Related Party Transactions | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block] | 6 | Related Party Transactions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1) UMTH is a Delaware limited partnership which is in the real estate finance business. UMTH holds a 99.9% limited partnership interest in UMTHLC, which originated interim loans that were assigned to the Company, UMTH Land Development, L.P., (“UMTHLD”), a Texas limited partnership which holds a 50% profit interest in United Development Funding, L.P., (“UDF”) a Nevada limited partnership that is affiliated with the Company’s Advisor, UMTHGS and acts as UDF's asset manager, and Prospect Service Corp. (“PSC”), which services the Company’s residential mortgages and contracts for deed and manages the Company’s real estate owned (“REO”). In addition, UMTH has a limited guarantee of the obligations of Capital Reserve Group (“CRG”), Ready America Funding Corp (“RAFC”), and South Central Mortgage, Incorporated (“SCMI”), a Texas corporation that sold mortgage investments to the Company, under the Secured Notes (see the discussion under “Recourse Obligations” below). United Development Funding III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, (“UDF III”) which is managed by UMTHLD, has previously provided a limited guarantee of the line of credit extended by the Company to UDF and has purchased an economic participation in a revolving credit facility the Company provided to UDF. |
|
2) UMTHLC is a Delaware limited partnership, and subsidiary of UMTH. The Company has loaned money to UMTHLC so it can make loans to its borrowers. The loans are collaterally assigned to the Company as security for the promissory note between UMTHLC and the Company. On March 26, 2009, the Company executed a secured line of credit promissory note with UMTHLC in the amount of $8,000,000. The note bears interest at 12.50% per annum, matured on September 26, 2012 and is secured by first lien mortgage interests in single family residential properties. The outstanding principal balance on this line of credit at December 31, 2014 was approximately $7,577,000. Effective January 1, 2015, the outstanding principal balance on this line of credit and related accrued interest of approximately $3,800,000 was rolled into the UMTHLC Deficiency Note in accordance with the Agreement described in Note 4 above. |
|
See Note 5 above for discussion of additional related party transactions with UMTHLC. |
|
3) CRG is a Texas corporation that is 50% owned by Todd Etter and William Lowe, partners of UMTH, which owns the Advisor. CRG was in the business of financing home purchases and renovations by real estate investors. The Company loaned money to CRG to make loans to other borrowers. During 2006 the Company took direct assignment of the remaining loans from CRG with full recourse. |
|
4) RAFC is a Texas corporation that is 50% owned by SCMI, which is owned by Todd Etter. RAFC is in the business of financing interim loans for the purchase of land and the construction of modular and manufactured single-family homes placed on the land by real estate investors. The Company continues to directly fund obligations under one existing RAFC loan, which was collaterally assigned to the Company, but does not fund new originations and the Company is in the process of foreclosing on the collateral in California. The unpaid principal balance of the loans at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was approximately $15,830,000, respectively. |
|
5) Wonder Funding, LP (“Wonder”) is a Delaware limited partnership that is owned by RMC. RMC is beneficially owned by Craig Pettit, a partner of UMTH and the sole proprietor of two companies that own 50% of RAFC. Wonder is in the business of financing interim loans for the purchase of land and the construction of single family homes and the purchase and renovation of single family homes. The Company has ceased funding any new originations. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, all remaining obligations owed by Wonder to the Company are included in the recourse obligations discussed below. |
|
6) Recourse Obligations. The Company has made recourse loans to (a) CRG, which is a Texas corporation that is 50% owned by Todd Etter (a UMTH partner) and William Lowe (a former UMTH partner), which owns the Advisor, (b) RAFC, which is owned by SCMI and two companies owned by Craig Pettit, Eastern Intercorp, Inc. and RMC, and (c) SCMI, which is owned by Todd Etter, (these companies are referred to as the "originating companies"). In addition to the originating companies discussed above, the Company made loans with recourse to Wonder. Each of these entities used the proceeds from such loans to originate loans, that are referred to as "underlying loans," that are pledged to the Company as security for such originating company's obligations to the Company. When principal and interest on an underlying loan are due in full, at maturity or otherwise, the corresponding obligation owed by the originating company to the Company is also due in full. |
|
In addition, some of the originating companies have sold loans to the Company, referred to as the "purchased loans," and entered into recourse agreements under which the originating company agreed to repay certain losses the Company incurred with respect to purchased loans. |
|
If the originating company forecloses on property securing an underlying loan, or the Company forecloses on property securing a purchased loan, and the proceeds from the sale are insufficient to pay the loan in full, the originating company has the option of (1) repaying the outstanding balance owed to the Company associated with the underlying loan or purchased loan, as the case may be, or (2) delivering an unsecured Deficiency Note in the amount of the deficiency to the Company. |
|
On March 30, 2006, but effective December 31, 2005, the Company and each originating company agreed to consolidate (1) all outstanding amounts owed by such originating company to the Company under the loans made by the Company to the originating company and under the Deficiency Notes described above and (2) the estimated maximum future liability to the Company under the recourse arrangements described above, into secured promissory notes (“Recourse Obligations”). Each originating company issued to the Company a secured variable amount promissory note dated December 31, 2005 (the “Secured Notes”) in the principal amounts shown below, which amounts represent all principal and accrued interest owed as of such date. The initial principal amounts are subject to increase if the Company incurs losses upon the foreclosure of loans covered by recourse arrangements with the originating company. The Secured Notes (including related guaranties discussed below) are secured by an assignment of the distributions on the Class C units and Class D units of limited partnership interest of UMT Holdings held by each originating company. |
|
Name | | Initial | | Balance at | | Promissory Note | | Units/ | | C Units | | Units/ | | Estimated | |
principal | March 31, | principal | indemnification | distributed | indemnification | Collateral |
amount | 2015 | amount (2) | pledged as security | during | remaining | Value (3) |
| | | | 2015 | | |
CRG | | $ | 2,725,442 | | $ | 4,847,503 | | $ | 4,300,000 | | | 4,984 Class C and 2,710 Class D | | 23 | | 2,452 Class C and 2,710 Class D | | $ | 5,027,000 | |
RAFC | | $ | 3,243,369 | | $ | 10,182,018 | | $ | 7,100,000 | | | 11,228Class C & 6,659 Class D | | 81 | | 8,148 Class C & 6,659 Class D | | $ | 10,560,000 | |
SCMI | | $ | 3,295,422 | | $ | 3,785,037 | | $ | 3,488,643 | | | 4,545 Class C and 3,000 Class D | | 9 | | 1,254 Class C and 3,000 Class D | | $ | 3,656,000 | |
RAFC / Wonder(1) | | $ | 1,348,464 | | $ | 2,101,831 | | $ | 1,400,000 | | | 1,657 Class C | | 14 | | 1,456 Class C | | $ | 1,471,000 | |
Wonder Indemnification (1) | | | n/a | | | n/a | | | n/a | | | $1,134,000 | | - | | n/a | | $ | 822,000 | |
Totals | | $ | 10,612,697 | | $ | 20,916,389 | | $ | 16,288,643 | | | | | | | | | $ | 21,536,000 | |
|
| -1 | Wonder is collateralized by an indemnification agreement from RMC in the original amount of $1,134,000, of which approximately $822,000 remains, and the pledge of 3,870 C Units. 2,213 of the pledged C Units also cross-collateralize the RAFC obligation. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| -2 | The CRG, RAFC, SCMI and Wonder balances at March 31, 2015, exceeded the stated principal amount per their variable Secured Notes by approximately $547,000, $3,082,000, $296,000 and $702,000, respectively. Per the terms of the Secured Notes, the unpaid principal balance may be greater or less than the initial principal amount of the note and is not considered an event of default. The rapid rate of liquidation of the remaining portfolio of properties caused a more rapid increase in the Unpaid Principal Balance (“UPB”) than originally anticipated and outpaced the minimum principal reductions scheduled for the loans. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| -3 | Estimated collateral value reflects pledge of C and D units of limited partnership interest of UMTH held by WLL, Ltd. (“WLL”), RAFC and KLA, Ltd. (“KLA”) UMTH D units represent equity interests in UMT Holdings, LP. Pledge of the UMTH D units entitles the beneficiary to a pro-rata share of UMTH partnership D unit cash distributions. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Through September 2007, the Secured Notes incurred interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The CRG, RAFC, and RAFC/Wonder Secured Notes amortize over 15 years. The SCMI Secured Note amortizes over approximately 22 years, which was the initial amortization of the deficiency notes from SCMI that were consolidated. The Secured Notes required the originating company to make monthly payments equal to the greater of (1) principal and interest amortized over 180 months and 264 months, respectively, or (2) the amount of any distributions paid to the originating company with respect to the pledged Class C units. Effective October 2007, the recourse loans were modified to accommodate the anticipated increases in principal balances throughout the remaining liquidation periods of the underlying assets, modify the amortization schedules for the period of July 2007 through June 2009, and reduce the interest rate from 10% to 6%. The above modifications were extended through December 31, 2014. |
|
Effective January 1, 2015, UMT entered into loan modification agreements with certain of its affiliated entities which are indebted to UMT under certain outstanding loan arrangements including Recourse Obligations owing from Capital Reserve Group, Inc., South Central Mortgage, Inc., Ready America Funding Corp. (“RAFC”) and (iii) certain payment obligations of UMT Holdings, L.P. (“UMTH”) in favor of UMT in connection with an indemnification agreement dated December 31, 2005 (the “Indemnification Agreement”) originally executed by UMTH in favor of RAFC, which Indemnification Agreement secures deficiency obligations owing to RAFC by Wonder Funding Corp., an affiliate of RAFC (“Wonder”). The total principal balance of all Recourse Obligations at December 31, 2014 was approximately $20,191,000. Effective January 1, 2015, UMT entered into loan modification agreements (“Agreements”) with certain of its affiliated entities which are indebted to UMT under certain outstanding loan arrangements including Recourse Obligations owing from Capital Reserve Group, Inc., South Central Mortgage, Inc., Ready America Funding Corp. (“RAFC”). Under the terms of the Agreements, the Recourse Obligation indebtedness, owed by each affiliated entity, is evidenced by two notes – Note 1 which bears interest at the rate of 1.75% and Note 2 which bears interest at the rate of 2.70%. Both notes mature on December 31, 2017. Under the terms of the Agreements, net accrued interest of approximately $748,000 was added to the principal balance of the Recourse Obligations. As of March 31, 2015, the total outstanding principal balance of the Recourse Obligations was approximately $20,916,000. From December 31, 2005 through March 31, 2015 the Company has received approximately $5,733,000 in aggregate principal and interest payments under the Recourse Obligations. Please see Note 4 above for additional information regarding the Agreements. |
|
Management has accounted for these as loan modifications in the normal course of business, and not as a troubled debt restructuring, as the underlying collateral value exceeds the outstanding loan amounts, the modifications did not include an extension of the debt’s original contractual maturity or expected duration, the borrowers and guarantors have obtained third party financing at current market rates, the modified rate represents a premium over current market rates and the risk characteristics of the third party debt obtained is similar to the modified debt. The Company expects to receive full repayment under the loans. |
|
On a quarterly basis, the Company conducts a review of the collateral pledged by the underlying borrowers and third party guarantors in order to assess their ability to perform their obligations under the terms of the Recourse Obligations. The collateral pledged consists of Class C and Class D ownership units of UMTH. These units represent capital shares in UMTH and are eligible for, and receive, quarterly distributions from UMTH. Such ability to perform is principally dependent upon the forecasted cash distributions associated with the pledged collateral and the ability of the distributions to meet the debt service requirements under the Secured Notes. The review includes analyzing projected future distribution sources and amounts, validating the assumptions used to generate such projections, assessing the ability to execute on the business plan, conducting discussions with and obtaining representations from the guarantors’ management with respect to their current and projected distribution amounts. The value of the pledged collateral is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that is reviewed and updated each quarter. Based on such reviews, the Company has concluded that the guarantors have the ability to perform their obligations under the guaranties and that the Recourse Obligations are fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any reserves on these loans. |
|
The Secured Notes have also been guaranteed by the following entities under the arrangements described below, all of which are dated effective December 31, 2005: |
|
| - | UMTH. This guaranty is limited to a maximum of $1,153,426 of all amounts due under the Secured Notes. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| - | WLL, a related party of CRG. This guaranty is of all amounts due under Secured Note from CRG, is non-recourse and is secured by an assignment of 2,492 Class C Units and 1,355 Class D units of limited partnership interest of UMT Holdings held by WLL, Ltd. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| - | RMC. This guaranty is non-recourse, is limited to 50% of all amounts due under the Secured Note from RAFC and is secured by an assignment of 3,870 Class C units of limited partnership interest of UMT Holdings. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| - | Wonder. Wonder Funding obligations are evidenced by a note from RAFC (RAFC/Wonder Note) and are secured by a pledge of a certain Indemnification Agreement given by UMTH to RAFC and assigned to UMT in the amount of $1,134,000, which amount is included in the UMTH limited guarantee referenced above. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| - | SCMI. This guaranty is limited to a maximum of $2,213,000 due under the Secured Note from RAFC and is secured by an assignment of 2,213 Class C units of limited partnership interest of UMTH. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| - | KLA. KLA has given the following limited guaranties: (1) Guaranty of obligations of SCMI under the First Amended and Restated Secured Variable Amount Promissory Note to the Company dated as of October 1, 2007 with a then current principal balance of $3,472,073 and secured by an assignment of 3,000 of Guarantor’s Class D units of partnership interest in UMTH (2) Guaranty of obligations of CRG under the First Amended and Restated Secured Variable Amount Promissory Note dated as of October 1, 2007 with a then current principal balance of $4,053,799 and secured by a pledge of 1,355 of Guarantor’s Class D units of partnership interest in UMTH. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
In addition, WLL has obligations to UMTH under an indemnification agreement between UMTH, WLL and William Lowe, under which UMTH is indemnified for certain losses on loans and advances made to William Lowe by UMTH. That indemnification agreement allows UMTH to offset any amounts subject to indemnification against distributions made to WLL with respect to the Class C and Class D units of limited partnership interest held by WLL. Because WLL has pledged these Class C and Class D units to the Company to secure its guaranty of Capital Reserve Corp.'s obligations under its Secured Note, UMTH and the Company entered into an Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement under which UMTH has agreed to subordinate its rights to offset amounts owed to it by WLL to the Company’s lien on such units. |
|
These loans were reviewed by management and no loss reserves on principal amounts are deemed necessary at March 31, 2015. |
|
7) On June 20, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Secured Line of Credit Promissory Note as modified by an amendment effective September 1, 2006 (the "Amendment") with UDF; a Nevada limited partnership that is a related party of the Company's Advisor, UMTHGS. The Amendment increased an existing revolving line of credit facility ("Loan") to $45 million. The purpose of the Loan is to finance UDF's loans and investments in real estate development projects. On July 29, 2009, our trustees approved an amendment to increase the revolving line of credit facility to an amount not to exceed $60,000,000. Effective December 31, 2010, the loan was extended for a period of one year and the loan amount was increased from $60,000,000 to $75,000,000. Effective September 30, 2014, the line of credit was increased from $82,000,000 to $84,674,672 and effective December 31, 2014, the line of credit was extended and matures on December 31, 2015. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The UDF I Loan is secured by the pledge of all of UDF's Land Development Loans and equity investments pursuant to the First Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of September 30, 2004, executed by UDF in favor of UMT (the “Security Agreement”). Those UDF loans may be first lien loans or subordinate loans. |
|
The Loan interest rate is the lower of 15% or the highest rate allowed by law, further adjusted with the addition of a credit enhancement to a minimum of 14%. Effective October 1, 2013, the loan was extended to December 31, 2014 and the base interest rate was decreased to a rate of 9.25%. Effective December 31, 2014, the line of credit was extended and matures on December 31, 2015. |
|
UDF may use the UDF I Loan proceeds to finance indebtedness associated with the acquisition of any assets to seek income that qualifies under the Real Estate Investment Trust provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent such indebtedness, including indebtedness financed by funds advanced under the UDF I Loan and indebtedness financed by funds advanced from any other source, including Senior Debt, is no more than 85% of 80% (68%) of the appraised value of all subordinate loans and equity interests for land development and/or land acquisition owned by UDF and 75% for first lien secured loans for land development and/or acquisitions owned by UDF. |
|
On September 19, 2008, UMT entered into an Economic Interest Participation Agreement with UDF III pursuant to which UDF III purchased (i) an economic interest in the UDF I Loan. |
|
Pursuant to the Economic Interest Agreement, each time UDF requests an advance of principal under the UDF I Loan, UDF III will fund the required amount to UMT and UDF III’s economic interest in the UDF I Loan increases proportionately. Because these advances are funded by UDF III and UMT recognizes an offsetting participation payable amount to UDF III, the Company does not earn any net interest income on the advances made under the Economic Interest Participation Agreement. UDF III’s economic interest in the UDF I Loan gives UDF III the right to receive payment from UMT of principal and accrued interest relating to amounts funded by UDF III to UMT which are applied towards UMT’s funding obligations to UDF under the UDF I Loan. UDF III may abate its funding obligations under the Economic Participation Agreement at any time for a period of up to twelve months by giving UMT notice of the abatement. |
|
The Option gives UDF III the right to convert its economic interest into a full ownership participation interest in the UDF I Loan at any time by giving written notice to UMT and paying an exercise price of $100. The participation interest includes all rights incidental to ownership of the UDF I Loan and the Security Agreement, including participation in the management and control of the UMT Loan. UMT will continue to manage and control the UDF I Loan while UDF III owns an economic interest in the UDF I Loan. If UDF III exercises its Option and acquires a participation interest in the UMT Loan, UMT will serve as the loan administrator but both UDF III and UMT will participate in the control and management of the UDF I Loan. UDF III had funded approximately $72,209,000 and $74,687,000 to UDF under the Economic Interest Participation Agreement at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. UMT had funded approximately $8,764,000 and $8,580,000 to UDF under this agreement at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. |
|
On July 22, 2013, the Company entered into a guaranty agreement (the “URHF Guaranty”) pursuant to which UDF IV guaranteed all amounts due associated with the URHF $15,000,000 revolving credit facility. The Company agreed to pay UDF IV a monthly credit enhancement fee equal to 1/12th of 1% of the outstanding principal balance on the above term line of credit facility at the end of each month. |
|
The following table summarizes the related party lines of credit receivable as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014: |
|
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF I | | $ | 8,764,000 | | $ | 8,580,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF III Economic Interest Participation Agreement | | | 72,209,000 | | | 74,687,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UMTHLC | | | - | | | 7,577,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 80,973,000 | | $ | 90,844,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
8) Loans made to affiliates of the Advisor. The table below sets forth the aggregate principal amount of mortgages funded during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to the companies affiliated with the Advisor, named in the table and aggregate amount of draws made by UDF under the line of credit, during the quarter indicated: |
|
Related Party Company | | 2015 | | 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF | | $ | 184,000 | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
9) As of August 1, 2006, (now subject to an Advisory Agreement effective January 1, 2009) the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with UMTHGS. Under the terms of the agreement, UMTHGS is paid a monthly trust administration fee. The fee is calculated monthly depending on the Company’s annual distribution rate, ranging from 1/12th of 1% up to 1/12th of 2% of the amount of average invested assets per month. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, the expenses for the Company’s Advisor were approximately $250,000 for both periods and actual payments were approximately, $88,000, and $250,000, respectively. The Advisor and its related parties are also entitled to reimbursement of costs of goods, materials and services obtained from non-related third parties for the Company’s benefit, except for note servicing and for travel and expenses incurred in connection with efforts to acquire investments for the Company or to dispose of any of its investments. The Company paid the Advisor approximately $19,000 and $34,000, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, and expensed approximately $19,000 in both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, associated with providing shareholder relations activities. |
|
The agreement also provides for a subordinated incentive fee equal to 25% of the amount by which the Company’s net income for a year exceeds a 10% per annum non-compounded cumulative return on its adjusted contributions. No incentive fee was paid during 2015 or 2014. In addition, for each year in which it receives a subordinated incentive fee, the Advisor will receive a 5-year option to purchase 10,000 Shares at a price of $20.00 per share (not to exceed 50,000 shares). As of March 31, 2015, the Advisor has not received options to purchase shares under this arrangement. |
|
The Advisory Agreement provides for the Advisor to pay all of the Company’s expenses and for the Company to reimburse the Advisor for any third-party expenses that should have been paid by the Company but which were instead paid by the Advisor. However, the Advisor remains obligated to pay: (1) the employment expenses of its employees, (2) its rent, utilities and other office expenses and (3) the cost of other items that are part of the Advisor's overhead that is directly related to the performance of services for which it otherwise receives fees from the Company. |
|
The Advisory Agreement also provides for the Company to pay to the Advisor, or a related party of the Advisor, a debt placement fee. The Company may engage the Advisor, or an Affiliate of the Advisor, to negotiate lines of credit on behalf of the Company. UMT shall pay a negotiated fee, not to exceed 1% of the amount of the line of credit secured, upon successful placement of the line of credit. The Company paid no debt placement fees during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively, and expensed approximately $21,000 and $20,000, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively. These fees are amortized monthly, as an adjustment to interest expense, over the term of the credit facility agreements described in Note 7. |
|
10) The Company pays loan servicing fees to PSC, a subsidiary of UMTH, under the terms of a Mortgage Servicing Agreement. The Company paid no loan servicing fees in the three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. |
|
11) The Company pays “guarantee” credit enhancement fees to UDF III, as specified under the terms of the UDF Guarantee agreement. In the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 the credit enhancement expenses were approximately $40,000 and $22,000, respectively, and the Company paid approximately $16,000, and $18,000 in the three months ending March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively. |
|
12) UDF IV, a related party, is reimbursed for its degree of invested “participatory” interest in the Company’s construction loans, the degree of invested interest is not to exceed $2,000,000. The Company made payments of such participation interest, as a net amount against the construction loan interest, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 of approximately $352,000 and $1,058,000, respectively. |
|
13) The Company pays UMTHLD administrative and origination fees for the Construction Loans in which UDF affiliates take an invested interest in. The fees are withheld from construction draws funded to the borrower and are in turn paid directly to UMTHLD. In the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, payments were made for the above administrative and origination fees of approximately $9,000, and $92,000, respectively. |
|
The table below summarizes the approximate payments associated with related parties for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014: |
|
Related Party Payments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | For Three Months Ended | | | | | | | |
Payee | | Purpose | | March 31, 2015 | | | March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | |
UMTHGS | | Trust administration fees | | $ | 88,000 | | 82 | % | | $ | 250,000 | | 88 | % | | | | | | |
UMTHGS | | General & administrative - Shareholder Relations | | | 19,000 | | 18 | % | | | 34,000 | | 12 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 107,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 284,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF III | | Credit Enhancement Fees | | | 16,000 | | 100 | % | | | 18,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF IV | | Participation Interest Paid | | | 352,000 | | 100 | % | | | 1,058,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UMTHLD | | Admin and Origination Fees Paid | | | 9,000 | | 100 | % | | | 92,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
|
|
The table below summarizes the approximate expenses associated with related parties for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014: |
|
Related Party Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | For Three Months Ended | | | | | | | |
Payee | | Purpose | | 31-Mar-15 | | | 31-Mar-14 | | | | | | | |
UMTHGS | | Trust administration fees | | $ | 250,000 | | 93 | % | | $ | 250,000 | | 93 | % | | | | | | |
UMTHGS | | General & administrative - Shareholder Relations | | | 19,000 | | 7 | % | | | 19,000 | | 7 | % | | | | | | |
UMTHGS | | General & administrative - Misc. | | | - | | 0 | % | | | - | | - | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 269,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 269,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PSC | | General & administrative - Misc. | | | - | | - | | | | 3,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | - | | - | | | $ | 3,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UMTH | | Debt Placement Fees | | | 21,000 | | 100 | % | | | 20,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDF III | | Credit Enhancement Fees | | | 40,000 | | 100 | % | | | 22,000 | | 100 | % | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |