Fair Value of Financial Instruments | 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Assets by Hierarchy Level Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized below (in thousands): March 31, 2016 Fair Value Measurement Using: Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Fixed maturity securities U.S. Government and government agencies $ 18,227 $ 6,688 $ 11,486 $ 53 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 395,116 — 389,355 5,761 Foreign government 6,232 — 6,232 — Residential mortgage-backed securities 158,169 — 82,969 75,200 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 69,425 — 14,820 54,605 Asset-backed securities 56,477 — 11,074 45,403 Corporate and other 574,385 6,510 555,389 12,486 Total fixed maturity securities 1,278,031 13,198 1,071,325 193,508 Equity securities Common stocks 17,332 12,756 — 4,576 Perpetual preferred stocks 30,225 9,698 20,527 — Total equity securities 47,557 22,454 20,527 4,576 Derivatives 3,345 258 — 3,087 Contingent asset 2,992 — — 2,992 Total assets accounted for at fair value $ 1,331,925 $ 35,910 $ 1,091,852 $ 204,163 Liabilities Warrant liability $ 2,358 $ — $ — 2,358 Deferred consideration 2,589 — — 2,589 Total liabilities accounted for at fair value $ 4,947 $ — $ — $ 4,947 December 31, 2015 Fair Value Measurement Using: Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Fixed maturity securities U.S. Government and government agencies $ 17,083 $ 5,753 $ 11,257 $ 73 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 386,260 — 380,601 5,659 Foreign government 6,429 — 6,429 — Residential mortgage-backed securities 166,315 — 87,296 79,019 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 75,035 — 14,510 60,525 Asset-backed securities 34,451 — 6,798 27,653 Corporate and other 546,268 7,090 525,234 13,944 Total fixed maturity securities 1,231,841 12,843 1,032,125 186,873 Equity securities Common stocks 18,625 13,693 — 4,932 Perpetual preferred stocks 31,057 10,271 20,786 — Total equity securities 49,682 23,964 20,786 4,932 Derivatives 4,843 632 — 4,211 Total assets accounted for at fair value $ 1,286,366 $ 37,439 $ 1,052,911 $ 196,016 Liabilities Warrant liability $ 4,332 $ — $ — $ 4,332 Total liabilities accounted for at fair value $ 4,332 $ — $ — $ 4,332 The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in and out of Level 3, or between other levels, at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. The Company transferred $1.1 million corporate and other bonds and $0.5 million preferred stock from Level 1 into Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting the level of market activity in these instruments. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for three months ended March 31, 2015 . Availability of secondary market activity for certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 impacted the market observable inputs used to establish fair values. Coupled with more consistent pricing from third-party sources, resulted in the Company's conclusion that there was sufficient trading activity in these instruments to support classifying these securities as Level 2 as of March 31, 2016 . Accordingly, the Company’s assessment resulted in a net transfer out of Level 3 of $9.5 million related to asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities during three months ended March 31, 2016 . Conversely, for the lack of the above factors, the Company recorded a net transfers to Level 3 of $11.7 million related to asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities during three months ended March 31, 2016 . The methods and assumptions the Company uses to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below. Fixed Maturity Securities - the fair values of the Company’s publicly-traded fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent pricing services. Prices from pricing services are sourced from multiple vendors, and a vendor hierarchy is maintained by asset type based on historical pricing experience and vendor expertise. In some cases, the Company receives prices from multiple pricing services for each security, but ultimately uses the price from the pricing service highest in the vendor hierarchy based on the respective asset type. Consistent with the fair value hierarchy described above, securities with validated quotes from pricing services are generally reflected within Level 2, as they are primarily based on observable pricing for similar assets and/or other market observable inputs. If the Company ultimately concludes that pricing information received from the independent pricing service is not reflective of market activity, non-binding broker quotes are used, if available. If the Company concludes the values from both pricing services and brokers are not reflective of market activity, it may override the information from the pricing service or broker with an internally developed valuation; however, this occurs infrequently. Internally developed valuations or non-binding broker quotes are also used to determine fair value in circumstances where vendor pricing is not available. These estimates may use significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset. Pricing service overrides, internally developed valuations and non-binding broker quotes are generally based on significant unobservable inputs and are reflected as Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy. The inputs used in the valuation of corporate and government securities include, but are not limited to, standard market observable inputs which are derived from, or corroborated by, market observable data including market yield curve, duration, call provisions, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer. For structured securities, valuation is based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market inputs including spreads for actively traded securities, spreads off benchmark yields, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, current and forecasted loss severity, rating, weighted average coupon, weighted average maturity, average delinquency rates, geographic region, debt-service coverage ratios and issuance-specific information including, but not limited to: collateral type, payment terms of the underlying assets, payment priority within the tranche, structure of the security, deal performance and vintage of loans. When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation techniques for determining the estimated fair value of certain types of securities that trade infrequently, and therefore have little or no price transparency, rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be based in large part on management judgment or estimation, and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and are believed to be consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities. The fair values of private placement securities are primarily determined using a discounted cash flow model. In certain cases these models primarily use observable inputs with a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries who are active in both primary and secondary transactions, taking into account, among other factors, the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and the reduced liquidity associated with private placements. Generally, these securities have been reflected within Level 3. For certain private fixed maturities, the discounted cash flow model may also incorporate significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the security. To the extent management determines that such unobservable inputs are not significant to the price of a security, a Level 2 classification is made. Otherwise, a Level 3 classification is used. Equity Securities – the balance consists principally of common and preferred stock of publicly and privately traded companies. The fair values of publicly traded equity securities are primarily based on quoted market prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of preferred equity securities, for which quoted market prices are not readily available, are based on prices obtained from independent pricing services and these securities are generally classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of common stock of privately held company was determined using unobservable market inputs, including volatility and underlying security values and was classified as Level 3. Cash Equivalents – the balance consists of money market instruments which are generally valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible for identical assets and are primarily classified as Level 1. Various time deposits carried as cash equivalents are not measured at estimated fair value and therefore are excluded from the tables presented. Derivatives – the balance consists of common stock purchase warrants and call options. The fair values of the call options are primarily based on quoted market prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Depending on the terms, the common stock warrants were valued using either Black-Scholes analysis or Monte Carlo Simulation. Fair value was determined using unobservable market inputs, including volatility and underlying security values, therefore the common stock purchase warrants were classified as Level 3. Warrant Liability – the balance consists of the Warrant and recorded within other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Fair value was determined using Monte Carlo Simulation. Monte Carlo Simulation was utilized because the adjustments for exercise price and warrant shares represent path dependent features; the exercise price from prior periods needs to be known to determine whether a subsequent sale of shares occurs at a price that is lower than the then current exercise price. The analysis entails a Geometric Brownian Motion based simulation of one hundred unique price paths of the Company's stock for each combination of assumptions. Fair value was determined using unobservable market inputs, including volatility, and a range of assumptions regarding a possibility of an equity capital raise each year and the expected size of future equity capital raises. The present value of a given simulated scenario was based on intrinsic value at expiration discounted to the valuation date, taking into account any adjustments to the exercise price or warrant shares issuable. The average present value across all one hundred independent price paths represents the estimate of fair value for each combination of assumption. Therefore, the warrant liability was classified as Level 3. Level 3 Measurements and Transfers Changes in balances of Level 3 financial assets carried at fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are presented below (in thousands): Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in Balance at December 31, 2015 Net earnings (loss) Other comp. income (loss) Purchases and issuances Sales and settlements Transfer to Level 3 Transfer out of Level 3 Balance at March 31, 2016 Assets Fixed maturity securities U.S. Government and government agencies $ 73 $ — $ (3 ) $ — $ (17 ) $ — $ — $ 53 States, municipalities and political subdivisions 5,659 99 3 — — — — 5,761 Foreign government — — — — — — — — Residential mortgage-backed securities 79,019 (1,139 ) (156 ) — (3,354 ) 6,387 (5,557 ) 75,200 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 60,525 (291 ) 632 — (3,814 ) 385 (2,832 ) 54,605 Asset-backed securities 27,653 32 (420 ) 14,660 (300 ) 4,911 (1,133 ) 45,403 Corporate and other 13,944 (18 ) (1,395 ) — (45 ) — — 12,486 Total fixed maturity securities 186,873 (1,317 ) (1,339 ) 14,660 (7,530 ) 11,683 (9,522 ) 193,508 Equity securities Common stocks 4,932 — (356 ) — — — — 4,576 Perpetual preferred stocks — — — — — — — — Total equity securities 4,932 — (356 ) — — — — 4,576 Derivatives 4,211 — — (1,124 ) — — — 3,087 Contingent asset — — — 2,992 — — — 2,992 Total financial assets $ 196,016 $ (1,317 ) $ (1,695 ) $ 16,528 $ (7,530 ) $ 11,683 $ (9,522 ) $ 204,163 Liabilities Warrants $ 4,332 $ (1,974 ) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2,358 Deferred consideration — — — 2,589 — — — 2,589 Total financial liabilities $ 4,332 $ (1,974 ) $ — $ 2,589 $ — $ — $ — $ 4,947 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in Balance at December 31, 2014 Net earnings (loss) Other comp. income (loss) Purchases and issuances Sales and settlements Transfer to Level 3 Transfer out of Level 3 Balance at March 31, 2015 Assets Fixed maturity securities Corporate and other $ 250 $ — $ — $ 2,955 $ — $ — $ — $ 3,205 Total fixed maturity securities 250 — — 2,955 — — — 3,205 Derivatives — — — 295 — — — 295 Total financial assets $ 250 $ — $ — $ 3,250 $ — $ — $ — $ 3,500 Since internally developed Level 3 asset fair values represent less than 1% of the Company’s total assets, any justifiable changes in unobservable inputs used to determine internally developed fair values would not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value The Company is required by general accounting principles for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures to disclose the fair value of certain financial instruments including those that are not carried at fair value. The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, which were not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 . This table excludes carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, costs and recognized earnings in excess of billings, accounts payable, accrued expenses, billings in excess of costs and recognized earnings, and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value due to relatively short periods to maturity (in thousands). March 31, 2016 Fair Value Measurement Using: Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Mortgage loans $ 1,145 $ 1,144 $ — $ — $ 1,144 Policy loans 18,360 18,360 — 18,360 — Other invested assets 4,890 2,482 — — 2,482 Total assets not accounted for at fair value $ 24,395 $ 21,986 $ — $ 18,360 $ 3,626 Liabilities Annuity benefits accumulated (1) $ 258,644 $ 256,469 $ — $ — $ 256,469 Long-term obligations (2) 340,610 285,525 — 285,525 — Total liabilities not accounted for at fair value $ 599,254 $ 541,994 $ — $ 285,525 $ 256,469 December 31, 2015 Fair Value Measurement Using: Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Mortgage loans $ 1,252 $ 1,252 $ — $ — $ 1,252 Policy loans 18,476 18,476 — 18,476 — Other invested assets 5,784 3,434 — — 3,434 Total assets not accounted for at fair value $ 25,512 $ 23,162 $ — $ 18,476 $ 4,686 Liabilities Annuity benefits accumulated (1) $ 257,454 $ 258,847 $ — $ — $ 258,847 Long-term obligations (2) 319,180 310,307 — 310,307 — Total liabilities not accounted for at fair value $ 576,634 $ 569,154 $ — $ 310,307 $ 258,847 (1) Excludes life contingent annuities in the payout phase. (2) Excludes certain lease obligations accounted for under ASC 840. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate – the fair value of mortgage loans on real estate is estimated by discounting cash flows, both principal and interest, using current interest rates for mortgage loans with similar credit ratings and similar remaining maturities. As such, inputs include current treasury yields and spreads, which are based on the credit rating and average life of the loan, corresponding to the market spreads. The valuation of mortgage loans on real estate is considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Policy Loans – the policy loans are reported at the unpaid principal balance and carry a fixed interest rate. The Company determined that the carrying value approximates fair value because (i) policy loans present no credit risk as the amount of the loan cannot exceed the obligation due upon the death of the insured or surrender of the underlying policy; (ii) there is no active market for policy loans, i.e. there is no commonly available exit price to determine the fair value of policy loans in the open market; (iii) policy loans are intricately linked to the underlying policy liability and in many cases, policy loan balances are recovered through offsetting the loan balance against the benefits paid under the policy; and (iv) policy loans can be repaid by policyholders at any time, and this prepayment uncertainty reduces the potential impact of a difference between amortized cost (carrying value) and fair value. The valuation of policy loans is considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Other Invested Assets – the balance primarily includes common stock purchase warrants. The fair values were derived using Black-Scholes analysis using unobservable market inputs, including volatility and underlying security values, therefore the common stock purchase warrants were classified as Level 3. Annuity Benefits Accumulated – The fair value of annuity benefits was determined using the surrender values of the annuities and classified as Level 3. Long-term Obligations – The fair value of the Company’s long-term obligations was determined using Bloomberg Valuation Service BVAL. The methodology combines direct market observations from contributed sources with quantitative pricing models to generate evaluated prices and classified as Level 2. |