UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-16103
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Ohio | | 31-1263732 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
6600 Port Road, Groveport, Ohio 43125
(Address of principal executive offices)
(614) 748-1150
(Issuer’s Telephone Number)
No change
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last reports)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
On May 11, 2007, the registrant had outstanding 6,370,748 common shares without par value, which is the Issuer’s only class of common equity.
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | December 31, 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | 42,000 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $134,000 and $138,000, respectively | | | 14,783,000 | | | | 17,718,000 | |
Inventory, net | | | 10,215,000 | | | | 11,732,000 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 538,000 | | | | 499,000 | |
Income taxes receivable | | | 1,309,000 | | | | 1,030,000 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 858,000 | | | | 858,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 27,738,000 | | | | 31,879,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 542,000 | | | | 511,000 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 416,000 | | | | 408,000 | |
Computer equipment and related software | | | 3,545,000 | | | | 3,373,000 | |
Shop equipment | | | 719,000 | | | | 619,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property and equipment, cost | | | 5,222,000 | | | | 4,911,000 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (3,788,000 | ) | | | (3,667,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property and equipment, net | | | 1,434,000 | | | | 1,244,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 597,000 | | | | 597,000 | |
Other assets | | | 138,000 | | | | 138,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other assets | | | 735,000 | | | | 735,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 29,907,000 | | | $ | 33,858,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit | | $ | 8,967,000 | | | $ | 9,109,000 | |
Short-term note | | | 4,000,000 | | | | 4,000,000 | |
Accounts payable | | | 8,186,000 | | | | 11,851,000 | |
Accrued expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Wages, payroll taxes and benefits | | | 849,000 | | | | 1,053,000 | |
Other | | | 1,865,000 | | | | 947,000 | |
Unearned revenue | | | 439,000 | | | | 204,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 24,306,000 | | | | 27,164,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Accrued other | | | 5,000 | | | | 675,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term liabilities | | | 5,000 | | | | 675,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 24,311,000 | | | | 27,839,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock; no par value; 4,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock; no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 6,367,948 and 6,363,448 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 3,445,000 | | | | 3,435,000 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 1,311,000 | | | | 1,263,000 | |
Retained earnings | | | 840,000 | | | | 1,321,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 5,596,000 | | | | 6,019,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 29,907,000 | | | $ | 33,858,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
SALES | | | | | | | | |
Product sales | | $ | 16,062,000 | | | $ | 12,409,000 | |
Service sales | | | 2,423,000 | | | | 2,550,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total sales | | | 18,485,000 | | | | 14,959,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
COST OF SALES | | | | | | | | |
Product sales | | | 13,457,000 | | | | 11,052,000 | |
Service sales | | | 1,665,000 | | | | 1,079,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | | 15,122,000 | | | | 12,131,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
GROSS PROFIT | | | 3,363,000 | | | | 2,828,000 | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | 3,901,000 | | | | 3,527,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | | (538,000 | ) | | | (699,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER EXPENSE | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | 250,000 | | | | 164,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | (788,000 | ) | | | (863,000 | ) |
INCOME TAX BENEFIT | | | (307,000 | ) | | | (345,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | | $ | (481,000 | ) | | $ | (518,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
BASIC LOSS PER COMMON SHARE | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (481,000 | ) | | $ | (518,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 121,000 | | | | 100,000 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 48,000 | | | | 5,000 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | — | | | | 30,000 | |
Inventory reserves | | | 54,000 | | | | 148,000 | |
Decrease/(increase) in assets: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 2,935,000 | | | | 1,131,000 | |
Inventory | | | 1,463,000 | | | | (1,586,000 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | (39,000 | ) | | | (119,000 | ) |
Income taxes receivable | | | (279,000 | ) | | | (413,000 | ) |
(Decrease)/increase in liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | (3,973,000 | ) | | | 964,000 | |
Accrued expenses and taxes | | | 44,000 | | | | (464,000 | ) |
Unearned revenue | | | 235,000 | | | | 199,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total adjustments | | | 609,000 | | | | (5,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | 128,000 | | | | (523,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (311,000 | ) | | | (91,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (311,000 | ) | | | (91,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from line of credit | | | (142,000 | ) | | | (399,000 | ) |
Outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit | | | 308,000 | | | | 937,000 | |
Proceeds from stock options exercised | | | 10,000 | | | | 403,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 176,000 | | | | 941,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH | | | (7,000 | ) | | | 327,000 | |
Cash at beginning of year | | | 42,000 | | | | 486,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of year | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | 813,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 248,000 | | | $ | 154,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income taxes (refund) net payments | | $ | (29,000 | ) | | $ | 451,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Nature of Business - Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) provides professional services around the development, deployment, and support of sophisticated computer systems that are, or are in, the products of its world-leading Original Equipment Manufacturer and Independent Software Vendor customer base in the computer and network, imaging, medical, telecommunications, and aerospace equipment industries, among others. The Company offers a full range of engineering, product development, project and program management, integration, manufacturing, and lifecycle support services designed to increase its customers’ product speed to market and engineered product life while decreasing overall costs to develop, deploy, and service their products, including depot repair, advanced exchange, contact center support and end-of-life control.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The condensed balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 and the condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial position, condensed statements of operations and changes in cash flows for all periods presented have been made. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed and omitted. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
Inventories - Inventories are valued at average cost, not in excess of market. Inventory at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was comprised of the following (net of inventory reserves):
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
Component parts (raw materials) | | $ | 7,205,000 | | $ | 9,855,000 |
Work-in-process | | | 2,794,000 | | | 1,169,000 |
Finished goods | | | 216,000 | | | 708,000 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,215,000 | | $ | 11,732,000 |
| | | | | | |
The carrying values of component parts and finished goods represent average cost or management’s estimate of its net realizable value. Such value is based on forecasts of product orders and repair/trade-in activity in the ensuing years. Such forecasts are based on historical information, known contracts, and management’s expertise in computer hardware life cycles. If demand for the Company’s products and repair/trade-in hardware prove to be significantly less than anticipated, the ultimate realizable value of such products could be substantially less than the amount shown in the balance sheet. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company provided reserves of approximately $2,050,000 and $1,996,000, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of inventory.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - The Company assesses the collectibility of the accounts receivable and provides for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of the accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and an on-going review of the Company’s trade customers and their ability to make payment. Credit is extended based on evaluation of customers’ financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable payment terms vary. Accounts receivable is stated in the financial statements at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
6
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Plant Consolidation Costs – The Company recognizes costs associated with the plant consolidation as discussed in Note 3 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”). The liability and expense for costs associated with the consolidation was recognized and measured at its fair value in the period in which the liability was incurred. The one-time termination benefits for the terminated associates were ratably expensed over the remaining service period of the associates. The estimated outstanding lease costs on the abandoned facility, which has no future economic benefit to the Company, was recognized and measured at its fair value in the period the Company ceased to use the facility for its intended use. In periods subsequent to the initial estimate of the lease costs on the abandoned facility, changes in the assumptions used to calculate the liability are evaluated, and adjustments to the liability are recognized in the period of change.
Stock-Based Compensation – Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) and related interpretations using the modified-prospective transition method. Under that method, compensation cost recognized in the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 includes (a) compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and (b) compensation cost for all stock-based awards granted on or subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated. Stock based compensation expense recognized for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $48,000 and $5,000, respectively, and was recognized as a component of “Operating Expenses” within in the Condensed Statements of Operations.
Income Taxes – The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The adoption of this pronouncement did not impact the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The Company recognizes any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” (“SFAS No. 157”) which establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its adoption on its financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS No. 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the objective to reduce both the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.
Note 3. Consolidation of Facilities
During 2006, the Company upgraded its headquarters facility in Groveport, Ohio, opened a warehouse and logistics facility in Groveport, Ohio, and consolidated the Company’s Monrovia, California operations into the Groveport, Ohio facilities (the “Plan”). The Company incurred $1,635,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for costs associated with the Plan. The amounts were recorded as a component of “Operating Expenses” within the Statements of Operations during second quarter 2006 and thereafter. The costs included $242,000 for termination and severance benefits for associates, $1,150,000 for the estimated outstanding lease costs for the facility in Monrovia, California that provides no future economic benefit to the Company, and $243,000 for other closure costs including travel, training, and relocation of associates and production lines. The Company is in negotiations with the lessor and potential tenants to sublease and/or terminate the lease in the Monrovia, California facility.
7
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the accrued liabilities associated with the Plan during the three month period ended March 31, 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Severance and Termination Benefits | | | Abandoned Facility | | | Total | |
Accrual as of January 1, 2007 | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | 868,000 | | | $ | 903,000 | |
Cash utilization | | | (23,000 | ) | | | (286,000 | ) | | | (309,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrual as of March 31, 2007 | | $ | 12,000 | | | $ | 582,000 | | | $ | 594,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of accrual as of March 31, 2007 | | $ | 12,000 | | | $ | 582,000 | | | $ | 594,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note 4. Debt
The Company is a borrower under a revolving credit promissory note (the “Line”) dated November 19, 2003, as amended, by and between the Company and KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”). The Line provides a maximum line of credit of $11,000,000, subject to borrowing base restrictions. The borrowing base is determined as the lesser of 1) $11,000,000 or 2) the sum of (a) 85% of the aggregate amount of eligible receivable accounts, plus (b) 50% of the aggregate amount of eligible inventory, not to exceed the lesser of $7,500,000 or 50% of the then outstanding principal balance of all loans, (c) minus the principal balance of the Term Note (as defined below). In addition, the agreement restricts the payments of cash dividends that would cause violations of the loan covenants. The maturity date of the Line is May 18, 2008.
The Line is payable on demand and is collateralized by a blanket lien on all assets of the Company. As of March 31, 2007, the maximum available borrowing base was $11,000,000, with unused capacity of $2,033,000. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the Line was $8,967,000 and $9,109,000, respectively.
The outstanding balance on the Line bears interest monthly at an annual rate equal to either prime rate or the overnight LIBOR plus 2.45%. Use of prime rate or the overnight LIBOR is at the discretion of the Company. The borrowing rate on the Line was 7.76% and 7.75% at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted average interest rate was 7.77% and 7.41% for March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, the unused Line capacity is subject to a commitment fee of 1/8%, payable quarterly in arrears.
The Line is subject to certain financial covenants, including a total debt to tangible net worth and the operating cash flow to total fixed charge ratio. As of March 31, 2007, the Company was not in compliance with these two financial covenants. KeyBank granted a waiver of the covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
The Company entered into a term loan with KeyBank, in the principal amount of $4,000,000, as evidenced by a promissory note dated September 28, 2006 (the “Term Note”). The principal amount of the Term Note will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the prime rate less 0.25%. The borrowing rate on the Term Note was 8.0% on March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The Term Note has a maturity date of May 15, 2007. On May 3, 2007, the Company entered into an extension of the Term Note, which provided for a maturity date of August 15, 2007 with no other changes in the terms of the loan. The Term Note is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, as provided for in the Commercial Security Agreement entered into between the Company and KeyBank on September 29, 2006.
The average debt balance, including the Line and the Term Note, for first quarter 2007 and for fiscal year 2006 was $12,625,000 and $10,055,000, respectively.
8
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 5. Income Taxes
Income taxes for interim periods were computed using the effective tax rate estimated to be applicable for the full fiscal year, which is subject to ongoing review and evaluation by management. During first quarter 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on the Company’s financial position and did not result in unrecognized tax benefits being recorded. Accordingly, no corresponding interest and penalties have been accrued. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. There are currently no federal or state income tax examinations underway for these jurisdictions.
Note 6. Stock Options
Under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, the stock option activity and weighted average exercise prices for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | March 31, 2006 |
| | Number of Options | | | Weighted Average Price | | Number of Options | | | Weighted Average Price |
Outstanding at December 31 | | 1,894,100 | | | $ | 2.71 | | 2,118,900 | | | $ | 2.54 |
Granted | | 225,300 | | | $ | 2.49 | | 160,000 | | | $ | 3.35 |
Exercised | | (4,500 | ) | | $ | 2.25 | | (231,300 | ) | | $ | 1.74 |
Forfeited | | (165,500 | ) | | $ | 3.00 | | (200 | ) | | $ | 3.88 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31 | | 1,949,400 | | | $ | 2.66 | | 2,047,400 | | | $ | 2.69 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercise price range of options outstanding | | $0.75 to $5.25 | | $0.75 to $5.25 |
The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used in this valuation for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 4.6 | % | | 4.5 | % |
Dividend yield | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % |
Volatility factor | | 68.9 | % | | 64.4 | % |
Weighted average expected life in years | | 6.4 | | | 6.4 | |
For purposes of determining the expected volatility factor, the Company used the historical price volatility of the Company’s stock price over the prior seven-year period. The approximate risk-free interest rate was based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equivalent to the expected term on the options granted. The Company does not expect to pay dividends on its common stock; therefore, a dividend yield of zero was used in the option-pricing model. The expected term of stock options granted is the period of time the options are expected to remain outstanding. Due to limited historical exercise data, the Company used the simplified method as provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 107 to estimate the expected term. Using this method, the expected term is calculated as the mid-point between the vesting date and the contractual term or expiration date. The options granted during the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 had a weighted-average fair value of $2.49 and $3.35, respectively.
9
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Loss Per Common and Common Equivalent Share
Loss per common and common equivalent shares (“LPS”) was computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, no conversion of common stock equivalents has been assumed in the calculation since the effect would be anti-dilutive. As a result, the number of weighted average outstanding common shares and LPS are the same for basic and diluted LPS calculations for the periods noted above.
The following table presents LPS for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Net loss | | $ | (481,000 | ) | | $ | (518,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Determination of common shares: | | | | | | | | |
Average common shares outstanding | | | 6,364,048 | | | | 6,062,282 | |
| | |
Basic loss per common share: | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Diluted loss per common share: | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Note 8. Operating Segments
The Company’s reportable segments are Product and Service. A description of the segments may be found in Item 1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for December 31, 2006, which includes a discussion of principal markets and distribution. The column noted as “Other” reflects the costs and assets of the functional and administrative groups of the Company that are not allocated to the reportable segments, and include engineering, finance, human resources, quality systems, and executive management. The Company evaluates performance based on operating earnings of the Product and Service segments and the segments’ effectiveness to cover the other administrative expenses of the Company. Segment information for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Sales | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 16,062,000 | | | $ | 12,409,000 | |
Services | | | 2,423,000 | | | | 2,550,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total sales | | $ | 18,485,000 | | | $ | 14,959,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 2,605,000 | | | $ | 1,357,000 | |
Services | | | 758,000 | | | | 1,471,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total gross profit | | $ | 3,363,000 | | | $ | 2,828,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 1,222,000 | | | $ | 209,000 | |
Services | | | 452,000 | | | | 1,122,000 | |
Other | | | (2,212,000 | ) | | | (2,030,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (538,000 | ) | | $ | (699,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
10
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Segment information at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
Total assets | | | | | | |
Product | | $ | 20,330,000 | | $ | 23,939,000 |
Services | | | 6,579,000 | | | 7,411,000 |
Other | | | 2,998,000 | | | 2,508,000 |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 29,907,000 | | $ | 33,858,000 |
| | | | | | |
11
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Financial Statements and Notes contained herein. This quarterly report, including the following sections, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “plan,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof. Investors are cautioned that such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results due to many factors. These factors include without limitation changes in general economic conditions, changes in the specific markets for our products and services, adverse business conditions, changes in customer order patterns, increased competition, changes in our business or our relationship with major technology partners or significant customers, pricing pressures, lack of adequate financing to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise, lack of success in technological advancements, risks associated with our new business practices, processes and information systems, and other factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” disclosed in Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. For more details, please refer to the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) provides professional services around the development, deployment, and support of sophisticated computer systems that are, or are in, the products of the Company’s customer base that include world-leading Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and Independent Software Vendors (“ISVs”) in the computer and network, imaging, medical, telecommunications, and aerospace equipment industries, among others. The Company offers a full range of engineering, product development, project and program management, integration, manufacturing, and lifecycle support services designed to increase its customers’ products speed to market and engineered product life while decreasing overall costs to develop, deploy, and service their products.
The Company’s business strategy is to collaborate with world-leading OEMs and ISVs by managing the critical business activities required to successfully deploy information technology (“IT”) solutions. The Company’s approach includes redefining the outsourced IT solution through offering comprehensive, global, and information-laden solutions to fill critical supply-chain, engineering, and logistics needs to OEMs that embed information technologies in products and to ISVs who distribute their software on information technology hardware.
During the first quarter 2007, the Company established a branch office in Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, the Company has collaborated with partner, E.C. Fix Technology Limited, to provide management and delivery of repair services for the Company’s global OEM and ISV customer base in the Asia region. In addition, in order to support a new international hard drive repair business for a certain customer, the Company has partnered with Aspan Computer Repair Laboratories B.V. to provide the repair services in The Netherlands. Management of the Company continues to actively negoiate terms for the acquisition of Aspan with the owner and plans to have a transaction completed by the end of 2007. The Company anticipates growth in the Asian and European markets.
During 2006, the Company upgraded its headquarters facility in Groveport, Ohio, opened a warehouse and logistics facility in Groveport, Ohio, and consolidated the Company’s Monrovia, California operations into the Groveport, Ohio facilities (the “Plan”). The Company invested approximately $0.4 million in 2006 to increase and improve its production, warehouse, and logistics capabilities in Ohio.
In executing the Plan in 2006, the Company incurred $1.6 million in costs. The costs included $0.2 million for termination and severance benefits for associates, an accrual of $1.2 million for the estimated outstanding lease costs for the facility in Monrovia, California that provides no future economic benefit to the Company, and $0.2 million for other closure costs including travel, training, and relocation of associates and production lines. The timing of finding a tenant, or multiple tenants, and vacating the Monrovia facility could alter the estimated lease termination costs. The Company is in negotiations with the lessor and potential tenants to sublease and/or terminate the lease in the Monrovia, California facility. Changes to the Company’s current lease options may have an adverse effect on the current estimate for future lease costs including broker fees and tenant improvements, net of rent adjustments.
12
As a result of the Plan, the Company is making strides towards gaining efficiencies in its operational areas that the Company believes will result in favorable operating results. The Company continues to address its scalability needs to meet customer requirements and to achieve profitable sales growth. In addition, the Company is evaluating and challenging existing businesses that consistently perform below expected results, and is taking a long-term strategic approach to new opportunities. The Company is focused on opportunities where the customer recognizes and values the Company as a partner and enabler to the customer’s specialized product and services needs.
In addition, the Company continues to evaluate viable acquisition opportunities that meet the Company’s established criteria, which include strategic fit, complementary, additive, or synergistic to the Company’s business, and projected accretive performance within less than a year.
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ON OPERATING RESULTS
The following is a discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company comparing the three month period ended March 31, 2007 with the three month period ended March 31, 2006. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
SALES
Sales for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | March 31, 2006 | | % Change | |
Total sales | | $ | 18,485 | | $ | 14,959 | | 24 | % |
Product | | $ | 16,062 | | $ | 12,409 | | 29 | % |
Services | | $ | 2,423 | | $ | 2,550 | | (5 | )% |
The increase in product sales from 2006 to 2007 was primarily attributable to substantial product orders from one customer in the imaging market. Sales to this customer increased substantially in the second half of the fiscal year 2006, as production of new programs came on line. The Company’s results are affected by fluctuation in its customers’ product lines and programs, and the demands of their market. The decrease in service sales from 2006 to 2007 was due to lower repair service requests from current customers, offset by an increase in new hard drive repair business in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region for one of the world’s largest contract manufacturers.
For the first quarter 2007, the Company had two customers that generated revenues of approximately $5.6 million and $4.0 million or 29% and 22% of total revenue, respectively. In addition, these customers represented 27% and 21%, respectively, of accounts receivable at March 31, 2007.
For the first quarter of 2006, the Company had two customers that generated revenues of approximately $3.6 million and $1.5 million or 24% and 10% of total revenue, respectively. In addition, these customers represented 31% and 11%, respectively, of accounts receivable at March 31, 2006.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | March 31, 2006 | | % Change | |
Total gross profit | | $ | 3,363 | | $ | 2,828 | | 19 | % |
Product | | $ | 2,605 | | $ | 1,357 | | 92 | % |
Services | | $ | 758 | | $ | 1,471 | | (48 | )% |
13
The gross profit margin percentages for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Total gross profit | | 18 | % | | 19 | % |
Product | | 16 | % | | 11 | % |
Services | | 31 | % | | 58 | % |
Gross margin as a percentage of sales on product sales increased to 16% in the three month period ended March 31, 2007 from 11% in the three month period ended March 31, 2006. During 2006, the Company transitioned the production from the Los Angeles facility to the facility in Columbus, Ohio. Through this consolidation, the Company was able to reduce certain overhead expenses. In addition, the increase in gross margin percentage is due to the different mix of products sold between each year. The Company continues to focus on opportunities with customers that have potentially higher gross margins on specialized products. Gross margin as a percentage of sales on services sales declined to 31% in the three month period ended March 31, 2007 from 58% in the three month period ended March 31, 2006. This decline was due to the increase of the new hard drive repair support services and the mix of business with existing customers between each year.
The Company continues to believe that as sales revenues increase through the organic growth of existing customers and other additional global businesses, the results of operations will be positively affected. Gross margins will vary from program to program, and the mix of programs will vary from quarter to quarter causing the gross margin percentages to vary from quarter to quarter. Consequently, it is difficult to predict gross margin results for the future revenues.
OPERATING EXPENSES AND INTEREST EXPENSES
Operating expenses, which include selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense, and interest expenses for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | March 31, 2006 | | % Change | |
Operating expenses | | $ | 3,901 | | $ | 3,527 | | 11 | % |
Interest expenses | | | 250 | | | 164 | | 52 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expense | | $ | 4,151 | | $ | 3,691 | | 12 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
The increase in SG&A expenses was due to the additional staffing costs and professional services needed to support the revenue growth and global market expansion. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses declined from 24% for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 to 21% for the three month period ended March 31, 2007.
The increase in interest expense in the three month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2006 was due to the higher average bank debt balance carried to support the working capital requirements for the growth in the Company’s business, and due to higher average interest rates.
INCOME TAX BENEFIT AND NET LOSS
Income tax benefit for the interim periods was computed using the effective tax rate estimated to be applicable for the full fiscal year, which is subject to an on-going review and evaluation by management. The effective tax rate was 39% and 40% for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Loss before taxes, income tax benefit and net loss for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | | | % Change | |
Loss before taxes | | $ | (788 | ) | | $ | (863 | ) | | 9 | % |
Income tax benefit | | | (307 | ) | | | (345 | ) | | (11 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (481 | ) | | $ | (518 | ) | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
14
LOSS PER SHARE
Loss per share (“LPS”) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Month Period Ended | |
| | March 31, 2007 | | | March 31, 2006 | |
Basic /diluted loss per common share: | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic / diluted | | | 6,364,048 | | | | 6,062,282 | |
The Company reported net loss of $(0.5) million, or $(0.08) per share for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net loss of $(0.5) million, or $(0.09) per share for the three month period ended March 31, 2006.
For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, no conversion of common stock equivalents has been assumed in the calculation of loss per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive. As a result, the number of weighted average outstanding common shares and LPS are the same for basic and diluted LPS calculations for the periods noted above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A summary of changes in current assets for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
Accounts receivable | | $ | 14,783 | | $ | 17,718 |
Inventory | | | 10,215 | | | 11,732 |
Other current assets | | | 2,740 | | | 2,429 |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | $ | 27,738 | | $ | 31,879 |
| | | | | | |
A summary of changes in current liabilities for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 |
Line of credit | | $ | 8,967 | | $ | 9,109 |
Short-term note | | | 4,000 | | | 4,000 |
Accounts payable | | | 8,186 | | | 11,851 |
Other current liabilities | | | 3,153 | | | 2,204 |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | $ | 24,306 | | $ | 27,164 |
| | | | | | |
During the three month period ended March 31, 2007, the net cash provided by operating activities was $0.1 million. During the three month period ended March 31, 2006, the net cash used in operating activities was $0.5 million. Net loss for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as adjusted for the effects of the non-cash items, which include depreciation expense, stock-based compensation expense, accounts receivable reserves, if applicable, and inventory reserves, used cash in operations of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Change in the working capital components provided a net cash inflow of $0.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, and required a net cash outflow of $0.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2006.
The net cash used in investing activities was $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company’s use of cash in investing activities was for the purchase of equipment, including computer equipment and leasehold improvements in the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
15
During the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the net cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively. In the three month period ended March 31, 2007, net cash provided by financing activities primarily included the proceeds from the short term note of $0.1 million and $0.3 million of outstanding checks to be applied against the Line (as defined below). In the three month period ended March 31, 2006, net cash provided by financing activities included the proceeds from the short term note of $0.4 million, $0.9 million of outstanding checks to be applied against the Line, and $0.4 million from the exercise of stock options.
The Company is a borrower under a revolving credit promissory note (the “Line”) dated November 19, 2003, as amended, by and between the Company and KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”). The Line provides a maximum line of credit of $11.0 million, subject to borrowing base restrictions. The borrowing base is determined as the lesser of 1) $11.0 million or 2) the sum of (a) 85% of the aggregate amount of eligible receivable accounts, plus (b) 50% of the aggregate amount of eligible inventory, not to exceed the lesser of $7.5 million or 50% of the then outstanding principal balance of all loans, (c) minus the principal balance of the Term Note (as defined below). In addition, the agreement restricts the payments of cash dividends that would cause violations of the loan covenants. The maturity date of the Line is May 18, 2008.
The Line, which is the Company’s primary source of operational and non-operational funding, is collateralized by a blanket lien on the Company’s assets. The agreement restricts the payments of cash dividends that would cause violations of the loan covenants. As of March 31, 2007, the maximum available borrowing base was $11.0 million, with unused capacity of $2.0 million. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the Line was $9.0 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
The outstanding balance on the Line bears interest monthly at an annual rate equal to either prime rate or the overnight LIBOR plus 2.45%. Use of prime rate or the overnight LIBOR is at the discretion of the Company. The borrowing rate on the Line was 7.76% and 7.75% at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted average interest rate was 7.77% and 7.41% for March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, the unused Line capacity is subject to a commitment fee of 1/8%, payable quarterly in arrears.
The Line is subject to certain financial covenants, including a total debt to tangible net worth and the operating cash flow to total fixed charge ratio. As of March 31, 2007, the Company was not in compliance with the Total Debt to Tangible Net Worth and the Operating Cash Flow to Total Fixed Charge Ratio covenants. KeyBank granted a waiver of the covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
The Company entered into a term loan with KeyBank, in the principal amount of $4.0 million, as evidenced by a promissory note dated September 28, 2006 (the “Term Note”). The principal amount of the Term Note will bear interest at an annual rate equal to the prime rate less 0.25%. The borrowing rate on the Term Note was 8.0% on March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The Term Note has a maturity date of May 15, 2007. The Term Note is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, as provided for in the Commercial Security Agreement entered into between the Company and KeyBank on September 29, 2006. On May 3, 2007, the Company entered into an extension of the Term Note, which provided for a maturity date of August 15, 2007 with no other changes in the terms of the loan.
The average bank debt balance, including the Line and the Term Note, for first quarter 2007 and for fiscal year 2006 was $12.6 million and $10.1 million, respectively.
The Company’s ability to meet the terms and covenants of the Line and Term Note will be dependent upon the Company’s future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions and financial operations. There can be no assurance that the Company’s future performance will not be affected negatively by changes in the above factors to such a degree that it affects the Company’s ability to meet the terms and covenants of the Line and Term Note.
Additional financing may be required to support the future growth plans of the Company. The future growth plans of the Company include an acquisition strategy that may include acquiring companies that are in a similar or complementary business as the Company. The Company’s acquisition strategy may be financed by the issuance of additional common or preferred stock that has been previously authorized by the shareholders. The issuance of these noted shares require the approval of the Board of Directors. The Company is evaluating acquisition targets based on similar or complementary services as currently provided by the Company that will be accretive within one year thereafter. The acquisition targets may provide large OEM customer relationships that have a potential for additional business through the synergies of the combined company (which may not be attainable by either company on their own); and/or bring resources, in terms of people, processes and/or systems, that increase the scalability of the combined businesses.
16
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements with any obligation under a guarantee contract, or a retained or contingent interest in assets or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets, or any other obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument or arising out of a variable interest.
At any given point in time in the normal course of business, the Company has numerous outstanding purchase orders with vendors to purchase inventory for use in the products that are sold to the Company’s customers or are used in performing repair services for the Company’s customers. Such orders are not recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet until the material is placed on a common carrier or delivered to the Company’s facilities, depending on terms of the arrangement. The Company has no minimum purchase quantity requirements with any of its vendors.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” (“SFAS No. 157”) which establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no material impact on the Company’s financial position and did not result in unrecognized tax benefits being recorded. Accordingly, no corresponding interest and penalties have been accrued. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. There are currently no federal or state income tax examinations underway for these jurisdictions.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS No. 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 159 provides entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the objective to reduce both the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Financial Statements and accompanying Notes. Note 2 to the Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Financial Statements. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The adoption of this pronouncement did not impact its financial position and results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company does not engage in commodity trading activities and does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. The Company also does not engage in transactions in foreign currencies that would expose itself to additional market risk. In the normal course of business, the Company’s operations are exposed to interest rate risk. The primary interest rate risk exposure relates to (i) the ability to refinance the line of credit and short term note at market rates, and (ii) the impact of interest rate movements on the ability to meet interest expense requirements and financial covenants under the Company’s debt instruments.
17
As a borrower under the Line and Term Note, the Company is exposed to changes in interest rates. The outstanding balance on the Line bears interest at an annual rate equal to prime rate or the overnight LIBOR plus 2.45%. The borrowing rate on the Line was 7.76% at March 31, 2007. A 1% increase in interest rate may cause an additional $0.1 million in annual expense on the total available Line of $11.0 million. The principal amount on the Term Note of $4.0 million bears interest at an annual rate equal to the prime rate less 0.25%. A 1% increase in interest rate may cause less than $0.1 million in annual expense on the Term Note. The Company believes that the effect of changes in interest rates will not adversely affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s market risk associated with foreign currency rates is not considered to be material. The Company had minor amounts of transactions that were denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as of the Evaluation Date, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
As of the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
18
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Since December 31, 2006, there have been no material changes to the significant risk factors and uncertainties known to the Company that, if they were to occur, could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flow. For a discussion of the Company’s risk factors, refer to Item 1A Risk Factors, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following is a listing of Exhibits either filed with this report or incorporated by reference:
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit | | If Incorporated by Reference, Document with which Exhibit was Previously Filed with the SEC |
3(a) | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | | Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 1999. |
| | |
3(b) | | Amendments to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, adopted June 26, 2000 | | Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission September 21, 2000. |
| | |
3(c) | | Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation adopted May 23, 2001 | | Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2001. |
| | |
3(d) | | Amended and Restated Code of Regulations | | Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006. |
| | |
4 | | Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures | | Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2000. |
| | |
31(a) | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | Contained herein. |
| | |
31(b) | | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | Contained herein. |
| | |
32(a) | | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | Contained herein. |
| | |
32(b) | | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 | | Contained herein. |
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | |
| | PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC. |
| |
Date: May 11, 2007 | | /s/ Michael R. Sayre |
| | Michael Sayre, Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| |
Date: May 11, 2007 | | /s/ George A. Troutman |
| | George A. Troutman, Chief Financial Officer |
20