The use of these strategies involves certain special risks, including a possible imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between price movements of derivative instruments and price movements of related investments. While some strategies involving derivative instruments can reduce the risk of loss, they can also reduce the opportunity for gain or even result in losses by offsetting favorable price movements in related investments or otherwise, due to the possible inability of a Portfolio to purchase or sell a portfolio security at a time that otherwise would be favorable or the possible need to sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time because the Portfolio is required to maintain asset coverage or offsetting positions in connection with transactions in derivative instruments. Additional associated risks from investing in derivatives also exist and potentially could have significant effects on the valuation of the derivative and a Portfolio. Associated risks are not the risks that a Portfolio is attempting to increase or decrease exposure to, per their investment objectives, but are the additional risks from investing in derivatives. Examples of these associated risks are liquidity risk, which is the risk that a Portfolio will not be able to sell the derivative in the open market in a timely manner, and counterparty credit risk, which is the risk that the counterparty will not fulfill its obligation to a Portfolio. Associated risks can be different for each type of derivative and are discussed by each derivative type in the following notes.
Each Portfolio may enter into futures contracts involving foreign currency, interest rates, securities and security indices. A futures contract is a commitment to buy or sell a specific amount of a financial instrument at a negotiated price on a stipulated future date. Each Portfolio may buy and sell futures contracts. Futures contracts traded on a commodities or futures exchange will be valued at the final settlement price or official closing price on the principal exchange as reported by such principal exchange at its trading session ending at, or most recently prior to, the time when the Portfolio’s assets are valued.
Upon entering into a futures contract, each Portfolio is required to deposit either cash or securities (initial margin) in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the Portfolio each day. The variation margin payments are equal to the daily changes in the contract value and are recorded as unrealized gains and losses. Open futures contracts are reported on a table following each Summary Portfolio of Investments. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover initial margin requirements on open futures contracts are footnoted in the Summary Portfolio of Investments. Cash collateral held by the broker to cover initial margin requirements on open futures contracts are noted in each Portfolio’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation is reported in each Portfolio’s Statement of Operations. Realized gains (losses) are reported in each Portfolio’s Statement of Operations at the closing or expiration of futures contracts.
Futures contracts are exposed to the market risk factor of the underlying financial instrument. During six months ended June 30, 2013, each Portfolio has purchased futures contracts on various equity indices to “equitize” cash. Futures contracts are purchased to provide immediate market exposure proportionate to the size of the Portfolio’s respective cash flows and residual cash balances in order to decrease potential tracking error if the cash remained uninvested in the market. Additional associated risks of entering into futures contracts include the possibility that there may be an illiquid market where the Portfolios are unable to liquidate the contract or enter into an offsetting position and, if used for hedging purposes, the risk that the price of the contract will correlate imperfectly with the prices of the Portfolios’ securities. With futures, there is minimal counterparty credit risk to the
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Portfolios since futures are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures against default.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, Index Plus LargeCap, Index Plus MidCap, and Index Plus SmallCap had average notional values on futures contracts purchased of $6,597,648, $6,277,160 and $1,932,070, respectively.
I. Securities Lending. Each Portfolio may temporarily loan up to 33 1/3% of its total assets to brokers, dealers or other financial institutions in exchange for a negotiated lender’s fee. The borrower is required to fully collateralize the loans with cash or U.S. government securities. Generally, in the event of counterparty default, each Portfolio has the right to use collateral to offset losses incurred. There would be potential loss to a Portfolio in the event the Portfolio is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral. Each Portfolio bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral with the following exception: The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY”) provides each portfolio indemnification from loss with respect to the investment of collateral provided that the cash collateral is invested solely in overnight repurchase agreements. Engaging in securities lending could have a leveraging effect, which may intensify the credit, market and other risks associated with investing in a Portfolio.
J. Restricted Securities. Each Portfolio may invest in restricted securities, which include those sold under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) or securities offered pursuant to Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and/or are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale and may not be publicly sold without registration under the 1933 Act. Restricted securities are valued using market quotations when readily available. In the absence of market quotations, the securities are valued based upon their fair value, as defined in the Act, determined under procedures approved by the Board.
K. Indemnifications. In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that provide certain indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Portfolios and, therefore, cannot be estimated; however, based on experience, management considers risk of loss from such claims remote.
NOTE 3 — INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the cost of purchases and the proceeds from the sale of securities, excluding short-term securities, were as follows:
| | | | Purchases
| | Sales
|
---|
| | | | $ | 267,853,829 | | | $ | 317,901,584 | |
| | | | | 241,726,004 | | | | 275,133,060 | |
| | | | | 81,472,317 | | | | 94,737,958 | |
NOTE 4 — INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
The Portfolios entered into an investment management agreement (“Investment Management Agreement”) with the Investment Adviser. The Investment Management Agreement compensates the Investment Adviser with a fee, computed daily and payable monthly, based on the average daily net assets of each Portfolio, at the following annual rates:
The Investment Adviser entered into a sub-advisory agreement with ING IM with respect to each of the Portfolios. Subject to such policies as the Board or the Investment Adviser may determine, ING IM manages the Portfolios’ assets in accordance with the Portfolios’ investment objectives, policies, and limitations.
Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, IFS acts as administrator and provides certain administrative and shareholder services necessary for Portfolio operations and is responsible for the supervision of other service providers. IFS is entitled to receive from each Portfolio a fee at an annual rate of 0.055% on the first $5 billion of daily net assets and 0.03% thereafter.
In placing equity security transactions, the Investment Adviser or Sub-Adviser is required to use its best efforts to choose a broker capable of providing brokerage services necessary to obtain the best execution for each transaction. Subject to this requirement, the Investment Adviser or Sub-Adviser may allocate equity security transactions through certain designated broker-dealers. Some of these broker-dealers participate in commission recapture programs that have been established for the benefit of the Portfolios. Under these programs, the participating broker-dealers will return to a Portfolio a portion of the brokerage commissions (in the form of a credit to a Portfolio) paid to the broker-dealers to pay certain
15
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4 — INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEES (continued)
expenses of a Portfolio. These commission recapture payments benefit the Portfolios and not the Investment Adviser or Sub-Adviser. Any amount credited to a Portfolio is reflected as brokerage commission recapture in the Statements of Operations.
NOTE 5 — DISTRIBUTION FEES
Class S shares of the Portfolios have adopted a Shareholder Services and Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the “12b-1 Plan”), whereby the Distributor is compensated by each Portfolio for expenses incurred for shareholder servicing and/or the distribution of each Portfolio’s Class S shares. Pursuant to the 12b-1 Plan, the Distributor is entitled to a payment each month to compensate for expenses incurred in the distribution and promotion of each Portfolio’s S shares, including expenses incurred in printing prospectuses and reports used for sales purposes, expenses incurred in preparing and printing sales literature and other such distribution related expenses, including any distribution or shareholder servicing fees paid to securities dealers who have executed a distribution agreement with the Distributor. Under the 12b-1 Plan, Class S shares of the Portfolios pay the Distributor a fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.25% of average daily net assets.
NOTE 6 — OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTIES
At June 30, 2013, the following indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of ING U.S., Inc. owned more than 5% of the following Portfolios:
Subsidiary
| | | | Portfolios
| | Percentage
|
---|
ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company | | | | | | | 76.55 | % |
| | | | | | | 77.59 | |
| | | | | | | 60.58 | |
|
ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company | | | | | | | 18.20 | |
| | | | | | | 17.42 | |
| | | | | | | 30.30 | |
Control is defined by the 1940 Act as the beneficial ownership, either directly or through one or more controlled companies, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a company. The 1940 Act defines affiliates as companies that are under common control. Investment activities of these shareholders could have a material impact on the Portfolios. Therefore, because the Portfolios have a common owner that owns over 25% of the outstanding securities of the Portfolios, they are deemed to be affiliates of each other.
The Company has adopted a Deferred Compensation Plan (“Policy”), which allows eligible non-affiliated directors as described in the Policy to defer the receipt of all or a portion of the directors’ fees payable. Amounts deferred are treated as though invested in various “Notional” funds advised by ING Investments until distribution in accordance with the Policy.
NOTE 7 — EXPENSE LIMITATION AGREEMENT
ING Investments has entered into a written expense limitation agreement (“Expense Limitation Agreement”) with each of the Portfolios whereby the Investment Adviser has agreed to limit expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses to the levels listed below:
Portfolio
| | | | Class I
| | Class S
|
---|
| | | | | 0.55 | % | | | 0.80 | % |
| | | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.85 | % |
| | | | | 0.60 | % | | | 0.85 | % |
The Investment Adviser may at a later date recoup from a Portfolio for management fees waived and other expenses assumed by the Investment Adviser during the previous 36 months, but only if, after such recoupment, the Portfolio’s expense ratio does not exceed the percentage described above. Waived and reimbursed fees and any recoupment by the Investment Adviser of such waived and reimbursed fees are reflected on the accompanying Statements of Operations for each Portfolio. Amounts payable by the Investment Adviser are reflected on the accompanying Statements of Assets and Liabilities for each Portfolio.
As of June 30, 2013, the Portfolios did not have any amount of waived or reimbursed fees that would be subject to possible recoupment by the Investment Adviser.
The Expense Limitation Agreement is contractual and shall renew automatically for one-year terms unless: (i) the Investment Adviser provides 90 days written notice of its termination; and (ii) such termination is approved by the Board; or (iii) the Investment Management Agreement has been terminated.
NOTE 8 — LINE OF CREDIT
All of the Portfolios included in this report, in addition to certain other funds managed by the Investment Adviser, have entered into an unsecured committed revolving line of credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with BNY for an aggregate amount of $200,000,000. Prior to May 24, 2013, the funds to which the Credit Agreement is available were each a party to
16
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 8 — LINE OF CREDIT (continued)
an unsecured committed revolving line of credit for an aggregate amount of $100,000,000. The proceeds may be used to: (1) temporarily finance the purchase or sale of securities; or (2) finance the redemption of shares of an investor in the funds. The funds to which the line of credit is available pay a commitment fee equal to 0.08% per annum on the daily unused portion of the committed line amount.
Generally, borrowings under the Credit Agreement accrue interest at the federal funds rate plus a specified margin. Repayments generally must be made within 60 days after the date of a revolving credit advance.
The Portfolios did not utilize the line of credit during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
NOTE 9 — CAPITAL SHARES
Transactions in capital shares and dollars were as follows:
| | | | Shares sold
| | Shares issued in merger
| | Reinvestment of distributions
| | Shares redeemed
| | Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding
| | Shares sold
| | Proceeds from shares issued in merger
| | Reinvestment of distributions
| | Shares redeemed
| | Net increase (decrease)
|
---|
Year or period ended
| | | | #
| | #
| | #
| | #
| | #
| | ($)
| | ($)
| | ($)
| | ($)
| | ($)
|
---|
|
|
| | | | | 202,574 | | | | — | | | | 607,185 | | | | (2,350,657 | ) | | | (1,540,898 | ) | | | 3,407,146 | | | | — | | | | 10,182,498 | | | | (39,337,995 | ) | | | (25,748,351 | ) |
| | | | | 304,013 | | | | — | | | | 596,330 | | | | (7,189,224 | ) | | | (6,288,881 | ) | | | 4,537,172 | | | | — | | | | 8,968,806 | | | | (107,234,969 | ) | | | (93,728,991 | ) |
|
| | | | | 14,916 | | | | — | | | | 127,124 | | | | (930,073 | ) | | | (788,033 | ) | | | 245,768 | | | | — | | | | 2,117,887 | | | | (15,396,648 | ) | | | (13,032,993 | ) |
| | | | | 81,751 | | | | — | | | | 120,391 | | | | (1,683,897 | ) | | | (1,481,755 | ) | | | 1,222,247 | | | | — | | | | 1,799,851 | | | | (24,843,902 | ) | | | (21,821,804 | ) |
|
|
| | | | | 283,258 | | | | — | | | | 317,825 | | | | (1,318,566 | ) | | | (717,483 | ) | | | 5,572,616 | | | | — | | | | 6,251,618 | | | | (25,912,352 | ) | | | (14,088,118 | ) |
| | | | | 439,377 | | | | — | | | | 261,931 | | | | (4,717,409 | ) | | | (4,016,101 | ) | | | 7,406,262 | | | | — | | | | 4,505,206 | | | | (79,190,296 | ) | | | (67,278,828 | ) |
|
| | | | | 38,645 | | | | — | | | | 60,593 | | | | (498,018 | ) | | | (398,780 | ) | | | 746,608 | | | | — | | | | 1,180,347 | | | | (9,674,661 | ) | | | (7,747,706 | ) |
| | | | | 72,117 | | | | — | | | | 44,505 | | | | (1,193,997 | ) | | | (1,077,375 | ) | | | 1,199,059 | | | | — | | | | 757,920 | | | | (19,886,501 | ) | | | (17,929,522 | ) |
|
|
| | | | | 362,350 | | | | — | | | | 118,398 | | | | (666,477 | ) | | | (185,729 | ) | | | 6,196,226 | | | | — | | | | 1,985,532 | | | | (11,378,955 | ) | | | (3,197,197 | ) |
| | | | | 398,791 | | | | — | | | | 71,947 | | | | (2,516,879 | ) | | | (2,046,141 | ) | | | 5,956,204 | | | | — | | | | 1,074,889 | | | | (37,300,755 | ) | | | (30,269,662 | ) |
|
| | | | | 9,194 | | | | — | | | | 44,228 | | | | (399,881 | ) | | | (346,459 | ) | | | 155,947 | | | | — | | | | 735,068 | | | | (6,775,341 | ) | | | (5,884,326 | ) |
| | | | | 46,924 | | | | — | | | | 17,703 | | | | (951,112 | ) | | | (886,485 | ) | | | 706,979 | | | | — | | | | 262,188 | | | | (13,896,497 | ) | | | (12,927,330 | ) |
NOTE 10 — SECURITIES LENDING
Under an agreement with BNY, the Portfolios can lend their securities to approved brokers, dealers and other financial institutions. Loans are collateralized by cash and U.S. government securities. The collateral must be equal to at least 105% of the market value of non-U.S. securities loaned and 102% of the market value of U.S. securities loaned. The market value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of business of the Portfolios at their last sale price or official closing price on the principal exchange or system on which they are traded and any additional collateral is delivered to the Portfolios on the next business day. The cash collateral received is invested in approved investments as defined in the Securities Lending Agreement with BNY (the “Agreement”). The Portfolios bear the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral with the following exception: BNY provides the Portfolios indemnification from loss with respect to the investment of collateral provided that the cash collateral is invested solely in overnight repurchase agreements.
The cash collateral is invested in overnight repurchase agreements that are collateralized at 102% with securities issued or fully guaranteed by the United States Treasury; United States government or any agency, instrumentality or authority of the United States government. The securities purchased with cash collateral received are reflected in the Summary Portfolio of Investments under Securities Lending Collateral.
Generally, in the event of counterparty default, the Portfolios have the right to use the collateral to offset losses incurred. The Agreement contains certain guarantees by BNY in the event of counterparty default and/or a borrower’s failure to return a loaned security;
17
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 10 — SECURITIES LENDING (continued)
however, there would be a potential loss to the Portfolios in the event the Portfolios are delayed or prevented from exercising their right to dispose of the collateral. Engaging in securities lending could have a leveraging effect, which may intensify the credit, market and other risks associated with investing in a Portfolio. At June 30, 2013, the following Portfolios had securities on loan with the following market values:
Portfolio
| | | | Value of Securities Loaned
| | Cash Collateral Received
|
---|
| | | | $ | 1,025,877 | | | $ | 1,085,255 | |
| | | | $ | 10,346,453 | | | $ | 11,085,683 | |
| | | | | 9,683,550 | | | | 9,928,133 | |
NOTE 11 — FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
The amount of distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for investment companies. These book/tax differences may be either temporary or permanent. Permanent differences are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences are not reclassified. Key differences include the treatment of short-term capital gains, foreign currency transactions, and wash sale deferrals. Distributions in excess of net investment income and/or net realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as return of capital.
Dividends paid by the Portfolios from net investment income and distributions of net realized short-term capital gains are, for federal income tax purposes, taxable as ordinary income to shareholders.
The tax composition of dividends and distributions to shareholders was as follows:
| | | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
| | Year Ended December 31, 2012
|
---|
| | | | Ordinary Income
| | Ordinary Income
|
---|
| | | | $ | 12,300,385 | | | $ | 10,768,657 | |
| | | | | 7,431,965 | | | | 5,263,126 | |
| | | | | 2,720,600 | | | | 1,337,077 | |
The tax-basis components of distributable earnings and the capital loss carryforwards which may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2012 are detailed below. The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”) provides an unlimited carryforward period for newly generated capital losses. Under the Act, there may be a greater likelihood that all or a portion of the Portfolios’ pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may expire without being utilized due to the fact that post-enactment capital losses are required to be utilized before pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards.
| | | | Undistributed Ordinary Income
| | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation)
| | Short-term Capital Loss Carryforwards
| | Expiration
|
---|
| | | | $ | 12,299,752 | | | $ | 37,204,167 | | | $ | (163,333,482 | ) | | | 2016 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (95,016,629 | ) | | | 2017 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (258,350,111 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | 7,431,611 | | | | 23,406,677 | | | | (51,059,632 | ) | | | 2017 | |
| | | | | 2,720,504 | | | | 7,786,365 | | | | (12,299,861 | ) | | | 2017 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (76,170,156 | ) | | | 2018 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (88,470,017 | ) | | | | |
The Portfolios’ major tax jurisdictions are U.S. federal and Arizona. The earliest tax year that remains subject to examination by these jurisdictions is 2008.
As of June 30, 2013, no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolios’ financial statements as a result of tax positions taken on federal and state income tax returns for open tax years. The Portfolios’ federal and state income and federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state department of revenue.
18
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 12 — CONCENTRATION OF INVESTMENT RISK
All mutual funds involve risk — some more than others — and there is always the chance that you could lose money or not earn as much as you hope. A Portfolio’s risk profile is largely a factor of the principal securities in which it invests and investment techniques that it uses. For more information regarding the types of securities and investment techniques that may be used by the Portfolios and their corresponding risks, see the Portfolios’ most recent Prospectus and/or the Statement of Additional Information.
NOTE 13 — RESTRUCTURING PLAN
The Investment Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, IFS and IID are indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of ING U.S., Inc. (“ING U.S.”). ING U.S. is a U.S.-based financial institution whose subsidiaries operate in the retirement, investment, and insurance industries. ING U.S. is a majority-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING Groep”), which is a global financial institution of Dutch origin, with operations in more than 40 countries.
In October 2009, ING Groep submitted a restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”) to the European Commission in order to receive approval for state aid granted to ING Groep by the Kingdom of the Netherlands in November 2008 and March 2009. To receive approval for this state aid, ING Groep was required to divest its insurance and investment management businesses, including ING U.S., before the end of 2013. In November 2012, the Restructuring Plan was amended to permit ING Groep additional time to complete the divestment. Pursuant to the amended Restructuring Plan, ING Groep must divest at least 25% of ING U.S. by the end of 2013, more than 50% by the end of 2014, and the remaining interest by the end of 2016 (such divestment, the “Separation Plan”).
On November 9, 2012, ING U.S. filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Form S-1”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register an initial public offering of ING U.S. common stock (the “IPO”). On May 1, 2013, this Registration Statement including subsequent amendments became effective and the IPO was priced. The IPO closed on May 7, 2013. The overallotment option was exercised on May 28, 2013 and closed on May 31, 2013. ING Groep continues to own a majority of the common stock of ING U.S. ING Groep intends to sell its remaining controlling ownership interest in ING U.S. over time. While the base case for the remainder of the Separation Plan is the divestment of ING Groep’s remaining interest in one or more broadly distributed offerings, all options remain open and it is possible that ING Groep’s divestment of its remaining interest in ING U.S. may take place by means of a sale to a single buyer or group of buyers.
It is anticipated that one or more of the transactions contemplated by the Separation Plan would result in the automatic termination of the existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements under which the Adviser and sub-adviser provide services to the Portfolios. In order to ensure that the existing investment advisory and sub-advisory services can continue uninterrupted, the Board approved new advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Portfolios in connection with the IPO. In addition, shareholders of the Portfolios were asked to approve new investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements prompted by the IPO, as well as any future advisory and sub-advisory agreements prompted by the Separation Plan that are approved by the Board and whose terms are not materially different from the current agreements. Shareholders of the Portfolios approved new advisory and sub-advisory agreements on April 22, 2013. This means that shareholders may not have another opportunity to vote on a new agreement with the Adviser or an affiliated sub-adviser even if they undergo a change of control, as long as no single person or group of persons acting together gains “control” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of ING U.S.
The Separation Plan, whether implemented through public offerings or other means, may be disruptive to the businesses of ING U.S. and its subsidiaries, including the Adviser and affiliated entities that provide services to the Portfolios, and may cause, among other things, interruption of business operations or services, diversion of management’s attention from day-to-day operations, reduced access to capital, and loss of key employees or customers. The completion of the Separation Plan is expected to result in the Adviser’s and affiliated entities’ loss of access to the resources of ING Groep, which could adversely affect their business. Since a portion of the shares of ING U.S., as a standalone entity, are publicly held, it is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as other U.S. government and state regulations, and subject to the risk of changing regulation.
The Separation Plan may be implemented in phases. During the time that ING Groep retains a majority interest in ING U.S., circumstances affecting ING Groep, including restrictions or requirements imposed on ING Groep by European and other authorities, may also affect ING U.S. A failure to complete the Separation Plan could create uncertainty about the nature of the relationship between ING U.S. and ING Groep, and
19
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
NOTE 13 — RESTRUCTURING PLAN (continued)
could adversely affect ING U.S. and the Adviser and its affiliates. Currently, the Adviser and its affiliates do not anticipate that the Separation Plan will have a material adverse impact on their operations or the Portfolios and its operations.
Shareholder Proxy Proposals
At a meeting of the Board on January 9, 2013, the Board nominated 13 individuals (collectively, the “Nominees”) for election as Directors of the Company. The Nominees include Albert E. DePrince, Jr., Russell H. Jones, Martin J. Gavin, Joseph E. Obermeyer and Shaun P. Mathews, each of whom was a current member of the Board. In addition, the Board nominated Colleen D. Baldwin, John V. Boyer, Patricia W. Chadwick, Peter S. Drotch, J. Michael Earley, Patrick W. Kenny, Sheryl K. Pressler and Roger B. Vincent, each of whom was not a member of the Board at the time, but who served as a director or trustee to other investment companies in the ING Funds complex. The Nominees were approved by shareholders on April 22, 2013. The election of the Nominees was effective on May 21, 2013. These nominations were, in part, the result of an effort on the part of the Board and another board in the ING Funds complex to consolidate the membership of the boards so that the same members serve on each board in the ING Funds complex. The result is that all ING Funds are now governed by Boards that are comprised of the same individuals.
NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 22, 2013, the Portfolios and the Investment Adviser received exemptive relief from the SEC which permits the Investment Adviser, with the approval of the Portfolios’ Board but without obtaining shareholder approval, to enter into or materially amend a sub-advisory agreement with sub-advisers that are indirect or direct, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Investment Adviser or of another company that, indirectly or directly wholly owns the Investment Adviser. Reliance on this exemptive relief was approved by shareholders of the Portfolios. For more information, please consult the Supplement to your Prospectus dated August 7, 2013.
The Portfolios have evaluated events occurring after the Statements of Assets and Liabilities date (subsequent events) to determine whether any subsequent events necessitated adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements. Other than the above, no such subsequent events were identified.
20
ING INDEX PLUS LARGECAP PORTFOLIO | SUMMARY PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 (UNAUDITED) |
Sector Diversification
as of June 30, 2013
(as a percentage of net assets)
| | | | | 18.7 | % |
| | | | | 16.6 | % |
| | | | | 12.3 | % |
| | | | | 11.8 | % |
| | | | | 10.8 | % |
| | | | | 10.1 | % |
| | | | | 9.0 | % |
Telecommunication Services | | | | | 3.5 | % |
| | | | | 3.0 | % |
| | | | | 2.8 | % |
Assets in Excess of Other Liabilities* | | | | | 1.4 | % |
| | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
* Includes short-term investments. |
Portfolio holdings are subject to change daily.
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value
|
| Percentage of Net Assets
|
---|
|
|
| |