The Manager receives a fee (and, prior to November 7, 2008, JWS received a fee), calculated daily and paid monthly, equal to a per annum percentage of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Effective November 7, 2008, the management fee rate is equal to 0.40% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Prior to November 7, 2008, the management fee rate was calculated on a sliding scale of 0.45% to 0.375% based on average daily net assets of all the investment companies managed by JWS. The management fee for the year ended December 31, 2008, was equivalent to an annual rate of 0.42% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. RiverSource received $133,062 of such fee and the balance was paid to JWS. From time to time, the Manager (and previously JWS) has agreed to reimburse a portion of the class-specific expenses of certain share classes to declare dividends equal to selected minimum annual rates. For the period March 25, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the minimum annual dividend rate was 0.01% for Class B, Class C, Class C2 and Class R shares, and 0.25% for Class A and Class I shares. As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Manager and JWS reimbursed $238,374 and $82,185, respectively, for all classes of shares.
Under an Administrative Services Agreement, effective November 7, 2008, Ameriprise administers certain aspects of the Fund’s business and other affairs at no cost. Ameriprise provides the Fund with office space, and certain administrative and other services and executive and other personnel as are necessary for Fund operations. Ameriprise pays all of the compensation of Board members of the Fund who are employees or consultants of RiverSource and of the officers and other personnel of the Fund. Ameriprise reserves the right to seek Board approval to increase the fees payable by the Fund under the Administrative Services Agreement. However, Ameriprise anticipates that any such increase in fees would be offset by corresponding decreases in advisory fees under the Investment Management Services Agreement. If an increase in fees under the Administrative Services Agreement would not be offset by corresponding decreases in advisory fees, the Fund will inform shareholders prior to the effectiveness of such increase. Prior to November 7, 2008, administrative services were provided to the Fund by JWS as part of its former management agreement with the Fund.
Notes to Financial Statements
annual basis of the average daily net assets of Class A shares, attributable to the particular service organizations for providing personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor, and likewise the Fund, did not make payments under the Plan with respect to Class A shares during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Under the Plan, with respect to Class B shares, Class C shares (formerly Class D shares prior to May 17, 2008), Class C2 shares (formerly Class C shares prior to May 17, 2008) issued in exchange from another Seligman mutual fund, and Class R shares, service organizations can enter into agreements with the Distributor and receive a continuing fee for providing personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts of up to 0.25% on an annual basis of the average daily net assets of the Class B, Class C, Class C2, and Class R shares for which the organizations are responsible; and, for Class C, Class C2, and Class R shares, fees for providing other distribution assistance of up to 0.75% (0.25%, in the case of Class R shares) on an annual basis of such average daily net assets. Such fees are paid monthly by the Fund to the Distributor pursuant to the Plan.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, fees incurred under the Plan, equivalent to 1%, 1%, 0.82% and 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets of Class B shares, Class C shares, Class C2 shares, and Class R shares, respectively, amounted to $73,616, $145,419, $46,038 and $3,299, respectively.
The Distributor and RiverSource Services, Inc. (formerly Seligman Services, Inc.), each an affiliate of the Manager, are eligible to receive distribution and service (12b-1) fees pursuant to the Plan. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Distributor and Seligman Services, Inc. received distribution and service (12b-1) fees of $9,445.
The Distributor is entitled to retain any CDSC imposed on certain redemptions of Class A, Class C, Class C2, and Class R shares. For the year ended December 31, 2008, such charges amounted to $16,471. The Distributor has sold its rights to third parties to collect any CDSC imposed on redemptions of Class B shares.
c. | | Transfer Agent and Shareholder Services — For the year ended December 31, 2008, Seligman Data Corp., owned by the Fund and certain associated investment companies, charged the Fund at cost $684,551 for shareholder account services in accordance with a methodology approved by the Fund’s directors. Class I shares receive more limited shareholder services than the Fund’s other classes of shares (the “Retail Classes”). Seligman Data Corp. does not allocate to Class I the costs of any of its departments that do not provide services to the Class I shareholders. |
Costs of Seligman Data Corp. directly attributable to the Retail Classes of the Fund were charged to those classes in proportion to their relative net asset values. Costs directly attributable to Class I shares were charged to Class I. The remaining charges were allocated to the Retail Classes and Class I by Seligman Data Corp. pursuant to a formula based on their net assets, shareholder transaction volumes and number of shareholder accounts.
The Fund and certain other associated investment companies (together, the “Guarantors”) have severally but not jointly guaranteed the performance and observance of all the terms and conditions of a lease entered into by Seligman Data Corp., including the payment of rent by Seligman Data Corp. (the “Guaranty”). The lease and the related Guaranty expire in January 2019. The obligation of the Fund to pay any amount due under the Guaranty is limited to a specified percentage of the full amount, which generally is based on the Fund’s percentage of the expenses billed by Seligman Data Corp. to all Guarantors in the most recent calendar quarter. As of December 31, 2008, the Fund’s potential obligation under the Guaranty is $349,700. As of December 31, 2008, no event has occurred which would result in the Fund becoming liable to make any payment under the Guaranty. A portion of the rent paid by Seligman Data Corp. is charged to the Fund as part of Seligman Data Corp.’s shareholder account services cost.
12
Notes to Financial Statements
At December 31, 2008, the Fund’s investment in Seligman Data Corp. is recorded at a cost of $3,719.
The Fund’s Board has approved RiverSource Service Corporation (“RSC”) as the Fund’s new transfer and shareholder service agent, and the termination of the Fund’s relationship with Seligman Data Corp., effective on or about May 9, 2009. RSC is an affiliate of RiverSource. The fees and expenses expected to be charged to the Fund by RSC are generally lower than the fees and expenses charged by Seligman Data Corp. Nevertheless, as a result of the termination of the relationship with Seligman Data Corp., the Fund will incur certain non-recurring charges, including charges relating to Seligman Data Corp.’s leases, that would in the aggregate approximate 0.16% of the Fund’s net assets as of January 23, 2009 (the “Non-Recurring Charges”). These Non-Recurring Charges will be incurred over a period of several months beginning January 28, 2009. Fund shareholders would bear their proportionate share of the Fund’s expenses, including the Non-Recurring Charges.
d. | | Directors’ Fees and Expenses — Directors’ fees and expenses includes the compensation of Board members who are not employees of RiverSource and the Fund’s proportionate share of certain expenses of a company providing limited administrative services to the Fund and the other Seligman and RiverSource Funds. These expenses include boardroom and office expense, employee compensation, employee health and retirement benefits and certain other expenses. For the period from November 7, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the Fund paid $214 to this company for such services. |
The Fund has a compensation arrangement under which directors who receive fees may elect to defer receiving such fees. Directors may elect to have their deferred fees accrue interest or earn a return based on the performance of the Fund or other funds in the Seligman Group of Investment Companies. The cost of such fees and earnings/loss accrued thereon is included in directors’ fees and expenses and the accumulated balance thereof at December 31, 2008 of $2,695 is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. Deferred fees and related accrued earnings are not deductible by the Fund for federal income tax purposes until such amounts are paid.
Certain officers and directors of the Fund are officers or directors of the Manager, Ameriprise, the Distributor, RiverSource Services, Inc., RSC, and/or Seligman Data Corp.
13
Notes to Financial Statements
5. | | Capital Share Transactions — Transactions in shares of Capital Stock, each at a value of $1.00 per share, were as follows: |
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Class A
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
---|
Sales of shares | | | | | 292,772,623 | | | | 266,471,087 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 1,821,724 | | | | 5,802,677 | |
Exchanged from associated funds | | | | | 46,854,491 | | | | 37,488,483 | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 25,208 | | | | — | |
Converted from Class B* | | | | | 1,882,161 | | | | 1,328,267 | |
Total | | | | | 343,356,207 | | | | 311,090,514 | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (335,597,683 | ) | | | (279,362,022 | ) |
Exchanged into associated funds | | | | | (16,531,904 | ) | | | (23,052,704 | ) |
Total | | | | | (352,129,587 | ) | | | (302,414,726 | ) |
Increase (decrease) | | | | | (8,773,380 | ) | | | 8,675,788 | |
|
Class B
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sales of shares | | | | | 209,668 | | | | 294,554 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 27,071 | | | | 218,629 | |
Exchanged from associated funds | | | | | 6,460,062 | | | | 8,180,622 | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 923 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | 6,697,724 | | | | 8,693,805 | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (2,823,973 | ) | | | (3,817,233 | ) |
Exchanged into associated funds | | | | | (2,507,748 | ) | | | (4,951,926 | ) |
Converted to Class A* | | | | | (1,882,113 | ) | | | (1,327,981 | ) |
Total | | | | | (7,213,834 | ) | | | (10,097,140 | ) |
Decrease | | | | | (516,110 | ) | | | (1,403,335 | ) |
|
Class C (formerly Class D prior to May 17, 2008)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sales of shares | | | | | 5,872,693 | | | | 4,705,646 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 49,352 | | | | 374,084 | |
Exchanged from associated funds | | | | | 11,334,684 | | | | 6,002,753 | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 2,076 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | 17,258,805 | | | | 11,082,483 | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (11,216,612 | ) | | | (7,165,040 | ) |
Exchanged into associated funds | | | | | (3,112,257 | ) | | | (3,124,387 | ) |
Total | | | | | (14,328,869 | ) | | | (10,289,427 | ) |
Increase | | | | | 2,929,936 | | | | 793,056 | |
* | | Automatic conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares approximately eight years after the initial purchase date. The amount of dividends accrued on Class B shares between the last dividend payment date and the conversion date is invested in Class A shares and is included in the conversion from Class B amount. |
14
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Class C2 (formerly Class C prior to May 17, 2008)
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
---|
Sales of shares | | | | | 314,004 | | | | 768,447 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 29,889 | | | | 122,569 | |
Exchanged from associated funds | | | | | 5,970,365 | | | | 5,394,413 | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 807 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | 6,315,065 | | | | 6,285,429 | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (4,443,980 | ) | | | (2,312,003 | ) |
Exchanged into associated funds | | | | | (3,030,277 | ) | | | (3,591,545 | ) |
Total | | | | | (7,474,257 | ) | | | (5,903,548 | ) |
Increase (decrease) | | | | | (1,159,192 | ) | | | 381,881 | |
|
Class I
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sales of shares | | | | | 21,128,370 | | | | 8,297,974 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 222,142 | | | | 581,898 | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 2,431 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | 21,352,943 | | | | 8,879,872 | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (15,423,295 | ) | | | (5,928,933 | ) |
Increase | | | | | 5,929,648 | | | | 2,950,939 | |
|
Class R
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sales of shares | | | | | 6,612,123 | | | | 2,962,036 | |
Investment of dividends | | | | | 8,356 | | | | 27,269 | |
Exchanged from associated funds | | | | | 83,248 | | | | — | |
Investment of gain distributions | | | | | 114 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | | 6,703,841 | | | | 2,989,305 | |
Cost of shares repurchased | | | | | (5,603,008 | ) | | | (2,921,095 | ) |
Exchanged into associated funds | | | | | (8,892 | ) | | | — | |
Shares repurchased | | | | | (5,611,900 | ) | | | (2,921,095 | ) |
Increase | | | | | 1,091,941 | | | | 68,210 | |
6. | | Other Matters — In late 2003, JWS conducted an extensive internal review concerning mutual fund trading practices. JWS’s review, which covered the period 2001–2003, noted one arrangement that permitted frequent trading in certain open-end registered investment companies then managed by JWS (the “Seligman Funds”); this arrangement was in the process of being closed down by JWS before September 2003. JWS identified three other arrangements that permitted frequent trading, all of which had been terminated by September 2002. In January 2004, JWS, on a voluntary basis, publicly disclosed these four arrangements to its clients and to shareholders of the Seligman Funds. JWS also provided information concerning mutual fund trading practices to the SEC and the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York (“NYAG”). |
| | In September 2005, the New York staff of the SEC indicated that it was considering recommending to the Commissioners of the SEC the instituting of a formal action against JWS and the Distributor relating to frequent trading in the Seligman Funds. JWS responded to the staff in October 2005 that it believed that any action would be both inappropriate and unnecessary, especially in light of the fact that JWS had previously resolved the underlying issue with the Independent Directors of the Seligman Funds and made recompense to the affected Seligman Funds. |
15
Notes to Financial Statements
In September 2006, the NYAG commenced a civil action in New York State Supreme Court against JWS, the Distributor, Seligman Data Corp. and Brian T. Zino (collectively, the “Seligman Parties”), alleging, in substance, that, in addition to the four arrangements noted above, the Seligman Parties permitted other persons to engage in frequent trading and, as a result, the prospectus disclosure used by the registered investment companies then managed by JWS is and has been misleading. The NYAG included other related claims and also claimed that the fees charged by JWS to the Seligman Funds were excessive. The NYAG is seeking damages of at least $80 million and restitution, disgorgement, penalties and costs and injunctive relief. The Seligman Parties answered the complaint in December 2006 and believe that the claims are without merit.
Any resolution of these matters may include the relief noted above or other sanctions or changes in procedures. Any damages would be paid by JWS and not by the Seligman Funds. If the NYAG obtains injunctive relief, each of JWS, RiverSource Investments, LLC (“RiverSource”) and their affiliates could, in the absence of the SEC in its discretion granting exemptive relief, be enjoined from providing advisory and underwriting services to the Seligman Funds and other registered investment companies, including those funds in the RiverSource complex.
Neither JWS nor RiverSource believes that the foregoing legal action or other possible actions will have a material adverse impact on JWS, RiverSource or their current and former clients, including the Seligman Funds and other investment companies managed by RiverSource; however, there can be no assurance of this or that these matters and any related publicity will not affect demand for shares of the Seligman Funds and such other investment companies or have other adverse consequences.
7. | | Temporary Money Market Fund Guarantee Program — On October 6, 2008, the Directors approved the participation by the Fund in the U.S. Treasury’s Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds (the “Program”). Under this Program, the U.S. Treasury protects the value of Fund shares held by shareholders as of close of business on September 19, 2008. Any Fund shares held by investors as of the close of business September 19, 2008 are insured against loss under the Program in the event the Fund liquidates its holdings and the per share net value at the time of liquidation is less than $1.00 per share. Shares acquired by investors after September 19, 2008 generally are not eligible for protection under the Program. The Program was in effect for an initial three month term, which expired on December 18, 2008, and has since been extended through April 30, 2009. The Fund has participated in this extension of the Program. The Fund paid fees equal to 0.025% of net assets as of September 18, 2008 to participate in the Program for the period from October 6, 2008 through April 30, 2009. The fees are being amortized over the period of the participation in the Program and are included as a component of other expenses in the Fund’s Statement of Operations. The cost to participate will be borne by the Fund without regard to any expense limitation currently in effect, if any. The Secretary of the Treasury has the option to extend the Program up to the close of business on September 18, 2009. If the Program is further extended, the Fund will consider whether to continue to participate. |
16
Financial Highlights
The tables below are intended to help you understand each Class’s financial performance for the years presented. Certain information reflects financial results for a single share of a Class that was held throughout the years shown. Per share amounts are calculated using average shares outstanding during the year. Total return shows the rate that you would have earned (or lost) on an investment in each Class, assuming you reinvested all your dividends. Total returns do not reflect any sales charges or transaction costs on your investment or taxes investors may incur on distributions or on the redemption of shares.
Class A
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.011 | | | | 0.040 | | | | 0.039 | | | | 0.022 | | | | 0.004 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.011 | )* | | | (0.040 | ) | | | (0.039 | ) | | | (0.022 | ) | | | (0.004 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 1.12 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 3.95 | % | | | 2.20 | % | | | 0.43 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 124,124 | | | $ | 132,924 | | | $ | 124,223 | | | $ | 132,506 | | | $ | 143,464 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.84 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 1.07 | % | | | 4.03 | % | | | 3.86 | % | | | 2.15 | % | | | 0.40 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 0.91 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.85 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.95 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.39 | % |
See footnotes on page 20.
17
Financial Highlights
Class B
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.003 | | | | 0.030 | | | | 0.028 | | | | 0.011 | | | | 0.001 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.003 | )* | | | (0.030 | ) | | | (0.028 | ) | | | (0.011 | ) | | | (0.001 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 0.35 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.85 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 0.07 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 6,941 | | | $ | 7,458 | | | $ | 8,860 | | | $ | 12,961 | | | $ | 21,214 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 1.18 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.33 | % | | | 3.03 | % | | | 2.86 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 0.07 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡ |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.91 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.85 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | | | | (0.05 | )% | | | | | | | | | | | 1.15 | % | | | (0.60 | )% |
Class C (formerly Class D prior to May 17, 2008)
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.003 | | | | 0.030 | | | | 0.028 | | | | 0.011 | | | | 0.001 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.003 | )* | | | (0.030 | ) | | | (0.028 | ) | | | (0.011 | ) | | | (0.001 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 0.35 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.85 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 0.07 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 16,571 | | | $ | 13,643 | | | $ | 12,848 | | | $ | 12,756 | | | $ | 13,574 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 1.18 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.33 | % | | | 3.03 | % | | | 2.86 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 0.07 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.91 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.85 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | | | | (0.05 | )% | | | | | | | | | | | 1.15 | % | | | (0.60 | )% |
See footnotes on page 20.
18
Financial Highlights
Class C2 (formerly Class C prior to May 17, 2008)
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.005 | | | | 0.033 | | | | 0.032 | | | | 0.016 | | | | 0.001 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.005 | )* | | | (0.033 | ) | | | (0.032 | ) | | | (0.016 | ) | | | (0.001 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 0.49 | % | | | 3.32 | % | | | 3.20 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 0.09 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 2,851 | | | $ | 4,011 | | | $ | 3,629 | | | $ | 4,248 | | | $ | 4,693 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.16 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.31 | % | | | 3.29 | % | | | 3.19 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 0.09 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.73 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.57 | % |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets | | | | | 0.13 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (0.32 | )% |
Class I
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.014 | | | | 0.043 | | | | 0.042 | | | | 0.024 | | | | 0.007 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.014 | )* | | | (0.043 | ) | | | (0.042 | ) | | | (0.024 | ) | | | (0.007 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 1.38 | % | | | 4.36 | % | | | 4.23 | % | | | 2.48 | % | | | 0.69 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 20,438 | | | $ | 14,511 | | | $ | 11,558 | | | $ | 13,242 | | | $ | 11,256 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 0.53 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.57 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 1.33 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.16 | % | | | 2.43 | % | | | 0.68 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 0.63 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 1.23 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See footnotes on page 20.
19
Financial Highlights
Class R
|
|
---|
| | | | Year Ended December 31,
|
|
---|
|
|
|
| 2008
|
| 2007
|
| 2006
|
| 2005
|
| 2004
|
---|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | 0.009 | | | | 0.038 | | | | 0.036 | | | | 0.019 | | | | 0.002 | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | | | (0.009 | )* | | | (0.038 | ) | | | (0.036 | ) | | | (0.019 | ) | | | (0.002 | ) |
Net Asset Value, End of Year | | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | 1.000 | |
Total Return | | | | | 0.93 | % | | | 3.83 | % | | | 3.69 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 0.24 | % |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data:
|
Net assets, end of year (000s omitted) | | | | $ | 1,646 | | | $ | 554 | | | $ | 486 | | | $ | 499 | | | $ | 2 | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.01 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.84 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | | 3.61 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 0.24 | % |
Without expense reimbursement:‡ | | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets | | | | | 1.16 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.10 | % |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | | | | | 0.71 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.15 | % |
* | | In addition, the Fund paid a short-term capital gain distribution of $0.000146 on July 25, 2008. |
‡ | | The Manager, at its discretion, reimbursed certain class-specific expenses of certain share classes to allow those classes to declare dividends equal to selected minimum annual rates. Absent such reimbursement, returns would have been lower. |
An investment in the Fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.
See Notes to Financial Statements.
20
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Seligman Cash Management Fund, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Seligman Cash Management Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), including the portfolio of investments, as of December 31, 2008, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Seligman Cash Management Fund, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
February 27, 2009
21
Matters Relating to the Directors’
Consideration of the Approval of the
Investment Management Services Agreement
Background
On July 7, 2008, RiverSource Investments, LLC (“RiverSource”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (“Ameriprise”), entered into a stock purchase agreement with the shareholders of J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated (“Seligman”) under which RiverSource would acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Seligman (the “Transaction”). The consummation of the Transaction resulted in the automatic termination of the Fund’s management agreement with Seligman (the “Seligman Management Agreement”). In anticipation of the termination of the Seligman Management Agreement, at a meeting held on July 29, 2008, the directors of the Fund then serving unanimously approved an investment management agreement with RiverSource (the “Proposed Advisory Agreement”). At the special meeting of shareholders of the Fund held on November 3, 2008, the shareholders approved the Proposed Advisory Agreement. The Transaction closed on November 7, 2008, and upon the closing, RiverSource became the investment advisor to the Fund.
Board Considerations
Prior to their approval of the Proposed Advisory Agreement, the directors requested and evaluated extensive materials from, and were provided materials and information about the Transaction and matters related to the proposed approval by, Seligman, RiverSource and Ameriprise.
In consultation with experienced counsel, who advised on the legal standards for consideration by the directors, the directors reviewed the Proposed Advisory Agreement with RiverSource. The independent directors also discussed the proposed approval with counsel in private sessions.
At their meetings on June 12, 2008, July 17, 2008 and July 29, 2008, the directors discussed the Transaction with Seligman, and the Transaction and RiverSource’s plans and intentions regarding the Fund with representatives of Ameriprise and RiverSource.
The directors considered all factors they believed relevant, including the specific matters discussed below. In their deliberations, the directors did not identify any particular information that was all-important or controlling, and directors may have attributed different weights to the various factors. The directors determined that the selection of RiverSource to advise the Fund, and the overall arrangements between the Fund and RiverSource as provided in the Proposed Advisory Agreement, including the proposed advisory fee and the related administration arrangements between the Fund and Ameriprise, were fair and reasonable in light of the services to be performed, expenses incurred and such other matters as the directors considered relevant. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the directors’ determination included, in addition, the factors discussed in further detail below:
(i) | | the reputation, financial strength and resources of RiverSource, and its parent, Ameriprise; |
(ii) | | the capabilities of RiverSource with respect to compliance and its regulatory histories; |
(iii) | | an assessment of RiverSource’s compliance system by the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer; |
(iv) | | that RiverSource and Ameriprise assured the directors that following the Transaction there will not be any diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Fund or its shareholders; |
22
Matters Relating to the Directors’
Consideration of the Approval of the
Investment Management Services Agreement
(v) | | that within the past year the directors had performed a full annual review of the Seligman Management Agreement, as required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), for the Fund and had determined that they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided thereunder and that the management fee rate for the Fund was satisfactory; |
(vi) | | the potential benefits to the Fund of the combination of RiverSource and Seligman to the Fund, including: greater resources to attract and retain high quality investment personnel; greater depth and breadth of investment management capabilities, including a new team of portfolio managers for the Fund; a continued high level of service to the Fund; and the potential for realization of economies of scale over time since the Fund will be part of a much larger fund complex; |
(vii) | | the fact that the Fund’s total advisory and administrative fees would not increase by virtue of the Proposed Advisory Agreement, but would decrease slightly from the fee rate under the Seligman Management Agreement (subject to certain scenarios in which the total advisory and administrative fees could increase); |
(viii) | | that RiverSource, and not the Fund, would bear the costs of obtaining all approvals of the Proposed Advisory Agreement; |
(ix) | | the qualifications of the personnel of RiverSource and Ameriprise that would provide advisory and administrative services to the Fund; |
(x) | | the terms and conditions of the Proposed Advisory Agreement, including the directors’ review of differences from the Seligman Management Agreement; |
(xi) | | that RiverSource and Ameriprise have agreed to refrain from imposing or seeking to impose, for a period of two years after the closing of the Transaction, any “unfair burden” (within the meaning of Section 15(f) of 1940 Act) on the Fund; and |
(xii) | | that certain members of RiverSource’s management have a significant amount of experience integrating other fund families. |
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided
In considering the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided under the Proposed Advisory Agreement, the directors of the Fund considered, among other things, the expected impact of the Transaction on the operations of the Fund, the information provided by RiverSource with respect to the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by it, RiverSource’s compliance programs and compliance records, and presentations provided on the quality of RiverSource’s investment research capabilities and the other resources it and Ameriprise have indicated that they would dedicate to performing services for the Fund.
The directors noted the professional experience and qualifications of the new portfolio management team proposed for the Fund and other senior personnel of RiverSource. The directors considered a report by, the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer, assessing RiverSource’s compliance system, which was followed by a private session with the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer. They also discussed RiverSource’s compliance system with the Chief Compliance Officer for the funds managed by
23
Matters Relating to the Directors’
Consideration of the Approval of the
Investment Management Services Agreement
RiverSource. The directors also considered RiverSource’s presentation on the selection of brokers and dealers for portfolio transactions. As administrative services (provided under the Seligman Management Agreement) would be provided to the Fund by Ameriprise at no additional cost under a new administrative services agreement rather than pursuant to the Proposed Advisory Agreement, the directors considered Ameriprise’s capability to provide such administrative services as well as RiverSource’s and Ameriprise’s role in coordinating the activities of the Fund’s other service providers. The directors noted that Ameriprise intended to continue Seligman’s practice of sub-contracting administrative services provided by Seligman for the Fund to State Street Bank and Trust Company for the foreseeable future. The directors concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with assurances from RiverSource and Ameriprise as to the expected nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund under the Proposed Advisory Agreement and the new administrative services agreement.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability
In considering the costs of services to be provided by RiverSource under the Proposed Advisory Agreement, the directors considered, among other things, the projected pre-tax, pre-distribution expense profitability of RiverSource’s proposed relationship with the Fund and discussed the assumptions of RiverSource and the limitations of the information provided. The directors noted that RiverSource had undertaken to provide profitability information in connection with future contract continuances. The directors also considered RiverSource’s financial condition based on information provided by it.
The directors noted that the proposed fee under the Proposed Advisory Agreement was slightly lower than the fee rate paid by the Fund pursuant to the Seligman Management Agreement and that due to the change in the methodology for calculating such fees, the fees payable under the Proposed Advisory Agreement could be higher than the fees that would be payable under the fee schedule in the Seligman Management Agreement under certain scenarios. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from fund advisory contracts because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors. In reviewing the projected profitability information, the directors considered the effect of fall-out benefits on RiverSource’s expenses. The directors concluded that they were satisfied that RiverSource’s estimated future profitability from its relationship with the Fund was not excessive.
Fall-Out Benefits
The directors noted that RiverSource may derive reputational and other benefits from its association with the Fund.
Investment Results
The directors receive and review detailed performance information on the Fund at each regular Board meeting during the year in addition to the information received for the meeting regarding approval of the Proposed Advisory Agreement. The directors noted that a new portfolio manager was being proposed by RiverSource for the Fund. The directors discussed the proposed portfolio management team, its investment strategy and process and historical performance record with representatives of RiverSource.
24
Matters Relating to the Directors’
Consideration of the Approval of the
Investment Management Services Agreement
The directors considered the twelve-month trailing average yield of the Fund as compared to an average of money market funds prepared by a third party provider of money market mutual fund information for the period from 1998 through June 30, 2008. The directors also reviewed performance information of RiverSource Cash Management Fund, which was managed at the time by the proposed portfolio management team. Seligman had previously explained that the Fund was managed conservatively by it, and that its average portfolio quality is higher than that of many other money market funds. Seligman noted that the Fund was, at the time, managed more conservatively than RiverSource Cash Management Fund and RiverSource confirmed that it had no plans at such time to change the Fund’s strategies or risk profile and would not make any such changes without board approval. The directors also noted that the performance of RiverSource Cash Management Fund exceeded that of the Citigroup 3 Month Treasury Index, its benchmark, in the first six-months of 2008, as well as the annualized one-year period ending June 30, 2008, but had lagged such benchmark in the other periods presented.
The directors recognized that it is not possible to predict what effect, if any, consummation of the Transaction would have on the future performance of the Fund.
Management Fee and Other Expenses
The directors considered the proposed advisory fee rate to be paid by the Fund to RiverSource. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of advisory and management fees because there are variations in the services that are included in the fees paid by other funds.
The directors noted that, under the Proposed Advisory Agreement in respect of the Fund, the advisory fee would be calculated solely as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets, rather than a percentage of the net assets of all funds in the Seligman Group of Funds (the “fee base”), and would no longer have any breakpoints. The directors noted that the proposed advisory fee under the Proposed Advisory Agreement was slightly lower than the Fund’s management fee under the Seligman Management Agreement (even after taking the elimination of the Fund’s breakpoints under the Seligman Management Agreement into account), although it was higher than the advisory fee for RiverSource Cash Management Fund. The directors also compared the proposed advisory fee rate to a subset of funds in the Lipper Money Market Funds category (the “peer group”). The information showed the proposed advisory fee rate was within the range of fees charged in the peer group.
In considering the proposed advisory fee rate, the directors noted that the Fund’s management fee rate under the Seligman Management Agreement covers administrative services provided by Seligman, whereas the Proposed Advisory Agreement does not include such services, but that Ameriprise will provide such services to the Fund pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement initially without a fee. The directors further considered that the administrative fees, since they are not included in an advisory agreement, could be increased without stockholder approval, although RiverSource noted that, at that time, it did not have an intention to seek an increase, and that any such administrative fee increase would require board approval. The directors also noted RiverSource’s and Ameriprise’s covenants in the Transaction’s stock purchase agreement regarding compliance with Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.
25
Matters Relating to the Directors’
Consideration of the Approval of the
Investment Management Services Agreement
The directors noted that the management fee rate paid by a registered investment company managed by Seligman that is a “clone” of the Fund is lower than the rate paid by the Fund primarily for historical reasons.
The directors also reviewed the Fund’s total expense ratio as compared to the fees and expenses of funds within its peer group. In considering the expense ratios of the Fund, the directors noted that the Fund has elected to have shareholder services provided at cost by Seligman Data Corp. (“SDC”). SDC provides services exclusively to the Seligman Group of Funds, and the directors believed that the arrangement with SDC has provided the Fund and its shareholders with a consistently high level of service. The directors noted that RiverSource had previously indicated that no changes to the arrangements with SDC were being proposed at the time by RiverSource.
The directors noted that they had concluded in their most recent continuance considerations regarding the Seligman Management Agreement that the management fee and total expense ratio were at an acceptable level in light of the quality of services provided to the Fund and in comparison to the Fund’s peer group; that the total expense ratio had not changed materially since that determination; and that RiverSource had represented that the overall expenses for the Fund were not expected to be adversely affected by the Transaction. On that basis, the directors concluded that the total expense ratio and proposed advisory fee for the Fund anticipated to result from the proposed arrangements with RiverSource was acceptable. The directors also noted that the total expense ratio for the Fund had been reduced since the time of the most recent consideration approval.
Economies of Scale
The directors noted that the management fee schedule for the Fund under the Seligman Management Agreement contained breakpoints that take into account the net assets of all funds in the Seligman Group of Funds, including the Fund, and that the these breakpoints reduced the fee rate paid by the Fund at the time of consideration. The directors also noted that, under the Proposed Advisory Agreement in respect of the Fund, the advisory fee would be calculated solely as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets, rather than a percentage of the “fee base,” and would no longer have any breakpoints. The directors recognized that there is no direct relationship between the economies of scale realized by funds and those realized by their investment advisers as assets increase. The directors do not believe that there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to fund-specific economies of scale with respect to services provided by fund advisers. The directors also observed that in the investment company industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Fund, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply, and that the advisory agreements for many competitor funds do not have breakpoints at all. The directors noted that RiverSource had indicated that no changes to the Fund’s breakpoint arrangements were proposed to be made at the time. Having taken these factors into account, the directors concluded that the Fund’s proposed breakpoint arrangements were acceptable under the Fund’s circumstances. The directors also recognized that the Fund may benefit from certain economies of scale over time from becoming a part of the larger RiverSource fund complex, based on potential future synergies of operations.
26
Proxy Results
Shareholders of Seligman Cash Management Fund, Inc. voted on two proposals at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on November 3, 2008. Shareholders voted in favor of each of the proposals. The description of each proposal and number of shares voted are as follows:
Proposal 1
To consider and vote upon the proposed Investment Management Services Agreement with RiverSource Investments, LLC:
|
|
|
| For
|
| Against
|
| Abstain
|
---|
| | | | | 147,191,364.020 | | | | 3,435,811.770 | | | | 3,179,806.400 | |
Proposal 2
To elect ten directors to the Board:
|
|
|
| For
|
|
|
| Withheld
|
---|
Kathleen Blatz | | | | | 160,977,372.410 | | | | | | | | 6,181,678.780 | |
Arne H. Carlson | | | | | 160,571,151.050 | | | | | | | | 6,587,900.140 | |
Pamela G. Carlton | | | | | 161,314,790.870 | | | | | | | | 5,844,260.320 | |
Patricia M. Flynn | | | | | 161,061,824.730 | | | | | | | | 6,097,226.460 | |
Anne P. Jones | | | | | 160,546,984.810 | | | | | | | | 6,612,066.380 | |
Jeffrey Laikind | | | | | 160,827,128.150 | | | | | | | | 6,331,923.040 | |
Stephen R. Lewis, Jr. | | | | | 160,768,739.240 | | | | | | | | 6,390,311.950 | |
Catherine James Paglia | | | | | 160,996,474.570 | | | | | | | | 6,162,576.620 | |
Alison Taunton-Rigby | | | | | 161,231,510.570 | | | | | | | | 5,927,540.620 | |
William F. Truscott | | | | | 161,231,510.570 | | | | | | | | 5,927,540.620 | |
27
Directors and Officers
Shareholders elect a Board of Directors that oversees the Fund’s operations. In connection with the acquisition of the Fund’s prior investment manager, J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated, by RiverSource Investments, LLC, shareholders of the Fund voted at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on November 3, 2008 to elect 10 members to the Fund’s Board. Messrs. Maher and Richie served on the Fund’s Board prior to the acquisition and will continue to do so.
Each member of the Board oversees 163 portfolios in the fund complex managed by RiverSource Investments, which includes 59 Seligman Funds and 104 RiverSource Funds. The address of each Director is 901 S. Marquette Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55402.
Independent Directors
Name, (Age), Position(s) held with Fund
|
|
|
| Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years, Directorships and Other Information
|
---|
Kathleen Blatz (54)1,2,6,7 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Attorney. Formerly, Chief Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court, 1998–2006. |
Arne H. Carlson (74)1,2,3,5,6 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Formerly, Chairman, RiverSource Funds, 1999–2006; Governor of Minnesota. |
Pamela G. Carlton (54)4,6,7 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | President, Springboard — Partners in Cross Cultural Leadership (consulting company). |
Patricia M. Flynn (58)1,3,6 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Trustee Professor of Economics and Management, Bentley College. Formerly, Dean, McCallum Graduate School of Business, Bentley College. |
Anne P. Jones (73)1,2,6,7 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Attorney and Consultant. |
Jeffrey Laikind, CFA (73)4,6,7 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Director, American Progressive Insurance. Formerly, Managing Director, Shikiar Asset Management. |
Stephen R. Lewis, Jr. (69)1,2,3,4,6 • Director and Chairman of the Board: From November 7, 2008 | | | | President Emeritus and Professor of Economics, Carleton College; Director, Valmont Industries, Inc. (manufactures irrigation systems). |
John F. Maher (64)4,6,7 • Director: December 2006 to Date | | | | Retired President and Chief Executive Officer, and former Director, Great Western Financial Corporation (bank holding company) and its principal subsidiary, Great Western Bank (a federal savings bank). |
See footnotes on page 29.
28
Directors and Officers
Independent Directors (continued)
Name, (Age), Position(s) held with Fund
|
|
|
| Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years, Directorships and Other Information
|
---|
Catherine James Paglia (56)2,3,4,5,6 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Director, Enterprise Asset Management, Inc. (private real estate and asset management company). |
Leroy C. Richie (66)3,4,6 • Director: 2000 to Date | | | | Counsel, Lewis & Munday, P.C. (law firm); Director, Vibration Control Technologies, LLC (auto vibration technology); Lead Outside Director, Digital Ally Inc. (digital imaging) and Infinity, Inc. (oil and gas exploration and production); Director and Chairman, Highland Park Michigan Economic Development Corp.; and Chairman, Detroit Public Schools Foundation; Director, OGE Energy Corp. (energy and energy services provider). Formerly, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Q Standards Worldwide, Inc. (library of technical standards); Director, Kerr-McGee Corporation (diversified energy and chemical company); Trustee, New York University Law Center Foundation; and Vice Chairman, Detroit Medical Center and Detroit Economic Growth Corp. |
Alison Taunton-Rigby (64)3,4,5,6 • Director: From November 7, 2008 | | | | Chief Executive Officer and Director, RiboNovix, Inc. since 2003 (biotechnology); Director, Idera Pharmaceutical, Inc. (biotechnology); Healthways, Inc. (health management programs). Formerly, President, Forester Biotech. |
Interested Director*
|
|
---|
William F. Truscott (48)*6 • Director and Vice President: From November 7, 2008 | | | | President — US Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and President, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Investment Officer, RiverSource Investments, LLC; Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ameriprise Certificate Company; and Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President, RiverSource Distributors, Inc. Formerly, Senior Vice President — Chief Investment Officer, Ameriprise Financial, Inc.; and Chairman of the Board and Chief Investment Officer, RiverSource Investments, LLC, 2001–2005. |
* | | Mr. Truscott is considered an “interested person” of the Fund, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, by virtue of his position with Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and its affiliates. |
Member: 1 Board Governance Committee 2 Compliance Committee 3 Contracts Committee 4 Distribution Committee | 5 Executive Committee 6 Investment Review Committee 7 Joint Audit Committee |
29
Directors and Officers
Fund Officers
The Board appoints officers who are responsible for day-to-day business decisions based on policies it has established. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board. In addition to Mr. Truscott, who is a Director and Vice President of the Fund, the Fund’s other officers are:
Name, (Age), Position(s) held with Fund, Address
|
|
|
| Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
|
---|
Patrick T. Bannigan (43) • President: From November 7, 2008 • 172 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 | | | | Director and Senior Vice President — Asset Management, Products and Marketing, RiverSource Investments, LLC; Director and Vice President — Asset Management, Products and Marketing, RiverSource Distributors, Inc. Formerly, Managing Director and Global Head of Product, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, 2004–2006; President, Touchstone Investments, 2002–2004. |
Michelle M. Keeley (44) • Vice President: From November 7, 2008 • 172 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 | | | | Executive Vice President — Equity and Fixed Income, Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and RiverSource Investments, LLC; Vice President — Investments, Ameriprise Certificate Company. Formerly, Senior Vice President — Fixed Income, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 2002–2006 and RiverSource Investments, LLC, 2004–2006. |
Amy K. Johnson (43) • Vice President: From November 7, 2008 • 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 | | | | Vice President — Asset Management and Trust Company Services, RiverSource Investments, LLC. Formerly, Vice President — Operations and Compliance, RiverSource Investments, LLC, 2004–2006; Director of Product Development — Mutual Funds, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 2001–2004. |
Scott R. Plummer (49) • Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary: From November 7, 2008 • 5228 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474 | | | | Vice President and Chief Counsel — Asset Management, Ameriprise Financial, Inc.; Chief Counsel, RiverSource Distributors, Inc. and Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, RiverSource Investments, LLC; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary, Ameriprise Certificate Company. Formerly, Vice President — Asset Management Compliance, Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 2004–2005; Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, USBancorp Asset Management, 2002–2004. |
Lawrence P. Vogel (52) • Treasurer: 2000 to Date • 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 | | | | Treasurer of each of the investment companies of the Seligman Group of Funds since 2000; and Treasurer, Seligman Data Corp. since 2000. Formerly, Senior Vice President, J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated and Vice President of each of the investment companies of the Seligman Group of Funds, 1992–2008. |
30
Directors and Officers
Fund Officers (continued)
Name, (Age), Position(s) held with Fund, Address
|
|
|
| Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
|
---|
Eleanor T.M. Hoagland (56) • Chief Compliance Officer: 2004 to Date • Money Laundering Prevention Officer and Identity Theft Prevention Officer: From November 7, 2008 • 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 | | | | Chief Compliance Officer, RiverSource Investments, LLC (J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated prior to November 7, 2008), of each of the investment companies of the Seligman Group of Funds since 2004; Money Laundering Prevention Officer and Identity Theft Prevention Officer, RiverSource Investments, LLC for each of the investment companies of the Seligman Group of Funds since November 7, 2008. Formerly, Managing Director, J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated and Vice President of each of the investment companies of the Seligman Group of Funds, 2004–2008. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (SAI) includes additional information about Fund directors and is available, without charge, upon request. You may call toll-free (800) 221-2450 in the US or call collect (212) 682-7600 outside the US to request a copy of the SAI, to request other information about the Fund, or to make shareholder inquiries.
31
Additional Fund Information
Fund Symbols Class A: SCMXX Class B: SCBXX Class C: SCCXX Class C2: SMCXX Class R: SMRXX
Manager From November 7, 2008 RiverSource Investments, LLC 200 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474
Until November 6, 2008 J. & W. Seligman & Co. Incorporated 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017
| General Distributor RiverSource Fund Distributors, Inc. (formerly Seligman Advisors, Inc.) 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017
Shareholder Service Agent Seligman Data Corp. 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017
Mail inquiries to: P.O. Box 9759 Providence, RI 02940-9759
| Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP
Important Telephone Numbers (800) 221-2450 Shareholder Services (800) 445-1777 Retirement Plan Services (212) 682-7600 Outside the United States (800) 622-4597 24-Hour Automated
Telephone Access Service |
Quarterly Schedule of Investments
A complete schedule of portfolio holdings owned by the Fund will be filed with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q, and will be available to shareholders (i) without charge, upon request, by calling toll-free (800) 221-2450 in the US or collect (212) 682-7600 outside the US or (ii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.1 In addition, the Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. Certain of the information contained on the Fund’s Form N-Q is also made available to shareholders on Seligman’s website at www.seligman.com.1
Proxy Voting
A description of the policies and procedures used by the Fund to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities as well as information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 of each year will be available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling toll-free (800) 221-2450 in the US or collect (212) 682-7600 outside the US and (ii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.1 Information for each new 12-month period ending June 30 will be available no later than August 31 of that year.
1 | | These website references are inactive textual references and information contained in or otherwise accessible through these websites does not form a part of this report or the Fund’s prospectuses or statement of additional information. |
32
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank.]
ITEM 2.
CODE OF ETHICS.
As of December 31, 2008, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive and principal financial officers. The registrant adopted a revised code of ethics on November 13, 2008, which is attached as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. The new code of ethics is substantially the same as the prior code of ethics.
ITEM 3.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The registrant’s board of directors has determined that independent directors Pamela G. Carlton, Jeffrey Leikind, John F. Maher and Anne P. Jones, each qualify as audit committee financial experts.
ITEM 4.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:
| | | |
| 2008 | | 2007 |
Audit Fees | $33,320 | | $31,513 |
Audit-Related Fees | – | | – |
Tax Fees | 2,750 | | 2,650 |
All Other Fees | – | | – |
Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Tax fees include amounts related to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.
Aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the last two fiscal years for non-audit services provided to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including a sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is sub-contracted or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registered investment company, where the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant, were as follows:
| | | |
| 2008 | | 2007 |
Audit-Related Fees | $144,330 | | $141,440 |
Tax Fees | 8,500 | | 9,000 |
All Other Fees | – | | 15,000 |
Audit-related fees include amounts for (i) attestation services for the registrant’s shareholder service agent; (ii) testing of the registrant’s shareholder service agent’s conversion to a new record-keeping system and (iii) performance of certain agreed-upon procedures relating to certain services performed by the registrant’s distributor. Tax fees include amounts related to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice for and an evaluation of certain tax reporting procedures of the registrant’s shareholder service agent.
(e) (1) The Audit Committee is required to preapprove audit and non-audit services performed for the registrant by the principal accountant in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the principal accountant’s independence. The Audit Committee also is required to preapprove certain non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and certain of the adviser’s affiliates that provide services directly related to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant. Unless a type of service to be provided by the principal accountant has received preapproval, it will require specific preapproval by the Audit Committee.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, under certain circumstances, preapproval of non-audit services of a de minimis amount is not required.
(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to the waiver provisions of paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) or (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $155,580 and $170,423, respectively.
(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, the audit committee considered whether these services were compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
ITEM 5.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 6.
INVESTMENTS.
a) SCHEDULE I - Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers. Included in Item 1 above.
b) Not applicable.
ITEM 7.
DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR
CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 8.
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 9.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Effective November 7, 2008, the duties of the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the registrant have been assumed by the Board Governance Committee of the Board. The Board Governance Committee would recommend to the Board the size, structure and composition of the Board and its committees. This committee would also review candidates for Board membership including candidates recommended by shareholders.
ITEM 11.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based upon their evaluation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that these disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the report it files or submits on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms and that such material information is accumulated and communicated to the registrant's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12.
EXHIBITS.
(a)(1)
Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers.
(a)(2)
Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3)
Not applicable.
(b)
Certifications of chief executive officer and chief financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SELIGMAN CASH MANAGEMENT FUND, INC.
By:
| /S/ PATRICK T. BANNIGAN Patrick T. Bannigan President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date:
March 9, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
| /S/ PATRICK T. BANNIGAN Patrick T. Bannigan President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date:
March 9, 2009
By:
| /S/ LAWRENCE P.VOGEL Lawrence P. Vogel Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Date:
March 9, 2009
SELIGMAN CASH MANAGEMENT FUND, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(1)
Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers.
(a)(2)
Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as
required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(b)
Certification of chief executive officer and chief financial officer as required by
Rule 30a-2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.