Legal Proceedings - Additional Information (Detail) | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended |
Feb. 09, 2012 | Mar. 31, 2014 |
Defendant |
Harris County Lawsuit | ' | ' |
Loss Contingencies [Line Items] | ' | ' |
Law suit filing date | ' | 'On June 13, 2012, the Directors of the Company and Mr. Bautista were named as defendants in a purported derivative action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Company by a stockholder in District Court in Harris County, Texas (the "Harris County Lawsuit"). |
Name of defendant | ' | 'The Directors of the Company and Mr. Bautista |
Name of plaintiff | ' | 'Stockholder in District Court in Harris County, Texas |
Laws affected | ' | 'This lawsuit alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty and other duties by the defendants that generally are related to the Federal Securities Lawsuit, as well as a breach of duty by certain defendants in connection with stock sales. The lawsuit requests unspecified damages and costs |
Federal Securities Lawsuit | ' | ' |
Loss Contingencies [Line Items] | ' | ' |
Name of defendant | ' | 'The Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista |
Laws affected | ' | 'The Federal Securities Lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws arising from statements concerning the Companybs business operations and business prospects that were made during the Relevant Time Period and requests unspecified damages and costs. |
April SDNY Lawsuit | ' | ' |
Loss Contingencies [Line Items] | ' | ' |
Law suit filing date | ' | 'On April 10, 2012, a second purported class-action lawsuit was filed against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased or sold CARBO Ceramics Inc. option contracts during the Relevant Time Period (the bApril SDNY Lawsuitb, and collectively with the February SDNY Lawsuit, the bFederal Securities Lawsuitb). |
Name of defendant | ' | 'The Company and two of its officers, Gary A. Kolstad and Ernesto Bautista III |
Name of plaintiff | ' | 'Shareholders who purchased or sold CARBO Ceramics Inc. option contracts during the Relevant Time Period |
Suit Consolidation | ' | 'In June 2012, the February SNDY Lawsuit and the April SDNY Lawsuit were consolidated. |
Actions Taken by Defendant | ' | 'In September 2012, the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit. The motion to dismiss was granted, and the Federal Securities Lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in June 2013. In September 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion requesting leave to file a second amended complaint and sustain the lawsuit. In January 2014, the Court denied plaintiffsb motion, and entered a judgment in favor of the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista. The plaintiffs did not timely appeal this judgment, and it has become final. |
Laws affected | ' | 'The Federal Securities Lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws arising from statements concerning the Companybs business operations and business prospects that were made during the Relevant Time Period and requests unspecified damages and costs. |
February SDNY Lawsuit | ' | ' |
Loss Contingencies [Line Items] | ' | ' |
Law suit filing date | ' | 'On February 9, 2012, the Company and two of its officers, Gary A. Kolstad and Ernesto Bautista III, were named as defendants in a purported class-action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "February SDNY Lawsuit"), brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company's Common Stock between October 27, 2011 and January 26, 2012 (the "Relevant Time Period"). |
Name of defendant | ' | 'The Company and two of its officers, Gary A. Kolstad and Ernesto Bautista III |
Name of plaintiff | ' | 'Shareholders who purchased the Company's Common Stock between October 27, 2011 and January 26, 2012 |
Number of officers named as defendants | 2 | ' |
Suit Consolidation | ' | 'In June 2012, the February SNDY Lawsuit and the April SDNY Lawsuit were consolidated. |
Actions Taken by Defendant | ' | 'In September 2012, the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit. The motion to dismiss was granted, and the Federal Securities Lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice in June 2013. In September 2013, the plaintiffs filed a motion requesting leave to file a second amended complaint and sustain the lawsuit. In January 2014, the Court denied plaintiffsb motion, and entered a judgment in favor of the Company and Messrs. Kolstad and Bautista. The plaintiffs did not timely appeal this judgment, and it has become final. |
Laws affected | ' | 'The Federal Securities Lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws arising from statements concerning the Companybs business operations and business prospects that were made during the Relevant Time Period and requests unspecified damages and costs. |