UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006
Commission File Number: 0-28426
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | | No. 41-1833089 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | | (IRS Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) | | Identification No.) |
| | |
5353 Nathan Lane | | |
Plymouth, MN | | 55442 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(763) 553-9300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer x | | Non-Accelerated Filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of August 4, 2006 was 33,332,412 shares.
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 33,058 | | $ | 42,585 | | $ | 69,284 | | $ | 84,766 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | | 28,272 | | 39,269 | | 61,822 | | 79,654 | |
Gross profit | | 4,786 | | 3,316 | | 7,462 | | 5,112 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 8,661 | | 9,734 | | 17,779 | | 19,961 | |
Restructuring costs | | — | | 2,179 | | 874 | | 2,409 | |
Litigation reserve adjustment | | — | | (415 | ) | — | | (2,245 | ) |
Total operating costs and expenses | | 8,661 | | 11,498 | | 18,653 | | 20,125 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | (3,875 | ) | (8,182 | ) | (11,191 | ) | (15,013 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | 476 | | 378 | | 895 | | 722 | |
Other income (expense), net | | (118 | ) | 43 | | 49 | | 49 | |
Loss before income taxes | | (3,517 | ) | (7,761 | ) | (10,247 | ) | (14,242 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | (98 | ) | (2,082 | ) | 93 | | (4,415 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (3,419 | ) | (5,679 | ) | $ | (10,340 | ) | $ | (9,827 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.11 | ) | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.11 | ) | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 32,488 | | 32,632 | | 32,485 | | 32,623 | |
Dilutive effect of stock options | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Diluted | | 32,488 | | 32,632 | | 32,485 | | 32,623 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
| | June 30, 2006 | | December 30, 2005 | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 42,014 | | $ | 45,250 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $475 in 2006 and $515 in 2005 | | 21,775 | | 26,823 | |
Inventories, net | | 9,452 | | 13,978 | |
Other current assets | | 2,521 | | 2,409 | |
Total current assets | | 75,762 | | 88,460 | |
| | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | 22,133 | | 24,504 | |
| | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities | | 1,890 | | 2,091 | |
| | | | | |
Other long-term assets | | 117 | | 117 | |
| | $ | 99,902 | | $ | 115,172 | |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 8,765 | | $ | 14,709 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 10,053 | | 11,538 | |
Total current liabilities | | 18,818 | | 26,247 | |
| | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | 271 | | 211 | |
| | | | | |
Other long-term liabilities | | 67 | | 106 | |
Total liabilities | | 19,156 | | 26,564 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | |
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 32,492 and 32,425 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005, respectively | | 63,252 | | 62,248 | |
Retained earnings | | 10,375 | | 20,715 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 7,119 | | 5,645 | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | 80,746 | | 88,608 | |
| | $ | 99,902 | | $ | 115,172 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
Operating activities: | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (10,340 | ) | $ | (9,827 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 3,683 | | 4,178 | |
Change in deferred taxes | | 55 | | (4,819 | ) |
Change in litigation reserves | | — | | (2,245 | ) |
Share based compensation expense | | 878 | | — | |
Non-cash restructuring charges | | — | | 852 | |
Gain on disposal of assets during restructuring | | (122 | ) | — | |
Other, net | | 56 | | — | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 5,638 | | 11,683 | |
Inventories | | 4,762 | | (597 | ) |
Other assets and liabilities | | 106 | | 2,798 | |
Accounts payable | | (6,181 | ) | (5,380 | ) |
Accrued expenses | | (1,597 | ) | (561 | ) |
Income taxes | | (202 | ) | 258 | |
Net cash used by operating activities | | (3,264 | ) | (3,660 | ) |
| | | | | |
Investing activities: | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | (410 | ) | (2,296 | ) |
Purchases of available for sale securities | | — | | (14,500 | ) |
Sale of available-for-sale securities | | — | | 33,700 | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | (410 | ) | 16,904 | |
| | | | | |
Financing activities: | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock | | 125 | | 289 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | 125 | | 289 | |
| | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | 313 | | (496 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | (3,236 | ) | 13,037 | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 45,250 | | 41,092 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 42,014 | | $ | 54,129 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. GENERAL
Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information furnished in the consolidated financial statements includes all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur for the entire fiscal year.
Fiscal Quarters. Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar year. Our fiscal quarters referenced herein refer to the periods ended June 30, 2006, December 30, 2005, and July 1, 2005.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In November 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing”, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2006 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued as of the grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. The Statement eliminates the alternative method of accounting for employee share-based payments previously available under APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS 123(R) became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2006 and is further discussed in Note 3.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” The new standard changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Among other changes, SFAS No. 154 requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior period financial statements presented based on the new accounting principle unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 also provides that (1) a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived non-financial asset be accounted for as a change in estimate (prospectively) that was effected by a change in accounting principle, and (2) correction of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.” The new standard is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement in the first quarter of 2006 did not have a material impact on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In September 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached consensus on Issue No. 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty” (EITF 04-13), which addresses the circumstances under which two or more inventory purchase and sales transactions with the same counterparty should be viewed as a single exchange transaction within the scope of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” for new arrangements entered into, or modifications or renewals of existing arrangements, beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after March 15, 2006. The adoption of this consensus in the second quarter of 2006 did not have a material impact on the Company’s overall results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and it seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of measurement and recognition in accounting for income taxes. In addition, FIN 48 requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes and is effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that FIN 48 will have on our financial statements.
6
NOTE 2. OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
Inventories (in thousands):
| | June 30, 2006 | | December 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 5,149 | | $ | 8,197 | |
Work in process | | 278 | | 443 | |
Finished goods | | 4,025 | | 5,338 | |
| | $ | 9,452 | | $ | 13,978 | |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (in thousands):
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
Cash paid for: | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 2 | | $ | — | |
Income taxes | | — | | 174 | |
Non-cash transactions: | | | | | |
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes of $0 in 2006 and $913 in 2005 | | (202 | ) | (1,534 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Loss. The table below presents our comprehensive loss, defined as changes in shareholders’ equity excluding changes resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,419 | ) | $ | (5,679 | ) | $ | (10,340 | ) | $ | (9,827 | ) |
Unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred taxes of $0 in 2006 and $913 in 2005 | | (524 | ) | (310 | ) | (202 | ) | (1,534 | ) |
Translation adjustments | | 1,427 | | (1,752 | ) | 1,675 | | (2,936 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (2,516 | ) | $ | (7,741 | ) | $ | (8,867 | ) | $ | (14,297 | ) |
7
NOTE 3. SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
Effective in the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires all share-based payments, including grants of restricted stock and stock options, to be recognized in the income statement as an operating expense, based on their fair values over the requisite service period. The Company recorded $499,000 and $877,000 of related compensation expense, before taxes, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The compensation expense reduced both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 for the three month period ended June 30, 2006. Stock based compensation expense reduced both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.03 for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, $1,272,970 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 4.0 years. Also, as of June 30, 2006, $851,185 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested restricted stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.5 years.
Prior to adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The Company has applied the modified prospective method in adopting SFAS 123(R). Accordingly, periods prior to adoption have not been restated. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value method had been applied to the three and six months ended July 1, 2005.
| | Three months ended July 1, 2005 | | Six months ended July 1, 2005 | |
Net Loss: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | (5,679 | ) | $ | (9,827 | ) |
Deduct: Stock-based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax | | (177 | ) | (424 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | (5,856 | ) | $ | (10,251 | ) |
| | | | | |
Basic Loss per Share: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) |
| | | | | |
Diluted Loss per Share: | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) |
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options. The weighted average assumptions used in these calculations are summarized below:
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 5.16 | % | 3.01 | % | 4.8 | % | 3.01 | % |
Expected life of options granted, in years | | 6.8 | | 5.7 | | 6.7 | | 5.7 | |
Expected volatility of options granted | | 60.5 | % | 92.1 | % | 61.0 | % | 92.1 | % |
Weighted average fair value of options granted | | $ | 1.75 | | $ | 3.00 | | $ | 1.88 | | $ | 2.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Through year-end 2005, we had an employee stock purchase plan that enabled our employees to contribute up to 10 percent of their compensation toward the purchase of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the lower of 85 percent of fair market value as of the beginning or end of each plan period. A total of approximately 2,549,359 shares had been reserved for issuance under this plan. Our employee stock purchase plan was terminated effective December 30, 2005.
Stock Option Plans. We have a 1996 Stock Option Plan (the “1996 Plan”) that provides for the granting of stock options to employees, officers, directors and independent consultants at exercise prices not less than 100 percent of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. These options, which can be either incentive stock options or nonqualified options, vest over a three to five-year schedule and expire 10 years after the grant date. The authorized number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1996 Plan total 6,400,000.
We also have a 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) that provides for the granting of stock awards to employees, officers, directors and independent consultants. These awards, which can either be incentive stock options, restricted stock or nonqualified options, vest over a one to five-year schedule unless performance based and expire 10 years after the grant date. Exercise prices for stock options granted under the 2004 Plan will not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The authorized number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan total 2,000,000.
We have also issued nonqualified stock options to our employees outside of these Plans for the purchase of 1,659,350 shares of common stock. These options were issued at the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and vest over a four to five-year schedule.
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value of the option shares outstanding and the option shares exercisable was $9.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively.
Information regarding all stock option activity during the six month period ended June 30, 2006 is summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 | |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| | | | | |
Options outstanding, beginning of period | | 3,511 | | $ | 4.08 | |
Granted | | 86 | | 1.92 | |
Exercised | | (8 | ) | 1.69 | |
Canceled | | (448 | ) | 4.90 | |
Options outstanding, end of period | | 3,141 | | $ | 4.02 | |
| | | | | |
Options exercisable, end of period | | 1,974 | | $ | 4.55 | |
Information regarding all outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2006 is summarized as follows (shares in thousands):
| | | | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Prices | | | | Weighted Average Remaining | | Weighted Average | | | | Weighted Average | |
Low | | High | | Shares | | Life (in years) | | Exercise Price | | Shares | | Exercise Price | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$ 1.13 | | $ | 2.86 | | 834 | | 5.7 | | $ | 2.21 | | 528 | | $ | 2.22 | |
2.87 | | 5.71 | | 1,494 | | 7.7 | | 3.62 | | 638 | | 3.84 | |
5.72 | | 8.57 | | 781 | | 4.8 | | 6.04 | | 776 | | 6.04 | |
8.58 | | 22.85 | | 32 | | 3.8 | | 20.94 | | 32 | | 20.94 | |
| | | | 3,141 | | 6.4 | | $ | 4.02 | | 1,974 | | $ | 4.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Stock Awards. The Company has entered into restricted stock agreements with certain key employees, covering the issuance of Common Stock (“Restricted Stock”). The Restricted Stock will vest upon certain time or performance specifications but will be forfeited if the employee is not employed by the Company at the time of vesting. The compensation expense has been recognized for the estimated fair value of the 840,000 common shares and is being charged to income over their respective vesting terms. Stock compensation expense recognized related to these awards totaled $206,000 during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and $0 for the three and six month periods ended July 1, 2005.
9
NOTE 4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
Our long-term investment in available-for-sale securities consists of approximately 309,000 shares of Intraware common stock (NASDAQ symbol: ITRA). The market value of our investment in Intraware was $1,890,000 as of June 30, 2006 and $2,091,000 as of December 30, 2005.
10
NOTE 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we have been the subject of an SEC investigation and a consolidated class action lawsuit involving allegations of securities law violations. The allegations related to Company disclosures and certain stock sales by two former officers during the third quarter of the year 2000.
On April 27, 2005, we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit. This stipulation of settlement received Court approval on September 6, 2005 and resulted in a settlement of $2,250,000 in cash and 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the class. The entire $2,250,000 cash payment was paid by proceeds received from our directors’ and officers’ insurance carrier. The settlement payments will be distributed to shareholders who incurred losses as a result of stock purchases between May 25, 2000 and October 18, 2002, inclusive, and to plaintiffs’ attorneys as fees and costs awarded by the Court. As of December 30, 2005, the cash portion of this settlement has been paid. The charge against earnings associated with the issuance of the 1,500,000 shares of stock was initially recorded in the third quarter of 2004, and the charge continued to be adjusted based on the market price of the Company’s stock until final Court approval of the settlement was granted on September 6, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, 375,000 of these shares have been issued.
On June 9, 2005, we announced that the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company paid a civil penalty in the amount of $2,000,000 to the SEC during our third quarter of 2005.
We have established a reserve of $3,353,000 for the stock portion of this matter which we believe to be adequate and is based on the terms of the settlement agreements and the provisions of FASB Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5”. The remaining liability represents 1,125,000 shares to be distributed valued at the closing price of $2.98 on September 6, 2005, the date of final court approval of the settlement.
We are involved in certain other claims arising in the normal course of business. In our opinion, the final resolution of these claims should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flow or results from operations.
11
NOTE 6. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
We operate in one industry segment. The geographic distributions of our revenue, operating income (loss), capital expenditures, depreciation and identifiable assets for 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 25,234 | | $ | 31,055 | | $ | 50,416 | | $ | 62,943 | |
Ireland | | 6,771 | | 6,669 | | 13,781 | | 14,700 | |
Canada | | 10,266 | | 11,770 | | 21,014 | | 18,676 | |
Intergeographic sales | | (9,213 | ) | (6,909 | ) | (15,927 | ) | (11,553 | ) |
| | $ | 33,058 | | $ | 42,585 | | $ | 69,284 | | $ | 84,766 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating (loss) income: | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | (915 | ) | $ | (1,676 | ) | $ | (3,923 | ) | $ | (3,806 | ) |
Ireland | | 311 | | (2,809 | ) | 623 | | (4,751 | ) |
Canada | | 755 | | 160 | | 1,364 | | (70 | ) |
Corporate and eliminations | | (4,026 | ) | (3,857 | ) | (9,255 | ) | (6,386 | ) |
| | $ | (3,875 | ) | $ | (8,182 | ) | $ | (11,191 | ) | $ | (15,013 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures: | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 170 | | $ | 398 | | $ | 288 | | $ | 697 | |
Ireland | | 7 | | — | | 24 | | 192 | |
Canada | | 32 | | 1,349 | | 98 | | 1,407 | |
| | $ | 209 | | $ | 1,747 | | $ | 410 | | $ | 2,296 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation: | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 957 | | $ | 1,154 | | $ | 1,970 | | $ | 2,332 | |
Ireland | | 189 | | 415 | | 380 | | 914 | |
Canada | | 700 | | 465 | | 1,333 | | 932 | |
| | $ | 1,846 | | $ | 2,034 | | $ | 3,683 | | $ | 4,178 | |
| | As of June 30, 2006 | | As of December 30, 2005 | |
Assets: | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 22,038 | | $ | 34,486 | |
Ireland | | 15,185 | | 13,700 | |
Canada | | 22,703 | | 20,193 | |
Total identifiable assets | | 59,926 | | 68,379 | |
| | | | | |
Corporate assets and eliminations | | 39,976 | | 46,793 | |
| | $ | 99,902 | | $ | 115,172 | |
12
NOTE 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On August 8, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Inomax, a Delaware limited liability company (Inomax), and Zomax Merger Corp., a Minnesota corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Inomax (“Subcorp”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Subcorp will be merged with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Inomax (the “Merger”). Inomax is owned by Comvest Investment Partners II, LLC. At the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company, other than any shares held by shareholders who perfect their rights as dissenting shareholders under the Minnesota Business Corporation Act, will be converted into the right to receive $2.09 in cash. In addition, each outstanding option to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock granted pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive plans will be cancelled and the holder of the option will be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal to the amount, if any, by which $2.09 exceeds the exercise price of the option.
Completion of the Merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including but not limited to (i) approval of the Company’s shareholders, (ii) expiration of the Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period, (iii) the maintenance of certain minimum net working capital and cash requirements and (iv) the absence of any law or order prohibiting or enjoining completion of the Merger. In addition, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is subject to certain other conditions, including (i) the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party and (ii) material compliance of the other party with its covenants. While there is no guarantee, the parties currently expect that the Merger will be completed late in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Project Clarion
On August 1, 2006 the Company announced that it had closed on the previously announced joint venture agreement with MPO Ireland commencing the consolidation of both parties’ manufacturing operations in Ireland. We expect to record a cash restructuring charge associated with the planned closure of our Clondalkin facility of approximately $1.9 million or $0.06 per share, of which we expect approximately $1.3 million or $0.04 per share would be recorded in the third quarter 2006.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Quarter-End
Our fiscal quarters consist of 13-weeks ending on a Friday so that our fiscal year ends on the last Friday of the calendar year. Our fiscal quarters referenced herein refer to the periods ended June 30, 2006, December 30, 2005 and July 1, 2005.
Introduction and Overview
Second quarter 2006 revenues of $33.1 million reflect a 22% decrease from revenues of $42.6 million in the second quarter of 2005. Revenue decreased primarily as a result of the previously disclosed trend of our customers implementing program changes and content reductions primarily in the PC/OEM segment, along with a comparison to prior year quarter that included a major customer launch of a new operating system. The PC/OEM ongoing trend has also impacted our year-to-date revenue performance compared to 2005. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, revenue declined 18% to $69.3 million compared to $84.8 million in 2005.
The company has taken several actions to reduce its cost base. We reduced SG&A expenses by 11% (16% exclusive of SFAS 123(R) stock option expenses recorded in 2006) and fixed manufacturing costs by 27% in the second quarter of 2006 versus the second quarter of 2005.
The company posted a $3.9 million operating loss in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to an $8.2 million operating loss in the second quarter of 2005. Operating loss was $11.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a 26% decrease from $15.0 million operating loss last year. Included in the year to date 2006 loss were $0.9 of restructuring costs associated with the closure of our Fremont, CA facility and $0.9 million in non-cash stock option expenses associated with the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123(R). Included in the 2005 loss were $2.4 million of restructuring costs for the Company’s Ireland subsidiary and a $2.2 million benefit due to the revaluation of the stock component of the litigation reserve.
Globalization, customization and shorter product lifecycles are resulting in significantly increased supply chain complexity. Companies are also looking to consolidate the number of outsource providers they use to drive improved integration, visibility and efficiency with their remaining partners. We believe our Program Management model will scale more easily with this rapid growth and change in our customers’ supply chains and allow them to consolidate suppliers without sacrificing best-in-class capabilities. This model also results in a lower fixed cost and less asset intensive structure which we believe will result in higher operating leverage and increased flexibility to change within a market or to migrate to new markets segments in the future. We have identified existing and potential new customers which will roll into this new business model over the upcoming quarters.
Our existing business continues to be focused on CD and DVD media replication services and related assembly, distribution and contact center services which we deliver primarily through Company-owned or leased facilities. Our goal is to evolve into a less vertically integrated model in which we will deliver a more comprehensive supply chain solution for our customers along with lower fixed costs and capital tied up in assets for the Company. As our relationships with our customers evolve, we believe many of these customers will place greater value on our ability to program manage their end-to-end supply chain and less emphasis on our ability to directly deliver those services.
We began a restructuring plan in 2005 which eliminated over 33% of our CD replication capacity. While this restructuring plan was primarily aimed at reducing this capacity and its related costs, it also represents a move toward less dependency on Company-owned assets in the delivery of our services and will result in a greater dependence on outsourcing this volume in peak demand periods. We expect to continue to evolve our strategy of increasing our emphasis on the value we provide our customers through our program management capabilities, with less dependency on Company-owned production assets in delivering those services.
We will continue our drive to reduce operating losses via cost reductions in operations and general overhead. For growth we will be aggressively pursuing new revenue opportunities in existing and new industry verticals.
14
General Factors Affecting Our Financial Results
Revenue. We derive our revenues from a wide variety of supply chain services provided to our customers. The number of CD and DVD media units that we replicate for our customers, changes in pricing, changes in the composition of the products and services we provide, consumer demand for our customers’ products, seasonal consumer buying patterns, and changes in the mix of customers we serve, are all factors that contribute to changes in our revenues from period to period. In addition, a significant portion of revenue from our larger customers is derived from individually large product programs within these customers. As a result, our revenues can be materially sensitive to decisions customers make with respect to these individual programs. Revenues are generally more favorably impacted when our mix of customers is weighted toward those who are using a broad range of our services. Bundled pricing, changes in the content of the products we make for our customers, and other dynamics make it difficult to precisely determine the impact each of these factors has on changes in our total revenue.
Gross Profit Percentage. Our gross profit percentage has become more volatile as media replication becomes a commodity product. A number of other factors impact this percentage as well. Market pressure from the PC and software industry is pushing down pricing thereby squeezing margins from the revenue side while inputs such as polycarbonate increase in cost and apply upward pressure through cost of goods. Due to our high fixed cost base, decreases in revenue unfavorably impact our gross profit percentage as we cannot quickly adjust these costs to be more in line with revenue. In addition to these factors, some of our labor and material costs are incurred in Ireland and Canada and changes in the respective foreign currency rates can cause our expenses reported in U.S. dollars to fluctuate.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses. A substantial portion of our SG&A expenses are fixed in nature. However, certain components such as incentive compensation, professional services, travel and other expenses can vary based on business results, individual events, or initiatives we may be pursuing at various times throughout the year. In addition to these factors, some of our SG&A expenses are incurred in Ireland and Canada and changes in the respective foreign currency rates can cause our expenses reported in U.S. dollars to fluctuate.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes certain key information to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of results of operations.
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | | June 30, 2006 | | July 1, 2005 | |
Percent of Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 14.5 | % | 7.8 | % | 10.8 | % | 6.0 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | 26.2 | | 22.9 | | 25.7 | | 23.5 | |
Restructuring costs | | — | | 5.1 | | 1.3 | | 2.8 | |
Litigation reserve adjustment | | — | | (1.0 | ) | — | | (2.6 | ) |
Operating loss | | (11.7 | ) | (19.2 | ) | (16.2 | ) | (17.7 | ) |
Other income, net | | 1.1 | | 1.0 | | 1.4 | | 0.9 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | 0.3 | | (4.9 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (5.2 | ) |
Net loss | | (10.3 | ) | (13.3 | ) | (14.9 | ) | (11.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other Operating Statistics: | | | | | | | | | |
Media units sold -% change from prior year period | | (23.2 | )% | (21.8 | )% | (27.7 | )% | (20.4 | )% |
Revenue -% change from prior year period | | (22.4 | )% | (5.5 | )% | (18.3 | )% | (10.9 | )% |
SG&A expenses -% change from prior year period | | (11.0 | )% | 0.1 | % | (10.9 | )% | 4.9 | % |
Effective tax rate | | 2.8 | % | 26.8 | % | (0.9 | )% | 31.0 | % |
15
Revenue
Our second quarter 2006 revenue was $33.1 million representing a 22% decrease from revenue of $42.6 million in the second quarter of 2005. Media unit volume decreased 23% over the same period contributing to our revenue decline. In addition to the prior year quarter which included a major customer launch of a new operating system, the decrease in revenue and media units sold is primarily the result of the following general business factors:
· Customer media reduction initiatives;
· Generally softer demand from our PC/OEM customers reflecting program and content changes;
· Increased pricing pressures; and
· Content shifts from CD media to DVD media by certain customers.
Our volumes with Microsoft and Dell continue to drive significant amounts of our overall revenue. Business with Microsoft, which remains our largest customer, generated approximately 28% of our total revenue in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 26% in 2005. Revenue with Dell comprised approximately 16% of our total revenue in the second quarter of 2006 compared to 17% of our total revenue in the second quarter of 2005. A third customer accounted for approximately 11% and 14% of our second quarter consolidated total revenue in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Gross Profit
Our reported second quarter gross profit percentage increased 6.7 points from 7.8% in 2005 to 14.5% in 2006. The increase is primarily attributable to a favorable sales mix complemented by strong operational performance in the second quarter of 2006, which may not be repeated in subsequent quarters, lower fixed costs as a percentage of revenue driven by various cost actions undertaken over the past year and operational efficiencies in our Ireland manufacturing facility. Since the first quarter of 2004, petroleum price increases and supply shortages have put significant upward pressure on the price of polycarbonate and freight.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
SG&A expenses in the second quarter decreased $1.0 million or 11% from $9.7 million in 2005 to $8.7 million in 2006. Our professional fees for the second quarter of 2006 decreased approximately $0.9 million over the same period in 2005 as a result of reduced audit work for the previously disclosed 2004 Ireland restatement and related controls testing for Sarbanes Oxley compliance. Our second quarter 2006 SG&A expense includes $499,000 of non-cash stock option expenses pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Excluding non-cash stock option expenses and nonrecurring items, SG&A decreased $1.6 million or 16% versus the same period in 2005.
Restructuring Costs
In the second quarter of 2005, we began to implement an operational plan aimed at reducing cost to more closely align our fixed cost infrastructure with our revenue base. In conjunction with this plan we had incurred $2.4 million in restructuring costs in the second quarter of 2005. No additional restructuring costs were incurred in second quarter of 2006.
16
Litigation Reserve Adjustment
As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, we have been the subject of an SEC investigation and a consolidated class action lawsuit involving allegations of securities law violations. The allegations related to Company disclosures and certain stock sales by two former officers during the third quarter of the year 2000.
On April 27, 2005, we announced, without admission of liability, an agreement to settle the outstanding class action lawsuit. This stipulation of settlement received Court approval on September 6, 2005 and resulted in a settlement of $2,250,000 in cash and 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the class. The entire $2,250,000 cash payment was paid by proceeds received from our directors’ and officers’ insurance carrier. The settlement payments will be distributed to shareholders who incurred losses as a result of stock purchases between May 25, 2000 and October 18, 2002, inclusive, and to plaintiffs’ attorneys as fees and costs awarded by the Court. As of December 30, 2005, the cash portion of this settlement has been paid. The charge against earnings associated with the issuance of the 1,500,000 shares of stock was initially recorded in the third quarter of 2004, and the charge continued to be adjusted based on the market price of the Company’s stock until final Court approval of the settlement was granted on September 6, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, 375,000 of these shares have been issued.
On June 9, 2005, we announced that the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company paid a civil penalty in the amount of $2,000,000 to the SEC during our third quarter of 2005.
We have established a reserve of $3,353,000 for the stock portion of this matter which we believe to be adequate and is based on the terms of the settlement agreements and the provisions of FASB Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and FASB Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5”. The remaining liability represents 1,125,000 shares to be distributed valued at the closing price of $2.98 on September 6, 2005, the date of final court approval of the settlement.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. For a detailed description of our critical accounting policies, see the notes to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005. There have been no changes in critical accounting policies subsequent to December 30, 2005 other than the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) as discussed in note 3.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)” included in Item 1 herein for a discussion of new accounting standards.
17
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Available-for-Sale Securities. As of June 30, 2006, cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities totaled $42.0 million, a decrease of $3.2 million from December 30, 2005. Year to date cash flows used in operating activities totaled $3.2 million. Capital expenditures totaling $0.4 million were offset by $0.4 million in foreign exchange gains and stock issuance proceeds. The company did not purchase any shares under its authorized share buyback program in the second quarter of 2006.
Working Capital and Liquidity. Working capital totaled $56.8 million and $62.2 million at June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively. This decrease primarily reflects the general impact to working capital of our year to date operating losses. Our principal source of working capital continues to be cash and cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale securities. In addition to our working capital balances, we also hold long term available-for-sale securities which represent our investment in Intraware (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). These securities are registered and readily tradable and had a market value at June 30, 2006 of $1.9 million.
Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, the level of cash operating losses, the need for additional restructuring actions, the timing of capital expenditures, expenditures in connection with possible acquisitions or investments, proceeds from sale of assets, changes in customer order volume, the timing and collection of receivables and the level of share repurchases under the approved stock buyback program. With $42.0 million in cash and no debt, we believe that existing cash and investment balances will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. The company has taken and intends to continue to take action to rationalize its cost structure and lower its cash operating losses and will be managing capital expenditures tightly, while evaluating other opportunities to free up cash from its assets.
Contractual Obligations. During the third quarter of 2005, we entered into an agreement with our supplier of polycarbonate, a petroleum-based commodity, which is the primary raw material used in the production of CD and DVD media. Under the agreement, which ended in June 2006, we agreed to purchase polycarbonate at minimum volumes and set price terms. Minimum remaining commitments for 2006, under this agreement are approximately $280,000 based on the current adjusted base price and minimum remaining quantity.
18
Outlook
Our business in 2006 continues to be dependent on a small number of key customers in the PC hardware and software industries. Accordingly, our operating results are influenced by the changes and volatility in these industries and the macroeconomic factors that influence the demand for personal computer hardware and software. Furthermore, significant portions of our revenue from these customers are derived from individually large product programs within these customers. As a result, our revenues can be materially sensitive to decisions customers make with respect to these individual programs. As previously discussed in our filings with the SEC, we were informed of changes to certain programs we support for several of our large customers that would result in noticeable future declines in the level of business we currently had with these customers. These changes include elimination of certain recovery media and printed materials from some of the new PC’s sold by our PC/OEM customers, migration to a new service delivery system operated by a competitor and moving CD and DVD media production internally. While there may be an opportunity to offset some of this decline with program expansion in other segments of our business with some of our PC/OEM customers, we are not assured of the timing or size of those opportunities. The potential negative effect on our business of these customer driven changes will continue to impact much of this year.In addition to these and other market changes, our customers continue to demand general pricing decreases in the services we provide. Our ability to grow or achieve consistent levels of revenue may be impacted by our ability or willingness to perform our services at prices acceptable to the market place.
Finally, we have experienced operating losses in the recent past, including 2005. While our balance sheet remains strong and we have taken aggressive actions to address our operating losses; continued operating losses raise potential concerns with new and existing customers that could result in them not awarding us new business or moving some or all of their business to an alternative provider.
While we continue to make efforts to expand our base of customers both within and outside the PC hardware and software industries, these initial customer opportunities tend to be smaller, making it very unlikely that we could quickly recover from the loss of one of our key customers through the acquisition of several new customers.
We continue to face significant costs and resource constraints in connection with our compliance with the necessary reporting, compliance and administrative aspects of a public company. These requirements drive additional SG&A costs for professional services, both legal and accounting, governance, and management time to support all of the additional legislation imposed on public companies. Many of our competitors are not public entities or are larger public entities, and the related impact of complying with these requirements can affect our ability to perform competitively.
The Company began a restructuring plan in the second quarter of 2005 with the goal of moving towards profitability at lower revenue levels. A variety of actions were taken including the closure of our Fremont, CA facility in the first quarter of 2006. These actions have benefited the Company’s financial performance in the second quarter of 2006.
19
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “possible,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “forecast” and similar words or expressions. Our forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including but not limited to the following:
· Our ability to successfully execute our plans to achieve our goal of profitability at lower revenue levels than we experienced in 2005;
· The negative effect on our revenues of our PC/OEM customers’ continuing initiatives to eliminate certain recovery CDs and print material from some of their new PC shipments, coupled with the opportunity to offset some of this effect with new business from those customers;
· The negative effect on our revenues of the previously discussed announcement by one of our major customers to expand their internal media production capabilities;
· The strength of our customer relationships, the related impact on our ability to retain such customers and our ability to develop new customers in the future;
· Our ability to execute our restructuring activities and the impact of such activities on our goals of cost reduction and profitability;
· Our ability to transition our business model to one that is less vertically integrated and more dependent on strategic supplier partnerships without disrupting service levels to our customers;
· The impact of polycarbonate and other raw material price increases on our gross profit margins and our ability to pass these price increases on to our customers;
· Our general expectations about our ability to meet the challenges of our business;
· The impact on our revenues resulting from our ability or willingness to perform our services at prices required by or mandated by our customers;
· The sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for our future liquidity and capital resource needs;
· Our competitive position relative to other companies providing similar services;
· Our ability to retain key executive, management and technical personnel through our transition;
· Our relationships more generally with our employees and managing turnover while the company transitions service models;
· The potential negative impact on profitability due to the growing pricing pressure from competitors;
· The potential threat caused by the development and rate of market acceptance of new media storage techniques or other electronic technologies on the need for CD and DVD media in the PC hardware and software industries;
· The growth opportunities associated with our efforts to broaden our customer base outside our traditional markets;
· �� Achievement of long-term benefits associated with necessary investments in our business;
· Our transition to the new Program Management model and its potential impact on customers, financial results and operations; and
· Our forecast of revenues and net loss per share in the second half of 2006 and beyond.
20
15604-1-bk.doc - Signatures_141434
We caution that any forward-looking statements made by us in this report or in other announcements made by us are qualified by important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following listing of risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. The risks and uncertainties described below may be amended, supplemented or superseded from time to time by other reports we file with the SEC in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the changes and volatility in the personal computer hardware and software industry, particularly with respect to the demand for CD and DVD media, from which a significant portion of our revenues are derived; macroeconomic factors that influence the demand for personal computer hardware and software and the resulting demand for our services; consolidation among our customers or competitors, which could cause disruption in our customer relationships or displacement of us as a services provider to one or more customers; our ability to make the proper strategic choices with respect to pursing profitable growth in our business; increased competition within our industry and increased pricing pressure from our customers; the volatility of petroleum prices which affect our costs including polycarbonate prices; our dependence on relatively few customers for a majority of our revenues; fluctuations in our operating results from quarter-to-quarter, which are influenced by many factors outside of our control, including variations in the demand for particular services we offer or the content included in the products we produce for our customers; the potential negative impact on our customer relationships as we transition their production to other locations or attempt to execute pricing strategies that are not acceptable to the market place, our ability to accurately predict the amount of time and cost required to fully complete our restructuring plan, our ability to retain key employees during and subsequent to the execution of these restructuring activities. These and other risks and uncertainties are discussed in detail under the caption “Risks and Uncertainties” in Item 1 of our 2005 Form 10-K captioned as follows:
· We are dependent on a small number of key customers in the personal computer (PC) hardware and software industries.
· We may not be able to maintain our status as a Microsoft Authorized Replicator.
· Evolution to a less vertically integrated business model.
· We may not be able to effectively compete in an increasingly competitive environment.
· Beginning in the first half of 2004, supply shortages and petroleum price increases have placed significant upward pressures on the price of polycarbonate, certain other raw materials and freight costs.
· We may not be able to meet our customers’ requirements regarding the security of their intellectual property, inventory and other assets.
· We are dependent on revenues from the replication of CD and DVD media which may be threatened by the development and rate of market acceptance of new media storage techniques or other electronic media technologies.
· Restructuring to move towards profitability.
· Limited visibility to customer demand.
· We are subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuations.
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements we make in this report due to new information or future events. Investors are advised to consult any further disclosures we make on this subject in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results.
21
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency. A portion of our operations are located in Ireland and Canada. A majority of the revenue from our Canadian operations, and a portion of the related costs, are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, our exposure to the Canadian currency results primarily from Canadian dollar denominated expenses. The majority of revenues and related costs in our Ireland operations are denominated in Euros. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reflected in our financial statements and historically have not been material to our results of operations or financial condition. However, we anticipate we will continue to incur exchange gains and losses from foreign operations in the future which may be significant depending on factors such as changes in foreign currency or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. In addition, sales of our products and services may be directly impacted by the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies.
22
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure controls and procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, the disclosure controls and procedures for Zomax Incorporated were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
(b) Change in internal control over financial reporting
The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during its most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
23
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 5 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In addition to the proceedings described in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report, we are a party to various other suits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business and we intend to vigorously defend them. The amount of monetary liability, if any, resulting from an adverse outcome in any of such suits, proceedings and claims in which we are a defendant cannot be determined at this time. However, in the opinion of our management, the aggregate amount of liability under these other suits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On June 30, 2006, the Company entered into an Amendment to the Replication Agreement dated July 1, 2005 with Microsoft Licensing, GP to extend the term of the agreement to August 31, 2006. The Amendment is filed as Exhibit 10.4 to this Form 10-Q and is incorporated by reference herein as appropriate.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed with this Report:
10.1 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Anthony Angelini
10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Michael L. Miller
10.3 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Richard. D. Barnes
10.4 Amendment to Replication Agreement dated June 30, 2006 with Microsoft Licensing, GP
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
24
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 9, 2006 | | ZOMAX INCORPORATED |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Anthony Angelini |
| | Anthony Angelini, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Richard Barnes |
| | Richard Barnes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
25
EXHIBIT INDEX
ZOMAX INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | |
10.1 | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Anthony Angelini |
10.2 | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Michael L. Miller |
10.3 | | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2006 with Richard D. Barnes |
10.4 | | Amendment to Replication Agreement dated June 30, 2006 with Microsoft Licensing, GP |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
26