Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. |
Investments | Investments: |
Investments are classified as short-term or long-term based on their remaining maturities. The Company’s short-term and long-term investments as of December 31, 2014 are comprised of U.S. and non-U.S. government securities, U.S. agency securities and corporate debt securities. All investments are held in the Company’s name at a limited number of major financial institutions. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, all of the Company’s investments were classified as available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on investments are recorded as a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. The Company reviews the individual securities in its portfolio to determine whether a decline in a security’s fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary. If the decline in fair value is considered to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to its fair value as a new cost basis. If the investments are sold at a loss or are considered to have other-than-temporarily declined in value, the amount of the loss or write-down is accounted for as a realized loss and included in earnings. The specific identification method is used to determine the cost of securities disposed of, with realized gains and losses reflected in “Interest and other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: |
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company regularly performs credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and considers factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, and geographic or country-specific risks and economic conditions that may affect a customer's ability to pay. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed quarterly and adjusted if necessary based on the Company's assessment of its customers' abilities to pay. If the financial conditions of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, adversely affecting their abilities to make payments, additional allowances would be required. |
Inventories | Inventories: |
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost computed on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. Consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration and other factors in evaluating net realizable value. The Company records write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the carrying value of inventory and the estimated future selling price based upon assumptions about future product life-cycles, product demand and market conditions. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment: |
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally from one to seven years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the related assets, typically three to thirteen years. Disposals of capital equipment are recorded by removing the costs and accumulated depreciation from the accounts and gains or losses on disposals are included in “Interest and other income (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Goodwill | Goodwill: |
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is regularly reviewed for potential impairment. The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each calendar year, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company performs an initial qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after the initial qualitative assessment, the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value and there is no indication of impairment, no further testing is performed; however, if the Company concludes otherwise, then the Company is required to perform a two-step impairment test to assess if a potential impairment has occurred and measure an impairment loss, if any. For further discussion of goodwill and its impairment review, see Note 6. |
Long-Lived Assets | Long-Lived Assets: |
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, which range from several months to six years. Purchased intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset or group of assets and their eventual disposition. The Company periodically assesses the remaining useful lives of long-lived assets. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the estimated fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. |
Guarantees | Guarantees: |
Warranty |
The Company provides for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold. In the case of hardware products, warranties generally start from the delivery date and continue for one year. Software products generally carry a 90-day warranty from the date of purchase. The Company’s liability under warranties on software products is to provide a corrected copy of any portion of the software found not to be in substantial compliance with the agreed upon specifications. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty obligation include product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. The Company assesses the adequacy of the recorded warranty liabilities every quarter and makes adjustments to the liability if necessary. |
Deferred Services Revenue |
The Company offers maintenance contracts for sale on most of its products which allow for customers to receive service and support in addition to, or subsequent to, the expiration of the contractual product warranty. The Company also provides managed services to its customers under contractual arrangements. The Company recognizes the maintenance and managed services revenues from these contracts over the life of the service contract. |
Officer and Director Indemnifications |
As permitted or required under Delaware law and to the maximum extent allowable under that law, the Company has certain obligations to indemnify its current and former officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at the Company’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that mitigates the Company’s exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of the Company’s insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is not material. |
Other Indemnifications |
As is customary in the Company’s industry, as provided for in local law in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, the Company’s standard contracts provide remedies to its customers, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of its products. From time to time, the Company indemnifies customers against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various trigger events related to the sale and the use of its products and services. In addition, from time to time the Company also provides protection to customers against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liabilities or environmental obligations. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition: |
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have transferred, product payment is not contingent upon performance of installation or service obligations, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product or service is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. Additionally, the Company recognizes maintenance service revenues on its hardware and software products ratably over the service periods of one to five years, and other services upon the completion of installation or professional services provided. |
Most of the Company’s products are integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. Additionally, the Company provides unspecified software upgrades and enhancements related to most of these products through maintenance contracts. |
A multiple-element arrangement includes the sale of one or more tangible product offerings with one or more associated services offerings, each of which are individually considered separate units of accounting. The Company allocates revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based upon the relative selling price of each deliverable. When applying the relative selling price method, the Company determines the selling price for each deliverable using vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price, if it exists, or third party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE of selling price exist for a deliverable, the Company uses its best estimate of selling price (“ESP”) for that deliverable. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized when the other revenue recognition criteria are met for each element. |
VSOE is established based on the Company’s standard pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, the Company requires that a substantial majority of the selling prices for a product or service fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. |
When VSOE cannot be established, the Company attempts to establish the selling price of each element based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. |
When the Company is unable to establish the selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses ESP in its allocation of revenue for the arrangement. ESP represents the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the element were sold on a stand-alone basis. The Company determines ESP for a product by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, geographies, market conditions, competitive landscape, and pricing practices. The determination of ESP is made based on review of historical sales price, taking into consideration the Company’s go-to-market strategy. Generally, the Company uses historical net selling prices to establish ESP. The Company regularly reviews its basis for establishing VSOE, TPE and ESP. |
Sales Returns, Channel Partner Programs and Incentives |
The Company’s contracts generally do not provide for a right of return on any of its products. However, a limited number of contracts contain stock rotation rights. The Company records an estimate of future returns based upon these contractual rights and its historical returns experience. The Company records estimated reductions to revenues for channel partner programs and incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. The Company also accrues for co-op marketing funds as a marketing expense if the Company receives an identifiable benefit in exchange and can reasonably estimate the fair value of the identifiable benefit received; otherwise, it is recorded as a reduction to revenues. |
Research and Development and Software Development Costs | Research and Development and Software Development Costs: |
The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. |
Software development costs incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are included in research and development costs as incurred. Eligible and material software development costs are capitalized upon the establishment of technological feasibility and before the general availability of such software products, including direct labor and related overhead costs, as well as stock-based compensation. The Company has defined technological feasibility as the establishment of a working model, which typically occurs when beta testing commences. The Company capitalized approximately $5.1 million and $2.4 million of development costs in 2014 and 2013, respectively, for software products to be marketed or sold to customers. There were no such costs capitalized in 2012 as the software development costs qualifying for capitalization were insignificant. The capitalized costs are included in “Other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized on a product-by-product basis using the straight-line method over the estimated product life, generally three years, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever is greater. Management believes that the capitalized software costs will be recoverable from future gross profits generated by these products. |
Advertising | Advertising: |
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $13.6 million, $14.9 million, and $22.3 million, respectively. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes: |
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when, based on available objective evidence, it is more likely than not that the benefit of such assets will not be realized. |
The Company recognizes and measures benefits for uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. For tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, the second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions. The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. Evaluations are based upon a number of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of audits and effective settlement of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in income tax expense in the period in which the change is made, which could have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate and operating results. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. |
Foreign Currency Translation | Foreign Currency Translation: |
Assets and liabilities of non-U.S subsidiaries, where that local currency is the functional currency, are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are directly recorded to a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign exchange transaction gains and losses from the remeasurement of non-functional currency denominated assets and liabilities have not been significant to date and are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as part of “Interest and other income (expense), net”. |
As a result of the sale of the Company’s former enterprise wireless voice solutions (the “EWS”) business in December 2012 (see Note 4), which included a wholly owned Danish subsidiary with a Danish Krone functional currency, the Company recognized the associated currency translation adjustment balance of $1.1 million which effectively reduced the gain from sale of the discontinued operations. |
The following table sets forth the change of foreign currency translation adjustments during each reporting period and the balances as of December 31 (in thousands): |
|
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 4,219 | | | $ | 3,180 | | | $ | 1,841 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (1,422 | ) | | | 1,039 | | | | 1,339 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 2,797 | | | $ | 4,219 | | | $ | 3,180 | |
|
Derivative Instruments | Derivative Instruments: |
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. For a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and is subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. The excluded and ineffective portions of the gain or loss are reported in earnings immediately. For derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the period of change. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. The Company enters into derivatives only with counterparties that are among the largest U.S. banks, ranked by assets, in order to minimize its credit risk. |
Net Income Per Share | Net Income Per Share: |
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the additional dilution from potential issuance of common stock, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options, unvested restricted stock units, and performance shares. Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share when their effect is antidilutive. |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements: |
The Company has certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value which have been classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, or identical or similar assets in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points for the asset or liability. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including its marketable securities and foreign currency contracts. |
The Company’s cash equivalents and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using inputs such as quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices for identical assets in active markets include money market funds. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include U.S. Treasury securities and other government agencies, corporate bonds and commercial paper. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 instruments are priced using quoted market prices for similar instruments or nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. |
The principal market where the Company executes its foreign currency contracts is the retail market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants and the Company’s counterparties are large money center banks and regional banks. The Company’s foreign currency contracts valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources such as spot rates, interest rate differentials rates and credit default rates, which do not involve management judgment. These contracts are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
In addition, the Company has facilities-related liabilities related to restructuring which were calculated based on the discounted future lease payments less sublease assumptions. This non-recurring fair value measurement is classified as a Level 3 measurement under ASC 820. The key assumptions used in the valuation model include discount rates, cash flow projections and estimated sublease income. These assumptions involve significant judgment, and are based on management’s estimate of current and forecasted market conditions and are sensitive and susceptible to change. The carrying amounts reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation: |
The Company’s stock-based compensation programs consist of grants of stock-based awards to employees and non-employee directors, including stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares, as well as purchase rights pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Stock-based compensation expense based on the estimated fair value of these awards is charged to operations over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, including the effect of forfeitures. |
The fair value of stock option and ESPP awards is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of a performance share with a market condition is estimated on the date of award, using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the total return ranking of the Company’s stock in relation to the target index of companies over each performance period. Stock-based compensation cost on performance shares with a market condition is not adjusted for subsequent changes regardless of the level of ultimate vesting. |
Recent Pronouncements | Recent Pronouncements: |
In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update which simplifies income statement classification by removing the concept of extraordinary items from the US GAAP. As a result, items that are both unusual and infrequent will no longer be separately reported net of tax after continuing operations. The new standard is effective for the fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect any impact on the adoption of this standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update related to the disclosures around going concern. The new standard provides guidance around management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The new standard is effective for the annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company does not expect any impact on the adoption of this standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements. |
In July 2013, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which clarifies that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. In situations where a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require, and the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The guidance is effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company adopted the guidance in 2014, and such adoption did not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements. |