Fair Value Measurements [Text Block] | Fair Value Measurements Fair Values - Recurring The following tables present assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by fair value hierarchy level. September 30, 2016 (In millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Derivative instruments, assets Commodity (a) $ — $ 4 $ — $ 4 Interest rate — 10 — 10 Derivative instruments, assets $ — $ 14 $ — $ 14 Derivative instruments, liabilities Commodity (a) $ — $ 43 $ — $ 43 Derivative instruments, liabilities $ — $ 43 $ — $ 43 (a) Derivative instruments are recorded on a net basis in our balance sheet (see Note 15 ). December 31, 2015 (In millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Derivative instruments, assets Commodity (a) $ — $ 51 $ — $ 51 Interest rate — 8 — 8 Derivative instruments, assets $ — $ 59 $ — $ 59 Derivative instruments, liabilities Commodity (a) $ — $ 1 $ — $ 1 Derivative instruments, liabilities $ — $ 1 $ — $ 1 (a) Derivative instruments are recorded on a net basis in our balance sheet (see Note 15 ). Commodity derivatives include three-way collars, two-way collars and call options. These instruments are measured at fair value using either the Black-Scholes Model or the Black Model. Inputs to both models include commodity prices, interest rates, and implied volatility. The inputs to these models are categorized as Level 2 because predominantly all assumptions and inputs are observable in active markets throughout the term of the instruments. Both our interest rate swaps and forward starting interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with a market approach using actionable broker quotes, which are Level 2 inputs. See Note 15 for additional discussion of the types of derivative instruments we use. Fair Values – Goodwill Unlike long-lived assets, goodwill must be tested for impairment at least annually, or between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. We estimate the fair value of our International E&P reporting unit using a combination of market and income approaches. The market approach referenced observable inputs specific to us and our industry, such as the price of our common equity, our enterprise value, and valuation multiples of us and our peers from the investor analyst community. The income approach utilized discounted cash flows, which were based on forecasted assumptions. Key assumptions to the income approach include future liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas pricing, estimated quantities of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas proved and probable reserves, estimated timing of production, discount rates, future capital requirements, operating expenses and tax rates. The assumptions used in the income approach are consistent with those that management uses to make business decisions. These valuations methodologies represent Level 3 fair value measurements. We performed our annual impairment test in April 2016 and concluded no impairment was required. While the fair value of our International E&P reporting unit exceeded the book value, subsequent commodity price and/or common stock declines may cause us to reassess our goodwill for impairment and could result in non-cash impairment charges in the future. Fair Values- Nonrecurring The following table shows the values of assets, by major category, measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 (In millions) Fair Value Impairment Fair Value Impairment Long-lived assets held for use $ 15 $ 47 $ 41 $ 337 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 (In millions) Fair Value Impairment Fair Value Impairment Long-lived assets held for use $ 15 $ 48 $ 58 $ 381 The continued decline of commodity prices resulted in a downward revision of our long-term commodity price assumptions which triggered an assessment of certain of our long-lived assets related to oil and gas producing properties for impairment as of September 30, 2016. Similarly, in 2015, a downward revision of our long-term commodity price assumptions triggered an assessment of our long-lived assets related to oil and gas producing properties for impairment as of September 30, 2015. Further changes in management's forecast assumptions may cause us to reassess our long-lived assets for impairment and could result in non-cash impairment charges in the future. Long-lived assets held for use that were impaired are discussed below. The fair values of each were measured using an income approach based upon internal estimates of future production levels, prices and discount rate, all of which are Level 3 inputs. Inputs to the fair value measurement include reserve and production estimates made by our reservoir engineers, estimated future commodity prices adjusted for quality and location differentials and forecasted operating expenses for the remaining estimated life of the reservoir. 2016 - North America E&P In the third quarter of 2016, impairments of $ 47 million were recorded primarily consisting of conventional non-core proved properties in Oklahoma as a result of lower forecasted long-term commodity prices, to an aggregate fair value of $15 million . 2015- North America E&P In the third quarter of 2015, impairments of $333 million were recorded primarily related to certain producing assets in Colorado and the Gulf of Mexico as a result of lower forecasted commodity prices, to an aggregate fair value of $ 41 million . During the second quarter of 2015, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $44 million related to East Texas, North Louisiana and Wilburton, Oklahoma natural gas assets as a result of the anticipated sale (see Note 6 ). The fair values were measured using a probability weighted income approach based on both the anticipated sales price and a held-for-use model. 2015- International E&P In the third quarter of 2015, a partial impairment of $ 12 million was recorded to an investment in an equity method investee as a result of lower forecasted commodity prices, to fair value of $ 604 million . This impairment was reflected in income equity method investments in our consolidated statements of income. Fair Values – Financial Instruments Our current assets and liabilities include financial instruments, the most significant of which are receivables, long-term debt and payables. We believe the carrying values of our receivables and payables approximate fair value. Our fair value assessment incorporates a variety of considerations, including (1) the short-term duration of the instruments, (2) our credit rating, and (3) our historical incurrence of and expected future insignificant bad debt expense, which includes an evaluation of counterparty credit risk. The following table summarizes financial instruments, excluding receivables, payables and derivative financial instruments, and their reported fair values by individual balance sheet line item at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 . September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Fair Carrying Fair Carrying (In millions) Value Amount Value Amount Financial assets Other noncurrent assets $ 112 $ 118 $ 104 $ 118 Total financial assets $ 112 $ 118 $ 104 $ 118 Financial liabilities Other current liabilities $ 49 $ 59 $ 34 $ 33 Long-term debt, including current portion (a) 7,345 7,292 6,723 7,291 Deferred credits and other liabilities 123 117 97 95 Total financial liabilities $ 7,517 $ 7,468 $ 6,854 $ 7,419 (a) Excludes capital leases, debt issuance costs and interest rate swap adjustments. Fair values of our financial assets included in other noncurrent assets, and of our financial liabilities included in other current liabilities and deferred credits and other liabilities, are measured using an income approach and most inputs are internally generated, which results in a Level 3 classification. Estimated future cash flows are discounted using a rate deemed appropriate to obtain the fair value. Most of our long-term debt instruments are publicly-traded. A market approach, based upon quotes from major financial institutions, which are Level 2 inputs, is used to measure the fair value of such debt. The fair value of our debt that is not publicly-traded is measured using an income approach. The future debt service payments are discounted using the rate at which we currently expect to borrow. All inputs to this calculation are Level 3. |