Nonperforming loans are those which the borrower fails to perform in accordance with the original terms of the obligation and include loans on nonaccrual status, loans past due 90 days or more and restructured loans. The Company generally places loans on nonaccrual status and accrued but unpaid interest is reversed against the current year's income when interest or principal payments become 90 days or more past due unless the outstanding principal and interest is adequately secured and, in the opinion of management, is deemed in the process of collection. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recorded on a cash basis. Payments may be treated as interest income or return of principal depending upon management's opinion of the ultimate risk of loss on the individual loan. Cash payments are treated as interest income where management believes the remaining principal balance is fully collectible. Additional loans not 90 days past due may also be placed on nonaccrual status if management reasonably believes the borrower will not be able to comply with the contractual loan repayment terms and collection of principal or interest is in question.
A "restructured loan" is a loan on which interest accrues at a below market rate or upon which certain principal has been forgiven so as to aid the borrower in the final repayment of the loan, with any interest previously accrued, but not yet collected, being reversed against current income. Interest is reported on a cash basis until the borrower's ability to service the restructured loan in accordance with its terms is established. The Company had no restructured loans as of the dates indicated in the above table.
The following table summarizes nonperforming assets of the Company at March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000:
Contractual accrued interest income on loans on nonaccrual status as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, that would have been recognized if the loans had been current in accordance with their original terms was approximately $276,000 and $258,000, respectively.
At March 31, 2001, nonperforming assets represented .38% of total assets, no change in total assets compared to the .38% at December 31, 2000. Nonperforming loans represented .61% of total loans at March 31, 2001, an increase of 4 basis points compared to the .57% at December 31, 2000. Nonperforming loans that were secured by first deeds of trust on real property were $0 at March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. Other forms of collateral such as inventory and equipment secured the remaining nonperforming loans as of each date. No assurance can be given that the collateral securing nonperforming loans will be sufficient to prevent losses on such loans.
The increase in nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2001 compared with their levels as of December 31, 2000, was due to a growth in nonperforming loans in the agricultural segment of the loan portfolio.
At March 31, 2001, the Company had $247,000 invested in two properties acquired through foreclosure. Each property is carried at the lower of its estimated market value, as evidenced by an independent appraisal, or the recorded investment in the related loan, less estimated selling expenses. At foreclosure, if the fair value of the real estate is less than the Company's recorded investment in the related loan, a charge is made to the allowance for loan losses. The Company expects to sell most of these properties within a twelve month period. No assurance can be given that the Company will sell such properties during 2001 or at any time or the amount for which such property might be sold.
Management defines impaired loans, regardless of past due status on loans, as those on which principal and interest are not expected to be collected under the original contractual loan repayment terms. An impaired loan is charged off at the time management believes the collection process has been exhausted. At March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, impaired loans were measured based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective rate, the loan's observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Impaired loans at March 31, 2001 were $2,423,000 (all of which were also nonaccrual loans), on account of which the Company had made provisions to the allowance for loan losses of $606,000.
Except for loans that are disclosed above, there were no assets as of March 31, 2001, where known information about possible credit problems of borrower causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may become nonperforming assets. Given the magnitude of the Company's loan portfolio, however, it is always possible that current credit problems may exist that may not have been discovered by management.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table summarizes the loan loss experience of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the year ended December 31, 2000.
| March 31
| December 31
|
| 2001
| 2000
| 2000
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Allowance for Loan Losses: | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | $8,207
| $6,542
| $6,542
|
Provision for loan losses | 750 | 763 | 3,286 |
Charge-offs: | | | |
Commercial andagricultural | 155 | 207 | 423 |
Real estate construction | - | - | - |
Consumer | 511
| 400
| 1,971
|
Total charge-offs | 666
| 607
| 2,394
|
Recoveries | | | |
Commercial and agricultural | 5 | 5 | 410 |
Real estate-mortgage | - | - | - |
Consumer | 93
| 89
| 363
|
Total recoveries | 98
| 94
| 773
|
Net charge-offs | 568
| 513
| 1,621
|
Balance at end of period | $8,389
| $6,792
| $8,207
|
Loans outstanding at period-end | $416,786
| $347,730
| $412,664
|
Average loans outstanding | $410,554
| $335,600
| $369,367
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans | 0.55% | 0.6%1 | 0.44% |
Allowance for loan losses | | | |
To total loans | 2.01% | 1.95% | 1.99% |
To nonperforming assets | 302.63% | 251.18% | 317.12% |
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to be adequate to cover the inherent risks of loss associated with its loan portfolio under prevailing and anticipated economic conditions. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management takes into consideration growth trends in the portfolio, examination of financial institution supervisory authorities, prior loan loss experience for the Company, concentrations of credit risk, delinquency trends, general economic conditions, the interest rate environment and internal and external credit reviews. In addition, the risks management considers vary depending on the nature of the loan. The normal risks considered by management with respect to agricultural loans include the fluctuating value of the collateral, changes in weather conditions and the availability of adequate water resources in the Company's local market area. The normal risks considered by management with respect to real estate construction loans include fluctuation in real estate values, the demand for improved commercial and industrial properties and housing, the availability of permanent financing in the Company's market area and borrowers' ability to obtain permanent financing. The normal risks considered by management with respect to real estate mortgage loans include fluctuations in the value of real estate. Additionally, the Company relies on data obtained through independent appraisals for significant properties to determine loss exposure on nonperforming loans.
The balance in the allowance is affected by the amounts provided from operations, amounts charged off and recoveries of loans previously charged off. The Company recorded provisions for loan losses in the first three months of 2001 of $750,000 compared with $763,000 in the same period of 2000. The decrease in loan loss provisions in 2001 was recorded in relation to support needed to adequately provide for the general loan growth of the Company that has occurred during the quarter.
The Company's charge-offs, net of recoveries, were $568,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2001 compared with $513,000 for the same three months in 2000. The increase in net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2001 was primarily due to increased charge-offs that occurred within the consumer installment segment of the loan portfolio. The increased charge-offs in this segment of the portfolio are primarily attributable to the strong loan growth that has occurred in this segment over the last several quarters.
As of March 31, 2001, the allowance for loan losses was $8,389,000 or 2.01% of total loans outstanding, compared with $8,207,000 or 1.99% of total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2000 and $6,792,000 or 1.95% of total loans outstanding as of March 31, 2000. During the period March 31, 2000 through March 31, 2001, the allowance for loan loss increased $1,597,000 or 24%.
The Company uses a method developed by management for determining the appropriate level of its allowance for loan losses. This method applies relevant risk factors to the entire loan portfolio, including nonperforming loans. The methodology is based, in part, on the Company's loan grading and classification system. The Company grades its loans through internal reviews and periodically subjects loans to external reviews which then are assessed by the Company's audit committee and management. Credit reviews are performed on a monthly basis and the quality grading process occurs on a quarterly basis. Risk factors applied to the performing loan portfolio are based on the Company's past loss history considering the current portfolio's characteristics, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. General reserves are applied to various categories of loans at percentages ranging up to 1.8% based on the Company's assessment of credit risks for each category. Risk factors are applied to the carrying value of each classified loan: (i) loans internally graded "Watch" or "Special Mention" carry a risk factor from 1.0% to 2.0%; (ii) "Substandard" loans carry a risk factor from 15% to 40% depending on collateral securing the loan, if any; (iii) "Doubtful" loans carry a 50% risk factor; and (iv) "Loss" loans are charged off 100%. In addition, a portion of the allowance is specially allocated to identified problem credits. The analysis also includes reference to factors such as the delinquency status of the loan portfolio, inherent risk by type of loans, industry statistical data, recommendations made by the Company's regulatory authorities and outside loan reviewers, and current economic environment. Important components of the overall credit rating process are the asset quality rating process and the internal loan review process.
The allowance is based on estimates and ultimate future losses may vary from current estimates. It is always possible that future economic or other factors may adversely affect the Company's borrowers, and thereby cause loan losses to exceed the current allowance. In addition, there can be no assurance that future economic or other factors will not adversely affect the Company's borrowers, or that the Company's asset quality may not deteriorate through rapid growth, failure to enforce underwriting standards, failure to maintain appropriate underwriting standards, failure to maintain an adequate number of qualified loan personnel, failure to identify and monitor potential problem loans or for other reasons, and thereby cause loan losses to exceed the current allowance.
The allocation of the allowance to loan categories is an estimate by management of the relative risk characteristics of loans in those categories. No assurance can be given that losses in one or more loan categories will not exceed the portion of the allowance allocated to that category or even exceed the entire allowance.
External Factors Affecting Asset Quality. As a result of the Company's loan portfolio mix, the future quality of its assets could be affected by adverse economic trends in its region or in the agricultural community. These trends are beyond the control of the Company.
California is an earthquake-prone region. Accordingly, a major earthquake could result in material loss to the Company. At times the Company's service area has experienced other natural disasters such as floods and droughts. The Company's properties and substantially all of the real and personal property securing loans in the Company's portfolio are located in California. The Company faces the risk that many of its borrowers face uninsured property damage, interruption of their businesses or loss of their jobs from earthquakes, floods or droughts. As a result these borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in accordance with their terms and the collateral for such loans may decline significantly in value. The Company's service area is a largely agricultural region and therefore is highly dependent on a reliable supply of water for irrigation purposes. The area obtains nearly all of its water from the run-off of melting snow in the mountains of the Sierra Nevada to the east. Although such sources have usually been available in the past, water supply can be adversely affected by light snowfall over one or more winters or by any diversion of water from its present natural courses. Any such natural disaster could impair the ability of many of the Company's borrowers to meet their obligations to the Company.
Parts of California have experienced significant floods in the late 1990s. No assurance can be given that future flooding will not have an adverse impact on the Company and its borrowers and depositors.
Liquidity. In order to maintain adequate liquidity, the Company must have sufficient resources available at all times to meet its cash flow requirements. The need for liquidity in a banking institution arises principally to provide for deposit withdrawals, the credit needs of its customers and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they arise. The Company may achieve desired liquidity from both assets and liabilities. The Company considers cash and deposits held in other banks, federal funds sold, other short term investments, maturing loans and investments, payments of principal and interest on loans and investments and potential loan sales as sources of asset liquidity. Deposit growth and access to credit lines established with correspondent banks and market sources of funds are considered by the Company as sources of liability liquidity. The Holding Company's primary source of liquidity is from dividends received from the Bank. Dividends from the Bank are subject to certain regulatory limitations.
The Company reviews its liquidity position on a regular basis based upon its current position and expected trends of loans and deposits. These assets include cash and deposits in other banks, available-for-sale securities and federal funds sold. The Company's liquid assets totaled $242,794,000 and $203,698,000 on March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively, and constituted 33% and 30% of total assets on those dates. Liquidity is also affected by the collateral requirements of its public deposits and certain borrowings. Total pledged securities were $119,325,000 at March 31, 2001 compared with $124,396,000 at December 31, 2000.
Although the Company's primary sources of liquidity include liquid assets and a stable deposit base, the Company maintains lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and Pacific Coast Bankers' Bank aggregating $57,822,000 of which $26,000,000 was outstanding as of March 31, 2001 and $14,600,000 was outstanding as of December 31, 2000. Funds received causing an increase in outstanding short term borrowings during the first quarter of 2001 were used to purchase securities within the investment portfolio. Management believes that the Company maintains adequate amounts of liquid assets to meet its liquidity needs. The Company's liquidity might be insufficient if deposit withdrawals were to exceed anticipated levels. Deposit withdrawals can increase if a company experiences financial difficulties or receives adverse publicity for other reasons, or if its pricing, products or services are not competitive with those offered by other institutions.
Capital Resources. Capital serves as a source of funds and helps protect depositors against potential losses. The primary source of capital for the Company has been internally generated capital through retained earnings. The Company's shareholders' equity increased by $3,582,000 or 7% from December 31, 2000 to March 31, 2001.
The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements. Management believes, as of March 31, 2001, that the Company and the Bank met all capital requirements to which they are subject. The Company’s leverage capital ratio at March 31, 2001 was 7.32% as compared with 7.56% as of December 31, 2000. The Company’s total risk based capital ratio at March 31, 2001 was 10.86% as compared to 10.92% as of December 31, 2000.
The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios met all regulatory requirements as of March 31, 2001 and were summarized as follows:
Dollars in thousands
| Actual
| For Capital Adequacy Purposes
| To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions:
|
Consolidated
| Amount
| Ratio
| Amount
| Ratio
| Amount
| Ratio
|
As of March 31, 2001 | | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | $64,394 | 11.98% | $42,996 | 8.0% | $53,746 | 10.0% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) | 57,655 | 10.73 | 21,498 | 4.0 | 32,247 | 6.0 |
Leverage ratio* | 57,655 | 8.41 | 27,432 | 4.0 | 34,289 | 5.0 |
| | | | | | |
The Bank:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2001 | | | | | | |
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | $55,211 | 10.39% | $42,510 | 8.0% | $53,137 | 10.0% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) | 48,547 | 9.14 | 21,254 | 4.0 | 31,882 | 6.0 |
Leverage ratio*
| 48,547
| 7.14
| 27,195
| 4.0
| 33,994
| 5.0
|
* The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average assets.The minimum leverage ratio is 3 percent for banking organizations that do not anticipate significant growth and that have well-diversified risk, excellent asset quality and in general, are considered top-rated banks.
The Company has no formal dividend policy, and dividends are issued solely at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to compliance with regulatory requirements. In order to pay any cash dividends, the Company must receive payments of dividends or management fees from the Bank. There are certain regulatory limitations on the payment of cash dividends by banks.
Deposits. Deposits are the Company's primary source of funds. At March 31, 2001, the Company had a deposit mix of 30% in savings deposits, 41% in time deposits, 13% in interest-bearing checking accounts and 16% in noninterest-bearing demand accounts. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits enhance the Company's net interest income by lowering its costs of funds.
The Company obtains deposits primarily from the communities it serves.No material portion of its deposits has been obtained from or is dependent on any one person or industry. The Company's business is not seasonal in nature. The Company accepts deposits in excess of $100,000 from customers. These deposits are priced to remain competitive. At March 31, 2001, the Company had brokered deposits of $6,953,000.
Maturities of time certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at March 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 are summarized as follows:
| March 31, 2001
| December 31, 2000
|
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| | |
Three months or less | $28,384 | $45,233 |
Over three to six months | 17,998 | 20,643 |
Over six to twelve months | 45,282 | 16,526 |
Over twelve months | 14,151
| 10,252
|
Total | $105,815
| $93,654
|
Borrowed Funds
The increase in other borrowings during the first quarter of 2001 was primarily due to the use of a leveraged investment strategy that uses additional FHLB borrowings to fund purchases of investment securities within the Bank’s investment portfolio.
Return on Equity and Assets
| Three months ended March 31 | Three months ended March 31 | Year ended December 31 |
| 2001
| 2000
| 2000
|
Annualized return on average assets | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Annualized return on average equity | 13.93% | 13.73% | 14.33% |
Average equity to average assets | 7.96% | 7.85% | 7.64% |
Impact of Inflation
The primary impact of inflation on the Company is its effect on interest rates. The Company’s primary source of income is net interest income which is affected by changes in interest rates. The Company attempts to limit inflation’s impact on its net interest margin through management of rate sensitive assets and liabilities and the analysis of interest rate sensitivity. The effect of inflation on premises and equipment, as well as on interest expenses, has not been significant for the periods covered in this report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to market risk which includes both price and liquidity risk. Price risk is created from fluctuations in interest rates and the mismatch in repricing characteristics of assets, liabilities, and off balance sheet instruments at a specified point in time. Mismatches in interest rate repricing among assets and liabilities arise primarily through the interaction of the various types of loans versus the types of deposits that are maintained as well as from management's discretionary investment and funds gathering activities. Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may not be able to satisfy current and future financial commitments or that the Company may not be able to liquidate financial instruments at market prices. Risk management policies and procedures have been established and are utilized to manage the Company's exposure to market risk.
On March 31, 2001, the interest rate position of the Company was relatively neutral as the impact of a gradual parallel 100 basis-point rise or fall in interest rates over the next 12 months was estimated to be approximately 1-2% of net interest income when compared to stable rates. See "BUSINESS - Selected Statistical Information - Interest Rate Sensitivity" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Interest Rate Risk Management."
PART II - - Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to routine litigation in the ordinary course of its business.In the opinion of management, pending and threatened litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Also see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Memorandum of Understanding.” contained herein.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
In the opinion of management, there is no additional information relating to these periods being reported which warrants inclusion in the report.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibits | Description of Exhibits | |
| | |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference from (filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s March 31, 1996 Form 10Q filed with the SEC on or about November 14, 1996). | * |
| | |
3.2 | Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s March 31, 1996 Form 10Q filed with the SEC on or about November 14, 1996.) | * |
| | |
10 | Employment agreement between Thomas T. Hawker and Capital Corp. (Filed as Exhibit 10 of the Company’s 2000 form 10K filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2001) | * |
| | |
10.1 | Administration Construction Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996). | * |
| | |
10.2 | Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996). | * |
| | |
10.3 | 401 (k) Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996). | * |
| | |
10.4 | Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s 1995 Form 10K filed with the SEC on or about March 31, 1996). | * |
| | |
10.5 | Purchase Agreement for three branches from Bank of America is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 Registration Statement on Form S-2 filed July 14, 1997, File No. 333-31193. | * |
| | |
10.6 | Change-in-Control Agreement between R. Dale McKinney and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10K with the SEC on or about March 17, 2000). | * |
| | |
10.7 | Deferred Compensation Agreement between members of the board of directors and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10K with the SEC on or about March 17, 2000). | * |
| | |
10.8 | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between certain members of executive management and Capital Corp of the West (filed as Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s 1999 Form 10K with the SEC on or about March 17, 2000). | * |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
* Denotes documents which have been incorporated by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| CAPITAL CORP OF THE WEST |
| (Registrant) |
| |
| By/s/ Thomas T. Hawker
|
| Thomas T. Hawker |
| President and |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| By/s/ R. Dale McKinney
|
| R. Dale McKinney |
| Chief Financial Officer |