Wintrust Financial (WTFC) 10-Q 2004 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2004
Commission File Number 0-21923

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Illinois	36-3873352
(State of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045

(Address of principal executive offices)

(847) 615-4096

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock — no par value, 21,535,597 shares, as of November 2, 2004.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.Financial Statements.		1-16
ITEM 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		17-45
ITEM 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks.		46-49
ITEM 4.Controls and Procedures.		49
PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.Legal Proceedings.		50
ITEM 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		50
ITEM 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		50
ITEM 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.		50
ITEM 5.Other Information.		50
ITEM 6.Exhibits.		50-51
Signature		52
Exhibit Index		53
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
906 Certifications

PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(In thousands)	2004			2003			2003
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	117,397		$	111,929		$	128,789
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		255,885			56,620			147,718
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		19,736			6,228			5,535
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value		928,825			906,881			714,412
Trading account securities		3,884			3,669			4,251
Brokerage customer receivables		33,386			33,912			32,549
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		80,074			24,041			65,240
Loans, net of unearned income		4,000,175			3,297,794			2,949,143
Less: Allowance for loan losses		31,408			25,541			22,760
Net loans		3,968,767			3,272,253			2,926,383
Premises and equipment, net		176,943			156,714			145,256
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		136,736			123,063			102,459
Goodwill		91,024			48,490			30,026
Other intangible assets		4,629			3,598			2,259
Total assets	$	5,817,286		$	4,747,398		$	4,304,877
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	449,343		$	360,666		$	332,538
Interest bearing		4,302,250			3,515,955			3,196,658
Total deposits		4,751,593			3,876,621			3,529,196
Notes payable		1,000			26,000			26,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		264,104			144,026			140,000
Other borrowings		44,043			78,069			64,098
Subordinated notes		50,000			50,000			50,000
Long-term debt — trust preferred securities		146,465			96,811			76,512
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		129,928			126,034			119,197
Total liabilities		5,387,133			4,397,561			4,005,003
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		—			—			—
Common stock		21,064			20,066			18,898
Surplus		287,547			243,626			205,238
Common stock warrants		993			1,012			1,030
Retained earnings		125,395			92,301			81,372
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(4,846	)		(7,168	)		(6,664	)
Total shareholders’ equity		430,153			349,837			299,874
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,817,286		$	4,747,398		$	4,304,877

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

1

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2004		2003		2004		2003
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	54,422	$	45,498	$	153,867	$	128,327
Interest bearing deposits with banks		12		40		50		97
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		152		346		566		1,816
Securities		10,367		6,257		29,069		17,626
Trading account securities		26		28		99		112
Brokerage customer receivables		398		303		1,032		999
Total interest income		65,377		52,472		184,683		148,977
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		21,044		16,535		57,909		50,650
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		2,186		1,489		5,752		4,419
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings		346		638		1,476		2,013
Interest on subordinated notes		723		713		2,130		1,782
Interest on long-term debt — trust preferred securities		1,987		1,207		5,097		3,290
Total interest expense		26,286		20,582		72,364		62,154
Net interest income		39,091		31,890		112,319		86,823
Provision for loan losses		1,258		2,909		5,020		8,402
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		37,833		28,981		107,299		78,421
Non-interest income
Wealth management fees		7,163		7,716		23,659		20,669
Mortgage banking revenue		5,292		5,079		12,549		14,877
Service charges on deposit accounts		998		890		2,944		2,611
Gain on sale of premium finance receivables		1,827		1,200		5,365		3,470
Administrative services revenue		1,040		1,019		2,927		3,178
Net available-for-sale securities gains		878		31		1,731		637
Other		4,249		2,508		12,453		9,849
Total non-interest income		21,447		18,443		61,628		55,291
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		23,768		19,957		66,841		55,673
Equipment expense		2,275		1,968		6,626		5,727
Occupancy, net		2,529		1,841		7,026		5,626
Data processing		1,257		1,114		3,909		3,193
Advertising and marketing		785		602		2,376		1,645
Professional fees		1,289		862		3,432		2,565
Amortization of other intangible assets		194		150		587		448
Other		6,368		5,344		19,312		16,382
Total non-interest expense		38,465		31,838		110,109		91,259
Income before income taxes		20,815		15,586		58,818		42,453
Income tax expense		7,740		5,679		21,655		15,264
Net income	$	13,075	$	9,907	$	37,163	$	27,189
Net income per common share – Basic	$	0.64	$	0.56	$	1.83	$	1.56
Net income per common share – Diluted	$	0.60	$	0.53	$	1.71	$	1.46
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.10	$	0.08	$	0.20	$	0.16
Weighted average common shares outstanding		20,541		17,617		20,347		17,445
Dilutive potential common shares		1,345		1,199		1,327		1,137
Average common shares and dilutive common shares		21,886		18,816		21,674		18,582

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

																	Accumulated
																	Other
																	Compre-
	Compre-							Common									hensive			Total
	hensive			Common				Stock			Treasury			Retained			Income			Shareholders’
(In thousands)	Income			Stock		Surplus		Warrants			Stock			Earnings			(Loss)			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2002				$	17,216	$	153,614	$	81		$	—		$	56,967		$	(876	)	$	227,002
Comprehensive income:
Net income	$	27,189			—		—		—			—			27,189			—			27,189
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized losses on securities, net of reclassification adjustment		(6,109	)		—		—		—			—			—			(6,109	)		(6,109	)
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments		321			—		—		—			—			—			321			321
Comprehensive income	$	21,401
Cash dividends paid					—		—								(2,784	)					(2,784	)
Purchase of 600 shares of common stock					—		—		—			(17	)		—			—			(17	)
Common stock issued for:
Secondary offering, net of costs					1,377		44,767		—			—			—			—			46,144
Business combination					82		2,418		950			—			—			—			3,450
Exercise of common stock warrants					2		20		(1	)		—			—			—			21
Director compensation plan					5		123		—			—			—			—			128
Employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options					179		3,464		—			17			—			—			3,660
Restricted stock awards					37		832		—			—			—			—			869
Balance at September 30, 2003				$	18,898	$	205,238	$	1,030		$	—		$	81,372		$	(6,664	)	$	299,874
Balance at December 31, 2003				$	20,066	$	243,626	$	1,012		$	—		$	92,301		$	(7,168	)	$	349,837
Comprehensive income:
Net income	$	37,163			—		—		—			—			37,163			—			37,163
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on securities, net of reclassification adjustment		2,276			—		—		—			—			—			2,276			2,276
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments		46			—		—		—			—			—			46			46
Comprehensive income	$	39,485
Cash dividends paid					—		—								(4,069	)					(4,069	)
Common stock issued for:
Business combinations					663		35,193		—			—			—			—			35,856
Exercise of common stock warrants					66		610		(19	)		—			—			—			657
Director compensation plan					5		168		—			—			—			—			173
Employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options					237		7,042		—			—			—			—			7,279
Restricted stock awards					27		908		—			—			—			—			935
Balance at September 30, 2004				$	21,064	$	287,547	$	993		$	—		$	125,395		$	(4,846	)	$	430,153

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
Disclosure of reclassification amount and income tax impact:	2004		2003
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities during the period, net	$	4,785	$	(8,882	)
Unrealized holding gains on derivative instruments arising during the period		51		624
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net		1,731		637
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)		783		(3,107	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and derivative instruments	$	2,322	$	(5,788	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(In thousands)	2004			2003
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	37,163		$	27,189
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		5,020			8,402
Depreciation and amortization		7,157			6,992
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		1,422			(140	)
Tax benefit from exercises of stock options		3,956			1,507
Net amortization of premium on of securities		1,487			1,077
Originations of mortgage loans held-for-sale		(1,010,221	)		(1,199,779	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale		1,082,716			1,238,697
(Increase) decrease in trading securities, net		(215	)		1,307
Net decrease in brokerage customer receivables		526			5,043
Gain on sale of premium finance receivables		(5,365	)		(3,470	)
Gains on mortgage loans sold		(8,301	)		(13,712	)
Gains on sales of available-for-sale securities, net		(1,731	)		(637	)
(Gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment, net		(573	)		216
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net		(1,985	)		(1,317	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net		(15,391	)		20,068
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	$	95,665		$	91,443
Investing Activities:
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities	$	143,428		$	940,835
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		652,014			3,095,816
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(767,641	)		(4,212,571	)
Proceeds from sales of premium finance receivables		345,720			194,915
Net cash paid for business combinations		(3,163	)		(1,879	)
Net decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits with banks		1,793			(1,117	)
Increase in loans, net		(796,216	)		(589,442	)
Increase in Bank Owned Life Insurance		(7,861	)		—
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(20,368	)		(33,021	)
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities	$	(452,294	)	$	(606,464	)
Financing Activities:
Increase in deposits	$	581,702		$	440,072
(Decrease) increase in other borrowings, net		(135,251	)		16,870
Decrease in notes payable, net		(25,000	)		(18,025	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		100,000			—
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated note		—			25,000
Proceeds from issuance of trust preferred securities, net		40,000			25,000
Issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs		—			46,144
Issuance of common shares from stock options, employee stock purchase plan and common stock warrants		3,980			2,346
Purchases of treasury stock		—			(17	)
Dividends paid		(4,069	)		(2,784	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	$	561,362		$	534,606
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	204,733		$	19,585
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	$	168,549		$	256,922
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	373,282		$	276,507

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries (“Wintrust” or “Company”) presented herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all necessary adjustments of a normal or recurring nature for a fair presentation of results as of the dates and for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements.

Wintrust is a financial holding company currently engaged in the business of providing traditional community banking services to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area. Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank subsidiaries.

As of September 30, 2004, Wintrust had eleven wholly-owned community bank subsidiaries (collectively, “Banks”), eight of which the Company started asde novoinstitutions, including Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company (“Lake Forest Bank”), Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company (“Hinsdale Bank”), North Shore Community Bank & Trust Company (“North Shore Bank”), Libertyville Bank & Trust Company (“Libertyville Bank”), Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Barrington Bank”), Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Crystal Lake Bank”), Northbrook Bank & Trust Company (“Northbrook Bank”) and Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Beverly Bank”). The Company acquired three banks, Advantage National Bank (“Advantage Bank”) in October 2003, Village Bank & Trust - Arlington Heights (“Village Bank”) in December 2003 and Northview Bank and Trust (“Northview Bank”) on September 30, 2004. Each of these banks was started as ade novo bank – Advantage Bank in 2001, Village Bank in 1995 and Northview Bank in 1993. On October 15, 2004, Wintrust completed the acquisition of Town Bancshares, Ltd., parent company of Town Bank, which began operations as ade novobank in 1998, and announced plans to acquire Antioch Holding Company, parent company of State Bank of The Lakes.

The Company provides loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their commercial insurance policies (“premium finance receivables”) on a national basis, through First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”). FIFC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crabtree Capital Corporation (“Crabtree”) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake Forest Bank.

Wintrust, through Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (“Tricom”), provides high-yielding short-term accounts receivable financing (“Tricom finance receivables”) and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to the temporary staffing industry, with clients located throughout the United States. Tricom is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hinsdale Bank.

The Company provides a full range of wealth management services through its trust, asset management and broker-dealer subsidiaries. Trust and investment services are provided at each of the Banks through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Hummer Trust Company, N.A. (“WHTC”), ade novocompany started in 1998 and formerly known as Wintrust Asset Management Company. Wayne Hummer Investments, LLC (“WHI”) is a broker-dealer providing a full range of private client and securities brokerage services to clients located primarily in the Midwest and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of North Shore Bank. Focused Investments, LLC (“Focused”) is a broker-dealer that provides a full range of investment services to individuals through a network of relationships with community-based financial institutions primarily in Illinois. Focused is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHI. Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company (“WHAMC”) provides money management services and advisory services to individuals, institutions and municipal and tax-exempt organizations, as well as two proprietary mutual funds in addition to portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide range of pension and profit-sharing plans. WHAMC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wintrust. Collectively WHI, WHAMC and Focused are referred to as the “Wayne Hummer Companies”.

5

In May 2004, the Company acquired SGB Corporation d/b/a/ WestAmerica Mortgage Company (“WestAmerica”) and WestAmerica’s affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc. (“Guardian”). WestAmerica engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market, and Guardian provides document preparation and other loan closing services to WestAmerica and its mortgage broker affiliates. WestAmerica maintains principal origination offices in seven states, including Illinois, and originates loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. Guardian’s headquarters are located in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois. WestAmerica and Guardian are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Barrington Bank. In connection with the acquisition of Northview Bank on September 30, 2004, the Company also acquired Northview Mortgage, LLC.

Wintrust Information Technology Services Company provides information technology support, item capture, imaging and statement preparation services to the Wintrust subsidiaries and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wintrust.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Operating results for the three-month and year-to-date periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year. Reclassifications of certain prior period amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation.

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Management believes that the estimates made are reasonable, however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other conditions change beyond management’s expectations. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions. Certain policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management currently views the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of the retained interest in the premium finance receivables sold and the valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be more subject to revision as new information becomes available.

(2) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers cash and cash equivalents to include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of 90 days or less.

(3) Available-for-sale Securities

The following table is a summary of the available-for-sale securities portfolio as of the dates shown:

	September 30, 2004				December 31, 2003				September 30, 2003
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value
U.S. Treasury	$	58,745	$	57,747	$	56,663	$	54,930	$	12,847	$	12,271
U.S. Government agencies		313,502		312,154		310,070		309,728		233,212		233,363
Municipal		24,062		24,053		11,326		11,364		11,789		11,806
Corporate notes and other debt		12,429		12,341		35,248		35,408		35,710		35,283
Mortgage-backed		439,196		433,674		403,133		393,239		335,654		326,732
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock and other equity securities		88,425		88,856		101,029		102,212		94,215		94,957
Total available-for-sale securities	$	936,359	$	928,825	$	917,469	$	906,881	$	723,427	$	714,412

6

(4) Loans

The following table is a summary of the loan portfolio as of the dates shown:

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			2003
Balance:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	2,161,971		$	1,648,022		$	1,436,123
Home equity		552,382			466,812			434,524
Residential real estate		223,713			173,625			151,606
Premium finance receivables		764,853			746,895			678,267
Indirect auto loans		178,285			174,071			166,560
Tricom finance receivables		31,413			25,024			26,275
Consumer and other loans		87,558			63,345			55,788
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	4,000,175		$	3,297,794		$	2,949,143
Mix:
Commercial and commercial real estate		54	%		50	%		49	%
Home equity		14			14			15
Residential real estate		6			5			5
Premium finance receivables		19			23			23
Indirect auto loans		4			5			5
Tricom finance receivables		1			1			1
Consumer and other loans		2			2			2
Total loans, net of unearned income		100	%		100	%		100	%

(5) Deposits

The following is a summary of deposits as of the dates shown:

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			2003
Balance:
Non-interest bearing	$	449,343		$	360,666		$	332,538
NOW accounts		547,534			407,803			399,797
Wealth management deposits		364,011			338,479			260,430
Money market accounts		578,167			470,849			428,535
Savings accounts		210,236			183,394			159,950
Time certificates of deposit		2,602,302			2,115,430			1,947,946
Total deposits	$	4,751,593		$	3,876,621		$	3,529,196
Mix:
Non-interest bearing		9	%		9	%		10	%
NOW accounts		12			10			11
Wealth management deposits		8			9			7
Money market accounts		12			12			12
Savings accounts		4			5			5
Time certificates of deposit		55			55			55
Total deposits		100	%		100	%		100	%

Wealth management deposits represent FDIC-insured deposits at the Banks from brokerage customers at WHI and trust and asset management customers at WHTC.

7

(6) Notes Payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, Other Borrowings and Subordinated Notes:

The following is a summary of notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and subordinated notes as of the dates shown:

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		2003
Notes payable	$	1,000	$	26,000	$	26,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		264,104		144,026		140,000
Other borrowings:
Federal funds purchased		—		38,800		27,568
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		39,358		26,544		22,938
Wayne Hummer Companies borrowings		—		9,025		9,892
Other		4,685		3,700		3,700
Total other borrowings		44,043		78,069		64,098
Subordinated notes		50,000		50,000		50,000
Total notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and subordinated notes	$	359,147	$	298,095	$	280,098

The Wayne Hummer Companies borrowings represent collateralized demand obligations to third party banks, at interest rates approximating the fed funds rate, used to finance securities purchased by customers on margin and securities owned by WHI. In the third quarter of 2004, WHI began borrowing funds from North Shore Bank, its parent company, rather than third party banks and therefore the balance of such borrowings was eliminated in consolidation. Other includes $2.4 million of interest-bearing deferred purchase price related to the Company’s acquisition of the Wayne Hummer Companies and a $2.0 million mortgage related to the main banking office of Northview Bank.

(7) Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities

The Company issued Trust Preferred Securities in five separate issuances through Wintrust Capital Trust I, Wintrust Capital Trust II, Wintrust Capital Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV and Wintrust Statutory Trust V and assumed the Trust Preferred Securities of Northview Capital Trust I in connection with the acquisition of Northview Financial Corporation (collectively, the “Trusts”). The Company owns 100% of the Common Securities of each of the Trusts. The Trust Preferred Securities represent preferred undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts. The Trusts invested the proceeds from the issuances of the Trust Preferred Securities and the Common Securities in Subordinated Debentures (“Debentures”) issued by the Company, with the same maturities and interest rates as the Trust Preferred Securities. The Debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. In each Trust the Common Securities represent approximately 3% of the Debentures and the Trust Preferred Securities represent approximately 97% of the Debentures.

In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Financial Interpretation No. 46, Revised, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46), which reflects new accounting guidance governing when a variable interest entity should be consolidated, as of September 30, 2004, the Trusts are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. Accordingly, the Debentures issued by the Company to these Trusts (as opposed to the Trust Preferred Securities issued by these Trusts) are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition as “Long-term debt – trust preferred securities” and the Common Securities of the Trusts held by the Company are included in available-for-sale securities.

8

The following table is a summary of the Company’s Long-term debt — trust preferred securities as of September 30, 2004.

(Dollars in thousands)

Trust

Earliest

Preferred

Issuance

Rate

Maturity

Redemption

Issuance Trust

Securities

Debentures

Date

Type

Rate

Date

Date

Wintrust Capital Trust I

$

31,050

$

32,010

10/98

Fixed

9.00

%

09/30/28

09/30/03

Less: Adjustment for fair value hedge

(188

)

Wintrust Capital Trust II

20,000

20,619

06/00

Fixed

10.50

%

06/30/30

06/30/05

Wintrust Capital Trust III

25,000

25,774

04/03

Floating

LIBOR

+3.25

%

04/07/33

04/07/08

Wintrust Statutory Trust IV

20,000

20,619

12/03

Floating

LIBOR

+2.80

%

12/08/33

12/08/08

Wintrust Statutory Trust V

40,000

41,238

05/04

Floating

LIBOR

+2.60

%

05/11/34

06/30/09

Northview Capital Trust I

6,000

6,186

10/03

Fixed (thru 2008)

6.35

%

11/08/33

11/08/08

Plus: Adjustment for purchase accounting

207

Total

$

146,465

The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions on and payments upon liquidation or redemption of the Trust Preferred Securities, in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the obligations of the Company under the guarantees, the Debentures, and other related agreements provide, in the aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the obligations of the Trusts under the Trust Preferred Securities. Subject to certain limitations, the Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on the Debentures at any time, or from time to time, for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the Debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The Debentures of the Trusts are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time after the dates shown in the table, and earlier at the discretion of the Company if certain conditions are met, and, in any event, only after the Company has obtained Federal Reserve approval, if then required under applicable guidelines or regulations.

The Trust Preferred Securities, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory purposes. As a result FIN 46, the Federal Reserve had been evaluating whether deconsolidation of the Trusts would affect the qualification of the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital. In May 2004, the Federal Reserve issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which would allow the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter quantitative limits and qualitative standards. The quantitative limits would become effective after a three year transition period on March 31, 2007. Interest expense on the Long-term debt – trust preferred securities are deductible for tax purposes.

(8) Earnings Per Share

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods shown:

	For the Three Months				For the Nine Months
	Ended September 30,				Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2004		2003		2004		2003
Net income	$	13,075	$	9,907	$	37,163	$	27,189
Average common shares outstanding		20,541		17,617		20,347		17,445
Effect of dilutive potential common shares		1,345		1,199		1,327		1,137
Weighted average common shares and effect of dilutive potential common shares		21,886		18,816		21,674		18,582
Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.64	$	0.56	$	1.83	$	1.56
Diluted	$	0.60	$	0.53	$	1.71	$	1.46

The effect of dilutive common shares outstanding results from stock options, restricted stock unit awards, stock warrants and shares to be issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan, all being treated as if they had been either exercised or issued, computed by application of the treasury stock method.

9

(9) Segment Information

The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. The Company evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit or loss and other appropriate profitability measures common to each segment. Certain indirect expenses have been allocated based on actual volume measurements and other criteria, as appropriate. Inter-segment revenue and transfers are generally accounted for at current market prices. The other category, as shown in the following table, reflects parent company information. The net interest income and segment profit of the banking segment includes income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the premium finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its premium finance segment as if all loans originated and sold to the banking segment were retained within that segment’s operations, thereby causing the inter-segment elimination amounts shown in the following table. The following table presents a summary of certain operating information for each reportable segment for three months ended for the periods shown:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,						$ Change in			% Change in
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			Contribution			Contribution
Net interest income:
Banking	$	35,200		$	28,494		$	6,706			23.5	%
Premium finance		12,196			11,958			238			2.0
Tricom		965			1,003			(38	)		(3.8	)
Wealth management		1,941			1,805			136			7.5
Inter-segment eliminations		(8,575	)		(9,033	)		458			5.1
Other		(2,636	)		(2,337	)		(299	)		(12.8	)
Total net interest income	$	39,091		$	31,890		$	7,201			22.6	%
Non-interest income:
Banking	$	11,194		$	8,395		$	2,799			33.3	%
Premium finance		1,827			1,200			627			52.3
Tricom		1,040			1,019			21			2.1
Wealth management		7,481			7,843			(362	)		(4.6	)
Inter-segment eliminations		(167	)		(47	)		(120	)		N/M
Other		72			33			39			118.2
Total non-interest income	$	21,447		$	18,443		$	3,004			16.3	%
Segment profit (loss):
Banking	$	12,188		$	9,699		$	2,489			25.7	%
Premium finance		6,303			5,848			455			7.8
Tricom		390			449			(59	)		(13.1	)
Wealth management		28			111			(83	)		(74.8	)
Inter-segment eliminations		(3,410	)		(3,978	)		568			14.3
Other		(2,424	)		(2,222	)		(202	)		(9.1	)
Total segment profit	$	13,075		$	9,907		$	3,168			32.0	%
Segment assets:
Banking	$	5,724,633		$	4,191,494		$	1,533,139			36.6	%
Premium finance		772,146			745,578			26,568			3.6
Tricom		45,440			43,526			1,914			4.4
Wealth management		77,316			76,052			1,264			1.7
Inter-segment eliminations		(829,788	)		(821,115	)		(8,673	)		(1.1	)
Other		27,539			69,342			(41,803	)		(60.3	)
Total segment assets	$	5,817,286		$	4,304,877			1,512,409			35.1	%

N/M = not meaningful

10

The following table presents a summary of certain operating information for each reportable segment for nine months ended for the periods shown:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						$ Change in			% Change in
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			Contribution			Contribution
Net interest income:
Banking	$	100,335		$	77,843		$	22,492			28.9	%
Premium finance		37,875			32,422			5,453			16.8
Tricom		2,714			2,767			(53	)		(1.9	)
Wealth management		5,832			5,108			724			14.2
Inter-segment eliminations		(27,119	)		(24,829	)		(2,290	)		(9.2	)
Other		(7,318	)		(6,488	)		(830	)		(12.8	)
Total net interest income	$	112,319		$	86,823		$	25,496			29.4	%
Non-interest income:
Banking	$	28,698		$	27,554		$	1,144			4.2	%
Premium finance		5,365			3,470			1,895			54.6
Tricom		2,927			3,178			(251	)		(7.9	)
Wealth management		24,656			21,238			3,418			16.1
Inter-segment eliminations		(378	)		(201	)		(177	)		(88.1	)
Other		360			52			308			N/M
Total non-interest income	$	61,628		$	55,291		$	6,337			11.5	%
Segment profit (loss):
Banking	$	33,706		$	27,511		$	6,195			22.5	%
Premium finance		19,709			15,284			4,425			29.0
Tricom		1,000			1,238			(238	)		(19.2	)
Wealth management		763			(6	)		769			N/M
Inter-segment eliminations		(11,230	)		(10,791	)		(439	)		(4.1	)
Other		(6,785	)		(6,047	)		(738	)		(12.2	)
Total segment profit	$	37,163		$	27,189		$	9,974			36.7	%

N/M = not meaningful

11

(10) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company enters into certain derivative financial instruments as part of its strategy to manage its exposure to market risk. Market risk is the possibility that, due to changes in interest rates or other economic conditions, the Company’s net interest income will be adversely affected. The derivative financial instruments historically utilized by the Company to manage this risk include interest rate cap and interest rate swap contracts. The amounts potentially subject to market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the contracts and not the notional principal amounts used to express the volume of the transactions.

In accordance with SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements, in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Derivative financial instruments are included in other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders’ equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income in the same period and in the same income statement line as changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective hedges, are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments not qualifying as hedges are reported in income. Derivative contracts are valued using market values provided by the respective counterparties and are periodically validated by comparison with other third parties.

At September 30, 2004, the Company had two interest rate swap contracts, totaling $56.05 million in notional principal amount, both of which qualified for hedge accounting. The following table presents a summary of these derivative instruments and whether the contracts were cash flow (CF) hedges with changes in fair values reported as other comprehensive income (OCI) or fair value (FV) hedges with changes in fair values reported in the income statement (IS):

(Dollars in thousands)						September 30, 2004					December 31, 2003
	Type of	Change in	Maturity			Notional		Fair			Notional		Fair
Derivative Instrument	hedge	market value	Date			Amount		Value			Amount		Value
Interest rate swap	CF	OCI		2/27/04		$	—	$	—		$	25,000	$	(245	)
Interest rate swap	CF	OCI		10/29/12			25,000		(416	)		25,000		(331	)
Interest rate swap	FV	IS		9/30/28	*		31,050		(188	)		31,050		(632	)

* callable since 9/30/03

All of the interest rate derivatives designated as hedges in SFAS 133 relationships were considered highly effective during the nine months ending September 30, 2004, and none of the changes in fair value of these derivatives was attributed to hedge ineffectiveness.

No interest rate cap contracts were entered into in 2003 or 2004, and the Company had no interest rate cap contracts outstanding at September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 or September 30, 2003.

Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities held within the Banks’ investment portfolios or the right to sell certain securities to the Company at predetermined prices. These option transactions are entered into with the intent to increase the total return associated with the investment securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133, and accordingly, changes in fair values of these contracts are reported in other non-interest income. There were no covered call or put options outstanding as of September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 or September 30, 2003.

The Company does not enter into derivatives for purely speculative purposes. However, certain derivatives have not been designated in a SFAS 133 hedge relationship. These derivatives include commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of

12

residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale. At September 30, 2004 the Company had approximately $158.1 million of interest rate lock commitments and $238.1 million of forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. The majority of these interest rate lock commitments and related forward commitments are made on a best efforts basis. The aggregate fair value of these derivatives at September 30, 2004 was nominal. The fair values were estimated based on changes in mortgage rates from the date of the commitments.

(11) Business Combinations

On September 30, 2004, Wintrust completed the acquisition of Northview Financial Corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Northview Bank and Trust (“Northview Bank”) and Northview Mortgage, LLC. Since the acquisition was completed on September 30, 2004, the Consolidated Statement of Condition as of September 30, 2004, includes the assets and liabilities of Northview Bank and Northview Mortgage, LLC; however, the results of operations of Northview Bank and Northview Mortgage, LLC will be included in Wintrust’s results of operations beginning October 1, 2004. Northview Financial Corporation was acquired for a total purchase price of $48.0 million, including the issuance of 475,246 shares of Wintrust’s common stock (then valued at $25.1 million).

In May 2004, Wintrust completed the acquisition of SGB Corporation d/b/a WestAmerica Mortgage Company (“WestAmerica”) and WestAmerica’s affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc. (“Guardian”). WestAmerica’s and Guardian’s results of operations are included in Wintrust’s 2004 results since the effective date of acquisition (May 1, 2004). WestAmerica and Guardian were acquired for a total purchase price of $19.4 million, including the issuance of 180,438 shares of Wintrust’s common stock (then valued at $8.5 million.)

In December 2003, Wintrust completed the acquisition of Village Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Village Bank & Trust — Arlington Heights (“Village Bank”). Village Bancorp, Inc.’s only activity is its ownership of Village Bank. Village Bank’s results of operations have been included in Wintrust’s consolidated financial statements since the effective date of the acquisition (December 1, 2003).

In October 2003, Wintrust completed the acquisition of Advantage National Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantage National Bank (“Advantage Bank”). Advantage National Bancorp, Inc.’s only activity is its ownership of Advantage Bank. Advantage Bank’s results of operations have been included in Wintrust’s consolidated financial statements since the effective date of the acquisition (October 1, 2003).

In February 2003, Wintrust completed the acquisition of Lake Forest Capital Management Company (“LFCM”) based in Lake Forest, Illinois. Upon consummation, LFCM was merged into Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company, Wintrust’s existing asset management subsidiary. LFCM’s results of operations have been included in Wintrust’s consolidated financial statements since the effective date of acquisition (February 1, 2003).

13

(12) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, Wintrust ceased amortizing goodwill effective January 1, 2002. SFAS 142 requires the testing of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment at least annually. In addition, it requires amortizing intangible assets with definite useful lives over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewing them for impairment in accordance with the SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.

A summary of the Company’s goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:

	January 1,		Goodwill		Impairment		September 30,
(In thousands)	2004		Acquired		Losses		2004
Banking	$	19,381	$	42,029	$	—	$	61,410
Premium finance		—		—		—		—
Tricom		8,958		—		—		8,958
Wealth management		20,151		505		—		20,656
Parent and other		—		—		—		—
Total	$	48,490	$	42,534	$	—	$	91,024

The $42.0 million increase in goodwill in the banking segment in the first nine months of 2004 relates to $31.3 million recorded in connection with the acquisition of Northview Financial Corporation and $10.6 million recorded in connection with the acquisitions of WestAmerica and Guardian. Wintrust could pay additional contingent consideration related to the WestAmerica and Guardian purchases upon the attainment of certain performance measures over the next five years. Such additional consideration, if any, would increase goodwill when it is determined to be payable beyond a reasonable doubt. The increase in goodwill in the wealth management segment represents additional contingent consideration earned by the former owners of LFCM as a result of attaining certain performance measures pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. Wintrust could pay additional contingent consideration pursuant to the LFCM purchase upon the attainment of certain performance measures over the next three years.

At September 30, 2004 and 2003, Wintrust had $4.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively, in unamortized finite-lived intangible assets, classified on the Consolidated Statement of Condition as other intangible assets. These other intangible assets relate to the portion of the purchase price assigned to the value of customer lists acquired in the acquisitions of LFCM and WHAMC and the value of the deposit bases acquired in the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank and Northview Bank. The wealth management segment and banking segment accounted for $1.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of the other intangible assets as of September 30, 2004. The values assigned to the customer lists of LFCM and WHAMC are being amortized on an accelerated basis over seven years and the values assigned to the deposit bases of Advantage Bank, Village Bank and Northview Bank are being amortized on an accelerated basis over ten-year periods. Estimated amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets for the years ended 2004 through 2008 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
Actual in 9 months ended September 30, 2004	$	587
Estimated remaining in 2004		263
Estimated – 2005		931
Estimated – 2006		766
Estimated – 2007		634
Estimated – 2008		535

14

(13) Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company follows Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. APB 25 uses the intrinsic value method and provides that compensation expense for employee stock options is generally not recognized if the exercise price of the option equals or exceeds the fair value of the stock on the date of grant. The Company follows the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (as amended by SFAS 148), rather than the recognition provisions of SFAS 123, as allowed by the Statement. Compensation expense for restricted share awards is ratably recognized over the period of service, usually the restricted period, based on the fair value of the stock on the date of grant.

The following table reflects the Company’s pro forma net income and earnings per share as if compensation expense for the Company’s stock options, determined based on the fair value at the date of grant consistent with the method of SFAS 123, had been included in the determination of the Company’s net income.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	2004			2003			2004			2003
Net income
As reported	$	13,075		$	9,907		$	37,163		$	27,189
Compensation cost of stock options based on fair value, net of related tax effect		(608	)		(317	)		(1,673	)		(971	)
Pro forma	$	12,467		$	9,590		$	35,490		$	26,218
Earnings per share – Basic
As reported	$	0.64		$	0.56		$	1.83		$	1.56
Compensation cost of stock options based on fair value, net of related tax effect		(0.03	)		(0.02	)		(0.09	)		(0.06	)
Pro forma	$	0.61		$	0.54		$	1.74		$	1.50
Earnings per share – Diluted
As reported	$	0.60		$	0.53		$	1.71		$	1.46
Compensation cost of stock options based on fair value, net of related tax effect		(0.03	)		(0.02	)		(0.07	)		(0.05	)
Pro forma	$	0.57		$	0.51		$	1.64		$	1.41

The fair values of stock options granted were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model is sensitive to changes in the subjective assumptions, which can materially affect the fair value estimates. As a result, the pro forma amounts indicated above may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years.

Included in the determination of net income as reported is compensation expense related to restricted share awards of $183,000 ($112,000 net of tax) in the third quarter of 2004 and $198,000 ($122,000 net of tax) in the third quarter of 2003. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, net income as reported included compensation expense related to restricted share awards of $538,000 ($330,000 net of tax) and $586,000 ($362,000 net of tax), respectively.

15

(14) Subsequent Events and Pending Acquisitions

On October 15, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Town Bancshares, Ltd, parent company of Town Bank with banking locations in Delafield and Madison, Wisconsin. Town Bank began operations as ade novobank in 1998 and had total assets of approximately $260 million as of September 30, 2004. The aggregate purchase price, including the value of in-the-money options, was approximately $41.1 million. This transaction fulfills the Company’s plans to continue expansion into communities within the Chicago and Milwaukee market areas.

On October 15 2004, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Antioch Holding Company (“Antioch”), the parent company of State Bank of The Lakes, with locations in Antioch, Lindenhurst, Grayslake, Spring Grove and a location under construction in McHenry. Antioch had total assets of approximately $443 million as of September 30, 2004. This transaction will significantly expand the Company’s community banking network into northern Lake County, Illinois. The aggregate purchase price is approximately $95 million. The transaction is subject to approval by the applicable bank regulators and certain closing conditions and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2005.

(15) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-1 applies to debt and equity securities and required qualitative and quantitative disclosures about impaired investment securities effective December 31, 2003. In addition, EITF 03-1 requires the application of a three-step model to determine other-than-temporary impairments of investment securities. On September 30, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 03-1-1, “Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, ‘The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments, ’” delaying the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance of EITF 03-1, until certain implementation issues are addressed and a final FSP providing implementation guidance is issued. The final FSP providing implementation guidance is expected to be issued in early December 2004.

On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that Statement 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which would require all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including employee stock options) at fair value, would be effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Retroactive application of the requirements of Statement 123 (not Statement 123R) to the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the effective date would be permitted, but not required. Therefore, the Company would be required to apply Statement 123R beginning July 1, 2005, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

16

ITEM 2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition as of September 30, 2004, compared with December 31, 2003, and September 30, 2003, and the results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and, as such, future results could differ significantly from management’s current expectations. See the last section of this discussion for further information on forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions. Certain policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. The determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of the retained interest in the premium finance receivables sold and the valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill are the areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. For a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see “Summary of Critical Accounting Policies” on page 63 of the Company’s Annual Report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Overview and Strategy

Wintrust is a financial holding company engaged in the business of providing traditional community banking services to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area through its twelve bank subsidiaries (collectively, “Banks”). Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank subsidiaries.

Wintrust organized its first bank in December 1991. As of September 30, 2004, it has organized a total of eight banks and purchased three banks that were started between 1993 and 2001. In October 2004, the Company purchased Town Bank with locations in Delafield and Madison Wisconsin, providing the Company with its first bank outside of Illinois. The Company has grown to $5.82 billion in total assets at September 30, 2004, from $4.30 billion in total assets at September 30, 2003, an increase of 35%. The historical financial performance of the Company has been affected by costs associated with growing market share in deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring new banks and opening new branch facilities, and building an experienced management team. During the first nine months of 2004, the Company opened seven new banking offices in addition to the four locations added by the Northview Bank acquisition. The Company’s financial performance generally reflects the improved profitability of its operating subsidiaries as they mature, offset by the costs of establishing and acquiring new banks and opening new branch facilities. The Company’s experience has been that it generally takes 13 to 24 months for new banks to first achieve operational profitability depending on the number and timing of branch facilities added.

The Banks began operations during the period indicated in the table below:

Lake Forest Bank	December 1991
Hinsdale Bank	October 1993
North Shore Bank	September 1994
Libertyville Bank	October 1995
Barrington Bank	December 1996
Crystal Lake Bank	December 1997
Northbrook Bank	November 2000
Advantage Bank(acquired by Wintrust in October 2003)	January 2001
Village Bank(acquired by Wintrust in December 2003)	November 1995
Beverly Bank	April 2004
Northview Bank (acquired by Wintrust in September 2004)	May 1993
Town Bank (acquired by Wintrust in October 2004)	July 1998

17

Subsequent to these initial dates of operations, each of the Banks, except Beverly Bank, has established additional full-service banking facilities. As of September 30, 2004, the Banks had 47 banking facilities, compared to 32 as of September 30, 2003. During those twelve months, the Company opened its tenth bank subsidiary, Beverly Bank, on the southwest side of Chicago, Lake Forest Bank opened a new branch serving the Ravinia community (Highland Park Bank & Trust), North Shore Bank opened a new branch (the Wayne Hummer Bank) in the downtown Chicago office of Wayne Hummer Investments, Hinsdale Bank opened a new branch in Downers Grove (the Community Bank of Downers Grove), Libertyville Bank opened new branches in Gurnee (the Gurnee Community Bank) and Lake Villa (Lake Villa Bank & Trust), Northbrook opened a new branch in Buffalo Grove (Buffalo Grove Bank & Trust), and the Company added four banking locations with the acquisitions of Advantage Bank (with banking locations in Elk Grove Village and Roselle) and Village Bank (with banking locations in Arlington Heights and Prospect Heights) in the fourth quarter of 2003 and four banking locations with the acquisition of Northview Bank on September 30, 2004.

While committed to a continuing growth strategy, management’s ongoing focus is also to balance further asset growth with earnings growth by seeking to more fully leverage the existing capacity within each of the operating subsidiaries. One aspect of this strategy is to continue to pursue specialized earning asset niches in order to maintain the mix of earning assets in higher-yielding loans as well as diversify the loan portfolio. Another aspect of this strategy is a continued focus on less aggressive deposit pricing at the Banks with significant market share and more established customer bases.

First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”) is the Company’s most significant specialized earning asset niche, originating $622 million in loan (premium finance receivables) volume in the third quarter of 2004, $1.9 billion in the first nine months of 2004 and $2.3 billion during the full year 2003. FIFC makes loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through independent medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States. The insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial customers’ purchases of liability, property and casualty and other commercial insurance. This lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. Because of the indirect nature of this lending and because the borrowers are located nationwide, this segment may be more susceptible to third party fraud. The majority of these loans are purchased by the Banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity. These loans generally provide the Banks higher yields than alternative investments. However, as a result of continued strong origination volume in 2004, FIFC sold approximately $120 million, or 19%, of the receivables originated in the third quarter of 2004, to an unrelated third party with servicing retained. On a year-to-date basis, FIFC sold approximately $346 million, or 18%, of the receivables originated in the first nine months of 2004, compared to sales of $195 million, or 12%, of the receivables originated during the first nine months of 2003. The Company began selling the excess of FIFC’s originations over the capacity to retain such loans within the Banks’ loan portfolios during 1999. In addition to recognizing gains on the sale of these receivables, the proceeds provide the Company with additional liquidity. Consistent with the Company’s strategy to be asset-driven, it is probable that similar sales of these receivables will occur in the future; however, future sales of these receivables depend on the level of new volume growth in relation to the capacity to retain such loans within the Banks’ loan portfolios.

As part of its continuing strategy to enhance and diversify its earning asset base and revenue stream, in May 2004, the Company acquired SGB Corporation d/b/a WestAmerica Mortgage Company (“WestAmerica”) and WestAmerica’s affiliate Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc (“Guardian”). WestAmerica engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market, and Guardian provides the document preparation and other loan closing services to WestAmerica and its mortgage broker affiliates. WestAmerica sells its loans with servicing released and does not currently engage in servicing loans for others. WestAmerica maintains principal origination offices in seven states, including Illinois, and originates loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. Guardian’s headquarters are located in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois. WestAmerica will provide the Banks with an enhanced loan origination and documentation system which should allow each firm to better utilize existing operational capacity and improve the product offering for the Banks’ customers. WestAmerica’s production of adjustable rate mortgage loan products and other variable rate mortgage loan products may be retained by the Banks in their loan portfolios resulting in additional earning assets to the combined organization, thus adding further diversification to the Company’s earning asset base.

18

In October 1999, the Company acquired Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (“Tricom”) as part of its strategy to pursue specialized earning asset niches. Tricom is a company based in the Milwaukee area that has been in business since 1989 and specializes in providing high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to clients in the temporary staffing industry. Tricom’s clients, located throughout the United States, provide staffing services to businesses in diversified industries. These receivables may involve greater credit risks than generally associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional community banks depending on the marketability of the collateral. The principal sources of repayments on the receivables are payments to borrowers from their customers who are located throughout the United States. The Company mitigates this risk by employing lockboxes and other cash management techniques to protect their interests. By virtue of the Company’s funding resources, this acquisition has provided Tricom with additional capital necessary to expand its financing services in a national market. Tricom’s revenue principally consists of interest income from financing activities and fee-based revenues from administrative services.

In addition to the earning asset niches provided by the Company’s non-bank subsidiaries, several earning asset niches operate within the Banks, including indirect auto lending which is conducted through Hinsdale Bank, equipment leasing which is conducted at Lake Forest Bank, and Barrington Bank’s Community Advantage program that provides lending, deposit and cash management services to condominium, homeowner and community associations. In addition, Hinsdale Bank operates a mortgage warehouse lending program that provides loan and deposit services to mortgage brokerage companies located predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area, and Crystal Lake Bank has developed a specialty in small aircraft lending. The Company continues to pursue the development and/or acquisition of other specialty lending businesses that generate assets suitable for bank investment and/or secondary market sales. The Company is not pursuing growth in indirect auto lending, however, and anticipates that the indirect auto loan portfolio will comprise a smaller portion of the loan portfolio in the future.

Wintrust’s strategy also includes building and growing its wealth management business, which includes trust, asset management and brokerage services. In February 2002, the Company completed its acquisition of the Wayne Hummer Companies, comprising Wayne Hummer Investments LLC (“WHI”), Wayne Hummer Management Company (subsequently renamed Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company “WHAMC”) and Focused Investments LLC (“Focused”), each based in the Chicago area. To further augment its wealth management business, in February 2003, the Company acquired Lake Forest Capital Management (“LFCM”), a registered investment advisor. LFCM was merged into WHAMC.

WHI, a registered broker-dealer, provides a full-range of investment products and services tailored to meet the specific needs of individual investors throughout the country, primarily in the Midwest. Headquartered in Chicago, WHI operates an office in Appleton, Wisconsin, and as of September 30, 2004, has established branch locations in offices at Lake Forest Bank, Hinsdale Bank, Libertyville Bank, Barrington Bank and Crystal Lake Bank. The Company plans to open WHI offices at each of the Banks. WHI is a member of the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and the National Association of Securities Dealers. Focused, a NASD member broker/dealer, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHI and provides a full range of investment services to clients through a network of relationships with community-based financial institutions located primarily in Illinois.

WHAMC, a registered investment advisor, is the investment advisory affiliate of WHI and is advisor to the Wayne Hummer proprietary mutual funds. The Wayne Hummer funds include the Wayne Hummer Growth Fund and the Wayne Hummer Core Portfolio Fund. WHAMC also provides money management and advisory services to individuals and institutional, municipal and tax-exempt organizations. WHAMC also provides portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide-range of pension and profit sharing plans.

In September 1998, the Company formed a trust subsidiary to expand the trust and investment management services that were previously provided through the trust department of Lake Forest Bank. The trust subsidiary, originally named Wintrust Asset Management Company, was renamed in May 2002 to Wayne Hummer Trust Company (“WHTC”), to bring together the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries under a common brand name. In addition to offering trust and investment services to existing bank customers at each of the Banks, the Company believes WHTC can successfully compete for trust business by targeting small to mid-size businesses and affluent individuals whose needs command the personalized attention offered by WHTC’s experienced trust professionals. Services offered by WHTC typically include traditional trust products and services, as well as investment management services.

19

The following table presents a summary of the approximate amount of assets under administration and/or management in the Company’s wealth management operating subsidiaries as of the dates shown:

	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		2003
WHTC	$	644,248	$	578,356	$	563,699
WHAMC(1)		813,460		796,095		733,843
WHAMC’s proprietary mutual funds		176,095		186,441		297,282
WHI – brokerage assets in custody		4,900,000		4,700,000		4,300,000

(1) Excludes the proprietary mutual funds managed by WHAMC

The decrease in the amount of the managed assets in WHAMC’s proprietary mutual funds from the third quarter of 2003 relates primarily to the migration of balances from the WHAMC money market mutual fund to FDIC-insured deposit accounts at the Banks. WHAMC’s money market mutual fund was liquidated in December 2003. The money market mutual fund balance was $125.8 million at September 30, 2003. In addition, the WHAMC Income Fund was liquidated in the second quarter of 2004. The Income Fund had a balance of $12.2 million at December 2003 and $14.9 million at September 30, 2003.

20

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Earnings Summary

The Company’s key operating measures, as compared to the same period last year, are shown below:

	Nine Months Ended						Percentage (%)/
	September 30,			September 30,			Basis Point (bp)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2004			2003			Change
Net income	$	7,163		$	27,189			36.7	%
Net income per common share – Diluted		1.71			1.46			17.1
Net revenues (1)		173,947			142,114			22.4
Net interest income		112,319			86,823			29.4
Net interest margin (5)		3.16	%		3.20	%		(4	)bp
Core net interest margin (2) (5)		3.30			3.32			(2	)
Net overhead ratio (3)		1.25			1.21			4
Efficiency ratio (4) (5)		63.74			64.23			(49	)
Return on average assets		0.95			0.91			4
Return on average equity		13.46			14.92			(146	)

	Three Months Ended						Percentage (%)/
	September 30,			September 30,			Basis Point (bp)
	2004			2003			Change
Net income	$	13,075		$	9,907			32.0	%
Net income per common share – Diluted		0.60			0.53			13.2
Net revenues (1)		60,538			50,333			20.3
Net interest income		39,091			31,890			22.6
Net interest margin (5)		3.16	%		3.31	%		(15	)bp
Core net interest margin (2) (5)		3.32			3.44			(12	)
Net overhead ratio (3)		1.25			1.27			(2	)
Efficiency ratio (4) (5)		64.29			63.08			121
Return on average assets		0.96			0.94			2
Return on average equity		13.56			15.24			(168	)
At end of period
Total assets	$	5,817,286		$	4,304,877			35.1	%
Total loans, net of unearned income		4,000,175			2,949,143			35.6
Total deposits		4,751,593			3,529,196			34.6
Long-term debt – trust preferred securities		146,465			76,512			91.4
Total shareholders’ equity		430,153			299,874			43.4
Book value per common share	$	20.42		$	15.87			28.7
Market price per common share		57.28			37.80			51.5
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.79	%		0.77	%		2	bp
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.33			0.34			(1	)

(1)	Net revenue includes net interest income and non-interest income.
(2)	The core net interest margin excludes the net interest expense associated with Wintrust’s Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities.
(3)	The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s total average assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
(4)	The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient revenue generation.
(5)	See following section titled, “Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios,” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.

21

Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios

The Company analyzes its performance on a net income basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States, as well as other ratios such as the net overhead ratio, efficiency ratio, taxable-equivalent net interest income and net interest margin (including the individual components) and core net interest margin. These performance measures are presented as supplemental information to enhance the readers’ understanding of, and highlight trends in, the Company’s financial results. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information a more complete view of the performance of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency for comparative purposes. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently. These measures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income and earnings per share as determined in accordance with GAAP.

In accordance with SEC rules required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding the use of financial measures and ratios not calculated in accordance with GAAP, a reconciliation must be provided that shows these measures and ratios calculated according to GAAP and a statement why management believes these measures and ratios provide a more accurate view of performance. The following discussion provides an explanation of these supplemental measures and ratios and why management believes that they provide a more accurate view of performance. In addition, the table below presents the supplemental data and the corresponding reconciliation to GAAP financial measures for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company, and its banking subsidiaries, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (“FTE”). In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses.

Management also evaluates the net interest margin excluding the interest expense associated with the Company’s Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities (“Core Net Interest Margin”). Because these instruments are utilized by the Company primarily as capital instruments, management finds it useful to view the net interest margin excluding this expense and deems it to be a more accurate view of the operational net interest margin of the Company.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			2004			2003
(A) Interest income (GAAP)	$	65,377		$	52,472		$	184,683		$	148,977
Taxable-equivalent adjustment – loans		123			109			330			375
Taxable-equivalent adjustment – liquidity management assets		39			47			173			180
Taxable equivalent adjustment – other earning assets		10			11			39			50
Interest income – FTE	$	65,549		$	52,639		$	185,225		$	149,582
(B) Interest expense (GAAP)		26,286			20,582			72,364			62,154
Net interest income – FTE	$	39,263		$	32,057		$	112,861		$	87,428
(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B)	$	39,091		$	31,890		$	112,319		$	86,823
Net interest income – FTE	$	39,263		$	32,057		$	112,861		$	87,428
Add: Interest expense on long-term debt – trust preferred securities, net (1)		1,919			1,214			4,938			3,290
Core net interest income – FTE (2)	$	41,182		$	33,271		$	117,799		$	90,718
(D) Net interest margin (GAAP)		3.15	%		3.30	%		3.14	%		3.18	%
Net interest margin – FTE		3.16	%		3.31	%		3.16	%		3.20	%
Core net interest margin – FTE (2)		3.32	%		3.44	%		3.30	%		3.32	%
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP)		64.47	%		63.29	%		63.94	%		64.50	%
Efficiency ratio – FTE		64.29	%		63.08	%		63.74	%		64.23	%

(1)	Interest expense from the long-term debt – trust preferred securities is net of the interest income on the Common Securities owned by the Trusts and included in interest income.
(2)	Core net interest income and core net interest margin are by definition non-GAAP measures/ratios. The GAAP equivalents are the net interest income and net interest margin determined in accordance with GAAP (lines C and D in the table).

22

Net Income

Net income for the third quarter ended September 30, 2004 totaled $13.1million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 32%, over the $9.9 million recorded in the third quarter of 2003. On a per share basis, net income for the third quarter of 2004 totaled $0.60 per diluted common share, a $0.07 per share, or 13%, increase as compared to the 2003 third quarter total of $0.53 per diluted common share. Return on average equity for the third quarter of 2004 was 13.56%, compared to 15.24% for the same period of 2003.

Net income for the first nine months of 2004, totaled $37.2 million, an increase of $10.0 million, or 37%, compared to $27.2 million for the same period in 2003. On a per share basis, net income per diluted common share was $1.71 for the first nine months of 2004, a $0.25 per share, or 17%, increase compared to $1.46 for the same period of 2003. Return on average equity for the first nine months of 2004 was 13.46% versus 14.92% for the same period of 2003.

The lower growth rate in the earnings per share as compared to net income for the third quarter and nine months ending September 30, 2004, was due primarily to an increase in the average number of common shares outstanding. Average common shares outstanding in the third quarter of 2004 reflected an increase of 2.9 million shares, or 17%, compared to the third quarter of 2003. This increase in average shares outstanding was due primarily to the issuance of 1,377,108 new shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering in September 2003, the issuance of 670,867 shares of common stock in October 2003 in connection with the acquisition of Advantage National Bancorp, the issuance of 257,202 shares of common stock in December 2003 in connection with the acquisition of Village Bancorp, Inc. and the issuance of 180,438 shares of common stock in May 2004 in connection with the acquisitions of WestAmerica and Guardian.

Wintrust acquired several operating companies since January 2003, including LFCM effective February 1, 2003, Advantage Bank effective October 1, 2003, Village Bank effective December 1, 2003, WestAmerica and Guardian effective May 1, 2004 and Northview Bank on September 30, 2004. The results of operations of each of these entities have been included in Wintrust’s results of operations since the respective effective dates.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, which is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is the major source of earnings for Wintrust. Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 totaled $39.3 million, an increase of $7.2 million, or 22%, as compared to the $32.1 million recorded in the same quarter of 2003. This increase in net interest income resulted primarily from an increase in average earning assets of $1.1 billion, or 28%, during the periods. In the third quarter of 2004, average loans, the highest yielding component of the earning asset base, increased $735 million, or 24%, compared to the third quarter of 2003. The positive effect of the increase in earning assets was offset by a decrease in the interest rate spread to 2.95% for the third quarter of 2004 from 3.11% in the prior year period. The table on page 26 presents a summary of changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the growth of earning assets and changes in interest rates.

Net interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of the average earning assets during the period. For the third quarter of 2004 the net interest margin was 3.16%, a decrease of 15 basis points when compared to the net interest margin of 3.31% in the prior year third quarter. The core net interest margin, which excludes the net interest expense related to Wintrust’s Long-term Debt — Trust Preferred Securities, was 3.32% for the third quarter of 2004, a decrease of 12 basis points when compared to the prior year third quarter’s core net interest margin of 3.44%. The net interest margin improved four basis points in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2004 as the yield on earning assets increased by 14 basis points, the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased by 11 basis points and the contribution from net free funds improved by one basis point. The earning asset yield improvement in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2004 was attributable to a 21 basis point increase in the yield on liquidity management assets and a 13 basis point increase in the yield on loans. The liquidity management asset yield increased as a result of a larger volume of higher yielding, longer term securities in the third quarter of 2004 as compared to the third quarter of 2003. The higher loan yield is reflective of the three 25 basis point increases affected by the Federal Reserve Bank between June 30, 2004 and September 21, 2004 offset somewhat by continued competitive pricing pressures in the premium finance industry and lower delinquency fees as

23

the premium finance portfolio credit quality improved. The interest-bearing liability rate increase of 11 basis points was due to higher costs of deposits in the third quarter as Treasury-based deposit products re-priced in advance of both rate increases announced by the Federal Reserve Bank on August 10, 2004 and September 21, 2004, promotional pricing activities associated with opening additional branches in communities not currently served by Wintrust and the extension of maturities on fixed maturity time deposits in anticipation of continued rate increases.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s average balance sheet, net interest income and related net interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, for the periods shown:

	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2004								September 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)	Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate
Liquidity management assets(1)(2)(8)	$	1,084,180			10,570		3.88	%	$	723,382		$	6,690		3.67	%
Other earning assets(2)(3)(8)		39,292			434		4.39			35,740			342		3.80
Loans, net of unearned income(2)(4)(8)		3,812,734			54,545		5.69			3,077,798			45,607		5.88
Total earning assets(8)	$	4,936,206		$	65,549		5.28	%	$	3,836,920		$	52,639		5.44	%
Allowance for loan losses		(29,584	)							(22,228	)
Cash and due from banks		100,436								84,083
Other assets		423,691								282,928
Total assets	$	5,430,749							$	4,181,703
Interest-bearing deposits	$	3,952,110		$	21,044		2.12	%	$	3,132,445		$	16,535		2.09	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		244,017			2,186		3.56			140,000			1,489		4.22
Notes payable and other borrowings		97,561			346		1.41			108,229			638		2.34
Subordinated notes		50,000			723		5.66			50,000			713		5.58
Long-term debt – trust preferred securities		139,838			1,987		5.68			76,816			1,207		6.29
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,483,526		$	26,286		2.33	%	$	3,507,490		$	20,582		2.33	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		432,695								330,623
Other liabilities		130,994								85,693
Equity		383,534								257,897
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,430,749							$	4,181,703
Interest rate spread(5)(8)							2.95	%							3.11	%
Net free funds/contribution(6)	$	452,680					0.21		$	329,430					0.20
Net interest income/Net interest margin(8)				$	39,263		3.16	%				$	32,057		3.31	%
Core net interest margin(7)(8)							3.32	%							3.44	%

(1)	Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(2)	Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total adjustments for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were $172,000 and $167,000, respectively.
(3)	Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
(4)	Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans.
(5)	Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(6)	Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)	The core net interest margin excludes the effect of Wintrust’s Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities.
(8)	See “Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios” section of this report for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.

The yield on total earning assets for the third quarter of 2004 was 5.28% as compared to 5.44% in 2003 and 5.14% in the second quarter of 2004. The decrease of 16 basis points from the third quarter of 2003 resulted primarily from the effects of competitive market pressures on loan rates offset somewhat by the rising interest rate environment in the third quarter of 2004. The third quarter 2004 yield on loans was 5.69%, a 19 basis point decrease when compared to the prior year third quarter yield of 5.88% and a 13 basis point increase compared to the second quarter of 2004. Average loans comprised approximately 77% of total average earning assets in the third quarter of 2004 and 80% in the third quarter of 2003, tempering somewhat the impact of the rising interest rate environment between the two periods. Average liquidity management assets (primarily investment securities) increased $361 million over the third quarter of 2003. The Company strives to maintain an average loan to average deposit ratio between 85-90%.

24

The rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased three basis points to 2.12% in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2.09% in the third quarter of 2003. The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes payable, subordinated notes and other borrowings, declined to 3.29% in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 3.77% in the third quarter of 2003 as a result of lower average rates paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances and the additional trust preferred borrowings added in the second half of 2003 and first half of 2004. The Company utilizes these borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the subsidiary banks, to manage its capital and its interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s average balance sheet, net interest income and related net interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, for the periods shown:

	For the Nine Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2004								September 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)	Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate
Liquidity management assets(1)(2)(8)	$	1,047,334		$	29,858		3.81	%	$	731,383		$	19,719		3.60	%
Other earning assets(2)(3)(8)		38,045			1,170		4.11			38,943			1,161		3.99
Loans, net of unearned income(2)(4)(8)		3,688,532			154,197		5.58			2,881,317			128,702		5.97
Total earning assets(8)	$	4,773,911		$	185,225		5.18	%	$	3,651,643		$	149,582		5.48	%
Allowance for loan losses		(28,262	)							(20,685	)
Cash and due from banks		101,741								77,617
Other assets		353,068								266,561
Total assets	$	5,200,458							$	3,975,136
Interest-bearing deposits	$	3,813,646		$	57,909		2.03	%	$	2,993,849		$	50,650		2.26	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		207,890			5,752		3.70			140,000			4,419		4.22
Notes payable and other borrowings		141,538			1,476		1.39			97,992			2,013		2.75
Subordinated notes		50,000			2,130		5.60			39,103			1,782		6.01
Long-term debt – trust preferred securities		120,247			5,097		5.65			66,275			3,290		6.62
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,333,321		$	72,364		2.23	%	$	3,337,219		$	62,154		2.49	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		372,994								314,071
Other liabilities		125,350								80,140
Equity		368,793								243,706
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,200,458							$	3,975,136
Interest rate spread(5)(8)							2.95	%							2.99	%
Net free funds/contribution(6)	$	440,590					0.21		$	314,424					0.21
Net interest income/Net interest margin(8)				$	112,861		3.16	%				$	87,428		3.20	%
Core net interest margin(7)(8)							3.30	%							3.32	%

(1)	Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(2)	Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were $542,000 and $605,000, respectively.
(3)	Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
(4)	Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans.
(5)	Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(6)	Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)	The core net interest margin excludes the effect of Wintrust’s Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities.
(8)	See “Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios” section of this report for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 totaled $112.9 million, an increase of $25.4 million, or 29%, as compared to the $87.4 million recorded in the same period of 2003. Growth in the Company’s earning asset base was the primary contributor to this increase, as year-to-date average loans increased $807 million, or 28%. The year-to-date net interest margin was 3.16%, a decrease of four basis points when compared to the net interest margin of 3.20% in the prior year.

25

The yield on total earning assets for the first nine months of 2004 was 5.18% as compared to 5.48% in 2003, a decrease of 30 basis points, primarily resulting from lower yields on loans. The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the first nine months of 2004 was 2.23%, compared to 2.49% in 2003, a decline of 26 basis points. As a result of a more significant decrease in the yield on earning assets compared to the decrease in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities, the interest rate spread (difference between the yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities) declined four basis points to 2.95% for first nine months of 2004 when compared to 2.99% for the first nine months of 2003. The net interest margin declined four basis points to 3.16% during the first nine months of 2004 compared to 3.20% for the first nine months of 2003.

The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the Company’s tax-equivalent net interest income comparing the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and June 30, 2004, the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 and the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003. The reconciliation sets forth the change in the tax-equivalent net interest income as a result of changes in volumes, changes in rates, and changes due to differing number of days in each period:

	Third Quarter		First Nine Months		Third Quarter
	of 2004		of 2004		of 2004
	Compared to		Compared to		Compared to
	Second Quarter		First Nine Months		Third Quarter
(Dollars in thousands)	of 2004		of 2003		of 2003
Tax-equivalent net interest income for comparative period	$	36,903	$	87,428	$	32,057
Change due to mix and growth of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (volume)		1,251		24,972		8,150
Change due to interest rate fluctuations (rate)		708		142		(944	)
Change due to number of days in each period		401		319		—
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period ended September 30, 2004	$	39,263	$	112,861	$	39,263

26

Non-interest Income

For the third quarter of 2004, non-interest income totaled $21.4 million and increased $3.0 million, or 16%, compared to the prior year third quarter. The increase in non-interest income in the quarter is primarily a result of a higher gain on sale of premium finance receivables, increased net gains on available-for-sale securities, increased fees from covered call and put options and the impact of the recent acquisitions. For the third quarter of 2004, the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian contributed $4.7 million of non-interest income, including $4.0 million in mortgage banking revenue, $101,000 in service charges on deposits, and $432,000 in fees from covered call and put options. Offsetting these increases were a lower level of revenue from WHI’s brokerage business and a lower level of mortgage banking revenue generated by the Banks. The net increase in mortgage banking revenue of $213,000 in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the third quarter of 2003, reflects the $4.0 million generated by WestAmerica and Guardian offset by $3.8 million in reduced revenue from the Banks.

Non-interest income as a percentage of net revenue decreased to 35% in the third quarter of 2004, compared to 37% in the second quarter of 2004 and the prior year third quarter.

The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		Change			Change
Brokerage	$	4,984	$	5,681	$	(697	)		(12.3	)%
Trust and asset management		2,179		2,035		144			7.1
Total wealth management		7,163		7,716		(553	)		(7.2	)
Mortgage banking revenue		5,292		5,079		213			4.2
Service charges on deposit accounts		998		890		108			12.1
Gain on sale of premium finance receivables		1,827		1,200		627			52.2
Administrative services revenue		1,040		1,019		21			2.1
Net available-for-sale securities gains		878		31		847			N/M
Other:
Fees from covered call and put options		2,669		1,278		1,391			108.8
Bank Owned Life Insurance		520		492		28			5.9
Miscellaneous		1,060		738		322			43.6
Total other		4,249		2,508		1,741			69.4
Total non-interest income	$	21,447	$	18,443	$	3,004			16.3	%

For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, non-interest income totaled $61.6 million, an increase of $6.3 million, or 12%, compared to the same period of 2003. For the year-to-date period, wealth management fees along with the same items that contributed to the increase in the quarterly period were the primary contributors to the year-to-date increase in non-interest income. These increases were offset by a significantly lower level of mortgage banking revenue generated by the Banks. For the nine months ending September 30, 2004, the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian contributed $8.6 million of non-interest income, including $6.8 million in mortgage banking revenue, $267,000 in service charges on deposits, and $1.2 million in fees from covered call and put options. The net decrease in mortgage banking revenue of $2.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the same period of 2003, reflects the $6.8 million generated by WestAmerica and Guardian offset by $9.1 million in reduced revenue from the Banks.

Non-interest income as a percentage of net revenue declined to 35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 39% for the first nine months of 2003.

27

The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		Change			Change
Brokerage	$	17,141		15,204	$	1,937			12.7	%
Trust and asset management		6,518		5,465		1,053			19.3
Total wealth management		23,659		20,669		2,990			14.5
Mortgage banking revenue		12,549		14,877		(2,328	)		(15.6	)
Service charges on deposit accounts		2,944		2,611		333			12.7
Gain on sale of premium finance receivables		5,365		3,470		1,895			54.6
Administrative services revenue		2,927		3,178		(251	)		(7.9	)
Net available-for-sale securities gains		1,731		637		1,094			171.8
Other:
Fees from covered call and put options		7,285		6,058		1,227			20.2
Bank Owned Life Insurance		1,542		1,461		81			5.6
Miscellaneous		3,626		2,330		1,296			55.6
Total other		12,453		9,849		2,604			26.4
Total non-interest income	$	61,628	$	55,291	$	6,337			11.5	%

Wealth management fees are comprised of the trust and asset management revenues generated by WHTC and the asset management fees, brokerage commissions, trading commissions and insurance product commissions at the Wayne Hummer Companies. Wealth management fees totaled $7.2 million in the third quarter of 2004, a $553,000 decrease from the $7.7 million in the third quarter of 2003. Revenue from retail brokerage trading in the debt and equity markets declined $697,000 when compared to the third quarter of 2003 and declined $878,000 from the second quarter of 2004. This decline in the third quarter is a result of the lack of individual investor interest in relatively low yields on fixed income securities and a recent apparent decline in investor confidence in the equity markets, causing lower volumes of trades. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, wealth management fees totaled $23.7 million in 2004, and increased $3.0 million, or 14%, compared to the same period of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, brokerage revenue as well as trust and asset management fees increased. Valuations of the equity securities under management affect the fees earned thereon and trading volumes affect brokerage fees. Wintrust’s strategy is to grow the wealth management business in order to better service its customers and create a more diversified revenue stream. Total assets under management and / or administration by WHTC and WHAMC were $1.6 billion at September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003. The September 30, 2003, balance includes $126 million of funds in the Wayne Hummer money market mutual fund. As previously disclosed, funds from the Wayne Hummer money market mutual fund have migrated into FDIC-insured deposits at the Banks and the money market mutual fund was liquidated in December 2003.

Mortgage banking revenue includes revenue from activities related to originating and selling residential real estate loans into the secondary market. With the addition of WestAmerica and Guardian in May 2004, this revenue line now includes gains on the sales of mortgage loans to the secondary market, origination fees, rate lock commitment fees, document preparation fees, the impact of capitalizing servicing rights on loans sold and serviced by certain Wintrust Banks and the impact of amortizing and valuing the capitalized servicing right asset. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, this revenue source totaled $5.3 million, including the $4.0 million generated by WestAmerica and Guardian. The Banks generated $1.3 million of mortgage banking revenue in the third quarter of 2004, compared to $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $5.1 million in the third quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis mortgage banking revenue totaled $12.5 million, and declined $2.3 million from the same period of 2003. WestAmerican and Guardian contributed $6.8 million of mortgage banking revenue since its acquisition in May 2004. The Banks generated $5.7 million of mortgage banking revenue for the first nine months of 2004, compared to $14.9 million for the same period of 2003. As previously discussed, the level of refinancing activity declined significantly beginning in the fourth quarter of 2003 as mortgage rates began to rise and have been at substantially lower levels in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period of 2003. Although mortgage banking revenue is a continuous source of revenue, these fees are significantly impacted by mortgage interest rates.

28

Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $998,000 for the third quarter of 2004, an increase of $108,000, or 12%, when compared to the same quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, service charges on deposit accounts totaled $2.9 million, an increase of $333,000, or 13%, compared to the same period of 2003. Advantage Bank and Village Bank contributed $101,000 to the third quarter increase and $267,000 to the year-to-date increase. The majority of deposit service charges relates to customary fees on overdrawn accounts and returned items. The level of service charges is substantially below peer group levels, as management believes in the philosophy of providing high quality service without encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.

Gain on sale of premium finance receivables results from the Company’s sales of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party. As previously noted, the majority of the receivables originated by FIFC are purchased by the Banks to more fully utilize their lending capacity. However, as a result of continued strong origination volume of premium finance receivables, the Company sold $120.0 million of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party in the third quarter of 2004 and recognized gains totaling $1.8 million related to this activity, compared to the sale of $62.9 million of premium finance receivables and recognized gains of $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, the Company recognized gains of $5.4 million in 2004 on sales of $345.7 million, compared to $3.5 million of gains in the same period of 2003 on sales of $194.9 million.

Recognized gains related to this activity are significantly influenced by the spread between the net yield on the loans sold and the rate passed on to the purchaser. The net yield on the loans sold and the rate passed on to the purchaser typically do not react in a parallel fashion, therefore causing the spreads to vary from period to period. This spread averaged 4.70% in the third quarter of 2004, compared to a range of 4.62% to 4.72% in the same quarter of 2003. For the first nine months of 2004 this spread ranged from 4.70% to 4.84%, compared to a range of 4.44% to 4.82% during the first nine months of 2003. The higher amount of gain recognized in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the prior year quarter was due primarily to a higher volume of loans sold, and to a lesser extent lower estimated credit losses. The Company continues to maintain an interest in the loans sold and establishes a servicing asset, interest only strip and a recourse obligation upon each sale. Recognized gains, recorded in accordance with SFAS 140, as well as the Company’s retained interests in these loans are based on the Company’s projection of cash flows that will be generated from the loans. The cash flow model incorporates the amounts contractually due from the customers, including an estimate of late fees, the amounts due to the purchaser of the loans, commissions paid to agents as well as estimates of the term of the loans and credit losses. Significant differences in actual cash flows and the projected cash flows can cause impairment to the servicing asset and interest only strip as well as the recourse obligation. The Company typically makes a clean up call by repurchasing the remaining loans in the pools sold after approximately ten months from the sale date. Upon repurchase, the loans are recorded in the Company’s premium finance receivables portfolio and any remaining balance of the Company’s retained interest is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale of premium finance receivables. In the third quarter of 2004, clean up calls resulted in increased gains (primarily from reversing the remaining balance of the related liability for the recourse obligation established for these loans) of approximately $95,000 while clean up calls made during the third quarter of 2003 resulted in increased gains of approximately $180,000. The Company continuously monitors the performance of the loan pools to the projections and adjusts the assumptions in its cash flow model when warranted. During the first nine months of 2004 estimated credit losses were estimated at 0.25%, compared to 0.50% in the first nine months of 2003. The decrease in estimated credit losses was a result of a lower level of charge-offs in recent quarters in the overall premium finance receivables portfolio (see “Allowance for Loan Losses” section later in this report for more detail). The average term of the loans was estimated at approximately eight months during the first nine months of 2004 and 2003. The applicable discount rate used in determining gains related to this activity in 2004 was unchanged from the discount rate used in 2003.

At September 30, 2004, premium finance loans sold and serviced for others for which the Company retains a recourse obligation related to credit losses totaled approximately $218.0 million. The recourse obligation is considered in computing the net gain on the sale of the premium finance receivables. At September 30, 2004, the remaining estimated recourse obligation carried in other liabilities is approximately $325,000.

Credit losses incurred on loans sold are applied against the recourse obligation liability that is established at the date of sale. Credit losses, net of recoveries, in the first nine months of 2004 for premium finance receivables sold and serviced for others totaled $131,000. At September 30, 2004, non-performing loans related to this sold portfolio were approximately $1.0 million, or 0.47%, of the outstanding loans in the sold portfolio. Ultimate losses on premium

29

finance loans are substantially less than non-performing loans for the reason noted in the “Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables” portion of the “Asset Quality” section of this report.

Wintrust attempts to maintain its average loan-to-deposit ratio in the range of 85-90%. During the third quarter of 2004, the ratio was approximately 87%. Consistent with Wintrust’s strategy to be asset-driven and the desire to maintain its loan-to-deposit ratio in the aforementioned range, it is probable that similar sales of premium finance receivables will occur in the future.

The administrative services revenue contributed by Tricom added $1.0 million to total non-interest income in the third quarter of 2004, up $21,000 over the third quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, Tricom contributed $2.9 million to non-interest income, reflecting a decrease of $251,000, or 8%, compared to the same period of 2003. This revenue comprises income from administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients located throughout the United States. During 2004, Tricom’s revenue has been negatively affected by competitive rate pressure in the industry. Increasing sales penetration offset the effects of the competitive pricing pressures in the third quarter of 2004, causing the administrative services revenues in the third quarter of 2004 to increase $95,000 compared to the second quarter of 2004. Tricom also earns interest and fee income from providing short-term accounts receivable financing to this same client base, which is included in the net interest income category.

Fees from covered call option and put option transactions in the third quarter of 2004 totaled $2.7 million, representing an increase of $1.4 million, or 109%, compared to the third quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, the Company recognized $7.3 million in fees in 2004 from this activity compared to $6.1 million in 2003, an increase of $1.2 million, or 20%. During the first nine months of 2004, covered call and put option contracts were written against $1.2 billion of underlying securities, compared to $1.6 billion in the first nine months of 2003. The same security may be included in this total more than once to the extent that multiple call option contracts were written against it if the initial call option contracts were not exercised. The Company routinely enters into these transactions with the goal of enhancing its overall return on its investment portfolio. The Company writes call options with terms of less than three months against certain U.S. Treasury and agency securities held in its portfolio for liquidity and other purposes. Put option contracts are also written with terms of less than three months against U.S. Treasury and agency securities deemed appropriate for the Banks’ investment portfolios. These option contracts are designed to increase the total return associated with the investment securities portfolio and do not qualify as hedges pursuant to SFAS 133. There were no outstanding call or put options at September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 or September 30, 2003.

During the third quarter of 2004, the Company purchased $7.9 million of additional Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”). The Company originally purchased $41.1 million of BOLI in the second quarter of 2002. The BOLI policies were purchased to consolidate existing term life insurance contracts of executive officers and to mitigate the mortality risk associated with death benefits provided for in the executives’ employment contracts. Adjustments to the cash surrender value of the BOLI policies are recorded as other non-interest income and totaled $520,000 and $492,000 for the third quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the third quarter of 2004 totaled $38.5 million, an increase of $6.6 million, or 21%, from the third quarter 2003 total of $31.8 million. For the first nine months of 2004, non-interest expense totaled $110.1 million, an increase of $18.9 million, or 21%, compared to the same period of 2003. The increases in non-interest expense in the quarterly and year-to-date periods over the prior year periods reflect the continued growth and expansion of the Banks with additional branches, the growth in the premium finance business and the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian. These acquisitions contributed $6.6 million in non-interest expense in the third quarter of 2004 and $13.6 million in the first nine months of 2004. Since September 30, 2003, total loans and total deposits have increased 36% and 35%, respectively, requiring higher levels of staffing and other costs in order to both attract and service a larger customer base. Despite the increases in non-interest expense, the Company’s efficiency ratio improved to 63.74% for the first nine months of 2004, compared to 64.23% for the same period of 2003.

30

The following table presents non-interest expense by category for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		Change			Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	23,768	$	19,957	$	3,811			19.1	%
Equipment		2,275		1,968		307			15.6
Occupancy, net		2,529		1,841		688			37.4
Data processing		1,257		1,114		143			12.8
Advertising and marketing		785		602		183			30.4
Professional fees		1,289		862		427			49.6
Amortization of other intangibles		194		150		44			29.1
Other:
Commissions – 3rd party brokers		859		847		12			1.4
Loan expenses		305		686		(381	)		(55.4	)
Postage		816		564		252			44.7
Miscellaneous		4,388		3,247		1,141			35.1
Total other		6,368		5,344		1,024			19.2
Total non-interest expense	$	38,465	$	31,838	$	6,627			20.8	%

The following table presents non-interest expense by category for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2003		Change			Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	66,841	$	55,673	$	11,168			20.0	%
Equipment		6,626		5,727		899			15.7
Occupancy, net		7,026		5,626		1,400			24.9
Data processing		3,909		3,193		716			22.4
Advertising and marketing		2,376		1,645		731			44.4
Professional fees		3,432		2,565		867			33.8
Amortization of other intangibles		587		448		139			31.1
Other:
Commissions – 3rd party brokers		3,092		2,224		868			39.1
Loan expenses		1,102		2,048		(946	)		(46.2	)
Postage		2,164		1,719		445			25.9
Miscellaneous		12,954		10,391		2,563			24.7
Total other		19,312		16,382		2,930			17.9
Total non-interest expense	$	110,109	$	91,259	$	18,850			20.7	%

Salaries and employee benefits totaled $23.8 million for the third quarter of 2004, an increase of $3.8 million, or 19%, as compared to the prior year’s third quarter total of $20.0 million. The acquisitions of Advantage Bank in October 2003, Village Bank in December 2003 and WestAmerica and Guardian in May 2004, contributed $4.3 million to the increase in salaries and employee benefits expense in the quarterly period. The net decrease in salaries and benefits of $528,000 attributable to non-acquisition related activities was due to significantly lower commissions paid in the third quarter of 2004 associated with decreased mortgage loan origination activity at the Company’s Banks and lower commissions paid on brokerage revenue, offset by higher salaries and benefits attributable to the continued growth and expansion of the Banks with additional branches, including the opening of Beverly Bank in April 2004. On a year-to-date basis salaries and employee benefits totaled $66.8 million, reflecting an increase of $11.2 million, or 20%, over the $55.7 million for the first nine months of 2003. The acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian contributed $8.5 million to the increase in this year-to-date period.

31

The remaining categories of non-interest expense, such as equipment expense, occupancy costs, data processing, advertising and marketing, professional fees and other expense, taken together, increased $2.8 million, or 24%, in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the third quarter of 2003, with $2.3 million of this increase directly attributable to the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, these categories of non-interest expense increased $7.7 million, or 22%, compared to the first nine months of 2003, of which $5.1 million was directly attributable to the acquisitions. The increases in these categories of non-interest expense that are not directly attributable to the acquisitions are a result of the growth and expansion of the Banks with additional branches, the opening of Beverly Bank in April 2004 and the growth in the premium finance business. Total loans and total deposits increased 36% and 35%, respectively, from September 30, 2003 to September 30, 2004, requiring higher levels of staffing and increases in other costs in order to both attract and service the larger customer base. Professional fees reflect the additional audit and legal costs associated with a larger organization and Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act compliance. The increase in amortization of other intangibles is a result of higher levels of amortizable customer list intangibles and deposit base intangibles attributable to the recent acquisitions. Commissions paid to third party brokers represent the commissions paid on higher levels of revenue generated by Focused Investments through its network of unaffiliated banks. Loan expenses reflect the lower volume of mortgage banking activity at the Banks as a result of increased mortgage rates. The increase of $1.1 million in miscellaneous expense for the third quarter of 2004 as compared to the third quarter of 2003, includes $917,000 of miscellaneous expenses directly attributable to the operations of the acquired companies. Similarly, on a year-to-date basis the increase in miscellaneous expense of $2.6 million includes $1.4 million of expenses directly attributable to the operations of the acquired companies.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $5.7 million for the same period of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, income tax expense was $21.7 million in 2004 and $15.3 million in 2003. The effective tax rate was 36.8% for the first nine months of 2004 and 36.0% for the first nine months of 2003.

32

Operating Segment Results

As described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company’s operations consist of four primary segments: banking, premium finance, Tricom and wealth management. The Company’s profitability is primarily dependent on the net interest income, provision for loan losses, non-interest income and operating expenses of its banking segment. The net interest income of the banking segment includes income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the premium finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its premium finance segment as if all loans originated and sold to the banking segment were retained within that segment’s operations.

The banking segment’s net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 totaled $35.2 million as compared to $28.5 million for the same period in 2003, an increase of $6.7 million, or 24%. This increase resulted from average total earning asset growth of $1.1 billion offsetting a decline in the net interest margin of 15 basis points. The banking segment’s non-interest income totaled $11.2 million in 2004, an increase of $2.8 million, or 33%, when compared to the 2003 total of $8.4 million. The increase in non-interest income is primarily a result of the impact of the recent acquisitions. The additional non-interest income added by the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian helped offset the decline in mortgage banking revenue at the Wintrust banking subsidiaries. The acquisitions contributed $4.7 million of non-interest income ($4.0 million in mortgage banking revenue, $101,000 in service charges on deposits, $5,000 in securities gains and $586,000 in other) in the third quarter of 2004. The banking segment’s net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 totaled $12.2 million, an increase of $2.5 million, or 26%, as compared to the 2003 total of $9.7 million. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $100.3 million for the first nine months of 2004, an increase of $22.5 million, or 29%, as compared to the $77.8 million recorded last year. Non-interest income increased $1.1 million to $28.7 million in the first nine months of 2004. The additional non-interest income added by the acquisitions of Advantage Bank, Village Bank, WestAmerica and Guardian helped offset the decline in mortgage banking revenues at the Wintrust banking subsidiaries. The acquisitions contributed $8.6 million in non-interest income ($6.8 million in mortgage banking revenue, $267,000 in service charges on deposits, $41,000 of net securities gains and $1.5 million in other) in the first nine months of 2004. The banking segment’s after-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, totaled $33.7 million, an increase of $6.2 million, or 23%, as compared to the prior year total of $27.5 million. The banking segment accounted for the majority of the Company’s total asset growth since September 30, 2003, increasing by $1.5 billion.

Net interest income for the premium finance segment totaled $12.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and increased $238,000, or 2%, over the $12.0 million in 2003. During the third quarter of 2004, this segment benefited from higher levels of average premium finance receivables outstanding, increasing 26% when compared to average balances outstanding for the third quarter of 2003. The premium finance segment’s non-interest income totaled $1.8 million and $1.2 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Non-interest income for this segment reflects the gains from the sale of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party. As a result of continued strong loan originations of premium finance receivables, Wintrust sold a larger volume in the third quarter of 2004 ($120 million) compared with the third quarter of 2003 ($63 million). Wintrust has a philosophy of maintaining its average loan-to-deposit ratio in the range of 85-90%. During the third quarter of 2004, the ratio was approximately 87%. Net after-tax profit of the premium finance segment totaled $6.3 million and $5.8 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $37.9 million for the first nine months of 2004, an increase of $5.5 million, or 17%, as compared to the $32.4 million recorded last year. Non-interest income increased $1.9 million to $5.4 million in the first nine months of 2004 as a larger volume of premium finance receivables were sold to an unrelated third party in the first nine months of 2004 ($346 million) than in the first nine months of 2003 ($195 million). The premium finance segment’s after-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, totaled $19.7 million, an increase of $4.4 million, or 29%, as compared to the prior year total of $15.3 million.

The Tricom segment data reflects the business associated with short-term accounts receivable financing and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, which Tricom provides to its clients in the temporary staffing industry. The segment’s net interest income was $965,000 in the third quarter of 2004 down slightly when compared to the $1.0 million reported for the same period in 2003. Continued competitive pricing pressures in the temporary staffing industry have lowered the margins significantly in the past year.

33

Increasing sales penetration offset the effects of the competitive pricing pressures in the third quarter of 2004, causing the administrative services revenues in the third quarter of 2004 to increase $21,000 over the third quarter of 2003. This marked the highest level of administrative services revenue since the second quarter of 2003. The segment’s net income was $390,000 in 2004 compared to $449,000 in 2003 as lower levels of net interest income and higher operating expenses offset the increase in the administrative services revenue. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $2.7 million for the first nine months of 2004, a slight decrease of $53,000, or 2%, as compared to the $2.8 million recorded in the first nine months of 2003. Non-interest income decreased $251,000 to $2.9 million in the first nine months of 2004. The Tricom segment’s after-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, totaled $1.0 million, a decrease of $238,000, or 19%, as compared to $1.2 million in the first nine months of 2003.

The wealth management segment reported net interest income of $1.9 million for the third quarter of 2004 compared to $1.8 million in the same quarter of 2003. The contribution from net interest income in this segment is primarily due to the net interest income allocated to the segment from non-interest bearing and interest-bearing account balances on deposit at the Banks and the interest-bearing brokerage customer receivables at WHI. This segment recorded non-interest income of $7.5 million for 2004 as compared to $7.8 million for 2003, a decrease of $362,000 or 5%. Wintrust is committed to growing the trust and investment business in order to better service its customers and create a more diversified revenue stream. The decrease in total non-interest income in the third quarter of 2004 was comprised of a decrease of approximately $506,000 from the brokerage business and an increase of approximately $144,000 from trust and asset management. Wealth management segment’s net income totaled $28,000 for 2004 compared to $111,000 for the third quarter of 2003. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $5.8 million for the first nine months of 2004, an increase of $724,000, or 14%, as compared to the $5.1 million recorded last year. Non-interest income increased $3.4 million to $24.7 million in the first nine months of 2004. The increase is attributable to higher levels of client trading and asset administration revenues. This segment’s after-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, totaled $763,000, an improvement of $769,000 as compared to the prior year loss of $6,000.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets were $5.8 billion at September 30, 2004, reflecting an increase of $1.5 billion, or 35%, over the $4.3 billion at September 30, 2003. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and advances, as well as the Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities, was $5.3 billion at September 30, 2004, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 35%, over the September 30, 2003 balances. The increased funding was primarily utilized to fund growth in the loan portfolio of $1.1 billion since September 30, 2003 and to provide liquidity to the Company on a temporary basis.

The Company acquired Northview Bank on September 30, 2004 and its total assets of $352 million are included in the Company’s consolidated total assets. However, since Northview Bank was acquired on the last day of the quarter, it had practically no effect on the Company’s average balances during the quarter.

See Notes 3-7 of the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements on pages 6-8 for additional period-end detail.

34

Interest-Earning Assets

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:

	Average Balances for the
	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2004					June 30, 2004					September 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Loans:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	1,902,340		38	%	$	1,840,039		39	%	$	1,490,957		39	%
Home equity		498,359		10			490,077		10			425,077		11
Residential real estate (1)		286,493		6			269,652		6			239,763		6
Premium finance receivables		850,946		17			827,467		17			673,800		18
Indirect auto loans		179,105		4			178,266		4			167,400		4
Tricom finance receivables		27,876		1			24,086		1			26,603		1
Consumer and other loans		67,615		1			69,434		1			54,198		1
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	3,812,734		77	%	$	3,699,021		78	%	$	3,077,798		80	%
Liquidity management assets (2)		1,084,180		22			1,016,517		21			723,382		19
Other earning assets (3)		39,292		1			38,202		1			35,740		1
Total average earning assets	$	4,936,206		100	%	$	4,753,740		100	%	$	3,836,920		100	%
Total average assets	$	5,430,749				$	5,176,455				$	4,181,703
Total average earning assets to total average assets				91	%				92	%				92	%

(1)	Includes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
(2)	Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(3)	Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.

Total average earning assets for the third quarter of 2004 were $4.9 billion and increased $1.1 billion, or 29%, compared to the third quarter of 2003, and $182 million, or 15% on an annualized basis, over the second quarter of 2004. The ratio of total average earning assets to total average total assets remained fairly consistent at 91-92% for each of the quarterly periods shown in the above table.

Loan growth continued to fuel the Company’s earning asset growth. Total average loans during the third quarter of 2004 increased $735 million, or 24% on an annualized basis, over the previous year’s third quarter. Average balances of commercial and commercial real estate loans increased 28%, home equity 17%, residential real estate 20%, and premium finance receivables 26%, compared to the average balances in the third quarter of 2003. Average total loans increased $114 million, or 12% on an annualized basis, over the average balance in the second quarter of 2004.

Other earning assets in the table include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities from the Wayne Hummer Companies. In the normal course of business, WHI activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various securities transactions. These activities may expose WHI to risk in the event the customer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations. WHI maintains cash and margin accounts for its customers, which are generally located in the Chicago, Illinois and Appleton, Wisconsin metropolitan areas of the Midwest.

WHI’s customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, WHI extends credit to its customers, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in customer’s accounts. In connection with these activities, WHI executes and clears customer transactions relating to the sale of securities not yet purchased, substantially all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to individual exchange regulations. Such transactions may expose WHI to off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in volatile trading markets, in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event the customer fails to satisfy its obligations, WHI may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customer’s obligations. WHI seeks to control the risks

35

associated with its customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. WHI monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires the customer to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.

WHI’s customer financing and securities settlement activities require WHI to pledge customer securities as collateral in support of various secured financing sources such as bank loans and securities loaned. In the event the counterparty is unable to meet its contractual obligation to return customer securities pledged as collateral, WHI may be exposed to the risk of acquiring the securities at prevailing market prices in order to satisfy its customer obligations. WHI attempts to control this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged on a daily basis and by requiring adjustments of collateral levels in the event of excess market exposure. In addition, WHI establishes credit limits for such activities and monitors compliance on a daily basis.

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:

	Average Balances for the
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2004					September 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Loans:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	1,826,958		38	%	$	1,387,681		38	%
Home equity		488,139		10			403,342		11
Residential real estate (1)		265,418		6			235,289		6
Premium finance receivables		833,672		17			604,127		16
Indirect auto loans		178,351		4			169,651		5
Tricom finance receivables		24,590		1			24,558		1
Consumer and other loans		71,404		1			56,669		2
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	3,688,532		77	%	$	2,881,317		79	%
Liquidity management assets (2)		1,047,334		22			731,383		20
Other earning assets (3)		38,045		1			38,943		1
Total average earning assets	$	4,773,911		100	%	$	3,651,643		100	%
Total average assets	$	5,200,458				$	3,975,136
Total average earning assets to total average assets				92	%				92	%

(1)	Includes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
(2)	Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
(3)	Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.

Total average earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, were $4.8 billion and increased $1.1 billion, or 31%, over the first nine months of 2003. The ratio of year-to-date total average earning assets to year-to date total average assets was 92% for each of the nine month periods, consistent with the range of this ratio on a quarterly basis as previously discussed. Loan growth fueled the Company’s year-to-date total earning asset growth in 2004. Total average loans increased $807 million, or 28%, for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period of 2003. Average commercial and commercial real estate loans increased 32%, home equity loans 21%, residential real estate loans 13% and premium finance receivables 38% in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the first nine months of 2003.

36

Deposits

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average deposit balances and the relative percentage of total average deposits for the periods presented:

	Average Balances for the
	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2004					June 30, 2004					September 30, 2003
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Non-interest bearing	$	432,695		10	%	$	375,986		9	%	$	330,623		10	%
NOW accounts		501,137		11			434,924		10			392,810		11
Wealth management deposits		351,572		8			338,268		8			268,670		8
Money market accounts		487,339		11			501,994		12			441,199		12
Savings accounts		181,583		4			191,508		5			161,434		5
Time certificates of deposits		2,430,479		56			2,362,688		56			1,868,332		54
Total average deposits	$	4,384,805		100	%	$	4,205,368		100	%	$	3,463,068		100	%

Total average deposits for the third quarter of 2004 were $4.38 billion, an increase of $922 million, or 27%, over the third quarter of 2003 and an increase of $179 million, or 17% on an annualized basis, over the second quarter of 2004. The percentage mix of average deposits for the third quarter of 2004 was relatively consistent with the deposit mix as of the prior period dates presented in the above table.

Total deposits at September 30, 2004, were $4.75 billion and increased $1.2 billion, or 35%, from September 30, 2003. The balances at September 30, 2004 include $294.7 million from Northview Bank, which was acquired on September 30, 2004. The deposits of Northview Bank did not have a significant impact on the quarterly average balances or the relative composition of the Company’s total deposits. See Note 5 on page 7 of this report for a summary of period end deposit balances.

As previously disclosed, following its acquisition of the Wayne Hummer Companies in February 2003, Wintrust undertook efforts to migrate funds from the money market mutual fund balances managed by Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company into FDIC-insured deposit accounts of the Wintrust Banks (included in “Wealth management deposits” in table above). Consistent with reasonable interest rate risk parameters, the funds have generally been invested in excess loan production of the Banks and FIFC as well as other investments suitable for banks. During 2003, the money market mutual fund balance was liquidated.

37

Other Funding Sources

Although deposits are the Company’s main source of funding its interest-earning asset growth, the Company’s ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer preferences and market competition. As a result, the Company uses several other funding sources to support the growth of its earning asset base. These sources include short-term borrowings, notes payable, FHLB advances, subordinated notes, trust preferred securities, the issuance of equity securities as well as the retention of earnings.

Average total interest-bearing funding, from sources other than deposits and including trust preferred securities, was $531 million in the third quarter of 2004, and increased $156 million compared to the third quarter of 2003 average balance of $375 million. These funding sources increased $44 million compared to the second quarter of 2004 average balance of $487 million.

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average other funding sources for the periods presented:

	Average Balances for the
	Three Months Ended
	September 30,		June 30,		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004		2004		2003
Notes payable	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	26,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		244,017		214,351		140,000
Other borrowings:
Federal funds purchased		24,644		13,462		36,662
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		52,961		32,949		27,548
Wayne Hummer Companies borrowings		16,534		13,245		14,349
Other		2,422		39,812		3,670
Total other borrowings		96,561		99,468		82,229
Subordinated notes		50,000		50,000		50,000
Long-term debt – trust preferred securities		139,838		122,105		76,816
Total other funding sources	$	531,416	$	486,924	$	375,045

The increases in the average balances of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2004, relate to the additional borrowing of $50 million during the second quarter of 2004. No additional FHLB advances were made during the third quarter of 2004, except for the $20.1 million of such advances outstanding at Northview Bank, which was acquired by Wintrust on September 30, 2004. At September 30, 2004, FHLB advances totaled $264.1 million. Wintrust initiated borrowing from the FHLB in 2001 and uses the funding resources available from the FHLB as part of its overall asset/liability and interest rate risk management process.

The Wayne Hummer Companies borrowings consist of demand obligations to third party banks primarily collateralized with customer assets to finance securities purchased by customers on margin and securities owned by WHI and demand obligations to brokers and clearing organizations. The Wayne Hummer Companies borrowings are at rates approximating fed funds. During the third quarter of 2004, WHI began to borrow such funds from its parent company, North Shore Bank, and since intercompany balances are eliminated in consolidation, the average balance of this funding source is expected to be zero in the fourth quarter.

Average other borrowings in the third quarter of 2004 reflect the interest bearing deferred purchase price related to the acquisition of the Wayne Hummer Companies. During the second quarter of 2004, this category also included borrowings by WestAmerica from a third party to fund its mortgage loans prior to their receipt of funds from the investors. In June 2004, WestAmerica paid off this borrowing and began to borrow such funds from Barrington Bank. At September 30, 2004, other borrowings also include a $2.0 million mortgage related to the main banking office of Northview Bank. This amount had no impact on the third quarter average balance.

38

The increase in the average balance of long-term debt – trust preferred securities in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2004, relates to the additional issuance of $40 million during the second quarter of 2004. No additional long-term debt – trust preferred securities were issued during the third quarter of 2004. However, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Northview Bank, Wintrust assumed $6.2 million of long-term debt – trust preferred sections issued by Northview Financial Corporation. This amount had no impact on the third quarter average balance.

See Notes 6 and 7 on pages 8 and 9 for period end balances of these other funding sources.

There were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Company’s contractual obligations during the third quarter of 2004.

Shareholders’ Equity

Total shareholders’ equity was $430 million at September 30, 2004 and increased $130 million since September 30, 2003 and $80 million since the end of 2003. Significant increases from December 31, 2003, include the retention of $37.2 million of earnings, offset by $4.1 million in dividend payments, the issuance of shares valued at $35.9 million in connection with business combinations, and $8.4 million from the issuance of shares pursuant to various stock compensation plans. In addition unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities and derivatives increased shareholders’ equity $2.3 million since December 31, 2003.

The annualized return on average equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was 13.46% as compared to 14.92% for the first nine months of 2003.

The following tables reflect various consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Bank for a bank holding company:

	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,
	2004			2004			2003
Leverage ratio		9.0	%		9.1	%		8.4	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		9.9			10.3			9.9
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		11.6			12.1			11.9
Total average equity-to-total average assets*		7.1			7.1			6.2

* based on quarterly average balances.

	Minimum
	Capital			Adequately			Well
	Requirements			Capitalized			Capitalized
Leverage ratio		3.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		4.0			4.0			6.0
Total risk-based capital ratio		8.0			8.0			10.0

The Company attempts to maintain an efficient capital structure in order to provide higher returns on equity. Additional capital is required from time to time, however, to support the growth of the organization. The issuance of additional common stock, additional trust preferred securities or subordinated notes are the primary forms of capital that are considered as the Company evaluates its capital position. The Company’s goal is to support the continued growth of its operating subsidiaries and to maintain its regulatory capital at the well-capitalized level with new issuances of these capital instruments.

The Company’s Board of Directors declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.10 per common share on in January 2004 and July 2004. The 2004 dividends represent a 25% increase over the semi-annual dividend declared in 2003. The annualized dividend payout ratio was 8.8% as of September 30, 2004 and 8.2% as of September 30, 2003.

39

ASSET QUALITY

Allowance for Loan Losses

A reconciliation of the activity in the balance of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented is shown below:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003			2004			2003
Balance at beginning of period	$	28,091		$	21,310		$	25,541		$	18,390
Provision for loan losses		1,258			2,909			5,020			8,402
Allowance acquired in business combination		2,534			—			2,534			—
Charge-offs:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		163			623			1,409			1,434
Home equity loans		—			159			—			159
Residential real estate loans		—			—			—			—
Consumer and other loans		10			22			184			152
Premium finance receivables		434			652			1,295			2,142
Indirect automobile loans		113			227			307			757
Tricom finance receivables		1			—			11			—
Total charge-offs		721			1,683			3,206			4,644
Recoveries:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		23			75			888			213
Home equity loans		—			—			6			—
Residential real estate loans		—			—			—			13
Consumer and other loans		14			8			92			32
Premium finance receivables		154			73			411			198
Indirect automobile loans		55			68			122			152
Tricom finance receivables		—			—			—			4
Total recoveries		246			224			1,519			612
Net charge-offs		(475	)		(1,459	)		(1,687	)		(4,032	)
Balance at September 30	$	31,408		$	22,760		$	31,408		$	22,760
Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		0.03	%		0.15	%		0.04	%		0.12	%
Home equity loans		—			0.15			—			0.05
Residential real estate loans		—			—			—			(0.01	)
Consumer and other loans		(0.02	)		0.10			0.17			0.28
Premium finance receivables		0.13			0.34			0.14			0.43
Indirect automobile loans		0.13			0.38			0.14			0.48
Tricom finance receivables		0.01			—			0.06			(0.02	)
Total loans		0.05	%		0.19	%		0.06	%		0.19	%
Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for loan losses		37.76	%		50.15	%		33.61	%		47.99	%
Loans at September 30							$	4,000,175		$	2,949,143
Allowance as a percentage of loans at period-end								0.79	%		0.77	%

Management believes that the loan portfolio is well diversified and well secured, without undue concentration in any specific risk area. Loan quality is continually monitored by management and is reviewed by the Banks’ Boards of Directors and their Credit Committees on a monthly basis. Independent external review of the loan portfolio is provided by the examinations conducted by regulatory authorities and an independent loan review performed by an entity engaged by the Board of Directors. Management evaluates on a quarterly basis a variety of factors, including actual charge-offs during the period, historical loss experience, delinquent and other potential problem loans, and economic conditions and trends in the market area in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

40

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to cover losses inherent in the portfolio and is based on an assessment of individual problem loans, actual and anticipated loss experience and other pertinent factors. The allowance for loan losses consists of an allocated and unallocated component. The Company reviews potential problem loans on a case-by-case basis to allocate a specific dollar amount of reserves, whereas all other loans are reserved for based on assigned reserve percentages evaluated by loan groupings. The loan groupings utilized by the Company are commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate, home equity, premium finance receivables, indirect automobile, Tricom finance receivables and consumer. The reserve percentages applied to these loan groups attempts to account for the inherent risk in the portfolio based upon various factors including industry concentration, geographical concentrations, local and national economic indicators, levels of delinquencies, historical loss experience, changes in trends in risk ratings assigned to loans, changes in underwriting standards and other pertinent factors. The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses reflects management’s estimate of probable inherent but undetected losses within the portfolio due to uncertainties in economic conditions, delays in obtaining information, including unfavorable information about a borrower’s financial condition, the difficulty in identifying triggering events that correlate perfectly to subsequent loss rates, and risk factors that have not yet manifested themselves in loss allocation factors. Management believes the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses is necessary due to the imprecision inherent in estimating expected future credit losses. The amount of future additions to the allowance for loan losses will be dependent upon growth in the loan portfolio, amount of charge-offs, as well as the economy, changes in real estate values, interest rates, the regulatory environment, the level of past-due and non-performing loans, and other factors. (See “Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets” below).

The provision for loan losses totaled $1.3 million for the third quarter of 2004, and decreased $1.7 million compared to the third quarter of 2003. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, net charge-offs totaled $475,000, a decrease of $984,000 from the $1.5 million of net charge-offs recorded in the same period of 2003. On a ratio basis, annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans decreased to 0.05% in the third quarter of 2004 from 0.19% in the same period in 2003. On a year-to-date basis, the provision for loan losses totaled $5.0 million for the first nine months of 2004, and decreased $3.4 million over the same period last year. Net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2004 were $1.7 million, and decreased $2.3 million, or 58%, compared to the $4.0 million recorded in the same period last year. On a ratio basis, annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans decreased to 0.06% for the first nine months of 2004 from 0.19% in the first nine months of 2003. The lower provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2004 and for the first nine months of 2004, compared to the same periods of 2003, is primarily the result of an improving level of non-performing loans and a significant reduction in the level of net charge-offs.

The allowance for loan losses increased $5.9 million from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004. This increase includes $2.5 million in allowance for loan losses acquired in the acquisition of Northview Bank on September 30, 2004. The allowance for loan losses increased $3.3 million as a result of the excess of the provision for loan losses over the period’s net charge-off. This increase relates to growth in the commercial and commercial real estate portfolio during this period (excluding the Northview Bank loans) of $355 million, or 29% on an annualized basis, and growth in the premium finance receivables portfolio of $18 million, or 3% on an annualized basis, as well as an increase in the performing loans on the Company’s Watch List from $27.4 million at December 31, 2003 to $46.9 million at September 30, 2004. Northview Bank contributed $8.8 million to the total performing loans on the Company’s Watch List at September 30, 2004. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.79% at September 30, 2004 compared to 0.77% at September 30, 2003. The commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and the premium finance portfolio have traditionally experienced the highest levels of charge-offs by the Company, along with losses related to the indirect automobile portfolio. The level of the allowance for loan losses was not impacted significantly by changes in the amount or credit risk associated with the indirect automobile loan portfolio as that portfolio has declined by $12 million, or 7%, since September 30, 2003, and improvements have been realized in the delinquencies, underwriting standards and collection routines involving the indirect auto loan portfolio.

41

Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets

The following table sets forth the Company’s non-performing assets as of the dates presented:

	September 30,			June 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2004			2003			2003
Past Due greater than 90 days and still accruing:
Residential real estate and home equity	$	166		$	—		$	—		$	80
Commercial, consumer and other		128			662			1,024			981
Premium finance receivables		2,971			3,627			3,439			3,210
Indirect automobile loans		312			204			313			294
Tricom finance receivables		—			—			—			—
Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing		3,577			4,493			4,776			4,565
Non-accrual loans:
Residential real estate and home equity		892			448			3,217			40
Commercial, consumer and other		5,954			3,925			9,646			3,190
Premium finance receivables		7,281			5,678			5,994			6,306
Indirect automobile loans		145			137			107			89
Tricom finance receivables		—			—			—			6
Total non-accrual loans		14,272			10,188			18,964			9,631
Total non-performing loans:
Residential real estate and home equity		1,058			448			3,217			120
Commercial, consumer and other		6,082			4,587			10,670			4,171
Premium finance receivables		10,252			9,305			9,433			9,516
Indirect automobile loans		457			341			420			383
Tricom finance receivables		—			—			—			6
Total non-performing loans		17,849			14,681			23,740			14,196
Other real estate owned		1,622			1,819			368			501
Total non-performing assets	$	19,471		$	16,500		$	24,108		$	14,697
Total non-performing loans by category as a percentage of its own respective category:
Residential real estate and home equity		0.14	%		0.07	%		0.48	%		0.02	%
Commercial, consumer and other		0.27			0.23			0.63			0.28
Premium finance receivables		1.34			1.18			1.26			1.40
Indirect automobile loans		0.26			0.19			0.24			0.23
Tricom finance receivables		—			—			—			0.02
Total non-performing loans		0.45	%		0.40	%		0.72	%		0.48	%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		0.33	%		0.31	%		0.51	%		0.34	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans		175.97	%		191.34	%		107.59	%		160.33	%

The information in the table should be read in conjunction with the detailed discussion following the table.

42

Non-performing Residential Real Estate, Commercial, Consumer and Other Loans

Total non-performing loans for Wintrust’s residential real estate, commercial, consumer and other loans were $7.1 million at September 30, 2004, reflecting an increase of $2.8 million from the level at September 30, 2003 and a decrease of $6.8 million from the $13.9 million reported at December 31, 2003. The September 30, 2004 balance of $7.1 million includes $2.0 million of non-performing loans in Northview Bank’s portfolio. The non-performing loans in these categories consist primarily of a small number of commercial, residential real estate and home equity loans, which management believes are well secured and in the process of collection. The small number of such non-performing loans allows management to monitor the status of these credits and work with the borrowers to resolve these problems effectively.

Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables

The table below presents the level of non-performing premium finance receivables as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the amount of net charge-offs for the nine months then ended.

	September 30,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2004			2003
Non-performing premium finance receivables	$	10,252		$	9,516
- as a percent of premium finance receivables		1.34	%		1.40	%
Net charge-offs of premium finance receivables	$	884		$	1,944
- annualized as a percent of premium finance receivables		0.14	%		0.43	%

The level of non-performing premium finance receivables as a percent of total premium finance receivables at September 30, 2004, of 1.34%, is down slightly from the September 30, 2003 level of 1.40%, but up compared to the 1.26% reported at December 31, 2003. As noted below, fluctuations in this category may occur due to the timing and nature of account collections from insurance carriers. Management is comfortable with administering the collections at this level of non-performing premium finance receivables and expects such ratios will remain at relatively low levels.

The ratio of non-performing premium finance receivables fluctuates throughout the year due to the nature and timing of canceled account collections from insurance carriers. Due to the nature of collateral for premium finance receivables it customarily takes 60-150 days to convert the collateral into cash collections. Accordingly, the level of non-performing premium finance receivables is not necessarily indicative of the loss inherent in the portfolio. In the event of default, Wintrust has the power to cancel the insurance policy and collect the unearned portion of the premium from the insurance carrier. In the event of cancellation, the cash returned in payment of the unearned premium by the insurer should generally be sufficient to cover the receivable balance, the interest and other charges due. Due to notification requirements and processing time by most insurance carriers, many receivables will become delinquent beyond 90 days while the insurer is processing the return of the unearned premium. Management continues to accrue interest until maturity as the unearned premium is ordinarily sufficient to pay-off the outstanding balance and contractual interest due.

Non-performing Indirect Automobile Loans

Total non-performing indirect automobile loans were $457,000 at September 30, 2004, up slightly from $420,000 at December 31, 2003 and from $383,000 at September 30, 2003. The ratio of these non-performing loans to total indirect automobile loans was 0.26% at September 30, 2004, 0.24% at December 31, 2003, and 0.23% at September 30, 2003. As noted in the Allowance for Loan Losses table, net charge-offs as a percent of total average indirect automobile loans was 0.13% in the third quarter of 2004 and 0.38% in the third quarter of 2003, and 0.14% and 0.48% for the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The level of non-performing and net charge-offs of indirect automobile loans continues to be below standard industry ratios for this type of lending. Due to the impact of the current economic and competitive environment surrounding this type of lending, management continues to de-emphasize, in relation to other loan categories, growth in the indirect automobile loan portfolio. Indirect automobile loans were $178 million, or 4.5% of the Company’s loan portfolio, at September 30, 2004, and $167 million, or 5.6% of the loan portfolio, at September 30, 2003.

43

Potential Problem Loans

Management believes that any loan where there are serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms should be identified as a non-performing loan and should be included in the disclosure of “Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets” in the previous section. Accordingly, at the periods presented in this report, the Company has no potential problem loans as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.

Credit Quality Review Procedures

The Company utilizes a loan rating system to assign risk to loans and utilizes that risk rating system to assist in developing an internal problem loan identification system (“Watch List”). The Watch List is used to monitor the credits as well as a means of reporting non-performing and potential problem loans. At each scheduled meeting of the Boards of Directors of the Banks and the Wintrust Board, a Watch List is presented, showing all loans that are non-performing and loans that may warrant additional monitoring. Accordingly, in addition to those loans disclosed under “Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets,” there are certain loans in the portfolio which management has identified, through its Watch List, which exhibit a higher than normal credit risk. These credits are reviewed individually by management to determine whether any specific reserve amount should be allocated to each respective credit. However, these loans are still performing and, accordingly, are not included in non-performing loans. Management’s philosophy is to be proactive and conservative in assigning risk ratings to loans and identifying loans to be on the Watch List. The principal amount of loans on the Company’s Watch List (exclusive of those loans reported as non-performing) as of September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003, were $46.9 million, $27.4 million and $37.8 million, respectively. The September 30, 2004, amount includes $8.8 million of such loans acquired with Northview Bank.

LIQUIDITY

Wintrust manages the liquidity position of its banking operations to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet customers’ needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. The liquidity to meet the demand is provided by maturing assets, sales of premium finance receivables, liquid assets that can be converted to cash, and the ability to attract funds from external sources. Liquid assets refer to federal funds sold and to marketable, unpledged securities, which can be quickly sold without material loss of principal.

Please refer to the Interest-Earning Assets, Deposits, Other Funding Sources and Shareholders’ Equity discussions of this report for additional information regarding the Company’s liquidity position.

INFLATION

A banking organization’s assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of inflation do not have as great an impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at the same percentage as does inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the Company. An analysis of the Company’s asset and liability structure provides the best indication of how the organization is positioned to respond to changing interest rates. See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks” section of this report.

44

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to anticipated improvements in financial performance and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations and financial condition from expected development or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including anticipated internal growth, plans to form additionalde novobanks and to open new branch offices, and to pursue additional potential development or the acquisition of banks, specialty finance or fee-related businesses. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:

• The level of reported net income, return on average assets and return on average equity for the Company will in the near term continue to be impacted by start-up costs associated withde novobank formations, branch openings, and expanded trust and investment operations.De novobanks may typically require 13 to 24 months of operations before becoming profitable, due to the impact of organizational and overhead expenses, the start-up phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. Similarly the expansion of wealth management services through the Company’s acquisitions of the Wayne Hummer Companies and Lake Forest Capital Management will depend on the successful integration of these businesses.

• The Company’s success to date has been and will continue to be strongly influenced by its ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services.

• Although management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb losses that may develop in the existing portfolio of loans and leases, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual loan or lease losses.

• If market interest rates should move contrary to the Company’s gap position on interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, the “gap” will work against the Company and its net interest income may be negatively affected.

• The financial services business is highly competitive which may affect the pricing of the Company’s loan and deposit products as well as its services.

• The Company may not be able to successfully adapt to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace.

• Unforeseen future events that may cause slower than anticipated development and growth of the Tricom business and/or changes in the temporary staffing industry.

• Changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors, may influence the anticipated growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of the loan portfolio and the pricing of loans and deposits and may affect the Company’s ability to successfully pursue acquisition and expansion strategies.

• The conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally, as well as unforeseen future events surrounding the wealth management business, including competition and related pricing of brokerage, trust and asset management products.

• Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the integration of Advantage National Bancorp, Inc. and Village Bancorp, Inc.

• Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Company’s newestde novo bank, Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A.

• Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the integration of SGB Corporation and Guardian Real Estate Services into and with the Company.

• Unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the integration of Northview Financial Corporation and Town Bancshares, Ltd.

• Unforeseen difficulties in completing the pending acquisitions of Antioch Holding Company, as well as the integration of its operating subsidiary, State Bank of The Lakes, with and into the Company.

45

ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

As a continuing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in conjunction with the boards of directors of the Banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk Management Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The policy establishes guidelines for acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates.

Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Company’s interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The Company continuously monitors not only the organization’s current net interest margin, but also the historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse swings in net interest income in future years, as a result of interest rate movements, by performing simulation analysis of potential interest rate environments. If a potential adverse swing in net interest margin and/or net income is identified, management then would take appropriate actions with its asset-liability structure to counter these potentially adverse situations. Please refer to earlier sections of this discussion and analysis for further discussion of the net interest margin.

Since the Company’s primary source of interest bearing liabilities is customer deposits, the Company’s ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the Company operates. The rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Company’s interest earning assets result primarily from the Company’s strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an acceptable interest rate spread.

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the Risk Management Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Banks and the Company. The objective is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income. Tools used by management include a standard gap analysis and a rate simulation model whereby changes in net interest income are measured in the event of various changes in interest rate indices. An institution with more assets than liabilities re-pricing over a given time frame is considered asset sensitive and will generally benefit from rising rates, and conversely, a higher level of re-pricing liabilities versus assets would be beneficial in a declining rate environment.

Standard gap analysis starts with contractual re-pricing information for assets, liabilities and derivative financial instruments. These items are then combined with re-pricing estimations for administered rate (NOW, savings and money market accounts) and non-rate related products (demand deposit accounts, other assets, other liabilities). These estimations recognize the relative insensitivity of these accounts to changes in market interest rates, as demonstrated through current and historical experiences. Also included are estimates for those items that are likely to materially change their payment structures in different rate environments, including residential loan products, certain commercial and commercial real estate loans and certain mortgage-related securities. Estimates for these sensitivities are based on industry assessments and are substantially driven by the differential between the contractual coupon of the item and current market rates for similar products.

46

The following table illustrates the Company’s estimated interest rate sensitivity and periodic and cumulative gap positions as of September 30, 2004:

	Time to Maturity or Repricing
	0-90			91-365			1-5			Over 5
(Dollars in thousands)	Days			Days			Years			Years			Total
Assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements	$	255,885			—			—			—			255,885
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		19,736			—			—			—			19,736
Available-for-sale securities		118,164			80,345			411,251			319,065			928,825
Total liquidity management assets		393,785			80,345			411,251			319,065			1,204,446
Loans, net of unearned income (1)		2,775,540			630,806			631,834			42,069			4,080,249
Other earning assets		37,270			—			—			—			37,270
Total earning assets		3,206,595			711,151			1,043,085			361,134			5,321,965
Other non-earning assets		—			—			—			495,321			495,321
Total assets (RSA)	$	3,206,595			711,151			1,043,085			856,455			5,817,286
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing deposits (2)	$	2,141,361			971,433			1,162,405			27,051			4,302,250
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		14,001			14,527			96,176			139,400			264,104
Notes payable and other borrowings		45,043			—			—			—			45,043
Subordinated note		50,000			—			—			—			50,000
Long-term Debt – Trust Preferred Securities		87,630			—			6,394			52,441			146,465
Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,338,035			985,960			1,264,975			218,892			4,807,862
Demand deposits		—			—			—			449,343			449,343
Other liabilities		—			—			—			129,928			129,928
Shareholders’ equity		—			—			—			430,153			430,153
Effect of derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate swap (Company pays fixed, receives floating)		(25,000	)		—			5,000			20,000			—
Interest rate swap (Company pays floating, receives fixed)		31,050			—			—			(31,050	)		—
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity including effect of derivative financial instruments (RSL)	$	2,344,085			985,960			1,269,975			1,217,266			5,817,286
Re-pricing gap (RSA – RSL)	$	862,510			(274,809	)		(226,890	)		(360,811	)
Cumulative re-pricing gap	$	862,510			587,701			360,811			—
Cumulative RSA/Cumulative RSL		137	%		118	%		108	%
Cumulative RSA/Total assets		55	%		67	%		85	%
Cumulative RSL/Total assets		40	%		57	%		79	%
Cumulative GAP/Total assets		15	%		10	%		6	%
Cumulative GAP/Cumulative RSA		27	%		15	%		7	%

(1)	Loans, net of unearned income, include mortgages held-for-sale and non-accrual loans.
(2)	Non-contractual interest-bearing deposits are subject to immediate withdrawal and, therefore, are included in 0-90 days.

47

While the gap position and related ratios illustrated in the table are useful tools that management can use to assess the general positioning of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ balance sheets, it is only as of a point in time. Management uses an additional measurement tool to evaluate its asset-liability sensitivity that determines exposure to changes in interest rates by measuring the percentage change in net interest income due to changes in interest rates over a two-year time horizon. Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates using many different interest rate scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized is to measure the percentage change in net interest income assuming an instantaneous permanent parallel shift in the yield curve of 200 basis points, both upward and downward. Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk of the Company, expressed as a percentage change in net interest income over a two-year time horizon due to changes in interest rates, at September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003, is as follows:

	+ 200 Basis			- 200 Basis
	Points			Points
Percentage change in net interest income due to an immediate 200 basis point shift in the yield curve:
September 30, 2004		13.9	%		(17.1	)%
December 31, 2003		5.9	%		(27.7	)%
September 30, 2003		11.6	%		(31.1	)%

Due to the low rate environment at September 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003, the 200 basis point instantaneous permanent downward parallel shift in the yield curve impacted a majority of the rate sensitive assets by the entire 200 basis points, while certain interest-bearing deposits were already at their floor, or repriced downward significantly less than 200 basis points.

These results are based solely on a permanent parallel shift in the yield curve and do not reflect the net interest income sensitivity that may arise from other factors, such as changes in the shape of the yield curve or the change in spread between key market rates. The above results are conservative estimates due to the fact that no management actions to mitigate potential changes in net interest income are included in this simulation process. These management actions could include, but would not be limited to, delaying a change in deposit rates, extending the maturities of liabilities, the use of derivative financial instruments, changing the pricing characteristics of loans or modifying the growth rate of certain types of assets or liabilities.

One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments with similar characteristics. The Company entered into two interest rate swap contracts in the fourth quarter of 2002. A $25 million notional principal amount swap was entered into to convert a $25 million newly issued subordinated note from variable-rate to fixed-rate. The swap matures in 2012, and the notional principal amount is reduced $5.0 million annually, beginning in 2008, to match the principal reductions on the subordinated note. Additionally, a $31.05 million interest rate swap contract was entered into to convert the Company’s 9% Trust Preferred Securities from fixed-rate to variable-rate. This swap has a termination date of September 30, 2028, and provides the counterparty with a call option on any date on or after September 30, 2003. The call option in the swap coincides with the Company’s call option in the trust preferred securities. As of September 30, 2004, neither the swap counterparty nor the Company exercised its call options on the swap and trust preferred securities, respectively. All of the Company’s interest rate swap contracts qualify as perfect hedges pursuant to SFAS 133.

48

During the first nine months of 2004, the Company also entered into certain covered call option transactions related to certain securities held by the Company. The Company uses the covered call option transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such as interest rate floors) to mitigate the effects of an asset-sensitive balance sheet in a falling rate environment and increase the total return associated with the related securities. Although the revenue received from the covered call options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income, the increased return attributable to the related securities from these covered call options contributes to the Company’s overall profitability in a falling rate environment. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk may be effected by these transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate term debt or use financial derivative instruments. During the first nine months of 2004, the Company also entered into certain put options on securities deemed appropriate for the Banks’ investment portfolios. There were no call or put options outstanding as of September 30, 2004.

ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under their supervision, with the participation of other members of management as they deemed appropriate, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as contemplated by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in all material respects, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the periodic reports the Company is required to file and submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

49

PART II – Other Information

Item 1: Legal Proceedings.

This item has been omitted from this Form 10-Q since it is inapplicable or would contain a negative response.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 450,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the repurchase agreement that was publicly announced on January 27, 2000 (the (“Program”). Unless terminated earlier by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Program will expire when the Company has repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase thereunder. No shares were repurchased in the third quarter of 2004. As of September 30, 2004, 85,950 shares may yet be repurchased under the Program.

Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None

Item 5: Other Information.

None.

Item 6: Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement (No. 333-18699) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24, 1996).
3.2	Statement of Resolution Establishing Series of Junior Serial Preferred Stock A of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
3.3	Amended and Restated By-laws of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.)
4.1	Rights Agreement between Wintrust Financial Corporation and Illinois Stock Transfer Company, as Rights Agent, dated July 28, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-A Registration Statement (No. 000-21923) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 1998).
4.2	Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the Commission upon request.

50

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
32.1	Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.

51

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)

Date: November 9, 2004	/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

52

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement (No. 333-18699) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24, 1996).
3.2	Statement of Resolution Establishing Series of Junior Serial Preferred Stock A of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
3.3	Amended and Restated By-laws of Wintrust Financial Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
4.1	Rights Agreement between Wintrust Financial Corporation and Illinois Stock Transfer Company, as Rights Agent, dated July 28, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-A Registration Statement (No. 000-21923) filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on August 28, 1998).
4.2	Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the Commission upon request.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.
32.1	Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003.

53