UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 |
| |
OR |
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-28312
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | | 71-0785261 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| | |
1401 Highway 62-65 North Harrison, Arkansas | | 72601 |
(Address of principal executive office) | | (Zip Code) |
(870) 741-7641
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of October 25, 2007, there were issued and outstanding 4,865,401 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 27,869 | | $ | 35,518 | |
Investment securities held to maturity | | 84,998 | | 60,746 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 4,376 | | 7,089 | |
Loans receivable, net | | 619,239 | | 693,095 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 9,958 | | 9,999 | |
Real estate owned, net | | 8,848 | | 3,858 | |
Office properties and equipment, net | | 20,856 | | 20,384 | |
Cash surrender value of life insurance | | 19,962 | | 19,396 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 1,687 | | 2,390 | |
| | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 797,793 | | $ | 852,475 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 640,903 | | $ | 652,265 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 79,749 | | 120,305 | |
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance | | 525 | | 666 | |
Other liabilities | | 2,521 | | 3,666 | |
Total liabilities | | 723,698 | | 776,902 | |
| | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | | | | |
Preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | | | | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,307,502 shares issued, 4,865,401 and 4,838,962 shares outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively | | 103 | | 103 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | 56,650 | | 56,617 | |
Employee stock benefit plans | | (48 | ) | (72 | ) |
Retained earnings-substantially restricted | | 87,726 | | 88,068 | |
| | 144,431 | | 144,716 | |
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,442,101 and 5,468,540 shares at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively | | (70,336 | ) | (69,143 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 74,095 | | 75,573 | |
| | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 797,793 | | $ | 852,475 | |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
INTEREST INCOME: | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | 11,020 | | $ | 12,627 | | $ | 35,225 | | $ | 37,703 | |
Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | |
Taxable | | 952 | | 650 | | 2,319 | | 1,853 | |
Nontaxable | | 177 | | 185 | | 537 | | 558 | |
Other | | 232 | | 219 | | 722 | | 393 | |
Total interest income | | 12,381 | | 13,681 | | 38,803 | | 40,507 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
INTEREST EXPENSE: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 6,099 | | 5,449 | | 17,991 | | 14,819 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 987 | | 1,858 | | 3,353 | | 5,378 | |
Total interest expense | | 7,086 | | 7,307 | | 21,344 | | 20,197 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET INTEREST INCOME | | 5,295 | | 6,374 | | 17,459 | | 20,310 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | | 1,330 | | 484 | | 3,662 | | 1,128 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | | 3,965 | | 5,890 | | 13,797 | | 19,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NONINTEREST INCOME: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit fee income | | 1,235 | | 1,264 | | 3,661 | | 3,579 | |
Earnings on life insurance policies | | 194 | | 187 | | 566 | | 556 | |
Gain on sale of loans | | 201 | | 310 | | 664 | | 841 | |
Other | | 365 | | 252 | | 924 | | 1,356 | |
Total noninterest income | | 1,995 | | 2,013 | | 5,815 | | 6,332 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NONINTEREST EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | 3,287 | | 3,195 | | 10,016 | | 10,174 | |
Net occupancy expense | | 560 | | 613 | | 1,752 | | 1,784 | |
Real estate owned, net | | 543 | | 62 | | 826 | | 41 | |
Data processing | | 339 | | 341 | | 1,143 | | 1,100 | |
Professional fees | | 119 | | 93 | | 401 | | 288 | |
Advertising and public relations | | 239 | | 342 | | 849 | | 971 | |
Postage and supplies | | 187 | | 188 | | 646 | | 616 | |
Other | | 535 | | 615 | | 1,701 | | 1,793 | |
Total noninterest expenses | | 5,809 | | 5,449 | | 17,334 | | 16,767 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | 151 | | 2,454 | | 2,278 | | 8,747 | |
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT) | | (150 | ) | 754 | | 284 | | 2,787 | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 301 | | $ | 1,700 | | $ | 1,994 | | $ | 5,960 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.34 | | $ | 0.41 | | $ | 1.19 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | 0.41 | | $ | 1.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash Dividends Declared | | $ | 0.16 | | $ | 0.15 | | $ | 0.48 | | $ | 0.43 | |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
| | Issued Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In | | Employee Stock Benefit | | Retained | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Capital | | Plans | | Earnings | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2007 | | 10,307,502 | | $ | 103 | | $ | 56,617 | | $ | (72 | ) | $ | 88,068 | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | 1,994 | |
Tax effect of stock compensation plan | | | | | | 480 | | | | | |
Treasury shares reissued due to exercise of stock options | | | | | | (454 | ) | | | | |
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock compensation expense | | | | | | 7 | | 24 | | | |
Dividends paid | | | | | | | | | | (2,336 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2007 | | 10,307,502 | | $ | 103 | | $ | 56,650 | | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 87,726 | |
| | Treasury Stock | | Total Stockholders’ | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Equity | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2007 | | 5,468,540 | | $ | (69,143 | ) | $ | 75,573 | | | | | |
Net income | | | | | | 1,994 | | | | | |
Tax effect of stock compensation plan | | | | | | 480 | | | | | |
Treasury shares reissued due to exercise of stock options | | (106,965 | ) | 804 | | 350 | | | | | |
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost | | 80,526 | | (1,997 | ) | (1,997 | ) | | | | |
Stock compensation expense | | | | | | 31 | | | | | |
Dividends paid | | | | | | (2,336 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2007 | | 5,442,101 | | $ | (70,336 | ) | $ | 74,095 | | | | | |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,994 | | $ | 5,960 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | 3,662 | | 1,128 | |
Provision for real estate losses | | 390 | | — | |
Deferred tax (benefit) provision | | (1,516 | ) | 9 | |
Accretion of discounts on investment securities, net | | (14 | ) | (5 | ) |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends | | (246 | ) | (294 | ) |
Gain on disposition of office properties and equipment | | (4 | ) | (233 | ) |
Loss (gain) on sale of repossessed assets, net | | 97 | | (43 | ) |
Originations of loans held for sale | | (48,077 | ) | (52,436 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale | | 47,787 | | 53,518 | |
Gain on sale of loans originated to sell | | (664 | ) | (841 | ) |
Depreciation | | 1,047 | | 966 | |
Amortization of deferred loan costs, net | | 334 | | 192 | |
Release of ESOP shares | | — | | 511 | |
Stock compensation expense | | 31 | | 66 | |
Earnings on life insurance policies | | (566 | ) | (556 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 41 | | (2,521 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 693 | | 187 | |
Other liabilities | | 691 | | (255 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | 5,680 | | 5,353 | |
| | | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity | | (29,118 | ) | (6,445 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities/calls of investment securities held to maturity | | 5,050 | | 2,290 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock redeemed | | 2,959 | | 377 | |
Loan participations purchased | | (2,552 | ) | — | |
Loan participations sold | | 7,208 | | 3,419 | |
Net loan (originations) repayments | | 57,871 | | (5,964 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of repossessed assets | | 3,389 | | 2,775 | |
Improvements to real estate owned | | (579 | ) | — | |
Proceeds from sales of office properties and equipment | | 10 | | 251 | |
Purchases of office properties and equipment | | (1,525 | ) | (1,971 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | 42,713 | | (5,268 | ) |
| | | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | | (11,362 | ) | 29,933 | |
Advances from FHLB | | 9,700 | | 55,000 | |
Repayment of advances from FHLB | | (50,256 | ) | (69,208 | ) |
Net decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance | | (141 | ) | (319 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | | (1,997 | ) | (4,667 | ) |
Reissued treasury stock | | 350 | | 906 | |
Dividends paid | | (2,336 | ) | (2,168 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | (56,042 | ) | 9,477 | |
| | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | (7,649 | ) | 9,562 | |
| | | | | | | |
4
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | $ | 35,518 | | $ | 21,109 | |
End of period | | $ | 27,869 | | $ | 30,671 | |
| | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | |
Cash paid for: | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 21,515 | | $ | 19,820 | |
Income taxes | | $ | 951 | | $ | 2,625 | |
| | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | |
Real estate and other assets acquired in settlement of loans | | $ | 9,297 | | $ | 3,529 | |
Loans to facilitate sales of real estate owned | | $ | 1,010 | | $ | — | |
Investment securities traded, recorded in investments not yet settled in cash | | $ | 170 | | $ | — | |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Company”) is a unitary holding company which owns all of the stock of First Federal Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank provides a broad line of financial products to individuals and small- to medium-sized businesses. The unaudited consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, First Harrison Service Corporation (“FHSC”), which is inactive.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, such information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2006, contained in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders.
Certain amounts in the September 30, 2006, unaudited consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the classifications adopted for reporting in 2007.
Note 2 – Recently Adopted Accounting Standard
We adopted SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Company.
We adopted SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Company.
We adopted FASB Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Company.
Note 3 – Accounting Standards Issued Not Yet Effective
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The statement applies whenever other standards require or permit that assets or liabilities be measured at fair value. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but rather provides a definition and framework for measuring fair value which will result in greater consistency and comparability among financial statements prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified
6
election dates. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of SFAS No. 159.
Note 4 - Earnings per Share
The weighted average number of common shares used to calculate earnings per share for the periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Basic weighted - average shares | | 4,865,007 | | 5,006,730 | | 4,867,729 | | 5,021,110 | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | 7,700 | | 111,206 | | 20,243 | | 124,131 | |
Diluted weighted - average shares | | 4,872,707 | | 5,117,936 | | 4,887,972 | | 5,145,241 | |
Note 5 – Allowances for Loan and Real Estate Losses
A summary of the activity in the allowances for loan and real estate losses is as follows for the periods ended September 30 (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 | |
| | Loans | | Real Estate | | Loans | | Real Estate | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance—beginning of period | | $ | 4,291 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,448 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provisions for estimated losses | | 1,330 | | 312 | | 484 | | 7 | |
Recoveries | | 43 | | — | | 55 | | — | |
Losses charged off | | (628 | ) | (312 | ) | (556 | ) | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance—end of period | | $ | 5,036 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,431 | | $ | — | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | |
| | Loans | | Real Estate | | Loans | | Real Estate | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance—beginning of period | | $ | 2,572 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,114 | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provisions for estimated losses | | 3,662 | | 390 | | 1,128 | | 7 | |
Recoveries | | 132 | | — | | 139 | | — | |
Losses charged off | | (1,330 | ) | (390 | ) | (950 | ) | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Balance—end of period | | $ | 5,036 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,431 | | $ | — | |
The allowance for loan losses increased between the periods listed above primarily due to specific loan loss allowances on two subdivisions totaling $2.2 million recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, the methodology for the determination of our allowance for loan losses, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in that policy, is critical to preparation of our financial statements. This policy and the judgments, estimates and assumptions are described in greater detail in subsequent sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and in the notes to the unaudited financial statements included herein. We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our financial statements to this critical accounting policy, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our financial condition or results of operations.
In estimating the amount of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio, various judgments and assumptions are made. For example, when assessing the condition of the overall economic environment, data is collected regarding current market conditions and their impact on the loan portfolio. Loss factors have been revised as a result of the downturn in the housing market, specifically the oversupply of speculative single-family homes and lots in our market area. If the housing market sustains a prolonged downturn, the loss factors applied to our portfolios may need to be further revised, which may significantly impact the measurement of the allowance for loan losses. For impaired loans that are collateral-dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral may deviate significantly from the proceeds received when the collateral is sold in the event that the Bank has to foreclose or repossess the collateral.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
Changes in financial condition between September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands). Material changes between the periods are discussed in the sections which follow the table.
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | Increase | | Percentage | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | (Decrease) | | Change | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 27,869 | | $ | 35,518 | | $ | (7,649 | ) | (21.5 | )% |
Investment securities held to maturity | | 84,998 | | 60,746 | | 24,252 | | 39.9 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 4,376 | | 7,089 | | (2,713 | ) | (38.3 | ) |
Loans receivable, net | | 619,239 | | 693,095 | | (73,856 | ) | (10.7 | ) |
Real estate owned, net | | 8,848 | | 3,858 | | 4,990 | | 129.3 | |
Other assets | | 52,463 | | 52,169 | | 294 | | 0.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL | | $ | 797,793 | | $ | 852,475 | | $ | (54,682 | ) | (6.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 640,903 | | $ | 652,265 | | $ | (11,362 | ) | (1.7 | )% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 79,749 | | 120,305 | | (40,556 | ) | (33.7 | ) |
Other liabilities | | 3,046 | | 4,332 | | (1,286 | ) | (29.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 723,698 | | 776,902 | | (53,204 | ) | (6.9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | 74,095 | | 75,573 | | (1,478 | ) | (2.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL | | $ | 797,793 | | $ | 852,475 | | $ | (54,682 | ) | (6.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE | | $ | 15.23 | | $ | 15.62 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
EQUITY TO ASSETS | | 9.3 | % | 8.9 | % | | | | |
8
Loans Receivable. Changes in loan composition between September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands).
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | Increase | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | (Decrease) | | % Change | |
| | | | | | | | | |
One- to four-family residences | | $ | 237,304 | | $ | 257,978 | | $ | (20,674 | ) | (8.0 | )% |
Home equity lines of credit and second mortgage | | 34,680 | | 34,971 | | (291 | ) | (0.8 | ) |
Multi-family | | 12,585 | | 12,203 | | 382 | | 3.1 | |
Commercial real estate | | 129,791 | | 133,647 | | (3,856 | ) | (2.9 | ) |
Land | | 43,605 | | 48,737 | | (5,132 | ) | (10.5 | ) |
Construction: | | | | | | | | | |
One- to four-family residences | | 21,851 | | 32,036 | | (10,185 | ) | (31.8 | ) |
Speculative one- to four-family residences | | 46,281 | | 80,311 | | (34,030 | ) | (42.4 | ) |
Multi-family | | 17,292 | | 14,120 | | 3,172 | | 22.5 | |
Commercial real estate | | 31,857 | | 21,896 | | 9,961 | | 45.5 | |
Land development | | 43,941 | | 47,439 | | (3,498 | ) | (7.4 | ) |
Total mortgage loans | | 619,187 | | 683,338 | | (64,151 | ) | (9.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | 22,128 | | 26,355 | | (4,227 | ) | (16.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Automobile | | 10,431 | | 12,210 | | (1,779 | ) | (14.6 | ) |
Other | | 13,978 | | 13,690 | | 288 | | 2.1 | |
Total consumer | | 24,409 | | 25,900 | | (1,491 | ) | (5.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total loans receivable | | 665,724 | | 735,593 | | (69,869 | ) | (9.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Undisbursed loan funds | | (41,704 | ) | (40,069 | ) | (1,635 | ) | 4.1 | |
Deferred loan costs – net | | 255 | | 143 | | 112 | | 78.3 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | (5,036 | ) | (2,572 | ) | (2,464 | ) | 95.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable, net | | $ | 619,239 | | $ | 693,095 | | $ | (73,856 | ) | (10.7 | )% |
The decrease in the Bank’s loan portfolio was primarily due to a softening of the housing market in Northwest Arkansas. Market data indicates an overall decrease in home sales in Benton and Washington counties in 2007 and 2006 compared to 2005. The Bank’s loan originations were down 41% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to the same period in 2006. Although the economy in the Northwest Arkansas region continues to be strong as reflected in sustained job and population growth, the supply of new residential lots and new speculative homes for sale has outpaced demand during the last few years.
Several years ago, the Bank began to emphasize commercial real estate lending, construction lending, and commercial lending to diversify its loan portfolio, take advantage of market opportunities in these types of loans, and help the Bank transition to a more full-service community bank, as well as to provide opportunities to cross-sell its other banking products. Although the Bank plans to continue this emphasis, the volume of such lending will continue to be subject to the economic and market conditions discussed above and the availability of prudent lending opportunities.
9
Asset Quality. The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of the Bank’s nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.
| | September 30, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) | |
Nonaccrual loans: | | | | | |
One- to four-family residential | | $ | 5,998 | | $ | 3,689 | |
Home equity | | 1,019 | | 994 | |
Speculative one- to four-family construction | | 3,625 | | 5,417 | |
Acquisition and development | | 7,776 | | 5,324 | |
Land | | 532 | | 1,372 | |
Commercial real estate | | 3,281 | | 738 | |
Commercial loans | | 539 | | 1,268 | |
Consumer loans | | 227 | | 213 | |
Total nonaccrual loans | | 22,997 | | 19,015 | |
| | | | | |
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due | | 4,892 | | 668 | |
Real estate owned | | 8,848 | | 3,858 | |
| | | | | |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 36,737 | | $ | 23,541 | |
| | | | | |
Total nonaccrual and accruing loans 90 days or more past due as a percentage of total loans receivable | | 4.19 | % | 2.68 | % |
| | | | | |
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets | | 4.60 | % | 2.76 | % |
The increase in nonaccrual loans is primarily related to increases in nonaccrual commercial real estate loans and nonaccrual acquisition and development loans, offset by decreases in nonaccrual land loans and nonaccrual commercial loans. The Northwest Arkansas market continues to experience an oversupply of lots and speculative homes. Certain of the Bank’s homebuilders are experiencing extended marketing times for the sale of their homes which has resulted in inadequate cash flow to service the interest carry on their loans. The specific loan loss allowance related to loans to builders and developers was approximately $2.5 million at September 30, 2007.
The level of nonaccrual speculative construction loans, acquisition and development loans and commercial real estate loans is attributable primarily to four loan relationships. These relationships are described in more detail in the paragraphs that follow.
The first relationship totaled $5.9 million at September 30, 2007, and is comprised of two subdivision loans totaling $5.4 million and the borrower’s primary residence totaling approximately $520,000. Foreclosure proceedings have begun on the subdivision and the borrower has filed for bankruptcy protection. The subdivision loans represent two phases of the same subdivision located in Lowell, Arkansas, one of which is complete and the other is approximately 10% complete. At December 31, 2006, we estimated no loss on the subdivision based on estimated sales prices of the lots and the estimated costs to complete the incomplete phase of the subdivision. Since that time, market conditions have deteriorated and a subdivision across the street from this subdivision has gone into default. We are aware that the financial institution in that case is trying to liquidate the lots quickly at a discounted price, which has in turn decreased the value of the lots in our subdivision. As a result, we obtained new appraisals on both phases of our subdivision which used discounted cash flow analysis for the complete phase, given the extended selling period that would be necessary to recover our costs, and a land only valuation on the incomplete phase given the decreasing likelihood that we would develop these lots. The new appraisals resulted in a specific loan loss allowance totaling $1.4 million on this subdivision which was recorded in the first quarter of 2007. These subdivision loans are also the subject of litigation alleging fraud and negligence, among other complaints, that the Bank has filed against various parties to the loan. The Bank may be able to recover some of its loss through this litigation, although at this time the Bank cannot give any assurances as to the amount of a recovery, if any. Due to the nature of these
10
loans, the uncertain nature of the legal process, and the possibility of continued adverse changes in market conditions, we may incur losses in the future in excess of the amount estimated as of September 30, 2007.
The second relationship totaled $2.2 million at September 30, 2007, and is comprised of a subdivision located in Cave Springs, Arkansas. The subdivision is 100% complete. The Bank obtained an updated valuation on the subdivision using discounted cash flow analysis. Due to the market conditions and the oversupply of lots in Northwest Arkansas, the valuation indicated lower lot prices and extended marketing time over that in the original appraisal obtained when the loan was originated. Based on the estimated fair value of the collateral, a specific loan loss allowance totaling $865,000 was recorded during the third quarter of 2007. Based on the nature of this loan and the possibility of continued adverse changes in the market conditions, we may incur losses in the future in excess of the amount estimated as of September 30, 2007.
The third relationship totaled $2.4 million at September 30, 2007, and is comprised of $840,000 of speculative single-family construction loans on two properties, a $560,000 single-family construction loan, approximately $390,000 of land and lot loans, approximately $280,000 of commercial loans and the borrower’s primary residence totaling $350,000. All of the real estate loans are in foreclosure. The commercial loans consist of a fully reserved unsecured loan of approximately $75,000, and junior liens on the lots and speculative homes totaling approximately $205,000, with an estimated loss allowance of $80,000. Additionally, there is an approximate $10,000 loss allowance on the land and lot loans. Based on factors such as the complexity of this relationship, the difficulty in estimating completion costs, and potential adverse changes in market conditions, we may incur losses in the future in excess of the amount estimated at September 30, 2007.
The fourth relationship totaled $2.6 million at September 30, 2007, and is comprised of loans to construct a shopping center. The shopping center construction loan matured in March and during the second quarter the borrower indicated he would be unable to pay the interest due in order to extend the construction loan. The Bank obtained an updated appraisal on the shopping center and based on the appraised amount, principal balance outstanding, and an estimate of costs to complete the construction of the shopping center, the Bank currently estimates no loss on the shopping center loans. The Bank intends to complete construction of the property and hold it as Bank-owned property. The Bank plans to occupy approximately 25% of the space with a branch and lease the rest to other tenants.
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2007, consisted of three loans to two borrowers. The first relationship consisted of two loans totaling $2.8 million secured by the borrower’s primary residence, commercial real estate, franchise rights, inventory and equipment. This borrower is in the process of liquidating his assets and we expect to receive all principal and interest due. The second borrower relationship totaled $2.1 million and represents a single commercial real estate loan secured by a convenience store, retail strip center and car wash. The loan is personally guaranteed by several individuals and related entities. One of the principals, who was the managing member, has experienced severe financial difficulties. The other principals/guarantors have indicated that they are in the process of formulating a workout plan that may include liquidation of the collateral to satisfy the obligation. In the event of a foreclosure and a possible deficiency judgment, we believe sufficient net worth exists among the guarantors to satisfy their obligation. The loans discussed above were kept on accrual status at September 30, 2007, based on the factors indicated. However, depending on the outcome of the borrowers’ workout plans, it is possible that the bank my incur losses on these loans in the future.
The increase in real estate owned was primarily due to foreclosures on properties related to three borrowers. The first borrower had properties totaling $3.0 million, which was comprised of $1.3 million in single-family rental properties and $1.7 million in speculative single-family homes under construction. The speculative homes are in various stages of completion ranging from approximately 85% to 100%. The second borrower had properties totaling $2.2 million comprised of 18 speculative single-family construction loans. The homes are complete and the Bank is actively selling these properties. The third borrower had loans totaling $1.1 million comprised of three speculative single-family construction loans in various stages of completion ranging from approximately 85% to 100%. Construction costs on the real estate owned are added to the real estate balance to the extent that the resulting balance does not exceed the estimated fair value of the property less estimated selling costs. Since December 31, 2006, approximately $9.2 million has been added to real estate owned and $4.4 million has been sold. As
11
discussed above, certain nonaccrual loans are in various stages of the foreclosure process at September 30, 2007. To the extent that these loans are foreclosed and ownership transferred to the Bank, real estate owned and associated expenses could continue to increase in the future.
Allowance for Loan Losses. A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 4,291 | | $ | 2,448 | | $ | 2,572 | | $ | 2,114 | |
Provisions for estimated losses | | 1,330 | | 484 | | 3,662 | | 1,128 | |
Recoveries | | 43 | | 55 | | 132 | | 139 | |
Losses charged off | | (628 | ) | (556 | ) | (1,330 | ) | (950 | ) |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 5,036 | | $ | 2,431 | | $ | 5,036 | | $ | 2,431 | |
Changes in the composition of the allowance for loan losses between September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table (in thousands):
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | Increase | |
General | | $ | 2,268 | | $ | 1,966 | | $ | 302 | |
Specific | | 2,768 | | 606 | | 2,162 | |
| | $ | 5,036 | | $ | 2,572 | | $ | 2,464 | |
The general component of the allowance for loan losses increased due to the loss factor applied to speculative single-family construction loans and acquisition and development loans. These loss factors were increased due to the recent loss history on these types of loans. The specific component of the allowance for loan losses increased primarily due to specific allowances on a subdivision in Lowell, Arkansas, and a subdivision in Cave Springs, Arkansas, as discussed in “Asset Quality” previously.
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes it is likely that a loan balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of incurred credit losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The estimation of the allowance is based on a variety of factors, including past loan loss experience, the current credit profile of the Company’s borrowers, adverse situations that have occurred that may affect the borrowers’ ability to repay, the estimated value of underlying collateral, and general economic conditions. Losses are recognized when available information indicates that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or conditions change.
In determining the allowance for loan losses, the Company allocates a portion of the allowance to its various loan categories based on an analysis of individual loans and pools of loans. However, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the
12
borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the short fall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Multi-family residential, commercial real estate, land and land development, and commercial loans that are delinquent or where the borrower’s total loan relationship exceeds $1 million are evaluated on a loan by loan basis at least annually.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures. Homogeneous loans are those that are considered to have common characteristics that provide for evaluation on an aggregate or pool basis. The Bank considers the characteristics of (1) one- to four-family residential first mortgage loans; (2) unsecured consumer loans; and (3) collateralized consumer loans to permit consideration of the appropriateness of the allowance for losses of each group of loans on a pool basis. The primary methodology used to determine the appropriateness of the allowance for losses includes segregating certain specific, poorly performing loans based on their performance characteristics from the pools of loans as to type, valuing these loans, and then applying a loss factor to the remaining pool balance based on several factors including past loss experience, inherent risks, and economic conditions in the primary market areas.
In estimating the amount of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio, various judgments and assumptions are made. For example, when assessing the condition of the overall economic environment, data is collected regarding current market conditions and their impact on the loan portfolio. Loss factors have been revised as a result of the downturn in the housing market, specifically the oversupply of speculative single-family homes and lots in our market area. If the housing market sustains a prolonged downturn, the loss factors applied to our portfolios may need to be further revised, which may significantly impact the measurement of the allowance for loan losses. For impaired loans that are collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral may deviate significantly from the proceeds received when the collateral is sold in the event that the Bank has to foreclose or repossess the collateral.
Although we consider the allowance for loan losses of approximately $5.0 million adequate to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio at September 30, 2007, no assurance can be given that we will not sustain loan losses that are significantly different from the amount recorded, or that subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, would not result in a significant change in the allowance for loan losses.
Investment Securities. Changes in the composition of investment securities held to maturity between September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table (in thousands).
| | September 30, | | December 31, | | Increase | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | (Decrease) | |
U.S. Government and agency obligations | | $ | 68,760 | | $ | 43,857 | | $ | 24,903 | |
Municipal securities | | 16,238 | | 16,889 | | (651 | ) |
Total | | $ | 84,998 | | $ | 60,746 | | $ | 24,252 | |
During the first nine months of 2007, investment securities totaling $29.3 million were purchased and $5.1 million matured or were called. Due to lower loan demand, the Bank used funds from loan repayments to purchase investment securities.
13
At September 30, 2007, estimated fair values of investment securities held to maturity were as follows (in thousands):
| | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | |
U.S. Government and agency obligations | | $ | 68,760 | | $ | 68,383 | |
Municipal securities | | 16,238 | | 16,161 | |
Total | | $ | 84,998 | | $ | 84,544 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. FHLB stock decreased by $2.7 million due to a lower balance requirement related to the decrease in FHLB advances.
Real Estate Owned. The increase in real estate owned was primarily due to an increase in foreclosures related to speculative homes. See “Asset Quality”.
Deposits. Changes in the composition of deposits between September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands).
| | September 30, 2007 | | December 31, 2006 | | Increase (Decrease) | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Checking accounts | | $ | 137,683 | | $ | 139,372 | | $ | (1,689 | ) | (1.2 | )% |
Money Market accounts | | 49,756 | | 51,827 | | (2,071 | ) | (4.0 | )% |
Savings accounts | | 25,786 | | 26,824 | | (1,038 | ) | (3.9 | )% |
Certificates of deposit | | 427,678 | | 434,242 | | (6,564 | ) | (1.5 | )% |
Total deposits | | $ | 640,903 | | $ | 652,265 | | $ | (11,362 | ) | (1.7 | )% |
Deposits decreased in the comparison period, primarily due to a decrease in public unit deposits.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances. The Bank used funds from loan repayments to repay FHLB of Dallas advances during the quarter. FHLB advances decreased by $40.6 million or 33.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The balance of advances at September 30, 2007 of $79.7 million consisted of $63.7 million of fixed rate advances with an average cost of 4.30% and $16.0 million of floating rate advances with an average cost of 5.57%.
Other Liabilities. Other liabilities decreased primarily due to a decrease in federal and state deferred tax liabilities related to the increase in the loan loss provision.
Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased approximately $1.5 million from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007. The decrease in stockholders’ equity was primarily due to the purchase of treasury stock totaling $2.0 million during the first nine months of 2007. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash dividends of approximately $2.3 million were paid. Such decreases were partially offset by net income of $2.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. See the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 for more detail.
14
Average Balance Sheets
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s average balance sheets and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the periods indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances are based on daily balances during the period.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest | | Average Yield/ Cost | | Average Balance | | Interest | | Average Yield/ Cost | |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable(1) | | $ | 632,106 | | $ | 11,020 | | 6.97 | % | $ | 730,630 | | $ | 12,627 | | 6.91 | % |
Investment securities(2) | | 85,666 | | 1,129 | | 5.27 | | 68,496 | | 835 | | 4.87 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | 18,111 | | 232 | | 5.13 | | 16,972 | | 219 | | 5.17 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | 735,883 | | 12,381 | | 6.73 | | 816,098 | | 13,681 | | 6.71 | |
Noninterest-earning assets | | 70,399 | | | | | | 62,556 | | | | | |
Total assets | | 806,282 | | | | | | 878,654 | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 639,452 | | 6,099 | | 3.82 | | 635,245 | | 5,449 | | 3.43 | |
FHLB advances | | 85,806 | | 987 | | 4.60 | | 157,615 | | 1,858 | | 4.72 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | 725,258 | | 7,086 | | 3.91 | | 792,860 | | 7,307 | | 3.69 | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | 5,803 | | | | | | 6,216 | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 731,061 | | | | | | 799,076 | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | 75,221 | | | | | | 79,578 | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 806,282 | | | | | | $ | 878,654 | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | $ | 5,295 | | | | | | $ | 6,374 | | | |
Net earning assets | | $ | 10,625 | | | | | | $ | 23,238 | | | | | |
Interest rate spread | | | | | | 2.82 | % | | | | | 3.02 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | 2.88 | % | | | | | 3.12 | % |
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | 101.46 | % | | | | | 102.93 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | Average Balance | | Interest | | Average Yield/ Cost | | Average Balance | | Interest | | Average Yield/ Cost | |
| | (Dollars in Thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable(1) | | $ | 661,297 | | $ | 35,225 | | 7.10 | % | $ | 733,842 | | $ | 37,703 | | 6.85 | % |
Investment securities(2) | | 74,260 | | 2,856 | | 5.13 | | 66,917 | | 2,411 | | 4.80 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | 18,730 | | 722 | | 5.14 | | 10,769 | | 393 | | 4.87 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | 754,287 | | 38,803 | | 6.86 | | 811,528 | | 40,507 | | 6.66 | |
Noninterest-earning assets | | 67,917 | | | | | | 61,233 | | | | | |
Total assets | | 822,204 | | | | | | 872,761 | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 643,475 | | 17,991 | | 3.73 | | 626,745 | | 14,819 | | 3.15 | |
FHLB advances | | 97,747 | | 3,353 | | 4.57 | | 161,103 | | 5,378 | | 4.45 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | 741,222 | | 21,344 | | 3.84 | | 787,848 | | 20,197 | | 3.42 | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | 5,644 | | | | | | 6,194 | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | 746,866 | | | | | | 794,042 | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | 75,338 | | | | | | 78,719 | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 822,204 | | | | | | $ | 872,761 | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | $ | 17,459 | | | | | | $ | 20,310 | | | |
Net earning assets | | $ | 13,065 | | | | | | $ | 23,680 | | | | | |
Interest rate spread | | | | | | 3.02 | % | | | | | 3.24 | % |
Net interest margin | | | | | | 3.09 | % | | | | | 3.34 | % |
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | 101.76 | % | | | | | 103.01 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes nonaccrual loans.
(2) Includes FHLB of Dallas stock.
15
Rate/Volume Analysis
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in average volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior average volume); (iii) changes in rate-volume (changes in rate multiplied by the change in average volume); and (iv) the net change.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 vs. 2006 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due to | | | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Rate/ Volume | | Total Increase (Decrease) | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | (1,703 | ) | $ | 111 | | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (1,607 | ) |
Investment securities | | 209 | | 68 | | 17 | | 294 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | 15 | | (2 | ) | — | | 13 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | (1,479 | ) | 177 | | 2 | | (1,300 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 36 | | 610 | | 4 | | 650 | |
FHLB advances | | (847 | ) | (45 | ) | 21 | | (871 | ) |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | (811 | ) | 565 | | 25 | | (221 | ) |
Net change in net interest income | | $ | (668 | ) | $ | (388 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (1,079 | ) |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 vs. 2006 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due to | | | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Rate/ Volume | | Total Increase (Decrease) | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Interest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | (3,727 | ) | $ | 1,386 | | $ | (137 | ) | $ | (2,478 | ) |
Investment securities | | 264 | | 163 | | 18 | | 445 | |
Other interest-earning assets | | 291 | | 22 | | 16 | | 329 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | (3,172 | ) | 1,571 | | (103 | ) | (1,704 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 396 | | 2,704 | | 72 | | 3,172 | |
FHLB advances | | (2,115 | ) | 148 | | (58 | ) | (2,025 | ) |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | (1,719 | ) | 2,852 | | 14 | | 1,147 | |
Net change in net interest income | | $ | (1,453 | ) | $ | (1,281 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | (2,851 | ) |
16
CHANGES IN RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The table below presents a comparison of results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands). Specific changes in captions are discussed in the sections which follow the table.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | | Percentage Change | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | |
Interest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | 11,020 | | $ | 12,627 | | $ | (1,607 | ) | (12.7 | )% |
Investment securities | | 1,129 | | 835 | | 294 | | 35.2 | |
Other | | 232 | | 219 | | 13 | | 5.9 | |
Total interest income | | 12,381 | | 13,681 | | (1,300 | ) | (9.5 | ) |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 6,099 | | 5,449 | | 650 | | 11.9 | |
FHLB advances | | 987 | | 1,858 | | (871 | ) | (46.9 | ) |
Total interest expense | | 7,086 | | 7,307 | | (221 | ) | (3.0 | ) |
Net interest income before provision for loan losses | | 5,295 | | 6,374 | | (1,079 | ) | (16.9 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | 1,330 | | 484 | | 846 | | 174.8 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | 3,965 | | 5,890 | | (1,925 | ) | (32.7 | ) |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit fee income | | 1,235 | | 1,264 | | (29 | ) | (2.3 | ) |
Gain on sale of loans | | 201 | | 310 | | (109 | ) | (35.2 | ) |
Other | | 559 | | 439 | | 120 | | 27.3 | |
Total noninterest income | | 1,995 | | 2,013 | | (18 | ) | (0.9 | ) |
Noninterest expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | 3,287 | | 3,195 | | 92 | | 2.9 | |
Real estate owned, net | | 543 | | 62 | | 481 | | 775.8 | |
Advertising and public relations | | 239 | | 342 | | (103 | ) | (30.1 | ) |
Other | | 1,740 | | 1,850 | | (110 | ) | (5.9 | ) |
Total noninterest expenses | | 5,809 | | 5,449 | | 360 | | 6.6 | |
Income before income taxes | | 151 | | 2,454 | | (2,303 | ) | (93.9 | ) |
Income tax provision | | (150 | ) | 754 | | (904 | ) | (119.9 | ) |
Net income | | $ | 301 | | 1,700 | | $ | (1,399 | ) | (82.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.34 | | $ | (0.28 | ) | (82.4 | )% |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.06 | | $ | 0.33 | | $ | (0.27 | ) | (81.8 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate spread | | 2.82 | % | 3.02 | % | | | | |
Net interest margin | | 2.88 | % | 3.12 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Average full-time equivalents | | 301 | | 305 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Full-service offices | | 18 | | 18 | | | | | |
17
The table below presents a comparison of results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands). Specific changes in captions are discussed in the sections which follow the table.
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | | Percentage Change | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | |
Interest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable | | $ | 35,225 | | $ | 37,703 | | $ | (2,478 | ) | (6.6 | )% |
Investment securities | | 2,856 | | 2,411 | | 445 | | 18.5 | |
Other | | 722 | | 393 | | 329 | | 83.7 | |
Total interest income | | 38,803 | | 40,507 | | (1,704 | ) | (4.2 | ) |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | 17,991 | | 14,819 | | 3,172 | | 21.4 | |
FHLB advances | | 3,353 | | 5,378 | | (2,025 | ) | (37.7 | ) |
Total interest expense | | 21,344 | | 20,197 | | 1,147 | | 5.7 | |
Net interest income before provision for loan losses | | 17,459 | | 20,310 | | (2,851 | ) | (14.0 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | 3,662 | | 1,128 | | 2,534 | | 224.7 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | 13,797 | | 19,182 | | (5,385 | ) | (28.1 | ) |
Noninterest income: | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit fee income | | 3,661 | | 3,579 | | 82 | | 2.3 | |
Gain on sale of loans | | 664 | | 841 | | (177 | ) | (21.1 | ) |
Other | | 1,490 | | 1,912 | | (422 | ) | (22.1 | ) |
Total noninterest income | | 5,815 | | 6,332 | | (517 | ) | (8.2 | ) |
Noninterest expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | 10,016 | | 10,174 | | (158 | ) | (1.6 | ) |
Real estate owned, net | | 826 | | 41 | | 785 | | 1,914.6 | |
Advertising and public relations | | 849 | | 971 | | (122 | ) | (12.6 | ) |
Other | | 5,643 | | 5,581 | | 62 | | 1.1 | |
Total noninterest expenses | | 17,334 | | 16,767 | | 567 | | 3.4 | |
Income before income taxes | | 2,278 | | 8,747 | | (6,469 | ) | (74.0 | ) |
Income tax provision | | 284 | | 2,787 | | (2,503 | ) | (89.8 | ) |
Net income | | $ | 1,994 | | 5,960 | | $ | (3,966 | ) | (66.5 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.41 | | $ | 1.19 | | $ | (0.78 | ) | (65.6 | )% |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.41 | | $ | 1.16 | | $ | (0.75 | ) | (64.7 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate spread | | 3.02 | % | 3.24 | % | | | | |
Net interest margin | | 3.09 | % | 3.34 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Average full-time equivalents | | 304 | | 306 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Full-service offices | | 18 | | 18 | | | | | |
18
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is determined by the Company’s interest rate spread (i.e., the difference between the yields earned on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities) and the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in net interest income was primarily due to the level of nonperforming loans, the Company’s negative gap position and the more rapid increase in rates paid on deposits compared to the yield on the Company’s interest earning assets.
INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
Dollar changes in interest income and interest expense for the comparison periods are presented in the Rate/Volume Analysis table which appears on a previous page.
Interest Income. The decreases in interest income for the three and nine month comparative periods were primarily due to decreases in the average balance of loans receivable and increases in the nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio, offset in the nine month comparative period by an increase in the average yield earned on loans receivable. The increase in average yield earned during the nine month comparative period was due primarily to increases in market interest rates during the year. The average balance of loans decreased primarily due to a decrease in loan originations.
Interest Expense. The increase in interest expense for the nine month comparative period was primarily due to an increase in the average rate paid on deposits and an increase in the average balance of deposits, offset by a decrease in the average balance of FHLB advances. The decrease in interest expense for the three month comparative period was due to a decrease in the average balance of FHLB advances, offset by an increase in the average rate paid on deposits. The average balance of FHLB advances decreased due to funds generated from loan repayments being used to pay down maturing advances. The increase in the average rates paid on deposit accounts reflects the increase in market interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses includes charges to maintain an allowance for loan losses adequate to cover probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans as well as probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date. Such provision and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated quarterly by management of the Bank based on the Bank’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions.
Factors influencing management’s decision to increase the provision in the 2007 vs. 2006 periods include an increase in nonaccrual loans, conditions in the speculative single-family real estate market in Northwest Arkansas, and specific loan loss allowances of $1.4 million on two phases of a subdivision in Lowell, Arkansas and $865,000 on a subdivision located in Cave Springs, Arkansas, as discussed in “Asset Quality” previously. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded $397,000 in net charge-offs on speculative single-family construction loans as well as $101,000 in net realized losses on sales of speculative single-family real estate owned and $271,000 in fair value writedowns of speculative single-family real estate owned. This compares to total net charge-offs, losses on sales, and fair value writedowns of $326,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, $77,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and none for the year ended December 31, 2004. The speculative single-family construction market demonstrated weakness in late 2005 and we began reducing our exposure in this area at that time. However, the continued oversupply of available housing has impacted the value of speculative single-family homes and development projects, as discussed above. Further deterioration in this market segment may impact the value of existing single-family home values as well as our provision for loan losses in the future.
Noninterest Income. Deposit fee income increased for the nine month comparative period in 2007 as a result of an increase in debit card usage and insufficient funds fee income. This increase resulted from an increase in the number of checking accounts with overdrawn balances and a 4.2% increase in the per item charge that was effective February 1, 2007. The Bank plans to continue to aggressively promote
19
checking accounts in 2007 through direct mail campaigns and offering “thank you” gifts to further expand its checking accounts and increase deposit fee income.
The decreases in gains on sales of loans for the three and nine month comparative periods ended September 30, 2007 were primarily related to a decrease in the number of loans sold.
The decrease in other noninterest income for the nine month comparative period ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to nonrecurring gains on the sales of two properties totaling approximately $528,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2006. These properties represented excess land and a building adjacent to two existing branches.
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and Employee Benefits. The changes in the composition of this line item are presented below (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | |
Salaries | | $ | 2,588 | | $ | 2,495 | | $ | 93 | | $ | 7,824 | | $ | 7,620 | | $ | 204 | |
Payroll taxes | | 197 | | 194 | | 3 | | 676 | | 662 | | 14 | |
Insurance | | 168 | | 173 | | (5 | ) | 508 | | 517 | | (9 | ) |
ESOP (1) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 508 | | (508 | ) |
401(k) | | 77 | | 72 | | 5 | | 233 | | 94 | | 139 | |
Stock compensation (2) | | 5 | | 12 | | (7 | ) | 24 | | 54 | | (30 | ) |
Defined benefit plan contribution | | 210 | | 210 | | — | | 630 | | 603 | | 27 | |
Other | | 42 | | 39 | | 3 | | 121 | | 116 | | 5 | |
Total | | $ | 3,287 | | $ | 3,195 | | $ | 92 | | $ | 10,016 | | $ | 10,174 | | $ | (158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(2) Includes stock options and Management Recognition and Retention Plan (“MRP”) expense.
The decrease in salaries and employee benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was due primarily to the decrease in employee stock ownership plan expense, as the plan shares became fully allocated as of March 31, 2006. The Company implemented a 401(k) Plan on June 1, 2006. The 401(k) expense above relates to employer matching of employee 401(k) contributions. Salaries increased in both comparison periods due to normal salary and merit increases.
Real Estate Owned, net. The changes in the composition of this line item are presented below (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (Decrease) | |
| | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 vs 2006 | |
Loss provisions | | $ | 312 | | $ | 7 | | $ | 305 | | $ | 390 | | $ | 7 | | $ | 383 | |
Net loss (gain) on sales | | 67 | | 39 | | 28 | | 119 | | (43 | ) | 162 | |
Taxes and insurance | | 69 | | 8 | | 61 | | 161 | | 36 | | 125 | |
Other | | 95 | | 8 | | 87 | | 156 | | 41 | | 115 | |
Total | | $ | 543 | | $ | 62 | | $ | 481 | | $ | 826 | | $ | 41 | | $ | 785 | |
Expenses associated with real estate owned have increased due to the increase in real estate owned balances. As discussed in “Asset Quality”, real estate owned is expected to continue to increase in the foreseeable future and real estate owned expenses are expected to increase accordingly.
Advertising and Public Relations. The decrease in this line item in both comparison periods was primarily due to a decrease in direct mail advertising as well as a decrease in expenses associated with branch openings.
20
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes decreased in both comparison periods due to a decrease in taxable income and certain nontaxable income amounts remaining relatively constant and therefore representing a larger percentage of taxable income.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company, in the normal course of business, makes commitments to buy or sell assets or to incur or fund liabilities. Commitments include, but are not limited to:
• the origination, purchase or sale of loans;
• the fulfillment of commitments under letters-of-credit, extensions of credit on home equity lines of credit, construction loans, and predetermined overdraft protection limits; and
• the commitment to fund withdrawals of certificates of deposit at maturity.
At September 30, 2007, the Bank’s off-balance sheet arrangements principally included lending commitments, which are described below. At September 30, 2007, the Company had no interests in non-consolidated special purpose entities.
At September 30, 2007, commitments included:
• total approved commitments to originate or purchase loans amounting to $3.3 million, including $572,000 of loans committed to sell;
• rate lock agreements with customers of $3.8 million, all of which have been locked with an investor;
• funded mortgage loans committed to sell of $2.1 million;
• unadvanced portion of construction loans of $41.7 million;
• unused lines of credit of $27.0 million;
• outstanding standby letters of credit of approximately $495,000;
• total predetermined overdraft protection limits of $13.2 million; and
• certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less totaling $339.9 million.
Total unfunded commitments to originate loans for sale and the related commitments to sell of $3.8 million meet the definition of a derivative financial instrument. The related asset and liability are considered immaterial at September 30, 2007.
Historically, a very small percentage of predetermined overdraft limits have been used. At September 30, 2007, overdrafts of accounts with Bounce ProtectionTM represented usage of 3.2% of the limit. We expect utilization of these overdraft limits to remain at comparable levels in the future.
Based on historical experience, management believes that a significant portion of maturing deposits will remain with the Bank. We anticipate that we will continue to have sufficient funds, through repayments, deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Bank’s liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents and eligible investment securities, is a product of its operating, investing and financing activities. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, collections on outstanding loans, maturities and calls of investment securities and other short-term investments and funds provided from operations. While scheduled loan amortization and maturing investment securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Bank manages the pricing of its deposits to maintain a steady deposit balance. In addition, the Bank invests excess funds in overnight deposits and other short-term interest-earning assets which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. During the first nine months of 2007, the use of FHLB advances decreased due to the Bank’s using funds generated from loan repayments to pay down
21
maturing advances. At September 30, 2007, available borrowing capacity with the FHLB was in excess of $217.0 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid dividends of $0.48 and $0.43 per share, respectively. The determination of future dividends on the Company’s common stock will depend on conditions existing at that time with consideration given to the Company’s earnings, capital, and liquidity needs.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments such as overnight deposits and certificates of deposit. On a longer-term basis, the Bank maintains a strategy of investing in various lending products and investment securities. The Bank uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments, to pay maturing savings certificates and savings withdrawals, to repay maturing FHLB of Dallas advances, and to fund loan commitments.
As of September 30, 2007, the Bank’s regulatory capital was in excess of all applicable regulatory requirements. At September 30, 2007, the Bank’s tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios amounted to 9.07%, 9.07% and 12.83%, respectively, compared to regulatory requirements of 1.5%, 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively.
22
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
The financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the Bank’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than does the effect of inflation.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. In addition, in this document, the words “anticipate”, “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “should” and similar expressions, or the negative thereof, as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future looking events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
There has been no material change in the market value of the Bank’s portfolio equity since December 31, 2006. Similarly, while there has been no material change in the Company’s asset and liability position since such time, the Bank’s negative gap position and the Bank’s level of nonperforming assets have adversely impacted net income as interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased at a greater pace than the comparable increase in interest income. Correspondingly, the Bank’s net interest margin decreased from 3.34% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to 3.09% for the same period in 2007. Based on the level of nonperforming assets and competitive pressures on loan and deposit rates, management anticipates continued pressure on the Bank’s interest rate spread and interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2007.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and are operating in an effective manner.
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. However, late in the first quarter of 2007, the Company migrated its operational software system from one product to another offered by its software vendor. This migration affected the deposit and loan processing functions of the Bank. Extensive data verification processes were performed throughout the Bank leading up to the conversion. In addition, our internal audit department reviewed the financial reporting control activities and narratives for each of the Company’s business cycles that had previously been identified for the Company’s testing of internal control over financial reporting. Each
23
major area of the Company that has a direct impact on the creation of data that is used in the financial reporting process asserted that the conversion did not create material changes in the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting.
The Company continues to evaluate and resolve post-conversion issues. The Company’s internal audit department began detailed analysis to identify any significant changes in the quality of internal control over financial reporting as a result of the conversion in the latter part of the second quarter. This evaluation will continue into the fourth quarter.
24
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
Part II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Company nor the Bank is involved in any pending legal proceedings other than non-material legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
| | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | |
July 1 to July 31, 2007 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
August 1 to August 31, 2007 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
September 1 to September 30, 2007 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
The Company is in its 19th announced repurchase program, which was approved by the board of directors on July 25, 2006, and publicly announced on November 8, 2006. Total shares approved to be purchased in this program are 245,197 of which 193,571 have been purchased as of September 30, 2007. All treasury stock purchases are made under publicly announced repurchase programs.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1 – Certification of Chief Executive Officer,
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Exhibit 31.2 – Certification of Chief Financial Officer,
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Exhibit 32.1 – Certification of Chief Executive Officer,
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
Exhibit 32.2 – Certification of Chief Financial Officer,
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
Date: | October 31, 2007 | By: | /s/ Larry J. Brandt |
| | | Larry J. Brandt |
| | | Chief Executive Officer |
Date: | October 31, 2007 | By: | /s/ Sherri R. Billings |
| | | Sherri R. Billings |
| | | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
26