Loans Held for Investment | Note 3: Loans Held for Investment Loans held for investment consisted of the following at June 30, 2020 and 2019 : (In Thousands) June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 Mortgage loans: Single-family $ 298,810 $ 324,952 Multi-family 491,903 439,041 Commercial real estate 105,235 111,928 Construction 7,801 4,638 Other 143 167 Commercial business loans 480 478 Consumer loans 94 134 Total loans held for investment, gross 904,466 881,338 Advance payments of escrows 68 53 Deferred loan costs, net 6,527 5,610 Allowance for loan losses (8,265) (7,076) Total loans held for investment, net $ 902,796 $ 879,925 The following table sets forth information at June 30, 2020 regarding the dollar amount of loans held for investment that are contractually repricing during the periods indicated, segregated between adjustable rate loans and fixed rate loans. Fixed-rate loans comprised 1% and 2% of loans held for investment at June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, respectively. Adjustable rate loans having no stated repricing date that reprice when the index they are tied to reprices (e.g. prime rate index) and checking account overdrafts are reported as repricing within one year. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments which may cause the Corporation’s actual repricing experience to differ materially from that shown. Adjustable Rate After After After One Year 3 Years 5 Years (In Thousands) Within One Year Through 3 Years Through 5 Years Through 10 Years Fixed Rate Total Mortgage loans: Single-family $ 80,167 $ 54,690 $ 89,820 $ 65,902 $ 8,231 $ 298,810 Multi-family 161,881 156,014 157,783 16,069 156 491,903 Commercial real estate 48,343 27,542 29,010 — 340 105,235 Construction 6,041 — — — 1,760 7,801 Other — — — — 143 143 Commercial business loans 85 — — — 395 480 Consumer loans 94 — — — — 94 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 296,611 $ 238,246 $ 276,613 $ 81,971 $ 11,025 $ 904,466 The Corporation has developed an internal loan grading system to evaluate and quantify the Bank’s loans held for investment portfolio with respect to quality and risk. Management continually evaluates the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and conducts a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses using quantitative and qualitative methods. The Corporation has adopted an internal risk rating policy in which each loan is rated for credit quality with a rating of pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss. The two primary components that are used during the loan review process to determine the proper allowance levels are individually evaluated allowances and collectively evaluated allowances. Quantitative loan loss factors are developed by determining the historical loss experience, expected future cash flows, discount rates and collateral fair values, among others. Qualitative loan loss factors are developed by assessing general economic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product, Retail Sales, Unemployment Rates, Employment Growth, California Home Sales and Median California Home Prices, among others. The Corporation assigns individual factors for the quantitative and qualitative methods for each loan category and each internal risk rating. The Corporation categorizes all of the loans held for investment into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrower to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows: § Pass - These loans range from minimal credit risk to average however still acceptable credit risk. The likelihood of loss is considered remote. § Special Mention - A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that may be temporary or, if left uncorrected, may result in a loss. While concerns exist, the Bank is currently protected and loss is considered unlikely and not imminent. § Substandard - A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. A substandard loan is characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. § Doubtful - A doubtful loan has all of the weaknesses inherent in one classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of the currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. § Loss - A loss loan is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the Bank is not warranted. The following tables summarize gross loans held for investment by loan types and risk category at the dates indicated: June 30, 2020 Commercial Commercial (In Thousands) Single-family Multi-family Real Estate Construction Other Mortgage Business Consumer Total Pass $ 289,942 $ 488,126 $ 105,235 $ 6,098 $ 143 $ 445 $ 94 $ 890,083 Special Mention 3,120 3,777 — 1,703 — — — 8,600 Substandard 5,748 — — — — 35 — 5,783 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 298,810 $ 491,903 $ 105,235 $ 7,801 $ 143 $ 480 $ 94 $ 904,466 June 30, 2019 Commercial Other Commercial (In Thousands) Single-family Multi-family Real Estate Construction Mortgage Business Consumer Total Pass $ 314,036 $ 435,177 $ 111,001 $ 3,667 $ 167 $ 429 $ 134 $ 864,611 Special Mention 3,795 3,864 927 — — — — 8,586 Substandard 7,121 — — 971 — 49 — 8,141 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 324,952 $ 439,041 $ 111,928 $ 4,638 $ 167 $ 478 $ 134 $ 881,338 The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loans held for investment and upon management’s continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loans held for investment. These factors include changes in the size and composition of the loans held for investment, actual loan loss experience, current economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, and determination of the realizable value of the collateral securing the loans. Provisions (recoveries) for loan losses are charged (credited) against operations on a quarterly basis, as necessary, to maintain the allowance at appropriate levels. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Corporation’s loans held for investment, will not request the Corporation to significantly increase its allowance for loan losses. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected as a result of Non-performing loans are charged-off to their fair market values in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed uncollectible, generally after the loan becomes 150 days delinquent for real estate secured first trust deed loans and 120 days delinquent for commercial business or real estate secured second trust deed loans. For loans that were modified from their original terms, were re-underwritten and identified in the Corporation’s asset quality reports as restructured loans, the charge-off occurs when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; and where borrowers file bankruptcy, the charge-off occurs when the loan becomes 60 days delinquent. The amount of the charge-off is determined by comparing the loan balance to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less disposition costs, with the loan balance in excess of the estimated fair value charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses for non-performing loans is determined by applying ASC 310, “Receivables.” For restructured loans that are less than 90 days delinquent, the allowance for loan losses are segregated into (a) individually evaluated allowances for those loans with applicable discounted cash flow calculations still in their restructuring period, classified lower than pass, and containing an embedded loss component or (b) collectively evaluated allowances based on the aggregated pooling method. For non-performing loans less than 60 days delinquent where the borrower has filed bankruptcy, the collectively evaluated allowances are assigned based on the aggregated pooling method. For non-performing commercial real estate loans, individually evaluated allowances are calculated based on their fair values and if their fair values are higher than their loan balances, no allowances are required. The following tables summarize the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in gross loans, by portfolio type, at the dates and for the periods indicated. Year Ended June 30, 2020 Commercial Commercial (In Thousands) Single-family Multi-family Real Estate Construction Other Mortgage Business Consumer Total Allowance at beginning of period $ 2,709 $ 3,219 $ 1,050 $ 61 $ 3 $ 26 $ 8 $ 7,076 Provision (recovery) for loan losses (156) 1,110 60 110 — (2) (3) 1,119 Recoveries 70 — — — — — 2 72 Charge-offs (1) — — — — — (1) (2) Allowance for loan losses, end of period $ 2,622 $ 4,329 $ 1,110 $ 171 $ 3 $ 24 $ 6 $ 8,265 Allowance: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 96 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 4 $ — $ 100 Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,526 4,329 1,110 171 3 20 6 8,165 Allowance for loan losses, end of period $ 2,622 $ 4,329 $ 1,110 $ 171 $ 3 $ 24 $ 6 $ 8,265 Gross Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 3,371 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 35 $ — $ 3,406 Collectively evaluated for impairment 295,439 491,903 105,235 7,801 143 445 94 901,060 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 298,810 $ 491,903 $ 105,235 $ 7,801 $ 143 $ 480 $ 94 $ 904,466 Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment 0.88 % 0.88 % 1.05 % 2.19 % 2.10 % 5.00 % 6.38 % 0.91 % Year Ended June 30, 2019 Commercial Commercial (In Thousands) Single-family Multi-family Real Estate Construction Other Mortgage Business Consumer Total Allowance at beginning of period $ 2,783 $ 3,492 $ 1,030 $ 47 $ 3 $ 24 $ 6 $ 7,385 Provision (recovery)for loan losses (241) (273) 20 14 — — 5 (475) Recoveries 198 — — — — 2 — 200 Charge-offs (31) — — — — — (3) (34) Allowance for loan losses, end of period $ 2,709 $ 3,219 $ 1,050 $ 61 $ 3 $ 26 $ 8 $ 7,076 Allowance: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 122 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 8 $ — $ 130 Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,587 3,219 1,050 61 3 18 8 6,946 Allowance for loan losses, end of period $ 2,709 $ 3,219 $ 1,050 $ 61 $ 3 $ 26 $ 8 $ 7,076 Gross Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,199 $ — $ — $ 971 $ — $ 49 $ — $ 6,219 Collectively evaluated for impairment 319,753 439,041 111,928 3,667 167 429 134 875,119 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 324,952 $ 439,041 $ 111,928 $ 4,638 $ 167 $ 478 $ 134 $ 881,338 Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment 0.83 % 0.73 % 0.94 % 1.32 % 1.80 % 5.44 % 5.97 % 0.80 % The following summarizes the components of the net change in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated: Year Ended June 30, (In Thousands) 2020 2019 Balance, beginning of year $ 7,076 $ 7,385 Provision (recovery) for loan losses 1,119 (475) Recoveries 72 200 Charge-offs (2) (34) Balance, end of year $ 8,265 $ 7,076 The following tables identify the Corporation’s total recorded investment in non-performing loans by type at the dates and for the periods indicated. Generally, a loan is placed on non-accrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest or if the loan is deemed impaired, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, where the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of the contractual principal or interest on the loan is doubtful. In addition, interest income is not recognized on any loan where management has determined that collection is not reasonably assured. A non-performing loan may be restored to accrual status when delinquent principal and interest payments are brought current and future monthly principal and interest payments are expected to be collected on a timely basis. Loans with a related allowance reserve have been individually evaluated for impairment using either a discounted cash flow analysis or, for collateral dependent loans, current appraisals less costs to sell to establish realizable value. This evaluation may identify a specific impairment amount needed or may conclude that no reserve is needed. Loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment are included in pools of homogeneous loans for evaluation of related allowance reserves. At or For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Unpaid Net Average Interest Principal Related Recorded Recorded Recorded Income (In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment Allowance (1) Investment Investment Recognized Mortgage loans: Single-family: With a related allowance $ 3,289 $ — $ 3,289 $ (438) $ 2,851 $ 1,541 $ 60 Without a related allowance (2) 2,509 (467) 2,042 — 2,042 2,572 119 Total single-family loans 5,798 (467) 5,331 (438) 4,893 4,113 179 Construction: Without a related allowance (2) — — — — — 271 20 Total construction loans — — — — — 271 20 Commercial business loans: With a related allowance 35 — 35 (4) 31 42 4 Total commercial business loans 35 — 35 (4) 31 42 4 Total non-performing loans $ 5,833 $ (467) $ 5,366 $ (442) $ 4,924 $ 4,426 $ 203 (1) Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan. (2) There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance. At or For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 Unpaid Related Net Average Interest Principal Charge-offs Recorded Recorded Recorded Income (In Thousands) Balance Related Investment Allowance (1) Investment Investment Recognized Mortgage loans: Single-family: With a related allowance $ 2,640 $ — $ 2,640 $ (434) $ 2,206 $ 1,583 $ 110 Without a related allowance (2) 3,518 (518) 3,000 — 3,000 4,301 293 Total single-family loans 6,158 (518) 5,640 (434) 5,206 5,884 403 Construction: Without a related allowance (2) 971 — 971 — 971 664 — Total construction loans 971 — 971 — 971 664 — Commercial business loans: With a related allowance 49 — 49 (8) 41 58 5 Total commercial business loans 49 — 49 (8) 41 58 5 Total non-performing loans $ 7,178 $ (518) $ 6,660 $ (442) $ 6,218 $ 6,606 $ 408 (1) Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan. (2) There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance. On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law and on April 7, 2020, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, OCC and consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus ("Interagency Statement"). Among other things, the CARES Act and Interagency Statement provided relief to borrowers, including the opportunity to defer loan payments while not negatively affecting their credit standing. For commercial and consumer customers, the Corporation has provided relief options, including payment deferrals and fee waivers. All loans modified due to COVID-19 will be separately monitored and any request for continuation of relief beyond the initial modification will be reassessed at that time to determine if a further modification should be granted and if a downgrade in risk rating is appropriate. As of June 30, 2020, loan forbearance related to COVID-19 hardship requests are described below: Forbearance Granted Forbearance Completed Forbearance Remaining Number of Number of Number of (Dollars In Thousands) Loans Amount Loans Amount Loans Amount Single-family loans 52 $ 21,470 4 $ 1,579 48 $ 19,891 Multi-family loans 3 1,592 — — 3 1,592 Commercial real estate loans 2 1,071 — — 2 1,071 Total loan forbearance 57 $ 24,133 4 $ 1,579 53 $ 22,554 As of June 30, 2020, loan forbearance outstanding balances are described below: Weighted Weighted Avg. % of Weighted Avg. Debt Forbearance Number Total Weighted Avg. Coverage Period (Dollars In Thousands) of Loans Amount Loans Avg. LTV (1) FICO (2) Ratio (3) Granted (4) Single-family loans 48 $ 19,891 2.20 % 64 % 727 N/A 6.0 Multi-family loans 3 1,592 0.17 % 41 % 719 1.65x 3.3 Commercial real estate loans (5) 2 1,071 0.12 % 31 % 755 1.36x 3.5 Total loans in forbearance 53 $ 22,554 2.49 % 61 % 727 1.53x 5.7 (1) Current loan balance in comparison to the original appraised value. (2) At time of loan origination, borrowers and/or guarantors. (3) At time of loan origination. (4) In months. (5) Comprised of $579 thousand in Office and $493 thousand in Mixed Used – Office/Single-Family Residential. In addition, as of June 30, 2020, the Bank had pending requests for payment relief for an additional seven single-family loans totaling approximately $2.6 million. After the payment deferral period, normal loan payments will once again become due and payable. The forbearance amount will be due and payable in full as a balloon payment at the end of the loan term or sooner if the loan becomes due and payable in full at an earlier date. The Corporation believes the steps we are taking are necessary to effectively manage its portfolio and assist the borrowers through the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the duration, impact and government response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At June 30, 2020 and 2019 , there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose loans were classified as non-performing, except for one construction loan with undisbursed loan funds of $1.0 million at June 30, 2019. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Corporation’s average investment in non-performing loans was $4.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively. The Corporation records payments on non-performing loans utilizing the cash basis or cost recovery method of accounting during the periods when the loans are on non-performing status. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Bank received $312,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $203,000 was recognized as interest income. The remaining $109,000 was applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method. In comparison, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, the Bank received $574,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $408,000 was recognized as interest income. The remaining $166,000 was applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method. The following tables denote the past due status of the Corporation’s loans held for investment, gross, at the dates indicated. June 30, 2020 30-89 Days Past Total Loans Held for (In Thousands) Current Due Non-Accrual (1) Investment, Gross Mortgage loans: Single-family $ 293,326 $ 219 $ 5,265 $ 298,810 Multi-family 491,903 — — 491,903 Commercial real estate 105,235 — — 105,235 Construction 7,801 — — 7,801 Other 143 — — 143 Commercial business loans 445 — 35 480 Consumer loans 94 — — 94 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 898,947 $ 219 $ 5,300 $ 904,466 (1) All loans 90 days or greater past due are placed on non-accrual status. June 30, 2019 30-89 Days Past Total Loans Held for (In Thousands) Current Due Non-Accrual (1) Investment, Gross Mortgage loans: Single-family $ 318,671 $ 660 $ 5,621 $ 324,952 Multi-family 439,041 — — 439,041 Commercial real estate 111,928 — — 111,928 Construction 3,667 — 971 4,638 Other 167 — — 167 Commercial business loans 429 — 49 478 Consumer loans 129 5 — 134 Total loans held for investment, gross $ 874,032 $ 665 $ 6,641 $ 881,338 (1) All loans 90 days or greater past due are placed on non-accrual status. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, there were two loans that were newly modified from their original terms, re-underwritten or identified as a restructured loan; one loan (previously modified) was downgraded; one loan was upgraded to the pass category; two loans were paid off; and no loans were converted to real estate owned. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, there were no loans that were newly modified from their original terms, re-underwritten or identified as a restructured loan; one loan (previously modified) was downgraded; three loans were upgraded to the pass category; one loan was paid off; and no loans were converted to real estate owned. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, no restructured loans were in default within a 12-month period subsequent to their original restructuring. Additionally, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, there were no restructured loans that were extended beyond the initial maturity of the modification; while in fiscal 2019, there was one restructured loan of $56,000 that was extended beyond the initial maturity of the modification. As of June 30, 2020, the net outstanding balance of the Corporation's eight restructured loans was $2.6 million, all were classified as substandard on non-accrual status. As of June 30, 2020, $1.2 million, or 44 percent, of the restructured loans were current with respect to their payment status, consistent with modified terms. As of June 30, 2019, the net outstanding balance of the Corporation's eight restructured loans was $3.8 million: one was classified as special mention on accrual status ($437,000); one was classified as substandard on accrual status ($1.4 million); and six were classified as substandard on non-accrual status ($1.9 million). As of June 30, 2019, $1.2 million, or 44 percent, of the restructured loans were current with respect to their payment status, consistent with modified terms. At both June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose loans were restructured. The following table summarizes at the dates indicated the restructured loan balances, net of allowance for loan losses or charge-offs, by loan type and non-accrual versus accrual status at June 30, 2020 and 2019 : At June 30, (In Thousands) 2020 2019 Restructured loans on non-accrual status: Mortgage loans: Single-family $ 2,612 $ 1,891 Commercial business loans 31 41 Total 2,643 1,932 Restructured loans on accrual status: Mortgage loans: Single-family — 1,861 Total — 1,861 Total restructured loans $ 2,643 $ 3,793 The following tables show the restructured loans by type, net of allowance for loan losses or charge-offs, at June 30, 2020 and 2019 : At June 30, 2020 Unpaid Net Principal Related Recorded Recorded (In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment Allowance (1) Investment Mortgage loans: Single-family: With a related allowance $ 1,650 $ — $ 1,650 $ (108) $ 1,542 Without a related allowance (2) 1,435 (365) 1,070 — 1,070 Total single-family 3,085 (365) 2,720 (108) 2,612 Commercial business loans: With a related allowance 35 — 35 (4) 31 Total commercial business loans 35 — 35 (4) 31 Total restructured loans $ 3,120 $ (365) $ 2,755 $ (112) $ 2,643 (1) Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan. (2) There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance. At June 30, 2019 Unpaid Net Principal Related Recorded Recorded (In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment Allowance (1) Investment Mortgage loans: Single-family: With a related allowance $ 2,199 $ — $ 2,199 $ (122) $ 2,077 Without a related allowance (2) 2,040 (365) 1,675 — 1,675 Total single-family 4,239 (365) 3,874 (122) 3,752 Commercial business loans: With a related allowance 49 — 49 (8) 41 Total commercial business loans 49 — 49 (8) 41 Total restructured loans $ 4,288 $ (365) $ 3,923 $ (130) $ 3,793 (1) Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan. (2) There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance. In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans to its directors, officers and employees on substantially the same terms prevailing at the time of origination for comparable transactions with unaffiliated borrowers. The following is a summary of related-party loan activity: Year Ended June 30, (In Thousands) 2020 2019 Balance, beginning of year $ 2 $ 677 Originations — — Sales and payments (1) (675) Balance, end of year $ 1 $ 2 As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, all of the related-party loans were performing in accordance with their original contractual terms. |