UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | | | | | | | | |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |
| OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| OR | |
| | | | | | | | |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |
| OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ | |
Commission file number 0 - 20957
| SUN BANCORP, INC. | | | |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| New Jersey | | 52-1382541 | | | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer | | | |
| incorporation or organization) | | Identification No) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 226 Landis Avenue, Vineland, New Jersey 08360 | | | | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
(Zip Code) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (856) 691 - 7700 | | | | |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer" and "large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one): Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value - 20,479,867 Shares Outstanding at November 7, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | Page Number |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 3 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 4 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| 5 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | 6 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 7 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | 20 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | 32 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 34 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 35 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 36 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 37 |
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
SUN BANCORP, INC. |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION |
(Dollars in thousands, except par value amounts) |
| | September 30, | | December 31, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
| | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 81,489 | | $ | 74,387 | |
Interest-bearing bank balances | | | 15,541 | | | 2,707 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 21,541 | | | 8,368 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 118,571 | | | 85,462 | |
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of $491,339 and $688,073 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) | | | 483,280 | | | 676,630 | |
Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of $26,494 and $31,734 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) | | | 27,258 | | | 32,445 | |
Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of $25,785 and $22,463 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) | | | 2,325,259 | | | 2,027,753 | |
Restricted equity investments | | | 17,969 | | | 19,991 | |
Bank properties and equipment, net | | | 42,575 | | | 42,110 | |
Real estate owned | | | 600 | | | 1,449 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 16,912 | | | 15,148 | |
Goodwill | | | 128,351 | | | 104,891 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 29,762 | | | 29,939 | |
Deferred taxes, net | | | 5,053 | | | 6,761 | |
Bank owned life insurance | | | 56,965 | | | 55,627 | |
Other assets | | | 11,862 | | | 9,683 | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,264,417 | | $ | 3,107,889 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | $ | 2,636,954 | | $ | 2,471,648 | |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) | | | 108,889 | | | 124,546 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - FHLB | | | - | | | 60,000 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - customers | | | 51,423 | | | 59,021 | |
Obligations under capital lease | | | 5,337 | | | 5,400 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 108,250 | | | 77,322 | |
Other liabilities | | | 17,715 | | | 14,299 | |
Total liabilities | | | 2,928,568 | | | 2,812,236 | |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $1 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | | | - | | | - | |
Common stock, $1 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 20,457,101 and 18,168,530 shares issued at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | | 20,457 | | | 18,169 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 304,285 | | | 264,152 | |
Retained earnings | | | 16,340 | | | 20,757 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (5,233 | ) | | (7,425 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 335,849 | | | 295,653 | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 3,264,417 | | $ | 3,107,889 | |
| | | | | | | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. | | |
|
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| | For the Three Months | | For the Nine Months | |
| | Ended September 30, | | Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and fees on loans | | $ | 41,576 | | $ | 31,981 | | $ | 117,885 | | $ | 91,736 | |
Interest on taxable investment securities | | | 4,351 | | | 6,381 | | | 14,943 | | | 18,545 | |
Interest on non-taxable investment securities | | | 450 | | | 249 | | | 1,047 | | | 1,139 | |
Interest and dividends on restricted equity investments | | | 285 | | | 223 | | | 861 | | | 622 | |
Interest on federal funds sold | | | 166 | | | 522 | | | 678 | | | 852 | |
Total interest income | | | 46,828 | | | 39,356 | | | 135,414 | | | 112,894 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INTEREST EXPENSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest on deposits | | | 17,479 | | | 11,391 | | | 47,090 | | | 29,398 | |
Interest on borrowed funds | | | 2,153 | | | 2,118 | | | 7,574 | | | 6,968 | |
Interest on junior subordinated debentures | | | 2,197 | | | 1,331 | | | 6,217 | | | 3,705 | |
Total interest expense | | | 21,829 | | | 14,840 | | | 60,881 | | | 40,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | 24,999 | | | 24,516 | | | 74,533 | | | 72,823 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | | | 1,317 | | | 500 | | | 2,817 | | | 1,790 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 23,682 | | | 24,016 | | | 71,716 | | | 71,033 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-INTEREST INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 3,188 | | | 2,245 | | | 7,934 | | | 6,783 | |
Other service charges | | | 80 | | | 88 | | | 238 | | | 203 | |
Gain on sale of bank properties and equipment | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 100 | |
Gain on sale of loans | | | 220 | | | 318 | | | 664 | | | 748 | |
(Loss) gain on sale of investment securities | | | - | | | - | | | (20 | ) | | 809 | |
Gain on derivative instruments | | | 154 | | | 491 | | | 978 | | | 1,056 | |
Other | | | 1,626 | | | 1,470 | | | 4,940 | | | 4,190 | |
Total non-interest income | | | 5,268 | | | 4,612 | | | 14,734 | | | 13,889 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 10,650 | | | 10,701 | | | 34,237 | | | 31,804 | |
Occupancy expense | | | 2,982 | | | 2,758 | | | 8,775 | | | 8,485 | |
Equipment expense | | | 1,945 | | | 1,959 | | | 5,956 | | | 5,820 | |
Data processing expense | | | 1,226 | | | 1,064 | | | 3,388 | | | 3,056 | |
Advertising expense | | | 303 | | | 412 | | | 1,276 | | | 1,202 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 1,193 | | | 1,117 | | | 3,574 | | | 3,381 | |
Real estate owned expense, net | | | 86 | | | 40 | | | 226 | | | (76 | ) |
Other | | | 3,205 | | | 3,128 | | | 10,072 | | | 9,260 | |
Total non-interest expenses | | | 21,590 | | | 21,179 | | | 67,504 | | | 62,932 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 7,360 | | | 7,449 | | | 18,946 | | | 21,990 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME TAXES | | | 2,503 | | | 2,455 | | | 6,126 | | | 7,053 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | $ | 4,857 | | $ | 4,994 | | $ | 12,820 | | $ | 14,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic Earnings Per Share | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.78 | |
Diluted Earnings Per Share | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 0.73 | |
Weighted Average Shares - Basic | | | 20,431,220 | | | 19,048,105 | | | 20,194,757 | | | 19,036,794 | |
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted | | | 21,382,752 | | | 20,308,659 | | | 21,233,019 | | | 20,344,611 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. |
| |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 | |
(In thousands) | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Treasury Stock | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2006 | | $ | 18,169 | | $ | 264,152 | | $ | 20,757 | | $ | (7,425 | ) | $ | - | | $ | 295,653 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | - | | | - | | | 12,820 | | | - | | | - | | | 12,820 | |
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax (see Note 1) | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 2,192 | | | - | | | 2,192 | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,012 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 439 | | | 2,167 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 2,606 | |
Excess tax benefit related to stock options | | | - | | | 1,534 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 1,534 | |
Issuance of common stock | | | 47 | | | 825 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 872 | |
Common stock issued in acquisition | | | 832 | | | 16,997 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 17,829 | |
Stock options exchanged in acquisition | | | - | | | 1,954 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 1,954 | |
Share-based compensation | | | - | | | 409 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 409 | |
Stock dividends | | | 970 | | | 16,247 | | | (17,217 | ) | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Cash paid for fractional interests resulting from stock dividend | | | - | | | - | | | (20 | ) | | - | | | - | | | (20 | ) |
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 | | $ | 20,457 | | $ | 304,285 | | $ | 16,340 | | $ | (5,233 | ) | $ | - | | $ | 335,849 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2005 | | $ | 17,205 | | $ | 244,108 | | $ | 21,718 | | $ | (2,765 | ) | $ | (1,046 | ) | $ | 279,220 | |
Comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | - | | | - | | | 14,937 | | | - | | | - | | | 14,937 | |
Unrealized losses on available for sale securities net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax (see Note 1) | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (3,611 | ) | | - | | | (3,611 | ) |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,326 | |
Exercise of stock options | | | 147 | | | (1,094 | ) | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (947 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to stock options | | | - | | | 1,437 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 1,437 | |
Issuance of common stock | | | 26 | | | 506 | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 532 | |
Stock dividends | | | 771 | | | 18,657 | | | (20,474 | ) | | - | | | 1,046 | | | - | |
Cash paid for fractional interests resulting from stock dividend | | | - | | | - | | | (8 | ) | | - | | | - | | | (8 | ) |
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 | | $ | 18,149 | | $ | 263,614 | | $ | 16,173 | | $ | (6,376 | ) | $ | - | | $ | 291,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. |
SUN BANCORP, INC. |
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(In thousands) |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 12,820 | | $ | 14,937 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 2,817 | | | 1,790 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 3,922 | | | 3,484 | |
Net accretion of investments securities | | | (711 | ) | | (36 | ) |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 3,574 | | | 3,381 | |
Write down of book value of fixed assets and real estate owned | | | 85 | | | 64 | |
Loss (gain) on sale of investment securities available for sale | | | 20 | | | (809 | ) |
Gain on sale of bank properties and equipment | | | - | | | (100 | ) |
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate owned | | | 115 | | | (199 | ) |
Gain on sale of loans | | | (664 | ) | | (748 | ) |
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance (BOLI) | | | (1,338 | ) | | (1,199 | ) |
Deferred income taxes | | | (703 | ) | | 108 | |
Share-based compensation | | | 409 | | | 51 | |
Shares contributed to employee benefit plans | | | 446 | | | - | |
Proceeds from the sale of loans | | | 45,500 | | | 51,444 | |
Originations of loans held for sale | | | (46,316 | ) | | (51,608 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to stock options | | | (1,534 | ) | | (1,437 | ) |
Change in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash: | | | | | | | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | (1,008 | ) | | (2,795 | ) |
Other assets | | | 698 | | | (7,027 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 1,191 | | | 913 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 19,323 | | | 10,214 | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | |
Purchases of investment securities available for sale | | | (121,721 | ) | | (170,270 | ) |
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity | | | (500 | ) | | - | |
Redemption of restricted equity securities | | | 2,224 | | | 692 | |
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments or calls of investment securities available for sale | | | 325,698 | | | 205,185 | |
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments or calls of investment securities held to maturity | | | 5,897 | | | 7,680 | |
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale | | | 25,498 | | | 26,705 | |
Net increase in loans | | | (176,616 | ) | | (92,625 | ) |
Purchase of bank properties and equipment | | | (2,048 | ) | | (3,807 | ) |
Net proceeds from the sale of bank properties and equipment | | | - | | | 100 | |
Net proceeds from sale of real estate owned | | | 1,337 | | | 1,673 | |
Net cash paid for bank acquisition | | | (15,101 | ) | | - | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | 44,668 | | | (24,667 | ) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in deposits | | | 17,292 | | | 77,202 | |
Net repayments under lines of credit and repurchase agreements | | | (83,318 | ) | | (38,339 | ) |
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | | | 1,534 | | | 1,437 | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 2,606 | | | 490 | |
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt | | | 30,928 | | | - | |
Payments of fractional interests resulting from stock dividend | | | (20 | ) | | (8 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 96 | | | 532 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | (30,882 | ) | | 41,314 | |
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | 33,109 | | | 26,861 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 85,462 | | | 74,902 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 118,571 | | $ | 101,763 | |
| | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 55,009 | | $ | 39,733 | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 4,236 | | $ | 6,147 | |
| | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ITEMS: | | | | | | | |
Transfer of loans to real estate owned | | $ | 669 | | $ | - | |
Net assets acquired and purchase adjustments in bank acquisition | | $ | 34,884 | | $ | - | |
Value of shares issued in bank acquisition | | $ | 7,829 | | $ | - | |
Fair value of options exchanged in bank acquisition | | $ | 1,954 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. | | | | | | | |
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(All dollar amounts presented in the tables, except per share amounts, are in thousands)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sun Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). Its principal wholly owned subsidiary is Sun National Bank (the “Bank”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, changes in equity and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America. However, all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 or any other period.
Reclassifications - Certain items previously reported in the 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. In particular, during the quarter, the Company reclassifed certain cash flows from loans held for sale as operating activities, whereas in prior periods, these cash flows were classified as investing activities. All prior period amounts have been restated to conform to this presentation.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. The significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses, goodwill, intangible assets, deferred tax asset valuation allowance and derivative financial instruments. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Stock Dividend - On April 20, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 5% stock dividend paid on May 18, 2006 to shareholders of record on May 8, 2006. Accordingly, per share data have been adjusted for all periods presented.
Share-Based Compensation - Stock based compensation is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”). The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. The Company establishes fair value for its equity awards to determine its cost and recognizes the related expense over the appropriate vesting period using the straight-line method. The grant date fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as adopted prospectively on January 1, 2003 and in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
Other Comprehensive Income - The Company classifies items of other comprehensive income by their nature and displays the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of the statement of financial position. Amounts categorized as other comprehensive income represent net unrealized gains or losses on investment securities available for sale, net of income taxes. Reclassifications are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items which are displayed as part of net income for the period. These reclassifications are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale arising during the period | | | 4,154 | | | (1,968 | ) | | 3,364 | | | (4,551 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income | | | - | | | - | | | 20 | | | (809 | ) |
Net change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale | | | 4,154 | | | (1,968 | ) | | 3,384 | | | (5,360 | ) |
Tax effect | | | (1,450 | ) | | 691 | | | (1,192 | ) | | 1,749 | |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of tax | | | 2,704 | | | (1,277 | ) | | 2,192 | | | (3,611 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - On December 19, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk. FSP 94-6-1 addresses whether, under existing guidance, non-traditional loan products represent a concentration of credit risk and what disclosures are required for entities that originate, hold, guarantee, service or invest in loan products whose terms may give rise to a concentration of credit risk. Non-traditional loan products expose the originator, holder, investor, guarantor or servicer to higher credit risk than traditional loan products. Typical features of non-traditional loan products may include high loan-to-value ratios and interest or principal repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans of an equivalent term. FSP 94-6-1 was effective upon its issuance and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or disclosures.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This Statement resolves issues addressed in SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this pronouncement but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS No. 140 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 amends SFAS No. 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. This Statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value. Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. Adoption of this Statement is required as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Upon adoption, the Company will apply the requirements for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities prospectively to all transactions. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 156 for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007 and is evaluating the impact of this pronouncement.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this interpretation but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this pronouncement but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 requires the use of two alternative approaches in quantitatively evaluating materiality of misstatements. If the misstatement as quantified under either approach is material to the current year financial statements, the misstatement must be corrected. If the effect of correcting the prior year misstatements, if any, in the current year income statement is material, the prior year financial statements should be corrected. This guidance is effective for the calendar year ending 2006. In the year of adoption, the misstatements may be corrected as an accounting change by adjusting opening retained earnings rather than being included in the current year income statement. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SAB No. 108 but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
(2) Share-Based Compensation
During 2003, the Company adopted the prospective method for fair value recognition of SFAS No. 123 for all options granted after January 1, 2003. Options granted prior to January 1, 2003 continued to be accounted for under APB No. 25 and related interpretations. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, using the modified prospective application. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company began to recognize through earnings, the fair value of the remaining unvested portion of options granted prior to January 1, 2003 that were accounted for under the provisions of APB No. 25, in addition to options that were currently being expensed under the provisions of SFAS No. 123. The following table further illustrates the impact of implementing SFAS No. 123R on the Company.
| | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 | | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | |
Share-based compensation calculated under the expensing provisions of SFAS No. 123 (adopted prospectively January 1, 2003) | | $ | 81 | | $ | 251 | |
Incremental share-based compensation required under the expensing provisions of SFAS No. 123R (unvested portion of options granted prior to January 1, 2003) | | | 23 | | | 158 | |
Total share-based compensation (pre-tax) | | $ | 104 | | $ | 409 | |
| | | | | | | |
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R for all periods presented using the Black-Scholes option valuation model to stock-based employee compensation.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Reported net income available to shareholders | | $ | 4,857 | | $ | 4,994 | | $ | 12,820 | | $ | 14,937 | |
Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total share-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (net of tax) | | | 94 | | | 41 | | | 360 | | | 51 | |
Deduct: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method (net of tax) | | | (94 | ) | | (102 | ) | | (360 | ) | | (311 | ) |
Pro forma net income available to shareholders | | $ | 4,857 | | $ | 4,933 | | $ | 12,820 | | $ | 14,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic - as reported | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.78 | |
Basic - pro forma | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.77 | |
Diluted - as reported | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 0.73 | |
Diluted - pro forma | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 0.72 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The purpose of the Company’s stock-based incentive plans is to attract and retain personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to certain officers, directors, advisory directors, employees and other persons to promote the success of the Company. Under the Company’s Stock Plans, options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the option terms. A committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the options granted will vest. Options are granted at the then fair market value of the Company’s stock and typically will vest evenly over five years. The grant date fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of options granted after January 1, 2006 will be expensed using the straight-line method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R.
A summary of award activity under the stock option plans as of September 30, 2006 and changes during the nine month period is presented below:
| | | | | | | |
| | Number of Stock Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per | | Number of Stock Options | |
| | Outstanding | | Share | | Exercisable | |
January 1, 2006 | | | 3,325,152 | | $ | 9.63 | | | 2,934,965 | |
Granted | | | 78,560 | | $ | 18.33 | | | | |
Exercised | | | (459,027 | ) | $ | 5.68 | | | | |
Expired | | | (17,920 | ) | $ | 17.50 | | | | |
Exchanged in Advantage acquisition | | | 168,908 | | $ | 7.76 | | | | |
September 30, 2006 | | | 3,095,673 | | $ | 10.28 | | | 2,898,223 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The weighted average remaining contractual term was approximately 4.1 years for stock options outstanding and 3.8 years for stock options exercisable as of September 30, 2006.
As of September 30, 2006, there was $848,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options granted under the stock option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.
The total intrinsic value (the excess of the market price over the exercise price) was $26.7 million for stock options outstanding and $26.5 million for stock options exercisable at September 30, 2006.
The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $221,000 and $2.6 million, respectively. The total tax benefit for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $48,000 and $1.5 million, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company granted 78,560 stock options and 130,200 stock options, respectively. The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model which uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free rate of return is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life of the stock option was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees at a particular level of management who were granted options with a ten year term. Stock options have historically been granted with this term, and therefore information necessary to make this estimate was available. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility for a period of three years ending on the date of grant. Utilizing a period greater than this was not representative of the Company’s view of its current stock volatility.
| | | |
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year | | $ | 6.32 | |
Weighted average risk-free rate of return | | | 5.04 | % |
Weighted average expected option life in months | | | 114 | |
Weighted average expected volatility | | | 28.0 | % |
Expected dividends | | $ | - | |
| | | | |
(3) Acquisition, Sales and Consolidations
On January 19, 2006, the Company acquired Advantage Bank (“Advantage”). The merger agreement permitted Advantage shareholders to elect to receive either $19.00 in cash or .87 shares of Sun common stock subject to adjustment or proration under certain circumstances. The merger agreement also provided for an overall requirement that 50 percent of the outstanding Advantage shares be exchanged for the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Company paid Advantage stockholders $17.3 million in cash and issued approximately 832,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On the date of merger, Advantage’s assets totaled approximately $164 million, net loans receivable were approximately $124 million, investments securities were approximately $29 million and total deposits were approximately $148 million. The Company recorded $23.4 million in goodwill and $3.4 million in intangible assets. Included in goodwill was $1.9 million relating to the fair value of stock options exchanged.
In July 2006, the Company announced a sales and consolidation initiative involving five identified branches. It is anticipated that two branches will be consolidated during the fourth quarter 2006 and the remaining three will be sold during the first quarter 2007.
(4) Investment Securities
The amortized cost of investment securities and the approximate fair value were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | |
| | | | Gross | | Gross | | Estimated | |
| | Amortized | | Unrealized | | Unrealized | | Fair | |
| | Cost | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | |
Available for Sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury obligations | | $ | 29,910 | | $ | - | | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 29,853 | |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 408,441 | | | - | | | (8,097 | ) | | 400,344 | |
State and municipal obligations | | | 50,976 | | | 400 | | | (305 | ) | | 51,071 | |
Other | | | 2,012 | | | - | | | - | | | 2,012 | |
Total available for sale investment securities | | | 491,339 | | | 400 | | | (8,459 | ) | | 483,280 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Held to Maturity | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 26,508 | | | - | | | (764 | ) | | 25,744 | |
Other | | | 750 | | | - | | | - | | | 750 | |
Total held to maturity investment securities | | | 27,258 | | | - | | | (764 | ) | | 26,494 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment securities | | $ | 518,597 | | $ | 400 | | $ | (9,223 | ) | $ | 509,774 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2005 | |
| | | | Gross | | Gross | | Estimated | |
| | Amortized | | Unrealized | | Unrealized | | Fair | |
| | Cost | | Gains | | Losses | | Value | |
Available for Sale | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury obligations | | $ | 59,237 | | $ | - | | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 59,092 | |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 596,823 | | | - | | | (11,142 | ) | | 585,681 | |
State and municipal obligations | | | 28,050 | | | 198 | | | (354 | ) | | 27,894 | |
Other | | | 3,963 | | | - | | | - | | | 3,963 | |
Total available for sale investment securities | | | 688,073 | | | 198 | | | (11,641 | ) | | 676,630 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Held to Maturity | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 32,445 | | | - | | | (711 | ) | | 31,734 | |
Total held to maturity investment securities | | | 32,445 | | | - | | | (711 | ) | | 31,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment securities | | $ | 720,518 | | $ | 198 | | $ | (12,352 | ) | $ | 708,364 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
| | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | |
| | Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Longer | | Total | |
| | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
U.S. Treasury obligations | | $ | 29,853 | | $ | (57 | ) | $ | | | $ | - | | $ | 29,853 | | $ | (57 | ) |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 33,339 | | | (596 | ) | | 392,749 | | | (8,265 | ) | | 426,088 | | | (8,861 | ) |
State and municipal obligations | | | 16,437 | | | (65 | ) | | 9,010 | | | (240 | ) | | 25,447 | | | (305 | ) |
Total | | $ | 79,629 | | $ | (718 | ) | $ | 401,759 | | $ | (8,505 | ) | $ | 481,388 | | $ | (9,223 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | December 31, 2005 | |
| | Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Longer | | Total | |
| | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
U.S. Treasury obligations | | $ | 48,963 | | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 10,129 | | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 59,092 | | $ | (145 | ) |
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities | | | 102,670 | | | (1,003 | ) | | 514,745 | | | (10,850 | ) | | 617,415 | | | (11,853 | ) |
State and municipal obligations | | | 15,975 | | | (238 | ) | | 3,381 | | | (116 | ) | | 19,356 | | | (354 | ) |
Total | | $ | 167,608 | | $ | (1,276 | ) | $ | 528,255 | | $ | (11,076 | ) | $ | 695,863 | | $ | (12,352 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At September 30, 2006, 99.6% of the gross unrealized losses in the security portfolio were comprised of securities issued by U.S. Government agencies, U.S. Government sponsored agencies and other securities rated investment grade by at least one bond credit rating service. The unrealized losses are due to increases in market interest rates over yields since the time the underlying securities were purchased. Recovery of fair value is expected as the securities approach their maturity date or if valuations for such securities improve as market yields change. Management considers the length of time and the extent to which fair value is less than cost, the credit worthiness and near-term prospects of the issuer, among other things, in determining the nature of the decline in market value of the securities. As the Company has the intent and ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of amortized cost, which may be maturity, no decline is deemed to be other than temporary. At September 30, 2006, the gross unrealized loss in the category 12 months or longer of $8.5 million consisted of 91 securities having an aggregate unrealized loss of 2.1% of the Bank’s amortized cost basis. The securities represented Federal Agency issues and 16 securities currently rated Aaa by at least one bond credit rating service. At September 30, 2006, securities in a gross unrealized loss position for less than 12 months consisted of 51 securities having an aggregate unrealized loss of 0.9% of the Bank’s amortized cost basis.
(5) Loans
The components of loans as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 1,927,964 | | $ | 1,732,202 | |
Home equity | | | 222,473 | | | 155,561 | |
Second mortgages | | | 78,251 | | | 53,881 | |
Residential real estate | | | 33,460 | | | 30,162 | |
Other | | | 88,896 | | | 78,410 | |
Total gross loans | | | 2,351,044 | | | 2,050,216 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (25,785 | ) | | (22,463 | ) |
Net loans | | $ | 2,325,259 | | $ | 2,027,753 | |
| | | | | | | |
Non-accrual loans | | $ | 14,073 | | $ | 9,957 | |
| | | | | | | |
Non-accrual loans increased $4.1 million or 41.3 % at September 30, 2006 as compared to December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to three unrelated relationships whose credits totaled $3.7 million. The Company believes that the loans are well secured and in the process of collection. The Company does not feel that this increase is indicative of a trend that will continue into the fourth quarter.
(6) Allowance for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
| | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 22,463 | | $ | 22,037 | |
Charge-offs | | | (1,281 | ) | | (2,641 | ) |
Recoveries | | | 527 | | | 757 | |
Net charge-offs | | | (754 | ) | | (1,884 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | 2,817 | | | 2,310 | |
Purchased allowance from bank acquisition | | | 1,259 | | | - | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 25,785 | | $ | 22,463 | |
| | | | | | | |
The provision for loan losses charged to expense is based upon past loan loss experience and an evaluation of estimated losses in the current loan portfolio, including the evaluation of impaired loans under SFAS Nos. 114 and 118. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan.
An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in a loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days are considered to be insignificant.
Impairment losses are included in the provision for loan losses. Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment, except for those loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment include consumer loans and residential real estate loans, and are not included in the data that follow:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Impaired loans with related allowance for loan losses calculated under SFAS No. 114 | | $ | 8,871 | | $ | 7,954 | |
Impaired loans with no related allowance for loan losses calculated under SFAS No. 114 | | | 5,748 | | | 10,061 | |
Total impaired loans | | $ | 14,619 | | $ | 18,015 | |
| | | | | | | |
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans | | $ | 2,580 | | $ | 2,381 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | | For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
Average impaired loans | | $ | 20,233 | | $ | 31,181 | |
Interest income recognized on impaired loans | | $ | 543 | | $ | 994 | |
Cash basis interest income recognized on impaired loans | | $ | 85 | | $ | 494 | |
| | | | | | | |
(7) Real Estate Owned
Real estate owned at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was as follows:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Commercial properties | | $ | - | | $ | 1,066 | |
Residential properties | | | 600 | | | 62 | |
Bank properties | | | - | | | 321 | |
Total | | $ | 600 | | $ | 1,449 | |
| | | | | | | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company sold various unrelated real estate properties with carrying values totaling $1.5 million resulting in recognized net losses of approximately $115,000. Recognized net gains during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were $199,000.
(8) Deposits
Deposits consist of the following major classifications:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, 2006 | | December 31, 2005 | |
Demand deposits - interest bearing | | $ | 823,333 | | $ | 886,773 | |
Demand deposits - non-interest bearing | | | 524,694 | | | 529,878 | |
Savings deposits | | | 350,802 | | | 386,821 | |
Time certificates under $100,000 | | | 597,859 | | | 443,535 | |
Time certificates $100,000 or more | | | 340,266 | | | 224,641 | |
Total | | $ | 2,636,954 | | $ | 2,471,648 | |
| | | | | | | |
(9) Junior Subordinated Debentures Held by Trusts that Issued Capital Debt
The following is a summary of the outstanding capital securities issued by each Issuer Trust and the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to each Trust as of September 30, 2006:
| | | | |
| | Capital Securities | | Junior Subordinated Debentures |
Issuer Trust | | Issuance Date | | Stated Value | | Distribution Rate | | Principal Amount | | Maturity | | Redeemable Beginning |
Sun Trust III | | April 22, 2002 | | $ | 20,000 | | 6-mo LIBOR plus 3.70% | | $ | 20,619 | | April 22, 2032 | | April 22, 2007 |
Sun Trust IV | | July 7, 2002 | | | 10,000 | | 3-mo LIBOR plus 3.65% | | | 10,310 | | October 7, 2032 | | July 7, 2007 |
Sun Trust V | | December 18, 2003 | | | 15,000 | | 3-mo LIBOR plus 2.80% | | | 15,464 | | December 30, 2033 | | December 30, 2008 |
Sun Trust VI | | December 19, 2003 | | | 25,000 | | 3-mo LIBOR plus 2.80% | | | 25,774 | | January 23, 2034 | | January 23, 2009 |
CBNJ Trust I | | December 19, 2002 | | | 5,000 | | 3-mo LIBOR plus 3.35% | | | 5,155 | | January 7, 2033 | | January 7, 2008 |
Sun Trust VII | | January 17, 2006 | | | 30,000 | | 6.24% Fixed | | | 30,928 | | March 15, 2036 | | March 15, 2011 |
| | | | $ | 105,000 | | | | $ | 108,250 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
While the capital securities are deconsolidated in accordance with GAAP, they continue to qualify as Tier 1 capital under federal regulatory guidelines. In March 2005, the Federal Reserve amended its risk-based capital standards to expressly allow the continued limited inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in a bank holding company’s Tier 1 capital, subject to tightened quantitative limits. The Federal Reserve’s amended rule will, effective March 31, 2009, limit capital securities and other restricted core capital elements to 25% of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. Management has developed a capital plan for the Company and the Bank that should allow the Company and the Bank to maintain “well-capitalized” regulatory capital levels.
The Issuer Trusts are wholly owned unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Company and have no independent operations. The obligations of Issuer Trusts are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The debentures are unsecured and rank subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness, liabilities and obligations of the Company. Interest on the debentures is cumulative and payable in arrears. Proceeds from any redemption of debentures would cause a mandatory redemption of capital securities having an aggregate liquidation amount equal to the principal amount of debentures redeemed.
Sun Trust III variable annual rate will not exceed 11.00% through five years from its issuance. Sun Trust IV variable annual rate will not exceed 11.95% through five years from its issuance. Sun Trust V and Sun Trust VI do not have interest rate caps. CBNJ Trust I was acquired in the July 2004 acquisition of Community Bancorp of New Jersey. CBNJ Trust I variable annual rate will not exceed 12.5% through five years from its issuance. In January 2006, the Company issued an additional $30.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities (Sun Trust VII) of which the annual rate will be fixed at 6.24% until March 15, 2011. Of the $30.0 million, approximately $17 million was used to fund the purchase of Advantage with the remaining $13 million being used for general corporate purposes.
(10) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock net of treasury shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock net of treasury shares outstanding increased by the weighted average dilutive common stock options outstanding reduced by the number of common shares that are assumed to have been purchased by the Company with the proceeds from the exercise of the options (treasury stock method) along with the assumed tax benefit from the exercise of non-qualified options and the average unrecognized compensation expense for unvested options. These purchases were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common stock, which is based on the daily closing price. Retroactive recognition has been given to market values, common stock outstanding and potential common shares for periods prior to the date of the Company’s stock dividends.
Earnings per share for the periods presented are as follows:
| | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, | | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Net income | | $ | 4,857 | | $ | 4,994 | | $ | 12,820 | | $ | 14,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average common shares outstanding | | | 20,431,220 | | | 19,048,105 | | | 20,194,757 | | | 19,036,794 | |
Net effect of dilutive stock options | | | 951,532 | | | 1,260,554 | | | 1,038,262 | | | 1,307,817 | |
Adjusted average shares outstanding - dilutive | | | 21,382,752 | | | 20,308,659 | | | 21,233,019 | | | 20,344,611 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.24 | | $ | 0.26 | | $ | 0.63 | | $ | 0.78 | |
Dilutive earnings per share | | $ | 0.23 | | $ | 0.25 | | $ | 0.60 | | $ | 0.73 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive stock options outstanding | | | 2,931,623 | | | 3,274,207 | | | 3,061,182 | | | 3,281,782 | |
Average exercise price | | $ | 9.67 | | $ | 9.45 | | $ | 9.42 | | $ | 9.15 | |
Average market price | | $ | 17.86 | | $ | 20.33 | | $ | 18.00 | | $ | 20.56 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
There were 159,293 and 8,163 stock options outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the stock options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods. There were 157,722 and 8,163 stock options outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the stock options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods.
(11) Derivative Financial Instruments.
The Company utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage interest rate risk that exists as part of its ongoing business operations. As of September 30, 2006, derivative financial instruments have been entered into to hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain fixed rate commercial loans. In general, the derivative transactions fall into one of two types, a bank hedge of a specific fixed rate loan or a hedged derivative offering to a Bank customer. In those transactions in which the Bank hedges a specific fixed rate loan, the derivative is executed for periods that match the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of these exposures. For derivatives offered to Bank customers, the economic risk of the customer transaction is offset by a mirror position with a non-affiliated third party.
As noted above, the Company currently utilizes interest rate swaps to hedge specified assets. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Interest rate swaps were entered into as fair value hedges for the purpose of modifying the interest rate characteristics of certain commercial loans. The interest rate swaps involve no exchange of principal either at inception or upon maturity; rather, it involves the periodic exchange of interest payments arising from an underlying notional value.
Financial derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. The Company manages these risks as part of its asset and liability management process and through credit policies and procedures. The Company seeks to minimize counterparty credit risk by establishing credit limits, and generally requiring bilateral netting and collateral agreements.
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the hedging instrument, based on the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Currently, the Company only participates in fair value hedges.
Fair Value Hedges - Interest Rate Swaps
The Company has entered into interest rate swap arrangements to exchange the payments on fixed rate commercial loan receivables for variable rate payments based on LIBOR. The interest rate swaps involve no exchange of principal either at inception or maturity and have maturities and call options identical to the fixed rate loan agreements. The arrangements have been designated as fair value hedges. The swaps are carried at their fair value and the carrying amount of the commercial loans includes the net change in their fair values since the inception of the hedge. Because the hedging arrangement is considered highly effective, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps exactly offset the corresponding changes in the fair value of the commercial loans and, as a result, the changes in fair value do not result in an impact on net income.
Information pertaining to outstanding interest rate swap agreements was as follows:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Notional amount | | $ | 44,261,945 | | $ | 35,201,182 | |
Weighted average pay rate | | | 6.69 | % | | 6.57 | % |
Weighted average receive rate | | | 7.31 | % | | 5.85 | % |
Weighted average maturity in years | | | 6.6 | | | 7.3 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) relating to interest rate swaps | | $ | 682,622 | | $ | 121,812 | |
|
Customer Derivatives
The Company also enters into several commercial loan swaps in order to provide commercial loan clients the ability to swap from variable to fixed interest rates. Under these agreements, the Company enters into a variable rate loan agreement with a client in addition to a swap agreement. This swap agreement effectively swaps the client’s variable rate loan into a fixed rate loan. The Company then enters into a corresponding swap agreement with a third party in order to swap its exposure on the variable to fixed rate swap on the commercial loan. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the notional amount of such arrangements was $511.5 million and $253.2 million, respectively. As the interest rate swaps with the clients and third parties are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, the instruments are marked to market in earnings. As the interest rate swaps are structured to offset each other, changes in market values will have no net earnings impact. The Company earned $154,000 and $978,000 from facilitating customer derivative transactions during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to $491,000 and $1.1 million for the same periods in 2005.
THE COMPANY MAY FROM TIME TO TIME MAKE WRITTEN OR ORAL “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS,” INCLUDING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY’S FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (INCLUDING THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND THE EXHIBITS THERETO), IN ITS REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IN OTHER COMMUNICATIONS BY THE COMPANY, WHICH ARE MADE IN GOOD FAITH BY THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995.
THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, SUCH AS STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY’S PLANS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTATIONS, ESTIMATES AND INTENTIONS, THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON VARIOUS IMPORTANT FACTORS (SOME OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANY’S CONTROL). THE FOLLOWING FACTORS, AMONG OTHERS, COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY’S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE PLANS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTATIONS, ESTIMATES AND INTENTIONS EXPRESSED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: THE STRENGTH OF THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY IN GENERAL AND THE STRENGTH OF THE LOCAL ECONOMIES IN WHICH THE COMPANY CONDUCTS OPERATIONS; THE EFFECTS OF, AND CHANGES IN, TRADE, MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES AND LAWS, INCLUDING INTEREST RATE POLICIES OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, INFLATION, INTEREST RATE, MARKET AND MONETARY FLUCTUATIONS; THE TIMELY DEVELOPMENT OF AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF THE COMPANY AND THE PERCEIVED OVERALL VALUE OF THESE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES BY USERS, INCLUDING THE FEATURES, PRICING AND QUALITY COMPARED TO COMPETITORS’ PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; THE IMPACT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL SERVICES’ LAWS AND REGULATIONS (INCLUDING LAWS CONCERNING TAXES, BANKING, RISK-BASED CAPITAL GUIDELINES AND REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS, SECURITIES AND INSURANCE); TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES; ACQUISITIONS; CHANGES IN CONSUMER SPENDING AND SAVING HABITS; AND THE SUCCESS OF THE COMPANY AT MANAGING THE RISKS INVOLVED IN THE FOREGOING.
THE COMPANY CAUTIONS THAT THE FOREGOING LIST OF IMPORTANT FACTORS IS NOT EXCLUSIVE. THE COMPANY DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT, WHETHER WRITTEN OR ORAL, THAT MAY BE MADE FROM TIME TO TIME BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY, UNLESS REQUIRED TO DO SO UNDER FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (All dollar amounts presented in the tables, except per share amounts, are in thousands.)
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including those described below. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These form the bases for making judgments on the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Through the Bank, the Company originates loans that it intends to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or repayment. The Bank may not be able to collect all principal and interest due on these loans. Allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The determination of the allowance for loan losses requires management to make significant estimates with respect to the amounts and timing of losses and market and economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to provide for estimated losses and impairment based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risk in the loan portfolio. Loan impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of collateral or estimated net realizable value. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s evaluation of the estimated losses that inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio. It is the policy of management to provide for losses on unidentified loans in its portfolio in addition to classified loans.
Management monitors its allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments to the allowance through the provision for loan losses as economic conditions and other pertinent factors indicate. In this context, a series of qualitative factors are used in a methodology as the Company’s measurement of how current circumstances are affecting the loan portfolio. Included in these qualitative factors are:
· | Levels of past due, classified and non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and modifications |
· | Nature and volume of loans |
· | Changes in lending policies and procedures, underwriting standards, collections, charge-offs and recoveries |
· | National and local economic and business conditions, including various market segments |
· | Concentrations of credit and changes in levels of such concentrations |
· | Effect of external factors on the level of estimated credit losses in the current portfolio. |
Additionally, historic loss experience over the trailing eight quarters is taken into account. In determining the allowance for loan losses, management has established both specific and general pooled allowances. Values assigned to the qualitative factors and those developed from historic loss experience provide a dynamic basis for the calculation of reserve factors for both pass-rated loans (general pooled allowance) and those criticized and classified loans without SFAS No. 114 reserves (specific allowance). The amount of the specific allowance is determined through a loan-by-loan analysis of certain large dollar commercial loans. Loans not individually reviewed are evaluated as a group using reserve factor percentages based on historic loss experience and the qualitative factors described above. In determining the appropriate level of the general pooled allowance, management makes estimates based on internal risk ratings, which take into account such factors as debt service coverage, loan to value ratios, and external factors. Estimates are periodically measured against actual loss experience.
As changes in the Company’s operating environment occur and as recent loss experience ebbs and flows, the factors for each category of loan based on type and risk rating will change to reflect current circumstances and the quality of the loan portfolio.
Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at levels considered adequate to provide for the inherent risk of loss in its loan portfolio, if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations there can be no assurance that future losses will not exceed estimated amounts or that additional provisions for loan losses will not be required in future periods. Accordingly, a decline in the national economy or the local economies of the areas in which the loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional loan loss allowances in future periods. In addition, the Company’s determination as to the amount of its allowance for loan losses is subject to review by its primary regulator, the OCC, as part of its examination process. This may result in the establishment of an additional allowance based upon the judgment of the OCC after a review of the information available at the time of the OCC examination.
Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, which requires the recording of deferred income taxes that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Management exercises significant judgment in the evaluation of the amount and timing of the recognition of the resulting tax assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates required for the evaluation are updated based upon changes in business factors, accounting standards, and the tax laws. In June of 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The Company will incorporate FIN 48 with its existing accounting policy at the time of required adoption.
Valuation of Goodwill. The Company assesses the impairment of goodwill at least annually and whenever events or significant changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that the Company considers important in determining whether to perform an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to forecasted operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends. If the Company determines that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable, then the Company will assess impairment based on a projection of future cash flows and measure the amount of impairment based on fair value.
Share-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Under the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the appropriate vesting period. Determining the fair value of stock based awards at grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of the stock options and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock. In addition, judgment is required in estimating the amount of stock based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates or different key assumptions were used, it could have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 2 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding stock based compensation expense.
Overview
The early effects of several of the Company’s previously announced profitability enhancement initiatives can begin to be seen in the third quarter 2006 results of operations:
· | A June 2006 reduction in staff across the Company coupled with a salary reduction for senior executives and the board of directors contributed to a linked quarter (June 2006) reduction in non-interest expense of 8.7%. |
· | Implementation of select fee enhancement recommendations from the recently completed retail bank consulting initiative have been a factor in increasing non-interest income 3.8% over the linked second quarter 2006. |
· | The Company reported a record low efficiency ratio of 71.3% as compared to 78.3% for the linked quarter and 72.7% for the same period 2005. |
In July 2006, the Company announced a sales and consolidation initiative involving five identified branches, of which two will be consolidated during the fourth quarter 2006. Sales of the remaining three branches are expected to close during the first quarter 2007. The Company does not anticipate that there will be a loss recognized nor will there be an impact to goodwill as a result of these transactions.
Financial Condition
Total assets increased $156.5 million or 5.0% from $3.11 billion at December 31, 2005 to $3.26 billion at September 30, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents increased $33.1 million, net loans receivable increased $297.5 million and investment securities available for sale decreased $193.4 million. On January 19, 2006, the Company acquired Advantage Bank. On the date of merger, Advantage’s assets totaled approximately $164 million, net loans receivable were approximately $124 million, investments securities were approximately $29 million and total deposits were approximately $148 million. The Company recorded $23.4 million in goodwill and $3.4 million in intangible assets. Included in goodwill was $1.9 million relating to the fair value of stock options exchanged.
Investment securities available for sale decreased $193.4 million or 28.6%, from $676.6 million at December 31, 2005 to $483.3 million at September 30, 2006. The decrease was primarily the result of the planned reduction of investment securities through normal maturities, calls or principal repayments with the proceeds used primarily to supplement loan funding. The investment securities portfolio balance is expected to remain relatively stable through the remainder of 2006.
Net loans receivable at September 30, 2006 were $2.33 billion, an increase of $297.5 million from $2.03 billion at December 31, 2005. In January 2006, the Company acquired approximately $124 million in net loans receivable as a result of the Advantage acquisition and experienced approximately $111.7 million in prepayments during the first nine months of 2006. Year to date loan growth adjusted for the acquisition and prepayments was approximately 14.1%. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total gross loans was 1.10% at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Non-performing loans were $14.1 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $10.1 million at December 31, 2005. Non-performing loans increased primarily as a result on an increase in non-accrual loans of $4.1 million or 41.3 % at September 30, 2006 as compared to December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily due to three unrelated relationships whose credits totaled $3.7 million. The Company believes that the loans are well secured and in the process of collection. The Company does not feel that this increase is indicative of a trend that will continue into the fourth quarter. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans was 182.4% at September 30, 2006 compared to 221.9% at December 31, 2005. Non-performing assets were $14.7 million at September 30, 2006 compared to $11.6 million at December 31, 2005. The ratio of non-performing assets to total gross loans and real estate owned was 0.63% at September 30, 2006 compared to 0.56% at December 31, 2005.
Other assets increased $2.2 million from $9.7 million at December 31, 2005, to $11.9 million at September 30, 2006. This primarily resulted from an increase of $928,000 related to the recording of the investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary in conjunction with the Company’s January 2006 issuance of an additional $30.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities (Sun Trust VII). In addition, accrued interest on commercial loan derivative products and prepaid expenses increased $850,000 and $376,000, respectively, from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
Total deposits were $2.64 billion at September 30, 2006, reflecting a $165.3 million increase from December 31, 2005. During the first quarter, the Company acquired approximately $148 million in deposits as a result of the Advantage acquisition. Core deposits, which exclude all certificates greater than $100,000, represented 87.1% and 90.9% of total deposits at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company has experienced a change in the composition of deposits with a decline in savings and demand deposits and an increase in higher cost time deposits. The Company’s increase on rates on time deposits are commensurate with increases in short term interest rates by the Federal Reserve during the first half of 2006. The Company believes this trend will continue for the remainder of 2006 as the competitive environment for deposits continues to be intense.
Total borrowings, excluding the issuance of $30.9 million in junior subordinated debentures during January 2006, decreased $83.3 million from December 31, 2005 to $165.6 million at September 30, 2006. The Company utilized cash flows from the maturities and calls of investment securities, the Advantage acquisition, and internal deposit growth to repay these borrowings.
Other liabilities increased $3.4 million to $17.7 million at September 30, 2006, as compared to $14.3 million at December 31, 2005. Other liabilities increased primarily as a result of a $4.9 million increase in accrued interest payable on deposits. The change in accrued interest payable on deposits was due to increases in volume and rates. The increase in accrued interest payable on deposits was offset by a decrease of $754,000 in accrued salaries which was primarily a result of the previously announced staff reduction, in addition to a decrease of $677,000 in other liabilities.
Total shareholders’ equity increased $40.2 million, from $295.7 million at December 31, 2005 to $335.8 million at September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of net income of $12.8 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the acquisition of Advantage which increased equity by $19.8 million, stock option exercises which increased equity $4.1 million, and a decrease in unrealized loss on available for sale securities of $2.2 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity management is a daily and long-term business function. The Company’s liquidity, represented in part by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of its operating, investing and financing activities. Proceeds from repayment and maturities of loans, sales and maturities of investment securities, net income and increases in deposits and borrowings are the primary sources of liquidity for the Company.
A major source of the Company's funding is deposits, which management believes will be sufficient to meet the Company’s long-term daily operating liquidity needs. The ability of the Company to retain and attract new deposits is dependent upon the variety and effectiveness of its customer account products, customer service and convenience, and rates paid to customers. The Company also obtains funds from the repayment and maturities of loans as well as sales and maturities of investment securities. Additional funds can be obtained from a variety of sources including federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances, loan sales or participations and other secured and unsecured borrowings. It is anticipated that FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase will be secondary sources of funding, and management expects there to be adequate collateral for such funding requirements.
The Company's primary uses of funds are the origination of loans, the funding of the Company's maturing certificates of deposit, deposit withdrawals and the repayment of borrowings. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature during the 12 months ending September 30, 2007 total $744.9 million. The Company will continue to price certificates of deposit for retention as well as provide fixed rate funding in the expected rising rate environment. However, based on market conditions and other liquidity considerations, it may also avail itself of the secondary borrowings discussed above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net loans receivable grew approximately $297.5 million or 14.7% of which approximately $124 million is attributable to the Advantage acquisition. The Company anticipates that cash and cash equivalents on hand, the cash flow from assets, particularly investment securities, as well as other sources of funds will provide adequate liquidity for the Company's future operating, investing and financing needs. In addition to cash and cash equivalents of $118.6 million at September 30, 2006, the Company’s estimated cash flow from securities with maturities of less than one year and principal payments from mortgage-backed securities over the next twelve months totaled $218.9 million. The Company has additional secured borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $157.5 million and other sources of approximately $20.8 million. The FHLB provides a reliable source of funds with a wide variety of terms and structures. Management will continue to monitor the Company’s liquidity and maintain it at a level deemed adequate but not excessive.
Management has developed a capital plan for the Company and the Bank that should allow the Company and the Bank to grow capital internally at levels sufficient for achieving its internal growth projections while managing its operating and financial risks. The Company has also considered a contingent capital plan, and when appropriate, the Company’s Board of Directors may consider various capital raising alternatives. The principle components of the capital plan are to generate additional capital through retained earnings from internal growth, access the capital markets for external sources of capital, such as common equity and trust preferred securities, when necessary or appropriate, redeem existing capital instruments and refinance such instruments at lower rates when conditions permit and maintain sufficient capital for safe and sound operations. The capital plan is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity. It is the Company’s intention to maintain “well-capitalized” risk-based capital levels.
While the capital securities are deconsolidated in accordance with GAAP, they continue to qualify as Tier 1 capital under federal regulatory guidelines. In March 2005, the Federal Reserve amended its risk-based capital standards to expressly allow the continued limited inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in a bank holding company’s Tier 1 capital, subject to tightened quantitative limits. The Federal Reserve’s amended rule, effective March 31, 2009, will limit capital securities and other restricted core capital elements to 25% of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.
As part of its capital plan, the Company, through its deconsolidated trust subsidiaries, issued Trust Preferred Securities that qualify as Tier 1 or core capital of the Company. These securities are subject to a 25% capital limitation under risk-based capital guidelines developed by the Federal Reserve Board. The portion that exceeds the 25% capital limitation qualifies as Tier 2, or supplementary capital of the Company. At September 30, 2006, the full amount of the Company’s $105.0 million in Trust Preferred Securities qualify as Tier 1.
Disclosures about Commercial Commitments
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In the event of a draw by the beneficiary that complies with the terms of the letter of credit, the Company would be required to honor the commitment. The Company takes various forms of collateral, such as real estate assets and customer business assets to secure the commitment. Additionally, all letters of credit are supported by indemnification agreements executed by the customer. The maximum undiscounted exposure related to these commitments at September 30, 2006 was $59.8 million, and the portion of the exposure not covered by collateral was approximately $7.2 million. The Company believes that the utilization rate of these letters of credit will continue to be substantially less than the amount of these commitments, as has been the Company’s experience to date.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Overview. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 of $4.9 million or $0.23 per diluted earnings per share, remained relatively flat as compared to $5.0 million or $0.25 per diluted earnings per share for the same period in 2005. Interest income increased $7.5 million offset by an increase in interest expense of $7.0 million. Net interest margin for the third quarter 2006 increased to 3.51% from 3.45%. The provision for loan loss increased $817,000. Non-interest income increased $656,000 offset by an increase of $411,000 in non-interest expense.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $597,000, or 2.4% to $25.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $1.5 million due to changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities offset by a $920,000 decrease in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) as a result of changes in the yields and costs of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Volume Variance. The $1.5 million increase in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) attributable to volume was due to an increase of $24.2 million in average interest-earning assets which increased interest income by $2.9 million offset by a $35.2 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities which increased interest expense $1.4 million.
Rate Variance. The $920,000 decrease in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) was due to an increase of 113 basis points in the cost of average interest-bearing deposits and an increase of 137 basis points in the cost of average borrowings which increased interest expense $5.0 million and $592,000, respectively. Offsetting these increases in interest expense, the yield on average loans receivable increased 66 basis points and the yield on average investment securities increased 48 basis points which increased interest income $3.6 million and $896,000 respectively.
The interest rate spread and net interest margin (on a tax-equivalent basis) for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was 2.86% and 3.51%, respectively, compared to 2.99% and 3.45%, respectively, for the same period in 2005. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased 101 basis points from 5.53% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to 6.54% for the same period in 2006, while the cost of funds on average interest-bearing liabilities increased 114 basis points from 2.54% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to 3.68% for the same period in 2006. The decrease in the interest rate spread reflects the impact of increasing rates, continued intense market competitiveness for both loans and deposits, and the flat yield curve.
The following table sets forth a summary of average balances with corresponding interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) and interest expense as well as average yield and cost information for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from daily balances.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 | | At or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
| �� | Average | | Interest | | Average | | Average | | Interest | | Average | |
| | Balance | | Earned/Paid | | Yield/Cost | | Balance | | Earned/Paid | | Yield/Cost | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable (1), (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 1,902,279 | | $ | 34,339 | | | 7.22 | % | $ | 1,672,481 | | $ | 27,230 | | | 6.51 | % |
Home equity | | | 213,888 | | | 3,584 | | | 6.70 | | | 134,382 | | | 2,049 | | | 6.10 | |
Second mortgage | | | 77,500 | | | 1,237 | | | 6.38 | | | 46,350 | | | 731 | | | 6.31 | |
Residential real estate | | | 27,443 | | | 563 | | | 8.21 | | | 27,634 | | | 565 | | | 8.18 | |
Other | | | 87,071 | | | 1,853 | | | 8.51 | | | 74,220 | | | 1,406 | | | 7.58 | |
Total loans receivable | | | 2,308,181 | | | 41,576 | | | 7.20 | | | 1,955,067 | | | 31,981 | | | 6.54 | |
Investment securities (3) | | | 548,293 | | | 5,224 | | | 3.81 | | | 831,006 | | | 6,921 | | | 3.33 | |
Interest-bearing deposit with banks | | | 8,348 | | | 103 | | | 4.94 | | | 7,414 | | | 59 | | | 3.18 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 13,725 | | | 166 | | | 4.84 | | | 60,856 | | | 522 | | | 3.43 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 2,878,547 | | | 47,069 | | | 6.54 | | | 2,854,343 | | | 39,483 | | | 5.53 | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 82,480 | | | | | | | | | 79,296 | | | | | | | |
Bank properties and equipment | | | 43,032 | | | | | | | | | 37,220 | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and intangible assets | | | 158,856 | | | | | | | | | 136,664 | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 53,892 | | | | | | | | | 51,528 | | | | | | | |
Non-interest-earning assets | | | 338,260 | | | | | | | | | 304,708 | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,216,807 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,159,051 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | 809,798 | | | 5,979 | | | 2.95 | % | $ | 906,514 | | | 4,571 | | | 2.02 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 352,027 | | | 1,618 | | | 1.84 | | | 421,059 | | | 1,293 | | | 1.23 | |
Time deposits | | | 920,732 | | | 9,882 | | | 4.29 | | | 712,596 | | | 5,527 | | | 3.10 | |
Total interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 2,082,557 | | | 17,479 | | | 3.36 | | | 2,040,169 | | | 11,391 | | | 2.23 | |
Borrowed money: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 4,549 | | | 67 | | | 5.89 | | | 47 | | | 1 | | | 4.30 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - customers | | | 45,117 | | | 515 | | | 4.57 | | | 86,007 | | | 613 | | | 2.85 | |
FHLB advances | | | 124,299 | | | 1,474 | | | 4.74 | | | 131,364 | | | 1,504 | | | 4.58 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 108,250 | | | 2,197 | | | 8.12 | | | 77,322 | | | 1,331 | | | 6.89 | |
Obligations under capital lease | | | 5,342 | | | 97 | | | 7.26 | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Total borrowings | | | 287,557 | | | 4,350 | | | 6.05 | | | 294,740 | | | 3,449 | | | 4.68 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 2,370,114 | | | 21,829 | | | 3.68 | | | 2,334,909 | | | 14,840 | | | 2.54 | |
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 498,416 | | | | | | | | | 516,778 | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,995 | | | | | | | | | 14,995 | | | | | | | |
Non-interest-bearing liabilities | | | 515,411 | | | | | | | | | 531,773 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 2,885,525 | | | | | | | | | 2,866,682 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | 331,282 | | | | | | | | | 292,369 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 3,216,807 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,159,051 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 25,240 | | | | | | | | $ | 24,643 | | | | |
Interest rate spread (4) | | | | | | | | | 2.86 | % | | | | | | | | 2.99 | % |
Net interest margin (5) | | | | | | | | | 3.51 | % | | | | | | | | 3.45 | % |
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | 121.45 | % | | | | | | | | 122.25 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(1) Average balances include non-accrual loans. |
(2) Loan fees are included in interest income and the amount is not material for this analysis. |
(3) Interest earned on non-taxable investment securities is shown on a tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% marginal federal tax rate for all periods. |
(4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
|
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in average volume multiplied by old rate) and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old average volume). The combined effect of changes in both volume and rate has been allocated to volume or rate changes in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
| | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 vs. 2005 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due To | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Net | |
Interest income | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable: | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 3,969 | | $ | 3,140 | | $ | 7,109 | |
Home equity | | | 1,315 | | | 220 | | | 1,535 | |
Second mortgage | | | 497 | | | 9 | | | 506 | |
Residential real estate | | | (4 | ) | | 2 | | | (2 | ) |
Other | | | 261 | | | 186 | | | 447 | |
Total loans receivable | | | 6,038 | | | 3,557 | | | 9,595 | |
Investment securities | | | (2,593 | ) | | 896 | | | (1,697 | ) |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 8 | | | 36 | | | 44 | |
Federal funds sold | | | (513 | ) | | 157 | | | (356 | ) |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 2,940 | | | 4,646 | | | 7,586 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | (530 | ) | | 1,938 | | | 1,408 | |
Savings deposits | | | (238 | ) | | 563 | | | 325 | |
Time deposits | | | 1,882 | | | 2,473 | | | 4,355 | |
Total interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 1,114 | | | 4,974 | | | 6,088 | |
Borrowed money: | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 66 | | | - | | | 66 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - customers | | | (369 | ) | | 271 | | | (98 | ) |
FHLB advances | | | (83 | ) | | 53 | | | (30 | ) |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 598 | | | 268 | | | 866 | |
Obligations under capital lease | | | 97 | | | - | | | 97 | |
Total borrowings | | | 309 | | | 592 | | | 901 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,423 | | | 5,566 | | | 6,989 | |
Net change in net interest income | | $ | 1,517 | | $ | (920 | ) | $ | 597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $7.6 million, or 19.2%, to $47.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from $39.5 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest income was due to an increase in interest rates, which increased the yield on average interest-earning assets by 101 basis points, or $4.6 million, and a 0.8% increase in average interest-earning assets which produced an increase in interest income of $2.9 million.
Interest expense increased $7.0 million, or 47.1%, to $21.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $14.8 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest expense was due to an increase in interest rates, which increased the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities by 114 basis points, or $5.6 million, and a 1.5% increase in average interest-bearing liabilities which produced an increase in interest expense of $1.4 million.
Provision for Loan Losses. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses was $1.3 million compared to $500,000 for the same period in 2005. The Company’s gross loans receivable grew $55.8 million during the third quarter 2006 as compared to $23.2 million during the same period in 2005. The provision recorded is the amount necessary to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the current risk profile of the portfolio. The Company focuses on its loan portfolio management and credit review process to address the current risk profile of the portfolio and manage troubled credits. This analysis includes evaluations of concentrations of credit, past loss experience, current economic conditions, amount and composition of the loan portfolio, estimated fair value of underlying collateral, loan commitments outstanding, delinquencies and other factors.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $656,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. This was primarily the result of an increase in service charges on deposit accounts of $943,000 as a result of the implementation of select fee enhancement recommendations from the recently completed retail banking consulting initiatives. Offsetting this increase was a decrease in derivative income of $337,000 which was a result of a reduction in the number of transactions.
Non-Interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $411,000 or 1.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Of this increase, approximately $722,000 is due to the incremental expenses resulting from the January 2006 Advantage acquisition which consist primarily of the following:
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Third Quarter | | | |
| | For the | | 2006 Expenses | | Internally | |
| | Three Months Ended | | of Newly | | Generated | |
| | September 30, | | Acquired Bank | | Variance | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | | | | |
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | $ | 10,650 | | $ | 10,701 | | $ | 377 | | $ | (428 | ) |
Other non-interest expenses | | | 10,940 | | | 10,478 | | | 345 | | | 117 | |
Total non-interest expenses | | $ | 21,590 | | $ | 21,179 | | $ | 722 | | $ | (311 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-interest expense, excluding the expenses of Advantage, decreased $311,000 or 1.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. The decrease was the result of a $428,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits offset by an increase of $117,000 in other non-interest expense. The $428,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits was primarily the result of a staff reduction across the entire organization during the second quarter 2006. The net increase in other non-interest expense is mainly due to an increase in data processing expense. As previously announced the Company reviewed several of its major operating services vendor contracts and as a result, entered into an agreement with a new item processing vendor while incurring an early termination charge of $121,000 by its previous vendor.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Overview. Net income decreased by $2.1 million, or 14.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $12.8 million from $14.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily due to an increase in non-interest expense of $4.6 million and an increase in the provision for loan losses of $1.0 million. These increases were offset by an increase in net interest income of $1.7 million and an increase in non-interest income of $845,000, and a decrease in income taxes of $927,000.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $1.7 million, or 2.3% to $75.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased $5.2 million due to the changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities offset by a $3.5 million decrease in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) as a result of changes in yields and costs of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Volume Variance. The $5.2 million increase in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) attributable to volume was due to an $83.6 million increase in average interest-earning assets which increased interest income $9.4 million offset by a $74.0 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities which increased interest expense $4.2 million.
Rate Variance. The $3.5 million decrease in net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) attributable to changes in interest rates resulted from an increase of 105 basis points in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits and an increase of 155 basis points in the cost of average borrowings which increased interest expense $14.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Offsetting these increases in interest expense, the yield on average loan receivables increased 67 basis points and the yield on average investment securities increased 35 basis points which increased interest income $10.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
The interest rate spread and net interest margin (on a tax-equivalent basis) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 2.88% and 3.46%, respectively, compared to 3.08% and 3.48%, respectively, for the same period in 2005. The yield on the average interest-earning assets increased 89 basis points from 5.38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to 6.27% for the same period in 2006, while the cost of funds on average interest-bearing liabilities increased 109 basis points from 2.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to 3.39% for the same period in 2006. The decrease in the interest rate spread reflects the impact of increasing rates, continued intense market competitiveness for both loans and deposits, and the flat yield curve.
The following table sets forth a summary of average balances with corresponding interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) and interest expense as well as average yield and cost information for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from daily balances.
| |
| | At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 | | At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
| | Average | | Interest | | Average | | Average | | Interest | | Average | |
| | Balance | | Earned/Paid | | Yield/Cost | | Balance | | Earned/Paid | | Yield/Cost | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable (1), (2): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 1,861,231 | | $ | 97,933 | | | 7.02 | % | $ | 1,652,621 | | $ | 78,644 | | | 6.34 | % |
Home equity | | | 192,997 | | | 9,503 | | | 6.57 | | | 130,903 | | | 5,300 | | | 5.40 | |
Second mortgage | | | 73,035 | | | 3,404 | | | 6.21 | | | 47,969 | | | 2,248 | | | 6.25 | |
Residential real estate | | | 28,559 | | | 1,773 | | | 8.28 | | | 26,970 | | | 1,598 | | | 7.90 | |
Other | | | 85,206 | | | 5,272 | | | 8.25 | | | 71,380 | | | 3,946 | | | 7.37 | |
Total loans receivable | | | 2,241,028 | | | 117,885 | | | 7.01 | | | 1,929,843 | | | 91,736 | | | 6.34 | |
Investment securities (3) | | | 622,732 | | | 17,035 | | | 3.65 | | | 837,579 | | | 20,758 | | | 3.30 | |
Interest-bearing deposit with banks | | | 10,549 | | | 377 | | | 4.77 | | | 6,850 | | | 132 | | | 2.57 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 19,377 | | | 678 | | | 4.67 | | | 35,819 | | | 852 | | | 3.17 | |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 2,893,686 | | | 135,975 | | | 6.27 | | | 2,810,091 | | | 113,478 | | | 5.38 | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 80,609 | | | | | | | | | 82,534 | | | | | | | |
Bank properties and equipment | | | 43,316 | | | | | | | | | 37,200 | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and intangible assets | | | 156,872 | | | | | | | | | 136,894 | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 56,428 | | | | | | | | | 52,879 | | | | | | | |
Non-interest-earning assets | | | 337,225 | | | | | | | | | 309,507 | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,230,911 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,119,598 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | $ | 851,604 | | | 17,215 | | | 2.70 | % | $ | 859,708 | | | 10,918 | | | 1.69 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 356,177 | | | 4,268 | | | 1.60 | | | 432,055 | | | 3,668 | | | 1.13 | |
Time deposits | | | 864,380 | | | 25,607 | | | 3.95 | | | 687,100 | | | 14,812 | | | 2.87 | |
Total interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 2,072,161 | | | 47,090 | | | 3.03 | | | 1,978,863 | | | 29,398 | | | 1.98 | |
Borrowed money: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 5,667 | | | 229 | | | 5.39 | | | 4,044 | | | 89 | | | 2.93 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - customers | | | 42,346 | | | 1,343 | | | 4.23 | | | 76,629 | | | 1,354 | | | 2.36 | |
FHLB advances | | | 160,347 | | | 5,578 | | | 4.64 | | | 181,169 | | | 5,525 | | | 4.07 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 106,437 | | | 6,217 | | | 7.79 | | | 77,605 | | | 3,705 | | | 6.37 | |
Obligations under capital lease | | | 5,366 | | | 424 | | | 7.29 | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
Total borrowings | | | 320,163 | | | 13,791 | | | 5.74 | | | 339,447 | | | 10,673 | | | 4.19 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 2,392,324 | | | 60,881 | | | 3.39 | | | 2,318,310 | | | 40,071 | | | 2.30 | |
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 499,257 | | | | | | | | | 499,293 | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,242 | | | | | | | | | 14,741 | | | | | | | |
Non-interest-bearing liabilities | | | 515,499 | | | | | | | | | 514,034 | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 2,907,823 | | | | | | | | | 2,832,344 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | 323,088 | | | | | | | | | 287,254 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 3,230,911 | | | | | | | | $ | 3,119,598 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 75,094 | | | | | | | | $ | 73,407 | | | | |
Interest rate spread (4) | | | | | | | | | 2.88 | % | | | | | | | | 3.08 | % |
Net interest margin (5) | | | | | | | | | 3.46 | % | | | | | | | | 3.48 | % |
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | 120.96 | % | | | | | | | | 121.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
(1) Average balances include non-accrual loans. |
(2) Loan fees are included in interest income and the amount is not material for this analysis. |
(3) Interest earned on non-taxable investment securities is shown on a tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% marginal federal tax rate for all periods. |
(4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
|
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in average volume multiplied by old rate) and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old average volume). The combined effect of changes in both volume and rate has been allocated to volume or rate changes in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
| | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 vs. 2005 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due to | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Net | |
Interest income | | | | | | | |
Loans receivable: | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 10,498 | | $ | 8,791 | | $ | 19,289 | |
Home equity | | | 2,887 | | | 1,316 | | | 4,203 | |
Second mortgage | | | 1,168 | | | (12 | ) | | 1,156 | |
Residential real estate | | | 97 | | | 78 | | | 175 | |
Other | | | 821 | | | 505 | | | 1,326 | |
Total loans receivable | | | 15,471 | | | 10,678 | | | 26,149 | |
Investment securities | | | (5,718 | ) | | 1,995 | | | (3,723 | ) |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 95 | | | 150 | | | 245 | |
Federal funds sold | | | (482 | ) | | 308 | | | (174 | ) |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 9,366 | | | 13,131 | | | 22,497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | (104 | ) | | 6,401 | | | 6,297 | |
Savings deposits | | | (723 | ) | | 1,323 | | | 600 | |
Time deposits | | | 4,406 | | | 6,389 | | | 10,795 | |
Total interest-bearing deposit accounts | | | 3,579 | | | 14,113 | | | 17,692 | |
Borrowed money: | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds purchased | | | 45 | | | 95 | | | 140 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase - customers | | | (779 | ) | | 768 | | | (11 | ) |
FHLB advances | | | (674 | ) | | 727 | | | 53 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 1,569 | | | 943 | | | 2,512 | |
Obligations under capital lease | | | 424 | | | - | | | 424 | |
Total borrowings | | | 585 | | | 2,533 | | | 3,118 | |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 4,164 | | | 16,646 | | | 20,810 | |
Net change in net interest income | | $ | 5,202 | | $ | (3,515 | ) | $ | 1,687 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) increased by $22.5 million, to $136.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $113.5 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest income was primarily due to increase in interest rates which increased the yield on average loans receivable 67 basis points or $10.7 million. In addition, there was a $15.5 million increase as a result of an increase of $311.2 million in average loans receivable offset by $5.7 million as a result of a decrease in average investment securities of $214.8 million.
Interest expense increased $20.8 million, or 51.9%, to $60.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $40.1 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to an increase in interest rates, which increased the cost of average interest-bearing deposit accounts by 105 basis points or $14.1 million and a $93.3 million or 4.7% increase in average interest-bearing deposit accounts which produced an increase in interest expense of $3.6 million.
Provision for Loan Losses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the provision for loan losses was $2.8 million, as compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2005. The Company’s gross loans receivable grew approximately $176 million (adjusted for approximately $125 million loans acquired in Advantage acquisition) during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $92.0 million for the same period in 2005.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income, excluding the decrease in gain on sale of investment securities of $829,000, increased $1.7 million or 12.8% to $14.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase was primarily as a result of an increase of $1.2 million in service charges on deposit accounts, and increase of $255,000 on third-party investment and advisory services, an increase of $207,000 on debit card interchange fees, and a $151,000 increase on dividends on Trust Preferred Securities.
Non-Interest Expenses. Non-interest expenses increased $4.6 million, or 7.3% to $67.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $62.9 million for the same period in 2005. Of this increase, approximately $2.2 million is due to the incremental expenses resulting from the January 2006 Advantage acquisition which consists primarily of the following:
| | | | | | | |
| | For the | | 2006 Expenses | | Internally | |
| | Nine Months Ended | | of Newly | | Generated | |
| | September 30, | | Acquired Bank | | Variance | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | | | | |
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | $ | 34,237 | | $ | 31,804 | | $ | 1,142 | | $ | 1,291 | |
Other non-interest expenses | | | 33,267 | | | 31,128 | | | 1,060 | | | 1,079 | |
Total non-interest expenses | | $ | 67,504 | | $ | 62,932 | | $ | 2,202 | | $ | 2,370 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-interest expense, excluding the expenses of Advantage, increased $2.4 million or 3.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. The increase was primarily a result of a $1.3 million increase in salaries and employee benefits which increased primarily as a result of $500,000 in severance related charges in 2006 and $158,000 in stock option expenses directly related to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. In addition, data processing fees and other expenses increased $324,000 and $574,000, respectively. Other expenses increased primarily as a result of an increase of $156,000 in professional fees relating to non-performing assets, an increase in loan related expenditures such as document filing fees and credit bureau reports of $133,000, and an increase of $156,000 in insurance premiums. Real estate owned expense increased $302,000 to $226,000 as the Company recognized a loss of $69,000 from a second lien on a residential property during the third quarter 2006 and incurred additional expenses on the sales of a commercial real estate property and an unoccupied branch property during the first half of 2006.
Income Taxes. Income taxes decreased $927,000 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. The increase resulted primarily from lower pre-tax earnings.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On December 19, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 94-6-1, Terms of Loan Products That May Give Rise to a Concentration of Credit Risk. FSP 94-6-1 addresses whether, under existing guidance, non-traditional loan products represent a concentration of credit risk and what disclosures are required for entities that originate, hold, guarantee, service or invest in loan products whose terms may give rise to a concentration of credit risk. Non-traditional loan products expose the originator, holder, investor, guarantor or servicer to higher credit risk than traditional loan products. Typical features of non-traditional loan products may include high loan-to-value ratios and interest or principal repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans of an equivalent term. FSP 94-6-1 was effective upon its issuance and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or disclosures.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This Statement resolves issues addressed in SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this pronouncement but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS No. 156”). SFAS No. 140 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 amends SFAS No. 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. This Statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value. Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. Adoption of this Statement is required as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. Upon adoption, the Company will apply the requirements for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities prospectively to all transactions. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 156 for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007 and is evaluating the impact of this pronouncement.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this interpretation but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of this pronouncement but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 requires the use of two alternative approaches in quantitatively evaluating materiality of misstatements. If the misstatement as quantified under either approach is material to the current year financial statements, the misstatement must be corrected. If the effect of correcting the prior year misstatements, if any, in the current year income statement is material, the prior year financial statements should be corrected. This guidance is effective for the calendar year ending 2006. In the year of adoption, the misstatements may be corrected as an accounting change by adjusting opening retained earnings rather than being included in the current year income statement. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SAB No. 108 but does not expect that the guidance will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Asset and Liability Management
Interest rate, credit and operational risks are among the most significant market risks impacting the performance of the Company. Interest rate risk is reviewed monthly by the Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), composed of senior management representatives from a variety of areas within the Company. ALCO devises strategies and tactics to maintain the net interest income of the Company within acceptable ranges over a variety of interest rate scenarios. Should the Company’s risk modeling indicate an undesired exposure to changes in interest rates, there are a number of remedial options available including changing the investment portfolio characteristics, and changing loan and deposit pricing strategies. Two of the tools used in monitoring the Company’s sensitivity to interest rate changes are gap analysis and net interest income simulation.
Gap Analysis. Banks are concerned with the extent to which they are able to match maturities or repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Such matching is facilitated by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are interest-rate sensitive and by monitoring the bank’s interest rate sensitivity gap. An asset or liability is considered to be interest-rate sensitive if it will mature or reprice within a specific time period, over the interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within that same time period. On a monthly basis, the Company and the Bank monitor their gap, primarily cumulative through one year maturities.
At September 30, 2006, total interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year exceeded interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing during the same time period by $6.3 million, representing a positive one-year gap ratio of 0.19%. All amounts are categorized by their actual maturity, anticipated call or repricing date with the exception of interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits. Though the rates on interest-bearing demand and savings deposits generally trend with open market rates, they often do not fully adjust to open market rates and frequently adjust with a time lag. As a result of prior experience during periods of rate volatility and management's estimate of future rate sensitivities, the Company allocates the interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits based on an estimated decay rate for those deposits.
Net Interest Income Simulation. Due to the inherent limitations of gap analysis, the Company also uses simulation models to measure the impact of changing interest rates on its operations. The simulation model attempts to capture the cash flow and repricing characteristics of the current assets and liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet. Assumptions regarding such things as prepayments, rate change behaviors, level and composition of new balance sheet activity and new product lines are incorporated into the simulation model. Net interest income is simulated over a twelve month horizon under a variety of linear yield curve shifts, subject to certain limits agreed to by ALCO. The Company uses a base interest rate scenario provided by a third party econometric modeling service.
Actual results may differ from the simulated results due to such factors as the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, changes in market conditions, management strategies and differences in actual versus forecasted balance sheet composition and activity.
The following table shows the Company’s estimated earnings sensitivity profile versus the most likely rate forecast from Global Insights as of September 30, 2006:
| | |
Change in Interest Rates | | Percentage Change in Net Interest Income |
(Basis Points) | | Year 1 |
+200 | | -0.5% |
+100 | | -0.2% |
-100 | | +0.4% |
-200 | | +0.6% |
| | |
Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage interest rate risk that exists as part of its ongoing business operations. As of September 30, 2006, derivative financial instruments have been entered into to hedge the interest rate risk associated with certain fixed rate commercial loans. In general, the derivative transactions fall into one of two types, a bank hedge of a specific fixed rate loan or a hedged derivative offering to a Bank customer. In those transactions in which the Bank hedges a specific fixed rate loan, the derivative is executed for periods that match the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of these exposures. For derivatives offered to Bank customers, the economic risk of the customer transaction is offset by a mirror position with a non-affiliated third party.
As noted above, the Company currently utilizes interest rate swaps to hedge specified assets. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Interest rate swaps were entered into as fair value hedges for the purpose of modifying the interest rate characteristics of certain commercial loans. The interest rate swaps involve no exchange of principal either at inception or upon maturity; rather, it involves the periodic exchange of interest payments arising from an underlying notional value.
Financial derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. The Company manages these risks as part of its asset and liability management process and through credit policies and procedures. The Company seeks to minimize counterparty credit risk by establishing credit limits, and generally requiring bilateral netting and collateral agreements.
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the hedging instrument, based on the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Currently, the Company only participates in fair value hedges.
Fair Value Hedges - Interest Rate Swaps
The Company has entered into interest rate swap arrangements to exchange the payments on fixed rate commercial loan receivables for variable rate payments based on LIBOR. The interest rate swaps involve no exchange of principal either at inception or maturity and have maturities and call options identical to the fixed rate loan agreements. The arrangements have been designated as fair value hedges. The swaps are carried at their fair value and the carrying amount of the commercial loans includes the net change in their fair values since the inception of the hedge. Because the hedging arrangement is considered highly effective, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps exactly offset the corresponding changes in the fair value of the commercial loans and, as a result, the changes in fair value do not result in an impact on net income.
Information pertaining to outstanding interest rate swap agreements was as follows:
| | | | | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Notional amount | | $ | 44,261,945 | | $ | 35,201,182 | |
Weighted average pay rate | | | 6.69 | % | | 6.57 | % |
Weighted average receive rate | | | 7.31 | % | | 5.85 | % |
Weighted average maturity in years | | | 6.6 | | | 7.3 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) relating to interest rate swaps | | $ | 682,622 | | $ | 121,812 | |
|
Customer Derivatives
The Company entered into several commercial loan swaps in order to provide commercial loan clients the ability to swap from variable to fixed interest rates. Under these agreements, the Company enters into a variable rate loan agreement with a client in addition to a swap agreement. This swap agreement effectively swaps the client’s variable rate loan into a fixed rate loan. The Company then enters into a corresponding swap agreement with a third party in order to swap its exposure on the variable to fixed rate swap on the commercial loan. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the notional amount of such arrangements was $511.5 million and $253.2 million, respectively. As the interest rate swaps with the clients and third parties are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, the instruments are marked to market in earnings. As the interest rate swaps are structured to offset each other, changes in market values will have no net earnings impact. The Company earned $154,000 and $978,000 from facilitating customer derivative transactions during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")), the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the quarter under report, there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 1. | |
| The Company is not engaged in any legal proceedings of a material nature at September 30, 2006. From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business wherein it enforces its security interest in loans. |
ITEM 1A. | |
| Management of the Company does not believe there have been any material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the Company’s Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
ITEM 2. | |
| Not applicable |
ITEM 3. | |
| Not applicable |
ITEM 4. | |
| Not applicable |
ITEM 5. | |
| Not applicable |
ITEM 6. | |
| |
| |
| |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | Sun Bancorp, Inc. |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Date: November 8, 2006 | | /s/ Thomas A. Bracken |
| | Thomas A. Bracken |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Date: November 8, 2006 | | /s/ Dan A. Chila |
| | Dan A. Chila |
| | Executive Vice President and |
| | Chief Financial Officer |