FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS | ||
FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 433 | ||
REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-190246-11 | ||
Dated December 5, 2014 | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Free Writing Prospectus Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | ||
JPMBB 2014-C26 | ||
$1,449,606,872 (Approximate Mortgage Pool Balance) | ||
$1,224,918,000 (Approximate Offered Certificates) | ||
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. Depositor | ||
| ||
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2014-C26 | ||
| ||
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association Column Financial, Inc. Barclays Bank PLC Redwood Commercial Mortgage Corporation General Electric Capital Corporation RAIT Funding, LLC Mortgage Loan Sellers | ||
J.P. Morgan Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner | Barclays Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner | Credit Suisse Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner |
Drexel Hamilton Co-Manager |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
Dated December 5, 2014 | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
This material is for your information, and none of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS”), Barclays Capital Inc. (“Barclays”), Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (“Credit Suisse”) and Drexel Hamilton, LLC (“Drexel”) (each individually, an “Underwriter”, and together, the ‘‘Underwriters’’) is soliciting any action based upon it. This material is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal.
The Depositor has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC (SEC File no. 333-190246) for the offering to which this free writing prospectus relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in the registration statement and other documents the Depositor has filed with the SEC for more complete information about the Depositor, the issuing trust and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the Depositor or any Underwriter or any dealer participating in the offering will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling 1 (866) 400-7834 or by emailing cmbs-prospectus@jpmorgan.com.
Neither this document nor anything contained in this document shall form the basis for any contract or commitment whatsoever. The information contained in this document is preliminary as of the date of this document, supersedes any previous such information delivered to you and will be superseded by any such information subsequently delivered prior to the time of sale. These materials are subject to change, completion or amendment from time to time.
The attached information contains certain tables and other statistical analyses (the “Computational Materials”) that have been prepared in reliance upon information furnished by the Mortgage Loan Sellers. Numerous assumptions were used in preparing the Computational Materials, which may or may not be reflected in this document. The Computational Materials should not be construed as either projections or predictions or as legal, tax, financial or accounting advice. You should consult your own counsel, accountant and other advisors as to the legal, tax, business, financial and related aspects of a purchase of these certificates. Any weighted average lives, yields and principal payment periods shown in the Computational Materials are based on prepayment and/or loss assumptions, and changes in such prepayment and/or loss assumptions may dramatically affect such weighted average lives, yields and principal payment periods. In addition, it is possible that prepayments or losses on the underlying assets will occur at rates higher or lower than the rates shown in the Computational Materials. The specific characteristics of the certificates may differ from those shown in the Computational Materials due to differences between the final underlying assets and the preliminary underlying assets used in preparing the Computational Materials. The principal amount and designation of any certificate described in the Computational Materials are subject to change prior to issuance. None of the Underwriters nor any of their respective affiliates make any representation or warranty as to the actual rate or timing of payments or losses on any of the underlying assets or the payments or yield on the certificates.
This information is based upon management forecasts and reflects prevailing conditions and management’s views as of this date, all of which are subject to change.
This document contains forward-looking statements. Those statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the success of collections and the actual cash flow generated to differ materially from the information set forth in this document. While such information reflects projections prepared in good faith based upon methods and data that are believed to be reasonable and accurate as of their dates, the issuer undertakes no obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and are advised to make their own independent analysis and determination with respect to the forecasted periods, which reflect the issuer’s view only as of the date of this document.
J.P. Morgan is the marketing name for the investment banking businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries worldwide. Securities, syndicated loan arranging, financial advisory and other investment banking activities are performed by JPMS and its securities affiliates, and lending, derivatives and other commercial banking activities are performed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and its banking affiliates. JPMS is a member of SIPC and the NYSE.
THE CERTIFICATES REFERRED TO IN THESE MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR REVISION (INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY THAT ONE OR MORE CLASSES OF CERTIFICATES MAY BE SPLIT, COMBINED OR ELIMINATED AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OR AVAILABILITY OF A FINAL PROSPECTUS) AND ARE OFFERED ON A “WHEN, AS AND IF ISSUED” BASIS. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT, WHEN CONSIDERING THE PURCHASE OF THESE CERTIFICATES, A CONTRACT OF SALE WILL COME INTO BEING NO SOONER THAN THE DATE ON WHICH THE RELEVANT CLASS OF CERTIFICATES HAS BEEN PRICED AND THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE CONFIRMED THE ALLOCATION OF CERTIFICATES TO BE MADE TO INVESTORS; ANY “INDICATIONS OF INTEREST” EXPRESSED BY ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR, AND ANY “SOFT CIRCLES” GENERATED BY THE UNDERWRITERS, WILL NOT CREATE BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR SUCH PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS, ON THE ONE HAND, OR THE UNDERWRITERS, THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS OR AFFILIATES, ON THE OTHER HAND.
AS A RESULT OF THE FOREGOING, A PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR MAY COMMIT TO PURCHASE CERTIFICATES THAT HAVE CHARACTERISTICS THAT MAY CHANGE, AND EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IS ADVISED THAT ALL OR A PORTION OF THE CERTIFICATES REFERRED TO IN THESE MATERIALS MAY BE ISSUED WITHOUT ALL OR CERTAIN OF THE CHARACTERISTICS DESCRIBED IN THESE MATERIALS. EACH UNDERWRITER’S OBLIGATION TO SELL CERTIFICATES TO ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IS CONDITIONED ON THE CERTIFICATES AND THE TRANSACTION HAVING THE CHARACTERISTICS DESCRIBED IN THESE MATERIALS. IF THE UNDERWRITERS DETERMINE THAT A CONDITION IS NOT SATISFIED IN ANY MATERIAL RESPECT, SUCH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR WILL BE NOTIFIED, AND NEITHER THE DEPOSITOR NOR THE UNDERWRITERS WILL HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO SUCH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR TO DELIVER ANY PORTION OF THE CERTIFICATES THAT SUCH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR HAS COMMITTED TO PURCHASE, AND THERE WILL BE NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION BETWEEN THE UNDERWRITERS, THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS OR AFFILIATES, ON THE ONE HAND, AND SUCH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR, ON THE OTHER HAND, AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE NON-DELIVERY.
THE UNDERWRITERS MAY FROM TIME TO TIME PERFORM INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES FOR, OR SOLICIT INVESTMENT BANKING BUSINESS FROM, ANY COMPANY NAMED IN THESE MATERIALS. THE UNDERWRITERS AND/OR THEIR AFFILIATES OR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES MAY FROM TIME TO TIME HAVE A LONG OR SHORT POSITION IN ANY CERTIFICATE OR CONTRACT DISCUSSED IN THESE MATERIALS.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
1 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Indicative Capital Structure |
Publicly Offered Certificates
Class | Expected Ratings (Moody’s / DRBS / Kroll) | Approximate Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount(1) | Approximate Initial Credit Support(2) | Expected Weighted Avg. Life (years)(3) | Expected Principal Window(3) | Certificate Principal to Value Ratio(4) | Underwritten NOI Debt Yield(5) | |||||
A-1 | Aaa(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $59,050,000 | 30.000% | 3.02 | 1/15-10/19 | 47.0% | 14.7% | |||||
A-2 | Aaa(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $211,650,000 | 30.000% | 4.89 | 10/19-1/20 | 47.0% | 14.7% | |||||
A-3 | Aaa(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $300,000,000 | 30.000% | 9.77 | 7/24-11/24 | 47.0% | 14.7% | |||||
A-4 | Aaa(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $337,579,000 | 30.000% | 9.89 | 11/24-12/24 | 47.0% | 14.7% | |||||
A-SB | Aaa(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $106,446,000 | 30.000% | 7.30 | 10/19-7/24 | 47.0% | 14.7% | |||||
X-A | Aa1(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $1,108,949,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
X-B | Aa3(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $67,045,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
A-S(7)(8) | Aa1(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $94,224,000 | 23.500% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 51.4% | 13.5% | |||||
B(7)(8) | Aa3(sf) / AA(sf) / AA(sf) | $67,045,000 | 18.875% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 54.5% | 12.7% | |||||
C(7)(8) | A3(sf) / A(high)(sf) / A(sf) | $48,924,000 | 15.500% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 56.8% | 12.2% | |||||
EC(7)(8)(9) | A1(sf) / A(high)(sf) / A(sf) | $210,193,000 | 15.500% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 56.8% | 12.2% |
Privately Offered Certificates(10) |
Class | Expected Ratings (Moody’s / DBRS / Kroll) | Approximate Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount(1) | Approximate Initial Credit Support(2) | Expected Weighted Avg. Life (years)(3) | Expected Principal Window(3) | Certificate Principal to Value Ratio(4) | Underwritten NOI Debt Yield(5) | |||||
X-C | A3(sf) / AAA(sf) / AAA(sf) | $48,924,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
X-D | NR / AAA(sf) / BBB-(sf) | $106,908,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
X-E | NR / AAA(sf) / BB(sf) | $34,428,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
X-F | NR / AAA(sf) / B(sf) | $25,369,000(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
X-NR | NR / AAA(sf) / NR | $57,983,872(6) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
D | NR / BBB(low)(sf) / BBB-(sf) | $106,908,000 | 8.125% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 61.7% | 11.2% | |||||
E | NR / BB(sf) / BB(sf) | $34,428,000 | 5.750% | 9.96 | 12/24-12/24 | 63.3% | 10.9% | |||||
F | NR / B(sf) / B(sf) | $25,369,000 | 4.000% | 9.96 | 12/24-1/25 | 64.5% | 10.7% | |||||
NR | NR / NR / NR | $57,983,872 | 0.000% | 10.04 | 1/25-1/25 | 67.2% | 10.3% |
Privately Offered Loan-Specific Certificates
Class | Expected Ratings (Moody’s / DBRS / Kroll) | Approximate Initial Certificate Balance(1) | Approximate Initial Credit Support(2) | Expected Weighted Avg. Life (years)(3) | Expected Principal Window(3) | Certificate Principal to Value Ratio(4) | Underwritten NOI Debt Yield(5) | |||||
HOW(11) | NR / NR / NR | $10,000,000 | 0.000% | 9.71 | 9/24-9/24 | N/A | N/A |
(1) | In the case of each such Class, subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%. |
(2) | The credit support percentages set forth for Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, and Class A-SB Certificates represent the approximate initial credit support for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates in the aggregate. The credit support percentage for each of the Publicly Offered Certificates and the Privately Offered Certificates does not include the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) | Assumes 0% CPR / 0% CDR and a December 29, 2014 closing date. Based on modeling assumptions as described in the Free Writing Prospectus dated December 5, 2014 (the “Free Writing Prospectus”). |
(4) | The “Certificate Principal to Value Ratio” for any Class (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates) is calculated as the product of (a) the weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage loans, multiplied by (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is the total initial Certificate Balance of such Class of Certificates and all Classes of Principal Balance Certificates senior to such Class of Certificates and the denominator of which is the total initial Certificate Balance of all of the Principal Balance Certificates. The Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificate Principal to Value Ratios are calculated in the aggregate for those Classes as if they were a single Class. Investors should note, however, that excess mortgaged property value associated with a mortgage loan will not be available to offset losses on any other mortgage loan. |
(5) | The “Underwritten NOI Debt Yield” for any Class (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates) is calculated as the product of (a) the weighted average UW NOI Debt Yield for the mortgage loans and (b) the total initial Certificate Balance of all of the Classes of Principal Balance Certificates divided by the total initial Certificate Balance for such Class and all Classes of Principal Balance Certificates senior to such Class of Certificates. The Underwritten NOI Debt Yield for each of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates is calculated in the aggregate for those Classes as if they were a single Class. Investors should note, however, that net operating income from any mortgaged property supports only the related mortgage loan and will not be available to support any other mortgage loan. |
(6) | The Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F and Class X-NR Notional Amounts are defined in the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(7) | A holder of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates (the “Exchangeable Certificates”) may exchange such Classes of Certificates (on an aggregate basis) for a related amount of Class EC Certificates, and Class EC Certificates may be exchanged for a ratable portion of each class of Exchangeable Certificates. |
(8) | The initial Certificate Balance of a Class of Exchangeable Certificates represents the principal balance of such Class without giving effect to any exchange. The initial Certificate Balance of the Class EC Certificates is equal to the aggregate of the initial Certificate Balances of the Exchangeable Certificates and represents the maximum principal balance of such Class that could be issued in an exchange. See “Exchangeable Certificates and the Class EC Certificates” below. |
(9) | Although the Class EC Certificates are listed below the Class C Certificates in the chart, the Class EC Certificates’ payment entitlements and subordination priority will be a result of the payment entitlements and subordination priority at each level of the related component classes of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates. For purposes of determining the Approximate Initial Credit Support, Certificate Principal to Value Ratio and Underwritten NOI Debt Yield for Class EC Certificates, the calculation is based on the aggregate initial Certificate Balance of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates as if they were a single class. |
(10) | The Class R Certificates are not shown above. |
(11) | The 543 Howard mortgage loan, which equals approximately $30.8 million (the “543 Howard Mortgage Loan”), is secured by the same mortgage instrument on the same related mortgaged property as the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan with a principal balance of $10.0 million (the “HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan”, together with the 543 Howard Mortgage Loan, the “543 Howard Whole Loan”). The Class HOW certificates will only receive distributions from, and will only incur losses with respect to, the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. Such class will share in losses and shortfalls on the 543 Howard Whole Loan only. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
2 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Summary of Transaction Terms |
Securities Offered: | $1,224,918,000 monthly pay, multi-class, commercial mortgage REMIC Pass-Through Certificates. |
Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners: | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. |
Co-Manager: | Drexel Hamilton, LLC |
Mortgage Loan Sellers: | JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMCB”) (36.9%), Column Financial, Inc. (“CFI”) (21.0%), Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) (18.9%), Redwood Commercial Mortgage Corporation (“Redwood”) (10.9%), General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) (7.1%), and RAIT Funding, LLC (“RAIT”) (5.1%). |
Master Servicer: | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”). |
Special Servicer: | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association. |
Directing Certificateholder: | Blackrock Realty Advisors, Inc. on behalf of one or more managed funds or accounts. |
Trustee: | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. |
Certificate Administrator: | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. |
Senior Trust Advisor: | Pentalpha Surveillance LLC. |
Rating Agencies: | Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), DBRS, Inc. (“DBRS”) and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. (“KBRA”). |
Pricing Date: | On or about December 17, 2014. |
Closing Date: | On or about December 29, 2014. |
Cut-off Date: | With respect to each mortgage loan, the related due date in December 2014, or with respect to any mortgage loan that has its first due date in January 2015 or February 2015, the date that would otherwise have been the related due date in December 2014. |
Distribution Date: | The 4th business day after the Determination Date in each month, commencing in January 2015. |
Determination Date: | 11th day of each month, or if the 11th day is not a business day, the next succeeding business day, commencing in January 2015. |
Assumed Final Distribution Date: | The Distribution Date in January 2025, which is the latest anticipated repayment date of the Certificates. |
Rated Final Distribution Date: | The Distribution Date in January 2048. |
Tax Treatment: | The Publicly Offered Certificates are expected to be treated as REMIC regular interests for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
Form of Offering: | The Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB, Class X-A, Class X-B, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class EC Certificates will be offered publicly (the “Publicly Offered Certificates”). The Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F, Class X-NR, Class D, Class E, Class F, Class NR, Class HOW and Class R Certificates (the “Privately Offered Certificates”) will be offered domestically to Qualified Institutional Buyers and (other than with respect to the Class HOW Certificates) to Institutional Accredited Investors and to institutions that are not U.S. Persons pursuant to Regulation S. |
SMMEA Status: | The Certificates will not constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of SMMEA. |
ERISA: | The Publicly Offered Certificates are expected to be ERISA eligible. |
Optional Termination: | 1.0% clean-up call. |
Minimum Denominations: | The Publicly Offered Certificates (other than the Class X-A and Class X-B Certificates) will be issued in minimum denominations of $10,000 and integral multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The Class X-A and Class X-B Certificates will be issued in minimum denominations of $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000. |
Settlement Terms: | DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream Banking. |
Analytics: | The transaction is expected to be modeled by Intex Solutions, Inc. and Trepp, LLC and is expected to be available on Bloomberg L.P., Blackrock Financial Management Inc., Interactive Data Corporation and Markit. |
Risk Factors: | THE CERTIFICATES INVOLVE CERTAIN RISKS AND MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR ALL INVESTORS. SEE THE “RISK FACTORS” SECTION OF THE FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
3 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Collateral Characteristics |
Loan Pool | ||
Initial Pool Balance (“IPB”): | $1,449,606,872 | |
Number of Mortgage Loans: | 69 | |
Number of Mortgaged Properties: | 93 | |
Average Cut-off Date Balance per Mortgage Loan: | $21,008,795 | |
Weighted Average Current Mortgage Rate: | 4.44151% | |
10 Largest Mortgage Loans as % of IPB: | 37.6% | |
Weighted Average Remaining Term to Maturity(1)(2): | 110 months | |
Weighted Average Seasoning: | 1 month | |
Credit Statistics | ||
Weighted Average UW NCF DSCR(3)(4): | 1.69x | |
Weighted Average UW NOI Debt Yield(3): | 10.3% | |
Weighted Average Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio (“LTV”)(3)(5): | 67.2% | |
Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV(1)(3)(5): | 58.9% | |
Other Statistics | ||
% of Mortgage Loans with Additional Debt: | 24.9% | |
% of Mortgaged Properties with Single Tenants: | 6.6% | |
Amortization | ||
Weighted Average Original Amortization Term(6): | 354 months | |
Weighted Average Remaining Amortization Term(6): | 354 months | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Partial Interest-Only followed by Amortizing Balloon: | 63.4% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Amortizing Balloon: | 20.9% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Interest-Only: | 11.2% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Partial Interest-Only followed by Amortizing Balloon followed by ARD-Structure: | 2.6% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Interest-Only followed by ARD-Structure: | 1.3% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Amortizing Balloon followed by ARD-Structure | 0.6% | |
Cash Management(7) | ||
% of Mortgage Loans with In-Place, CMA Lockboxes: | 45.1% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with In-Place, Hard Lockboxes: | 31.5% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with Springing Lockboxes: | 18.5% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with No Lockbox: | 3.0% | |
% of Mortgage Loans with In-Place, Soft Lockboxes: | 1.8% | |
Reserves | ||
% of Mortgage Loans Requiring Monthly Tax Reserves: | 78.5% | |
% of Mortgage Loans Requiring Monthly Insurance Reserves: | 38.4% | |
% of Mortgage Loans Requiring Monthly CapEx Reserves(8): | 62.7% | |
% of Mortgage Loans Requiring Monthly TI/LC Reserves(9): | 60.5% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46 each with an anticipated repayment date, as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 2 and 29, the first payment dates for the loans are February 1, 2015. On the Closing Date, JPMCB will deposit sufficient funds to pay the interest associated with the interest due for the January 2015 payment for the related loans. Information presented in this term sheet reflects the loans’ contractual loan terms. |
(3) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(4) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical ”as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(6) | Excludes six mortgage loans that are interest-only for the entire term or until the anticipated repayment date, as applicable. |
(7) | For a detailed description of Cash Management, refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Lockbox Accounts” in the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(8) | CapEx Reserves include FF&E reserves for hotel properties. |
(9) | Calculated only with respect to Cut-off Date Balance of mortgage loans secured by retail, industrial, office and mixed use properties. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
4 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Collateral Characteristics |
Mortgage Loan Seller | Number of Mortgage Loans | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | % of IPB | |
JPMCB | 19 | 37 | $535,590,750 | 36.9 | % |
Column | 12 | 18 | 304,654,404 | 21.0 | |
Barclays | 12 | 12 | 273,628,152 | 18.9 | |
RCMC | 10 | 10 | 158,546,099 | 10.9 | |
GECC | 8 | 8 | 103,096,851 | 7.1 | |
RAIT | 8 | 8 | 74,090,617 | 5.1 | |
Total: | 69 | 93 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0 | % |
Ten Largest Mortgage Loans |
No. | Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Seller | No. of Prop. | Cut-off Date Balance | % of IPB | SF/ Rooms | Property Type | UW NCF DSCR(1) | UW NOI Debt Yield(1) | Cut-off Date LTV(1) | Maturity Date LTV(1) | |
1 | 500 Fifth Avenue | Column | 1 | $100,000,000 | 6.9% | 712,791 | Office | 3.37x | 13.7% | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
2 | 1515 Market | JPMCB | 1 | $63,750,000 | 4.4% | 502,213 | Office | 1.50x | 10.3% | 73.3% | 66.8% | |
3 | Wells Fargo Center Tampa | JPMCB | 1 | $59,800,000 | 4.1% | 389,524 | Office | 1.33x | 9.0% | 76.7% | 70.4% | |
4 | Heron Lakes | JPMCB | 1 | $52,000,000 | 3.6% | 314,504 | Office | 1.36x | 9.3% | 73.2% | 62.5% | |
5 | Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio | JPMCB | 7 | $49,750,000 | 3.4% | 732 | Hotel | 1.75x | 10.7% | 68.9% | 58.8% | |
6 | St. Louis Premium Outlets | Column | 1 | $47,500,000 | 3.3% | 351,462 | Retail | 1.41x | 8.6% | 71.6% | 65.1% | |
7 | Centergy One | GECC | 1 | $45,750,000 | 3.2% | 253,435 | Office | 1.29x | 8.9% | 75.0% | 64.2% | |
8 | The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass | JPMCB | 1 | $45,000,000 | 3.1% | 374,683 | Retail | 1.83x | 11.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | |
9 | United Healthcare Office | Barclays | 1 | $42,000,000 | 2.9% | 204,123 | Office | 2.02x | 9.8% | 70.0% | 70.0% | |
10 | 117 Kendrick Street | JPMCB | 1 | $39,560,000 | 2.7% | 212,846 | Office | 1.33x | 8.7% | 74.6% | 68.1% | |
Top 3 Total/Weighted Average | 3 | $223,550,000 | 15.4% | 2.29x | 11.5% | 56.3% | 52.8% | |||||
Top 5 Total/Weighted Average | 11 | $325,300,000 | 22.4% | 2.06x | 11.0% | 60.9% | 55.3% | |||||
Top 10 Total/Weighted Average | 16 | $545,110,000 | 37.6% | 1.86x | 10.4% | 64.9% | 58.5% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6 and 8, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. |
Pari Passu Note Loan Summary | ||||||||||||||
No. | Loan Name | Trust Cut- off Date Balance | Pari Passu Loan Cut- off Date Balance | Total Mortgage Loan Cut- off Date Balance | Controlling Pooling & Servicing Agreement | Master Servicer | Special Servicer | Voting Rights | ||||||
1 | 500 Fifth Avenue | $100,000,000 | $100,000,000 | $200,000,000 | JPMBB 2014-C26 | Midland | Midland | JPMBB 2014-C26 | ||||||
6 | St. Louis Premium Outlets | $47,500,000 | $47,500,000 | $95,000,000 | JPMBB 2014-C26 | Midland | Midland | JPMBB 2014-C26 | ||||||
8 | The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass | $45,000,000 | $32,500,000 | $77,500,000 | JPMBB 2014-C26 | Midland | Midland | JPMBB 2014-C26 | ||||||
26 | Florida Multifamily Portfolio | $22,300,000 | $35,000,000 | $57,300,000 | JPMBB 2014-C25 | Wells Fargo | Rialto | JPMBB 2014-C25 |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
5 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Collateral Characteristics |
Additional Debt Summary(1) |
No. | Loan Name | Trust Cut-off Date Balance | Subordinate Debt Cut-off Date Balance | Total Debt Cut-off Date Balance | Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR | Total Debt UW NCF DSCR | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV | Mortgage Loan UW NOI Debt Yield | Total Debt UW NOI Debt Yield | ||||||||||||
2 | 1515 Market | $63,750,000 | $8,500,000 | $72,250,000 | 1.50x | 1.22x | 73.3% | 83.0% | 10.3% | 9.1% | ||||||||||||
4 | Heron Lakes | $52,000,000 | $7,000,000 | $59,000,000 | 1.36x | 1.11x | 73.2% | 83.1% | 9.3% | 8.2% | ||||||||||||
5 | Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio | $49,750,000 | $8,050,000 | $57,800,000 | 1.75x | 1.38x | 68.9% | 80.0% | 10.7% | 9.2% | ||||||||||||
9 | United Healthcare Office | $42,000,000 | $9,000,000 | $51,000,000 | 2.02x | 1.37x | 70.0% | 85.0% | 9.8% | 8.1% | ||||||||||||
20 | 543 Howard(2) | $30,798,301 | $10,000,000 | $40,798,301 | 1.44x | 1.19x | 56.2% | 74.4% | 11.4% | 8.6% | ||||||||||||
22 | Marriott Fort Lauderdale | $25,950,000 | $4,000,000 | $29,950,000 | 1.64x | 1.31x | 63.0% | 72.7% | 10.1% | 8.8% | ||||||||||||
24 | Eagle View Apartments | $24,000,000 | $3,200,000 | $27,200,000 | 1.50x | 1.22x | 72.7% | 82.4% | 9.3% | 8.2% | ||||||||||||
26 | Florida Multifamily Portfolio(3) | $22,300,000 | $12,000,000 | $34,300,000 | 1.84x | 1.34x | 66.1% | 80.0% | 12.8% | 10.6% | ||||||||||||
31 | Renaissance Boca Raton | $18,450,000 | $4,000,000 | $22,450,000 | 1.72x | 1.27x | 59.3% | 72.2% | 10.6% | 8.7% | ||||||||||||
39 | Eastwood Village Shopping Center | $12,900,000 | $1,600,000 | $14,500,000 | 1.72x | 1.41x | 74.8% | 84.1% | 11.4% | 10.1% | ||||||||||||
42 | 10 New Road | $9,750,000 | $1,370,000 | $11,120,000 | 1.76x | 1.41x | 72.2% | 82.4% | 11.6% | 10.2% | ||||||||||||
45 | Hampshire Park Apartments(4) | $9,000,000 | $900,000 | $9,900,000 | 1.52x | 1.27x | 76.8% | 84.4% | 9.6% | 8.8% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 2, 4, 5, 9, 22, 24, 26, 31, 39, 42 and 45, subordinate debt represents mezzanine loans. In the case of Loan No. 20, subordinate debt represents a B-Note. |
(2) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR and Total Debt UW NCF DSCR are calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(3) | In the case of Loan No. 26, Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR, Mortgage Loan UW NOI Debt Yield and Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. |
(4) | In the case of Loan No. 45, the Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR and Total Debt UW NCF DSCR are calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan Summary |
HOW Subordinate | Mortgage | Mortgage | Whole | Mortgage | |||||||
Mortgage | Companion | Whole | Loan | Whole | Loan | Loan | Loan | Whole | |||
Loan | Loan | Loan | UW | Loan | Cut-off | Cut-off | UW NOI | Loan | |||
Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | Cut-off Date | NCF | UW NCF | Date | Date | Debt | UW NOI | |||
No. | Loan Name | Balance | Balance | Balance | DSCR | DSCR | LTV | LTV | Yield | Debt Yield | |
20 | 543 Howard (1)(2) | $30,798,301 | $10,000,000 | $40,798,301 | 1.44x | 1.19x | 56.2% | 74.4% | 11.4% | 8.6% |
(1) | The Class HOW Certificates, which are backed by the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, are expected to be sold to Redwood Commercial Mortgage Corporation or its affiliates. |
(2) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR and Whole Loan UW NCF DSCR are calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
6 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |
Mortgaged Properties by Type(1) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||
Property Type | Property Subtype | Number of Properties | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Occupancy | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(2)(4)(5) | |||||||
Office | CBD | 9 | $368,413,301 | 25.4% | 93.7% | 2.08x | 11.2% | 59.4% | 53.1% | |||||||
Suburban | 10 | 253,917,871 | 17.5 | 97.2% | 1.52x | 9.8% | 71.9% | 64.8% | ||||||||
Medical | 1 | 8,720,789 | 0.6 | 100.0% | 1.50x | 10.5% | 69.8% | 51.9% | ||||||||
Subtotal: | 20 | $631,051,961 | 43.5% | 95.2% | 1.85x | 10.6% | 64.6% | 57.8% | ||||||||
Multifamily | Garden | 27 | $175,358,986 | 12.1% | 94.7% | 1.40x | 9.2% | 75.2% | 65.7% | |||||||
High Rise | 2 | 57,453,152 | 4.0 | 94.1% | 1.58x | 10.2% | 60.2% | 52.9% | ||||||||
Student | 2 | 10,650,000 | 0.7 | 98.9% | 1.34x | 8.4% | 72.5% | 62.1% | ||||||||
Subtotal: | 31 | $243,462,138 | 16.8% | 94.8% | 1.44x | 9.4% | 71.6% | 62.5% | ||||||||
Hotel | Full Service | 4 | $114,400,000 | 7.9% | 76.2% | 1.71x | 10.6% | 66.7% | 57.8% | |||||||
Limited Service | 10 | 89,455,000 | 6.2 | 73.2% | 1.66x | 10.5% | 69.4% | 57.0% | ||||||||
Extended Stay | 3 | 31,970,000 | 2.2 | 81.3% | 1.77x | 10.9% | 68.7% | 60.7% | ||||||||
Subtotal: | 17 | $235,825,000 | 16.3% | 75.8% | 1.70x | 10.6% | 68.0% | 57.9% | ||||||||
Retail | Anchored | 6 | $98,238,691 | 6.8% | 94.4% | 1.41x | 9.3% | 69.6% | 60.6% | |||||||
Outlet Center | 2 | 92,500,000 | 6.4 | 98.8% | 1.61x | 9.9% | 67.4% | 57.1% | ||||||||
Shadow Anchored | 2 | 21,627,000 | 1.5 | 92.8% | 1.85x | 11.9% | 70.4% | 60.7% | ||||||||
Unanchored | 2 | 10,590,108 | 0.7 | 90.6% | 1.49x | 9.8% | 68.1% | 58.0% | ||||||||
Single Tenant | 1 | 3,096,114 | 0.2 | 100.0% | 1.40x | 8.9% | 64.5% | 52.7% | ||||||||
Subtotal: | 13 | $226,051,914 | 15.6% | 96.0% | 1.54x | 9.8% | 68.6% | 59.2% | ||||||||
Industrial | Flex | 3 | $33,590,738 | 2.3% | 84.9% | 1.53x | 10.5% | 69.7% | 62.5% | |||||||
Warehouse | 2 | 15,978,750 | 1.1 | 96.8% | 1.99x | 11.4% | 66.2% | 59.6% | ||||||||
Subtotal: | 5 | $49,569,488 | 3.4% | 88.7% | 1.68x | 10.8% | 68.6% | 61.6% | ||||||||
Manufactured Housing | Manufactured Housing | 5 | $35,446,371 | 2.4% | 87.4% | 1.65x | 10.4% | 70.5% | 57.6% | |||||||
Mixed Use | Industrial/Office | 1 | $20,000,000 | 1.4% | 100.0% | 1.73x | 10.7% | 61.0% | 54.3% | |||||||
Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 | $8,200,000 | 0.6% | 84.2% | 1.57x | 9.4% | 63.6% | 52.6% | |||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 93 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 91.7% | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
(1) | Because this table presents information relating to the mortgaged properties and not mortgage loans, the information for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(4) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical “as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46, each of which has an anticipated repayment date, Maturity Date LTV is as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
7 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |

Mortgaged Properties by Location(1) | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||
State | Number of Properties | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Occupancy | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(2)(4)(5) | |||||||
Florida | 25 | $228,362,793 | 15.8% | 85.3% | 1.60x | 10.2% | 69.1% | 60.4% | |||||||
New York | 4 | 166,825,000 | 11.5 | 92.6% | 2.61x | 12.2% | 47.5% | 44.2% | |||||||
Texas | 7 | 131,495,310 | 9.1 | 91.5% | 1.36x | 9.1% | 72.2% | 63.9% | |||||||
Massachusetts | 4 | 91,060,000 | 6.3 | 92.2% | 1.40x | 9.9% | 72.9% | 67.4% | |||||||
Georgia | 5 | 88,376,381 | 6.1 | 92.0% | 1.48x | 9.7% | 71.2% | 61.5% | |||||||
California | 6 | 83,438,409 | 5.8 | 98.8% | 2.01x | 11.5% | 55.7% | 45.6% | |||||||
Kentucky | 2 | 79,000,000 | 5.4 | 84.0% | 1.71x | 10.9% | 69.9% | 57.9% | |||||||
Pennsylvania | 3 | 75,206,888 | 5.2 | 86.7% | 1.52x | 10.3% | 72.7% | 65.5% | |||||||
Illinois | 5 | 70,838,601 | 4.9 | 94.4% | 1.59x | 10.9% | 70.2% | 58.5% | |||||||
North Carolina | 6 | 56,438,986 | 3.9 | 94.4% | 1.19x | 8.0% | 79.6% | 68.4% | |||||||
Missouri | 1 | 47,500,000 | 3.3 | 100.0% | 1.41x | 8.6% | 71.6% | 65.1% | |||||||
Maryland | 2 | 45,938,078 | 3.2 | 93.9% | 1.74x | 10.9% | 55.2% | 44.5% | |||||||
Nevada | 2 | 44,070,000 | 3.0 | 99.9% | 1.99x | 9.8% | 69.8% | 69.4% | |||||||
Wisconsin | 1 | 38,100,000 | 2.6 | 95.9% | 1.33x | 8.9% | 72.2% | 61.9% | |||||||
West Virginia | 2 | 33,640,000 | 2.3 | 91.0% | 1.57x | 9.7% | 71.6% | 59.9% | |||||||
Colorado | 2 | 24,838,691 | 1.7 | 94.8% | 1.38x | 8.9% | 68.2% | 60.8% | |||||||
Connecticut | 1 | 24,000,000 | 1.7 | 100.0% | 1.28x | 8.6% | 74.3% | 63.9% | |||||||
Indiana | 3 | 22,598,750 | 1.6 | 92.6% | 1.73x | 9.9% | 70.1% | 63.3% | |||||||
South Carolina | 2 | 22,400,000 | 1.5 | 96.2% | 1.57x | 9.0% | 76.4% | 69.1% | |||||||
New Jersey | 2 | 18,782,871 | 1.3 | 82.5% | 1.57x | 10.6% | 67.6% | 49.9% | |||||||
Alabama | 1 | 12,900,000 | 0.9 | 97.9% | 1.72x | 11.4% | 74.8% | 63.5% | |||||||
Delaware | 1 | 9,750,000 | 0.7 | 81.3% | 2.37x | 14.4% | 75.0% | 60.6% | |||||||
Rhode Island | 1 | 9,750,000 | 0.7 | 94.7% | 1.76x | 11.6% | 72.2% | 61.3% | |||||||
Michigan | 1 | 8,350,000 | 0.6 | 96.0% | 1.84x | 13.3% | 57.6% | 48.2% | |||||||
Arizona | 2 | 6,896,114 | 0.5 | 95.9% | 1.43x | 9.3% | 71.3% | 59.9% | |||||||
Louisiana | 1 | 5,700,000 | 0.4 | 87.2% | 3.06x | 15.4% | 55.9% | 55.9% | |||||||
Mississippi | 1 | 3,350,000 | 0.2 | 98.6% | 1.48x | 9.6% | 71.3% | 58.3% | |||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 93 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 91.7% | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
(1) | Because this table presents information relating to the mortgaged properties and not mortgage loans, the information for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(4) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical ”as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46, each of which has an anticipated repayment date, Maturity Date LTV is as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
8 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance |
Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Principal Balances | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | ||||||||||||
$2,070,000 | - | $9,999,999 | 28 | $169,031,642 | 11.7% | 4.52795% | 115 | 1.68x | 10.6% | 68.8% | 59.1% | ||||||||||
$10,000,000 | - | $19,999,999 | 14 | 213,169,792 | 14.7 | 4.44804% | 99 | 1.76x | 10.6% | 66.6% | 57.5% | ||||||||||
$20,000,000 | - | $24,999,999 | 5 | 114,300,000 | 7.9 | 4.52902% | 119 | 1.55x | 10.4% | 69.7% | 60.9% | ||||||||||
$25,000,000 | - | $49,999,999 | 18 | 677,555,439 | 46.7 | 4.51513% | 112 | 1.53x | 9.8% | 69.6% | 60.6% | ||||||||||
$50,000,000 | - | $100,000,000 | 4 | 275,550,000 | 19.0 | 4.16613% | 106 | 2.12x | 11.1% | 59.5% | 54.6% | ||||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Mortgage Interest Rates |
Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Mortgage Interest Rates | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | ||||||||||||
3.55000% | - | 4.40000% | 19 | $527,863,469 | 36.4% | 4.08270% | 116 | 2.03x | 11.1% | 61.1% | 54.6% | ||||||||||
4.40001% | - | 4.60000% | 23 | 472,673,628 | 32.6 | 4.48442% | 116 | 1.51x | 9.8% | 70.5% | 60.8% | ||||||||||
4.60001% | - | 4.80000% | 17 | 309,463,775 | 21.3 | 4.69883% | 93 | 1.53x | 9.7% | 70.3% | 62.3% | ||||||||||
4.80001% | - | 5.00000% | 8 | 67,356,001 | 4.6 | 4.94082% | 118 | 1.42x | 10.4% | 66.0% | 50.5% | ||||||||||
5.00001% | - | 5.22000% | 2 | 72,250,000 | 5.0 | 5.21471% | 87 | 1.40x | 9.5% | 76.9% | 70.4% | ||||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Original Term to Maturity/ARD in Months(1)(5) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Original Term to Maturity/ARD in Months(5) | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||
60 | 9 | $221,338,691 | 15.3% | 4.65049% | 59 | 1.72x | 9.9% | 69.3% | 66.1% | |||||||||
120 | 60 | 1,228,268,181 | 84.7 | 4.40385% | 119 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 66.8% | 57.6% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD in Months(1)(5) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD in Months(5) | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||||
58 | - | 60 | 9 | $221,338,691 | 15.3% | 4.65049% | 59 | 1.72x | 9.9% | 69.3% | 66.1% | |||||||||
61 | - | 120 | 60 | 1,228,268,181 | 84.7 | 4.40385% | 119 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 66.8% | 57.6% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46, each of which has an anticipated repayment date, Remaining Loan Term, Original Term To Maturity/ARD, Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD and Maturity Date LTV are as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(4) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical “as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 2 and 29, the the first payment dates for the loans are February 1, 2015. On the Closing Date, JPMCB will deposit sufficient funds to pay the interest due for the January 2015 payment for the related loans. Information presented in this term sheet reflects the loans’ contractual loan terms. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
9 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |
Original Amortization Term in Months |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Original Amortization Term in Months | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||
Interest Only | 6 | $180,988,750 | 12.5% | 3.91119% | 96 | 2.99x | 12.7% | 45.6% | 45.6% | |||||||||
300 | 6 | 77,906,961 | 5.4 | 4.84410% | 118 | 1.47x | 10.7% | 65.1% | 47.6% | |||||||||
324 | 2 | 71,078,986 | 4.9 | 4.41100% | 119 | 1.19x | 8.0% | 79.7% | 68.5% | |||||||||
360 | 55 | 1,119,632,176 | 77.2 | 4.50116% | 111 | 1.53x | 10.0% | 70.0% | 61.2% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Remaining Amortization Term in Months |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining Amortization Term in Months | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||||
Interest Only | 6 | $180,988,750 | 12.5% | 3.91119% | 96 | 2.99x | 12.7% | 45.6% | 45.6% | |||||||||||
297 | - | 299 | 3 | 44,501,961 | 3.1 | 4.91742% | 117 | 1.49x | 11.3% | 59.7% | 41.6% | |||||||||
300 | - | 360 | 60 | 1,224,116,162 | 84.4 | 4.50262% | 112 | 1.51x | 9.9% | 70.6% | 61.4% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Amortization Types |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization Types | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||
IO-Balloon | 40 | $918,625,986 | 63.4% | 4.47758% | 117 | 1.49x | 9.8% | 71.4% | 62.4% | |||||||||
Balloon | 21 | 303,021,347 | 20.9 | 4.54189% | 103 | 1.59x | 10.5% | 66.3% | 54.5% | |||||||||
Interest Only | 5 | 161,688,750 | 11.2 | 3.95430% | 100 | 2.92x | 12.5% | 46.3% | 46.3% | |||||||||
ARD-IO-Balloon | 1 | 38,250,000 | 2.6 | 5.21000% | 58 | 1.25x | 8.7% | 75.0% | 71.8% | |||||||||
ARD-Interest Only | 1 | 19,300,000 | 1.3 | 3.55000% | 60 | 3.61x | 13.9% | 40.0% | 40.0% | |||||||||
ARD-Balloon | 1 | 8,720,789 | 0.6 | 4.79000% | 118 | 1.50x | 10.5% | 69.8% | 51.9% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratios(2)(3) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratios | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||||
1.19x | - | 1.36x | 13 | $365,334,565 | 25.2% | 4.64287% | 100 | 1.28x | 8.6% | 75.5% | 67.0% | |||||||||
1.36x | - | 1.44x | 12 | 240,044,415 | 16.6 | 4.49510% | 117 | 1.41x | 9.7% | 69.7% | 59.7% | |||||||||
1.46x | - | 1.54x | 17 | 255,531,709 | 17.6 | 4.43171% | 112 | 1.51x | 10.2% | 70.9% | 62.0% | |||||||||
1.56x | - | 1.64x | 6 | 95,708,029 | 6.6 | 4.73208% | 119 | 1.59x | 10.1% | 71.0% | 60.0% | |||||||||
1.66x | - | 1.79x | 8 | 162,286,023 | 11.2 | 4.43931% | 119 | 1.75x | 10.9% | 62.8% | 52.9% | |||||||||
1.81x | - | 2.00x | 6 | 139,963,381 | 9.7 | 4.32749% | 119 | 1.87x | 11.9% | 64.1% | 53.8% | |||||||||
2.01x | - | 3.61x | 7 | 190,738,750 | 13.2 | 3.94129% | 97 | 2.96x | 12.8% | 47.1% | 46.4% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46, each of which has an anticipated repayment date, Remaining Loan Term, Original Term To Maturity/ARD, Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD and Maturity Date LTV are as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) | In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(4) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical “as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 2 and 29, the the first payment dates for the loans are February 1, 2015. On the Closing Date, JPMCB will deposit sufficient funds to pay the interest due for the January 2015 payment for the related loans. Information presented in this term sheet reflects the loans’ contractual loan terms. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
10 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |
LTV Ratios as of the Cut-off Date(2)(4) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Cut-off Date LTVs | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||||
33.3% | - | 59.9% | 9 | $235,280,203 | 16.2% | 4.07079% | 112 | 2.61x | 12.6% | 44.8% | 39.3% | |||||||||
60.0% | - | 64.9% | 10 | 170,778,985 | 11.8 | 4.35687% | 115 | 1.73x | 10.7% | 62.4% | 52.9% | |||||||||
65.0% | - | 69.9% | 13 | 185,719,979 | 12.8 | 4.55479% | 113 | 1.65x | 10.6% | 68.3% | 58.7% | |||||||||
70.0% | - | 75.0% | 26 | 552,393,720 | 38.1 | 4.42132% | 112 | 1.50x | 9.7% | 72.3% | 64.1% | |||||||||
75.0% | - | 80.0% | 11 | 305,433,986 | 21.1 | 4.74205% | 100 | 1.35x | 9.0% | 77.1% | 67.9% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
LTV Ratios as of the Maturity Date(1)(2)(4) |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Maturity Date/ARD LTVs | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||||
33.3% | - | 44.9% | 4 | $185,051,453 | 12.8% | 3.96998% | 112 | 2.78x | 12.8% | 41.1% | 36.1% | |||||||||
45.0% | - | 49.9% | 5 | 75,032,871 | 5.2 | 4.25810% | 120 | 1.80x | 11.4% | 61.9% | 48.9% | |||||||||
50.0% | - | 54.9% | 8 | 134,216,903 | 9.3 | 4.49533% | 120 | 1.70x | 10.6% | 62.9% | 52.9% | |||||||||
55.0% | - | 59.9% | 19 | 245,440,968 | 16.9 | 4.45672% | 114 | 1.65x | 10.5% | 67.6% | 58.2% | |||||||||
60.0% | - | 65.0% | 16 | 305,940,691 | 21.1 | 4.56796% | 116 | 1.44x | 9.5% | 73.5% | 62.8% | |||||||||
65.0% | - | 71.8% | 17 | 503,923,986 | 34.8 | 4.54347% | 100 | 1.45x | 9.4% | 74.6% | 68.2% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Prepayment Protection |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepayment Protection | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||
Defeasance | 48 | $965,936,122 | 66.6% | 4.44050% | 111 | 1.72x | 10.3% | 65.9% | 57.4% | |||||||||
Yield Maintenance | 21 | 483,670,750 | 33.4 | 4.44354% | 107 | 1.64x | 10.3% | 69.8% | 61.8% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
Loan Purpose |
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Loan Purpose | Number of Loans | Cut-off Date Principal Balance | % of IPB | Mortgage Rate | Remaining Loan Term(1)(5) | UW NCF DSCR(2)(3) | UW NOI DY(2) | Cut-off Date LTV(2)(4) | Maturity Date LTV(1)(2)(4) | |||||||||
Refinance | 45 | $963,702,008 | 66.5% | 4.41378% | 111 | 1.74x | 10.3% | 65.5% | 56.7% | |||||||||
Acquisition | 24 | 485,904,864 | 33.5 | 4.49653% | 107 | 1.61x | 10.2% | 70.6% | 63.1% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | 69 | $1,449,606,872 | 100.0% | 4.44151% | 110 | 1.69x | 10.3% | 67.2% | 58.9% |
(1) | In the case of Loan Nos. 11, 29 and 46, each of which has an anticipated repayment date, Remaining Loan Term, Original Term To Maturity/ARD, Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD and Maturity Date LTV are as of the related anticipated repayment date. |
(2) | In the case of Loan Nos. 1, 6, 8 and 26, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR, UW NOI Debt Yield, Cut-off Date LTV and Maturity Date LTV calculations exclude the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. |
(3) In the case of Loan No. 20, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the cut-off date based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex F of the Free Writing Prospectus. In the case of Loan No. 45, the UW NCF DSCR is calculated using the average of principal and interest payments over the first 12 months following the initial interest only period based on the principal payment schedule provided on Annex G of the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(4) | In the case of Loan Nos. 14, 28, 52 and 65 the Cut-off Date LTV and the Maturity Date LTV are calculated based upon a hypothetical “as-stabilized,” “as-renovated” or “as-complete” appraised value based on certain assumptions. Refer to “Description of the Mortgage Pool – Assessments of Property Value and Condition” in the Free Writing Prospectus for additional details. |
(5) | In the case of Loan Nos. 2 and 29, the the first payment dates for the loans are February 1, 2015. On the Closing Date, JPMCB will deposit sufficient funds to pay the interest due for the January 2015 payment for the related loans. Information presented in this term sheet reflects the loans’ contractual loan terms. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
11 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Collateral Characteristics |
Previous Securitization History(1) |
No. | Loan Name | Location | Property Type | Previous Securitization |
2 | 1515 Market | Philadelphia, PA | Office | JPMCC 2007-LDPX |
4 | Heron Lakes | Houston, TX | Office | JPMCC 2013-FL3 |
5.01 | Holiday Inn Express - Charleston | Charleston, WV | Hotel | GSMS 2006-GG6 |
7 | Centergy One | Atlanta, GA | Office | CSFB 2005-C5 |
9 | United Healthcare Office | Las Vegas, NV | Office | WBCMT 2006-C27 |
13.01 | Gable Oaks | Rockhill, SC | Multifamily | CSMC 2007-C5 |
13.02 | Sharon Pointe | Charlotte, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2008-C1 |
13.03 | Woodbrook | Monroe, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2007-C5 |
18.01 | Huntersville Apartments | Huntersville, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2007-C5 |
18.02 | Wexford Apartments | Charlotte, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2008-C1 |
18.03 | Davidson Apartments | Concord, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2007-C5 |
18.04 | Marion Ridge Apartments | Shelby, NC | Multifamily | CSMC 2008-C1 |
22 | Marriott Fort Lauderdale | Fort Lauderdale, FL | Hotel | CSFB 2005-C5 |
25 | Newington Commons | Newington, CT | Retail | MSC 2005-HQ6 |
28 | Westview Apartments | Lewisville, TX | Multifamily | FREMF 2013-KF02 |
31 | Renaissance Boca Raton | Boca Raton, FL | Hotel | CSFB 2005-C5 |
32 | Broadway Marketplace - Parcel 2,3,4 | Denver, CO | Retail | JPMCC 2004-C3 |
35 | Hilton Garden Inn Tampa Riverview | Riverview, FL | Hotel | S2H 2012-LV1 |
46 | 100 Provena Way | Bourbonnais, IL | Office | WBCMT 2006-C24 |
47 | Forest Cove | Ann Arbor, MI | Office | GCCFC 2004-GG1 |
49 | Summer Chase | Little River, SC | Multifamily | GECMC 2005-C1 |
50 | Walden Park Shopping Center | Austin, TX | Retail | GCCFC 2005-GG3 |
53 | Mill Creek Crossing | Buford, GA | Retail | FDIC 2012-C1 |
54 | Cypress Pointe | Redding, CA | Retail | BSCMS 2005-T18 |
58 | 3445 North Causeway | Metairie, LA | Office | BACM 2006-4 |
60 | 701 Martinsville | Liberty Corner, NJ | Office | MSC 2005-HQ5 |
67 | Mobile Gardens MHC | Mission, TX | Manufactured Housing | WBCMT 2007-C31 |
(1) | The table above represents the properties for which the previously existing debt was most recently securitized, based on information provided by the related borrower or obtained through searches of a third-party database. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
12 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Class A-2(1) |
No. | Loan Name | Location | Cut-off Date Balance | % of IPB | Maturity/ARD Balance | % of Certificate Class(2) | Original Loan Term | Remaining Loan Term | UW NCF DSCR | UW NOI Debt Yield | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Maturity Date/ARD LTV Ratio | |||||||||
3 | Wells Fargo Center Tampa | Tampa, FL | $59,800,000 | 4.1% | $54,914,163 | 25.9% | 60 | 60 | 1.33x | 9.0% | 76.7% | 70.4% | |||||||||
9 | United Healthcare Office | Las Vegas, NV | 42,000,000 | 2.9 | 42,000,000 | 19.8 | 60 | 58 | 2.02x | 9.8% | 70.0% | 70.0% | |||||||||
11 | The View & Legends | Dallas, TX | 38,250,000 | 2.6 | 36,619,487 | 17.3 | 60 | 58 | 1.25x | 8.7% | 75.0% | 71.8% | |||||||||
29 | 1019 Market Street | San Francisco, CA | 19,300,000 | 1.3 | 19,300,000 | 9.1 | 60 | 60 | 3.61x | 13.9% | 40.0% | 40.0% | |||||||||
30 | Fordham Road Business Park | Wilmington, MA | 18,500,000 | 1.3 | 17,911,899 | 8.5 | 60 | 59 | 1.51x | 10.7% | 69.8% | 67.6% | |||||||||
32 | Broadway Marketplace - Parcel 2,3,4 | Denver, CO | 16,638,691 | 1.1 | 15,283,737 | 7.2 | 60 | 59 | 1.29x | 8.6% | 70.5% | 64.8% | |||||||||
33 | Staybridge Suites Savannah Historic District | Savannah, GA | 14,850,000 | 1.0 | 14,152,798 | 6.7 | 60 | 59 | 1.53x | 9.5% | 62.4% | 59.5% | |||||||||
55 | American Water Works | Pensacola, FL | 6,300,000 | 0.4 | 5,769,609 | 2.7 | 60 | 60 | 1.41x | 9.8% | 74.6% | 68.4% | |||||||||
58 | 3445 North Causeway | Metairie, LA | 5,700,000 | 0.4 | 5,700,000 | 2.7 | 60 | 60 | 3.06x | 15.4% | 55.9% | 55.9% | |||||||||
Total / Weighted Average: | $221,338,691 | 15.3% | $211,651,694 | 100.0% | 60 | 59 | 1.72x | 9.9% | 69.3% | 66.1% |
(1) | The table above presents the mortgage loans whose balloon payments would be applied to pay down the principal balance of the Class A-2 Certificates, assuming a 0% CPR and applying the “Modeling Assumptions” described in the Free Writing Prospectus, including the assumptions that (i) none of the mortgage loans in the pool experience prepayments, defaults or losses; (ii) there are no extensions of maturity dates of any mortgage loans in the pool; and (iii) each mortgage loan in the pool is paid in full on its stated maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable. Each class of Certificates, including the Class A-2 Certificates, evidences undivided ownership interests in the entire pool of mortgage loans. Debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and loan-to-value ratio information does not take into account subordinate debt (whether or not secured by the mortgaged property), if any, that is allowed under the terms of any mortgage loan. See Annex A-1 to the Free Writing Prospectus. |
(2) | Reflects the percentage equal to the Maturity/ARD Balance divided by the initial Class A-2 Certificate Balance. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
13 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
■ | Accrual: | Each Class of Certificates (other than the Class HOW and Class R Certificates) will accrue interest on a 30/360 basis. Interest on the Class HOW Certificates will be calculated on an Actual/360 Basis. The Class R Certificates will not accrue interest. On each Distribution Date, any excess interest collected in respect of any mortgage loan in the trust with an anticipated repayment date during the related due period will be distributed to the holders of the Class NR Certificates. | |
■ | Distribution of Interest: | On each Distribution Date, accrued interest for each Class of Certificates (other than the Class HOW and Class R Certificates) at the applicable pass-through rate will be distributed in the following order of priority to the extent of available funds: first, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB, Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F and Class X-NR Certificates, on a pro rata basis, based on the interest entitlement for each such Class on such date, and then to the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F and Class NR Certificates, in that order, in each case until the interest entitlement for such date payable to each such Class is paid in full. | |
Payments of interest collected on the 543 Howard Whole Loan will be allocated first to the 543 Howard Mortgage Loan and then to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan (as defined below). Interest allocated to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan will only be available to make distributions and pay other amounts in respect of the Class HOW Certificates, as applicable. | |||
The pass-through rate applicable to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F and Class NR certificates on each Distribution Date will be a per annum rate equal to one of (i) a fixed rate, (ii) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), (iii) the lesser of a specified fixed pass-through rate and the rate described in clause (ii) above or (iv) the rate described in clause (ii) above less a specified percentage. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-A Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB and Class A-S Certificates, weighted on the basis of their respective Certificate Balances immediately prior to that Distribution Date and calculated without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of any Class A-S Certificates for Class EC Certificates. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-B Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class B Certificates for that Distribution Date. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-C certificates for any distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class C certificates for that distribution date. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-D Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class D Certificates for that Distribution Date. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
14 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
The pass-through rate for the Class X-E Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class E Certificates for that Distribution Date. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-F Certificates for any Distribution Date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class F Certificates for that Distribution Date. | |||
The pass-through rate for the Class X-NR certificates for any distribution date will equal the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (b) the pass-through rate of the Class NR certificates for that distribution date. | |||
The Class EC Certificates will not have a pass-through rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest otherwise distributable on the portion of Exchangeable Certificates that have been converted in an exchange for such Class EC Certificates. | |||
On each Distribution Date, any excess interest collected in respect of any mortgage loan in the trust with an anticipated repayment date during the related due period will be distributed to the holders of the Class NR Certificates. | |||
See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions” in the Free Writing Prospectus. | |||
■ | Distribution of Principal: | On any Distribution Date prior to the Cross-Over Date, payments in respect of principal of the Certificates will be distributed first, to the Class A-SB Certificates until the Certificate Balance of the Class A-SB Certificates is reduced to the planned principal balance for the related Distribution Date set forth in Annex E to the Free Writing Prospectus, second, to the Class A-1 Certificates, until the Certificate Balance of such Class is reduced to zero, third, to the Class A-2 Certificates, until the Certificate Balance of such Class is reduced to zero, fourth, to the Class A-3 Certificates, until the Certificate Balance of such Class is reduced to zero, fifth, to the Class A-4 Certificates, until the Certificate Balance of such Class is reduced to zero, sixth, to the Class A-SB Certificates, until the Certificate Balance of such Class is reduced to zero and then to the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F and Class NR Certificates, in that order, until the Certificate Balance of each such Class is reduced to zero. | |
On any Distribution Date on or after the Cross-Over Date, payments in respect of principal of the Certificates will be distributed first, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates, on a pro rata basis, based on the Certificate Balance of each such Class until the Certificate Balance of each such Class is reduced to zero and then, to the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F and Class NR Certificates, in that order, until the Certificate Balance of each such Class is reduced to zero. | |||
The “Cross-Over Date” means the Distribution Date on which the aggregate Certificate Balances of the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F and Class NR Certificates (without giving effect to any exchange of the Exchangeable Certificates for Class EC Certificates) have been reduced to zero (after taking into account any allocation of realized losses on the mortgage loans (exclusive of any related companion loan and with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan, exclusive of the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan) to such Classes on or prior to such date). If Exchangeable Certificates are converted in an exchange for Class EC Certificates, all principal that would otherwise be distributable to such converted Exchangeable Certificates will be distributed to such Class EC Certificates. | |||
The Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F and Class X-NR Certificates (the “Class X Certificates”) will not be entitled to receive distributions of |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
15 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
principal; however, the notional amount of the Class X-A Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to Certificates that are components of the Class X-A Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB and Class A-S Certificates (determined without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of any Class A-S Certificates for Class EC Certificates)), the notional amount of the Class X-B Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to Certificates that are components of the Class X-B Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class B Certificates (determined without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of any Class B Certificates for Class EC Certificates)), the notional amount of the Class X-C Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to Certificates that are components of the Class X-C Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class C Certificates (determined without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of any Class C Certificates for Class EC Certificates)), the notional amount of the Class X-D Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to the Certificates that are components of the Class X-D Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class D Certificates), the notional amount of the Class X-E Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to the Certificates that are components of the Class X-E Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class E Certificates), the notional amount of the Class X-F Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distributions, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to the Certificates that are components of the Class X-F Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class F Certificates) and the notional amount of the Class X-NR Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal distribution, realized losses and trust fund expenses allocated to the Certificates that are components of the Class X-NR Certificates’ notional amount (the Certificate Balance of the Class NR Certificates). | |||
On each Distribution Date, the Class HOW Certificates will be entitled to distributions of principal in reduction of its Certificate Balance to the extent of the amounts distributed to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan in respect of principal for such Distribution Date. | |||
■ | Exchangeable Certificates and the Class EC Certificates: | A holder of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates (the “Exchangeable Certificates”) may exchange and convert such Classes of Certificates (on an aggregate basis) for a related amount of Class EC Certificates, and Class EC Certificates may be exchanged and converted for a ratable portion of each Class of Exchangeable Certificates. | |
The initial Certificate Balance of a Class of Exchangeable Certificates represents the principal balance of such Class without giving effect to any exchange and conversion for Class EC Certificates. The initial Certificate Balance of the Class EC Certificates is equal to the aggregate of the initial Certificate Balances of the Exchangeable Certificates and represents the maximum principal balance of such Class that could be issued in an exchange. In the event that no Exchangeable Certificates are exchanged and converted for Class EC Certificates, the Class EC Certificate Balance would be equal to zero. Any exchange of (a) a portion of the Exchangeable Certificates will result in a conversion and reduction, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, of a proportionate share of each related component Class of the Exchangeable Certificates and an increase, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, of the Certificate Balance of the Class EC Certificates, and (b) any amount of the Class EC Certificates will result in a conversion and reduction, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, of the Certificate Balance of the Class EC Certificates and an increase, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, of a proportionate share of the related Certificate Balances of each Class of Certificates that are components of the Exchangeable Certificates. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
16 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
The Class EC Certificates will not have a pass-through rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest otherwise distributable on the portion of Exchangeable Certificates that have been exchanged and converted for such Class EC Certificates. | |||||||
If an exchange and conversion has occurred, the Class EC Certificates received in such exchange will be entitled to receive on each Distribution Date distributions equal to the aggregate amount of Interest Distribution Amounts, Accrued Interest From Recoveries, distributions of principal, Yield Maintenance Charges and reimbursements of Collateral Support Deficits that would be distributable to the Exchangeable Certificates that were exchanged and converted for such Class EC Certificates. | |||||||
If an exchange and conversion has occurred, the Class EC Certificates received in such exchange and conversion will be allocated the aggregate amount of Collateral Support Deficits, Net Prepayment Interest Shortfalls and other interest shortfalls (including those resulting from Appraisal Reduction Events) that would be allocated to the Exchangeable Certificates that were exchanged and converted for such Class EC Certificates. | |||||||
■ | Yield Maintenance / Fixed Penalty Allocation: | For purposes of the distribution of Yield Maintenance Charges on any Distribution Date, Yield Maintenance Charges collected in respect of the mortgage loans (or, in the case of the 543 Howard Whole Loan to the extent collected and allocated to the 543 Howard Mortgage Loan) will first be allocated pro rata between four groups (based on the amount of principal distributed to the Principal Balance Certificates in each group), consisting of (a) the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB, Class X-A and Class A-S Certificates (calculated without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of Class A-S Certificates for Class EC Certificates), on the one hand (“YM Group A”), (b) the Class B and Class X-B Certificates (calculated without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of Class B Certificates for Class EC Certificates) (“YM Group B”), (c) the Class C and Class X-C Certificates (calculated without giving effect to any exchange and conversion of Class C Certificates for Class EC Certificates) (“YM Group C”) and (d) the Class D and Class X-D Certificates (“YM Group D”). As among the Classes of Certificates in each YM Group, each Class of Certificates entitled to distributions of principal will receive an amount calculated generally in accordance with the following formula and as more specifically described in the Free Writing Prospectus, with any remaining Yield Maintenance Charges on such Distribution Date being distributed to the class of Class X Certificates in such YM Group. | |||||
YM Charge | x | Principal Paid to Class | x | (Pass-Through Rate on Class – Discount Rate) | |||
Total Principal Paid | (Mortgage Rate on Loan – Discount Rate) | ||||||
No Yield Maintenance Charges will be distributed to the Class X-E, Class X-F, Class X-NR, Class E, Class F, Class NR or Class R Certificates. Once the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-SB, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D Certificates have been reduced to zero, all Yield Maintenance Charges will be distributed to the holders of the Class X-C Certificates, regardless of whether the notional amount of such Class of Certificates has been reduced to zero. | |||||||
Yield Maintenance Charges allocable to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan will be distributable to the Class HOW Certificates. | |||||||
If Exchangeable Certificates are converted in an exchange for Class EC Certificates, any Yield Maintenance Charges that otherwise would have been distributable to such Exchangeable Certificates had they not been converted will be distributed to the Class EC Certificates. | |||||||
■ | Realized Losses: | Realized losses on the mortgage loans (exclusive of losses on any related companion loan and losses allocated to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan) will be allocated first to the Class NR, Class F, Class E, Class D, Class C, Class B and Class A-S Certificates, in that order, in each case until the Certificate Balance of each such Class has been reduced to zero, and then, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates, on a pro rata basis, based on the Certificate Balance of each |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
17 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
such class, until the Certificate Balance of each such class has been reduced to zero. The notional amount of the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F and Class X-NR Certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of realized losses allocated to Certificates that are components of the notional amounts of the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class X-C, Class X-D, Class X-E, Class X-F and Class X-NR Certificates, respectively. | |||||||
Realized losses on each pari passu whole loan will be allocated pro rata, between the related mortgage loan and the related pari passu Companion Loan, based upon their respective Stated Principal Balances. Realized losses on the 543 Howard Whole Loan will be allocated first, to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan and then, to the related mortgage loan. | |||||||
The Class EC Certificates will be allocated the realized losses and other shortfalls otherwise allocable to the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates that are converted in an exchange for such Class EC Certificates. | |||||||
■ | Interest Shortfalls: | A shortfall with respect to the amount of available funds distributable in respect of interest can result from, among other sources: (a) delinquencies and defaults by borrowers; (b) shortfalls resulting from the application of Appraisal Reductions to reduce P&I Advances; (c) shortfalls resulting from interest on Advances made by the Master Servicer or the Trustee; (d) shortfalls resulting from the payment of Special Servicing Fees and other additional compensation that the Special Servicer is entitled to receive; (e) shortfalls resulting from extraordinary expenses of the trust, including indemnification payments payable to the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee or the Senior Trust Advisor; (f) shortfalls resulting from a modification of a mortgage loan’s interest rate or principal balance; and (g) shortfalls resulting from other unanticipated or default-related expenses of the trust. Any such shortfalls that decrease the amount of available funds distributable in respect of interest to the Certificateholders will reduce distributions to the classes of Certificates (other than the Class R Certificates) beginning with those with the lowest payment priorities, in reverse sequential order. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority” in the Free Writing Prospectus. | |||||
■ | Appraisal Reductions: | With respect to mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, upon the occurrence of certain trigger events with respect to a mortgage loan, which are generally tied to certain events of default under the related mortgage loan documents, the Special Servicer will be obligated to obtain an appraisal of the related mortgaged property and the Master Servicer will calculate the Appraisal Reduction amount. The “Appraisal Reduction” amount is generally the amount by which the current principal balance of the related mortgage loan or whole loan, plus outstanding advances, real estate taxes, unpaid servicing fees and certain similar amounts exceeds 90% of the appraised value of the related mortgaged property, plus the amount of any escrows and letters of credit. | |||||
With respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio mortgage loan, any Appraisal Reduction will be similarly determined pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement under which it is serviced. | |||||||
In general, the Appraisal Reduction amounts that are allocated to the mortgage loans (exclusive of amounts allocated to a Companion Loan (defined below)) are notionally allocated to reduce, in reverse sequential order, the Certificate Balance of each Class of Certificates (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-SB Certificates) beginning with the Class NR Certificates for certain purposes, including certain voting rights and the determination of the controlling class. | |||||||
With respect to each pari passu whole loan, the Appraisal Reduction amount is notionally allocated pro rata, between the related mortgage loan and the related pari passu Companion Loan, based upon their respective Stated Principal Balances. The Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan is notionally allocated first to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan (until the principal balance of the HOW |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
18 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
Trust Subordinate Companion Loan is notionally reduced to zero by such Appraisal Reductions) and then to the related mortgage loan. | |||||||
■ | Appraisal Reduced Interest: | Accrued and unpaid interest at the related Mortgage Rate for a mortgage loan that is not advanced by the Master Servicer or the Trustee as backup master servicer due to the application of Appraisal Reduction amounts to such mortgage loan. | |||||
■ | Master Servicer Advances: | The Master Servicer will be required to advance certain delinquent scheduled mortgage loan payments of principal and interest and certain property protection advances, in each case, to the extent the Master Servicer deems such advances to be recoverable. At any time that an Appraisal Reduction amount exists, the amount that would otherwise be required to be advanced by the Master Servicer in respect of delinquent payments of interest on the mortgage loan will be reduced to equal the product of (x) the interest portion of the amount that would be advanced without regard to any Appraisal Reduction and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan minus the Appraisal Reduction amount and the denominator of which is the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan. The Master Servicer will not make any principal or interest advances with respect to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. | |||||
■ | Whole Loans: | Four mortgage loans are each evidenced by a separate note and are each, together with an additional companion loan (each a “Companion Loan” and collectively with the related mortgage loan, a “Whole Loan”), secured by the same mortgage(s) on the related mortgaged property or portfolio of related mortgaged properties. Each such mortgage loan and its related Companion Loan are subject to an intercreditor agreement. None of these Companion Loans will be part of the trust. | |||||
In the case of all of these Whole Loans, referred to as the “500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan”, the “St. Louis Premium Outlets Whole Loan”, “The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Whole Loan” and the “Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan”, a related Companion Loan is pari passu with the related mortgage loan (these Companion Loans are also referred to as the “Pari Passu Companion Loans”). The 500 Fifth Avenue Pari Passu Companion Loan, the St. Louis Premium Outlets Pari Passu Companion Loan and The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Pari Passu Companion Loan are referred to as “Serviced Companion Loans”. | |||||||
The 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan, the St. Louis Premium Outlets Whole Loan and The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Whole Loan (the “Serviced Whole Loans”) will be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for the JPMBB 2014-C26 transaction (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”). | |||||||
The Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to another pooling and servicing agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan” in the Free Writing Prospectus. | |||||||
■ | HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan : | One mortgage loan referred to as the “543 Howard Mortgage Loan” is evidenced by a note, and such mortgage loan, together with a related trust subordinate companion loan (the “HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan”), are secured by a single mortgage or deed of trust on the related mortgaged property and are subject to an intercreditor agreement. Together, the 543 Howard Mortgage Loan and the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan are referred to herein as the “543 Howard Whole Loan” or the “543 Howard Whole Loan”. The HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan is also part of the trust. The Class HOW Certificates will only receive distributions from, and will only incur losses with respect to, the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan that are allocable to them pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement from the 543 Howard Whole Loan. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
19 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
■ | Liquidated Loan Waterfall: | On liquidation of any mortgage loan, all net liquidation proceeds (or, with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan, liquidation proceeds allocated to the 543 Howard Mortgage Loan) related to the mortgage loan (but not any related Companion Loan) will be applied so that amounts allocated as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest will not, in the first instance, include any Appraisal Reduced Interest. After the adjusted interest amount is so allocated, any remaining liquidation proceeds will be allocated to offset certain advances and to pay principal on the mortgage loan until the unpaid principal amount of the mortgage loan has been reduced to zero. Any remaining liquidation proceeds will then be allocated to pay Appraisal Reduced Interest. Any liquidation proceeds in respect of each such mortgage loan in excess of the related outstanding balance will first be applied to offset any interest shortfalls allocated to the Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates), in sequential order, and then to offset any realized losses allocated to the Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates), in sequential order. Any liquidation proceeds remaining after such applications will be distributed to the Class R Certificates. | |||||
■ | Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties: | The Special Servicer may offer to sell or may offer to purchase any defaulted mortgage loan or REO property, if the Special Servicer determines that no satisfactory arrangements can be made for collection of delinquent payments and the sale would be in the best economic interests of the trust (or in the case of any Whole Loan, the trust and the holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan or the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, as a collective whole taking into account the pari passu or subordination nature of any Pari Passu Companion Loan or the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, as applicable), on a net present value basis. The Special Servicer is required to accept the highest offer for any defaulted mortgage loan or REO property in an amount at least equal to par plus accrued interest plus all other outstanding amounts due under such mortgage loan and any outstanding expenses of the trust relating to such mortgage loan (the “Defaulted Loan Purchase Price”) except as described in the Free Writing Prospectus. | |||||
With respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, any such sale of the related defaulted mortgage loan will also include the related Pari Passu Companion Loan, if any, and the prices will be adjusted accordingly. | |||||||
In connection with such sale and fair value determination, within 30 days of a mortgage loan becoming a specially serviced mortgage loan, the Special Servicer is required to order an appraisal and, within 30 days of receipt of such appraisal, is required to determine the fair value of such defaulted mortgage loan in accordance with the applicable servicing standard. If, however, the Special Servicer is already in the process of obtaining an appraisal with respect to the related mortgaged property, the Special Servicer is required to make its fair value determination as soon as reasonably practicable (but in any event within 30 days) after its receipt of such appraisal. Additionally, with respect to the mortgage loans that have mezzanine debt (whether in existence now or permitted in the future) or the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, the mezzanine lenders or the holders of the Class HOW Certificates as holders of the beneficial interest in the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, may have the option to purchase the related mortgage loan after certain events of default under such mortgage loan. | |||||||
The Directing Certificateholder will not have a right of first refusal to purchase a defaulted mortgage loan. | |||||||
If the Special Servicer does not receive an offer at least equal to the Defaulted Loan Purchase Price, the Special Servicer may purchase the defaulted mortgage loan or REO property at the Defaulted Loan Purchase Price. If the Special Servicer does not elect to purchase the defaulted mortgage loan or REO property at the Defaulted Loan Purchase Price, the Special Servicer is required to accept the highest offer received from any person that is determined to be a fair price (supported by an appraisal required to be obtained by the Special Servicer within 30 days of a mortgage loan becoming a specially serviced mortgage loan) for such defaulted mortgage loan or REO property, if the highest offeror is a person other than the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
20 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Senior Trust Advisor, any borrower, any manager of a mortgaged property, any independent contractor engaged by the Special Servicer, a holder of any related Pari Passu Companion Loan, a holder of Class HOW Certificates (but only with respect to the related mortgage loan) or mezzanine loan (but only with respect to the related mortgage loan), or any known affiliate of any such person (each, an “Interested Person”). If the highest offer is made by an Interested Person, the Trustee must approve the purchase of the defaulted mortgage loan or REO property based upon its determination of the fair price for the defaulted mortgage loan or REO property (based upon updated appraisals received by the Trustee) and the Trustee may conclusively rely on the opinion of an independent appraiser or other independent expert retained by the Trustee in connection with making such determination. Neither the Trustee nor any of its affiliates may make an offer for or purchase any specially serviced mortgage loan or REO property. | |||||||
If the Special Servicer does not receive any offers that are at least equal to the Defaulted Loan Purchase Price, the Special Servicer is not required to accept the highest offer and may accept a lower offer for a defaulted mortgage loan or REO property if the Special Servicer determines, in accordance with the servicing standard, that a rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the related holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan, or, with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan, the holder of the Class HOW Certificates, as applicable, and in either case, as a collective whole (taking into account the subordinate or pari passu nature of any Companion Loan or HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan, as applicable), so long as such lower offer was not made by the Special Servicer or any of its affiliates. | |||||||
If title to any mortgaged property is acquired by the trust fund, the Special Servicer will be required to sell such mortgaged property prior to the close of the third calendar year beginning after the year of acquisition, unless (a) the IRS grants or has not denied an extension of time to sell such mortgaged property or (b) the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator and the Master Servicer receive an opinion of independent counsel to the effect that the holding of the property by the trust fund longer than the above-referenced three-year period will not result in the imposition of a tax on any REMIC of the trust fund or cause any REMIC of the trust fund to fail to qualify as a REMIC. | |||||||
The foregoing applies to mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. With respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan, if the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement determines to sell the related Pari Passu Companion Loan as described above, then the special servicer will be required to sell the Whole Loan, including the mortgage loan included in the JPMBB 2014-C26 Trust and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan, as a single loan. In connection with any such sale, the then-applicable special servicer will be required to follow procedures substantially similar to those set forth above. | |||||||
■ | Control Eligible Certificates: | Classes E, F and NR. | |||||
■ | Control Rights: | The Control Eligible Certificates will have certain control rights attached to them. The “Directing Certificateholder” will be the Controlling Class Certificateholder (or its representative) selected by more than 50% of the Controlling Class Certificateholders; provided, however, that (1) absent that selection, (2) until a Directing Certificateholder is so selected or (3) upon receipt of a notice from a majority of the Controlling Class Certificateholders that a Directing Certificateholder is no longer designated, the Controlling Class Certificateholder that owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class (or its representative) will be the Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that in the case of this clause (3), in the event no one holder owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class, then there will be no Directing Certificateholder until appointed in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Directing Certificateholder will be entitled to direct the Special Servicer to take, or refrain from taking certain actions with respect to a mortgage loan. Furthermore, |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
21 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
the Directing Certificateholder will also have the right to receive notice and provide consent with respect to certain material actions that the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer plan on taking with respect to a mortgage loan. With respect to any mortgage loan that has, or may in the future have, mezzanine debt, pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement, the related mezzanine lender may have certain consent rights with respect to certain modifications related to such mortgage loan. In addition, pursuant to the related intercreditor agreements and the pooling and servicing agreement, the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan holder will have certain direction, consent and consultation rights with respect to the related mortgage loan. The rights of the Directing Certificateholder prior to a control appraisal event (as defined in the related intercreditor agreement) are subject to the rights of the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan holder’s rights under the related intercreditor agreement. In addition, the holder of the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan will have certain rights to cure defaults under the related mortgage loan, and in certain circumstances, to purchase the related defaulted mortgage loan. | |||||||
With respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio mortgage loan, direction, consent and consultation rights with respect to the related Whole Loan will be exercised by the directing certificateholder or controlling class representative under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement. | |||||||
With respect to the 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan, the St. Louis Premium Outlets Whole Loan and The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Whole Loan, direction, consent and consultation rights with respect to the related Whole Loan are subject to certain consultation rights of the holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement. | |||||||
■ | Directing Certificateholder: | Blackrock Realty Advisors, Inc. on behalf of one or more managed funds or accounts is expected to be appointed the initial directing certificateholder. | |||||
■ | Controlling Class: | The “Controlling Class” will at any time of determination be the most subordinate Class of Control Eligible Certificates then outstanding that has an aggregate Certificate Balance, as notionally reduced by any Appraisal Reduction amounts allocable to such Class, equal to no less than 25% of the initial Certificate Balance for such Class. | |||||
The Controlling Class as of the Closing Date will be the Class NR Certificates. | |||||||
■ | Control Event: | A “Control Event” will occur when (i) the Certificate Balance of the Class E Certificates (taking into account the application of Appraisal Reductions to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the Class E Certificates) has been reduced to less than 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of such Class as of the Closing Date or (ii) a holder of the Class E Certificates becomes the majority holder of the Controlling Class (the “Controlling Class Certificateholder”) and irrevocably waives its right to exercise any rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder and such rights have not been reinstated to a successor Controlling Class Certificateholder. | |||||
Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Controlling Class will no longer have any control rights. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Directing Certificateholder will relinquish its right to direct certain actions of the Special Servicer and will no longer have consent rights with respect to certain actions that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer plan on taking with respect to a mortgage loan. Following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Directing Certificateholder will retain consultation rights with the Special Servicer with respect to certain material actions that the Special Servicer plans on taking with respect to a mortgage loan. Such consultation rights will continue until the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
22 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
■ | Consultation Termination Event: | A Consultation Termination Event will occur (i) when, without regard to the application of any Appraisal Reduction amount (i.e., giving effect to principal reductions through principal payments and realized losses only), there is no Class of Control Eligible Certificates that satisfies the requirement of a Controlling Class or (ii) during such time as the Class E Certificates are the most subordinate class among the Control Eligible Certificates that have a then-outstanding Principal Balance, net of Appraisal Reductions, at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of such Class, and the then-Controlling Class Certificateholder has irrevocably waived its right to appoint a Directing Certificateholder and to exercise any of the rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder and such rights have not been reinstated. | |||||
Upon the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, there will be no Class of Certificates that will act as the Controlling Class. After the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder will have no rights under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, other than those rights generally available to all Certificateholders. | |||||||
■ | Appraised-Out Class: | A Class of Control Eligible Certificates that has been determined, as a result of Appraisal Reduction amounts allocable to such Class, to no longer be the Controlling Class. | |||||
■ | Remedies Available to Holders of an Appraised-Out Class: | Holders of the majority of any Class of Control Eligible Certificates that are determined at any date of determination to no longer be the Controlling Class as a result of an Appraisal Reduction allocable to such class will have the right, at their sole expense, to require the Special Servicer to order a second appraisal report from an MAI appraiser (selected by the Special Servicer) for any mortgage loan that results in the Class becoming an Appraised-Out Class. | |||||
Upon receipt of that second appraisal, the Special Servicer will be required to determine, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, whether, based on its assessment of the second appraisal, any recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction amount is warranted, and if so warranted, the Special Servicer is required to recalculate the Appraisal Reduction amount based on the second appraisal and if required by such recalculation, the Appraised-Out Class will be reinstated as the Controlling Class. The holders of an Appraised-Out Class requesting a second appraisal are not permitted to exercise any control or consent rights of the Controlling Class until such time, if any, as the Class is reinstated as the Controlling Class. | |||||||
■ | Senior Trust Advisor: | The Senior Trust Advisor will initially be Pentalpha Surveillance LLC. The Senior Trust Advisor will have certain review and consultation rights relating to the performance of the Special Servicer and with respect to its actions taken in connection with the resolution and/or liquidation of specially serviced mortgage loans. The Senior Trust Advisor will generally be responsible for reviewing the Special Servicer’s operational practices with respect to the resolution and liquidation of specially serviced mortgage loans. In addition, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Senior Trust Advisor will have certain consultation rights with respect to the specially serviced mortgage loans except with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan unless a control appraisal period with respect to the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan has occurred and is continuing. The Senior Trust Advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan. However, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC is also the senior trust advisor under the JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C25 pooling and servicing agreement and, in such capacity, will have certain obligations and consultation rights with respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan that are substantially similar to those of the senior trust advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
23 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
The Senior Trust Advisor will be responsible for: | ||||
● | after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, consulting with the Special Servicer with respect to each asset status report prepared by the Special Servicer and recommending proposed alternative courses of action. | |||
● | after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, preparing an annual report addressing the Senior Trust Advisor’s overall findings and determinations and setting forth its assessment of the Special Servicer’s performance of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement on a platform-level basis with respect to the resolution and liquidation of specially serviced mortgage loans that the Special Servicer is responsible for servicing under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. As used above, “platform-level basis” refers to the Special Servicer’s performance of its duties as they relate to the resolution and liquidation of specially serviced mortgage loans, taking into account the Special Servicer’s specific duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as well as the extent to which those duties were performed in accordance with the servicing standard, with due consideration to (and as limited by) the Senior Trust Advisor’s review of any assessment of compliance report, attestation report, asset status report and other information delivered to the Senior Trust Advisor by the Special Servicer with respect to the specially serviced mortgage loans (other than any communications between the Directing Certificateholder and the Special Servicer that would be privileged information). The annual report will be based on the Senior Trust Advisor’s knowledge of the Special Servicer’s actions taken during the applicable calendar year with respect to the resolution or liquidation of specially serviced mortgage loans that the Special Servicer is responsible for servicing under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including knowledge obtained in connection with the Senior Trust Advisor’s review of each asset status report prepared by the Special Servicer. | |||
● | prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Event, the Special Servicer will forward any Appraisal Reduction and net present value calculations used in the Special Servicer’s determination of what course of action to take in connection with the workout or liquidation of a specially serviced mortgage loan to the Senior Trust Advisor after such calculations have been finalized. The Senior Trust Advisor will be required to review such calculations but will not opine on or take any affirmative action with respect to such Appraisal Reduction calculations and/or net present value calculations. | |||
● | after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, recalculating and verifying, on a limited basis, the accuracy of mathematical calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portion of the applicable formulas utilized in connection with any Appraisal Reduction or net present value calculations performed by the Special Servicer. In the event the Senior Trust Advisor does not agree with the mathematical calculations or the application of the non-discretionary portion of the applicable formulas required to be utilized for such calculation, the Senior Trust Advisor and the Special Servicer will consult with each other in order to resolve any disagreement. Any disagreement with respect to such calculations that the Senior Trust Advisor and the Special Servicer are unable to resolve will be determined by the Certificate Administrator. | |||
In addition, the Senior Trust Advisor is required to promptly review all information available to Privileged Persons (as defined in the Free Writing Prospectus) on the Certificate Administrator’s website related to specially serviced mortgage loans and certain information available to Privileged Persons on the Certificate Administrator’s website related to mortgage loans included on the monthly CREFC® servicer watch list report, each final asset status report delivered to the Senior Trust Advisor by the Special Servicer and each assessment of compliance report and attestation report prepared by the Special Servicer in order to maintain its familiarity with the mortgage loans and the performance of the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
24 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Senior Trust Advisor will also consult with the Special Servicer in connection with certain major decisions and propose possible alternative courses of action. | ||||
In addition, after the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, if the Senior Trust Advisor determines that the Special Servicer is not performing its duties as required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard, the Senior Trust Advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the Special Servicer and will submit its formal recommendation to the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator (along with its rationale, its proposed replacement special servicer and other relevant information justifying its recommendation). | ||||
The Senior Trust Advisor’s recommendation to replace the Special Servicer must be confirmed by an affirmative vote of holders of Certificates evidencing at least a majority of the aggregate notional balance of all Classes of Certificates entitled to principal distributions (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of the Classes to which such Appraisal Reduction amounts are allocable). In the event the holders of such Certificates elect to remove and replace the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator will be required to obtain a rating agency confirmation from each of the rating agencies at that time. | ||||
■ | Replacement of Senior Trust Advisor: | The Senior Trust Advisor may be terminated or removed under certain circumstances and a replacement Senior Trust Advisor appointed as described in the Free Writing Prospectus. | ||
Any replacement Senior Trust Advisor (or the personnel responsible for supervising the obligations of the replacement Senior Trust Advisor) must (A) (i) be regularly engaged in the business of analyzing and advising clients in commercial mortgage-backed securities matters and have at least 5 years of experience in collateral analysis and loss projections and (ii) have at least 5 years of experience in commercial real estate asset management and experience in the workout and management of distressed commercial real estate assets or (B) be an institution that is a special servicer, senior trust advisor or operating advisor on a rated CMBS transaction, but has not been a special servicer or a senior trust advisor on a transaction that a rating agency has downgraded, qualified or withdrawn its ratings citing servicing concerns with the special servicer or a senior trust advisor as the sole or a material factor in such rating action. Any Senior Trust Advisor is prohibited from making an investment in any class of certificates in the Trust as described in the Free Writing Prospectus. | ||||
■ | Appointment and Replacement of Special Servicer: | The Directing Certificateholder will appoint the initial Special Servicer as of the Closing Date. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Event and the Special Servicer may generally be replaced at any time by the Directing Certificateholder. | ||
Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event, the Directing Certificateholder will no longer have the right to replace the Special Servicer and such replacement will occur based on a vote of holders of all voting eligible Classes of Certificates as described below. | ||||
After the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the Senior Trust Advisor may also recommend the replacement of the Special Servicer as described above. The holder of the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan will have the right, prior to the occurrence of an AB Control Appraisal Period (as defined in the Free Writing Prospectus), to replace the Special Servicer solely with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan. | ||||
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Senior Trust Advisor will not be permitted to recommend the replacement of the Special Servicer with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan so long as the holder of the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan is not subject to a HOW Control Appraisal Period under the intercreditor agreement. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
25 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
■ | Replacement of Special Servicer by Vote of Certificateholders: | After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Event and upon (a) the written direction of holders of Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the aggregate notional balance of all Classes of Certificates entitled to principal (taking into account the application of Appraisal Reduction amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of Classes to which such Appraisal Reduction amounts are allocable) requesting a vote to replace the Special Servicer with a replacement special servicer, (b) payment by such requesting holders to the Certificate Administrator of all reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the Certificate Administrator in connection with administering such vote and (c) delivery by such holders to the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee of written confirmations from each Rating Agency that the appointment of such replacement special servicer will not result in a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the Certificates (which confirmations will be obtained at the expense of such holders), the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly post such notice on its Internet website, and by mail conduct the solicitation of votes of all Certificates in such regard, which such vote must occur within 180 days of the posting of such notice. Upon the written direction of holders of at least 75% of a Certificateholder Quorum, the Trustee will immediately replace the Special Servicer with the replacement special servicer. | ||
A “Certificateholder Quorum” means, in connection with any solicitation of votes in connection with the replacement of the Special Servicer described above, the holders of Certificates evidencing at least 75% of the aggregate voting rights (taking into account the application of realized losses and the application of any Appraisal Reductions to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the Certificates) of all Classes of Certificates entitled to principal on an aggregate basis. | ||||
The holders of the Class HOW Certificates will have the right, prior to the occurrence of a HOW Control Appraisal Period, to replace the special servicer solely with respect to the 543 Howard Whole Loan. | ||||
With respect to each of the 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan, the St. Louis Premium Outlets Whole Loan and The Outlet Shoppes of the Bluegrass Whole Loan, the holders of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan, under certain circumstances following a servicer termination event with respect to the special servicer, will be entitled to direct the trustee (and the trustee will be required) to terminate the special servicer solely with respect to such Whole Loan. A replacement special servicer will be selected by the trustee or, prior to a Control Event, by the Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that any successor special servicer appointed to replace the Special Servicer with respect to such Whole Loan can generally not be the person (or its affiliate) that was terminated at the direction of the holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan. | ||||
With respect to the Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan, the JPMBB 2014-C26 trust as holder of the related mortgage loan has similar termination rights in the event of a servicer termination event with respect to the special servicer under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement as described above, which may be exercised by the Directing Certificateholder prior to the Control Event, however, the successor special servicer will be selected pursuant to the applicable pooling and servicing agreement by the related directing holder prior to a control event under such pooling and servicing agreement. The Master Servicer and Special Servicer are entitled to certain fees in connection with the servicing and administration of the mortgage loans as more fully described in “Transaction Parties–Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in the Free Writing Prospectus. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
26 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
■ | Master Servicer and Special Servicer Compensation: | The Master Servicer is entitled to a fee (the “Servicing Fee”) payable monthly from interest received in respect of each mortgage loan and REO loan (including specially serviced mortgage loans, Serviced Companion Loan and the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan) that will accrue at the related servicing fee rate described in the Free Writing Prospectus. The Special Servicer is also entitled to a fee (the “Special Servicing Fee”) with respect to each specially serviced mortgage loan and REO loan at the special servicing fee rate described in the Free Writing Prospectus. | ||
In addition to the Servicing Fee, Special Servicing Fee and certain other fees described below, the Master Servicer and Special Servicer are entitled to retain and share certain additional servicing compensation, including assumption application fees, assumption fees, defeasance fees and certain Excess Modification Fees and consent fees with respect to the mortgage loans. The Special Servicer may also be entitled to either a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee, but not both, from recoveries in respect of any particular mortgage loan. | ||||
An “Excess Modification Fee” with respect to any mortgage loan (other than the non-serviced mortgage loan), Serviced Whole Loan or 543 Howard Whole Loan is the sum of (A) the excess of (i) any and all Modification Fees with respect to a mortgage loan, Serviced Whole Loan or 543 Howard Whole Loan over (ii) all unpaid or unreimbursed additional expenses described in the Free Writing Prospectus (excluding Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) outstanding with respect to the related mortgage loan, Serviced Whole Loan or 543 Howard Whole Loan, as applicable, and reimbursed from such Modification Fees and (B) expenses previously paid or reimbursed from Modification Fees as described in clause (A), which expenses have subsequently been recovered from the related borrower or otherwise. | ||||
With respect to the Master Servicer and Special Servicer, the Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such servicer from the related borrower (taken in the aggregate with any other Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such servicer from the related borrower within the prior 12 months of the collection of the current Excess Modification Fees) will be subject to a cap of 1.00% of the outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage loan, Serviced Whole Loan or HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan on the closing date of the related modification, extension, waiver or amendment. A “Modification Fee” with respect to any mortgage loan (other than the non-serviced mortgage loan), Serviced Whole Loan or HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan is generally any fee with respect to a modification, extension, waiver or amendment of any mortgage loan, Serviced Whole Loan or HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan. | ||||
A “Workout Fee” will generally be payable with respect to each corrected mortgage loan (as more specifically described in the Free Writing Prospectus) and will be calculated at a rate of 1.00% of payments of principal and interest on the respective mortgage loan for so long as it remains a corrected mortgage loan. After receipt by the Special Servicer of Workout Fees with respect to a corrected mortgage loan in an amount equal to $25,000, any Workout Fees in excess of such amount will be reduced by the Excess Modification Fee Amount; provided that in the event the Workout Fee, collected over the course of such workout, calculated at the Workout Fee Rate is less than $25,000, then the Special Servicer will be entitled to an amount from the final payment on the related corrected mortgage loan that would result in the total Workout Fees payable to the Special Servicer in respect of that corrected mortgage loan to be $25,000. | ||||
The “Excess Modification Fee Amount” for any corrected mortgage loan is an amount equal to any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to the related mortgage loan (including the related Companion Loan or HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan) and received and retained by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, as additional servicing compensation within the prior 12 months of the related modification, waiver, extension or amendment resulting in the mortgage loan or REO loan being a corrected mortgage loan, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
27 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Structural Overview |
A “Liquidation Fee” will generally be payable with respect to each specially serviced mortgage loan or REO property as to which the Special Servicer obtains a full or partial recovery of the related asset. The Liquidation Fee for each specially serviced mortgage loan will be payable at a rate of 1.00% of the liquidation proceeds; provided, however, that no Liquidation Fee will be less than $25,000. | ||||
The Liquidation Fees will be reduced by the amount of any Excess Modification Fees received by the Special Servicer with respect to the related mortgage loan (including a Companion Loan or the HOW Trust Subordinate Companion Loan) or REO property as additional compensation within the prior 12 months, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee. | ||||
Similar fees to those described above will be payable to the special servicer for the Florida Multifamily Portfolio Whole Loan under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement. | ||||
Subject to certain limited exceptions, in connection with its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Special Servicer and its affiliates are prohibited from receiving or retaining any compensation (other than compensation specifically provided for under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) from anyone in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any mortgage loan, the management or disposition of any REO property, or the performance of any other special servicing duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In the event the Special Servicer does receive any such compensation, it will be required to disclose those fees to the Certificate Administrator who will include it as part of the statement to Certificateholders. | ||||
In addition, no liquidation fee will be payable to the Special Servicer if a mortgage loan becomes a specially serviced mortgage loan only because of a maturity default and the related liquidation proceeds are received within 90 days following the stated maturity date as a result of the related mortgage loan being refinanced or otherwise repaid in full. | ||||
■ | Deal Website: | The Certificate Administrator will maintain a deal website to which certain persons will have access to certain information including, but not limited to the following, which will be posted: | ||
■ | special notices | |||
■ | summaries of asset status reports | |||
■ | appraisals in connection with Appraisal Reductions plus any second appraisals ordered | |||
■ | an “Investor Q&A Forum” | |||
■ | a voluntary investor registry | |||
■ | SEC EDGAR filings |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
28 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
29 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
30 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
31 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Column | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset | |
Original Principal Balance(1): | $100,000,000 | Title: | Fee | |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance(1): | $100,000,000 | Property Type - Subtype: | Office - CBD | |
% of Pool by IPB: | 6.9% | Net Rentable Area (SF): | 712,791 | |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Location: | New York, NY | |
Borrower: | 500 Fifth Avenue (New York) LLC | Year Built / Renovated: | 1931 / 2012 | |
Sponsor: | 500 Holdings, Inc. | Occupancy: | 92.3% | |
Interest Rate: | 3.58000% | Occupancy Date: | 10/1/2014 | |
Note Date: | 10/3/2014 | Number of Tenants: | 94 | |
Maturity Date: | 10/6/2024 | 2011 NOI: | $21,383,626 | |
Interest-only Period: | 120 months | 2012 NOI: | $21,014,691 | |
Original Term: | 120 months | 2013 NOI: | $19,461,901 | |
Original Amortization: | None | TTM NOI (as of 7/2014)(2): | $18,808,084 | |
Amortization Type: | Interest Only | UW Economic Occupancy: | 92.5% | |
Call Protection(3): | L(26),Def(89),O(5) | UW Revenues: | $48,087,824 | |
Lockbox: | CMA | UW Expenses: | $20,697,525 | |
Additional Debt: | Yes | UW NOI(2): | $27,390,298 | |
Additional Debt Balance: | $100,000,000 | UW NCF: | $24,433,310 | |
Additional Debt Type: | Pari Passu | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $600,000,000 / $842 | |
Appraisal Date: | 8/13/2014 | |||
Escrows and Reserves(4) | Financial Information(1) | |||||
Initial | Monthly | Initial Cap | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $281 | ||
Taxes: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $281 | |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV: | 33.3% | |
Replacement Reserves: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Maturity Date LTV: | 33.3% | |
TI/LC: | $0 | Springing | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 3.37x | |
Other: | $16,029,253 | $0 | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 13.7% | |
Sources and Uses |
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Mortgage Loan(1) | $200,000,000 | 100.0% | Payoff Existing Debt | $105,854,644 | 52.9% | |
Return of Equity | 74,395,810 | 37.2 | ||||
Upfront Reserves | 16,029,253 | 8.0 | ||||
Closing Costs | 3,720,293 | 1.9 | ||||
Total Sources | $200,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses | $200,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | 500 Fifth Avenue is part of a loan evidenced by two pari passu notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $200.0 million. The Financial Information presented in the chart above reflects the Cut-off Date balance of the $200.0 million 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan. |
(2) | The increase in UW NOI from TTM NOI is primarily the result of five new or renewed leases to tenants expanding or relocating within the building, representing approximately 111,686 square feet and $7,633,820 of annual rent with lease commencement dates ranging from February 1, 2014 through February 1, 2015. Additionally, the UW NOI includes $895,565 in rent steps through October 31, 2015. |
(3) | The lockout period will be at least 26 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of November 6, 2014. Defeasance of the full $200.0 million 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan is permitted after the date that is the earlier of (i) two years after the securitization of the last pari passu note to be securitized, and (ii) three years after the closing date. |
(4) | For a full description of Escrows and Reserves, please refer to “Escrows and Reserves” below. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
32 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |
The Loan. The 500 Fifth Avenue loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on a 59-story, 712,791 square foot office building located in midtown Manhattan. The whole loan has an outstanding principal balance of $200.0 million (the “500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan”), which is comprised of two pari passu notes, Note A-1 and Note A-2. Note A-1 has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100.0 million and is being contributed to the JPMBB 2014-C26 Trust. Note A-2, with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100.0 million, is currently held by Column and is expected to be contributed to a future securitized trust. The holder of Note A-1 (the “Controlling Noteholder”) will be the trustee of the JPMBB 2014-C26 Trust. The trustee of the JPMBB 2014-C26 Trust (or, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Event, the Directing Certificateholder) will be entitled to exercise all of the rights of the Controlling Noteholder with respect to the 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan; however, the holder of Note A-2 will be entitled, under certain circumstances, to consult with respect to certain major decisions. The loan has a 10-year term and is interest-only for the term of the loan.
The Borrower. The borrowing entity for the 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan is 500 Fifth Avenue (New York) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and special purpose entity.
The Sponsor. The loan sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor of the mortgage loan is 500 Holdings, Inc. which owns four commercial properties in addition to the property in New York, California and Illinois. The loan sponsor is ultimately controlled and owned by Moises Cosio Espinosa, a Mexican-born businessman and member of a prominent Mexican family with a long history in the investment and banking sectors.
The Property. 500 Fifth Avenue is a 59-story office building located in midtown Manhattan. The property was constructed in 1931, renovated in 2012 and consists of primarily office space with a retail component. The property offers unobstructed southerly views from the second floor up, over New York’s Bryant Park and the New York City Public Library and also offers unobstructed easterly and westerly views from the mid and tower floors. The ground floor features the main entrance on Fifth Avenue and retail spaces along West 42nd Street and Fifth Avenue. The property’s office space is located on floors three through 59. In the last 10 years, in excess of $12.0 million has been spent on capital items, including a lobby renovation (2005 - 2009), a retail restack expanding retail use to the basement and third floors (underway), standpipe to sprinkler conversion (2006 - 2012), winterization of the cooling tower (2011 - 2012), common corridor (2005 - 2012), restroom renovations (2005 - 2006), electrical riser installation (2006 - 2007), and a class E system upgrade (2010).
As of October 1, 2014, the property was 92.3% leased by 94 tenants representing apparel manufacturing and sales, publishing, legal, financial services and technology sectors. The largest tenant at the property, Zara USA, Inc. (“Zara”), leases 10.2% of the net rentable area with 13,843 square feet expiring in March 2024 and 58,701 square feet expiring in February 2035. Zara leases portions of four floors and the basement at the property, which comprises traditional office (portions of third and fourth floors), retail (basement to third floor), and traditional office which serves as its United States corporate office for Zara’s parent, Inditex (MSE: ITX). Zara currently has a presence in 88 countries with 2,000 stores. The tenant originally took occupancy in 2008 and has expanded its presence over the years to its current square footage of 72,544 square feet. The Zara space is currently being built out on the ground floor and lower level by the tenant with an anticipated opening in February 2015. The tenant has a five year renewal option for both the retail and office space at the greater of 95% of fair market value and the current rent. The second largest tenant, W.W. Norton & Co., leases 64,668 square feet (9.1% of net rentable area) through July 2017 and has no remaining renewal or termination rights. W.W. Norton & Co. is an international publishing firm which has been in operation for over 90 years. The firm originally took occupancy in 1973 and currently occupies space on five floors. The third largest tenant, Mercer, Inc. leases 36,232 square feet (5.1% of net rentable area) through June 2019. The company, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, is a global consulting firm specializing in talent, health, retirement and investment services.
The property is located within the Midtown office market containing approximately 241.5 million square feet, representing the largest office market inventory in Manhattan. As of the second quarter 2014, the Midtown market reported an overall vacancy rate of 11.0%, and an overall average market rent of $70.82 per square foot, representing an increase of 1.1% over the prior quarter and increase of 3.8% over the prior year. More specifically, the property is located in the Grand Central submarket. The Grand Central submarket contains approximately 44.0 million square feet of office space and represents the largest office inventory within the Midtown market. As of the second quarter 2014, the submarket reported an overall vacancy rate of 13.6% and reported an overall average submarket rent of $61.85 per square foot, almost 6% higher than a year ago. The appraisal identified seven buildings which are directly competitive with the property. As identified by the appraisal, asking rents ranged between $50.00 and $85.00 per square foot and direct occupancy averaged 92.6% compared to rents at the property of $58.00 per square foot to $95.00 per square foot depending on the floor and current occupancy of 92.3%. No new construction is currently under construction within the submarket.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
33 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |
Historical and Current Occupancy(1) |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Current(2) |
N/A | 87.7% | 87.4% | 92.3% |
(1) | Historical Occupancies are as of December 31 of each respective year. 2011 occupancy was not provided by the borrower. |
(2) | Current Occupancy is as of October 1, 2014. |
Recent Leasing Activity | |||||||
Tenant Name | New / Renewal / Relocation Leases | Net Rentable Area | Lease Date | Term (years) | Base Rent PSF | Annual Rent | |
Vince LLC | New / Renewal | 33,009 | 04/01/2014 | 10.0 | $59.00 | $1,947,531 | |
Zara USA, Inc.(office expansion) | Expansion | 13,067 | 08/01/2014 | 21.0 | $151.40 | 1,978,332 | |
Zara USA, Inc. (office expansion) | Expansion | 9,783 | 02/01/2015 | 20.0 | $35.34 | 345,731 | |
Zara USA, Inc. (basement expansion) | Expansion | 2,558 | 07/01/2014 | 20.6 | $197.11 | 504,207 | |
Kanematsu | New | 10,914 | 07/01/2014 | 10.0 | $63.50 | 693,039 | |
Bliss PR | Relocation | 9,783 | 12/01/2014 | 7.8 | $50.01 | 489,248 | |
W.W. Norton & Co. | Expansion | 5,779 | 09/01/2014 | 2.9 | $53.00 | 306,287 | |
Computer Design & Integration LLC | Relocation | 5,356 | 10/15/2014 | 5.2 | $55.50 | 277,500 | |
Wolmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP | Expansion | 4,923 | 01/01/2015 | 15.7 | $50.00 | 246,150 | |
South African Tourism Board | Relocation | 4,880 | 04/01/2014 | 10.4 | $48.00 | 234,240 | |
The Reed Foundation | Renewal / Relocation | 4,070 | 10/01/2014 | 1.0 | $81.98 | 333,659 | |
Lankler Siffert & Wohl | Relocation | 3,544 | 02/01/2014 | 3.0 | $20.02 | 70,951 | |
KFW-Ipex-Bank GmbH | Renewal / Relocation | 2,566 | 03/01/2014 | 5.5 | $51.75 | 132,791 | |
The Swiss Benevolent Society | Renewal | 1,454 | 07/01/2014 | 3.0 | $51.00 | 74,154 | |
Total | 111,686 | $7,633,820 |
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||
Tenant | Ratings(2) Moody’s/S&P/Fitch | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Total NRA | Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration Date |
Zara USA, Inc.(3) | NA / NA / NA | 72,544 | 10.2% | $137.66 | 02/28/2035 |
W.W. Norton & Co. | NA / NA / NA | 64,668 | 9.1% | $45.19 | 07/31/2017 |
Mercer, Inc.(4) | Baa1 /A- / BBB+ | 36,232 | 5.1% | $41.34 | 06/14/2019 |
Vince LLC(5) | NA / NA / NA | 33,009 | 4.6% | $59.00 | 04/30/2025 |
Lankler Siffert & Wohl(6) | NA / NA / NA | 27,500 | 3.9% | $53.78 | 05/31/2023 |
Schlesinger Assoc, N.Y. Inc. | NA / NA / NA | 21,006 | 2.9% | $66.07 | 02/28/2018 |
Wollmuth, Maher & Deutsch LLP | NA / NA / NA | 19,942 | 2.8% | $50.70 | 08/31/2029 |
Dragados USA Inc | NA / NA / NA | 14,190 | 2.0% | $72.77 | 05/31/2017 |
A.R. Schmeidler & Co. Inc. | NA / NA / NA | 12,088 | 1.7% | $55.76 | 05/31/2017 |
Kanematsu USA Inc. | NA / NA / NA | 10,914 | 1.5% | $63.50 | 01/31/2025 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant” field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Zara USA, Inc. has multiple leases at the property and the expiration date listed above reflects the expiration date of the largest space that the tenant occupies. In total, Zara USA, Inc. has 58,701 square feet expiring in February 2035 and 13,843 square feet expiring in March 2024. Currently, the borrower has not received a fully executed certificate of occupancy which would allow Zara USA, Inc. to occupy the space being renovated upon its completion. Additionally, the tenant has received a six-month abatement of monthly rent for the six-month period ending February 10, 2015. |
(4) | Mercer, Inc. is currently subleasing 5,143 square feet to W.W. Norton & Co. and has the remainder of its space on the market for sublease. |
(5) | Vince LLC has the right to terminate its lease in April 2022 with 12 months’ notice and the payment of a termination fee. |
(6) | Lankler Siffert & Wohl has multiple leases at the property and the expiration date listed above reflects the expiration date of the largest space that the tenant occupies. Lankler Siffert & Wohl has 3,543 square feet expiring in February 2017 and 23,957 square feet expiring in May 2023. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
34 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |
Lease Rollover Schedule (1) | |||||||||||
Year | Number of Leases Expiring | Net Rentable Area Expiring | % of NRA Expiring | Base Rent Expiring | % of Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative Net Rentable Area Expiring | Cumulative % of NRA Expiring | Cumulative Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative % of Base Rent Expiring | ||
Vacant | NAP | 54,845 | 7.7 | % | NAP | NAP | 54,845 | 7.7% | NAP | NAP | |
2014 & MTM(2) | 9 | 29,477 | 4.1 | $1,603,456 | 3.6% | 84,322 | 11.8% | $1,603,456 | 3.6% | ||
2015 | 11 | 25,124 | 3.5 | 1,313,202 | 2.9 | 109,446 | 15.4% | $2,916,658 | 6.5% | ||
2016 | 7 | 31,632 | 4.4 | 1,817,187 | 4.1 | 141,078 | 19.8% | $4,733,845 | 10.6% | ||
2017 | 24 | 172,956 | 24.3 | 9,386,454 | 21.0 | 314,034 | 44.1% | $14,120,299 | 31.6% | ||
2018 | 15 | 91,571 | 12.8 | 6,213,719 | 13.9 | 405,605 | 56.9% | $20,334,018 | 45.5% | ||
2019 | 9 | 66,361 | 9.3 | 3,891,754 | 8.7 | 471,966 | 66.2% | $24,225,772 | 54.2% | ||
2020 | 4 | 24,438 | 3.4 | 1,646,133 | 3.7 | 496,404 | 69.6% | $25,871,905 | 57.9% | ||
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 496,404 | 69.6% | $25,871,905 | 57.9% | ||
2022 | 4 | 24,893 | 3.5 | 1,435,895 | 3.2 | 521,297 | 73.1% | $27,307,800 | 61.1% | ||
2023 | 3 | 33,284 | 4.7 | 2,414,024 | 5.4 | 554,581 | 77.8% | $29,721,824 | 66.5% | ||
2024 | 4 | 35,644 | 5.0 | 2,068,147 | 4.6 | 590,225 | 82.8% | $31,789,971 | 71.1% | ||
2025 & Beyond | 4 | 122,566 | 17.2 | 12,925,963 | 28.9 | 712,791 | 100.0% | $44,715,934 | 100.0% | ||
Total | 94 | 712,791 | 100.0 | % | $44,715,934 | 100.0% |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Includes the building’s security and management offices. |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow(1) | |||||||
2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | Underwritten | Per Square Foot | %(3) | ||
Rents in Place(4) | $35,585,996 | $34,840,348 | $34,484,013 | $44,715,934 | $62.73 | 86.5% | |
Vacant Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,680,279 | 5.16 | 7.1 | |
Gross Potential Rent | $35,585,996 | $34,840,348 | $34,484,013 | $48,396,213 | $67.90 | 93.7% | |
Total Reimbursements | 2,673,958 | 3,019,339 | 2,987,719 | 3,276,638 | 4.6 | 6.3 | |
Net Rental Income | $38,259,954 | $37,859,687 | $37,471,732 | $51,672,851 | $72.49 | 100.0% | |
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | 0 | (60,687) | (86,621) | (3,899,013) | (5.47) | (7.5) | |
Other Income | 416,722 | 330,508 | 194,725 | 313,985 | 0.44 | 0.6 | |
Effective Gross Income | $38,676,676 | $38,129,508 | $37,579,836 | $48,087,824 | $67.46 | 93.1% | |
Total Expenses | $17,661,985 | $18,667,607 | $18,771,752 | $20,697,525 | $29.04 | 43.0% | |
Net Operating Income(5) | $21,014,691 | $19,461,901 | $18,808,084 | $27,390,298 | $38.43 | 57.0% | |
Total TI/LC, Capex/RR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,956,988 | 4.15 | 6.1 | |
Net Cash Flow | $21,014,691 | $19,461,901 | $18,808,084 | $24,433,310 | $34.28 | 50.8% |
(1) | A detailed operating statement for 2011 was not provided by the borrower. |
(2) | TTM column represents the trailing twelve months ending July 31, 2014. |
(3) | Percentage column represents percent of Net Rental Income for all revenue lines and represents percent of Effective Gross Income for the remainder of fields. |
(4) | Underwritten rents in-place, include $895,565 in contractual rent steps through October 31, 2015. |
(5) | The increase in UW NOI from TTM NOI is primarily the result of five new or renewed leases to tenants expanding or relocating within the building, representing approximately 111,686 square feet and $7,633,820 of annual rent with lease commencement dates ranging from February 1, 2014 through February 1, 2015. |
Property Management. The property is managed by Cushman & Wakefield under an agreement that automatically renews annually unless terminated by either party in writing.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
35 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
500 Fifth Avenue |
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the borrower deposited into escrow approximately $16,028,841 for unfunded obligations, and required repairs of $413. The unfunded obligations reserve covers unfunded tenant improvements of $7,153,458, façade repairs of $4,021,131, rent abatements for existing tenants of $3,094,077, building improvements in progress of $1,393,384 and unfunded leasing commissions of $366,791.
Tax Escrows - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits to the tax escrow is waived so long as no Cash Sweep Period exists.
Insurance Escrows - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits to the insurance escrow is waived so long as no Cash Sweep Period exists.
Replacement Reserves - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits to the replacement reserve escrow is waived so long as no Cash Sweep Period exists.
TI/LC Reserves - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits to the TI/LC escrow is waived so long as no Cash Sweep Period exists. During the existence of a Cash Sweep Period, the borrower shall pay to the lender on each monthly payment date the sum of $229,649 (approximately $3.86 per square foot annually), which amounts shall be deposited with and held by lender for tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The 500 Fifth Avenue Whole Loan is structured with a CMA lockbox. The borrower and property manager are required to direct tenants to deposit all rents directly to the lockbox account. All funds in the lockbox account shall be remitted to the borrower on a daily basis in the absence of a Cash Sweep Period. During the continuance of a Cash Sweep Period, all excess cash flow after payment of debt service, required reserves and operating expenses will be held as additional collateral for the loan.
A “Cash Sweep Period” means, subject to termination in accordance with the related loan documents, the period commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence of an event of default, (ii) the debt yield on a trailing twelve-month basis falls below 7.0%, or (iii) any bankruptcy action of the borrower or manager.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
36 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
37 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
38 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
39 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | JPMCB | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset | |
Original Principal Balance: | $63,750,000 | Title: | Fee | |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance: | $63,750,000 | Property Type - Subtype: | Office - CBD | |
% of Pool by IPB: | 4.4% | Net Rentable Area (SF): | 502,213 | |
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Location: | Philadelphia, PA | |
Borrower: | BRI 1866 1515 Market, LP | Year Built / Renovated: | 1960 / 2007 | |
Sponsors(1): | Various | Occupancy: | 88.7% | |
Interest Rate: | 4.30450% | Occupancy Date: | 11/20/2014 | |
Note Date: | 12/2/2014 | Number of Tenants: | 73 | |
Maturity Date: | 1/1/2025 | 2011 NOI: | $6,073,294 | |
Interest-only Period(2): | 61 months | 2012 NOI: | $4,807,093 | |
Original Term(2): | 121 months | 2013 NOI(3): | $4,090,220 | |
Original Amortization: | 360 months | TTM NOI (as of 10/2014): | $4,878,882 | |
Amortization Type: | IO-Balloon | UW Economic Occupancy: | 89.3% | |
Call Protection: | L(26),Grtr1%orYM(92),O(3) | UW Revenues: | $12,069,378 | |
Lockbox: | Hard | UW Expenses: | $5,487,872 | |
Additional Debt: | Yes | UW NOI(3): | $6,581,505 | |
Additional Debt Balance: | $8,500,000 | UW NCF: | $5,673,534 | |
Additional Debt Type: | Mezzanine Loan | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $87,000,000 / $173 | |
Appraisal Date: | 10/31/2014 | |||
Escrows and Reserves(4) | Financial Information | ||||||
Initial | Monthly | Initial Cap | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $127 | |||
Taxes: | $911,434 | $91,144 | N/A | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $116 | ||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV: | 73.3% | ||
Replacement Reserves: | $8,371 | $8,371 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV: | 66.8% | ||
TI/LC: | $54,167 | $54,167 | $3,750,000 | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.50x | ||
Other: | $2,807,354 | Springing | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 10.3% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Mortgage Loan | $63,750,000 | 72.7% | Net Purchase Price(5) | $81,087,385 | 92.4% | |
Mezzanine Loan | 8,500,000 | 9.7 | Upfront Reserves | 3,781,326 | 4.3 | |
Sponsor Equity | 15,483,167 | 17.6 | Closing Costs | 2,864,456 | 3.3 | |
Total Sources | $87,733,167 | 100.0% | Total Uses | $87,733,167 | 100.0% |
(1) | For a full description of the Sponsors, please refer to “The Sponsors” below. |
(2) | The first payment date for the loan according to the mortgage loan documents is February 1, 2015. At securitization, funds sufficient to pay the interest associated with the loan on the Distribution Date in January 2015 will be deposited into the trust. Consequently, the mortgage loan term has been adjusted to reflect the additional payment of interest that the trust will receive on behalf of the mortgage loan. |
(3) | The increase in 2013 NOI to UW NOI can be attributed to lease-up at the property, with occupancy increasing from 76.0% as of December 31, 2013 to 88.7% as of November 20, 2014. |
(4) | For a full description of Escrows and Reserves, please refer to “Escrows and Reserves” below. |
(5) | The Sponsors purchased the property for $85,000,000. The Net Purchase Price of $81,087,385 is $3,912,615 lower due to adjustments for real estate taxes, rent credits, outstanding tenant improvements, outstanding rent abatements, security deposits and other credits. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
40 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |
The Loan. The 1515 Market loan has an outstanding principal balance of $63.75 million and is secured by a first mortgage lien on a Class A office building located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The loan has a 10-year term and, subsequent to a five-year interest-only period, will amortize on a 30-year schedule.
The Borrower. The borrowing entity for the loan is BRI 1866 1515 Market, LP, a Delaware limited partnership and special purpose entity.
The Sponsors. The loan sponsors and nonrecourse carve-out guarantors are Accesso Investment Properties V, LLLP and Accesso Investment Properties V (US), LLLP, which are both Florida limited liability limited partnerships. The loan sponsors are affiliated with Accesso Partners LLC, formerly known as Beacon Investment Properties. Accesso Partners LLC is a real estate investment and property development group that was founded in 2003 and is based in Hallandale Beach, Florida. Accesso Partners LLC currently has a portfolio of 31 properties totaling approximately 7.8 million square feet.
The loan sponsors acquired the property from Winthrop Realty Trust for approximately $85.0 million. Prior to Winthrop Realty Trust’s ownership the property was owned by a joint venture between CBRE Realty Finance and Stockton Partners of New York, which had purchased the building in 2007 for approximately $75.0 million. As part of the acquisition, a $70.0 million loan was put in place that was subsequently securitized in the JPMCC 2007-LDPX transaction. The loan faced a number of near-term lease maturities, complicating its ability to refinance the mortgage and in April 2011 was placed into special servicing as the previous owner pursued a loan modification. The loan modification failed to close and due to strong interest in the building the special servicer conducted a note sale in September 2012. Winthrop Realty Trust acquired the note from the JPMCC 2007-LDPX Trust for approximately $56.85 million (81.2% of par) resulting in a loss to the JPMCC 2007-LDPX Trust. At the time of the note purchase, the occupancy was approximately 76.0%
The Property. 1515 Market is a Class A office building located at the corner of Market Street and 15th Street in Philadelphia’s central business district. The 20-story property was constructed in 1960, renovated in 2007 and totals 502,213 square feet.
As of November 20, 2014, the property is approximately 88.7% leased by 73 tenants. The largest tenant at the property, Temple University, leases 130,213 square feet (25.9% of the net rentable area) through June 2022. Temple University is the fourth largest provider of professional post-secondary education in the United States. Temple University utilizes its space at the property as its “downtown campus”, an annex to its primary campus which is located two miles north. This location caters primarily to adults/full time employees that are pursuing a graduate degree. The tenant has its own separate entrance with security and elevator lobby. Temple University has been a tenant since 2000 and in 2012 executed an early ten year lease extension through June 2022. In September 2014, Temple University agreed to lease an additional 2,347 square feet of ground floor space which will have a bookstore and outdoor café. The second largest tenant at the property, Heffler Radetich & Saitta, leases 26,027 square feet (5.2% of the net rentable area) through May 2019. Heffler Radetich & Saitta has been a tenant at the property since 2000, when it originally occupied approximately 19,752 square feet, and has subsequently expanded multiple times to its current 26,027 square feet. Heffler Radetich & Saitta is a full-service certified public accounting and consulting firm. The firm is ranked by the Philadelphia Business Journal as the 19th largest CPA firm in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. The third largest tenant at the property, the Commonwealth of PA, leases 18,356 square feet (3.7% of the net rentable area) through May 2023. The Commonwealth of PA has been a tenant at the property since 1986 and most recently in September 2013 extended the term of its lease for ten years to its expiration in May 2023. The Commonwealth of PA represents the government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and currently uses the space for administrative offices supporting the Pennsylvania court system. No other tenant accounts for more then 3.3% of the net rentable area.
The property is located adjacent to both City Hall and Dilworth Park which recently re-opened following the completion of an approximately $70.0 million renovation project and now is an integrated transit/public space with a fountain/ice skating rink, café and areas for markets, concerts and other open-air activities. In addition, the property is part of and has direct weather protected access to the subterranean retail and regional train complex known as Suburban Station. Tenants and visitors are sheltered from weather and vehicular traffic as the property’s lobby offers direct access to the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s (“SEPTA”) regional rail, Suburban Station’s concourse retail, surface trolleys as well as the Market-Frankford and Broad Street subway lines.
1515 Market is located in the Market West submarket of the Philadelphia central business district which is considered the city’s primary office district. According to the appraisal, the Market West corridor is located between 15th and 21st streets from Market to Arch streets. As of the third quarter of 2014 the Market West office market is comprised of approximately 29.9 million square feet and reported overall occupancy of 84.4% with asking rents of $29.77 per square foot. The appraisal identified six office properties that serve as a competitive set for the property. The properties in the competitive set range from 235,000 square feet to 686,503 square feet with a weighted average vacancy rate of 18.8% and asking rents of $22.50 to $27.00 per square foot.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
41 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |
Historical and Current Occupancy(1) | |||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Current(2) |
84.0% | 76.4% | 76.0% | 88.7% |
(1) | Historical Occupancies are as of December 31 of each respective year. |
(2) | Current Occupancy is as of November 20, 2014. |
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||
Tenant | Ratings(2) Moody’s/S&P/Fitch | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Total NRA | Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration Date |
Temple University | NA / NA / NA | 130,213 | 25.9% | $25.50 | 6/30/2022 |
Heffler Radetich & Saitta | NA / NA / NA | 26,027 | 5.2% | $24.39 | 5/31/2019 |
Commonwealth of PA(3) | NA / NA / AA- | 18,356 | 3.7% | $25.73 | 5/31/2023 |
Service Employees International Union | A2 / NA / NA | 16,529 | 3.3% | $21.00 | 3/31/2025 |
Sweeney & Sheehan | NA / NA / NA | 16,072 | 3.2% | $25.50 | 9/30/2021 |
Simon & Simon PC | NA / NA / NA | 15,983 | 3.2% | $24.00 | 4/30/2018 |
American Executive Center | NA / NA / NA | 15,822 | 3.2% | $23.25 | 5/31/2025 |
Ricci, Tyrrell, Johnson, | NA / NA / NA | 13,632 | 2.7% | $21.00 | 1/31/2022 |
Gannett Fleming, Inc. | NA / A / NA | 12,418 | 2.5% | $26.59 | 4/30/2015 |
Golomb & Honick PC | NA / NA / NA | 11,464 | 2.3% | $27.66 | 5/31/2018 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant” field whether or not the parent company guarantee the lease. |
(3) | Commonwealth of PA is only obligated to pay rent to the extent it has received appropriations from the state government. |
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | |||||||||||||||||
Year | Number of Leases Expiring | Net Rentable Area Expiring | % of NRA Expiring | Base Rent Expiring | % of Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative Net Rentable Area Expiring | Cumulative % of NRA Expiring | Cumulative Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative % of Base Rent Expiring | ||||||||
Vacant | NAP | 56,761 | 11.3 | % | NAP | NAP | 56,761 | 11.3% | NAP | NAP | |||||||
2014 & MTM | 2 | 7,105 | 1.4 | $29,975 | 0.3 | % | 63,866 | 12.7% | $29,975 | 0.3% | |||||||
2015 | 6 | 24,230 | 4.8 | 697,706 | 6.0 | 88,096 | 17.5% | $727,681 | 6.2% | ||||||||
2016 | 8 | 21,562 | 4.3 | 567,066 | 4.9 | 109,658 | 21.8% | $1,294,747 | 11.1% | ||||||||
2017 | 8 | 19,875 | 4.0 | 500,159 | 4.3 | 129,533 | 25.8% | $1,794,906 | 15.4% | ||||||||
2018 | 15 | 64,141 | 12.8 | 1,804,565 | 15.5 | 193,674 | 38.6% | $3,599,471 | 30.8% | ||||||||
2019 | 14 | 58,470 | 11.6 | 1,849,996 | 15.8 | 252,144 | 50.2% | $5,449,466 | 46.7% | ||||||||
2020 | 1 | 4,698 | 0.9 | 115,101 | 1.0 | 256,842 | 51.1% | $5,564,567 | 47.6% | ||||||||
2021 | 7 | 41,558 | 8.3 | 1,084,078 | 9.3 | 298,400 | 59.4% | $6,648,645 | 56.9% | ||||||||
2022 | 3 | 148,185 | 29.5 | 3,719,544 | 31.9 | 446,585 | 88.9% | $10,368,189 | 88.8% | ||||||||
2023 | 4 | 19,622 | 3.9 | 501,048 | 4.3 | 466,207 | 92.8% | $10,869,237 | 93.1% | ||||||||
2024 | 1 | 1,383 | 0.3 | 89,597 | 0.8 | 467,590 | 93.1% | $10,958,834 | 93.8% | ||||||||
2025 & Beyond | 4 | 34,623 | 6.9 | 719,187 | 6.2 | 502,213 | 100.0% | $11,678,020 | 100.0% | ||||||||
Total | 73 | 502,213 | 100.0 | % | $11,678,020 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
42 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow | ||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(1) | Underwritten | Per Square Foot | %(2) | ||
Rents in Place(3) | $10,742,096 | $9,858,321 | $8,976,675 | $9,776,056 | $11,678,020 | $23.25 | 86.4% | |
Vacant Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,404,706 | 2.80 | 10.4 | |
Gross Potential Rent | $10,742,096 | $9,858,321 | $8,976,675 | $9,776,056 | $13,082,726 | $26.05 | 96.8% | |
Total Reimbursements | 936,295 | 380,523 | 580,668 | 525,978 | 438,432 | 0.87 | 3.2 | |
Net Rental Income | $11,678,391 | $10,238,844 | $9,557,344 | $10,302,034 | $13,521,158 | $26.92 | 100.0% | |
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,451,780) | (2.89) | (10.7) | |
Other Income | 342,415 | 269,333 | 52,260 | 139,511 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | |
Effective Gross Income | $12,020,806 | $10,508,177 | $9,609,604 | $10,441,545 | $12,069,378 | $24.03 | 89.3% | |
Total Expenses | $5,947,512 | $5,701,084 | $5,519,383 | $5,562,663 | $5,487,872 | $10.93 | 45.5% | |
Net Operating Income | $6,073,294 | $4,807,093 | $4,090,220 | $4,878,882 | $6,581,505 | $13.11 | 54.5% | |
Total TI/LC, Capex/RR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 907,972 | 1.81 | 7.5 | |
Net Cash Flow | $6,073,294 | $4,807,093 | $4,090,220 | $4,878,882 | $5,673,534 | $11.30 | 47.0% |
(1) | TTM column represents the trailing twelve months ending October 31, 2014. |
(2) | Percentage column represents percent of Net Rental Income for all revenue lines and represents percent of Effective Gross Income for the remainder of fields. |
(3) | The increase in 2013 Rents in Place to the Underwritten Rents in Place can be attributed to lease-up at the property, with occupancy increasing from 76.0% as of December 31, 2013 to 88.7% as of November 20, 2014. |
Property Management. The property is managed by Accesso Services, LLC, an affiliate of the sponsor.
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the borrower deposited into escrow approximately $1,934,290 for outstanding tenant improvement and leasing commissions associated with 12 tenants, $911,434 for real estate taxes, $660,314 for free rent, $212,750 for deferred maintenance, $54,167 for tenant improvement and leasing commissions and $8,371 for replacement reserves.
Tax Escrows - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, which currently equates to $91,144.
Insurance Escrows - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits into the insurance escrow is waived so long as no event of default exists and either the borrower provides satisfactory evidence that the property is insured under an approved blanket policy in accordance with the loan documents or the property maintains a debt service coverage ratio as calculated in the loan documents greater than 1.25x.
Replacement Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow $8,371 (approximately $0.20 per square foot annually) for replacement reserves.
TI/LC Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow $54,167 (approximately $1.29 per square foot annually) for future tenant improvements and leasing commissions. The reserve is subject to a cap of $3.75 million (approximately $7.47 per square foot).
Lockbox / Cash Management. The loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in-place cash management. The borrower or manager were required to send tenant direction letters to all tenants instructing them to deposit all rents and payments into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. All funds in the lockbox account are swept daily to a cash management account under the control of the lender and disbursed during each interest period during the term of the loan in accordance with the loan documents. To the extent that (i) there is an event of default under the loan documents, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio (including the mezzanine loan) as calculated in the loan documents based on a trailing three month period falls below 1.10x, (iii) the borrower or property manager becomes the subject of a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar action or (iv) a Temple University Trigger Event occurs, then all excess cash flow after payment of debt service, required reserves and operating expenses will be held as additional collateral for the loan.
A “Temple University Trigger Event” means: (i) any bankruptcy action with respect to Temple University, (ii) Temple University goes dark, vacates or abandons its space at the property, (iii) Temple University terminates its lease or (iv) Temple University fails to renew its lease for a minimum of five years on or before 12 months prior to its current lease expiration date in June 2022.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
43 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
1515 Market |
Additional Mezzanine Debt. JPMCB provided the loan sponsors with a $8.5 million mezzanine loan that is secured by the loan sponsor’s equity interest in the borrower. The mezzanine loan has an anticipated repayment date of June 29, 2015 and a final maturity date of January 1, 2025. The mezzanine loan is interest-only for the term of the loan and has an initial interest rate of 10.00000%. If the mezzanine loan has not been repaid prior to the anticipated repayment date, after the anticipated repayment date, the interest rate will be 12.00000% and all excess cash flow will be swept and utilized to pay down the outstanding mezzanine loan balance (subject to the waterfall set forth in the cash management agreement). Including the mezzanine loan, the Cut-off Date LTV is 83.0%, the UW NCF DSCR is 1.22x based on the current mezzanine loan interest rate of 10.00000% and the amortizing mortgage loan debt service. Based on the mezzanine loan interest rate converting to 12.00000% and the amortizing mortgage loan debt service payment, the UW NCF DSCR is 1.18x. The mortgage and mezzanine lenders have entered into an intercreditor agreement.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
44 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
45 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
46 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
47 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | JPMCB | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset | |
Original Principal Balance: | $59,800,000 | Title: | Fee | |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance: | $59,800,000 | Property Type - Subtype: | Office - CBD | |
% of Pool by IPB: | 4.1% | Net Rentable Area (SF): | 389,524 | |
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Location: | Tampa, FL | |
Borrower: | 100 South Ashley Property Owner, LLC | Year Built / Renovated: | 1985 / 2013 | |
Sponsor: | Greenfield Acquisition Partners VII, L.P. | Occupancy: | 93.1% | |
Interest Rate: | 4.72150% | Occupancy Date: | 11/1/2014 | |
Note Date: | 11/25/2014 | Number of Tenants: | 51 | |
Maturity Date: | 12/1/2019 | 2011 NOI: | $2,756,369 | |
Interest-only Period: | None | 2012 NOI(1): | $2,341,719 | |
Original Term: | 60 months | 2013 NOI(1): | $2,918,702 | |
Original Amortization: | 360 months | TTM NOI (as of 9/2014)(1)(2) : | $3,176,544 | |
Amortization Type: | Balloon | UW Economic Occupancy: | 91.4% | |
Call Protection: | L(24),Grtr1%orYM(12),O(24) | UW Revenues: | $9,349,535 | |
Lockbox: | Hard | UW Expenses: | $3,965,225 | |
Additional Debt: | N/A | UW NOI(2): | $5,384,310 | |
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | UW NCF: | $4,958,329 | |
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $78,000,000 / $200 | |
Appraisal Date: | 10/29/2014 | |||
Escrows and Reserves(3) | Financial Information | |||||
Initial | Monthly | Initial Cap | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $154 | ||
Taxes: | $116,465 | $116,465 | N/A | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $141 | |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV: | 76.7% | |
Replacement Reserves: | $800,000 | $4,870 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV: | 70.4% | |
TI/LC: | $40,576 | $40,576 | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.33x | |
Other: | $2,070,300 | $0 | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 9.0% | |
Sources and Uses | ||||||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |||||
Mortgage Loan | $59,800,000 | 72.9 | % | Purchase Price | $78,000,000 | 95.1 | % | |||
Sponsor Equity | 22,204,601 | 27.1 | Upfront Reserves | 3,027,341 | 3.7 | |||||
Closing Costs | 977,260 | 1.2 | ||||||||
Total Sources | $82,004,601 | 100.0 | % | Total Uses | $82,004,601 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | Increases in historical NOI can be attributed to lease-up at the property, with occupancy increasing from 72.5% in 2011 to 75.1% in 2012, 86.3% in 2013 and to the current occupancy of 93.1% as of November 1, 2014. |
(2) | The increase in UW NOI from TTM NOI is primarily the result of contractual rent increases through December 2015 and 26,132 square feet of newly executed leases since September 2014 that account for approximately $653,300 of annual rent. |
(3) | For a full description of Escrows and Reserves, please refer to “Escrows and Reserves” below. |
The Loan. The Wells Fargo Center Tampa loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on a 22-story, 389,524 square foot office building located in the central business district of Tampa, Florida. The loan has an outstanding principal balance of $59.8 million, has a five-year term and amortizes on a 30-year schedule for the entire term of the loan.
The Borrower. The borrowing entity for the Wells Fargo Center Tampa loan is 100 South Ashley Property Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and special purpose entity.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
48 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |
The Sponsor. The loan sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor is Greenfield Acquisition Partners VII, L.P. The loan sponsor is an affiliate of Greenfield Partners, which was established in 1997 by Eugene A. Gorab and is a real estate acquisition, development, asset management and finance company. The firm manages capital on behalf of its principals and limited partners, and has since inception secured capital commitments in excess of $4.0 billion across a series of discretionary investment vehicles. The company’s limited partners include state and corporate pension plans, university endowments, private foundations and high net worth individuals.
The Property. Wells Fargo Center Tampa is a Class A office building located on South Ashley Drive and occupies one city block between East Brorein Street and East Whiting Street in the central business district of Tampa, Florida. The property was constructed in 1985 and renovated in 2013. The 22-story property totals 389,524 square feet and consists primarily of office space with a small retail component which includes a Wells Fargo Bank branch. The property features amenities that include a fitness center, café, full service bank branch, conference center and complimentary shuttle service. The property also features an attached nine-story parking garage with 505 spaces, which provides for a parking ratio of 1.3 per 1,000 square feet. Prior to the acquisition, the previous owner spent over $6.0 million in upgrades and renovations. The renovations included modernizing of systems, telecommunications infrastructure and multi-tenant corridors. The corridor renovations include new lighting, new carpeting and bathroom upgrades. Upgrades to the property amenities include a new restaurant, a high-end fitness center and an upgrade to the parking garage. Additionally, the property obtained LEED Gold status.
As of November 1, 2014, the property was 93.1% leased by 51 tenants. The largest tenant at the property, Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo”), leases 14.9% of the net rentable area through July 2022 and has two five-year extension options remaining. Wells Fargo has been a tenant at the property since 1994 and in August 2012 extended the term of their lease through their current expiration of July 2022. Wells Fargo is rated A2/A+/AA- by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, respectively. The property is Wells Fargo’s Tampa headquarters and is home to the wholesale banking unit which includes investment banking and capital markets, securities investment, commercial real estate and capital finance. Wells Fargo is a nationwide, diversified financial services company with $1.6 trillion in assets. At the end of third quarter 2014, Wells Fargo ranked fourth in assets among U.S. banks and was the world’s most valuable bank by market capitalization. The second largest tenant, Phelps Dunbar, leases 9.3% of the net rentable area through October 2017 and has two five-year extension options remaining. Phelps Dunbar is a regional law firm of more than 270 attorneys with offices positioned along the Gulf Coast from Houston to Tampa and has been a tenant at the property since 2006. The third largest tenant, UBS Financial Services, leases 5.1% of the net rentable area through February 2021 and has one five-year extension option remaining. UBS Financial Services is rated A2/A/A by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch and has been at the property since 1986 and is part of UBS’s Wealth Management Americas segment. UBS Wealth Management offers an array of investment products and services to affluent clients with more than $250,000 of investable assets. UBS Financial Services has a network of 7,000 financial advisors across the U.S., Puerto Rico and Canada serving more than two million customers. It has more than $600 billion of assets under management.
The property is located on South Ashley Drive and occupies one city block between East Brorein Street and East Whiting Street in the central business district of Tampa, Florida. Given the property’s central location, it is within walking distance of the Tampa Riverwalk, Tampa Convention Center and many of the amenities of downtown Tampa. At 22-stories, the property offers expansive views overlooking Hillsborough Bay, the Hillsborough River and the downtown Tampa skyline.
According to the appraisal, the overall Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater office market consists of approximately 45.2 million square feet with an overall vacancy rate of 16.1% and a weighted average Class A rent of $23.63 per square foot as of first quarter 2014. Wells Fargo Center Tampa is located in the Tampa central business district office submarket which consists of approximately 6.4 million square feet with an overall vacancy rate of 13.2% and a weighted average Class A rent of $24.08 per square foot as of first quarter 2014. The Tampa central business district submarket is identified as one of the more desirable submarkets within the overall Tampa market. Overall vacancy in the central business district submarket has decreased by 2.1% between first quarter 2013 and first quarter 2014. The appraisal identified recent leases at five directly competitive properties built between 1981 and 1992 and ranging in size from 281,187 to 762,062 square feet. The rents at the comparable properties ranged from $22.00 to $27.50 per square foot. The appraisal’s conclusion of market rent for the property ranged from $24.50 to $26.00 per square foot depending on location and quality of space within the property. Using this conclusion of market rent, the appraisal determined that rents at the property are approximately 12.95% below market.
Historical and Current Occupancy(1) | ||||
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Current(2) |
69.8% | 72.5% | 75.1% | 86.3% | 93.1% |
(1) | Historical Occupancies are as of December 31 of each respective year. |
(2) | Current Occupancy is as of November 1, 2014. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
49 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant | Ratings(2) Moody’s/S&P/Fitch | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Total NRA | Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration Date | ||
Wells Fargo Bank | A2 / A+ / AA- | 58,098 | 14.9% | $21.85 | 7/31/2022 | ||
Phelps Dunbar | N/A / N/A / N/A | 36,272 | 9.3% | $24.39 | 10/31/2017 | ||
UBS Financial Services | A2 / A / A | 19,997 | 5.1% | $25.00 | 2/28/2021 | ||
Allegiant MD | N/A / N/A / N/A | 18,951 | 4.9% | $21.38 | 1/31/2019 | ||
Warren Averett | N/A / N/A / N/A | 18,743 | 4.8% | $24.78 | 8/31/2018 | ||
Valet Waste | N/A / N/A / N/A | 17,194 | 4.4% | $21.50 | 3/31/2021 | ||
Hinshaw & Culbertson | N/A / N/A / N/A | 16,039 | 4.1% | $24.76 | 8/31/2017 | ||
Carlton Fields | N/A / N/A / N/A | 14,510 | 3.7% | $19.94 | 10/31/2019 | ||
Glenn Rasmussen | N/A / N/A / N/A | 14,400 | 3.7% | $22.28 | 3/31/2019 | ||
Entegra Power Services | N/A / N/A / N/A | 13,632 | 3.5% | $21.67 | 3/31/2017 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant” field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Year | Number of Leases Expiring | Net Rentable Area Expiring | % of NRA Expiring | Base Rent Expiring | % of Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative Net Rentable Area Expiring | Cumulative % of NRA Expiring | Cumulative Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative % of Base Rent Expiring | |||||||
Vacant | NAP | 27,014 | 6.9% | NAP | NAP | 27,014 | 6.9% | NAP | NAP | |||||||
2014 & MTM | 1 | 1,338 | 0.3 | $28,259 | 0.3% | 28,352 | 7.3% | $28,259 | 0.3% | |||||||
2015 | 4 | 9,488 | 2.4 | 204,263 | 2.5 | 37,840 | 9.7% | $232,522 | 2.9% | |||||||
2016 | 5 | 13,399 | 3.4 | 317,234 | 3.9 | 51,239 | 13.2% | $549,755 | 6.8% | |||||||
2017 | 11 | 96,777 | 24.8 | 2,250,959 | 27.8 | 148,016 | 38.0% | $2,800,714 | 34.6% | |||||||
2018 | 5 | 27,542 | 7.1 | 651,163 | 8.0 | 175,558 | 45.1% | $3,451,877 | 42.7% | |||||||
2019 | 15 | 84,876 | 21.8 | 1,807,801 | 22.3 | 260,434 | 66.9% | $5,259,679 | 65.0% | |||||||
2020 | 2 | 12,412 | 3.2 | 306,534 | 3.8 | 272,846 | 70.0% | $5,566,212 | 68.8% | |||||||
2021 | 2 | 37,191 | 9.5 | 869,596 | 10.7 | 310,037 | 79.6% | $6,435,808 | 79.5% | |||||||
2022 | 1 | 58,098 | 14.9 | 1,270,987 | 15.7 | 368,135 | 94.5% | $7,706,795 | 95.2% | |||||||
2023 | 2 | 4,893 | 1.3 | 108,749 | 1.3 | 373,028 | 95.8% | $7,815,544 | 96.6% | |||||||
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 373,028 | 95.8% | $7,815,544 | 96.6% | |||||||
2025 & Beyond | 3 | 16,496 | 4.2 | 277,501 | 3.4 | 389,524 | 100.0% | $8,093,045 | 100.0% | |||||||
Total | 51 | 389,524 | 100.0% | $8,093,045 | 100.0% |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
50 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Wells Fargo Center Tampa |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow | |||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(1) | Underwritten | Per Square Foot | %(2) | |||||
Rents in Place(3)(4)(5) | $5,291,377 | $5,166,622 | $5,876,099 | $6,036,722 | $8,093,045 | $20.78 | 87.7% | ||||
Vacant Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 666,172 | 1.71 | 7.2 | ||||
Gross Potential Rent | $5,291,377 | $5,166,622 | $5,876,099 | $6,036,722 | $8,759,217 | $22.49 | 95.0% | ||||
Total Reimbursements | 234,534 | 171,889 | 103,483 | 240,453 | 465,285 | 1.19 | 5.0 | ||||
Net Rental Income | $5,525,911 | $5,338,511 | $5,979,582 | $6,277,175 | $9,224,502 | $23.68 | 100.0% | ||||
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (792,967) | (2.04) | (8.6) | ||||
Parking Income | 628,880 | 618,316 | 644,247 | 725,508 | 918,000 | 2.36 | 10.0 | ||||
Effective Gross Income | $6,154,791 | $5,956,827 | $6,623,829 | $7,002,682 | $9,349,535 | $24.00 | 101.4% | ||||
Total Expenses | $3,398,422 | $3,615,108 | $3,705,127 | $3,826,138 | $3,965,225 | $10.18 | 42.4% | ||||
Net Operating Income | $2,756,369 | $2,341,719 | $2,918,702 | $3,176,544 | $5,384,310 | $13.82 | 57.6% | ||||
Total TI/LC, Capex/RR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 425,981 | 1.09 | 4.6 | ||||
Net Cash Flow | $2,756,369 | $2,341,719 | $2,918,702 | $3,176,544 | $4,958,329 | $12.73 | 53.0% | ||||
(1) | TTM column represents the trailing twelve-month period ending on September 30, 2014. |
(2) | Percentage column represents percent of Net Rental Income for all revenue lines and represents percent of Effective Gross Income for the remainder of fields. |
(3) | The increase in 2013 Rents in Place from 2012 Rents in Place is primarily the result of approximately 47,898 square feet of leasing activity at the property in 2013. Occupancy increased from 75.1% in 2012 to 86.3% in 2013. |
(4) | The increase in TTM Rents in Place from 2013 Rents in Place is primarily the result of a new lease to Valet Waste for 17,194 square feet. |
(5) | The increase in Underwritten Rents in Place from TTM Rents in Place is primarily the result of 26,132 square feet of newly executed leases since September 2014 that account for approximately $653,300 of annual rent and contractual rent increases through December 2015. |
Property Management. The property is managed by Tower Realty Asset Management, Inc., an affiliate of Tower Realty Partners, a privately held commercial real estate investment firm focusing on value-added opportunities throughout Florida. The company owns and operates over three million square feet of office and retail space throughout Florida.
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the borrower deposited into escrow approximately $819,185 for a free rent reserve relating to 12 tenants, $800,000 for general replacement reserves, $759,484 for capital expenditure relating to modernization of the elevator system, $491,631 for outstanding tenant improvement and leasing commissions, $116,465 for real estate taxes and $40,576 for future tenant improvement and leasing commissions.
Tax Escrows - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, which currently equates to $116,465.
Insurance Escrows - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits into the insurance escrow is waived so long as (i) no event of default exists and (ii) the borrower provides satisfactory evidence that the property is insured under an approved blanket policy in accordance with the loan documents.
Replacement Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow $4,870 (approximately $0.15 per square foot annually) for replacement reserves.
TI/LC Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to deposit $40,576 (approximately $1.25 per square foot annually) into the TI/LC escrow.
Lockbox / Cash Management. The loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in-place cash management. The borrower was required to send tenant direction letters to all tenants instructing them to deposit all rents and payments into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. All rents will be swept daily to a segregated cash management account and disbursed during each interest period in accordance with the loan documents. The lender will have a first priority security interest in the cash management account. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a Cash Sweep Event, all funds deposited into the cash management account after payment of debt service, required reserves and budgeted operating expenses will be held as additional security for the loan.
A “Cash Sweep Event” means: (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, (ii) any bankruptcy action of the borrower, its principal or manager or (iii) the debt service coverage ratio as calculated in the loan documents based on the trailing three-month period falls below 1.10x.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
51 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
52 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
53 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
54 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | JPMCB | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Single Asset | |
Original Principal Balance: | $52,000,000 | Title: | Fee | |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance: | $52,000,000 | Property Type - Subtype: | Office - Suburban | |
% of Pool by IPB: | 3.6% | Net Rentable Area (SF): | 314,504 | |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Location: | Houston, TX | |
Borrower: | L REIT, Ltd. | Year Built / Renovated: | 2001-2008 / N/A | |
Sponsor: | Mohammad Nasr | Occupancy(1)(2): | 98.2% | |
Interest Rate: | 4.48500% | Occupancy Date: | 12/1/2014 | |
Note Date: | 11/14/2014 | Number of Tenants: | 37 | |
Maturity Date: | 12/1/2024 | 2011 NOI: | $4,506,692 | |
Interest-only Period: | 24 months | 2012 NOI: | $4,560,844 | |
Original Term: | 120 months | 2013 NOI: | $4,506,964 | |
Original Amortization: | 360 months | TTM NOI (as of 9/2014): | $4,704,666 | |
Amortization Type: | IO-Balloon | UW Economic Occupancy: | 95.0% | |
Call Protection: | L(25),Grtr1%orYM(91),O(4) | UW Revenues(2): | $7,968,098 | |
Lockbox: | Hard | UW Expenses: | $3,137,765 | |
Additional Debt: | Yes | UW NOI: | $4,830,334 | |
Additional Debt Balance: | $7,000,000 | UW NCF: | $4,288,295 | |
Additional Debt Type: | Mezzanine Loan | Appraised Value / Per SF: | $71,000,000 / $226 | |
Appraisal Date: | 11/1/2014 | |||
Escrows and Reserves(3) | Financial Information | |||||
Initial | Monthly | Initial Cap | Cut-off Date Loan / SF: | $165 | ||
Taxes: | $94,445 | $94,445 | N/A | Maturity Date Loan / SF: | $141 | |
Insurance: | $9,479 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV: | 73.2% | |
Replacement Reserves: | $5,250 | $5,250 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV: | 62.5% | |
TI/LC: | $39,375 | $39,375 | $1,890,000 | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.36x | |
Other: | $5,135,169 | $0 | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 9.3% | |
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Mortgage Loan | $52,000,000 | 88.1% | Payoff Existing Debt | $48,672,135 | 82.5% | |
Mezzanine Loan | 7,000,000 | 11.9 | Upfront Reserves | 5,283,718 | 9.0 | |
Closing Costs | 2,538,285 | 4.3 | ||||
Return of Equity | 2,505,862 | 4.2 | ||||
Total Sources | $59,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses | $59,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | Occupancy includes Logan International (14,482 square feet), Global Drilling Support (9,865 square feet) and American International Relocation Services (7,775 square feet), which have executed leases but are not expected to take occupancy until February 2015, January 2015 and February 2015, respectively. |
(2) | Occupancy and UW Revenues include three tenants that are affiliated with the sponsor. These tenants account for approximately 4.0% of the net rentable area and 3.2% of the underwritten rents. |
(3) | For a full description of Escrows and Reserves, please refer to “Escrows and Reserves” below. |
The Loan. The Heron Lakes loan has an outstanding principal balance of $52.0 million and is secured by a first mortgage lien on seven Class A office buildings located in Houston, Texas. The loan has a 10-year term and subsequent to a two-year interest-only period, will amortize on a 30-year schedule. The previously existing debt consisted of a $26.0 million mortgage loan that was securitized in the JPMCC 2013-FL3 transaction, together with a $25.0 million mezzanine loan.
The Borrower. The borrowing entity for the loan is L REIT, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership and special purpose entity.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
55 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |
The Sponsor. The loan sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor is Mohammad Nasr. Mr. Nasr is the principal of a Houston based architectural and real estate development firm that has experience in over 24 projects across the United States comprising over 5.0 million square feet. Mr. Nasr developed the property between 2001 and 2008 for a total cost of approximately $73.0 million and has a current basis of approximately $74.3 million.
The Property. The property consists of seven Class A/B office buildings containing approximately 314,504 square feet located in Houston, Texas. The seven buildings were developed between 2001 and 2008 and are situated across 14.4 acres with frontage along Beltway 8 (Sam Houston Parkway), approximately 13 miles north of the Houston central business district. The buildings range from two to five stories and from approximately 35,000 square feet to 75,000 square feet.
As of December 1, 2014, the property was approximately 98.2% leased by 37 tenants. The tenants at the property operate in a variety of industries including oil and gas services, energy, technology, education, communications and banking. The largest tenant at the property, Boots & Coots, leases 34,052 square feet (10.8% of the net rentable area) through July 2017. Boots & Coots is a subsidiary of Halliburton and provides services to the oil and gas industry. The second largest tenant at the property, Intergraph, leases 29,581 square feet (9.4% of the net rentable area) through June 2020. Intergraph is a provider of engineering and geospatial software. In December 2012, Intergraph expanded by 21,040 square feet to its current total of 29,581 square feet and extended the term of its lease from May 2014 to June 2020. The third largest tenant at the property, Icon Bank, leases 22,029 square feet (7.0% of the net rentable area) and is headquartered at the property. Of the total space Icon Bank leases, 12,548 square feet are expiring in February 2017 and 9,481 square feet are expiring in February 2020. Icon Bank has been a tenant at the property since 2007 and has expanded multiple times, most recently in October 2014 by an additional 5,695 square feet. Icon Bank is a Texas based full-service bank with seven offices located in the state. As of the second quarter of 2014, the bank reported assets of approximately $597.1 million, up from approximately $481.5 million the previous year.
When the Heron Lakes loan was previously securitized in the JPMCC 2013-FL3 transaction, the third largest tenant at the time was the University of Phoenix, which occupied 24,749 square feet on a lease through December 2014. The University of Phoenix vacated the property in early 2014 but continued to fulfill its obligations under the lease until November 2014, when the tenant and loan sponsor agreed to terminate the lease early. The University of Phoenix space is being backfilled by Global Drilling Support, American International Relocation Services and Coperion. All three tenants have executed leases but Global Drilling Support and American International Relocation Services are not expected to take occupancy of their respective spaces until January 2015 and February 2015, respectively.
Located off of Sam Houston Parkway and North Gessner Road, the property represents the office component of the master-planned Heron Lakes Estates, which includes residential units, the 18-hole Heron Lakes Golf Course, and a Staybridge Suites hotel (none of which are part of the collateral). Nearby amenities for the residents of the community include Willowbrook Mall and the Sam Houston Race Park. Bush Intercontinental Airport is approximately 15 miles east/northeast of the property. The property has nearby access to Beltway 8, the FM 1960 highway and State Highway 249, which are the main thorough-fares in the area going east/west and north/south.
Heron Lakes is located in the FM 1960 submarket, northwest of the Houston central business district office market. According to the appraisal, as of the second quarter of 2014 the FM 1960 office market was comprised of approximately 6.2 million square feet, of which 2.04 million square feet is Class A. The Class A vacancy rate for the FM 1960 submarket as of the second quarter of 2014 was 6.9%, down from 11.8% at the end of 2012. Class A asking rents as of the second quarter of 2014 were $29.38 per square foot, up from $24.57 at the end of 2012. The appraiser stated that Heron Lakes lies within a stronger micromarket within the FM 1960 submarket, primarily due to its recent construction and frontage along Beltway 8. The appraisal identified five office properties that serve as a competitive set for the property. The properties in the competitive set range from 48,139 square feet to 159,175 square feet and were constructed between 2007 and 2009. The competitive set has a rental range of $17.50 to $21.50 per square foot NNN with a weighted average vacancy rate of 2.6%.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
56 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |
Historical and Current Occupancy(1) | ||||
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Current(2)(3) |
96.0% | 94.8% | 90.0% | 95.3% | 98.2% |
(1) | Historical Occupancies are as of December 31 of each respective year. |
(2) | Current Occupancy is as of December 1, 2014. |
(3) | Current Occupancy includes Logan International (14,482 square feet), Global Drilling Support (9,865 square feet) and American International Relocation Services (7,775 square feet), which have executed leases but are not expected to take occupancy until February 2015, January 2015 and February 2015, respectively. |
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||
Tenant | Ratings(2) Moody’s/S&P/Fitch | Net Rentable Area (SF) | % of Total NRA | Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration Date |
Boots & Coots | A2 / A / A- | 34,052 | 10.8% | $25.01 | 7/31/2017 |
Intergraph | NA / NA / NA | 29,581 | 9.4% | $25.05 | 6/30/2020 |
Icon Bank(3)(4) | NA / NA / NA | 22,029 | 7.0% | $20.44 | 2/28/2017 |
Kiewit | NA / NA / NA | 21,923 | 7.0% | $26.95 | 6/30/2019 |
Art Institute(4) | NA / NA / NA | 20,711 | 6.6% | $19.50 | 6/30/2019 |
Energy Solution | NA / NA / NA | 16,447 | 5.2% | $25.00 | 4/30/2016 |
Accudata | NA / NA / NA | 14,885 | 4.7% | $24.87 | 6/30/2016 |
Logan International(4) | NA / NA / NA | 14,482 | 4.6% | $17.00 | 1/31/2025 |
Caldwell Watson Real Estate Group | NA / NA / NA | 13,692 | 4.4% | $23.67 | 12/31/2019 |
Global Drilling Support(4) | NA / NA / NA | 9,865 | 3.1% | $17.50 | 12/31/2019 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant” field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Icon Bank has multiple leases at the property and the expiration date listed above reflects the expiration date of the largest space they occupy. In total, 12,548 square feet are expiring in February 2017 and 9,481 square feet are expiring in February 2020. |
(4) | The Base Rent PSF for Icon Bank, Art Institute, Logan International and Global Drilling Support are lower then other tenants in the above chart because the leases are NNN while other tenants have gross leases. The loan sponsor has made a recent effort to convert new or renewal leases from gross to NNN. |
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | |||||||||
Year | Number of Leases Expiring | Net Rentable Area Expiring | % of NRA Expiring | Base Rent Expiring | % of Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative Net Rentable Area Expiring | Cumulative % of NRA Expiring | Cumulative Base Rent Expiring | Cumulative % of Base Rent Expiring |
Vacant | NAP | 5,563 | 1.8% | NAP | NAP | 5,563 | 1.8% | NAP | NAP |
2014 & MTM | 1 | 411 | 0.1 | $0 | 0.0% | 5,974 | 1.9% | $0 | 0.0% |
2015 | 2 | 15,266 | 4.9 | 378,711 | 5.5 | 21,240 | 6.8% | $378,711 | 5.5% |
2016 | 8 | 60,688 | 19.3 | 1,491,556 | 21.7 | 81,928 | 26.0% | $1,870,267 | 27.2% |
2017 | 5 | 56,737 | 18.0 | 1,331,678 | 19.4 | 138,665 | 44.1% | $3,201,944 | 46.5% |
2018 | 4 | 14,889 | 4.7 | 296,198 | 4.3 | 153,554 | 48.8% | $3,498,142 | 50.8% |
2019 | 7 | 76,072 | 24.2 | 1,659,426 | 24.1 | 229,626 | 73.0% | $5,157,567 | 74.9% |
2020 | 5 | 53,834 | 17.1 | 1,174,233 | 17.1 | 283,460 | 90.1% | $6,331,800 | 92.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 283,460 | 90.1% | $6,331,800 | 92.0% |
2022 | 1 | 2,444 | 0.8 | 41,548 | 0.6 | 285,904 | 90.9% | $6,373,348 | 92.6% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 285,904 | 90.9% | $6,373,348 | 92.6% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 285,904 | 90.9% | $6,373,348 | 92.6% |
2025 & Beyond | 4 | 28,600 | 9.1 | 508,026 | 7.4 | 314,504 | 100.0% | $6,881,374 | 100.0% |
Total | 37 | 314,504 | 100.0% | $6,881,374 | 100.0% |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
57 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow | ||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(1) | Underwritten | Per Square Foot | %(2) | ||
Rents in Place | $7,031,517 | $7,260,348 | $7,284,620 | $7,713,318 | $6,881,374 | $21.88 | 82.3% | |
Vacant Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101,525 | 0.32 | 1.2 | |
Gross Potential Rent | $7,031,517 | $7,260,348 | $7,284,620 | $7,713,318 | $6,982,899 | $22.20 | 83.5% | |
Total Reimbursements(3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,375,100 | 4.37 | 16.5 | |
Net Rental Income | $7,031,517 | $7,260,348 | $7,284,620 | $7,713,318 | $8,357,998 | $26.58 | 100.0% | |
(Vacancy/Credit Loss) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (417,900) | (1.33) | (5.0) | |
Other Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28,000 | 0.09 | 0.3 | |
Effective Gross Income | $7,031,517 | $7,260,348 | $7,284,620 | $7,713,318 | $7,968,098 | $25.34 | 95.3% | |
Total Expenses | $2,524,825 | $2,699,504 | $2,777,656 | $3,008,652 | $3,137,765 | $9.98 | 39.4% | |
Net Operating Income | $4,506,692 | $4,560,844 | $4,506,964 | $4,704,666 | $4,830,334 | $15.36 | 60.6% | |
Total TI/LC, Capex/RR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 542,039 | 1.72 | 6.8 | |
Net Cash Flow | $4,506,692 | $4,560,844 | $4,506,964 | $4,704,666 | $4,288,295 | $13.64 | 53.8% |
(1) | TTM column represents the trailing twelve months ending September 30, 2014. |
(2) | Percentage column represents percent of Net Rental Income for all revenue lines and represents percent of Effective Gross Income for the remainder of fields. |
(3) | The increase in TTM and Underwritten Total Reimbursements is due to the loan sponsor’s recent efforts to convert new or renewal leases from gross to NNN. |
Property Management. The property is managed by Hollister Property, Inc., an affiliate of the loan sponsor.
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the borrower deposited into escrow approximately $4,000,000 for a Logan International reserve as described below, $1,087,669 for an outstanding leasing costs and free rent reserve as described below, $94,445 for real estate taxes, $47,500 for deferred maintenance, $39,375 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions, $9,479 for insurance and $5,250 for replacement reserves.
Tax Escrows - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, which currently equates to $94,445.
Insurance Escrows - The requirement for the borrower to make monthly deposits into the insurance escrow is waived so long as (i) no event of default exists and (ii) the borrower provides satisfactory evidence that the property is insured under an approved blanket policy in accordance with the loan documents.
Replacement Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow $5,250 (approximately $0.20 per square foot annually) for replacement reserves.
TI/LC Reserves - On a monthly basis, the borrower is required to escrow $39,375 (approximately $1.50 per square foot annually) for future tenant improvements and leasing commissions. The reserve is subject to a cap of $1.89 million (approximately $6.01 per square foot). The borrower is required to deposit all fees into the TI/LC reserve in connection with any tenant exercising any termination or partial termination or contraction rights.
Outstanding Leasing Costs Reserves - At closing, the borrower deposited into escrow $1,087,669 for outstanding leasing costs. Of such funds, $890,570 will be used for outstanding tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations under leases in effect at closing and $197,099 will be used for free rent, rent abatements and tenant reimbursements under such existing leases.
Logan International Reserve - At closing, the borrower deposited into escrow $4,000,000 which shall be disbursed when Logan International (or one or more tenants acceptable to the lender) is in possession of its space, open for business and is paying full rent without offset, free rent or abatements and all landlord and tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations have been satisfied. The Logan International lease is expected to commence in February 2015 and is structured with four months of abated rent.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
58 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
Heron Lakes |
Lockbox / Cash Management. The loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in-place cash management. The borrower or manager were required to send tenant direction letters to all tenants instructing them to deposit all rents and payments into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. All funds in the lockbox account are swept daily to a cash management account under the control of the lender and disbursed during each interest period during the term of the loan in accordance with the loan documents. To the extent that (i) there is an event of default under the loan documents, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio (including the mezzanine loan) as calculated in the loan documents based on a trailing three-month period falls below 1.05x for the period beginning on December 1, 2014 and ending on November 30, 2015 and 1.10x at any time thereafter or (iii) the borrower or property manager becomes the subject of a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar action, then all excess cash flow after payment of debt service, required reserves and operating expenses will be held as additional collateral for the loan.
Release of Individual Properties. None.
Additional Mezzanine Debt. A mezzanine loan of $7.0 million secured by the equity interests in the borrower was provided by JPMCB. The mezzanine loan has a coterminous maturity with the mortgage loan. The mezzanine loan makes interest only payments throughout the term of the loan and has a 10.10000% coupon. Including the mezzanine loan, the Cut-off Date LTV is 83.1%, the UW NCF DSCR is 1.11x (calculated based on amortizing debt service payments for the Mortgage Loan) and the UW NOI Debt Yield is 8.2%. The mortgage and mezzanine lenders have entered into an intercreditor agreement.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
59 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
60 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
61 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |

THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
62 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | JPMCB | Single Asset / Portfolio: | Portfolio | |
Original Principal Balance: | $49,750,000 | Title: | Fee / Leasehold | |
Cut-off Date Principal Balance: | $49,750,000 | Property Type - Subtype: | Hotel - Limited Service | |
% of Pool by IPB: | 3.4% | Net Rentable Area (Rooms): | 732 | |
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Location: | Various | |
Borrowers(1): | Various | Year Built / Renovated: | Various / Various | |
Sponsor: | Lance T. Shaner | Occupancy / ADR / RevPAR: | 73.4% / $96.93 / $71.11 | |
Interest Rate: | 4.52700% | Occupancy / ADR / RevPAR Date: | 8/31/2014 | |
Note Date: | 10/31/2014 | Number of Tenants: | N/A | |
Maturity Date: | 11/1/2024 | 2011 NOI: | $3,168,150 | |
Interest-only Period: | 24 months | 2012 NOI: | $4,116,135 | |
Original Term: | 120 months | 2013 NOI: | $4,673,646 | |
Original Amortization: | 360 months | TTM NOI (as of 8/2014): | $5,342,856 | |
Amortization Type: | IO-Balloon | UW Occupancy / ADR / RevPAR: | 73.4% / $96.93 / $71.11 | |
Call Protection: | L(25),Def(91),O(4) | UW Revenues: | $20,021,078 | |
Lockbox: | Hard | UW Expenses: | $14,708,924 | |
Additional Debt: | Yes | UW NOI: | $5,312,154 | |
Additional Debt Balance: | $8,050,000 | UW NCF: | $5,312,154 | |
Additional Debt Type: | Mezzanine Loan | Appraised Value / Per Room: | $72,250,000 / $98,702 | |
Appraisal Date: | 9/1/2014 | |||
Escrows and Reserves(2) | Financial Information | |||||
Initial | Monthly | Initial Cap | Cut-off Date Loan / Room: | $67,964 | ||
Taxes: | $313,522 | $47,334 | N/A | Maturity Date Loan / Room: | $58,084 | |
Insurance: | $127,795 | $21,303 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV: | 68.9% | |
FF&E Reserves: | $0 | 4% of Gross Revenues | N/A | Maturity Date LTV: | 58.8% | |
TI/LC: | $0 | $0 | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.75x | |
Other: | $358,224 | $210,732 | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 10.7% | |
Sources and Uses | ||||||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |||||
Mortgage Loan | $49,750,000 | 86.1% | Payoff Existing Debt | $42,367,985 | 73.3 | % | ||||
Mezzanine Loan | 8,050,000 | 13.9 | Return of Equity | 13,369,180 | 23.1 | |||||
Closing Costs | 1,263,294 | 2.2 | ||||||||
Upfront Reserves | 799,541 | 1.4 | ||||||||
Total Sources | $57,800,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses | $57,800,000 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | For a full description of the borrowers, please refer to “The Borrowers” below. |
(2) | For a full description of Escrows and Reserves, please refer to “Escrows and Reserves” below. |
The Loan. The Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio loan has an outstanding principal balance of $49.75 million and is secured by a first mortgage lien on the fee or leasehold interests in seven limited service hotels totaling 732 rooms located in Florida, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Georgia. The loan has a 10-year term, and subsequent to a two-year interest-only period, will amortize on a 30-year schedule.
The Borrowers. The borrowing entities for the loan are Shaner Select Services Hotels II, LLC, Shaner Select Services Hotels III, LLC, Shaner Select Services Hotels IV, LLC, Shaner Select Services Hotels V, LLC, Shaner Select Services Hotels VI, LLC, Shaner Augusta 141 LLC and Shaner Charleston LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and a special purpose entity.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
63 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |
The Sponsor. The loan sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor is Lance T. Shaner, chairman and CEO of Shaner Hotel Group (“Shaner”). Shaner, a leading owner-operator in the hospitality industry, owns or manages 40 hotel properties in 17 states and two countries with gross revenues in excess of $150.0 million. Shaner’s hotels comprise 16 different brands, and Shaner employs approximately 2,700 people.
The Portfolio. The collateral consists of seven limited service hotels totaling 732 rooms located in Florida, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Georgia. The portfolio is comprised of three Courtyards (286 rooms, 45.9% of UW NCF), three Fairfield Inn & Suites (251 rooms, 37.7% of UW NCF) and one Holiday Inn Express (195 rooms, 16.4% of UW NCF).
Portfolio Summary | ||||||||||||||||
Property | Location | Rooms | Year Built / Renovated | Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount | % of Allocated Loan Amount | Appraised Value | Underwritten Net Cash Flow | % of Underwritten Net Cash Flow | ||||||||
Holiday Inn Express - Charleston | Charleston, WV | 195 | 1978 / 2013 | $9,640,000 | 19.4% | $14,000,000 | $869,912 | 16.4% | ||||||||
Courtyard - Mechanicsburg | Mechanicsburg, PA | 91 | 2007 / NA | 8,950,000 | 18.0 | 13,000,000 | 942,585 | 17.7 | ||||||||
Courtyard - St. Augustine | St. Augustine, FL | 98 | 2009 / NA | 7,400,000 | 14.9 | 10,750,000 | 901,029 | 17.0 | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augusta | Augusta, GA | 82 | 2009 / NA | 7,230,000 | 14.5 | 10,500,000 | 834,651 | 15.7 | ||||||||
Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East | Jacksonville, FL | 97 | 2009 / NA | 6,370,000 | 12.8 | 9,250,000 | 595,718 | 11.2 | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland | Plant City, FL | 87 | 2008 / NA | 5,510,000 | 11.1 | 8,000,000 | 599,388 | 11.3 | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine | St. Augustine, FL | 82 | 2009 / NA | 4,650,000 | 9.3 | 6,750,000 | 568,871 | 10.7 | ||||||||
Total | 732 | $49,750,000 | 100.0% | $72,250,000 | $5,312,154 | 100.0% |
Geographic Summary | ||||||||||||||||
State | # of Properties | Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount | % of Allocated Loan Amount | # of Rooms | % of Rooms | Appraised Value | % of Appraised Value | Underwritten Net Cash Flow | % of Underwritten Net Cash Flow | |||||||
Florida | 4 | $23,930,000 | 48.1% | 364 | 49.7% | $34,750,000 | 48.1% | $2,665,006 | 50.2% | |||||||
West Virginia | 1 | 9,640,000 | 19.4 | 195 | 26.6 | 14,000,000 | 19.4 | 869,912 | 16.4 | |||||||
Pennsylvania | 1 | 8,950,000 | 18.0 | 91 | 12.4 | 13,000,000 | 18.0 | 942,585 | 17.7 | |||||||
Georgia | 1 | 7,230,000 | 14.5 | 82 | 11.2 | 10,500,000 | 14.5 | 834,651 | 15.7 | |||||||
Total | 7 | $49,750,000 | 100.0% | 732 | 100.0% | $72,250,000 | 100.0% | $5,312,154 | 100.0% |
Brand Summary | ||||||||||||||||
Flag | # of Properties | Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount | % of Allocated Loan Amount | # of Rooms | % of Rooms | Appraised Value | % of Appraised Value | Underwritten Net Cash Flow | % of Underwritten Net Cash Flow | |||||||
Courtyard | 3 | $22,720,000 | 45.7% | 286 | 39.1% | $33,000,000 | 45.7% | $2,439,332 | 45.9% | |||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites | 3 | 17,390,000 | 35.0 | 251 | 34.3 | 25,250,000 | 34.9 | 2,002,910 | 37.7 | |||||||
Holiday Inn Express | 1 | 9,640,000 | 19.4 | 195 | 26.6 | 14,000,000 | 19.4 | 869,912 | 16.4 | |||||||
Total | 7 | $49,750,000 | 100.0% | 732 | 100.0% | $72,250,000 | 100.0% | $5,312,154 | 100.0% |
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
64 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |
Historical Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR(1) | ||||||||||||||
Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | ||||||||||||
Property | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | ||
Holiday Inn Express – Charleston(3) | 69.4% | 69.1% | 69.3% | 68.6% | $82.34 | $85.82 | $85.64 | $86.82 | $57.13 | $59.32 | $59.33 | $59.53 | ||
Courtyard - Mechanicsburg | 74.5% | 76.4% | 75.0% | 75.8% | $109.85 | $110.15 | $114.72 | $115.32 | $81.84 | $84.19 | $86.00 | $87.47 | ||
Courtyard - St. Augustine | 63.8% | 71.0% | 73.8% | 76.5% | $87.28 | $92.27 | $95.10 | $99.56 | $55.65 | $65.55 | $70.17 | $76.17 | ||
Fairfield Inn & Suites – Augusta(4) | 75.8% | 74.1% | 70.5% | 72.3% | $95.55 | $100.14 | $107.29 | $108.78 | $72.39 | $74.24 | $75.59 | $78.64 | ||
Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East | 66.6% | 78.8% | 72.9% | 74.0% | $85.07 | $79.96 | $82.17 | $90.33 | $56.62 | $63.00 | $59.86 | $66.82 | ||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland | 63.2% | 66.5% | 69.5% | 72.1% | $82.63 | $90.91 | $91.67 | $96.70 | $52.23 | $60.46 | $63.75 | $69.68 | ||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine | 65.0% | 70.8% | 77.2% | 80.0% | $78.21 | $82.26 | $87.21 | $91.94 | $50.85 | $58.22 | $67.35 | $73.55 | ||
Weighted Average(5) | 68.4% | 72.0% | 72.1% | 73.4% | $88.27 | $90.85 | $93.48 | $96.93 | $60.36 | $65.42 | $67.41 | $71.11 |
(1) | Based on operating statements provided by the borrowers. |
(2) | TTM as of August 31, 2014. |
(3) | In the TTM period, the Holiday Inn Express - Charleston’s competitive set was adjusted to include a 94 room Wingate By Wyndham Charleston and a 64 room Country Inn & Suites Charleston South and the removal of the 225 room Ramada Charleston Downtown. |
(4) | Beginning in December 2013, the Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augustas’s competitive set was expanded to include a newly constructed 88 room Hampton Inn Augusta Gordon Highway. |
(5) | Weighted by room count. |
Historical Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR Penetration Rates(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | |||||||||||||||||||||
Property | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(2) | ||||||||
Holiday Inn Express - Charleston | 117.2% | 135.7% | 114.1% | 131.5% | 107.6% | 100.0% | 97.4% | 97.4% | 89.2% | 88.0% | 117.2% | 132.2% | 111.1% | 117.3% | 94.6% | ||||||||
Courtyard - Mechanicsburg | 117.7% | 119.4% | 120.1% | 120.4% | 118.4% | 114.0% | 118.1% | 116.8% | 117.7% | 118.5% | 134.3% | 141.0% | 140.3% | 141.8% | 140.4% | ||||||||
Courtyard - St. Augustine | 103.5% | 112.3% | 119.9% | 116.6% | 120.5% | 102.8% | 105.4% | 104.7% | 101.6% | 100.1% | 106.4% | 118.3% | 125.5% | 118.4% | 120.6% | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augusta | 118.5% | 118.4% | 116.8% | 115.7% | 107.7% | 112.0% | 118.3% | 121.9% | 128.8% | 125.2% | 132.7% | 140.1% | 142.3% | 149.0% | 134.8% | ||||||||
Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East | 112.0% | 117.7% | 126.6% | 114.7% | 114.8% | 124.0% | 121.7% | 112.0% | 114.1% | 110.5% | 138.9% | 143.2% | 141.8% | 130.9% | 126.9% | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland | 112.2% | 114.4% | 117.2% | 114.3% | 116.4% | 92.1% | 95.0% | 99.9% | 96.5% | 93.5% | 103.4% | 108.8% | 117.1% | 110.3% | 108.9% | ||||||||
Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine | 93.0% | 107.5% | 110.1% | 111.5% | 115.6% | 104.5% | 104.5% | 103.4% | 103.6% | 101.8% | 97.1% | 112.4% | 113.9% | 115.4% | 117.7% | ||||||||
Weighted Average(3) | 111.6% | 120.5% | 117.5% | 119.9% | 113.6% | 106.2% | 107.1% | 106.4% | 104.6% | 102.8% | 118.6% | 128.8% | 125.2% | 124.8% | 116.8% |
(1) | 2010, 2011 and 2012 Penetration Factors are per the 2012 STR report. 2013 and TTM Penetration Factors are per the 2013 and TTM August 2014 STR reports, respectively. |
(2) | TTM is as of August 31, 2014. |
(3) | Weighted by room count. |
Holiday Inn Express - Charleston (Charleston, WV). The Holiday Inn Express - Charleston is a six-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.08 acre site on Civic Centre Drive, off of Route 60 and Interstate 64 in Charleston, West Virginia. The property, which was constructed as a Sheraton, was built in 1978 and is comprised of 195 guest rooms of various layouts. The Holiday Inn Express - Charleston features a business center, fitness center, breakfast room and approximately 2,383 square feet of meeting space. Between 2011 and 2013, the loan sponsor invested approximately $3.7 million (approximately $18,813 per room) in capital expenditures. The property is located in Charleston, the capital of West Virginia and the state’s primary business center. The city of Charleston had an average household income of $47,582 and an estimated total population of 50,821 residents as of 2013 according to the U.S. Census. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 60% of its room nights from commercial business, 22% from leisure business and 18% from meeting and group business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of six hotels, which range in size from 84 to 176 rooms. Per the appraisal, there is one new hotel project under construction in the Charleston market at this time: a 110-room Courtyard by Marriott which is scheduled to open in the fourth quarter of 2014 and is located approximately 0.2 miles from the subject property.
Courtyard - Mechanicsburg (Mechanicsburg, PA). The Courtyard - Mechanicsburg is a three-story, limited service hotel situated on a 6.29 acre site, on Gettysburg Road in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. The property was built in 2007 and is comprised of 91 guest rooms of various layouts. The Courtyard - Mechanicsburg features an indoor pool, a business center, fitness center, café and 635 square feet of meeting space. The property is located in Mechanicsburg, home to a number of major corporations including Rite Aid, Acosta and Ahold USA, among others. Mechanicsburg is approximately eight miles southwest of the state capitol of Harrisburg and 20 miles from Hershey, home of Hershey Chocolate and Hershey Park. The Harrisburg-Carlisle metropolitan statistical area had a median household income of approximately $55,300 and an estimated total population of approximately 557,700 residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 60% of its room nights from commercial business, 25% from meeting and group business and 15% from leisure business. The primary competitive set
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
65 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |
for the property consists of seven hotels, which range in size from 64 to 219 rooms. Per the appraisal, there is one new hotel project currently under construction in the Mechanicsburg market: a 120-room Towneplace Suites by Marriott which is scheduled to open in the fourth quarter of 2014 and is located approximately 0.9 miles from the subject property. Approximately $1.6 million is expected to be spent in conjunction with the hotel’s property improvement plan over the next two years.
Courtyard - St. Augustine (St. Augustine, FL). The Courtyard - St. Augustine is a three-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.75 acre site in the historic city of St. Augustine, Florida and near the World Golf Village. The property was built in 2009 and is comprised of 98 guest rooms of various layouts. The Courtyard - St. Augustine features an outdoor pool, bistro, business center, fitness center, lounge and approximately 638 square feet of meeting space. St. Augustine is the oldest continuously occupied European settlement in the United States, featuring an array of historical monuments and sites, as well as access to a number of popular beaches. The hotel is also located near the World Golf Village, a golf resort created by the PGA Tour which showcases the World Golf Hall of Fame and features two championship golf courses. The Courtyard - St. Augustine is located in the Jacksonville metropolitan statistical area, which had a per capita income of $42,356 and an estimated total population of approximately 1.4 million residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 45% of its room nights from leisure business, 43% from commercial business and 12% from meeting and group business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of seven hotels, which range in size from 54 to 162 rooms. Per the appraisal, there are two new hotel projects under construction in the St. Augustine market at this time: a 95-room DoubleTree by Hilton which is scheduled to open in December 2014 and a 200-room Courtyard by Marriott expected to open in October 2015.
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augusta (Augusta, GA). The Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augusta is a four-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.12 acre site near Fort Gordon, a U.S. Army military base which is home to the U.S. Army Signal Corps and Signal Center, in Augusta, Georgia. The property was built in 2009 and is comprised of 82 guest rooms of various layouts. The Fairfield Inn & Suites - Augusta features an indoor pool, a fitness center and breakfast area. Since 2009, the loan sponsor has invested $87,344 (approximately $1,065 per room) in capital expenditures. Approximately $25,910 in capital expenditures was budgeted for 2014. The property is located in Augusta, the third largest city in the state of Georgia and an important hub for the medical, biotechnology, military and nuclear power industries. Augusta is also home to Augusta National Golf Club, the annual host to the Masters Tournament. The Augusta-Richmond County metropolitan statistical area had a median household income of approximately $45,000 and an estimated total population of approximately 572,500 residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 60% of its room nights from commercial business, 20% from meeting and group business and 20% from leisure business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of five hotels, which range in size from 61 to 150 rooms. Per the appraisal, there is one new hotel project under construction in the Augusta market at this time: a 124-room Residence Inn which is scheduled to open in March 2015. A 90-room SpringHill Suites is also under consideration, although no construction schedule has yet been set.
Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East (Jacksonville, FL). The Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East is a four-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.50 acre site between downtown Jacksonville and the Naval Station Mayport. The property was built in 2009 and is comprised of 97 guest rooms of various layouts. The Courtyard - Jacksonville - I295 East features an outdoor pool, bistro, business center, fitness center, lounge and approximately 700 square feet of meeting space. Jacksonville is Florida’s most populous city and an important financial and insurance center, as well as home to two naval bases, several hospitals and medical facilities and the NFL’s Jacksonville Jaguars. Jacksonville is also a popular tourist destination due to its proximity to a number of beaches and golf courses. The Jacksonville metropolitan statistical area had a per capita income of $42,356 and an estimated total population of approximately 1.4 million residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 50% of its room nights from commercial business, 35% from leisure business and 15% from meeting and group business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of four hotels, which range in size from 73 to 112 rooms. Per the appraisal, there are no new hotel projects currently under construction in the Jacksonville market.
Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland (Plant City, FL). The Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland is a three-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.65 acre site in Plant City, Florida. The property was built in 2008 and is comprised of 87 guest rooms of various layouts. The Fairfield Inn & Suites - Lakeland features an outdoor pool, a fitness center, business center and breakfast area. The property is located in Plant City, within the Tampa metropolitan statistical area and approximately 22 miles east of the Tampa central business district. Local attractions include LEGOLAND, alligator nature tours, Lakeland Center (home to the Lakeland Raiders of the Xtreme Indoor Football League) and Sun ‘N Fun, a non-profit promoting aviation education and known for its annual weeklong airshow. The Tampa metropolitan statistical area had per capita income of $41,412 and an estimated total population of approximately 2.8 million residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 55% of its room nights from commercial business, 25% from leisure business and 20% from meeting and group business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of five hotels, which range in size from 60 to 119 rooms. Per the appraisal, there are no new hotel projects currently under construction in the property’s submarket. Minor upgrades totaling approximately $200,000 (approximately $2,299 per room) are expected to be completed within the next year.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE AMENDED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF SALE. THIS TERM SHEET IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
66 of 133 |
Structural and Collateral Term Sheet | JPMBB 2014-C26 | |
Shaner Hotels Limited Service Portfolio |
Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine (St. Augustine, FL). The Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine is a three-story, limited service hotel situated on a 2.57 acre site in the historic city of St. Augustine, Florida and near the World Golf Village. The property was built in 2009 and is comprised of 82 guest rooms of various layouts. The Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine features an outdoor pool, a fitness center, business center and breakfast area. St. Augustine is the oldest continuously occupied European settlement in the United States, featuring an array of historical monuments and sites, as well as access to a number of popular beaches. The hotel is also located near the World Golf Village, a golf resort created by the PGA Tour which showcases the World Golf Hall of Fame and features two championship golf courses. The Fairfield Inn & Suites - St. Augustine is located in the Jacksonville metropolitan statistical area, which had a per capita income of $42,356 and an estimated total population of approximately 1.4 million residents as of 2013 according to a report by Moody’s Analytics. According to the appraisal, in 2013 the property generated approximately 45% of its room nights from leisure business, 35% from meeting and group business and 20% from commercial business. The primary competitive set for the property consists of seven hotels, which range in size from 48 to 108 rooms. Per the appraisal, there are two new hotel projects under construction in the St. Augustine market at this time: a 95-room DoubleTree by Hilton which is scheduled to open in December 2014 and a 200-room Courtyard by Marriott expected to open in October 2015.
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow | |||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TTM(1) | Underwritten | Per Room(2) | % of Total Revenue(3) | |
Occupancy | 68.4% | 72.0% | 72.1% | 73.4% | 73.4% | ||
ADR | $88.27 | $90.85 | $93.48 | $96.93 | $96.93 | ||
RevPAR | $60.36 | $65.42 | $67.41 | $71.11 | $71.11 | ||
Room Revenue | $16,127,001 | 17,525,957 | $18,011,014 | $18,999,996 | $18,999,996 | $25,956 | 94.9% |
Other Department Revenues | 698,552 | 930,219 | 962,817 | 1,021,082 | 1,021,082 | 1,395 | 5.1 |
Total Revenue | $16,825,553 | $18,456,176 | $18,973,831 | $20,021,078 | $20,021,078 | $27,351 | 100.0% |
Room Expense | $4,941,269 | $5,143,913 | $5,104,454 | $5,256,127 | $5,256,127 | $7,181 | 27.7% |
Other Departmental Expenses | 743,120 | 818,191 | 807,254 | 849,592 | 849,592 | 1,161 | 83.2 |
Departmental Expenses | $5,684,389 | $5,962,104 | $5,911,708 | $6,105,719 | $6,105,719 | $8,341 | 30.5% |
Departmental Profit | $11,141,164 | $12,494,072 | $13,062,123 | $13,915,359 | $13,915,359 | $19,010 | 69.5% |
Operating Expenses | $4,561,369 | $4,590,461 | $4,586,941 | $4,649,020 | $4,649,020 | $6,351 | 23.2% |
Gross Operating Profit | $6,579,795 | $7,903,611 | $8,475,182 | $9,266,339 | $9,266,339 |