The level of nonperforming assets at March 31, 2009, and 2008, and December 31, 2008 is illustrated in the table above. Nonperforming assets of $16.3 million at March 31, 2009, were relatively unchanged from December 31, 2008, and were up $7.1 million from March 31, 2008. In general, the increasing trend in nonperforming assets is reflective of the current weak economic conditions. The increase over the prior year is also due to the second quarter 2008 acquisition of Sleepy Hollow, which added about $2.6 million of nonperforming assets. Approximately $3.5 million of nonperforming loans at March 31, 2009, were secured by U.S. government guarantees, while $3.1 million were secured by one-to-four family residential properties.
Nonperforming assets represented 0.54% of total assets at March 31, 2009, compared to 0.56% at December 31, 2008, and 0.38% at March 31, 2008. Although up over the same period prior year, the Company’s ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets of 0.54% continues to compare favorably to a peer ratio of 2.26%. The peer data is from the Federal Reserve Board and represents banks or bank holding companies with assets between $1.0 billion and $3.0 billion. The peer ratio is as of December 31, 2008, the most recent data available from the Federal Reserve Board.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company’s recorded investment in loans and leases that are considered impaired totaled $15.5 million compared to $9.7 million at December 31, 2008, and $7.0 million at March 31, 2008. The $15.5 million of impaired loans at March 31, 2009, had related allowances of $1.6 million, the $9.7 million of impaired loans at December 31, 2008, had related allowances of $520,000, and the $7.0 million at March 31, 2008, had related allowances of $463,000.
Potential problem loans and leases are loans and leases that are currently performing, but where known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have doubt as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in disclosure of such loans and leases as nonperforming at some time in the future. Management considers loans and leases classified as Substandard that continue to accrue interest to be potential problem loans and leases. At March 31, 2009, the Company’s internal loan review function had identified 46 commercial relationships totaling $33.2 million, which it has classified as Substandard, which continue to accrue interest. As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal loan review function had classified 36 commercial relationships as Substandard totaling $20.3 million, which continued to accrue interest. These loans remain in a performing status due to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits, and personal or government guarantees. These factors, when considered in the aggregate, give management reason to believe that the current risk exposure on these loans is not significant. However, these loans do exhibit certain risk factors, which have the potential to cause them to become nonperforming. Accordingly, management’s attention is focused on these credits, which are reviewed at least quarterly. The increase in the dollar amount of commercial relationships classified as Substandard and still accruing interest between December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 was mainly due to the addition of two commercial relationships, one totaling $11.7 million and one totaling $3.0 million that were classified as Substandard and accruing at March 31, 2009, and were not classified as Substandard at December 31, 2008.
Total deposits of $2.3 billion at March 31, 2009, were up $201.9 million or 9.5% from December 31, 2008. Deposit growth included $179.2 million in interest checking, savings and money market balances, and $62.9 million in time deposits. Noninterest bearing deposit balances were down $40.2 million to $410.7 million at March 31, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Growth in municipal deposits accounted for a majority of the increase in savings and money market balances from year-end 2008. With deposit rates down on time deposits and more in line with money market rates, municipalities are placing tax deposits into money market accounts. Municipal deposit balances are somewhat seasonal, increasing as tax deposits are collected and decreasing as these monies are used by the municipality.
The increase in time deposits was partially due to an increase in brokered time deposits, which were up $30.0 million to $50.0 million at March 31, 2009, as rates on these deposits were favorable compared to other funding sources. Total deposits were up $495.0 million or 26.9% over March 31, 2008. A large portion of the growth was due to the Sleepy Hollow acquisition during the second quarter of 2008. Total deposits in Sleepy Hollow Bank’s five Westchester County, New York branches were $229.0 million at the time of the acquisition. In 2007 and 2008, the Federal Reserve reduced short-term market rates, which led to a decrease in rates paid on deposits.
The Company’s primary funding source is core deposits, defined as total deposits less time deposits of $100,000 or more, brokered time deposits, and municipal money market deposits. Core deposits increased $47.3 million or 2.9% from year-end 2008 to $1.7 billion at March 31, 2009, and represented 71.9% of total deposits compared to 76.4% of total deposits at December 31, 2008.
The Company uses both retail and wholesale repurchase agreements. Retail repurchase agreements are arrangements with local customers of the Company, in which the Company agrees to sell securities to the customer with an agreement to repurchase those securities at a specified later date. Retail repurchase agreements totaled $34.6 million at March 31, 2009, and $42.1 million at December 31, 2008. Management generally views local repurchase agreements as an alternative to large time deposits. The Company’s wholesale repurchase agreements are primarily with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and amounted to $148.1 million at March 31, 2009, and $153.2 million at December 31, 2008. Included in the $148.1 million of wholesale repurchase agreements at March 31, 2009, are $16.1 million of repurchase agreements with the FHLB where the Company elected to adopt the fair value option under SFAS 159. The fair value of these borrowings decreased by $61,000 (net mark-to-market pre-tax gain of $61,000) over the 3-months ended March 31, 2009.
The Company’s other borrowings totaled $206.1 million at March 31, 2009, down $68.7 million or 25.0% from $274.8 million at year-end 2008. The $206.1 million in borrowings at March 31, 2009, included $181.9 million in term advances, and a $24.0 million advance from a bank. The $274.8 million at year-end 2008 included $177.2 million in term advances, $73.5 million of overnight FHLB advances and a $24.0 million advance from a bank. Of the $181.9 million of the FHLB term advances at March 31, 2009, $166.0 million are due over one year. The Company elected the fair value option under SFAS 159 for a $10.0 million advance with the FHLB. The fair value of this advance decreased by $195,000 (net mark-to-market gain of $195,000) over the 3-months ended March 31, 2009.
Other borrowings also include a Treasury Tax and Loan Note account with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York totaling $100,000 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and borrowings from unrelated financial institutions totaling $37,000 and $39,000 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of adequate funding sources to satisfy the demand for credit, deposit withdrawals, and business investment opportunities. The Company’s large, stable core deposit base and strong capital position are the foundation for the Company’s liquidity position. The Company uses a variety of resources to meet its liquidity needs, which include deposits, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flow from lending and investing activities, repurchase agreements, and borrowings. Asset and liability positions are monitored primarily through Asset/Liability Management Committees of the Company’s subsidiary banks individually and on a combined basis. These Committees review periodic reports on liquidity and interest rate sensitivity positions. Comparisons with industry and peer groups are also monitored. The Company’s strong reputation in the communities it serves, along with its strong financial condition, provides access to numerous sources of liquidity as described below. Management believes these diverse liquidity sources provide sufficient means to meet all demands on the Company’s liquidity that are reasonably likely to occur.
Core deposits are a primary and low cost funding source obtained primarily through the Company’s branch network. Core deposits totaled $1.7 billion at March 31, 2009, up $47.3 million or 2.9% from year-end 2008, and $303.0 million or 22.0% from March 31, 2008. Core deposits represented 71.9% of total deposits and 60.7% of total liabilities at March 31, 2009, compared to 76.4% of total deposits and 61.6% of total liabilities at December 31, 2008.
In addition to core deposits, the Company uses non-core funding sources to support asset growth. These non-core funding sources include time deposits of $100,000 or more, brokered time deposits, municipal money market deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and term advances from the FHLB. Rates and terms are the primary determinants of the mix of these funding sources. Non-core funding sources increased by $72.3 million or 7.4% from December 31, 2008 to $1.0 billion at March 31, 2009. Non-core funding sources, as a percentage of total liabilities, were 37.8% at March 31, 2009, up from 36.8% at December 31, 2008. The increase in non-core funding sources was mainly in municipal money market deposit balances and brokered time deposits, partially offset by a decrease in FHLB advances.
27
Non-core funding sources may require securities to be pledged against the underlying liability. Securities carried at $798.1 million and $677.8 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were either pledged or sold under agreements to repurchase. Pledged securities represented 80.6% of total securities at March 31, 2009, compared to 79.1% of total securities at December 31, 2008.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $47.6 million at March 31, 2009, down from $52.2 million at December 31, 2008. Short-term investments, consisting of securities due in one year or less, decreased from $41.9 million at December 31, 2008, to $29.2 million at March 31, 2009. The Company also has $36.7 million of securities designated as trading securities.
Cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios provides a significant source of liquidity. These assets may have stated maturities in excess of one year, but have monthly principal reductions. Total available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities, at book value, were $533.2 million at March 31, 2009, compared with $469.2 million at December 31, 2008. Outstanding principal balances of residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and leases totaled approximately $731.6 million at March 31, 2009, as compared to $732.5 million at December 31, 2008. Aggregate amortization from monthly payments on these assets provides significant additional cash flow to the Company.
Liquidity is enhanced by ready access to national and regional wholesale funding sources, including Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, brokered certificates of deposit, and FHLB advances. Through its subsidiary banks, the Company has borrowing relationships with the FHLB and correspondent banks, which provide secured and unsecured borrowing capacity. At March 31, 2009 the unused borrowing capacity on established lines with the FHLB was $446.5 million. As members of the FHLB, the Company’s subsidiary banks can use certain unencumbered mortgage-related assets to secure additional borrowings from the FHLB. At March 31, 2009, total unencumbered residential mortgage loans of the Company were $171.1 million. Additional assets may also qualify as collateral for FHLB advances upon approval of the FHLB.
The Company has not identified any trends or circumstances that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity in the near term.
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk category associated with the Company’s operations. Interest rate risk refers to the volatility of earnings caused by changes in interest rates. The Company manages interest rate risk using income simulation to measure interest rate risk inherent in its on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments at a given point in time. The simulation models are used to estimate the potential effect of interest rate shifts on net interest income for future periods. Each quarter, the Asset/Liability Management Committee reviews the simulation results to determine whether the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates remains within board-approved levels. The Committee also considers strategies to manage this exposure and incorporates these strategies into the investment and funding decisions of the Company. The Company does not currently use derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, to manage its interest rate risk exposure, but may consider such instruments in the future.
The Company’s Board of Directors has set a policy that interest rate risk exposure will remain within a range whereby net interest income will not decline by more than 10% in one year as a result of a 100 basis point parallel change in rates. Based upon the simulation analysis performed as of March 31, 2009, a 200 basis point parallel upward change in interest rates over a one-year time frame would result in a one-year decline in net interest income from the base case of approximately 0.5%, while a 100 basis point parallel decline in interest rates over a one-year period would result in a marginal decrease in one-year net interest income from the base case of 0.8%. The simulation assumes no balance sheet growth and no management action to address balance sheet mismatches.
The negative exposure in a rising rate environment is mainly driven by the repricing assumptions of the Company’s core deposit base and the lag in the repricing of the Company’s adjustable rate assets. Longer-term, the impact of a rising rate environment is positive as the asset base continues to reset at higher levels, while the repricing of the rate sensitive liabilities moderates. The moderate exposure in the 100 basis point decline scenario results from the Company’s assets repricing downward to a greater degree than the rates on the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities, mainly deposits. Rates on savings and money market accounts are at low levels given the historically low interest rate environment experienced in recent years. In addition, the model assumes that prepayments accelerate in the down interest rate environment resulting in additional pressure on asset yields as proceeds are reinvested at lower rates.
In our most recent simulation, the base case scenario, which assumes interest rates remain unchanged from the date of the simulation, showed a relatively flat net interest margin during the remainder of 2009.
28
Although the simulation model is useful in identifying potential exposure to interest rate movements, actual results may differ from those modeled as the repricing, maturity, and prepayment characteristics of financial instruments may change to a different degree than modeled. In addition, the model does not reflect actions that management may employ to manage its interest rate risk exposure. The Company’s current liquidity profile, capital position, and growth prospects, offer a level of flexibility for management to take actions that could offset some of the negative effects of unfavorable movements in interest rates. Management believes the current exposure to changes in interest rates is not significant in relation to the earnings and capital strength of the Company.
In addition to the simulation analysis, management uses an interest rate gap measure. The table below is a Condensed Static Gap Report, which illustrates the anticipated repricing intervals of assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2009. The Company’s one-year net interest rate gap was a positive $19,000 or 0.64% of total assets at March 31, 2009, compared with a negative $12,000 or 0.44% of total assets at December 31, 2008. A positive gap position exists when the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing exceeds the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a particular time period. This analysis suggests that the Company’s net interest income is more vulnerable to a decreasing rate environment than it is to a prolonged rising interest rate environment. An interest rate gap measure could be significantly affected by external factors such as a rise or decline in interest rates, loan or securities prepayments, and deposit withdrawals.
Condensed Static Gap – March 31, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Repricing Interval | |
(Dollar amounts in thousands) | | Total | | 0-3 months | | 3-6 months | | 6-12 months | | Cumulative 12 months | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | $ | 2,787,278 | | $ | 767,755 | | $ | 202,771 | | $ | 350,719 | | $ | 1,321,245 | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | 2,314,014 | | | 905,798 | | | 200,140 | | | 196,235 | | $ | 1,302,173 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net gap position | | | | | | (138,043 | ) | | 2,631 | | | 154,484 | | | 19,072 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net gap position as a percentage of total assets | | | | | | (4.61 | %) | | 0.09 | % | | 5.16 | % | | 0.64 | % |
|
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2009. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Report on Form 10-Q the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that any information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that material information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries is made known to management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s first quarter ended March 31, 2009, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is involved in legal proceedings in the normal course of business, none of which are expected to have a material adverse impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
| |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
| |
| There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. |
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table includes all Company repurchases made on a monthly basis during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those made pursuant to publicly announced plans or programs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) | | Average Price Paid Per Share (b) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (c) | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (d) | |
|
January 1, 2009 through January 31, 2009 | | | 1,172 | | | 53.67 | | | 0 | | | 148,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
February 1, 2009 through February 28, 2009 | | | 345 | | | 43.07 | | | 0 | | | 148,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 | | | 5,000 | | | 35.51 | | | 5,000 | | | 143,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 6,517 | | $ | 39.18 | | | 5,000 | | | 143,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On July 22, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan (the “2008 Plan”). The 2008 Plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 150,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock over a two-year period. The Company purchased 5,000 shares at an average price of $35.51 during the first quarter of 2009.
Included above are 1,172 shares purchased in January 2009, at an average cost of $53.67, and 345 shares purchased in February 2009, at an average cost of $43.07, by the trustee of the rabbi trust established by the Company under the Company’s Stock Retainer Plan For Eligible Directors of Tompkins Financial Corporation and Participating Subsidiaries, and were part of the director deferred compensation under that plan. Shares purchased under the rabbi trust are not part of the Board approved stock repurchase plan.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On April 10, 2009, Tompkins issued $15 million aggregate liquidation amount of 7.00% cumulative trust preferred securities (the “Trust Preferred Securities”), through a newly-formed subsidiary, Tompkins Capital Trust I, a wholly-owned Delaware statutory trust (“Tompkins Capital Trust I”). The details of the issuance were included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2009.
| |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
| |
| None |
30
| | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
| | |
| None |
| | |
Item 5. | Other Information |
| | |
| None |
| | |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith). |
| | |
| 32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith) |
| | |
| 32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 8, 2009
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| | |
By: | /S/ Stephen S. Romaine | |
| | |
| Stephen S. Romaine | |
| President and | |
| Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | |
By: | /S/ Francis M. Fetsko | |
| | |
| Francis M. Fetsko | |
| Executive Vice President and | |
| Chief Financial Officer | |
| (Principal Financial Officer) | |
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description | | Pages |
| | | | |
| | | | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | | 33 |
| | | | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | | 34 |
| | | | |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | | 35 |
| | | | |
32.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer and required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | | 36 |
32