Wtd. Avg. | 540,986 | 100.0% | | $24,145,313 | 100.0% | | $46.77 | 141 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024, inclusive of rent steps through July 19, 2025. |
| (2) | Certain tenants may have termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the Lease Rollover Schedule. |
Retail – Super Regional Mall 500 Baybrook Mall Drive Friendswood, TX 77546 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Baybrook Mall | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 56.0% 1.72x 13.7% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Baybrook Mall property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | May 2024 TTM | U/W | U/W Per SF |
UW Base Rent(2) | $18,604,963 | $20,497,649 | $22,763,176 | $23,503,197 | $24,145,313 | $44.63 |
Overage Rent | $1,612,557 | $2,715,675 | $1,599,994 | $1,503,731 | $1,237,029 | $2.29 |
Percent in Lieu | $3,194,193 | $1,998,895 | $1,216,952 | $1,276,522 | $808,724 | $1.49 |
Specialty Leasing | $608,844 | $547,014 | $437,322 | $381,278 | $408,693 | $0.76 |
Kiosk Leasing | $1,418,115 | $1,615,242 | $1,531,626 | $1,529,970 | $1,571,257 | $2.90 |
Leasing Termination | $281,447 | $150,373 | $883,647 | $0 | $0 | $0.00 |
Gross Potential Rent | $25,720,119 | $27,524,849 | $28,432,717 | $28,194,698 | $28,171,016 | $52.07 |
Total Reimbursements | $10,638,392 | $10,895,133 | $11,417,589 | $11,172,921 | $11,141,965 | $20.60 |
Net Rental Income | $36,358,511 | $38,419,981 | $39,850,306 | $39,367,618 | $39,312,981 | $72.67 |
Other Income | $1,860,280 | $2,119,328 | $2,297,302 | $2,301,138 | $2,168,140 | $4.01 |
Effective Gross Income | $38,218,791 | $40,539,309 | $42,147,608 | $41,668,756 | $41,481,121 | $76.68 |
Taxes | $5,035,298 | $4,702,799 | $4,420,599 | $4,217,902 | $4,899,635 | $9.06 |
Insurance | $323,413 | $366,254 | $541,679 | $614,253 | $687,119 | $1.27 |
Utilities | $2,093,504 | $1,628,772 | $1,841,109 | $1,843,143 | $1,311,492 | $2.42 |
Management Fee | $1,535,543 | $1,390,038 | $1,415,646 | $1,381,937 | $1,000,000 | $1.85 |
Other Expenses | 3,286,607 | 3,859,562 | 4,008,604 | 3,763,128 | 3,372,931 | $6.23 |
Total Expenses | $12,274,364 | $11,947,424 | $12,227,638 | $11,820,364 | $11,271,177 | $20.83 |
Net Operating Income | $25,944,427 | $28,591,885 | $29,919,970 | $29,848,392 | $30,209,945 | $55.84 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $232,624 | $0.43 |
TI/LC | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $324,592 | $0.60 |
Net Cash Flow | $25,944,427 | $28,591,885 | $29,919,970 | $29,848,392 | $29,652,729 | $54.81 |
| | | | | | |
Occupancy (%) | 97.9% | 97.5% | 99.3% | 96.1% | 95.4% | |
NCF DSCR(3) | 1.50x | 1.66x | 1.74x | 1.73x | 1.72x | |
NOI Debt Yield(3) | 11.8% | 13.0% | 13.6% | 13.6% | 13.7% | |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated June 30, 2024. |
| (2) | Includes underwritten Rent Steps through July 19, 2025. |
| (3) | Based on the Baybrook Mall Whole Loan as of the Cut-off Date. |
Multifamily – Garden 4104 South 130th East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74134 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 Union Point Apartments | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 71.6% 1.41x 9.6% |
Mortgage Loan Information | | Property Information |
Loan Seller: | CREFI | | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | | Property Type – Subtype: | Multifamily - Garden |
Borrower Sponsor(s): | Moshe Wechsler | | Collateral: | Fee |
Borrower(s): | Union Point Mazel LLC | | Location: | Tulsa, OK |
Original Balance: | $25,000,000 | | Year Built / Renovated: | 1982 / 2022 |
Cut-off Date Balance: | $25,000,000 | | Property Management: | CYM Living, LLC |
% by Initial UPB: | 2.8% | | Size: | 400 Units |
Interest Rate: | 6.40000% | | Appraised Value / Per Unit: | 34,900,000 / $87,250 |
Note Date: | July 5, 2024 | | Appraisal Date: | March 28, 2024 |
Original Term: | 60 months | | Occupancy: | 95.5% (as of April 24, 2024) |
Amortization: | Interest Only | | UW Economic Occupancy: | 94.5% |
Original Amortization: | NAP | | Underwritten NOI: | $2,392,881 |
Interest Only Period: | 60 months | | Underwritten NCFs: | $2,291,181 |
First Payment Date: | August 6, 2024 | | | |
Maturity Date: | July 6, 2029 | | Historical NOI |
Additional Debt Type: | NAP | | Most Recent NOI: | $2,522,675 (TTM March 31, 2024) |
Additional Debt Balance: | NAP | | 2023 NOI: | $2,436,325 |
Call Protection: | L(25),D(28),O(7) | | 2022 NOI(1): | NAV |
Lockbox / Cash Management: | Springing / Springing | | 2021 NOI(1): | NAV |
Reserves | | Financial Information |
| Initial | Monthly | Cap | | Cut-off Date Loan / Unit: | $62,500 |
Taxes: | $127,185 | $14,132 | NAP | | Maturity Date Loan / Unit: | $62,500 |
Insurance: | $77,846 | $25,949 | NAP | | Cut-off Date LTV: | 71.6% |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | $8,475 | NAP | | Maturity Date LTV: | 71.6% |
TI / LC: | $0 | $0 | NAP | | UW NOI DY: | 9.6% |
Deferred Maintenance: | $130,563 | $0 | NAP | | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.41x |
| | | | | | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total |
Mortgage Loan | $25,000,000 | 100.0% | | Loan Payoff | $21,888,606 | 87.6 | % |
| | | | Closing Costs(2) | 1,790,369 | 7.2 | |
| | | | Borrower Sponsor Equity | 985,431 | 3.9 | |
| | | | Upfront Reserves | 335,594 | 1.3 | |
Total Sources | $25,000,000 | 100.0% | | Total Uses | $25,000,000 | 100.0 | % |
| (1) | 2021 NOI and 2022 NOI information is not available because the Union Point Apartments property was renovated in 2022. |
| (2) | Closing Costs include a rate buydown fee of $1,000,000. |
Multifamily – Garden 4104 South 130th East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74134 | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 Union Point Apartments | Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV: U/W NCF DSCR: U/W NOI Debt Yield: | $25,000,000 71.6% 1.41x 9.6% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the unit mix at the Union Point Apartments property:
Unit Mix(1) |
Unit Type | # of Units | % of Total Units | Occupancy | Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.) | Average Monthly Rent Per Unit | Average Monthly Market Rent Per Unit(2) |
Studio | 80 | 20.0% | 100.0% | 550 | $626 | $795 |
1 BR/1BA | 240 | 60.0 | 93.3 | 750 | $694 | $870 |
2BR/2BA | 80 | 20.0 | 97.5 | 950 | $884 | $970 |
Total / Wtd Avg. | 400 | 100.0% | 95.5% | 750 | $718 | $875 |
| (1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated April 25, 2024. Average Monthly Rent Per Unit is based on occupied units. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Union Point Apartments property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) |
| 2023 | TTM 3/31/2024 | U/W | U/W Per Unit |
Base Rent | $3,478,237 | $3,543,662 | $3,292,560 | $8,231 |
Potential Income from Vacant Units | 0 | 0 | 190,320 | $476 |
Gross Potential Rent | $3,478,237 | $3,543,662 | $3,482,880 | $8,707 |
Other Income(2) | 367,368 | 391,936 | 464,194 | $1,160 |
Net Rental Income | $3,845,605 | $3,935,598 | $3,947,074 | $9,868 |
Vacancy Residential | (191,303) | (166,552) | (190,320) | ($476) |
Effective Gross Income | $3,654,302 | $3,769,046 | $3,756,754 | $9,392 |
| | | | |
Real Estate Taxes | 161,505 | 161,505 | 169,580 | $424 |
Insurance | 178,188 | 205,607 | 296,558 | $741 |
Management Fee | 91,358 | 94,226 | 112,703 | $282 |
Other Expenses(3) | 786,927 | 785,032 | 785,032 | $1,963 |
Total Expenses | $1,217,977 | $1,246,371 | $1,363,873 | $3,410 |
| | | | |
Net Operating Income | $2,436,325 | $2,522,675 | $2,392,881 | $5,982 |
Replacement Reserves | 0 | 0 | 101,700 | $254 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,436,325 | $2,522,675 | $2,291,181 | $5,728 |
| | | | |
Occupancy | 94.5% | 95.3% | 94.5%(4) | |
NCF DSCR | 1.50x | 1.56x | 1.41x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 9.7% | 10.1% | 9.6% | |
| (1) | Historical financial information before 2023 is not available because the Union Point Apartments property was renovated in 2022. |
| (2) | Other Income includes water and sewer utility income, lease termination fees income, late rent charges, and other miscellaneous income. |
| (3) | Other Expenses include payroll and benefits, repairs and maintenance, utilities, advertising and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. |
| (4) | Represents economic occupancy. |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX B
FORM OF DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Table of Contents |
Section | Pages |
Certificate Distribution Detail | 2 |
Certificate Factor Detail | 3 |
Certificate Interest Reconciliation Detail | 4 |
Additional Information | 5 |
Bond / Collateral Reconciliation - Cash Flows | 6 |
Bond / Collateral Reconciliation - Balances | 7 |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification | 8-12 |
Mortgage Loan Detail (Part 1) | 13 |
Mortgage Loan Detail (Part 2) | 14 |
Principal Prepayment Detail | 15 |
Historical Detail | 16 |
Delinquency Loan Detail | 17 |
Collateral Stratification and Historical Detail | 18 |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 1 | 19 |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 2 | 20 |
Modified Loan Detail | 21 |
Historical Liquidated Loan Detail | 22 |
Historical Bond / Collateral Loss Reconciliation Detail | 23 |
Interest Shortfall Detail - Collateral Level | 24 |
Supplemental Notes | 25 |
| |
| |
Contacts |
Role | Party and Contact Information |
Depositor | GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II | | |
| Attention: Scott Epperson | (212) 902-1000 | scott.epperson@gs.com; gs-refgsecuritization@gs.com |
| 200 West Street | New York, NY 10282 | United States |
Certificate Administrator | Computershare Trust Company, N.A. | | |
| Corporate Trust Services (CMBS) | | cctcmbsbondadmin@computershare.com; trustadministrationgroup@computershare.com |
| 9062 Old Annapolis Road | Columbia, MD 21045 | United States |
Master Servicer | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A. | | |
| Executive Vice President - Division Head | | askmidlandls.com |
| 10851 Mastin Street, Suite 700 | Overland Park, KS 66210 | United States |
Special Servicer | 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC | | |
| Attention: General Counsel | | compliance@3650REIT.com; servicing@3650reit.com |
| 2977 McFarlane Road, Suite 300 | Miami, FL 33133 | United States |
Operating Advisor & Asset Representations Reviewer | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | | |
| CMBS Notices | | cmbs.notices@parkbridgefinancial.com |
| 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor | New York, NY 10016 | United States |
Trustee | Computershare Trust Company, N.A. | | |
| Corporate Trust Services (CMBS) | | cctcmbsbondadmin@computershare.com; trustadministrationgroup@computershare.com |
| 9062 Old Annapolis Road | Columbia, MD 21045 | United States |
Directing Holder | 3650 Real Estate Investment Trust 2 LLC | | |
| - | | |
| |
| This report is compiled by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. from information provided by third parties. Computershare Trust Company, N.A. has not independently confirmed the accuracy of the information. |
| Please visit www.ctslink.com for additional information and if applicable, any special notices and any credit risk retention notices. In addition, certificate holders may register online for email notification when special notices are posted. For information or assistance please call 866-846-4526. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 1 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Certificate Distribution Detail |
Class | CUSIP | Pass-Through Rate (2) | | Original Balance | Beginning Balance | Principal Distribution | Interest Distribution | Prepayment Penalties | Realized Losses | Total Distribution | Ending Balance | Current Credit Support¹ | Original Credit Support¹ |
Regular Certificates |
A-1 | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
A-2 | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
A-3 | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
A-S | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
B | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
C | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
D | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
E-RR | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
F-RR | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
G-RR | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
J-RR | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
R | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Regular SubTotal | | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notional Certificates |
X-A | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
X-B | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
X-D | | 0.000000% | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
Notional SubTotal | | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deal Distribution Total | | | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | | |
* | Denotes the Controlling Class (if required) |
(1) | Calculated by taking (A) the sum of the ending certificate balance of all classes in a series less (B) the sum of (i) the ending certificate balance of the designated class and (ii) the ending certificate balance of all classes which are not subordinate to the designated class and dividing the result by (A). |
(2) | Pass-Through Rates with respect to any Class of Certificates on next month's Payment Date is expected to be the same as the current respective Pass-Through Rate, subject to any modifications on the underlying loans, any change in certificate or pool balance, any change in the underlying index (if and as applicable), and any other matters provided in the governing documents. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 2 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Certificate Factor Detail |
Class | CUSIP | Beginning Balance | Principal Distribution | Interest Distribution | Interest Shortfalls / (Paybacks) | Cumulative Interest Shortfalls | Prepayment Penalties | Realized Losses | Total Distribution | Ending Balance |
Regular Certificates |
A-1 | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
A-2 | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
A-3 | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
A-S | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
B | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
C | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
D | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
E-RR | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
F-RR | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
G-RR | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
J-RR | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
R | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Notional Certificates |
X-A | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
X-B | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
X-D | | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 3 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Certificate Interest Reconciliation Detail |
| Class | Accrual Period | Accrual Days | Prior Cumulative Interest Shortfalls | Accrued Certificate Interest | Net Aggregate Prepayment Interest Shortfall | Distributable Certificate Interest | Interest Shortfalls / (Paybacks) | Payback of Prior Realized Losses | Additional Interest Distribution Amount | Interest Distribution | Cumulative Interest Shortfalls | |
| A-1 | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| A-2 | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| A-3 | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| X-A | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| X-B | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| X-D | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| A-S | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| B | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| C | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| D | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| E-RR | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| F-RR | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| G-RR | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| J-RR | MM/DD/YY-MM/DD/YY | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Totals | | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 4 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
|
Total Available Distribution Amount (1) | 0.00 |
(1) | The Available Distribution Amount includes any Prepayment Premiums. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 5 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Bond / Collateral Reconciliation - Cash Flows
| Interest |
| | Interest Paid or Advanced | 0.00 |
| | Interest Reductions due to Nonrecoverability Determination | 0.00 |
| | Interest Adjustments | 0.00 |
| | Deferred Interest | 0.00 |
| | ARD Interest | 0.00 |
| | Net Prepayment Interest Excess / (Shortfall) | 0.00 |
| | Extension Interest | 0.00 |
| | Interest Reserve Withdrawal | 0.00 |
| | Total Interest Collected | 0.00 |
| Principal |
| | Scheduled Principal | 0.00 |
| | Unscheduled Principal Collections | |
| | Principal Prepayments | 0.00 |
| | Collection of Principal after Maturity Date | 0.00 |
| | Recoveries From Liquidations and Insurance Proceeds | 0.00 |
| | Excess of Prior Principal Amounts Paid | 0.00 |
| | Curtailments | 0.00 |
| | Negative Amortization | 0.00 |
| | Principal Adjustments | 0.00 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Total Principal Collected | 0.00 |
| Other |
| | Prepayment Penalties / Yield Maintenance | 0.00 |
| | Gain on Sale / Excess Liquidation Proceeds | 0.00 |
| | Borrower Option Extension Fees | 0.00 |
| | Total Other Collected | 0.00 |
| Total Funds Collected | 0.00 |
| Fees |
| | Master Servicing Fee | 0.00 |
| | Certificate Administrator Fee | 0.00 |
| | Trustee Fee | 0.00 |
| | CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee | 0.00 |
| | Operating Advisor Fee | 0.00 |
| | Asset Representations Reviewer Fee | 0.00 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Total Fees | 0.00 |
| Expenses/Reimbursements |
| | Reimbursement for Interest on Advances | 0.00 |
| | ASER Amount | 0.00 |
| | Special Servicing Fees (Monthly) | 0.00 |
| | Special Servicing Fees (Liquidation) | 0.00 |
| | Special Servicing Fees (Work Out) | 0.00 |
| | Legal Fees | 0.00 |
| | Rating Agency Expenses | 0.00 |
| | Taxes Imposed on Trust Fund | 0.00 |
| | Non-Recoverable Advances | 0.00 |
| | Workout Delayed Reimbursement Amounts | 0.00 |
| | Other Expenses | 0.00 |
| | Total Expenses/Reimbursements | 0.00 |
| Interest Reserve Deposit | 0.00 |
| Payments to Certificateholders and Others |
| | Interest Distribution | 0.00 |
| | Principal Distribution | 0.00 |
| | Prepayment Penalties / Yield Maintenance | 0.00 |
| | Total Payments to Certificateholders and Others | 0.00 |
| Total Funds Distributed | 0.00 |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 6 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Bond / Collateral Reconciliation - Balances
Collateral Reconciliation |
| | | | Total |
Beginning Scheduled Collateral Balance | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Scheduled Principal Collections | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Unscheduled Principal Collections | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Principal Adjustments (Cash) | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Principal Adjustments (Non-Cash) | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Realized Losses from Collateral | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
(-) Other Adjustments² | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
| | | | |
Ending Scheduled Collateral Balance | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
Beginning Actual Collateral Balance | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
Ending Actual Collateral Balance | 0.00 | | | 0.00 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Certificate Reconciliation |
| Total |
Beginning Certificate Balance | 0.00 |
(-) Principal Distributions | 0.00 |
(-) Realized Losses | 0.00 |
| Realized Loss and Realized Loss Adjustments on Collateral | 0.00 |
| Current Period NRA¹ | 0.00 |
| Current Period WODRA¹ | 0.00 |
| Principal Used to Pay Interest | 0.00 |
| Non-Cash Principal Adjustments | 0.00 |
| Certificate Other Adjustments** | 0.00 |
Ending Certificate Balance | 0.00 |
| |
| |
NRA/WODRA Reconciliation |
| Non-Recoverable Advances (NRA) from Principal | Workout Delayed Reimbursement of Advances (WODRA) from Principal |
Beginning Cumulative Advances | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Current Period Advances | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Ending Cumulative Advances | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| | |
Under / Over Collateralization Reconciliation |
Beginning UC / (OC) | 0.00 |
UC / (OC) Change | 0.00 |
Ending UC / (OC) | 0.00 |
Net WAC Rate | 0.00% |
UC / (OC) Interest | 0.00 |
(1) | Current Period NRA and WODRA displayed will represent the portion applied as Realized Losses to the bonds. |
(2) | Other Adjustments value will represent miscellaneous items that may impact the Scheduled Balance of the collateral. |
** | A negative value for Certificate Other Adjustments represents the payback of prior Principal Shortfalls, if any. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 7 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification
Aggregate Pool
Scheduled Balance |
Scheduled Balance | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio¹ |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
(1) | Debt Service Coverage Ratios are updated periodically as new NOI figures become available from borrowers on an asset level. In all cases the most current DSCR provided by the Servicer is used. To the extent that no DSCR is provided by the Servicer, information from the offering document is used. The debt service coverage ratio information was provided to the Certificate Administrator by the Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator has not independently confirmed the accuracy of such information. |
(2) | Anticipated Remaining Term and WAM are each calculated based upon the term from the current month to the earlier of the Anticipated Repayment Date, if applicable, and the Maturity Date. |
(3) | Data in this table was calculated by allocating pro-rata the current loan information to the properties based upon the Cut Off Date Balance of each property as disclosed in the offering document. The Scheduled Balance Totals reflect the aggregate balances of all pooled loans as reported in the CREFC Loan Periodic Update File. To the extent that the Scheduled Balance Total figure for the "State" and "Property" stratification tables is not equal to the sum of the scheduled balance figures for each state or property, the difference is explained by loans that have been modified into a split loan structure. The "State" and "Property" stratification tables do not include the balance of the subordinate note (sometimes called the B-piece or a "hope note") of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. Rather, the scheduled balance for each state or property only reflects the balance of the senior note (sometimes called the A-piece) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 8 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification
Aggregate Pool
State³ |
State | # Of Properties | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Property Type³ |
Property Type | # Of Properties | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Note: Please refer to footnotes on the next page of the report.
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 9 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification
Aggregate Pool
Note Rate |
Note Rate | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Seasoning |
Seasoning | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
(1) | Debt Service Coverage Ratios are updated periodically as new NOI figures become available from borrowers on an asset level. In all cases the most current DSCR provided by the Servicer is used. To the extent that no DSCR is provided by the Servicer, information from the offering document is used. The debt service coverage ratio information was provided to the Certificate Administrator by the Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator has not independently confirmed the accuracy of such information. |
(2) | Anticipated Remaining Term and WAM are each calculated based upon the term from the current month to the earlier of the Anticipated Repayment Date, if applicable, and the Maturity Date. |
(3) | Data in this table was calculated by allocating pro-rata the current loan information to the properties based upon the Cut Off Date Balance of each property as disclosed in the offering document. The Scheduled Balance Totals reflect the aggregate balances of all pooled loans as reported in the CREFC Loan Periodic Update File. To the extent that the Scheduled Balance Total figure for the "State" and "Property" stratification tables is not equal to the sum of the scheduled balance figures for each state or property, the difference is explained by loans that have been modified into a split loan structure. The "State" and "Property" stratification tables do not include the balance of the subordinate note (sometimes called the B-piece or a "hope note") of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. Rather, the scheduled balance for each state or property only reflects the balance of the senior note (sometimes called the A-piece) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 10 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification
Aggregate Pool
Anticipated Remaining Term (ARD and Balloon Loans) |
Anticipated Remaining Term | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Remaining Amortization Term (ARD and Balloon Loans) |
Remaining Amortization Term | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
(1) | Debt Service Coverage Ratios are updated periodically as new NOI figures become available from borrowers on an asset level. In all cases the most current DSCR provided by the Servicer is used. To the extent that no DSCR is provided by the Servicer, information from the offering document is used. The debt service coverage ratio information was provided to the Certificate Administrator by the Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator has not independently confirmed the accuracy of such information. |
(2) | Anticipated Remaining Term and WAM are each calculated based upon the term from the current month to the earlier of the Anticipated Repayment Date, if applicable, and the Maturity Date. |
(3) | Data in this table was calculated by allocating pro-rata the current loan information to the properties based upon the Cut Off Date Balance of each property as disclosed in the offering document. The Scheduled Balance Totals reflect the aggregate balances of all pooled loans as reported in the CREFC Loan Periodic Update File. To the extent that the Scheduled Balance Total figure for the "State" and "Property" stratification tables is not equal to the sum of the scheduled balance figures for each state or property, the difference is explained by loans that have been modified into a split loan structure. The "State" and "Property" stratification tables do not include the balance of the subordinate note (sometimes called the B-piece or a "hope note") of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. Rather, the scheduled balance for each state or property only reflects the balance of the senior note (sometimes called the A-piece) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 11 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification
Aggregate Pool
Age of Most Recent NOI |
Age of Most Recent NOI | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
Remaining Stated Term (Fully Amortizing Loans) |
Age of Most Recent NOI | # Of Loans | Scheduled Balance | % Of Agg. Bal. | WAM² | WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR¹ |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | |
(1) | Debt Service Coverage Ratios are updated periodically as new NOI figures become available from borrowers on an asset level. In all cases the most current DSCR provided by the Servicer is used. To the extent that no DSCR is provided by the Servicer, information from the offering document is used. The debt service coverage ratio information was provided to the Certificate Administrator by the Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator has not independently confirmed the accuracy of such information. |
(2) | Anticipated Remaining Term and WAM are each calculated based upon the term from the current month to the earlier of the Anticipated Repayment Date, if applicable, and the Maturity Date. |
(3) | Data in this table was calculated by allocating pro-rata the current loan information to the properties based upon the Cut Off Date Balance of each property as disclosed in the offering document. The Scheduled Balance Totals reflect the aggregate balances of all pooled loans as reported in the CREFC Loan Periodic Update File. To the extent that the Scheduled Balance Total figure for the "State" and "Property" stratification tables is not equal to the sum of the scheduled balance figures for each state or property, the difference is explained by loans that have been modified into a split loan structure. The "State" and "Property" stratification tables do not include the balance of the subordinate note (sometimes called the B-piece or a "hope note") of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. Rather, the scheduled balance for each state or property only reflects the balance of the senior note (sometimes called the A-piece) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 12 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Mortgage Loan Detail (Part 1) |
Pros ID | Loan ID | Loan Group | Prop Type | City | State | Interest Accrual Type | Gross Rate | Scheduled Interest | Scheduled Principal | Principal Adjustments | Anticipated Repay Date | Original Maturity Date | Adjusted Maturity Date | Beginning Scheduled Balance | Ending Scheduled Balance | Paid Through Date |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 Property Type Codes |
| | HC - Health Care | MU - Mixed Use | WH - Warehouse | MF - Multi-Family |
| | SS - Self Storage | LO - Lodging | RT - Retail | SF - Single Family Rental |
| | 98 - Other | IN - Industrial | OF - Office | MH - Mobile Home Park |
| | SE - Securities | CH - Cooperative Housing | ZZ - Missing Information/Undefined | |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 13 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Mortgage Loan Detail (Part 2) |
Pros ID | Loan Group | Most Recent Fiscal NOI | Most Recent NOI | Most Recent NOI Start Date | Most Recent NOI End Date | Appraisal Reduction Date | Appraisal Reduction Amount | Cumulative ASER | Current P&I Advances | Cumulative P&I Advances | Cumulative Servicer Advances | Current NRA/WODRA from Principal | Defease Status |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 14 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Principal Prepayment Detail |
| | | Unscheduled Principal | Prepayment Premiums |
Pros ID | Loan Number | Loan Group | Amount | | Prepayment / Liquidation Code | Prepayment Premium Amount | Yield Maintenance Amount |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | |
| Note: Principal Prepayment Amount listed here may include Principal Adjustment Amounts on the loan in addition to the Unscheduled Principal Amount. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 15 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Historical Detail |
| Delinquencies¹ | Prepayments | Rate and Maturities |
| 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | Foreclosure | REO | Modifications | Curtailments | Payoff | Next Weighted Avg. | |
Distribution Date | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Amount | # | Amount | Coupon | Remit | WAM¹ |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Foreclosure and REO Totals are included in the delinquencies aging categories. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 16 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Delinquency Loan Detail |
Pros ID | Loan ID | Paid Through Date | Months Delinquent | Mortgage Loan Status¹ | Current P&I Advances | Outstanding P&I Advances | Outstanding Servicer Advances | Actual Principal Balance | Servicing Transfer Date | Resolution Strategy Code² | Bankruptcy Date | Foreclosure Date | REO Date |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 1 Mortgage Loan Status |
| | A - Payment Not Received But Still in Grace Period | 0 - Current | 4 - Performing Matured Balloon |
| | B - Late Payment But Less Than 30 days Delinquent | 1 - 30-59 Days Delinquent | 5 - Non Performing Matured Balloon |
| | | 2 - 60-89 Days Delinquent | 6 - 121+ Days Delinquent |
| | | 3 - 90-120 Days Delinquent | |
| | | | |
| 2 Resolution Strategy Code |
| | 1 - Modification | 6 - DPO | 10 - Deed in Lieu of Foreclosures |
| | 2 - Foreclosure | 7 - REO | 11- Full Payoff |
| | 3 - Bankruptcy | 8 - Resolved | 12 - Reps and Warranties |
| | 4 - Extension | 9 - Pending Return to Master Servicer | 13 - TBD |
| | 5 - Note Sale | 98 - Other | |
| Note: Outstanding P & I Advances include the current period advance. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 17 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Collateral Stratification and Historical Detail
Maturity Dates and Loan Status¹ |
| Total | Performing | Non-Performing | REO/Foreclosure |
| ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg002.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg003.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg004.jpg) |
Past Maturity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 - 6 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 - 12 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13 - 24 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25 - 36 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37 - 48 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
49 - 60 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 60 Months | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Historical Delinquency Information |
| Total | Current | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90+ Days | REO/Foreclosure |
| ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg005.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg006.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg007.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg008.jpg) | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg009.jpg) |
Sep-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aug-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jul-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jun-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
May-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Apr-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mar-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Feb-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jan-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dec-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nov-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oct-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(1) | Maturity dates used in this chart are based on the dates provided by the Master Servicer in the Loan Periodic File. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 18 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 1 |
Pros ID | Loan ID | Ending Scheduled Balance | Actual Balance | Appraisal Value | Appraisal Date | Net Operating Income | DSCR | DSCR Date | Maturity Date | Remaining Amort Term |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | | | | |
|
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 19 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 2 |
Pros ID | Loan ID | Property Type¹ | State | Servicing Transfer Date | Resolution Strategy Code² | Special Servicing Comments |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | |
| |
| 1 Property Type Codes |
| | HC - Health Care | MU - Mixed Use | WH - Warehouse |
| | MF - Multi-Family | SS - Self Storage | LO - Lodging |
| | RT - Retail | SF - Single Family Rental | 98 - Other |
| | IN - Industrial | OF - Office | MH - Mobile Home Park |
�� | | SE - Securities | CH - Cooperative Housing | ZZ - Missing Information/Undefined |
| 2 Resolution Strategy Code |
| | 1 - Modification | 6 - DPO | 10 - Deed in Lieu of Foreclosures |
| | 2 - Foreclosure | 7 - REO | 11- Full Payoff |
| | 3 - Bankruptcy | 8 - Resolved | 12 - Reps and Warranties |
| | 4 - Extension | 9 - Pending Return to Master Servicer | 13 - TBD |
| | 5 - Note Sale | 98 - Other | |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 20 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Modified Loan Detail
| | | Pre-Modification | Post-Modification | | | Modification | Modification |
Pros ID | Loan Number | | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Modification Code¹ | Modification Booking Date | Closing Date | Effective Date |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Totals | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Modification Codes |
| 1 - Maturity Date Extension | 5 - Temporary Rate Reduction | 8 - Other | |
| 2 - Amortization Change | 6 - Capitalization on Interest | 9 - Combination | |
| 3 - Principal Write-Off | 7 - Capitalization on Taxes | 10 - Forbearance | |
| | | | |
| Note: Please refer to Servicer Reports for modification comments. |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 21 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Historical Liquidated Loan Detail |
Pros ID¹ | Loan Number | Dist.Date | Loan Beginning Scheduled Balance | Most Recent Appraised Value or BPO | Gross Sales Proceeds or Other Proceeds | Fees, Advances, and Expenses | Net Proceeds Received on Liquidation | Net Proceeds Available for Distribution | Realized Loss to Loan | Current Period Adjustment to Loan | Cumulative Adjustment to Loan | Loss to Loan with Cumulative Adjustment | Percent of Original Loan Balance |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current Period Totals | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative Totals | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Note: Fees, Advances and Expenses also include outstanding P & I advances and unpaid fees (servicing, trustee, etc.). |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 22 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Historical Bond / Collateral Loss Reconciliation Detail |
Pros ID | Loan Number | Distribution Date | Certificate Interest Paid from Collateral Principal Collections | Reimb of Prior Realized Losses from Collateral Interest Collections | Aggregate Realized Loss to Loan | Loss Covered by Credit Support/Deal Structure | Loss Applied to Certificate Interest Payment | Loss Applied to Certificate Balance | Non-Cash Principal Adjustment | Realized Losses from NRA/WODRA | Total Loss Applied to Certificate Balance |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Current Period Totals | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative Totals | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 23 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Interest Shortfall Detail - Collateral Level
Pros ID | Interest Adjustments | Deferred Interest Collected | Special Servicing Fees | ASER | PPIS / (PPIE) | Non- Recoverable Interest | Interest on Advances | Reimbursement of Advances from Interest | Other Shortfalls / (Refunds) | Modified Interest Reduction / (Excess) |
Monthly | Liquidation | Work Out |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Interest Adjustments listed for each loan do not include amounts that were used to adjust the Weighted Average Net Rate of the mortgage loans. | Collateral Shortfall Total | 0.00 |
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 24 of 25 |
Distribution Date: | 09/17/24 | Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust | ![](https://capedge.com/proxy/424B2/0001539497-24-001728/n4397ddsimg001.jpg) |
Determination Date: | 09/11/24 |
Record Date: | 08/30/24 | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2024-V9 |
| | | |
Supplemental Notes
© 2021 Computershare. All rights reserved. Confidential. | Page 25 of 25 |
ANNEX C
FORM OF OPERATING ADVISOR ANNUAL REPORT1
Report Date: This report will be delivered annually no later than [INSERT DATE], pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2024 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, 3650 REIT Loan Servicing LLC, as special servicer, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as certificate administrator and as trustee, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor and as asset representations reviewer.
Transaction: Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2024-V9
Operating Advisor: Park Bridge Lender Services LLC
Special Servicer as of December 31, 20[__]: [______]
Directing Holder: [______]
I. Population of Mortgage Loans that Were Considered in Compiling this Report
| 1. | The Special Servicer has notified the Operating Advisor that [●] Specially Serviced Loans were transferred to special servicing in the prior calendar year [INSERT YEAR]. |
| a. | [●] of those Specially Serviced Loans are still being analyzed by the Special Servicer as part of the development of [a Final] Asset Status Report. |
| b. | [Final] Asset Status Reports were issued with respect to [●] of such Specially Serviced Loans. This report is based only on the Specially Serviced Loans in respect of which [a Final] Asset Status Report has been issued. The [Final] Asset Status Reports may not yet be fully implemented. |
| 2. | Prior to an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, if one Mortgage Loan is in special servicing and if the Special Servicer has subsequently completed a Major Decision with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer has provided the applicable fully executed Major Decision Reporting Package approved or deemed approved by the Directing Holder to the Operating Advisor concurrently with delivery to the Directing Holder. |
| 3. | After an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the Special Servicer has provided to the Operating Advisor: |
| a. | with respect to each Major Decision for the following non-Specially Serviced Loans, the related Major Decision Reporting Package and the opportunity to consult with respect to such Major Decision and recommended action: |
1 This report is an indicative report and does not reflect the final form of annual report to be used in any particular year. The Operating Advisor will have the ability to modify or alter the organization and content of any particular report, subject to the compliance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including, without limitation, provisions relating to Privileged Information.
| b. | with respect to following Specially Serviced Loans, each related Asset Status Report and the opportunity to consult with respect to such recommended action: |
II. Executive Summary
Based on the requirements and qualifications set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as well as the items listed below, the Operating Advisor (in accordance with the Operating Advisor’s analysis requirements outlined in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) has undertaken a limited review of the Special Servicer’s actions under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement on the loans identified in this report. Based solely on such limited review of the items listed below, and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth herein, the Operating Advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the Special Servicer [is/is not] operating in compliance with the Servicing Standard with respect to its performance of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the prior calendar year on an “asset-level” basis. [The Operating Advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the Special Servicer has failed to comply with the Servicing Standard, as a result of the following material deviations.]
| ● | [LIST OF MATERIAL DEVIATION ITEMS] |
In addition, the Operating Advisor notes the following: [PROVIDE SUMMARY OF ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION].
[ADD RECOMMENDATION OF REPLACEMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICER, IF APPLICABLE]
III. List of Items that Were Considered in Compiling this Report
In rendering our assessment herein, we examined and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the items listed below:
| 1. | Any Major Decision Reporting Package that is delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor by the Special Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
| 2. | Reports by the Special Servicer made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website that is relevant to the Operating Advisor’s obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each Asset Status Report (after an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), and each Final Asset Status Report, in each case, delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
| 3. | The Special Servicer’s assessment of compliance report, attestation report by a third party regarding the Special Servicer’s compliance with its obligations and net present value calculations and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
| 4. | [LIST OTHER REVIEWED INFORMATION]. |
| 5. | [INSERT IF AFTER AN OPERATING ADVISOR CONSULTATION EVENT: Consulted with the Special Servicer as provided under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement on Asset Status Reports for a Specially Serviced Loan delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and with respect to Major Decisions processed by the Special Servicer.] |
NOTE: The Operating Advisor’s review of the above materials should be considered a limited review and not be considered a full or limited audit, legal review or legal conclusion. For instance, we did not review each page of the Special Servicer’s policy and procedure manuals (including amendments and
appendices), review underlying lease agreements or similar underlying documents, re-engineer the quantitative aspects of their net present value calculator, visit any related property, visit the Special Servicer, visit the Directing Holder or interact with any borrower. In addition, our review of the net present value calculations and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations is limited to the mathematical accuracy of the calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portions of the applicable formulas, and as such, does not take into account the reasonableness of the discretionary portions of such formulas.
IV. Assumptions, Qualifications and Disclaimers Related to the Work Product Undertaken and Opinions Related to this Report
| 1. | As provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Operating Advisor (i) is not required to report on instances of non-compliance with, or deviations from, the Servicing Standard or the special servicer’s obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that the Operating Advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, to be immaterial and (ii) will not be required to provide or obtain a legal opinion, legal review or legal conclusion. |
| 2. | In rendering our assessment herein, we have assumed that all executed factual statements, instruments, and other documents that we have relied upon in rendering this assessment have been executed by persons with legal capacity to execute such documents. |
| 3. | Other than the receipt of any Major Decision Reporting Package or any Asset Status Report that is delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Operating Advisor did not participate in, or have access to, the Special Servicer’s and Directing Holder’s discussion(s) regarding any Specially Serviced Loan. The Operating Advisor does not have authority to speak with the Directing Holder directly. As such, the Operating Advisor relied solely upon the information delivered to it by the Special Servicer as well as its interaction with the Special Servicer, if any, in gathering the relevant information to generate this report. The services that we perform are not designed and cannot be relied upon to detect fraud or illegal acts should any exist. |
| 4. | The Special Servicer has the legal authority and responsibility to service any Specially Serviced Loan pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Operating Advisor has no responsibility or authority to alter the standards set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the actions of the Special Servicer. |
| 5. | Confidentiality and other contractual limitations limit the Operating Advisor’s ability to outline the details or substance of any communication held between it and the Special Servicer regarding any Specially Serviced Loan and certain information it reviewed in connection with its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. As a result, this report may not reflect all the relevant information that the Operating Advisor is given access to by the Special Servicer. |
| 6. | The Operating Advisor is not empowered to speak with any investors directly. If the investors have questions regarding this report, they should address such questions to the certificate administrator through the certificate administrator’s website. |
| 7. | This report does not constitute recommendations to buy, sell or hold any security, nor does the Operating Advisor take into account market prices of securities or financial markets generally when performing its limited review of the Special Servicer as described above. The Operating Advisor does not have a fiduciary relationship with any Certificateholder or any other party or individual. Nothing is intended to or should be construed as creating a fiduciary relationship between the Operating Advisor and any Certificateholder, party or individual. |
Terms used but not defined in this report have the meaning set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX D-1
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
GSMC will in its MLPA, with respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan, make the representations and warranties set forth below as of the Cut-off Date or such other date specified below, in each case subject to the exceptions to those representations and warranties that are described on Annex D-2. Prior to the execution of the related final MLPA, there may be additions, subtractions or other modifications to the representations, warranties and exceptions. These representations, warranties and exceptions should not be read alone, but should only be read in conjunction with the prospectus. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Annex D-1 will have the meanings set forth in this prospectus or, if not defined in this prospectus, in the related MLPA.
The related MLPA, together with the related representations and warranties (subject to the exceptions thereto), serves to contractually allocate risk between GSMC, on the one hand, and the issuing entity, on the other. The representations and warranties are not intended to be disclosure statements regarding the characteristics of the related mortgage loans, Mortgaged Properties or other subjects discussed, but rather are intended as a risk allocation mechanism. We cannot assure you that the mortgage loans actually conform to the statements made in the representations and warranties that are presented below. The representations, warranties and exceptions have been provided to you for informational purposes only and prospective investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and exceptions as a basis for any investment decision. For disclosure regarding the characteristics, risks and other information regarding the mortgage loans, Mortgaged Properties and the certificates, you should read and rely solely on the prospectus. None of the depositor or the underwriters or their respective affiliates makes any representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of the representations, warranties and exceptions.
(1) Whole Loan; Ownership of Mortgage Loans. Except with respect to a GSMC Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, each GSMC Mortgage Loan is a whole loan and not a participation interest in a GSMC Mortgage Loan. Each GSMC Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan is a senior or pari passu portion of a whole loan evidenced by a senior or pari passu note. At the time of the sale, transfer and assignment to the depositor, no Mortgage Note or Mortgage was subject to any assignment (other than assignments to GSMC), participation or pledge, and GSMC had good title to, and was the sole owner of, each GSMC Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, charges, pledges, encumbrances, participations, any other ownership interests on, in or to such GSMC Mortgage Loan other than any servicing rights appointment, or similar agreement, any Non-Serviced PSA with respect to a GSMC Mortgage Loan and rights of the holder of a related Companion Loan pursuant to a Co-Lender Agreement. GSMC has full right and authority to sell, assign and transfer each GSMC Mortgage Loan, and the assignment to Depositor constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment of each GSMC Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, pledges, charges or security interests of any nature encumbering any GSMC Mortgage Loan other than the rights of the holder of a related Companion Loan pursuant to a Co-Lender Agreement.
(2) Loan Document Status. Each related Mortgage Note, Mortgage, assignment of leases (if a separate instrument), guaranty and other agreement executed by or on behalf of the related mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor in connection with such GSMC Mortgage Loan is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the related mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor (subject to any non-recourse provisions contained in any of the foregoing agreements and any applicable state anti-deficiency or market value limit deficiency legislation), as applicable, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except (i) as such enforcement may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (ii) that certain provisions in such Mortgage Loan documents (including, without limitation, provisions requiring the payment of default interest, late fees or prepayment/yield maintenance fees, charges and/or premiums) are, or may be, further limited or rendered unenforceable by or under
applicable law, but (subject to the limitations set forth in clause (i) above) such limitations or unenforceability will not render such Mortgage Loan documents invalid as a whole or materially interfere with the Mortgagee’s realization of the principal benefits and/or security provided thereby (clauses (i) and (ii) collectively, the “Standard Qualifications”).
Except as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence, there is no valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right of rescission available to the related mortgagor with respect to any of the related Mortgage Notes, Mortgages or other Mortgage Loan documents, including, without limitation, any such valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right based on intentional fraud by GSMC in connection with the origination of any GSMC Mortgage Loan, that would deny the Mortgagee the principal benefits intended to be provided by the Mortgage Note, Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents.
(3) Mortgage Provisions. The Mortgage Loan documents for each GSMC Mortgage Loan contain provisions that render the rights and remedies of the holder thereof adequate for the practical realization against the related Mortgaged Property of the principal benefits of the security intended to be provided thereby, including realization by judicial or, if applicable, nonjudicial foreclosure subject to the limitations set forth in the Standard Qualifications.
(4) Mortgage Status; Waivers and Modifications. Since origination and except by written instruments set forth in the related Mortgage File or as otherwise provided in the related Mortgage Loan documents (a) the material terms of such Mortgage, Mortgage Note, GSMC Mortgage Loan guaranty and related Mortgage Loan documents have not been waived, impaired, modified, altered, satisfied, canceled, subordinated or rescinded in any respect; (b) no related Mortgaged Property or any portion thereof has been released from the lien of the related Mortgage in any manner which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the use or operation of the remaining portion of such Mortgaged Property; and (c) neither the related mortgagor nor the related guarantor has been released from its material obligations under the related GSMC Mortgage Loan.
(5) Lien; Valid Assignment. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each assignment of Mortgage and assignment of assignment of leases to the issuing entity (or, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the related Non-Serviced Trustee) constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment to the issuing entity (or, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the related Non-Serviced Trustee). Each related Mortgage and assignment of leases is freely assignable without the consent of the related mortgagor. Each related Mortgage is a legal, valid and enforceable first lien on the related Mortgagor’s fee (or if identified on the mortgage loan schedule attached to the related MLPA, leasehold) interest in the related Mortgaged Property in the principal amount of such GSMC Mortgage Loan or allocated loan amount (subject only to Permitted Encumbrances (as defined below) and the exceptions to paragraph (6) set forth on Annex D-2 (each such exception, a “Title Exception”)), except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. Such Mortgaged Property (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions) as of origination was, and as of the Cut-off Date, to GSMC’s knowledge, is free and clear of any recorded mechanics’ liens, recorded materialmen’s liens and other recorded encumbrances which are prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below), and, to GSMC’s knowledge and subject to the rights of tenants (as tenants only) (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions), no rights exist which under law could give rise to any such lien or encumbrance that would be prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below). Notwithstanding anything in this representation to the contrary, no representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of Uniform Commercial Code financing statements is required in order to effect such perfection.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance. Each Mortgaged Property securing a GSMC Mortgage Loan is covered by an American Land Title Association loan title insurance policy or a comparable form of loan title insurance policy approved for use in the applicable jurisdiction (or, if such policy is yet to be issued, by a pro forma policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment, in each case binding on the title insurer) (the “Title Policy”) in the original principal amount of such GSMC
Mortgage Loan (or with respect to a GSMC Mortgage Loan secured by multiple properties, an amount equal to at least the allocated loan amount with respect to the Title Policy for each such property) after all advances of principal (including any advances held in escrow or reserves), that insures for the benefit of the owner of the indebtedness secured by the Mortgage, the first priority lien of the Mortgage, which lien is subject only to (a) the lien of current real property taxes, water charges, sewer rents and assessments due and payable but not yet delinquent; (b) covenants, conditions and restrictions, rights of way, easements and other matters of public record; (c) the exceptions (general and specific) and exclusions set forth in such Title Policy; (d) other matters to which like properties are commonly subject; (e) the rights of tenants (as tenants only) under leases (including subleases) pertaining to the related Mortgaged Property and condominium declarations; (f) if the related GSMC Mortgage Loan constitutes a cross-collateralized GSMC Mortgage Loan, the lien of the Mortgage for another GSMC Mortgage Loan contained in the same Crossed Group; and (g) if the related GSMC Mortgage Loan is part of a Whole Loan, the rights of the holder(s) of any related Companion Loan(s) pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement; provided that none of items (a) through (g), individually or in the aggregate, materially and adversely interferes with the value or current use of the Mortgaged Property or the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the mortgagor’s ability to pay its obligations when they become due (collectively, the “Permitted Encumbrances”). Except as contemplated by clauses (f) and (g) of the preceding sentence, none of the Permitted Encumbrances are mortgage liens that are senior to or coordinate and co-equal with the lien of the related Mortgage. Such Title Policy (or, if it has yet to be issued, the coverage to be provided thereby) is in full force and effect, all premiums thereon have been paid and no claims have been made by GSMC thereunder and no claims have been paid thereunder. Neither GSMC, nor to GSMC’s knowledge, any other holder of a GSMC Mortgage Loan, has done, by act or omission, anything that would materially impair the coverage under such Title Policy.
(7) Junior Liens. It being understood that B notes secured by the same Mortgage as a GSMC Mortgage Loan are not subordinate mortgages or junior liens, except for any GSMC Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another GSMC Mortgage Loan, there are no subordinate mortgages or junior liens securing the payment of money encumbering the related Mortgaged Property (other than Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, taxes and assessments, mechanics and materialmens liens (which are the subject of the representation in paragraph (5) above), and equipment and other personal property financing). Except as set forth on Schedule D-1 to this Annex D-1, GSMC has no knowledge of any mezzanine debt secured directly by interests in the related mortgagor.
(8) Assignment of Leases and Rents. There exists as part of the related Mortgage File an assignment of leases (either as a separate instrument or incorporated into the related Mortgage). Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, each related assignment of leases creates a valid first-priority collateral assignment of, or a valid first-priority lien or security interest in, rents and certain rights under the related lease or leases, subject only to a license granted to the related mortgagor to exercise certain rights and to perform certain obligations of the lessor under such lease or leases, including the right to operate the related leased property, except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. The related Mortgage or related assignment of leases, subject to applicable law, provides that, upon an event of default under each GSMC Mortgage Loan, a receiver is permitted to be appointed for the collection of rents or for the related Mortgagee to enter into possession to collect the rents or for rents to be paid directly to the Mortgagee.
(9) UCC Filings. If the related Mortgaged Property is operated as a hospitality property, GSMC has filed and/or recorded or caused to be filed and/or recorded (or, if not filed and/or recorded, submitted in proper form for filing and/or recording), UCC financing statements in the appropriate public filing and/or recording offices necessary at the time of the origination of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan to perfect a valid security interest in all items of physical personal property reasonably necessary to operate such Mortgaged Property owned by such mortgagor and located on the related Mortgaged Property (other than any non-material personal property, any personal property subject to a purchase money security interest, a sale and leaseback financing arrangement as permitted under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or any other personal property leases applicable to such personal property), to the extent perfection may be effected pursuant to applicable law by recording or filing, as the case may be. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each related Mortgage (or equivalent document) creates a valid and
enforceable lien and security interest on the items of personalty described above. No representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of UCC financing statements are required in order to effect such perfection.
(10) Condition of Property. GSMC or the originator of each GSMC Mortgage Loan inspected or caused to be inspected each related Mortgaged Property within six (6) months of origination of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan and within thirteen months of the Cut-off Date.
An engineering report or property condition assessment was prepared in connection with the origination of each GSMC Mortgage Loan no more than thirteen months prior to the Cut-off Date. To GSMC’s knowledge, based solely upon due diligence customarily performed in connection with the origination of comparable mortgage loans, as of the Closing Date, each related Mortgaged Property was free and clear of any material damage (other than deferred maintenance for which escrows were established at origination) that would affect materially and adversely the use or value of such Mortgaged Property as security for the GSMC Mortgage Loan.
(11) Taxes and Assessments. All taxes, governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges (including, without limitation, water and sewage charges), or installments thereof, which could be a lien on the related Mortgaged Property that would be of equal or superior priority to the lien of the Mortgage and that prior to the Cut-off Date have become delinquent in respect of each related Mortgaged Property have been paid, or an escrow of funds has been established in an amount sufficient to cover such payments and reasonably estimated interest and penalties, if any, thereon. For purposes of this representation and warranty, real estate taxes and governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges and installments thereof will not be considered delinquent until the earlier of (a) the date on which interest and/or penalties would first be payable thereon and (b) the date on which enforcement action is entitled to be taken by the related taxing authority.
(12) Condemnation. As of the date of origination and to GSMC’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding pending, and, to GSMC’s knowledge as of the date of origination and as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding threatened, for the total or partial condemnation of any Mortgaged Property that would have a material adverse effect on the value, use or operation of such Mortgaged Property.
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan. To GSMC’s knowledge, based on evaluation of the Title Policy (as defined in paragraph (6)), an engineering report or property condition assessment as described in paragraph (10), applicable local law compliance materials as described in paragraph (24), and the ESA (as defined in paragraph (40)), as of origination, there was no pending or filed action, suit or proceeding, arbitration or governmental investigation involving any mortgagor, guarantor, or mortgagor’s interest in the related Mortgaged Property, an adverse outcome of which would reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect (a) such mortgagor’s title to such Mortgaged Property, (b) the validity or enforceability of the Mortgage, (c) such mortgagor’s ability to perform under the related GSMC Mortgage Loan, (d) such guarantor’s ability to perform under the related guaranty, (e) the principal benefit of the security intended to be provided by the related Mortgage Loan documents or (f) the current principal use of such Mortgaged Property.
(14) Escrow Deposits. All escrow deposits and payments required to be escrowed with any Mortgagee pursuant to each GSMC Mortgage Loan are in the possession, or under the control, of GSMC or its servicer, and there are no deficiencies (subject to any applicable grace or cure periods) in connection therewith, and all such escrows and deposits (or the right thereto) that are required to be escrowed with the related Mortgagee under the related Mortgage Loan documents are being conveyed by GSMC to the Depositor or its servicer.
(15) No Holdbacks. The principal amount of each GSMC Mortgage Loan stated on the mortgage loan schedule attached to the related MLPA has been fully disbursed as of the Closing Date and there is no requirement for future advances thereunder (except in those cases where the full amount of the GSMC Mortgage Loan has been disbursed but a portion thereof is being held in escrow or reserve
accounts pending the satisfaction of certain conditions relating to leasing, repairs or other matters with respect to the related Mortgaged Property, the mortgagor or other considerations determined by GSMC to merit such holdback).
(16) Insurance. Each related Mortgaged Property is, and is required pursuant to the related Mortgage to be, insured by a property insurance policy providing coverage for loss in accordance with coverage found under a “special cause of loss form” or “all risk form” that includes replacement cost valuation issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents and meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements (as defined below), in an amount (subject to a customary deductible) not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan and (2) the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements, furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment owned by the related mortgagor and included in such Mortgaged Property (with no deduction for physical depreciation), but, in any event, not less than the amount necessary or containing such endorsements as are necessary to avoid the operation of any coinsurance provisions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property.
“Insurance Rating Requirements” means either (i) a claims paying or financial strength rating of at least “A-:VIII” from A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or “A-” from S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or (ii) the Syndicate Insurance Rating Requirements. “Syndicate Insurance Rating Requirements” means insurance provided by a syndicate of insurers, as to which (i) if such syndicate consists of 5 or more members, at least 60% of the coverage is provided by insurers that meet the Insurance Rating Requirements (under clause (i) of the definition of such term) and up to 40% of the coverage is provided by insurers that have a claims paying or financial strength rating of at least “BBB-” by S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or at least “Baa3” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and (ii) if such syndicate consists of 4 or fewer members, at least 75% of the coverage is provided by insurers that meet the Insurance Rating Requirements (under clause (i) of the definition of such term) and up to 25% of the coverage is provided by insurers that have a claims paying or financial strength rating of at least “BBB-” by S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or at least “Baa3” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Each related Mortgaged Property is also covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by business interruption or rental loss insurance which (subject to a customary deductible) covers a period of not less than 12 months (or with respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan on a single asset with a principal balance of $50 million or more, 18 months).
If any material part of the improvements, exclusive of a parking lot, located on a Mortgaged Property is in an area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a “Special Flood Hazard Area,” the related mortgagor is required to maintain insurance in the maximum amount available under the National Flood Insurance Program (irrespective of whether such coverage is provided pursuant to a National Flood Insurance Program policy or through a private policy), plus such additional flood coverage in an amount as is generally required by GSMC for comparable mortgage loans intended for securitization.
If a Mortgaged Property is located within 25 miles of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic coast of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or North Carolina, the related mortgagor is required to maintain coverage for windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or “named storms” issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements or endorsement covering damage from windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or named storms, in an amount not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan and (2) 100% of the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements and personalty and fixtures included in the related Mortgaged Property by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements.
Each Mortgaged Property is covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by a commercial general liability insurance policy issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements including coverage for property damage, contractual damage and personal injury (including bodily injury and death) in amounts as are generally required by prudent institutional commercial mortgage lenders, and in any event not less than $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in the aggregate.
An architectural or engineering consultant has performed an analysis of each Mortgaged Property located in seismic zones 3 or 4 in order to evaluate the structural and seismic condition of such property, for the sole purpose of assessing the scenario expected limit (“SEL”) for the related Mortgaged Property in the event of an earthquake. In such instance, the SEL was based on a 475-year return period, an exposure period of 50 years and a 10% probability of exceedance. If the resulting report concluded that the SEL would exceed 20% of the amount of the replacement costs of the improvements, earthquake insurance on such Mortgaged Property was obtained from an insurer rated at least “A:VIII” by A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or “A-” by S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC in an amount not less than 100% of the SEL.
The Mortgage Loan documents for each GSMC Mortgage Loan require insurance proceeds in respect of a property loss to be applied either (a) to the repair or restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property, with respect to all property losses in excess of 5% of the original or then outstanding principal amount of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan), the Mortgagee (or a trustee appointed by it) having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as the repair or restoration progresses, or (b) to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of such GSMC Mortgage Loan together with any accrued interest thereon.
All premiums on all insurance policies referred to in this section required to be paid as of the Cut-off Date have been paid, and such insurance policies name the Mortgagee under each GSMC Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns as a loss payee under a Mortgagee endorsement clause or, in the case of the general liability insurance policy, as named or additional insured. Such insurance policies will inure to the benefit of the trustee (or, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the applicable Non-Serviced Trustee). Each related GSMC Mortgage Loan obligates the related mortgagor to maintain (or cause to be maintained) all such insurance and, at such mortgagor’s failure to do so, authorizes the Mortgagee to maintain such insurance at the mortgagor’s reasonable cost and expense and to charge such mortgagor for related premiums. All such insurance policies (other than commercial liability policies) require at least 10 days’ prior notice to the Mortgagee of termination or cancellation arising because of nonpayment of a premium and at least 30 days’ prior notice to the Mortgagee of termination or cancellation (or such lesser period, not less than 10 days, as may be required by applicable law) arising for any reason other than non-payment of a premium and no such notice has been received by GSMC.
(17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots. Each Mortgaged Property (a) is located on or adjacent to a public road and has direct legal access to such road, or has access via an irrevocable easement or irrevocable right of way permitting ingress and egress to/from a public road, (b) is served by or has uninhibited access rights to public or private water and sewer (or well and septic) and all required utilities, all of which are appropriate for the current use of such Mortgaged Property, and (c) constitutes one or more separate tax parcels which do not include any property which is not part of the Mortgaged Property or is subject to an endorsement under the related Title Policy insuring the Mortgaged Property, or in certain cases, an application has been, or will be, made to the applicable governing authority for creation of separate tax lots, in which case the related GSMC Mortgage Loan requires the mortgagor to escrow an amount sufficient to pay taxes for the existing tax parcel of which such Mortgaged Property is a part until the separate tax lots are created.
(18) No Encroachments. To GSMC’s knowledge based solely on surveys obtained in connection with origination and the Mortgagee’s Title Policy (or, if such policy is not yet issued, a pro forma title policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment) obtained in connection with the origination of each GSMC Mortgage Loan, all material improvements that were included for the purpose of determining the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property at the time
of the origination of such GSMC Mortgage Loan are within the boundaries of the related Mortgaged Property, except encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements on adjoining parcels encroach onto the related Mortgaged Property except for encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements encroach upon any easements except for encroachments the removal of which would not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy.
(19) No Contingent Interest or Equity Participation. No GSMC Mortgage Loan has a shared appreciation feature, any other contingent interest feature or a negative amortization feature or an equity participation by GSMC.
(20) REMIC. Each GSMC Mortgage Loan is a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code (but determined without regard to the rule in the U.S. Department of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) (the “Treasury Regulations”) that treats certain defective mortgage loans as qualified mortgages), and, accordingly, (A) the issue price of the GSMC Mortgage Loan to the related Mortgagor at origination did not exceed the non-contingent principal amount of the GSMC Mortgage Loan and (B) either: (a) such GSMC Mortgage Loan is secured by an interest in real property (including buildings and structural components thereof, but excluding personal property) having a fair market value (i) at the date the GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) was originated at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date or (ii) at the Closing Date at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date, provided that for purposes hereof, the fair market value of the real property interest must first be reduced by (A) the amount of any lien on the real property interest that is senior to the GSMC Mortgage Loan and (B) a proportionate amount of any lien that is in parity with the GSMC Mortgage Loan; or (b) substantially all of the proceeds of such GSMC Mortgage Loan were used to acquire, improve or protect the real property which served as the only security for such GSMC Mortgage Loan (other than a recourse feature or other third party credit enhancement within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(1)(ii)). If the GSMC Mortgage Loan was “significantly modified” prior to the Closing Date so as to result in a taxable exchange under Section 1001 of the Code, it either (x) was modified as a result of the default or reasonably foreseeable default of such GSMC Mortgage Loan or (y) satisfies the provisions of either sub-clause (B)(a)(i) above (substituting the date of the last such modification for the date the GSMC Mortgage Loan was originated) or sub-clause (B)(a)(ii), including the proviso thereto. Any prepayment premium and yield maintenance charges applicable to the GSMC Mortgage Loan constitute “customary prepayment penalties” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-1(b)(2). All terms used in this paragraph will have the same meanings as set forth in the related Treasury Regulations.
(21) Compliance with Usury Laws. The Mortgage Rate (exclusive of any default interest, late charges, yield maintenance charge, or prepayment premiums) of each GSMC Mortgage Loan complied as of the date of origination with, or was exempt from, applicable state or federal laws, regulations and other requirements pertaining to usury.
(22) Authorized to do Business. To the extent required under applicable law, as of the Cut-off Date or as of the date that such entity held the Mortgage Note, each holder of the Mortgage Note was authorized to originate, acquire and/or hold (as applicable) the Mortgage Note in the jurisdiction in which each related Mortgaged Property is located, or the failure to be so authorized does not materially and adversely affect the enforceability of such GSMC Mortgage Loan by the issuing entity.
(23) Trustee under Deed of Trust. With respect to each Mortgage which is a deed of trust, as of the date of origination and, to GSMC’s knowledge, as of the Closing Date, a trustee, duly qualified under applicable law to serve as such, currently so serves and is named in the deed of trust or has been substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law or may be substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law by the related Mortgagee.
(24) Local Law Compliance. To GSMC’s knowledge, based upon any of a letter from any governmental authorities, a legal opinion, an architect’s letter, a zoning consultant’s report, an endorsement to the related Title Policy, or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by GSMC for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, there are no material violations of applicable zoning ordinances, building codes and land laws (collectively “Zoning Regulations”) with respect to the improvements located on or forming part of each Mortgaged Property securing a GSMC Mortgage Loan as of the date of origination of such GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan, as applicable) and as of the Cut-off Date, other than those which (i) are insured by the Title Policy or a law and ordinance insurance policy or (ii) would not have a material adverse effect on the value, operation or net operating income of the related Mortgaged Property. The terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents require the mortgagor to comply in all material respects with all applicable governmental regulations, zoning and building laws.
(25) Licenses and Permits. Each mortgagor covenants in the related Mortgage Loan documents that it will keep all material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations necessary for its operation of the related Mortgaged Property in full force and effect, and to GSMC’s knowledge based upon any of a letter from any government authorities or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by GSMC for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, all such material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations are in effect. Each GSMC Mortgage Loan requires the related mortgagor to be qualified to do business in the jurisdiction in which the related Mortgaged Property is located.
(26) Recourse Obligations. The Mortgage Loan documents for each GSMC Mortgage Loan provide that such GSMC Mortgage Loan (a) becomes full recourse to the mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis) in any of the following events: (i) if any voluntary petition for bankruptcy, insolvency, dissolution or liquidation pursuant to federal bankruptcy law, or any similar federal or state law, will be filed by the related mortgagor; (ii) the related mortgagor or guarantor will have colluded with (or, alternatively, solicited or caused to be solicited) other creditors to cause an involuntary bankruptcy filing with respect to such mortgagor or (iii) voluntary transfers of either the Mortgaged Property or equity interests in the mortgagor made in violation of the related Mortgage Loan documents; and (b) contains provisions providing for recourse against the mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis), for losses and damages sustained by reason of such mortgagor’s (i) misappropriation of rents after the occurrence of an event of default under the related GSMC Mortgage Loan; (ii) misappropriation of (A) insurance proceeds or condemnation awards or (B) security deposits or, alternatively, the failure of any security deposits to be delivered to the Mortgagee upon foreclosure or action in lieu thereof (except to the extent applied in accordance with leases prior to a GSMC Mortgage Loan event of default); (iii) fraud or intentional material misrepresentation; (iv) breaches of the environmental covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents; or (v) commission of intentional material physical waste at the related Mortgaged Property (but, in some cases, only to the extent there is sufficient cash flow generated by the related Mortgaged Property to prevent such waste).
(27) Mortgage Releases. The terms of the related Mortgage or related Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for release of any material portion of the related Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage except (a) a partial release, accompanied by principal repayment, or partial Defeasance (as defined in paragraph (32)), in each case, of not less than a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (i) 110% of the related allocated loan amount of such portion of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) the outstanding principal balance of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan, (b) upon payment in full of such GSMC Mortgage Loan, (c) upon a Defeasance (as defined in (32) below), (d) releases of out-parcels that are unimproved or other portions of the related Mortgaged Property which will not have a material adverse effect on the underwritten value of such Mortgaged Property and which were not afforded any material value in the appraisal obtained at the origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loan and are not necessary for physical access to the Mortgaged Property or compliance with zoning requirements, or (e)
as required pursuant to an order of condemnation or taking by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof. With respect to any partial release (including in connection with any partial Defeasance) under the preceding clauses (a) or (d), either: (x) such release of collateral (i) would not constitute a “significant modification” of the subject GSMC Mortgage Loan within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations and (ii) would not cause the subject GSMC Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3)(A); or (y) the Mortgagee or servicer can, in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents, condition such release of collateral on the related mortgagor’s delivery of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect specified in the immediately preceding clause (x). For purposes of the preceding clause (x), for all GSMC Mortgage Loans originated after December 6, 2010, if the fair market value of the real property constituting such Mortgaged Property (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property that is senior to the GSMC Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on the real property that is in parity with the lien of the GSMC Mortgage Loan) after the release is not equal to at least 80% of the principal balance of the GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) outstanding after the release, the related mortgagor is required to make a payment of principal in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC provisions of the Code.
With respect to any partial release under the preceding clause (e), for all GSMC Mortgage Loans originated after December 6, 2010, the mortgagor can be required to pay down the principal balance of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC provisions of the Code and, to such extent, such amount may not be required to be applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the mortgagor, if, immediately after the release of such portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage (but taking into account the planned restoration) the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property is not equal to at least 80% of the remaining principal balance of the GSMC Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan).
No GSMC Mortgage Loan that is secured by more than one Mortgaged Property or that is cross-collateralized with another GSMC Mortgage Loan permits the release of cross-collateralization of the related Mortgaged Properties or a portion thereof, including due to partial condemnation, other than in compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code.
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls. The GSMC Mortgage Loan documents for each GSMC Mortgage Loan require the related mortgagor to provide the owner or holder of the Mortgage with quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) and annual operating statements, and quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) rent rolls for properties that have leases contributing more than 5% of the in-place base rent and annual financial statements, which annual financial statements with respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan with more than one mortgagor are in the form of an annual combined balance sheet of the mortgagor entities (and no other entities), together with the related combined statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows, including a combining balance sheet and statement of income for the Mortgaged Properties on a combined basis.
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion. With respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan over $20 million, the related special-form all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) do not specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (collectively referred to as “TRIA”), from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each other GSMC Mortgage Loan, the related special all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) did not, as of the date of origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loan, and, to GSMC’s knowledge, do not, as of the Cut-off Date, specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan, the related Loan Documents do not expressly waive or prohibit the Mortgagee from requiring coverage for Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, or damages related thereto; provided, however, that if TRIA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then
provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the Mortgagor under each GSMC Mortgage Loan is required to carry terrorism insurance, but in such event the Mortgagor will not be required to spend more than the Terrorism Cap Amount on terrorism insurance coverage, and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds the Terrorism Cap Amount, the Mortgagor is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to the Terrorism Cap Amount. The “Terrorism Cap Amount” is the specified percentage (which is at least equal to 200%) of the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at such time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related Loan Documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such casualty and business interruption/rental loss insurance).
(30) Due on Sale or Encumbrance. Subject to specific exceptions set forth below, each GSMC Mortgage Loan contains a “due on sale” or other such provision for the acceleration of the payment of the unpaid principal balance of such GSMC Mortgage Loan if, without the consent of the holder of the Mortgage (which consent, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld) and/or complying with the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents (which provide for transfers without the consent of the Mortgagee which are customarily acceptable to prudent commercial and multifamily mortgage lending institutions lending on the security of property comparable to the related Mortgaged Property, including, without limitation, transfers of worn-out or obsolete furnishings, fixtures, or equipment promptly replaced with property of equivalent value and functionality and transfers by leases entered into in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents), (a) the related Mortgaged Property, or any equity interest of greater than 50% in the related mortgagor, is directly or indirectly pledged, transferred or sold, other than as related to (i) family and estate planning transfers or transfers upon death or legal incapacity, (ii) transfers to certain affiliates as defined in the related Mortgage Loan documents, (iii) transfers of less than, or other than, a controlling interest in the related mortgagor, (iv) transfers to another holder of direct or indirect equity in the Mortgagor, a specific Person designated in the related Mortgage Loan documents or a Person satisfying specific criteria identified in the related Mortgage Loan documents, such as a qualified equityholder, (v) transfers of stock or similar equity units in publicly traded companies, (vi) a substitution or release of collateral within the parameters of paragraphs (27) and (32) in this Annex D-1 or the exceptions thereto set forth on Annex D-2, or (vii) any mezzanine debt that existed at the origination of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan as set forth on Schedule D-1 to this Annex D-1, or future permitted mezzanine debt as set forth on Schedule D-2 to this Annex D-1 or (b) the related Mortgaged Property is encumbered with a subordinate lien or security interest against the related Mortgaged Property, other than (i) any Companion Loan of any GSMC Mortgage Loan or any subordinate debt that existed at origination and is permitted under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) purchase money security interests (iii) any GSMC Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another GSMC Mortgage Loan, as set forth on Schedule D-3 to this Annex D-1 or (iv) Permitted Encumbrances. The Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents provide that, to the extent any Rating Agency fees are incurred in connection with the review of and consent to any transfer or encumbrance, the related mortgagor is responsible for such payment along with all other reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by the Mortgagee relative to such transfer or encumbrance.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity. Each GSMC Mortgage Loan requires the related mortgagor to be a Single-Purpose Entity for at least as long as the related GSMC Mortgage Loan is outstanding. Both the Mortgage Loan documents and the organizational documents of the mortgagor with respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance in excess of $5 million provide that such mortgagor is a Single-Purpose Entity, and each GSMC Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance of $20 million or more has a counsel’s opinion regarding non-consolidation of the related mortgagor. For this purpose, a “Single-Purpose Entity” means an entity, other than an individual, whose organizational documents (or if the GSMC Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date Balance equal to $5 million or less, its organizational documents or the related Mortgage Loan documents) provide substantially to the effect that it was formed or organized solely for the purpose of owning and operating one or more of the Mortgaged Properties securing the GSMC Mortgage Loans and prohibit it from engaging in any business unrelated to such Mortgaged Property or Properties, and whose organizational documents further provide, or which entity represented in the related Mortgage Loan documents, substantially to the effect that it does not have any assets other than those related to its interest in and operation of such Mortgaged Property or Properties, or any indebtedness other than as permitted by the related Mortgage(s) or the other related Mortgage
Loan documents, that it has its own books and records and accounts separate and apart from those of any other person (other than a mortgagor for a GSMC Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with the related GSMC Mortgage Loan), and that it holds itself out as a legal entity, separate and apart from any other person or entity.
(32) Defeasance. With respect to any GSMC Mortgage Loan that, pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, can be defeased (a “Defeasance”), (i) the related Mortgage Loan documents provide for defeasance as a unilateral right of the mortgagor, subject to satisfaction of conditions specified in the Mortgage Loan documents; (ii) such GSMC Mortgage Loan cannot be defeased within two (2) years after the Closing Date; (iii) the mortgagor is permitted to pledge only United States “government securities” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(8)(ii), the revenues from which will, in the case of a full Defeasance, be sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the GSMC Mortgage Loan when due, including the entire remaining principal balance on the maturity date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty), and if the GSMC Mortgage Loan permits partial releases of real property in connection with partial defeasance, the revenues from the collateral will be sufficient to pay all such scheduled payments calculated on a principal amount equal to a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (A) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the real property to be released and (B) the outstanding principal balance of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan; (iv) the mortgagor is required to provide a certification from an independent certified public accountant that the collateral is sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Note as set forth in (iii) above, (v) if the mortgagor would continue to own assets in addition to the defeasance collateral, the portion of the GSMC Mortgage Loan secured by defeasance collateral is required to be assumed (or the Mortgagee may require such assumption) by a Single-Purpose Entity; (vi) the mortgagor is required to provide an opinion of counsel that the Mortgagee has a perfected security interest in such collateral prior to any other claim or interest; and (vii) the mortgagor is required to pay all rating agency fees associated with Defeasance (if rating confirmation is a specific condition precedent thereto) and all other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with Defeasance, including, but not limited to, accountant’s fees and opinions of counsel.
(33) Fixed Interest Rates. Each GSMC Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate that remains fixed throughout the remaining term of such GSMC Mortgage Loan, except in situations where default interest is imposed.
(34) Ground Leases. For purposes of this Annex D-1, a “Ground Lease” means a lease creating a leasehold estate in real property where the fee owner as the ground lessor conveys for a term or terms of years its entire interest in the land and buildings and other improvements, if any, comprising the premises demised under such lease to the ground lessee (who may, in certain circumstances, own the building and improvements on the land), subject to the reversionary interest of the ground lessor as fee owner and does not include industrial development agency (IDA) or similar leases for purposes of conferring a tax abatement or other benefit.
With respect to any GSMC Mortgage Loan where the GSMC Mortgage Loan is secured by a leasehold estate under a Ground Lease in whole or in part, and the related Mortgage does not also encumber the related lessor’s fee interest in such Mortgaged Property, based upon the terms of the Ground Lease and any estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor in favor of GSMC, its successors and assigns, GSMC represents and warrants that:
(a) The Ground Lease or a memorandum regarding such Ground Lease has been duly recorded or submitted for recordation in a form that is acceptable for recording in the applicable jurisdiction. The Ground Lease or an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor permits the interest of the lessee to be encumbered by the related Mortgage and does not restrict the use of the related Mortgaged Property by such lessee, its successors or assigns in a manner that would materially adversely affect the security provided by the related Mortgage. No material change in the terms of the Ground Lease had occurred since the origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loan, except as reflected in any written instruments which are included in the related Mortgage File;
(b) The lessor under such Ground Lease has agreed in a writing included in the related Mortgage File (or in such Ground Lease) that the Ground Lease may not be amended or modified, or canceled or terminated by agreement of lessor and lessee, without the prior written consent of the Mortgagee;
(c) The Ground Lease has an original term (or an original term plus one or more optional renewal terms, which, under all circumstances, may be exercised, and will be enforceable, by either mortgagor or the Mortgagee) that extends not less than 20 years beyond the stated maturity of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan, or 10 years past the stated maturity if such GSMC Mortgage Loan fully amortizes by the stated maturity (or with respect to a GSMC Mortgage Loan that accrues on an actual 360 basis, substantially amortizes);
(d) The Ground Lease either (i) is not subject to any liens or encumbrances superior to, or of equal priority with, the Mortgage, except for the related fee interest of the ground lessor and the Permitted Encumbrances or (ii) is subject to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement to which the Mortgagee on the lessor’s fee interest in the Mortgaged Property is subject;
(e) The Ground Lease does not place commercially unreasonably restrictions on the identity of the Mortgagee and the Ground Lease is assignable to the holder of the GSMC Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor thereunder (provided that proper notice is delivered to the extent required in accordance with the Ground Lease), and in the event it is so assigned, it is further assignable by the holder of the GSMC Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of (but with prior notice to) the lessor;
(f) GSMC has not received any written notice of material default under or notice of termination of such Ground Lease. To GSMC’s knowledge, there is no material default under such Ground Lease and no condition that, but for the passage of time or giving of notice, would result in a material default under the terms of such Ground Lease and to GSMC’s knowledge, such Ground Lease is in full force and effect as of the Closing Date;
(g) The Ground Lease or ancillary agreement between the lessor and the lessee requires the lessor to give to the Mortgagee written notice of any default, and provides that no notice of default or termination is effective against the Mortgagee unless such notice is given to the Mortgagee;
(h) The Mortgagee is permitted a reasonable opportunity (including, where necessary, sufficient time to gain possession of the interest of the lessee under the Ground Lease through legal proceedings) to cure any default under the Ground Lease which is curable after the Mortgagee’s receipt of notice of any default before the lessor may terminate the Ground Lease;
(i) The Ground Lease does not impose any restrictions on subletting that would be viewed as commercially unreasonable by a prudent commercial mortgage lender;
(j) Under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds or the portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest (other than (i) de minimis amounts for minor casualties or (ii) in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking as addressed in clause (k) below) will be applied either to the repair or to restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property with (so long as such proceeds are in excess of the threshold amount specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents) the Mortgagee or a trustee appointed by it having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as repair or restoration progresses, or to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the GSMC Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest;
(k) In the case of a total or substantially total taking or loss, under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds, or portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking of the related Mortgaged Property to the extent not applied to restoration, will be applied first to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the GSMC Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest; and
(l) Provided that the Mortgagee cures any defaults which are susceptible to being cured, the ground lessor has agreed to enter into a new lease with the Mortgagee upon termination of the Ground Lease for any reason, including rejection of the Ground Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding.
(35) Servicing. The servicing and collection practices used by GSMC with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loans have been, in all respects, legal and have met customary industry standards for servicing of commercial loans for conduit loan programs.
(36) Origination and Underwriting. The origination practices of GSMC (or the related originator if GSMC was not the originator) with respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan have been, in all material respects, legal and as of the date of its origination, such GSMC Mortgage Loan (or the related Whole Loan, as applicable) and the origination thereof complied in all material respects with, or was exempt from, all requirements of federal, state or local law relating to the origination of such GSMC Mortgage Loan; provided that such representation and warranty does not address or otherwise cover any matters with respect to federal, state or local law otherwise covered in this Annex D-1.
(37) No Material Default; Payment Record. No GSMC Mortgage Loan has been more than 30 days delinquent, without giving effect to any grace or cure period, in making required debt service payments since origination, and no GSMC Mortgage Loan is more than 30 days delinquent (beyond any applicable grace or cure period) in making required payments as of the Closing Date. To GSMC’s knowledge, there is (a) no material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration existing under any GSMC Mortgage Loan, or (b) no event (other than payments due but not yet delinquent) which, with the passage of time or with notice and the expiration of any grace or cure period, would constitute a material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, which default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, in the case of either clause (a) or clause (b), materially and adversely affects the value of any GSMC Mortgage Loan or the value, use or operation of the related Mortgaged Property, provided, however, that this representation and warranty does not cover any default, breach, violation or event of acceleration that specifically pertains to or arises out of an exception scheduled to any other representation and warranty made by GSMC in this Annex D-1 (including, but not limited to, the prior sentence). No person other than the holder of any GSMC Mortgage Loan may declare any event of default under the related GSMC Mortgage Loan or accelerate any indebtedness under such Mortgage Loan documents.
(38) Bankruptcy. As of the date of origination of the related GSMC Mortgage Loan and to the GSMC’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, neither the Mortgaged Property (other than any tenants of such Mortgaged Property), nor any portion thereof, is the subject of, and no mortgagor, guarantor or tenant occupying a single-tenant property is a debtor in state or federal bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding.
(39) Organization of Mortgagor. With respect to each GSMC Mortgage Loan, in reliance on certified copies of the organizational documents of the related mortgagor delivered by such mortgagor in connection with the origination of such GSMC Mortgage Loan (or the related Whole Loan, as applicable), the mortgagor is an entity organized under the laws of a state of the United States of America, the District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Except with respect to any GSMC Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another GSMC Mortgage Loan, no GSMC Mortgage Loan has a mortgagor that is an affiliate of another mortgagor under another GSMC Mortgage Loan.
(40) Environmental Conditions. A Phase I environmental site assessment (or update of a previous Phase I and or Phase II site assessment) and, with respect to certain GSMC Mortgage Loans, a Phase II environmental site assessment (collectively, an “ESA”) meeting ASTM requirements were conducted by a reputable environmental consultant in connection with such GSMC Mortgage Loan within 12 months prior to its origination date (or an update of a previous ESA was prepared), and such ESA (i) did not identify the existence of recognized environmental conditions (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-13 or its successor, an “Environmental Condition”) at the related Mortgaged Property or the need for further investigation, or (ii) if the existence of an Environmental Condition or need for further investigation was indicated in any such ESA, then at least one of the following statements is true: (A) an amount reasonably estimated by a reputable environmental consultant to be sufficient to cover the estimated cost to cure any material noncompliance with applicable environmental laws or the Environmental Condition has been escrowed by the related Mortgagor and is held or controlled by the related Mortgagee; (B) if the only Environmental Condition relates to the presence of asbestos-containing materials, radon in indoor air, lead based paint or lead in drinking water, the only recommended action in the ESA is the institution of such a plan, an operations or maintenance plan has been required to be instituted by the related Mortgagor that, based on the ESA, can reasonably be expected to mitigate the identified risk; (C) the Environmental Condition identified in the related environmental report was remediated or abated in all material respects prior to the Cut-off Date, and, if and as appropriate, a no further action or closure letter was obtained from the applicable governmental regulatory authority (or the environmental issue affecting the related Mortgaged Property was otherwise listed by such governmental authority as “closed” or a reputable environmental consultant has concluded that no further action is required); (D) an environmental policy or a lender’s pollution legal liability insurance policy meeting the requirements set forth below that covers liability for the identified circumstance or condition was obtained from an insurer rated no less than “A-” (or the equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and/or Fitch Ratings, Inc.; (E) a party not related to the Mortgagor was identified as the responsible party for such condition or circumstance and such responsible party has financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation; or (F) a party related to the Mortgagor having financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation is required to take action. To GSMC’s knowledge, except as set forth in the ESA, there is no Environmental Condition (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-13 or its successor) at the related Mortgaged Property.
(41) Appraisal. The Mortgage File contains an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property with an appraisal date within 6 months of the GSMC Mortgage Loan origination date, and within 12 months of the Closing Date. The appraisal is signed by an appraiser who is a Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) and, to GSMC’s knowledge, had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the mortgagor or in any loan made on the security thereof, and whose compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the GSMC Mortgage Loan. Each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation. Each appraisal contains a statement, or is accompanied by a letter from the appraiser, to the effect that the appraisal was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, as in effect on the date such GSMC Mortgage Loan was originated.
(42) Mortgage Loan Schedule. The information pertaining to each GSMC Mortgage Loan which is set forth on the mortgage loan schedule attached to the related MLPA is true and correct in all material respects as of the Cut-off Date and contains all information required by the PSA to be contained on the mortgage loan schedule attached to the related MLPA.
(43) Cross-Collateralization. Except with respect to a GSMC Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, no GSMC Mortgage Loan is cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with any other mortgage loan that is outside the Mortgage Pool, except as set forth on Annex D-2.
(44) Advance of Funds by the Sponsor. After origination, no advance of funds has been made by GSMC to the related mortgagor other than in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents, and, to GSMC’s knowledge, no funds have been received from any person other than the related mortgagor or an affiliate for, or on account of, payments due on the GSMC Mortgage Loan (other than as contemplated by the related Mortgage Loan documents, such as, by way of example and not in limitation of the foregoing, amounts paid by the tenant(s) into a mortgagee-controlled lockbox if required or contemplated under the related lease or Mortgage Loan documents). Neither GSMC nor any affiliate thereof has any obligation to make any capital contribution to any mortgagor under a GSMC Mortgage Loan, other than contributions made on or prior to the Closing Date.
(45) Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering Laws. GSMC has complied in all material respects with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including without limitation the USA Patriot Act of 2001 with respect to the origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loans.
For purposes of these representations and warranties, “Mortgagee” means the mortgagee, grantee or beneficiary under any Mortgage, any holder of legal title to any portion of any GSMC Mortgage Loan or, if applicable, any agent or servicer on behalf of such party.
For purposes of these representations and warranties, the phrases “GSMC’s knowledge” or “GSMC’s belief” and other words and phrases of like import mean, except where otherwise expressly set forth in this Annex D-1, the actual state of knowledge or belief of GSMC, its officers and employees directly responsible for the underwriting, origination, servicing or sale of the GSMC Mortgage Loans regarding the matters expressly set forth in this Annex D-1.
Schedule D-1 to Annex D-1
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
None.
Schedule D-2 to Annex D-1
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule D-3 to Annex D-1
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
ANNEX D-2
EXCEPTIONS TO GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | So long as no event of default exists, under the related Whole Loan, the Mortgagee, without the prior written consent of the Mortgagor borrower, may not sell any note, participation or interest in the Whole Loan to Simon Property Group, Taubman Centers, Inc., The Macerich Company, Kimco Realty, Starwood Retail, PREIT, Washington Prime Group, Pyramid Real Estate Group, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., Westfield Holdings Limited or Unibail-Rodamco (or any successors or assigns of or any person or entity controlled by, controlling or under common control with the foregoing); provided, however, such restrictions will not apply to (a) any transfer or sale by the Mortgagee of commercial mortgage-backed securities certificates, bonds or similar certificated interests secured in whole or in part by the Whole Loan or (b) any subsequent resale or transfer of the Whole Loan (or any interest therein) occurring after an initial sale or transfer by the Mortgagee even if such transaction results in a portion of the Whole Loan being held by a person or entity described above. |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (16) Insurance | The Mortgage Loan documents permit (i) a property insurance deductible up to $250,000, except with respect to windstorm, flood and earthquake coverages, which are required to provide for a deductible not to exceed 5% of the total insurable value of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) a commercial general liability insurance deductible no greater than $250,000. Such deductibles may not be considered customary. Wind/named storm coverage may be reasonably sub-limited. The threshold above which the Mortgagee (or a trustee appointed by it) has the right to hold and disburse insurance proceeds is $13,000,000 (which amount is higher than 5% of the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and may be higher than the then-outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan). The Mortgage Loan documents provide that the Mortgagee may consent (subject to rating agency confirmation) to the Mortgagor maintaining (or causing to be maintained) insurance policies which (i) have coverages, deductibles and/or other related provisions other than those specified in the Mortgage Loan documents and/or (ii) are provided by insurance companies not meeting the credit rating requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 29, below. |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (26) Recourse Obligations | With respect to clause (a)(iii) of Representation and Warranty No. 26, the Mortgage Loan documents only provide recourse for losses to the Mortgagee (and not full recourse) for transfers made in violation of the Mortgage Loan documents and only if such transfers are of all or substantially all of the Mortgaged Property or result in a prohibited change of control of the Mortgagor or any general partner or managing member of the Mortgagor, as applicable. With respect to clause (b)(i) of Representation and Warranty No. 26, the Mortgage Loan documents only provide recourse for intentional misappropriation. |
All GSMC Mortgage Loans | All GSMC Mortgage Loans | (27) Mortgage Releases | If the subject Mortgage Loan is included in a REMIC and the loan-to-value ratio of the related Mortgaged Property following a condemnation exceeds 125%, the related Mortgagor may be able to avoid having to pay down the subject Mortgage Loan if it delivers an opinion of counsel to the effect that the failure to make such pay down will not cause such REMIC to fail to qualify as such. |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (27) Mortgage Releases | The Mortgagor is permitted to obtain the release of parcels at the Mortgaged Property upon the substitution therefor of other parcels of real property and satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents including without limitation, satisfaction of customary REMIC requirements. |
| | | |
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (29) Acts Terrorism Exclusion | The Mortgage Loan documents permit a terrorism insurance deductible of up to $1,000,000. Such deductible may not be considered customary. In addition, the Mortgage Loan documents permit terrorism insurance to be obtained through a captive insurance program with Liberty IC Casualty LLC (“Liberty”) , subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including that covered losses which are not reinsured by the federal government under TRIPRA and paid to Liberty must be reinsured with a cut-through endorsement acceptable to the Mortgagee and the rating agencies by insurance companies which satisfy the rating requirements set forth in the related loan agreement. |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | The Mortgagor previously owned two parcels of land adjacent to the Mortgaged Property which were sold to a third party prior to the loan origination date. |
13 | Viera at Whitemarsh | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | No non-consolidation opinion was obtained in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan. |
17 | Eastern Shore Centre | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | No non-consolidation opinion was obtained in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan. |
1 | Stonebriar Centre | (32) Defeasance | In connection with a defeasance, the Mortgagor’s obligations to pay servicing fees is capped at $10,000 (exclusive of any rating agency fees and expenses). |
ANNEX E-1
CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC., 3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC, BARCLAYS
CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC., BANK OF MONTREAL AND GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL
CORPORATION AND REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Each of CREFI, 3650 REIT, BCREI, BMO and GACC (referred to as a “Mortgage Loan Seller” in the representations and warranties below) will make, as of the Cut-off Date or such other date as set forth below, with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by it to us (referred to as the “Purchaser” in the representations and warranties below) that we include in the issuing entity, representations and warranties generally to the effect set forth below. Prior to the execution of the related final Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, there may be additions, subtractions or other modifications to the representations, warranties and exceptions. The exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth below are identified on Annex E-2 through Annex E-6, respectively, to this prospectus. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Annex E-1 will have the meanings set forth in this prospectus or, if not defined in this prospectus, in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt references to “Mortgage Loan” and “Mortgage Loans” in this Annex E-1 and the related exceptions set forth in Annex E-2 through Annex E-6, as applicable, exclude the GSMC Mortgage Loans and with respect to each of CREFI, 3650 REIT, BCREI, BMO and GACC, exclude the other such Mortgage Loan Seller’s Mortgage Loans. In addition, solely for purposes of this Annex E-1 and the related exceptions set forth in Annex E-2 through Annex E-6, as applicable, the term “Mortgage Loans” and “Mortgage Notes” will refer to such Mortgage Loans sold by the applicable Mortgage Loan Seller and the related promissory note(s).
Each Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, together with the related representations and warranties (subject to the exceptions to such representations and warranties), serves to contractually allocate risk between the related Mortgage Loan Seller, on the one hand, and the issuing entity, on the other. We present the related representations and warranties set forth below for the sole purpose of describing some of the terms and conditions of that risk allocation. The presentation of representations and warranties below is not intended as statements regarding the actual characteristics of the Mortgage Loans, the Mortgaged Properties or other matters. We cannot assure you that the Mortgage Loans actually conform to the statements made in the representations and warranties that we present below.
(1) Whole Loan; Ownership of Mortgage Loans. Except with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, each Mortgage Loan is a whole loan and not a participation interest in a Mortgage Loan. Each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan is a portion of a whole loan evidenced by a Mortgage Note. At the time of the sale, transfer and assignment to the Purchaser, no Mortgage Note or Mortgage was subject to any assignment (other than assignments to the Mortgage Loan Seller or, with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the trustee for the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust), participation or pledge, and the Mortgage Loan Seller had good title to, and was the sole owner of, each Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, charges, pledges, encumbrances, participations, any other ownership interests on, in or to such Mortgage Loan other than any servicing rights appointment or similar agreement. The Mortgage Loan Seller has full right and authority to sell, assign and transfer each Mortgage Loan, and the assignment to the Purchaser constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment of such Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, pledges, charges or security interests of any nature encumbering such Mortgage Loan.
(2) Loan Document Status. Each related Mortgage Note, Mortgage, Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits (if a separate instrument), guaranty and other agreement executed by or on behalf of the related borrower, guarantor or other obligor in connection with such Mortgage Loan is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the related borrower, guarantor or other obligor (subject to any non-recourse provisions contained in any of the foregoing agreements and any applicable state anti-deficiency or market value limit deficiency legislation), as applicable, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except (i) as such enforcement may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally
and (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (ii) that certain provisions in such Mortgage Loan documents (including, without limitation, provisions requiring the payment of default interest, late fees or prepayment/yield maintenance fees, charges and/or premiums) are, or may be, further limited or rendered unenforceable by or under applicable law, but (subject to the limitations set forth in clause (i) above) such limitations or unenforceability will not render such Mortgage Loan documents invalid as a whole or materially interfere with the mortgagee’s realization of the principal benefits and/or security provided thereby (clauses (i) and (ii) collectively, the “Standard Qualifications”).
Except as set forth in the immediately preceding sentences, there is no valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right of rescission available to the related borrower with respect to any of the related Mortgage Notes, Mortgages or other Mortgage Loan documents, including, without limitation, any such valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right based on intentional fraud by the Mortgage Loan Seller in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, that would deny the mortgagee the principal benefits intended to be provided by the Mortgage Note, Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents.
(3) Mortgage Provisions. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan contain provisions that render the rights and remedies of the holder thereof adequate for the practical realization against the Mortgaged Property of the principal benefits of the security intended to be provided thereby, including realization by judicial or, if applicable, non-judicial foreclosure subject to the limitations set forth in the Standard Qualifications.
(4) Mortgage Status; Waivers and Modifications. Since origination and except by written instruments set forth in the related Mortgage File or as otherwise provided in the related Mortgage Loan documents (a) the material terms of such Mortgage, Mortgage Note, Mortgage Loan guaranty and related Mortgage Loan documents have not been waived, impaired, modified, altered, satisfied, canceled, subordinated or rescinded in any respect; (b) no related Mortgaged Property or any portion thereof has been released from the lien of the related Mortgage in any manner which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the use or operation of the remaining portion of such Mortgaged Property; and (c) neither the related borrower nor the related guarantor has been released from its material obligations under the Mortgage Loan.
(5) Lien; Valid Assignment. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each assignment of Mortgage and assignment of Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits to the issuing entity (or, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the related Non-Serviced Trustee) constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment to the issuing entity (or, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the related Non-Serviced Trustee). Each related Mortgage and Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits is freely assignable without the consent of the related borrower. Each related Mortgage is a legal, valid and enforceable first lien on the related borrower’s fee or leasehold interest in the Mortgaged Property in the principal amount of such Mortgage Loan or allocated loan amount (subject only to Permitted Encumbrances (as defined below) and the exceptions to paragraph (6) set forth in Annex E-2 through Annex E-6 (each such exception, a “Title Exception”)), except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. Such Mortgaged Property (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions) as of origination was, and as of the Cut-off Date, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, is free and clear of any recorded mechanics’ liens, recorded materialmen’s liens and other recorded encumbrances which are prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage (which lien secures the related Whole Loan, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan), except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below), and, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge and subject to the rights of tenants (as tenants only)(subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions), no rights exist which under law could give rise to any such lien or encumbrance that would be prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below). Notwithstanding anything in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement to the contrary, no representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or
control of such items or actions other than the filing of Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) financing statements is required in order to effect such perfection.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance. Each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan is covered by an American Land Title Association loan title insurance policy or a comparable form of loan title insurance policy approved for use in the applicable jurisdiction (or, if such policy is yet to be issued, by a pro forma policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment, in each case binding on the title insurer) (the “Title Policy”) in the original principal amount of such Mortgage Loan (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan secured by multiple properties, an amount equal to at least the allocated loan amount with respect to the Title Policy for each such property) after all advances of principal (including any advances held in escrow or reserves), that insures for the benefit of the owner of the indebtedness secured by the Mortgage, the first priority lien of the Mortgage (which lien secures the related Whole Loan, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan), which lien is subject only to (a) the lien of current real property taxes, water charges, sewer rents and assessments not yet due and payable; (b) covenants, conditions and restrictions, rights of way, easements and other matters of public record; (c) the exceptions (general and specific) and exclusions set forth in such Title Policy; (d) other matters to which like properties are commonly subject; (e) the rights of tenants (as tenants only) under leases (including subleases) pertaining to the related Mortgaged Property and condominium declarations; and (f) if the related Mortgage Loan is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another Mortgage Loan (each a “Crossed Mortgage Loan”), the lien of the Mortgage for such other Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with such Crossed Mortgage Loan, provided that none of which items (a) through (f), individually or in the aggregate, materially and adversely interferes with the value or current use of the Mortgaged Property or the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the borrower’s ability to pay its obligations when they become due (collectively, the “Permitted Encumbrances”). For purposes of clause (a) of the immediately preceding sentence, any such taxes, assessments and other charges will not be considered due and payable until the date on which interest and penalties would be payable thereon. Except as contemplated by clause (f) of the second preceding sentence, none of the Permitted Encumbrances are mortgage liens that are senior to or coordinate and co-equal with the lien of the related Mortgage. Such Title Policy (or, if it has yet to be issued, the coverage to be provided thereby) is in full force and effect, all premiums thereon have been paid and no claims have been made by the Mortgage Loan Seller thereunder and no claims have been paid thereunder. Neither the Mortgage Loan Seller, nor to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, any other holder of the Mortgage Loan, has done, by act or omission, anything that would materially impair the coverage under such Title Policy.
(7) Junior Liens. It being understood that B notes secured by the same Mortgage as a Mortgage Loan are not subordinate mortgages or junior liens, except for any Crossed Mortgage Loan, there are, as of origination, and to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, as of the Cut-off Date, no subordinate mortgages or junior liens securing the payment of money encumbering the related Mortgaged Property (other than Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, taxes and assessments, mechanics and materialmen’s liens (which are the subject of the representation in paragraph (5) above), and equipment and other personal property financing). Except as set forth on Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1, the Mortgage Loan Seller has no knowledge of any mezzanine debt secured directly by interests in the related borrower.
(8) Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits. There exists as part of the related Mortgage File an Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits (either as a separate instrument or incorporated into the related Mortgage). Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions (and, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, subject to the related Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits constituting security for the entire Whole Loan), each related Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits creates a valid first-priority collateral assignment of, or a valid first-priority lien or security interest in, rents and certain rights under the related lease or leases, subject only to a license granted to the related borrower to exercise certain rights and to perform certain obligations of the lessor under such lease or leases, including the right to operate the related leased property, except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. The related Mortgage or related Assignment of Leases, Rents and Profits, subject to applicable law, provides that, upon an event of default under the
Mortgage Loan, a receiver is permitted to be appointed for the collection of rents or for the related mortgagee to enter into possession to collect the rents or for rents to be paid directly to the mortgagee.
(9) UCC Filings. If the related Mortgaged Property is operated as a hospitality property, the Mortgage Loan Seller has filed and/or recorded or caused to be filed and/or recorded (or, if not filed and/or recorded, have been submitted in proper form for filing and/or recording), UCC financing statements in the appropriate public filing and/or recording offices necessary at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan to perfect a valid security interest in all items of physical personal property reasonably necessary to operate such Mortgaged Property owned by such borrower and located on the related Mortgaged Property (other than any non-material personal property, any personal property subject to a purchase money security interest, a sale and leaseback financing arrangement as permitted under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or any other personal property leases applicable to such personal property), to the extent perfection may be effected pursuant to applicable law by recording or filing, as the case may be. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each related Mortgage (or equivalent document) creates a valid and enforceable lien and security interest on the items of personalty described above. No representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of UCC financing statements are required in order to effect such perfection.
(10) Condition of Property. The Mortgage Loan Seller or the originator of the Mortgage Loan inspected or caused to be inspected each related Mortgaged Property within six (6) months of origination of the Mortgage Loan and within twelve months of the Cut-off Date.
An engineering report or property condition assessment was prepared in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan no more than twelve months prior to the Cut-off Date. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, based solely upon due diligence customarily performed in connection with the origination of comparable mortgage loans, as of the Closing Date, each related Mortgaged Property was free and clear of any material damage (other than (i) any damage or deficiency that is estimated to cost less than $50,000 to repair, (ii) any deferred maintenance for which escrows were established at origination and (iii) any damage fully covered by insurance) that would affect materially and adversely the use or value of such Mortgaged Property as security for the Mortgage Loan.
(11) Taxes and Assessments. All taxes, governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges (including, without limitation, water and sewage charges), or installments thereof, that could be a lien on the related Mortgaged Property that would be of equal or superior priority to the lien of the Mortgage and that prior to the Cut-off Date have become delinquent in respect of each related Mortgaged Property have been paid, or an escrow of funds has been established in an amount sufficient to cover such payments and reasonably estimated interest and penalties, if any, thereon. For purposes of this representation and warranty, real estate taxes and governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges and installments thereof will not be considered delinquent until the earlier of (a) the date on which interest and/or penalties would first be payable thereon and (b) the date on which enforcement action is entitled to be taken by the related taxing authority.
(12) Condemnation. As of the date of origination and to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding pending, and, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge as of the date of origination and as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding threatened, for the total or partial condemnation of such Mortgaged Property that would have a material adverse effect on the value, use or operation of the Mortgaged Property.
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, based on evaluation of the Title Policy (as defined in paragraph (6)), an engineering report or property condition assessment as described in paragraph (10), applicable local law compliance materials as described in paragraph (24), and the ESA (as defined in paragraph (40)), as of origination, there was no pending or filed action, suit or proceeding, arbitration or governmental investigation involving any borrower, guarantor, or borrower’s interest in the Mortgaged Property, an adverse outcome of which would reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect (a) such borrower’s title to the Mortgaged Property, (b) the validity or enforceability of the Mortgage, (c) such borrower’s ability to perform under the
related Mortgage Loan, (d) such guarantor’s ability to perform under the related guaranty, (e) the principal benefit of the security intended to be provided by the Mortgage Loan documents or (f) the current principal use of the Mortgaged Property.
(14) Escrow Deposits. All escrow deposits and payments required to be escrowed with the lender pursuant to each Mortgage Loan are in the possession, or under the control, of the Mortgage Loan Seller or its servicer, and there are no deficiencies (subject to any applicable grace or cure periods) in connection therewith, and all such escrows and deposits (or the right thereto) that are required to be escrowed with lender under the related Mortgage Loan documents are being conveyed by the Mortgage Loan Seller to the Purchaser or its servicer (or, with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the depositor or servicer for the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust).
(15) No Holdbacks. The Stated Principal Balance as of the Cut-off Date of the Mortgage Loan set forth on the mortgage loan schedule attached as an exhibit to the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement has been fully disbursed as of the Closing Date and there is no requirement for future advances thereunder (except in those cases where the full amount of the Mortgage Loan has been disbursed but a portion thereof is being held in escrow or reserve accounts pending the satisfaction of certain conditions relating to leasing, repairs or other matters with respect to the related Mortgaged Property, the borrower or other considerations determined by the Mortgage Loan Seller to merit such holdback).
(16) Insurance. Each related Mortgaged Property is, and is required pursuant to the related Mortgage to be, insured by a property insurance policy providing coverage for loss in accordance with coverage found under a “special cause of loss form” or “all risk form” that includes replacement cost valuation issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents and having a claims-paying or financial strength rating meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements (as defined below), in an amount (subject to a customary deductible) not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and (2) the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements, furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment owned by the borrower and included in the Mortgaged Property (with no deduction for physical depreciation), but, in any event, not less than the amount necessary or containing such endorsements as are necessary to avoid the operation of any coinsurance provisions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property.
“Insurance Rating Requirements” means either (i) a claims paying or financial strength rating of any of the following; (a) at least “A-:VIII” from A.M. Best Company, (b) at least “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or (c) at least “A-” from S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or (ii) the Syndicate Insurance Rating Requirements. “Syndicate Insurance Rating Requirements” means insurance provided by a syndicate of insurers, as to which (i) if such syndicate consists of 5 or more members, at least 60% of the coverage is provided by insurers that meet the Insurance Rating Requirements (under clause (i) of the definition of such term) and up to 40% of the coverage is provided by insurers that have a claims paying or financial strength rating of at least “BBB-” by S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or at least “Baa3” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and (ii) if such syndicate consists of 4 or fewer members, at least 75% of the coverage is provided by insurers that meet the Insurance Rating Requirements (under clause (i) of the definition of such term) and up to 25% of the coverage is provided by insurers that have a claims paying or financial strength rating of at least “BBB-” by S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or at least “Baa3” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Each related Mortgaged Property is also covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by business interruption or rental loss insurance which (subject to a customary deductible) covers a period of not less than 12 months (or with respect to each Mortgage Loan on a single asset with a principal balance of $50 million or more, 18 months).
If any material part of the improvements, exclusive of a parking lot, located on a Mortgaged Property is in an area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as having special flood hazards, the related borrower is required to maintain insurance in the maximum amount
available under the National Flood Insurance Program, plus such additional excess flood coverage in an amount as is generally required by the Mortgage Loan Seller originating mortgage loans for securitization.
If the Mortgaged Property is located within 25 miles of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic coast of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or North Carolina, the related borrower is required to maintain coverage for windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or “named storms” issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements or endorsement covering damage from windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or named storms, in an amount not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and (2) 100% of the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements and personalty and fixtures owned by the borrower and included in the related Mortgaged Property by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements.
The Mortgaged Property is covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by a commercial general liability insurance policy issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements including coverage for property damage, contractual damage and personal injury (including bodily injury and death) in amounts as are generally required by the Mortgage Loan Seller for loans originated for securitization, and in any event not less than $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in the aggregate.
An architectural or engineering consultant has performed an analysis of each of the Mortgaged Properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4 in order to evaluate the structural and seismic condition of such property, for the sole purpose of assessing either the scenario expected limit (“SEL”) or the probable maximum loss (“PML”) for the Mortgaged Property in the event of an earthquake. In such instance, the SEL or PML, as applicable, was based on a 475-year return period, an exposure period of 50 years and a 10% probability of exceedance. If the resulting report concluded that the SEL or PML, as applicable, would exceed 20% of the amount of the replacement costs of the improvements, earthquake insurance on such Mortgaged Property was obtained by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements (provided that for this purpose (only), the A.M. Best Company minimum rating referred to in the definition of Insurance Rating Requirements will be deemed to be at least “A:VIII”) in an amount not less than 100% of the SEL or PML, as applicable.
The Mortgage Loan documents require insurance proceeds in respect of a property loss to be applied either (a) to the repair or restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property, with respect to all property losses in excess of 5% of the then outstanding principal amount of the related Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable), the lender (or a trustee appointed by it) having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as the repair or restoration progresses, or (b) to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) together with any accrued interest thereon.
All premiums on all insurance policies referred to in this section required to be paid as of the Cut-off Date have been paid, and such insurance policies name the lender under the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns as a loss payee under a mortgagee endorsement clause or, in the case of the general liability insurance policy, as named or additional insured. Such insurance policies will inure to the benefit of the Trustee (or, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the applicable Non-Serviced Trustee). Each related Mortgage Loan obligates the related borrower to maintain, or cause to be maintained, all such insurance and, at such borrower’s failure to do so, authorizes the lender to maintain such insurance at the borrower’s cost and expense and to charge such borrower for related premiums. All such insurance policies (other than commercial liability policies) require at least 10 days’ prior notice to the lender of termination or cancellation arising because of nonpayment of a premium and at least 30 days prior notice to the lender of termination or cancellation (or such lesser period, not less than 10 days, as may be required by applicable law) arising for any reason other than non-payment of a premium and no such notice has been received by the Mortgage Loan Seller.
(17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots. Each Mortgaged Property (a) is located on or adjacent to a public road and has direct legal access to such road, or has access via an irrevocable easement or irrevocable right of way permitting ingress and egress to/from a public road, (b) is served by or has uninhibited access rights to public or private water and sewer (or well and septic) and all required utilities, all of which are appropriate for the current use of the Mortgaged Property, and (c) constitutes one or more
separate tax parcels which do not include any property which is not part of the Mortgaged Property or is subject to an endorsement under the related Title Policy insuring the Mortgaged Property, or in certain cases, an application has been, or will be, made to the applicable governing authority for creation of separate tax lots, in which case the Mortgage Loan requires the borrower to escrow an amount sufficient to pay taxes for the existing tax parcel of which the Mortgaged Property is a part until the separate tax lots are created.
(18) No Encroachments. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge based solely on surveys obtained in connection with origination and the lender’s Title Policy (or, if such policy is not yet issued, a pro forma title policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment) obtained in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan, all material improvements that were included for the purpose of determining the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property at the time of the origination of such Mortgage Loan are within the boundaries of the related Mortgaged Property, except encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements on adjoining parcels encroach onto the related Mortgaged Property except for encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements encroach upon any easements except for encroachments the removal of which would not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements obtained with respect to the Title Policy.
(19) No Contingent Interest or Equity Participation. No Mortgage Loan has a shared appreciation feature, any other contingent interest feature or a negative amortization feature or an equity participation by the Mortgage Loan Seller.
(20) REMIC. Each Mortgage Loan is a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code (but determined without regard to the rule in the U.S. Department of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) (the “Treasury Regulations”) that treats certain defective mortgage loans as qualified mortgages), and, accordingly, (A) the issue price of the Mortgage Loan to the related borrower at origination did not exceed the non-contingent principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and (B) either: (a) such Mortgage Loan is secured by an interest in real property (including permanently affixed buildings and structural components, such as wiring, plumbing systems and central heating and air-conditioning systems, that are integrated into such buildings, serve such buildings in their passive functions and do not produce or contribute to the production of income other than consideration for the use or occupancy of space, but excluding personal property) having a fair market value (i) at the date the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) was originated at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date or (ii) at the Closing Date at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date, provided that for purposes hereof, the fair market value of the real property interest must first be reduced by (A) the amount of any lien on the real property interest that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (B) a proportionate amount of any lien that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan; or (b) substantially all of the proceeds of such Mortgage Loan were used to acquire, improve or protect the real property which served as the only security for such Mortgage Loan (other than a recourse feature or other third-party credit enhancement within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(1)(ii)). If the Mortgage Loan was “significantly modified” prior to the Closing Date so as to result in a taxable exchange under Section 1001 of the Code, it either (x) was modified as a result of the default or reasonably foreseeable default of such Mortgage Loan or (y) satisfies the provisions of either sub-clause (B)(a)(i) above (substituting the date of the last such modification for the date the Mortgage Loan was originated) or sub-clause (B)(a)(ii), including the proviso thereto. Any prepayment premium and yield maintenance charges applicable to the Mortgage Loan constitute “customary prepayment penalties” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-1(b)(2). All terms used in this paragraph will have the same meanings as set forth in the related Treasury Regulations.
(21) Compliance with Usury Laws. The Mortgage Rate (exclusive of any default interest, late charges, yield maintenance charge, or prepayment premiums) of such Mortgage Loan complied as of the date of origination with, or was exempt from, applicable state or federal laws, regulations and other requirements pertaining to usury.
(22) Authorized to do Business. To the extent required under applicable law, as of the Cut-off Date or as of the date that such entity held the Mortgage Note, each holder of the Mortgage Note was authorized to transact and do business in the jurisdiction in which each related Mortgaged Property is located, or the failure to be so authorized does not materially and adversely affect the enforceability of such Mortgage Loan by the issuing entity.
(23) Trustee under Deed of Trust. With respect to each Mortgage which is a deed of trust, as of the date of origination and, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, as of the Closing Date, a trustee, duly qualified under applicable law to serve as such, currently so serves and is named in the deed of trust or has been substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law or may be substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law by the related mortgagee.
(24) Local Law Compliance. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, based upon any of a letter from any governmental authorities, a legal opinion, an architect’s letter, a zoning consultant’s report, an endorsement to the related Title Policy, or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by the Mortgage Loan Seller for similar commercial, multifamily or, if applicable, manufactured housing community mortgage loans intended for securitization, with respect to the improvements located on or forming part of each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan as of the date of origination of such Mortgage Loan and as of the Cut-off Date, there are no material violations of applicable zoning ordinances, building codes and land laws (collectively “Zoning Regulations”) other than those which (i) constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure, as to which as the Mortgaged Property may be restored or repaired to the full extent necessary to maintain the use of the structure immediately prior to a casualty or the inability to restore or repair to the full extent necessary to maintain the use or structure immediately prior to the casualty would not materially and adversely affect the use or operation of the Mortgaged Property, (ii) are insured by the Title Policy or other insurance policy, (iii) are insured by law and ordinance insurance coverage in amounts customarily required by the Mortgage Loan Seller for loans originated for securitization that provides coverage for additional costs to rebuild and/or repair the property to current Zoning Regulations or (iv) would not have a material adverse effect on the Mortgage Loan. The terms of the Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to comply in all material respects with all applicable governmental regulations, zoning and building laws.
(25) Licenses and Permits. Each borrower covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents that it will keep all material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations necessary for its operation of the Mortgaged Property in full force and effect, and to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge based upon a letter from any government authorities, zoning consultant’s report or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by the Mortgage Loan Seller for similar commercial, multifamily or, if applicable, manufactured housing community mortgage loans intended for securitization, all such material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations are in effect. The Mortgage Loan requires the related borrower to be qualified to do business in the jurisdiction in which the related Mortgaged Property is located.
(26) Recourse Obligations. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan provide that (a) the related borrower and at least one individual or entity will be fully liable for actual losses, liabilities, costs and damages arising from certain acts of the related borrower and/or its principals specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents, which acts generally include the following: (i) acts of fraud or intentional material misrepresentation, (ii) misapplication or misappropriation of rents (if after an event of default under the Mortgage Loan), insurance proceeds or condemnation awards, (iii) intentional material physical waste of the Mortgaged Property (but, in some cases, only to the extent there is sufficient cash flow generated by the related Mortgaged Property to prevent such waste), and (iv) any breach of the environmental covenants contained in the related Mortgage Loan documents, and (b) the Mortgage Loan will become full recourse to the related borrower and at least one individual or entity, if the related borrower files a voluntary petition under federal or state bankruptcy or insolvency law.
(27) Mortgage Releases. The terms of the related Mortgage or related Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for release of any material portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage except (a) a partial release, accompanied by principal repayment, or partial Defeasance (as defined in paragraph (32)), in each case, of not less than a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (i) 110% of the related allocated loan amount of such portion of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, (b) upon payment in full of such Mortgage Loan, (c) upon a Defeasance (as defined in paragraph (32)), (d) releases of out-parcels that are unimproved or other portions of the Mortgaged Property which will not have a material adverse effect on the underwritten value of the Mortgaged Property and which were not afforded any material value in the appraisal obtained at the origination of the Mortgage Loan and are not necessary for physical access to the Mortgaged Property or compliance with zoning requirements, or (e) as required pursuant to an order of condemnation or taking by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof. With respect to any partial release (including in connection with any partial Defeasance) under the preceding clauses (a) or (d), either: (x) such release of collateral (i) would not constitute a “significant modification” of the subject Mortgage Loan within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations and (ii) would not cause the subject Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3)(A); or (y) the mortgagee or servicer can, in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents, condition such release of collateral on the related borrower’s delivery of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect specified in the immediately preceding clause (x). For purposes of the preceding clause (x), if the fair market value of the real property constituting such Mortgaged Property (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on the real property that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) after the release is not equal to at least 80% of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, as applicable) outstanding after the release, the borrower is required to make a payment of principal in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC provisions of the Code.
In the case of any Mortgage Loan, in the event of a condemnation or taking of any portion of a Mortgaged Property by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof, whether by legal proceeding or by agreement, the borrower can be required to pay down the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC provisions and, to such extent, condemnation proceeds may not be required to be applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the borrower, if, immediately after the release of such portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage (but taking into account the planned restoration) the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on the real property that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) is not equal to at least 80% of the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, as applicable).
No Mortgage Loan that is secured by more than one Mortgaged Property or that is a Crossed Mortgage Loan permits the release of cross-collateralization of the related Mortgaged Properties or a portion thereof, including due to a partial condemnation, other than in compliance with the loan-to-value ratio and other requirements of the REMIC provisions of the Code.
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls. Each Mortgage Loan requires the borrower to provide the owner or holder of the Mortgage with quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) and annual operating statements, and quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) rent rolls for properties that have leases contributing more than 5% of the in-place base rent and annual financial statements.
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion. With respect to each Mortgage Loan over $20 million, the related special-form all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) do not specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (collectively referred to as “TRIA”), from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each other Mortgage Loan, the related special-form all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer or insurers meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) did not, as of the date of origination of
the Mortgage Loan, and, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, do not, as of the Cut-off Date, specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgage Loan documents do not expressly waive or prohibit the mortgagee from requiring coverage for Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, or damages related thereto except to the extent that any right to require such coverage may be limited by commercial availability on commercially reasonable terms, or as otherwise indicated in Annex E-2 through Annex E-6, as applicable; provided, however, that if TRIA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then, provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the borrower under each Mortgage Loan is required to carry terrorism insurance, but in such event the borrower will not be required to spend on terrorism insurance coverage more than two (2) times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related Mortgage Loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such casualty and business interruption/rental loss insurance) at such time, and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, the borrower is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount.
(30) Due on Sale or Encumbrance. Subject to specific exceptions set forth below, each Mortgage Loan contains a “due on sale” or other such provision for the acceleration of the payment of the unpaid principal balance of such Mortgage Loan if, without the consent of the holder of the Mortgage (which consent, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld) and/or complying with the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents (which provide for transfers without the consent of the lender which are customarily acceptable to the Mortgage Loan Seller lending on the security of property comparable to the related Mortgaged Property, including, without limitation, transfers of worn-out or obsolete furnishings, fixtures, or equipment promptly replaced with property of equivalent value and functionality and transfers by leases entered into in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents), (a) the related Mortgaged Property, or any equity interest of greater than 50% in the related borrower, is directly or indirectly pledged, transferred or sold (in each case, a “Transfer”), other than as related to (i) family and estate planning Transfers or Transfers upon death or legal incapacity, (ii) Transfers to certain affiliates as defined in the related Mortgage Loan documents, (iii) Transfers of less than, or other than, a controlling interest in the related borrower, (iv) Transfers to another holder of direct or indirect equity in the borrower, a specific Person designated in the related Mortgage Loan documents or a Person satisfying specific criteria identified in the related Mortgage Loan documents, such as a qualified equityholder, (v) Transfers of stock or similar equity units in publicly traded companies, (vi) a substitution or release of collateral within the parameters of paragraphs (27) and (32) in this Annex E-1 or the exceptions thereto set forth in Annex E-2 through Annex E-6, or (vii) by reason of any mezzanine debt that existed at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan as set forth on Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1, or future permitted mezzanine debt in each case as set forth on Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1 or (b) the related Mortgaged Property is encumbered with a subordinate lien or security interest against the related Mortgaged Property, other than (i) any Companion Loan or any subordinate debt that existed at origination and is permitted under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) purchase money security interests, (iii) any Crossed Mortgage Loan as set forth on Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1 or (iv) Permitted Encumbrances. The Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents provide that to the extent any Rating Agency fees are incurred in connection with the review of and consent to any transfer or encumbrance, the borrower is responsible for such payment along with all other reasonable fees and expenses incurred by the Mortgagee relative to such transfer or encumbrance.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity. Each Mortgage Loan requires the borrower to be a Single-Purpose Entity for at least as long as the Mortgage Loan is outstanding. Both the Mortgage Loan documents and the organizational documents of the borrower with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance in excess of $5 million provide that the borrower is a Single-Purpose Entity, and each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance of $20 million or more has a counsel’s opinion regarding non-consolidation of the borrower. For this purpose, a “Single-Purpose Entity” means an entity, other than an individual, whose organizational documents (or if the Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date Balance equal to $5 million or less, its organizational documents or the related Mortgage Loan documents) provide substantially to the effect that it was formed or organized solely for the purpose of owning and operating
one or more of the Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loans and prohibit it from engaging in any business unrelated to such Mortgaged Property or Properties, and whose organizational documents further provide, or which entity represented in the related Mortgage Loan documents, substantially to the effect that it does not have any assets other than those related to its interest in and operation of such Mortgaged Property or Properties, or any indebtedness other than as permitted by the related Mortgage(s) or the other related Mortgage Loan documents, that it has its own books and records and accounts separate and apart from those of any other person (other than a borrower for a Crossed Mortgage Loan), and that it holds itself out as a legal entity, separate and apart from any other person or entity.
(32) Defeasance. With respect to any Mortgage Loan that, pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, can be defeased (a “Defeasance”), (i) the Mortgage Loan documents provide for Defeasance as a unilateral right of the borrower, subject to satisfaction of conditions specified in the Mortgage Loan documents; (ii) the Mortgage Loan cannot be defeased within two (2) years after the Closing Date; (iii) the borrower is permitted to pledge only United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(a)(8)(ii) of the Treasury Regulations, the revenues from which will, in the case of a full Defeasance, be sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Loan when due, including the entire remaining principal balance on the maturity date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty), and if the Mortgage Loan permits partial releases of real property in connection with partial Defeasance, the revenues from the collateral will be sufficient to pay all such scheduled payments calculated on a principal amount equal to a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (a) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the real property to be released and (b) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan; (iv) the borrower is required to provide a certification from an independent certified public accountant that the collateral is sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Note as set forth in clause (iii) above; (v) if the borrower would continue to own assets in addition to the defeasance collateral, the portion of the Mortgage Loan secured by defeasance collateral is required to be assumed (or the mortgagee may require such assumption) by a Single-Purpose Entity; (vi) the borrower is required to provide an opinion of counsel that the mortgagee has a perfected security interest in such collateral prior to any other claim or interest; and (vii) the borrower is required to pay all rating agency fees associated with Defeasance (if rating confirmation is a specific condition precedent thereto) and all other reasonable expenses associated with Defeasance, including, but not limited to, accountant’s fees and opinions of counsel.
(33) Fixed Interest Rates. Each Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate that remains fixed throughout the remaining term of such Mortgage Loan, except in situations where default interest is imposed.
(34) Ground Leases. For purposes of this Annex E-1, a “Ground Lease” will mean a lease creating a leasehold estate in real property where the fee owner as the ground lessor conveys for a term or terms of years its entire interest in the land, or with respect to air rights leases, the air, and buildings and other improvements, if any, comprising the premises demised under such lease to the ground lessee (who may, in certain circumstances, own the building and improvements on the land), subject to the reversionary interest of the ground lessor as fee owner and does not include industrial development agency (IDA) or similar leases for purposes of conferring a tax abatement or other benefit.
With respect to any Mortgage Loan where the Mortgage Loan is secured by a leasehold estate under a Ground Lease in whole or in part, and the related Mortgage does not also encumber the related lessor’s fee interest in such Mortgaged Property, based upon the terms of the Ground Lease and any estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor in favor of the Mortgage Loan Seller, its successors and assigns, the Mortgage Loan Seller represents and warrants that:
(a) The Ground Lease or a memorandum regarding such Ground Lease has been duly recorded or submitted for recordation in a form that is acceptable for recording in the applicable jurisdiction. The Ground Lease or an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor permits the interest of the lessee to be encumbered by the related Mortgage and does not
restrict the use of the related Mortgaged Property by such lessee, its successors or assigns in a manner that would materially adversely affect the security provided by the related Mortgage;
(b) The lessor under such Ground Lease has agreed in a writing included in the related Mortgage File (or in such Ground Lease) that the Ground Lease may not be amended or modified, or canceled or terminated by agreement of lessor and lessee, without the prior written consent of the lender, and no such consent has been granted by the Mortgage Loan Seller since the origination of the Mortgage Loan except as reflected in any written instruments which are included in the related Mortgage File;
(c) The Ground Lease has an original term (or an original term plus one or more optional renewal terms, which, under all circumstances, may be exercised, and will be enforceable, by either borrower or the mortgagee) that extends not less than 20 years beyond the stated maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, or 10 years past the stated maturity if such Mortgage Loan fully amortizes by the stated maturity (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan that accrues on an actual 360 basis, substantially amortizes);
(d) The Ground Lease either (i) is not subject to any liens or encumbrances superior to, or of equal priority with, the Mortgage, except for the related fee interest of the ground lessor and the Permitted Encumbrances, or (ii) is subject to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement to which the mortgagee on the lessor’s fee interest in the Mortgaged Property is subject;
(e) The Ground Lease does not place commercially unreasonable restrictions on the identity of the Mortgagee and the Ground Lease is assignable to the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor thereunder, and in the event it is so assigned, it is further assignable by the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor;
(f) The Mortgage Loan Seller has not received any written notice of material default under or notice of termination of such Ground Lease. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, there is no material default under such Ground Lease and no condition that, but for the passage of time or giving of notice, would result in a material default under the terms of such Ground Lease and to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, such Ground Lease is in full force and effect as of the Closing Date;
(g) The Ground Lease or ancillary agreement between the lessor and the lessee requires the lessor to give to the lender written notice of any default, and provides that no notice of default or termination is effective against the lender unless such notice is given to the lender;
(h) A lender is permitted a reasonable opportunity (including, where necessary, sufficient time to gain possession of the interest of the lessee under the Ground Lease through legal proceedings) to cure any default under the Ground Lease which is curable after the lender’s receipt of notice of any default before the lessor may terminate the Ground Lease;
(i) The Ground Lease does not impose any restrictions on subletting that would be viewed as commercially unreasonable by the Mortgage Loan Seller in connection with loans originated for securitization;
(j) Under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds or the portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest (other than (i) de minimis amounts for minor casualties or (ii) in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking as addressed in clause (k) below) will be applied either to the repair or to restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property with (so long as such proceeds are in excess of the threshold amount specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents) the lender or a trustee appointed by it
having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as repair or restoration progresses, or to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest;
(k) In the case of a total or substantially total taking or loss, under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds, or portion of the condemnation award allocable to ground lessee’s interest in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking of the related Mortgaged Property to the extent not applied to restoration, will be applied first to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest; and
(l) Provided that the lender cures any defaults which are susceptible to being cured, the ground lessor has agreed to enter into a new lease with lender upon termination of the Ground Lease for any reason, including rejection of the Ground Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding.
(35) Servicing. The servicing and collection practices used by the Mortgage Loan Seller with respect to the Mortgage Loan have been, in all respects, legal and have met customary industry standards for servicing of commercial loans for conduit loan programs.
(36) Origination and Underwriting. The origination practices of the Mortgage Loan Seller (or the related originator if the Mortgage Loan Seller was not the originator) with respect to each Mortgage Loan have been, in all material respects, legal and as of the date of its origination, such Mortgage Loan and the origination thereof complied in all material respects with, or was exempt from, all requirements of federal, state or local law relating to the origination of such Mortgage Loan; provided that such representation and warranty does not address or otherwise cover any matters with respect to federal, state or local law otherwise covered in this Annex E-1.
(37) No Material Default; Payment Record. No Mortgage Loan has been more than 30 days delinquent, without giving effect to any grace or cure period, in making required payments since origination, and no Mortgage Loan is more than 30 days delinquent (beyond any applicable grace or cure period) in making required payments as of the Closing Date. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, there is (a) no material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration existing under the related Mortgage Loan, or (b) no event (other than payments due but not yet delinquent) which, with the passage of time or with notice and the expiration of any grace or cure period, would constitute a material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, which default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, in the case of either clause (a) or clause (b), materially and adversely affects the value of the Mortgage Loan or the value, use or operation of the related Mortgaged Property, provided, however, that this representation and warranty does not cover any default, breach, violation or event of acceleration that specifically pertains to or arises out of an exception scheduled to any other representation and warranty made by the Mortgage Loan Seller in this Annex E-1. No person other than the holder of such Mortgage Loan may declare any event of default under the Mortgage Loan or accelerate any indebtedness under the Mortgage Loan documents.
(38) Bankruptcy. As of the date of origination of the related Mortgage Loan and to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, no borrower, guarantor or tenant occupying a single-tenant property is a debtor in state or federal bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding.
(39) Organization of Borrower. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, in reliance on certified copies of the organizational documents of the borrower delivered by the borrower in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan, the borrower is an entity organized under the laws of a state of the United States of America, the District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Except with respect to any Crossed Mortgage Loan, no Mortgage Loan has a borrower that is an Affiliate of another borrower under another Mortgage Loan. (An “Affiliate” for purposes of this paragraph (39) means, a borrower that is under direct or indirect common ownership and control with another borrower.)
(40) Environmental Conditions. A Phase I environmental site assessment (or update of a previous Phase I and or Phase II site assessment) and, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, a Phase II
environmental site assessment (collectively, an “ESA”) meeting ASTM requirements conducted by a reputable environmental consultant in connection with such Mortgage Loan within 12 months prior to its origination date (or an update of a previous ESA was prepared), and such ESA either (i) did not identify the existence of recognized environmental conditions (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-13 or its successor, hereinafter “Environmental Condition”) at the related Mortgaged Property or the need for further investigation with respect to any Environmental Condition that was identified, or (ii) if the existence of an Environmental Condition or need for further investigation was indicated in any such ESA, then at least one of the following statements is true: (A) an amount reasonably estimated by a reputable environmental consultant to be sufficient to cover the estimated cost to cure any material noncompliance with applicable environmental laws or the Environmental Condition has been escrowed by the related borrower and is held or controlled by the related lender; (B) if the only Environmental Condition relates to the presence of asbestos-containing materials, radon in indoor air, lead based paint or lead in drinking water, and the only recommended action in the ESA is the institution of such a plan, an operations or maintenance plan has been required to be instituted by the related borrower that can reasonably be expected to mitigate the identified risk; (C) the Environmental Condition identified in the related environmental report was remediated or abated in all material respects prior to the Cut-off Date, and, if and as appropriate, a no further action or closure letter was obtained from the applicable governmental regulatory authority (or the Environmental Condition affecting the related Mortgaged Property was otherwise listed by such governmental authority as “closed” or a reputable environmental consultant has concluded that no further action is required); (D) a secured creditor environmental policy or a pollution legal liability insurance policy that covers liability for the Environmental Condition was obtained from an insurer or insurers rated no less than “A-” (or the equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., S&P Global Ratings, acting through Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and/or Fitch Ratings, Inc.; (E) a party not related to the borrower was identified as the responsible party for such Environmental Condition and such responsible party has financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation; or (F) a party related to the borrower having financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation is required to take action. To the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, except as set forth in the ESA, there is no Environmental Condition (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-13 or its successor) at the related Mortgaged Property.
(41) Appraisal. The Servicing File contains an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property with an appraisal date within 6 months of the Mortgage Loan origination date, and within 12 months of the Closing Date. The appraisal is signed by an appraiser who is either a Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) and/or has been licensed and certified to prepare appraisals in the state where the Mortgaged Property is located. Each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and has certified that such appraiser had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the borrower or in any loan made on the security thereof, and its compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Mortgage Loan.
(42) Mortgage Loan Schedule. The information pertaining to each Mortgage Loan which is set forth in the mortgage loan schedule attached as an exhibit to the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement is true and correct in all material respects as of the Cut-off Date and contains all information required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to be contained therein.
(43) Cross-Collateralization. Except with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, no Mortgage Loan is cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with any other mortgage loan that is outside the Mortgage Pool, except as set forth on Schedule E-3.
(44) Hospitality Provisions. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan that is secured by a hospitality property operated pursuant to a franchise or license agreement includes an executed comfort letter or similar agreement signed by the related borrower and franchisor or licensor of such property that, subject to the applicable terms of such franchise or license agreement and comfort letter or similar agreement, is enforceable by the issuing entity (or, in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, by the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust) against such franchisor or licensor either (A) directly or
as an assignee of the originator, or (B) upon the Mortgage Loan Seller’s or its designee’s providing notice of the transfer of the Mortgage Loan to the issuing entity (or, in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, by the seller of the note which is contributed to the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust or its designee providing notice of the transfer of such note to the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust) in accordance with the terms of such executed comfort letter or similar agreement, which the Mortgage Loan Seller or its designee (except in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will provide, or if neither (A) nor (B) is applicable, except in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the Mortgage Loan Seller or its designee will apply for, on the issuing entity’s behalf, a new comfort letter or similar agreement as of the Closing Date. The mortgage or related security agreement for each Mortgage Loan secured by a hospitality property creates a security interest in the revenues of such property for which a UCC financing statement has been filed in the appropriate filing office. For the avoidance of doubt, no representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in revenues to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of Uniform Commercial Code financing statements is required to effect such perfection.
(45) Advance of Funds by the Mortgage Loan Seller. After origination, no advance of funds has been made by the Mortgage Loan Seller to the related borrower other than in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents, and, to the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge, no funds have been received from any person other than the related borrower or an affiliate for, or on account of, payments due on the Mortgage Loan (other than as contemplated by the Mortgage Loan documents, such as, by way of example and not in limitation of the foregoing, amounts paid by the tenant(s) into a lender-controlled lockbox if required or contemplated under the related lease or Mortgage Loan documents). Neither the Mortgage Loan Seller nor any affiliate thereof has any obligation to make any capital contribution to any borrower under a Mortgage Loan, other than contributions made on or prior to the Closing Date.
(46) Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering Laws. The Mortgage Loan Seller has complied in all material respects with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including without limitation the USA Patriot Act of 2001 with respect to the origination of the Mortgage Loan, the failure to comply with which would have a material adverse effect on the Mortgage Loan.
For purposes of these representations and warranties, the phrases “the Mortgage Loan Seller’s knowledge” or “the Mortgage Loan Seller’s belief” and other words and phrases of like import mean, except where otherwise expressly set forth in these representations and warranties, the actual state of knowledge or belief of the Mortgage Loan Seller, its officers and employees directly responsible for the underwriting, origination, servicing or sale of the Mortgage Loans regarding the matters expressly set forth in these representations and warranties.
Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1
CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
None.
Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1
3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
Loan No. | Mortgage Loan | Original Principal Amount of Existing Mezzanine Debt |
10 | Liberties Walk | $9,200,000 |
Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1
BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
None.
Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1
BANK OF MONTREAL
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
None.
Schedule E-1 to Annex E-1
GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH EXISTING MEZZANINE DEBT
None.
Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1
CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1
3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1
BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1
BANK OF MONTREAL
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule E-2 to Annex E-1
GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH RESPECT TO WHICH MEZZANINE DEBT
IS PERMITTED IN THE FUTURE
None.
Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1
CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC.
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1
3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1
BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC.
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1
BANK OF MONTREAL
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
Schedule E-3 to Annex E-1
GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
CROSS-COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE LOANS
None.
ANNEX E-2
EXCEPTIONS TO CITI REAL ESTATE FUNDING INC. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (12) Condemnation | The Semmes Mortgaged Property is subject to a planned partial condemnation which is expected to be limited to the addition of sidewalk improvements. |
27 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | (16) Insurance | The Mortgaged Property is subject to a condominium declaration that requires insurance proceeds on account of the common elements to be deposited with an insurance trustee. The identity of the insurance trustee is subject to approval of the “primary institutional first mortgagee”. At origination of the Mortgage Loan, it could not be confirmed with the condominium association nor other diligence that the lender is the primary institutional first mortgagee. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio
| (16) Insurance | With respect to excess flood coverage, the lender accepted a higher than market deductible and accepted combined limits for business interruption and the improvements and betterments in an amount less than lender would generally require. |
27 | 2001 Biscayne Boulevard | (16) Insurance | The flood insurance provided by the related borrower does not meet the lender’s institutional requirements. |
All CREFI Mortgage Loans | All CREFI Mortgage Loans | (16) Insurance | The Mortgage Loan documents may permit the related Mortgagor to cause the insurance required at the related Mortgaged Property under the Mortgage Loan documents to be maintained by a tenant, or by a condominium board or association, at the related Mortgaged Property. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots | The following Mortgaged Properties are not connected to public water and/or sewer utilities; (i) Canby Regency, (ii) Rock Springs Regency, (iii) San Marcos Regency, (iv) Durango Regency, (v) Douglasville Regency, (vi) Iowa City Regency and (vii) Oxford Pines Regency . Parcel 2 of the Iowa City Regency Mortgaged Property does not have insured access to a public right-of-way. This parcel includes private sewer improvements and services parcel 1 of such Mortgaged Property, on which manufactured housing pads are located. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (24) Local Law Compliance and (25) Licenses and Permits | The following Mortgaged Properties are legal non-conforming as to use: (i) Durango Regency; (ii) Canby Regency; (iii) Savannah Regency; (iv) Douglasville Regency; (v) Rock Springs Regency; (vi) Oxford Regency; (vii) Waveland; (viii) Montgomery Regency; (ix) Hwy 49; (x) San Juan; (xi) Sioux City Regency; (xii) Iowa City Regency; (xiii) Semmes (as to the portion of the Mortgaged Property at 8990 Moffett Road); (xiv) Eagle Lake Regency; (xv) Gautier, (xvi ) Alpine Regency (xvii) Dickson Regency and (xviii) Memphis. With respect to such Mortgaged Properties, if damage from a casualty or other cause occurs beyond a specified threshold, such Mortgaged Properties will not be able, or may not be able, to be reconstructed for the existing use. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (24) Local Law Compliance and (25) Licenses and Permits | The zoning reports for the Detroit Mortgaged Property and Waveland Mortgaged Property lacked information regarding open or outstanding building, zoning, fire code or other municipal code violations. The borrower is obligated under the Mortgage Loan documents to provide a final zoning report containing such information within 60 days of the origination date. |
11 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | (24) Local Law Compliance and (25) Licenses and Permits | As of the origination of the Mortgage Loan, the following Mortgaged Properties are missing certificates of occupancy: (i) 228 East 51st Street; (ii) 73 2nd Avenue; (iii) 289 East 149th Street; (iv) 543 East 6th Street; and (v) 151-165 East Burnside Avenue. In addition, the use of the 228 East 51st Street Mortgaged Property for commercial use is a legal non-conforming use. If damage from a casualty or other cause occurs beyond a specified threshold, such Mortgaged Property will not be able to be reconstructed for the existing commercial use. |
| | | | |
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
All CREFI Mortgage Loans | All CREFI Mortgage Loans | (26) Recourse Obligations | The Mortgage Loan documents with respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans provide loss recourse for any material breach of the environmental covenants contained in the Mortgage Loan documents. |
All CREFI Mortgage Loans | All CREFI Mortgage Loans | (29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | All exceptions to Representation and Warranty No. 16 are also exceptions to this Representation and Warranty No. 29. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | There is a master lease between the borrower and an affiliate. The affiliate owns certain manufactured homes at certain of the Mortgaged Properties, which it rents out to the occupants. In addition, the affiliate may acquire additional manufactured homes at the Mortgaged Properties and subject such manufactured homes and pads to the master lease. The master lease provides for such affiliate to rent the pads on which such manufactured homes are located at a rate of $578 per month, and to pay to the borrower all rents received by such affiliate from the rental of the manufactured homes on such pads. The non-consolidation opinion delivered at origination is based on the assumption that such master lease is on arm’s length terms, and that the rent paid under the master lease for the pads is consistent with prevailing rental rates charged by the borrower to other manufactured home owners within the applicable properties and the rent paid under the master lease for the manufactured homes is consistent with market rates. |
3 | Memphis and Chicago Industrial Portfolio | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | The Mortgage Loan documents provide for a 25% payment guaranty by the non-recourse carveout guarantor, and also include a master lease with the non-recourse carveout guarantor. The non-consolidation opinion delivered at origination (i) expresses no opinion with respect to substantive consolidation of a borrower with its affiliates that is based in whole or part on the 25% payment guaranty and (ii) is based on the assumption that the master lease obligations, as well as guaranteed obligations to make “true up” payments with respect to certain reserve funds, will not exceed 10% of the original principal amount of the Mortgage Loan. |
11 | ST NYC Mixed-Use Portfolio | (31) Single-Purpose Entity | The Mortgage Loan has an original principal balance of $30,000,000 and no non-consolidation opinion has been delivered. |
2 | Churchill Portfolio | (34) Ground Leases | The Canby Mortgaged Property is comprised in part of a ground leasehold interest. With respect to such ground lease: (34)(a) A memorandum of ground lease with respect to the original ground lease was recorded, but there is nothing of record in connection with any amendments or extensions. The ground lease is silent as to the ability to mortgage the leasehold interest. (34)(b) The ground lease does not include any mortgagee consent rights regarding amendments, modifications, cancellations or terminations. (34)(c) The ground lease expires December 31, 2033, and there are no remaining extension options. (34)(g) The ground lease does not include any requirement to provide notice to the mortgagee of defaults. (34)(h) The ground lease does not provide the mortgagee any cure rights. (34)(j) The ground lease is silent as to application of insurance. (34)(k) The ground lease is silent as to application of condemnation awards. (34)(l) The ground lease does not provide the mortgagee with any rights to obtain a new lease. |
ANNEX E-3
EXCEPTIONS TO 3650 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST 2 LLC REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
29 | 500 Delaware | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment | The second largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property, Morris James LLP, has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property in the event of a proposed sale of the Mortgaged Property. The right of first refusal does not apply to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property in connection with a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. |
8 | Towne Center at Webster | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment | A tenant, Pizzeria Uno, leasing approximately 1.75% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has a right of first refusal to purchase its leased premises in the event of a proposed sale of such premises. Pursuant to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement, the right of first refusal is subject and subordinate to the Mortgage Loan and does not apply to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property in connection with a foreclosure, a deed-in-lieu of disclosure or the first subsequent transfer of the Mortgaged Property following the foregoing. |
29 | 500 Delaware | (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 5, above. |
8 | Towne Center at Webster | (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 5, above. |
29 | 500 Delaware | (10) Condition of Property | The property inspection conducted in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan was not performed within 12 months of the Cut-off Date (nor has the related Mortgaged Property otherwise been inspected within 12 months of the Cut-off Date). |
5 | NYC Multifamily Portfolio | (24) Local Law Compliance | Certain administrative code, building code and fire code violations are open at each of the related Mortgaged Properties (the “Open Code Violations”). The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor, at its sole cost and expense, to diligently prosecute the cure of each Open Code Violation and to cause each Open Code Violation to be removed of record. The commercial space at the 210 East 58th Street Mortgaged Property, representing approximately 8,381 square feet, is legal non-conforming as to use as commercial uses are no longer permitted under the current zoning code. If a structure containing a legal non-conforming use is damaged or destroyed to the extent of 75% or more of its total floor area, such structure may be reconstructed only in accordance with the current zoning code. If the extent of such damage or destruction is less than 75%, the structure may be reconstructed to its prior legal non-conforming use provided that such reconstruction does not create a new non-compliance nor increase the pre-existing degree of non-compliance. |
10 | Liberties Walk | (24) Local Law Compliance | Certain portions of the Mortgaged Property improved by single-family townhomes or commercial space are legal non-conforming as to use (including certain smoking lounge, eating and drinking establishment, office and consumer goods uses), as such uses are no longer permitted (or are no longer permitted without a special exception approval and the related borrower has not obtained such an approval) under the current zoning code at such portions of the Mortgaged Property. If a structure containing a non-conforming use is destroyed (other than voluntarily), such structure may be may be restored to its prior legal non-conforming use provided that reconstruction begins within 3 years after the destruction and is completed without interruption. |
10 | Liberties Walk | (26) Recourse Obligations | With respect to clause (a)(ii) of Representation and Warranty No. 26, the Mortgage Loan documents only provide recourse for intentional misapplication or misappropriation. |
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
29 | 500 Delaware | (32) Defeasance | A REMIC declaration was made with respect to the Mortgage Loan on April 7, 2023. The Mortgage Loan may be defeased beginning on the day after April 7, 2025, which is less than two years after the Closing Date and more than two years from the start-up date of the REMIC formed in connection with such REMIC declaration. |
29 | 500 Delaware | (41) Appraisal | The related appraisal is dated April 11, 2022, which is not within 12 months of the Closing Date. |
ANNEX E-4
EXCEPTIONS TO BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE INC. REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
12 | The Plaza at Milford | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment | Tenants Chick-Fil-A and Mid-Atlantic Lube each have a right of first offer to purchase their respective leased space at the Mortgaged Property in the event of a proposed transfer of such space separately from the remainder of the shopping center to an unaffiliated third party. The rights of first offer do not apply in the event of a foreclosure or similar proceeding. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment | Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing, under the related Whole Loan, the Mortgage Loan documents prohibit the lender, without the prior written consent of the Mortgagor, from selling any note, participation or interest in the Whole Loan to Simon Property Group, Taubman Centers, Inc., The Macerich Company, Kimco Realty, Starwood Retail, PREIT, Washington Prime Group, Pyramid Real Estate Group, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., Centennial, Inc., Westfield Holdings Limited or Unibail-Rodamco (or any successors or assigns of or any person or entity controlled by, controlling or under common control with the foregoing); provided, however, such restrictions will not apply to (a) any transfer or sale by the lender of commercial mortgage-backed securities certificates, bonds or similar certificated interests secured in whole or in part by the Whole Loan or (b) any subsequent resale or transfer of the Whole Loan (or any interest therein) occurring after an initial sale or transfer by the lender even if such transaction results in a portion of the Whole Loan being held by a person or entity described above. |
32 | Telegraph Budget Storage | (5) Lien; Valid Assignment | Unison Site Management, L.L.C., the tenant occupying the portion of the Mortgaged Property consisting of a cell tower used for the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals, has a right of first refusal to purchase the related Mortgaged Property if the Mortgagor decides to sell the Mortgaged Property to a buyer who intends to install and use communication towers, antennas or similar equipment at the Mortgaged Property, provided that such tenant provides 20 days’ prior notice. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 5, above. |
32 | Telegraph Budget Storage | (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 5, above. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (16) Insurance | The Mortgage Loan documents permit (i) a property insurance deductible up to $250,000, except with respect to flood, windstorm/named storm/hail coverage and earthquake coverage, which may have a deductible up to 5% of the total insurable value of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) a commercial general liability insurance deductible or self-insured retention up to $250,000. The threshold above which the lender (or a trustee appointed by it) has the right to hold and disburse insurance proceeds is $11,750,000 (which amount is equal to 5% of the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan but may be higher than the then-outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan). The Mortgage Loan documents provide that the lender may consent (subject to rating agency confirmation) to the Mortgagor maintaining (or causing to be maintained) insurance policies which (i) have coverages, deductibles and/or other related provisions other than those specified in the Mortgage Loan documents and/or (ii) are provided by insurance companies not meeting the credit rating requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. See exception to Representation and Warranty No. 29, below. |
| | | |
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
6 | Oasis Plaza | (24) Local Law Compliance | The portion of the Mortgaged Property consisting of office space (approximately 24.4% of the net rentable area) is legal non-conforming as to use as use of a non-accessory office is no longer permitted due to changes in the current zoning code unless a special use permit is obtained. If a structure containing a legal non-conforming use is damaged or destroyed to an extent greater than 50% of its estimated replacement cost, it may not be reconstructed except in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations. |
12 | The Plaza at Milford | (24) Local Law Compliance | The Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to use as use of a shopping center is no longer permitted without a conditional use permit due to changes in the current zoning code. If a structure containing a non-conforming building is destroyed more than 75% of its current sound value, exclusive of the foundation and provided that such restoration begins within 12 months of destruction, it may not be reconstructed except in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations. |
26 | DH Holmes | (24) Local Law Compliance | Certain building code violations are open at the Mortgaged Property. The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to cure all violations and provide evidence reasonably satisfactory to the lender that such violations have been cured. |
31 | Essential Storage Portfolio | (24) Local Law Compliance | The Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to use as use of single-family homes and truck leasing are no longer permitted due to changes in the current zoning code. If a structure containing a non-conforming building (except for a structure used as a dwelling unit) is destroyed by any means to an extent greater than 50% of its replacement cost at the time of destruction, it may not be reconstructed except in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations. |
32 | Telegraph Budget Storage | (24) Local Law Compliance | The Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to use as use of self storage with accessory caretaker’s residence and outdoor storage of vehicles is no longer permitted due to changes in the current zoning code. In addition, the Mortgaged Property is non-conforming with respect to its use of U-Haul truck leasing. If a structure containing a non-conforming building is destroyed by any means to an extent greater than 50% of its replacement cost at the time of destruction, it may not be reconstructed except in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (26) Recourse Obligations | With respect to clause (a)(ii) of Representation and Warranty No. 26, the Mortgage Loan documents only provide recourse for material misappropriation. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (27) Mortgage Releases | The Mortgagor is permitted to obtain the release of parcels at the Mortgaged Property upon the substitution therefor of other parcels of real property and satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | The Mortgage Loan documents permit a terrorism insurance deductible of up to $1,000,000. Such deductible may not be considered customary. In addition, the Mortgage Loan documents permit terrorism insurance to be obtained through a captive insurance program with Liberty IC Casualty LLC, subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including that covered losses which are not reinsured by the federal government under TRIPRA and paid to Liberty must be reinsured with a cut through endorsement acceptable to the lender and the rating agencies by insurance companies which satisfy the rating requirements set forth in the loan agreement. |
14 | Baybrook Mall | (33) Defeasance | In connection with a defeasance, the related Mortgagor is not required to pay defeasance related costs and expenses of Servicer or Trustee in excess of $10,000. |
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
26 | DH Holmes | (34) Ground Leases | The Mortgaged Property is subject to: (i) that certain Eighth Amendment and Restatement of Apartments Lease Agreement, dated October 10, 2014, effective January 1, 2014, between New Orleans Building Corporation (“NOBC”), as lessor, and the Mortgagor, as lessee (the “Apartments Ground Lease”), (ii) that certain First Amendment and Restatement of Apartments Parking Lease Agreement, dated March 30, 1994, between NOBC, as lessor, and the Mortgagor, as lessee (the “Parking Sublease”), (iii) that certain Third Amendment and Restatement of Lease Agreement, dated September 25, 1989, between Mercier Realty & Investment Company, as lessor, and NOBC, as lessee (the “Mercier Parking Lease”) and (iv) that certain Lease of Air Space, dated March 24, 1994, between The City of New Orleans, as lessor, and NOBC as lessee (the “Air Rights Lease”). With respect to clause (a) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, the Mercier Parking Lease does not explicitly permit the interests of the lessee to be encumbered by the related Mortgage, though it does contemplate an encumbrance on NOBC’s leasehold interest. With respect to clause (b) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, the Apartments Ground Lease permits the ground lessor to amend, modify and terminate the Apartments Ground Lease without lender’s consent in the event a default under the Apartments Ground Lease has occurred and the lender has not cured such default. The Parking Sublease and Mercier Parking Lease permit the amendment, modification, cancellation or termination of such ground lease without Lender consent. With respect to the Parking Sublease an amendment, modification or termination of such lease without the lender’s consent will trigger full recourse. With respect to the Mercier Parking Lease, a termination of such lease without lender’s consent will trigger loss recourse. With respect to clause (e) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, with respect to the Apartments Ground Lease, any proposed sale or transfer to any person or entity obligated to the City of New Orleans for nonpayment of any sums or obligated to the ground lessor for nonpayment of any sums due under the Apartments Ground Lease, or to an affiliate of such person or entity, will require the consent of NOBC. Additionally, the first subsequent sale of the Apartments Ground Lease after foreclosure requires NOBC’s consent unless the purchaser is an Institutional Buyer (as defined in the Apartments Ground Lease) that has a net worth, or that is owned by an entity that has a net worth, of not less than $25 million. With respect to clause (h) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, the Parking Sublease and the Mercier Ground Lease do not extend the cure period in order to acquire the applicable leasehold estate. With respect to clauses (j) and (k) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, the Parking Sublease defers to the terms of the Mercier Ground Lease with respect to casualty/condemnation, and the Mercier Ground Lease states that insurance proceeds are to be held by a national bank in the City of New Orleans and applied in accordance with the leasehold mortgage loan documents (if any). The Mercier Ground Lease also states that ground lessee has the right to the award for its fixtures, personal property or leasehold value, but does not address holding and disbursing such condemnation proceeds. The Air Rights Lease does not address either casualty or condemnation. With respect to clause (l) of Representation and Warranty No. 34, the Mercier Parking Lease contains a new lease provision, but such provision does not include the broad right to a new lease for any termination of the Mercier Parking Lease or any specific language regarding rejection of the Mercier Parking Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding. The Parking Sublease and Air Rights Lease do not contain any new lease provisions. |
31 32 | Essential Storage Portfolio Telegraph Budget Storage | (39) Organization of Mortgagor | The related Mortgagors are affiliated. |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX E-5
EXCEPTIONS TO BANK OF MONTREAL REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions |
21 22 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center | (16) Insurance | With respect to the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan and SpringHill Suites Charleston Airport & Convention Center Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgage Loan documents for each such Mortgage Loan permit the related Mortgagor to maintain coverage for windstorm with Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co., an insurance company that is rated by KBRA only, until the policy renewal date (April 1, 2025). The Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co. policy also includes co-insurance with a coverage limit equal to the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis. Under the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents, the Mortgagor is required to maintain a coverage limit equal to the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis during the current policy term, and upon renewal, the Mortgagor is required to obtain a windstorm policy meeting the requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. In addition, with respect to the Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to setbacks and parking, and such Mortgaged Property does not have law and ordinance insurance coverage with respect to a windstorm or named storm because Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co. does not offer law and ordinance coverage. |
All BMO Mortgage Loans | All BMO Mortgage Loans | (16) Insurance | The Mortgage Loan documents may permit the related Mortgagor to cause the insurance required at the related Mortgaged Property under the Mortgage Loan documents to be maintained by a tenant, or by a condominium board or association, at the related Mortgaged Property. |
21 | Tru by Hilton Mt Pleasant Charleston | (24) Local Law Compliance | According to the zoning report obtained in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgaged Property is legal non-conforming as to setbacks and parking, and such Mortgaged Property does not have law and ordinance insurance coverage with respect to a windstorm or named storm because Frontline Insurance Unlimited Co. does not offer law and ordinance coverage. In addition, such zoning report has revealed one open fire code violation with respect to such Mortgaged Property. |
All BMO Mortgage Loans | All BMO Mortgage Loans | (27) Mortgage Releases | In the event of a taking of any portion of any of the Mortgaged Property by a state or any political subdivision or authority thereof, the Mortgagor cannot be required to pay down the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount not less than the amount required by the loan-to-value ratio and other requirements of the REMIC provisions if the related Mortgagor provides an opinion of counsel to the holder of the Mortgage Loan that the trust will continue to maintain its status as a REMIC trust if such amount is not paid. |
All BMO Mortgage Loans | All BMO Mortgage Loans | (39) Organization of Mortgagor | The Mortgagors are affiliated through a common sponsor. |
All BMO Mortgage Loans | All BMO Mortgage Loans | (29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | The Mortgage Loan documents may permit the related Mortgagor to cause the insurance required at the related Mortgaged Property under the Mortgage Loan documents to be maintained by a tenant, or by a condominium board or association, at the related Mortgaged Property. |
| | | |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX E-6
EXCEPTIONS TO GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES
Annex A-1 ID# | Mortgage Loans | Representations | Exceptions | |
7 | The Meadows and the Hills of Lehigh Valley | (24) Local Law Compliance and (25) Licenses and Permits | There are several open building code violations at The Meadows at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property, and the zoning report for The Hills at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property indicates that fire code documents have been requested but were not received at the time of origination. With respect to the violations at The Meadows of Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagor represented in the Mortgage Loan documents that, to the best of its knowledge, after due inquiry and investigation, all remedial work in connection with the violations was completed as of the origination date. The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagors to cause the removal of the existing violations at The Meadows of Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property from the record within 120 days following the origination date, which 120 day period may be extended for 30-day periods so long as the Mortgagors are diligently pursuing the removal of the violations from the record; provided that in no event will the deadline be extended beyond a date that is 30 days prior to any enforcement action. For The Hills at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagors entered into a post-closing agreement pursuant to which they are required to deliver a completed zoning report for such Mortgaged Property reflecting any current fire code violations or a statement that none exist. The Mortgagors covenant in the Mortgage Loan documents to cause the removal from the record of any such violations that may be shown on the post-closing zoning report within 60 days following the origination date, which 60-day period may be extended for 30-day periods so long as the Mortgagors are diligently pursuing the removal of the violations from the record; provided that in no event will the deadline be extended beyond a date that is 30 days prior to any enforcement action. With respect to the Meadows at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property, any property in the City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania that has a violation is considered to have certificates of occupancy that are not “clear.” As a result, multiple units at The Meadows at Lehigh Valley Mortgaged Property are considered to not have “clear” certificates of occupancy as a result of the existing violations. |
24 | 22 North 15th Street | (24) Local Law Compliance and (25) Licenses and Permits | The Mortgaged Property is subject to several building and zoning code violations. The violations are the responsibility of the tenant, The City of New York, under its lease. The Mortgagor covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents to cure the violations, or cause the tenant to cure the violations, within 90 days following the origination date as to Department of Buildings violations and within 45 days following the origination date for fire code violations, subject to 30-day extensions so long as the Mortgagor is diligently pursuing the cure of the violations, provided that such extensions may not go beyond the date that is 30 days prior to any enforcement action on such violations. |
All GACC Mortgage Loans | All GACC Mortgage Loans | (26) Recourse Obligations | In most cases, the Mortgage Loans being sold by German American Capital Corporation do not provide for recourse for misapplication of rents, insurance proceeds or condemnation awards. |
All GACC Mortgage Loans | All GACC Mortgage Loans | (27) Mortgage Releases | In most cases, the Mortgage Loan documents provide that in the event of a condemnation or taking of any portion of a Mortgaged Property by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof, whether by legal proceeding or by agreement, the Mortgagor may not be required to pay down the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC Provisions if the Mortgagor delivers an opinion of counsel to the effect that the failure to make such pay down will not cause such REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC. |
| | | | |
No dealer, salesman or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the securities offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Certificates | 3 |
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates | 12 |
Important Notice About Information Presented in This Prospectus | 12 |
Summary of Terms | 23 |
Summary of Risk Factors | 55 |
Risk Factors | 57 |
Description of the Mortgage Pool | 147 |
Transaction Parties | 212 |
Credit Risk Retention | 274 |
Description of the Certificates | 280 |
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements | 313 |
Pooling and Servicing Agreement | 323 |
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans | 429 |
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties | 446 |
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties | 448 |
Use of Proceeds | 448 |
Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations | 448 |
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations | 458 |
Certain State and Local and Foreign Tax Considerations | 471 |
Method of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest) | 471 |
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference | 473 |
Where You Can Find More Information | 474 |
Financial Information | 474 |
Certain ERISA Considerations | 474 |
Legal Investment | 478 |
Legal Matters | 479 |
Ratings | 479 |
Index of Defined Terms | 482 |
Dealers will be required to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters of these certificates and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions. In addition, all dealers selling these certificates will deliver a prospectus until the date that is ninety days from the date of this prospectus.
$812,896,000
(Approximate)
GS Mortgage Securities
Corporation II
(Central Index Key Number
0001004158)
Depositor
Benchmark 2024-V9 Mortgage Trust
(Central Index Key Number
0002030476)
Issuing Entity
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2024-V9
Class A-1 | $1,595,000 |
Class A-3 | $622,886,000 |
Class X-A | $722,614,000 |
Class X-B | $75,828,000 |
Class X-D | $14,454,000 |
Class A-S | $98,133,000 |
Class B | $43,490,000 |
Class C | $32,338,000 |
Class D | $14,454,000 |
PROSPECTUS
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Citigroup
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Barclays
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
BMO Capital Markets
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Deutsche Bank Securities
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Academy Securities
Co-Manager
CastleOak Securities, L.P.
Co-Manager
August 14, 2024