Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 0-28402
Aradigm Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 94-3133088 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3929 Point Eden Way
Hayward, CA 94545
Hayward, CA 94545
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
(510) 265-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, no par value (Class) | 72,590,238 (Outstanding at July 31, 2005) |
ARADIGM CORPORATION
INDEX
INDEX
1
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Condensed Financial Statements
ARADIGM CORPORATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note 1) | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 37,372 | $ | 14,308 | ||||
Short-term investments | 7,447 | 2,455 | ||||||
Receivables | 749 | 99 | ||||||
Current portion of notes receivable from officers and employees | 61 | 67 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1,158 | 1,602 | ||||||
Total current assets | 46,787 | 18,531 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 7,966 | 60,555 | ||||||
Noncurrent portion of notes receivable from officers and employees | 192 | 216 | ||||||
Other assets | 557 | 439 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 55,502 | $ | 79,741 | ||||
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,221 | $ | 2,469 | ||||
Accrued clinical and cost of other studies | 153 | 293 | ||||||
Accrued compensation | 3,131 | 2,984 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | — | 7,525 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 389 | 1,138 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 5,894 | 14,409 | ||||||
Noncurrent portion of deferred revenue | — | 3,966 | ||||||
Noncurrent portion of deferred rent | 606 | 1,943 | ||||||
Commitments | ||||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding shares: 1,544,626 at June 30, 2005 and at December 31, 2004; liquidation preference of $37,380 at June 30, 2005 and at December 31, 2004 | 23,669 | 23,669 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value; 150,000,000 authorized; issued and outstanding shares: 72,590,238 at June 30, 2005 and 72,295,730 at December 31, 2004 | 281,797 | 281,387 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (11 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation | (14 | ) | — | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (256,439 | ) | (245,623 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 25,333 | 35,754 | ||||||
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity | $ | 55,502 | $ | 79,741 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
2
Table of Contents
ARADIGM CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Contract revenues (Including amounts from related parties: | ||||||||
2005 — $0; 2004 — $7,006) | $ | 1,212 | $ | 7,078 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Research and development | 7,317 | 11,412 | ||||||
General and administrative | 2,713 | 3,167 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 10,030 | 14,579 | ||||||
Loss from operations | (8,818 | ) | (7,501 | ) | ||||
Interest income | 350 | 49 | ||||||
Interest and other expense | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Net loss | $ | (8,476 | ) | $ | (7,457 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 72,561 | 63,531 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
3
Table of Contents
ARADIGM CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Contract revenues (Including amounts from related parties: | ||||||||
2005 — $7,444; 2004— $13,616) | $ | 8,926 | $ | 13,721 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Research and development | 14,387 | 23,299 | ||||||
General and administrative | 5,948 | 5,703 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 20,335 | 29,002 | ||||||
Loss from operations | (11,409 | ) | (15,281 | ) | ||||
Interest income | 638 | 115 | ||||||
Interest and other expense | (45 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Net loss | $ | (10,816 | ) | $ | (15,181 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 72,429 | 63,238 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
Table of Contents
ARADIGM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (10,816 | ) | $ | (15,181 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 743 | 2,576 | ||||||
Loss on retirement and sale of property and equipment | 25 | 257 | ||||||
Cost of warrants and stock options for services | 93 | 75 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | 7 | — | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | (650 | ) | 5 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 444 | 171 | ||||||
Other assets | (118 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable | (248 | ) | 120 | |||||
Accrued compensation | 147 | 1,567 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | (889 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Deferred rent | (1,337 | ) | 332 | |||||
Deferred revenue | (7,472 | ) | (251 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (20,071 | ) | (10,425 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (2,490 | ) | (849 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment to Novo Nordisk Delivery Technologies, a related party | 50,291 | — | ||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investments | (5,530 | ) | (6,376 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments | 538 | 9,468 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities | 42,809 | 2,243 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net | 254 | 481 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants for common stock | 42 | 305 | ||||||
Notes receivable from officers and employees | 30 | 87 | ||||||
Payments on lease obligations and equipment loans | — | (427 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 326 | 446 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 23,064 | (7,736 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 14,308 | 18,327 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 37,372 | $ | 10,591 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
5
Table of Contents
ARADIGM CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2005
June 30, 2005
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
Aradigm Corporation (the “Company”) is a California corporation engaged in the development and commercialization of non-invasive drug delivery systems. Principal activities to date have included obtaining financing, recruiting management and technical personnel, securing operating facilities, conducting research and development, and expanding commercial production capabilities. The Company does not anticipate receiving any revenue from the sale of products in the upcoming year. These factors indicate that the Company’s ability to continue its research, development and commercialization activities is dependent upon the ability of management to obtain additional financing as required. The Company operates as a sole operating segment.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of the Company’s operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full fiscal year or any future interim period.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Stock Based Compensation
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, between the fair value of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price of the option or share right on the measurement date, which is typically the date of grant. This amount is recorded as “Deferred Stock Compensation” in the balance sheet and amortized as a charge over the vesting period of the applicable options or share rights. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123”) as amended by SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” the Company has provided below, the pro forma disclosures of the effect on net loss and loss per share as if SFAS 123 had been applied in measuring compensation expense for all periods presented (in thousands, except per share data).
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2004 | |||||||||||||
Net loss — as reported | $ | (8,476 | ) | $ | (7,457 | ) | $ | (10,816 | ) | $ | (15,181 | ) | ||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss | 2 | — | 7 | — | ||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards | (867 | ) | (1,299 | ) | (1,605 | (2,403 | ) | |||||||||
Pro forma net loss applicable to common shareholders | $ | (9,284 | ) | $ | (8,756 | ) | $ | (12,414 | ) | $ | (17,584 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share applicable to common shareholders — | ||||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | ||||
Pro forma | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) |
6
Table of Contents
The Company accounts for options and warrants issued to non-employees under SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services,” using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The value of options and warrants are periodically remeasured over their vesting terms.
Computation of Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. No diluted loss per share information has been presented in the accompanying statements of operations since potential common shares from stock options, warrants and redeemable convertible preferred stocks are antidilutive.
3. Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following summarizes the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents and investments (amounts in thousands):
June 30, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Money market fund | $ | 1,448 | $ | 800 | ||||
Commercial paper | 35,924 | 13,508 | ||||||
Total cash equivalents | $ | 37,372 | $ | 14,308 | ||||
Short-term investments: | ||||||||
Certificate of Deposit | $ | 200 | $ | — | ||||
Corporate and Government notes | 7,247 | 2,455 | ||||||
Total short-term investments | $ | 7,447 | $ | 2,455 | ||||
Short-Term investments:
June 30, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Investments maturing in less than 1 year: | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit | $ | 200 | $ | — | ||||
Corporate notes | 2,017 | 1,016 | ||||||
US government agencies | 5,230 | 1,439 | ||||||
Total maturing in less than 1 year | $ | 7,447 | $ | 2,455 | ||||
The Company places its cash in money market funds. The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of commercial paper, government bonds and corporate notes. All of the Company’s investments with original maturity greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale, carried at estimated fair values and reported as short term investments. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the difference between the fair value and the amortized cost of available-for-sale securities was $11,000 loss and $10,000 loss, respectively.
7
Table of Contents
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (amounts in thousands):
June 30, 2005 | December 31,2004 | |||||||
Machinery and equipment | $ | 3,651 | $ | 14,364 | ||||
Furniture and fixtures | 1,166 | 1,917 | ||||||
Lab equipment | 2,682 | 4,086 | ||||||
Computer equipment and software | 5,517 | 6,256 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,444 | 12,225 | ||||||
Fixed assets at cost | 14,460 | 38,848 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (11,440 | ) | (27,740 | ) | ||||
Net depreciable assets | 3,020 | 11,108 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 4,946 | 49,447 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 7,966 | $ | 60,555 | ||||
As of January 26, 2005, the Company completed the restructuring of its AERx iDMS program, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement entered into with Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Delivery Technologies, Inc. (“NNDT”) as of September 28, 2004. Under the terms of the Restructuring Agreement the Company sold certain equipment and leasehold improvements utilized in the AERx iDMS program with net book value of $53.9 million to NNDT for a cash payment of approximately $54.0 million, netting proceeds of $50.0 million after refund of cost advances from Novo Nordisk, A/S of approximately $4.0 million.
5. Leases and Commitments
Subsequent to completion in January 2005 of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S, the Company has commitments under two leases rather than four. The first lease is for a building containing office, laboratory and manufacturing facilities, and expires in 2016. A small portion of this lease expense is offset by a sublease to NNDT of $10,000 per month for 24 months that commenced in January 2005 and expires in December 2006. The second lease is for a warehouse and expires in December 2005. The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and future minimum lease payments that are non-cancelable at June 30, 2005 under the two leases. Unconditional purchase obligations have increased in support of Intraject development and manufacturing activities.
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations | Total | 20051 | 2006/2007 | 2008/2009 | 2010+ | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 24,666 | $ | 1,241 | $ | 3,994 | $ | 4,726 | $ | 14,705 | ||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations | 2,391 | 2,391 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual commitments | $ | 27,057 | $ | 3,632 | $ | 3,994 | $ | 4,726 | 14,705 | |||||||||||
1 | For six months ending December 31, 2005. |
8
Table of Contents
6. Related Party
Novo Nordisk, A/S and its affiliates, Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and NNDT, are considered related parties, and at June 30, 2005 own approximately 10.8% of the Company’s total outstanding common stock (10.0% on an as-converted basis).
7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R (“SFAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment,” effective as of June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R supersedes APB. 25and will require companies to recognize compensation expense, using a fair-value based method, for costs related to share-based payments including stock options and stock issued under our employee stock purchase plans. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a rule to allow companies to adopt the standard at the beginning of their next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company will be required to implement SFAS 123R beginning January 1, 2006. We are currently evaluating how we will adopt the standard and will be evaluating option valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of SFAS 123R, and therefore cannot estimate the impact of our adoption at this time. These methodologies and assumptions may be different than those currently employed by us in applying SFAS 123 as outlined in our “Stock-based Compensation” section above. We expect that our adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
In March 2005, the SEC staff issued guidance on SFAS 123(R). Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) was issued to assist preparers by simplifying some of the implementation challenges of SFAS 123(R) while enhancing the information that investors receive. SAB 107 creates a framework that is premised on two overarching themes: (a) considerable judgment will be required by preparers to successfully implement SFAS 123(R), specifically when valuing employee stock options; and (b) reasonable individuals, acting in good faith, may conclude differently on the fair value of employee stock options. Key topics covered by SAB 107 include: (a) valuation models – SAB 107 reinforces the flexibility allowed by SFAS 123(R) to choose an option-pricing model that meets the standard’s fair value measurement objective; (b) expected volatility – SAB 107 provides guidance on when it would be appropriate to rely exclusively on either historical or implied volatility in estimating expected volatility; and (c) expected term – the new guidance includes examples and some simplified approaches to determining the expected term under certain circumstances. The Company will apply the principles of SAB 107 in conjunction with its adoption of SFAS 123(R).
9
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are based on the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. Our future results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in this section as well as in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The business is subject to significant risks including, but not limited to, the success of research and development efforts, dependence on corporate partners for marketing, distribution and other resources, obtaining and enforcing patents important to the business, clearing the lengthy and expensive regulatory process and possible competition from other products. Even if the products appear promising at various stages of development, they may not reach the market or may not be commercially successful for a number of reasons. Such reasons include, but are not limited to, the possibilities that the potential products may be found to be ineffective during clinical trials, fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals, are difficult to manufacture on a large scale, are uneconomical to market, are precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties or may not gain acceptance from health care professionals and patients. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in light of events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
Aradigm Corporation (“We”) is a leading developer of innovative needle-free drug delivery systems that enable patients to self-administer liquid drugs that would otherwise be given by needle injection. Our hand-held AERx technology is designed for the rapid and reproducible delivery of a wide range of pharmaceutical drugs and biotech compounds through the lung. Our pen-sized, needle-free Intraject system is designed to comfortably and rapidly deliver drugs to the subcutaneous layer of the skin, where they can gain access to the bloodstream. We believe that our non-invasive AERx and Intraject systems, which have been shown in clinical studies to achieve performance equivalent to needle injection, will be a welcomed alternative to needle-based drug delivery. In addition, our systems may improve therapeutic efficacy in cases where other existing drug delivery methods, such as pills, transdermal patches, autoinjectors or inhalers, are too slow, painful or imprecise.
Since our inception in 1991, we have been engaged in the development of needle-free drug delivery systems. As of June 30, 2005 we had an accumulated deficit of $256.4 million. We have not been profitable since inception and expect to incur additional operating losses over the next several years as research and development efforts, preclinical and clinical testing activities and manufacturing scale-up efforts expand and as we plan and build our late-stage clinical and early commercial production capabilities. To date, we have not had any material product sales and do not anticipate receiving any revenue from the sale of products in 2005. Our sources of working capital have been equity financings, equipment lease financings, contract and license revenues, interest earned on investments and funds received from the sale of assets to NNDT.
AERx
Our AERx technology platform is being developed to enable pulmonary delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals in liquid formulations for local or systemic effect. Our proprietary AERx technologies focus principally on delivering liquid medications through small-particle aerosol generation and controlling patient-inhalation technique for efficient and reproducible delivery of the aerosol drug to the deep lung. We have developed these proprietary technologies through an integrated approach that combines expertise in physics, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, laser engineering and pharmaceutical sciences.
AERx insulin Diabetes Management System
The AERx iDMS permits patients with diabetes to non-invasively self-administer insulin. We believe that when patients are provided a non-invasive delivery alternative to injection, they will be more likely to self-administer insulin as often as needed to keep tight control of their blood-glucose levels. This product is being developed in collaboration with Novo Nordisk A/S, a leader in the field of diabetes care. From the inception of our collaboration in June 1998 through June 30, 2005, we have received from Novo Nordisk A/S approximately $137.1 million in product development payments, approximately $13.0 million in milestone payments and $35.0 million from the purchase of our common stock by Novo Nordisk A/S and its affiliates.
10
Table of Contents
As of January 26, 2005, we completed the restructuring of our AERx iDMS program, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement entered into with Novo Nordisk A/S and NNDT, a newly created wholly owned subsidiary of Novo Nordisk A/S. Under the terms of the Restructuring Agreement we sold certain equipment, leasehold improvements and other tangible assets currently utilized in the AERx iDMS program to NNDT, for a cash payment of approximately $55.0 million, netting proceeds of $51.0 million after refund of cost advances from Novo Nordisk, A/S of approximately $4.0 million. Our expenses related to this transaction for legal and other advisory services were approximately $1.1 million. In connection with the restructuring transaction, we entered into various related agreements with Novo Nordisk, A/S and NNDT, effective January 26, 2005, including the following:
• | an amended and restated license agreement amending the Development and License Agreement previously in place with Novo Nordisk, A/S, expanding Novo Nordisk’s development and manufacturing rights to the AERx iDMS program and providing for royalties to us on future AERx iDMS net sales; | |
• | a three-year agreement under which NNDT will perform contract manufacturing for us of AERx iDMS-identical devices and dosage forms filled with compounds provided by us in support of preclinical and initial clinical development by us of other AERx products; and | |
• | we will receive royalties of approximately 6% on net sales of AERx iDMS products, AERx products containing insulin analogs, and, in certain circumstances, non-AERx products by Novo Nordisk and its sub licensees. |
In addition, NNDT hired 126 Aradigm employees, including 119 research and development employees, as of the closing of the restructuring transaction. We continue to provide support and consulting services for the AERx iDMS program, and we will be entitled to receive royalties on future sales of the commercialized product.
Other AERx Applications
We continue to work on other early-stage AERx programs, including liposomal ciprofloxacin under the recently announced agreement with Canada’s Department of Defence and Hydroxycholoroquine (or HCQ) for the treatment of asthma and an undisclosed drug that targets a common respiratory disease.
Intraject
Intraject, a pen-sized, pre-filled, single-use system, is designed to enable patients and healthcare workers to deliver precise measured doses of drug to the subcutaneous layer of the skin without the use of needles. This system has two main parts: the glass drug capsule with a fill volume of 0.5 ml and a compact nitrogen gas power source called the actuator. Intraject uses the actuator to create a fine, high-velocity, liquid stream that penetrates the skin to pass into the subcutaneous layer.
Key features of the Intraject platform include:
• | Pre-filled, fixed dose and ready to use; | ||
• | Lightweight and pocket-sized; and | ||
• | Easy to operate. |
We are continuing to develop this system to allow for the subcutaneous, needle-free delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals. In clinical trials, patients have overwhelmingly preferred Intraject as compared to the standard needle and syringe.
We are implementing a Contract Manufacturing Organization (CMO) strategy for manufacture of the Intraject system. This approach will use best-in-class suppliers, whose expertise will allow us to minimize risk and investment compared to assuming responsibilities ourselves. We have secured supplier agreements with each of these manufacturers and are now in a position to execute on this strategy with production of lots for pivotal bioequivalence studies in 2005 for our first drug, sumatriptan.
Intraject Sumatriptan
Our most advanced Intraject application is for the delivery of sumatriptan, which is being developed as a needle-free alternative for migraine sufferers. As our clinical data to date indicate, there is a clear preference by patients for the Intraject system over the currently available needle-based therapy, and we believe that this application could offer significant benefits over currently marketed products. We believe that Intraject’s easy-to-use, patient friendly approach will assist patients in managing their migraines. In November 2004, we announced clinical results from a pilot pharmacokinetic study demonstrating that Intraject sumatriptan was bioequivalent to the currently injectable product. In June 2004, we announced positive results from a self-injection study of Intraject sumatriptan, which showed that volunteers could
11
Table of Contents
self-administer Intraject and achieve bioequivalence to the currently marketed needle-injected product. We plan to manufacture registration batches later this year to be used as a basis for regulatory approval in 2007. We intend to develop this program with the goal of securing a commercial partner during 2005. There can be no assurance that this development program will be successful.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, long lived assets and the use of estimates to be critical accounting policies that require the use of significant judgments and estimates relating to matters that are inherently uncertain and may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.
Revenue Recognition
Contract revenues consist of revenue from collaboration agreements and feasibility studies. We recognize revenue under the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. Under the agreements, revenue is recognized as costs are incurred. Deferred revenue represents the portion of all refundable and nonrefundable research payments received that have not been earned. In accordance with contract terms, milestone payments from collaborative research agreements are considered reimbursements for costs incurred under the agreements and, accordingly, are generally recognized as revenue either upon the completion of the milestone effort when payments are contingent upon completion of the effort or are based on actual efforts expended over the remaining term of the agreements when payments precede the required efforts. Costs of contract revenues are approximate to or are greater than such revenue and are included in research and development expenses. Refundable development and license fee payments are deferred until the specified performance criteria are achieved. Refundable development and license fee payments are generally not refundable once the specific performance criteria are achieved and accepted.
Long-Lived Assets
We review for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of property and equipment may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values and the loss is recognized on the statements of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. These estimates include useful lives for property and equipment and related depreciation calculations, estimated amortization period for payments received from product development and license agreements as they relate to the revenue recognition of deferred revenue and assumptions for valuing options, and warrants. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Contract Revenues.Contract revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 were $1.2 million, compared to $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in revenue is primarily due to our reduced role in the AERx insulin program as a result of the closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S in the first quarter of 2005. While we expect future revenue from collaborations with other partners, we cannot reliably predict the expected amounts for the remaining quarters of 2005. We expect revenues in 2005 to be significantly lower than in 2004 due to the ending of the AERx insulin program.
Contract revenues are divided into two components: development contract revenues and milestone revenues.
Contract Revenues: Three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Development revenues | $ | 1,212 | $ | 6,755 | $ | (5,543 | ) | |||||
Milestone revenues | — | 323 | ( 323 | ) | ||||||||
Total contract revenues | $ | 1,212 | $ | 7,078 | $ | (5,866 | ) |
12
Table of Contents
Research and Development Expenses:Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 were $7.3 million, compared to $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total operating expenses were 73% in the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 78% in the same period of 2004. The decrease in research and development expenses is primarily due to the reduction in wages and other compensation related to the transfer of approximately 119 research and development employees to NNDT and the reduction in facilities costs associated with the closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S in January 2005, offset by an increase in research and development for self initiated studies, primarily for Intraject.
Three months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
Spending for collaborative and self-initiated research and | Increase | |||||||||||
development projects was as follows (in thousands): | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Collaborative | $ | 1,183 | $ | 6,818 | $ | (5,635 | ) | |||||
Self initiated | 6,134 | 4,594 | 1,540 | |||||||||
Total research and development expenses | $ | 7,317 | $ | 11,412 | $ | (4,095 | ) |
These expenses represent proprietary research expenses as well as costs related to contract revenues and include salaries and benefits of scientific and development personnel, laboratory supplies, consulting services and expenses associated with the development of manufacturing processes.
We expect research and development spending to increase over the next few years as development programs progress, as we continue to expand our development activities to support current and potential future collaborations, and as we pursue commercialization activities for our technology platforms. The increase in research and development expenditures cannot be predicted accurately as it depends in part upon the future success of, and funding levels supported by, our existing development collaborations, as well as obtaining new collaborative agreements.
General and Administrative Expenses:General and administrative expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2005 were $2.7 million, compared to $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease of $454,000 was primarily due to reduced legal costs related to the restructuring transaction offset by an increase in business development costs.
Interest IncomeInterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $350,000, compared to $49,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The increase of $301,000 was primarily due to interest earned on higher cash, cash equivalents and investment balances, and to a lesser extent, increases in interest rates earned on invested cash balances. For the year ended December 31, 2005 we expect interest income to increase over 2004 due to our receipt of net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million from the December 2004 closing of a private placement of our common stock and net proceeds of approximately $51.0 million from the January 2005 closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S.
Interest and Other Expense. Interest and other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $8,000, compared to $5,000 for the same period in 2004. We have not incurred any interest expense in 2005, as all payment obligations under capital leases have been satisfied in full. The second quarter 2005 other expense is related to foreign exchange loss on Canadian dollars.
13
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Contract Revenues:Contract revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $8.9 million, compared to $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Contract revenues are divided into two components: development contract revenues and milestone revenues.
Contract Revenues: Six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Development revenues | $ | 3,740 | $ | 13,038 | $ | (9,298 | ) | |||||
Milestone revenues | 5,186 | 683 | 4,503 | |||||||||
Total contract revenues | $ | 8,926 | $ | 13,721 | $ | (4,795 | ) |
Of the $8.9 million in total contract revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005, $5.2 million represents recognition of revenue for the remaining balance from a milestone payment made by Novo Nordisk, A/S prior to the closing of the restructuring transaction. As a result of the closing of the restructuring transaction, the remaining associated deferred revenue was recognized as all of our obligations under the prior agreement were released. In addition, we recognized $2.1 million for work related to the AERx insulin program that we performed during the month of January 2005. The balance of the revenue was from other funded development programs and $424,000 from NNDT related to transition and support services performed in accordance with the restructuring agreement. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 include $12.9 million related to the AERx insulin program and $683,000 in deferred milestone revenue amortization.
Research and Development Expenses:Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $14.4 million, compared to $23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total operating expenses were 71% in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 80% in the same period of 2004. The decrease in research and development expenses is primarily due to the reduction in wages and other compensation related to the transfer of approximately 119 research and development employees to NNDT and the reduction in facilities costs associated with the closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S in January 2005, offset by an increase in research and development for self initiated studies, primarily for Intraject.
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
Spending for collaborative and self-initiated research and | Increase | |||||||||||
development projects was as follows (in thousands): | 2005 | 2004 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Collaborative | $ | 3,231 | $ | 14,224 | $ | (10,993 | ) | |||||
Self initiated | 11,156 | 9,075 | 2,081 | |||||||||
Total research and development expenses | $ | 14,387 | $ | 23,299 | $ | (8,912 | ) |
These expenses represent proprietary research expenses as well as costs related to contract revenues and include salaries and benefits of scientific and development personnel, laboratory supplies, consulting services and expenses associated with the development of manufacturing processes.
We expect research and development spending to increase over the next few years as development programs progress, as we continue to expand our development activities to support current and potential future collaborations and as we pursue commercialization activities for our technology platforms. The increase in research and development expenditures cannot be predicted accurately as it depends in part upon the future success of, and funding levels supported by, our existing development collaborations, as well as obtaining new collaborative agreements.
General and Administrative Expenses:General and administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $5.9 million, compared to $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase of $245,000 was due primarily from legal and consulting costs associated with the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S. For the year ending December 31, 2005 we expect general and
14
Table of Contents
administrative expense to decrease from 2004 levels by approximately 5% to 10% due to reduced activities resulting from the closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S.
Interest Income:Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $638,000, compared to $115,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase of $523,000 was primarily due to interest earned on higher cash, cash equivalents and investment balances, and to a lesser extent, increases in interest rates earned on invested cash balances. For the year ended December 31, 2005 we expect interest income to increase over 2004 due to our receipt of net proceeds of approximately $11.7 million from the December 2004 closing of a private placement of our common stock and net proceeds of approximately $51.0 million from the January 2005 closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S.
Interest and Other Expense. Interest and other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $45,000, compared to $15,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. We incurred no interest expense in the first half of 2005, as all payment obligations under capital leases have been satisfied in full. The first half of 2005 other expenses is foreign exchange loss, $20,000; loss on retirement of fixed assets, $11,000; and net loss on the sale of equipment to NNDT, $14,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through private placements and public offerings of our capital stock, proceeds from equipment lease financings, contract research funding, proceeds from the sale of assets to Novo Nordisk, A/S in connection with the restructuring transaction and interest earned on investments. As of June 30, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $44.8 million.
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $20.1 million, compared to $10.4 million used for the same period of 2004. The change is primarily due to the restructuring transaction terminating the advanced funding for Novo Nordisk, A/S for work to be performed in the subsequent quarter. Novo Nordisk, A/S advanced program costs of $6.2 million in March 2004. No advances for program costs were provided in March of 2005. In addition, during the first quarter of 2005 we paid out final vacation and other employee liabilities for those employees who transitioned to NNDT and we paid vendor accounts related to AERx iDMS activities.
Net cash provided by investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $42.8 million, compared to cash provided of $2.2 million for the same period of 2004. This increase is comprised of $50.3 million in net proceeds from NNDT in connection with the closing of the restructuring agreement, offset by our purchase of $2.5 million of fixed assets relating to our Intraject platform and purchases of $5.5 million in securities classified as short-term investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $326,000, compared to $446,000 for same period of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we received $296,000 from issuance of common stock including issuance of shares under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options. There were no payments on capital lease obligations during 2005 as all capital lease obligations were paid in full during 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the proceeds from issuance of common stock of $786,000 were offset by payments on capital lease obligations of $427,000.
The development of our technology and proposed products has and will continue to require a commitment of substantial funds to conduct the costly and time-consuming research, preclinical and clinical testing activities necessary to develop and refine such technology and proposed products and to bring any such products to market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including continued progress and the results of the research and development of our technology and drug delivery systems, our ability to establish and maintain favorable collaborative arrangements with others, progress with preclinical studies and clinical trials and the results thereof, the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals, the cost of development and the rate of scale-up of our production technologies, the cost involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims, and the need to acquire licenses or other rights to new technology.
We continue to review our planned operations through the end of 2005 and beyond. We particularly focus on capital spending requirements to ensure that capital outlays are not expended sooner than necessary. We expect our total capital outlays for 2005 to be approximately $8.0 million or $2.5 million less than previously forecast due to the timing of development program capital requirements. The majority of these outlays will be associated with completing the commercial scale-up of the Intraject production processes, including process, qualification, and registration batch production for sumatriptan. At June 30, 2005, we are contractually committed to approximately $1.7 million of anticipated 2005 capital outlays. Capital outlays beyond 2005 will depend on our ability to raise additional capital and future partner funding
15
Table of Contents
arrangements. We believe that our existing cash balances at June 30, 2005, funding commitments from corporate development partners and interest earned on our investments should be sufficient to meet our needs for at least the next 12 months.
If we make good progress in our development programs, we would expect our cash requirements for capital spending and operations to increase in future periods. We will need to raise additional capital to fund our capital spending and operations before we become profitable. We may seek additional funding through collaborations, borrowing arrangements or through public or private equity financings. There can be no assurance that additional financing can be obtained on acceptable terms, or at all. Dilution to shareholders may result if additional equity securities are issued to raise capital. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, to reduce the scope of, or to eliminate one or more of our research and development programs, or to obtain funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or other sources that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products that we would not otherwise relinquish.
Off-Balance Sheet Financings and Liabilities
Other than contractual obligations incurred in the normal course of business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in transferred assets or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity. We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries .
Contractual Obligations
Subsequent to the January 2005 closing of the restructuring transaction with Novo Nordisk, A/S, we have commitments under two remaining leases. The first lease is for a building containing office, laboratory and manufacturing facilities, and expires in 2016. A small portion of this lease expense is offset by a sublease to NNDT of $10,000 per month for 24 months that commenced in January 2005 and expires December 2006. The second lease is for a warehouse and expires in December 2005. The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and future minimum lease payments that are non-cancelable at June 30, 2005 under the two lease agreements. Unconditional purchase obligations have increased in support of Intraject development and manufacturing activities.
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations | Total | 20051 | 2006/2007 | 2008/2009 | 2010+ | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | $ | 24,666 | $ | 1,241 | $ | 3,994 | $ | 4,726 | $ | 14,705 | ||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations | 2,391 | 2,391 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual commitments | $ | 27,057 | $ | 3,632 | $ | 3,994 | $ | 4,726 | $ | 14,705 | ||||||||||
1 | For six months ending December 31, 2005. |
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk Disclosures
In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely subject to a variety of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movement. We regularly assess these risks and have established policies and business practices to protect against these and other exposures. As a result, we do not anticipate material potential losses in these areas.
As of June 30, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $44.8 million, consisting of cash and highly liquid short-term investments. Our short-term investments will decline by an immaterial amount if market interest rates increase, and therefore, our exposure to interest rate changes has been immaterial. Declines of interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income from our short-term investments.
16
Table of Contents
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the effectiveness of controls.
We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective at the “reasonable assurance” level.
17
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Aradigm Corporation was held on May 19, 2005.
(b) Frank H. Barker, Igor Gonda, Stephen O. Jaeger, V. Bryan Lawlis, John M. Nehra, Wayne I. Roe, Richard P. Thompson and Virgil D. Thompson, were elected to the Board of Directors to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.
(c) The matters voted upon at the meeting and the voting of the shareholders with respect thereto were as follows:
(1a) The election of Frank H. Barker as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 58,370,458 1,346,486 | ||
(1b) The election of V. Bryan Lawlis as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 58,342,091 1,374,853 | ||
(1c) The election of Igor Gonda as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 56,877,727 2,839,217 | ||
(1d) The election of Stephen O. Jaeger as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 57,013,333 2,703,611 | ||
(1e) The election of John M. Nehra as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 58,377,813 1,339,131 | ||
(1f) The election of Wayne I. Roe as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 58,375,308 1,341,636 | ||
(1g) The election of Richard P. Thompson as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 56,668,418 3,048,526 | ||
(1h) The election of Virgil D. Thompson as Director to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified: | For: Withheld: | 58,249,823 1,467,121 | ||
(2) Proposal to approve the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which amends, restates and retitles the Company’s 1996 Equity Incentive Plan: | For: Against: Abstain: | 30,719,713 5,072,292 738,876 | ||
(3) Proposal to approve the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under such plan by 2,000,000 shares: | For: Against: Abstain: | 33,915,169 2,194,655 421,057 | ||
(4) Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005: | For: Against: Abstain: | 59,091,851 493,677 131,416 |
Item 6.Exhibits
31.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
18
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ARADIGM CORPORATION | ||
(Registrant) | ||
/s/ V. BRYAN LAWLIS | ||
V. Bryan Lawlis | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
/s/ THOMAS C. CHESTERMAN | ||
Thomas C. Chesterman | ||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Dated: August 11, 2005 |
19
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
20