SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Presentation | |
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aware, Inc. and its subsidiary (“the Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates – The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates included in the financial statements pertain to revenue recognition, reserves for doubtful accounts, useful lives of fixed assets, valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets, and accrued liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements - The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification defines fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to the unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the FASB Codification are: i) Level 1 – valuations that are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date; ii) Level 2 – valuations that are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and iii) Level 3 – valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, which primarily include money market mutual funds, were $44.0 million and $72.7 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. We classified our cash equivalents of $34.3 million and $68.6 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. |
|
Our investments, which consist of high yield corporate debt securities, are also classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. Debt securities with maturities greater than one year are classified as long term assets. We categorize our investments as available-for-sale securities, and carry them at fair value in our financial statements. We had $1.4 million and $2.8 million of available-for-sale investments as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. |
|
As of December 31, 2014, our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and whose carrying values approximate their respective fair values include the following (in thousands): |
|
| | Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2014 Using: | |
| | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant Other | | | Significant Unobservable | |
Active Markets for | Observable Inputs | Inputs |
Identical Assets | | |
| | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
Corporate debt securities | | $ | 1,428 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents) | | | 34,339 | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 35,767 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
|
|
| | Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2013 Using: | |
| | Quoted Prices in | | | | | | Significant Unobservable | |
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Inputs |
Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | |
| | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
Corporate debt securities | | $ | 2,754 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents) | | | 68,556 | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 71,310 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents, which consist primarily of money market funds and demand deposits, are stated at fair value. All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Our cash balances exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company does not believe it is exposed to significant credit risk related to cash and cash equivalents. |
Investments | Investments - At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we categorized all investment securities as available-for-sale, since we may liquidate these investments currently. In calculating realized gains and losses, cost is determined using specific identification. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of stockholders’ equity called Accumulated Comprehensive Income. |
|
Realized losses on investments were $59,000 in the year ended December 31, 2014. Realized gains on investments were $23,000 and $85,000 in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Unrealized gains on investments were $162,000 in the year ended December 31, 2014. Unrealized losses on investments were $156,000, and $30,000 in the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012. |
|
The amortized cost of our corporate debt securities was $1.5 million at December 31, 2014. Corporate debt securities comprising investments mature in 2017 and 2018. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Accounts are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts as they are deemed uncollectible based on a periodic review of the accounts. |
Inventories | Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. We evaluate all inventories for net realizable value on a quarterly basis, and record provisions for excess and obsolete inventory when required. There was no reserve for excess and obsolete inventory as of December 31, 2014. |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment – Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Upon retirement or sale, the costs of the assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss on disposal is included in the determination of income or loss. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. |
|
The estimated useful lives of assets used by us are: |
Building | 30 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Building improvements | 5 to 20 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | 5 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer, office & manufacturing equipment | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchased software | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets – We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets over their estimated economic life to the related carrying value of those assets to determine if the assets are impaired. If an impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value. The cash flow estimates used to identify the potential impairment reflect our best estimates using appropriate assumptions and projections at that time. We believe that no significant impairment of our long-lived assets has occurred as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition – We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured, and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. |
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement: We use contracts signed by both the customer and us or written purchase orders issued by the customer as evidence of an arrangement. |
|
Product delivery: We deem delivery to have occurred: (i) upon shipment when products are shipped FOB shipping point, or (ii) upon delivery at a customer’s location when products are shipped FOB destination, or (iii) when software is delivered electronically. If customer acceptance provisions apply, revenue is not recognized until delivery has occurred and we have received such acceptance. If we are required to provide installation services, revenue is not recognized until installation is complete. |
|
Fixed or determinable fee: We consider fees to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and the payment terms are within normal established practices. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, we recognize the revenue as amounts become due and payable. |
|
Collection is deemed probable: We conduct a credit review for significant transactions at the time of the arrangement to determine the credit-worthiness of the customer. Collection is deemed probable if we expect that the customer will pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. |
|
We categorize revenue as software licenses, software maintenance, services, hardware, or royalties. In addition to the general revenue recognition policies described above, specific revenue recognition policies apply to each category of revenue. |
|
Software licenses |
Software licenses consist of revenue from the sale of software licenses for biometrics and imaging applications. Our software licenses typically provide customers with the right to use our software in perpetuity. We recognize revenue from software licenses upon delivery when licenses are sold in single element arrangements, because we have no post-delivery obligations, including contractual or implied Post Contract Support (“PCS”). |
|
Software maintenance |
Software maintenance consists of revenue from the sale of software maintenance contracts for biometrics and imaging software. Software maintenance contracts entitle customers to receive software support and software updates, if and when they become available, during the term of the maintenance contract. We recognize software maintenance revenue ratably over the related contract period. |
|
Services |
Service revenue consists of fees from biometrics customers for software engineering services we provide to them. We recognize services revenue as services are delivered when services are sold in single element arrangements. |
|
Hardware |
Hardware revenue consists of sales of biometrics equipment to a single U.S. government customer. We recognize hardware revenue upon delivery and acceptance of the equipment by the customer. |
|
Royalties |
Royalties consist primarily of royalty payments we receive under DSL silicon contracts with two customers that incorporate our silicon intellectual property (“IP”) in their DSL chipsets. We sold the assets of our DSL IP business in 2009, but we continue to receive royalty payments from these customers. Royalties are reported in continuing operations in accordance with ASC 205, Reporting Discontinued Operations, because we have continuing ongoing cash flows from this business. |
|
Since we cannot reasonably estimate royalty revenue, such revenue is recognized in the quarter in which a final report is received from a customer. Royalty reports are typically received in the quarter immediately following the quarter in which sales of royalty-bearing products occur. |
|
Multiple element arrangements with software and software related elements |
In addition to selling software licenses, software maintenance and software services in single element arrangements, we also sell these three products as part of multiple element arrangements. We apply the provisions of ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, to these arrangements because all the elements are software or software related. The various combinations of multiple element arrangements and our revenue recognition for each are described as follows: |
|
| ● | Software licenses and software maintenance. When software licenses and software maintenance contracts are sold together, we recognize software license revenue upon delivery, provided we have vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) for the fair value of the maintenance contract fee, and we recognize the fair value of maintenance contract revenue ratably over the related contract period. Under ASC 985-605, the residual method is the appropriate manner in which to allocate arrangement consideration to the license when VSOE exists for all undelivered elements (e.g., PCS), but not for the delivered element (e.g., the license). | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| ● | Software licenses and services. When software licenses and software engineering services are sold together, the total fee is generally recognized by applying contract accounting. We have adopted the percentage-of-completion method of contract accounting, and we generally use an input method (i.e., labor hours) to determine our completion percentage. The software license portion of the arrangement is classified as software license revenue and the engineering services portion is classified as services revenue in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| ● | Software licenses, software maintenance and services. When we sell software licenses, software maintenance and software services together, revenue is recognized as follows: i) software maintenance revenue is separated from the other two elements and is recognized ratably over the related software maintenance contract period; provided we have VSOE for the fair value of the maintenance element; and ii) the total fee from the software license and engineering service elements is recognized by applying the contract accounting method described in the previous paragraph. | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Multiple element arrangement with hardware and software elements |
We also have a multiple element arrangement with one customer that involves the delivery of hardware, software maintenance, and software services. We determined that these elements qualified as separate units of accounting under ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, because they have value to the customer on a standalone basis. We recognize revenue from this arrangement as follows: i) hardware revenue is recognized upon delivery and acceptance of the equipment by the customer; ii) maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the related contract period; and iii) service revenue is recognized as services are delivered. |
Income Taxes | |
Income Taxes – We compute deferred income taxes based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We establish a valuation allowance to offset temporary deductible differences, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. |
|
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the tax position. The evaluation of an uncertain tax position is based on factors that include, but are not limited to, changes in the tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. Any changes to these estimates, based on the actual results obtained and/or a change in assumptions, could impact our tax provision in future periods. Interest and penalty charges, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits would be classified as a provision for income tax in the statement of income. |
Capitalization of Software Costs | Capitalization of Software Costs – We capitalize certain internally developed software development costs after technological feasibility of the product has been established. No software costs were capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, because such costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility, but prior to commercial availability, were immaterial. |
Research and Development Costs | Research and Development Costs – Costs incurred in the research and development of our products are expensed as incurred. |
Concentration of Credit Risk | Concentration of Credit Risk – At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents, in excess of federally insured deposit limits of approximately $43.7 million and $72.4 million, respectively. |
|
Concentration of credit risk with respect to net accounts receivable consisted of amounts owed by the following customers that comprised more than 10% of net accounts receivable at December 31: |
|
| | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | | |
| Customer A | | | 18 | % | | | 60 | % | | | |
| Customer B | | | 15 | % | | | - | % | | | |
| Customer C | | | 11 | % | | | - | % | | | |
|
Concentration of credit risk with respect to our investment portfolio consisted of $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million with three issuers of corporate debt securities, respectively, at December 31, 2014, and $0.8 million, $0.5 million, $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million with five issuers of corporate debt securities, respectively, at December 31, 2013. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation – We grant stock and stock options to our employees and directors. We measure stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. |
|
For stock awards, we determine the fair value of the award by using the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant; provided the number of shares in the grant is fixed on the grant date. |
|
For stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of the award. This valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant assumptions. The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected term, the expected volatility of our stock over the expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the expected term, and our expected annual dividend yield. |
Computation of Earnings per Share | Computation of Earnings per Share – Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. For the purposes of this calculation, stock options are considered common stock equivalents in periods in which they have a dilutive effect. Stock options that are antidilutive are excluded from the calculation. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. The carrying amount of investments is based on the fair value of the individual securities in our investment portfolio. |
Advertising Costs | Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were not material for 2014, 2013, and 2012. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU is the result of a joint project by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) that would: remove inconsistencies and weaknesses, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, jurisdictions, industries, and capital markets, improve disclosure requirements and resulting financial statements, and simplify the presentation of financial statements. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. |
|
With the exception of the new revenue standard discussed above, there have been no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that are of significance or potential significance to us that we have not adopted as of December 31, 2014. |
|
Reclassifications | Reclassifications - Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with the current period presentation. |
Segments | Segments – We organize ourselves into a single segment reporting to the chief operating decision makers. We have sales outside of the United States, which are described in Note 10. All long-lived assets are maintained in the United States. |