UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 001-15903
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
DELAWARE | | 72-1100013 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification Number) |
575 North Dairy Ashford
Suite 300
Houston, TX 77079
(Address of principal executive offices)
(281) 921-6400
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | x | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of July 23, 2013, 23,081,934 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Note 1) | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 76,023 | | | $ | 90,635 | |
Trade accounts and other receivables, net | | | 109,828 | | | | 103,258 | |
Inventories: | | | | | | | | |
Finished goods | | | 100,274 | | | | 102,625 | |
Raw materials and supplies | | | 42,131 | | | | 38,061 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total inventories | | | 142,405 | | | | 140,686 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 7,731 | | | | 4,293 | |
Prepaid income taxes | | | 3,049 | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 11,022 | | | | 11,045 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 350,058 | | | | 349,917 | |
Property, plant and equipment: | | | | | | | | |
Land and land improvements | | | 19,758 | | | | 19,700 | |
Land-use and mineral rights | | | 11,149 | | | | 9,559 | |
Buildings | | | 68,856 | | | | 67,866 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 534,258 | | | | 530,129 | |
Construction in progress | | | 59,593 | | | | 39,564 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 693,614 | | | | 666,818 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | 260,373 | | | | 240,586 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net property, plant and equipment | | | 433,241 | | | | 426,232 | |
Goodwill | | | 12,164 | | | | 12,164 | |
Intangible and other assets, net | | | 18,509 | | | | 20,565 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 813,972 | | | $ | 808,878 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 15,333 | | | $ | 20,078 | |
Accrued income taxes | | | — | | | | 727 | |
Other accrued expenses | | | 23,394 | | | | 30,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 38,727 | | | | 50,830 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 46,582 | | | | 44,970 | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 80,000,000 shares authorized; 23,083,033 and 23,092,906 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | | | 231 | | | | 231 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 54,329 | | | | 57,364 | |
Retained earnings | | | 677,816 | | | | 657,423 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (3,713 | ) | | | (1,940 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 728,663 | | | | 713,078 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 813,972 | | | $ | 808,878 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
($ in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Revenues | | $ | 153,744 | | | $ | 177,614 | | | $ | 301,402 | | | $ | 340,780 | |
Cost of sales | | | 114,411 | | | | 113,361 | | | | 219,684 | | | | 213,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 39,333 | | | | 64,253 | | | | 81,718 | | | | 127,717 | |
Selling, general, and administrative, and other operating expenses | | | 15,457 | | | | 17,003 | | | | 32,451 | | | | 33,722 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating profit | | | 23,876 | | | | 47,250 | | | | 49,267 | | | | 93,995 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | 242 | | | | 9 | | | | 427 | | | | (35 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain, net | | | (19 | ) | | | 579 | | | | (31 | ) | | | 144 | |
Other, net | | | (11 | ) | | | 47 | | | | (71 | ) | | | (212 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 212 | | | | 635 | | | | 325 | | | | (103 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 24,088 | | | | 47,885 | | | | 49,592 | | | | 93,892 | |
Income taxes | | | 7,781 | | | | 15,968 | | | | 15,709 | | | | 31,684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 16,307 | | | $ | 31,917 | | | $ | 33,883 | | | $ | 62,208 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 1.47 | | | $ | 2.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 1.47 | | | $ | 2.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared per common share (See Note 4) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.54 | | | $ | 0.48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
($ in thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Net income | | $ | 16,307 | | | $ | 31,917 | | | $ | 33,883 | | | $ | 62,208 | |
Other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | (2,033 | ) | | | (6,002 | ) | | | (2,727 | ) | | | (1,171 | ) |
Deferred income tax benefit | | | 712 | | | | 2,101 | | | | 954 | | | | 410 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | (1,321 | ) | | | (3,901 | ) | | | (1,773 | ) | | | (761 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 14,986 | | | $ | 28,016 | | | $ | 32,110 | | | $ | 61,447 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 33,883 | | | $ | 62,208 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 23,394 | | | | 21,801 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 28 | | | | 12 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 2,609 | | | | 5,299 | |
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation | | | (67 | ) | | | (1,257 | ) |
Gain on disposal or impairment of assets | | | (40 | ) | | | (54 | ) |
Foreign currency transaction loss (gain), net | | | 31 | | | | (144 | ) |
Stock compensation expense | | | 3,189 | | | | 3,087 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Trade accounts and other receivables | | | (6,540 | ) | | | (5,525 | ) |
Inventories | | | (2,372 | ) | | | 1,938 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (3,466 | ) | | | (1,451 | ) |
Long-term prepaid expenses | | | 1,711 | | | | 766 | |
Accounts payable | | | (4,845 | ) | | | (18,142 | ) |
Accrued expenses | | | (6,748 | ) | | | (12,482 | ) |
Accrued income taxes, net | | | (4,054 | ) | | | 5,764 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 36,713 | | | | 61,820 | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (31,169 | ) | | | (50,288 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (31,169 | ) | | | (50,288 | ) |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from bank borrowings | | | — | | | | 10,000 | |
Repayments on bank borrowings | | | — | | | | (10,000 | ) |
Dividends paid | | | (12,503 | ) | | | (11,095 | ) |
Purchase of common stock | | | (6,821 | ) | | | (7,655 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from stock based compensation | | | 67 | | | | 1,257 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (19,257 | ) | | | (17,493 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | (899 | ) | | | (443 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | (14,612 | ) | | | (6,404 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 90,635 | | | | 41,270 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 76,023 | | | $ | 34,866 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow information | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 72 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 17,153 | | | $ | 20,621 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
CARBO CERAMICS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($ in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of CARBO Ceramics Inc. have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in the annual report on Form 10-K of CARBO Ceramics Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CARBO Ceramics Inc. and its operating subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended | | | Six months ended | |
| | June 30, | | | June 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 16,307 | | | $ | 31,917 | | | $ | 33,883 | | | $ | 62,208 | |
Effect of reallocating undistributed earnings of participating securities | | | (107 | ) | | | (171 | ) | | | (224 | ) | | | (336 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income available under the two-class method | | $ | 16,200 | | | $ | 31,746 | | | $ | 33,659 | | | $ | 61,872 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator for basic earnings per share— weighted-average shares | | | 22,953,453 | | | | 22,961,130 | | | | 22,971,649 | | | | 22,967,558 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock options | | | — | | | | 1,220 | | | | — | | | | 1,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive potential common shares | | | — | | | | 1,220 | | | | — | | | | 1,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Denominator for diluted earnings per share— adjusted weighted-average shares | | | 22,953,453 | | | | 22,962,350 | | | | 22,971,649 | | | | 22,968,808 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 1.47 | | | $ | 2.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 1.47 | | | $ | 2.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. | Common Stock Repurchase Program |
On August 28, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares are effectively retired at the time of purchase. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company repurchased and retired 75,000 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $5,833. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has repurchased and retired 1,952,576 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $84,134.
7
On March 19, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.27 per common share payable to shareholders of record on May 1, 2013. The dividend was paid on May 15, 2013. On July 16, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.30 per common share payable to shareholders of record on August 1, 2013. This dividend is payable on August 15, 2013.
5. | Stock Based Compensation |
The CARBO Ceramics Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) provides for granting of cash-based awards, stock options (both non-qualified and incentive) and other equity-based awards (including stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, deferred share units or share-denominated performance units) to employees and non-employee directors. As of June 30, 2013, 494,054 shares were available for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
The Company has made restricted stock awards pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. A summary of restricted stock activity and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
Nonvested at January 1, 2013 | | | 115,722 | | | $ | 99.50 | |
Granted | | | 86,143 | | | $ | 80.59 | |
Vested | | | (47,607 | ) | | $ | 98.20 | |
Forfeited | | | (12,019 | ) | | $ | 94.17 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonvested at June 30, 2013 | | | 142,239 | | | $ | 88.93 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2013, there was $8,804 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted shares granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $4,675.
The Company has made phantom stock awards to key international employees pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The units subject to an award vest and cease to be forfeitable in equal annual installments over a three-year period. Participants awarded units of phantom shares are entitled to a lump sum cash payment equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the vesting date. In no event will Common Stock of the Company be issued with regard to outstanding phantom shares. As of June 30, 2013, there were 14,960 units of phantom shares granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, of which 6,156 have vested and 1,304 have been forfeited, with a total value of $506, a portion of which is accrued as a liability within Other Accrued Expenses.
The Company has an unsecured revolving credit agreement with a bank. On March 5, 2012, the Company entered into a first amendment to this credit agreement to (i) extend its maturity date from January 29, 2013 to July 29, 2013, (ii) increase the size from $10,000 to $25,000, and (iii) make other administrative changes to certain covenants and provisions. The Company has the option of choosing either the bank’s fluctuating Base Rate or LIBOR Fixed Rate, plus an Applicable Margin, all as defined in the credit agreement. The terms of the credit agreement provide for certain affirmative and negative covenants and require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. Commitment fees are payable quarterly at the annual rate of 0.50% of the unused line of credit.
On July 25, 2013, the Company entered into a second amendment to this credit agreement that (i) extends the maturity date of the credit agreement to July 25, 2018, (ii) increases the size of the revolving credit facility to $50,000, and (iii) makes other administrative changes to certain covenants and provisions of the credit agreement.
8
As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s net investment that is subject to foreign currency fluctuations totaled $87,416 and the Company has recorded a cumulative foreign currency translation loss of $3,713, net of deferred income tax benefit. This cumulative translation loss is included in and is the only component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. There were no amounts reclassified to net income during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013.
8. | New Accounting Pronouncements |
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance on reporting of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires a company to present significant amounts reclassified from each component of other comprehensive income and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2013. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02,“Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350),”(“ASU 2012-02”). This accounting update allows entities to perform a qualitative assessment on intangible assets impairment to determine whether it is more likely than not (defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount. This guidance is effective for intangible assets impairment tests performed in interim and annual periods for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2013. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On February 9, 2012, the Company and two of its officers, Gary A. Kolstad and Ernesto Bautista III, were named as defendants in a purported class-action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “February SDNY Lawsuit”), brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s Common Stock between October 27, 2011 and January 26, 2012 (the “Relevant Time Period”). On April 10, 2012, a second purported class-action lawsuit was filed against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased or sold CARBO Ceramics Inc. option contracts during the Relevant Time Period (the “April SDNY Lawsuit”, and collectively with the February SDNY Lawsuit, the “Federal Securities Lawsuit”). In June 2012, the February SNDY Lawsuit and the April SDNY Lawsuit were consolidated, and will now proceed as one lawsuit. The Federal Securities Lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws arising from statements concerning the Company’s business operations and business prospects that were made during the Relevant Time Period and requests unspecified damages and costs. In September 2012, the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit. The motion to dismiss was granted, and the Federal Securities Lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in June 2013.
On June 13, 2012, the Directors of the Company and Mr. Bautista were named as defendants in a purported derivative action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Company by a stockholder in District Court in Harris County, Texas. This lawsuit alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty and other duties by the defendants that generally are related to the Federal Securities Lawsuit, as well as a breach of duty by certain defendants in connection with stock sales. The lawsuit requests unspecified damages and costs, and has been further stayed while it is determined whether the plaintiffs in the Federal Securities Lawsuit will appeal the dismissal or seek leave to file a second amended complaint.
While each of the Federal Securities Lawsuit and the June Harris County Lawsuit remain in their early stages, the Company does not believe they have merit, and plans to vigorously contest and defend against them.
The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome or duration of these lawsuits.
9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Business
The Company generates revenue primarily through the sale of production enhancement products and services to the oil and natural gas industry. The Company’s principal business consists of manufacturing and selling proppant products for use primarily in the hydraulic fracturing of oil and natural gas wells. These proppant products include ceramic, resin-coated ceramic, and resin-coated sand. The Company also provides the industry’s most widely used hydraulic fracture simulation software, FracPro®, as well as hydraulic fracture design and consulting services. In addition, the Company provides a broad range of technologies for spill prevention, containment and countermeasures.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, which require the Company to make estimates and assumptions (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012). The Company believes that some of its accounting policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than others. As of December 31, 2012, critical accounting policies for the Company included revenue recognition, estimating the recoverability of accounts receivable, inventory valuation, accounting for income taxes and accounting for long-lived assets. These critical accounting policies are discussed more fully in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no changes in the Company’s evaluation of its critical accounting policies since December 31, 2012.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Revenues. Revenues of $153.7 million for the second quarter of 2013 decreased 13% compared to $177.6 million for the same period in 2012. The decrease is mainly attributed to two factors. First, ceramic proppant sales volumes were lower primarily as a result of lower drilling activity. In addition, the Company experienced a 15% decrease in the average proppant selling price for all proppants, as a result of price decreases in response to market conditions and a shift in product mix towards sand-based products. The average selling price per pound of all proppant was $0.303 during the second quarter of 2013 compared to $0.358 for the same period in 2012.
Worldwide proppant sales volume totaled 457 million pounds for the second quarter of 2013 compared to 454 million pounds for the same period in 2012. Ceramic proppant sales volumes decreased to 378 million pounds in the second quarter of 2013 from 440 million pounds in the same period last year. Resin-coated sand sales volumes increased to 68 million pounds in the second quarter of 2013 from 14 million pounds in the same period last year. Other Proppants (defined as raw sand sold in the course of producing substrate for resin-coating) was 11 million pounds in the second quarter of 2013. North American (defined as Canada and the U.S.) proppant sales volume increased 3% due to higher sales of resin-coated sand and Other Proppants. International (excluding Canada) sales volume decreased 13% primarily due to decreased sales volumes in Latin America, Asia, and Russia, offset by increases in the Middle East.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the second quarter of 2013 was $39.3 million, or 26% of revenues, compared to $64.3 million, or 36% of revenues, for the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in gross profit was primarily the result of a decrease in average selling price, higher ceramic proppant unit costs resulting from lower plant utilization, and a change in product sales mix resulting from volume gains of the Company’s sand-based products. Given current market conditions, the Company experienced difficulties in achieving acceptable margins on the sale of sand-based products. In addition, gross profit was reduced as a result of continued spending to bring the Company’s new proppant technology to a commercial state. The commercial launch of this new proppant is anticipated in the second half of 2013.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) and Other Operating Expenses. SG&A and other operating expenses totaled $15.5 million for the second quarter of 2013 compared to $17.0 million for the same period in 2012. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A and other operating expenses increased to 10.1% compared to 9.6% for the second quarter of 2012, driven by the decline in revenues.
10
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) for the second quarter of 2013 decreased $0.4 million compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily due to changes in exchange rates between the functional currency and the foreign currency in which the effective transactions were denominated, offset by an increase in interest income.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $7.8 million, or 32.3% of pretax income, for the second quarter of 2013 compared to $16.0 million, or 33.3% of pretax income, for the same period last year. The $8.2 million decrease is primarily due to lower pre-tax income.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Revenues. Revenues of $301.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased 12% compared to $340.8 million for the same period in 2012. The decrease is mainly attributed to a 17% decrease in the average proppant selling price, partially offset by an increase in proppant sales volume. The decrease in average selling price is the result of price decreases in response to market conditions and a shift in product mix towards sand-based products. The average selling price per pound of all proppant was $0.303 during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $0.364 for the same period in 2012.
Worldwide proppant sales volume totaled 902 million pounds for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 857 million pounds for the same period in 2012. Ceramic proppant sales volumes decreased to 776 million pounds in the six months ended June 30, 2013 from 833 million pounds in the same period last year. Resin-coated sand increased to 93 million pounds in the six months ended June 30, 2013 from 24 million pounds in the same period last year. Other Proppants was 33 million pounds in the six months ended June 30, 2013. North American (defined as Canada and the U.S.) proppant sales volume increased 8% due to higher sales of resin-coated sand and Other Proppants. International (excluding Canada) sales volume decreased 8%.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $81.7 million, or 27% of revenues, compared to $127.7 million, or 37% of revenues, for the same period in 2012. The decrease in gross profit was primarily the result of a decrease in average selling price, a change in the product sales mix resulting from volume gains of the Company’s sand-based products, and spending to bring the Company’s new proppant technology to a commercial state.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) and Other Operating Expenses.SG&A expenses totaled $32.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $33.7 million for the same period in 2012. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses increased to 10.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 9.9% for the same period in 2012, driven by the decline in revenues.
Other Income (Expense).Other income (expense) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $0.4 million compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to an increase in interest income.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $15.7 million, or 31.7% of pretax income, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $31.7 million, or 33.7% of pretax income for the same period last year. The $16.0 million decrease is primarily due to lower pre-tax income. In addition, the Company realized $0.4 million in R&D tax credits as a result of legislation enacted in the first quarter of 2013, as well as additional tax benefits from mining depletion deductions.
Outlook
Given the cyclical nature of the industry, the Company believes that market conditions will improve, however it is difficult to pinpoint the exact timing. The Company expects activity over the short-term will be variable and driven by a focus on reduction of well costs and a continued over-supply in the proppant market. However, the Company believes the inventories of Chinese ceramic proppant appear to be shrinking in North America. As a result, the Company believes the operating environment may have the potential for ceramic proppant sales volume growth during the second half of 2013. Seasonality negatively affected ceramic sales volumes for the second quarter of 2013 due to the Canadian spring break-up.
11
The Company expects to see continued pricing pressures until market conditions improve; but increased ceramic proppant sales volumes, coupled with successful execution on cost reduction initiatives, could lead to improved sequential margins.
Resin-coated sand products are unlikely to realize large, near-term price increases, given the current low natural gas activity and industry oversupply. The Company is focused on improving margins through efficient plant utilization and lowering certain manufacturing costs.
The Company expects to support near-term demand with its current ceramic proppant production capacity of 1.75 billion pounds per year, along with existing inventories of ceramic proppant. The Company is moving forward with construction of the first 250 million pound line at its Millen, Georgia facility, which it anticipates could commence operation near the end of the second quarter of 2014.
The increased amount of activity in infrastructure-limited, liquids-rich basins introduced supply chain challenges to the industry and resulted in higher distribution costs during 2012 and the first six months of 2013. The Company is addressing distribution costs with a number of ongoing initiatives. A critical initiative is rationalizing its rail fleet to reduce reliance on the fleet as a form of storage. Other initiatives include reducing transportation costs. The Company anticipates completing a majority of these initiatives in the second half of 2013, with the resulting benefits seen in 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $76.0 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $90.6 million at December 31, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company generated $36.7 million of cash from operating activities. Uses of cash included $31.2 million for capital expenditures, $12.5 million for the payment of cash dividends and $6.8 million for repurchases of the Company’s common stock.
Subject to the Company’s financial condition, the amount of funds generated from operations and the level of capital expenditures, the Company’s current intention is to continue to pay quarterly dividends to holders of its common stock. On July 16, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.30 per common share payable to shareholders of record on August 1, 2013. This dividend is payable on August 15, 2013. The Company estimates its total capital expenditures for the remainder of 2013 will be between $60.0 million and $70.0 million. Capital expenditures for the remainder of 2013 are expected to include costs associated with the construction of the new manufacturing facility in Millen, Georgia and expansion of the Company’s distribution infrastructure.
The Company maintains an unsecured line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. On July 25, 2013, this line of credit was increased from $25.0 million to $50.0 million, and the expiration date of the facility was extended to 2018. As of June 30, 2013, there was no outstanding debt under the credit agreement. The Company anticipates that cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities and funds available under its line of credit will be sufficient to meet planned operating expenses, tax obligations, capital expenditures and other cash needs for the next 12 months. Based on these assumptions, the Company believes that its fixed costs could be met even with a moderate decrease in demand for the Company’s products.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2013.
Forward-Looking Information
The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical statements, including statements regarding our future financial and operating performance and liquidity and capital resources, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and estimates, which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Among these factors are:
| • | | changes in overall economic conditions, |
| • | | changes in the cost of raw materials and natural gas used in manufacturing our products, |
| • | | ability to manage distribution costs effectively, |
12
| • | | changes in demand and prices charged for our products, |
| • | | changes in the demand for, or price of, oil and natural gas, |
| • | | risks of increased competition, |
| • | | technological, manufacturing and product development risks, |
| • | | changes in foreign and domestic government regulations, including environmental restrictions on operations and regulation of hydraulic fracturing, |
| • | | changes in foreign and domestic political and legislative risks, |
| • | | the risks of war and international and domestic terrorism, |
| • | | risks associated with foreign operations and foreign currency exchange rates and controls, and |
| • | | weather-related risks and other risks and uncertainties. |
Additional factors that could affect our future results or events are described from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). See in particular our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 under the caption “Risk Factors” and similar disclosures in subsequently filed reports with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company’s major market risk exposure is to foreign currency fluctuations that could impact its investments in China and Russia. As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s net investment that is subject to foreign currency fluctuations totaled $87.4 million and the Company has recorded a cumulative foreign currency translation loss of $3.7 million, net of deferred income tax benefit. This cumulative translation loss is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. From time to time, the Company may enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. There were no such foreign exchange contracts outstanding at June 30, 2013.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of June 30, 2013, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.
13
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 9, 2012, the Company and two of its officers, Gary A. Kolstad and Ernesto Bautista III, were named as defendants in a purported class-action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “February SDNY Lawsuit”), brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s Common Stock between October 27, 2011 and January 26, 2012 (the “Relevant Time Period”). On April 10, 2012, a second purported class-action lawsuit was filed against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased or sold CARBO Ceramics Inc. option contracts during the Relevant Time Period (the “April SDNY Lawsuit”, and collectively with the February SDNY Lawsuit, the “Federal Securities Lawsuit”). In June 2012, the February SNDY Lawsuit and the April SDNY Lawsuit were consolidated, and will now proceed as one lawsuit. The Federal Securities Lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws arising from statements concerning the Company’s business operations and business prospects that were made during the Relevant Time Period and requests unspecified damages and costs. In September 2012, the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit. The motion to dismiss was granted, and the Federal Securities Lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in June 2013.
On June 13, 2012, the Directors of the Company and Mr. Bautista were named as defendants in a purported derivative action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Company by a stockholder in District Court in Harris County, Texas. This lawsuit alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty and other duties by the defendants that generally are related to the Federal Securities Lawsuit, as well as a breach of duty by certain defendants in connection with stock sales. The lawsuit requests unspecified damages and costs, and has been further stayed while it is determined whether the plaintiffs in the Federal Securities Lawsuit will appeal the dismissal or seek leave to file a second amended complaint.
While each of the Federal Securities Lawsuit and the June Harris County Lawsuit remain in their early stages, the Company does not believe they have merit, and plans to vigorously contest and defend against them.
Additionally, from time to time, the Company is the subject of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material effect on its business or its results of operations.
The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome or duration of any lawsuit described in this report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table provides information about the Company’s repurchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2013:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan(1) | | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan(1) | |
04/01/13 to 04/30/13 | | | 45,000 | | | $ | 70.00 | | | | 45,000 | | | | 47,424 | |
05/01/13 to 05/31/13 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 47,424 | |
06/01/13 to 06/30/13 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 47,424 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 45,000 | | | | | | | | 45,000 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | On August 28, 2008, the Company announced the authorization by its Board of Directors for the repurchase of up to two million shares of its Common Stock. |
14
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Our U.S. manufacturing facilities process mined minerals, and therefore are viewed as mine operations subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the recently proposed Item 106 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.106) is included in Exhibit 95 to this quarterly report.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On July 25, 2013, the Company entered into a second amendment (“Amendment No. 2”) to its Credit Agreement, dated January 29, 2010 (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”), with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, issuing lender and swing line lender, and the financial institutions party thereto.
In summary, Amendment No. 2 (i) extends the maturity date of the Credit Agreement from July 29, 2013 to July 25, 2018, (ii) increases the size of the Company’s revolving credit facility from $25 million to $50 million and (iii) makes other administrative changes to certain covenants and provisions of the Credit Agreement.
The foregoing description of Amendment No. 2 is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Amendment No. 2, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit to this report.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
| | |
| |
10.1 | | Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2013, among CARBO Ceramics Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, issuing lender and swing line lender, and the lenders named therein. |
| |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary A. Kolstad. |
| |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Ernesto Bautista III. |
| |
32 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
95 | | Mine Safety Disclosure |
| |
101 | | The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
CARBO CERAMICS INC. |
|
/s/ Gary A. Kolstad |
Gary A. Kolstad |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
/s/ Ernesto Bautista III |
Ernesto Bautista III |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: July 29, 2013
16
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
EXHIBIT | | DESCRIPTION |
| |
10.1 | | Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2013, among CARBO Ceramics Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, issuing lender and swing line lender, and the lenders named therein. |
| |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary A. Kolstad. |
| |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Ernesto Bautista III. |
| |
32 | | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
95 | | Mine Safety Disclosure |
| |
101 | | The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
17