a. ASE Test, Inc. (incorporated in the Republic of China (“ROC”) in December 1987), which is engaged in the testing of semiconductors.
b. ASE Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (incorporated in Singapore in December 1994), which holds shares in ASE Test group companies;
c. ASE Test Holdings, Limited (“ASE Test Holdings”) (incorporated in Cayman Islands in April 1999), which holds shares in ASE Test group companies; and
d. ASE Test Finance Limited (“ASE Test Finance”) (incorporated in Mauritius in June 1999), which is engaged in financing activities.
a. Effect of adopting the newly released SFASs and other revisions of previously released SFASs
9. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
| | The investment in ASE Investment (Labuan) Inc. (incorporated in Malaysia in June 1999) was made in connection with the acquisition of the operation of the Motorola Semiconductor Products Sector Businesses in Paju, Korea. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company held a 30% ownership interest in ASE Investment (Labuan) Inc. at a carrying amount of $57,974 thousand and $75,979 thousand, respectively. |
| | Investment income under the equity method was as follows: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ASE Investment (Labuan) Inc. | | $ | 3,569 | | | $ | 6,637 | | | $ | 18,005 | |
ASE Material Inc. | | | 1,068 | | | | - | | | | - | |
ASE (Chung Li) Inc. | | | 5,207 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,844 | | | $ | 6,637 | | | $ | 18,005 | |
| | ASE Material Inc. and ASE (Chung Li) Inc. were merged into ASE Inc. and the Company received ASE Inc.’s shares in exchange for its ownership interest in the two companies. |
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Cost | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | | $ | 113,688 | | | $ | 114,296 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 1,001,430 | | | | 927,249 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 19,091 | | | | 18,964 | |
Leased assets - machinery and equipment | | | 10,464 | | | | 23,259 | |
Machinery in transit and prepayments | | | 15,137 | | | | 8,515 | |
Construction in progress | | | 372 | | | | 12 | |
| | | 1,160,182 | | | | 1,092,295 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 46,713 | | | | 52,700 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 634,835 | | | | 630,496 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 13,310 | | | | 14,581 | |
Leased assets - machinery and equipment | | | 2,074 | | | | 5,083 | |
| | | 696,932 | | | | 702,860 | |
Accumulated impairment | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 402 | | | | - | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 28,549 | | | | - | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 271 | | | | - | |
Machinery in transit and prepayments | | | 3,834 | | | | - | |
Construction in progress | | | 115 | | | | - | |
| | | 33,171 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 430,079 | | | $ | 389,435 | |
As discussed in Note 21, the Company reversed $5,641 thousand of impairment loss previously recorded to accumulated impairment. The remaining $27,530 thousand of impairment was concluded not recoverable, and was subsequently written off to reduce the cost basis of the corresponding assets in 2006.
| Capitalized interest consists of the following: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense including capitalized interest | | $ | 9,609 | | | $ | 13,622 | | | $ | 13,568 | |
Less: capitalized interest | | | 2,844 | | | | 878 | | | | 403 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | $ | 6,765 | | | $ | 12,744 | | | $ | 13,165 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalization rate | | | 2.46-3.93 | % | | | 2.32-3.94 | % | | | 1.75-5.67 | % |
11. GOODWILL
| | The Company adopted ROC SFAS No. 35 on December 31, 2004, and recognized an impairment loss on goodwill of $26,500 thousand, which was determined based on the amount by which the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit exceeded its recoverable amount. The Company identified the goodwill related to the cash generating unit of ISE Labs. The recoverable amount was the “value-in-use” of ISE Labs, which was determined based on six-years of projected cash flows, discounted at a rate of 9.58%. The Company attributed the impairment of goodwill associated with the acquisition of ISE Labs primarily to a downward revision in the forecasted revenue of ISE Labs. The reduction in forecasted revenues was made in response to company estimates and industry trend data that suggested the outlook for semiconductor industry, and ISE Labs in particular, was less favorable than in prior years, including the year in which the Company acquired its interest in ISE Labs. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test on December 31, 2005 and 2006, and found no impairment. As described in Note 2, the goodwill was no longer amortized under ROC SFAS No. 25 after January 1, 2006. Amortization of the goodwill is reflected in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income and was $10,105 thousand and $4,966 thousand for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. |
12. LONG-TERM DEBTS
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Bank loans | | $ | 288,094 | | | $ | 105,039 | |
Capital lease obligation (Note 20) | | | 6,952 | | | | 15,085 | |
| | | 295,046 | | | | 120,124 | |
Less: Current portion | | | (49,743 | ) | | | (34,418 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 245,303 | | | $ | 85,706 | |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
ASE Test, Inc. | | | | | | |
Repayment at maturity in August 2007, interest at 1.98% and 2.25% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | $ | 15,216 | | | $ | 15,339 | |
Repayable by December 2009 in quarterly installments, interest at 2.50% and 2.69% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | | 7,273 | | | | 5,640 | |
Repayable by May 2008 in semi-annual installments, interest at 3.10% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | | 7,303 | | | | 3,682 | |
Others, repaid in 2006, interest from 2.50% to 3.70% as of December 31, 2005 | | | 48,107 | | | | - | |
| | | 77,899 | | | | 24,661 | |
(Continued)
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
ISE Labs | | | | | | |
Repayable by March 2009 in quarterly installments, interest at 4.70% and 6.10% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | $ | 1,745 | | | $ | 1,235 | |
Repayable by July 2009 in quarterly installments, interest at 4.20% and 6.10% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | | 1,523 | | | | 1,143 | |
Repaid in September 2006, interest at 5.25% as of December 31, 2005 | | | 607 | | | | - | |
| | | 3,875 | | | | 2,378 | |
ASE Test Malaysia | | | | | | | | |
Repaid in March 2006, interest from 5.00% to 5.29% as of December 31, 2005 | | | 13,320 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
ASE Test Finance | | | | | | | | |
Repayable in semi-annual installments from August 2008 to August 2010, interest at 5.45% and 6.23% as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively | | | 78,000 | | | | 78,000 | |
Repaid in December 2006, interest at 5.73% as of December 31, 2005 | | | 115,000 | | | | - | |
| | | 193,000 | | | | 78,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 288,094 | | | $ | 105,039 | |
(Concluded)
| | Bank loans obtained by ASE Test Finance were restricted for the use in the redemption of ASE Test Finance’s and the Company’s loans. The Company and ASE Inc. provided guarantees for ASE Test Finance’s payment obligations under the $78,000 thousand loan. Under the guaranty, the Company is required to maintain certain financial ratios and the tangible net worth of the Company shall not be less than $450 million at any time. |
| | Several loan agreements specify the following non-financial covenants: |
| | Without the prior written consent from the majority of the banks, the Company should not: |
| a) | Pledge its assets, assume liabilities or dispose of assets in excess of 20% of total assets, unless the transaction involves a transfer of assets between affiliates. Assets in exchange for other comparable or superior as to type are excluded from this covenant; or |
| b) | Merge with any other entity or make investments in excess of $100 million or acquire material assets from another entity. |
| | The abovementioned bank loan contracts have variable interest rates and are subject to adjustments by banks or changes in prime rate. In addition, several of the loan agreements have default provisions, whereby a default under one loan agreement may also trigger cross-defaults under other loan agreements. |
| | As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company was in compliance with its financial and non-financial covenants. |
| | Long-term debt by currencies other than U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 is as follows: |
| | December 31 |
| | 2005 | 2006 |
| | (In thousands) | (In thousands) |
| | | |
New Taiwan dollars | | NT$ 2,559,760 | NT$ 803,845 |
| | Such amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars at the spot rates quoted by the Bank of Taiwan of NT$32.86 to US$1 and NT$32.596 to US$1 as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. |
| | As of December 31, 2006, the maturities of long-term debts are as follows: |
2007 | | $ | 34,418 | |
2008 | | | 20,564 | |
2009 | | | 33,940 | |
2010 | | | 31,202 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 120,124 | |
13. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| | As stipulated by the Company Law of the ROC, the Company's subsidiary in the ROC is required to make an appropriation for legal capital reserve at 10% of net income as determined in accordance with ROC GAAP. Use of the legal capital reserve is restricted to certain purposes, including the offset of a deficit, and the transfer of up to 50% of the legal capital reserve to capital stock when the legal capital reserve has reached 50% of total capital stock. As of December 31, 2006, the legal capital reserve approximated US$26,770 thousand and was not available for distribution. |
| | As of December 31, 2006, the Company had three stock option plans, the 1999, 2000 and 2004 Option Plans. Stock options granted under these plans are exercisable for ordinary shares of the Company and vest ratably over a period of three or five years. The options expire five or ten years from the date of grant. |
| | Information regarding stock options granted or modified after January 1, 2004 is presented below: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | | | | Average | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | | | | Exercise | | | Average | |
| | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning outstanding balance | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | | | | 260,000 | | | $ | 6.18 | | | | | | | 292,500 | | | $ | 6.21 | | | | |
Options granted | | | 260,000 | | | | 6.18 | | | $ | 6.18 | | | | 32,500 | | | | 6.50 | | | $ | 6.50 | | | | 130,000 | | | | 9.60 | | | $ | 9.60 | |
Options exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | (9,000 | ) | | | 6.10 | | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance | | | 260,000 | | | | 6.18 | | | | | | | | 292,500 | | | | 6.21 | | | | | | | | 413,500 | | | | 7.28 | | | | | |
| | Options outstanding on December 31, 2006, the related weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual life information are as follows: |
| | | Outstanding Shares | | | Exercisable Shares | | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Options with exercise price of: | | | | | | | | | | |
$5.50 | | | | | 60,000 | | | | 24,000 | | | | 7.6 | |
$6.10 | | | | | 51,000 | | | | 15,000 | | | | 7.8 | |
$6.50 | | | | | 172,500 | | | | 76,500 | | | | 7.6 | |
$9.79 | | | | | 115,000 | | | | 11,500 | | | | 9.3 | |
$8.10 | | | | | 15,000 | | | | 7,500 | | | | 9.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 413,500 | | | | 134,500 | | | | | |
| | The Company has computed, for pro forma disclosure purposes, the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: |
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
| | | |
Risk-free interest rate | 3.50%-3.88% | 3.88% | 4.88% |
Expected life | 5 years | 5 years | 3-5 years |
Expected volatility | 78.28% | 59.06% | 59.95-62.03% |
Expected dividend | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| | ASE Inc., the parent company, has two option plans, which were adopted in 2002 and 2004. Under the terms of the plans, stock options are granted to employees including those of the Company. The option rights expire ten years from the date of grant. On the second anniversary of the grant date, 40% of the options become vested and the remaining options vest ratably over a period of three years thereafter. |
| | Information regarding the ASE Inc.’s stock option plans for the Company and its subsidiaries is as follows: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | | | | Average | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | | | | Exercise | | | Average | |
| | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning outstanding balance | | | 38,852,400 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | | | | | 61,752,100 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | | | | | 52,926,580 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | | |
Options granted | | | 25,499,500 | | | | 0.79 | | | $ | 0.79 | | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | |
Options forfeited | | | (2,261,800 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | | | | (5,126,800 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | | | | (2,489,000 | ) | | | 0.62 | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (338,000 | ) | | | 0.56 | | | | | | | | (6,698,720 | ) | | | 0.49 | | | | | | | | (9,908,710 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance | | | 61,752,100 | | | | 0.67 | | | | | | | | 52,926,580 | | | | 0.60 | | | | | | | | 40,528,870 | | | | 0.61 | | | | | |
| | Options outstanding on December 31, 2006, the related weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual life information are as follows: |
| | | Outstanding Shares | | | Exercisable Shares | | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | |
Options with exercise price | | | | | | | | | | |
$0.49 | | | | | 15,222,300 | | | | 9,936,500 | | | | 6.0 | |
$0.64 | | | | | 4,327,170 | | | | 2,302,690 | | | | 6.6 | |
$0.70 | | | | | 18,564,400 | | | | 7,372,700 | | | | 7.5 | |
$0.57 | | | | | 2,415,000 | | | | - | | | | 8.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 40,528,870 | | | | 19,611,890 | | | | | |
| | The fair value of the common stock options issued was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: |
| 2004 | 2005 |
| | |
Risk-free interest rate | 2.50% | 1.80% |
Expected life | 5 years | 5 years |
Expected volatility | 59% | 47% |
Expected dividend | 3% | 3% |
| | For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair values of the options are amortized to expense ratably over the option vesting periods. Had the Company recorded compensation costs based on the estimated grant date fair value, the Company’s net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share (in U.S. dollars) would have been as follows: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 25,139 | | | $ | (35,484 | ) | | $ | 150,769 | |
Stock-based compensation expense (net of related tax effect) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From the Company | | | (97 | ) | | | (209 | ) | | | (317 | ) |
From ASE Inc. | | | (2,407 | ) | | | (9,084 | ) | | | (8,486 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma net income (loss) | | $ | 22,635 | | | $ | (44,777 | ) | | $ | 141,966 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic EPS As reported | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 1.51 | |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | (0.45 | ) | | $ | 1.42 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted EPS As reported | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 1.50 | |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | (0.45 | ) | | $ | 1.41 | |
14. PENSION PLAN
| | The Labor Pension Act (the “Act”), which took effect in the ROC on July 1, 2005, provides for a pension mechanism that is deemed a defined contribution pension plan. The employees who were subject to the Labor Standards Law of the ROC before the enforcement of this Act may choose to be subject to the pension mechanism under this Act or may continue to be subject to the pension mechanism under the Labor Standards Law. For those employees who were subject to the Labor Standards Law before July 1, 2005, work for the same company after July 1, 2005 and choose to be subject to the pension mechanism under the Act, their service years as of July 1, 2005 will be retained. Under the Act, the rate of an employer’s monthly contribution to the employees’ personal pension accounts should not be less than 6% of each employee’s monthly salary or wage. Thus, since July 1, 2005, ASE Test, Inc. has made monthly contributions based on each employee’s salary or wage to personal pension accounts, and recognized pension costs of $885 thousand and $1,984 thousand for each year ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. |
| | ASE Test, Inc. has a defined benefit pension plan for its regular employees. Retirement benefits are based on the length of service and average salaries or wages of the last six months before retirement. ASE Test, Inc. makes monthly contributions, at 2% of salaries and wages, to plan assets which are in the name of, and are administered by, the employee pension plan committee and are deposited in the Central Trust of China (the “CTC”), an ROC government agency. Besides, ASE Test, Inc. also accrued pension cost of executive managers. Pension cost for executive managers was $11 thousand and $288 thousand in 2005 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, accrued pension cost of aforementioned plan was $11 thousand and $299 thousand, respectively. |
| | ISE Labs, Inc. has a defined contribution plan (“401k plan”) for eligible employees. This plan permits employees to make contributions up to the maximum limits allowable under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code Section 401k. ASE Test Malaysia and ASE Singapore Pte Ltd. also have a defined contribution plan. The Company has no other post-retirement or post-employment benefit plans. |
| | As of December 31, 2006, allocations by investment type of the plan assets deposited in the CTC are as follows: |
Type of Investment | | Allocation (%) | |
| | | |
Cash | | | 46 | |
Notes | | | 18 | |
Equity | | | 17 | |
Bond | | | 10 | |
Other | | | 9 | |
| | | | |
| | | 100 | |
| | Information about the defined benefit plans for ASE Test Inc. is summarized as follows: |
| a. | Components of net periodic pension cost for the year: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,906 | | | $ | 1,705 | | | $ | 301 | |
Interest | | | 349 | | | | 373 | | | | 308 | |
Projected return on plan assets | | | (78 | ) | | | (117 | ) | | | (109 | ) |
Amortization | | | 172 | | | | 69 | | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic pension cost | | $ | 2,349 | | | $ | 2,030 | | | $ | 511 | |
| b. | Reconciliation of funded status of the plan and accrued pension cost at December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006: |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Vested benefit obligation | | $ | 38 | | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 98 | |
Non-vested benefit obligation | | | 6,978 | | | | 6,424 | | | | 7,255 | |
Accumulated benefit obligation | | | 7,016 | | | | 6,440 | | | | 7,353 | |
Additional benefits based on future salaries | | | 5,644 | | | | 4,638 | | | | 5,140 | |
Projected benefit obligation | | | 12,660 | | | | 11,078 | | | | 12,493 | |
Fair value of plan assets | | | (3,154 | ) | | | (3,668 | ) | | | (4,318 | ) |
Funded status | | | 9,506 | | | | 7,410 | | | | 8,175 | |
Unrecognized net transition obligation | | | (163 | ) | | | (148 | ) | | | (138 | ) |
Unrecognized actuarial loss | | | (4,172 | ) | | | (814 | ) | | | (1,646 | ) |
Accrued expense | | | (52 | ) | | | (47 | ) | | | (42 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued pension cost | | $ | 5,119 | | | $ | 6,401 | | | $ | 6,349 | |
Vested obligation | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 98 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
c. Actuarial assumption | | | |
| | | |
Discount rate | 3.25% | 2.75% | 2.25% |
Increase in future salary level | 3.00% | 2.5-3.0% | 2.5-3.0% |
Expected rate of return on plan assets | 3.25% | 2.75% | 2.50% |
| d. | ASE Test, Inc. expects to make contributions of $554 thousand to its defined pension plan in 2007. |
| e | Expected benefit payments: |
Year of Payments | | | |
| | | |
2007 | | $ | 105 | |
2008 | | | 8 | |
2009 | | | 58 | |
2010 | | | 42 | |
2011 | | | 52 | |
2012 and thereafter | | | 1,483 | |
| Plan assets and obligations reflected herein were measured as of December 31, 2006. |
15. EMPLOYEES BENEFITS, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | Cost of | | | Operating | | | | | | Cost of | | | Operating | | | | | | Cost of | | | Operating | | | | |
| | Revenues | | | Expenses | | | Total | | | Revenues | | | Expenses | | | Total | | | Revenues | | | Expenses | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employees benefits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salary | | $ | 63,555 | | | $ | 19,393 | | | $ | 82,948 | | | $ | 51,573 | | | $ | 20,350 | | | $ | 71,923 | | | $ | 58,183 | | | $ | 22,111 | | | $ | 80,294 | |
Insurance | | | 4,281 | | | | 1,575 | | | | 5,856 | | | | 3,561 | | | | 1,360 | | | | 4,921 | | | | 4,129 | | | | 1,826 | | | | 5,955 | |
Pension costs | | | 4,019 | | | | 1,397 | | | | 5,416 | | | | 3,864 | | | | 1,477 | | | | 5,341 | | | | 3,584 | | | | 1,500 | | | | 5,084 | |
Other | | | 5,829 | | | | 1,668 | | | | 7,497 | | | | 7,619 | | | | 2,009 | | | | 9,628 | | | | 5,831 | | | | 1,314 | | | | 7,145 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 77,684 | | | $ | 24,033 | | | $ | 101,717 | | | $ | 66,617 | | | $ | 25,196 | | | $ | 91,813 | | | $ | 71,727 | | | $ | 26,751 | | | $ | 98,478 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | $ | 141,839 | | | $ | 2,441 | | | $ | 144,280 | | | $ | 138,084 | | | $ | 2,691 | | | $ | 140,775 | | | $ | 110,830 | | | $ | 2,732 | | | $ | 113,562 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | | 9,339 | | | | 11,289 | | | | 20,628 | | | | 6,875 | | | | 6,652 | | | | 13,527 | | | | 5,276 | | | | 1,800 | | | | 7,076 | |
16. INCOME TAX
The ROC government enacted the Alternative Minimum Tax Act (the “AMT Act”), which became effective on January 1, 2006. The alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) imposed under the AMT Act is a supplemental tax levied at a rate of 10% which is payable if the income tax payable determined pursuant to the Income Tax Law is below the minimum amount prescribed under the AMT Act. The taxable income for calculating the AMT includes most of the income that is exempted from income tax under various laws and statutes. ASE Test, Inc., the Company’s Taiwan based subsidiary, has considered the impact of the AMT Act in the determination of its tax liabilities.
| a. | Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to continuing operations is summarized as follows: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Tax expense (benefit) based on pre-tax accounting income (loss) from continuing operations at statutory rate | | $ | 10,478 | | | $ | (4,169 | ) | | $ | 38,973 | |
Add (deduct) tax effects of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Permanent differences | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-exempt income - tax holiday | | | (6,146 | ) | | | - | | | | (6,450 | ) |
Other | | | (937 | ) | | | 181 | | | | (40 | ) |
Temporary differences | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and capital allowance | | | (1,501 | ) | | | 1,035 | | | | (11,569 | ) |
Depreciation | | | (945 | ) | | | (597 | ) | | | 5,995 | |
Other | | | 3,028 | | | | 53 | | | | 2,089 | |
| | | 3,977 | | | | (3,497 | ) | | | 28,998 | |
(Continued)
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss carryforward | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,101 | | | $ | (5,356 | ) |
Income taxes on undistributed earnings | | | 2,244 | | | | 2,369 | | | | - | |
Credits for investments, investment in machinery and equipment, and research and development | | | (4,494 | ) | | | (5,637 | ) | | | (14,802 | ) |
Net change in deferred income tax for the year | | | (22,936 | ) | | | 4,991 | | | | 3,821 | |
Adjustment of prior years’ income tax | | | - | | | | (2,790 | ) | | | (94 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | (21,209 | ) | | $ | 2,537 | | | $ | 12,567 | |
The above-mentioned taxes on pre-tax accounting income (loss) based on the applicable statutory rates for both domestic and foreign entities are shown below:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Domestic entity | | $ | 509 | | | $ | 1,079 | | | $ | 3,580 | |
Foreign entities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASE Test, Inc. (25% statutory rate) | | | 8,708 | | | | (4,314 | ) | | | 32,090 | |
ASE Test Malaysia (28% statutory rate) | | | 1,765 | | | | 745 | | | | 3,646 | |
ISE Labs (federal tax rate 35% and state tax rate 6%) | | | (504 | ) | | | (1,679 | ) | | | (343 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,478 | | | $ | (4,169 | ) | | $ | 38,973 | |
ASE Test Inc. has two five-year income tax exemption projects beginning from January 2001 and 2006, respectively. A portion of ASE Test, Inc.’s income from the testing of semiconductors is exempt from income tax. ASE Singapore Pte Ltd., a subsidiary of ISE Labs, has been granted pioneer status under the provisions of the Economic Expansion Incentives (Relief from Income Tax) Act for its operations in Singapore for a qualifying period of 10 years commencing September 1, 1998. During the qualifying period, all income arising from pioneer status activities is wholly exempt from income tax. In addition, ASE Test Malaysia also has been granted pioneer status by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry in Malaysia for five years from July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2004. During the year 2003, the Company applied to the relevant authorities to surrender its pioneer status in accordance with the 2003 budget proposal, which allows a pioneer company that intends to undertake reinvestment before the expiry of its pioneer status the option to surrender its pioneer certificate to qualify for reinvestment allowance. On September 11, 2004, the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority approved the Company’s surrender of pioneer status with effect from September 21, 2002, the date of announcement of the 2003 budget proposal. The per share effect (basic earnings per share) of tax holiday is $0.06 in 2004 and $0.06 in 2006.
| b. | Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows: |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Current deferred income tax assets | | | | | | |
Unused tax credits | | $ | 9,267 | | | $ | 22,639 | |
Loss carryforward | | | 4,067 | | | | - | |
Other | | | 1,880 | | | | 1,241 | |
| | | 15,214 | | | | 23,880 | |
Less : valuation allowance | | | (6,281 | ) | | | (319 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 8,933 | | | $ | 23,561 | |
(Continued)
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets | | | | | | |
Unused tax credits | | $ | 29,528 | | | $ | 9,706 | |
Tax effect of unabsorbed capital allowance | | | 10,263 | | | | 6,284 | |
Loss carryforward | | | 9,294 | | | | 8,196 | |
Other | | | (2,818 | ) | | | (17 | ) |
| | | 46,267 | | | | 24,169 | |
Less : valuation allowance | | | (15,303 | ) | | | (11,046 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 30,964 | | | $ | 13,123 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 608 | |
(Concluded)
In assessing the realization of deferred income tax assets, the Company considers its future taxable earnings and expected timing for the reversal of temporary differences. In addition, in the event future taxable earnings do not materialize, the Company will consider executing certain tax planning strategies available to realize the deferred income tax assets. The valuation allowance is provided to reduce the gross deferred income tax assets to an amount which the Company believes will more likely than not be realized. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are classified in the consolidated balance sheets based on the classification of the related assets or liabilities or the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences.
| c. | As of December 31, 2006, unused tax credits which can be utilized to offset future income tax, are set forth below: |
Year of Expiry | | | |
| | | |
2007 | | $ | 10,045 | |
2008 | | | 9,883 | |
2009 | | | 2,392 | |
2010 | | | 2,578 | |
2011 and thereafter | | | 7,447 | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 32,345 | |
In the ROC, tax credits may be utilized to reduce up to 50% of income tax payable each year. In the expiring year, any remaining unused tax credits may be used entirely.
The U.S. Federal and California State net operating loss carry forwards of ISE Labs as of December 31, 2006 approximated $21.4 million and $30.4 million which expire in 2025 and 2015, respectively.
17. DISCLOSURES FOR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
| a. | Fair values of financial instruments were as follows: |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | Carrying | | | Fair | | | Carrying | | | Fair | |
| | Amount | | | Value | | | Amount | | | Value | |
Non-derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale financial assets-current | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 89,341 | | | $ | 89,341 | |
Available-for-sale financial assets-noncurrent | | | 81,251 | | | | 165,002 | | | | 204,851 | | | | 204,851 | |
Pledged time deposit ( included in other assets ) | | | 2,006 | | | | 2,006 | | | | 5,276 | | | | 5,276 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debts (including current portion) | | | 295,046 | | | | 295,046 | | | | 120,124 | | | | 120,124 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial currency forward contracts | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | (262 | ) | | | (262 | ) |
| b. | Methods and assumptions used in the determination of fair values of financial instruments were as below: |
| 1) | The aforementioned financial instruments do not include cash, notes and accounts receivable, receivables from related parties, pledged time deposit-current, notes and accounts payable, payable to related parties, accrued expenses and payables for property, plant and equipment. These financial instruments’ carrying amounts approximate their fair values. |
| 2) | Fair values of available-for-sale financial assets are determined based on their quoted market prices. Fair values of derivatives were determined using valuation techniques incorporating estimates and assumptions that were consistent with prevailing market conditions. |
| 3) | The carrying amount of pledged time deposit reflects its fair value. |
| 4) | Fair values of long-term debts were based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at current interest rates of similar long-term debts. The carrying amount of long-term debts approximates their fair value. |
| c. | The Company recognized $314 thousand and $685 thousand of gains for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, and $1,731 thousand of losses for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the changes in fair value of derivatives determined using valuation techniques. |
| d. | As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, financial assets exposed to fair value interest rate risk were $5,031 thousand and $6,081 thousand, respectively, financial liabilities exposed to fair value interest rate risk were $20,644 thousand and $1,781 thousand, respectively. Financial assets exposed to cash flow interest rate risk were $77,439 thousand and $62,088 thousand, respectively, and financial liabilities exposed to cash flow interest rate risk were $267,096 thousand and $101,358 thousand, respectively. |
| e. | For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company recognized interest income of $578 thousand, $1,598 thousand and $3,369 thousand, and interest expense (including capitalized interest) of $9,609 thousand, $13,622 thousand and $13,568 thousand, respectively, for those financial assets or liabilities that are not categorized as financial assets or liabilities at fair value through profit and loss. |
| f. | The derivative instruments employed by the Company is to mitigate risks arising from the ordinary business operation. All derivative transactions engaged by the Company should be designated into two purposes: hedging and speculating which are governed by separated internal guidelines and controls. Derivative transactions enter for hedging purposes must hedge the risk against fluctuation in foreign exchange and interest rates arising from operating activities. The currency and the amount of derivative instruments held by the Company must match the Company’s assets and liabilities. |
| g. | Information about financial risk |
The Company invested in open-end funds and listed shares which are traded in active market. The fair value of financial assets was changed based on market condition. All derivative financial instruments are mainly used to hedge the exchange rate fluctuations of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Therefore, the market risk of derivatives will be offset by the foreign exchange risk of these assets and liabilities.
Credit risk represents the potential loss that would be incurred by the Company if the counter-parties or third-parties breached contracts. Risk factors are including the concentration degree, components and contract amounts of financial instruments. The counter-parties or third-parties to the foregoing financial instruments are reputable financial institutions and business organizations. Management believes that the Company’s exposure to default by those parties is low.
The Company believes its liquidity risk is low because the Company’s working capital, which includes investments in mutual funds and other marketable securities that are readily convertible to cash at or near fair market value, is sufficient to fulfill its obligations incurred in the operation.
| 4) | Cash flow interest rate risk |
The Company mainly engages in floated-interest-rate debt. Therefore, cash flows are expected to increase $1,014 thousand while the market interest rate increases by 1%.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
| Related Parties | | Relationship |
| | | |
| ASE Inc. | | Parent company |
| ASE Korea, Inc. | | Affiliate |
| Hung Ching Development & Construction Co. (“HCDC”) | | Affiliate |
| ASE (Shanghai) Inc. | | Affiliate |
| ASE (U.S.) Inc. | | Affiliate (starting August, 2004) |
| ASE Japan Co., Ltd. (“ASE Japan”) | | Affiliate (starting May, 2004) |
| ASE Material Inc. | | Affiliate (merged into ASE Inc. in August, 2004) |
| ASE Electronics, Inc. (“ASEE”) | | Affiliate (starting August, 2006) |
| b. | Significant related party transactions: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
1) Revenue | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ASE Inc. | | $ | 16,760 | | | $ | 44,552 | | | $ | 45,086 | |
Other | | | 446 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 17,206 | | | $ | 44,552 | | | $ | 45,086 | |
The revenue from related parties is generated from jointly marketed turnkey services.
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
2) Purchase of machinery and equipment | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
ASE Korea, Inc. | | $ | 146 | | | $ | 990 | | | $ | 7,144 | |
ASE Inc. | | | - | | | | 1,124 | | | | 4,716 | |
ASE (Chung Li) Inc. | | | 1,235 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Other | | | 4 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,385 | | | $ | 2,114 | | | $ | 11,860 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
3) Purchase of buildings - HCDC | | $ | 2,995 | | | $ | 7,293 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
4) Purchase of raw materials | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASE Inc. | | $ | 2,650 | | | $ | 5,577 | | | $ | 3,123 | |
ASE Material Inc. | | | 3,353 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Other | | | - | | | | 4 | | | | 1,041 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,003 | | | $ | 5,581 | | | $ | 4,164 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
5) Sale of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASE Korea, Inc. | | $ | 2,943 | | | $ | 14,119 | | | $ | 5,067 | |
ASE Inc. | | | 9,790 | | | | 1,598 | | | | 337 | |
ASE Japan | | | - | | | | 1,540 | | | | 1,194 | |
Other | | | 1,046 | | | | 55 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 13,779 | | | $ | 17,312 | | | $ | 6,598 | |
6) Service fees
The Company engages ASE (U.S.) Inc. as a sales agent and the service fees paid were based on monthly service-related costs and expenses incurred (limited amounts prescribed for costs and expenses). Total service fees were $3,253 thousand for the period from August to December of 2004, and $7,674 thousand and $5,008 thousand in 2005 and 2006, respectively.
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Receivable | | | | | | |
ASE Inc. | | $ | 16,394 | | | $ | 13,811 | |
ASE Korea, Inc. | | | 3,416 | | | | 73 | |
Other | | | 467 | | | | 734 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,277 | | | $ | 14,618 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Payable | | | | | | | | |
ASE Inc. | | $ | 9,082 | | | $ | 4,207 | |
ASEE | | | - | | | | 565 | |
Other | | | 1,265 | | | | 365 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,347 | | | $ | 5,137 | |
These transactions were conducted at prices and terms comparable to those applied in transactions with unrelated companies, except for the purchases and sales of machinery and equipment which were recorded at net book values and the purchase of building from HCDC which was based on appraisal from an independent third party.
19. ASSETS PLEDGED
| The following assets have been pledged or mortgaged as collaterals for bank loans and as guarantees for the employment of foreign labor and the lease of office buildings: |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Machinery and equipment, net | | $ | 28,021 | | | $ | 7,326 | |
Pledged time deposit | | | 3,908 | | | | 5,276 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 31,929 | | | $ | 12,602 | |
| Included in other assets-other are $2,006 thousand and $5,276 thousand of time deposit which have been pledged as collateral as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. |
20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
ASE Test, Inc. leases the land on which its buildings are situated under various operating lease agreements with the government expiring on various dates through February 2015. The lease agreements grant ASE Test, Inc. the option to renew the leases and reserve the right for the lessor to adjust the lease charges upon an increase in the assessed value of the land and to terminate the leases under certain conditions. Moreover, the Company leases machinery, equipment and office building under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The rental expenses for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were $40,841 thousand, $46,816 thousand and $42,523 thousand, respectively. The future minimum lease payments under the above-mentioned operating leases are as follows:
2007 | | $ | 20,081 | |
2008 | | | 7,701 | |
2009 | | | 5,144 | |
2010 | | | 3,215 | |
2011 and thereafter | | | 655 | |
| | | | |
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 36,796 | |
In addition, the Company also leases machinery and equipment under non-cancellable capital lease agreements. As of December 31, 2006, the net book value of the machinery and equipment acquired under the capital obligations amounted to $18,176 thousand. The future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:
2007 | | $ | 14,591 | |
2008 | | | 847 | |
2009 | | | 36 | |
2010 | | | 3 | |
Total minimum lease payments | | | 15,477 | |
Less: Imputed interest | | | (392 | ) |
Present value of future lease obligations | | | 15,085 | |
Capital lease obligation, current | | | (14,225 | ) |
| | | | |
Capital lease obligation, long-term | | $ | 860 | |
| b. | The Company had unused letters of credit of $43 thousand as of December 31, 2006. |
| c. | The Company had commitments to certain vendors to purchase property, plant and equipment of approximately $52,000 thousand, and had prepaid $360 thousand as of December 31, 2006. |
| d. | At December 31, 2006, the Company did not have any significant unasserted claims or pending litigations. |
21. LOSS ON FIRE DAMAGE
Significant Unusual Loss
ASE Test, Inc., incurred fire damage to its production lines in Chung Li, Taiwan on May 1, 2005, and recognized an estimated loss of $52,014 thousand for damages to its machinery and equipment. With the assistance of external counsel, the Company submitted insurance claims of $790 thousand to its insurers for compensation for damages which the Company believed to be clearly identifiable and reasonably estimated, and recorded such amount as an offset to fire loss in 2005.
The Company reached final settlement with the insurers in June 2006 with regards to the fire damage incurred to the production lines in Chung Li. The final settlement amount of $27,289 thousand, offset by the $790 thousand recorded in 2005, was recorded in the current period. The Company also reversed $5,641 thousand of impairment loss recognized in 2005 after a careful analysis of the increase in the estimated service potential of the production line facilities by an external specialist. Net amount of $32,145 thousand, including the reversal of $5 thousand of other accruals, was recognized as a gain on insurance settlement and loss recovery in 2006. All of the insurance recoveries were received in August 2006.
22. SEGMENT INFORMATION
| a. | Geographical information, net revenues |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Area | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | $ | 236,527 | | | | 55 | | | $ | 260,224 | | | | 62 | | | $ | 320,895 | | | | 62 | |
Asia | | | 152,485 | | | | 36 | | | | 104,179 | | | | 25 | | | | 114,235 | | | | 22 | |
Europe | | | 38,740 | | | | 9 | | | | 56,526 | | | | 13 | | | | 82,558 | | | | 16 | |
Australia | | | 11 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 18 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 427,763 | | | | 100 | | | $ | 420,929 | | | | 100 | | | $ | 517,706 | | | | 100 | |
| b. | Geographical information- long-lived assets |
| | December 31 | |
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | Amount | | | % | | | Amount | | | % | |
Asia | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Taiwan | | $ | 306,060 | | | | 71 | | | $ | 282,309 | | | | 73 | |
Malaysia | | | 76,194 | | | | 18 | | | | 56,300 | | | | 14 | |
Singapore | | | 36,847 | | | | 8 | | | | 38,222 | | | | 10 | |
United States | | | 10,978 | | | | 3 | | | | 12,604 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 430,079 | | | | 100 | | | $ | 389,435 | | | | 100 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company did not have a single customer to which the net revenues accounted for over 10% of total net revenues.
| d. | Operating segment information |
Other than its investing segment, the Company has two major operating segments: Testing, and Packaging. The Company packages bare semiconductors into finished semiconductors with enhanced electrical and thermal characteristics and provides testing services, including front-end engineering testing, wafer probing and final testing services. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 is as follows:
| | Testing | | | Packaging | | | Other | | | Total | |
2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from external customers | | $ | 343,116 | | | $ | 84,647 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 427,763 | |
Interest income | | | 154 | | | | 83 | | | | 341 | | | | 578 | |
Interest expense | | | (1,069 | ) | | | (255 | ) | | | (5,441 | ) | | | (6,765 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | (915 | ) | | | (172 | ) | | | (5,100 | ) | | | (6,187 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 138,328 | | | | 18,601 | | | | - | | | | 156,929 | |
Impairment loss on assets | | | (26,500 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (26,500 | ) |
Segment profit (loss) | | | (6,248 | ) | | | (10,456 | ) | | | 3,666 | | | | (13,038 | ) |
Segment assets | | | 782,089 | | | | 149,820 | | | | 151,200 | | | | 1,083,109 | |
Expenditures for segment assets | | | 174,382 | | | | 36,274 | | | | - | | | | 210,656 | |
Goodwill | | | 25,612 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25,612 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
| | Testing | | | Packaging | | | Other | | | Total | |
2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from external customers | | $ | 346,639 | | | $ | 74,290 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 420,929 | |
Interest income | | | 868 | | | | 574 | | | | 156 | | | | 1,598 | |
Interest expense | | | (3,418 | ) | | | (427 | ) | | | (8,899 | ) | | | (12,744 | ) |
Net interest revenue (expense) | | | (2,550 | ) | | | 147 | | | | (8,743 | ) | | | (11,146 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 134,383 | | | | 15,239 | | | | - | | | | 149,622 | |
Loss on fire damage | | | (51,224 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (51,224 | ) |
Segment loss | | | (31,709 | ) | | | (9,372 | ) | | | (2,705 | ) | | | (43,786 | ) |
Segment assets | | | 669,190 | | | | 125,561 | | | | 145,588 | | | | 940,339 | |
Expenditures for segment assets | | | 48,844 | | | | 1,842 | | | | - | | | | 50,686 | |
Goodwill | | | 20,646 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 20,646 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue from external customers | | | 423,341 | | | | 94,365 | | | | - | | | | 517,706 | |
Interest income | | | 1,379 | | | | 1,432 | | | | 558 | | | | 3,369 | |
Interest expense | | | (2,302 | ) | | | (117 | ) | | | (10,746 | ) | | | (13,165 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | (923 | ) | | | 1,315 | | | | (10,188 | ) | | | (9,796 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 108,410 | | | | 12,228 | | | | - | | | | 120,638 | |
Gain on insurance settlement and impairment recovery | | | 32,145 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 32,145 | |
Segment profit | | | 149,369 | | | | 8,040 | | | | 5,927 | | | | 163,336 | |
Segment assets | | | 682,364 | | | | 83,605 | | | | 278,459 | | | | 1,044,428 | |
Expenditures for segment assets | | | 85,038 | | | | 2,370 | | | | - | | | | 87,408 | |
Goodwill | | | 20,646 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 20,646 | |
23. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
ASE Test Malaysia sold its camera module assembly operations in early October 2005 for $19,116 thousand, which covers the book value of the equipment and inventory, plus an acquisition premium. As a result, the Company reclassified the camera module assembly segment as discontinued operations.
Summarized below were operating results of the discontinued segment for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.
| | 2004 | | | From January 1, 2005 to October 3, 2005 | |
| | | | | | |
Net revenues | | $ | 193,375 | | | $ | 66,493 | |
Cost of revenues | | | 173,389 | | | | 59,819 | |
Gross profit | | | 19,986 | | | | 6,674 | |
Operating expenses | | | 2,229 | | | | 1,422 | |
Non-operating expenses | | | 768 | | | | 1,257 | |
Income from discontinued operations before income tax | | | 16,989 | | | | 3,995 | |
Income tax expense | | | 21 | | | | 66 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 16,968 | | | | 3,929 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
| | 2004 | | | From January 1, 2005 to October 3, 2005 | |
Gain on disposal of assets | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,969 | |
Income tax expense | | | - | | | | 59 | |
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations | | | - | | | | 6,910 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 16,968 | | | $ | 10,839 | |
24. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED BY THE COMPANY AND ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ROC GAAP, which differ in the following respects from U.S. GAAP:
ASE Test, Inc. adopted U.S. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“U.S. SFAS”) No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (“U.S. SFAS No. 87”) on January 1, 1987, which requires the Company to determine the accumulated pension obligation and the pension expense on an actuarial basis.
U.S. SFAS No. 87 was amended by U.S. SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“U.S. SFAS No. 158”) on September 29, 2006, which requires employers to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. U.S. SFAS No. 158 defines the funded status of a benefit plan as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation. Previously unrecognized items such as gains or losses, prior service credits and transition assets or liabilities will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be subsequently recognized through net periodic benefit cost pursuant to the provisions of U.S. SFAS No. 87. The Company adopted U.S. SFAS No. 158 on December 31, 2006.
ROC SFAS No. 18, “Accounting for Pensions” (“ROC SFAS No. 18”) is similar in many respects to U.S. SFAS No. 87 and was adopted by ASE Test, Inc. in 1996. However, ROC SFAS No. 18 does not require a company to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension plan as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position. The difference in the dates of adoption gives rise to a U.S. GAAP difference in the actuarial computation for transition obligation pension expense and the related amortization.
Under ROC GAAP, prior to January 1, 2006, marketable securities were carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market, and securities without active market were carried at cost, with only unrealized losses or impairment loss recognized. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ROC SFAS No. 34 and No. 36. Financial instruments including debt securities and equity securities are recognized at fair value or including transaction costs and categorized as financial assets or liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), available-for-sale (“AFS”) or held-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities. FVTPL has two sub-categories, financial assets designated on initial recognition as one to be measured at fair value, and those that are classified as held for trading, which are also measured at fair value with fair value changes recognized in profit and loss. These classifications are similar to
those required by U.S. SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“U.S. SFAS No. 115”).
Under U.S. SFAS No. 115, debt and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are classified as either trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity securities. Debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and traded for short-term profit are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
ROC SFAS No. 34 and No. 36 require the Company to adjust the carry amount of trading and available-for-sale marketable securities from the lower of aggregate cost or market to fair value upon initial adoption. Since the Company did not hold any marketable securities at December 31, 2005, no adjustments were made as a result of the adoption of these new standards. No GAAP differences exist in the carrying amount and unrealized gains and losses for marketable securities acquired after January 1, 2006.
| c. | Bonuses to employees, directors and supervisors |
According to ROC regulations and the Articles of Incorporation of ASE Inc. and ASE Test, Inc., a portion of the Company’s earnings is required to be set aside as bonuses to employees, directors and supervisors. Bonuses to directors and supervisors are always paid in cash. However, bonuses to employees may be granted in cash or stock or both. All of these appropriations, including stock bonuses which are valued at par value of NT$10, are charged against retained earnings under ROC GAAP after such appropriations are formally approved by the shareholders in the following year.
Under U.S. GAAP, such bonuses are charged against income in the year earned. Shares issued as part of these bonuses are recorded at fair market value. The total amount of the aforementioned bonuses to be paid in the following year is initially accrued based on management’s estimate pursuant to the Company‘s Articles of Incorporation. Any difference between the initially accrued amount and the fair market value of any shares issued as bonuses is recognized in the year of approval by shareholders, which normally occurs during the subsequent year.
ASE Inc. pays the bonuses on behalf of the Company and does not require reimbursement. For U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, bonus payments made by ASE Inc. directly to ASE Test, Inc.’s employees are recorded as compensation expense for the Company and credited to additional paid-in capital.
The impact of bonuses under U.S. GAAP to specific cost and expense categories is as follows:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenues | | $ | 2,591 | | | $ | (1,546 | ) | | $ | 8,079 | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | 1,080 | | | | (1,420 | ) | | | 3,872 | |
Research and development | | | 418 | | | | (236 | ) | | | 1,235 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 4,089 | | | $ | (3,202 | ) | | $ | 13,186 | |
| d. | Depreciation of buildings |
Under ROC GAAP, buildings may be depreciated over their estimated life or up to 40 years based on ROC practices and tax regulations. For U.S. GAAP purposes, buildings are depreciated over their estimated economic useful life of 25 years.
| e. | Depreciation on the excess of book value on transfer of buildings between related parties |
ASE Test, Inc. purchased buildings and facilities from its affiliate, ASE Technology, in 1997. The purchase price was based on market value, which represented the portion of the purchase price in excess of the book value NT$17,667 thousand (US$642 thousand) was capitalized by ASE Test, Inc. as allowed under ROC GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP, transfers of assets between related parties are recorded at historical costs. Therefore, depreciation on the capitalized amount recorded under ROC GAAP is reversed under U.S. GAAP until the buildings and facilities are fully depreciated or disposed.
| f. | Impairment of long-lived assets |
Under U.S. GAAP, an impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets is not recoverable from the expected future cash flows and the impairment loss is measured as the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets. The impairment loss is recorded in earnings and cannot be reversed subsequently. Effective January 1, 2002, long-lived assets (excluding goodwill and other indefinite lived assets) held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Under ROC GAAP, effective January 1, 2005, the Company is required to recognize an impairment loss when an indication is identified that the carrying amount of an asset or a group of assets is not recoverable from the expected future cash flows. However, if the recoverable amount increases in a future period, the amount previously recognized as impairment would be reversed and recognized as a gain. The adjusted amount may not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Prior to January 1, 2005, the Company followed U.S. GAAP in accounting for impairment of long-lived assets for ROC GAAP purposes.
As discussed in Note 21, the Company reversed $5,641 thousand of impairment loss recognized in 2005 under ROC GAAP after a careful analysis of the increase in the estimated service potential of the production line facilities by an external specialist. Such reversal is prohibited under U.S. GAAP. As such, differences in the cost basis of these damaged machinery and equipment and associated depreciation expense between ROC and U.S. GAAP are reflected in the reconciliation.
| g. | Derivative financial instruments |
Under ROC GAAP, prior to January 1, 2006, there were no specific accounting standards which addressed measurement for derivative instruments, except for foreign currency forward contracts. Forward contracts were accounted for in a manner similar to that required under U.S. SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ROC SFAS No. 34 which requires derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting be recorded as FVTPL as described in Note 2.
Under U.S. GAAP, accounting for derivative instruments is covered under U.S. SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“U.S. SFAS No. 133”), as amended by U.S. SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derixxvative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities”, which require that all companies recognize derivative instruments as assets and liabilities in the statements of financial position at fair value. If certain conditions are met, companies may elect to designate a derivative instrument as a hedge. For U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, the Company does not apply hedge accounting, and derivatives have historically been, and will continue to be, recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded through current period earnings.
| h. | Stock-based compensation |
Under U.S. GAAP, stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes compensation expense for all unvested stock-based compensation awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 that are expected to vest, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the transition method and the original provision of U.S. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“U.S. SFAS No. 123”). Upon an employee’s termination, unvested awards are forfeited, which affects the quantity of options to be included in the calculation of stock-based compensation expense. Forfeitures do not include vested options that expire unexercised. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted after January 1, 2006 is based on the grant-date fair value estimate in accordance with the provisions of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“U.S. SFAS No. 123R”). The Company recognizes these compensation costs using the graded vesting method over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of five years. Prior to the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense in accordance with U.S. Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). See Note 25e for a further discussion on stock-based compensation.
ASE Inc. pays certain employee compensation amounts, by means of stock options, on behalf of the Company and does not require reimbursement. For U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, such payments made by ASE Inc. directly to the employees of ASE Test and subsidiaries are recorded as compensation expense for the Company and credited to additional paid-in capital.
Certain characteristics of the stock options granted under the ASE 2002 Option Plan made the fair values of these options not reasonably estimable using appropriate valuation methodologies as prescribed under U.S. SFAS No. 123 and have been accounted for using the intrinsic value method. Upon the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company continued to account for these stock options based on its intrinsic value, remeasured at each reporting date through the date of exercise or other settlement.
Under ROC GAAP, employee stock option plans that are amended or have options granted on or after January 1, 2004 must be accounted for by an interpretation issued by the ARDF in the ROC. The Company adopted the intrinsic value method and any compensation expense determined using this method is recognized over the vesting period. No stock-based compensation expense was recognized under ROC GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Prior to January 1, 2006, under ROC GAAP, the Company amortized goodwill arising from acquisitions over 10 years. The Company adopted ROC SFAS No. 35 on December 31, 2004, and in accordance with this new standard, performed an impairment analysis and recorded an impairment charge of $26,500 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004 based on a “recoverable amount” as determined by an estimate of discounted cash flows for the next six years. The Company found no impairment as of December 31, 2005 and 2006.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted ROC SFAS No. 25 which is similar to U.S. SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’ (“U.S. SFAS No. 142”). The Company ceased amortization and reviewed goodwill for impairment in accordance with the provisions of the standard and ROC SFAS No. 35. Total amortization expenses of goodwill under ROC GAAP were $10,105 thousand and $4,966 thousand in 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company adopted the provisions of U.S. SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. U.S. SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to review for possible impairment of goodwill existing at the date of adoption and perform subsequent impairment tests on at least an annual basis. In addition, existing goodwill and intangible assets must be reassessed and classified consistently in accordance with the criteria set forth in U.S. SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations’’ and U.S. SFAS No. 142.
As a result, the Company ceased to amortize goodwill effective January 1, 2002. Definite lived intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives.
The determination of whether or not the goodwill is impaired under U.S. SFAS No. 142 is made by first estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing such fair value with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the Company calculates an implied fair value of the goodwill based on an allocation of the fair value of the reporting unit to its underlying assets and liabilities. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $41,500 thousand for U.S. GAAP purposes.
| j. | Undistributed earnings tax |
In the ROC, a 10% tax is imposed on unappropriated earnings (excluding earnings from foreign consolidated subsidiaries). For ROC GAAP purposes, the Company records the 10% tax on unappropriated earnings in the year of shareholders’ approval. Starting from 2002, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants International Practices Task Force (the "Task Force") concluded that in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 95-10, “Accounting for tax credits related to dividends in accordance with SFAS 109,” the 10% tax on unappropriated earnings should be accrued under U.S. GAAP during the period the earnings arise and adjusted to the extent that distributions are approved by the shareholders in the following year.
| k. | Investments in parent company accounted for as treasury stock |
Under ROC GAAP, shareholdings in the parent company are recorded as an available-for-sale financial asset and changes in fair value from a subsequent remeasurement are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Under U.S. GAAP, according to ARB No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements”, there is a presumption that the parent company must approve the subsidiary's transactions. Accordingly, unless this presumption can be overcome, the investment in the parent company's stock should be presented within the equity section of a wholly owned subsidiary's separate financial statements and be accounted for in the same manner as treasury stock. Upon the company’s receipt of cash dividend distributed by the parent company, the cash dividend should be recorded as additional paid-in capital.
Under both ROC GAAP and U.S. GAAP, basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the average number of shares outstanding in each period. Other shares issued from unappropriated earnings, such as stock bonuses to employees, are included in the calculation of weighted-average number of shares outstanding from the date of occurrence. For diluted earnings per share, unvested stock options are included in the calculation using the treasury stock method if the inclusion of such would be dilutive.
U.S. SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” provides guidance on applying the treasury stock method for equity instruments granted in share-based payment transactions in determining diluted earnings per share, which states that the assumed proceeds shall be the sum of (a) the exercise price, (b) the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized, and (c) the amount of excess tax benefits that would be credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of the options. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company used intrinsic value method to account for its stock-based compensation under both U.S. GAAP and ROC GAAP, resulting in no unrecognized compensation expense to be included in the assumed proceeds calculation. However, upon adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company now has unrecognized compensation costs, and therefore, the number of diluted shares included in the diluted earnings per share calculation under U.S. GAAP will be different from that under ROC GAAP.
The following reconciles net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity under ROC GAAP as reported in the consolidated financial statements to the approximate net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity amounts as determined under U.S. GAAP, giving effect to adjustments for the differences listed above.
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) based on ROC GAAP | | $ | 25,139 | | | $ | (35,484 | ) | | $ | 150,769 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
a. Pension benefits | | | 7 | | | | 7 | | | | 11 | |
c. Bonuses to employees, directors and supervisors | | | (4,089 | ) | | | 3,202 | | | | (13,186 | ) |
d. Depreciation of buildings | | | (489 | ) | | | (582 | ) | | | (664 | ) |
e. Depreciation on the excess of book value of buildings transferred between related parties | | | 13 | | | | 13 | | | | 13 | |
f. Impairment loss reversal | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recoverable amount | | | - | | | | - | | | | (5,641 | ) |
Depreciation on recoverable amount | | | - | | | | - | | | | 791 | |
Income tax effect | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,212 | |
h. Stock option compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock option compensation from ASE Inc. | | | 1,856 | | | | (7,423 | ) | | | (3,750 | ) |
Stock option compensation from the Company | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,682 | ) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for adopting U.S. SFAS No. 123R | | | - | | | | - | | | | 381 | |
i. Goodwill | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Consolidated subsidiary | | | 10,105 | | | | 4,966 | | | | - | |
- Equity-method investee | | | 348 | | | | 348 | | | | - | |
Impairment | | | (15,000 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
j. Undistributed earnings tax | | | - | | | | - | | | | (8,936 | ) |
k. Cash dividend from investment in parent company accounted for as treasury stock | | | - | | | | (493 | ) | | | - | |
| | | (7,249 | ) | | | 38 | | | | (33,451 | ) |
Net income (loss) based on U.S. GAAP | | $ | 17,890 | | | $ | (35,446 | ) | | $ | 117,318 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share based on U.S. GAAP (in U.S. dollars) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 1.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of shares based on U.S. GAAP (Note 25d) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 100,037,524 | | | | 100,059,031 | | | | 100,081,418 | |
Diluted | | | 100,111,113 | | | | 100,059,031 | | | | 100,234,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity based on ROC GAAP | | $ | 599,591 | | | $ | 558,205 | | | $ | 843,128 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
a. Pension benefits and additional liability | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension benefits | | | (44 | ) | | | (37 | ) | | | (26 | ) |
Unrecognized pension cost on adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 158 | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,712 | ) |
c. Bonuses to employees, directors and supervisors | | | (4,758 | ) | | | - | | | | (8,843 | ) |
d. Depreciation of buildings | | | (2,118 | ) | | | (2,700 | ) | | | (3,364 | ) |
(Continued)
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
e. Depreciation on the excess of book value of buildings transferred between related parties | | $ | (518 | ) | | $ | (505 | ) | | $ | (492 | ) |
f. Impairment loss reversal, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,638 | ) |
i. Goodwill | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- Consolidated subsidiary | | | 30,315 | | | | 35,281 | | | | 35,281 | |
- Equity-method investee | | | 1,044 | | | | 1,392 | | | | 1,392 | |
Impairment | | | (15,000 | ) | | | (15,000 | ) | | | (15,000 | ) |
j. Undistributed earnings tax | | | - | | | | - | | | | (8,936 | ) |
k. Investment in parent company accounted for as treasury stock | | | (81,362 | ) | | | (81,422 | ) | | | (81,422 | ) |
k. Unrealized gain on investment in parent company accounted for as treasury stock | | | - | | | | - | | | | (123,429 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustments on U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | 60 | | | | 242 | | | | 172 | |
Net decrease in shareholders’ equity | | | (72,381 | ) | | | (62,749 | ) | | | (210,017 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity based on U.S. GAAP | | $ | 527,210 | | | $ | 495,456 | | | $ | 633,111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in shareholders’ equity based on U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 562,499 | | | $ | 527,210 | | | $ | 495,456 | |
Net income (loss) for the year | | | 17,890 | | | | (35,446 | ) | | | 117,318 | |
Issuance of new shares under stock option plans | | | 4,552 | | | | - | | | | 678 | |
Unrecognized pension cost | | | 646 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Adjustment of pension cost upon adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 158 | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,712 | ) |
ASE Inc. shares to be distributed as bonus to employees | | | 1,525 | | | | 1,556 | | | | 4,343 | |
Stock option compensation | | | (1,856 | ) | | | 7,423 | | | | 7,051 | |
Cumulative translation adjustments for subsidiaries | | | 22,976 | | | | (5,780 | ) | | | 9,444 | |
Unrealized gain on financial instruments | | | 400 | | | | - | | | | 533 | |
Long-term investment in parent company accounted for as treasury stock | | | (81,422 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Cash dividend income from the parent company | | | - | | | | 493 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 527,210 | | | $ | 495,456 | | | $ | 633,111 | |
(Concluded)
As a result of the adjustments, the amounts of total assets under U.S. GAAP were $877,687 thousand and $844,990 thousand as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Total liabilities under U.S. GAAP were $382,231 thousand and $211,879 thousand as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. A reconciliation of significant balance sheet accounts to the amounts as determined under U.S. GAAP is as follows:
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Available-for-sale financial assets - noncurrent | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 81,251 | | | $ | 204,851 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Treasury stock | | | (81,422 | ) | | | (81,422 | ) |
(Continued)
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Effect of change in exchange rate | | $ | 171 | | | $ | - | |
Unrealized gain on financial instruments | | | - | | | | (123,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equity method investments | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 57,974 | | | $ | 75,979 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustment | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 1,392 | | | | 1,392 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 59,366 | | | $ | 77,371 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Building and improvements | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 66,573 | | | $ | 61,596 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Effect of adjustments on depreciation of buildings | | | (2,700 | ) | | | (3,364 | ) |
Excess of adjustments on buildings transferred between related parties | | | (505 | ) | | | (492 | ) |
Effect of change in exchange rate | | | 131 | | | | 134 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 63,499 | | | $ | 57,874 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Machinery and equipment | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 338,046 | | | $ | 296,753 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustment | | | | | | | | |
Impairment recovery | | | - | | | | (5,641 | ) |
Depreciation | | | - | | | | 791 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 338,046 | | | $ | 291,903 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 20,646 | | | $ | 20,646 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill impairment | | | (15,000 | ) | | | (15,000 | ) |
Goodwill amortization | | | 35,281 | | | | 35,281 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 40,927 | | | $ | 40,927 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred income tax assets - noncurrent | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 30,964 | | | $ | 13,123 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed earnings tax | | | - | | | | (8,936 | ) |
Effect of impairment recovery | | | - | | | | 1,212 | |
Effect of change in exchange rate | | | - | | | | 36 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 30,964 | | | $ | 5,435 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(Continued)
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 37,986 | | | $ | 21,725 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Bonus to employees, directors and supervisors | | | - | | | | 8,843 | |
Effect of change in exchange rate | | | 9 | | | | (53 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 37,995 | | | $ | 30,515 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accrued pension cost | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 6,412 | | | $ | 6,648 | |
U.S. GAAP adjustments | | | | | | | | |
Pension benefits | | | 37 | | | | 26 | |
Unrecognized pension cost on adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 158 | | | - | | | | 1,712 | |
Effect of change in exchange rate | | | 51 | | | | 51 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As adjusted | | $ | 6,500 | | | $ | 8,437 | |
(Concluded)
The Company applies ROC SFAS No. 17, “Statement of Cash Flows”. Its objectives and principles are similar to those set out in U.S. SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. The principal differences between the two standards relate to classification. Cash flows from investing activities for changes in deferred charges, refundable deposits and other assets-miscellaneous, and cash flows from financing activities for changes in guarantee deposits, other liabilities and cash bonuses paid to employees, directors and supervisors are reclassified to operating activities under U.S. SFAS No. 95.
25. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES REQUIRED BY U.S. GAAP
| a. | Recently issued accounting standards |
In February 2006, the FASB issued U.S. SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (“U.S. SFAS No. 155”). This Statement resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.” U.S. SFAS No. 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives and amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. U.S. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The fair value election provided for in this U.S. SFAS No. 155 may also be applied upon adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 155 for hybrid financial instruments that had been bifurcated under paragraph 12 of Statement 133 prior to the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 155. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, providing the entity has not yet issued financial statements for any interim period for that fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 155 to impact the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued U.S. SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets” (“U.S. SFAS No. 156”), which (i) provides revised guidance on when a servicing asset and servicing liability should be recognized, (ii) requires all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable, and (iii) permits an entity to elect to measure servicing assets and liabilities at fair value each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. The Company believes that there is no impact on the results of operations and financial position of the Company upon adopting U.S. SFAS No. 156.
In September 2006, the FASB issued U.S. SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“U.S. SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. U.S. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but brings up guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. This statement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 157 will have on the results of operations and financial position of the Company, and is not yet in a position to determine such effects.
In September 2006, the FASB issued U.S. SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R” (“U.S. SFAS No. 158”). Provisions with respect to the recognition of an asset and liability related to the funded status and the changes in the funded status be reflected in comprehensive income are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006 and the change in measurement date provisions is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. U.S. SFAS No. 158 also requires the measurement date of the plan’s funded status be the same as the Company’s fiscal year-end. The Company adopts all requirements of U.S. SFAS No. 158 in its fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Upon the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 158, the Company recognized a decrease to accumulated other comprehensive income of $1,712 thousand as of December 31, 2006.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing the recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is required to be adopted by the Company in fiscal 2007. The cumulative effects, if any, of applying FIN 48 will be recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on the results of operations and financial position of the Company and is not yet in a position to determine such effects.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 (“SAB No.108”), “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Current Year Misstatements”. SAB No. 108 requires analysis of misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment. SAB No. 108 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year 2006 annual financial statements. The Company believes that there is no impact on the results of operations and financial position of the Company after adopting SAB No. 108.
According to U.S. SFAS No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, the pension information about the defined benefit plans is disclosed below:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
Components of net periodic pension cost | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,906 | | | $ | 1,705 | | | $ | 301 | |
Interest cost | | | 349 | | | | 373 | | | | 308 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (78 | ) | | | (117 | ) | | | (109 | ) |
Amortization of prior service cost | | | 165 | | | | 59 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net periodic pension cost | | $ | 2,342 | | | $ | 2,020 | | | $ | 500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of year | | $ | 10,855 | | | $ | 12,660 | | | $ | 11,078 | |
Service cost | | | 1,906 | | | | 1,705 | | | | 301 | |
Interest cost | | | 349 | | | | 373 | | | | 308 | |
Actuarial gain (loss) | | | (1,038 | ) | | | (3,325 | ) | | | 815 | |
Benefits paid | | | (163 | ) | | | - | | | | (95 | ) |
Exchange difference | | | 751 | | | | (335 | ) | | | 86 | |
Benefit obligation at end of year | | | 12,660 | | | | 11,078 | | | | 12,493 | |
Change in plan assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | | | 2,386 | | | | 3,154 | | | | 3,668 | |
Employer contribution | | | 554 | | | | 570 | | | | 620 | |
Actual return on plan assets | | | 32 | | | | 49 | | | | 97 | |
Benefits paid | | | - | | | | - | | | | (95 | ) |
Exchange difference | | | 182 | | | | (105 | ) | | | 28 | |
| | | 3,154 | | | | 3,668 | | | | 4,318 | |
Funded status | | | 9,506 | | | | 7,410 | | | | 8,175 | |
Unrecognized actuarial loss | | | (4,240 | ) | | | (874 | ) | | | - | |
Accrued expense | | | (52 | ) | | | (47 | ) | | | (37 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net amount recognized (recognized as accrued pension cost) | | $ | 5,214 | | | $ | 6,489 | | | $ | 8,138 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actuarial assumptions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount rate | | | 3.25 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 2.25 | % |
Rate of compensation increase | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.5%-3.0 | % | | | 2.5%-3.0 | % |
Expected return on plan assets | | | 3.25 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 2.50 | % |
A reconciliation of income tax (benefit) attributable to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 calculated on pre-tax financial statement income (loss) from continuing operations based on the statutory tax rate and the income tax expense (benefit), which conforms to U.S. GAAP, is as follows:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Tax expense (benefit) based on pre-tax accounting income (loss) from continuing operations at statutory rate | | $ | 9,920 | | | $ | (4,481 | ) | | $ | 33,818 | |
Add (deduct) tax effects of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Permanent differences | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bonuses to directors, supervisors and employees | | | 1,022 | | | | (801 | ) | | | 3,297 | |
Stock option compensation | | | (464 | ) | | | 1,113 | | | | 1,858 | |
Tax-exempt income - tax holiday | | | (6,146 | ) | | | - | | | | (6,450 | ) |
Other | | | (937 | ) | | | 181 | | | | (40 | ) |
(Continued)
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Deferred | | $ | (26,848 | ) | | $ | (155 | ) | | $ | (15,678 | ) |
Loss carryforward | | | - | | | | 7,101 | | | | (5,356 | ) |
Income taxes on undistributed earnings | | | 2,244 | | | | 2,369 | | | | 8,936 | |
Adjustment of prior years’ income tax | | | - | | | | (2,790 | ) | | | (94 | ) |
| | | | | | �� | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | (21,209 | ) | | $ | 2,537 | | | $ | 20,291 | |
(Concluded)
The above-mentioned taxes on pre-tax accounting income (loss) from continuing operations based on the applicable statutory rates for both domestic and foreign entities are shown below:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Domestic entity | | $ | 509 | | | $ | 1,079 | | | $ | 3,580 | |
Foreign entities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASE Test, Inc. (25% statutory rate) | | | 8,150 | | | | (4,626 | ) | | | 26,935 | |
ASE Test Malaysia (28% statutory rate) | | | 1,765 | | | | 745 | | | | 3,646 | |
ISE Labs (federal tax rate 35% and state tax rate 6%) | | | (504 | ) | | | (1,679 | ) | | | (343 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,920 | | | $ | (4,481 | ) | | $ | 33,818 | |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:
| | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | |
Current deferred income tax assets | | | | | | |
Unused tax credits | | $ | 9,267 | | | $ | 22,639 | |
Loss carryforward | | | 4,067 | | | | - | |
Other | | | 1,880 | | | | 1,241 | |
| | | 15,214 | | | | 23,880 | |
Less: valuation allowance | | | (6,281 | ) | | | (319 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 8,933 | | | $ | 23,561 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets | | | | | | | | |
Unused tax credits | | $ | 29,528 | | | $ | 2,018 | |
Tax effect of unabsorbed capital allowance | | | 10,263 | | | | 6,284 | |
Loss carryforward | | | 9,294 | | | | 8,196 | |
Other | | | (2,818 | ) | | | (17 | ) |
| | | 46,267 | | | | 16,481 | |
Less: valuation allowance | | | (15,303 | ) | | | (11,046 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 30,964 | | | $ | 5,435 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 608 | |
| d. | Earnings (loss) per share |
U.S. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of dilutive equivalent common shares (stock options issued during the year using the treasury stock method).
Following is a reconciliation of amounts used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) under U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 922 | | | $ | (46,285 | ) | | $ | 116,937 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 16,968 | | | | 10,839 | | | | - | |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax | | | - | | | | - | | | | 381 | |
| | $ | 17,890 | | | $ | (35,446 | ) | | $ | 117,318 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted - denominator | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 100,037,524 | | | | 100,059,031 | | | | 100,081,418 | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | 73,589 | | | | - | | | | 152,984 | |
Diluted | | | 100,111,113 | | | | 100,059,031 | | | | 100,234,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share (in U.S. dollars) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | (0.46 | ) | | $ | 1.17 | |
Earnings from discontinued operations | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.11 | | | | - | |
Earnings from cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 1.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | (0.46 | ) | | $ | 1.17 | |
Earnings from discontinued operations | | | 0.17 | | | | 0.11 | | | | - | |
Earnings from cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | 1.17 | |
The computation of diluted earnings per share exclude 10,803,859, 10,491,064 and 10,172,054 anti-dilutive options for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. While these options were anti-dilutive for the respective periods, they could be dilutive in the future. No stock options were considered dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of net loss.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective transition method and therefore has not restated the results of operations for prior years. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 included stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provision of U.S. SFAS No. 123. In addition, the stock-based compensation expense also includes intrinsic value of certain outstanding share-based awards for which it was not possible to reasonable estimate their grant-date fair value under the requirement of U.S. SFAS No. 123. Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted after January 1, 2006 is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provision of U.S. SFAS No. 123R. The Company recognizes these compensation costs using the graded vesting method over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally a five-year vesting period. The adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R resulted in a cumulative gain from changes in accounting principle of $381 thousand, which reflects the net cumulative impact of estimating future forfeitures in the determination of period expense, rather than recording forfeitures when they occur as previously permitted. Prior to the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for awards granted from ASE Inc. under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25, and related
interpretations, and provided the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by U.S. SFAS No. 123. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding SEC’s interpretation of U.S. SFAS No. 123R and the value of share-based payments for public companies. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R.
As a result of adopting U.S. SFAS No. 123R, income before income taxes and net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 were lower by $5,178 thousand and $3,884 thousand, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. The impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006 was a decrease of $0.04. In addition, prior to the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented the tax benefit of stock options exercised as an operating cash flow.
Information regarding ASE Test’s and ASE Inc’s stock option plans is as follows.
ASE Test
ASE Test has three stock option plans, the 1999 Option Plan, 2000 Option Plan and 2004 Option Plan. Up to 2,000,000, 12,000,000, and 2,500,000 shares have been reserved for issuance under the 1999, 2000 and 2004 Option Plans, respectively.
The 1999, 2000 and 2004 Option Plans granted the following stock options to purchase ASE Test’s shares which vest ratably over a period of three or five years from the date of grant until the expiration of options, to directors, officers and key employees. If any granted shares are forfeited, the shares may be granted again, to the extent of any such forfeiture.
The exercise price under each of the aforementioned stock option plans was equal to the stock’s market price on the date of grant. Options granted under the 1999, 2000 and 2004 Option Plans expire 5 or 10 years after grant.
Information regarding the option plans of ASE Test is presented below:
| | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | | Aggregate |
| | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | | Intrinsic |
| | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | | Value (In |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | | thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning outstanding balance - January 1, 2004 | | | 13,301,418 | | | | 11.80 | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | 260,000 | | | | 6.18 | | | $ | 6.18 | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (512,815 | ) | | | 8.90 | | | | | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (417,815 | ) | | | 11.82 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | (1,753,340 | ) | | | 20.00 | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2004 | | | 10,877,448 | | | | 10.48 | | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | 32,500 | | | | 6.50 | | | $ | 6.50 | | | | |
Options exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (358,884 | ) | | | 10.97 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | (60,000 | ) | | | 25.00 | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2005 | | | 10,491,064 | | | | 10.37 | | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | 130,000 | | | | 9.60 | | | $ | 9.60 | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (79,201 | ) | | | 8.56 | | | | | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (216,825 | ) | | | 11.60 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2006 | | | 10,325,038 | | | | 10.34 | | | | | | | $ | 16,660 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending exercisable balance - December 31, 2006 | | | 9,025,838 | | | | 10.18 | | | | | | | $ | 15,479 |
As of December 31, 2006, the number of options that are expected to vest was 1,278,131.
Total intrinsic value of options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2006 was $2,144 thousand and $76 thousand, respectively.
Options outstanding on December 31, 2006, the related weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual life information are as follows (in U.S. dollars):
| | | | | | | |
| | | Number of Shares | | | | | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted | | | Weighted AverageRemaining Life (Years) | |
Options with exercise price of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$20-$25 | | | | 596,900 | | | $ | 22.35 | | | | 2.93 | | | | 596,900 | | | $ | 22.35 | | | | 2.94 | |
$11.5-$12.95 | | | | 2,139,450 | | | | 12.81 | | | | 6.48 | | | | 1,176,450 | | | | 12.70 | | | | 6.69 | |
$5.5-$9.79 | | | | 7,588,688 | | | | 8.70 | | | | 4.34 | | | | 7,252,488 | | | | 8.77 | | | | 4.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 10,325,038 | | | | | | | | 4.74 | | | | 9,025,838 | | | | | | | | 4.39 | |
ASE Test has used the fair value based method (based on the Black-Sholes model) to evaluate the options granted with the following assumptions:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 3.50-3.88 | | | | 3.88% | | | | 4.88% | |
Expected life | | | 5 years | | | | 5 years | | | | 3-5 years | |
Expected volatility | | | 78.28% | | | | 59.06% | | | | 59.95%-62.03% | |
Expected dividend | | | 0% | | | | 0% | | | | 0% | |
ASE Inc.
ASE Inc., the parent company, has two option plans, the 2002 Option Plan and 2004 Option Plan. The maximum number of units authorized to be granted under the 2002 and 2004 Option Plan is 160 million and 140 million, respectively, with each unit representing one share of ASE Inc. Under the terms of the plans, stock option rights are granted to employees, including those of the Company, which have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the ASE Inc. common stock as per the Taiwan Stock Exchange on the date of grant, and such exercise price is subject to retroactive adjustment in the event of certain capital transactions in subsequent periods. The option rights expire ten years from the date of grant. On the second anniversary of the grant date, 40% of the options become vested and the remaining options vest ratably over a period of three years thereafter. Under the 2002 and 2004 Option Plans, 41,603,100 and 28,499,550 units were granted, respectively, by ASE Inc. to employees of the Company.
Information regarding the options issued to employees of the Company under ASE Inc.’s stock option plans for the Company is as follows (in U.S. dollars):
| | | | | Weighted | | | | | | |
| | | | | Average | | | Weighted | | | Aggregate |
| | | | | Exercise | | | Average | | | Intrinsic |
| | Number of | | | Price | | | Grant Date | | | Value (In |
| | Shares | | | Per Share | | | Fair Value | | | thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning outstanding balance - January 1, 2004 | | | 38,852,400 | | | $ | 0.58 | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | 25,499,500 | | | | 0.79 | | | $ | 0.79 | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (2,261,800 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (338,000 | ) | | | 0.56 | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2004 | | | 61,752,100 | | | | 0.60 | | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.57 | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (5,126,800 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (6,698,720 | ) | | | 0.49 | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2005 | | | 52,926,580 | | | | 0.60 | | | | | | | | |
Options granted | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | |
Options forfeited | | | (2,489,000 | ) | | | 0.62 | | | | | | | | |
Options expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | | | | | |
Options exercised | | | (9,908,710 | ) | | | 0.58 | | | | | | | | |
Ending outstanding balance - December 31, 2006 | | | 40,528,870 | | | | 0.61 | | | | | | | $ | 21,392 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending exercisable balance - December 31, 2006 | | | 19,611,890 | | | | 0.59 | | | | | | | $ | $10,736 |
As of December 31, 2006, the number of options that are expected to vest was 19,168,273.
Total intrinsic value of options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was $62 thousand, $ 1,331 thousand and $4,001 thousand, respectively.
The weighted average exercise price and remaining contractual life of the options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:
| | Outstanding | | Exercisable | |
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | |
Options with exercise price | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$0.49 | | | | 15,222,300 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 9,936,500 | | | | 6.0 | |
$0.64 | | | | 4,327,170 | | | | 6.6 | | | | 2,302,690 | | | | 6.6 | |
$0.70 | | | | 18,564,400 | | | | 7.5 | | | | 7,372,700 | | | | 7.5 | |
$0.57 | | | | 2,415,000 | | | | 8.4 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 40,528,870 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 19,611,890 | | | | 6.6 | |
The 2002 Option Plan is accounted for as a variable plan, as a result of a provision in the plan which would require an adjustment of the exercise price in accordance with a prescribed formula based on occurrence of certain future events. Accordingly, no adjustment is required for purposes of the pro forma compensation expense calculated in accordance with U.S. SFAS No. 123 before January 1, 2006 for these options. Upon the adoption of U.S. SFAS No. 123R, the Company continued to account for these stock options based on its intrinsic value, and remeasured at each reporting date through the date of exercise or other settlement.
The fair value of the option plan issued was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.50% | | | | 1.80% | |
Expected life | | | 5 years | | | | 5 years | |
Expected dividend | | | 3.00% | | | | 3.00% | |
Expected volatility | | | 59% | | | | 47% | |
Prior to January 1, 2006, no compensation cost was recognized except 2002 Option Plan of ASE Inc. Therefore, for purposes of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair values of the options are amortized to expense ratably over the option vesting periods. Had the Company recorded compensation costs based on the estimated grant date fair value for 2004 and 2005, as defined by U.S. SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts below (earnings (loss) per share in U.S. dollars).
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income (loss) based on U.S. GAAP | | $ | 17,890 | | | $ | (35,446 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense (net of related tax effect) | | | | | | | | |
From the Company | | | (13,998 | ) | | | (10,525 | ) |
From ASE Inc. | | | (836 | ) | | | (1,660 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Pro forma net income (loss) | | $ | 3,056 | | | $ | (47,631 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per share | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | (0.48 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.03 | | | $ | (0.48 | ) |
The pro forma amounts reflect compensation expense related to option grants under the 1999, 2000 and 2004 Option Plans of the Company and 2004 Option Plan of ASE Inc.
| f. | According to U.S. SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, the statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 are presented below: |
| | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) based on U.S. GAAP | | $ | 17,890 | | | $ | (35,446 | ) | | $ | 117,318 | |
Translation adjustment on subsidiaries | | | 22,976 | | | | (5,780 | ) | | | 9,444 | |
Unrecognized pension cost | | | 646 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Unrealized gain on financial instruments | | | 400 | | | | - | | | | 533 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 41,912 | | | $ | (41,226 | ) | | $ | 127,295 | |
As of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted U.S. SFAS No. 142, which requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, and instead, be tested for impairment on a periodic basis. In conjunction with the implementation of U.S. SFAS No. 142, the Company completed a goodwill impairment review as of January 1, 2002 using a fair-value based approach in accordance with the provision of the standard and found no impairment. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test on December 31, 2006 and found no impairment. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had $40,927 thousand of goodwill.
ASE TEST LIMITED
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2006
(Expressed in Thousands of US dollars)
| | Note | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | 3,784 | | | | 8,516 | |
Other receivables and prepayments | | | 3 | | | | 8,959 | | | | 24,148 | |
Total current assets | | | | | | | 12,743 | | | | 32,664 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | 4 | | | | 674,935 | | | | 509,506 | |
Investments in associates | | | 5 | | | | 75,979 | | | | 57,974 | |
Available-for-sale financial assets | | | 6 | | | | 197,303 | | | | 76,899 | |
Financial assets carried at cost | | | | | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,000 | |
Total non-current assets | | | | | | | 949,217 | | | | 645,379 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | 961,960 | | | | 678,043 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liability | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other payables | | | 7 | | | | 118,832 | | | | 119,838 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital and reserves | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issued capital | | | 8 | | | | 25,035 | | | | 25,015 | |
Share premium | | | | | | | 455,717 | | | | 455,059 | |
Unrealised gain on financial instruments | | | | | | | 123,961 | | | | - | |
Currency translation reserve | | | | | | | (38,309 | ) | | | (47,823 | ) |
Accumulated profits | | | | | | | 276,724 | | | | 125,954 | |
Total equity | | | | | | | 843,128 | | | | 558,205 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | | | | | | 961,960 | | | | 678,043 | |
See accompanying notes to supplementary financial statements.
ASE TEST LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2006
| The company (Registration No. 199508552K) is incorporated in the Republic of Singapore with its principal place of business and registered office at One Marina Boulevard #28-00, Singapore 018989. The supplementary financial statements are expressed in thousands of United States dollars. |
| The company is a subsidiary of J & R Holding Limited, incorporated in Taiwan. The company’s ultimate holding company is Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., incorporated in Taiwan. |
| The principal activity of the company is that of an investment holding company. |
2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
| BASIC OF ACCOUNTING - The company is listed on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations National Market System (“NASDAQ”). In view of the composition of the company’s shareholders, its business strategy and capital raising plans, the company ceased the application of Singapore Statements of Accounting Standard (“SAS”) effective January 2000 and adopted generally accepted accounting principles in the Republic of China (“ROC GAAP”) as its comprehensive basis of accounting for financial reporting purposes, with a description of the differences and the adjustments required to reconcile the financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America as set out in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. This is to comply with the requirements of the United States of America Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| The company believes that ROC GAAP is the most relevant basis of accounting and that US dollar is the most appropriate functional and presentation currency. The adoption of ROC GAAP was applied retrospectively, as if the company had adopted ROC GAAP since its inception. |
| In the company’s financial statements, equity method of accounting is applied to the carrying values of subsidiaries and associates. |
| REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPANIES ACT - The consolidated ROC GAAP financial statements of the company are set out on pages 11 to 71. Under ROC GAAP, the company is not required to present the company’s financial statements. In order to comply with the additional requirements of the Singapore Companies Act (the “Act”), to the extent such requirements are not dealt with in the ROC GAAP financial statements or have not been waived by exemption orders of the Accounting & Corporate Regulatory Authority, the company presents additional financial information in this set of supplementary financial statements (“the supplementary financial statements”). The ROC GAAP consolidated financial statements together with the supplementary financial statements comprise the statutory financial statements of the company. The statutory financial statements of the company do not comply with the Singapore Financial Reporting Standards. |
| The supplementary financial statements should be read in conjunction with the ROC GAAP consolidated financial statements, and comprise the balance sheet of the company as at December 31, 2006. |
3 | OTHER RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS |
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Subsidiaries (Note 4) | | | 8,831 | | | | 23,662 | |
| Other receivables and prepayments | | | 128 | | | | 486 | |
| | | | 8,959 | | | | 24,148 | |
4 | INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES |
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Balance, at beginning of year | | | 509,506 | | | | 565,544 | |
| Additional investment in: | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Test, Inc | | | - | | | | 5,961 | |
| | | | 509,506 | | | | 571,505 | |
| Share of current year results | | | 220,013 | | | | (39,964 | ) |
| Share of other reserves | | | 13,072 | | | | (5,902 | ) |
| Dividend received | | | (67,656 | ) | | | (16,133 | ) |
| | | | 674,935 | | | | 509,506 | |
Details of the subsidiaries as at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
| Name of Company | | Principal activities | | Country of incorporation and operations | | Percentage of equity held by the Company | | Cost of investment by the Company |
| | | | | | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | | % | | % | | $ | | $ |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Test, Inc# | | Testing of Integrated circuits | | Taiwan, Republic China | | 99.98 | | 99.98 | | 191,029 | | 191,029 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd* | | Investment holding | | Singapore | | 100 | | 100 | | 66,315 | | 66,315 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Test Holding, Limited+ | | Investment holding | | Cayman Islands | | 100 | | 100 | | 224,681 | | 224,681 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Test Finance Limited+@ | | Financing activities | | Mauritius | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held by ASE Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd, a subsidiary | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Electronics (M) Sdn. Bhd.# | | Packaging and testing of integrated circuits | | Malaysia | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held by ASE Test Holding, Limited, a subsidiary | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ISE Labs, Inc.+ | | Testing of integrated circuits | | State of California, United States America | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Held by ISE Labs, Inc, a subsidiary | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ISE Labs Hong Kong Limited+ | | Liquidated in 2006 | | Hong Kong | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Singapore Pte. Ltd* | | Testing of integrated circuits | | Singapore | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ISE Technology Inc+ | | Dormant | | State of California, United States of America | | 100 | | 100 | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name of Company | | Principal activities | | Country of incorporation and operations | | Percentage of equity held by the Company | | Cost of investment by the Company |
| | | | | | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | | % | | % | | $ | | $ |
| Digital Testing Services Inc.+ | | Dormant | | State of California Unites States of America | | 100 | | | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 482,025 | | 482,025 |
| # | Audited by overseas practices of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. |
| + | Audited by overseas practices of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for consolidation purposes. |
| * | Audited by Deloitte & Touche, Singapore. |
| @ | Unconsolidated cost of investment is US$2 as at December 31, 2006 and 2005. |
5 | INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES |
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Balance, at beginning of year | | | 57,974 | | | | 51,337 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Share of current year results | | | 18,005 | | | | 6,637 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 75,979 | | | | 57,974 | |
| Name of Company | | Principal activities | | Country of incorporation and operations | | Percentage of equity held by the Company | | Cost of investment by the Company |
| | | | | | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | | % | | % | | $ | | $ |
| Held by the Company | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASE Investment (Labuan) Inc. | | Investment holding | | Malaysia | | 30 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 54,304 | | 54,304 |
| Name of Company | | Principal activities | | Country of incorporation and operations | | Percentage of equity held by the Company | | Cost of investment by the Company |
| | | | | | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | | % | | % | | $ | | $ |
| Held by ASE Investment (Labuan) Inc., an associate | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Packaging and testing of integrated circuits | | Korea | | 30 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 54,304 | | 54,304 |
6 | AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS |
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| At cost: | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted equity shares (a) | | | 76,899 | | | | 76,899 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Market value of: | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted equity shares | | | 197,303 | | | | 144,287 | |
On August 1, 2004, ASE (Chung Li) Inc. and ASE Material Inc. were merged into ASE Inc. with stock exchange ratio of 1:0.85 and 1:0.5, respectively. Upon the completion of the merger, all of the assets and liabilities of ASE (Chung Li) Inc. and ASE Material Inc. were taken over by ASE Inc. The Company received 154,175 thousand shares through such merger. As a Singapore incorporated company, pursuant to the applicable Singapore regulations, the Company may not acquire, directly or indirectly, shares or units of shares in its parent company, ASE Inc. In order to comply with this regulation, a trust has been established to hold and dispose of the ASE Inc. shares obtained in connection with this merger. The company does not have any rights with respect to the common shares held in trust, other than the right to receive the proceeds from the sale of such common shares and any cash dividends declared while the shares remain in trust.
Fair values of available-for-sale financial assets are determined at their quoted market prices. Fair values of derivatives were determined using valuation techniques incorporating estimates and assumptions that were consistent with prevailing market conditions.
| | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Subsidiaries (Note 4) | | | 118,620 | | | | 118,646 | |
| Other payables | | | 212 | | | | 1,192 | |
| | | | 118,832 | | | | 119,838 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2005 | |
| | | | $ | | | | $ | |
| Issued and fully paid: | | | | | | | | |
| 100,138,232 (2005 : 100,059,031) ordinary shares of $0.25 each | | | 25,035 | | | | 25,015 | |
Please see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the stock option plans of the Company.
ASE TEST LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS
In the opinion of the directors, the accompanying supplementary financial statements of the company and consolidated financial statements of the group set out on pages 11 to 73 are drawn up so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the group as at December 31, 2006 and of the results, changes in equity and cash flows of the group for the financial year then ended and at the date of this statement there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due.
ON BEHALF OF THE DIRECTORS
……………………………………….
Joseph Hung-Szu Tung
……………………………………….
Liu His-Liang, Freddie
April 30, 2007
- 63 -