Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization expense consists of the amortization of acquired intangible assets which are operating expenses and not considered costs of revenues. In the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, amortization expense was $1.3 million and $793,000, respectively. The increase is due to the estimated amortization of intangible assets in connection with the acquisition of Mobix Interactive on November 18, 2008. An additional $60,000 and $94,000 of amortization expense related to acquired technology was charged to cost of sales for the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In the future, SeaChange expects to have a higher amortization expense as a result of the recent acquisitions of Mobix on November 19, 2008 and eventIS on September 1, 2009. The Company expects to complete valuations for Mobix and eventIS during the third quarter.
Interest and Other Income, net. Interest and other income, net was $285,000 in the six months ended July 31, 2009, compared to $1.5 million in the six months ended July 31, 2008. The decrease in interest and other income, net is primarily due to a $873,000 decrease in interest income resulting from lower investment yields and $373,000 of translation losses at our various foreign subsidiaries (where the functional currency is the US Dollar) derived from fluctuations in exchange rates between the various currencies and the U.S dollar.
Equity Loss in Earnings of Affiliates.Equity loss in earnings of affiliates was $244,000 in the six months ended July 31, 2009 in comparison to equity loss in earnings of affiliates of $397,000 in the six months ended July 31, 2008. For the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, $520,000 and $755,000, respectively, of equity loss was recognized from On Demand Deutschland, net of $286,000 and $358,000, respectively, in accreted gains related to customer contracts and content licensing agreements and a capital distribution related to reimbursement of previously incurred costs.
Income Tax Provision.For the six months ended July 31, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of $233,000 on income before tax of $1.1 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 21%. The effective tax rate of 21% was primarily attributable to income in our foreign subsidiaries which are taxed at lower rates than in the U.S. rate of 35%. For the six months ended July 31, 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $633,000 on income before taxes of $2.9 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 22%.
As of July 31, 2009, the Company has maintained the full valuation allowance against its net U.S. and U.K. deferred tax assets primarily due to the uncertainties related to our ability to generate sufficient pre-tax income for fiscal 2010 and thereafter. If we generate sufficient pre-tax income in the future, some portion or all of the valuation allowance could be reversed and a corresponding increase in net income would be reported in future periods.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, we have financed our operations and capital expenditures primarily with cash on-hand and the proceeds from sales of our common stock. Cash and marketable securities increased $7.7 million from $85.8 million at January 31, 2009 to $93.5 million at July 31, 2009. Working capital, excluding long-term marketable securities, increased from $89.5 million at January 31, 2009 to $89.7 million at July 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2009 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $3.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2008. The net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended July 31, 2009 was primarily the result of non-cash expenses of $7.7 million and a decrease of $12.0 million of accounts receivable, resulting from strong collections during the period offset by a decrease of $2.7 million in accrued expenses.
Net cash used by investing activities was $6.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2009 compared to net cash used by investing activities of $4.9 million for the six months ended July 31, 2008. Investment activity for the six months ended July 31, 2009 consisted of net purchases of $300,000 of marketable securities, the purchase of property and equipment of $6.0 million, a $700,000 contingent payment to the former shareholders of Mobix and additional investments in Casa Systems, Inc. of $654,000 and On Demand Deutschland GMBH and CoKG of $212,000.
Net cash used by financing activities was $800,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2009 and net cash used by financing activities was $4.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2008. In the six months ended July 31, 2009, the cash used by financing activities was due to the repurchase of $1.7 million of the Company’s stock partially offset by $900,000 from the issuance of common stock in connection with stock option exercises and stock purchases under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
24
For the six month period ended July 31, 2009 the effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents from translating ODG’s cash balances to U.S. dollars from British Pounds resulted in an increase of the cash balance of $600,000.
In connection with our acquisition of eventIS Group B.V., (eventIS), SeaChange paid €25.5 million (approximately $36.6 million) upon the closing of the transaction on September 1, 2009. In addition, SeaChange is obligated to pay annually €1.2 (approximately $1.7 million) million in cash and issue shares of restricted stock of SeaChange equating to €800,000 (approximately $1.1 million) to the former eventIS shareholders on each of the first three anniversary dates following the acquisition. In addition, we have agreed to contingent earnout payments principally related to the achievement of certain annual revenue targets for eventIS products and sales of SeaChange products and services. The revenue performance metrics will cover the three year period ending January 31, 2013 with payment upon achievement of these metrics occurring annually. We incurred a total of approximately $500,000 of transaction expenses, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 which were expensed as general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. We expect to incur further transactions costs associated with the acquisition of eventIS during our third quarter.
In connection with our acquisition of Mobix, at the closing, we deposited £1 million (approximately $1.5 million) in escrow, which was subsequently returned to ODG on May 27, 2009 due to Mobix failing to meet certain performance goals. In addition, we have agreed to make total contingent earnout cash payments of approximately £8.3 million upon the achievement of certain financial targets measured over defined periods through November 19, 2011.
On February 27, 2007, the On Demand Group Ltd. (“ODG”), a wholly-owned U.K. subsidiary of SeaChange, entered into an agreement with Tele-Munchen Fernseh GmbH & Co. Produktionsgesellschaft to create a joint venture named On Demand Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG. The Shareholder’s Agreement requires ODG to provide cash contributions up to $4.2 million upon the request of the joint venture’s management and approval by the shareholders of the joint venture. During the six months ended July 31, 2009, the Company contributed $212,000.
On March 11, 2009, SeaChange’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of its common stock, par value $.01 per share, through a share repurchase program. As authorized by the program, shares may be purchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions in a manner consistent with applicable securities laws and regulations, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan maintained by the Company. This share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. All repurchases are expected to be funded from the Company’s current cash and investment balances. The timing and amount of the shares to be repurchased will be based on market conditions and other factors, including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and alternative investment opportunities. The repurchase program is scheduled to terminate on January 31, 2010. During the six months ended July 31, 2009, the Company repurchased 298,415 shares at a cost of $1.7 million.
On October 31, 2008, RBS Citizens (a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc) extended our $15.0 million revolving line of credit from October 31, 2008 through October 31, 2010. Loans made under this revolving line of credit bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the bank’s prime rate. Borrowings under this line of credit are collateralized by substantially all of our assets. The loan agreement requires SeaChange to comply with certain financial covenants. On August 31, 2009, these financial covenants were amended to reflect the acquisition of eventIS. As of July 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the financial covenants and there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit.
We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued by a financial institution, to secure certain sales contracts. Letters of credit generally authorize the financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to reimburse the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of credit. We believe that it is unlikely we will be required to fund a claim under our outstanding letters of credit. As of July 31, 2009, the full amount of the letters of credit of $629,000 was supported by our credit facility.
We believe that existing funds combined with available borrowings under the revolving line of credit and cash provided by future operating activities are adequate to satisfy our working capital, potential acquisitions and capital expenditure requirements and other contractual obligations for the foreseeable future, including at least the next twelve months. In addition, we actively review potential acquisitions, such as our recent acquisition of eventIS on September 1, 2009, that would complement our existing product offerings, enhance our technical capabilities or expand our marketing and sales presence. Any future transactions of this nature could require potentially significant amounts of capital or could require us to issue additional stock and dilute existing stockholders. Our ability to raise funds may be adversely affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including the global economic slowdown as well as conditions in financial markets and the cable and telecom industries. There can be no assurance that any financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
25
Effects of Inflation
Management believes that financial results have not been significantly impacted by inflation and price changes in materials we use in manufacturing our products.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board “(FASB) issued SFAS No. 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No. 140 (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 eliminates the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity," changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an entity's continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)(“SFAS 167”), which amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) to address the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity and replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. Also, SFAS 167 requires an ongoing assessment of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amended approach focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, SFAS 167 provides more timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement with a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 will become effective for the first annual period starting after November 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impact of the Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) uses the fair value definition in SFAS 157, which defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” SFAS 141(R) also changes the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. Acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. SFAS 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS 141(R) would also apply the provisions of SFAS 141 (R). SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and was adopted by the Company on February 1, 2009. See Note 12 for disclosures relating to the acquisition of eventIS Group B.V. which was completed on September 1, 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events(“SFAS 165”). This statement incorporates accounting and disclosure requirements related to subsequent events into U.S. GAAP. The requirements of SFAS 165 for subsequent-events accounting and disclosure are not significantly different from those in existing auditing standards, which SeaChange has historically followed for financial reporting purposes. As a result, SeaChange does not believe this standard had any material impact on its financial statements. The Company evaluated its July 31, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through the date of issuance of these interim financial statements, which is September 8, 2009. Other than the definitive agreement entered into on September 1, 2009 for the purchase of all outstanding shares of eventIS Group B.V., further detailed in Note 12, the Company is not aware of any other subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
26
In April 2009, the FASB issued the following new accounting standards:
- FASB Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, amends FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements.
- FASB Staff Position FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset orLiability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” (“FSP FAS 157-4”).FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principlespresented in SFAS 157. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional authoritative guidance in determining whether a marketis active or inactive, and whether a transaction is distressed, and is applicable to all assets and liabilities (i.e.financial and nonfinancial) and will require enhanced disclosures.
- FASB Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-TemporaryImpairments,” (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 provides additional guidance toprovide greater clarity about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment event andto more effectively communicate when an other-than-temporary impairment event has occurred. This FSP applies todebt securities.
Upon implementation during SeaChange’s second quarter of fiscal 2010, the FASB Staff Positions (“FSP) did not have a material impact on SeaChange’s consolidated financial statements. The additional disclosures related to FSP’s are included in Note 2.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We face exposure to financial market risks, including adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. Our foreign currency exchange exposure is primarily associated with product sales arrangements, European and Asian repatriation or settlement of intercompany payables and receivables among subsidiaries and its parent company, and/or investment/equity contingency considerations denominated in the local currency where the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of our international product sales are payable in United States Dollars (USD) or in the case of our Media Services operations in the United Kingdom service sales, payable in GBP, providing a natural hedge for receipts and local payments. In light of the high proportion of our international businesses, we expect the risk of any adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates could have an impact on our translated results within the Combined Statements of Financial Position and Operations. In addition, for the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s Media Services operations in the United Kingdom generated a foreign currency translation gain of $4.5 million and $207,000, respectively, which was recorded as accumulated other comprehensive gain increasing the Company’s equity section of the balance sheet over the prior period.
With the exception of ODG and Mobix, the U.S. Dollar is the functional currency for our international subsidiaries. All foreign currency gains and losses are included in interest and other income, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the three months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company recorded approximately $80,000 in losses and $46,000 in gains to interest and other income, net, due to international subsidiary translations and cash settlements of revenues and expenses. For the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company recorded approximately $155,000 in losses and $201,000 in gains to interest and other income, net, due to international subsidiary translations and cash settlements of revenues and expenses.
The carrying amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheet of cash and cash equivalents, short-term marketable securities, trade receivables and trade payables approximate fair value at July 31, 2009 due to the short maturities of these instruments. We maintain investment portfolio holdings of various issuers, types, and maturities. Our cash and marketable securities include cash equivalents, which we consider to be investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less. Given the short maturities and investment grade quality of the portfolio holdings at July 31, 2009, a sharp rise in interest rates should not have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Additionally, our long term marketable investments, which are carried at the lower of cost or market, have fixed interest rates, and therefore are subject to changes in fair value. As a result, we do not currently hedge these market risk exposures.
27
At July 31, 2009, we had $8.9 million in short-term marketable securities and $13.1 million in long-term marketable securities. Of the $22.0 million in available-for-sale securities at July 31, 2009, the Company holds $1.0 million in auction rate securities ("ARS") that were intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate in the event there is no new investment in these securities. Due to the uncertainty in the credit markets, this $1.0 millionARS holding in our investment portfolio has failed to settle on its respective settlement date resulting in the illiquidity of this investment. Consequently, we have not been able to access these funds and do not expect to do so until a future auction of these investments is successful or a buyer is found outside the auction process. Although the maturity date of the underlying security of our ARS investment is twenty-two years, we currently have sufficient cash and cash equivalents, cash from operations and access to unused credit facilities to meet our short term liquidity requirements and do not anticipate that we will need to access our ARS investment. Accordingly, the Company has classified this investment as long-term and its fair value equals par at maturity.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. William C. Styslinger, III, our Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin M. Bisson, our Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in this evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, Messrs. Styslinger and Bisson concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report and as of the date of the evaluation.
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting As a result of the evaluation completed by the Company, and in which Messrs. Styslinger and Bisson participated, the Company has concluded that there were no changes during the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009 in its internal controls over financial reporting, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
Litigation
None
Other Matters
ARRIS Litigation
On July 31, 2009, Arris Corporation filed a contempt motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against SeaChange International relating to U.S. Patent No 5,805,804, a patent owned by Arris Corporation. In its motion, Arris Corporation is seeking further patent royalties and the enforcement of the permanent injunction entered by the Court on April 6, 2006 against certain of our products. In response, on August 3, 2009, we filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment from the Court to declare that its products are non-infringing with respect to the ‘804 patent and asserting certain equitable defenses.
On August 25, 2009, Arris Corporation filed 1) an answer to our complaint that included a counterclaim of patent infringement under the ‘804 patent; and 2) a motion to stay the declaratory judgment action until the resolution of the contempt motion. We have filed a motion to consolidate the Arris contempt motion with our declaratory judgment action. We believes that Arris’ contempt motion is without merit, and that our products do not infringe the remaining claims under the ‘804 patent.
Indemnification and Warranties
SeaChange provides indemnification, to the extent permitted by law, to its officers, directors, employees and agents for liabilities arising from certain events or occurrences while the officer, director, employee, or agent is or was serving at SeaChange’s request in such capacity. With respect to acquisitions, SeaChange provides indemnification to or assumes indemnification obligations for the current and former directors, officers and employees of the acquired companies in accordance with the acquired companies’ bylaws and charter. As a matter of practice, SeaChange has maintained directors and officers’ liability insurance including coverage for directors and officers of acquired companies.
SeaChange enters into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers, resellers, distributors, integrators and suppliers. Most of these agreements require SeaChange to defend and/or indemnify the other party against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to SeaChange’s products. From time to time, SeaChange also indemnifies customers and business partners for damages, losses and liabilities they may suffer or incur relating to personal injury, personal property damage, product liability, and environmental claims relating to the use of SeaChange’s products and services or resulting from the acts or omissions of SeaChange, its employees, authorized agents or subcontractors. For example, SeaChange has received requests from several of its customers for indemnification of patent litigation claims asserted by Acacia Media Technologies, USA Video Technology Corporation, Multimedia Patent Trust, and VTran Media Technologies. Management performed an analysis of all requests under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies (“SFAS 5”) as interpreted by FASB Interpretation No. 45,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others(“FIN45”).
SeaChange warrants that its products, including software products, will substantially perform in accordance with its standard published specifications in effect at the time of delivery. Most warranties have at least a one year duration that generally commence upon installation. In addition, SeaChange provides maintenance support to customers and therefore allocates a portion of the product purchase price to the initial warranty period and recognizes revenue on a straight line basis over that warranty period related to both the warranty obligation and the maintenance support agreement. When SeaChange receives revenue for extended warranties beyond the standard duration, it is deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the contract period. Related costs are expensed as incurred.
In the ordinary course of business, SeaChange provides minimum purchase guarantees to certain of its vendors to ensure continuity of supply against the market demand. Although some of these guarantees provide penalties for cancellations and/or modifications to the purchase commitments as the market demand decreases, most of the guarantees do not. Therefore, as the market demand decreases, SeaChange re-evaluates the accounting implications of guarantees and determines what charges, if any, should be recorded.
29
With respect to its agreements covering product, business or entity divestitures and acquisitions, SeaChange provides certain representations and warranties and agrees to indemnify and hold such purchasers harmless against breaches of such representations, warranties and covenants. With respect to its acquisitions, SeaChange may, from time to time, assume the liability for certain events or occurrences that took place prior to the date of acquisition.
SeaChange provides such guarantees and indemnification obligations after considering the economics of the transaction and other factors including but not limited to the liquidity and credit risk of the other party in the transaction. SeaChange believes that the likelihood is remote that any such arrangement could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operation or liquidity. SeaChange records liabilities, as disclosed above, for such guarantees based on the Company’s best estimate of probable losses which considers amounts recoverable under any recourse provisions.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Repurchase of the Company’s Equity Securities
On March 11, 2009, SeaChange’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of its common stock, par value $.01 per share, through a share repurchase program. As authorized by the program, shares may be purchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions in a manner consistent with applicable securities laws and regulations, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan maintained by the Company. This share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. All repurchases are expected to be funded from the Company’s current cash and investment balances. The timing and amount of the shares to be repurchased will be based on market conditions and other factors, including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and alternative investment opportunities.
The repurchase program is scheduled to terminate on January 31, 2010. No shares were purchased during the three months ended July 31, 2009. As of July 31, 2009, the remaining maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program is $18.3 million.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of the stockholders of SeaChange was held on July 15, 2009 at which the stockholders voted on the following matters:
1. The election of one (1) member (William C. Styslinger, III) to SeaChange’s Board of Directors, to serve for a three-year term as a Class I Director;
2. The ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP, SeaChange’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Voting results were as follows:
| | Votes For | | Votes Against | | Abstained |
Election of William C. Styslinger, III | | 20,791,253 | | — | | 7,779,350 |
Ratification of appointment of independent registered public | | | | | | |
accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP | | 28,540,635 | | 28,468 | | 1,500 |
After the annual meeting, Thomas F. Olson, Carlo Salvatori, Mary Palermo Cotton and Carmine Vona continued to serve as our directors, in addition to William C. Styslinger, III. As disclosed in our Current Report on Form-8-K filed on September 3, 2009, Reijane Huai was elected as a director on August 28, 2009.
30
ITEM 6. Exhibits
| | (a) Exhibits |
| | |
2.1 | | Agreement for the Entire Issued Share Capital of eventIS Group B.V. dated as of September 1, 2009 by and among Ventise Holding B.V., SeaChange B.V. and SeaChange International, Inc. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SeaChange International, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: September 8, 2009 | | |
| SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| | |
| by: | /S/ KEVINM. BISSON |
| | Kevin M. Bisson |
| | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, |
| | Finance and |
| | Administration, Treasurer and Secretary |
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Index to Exhibits
No. | | Description |
2.1 | | Agreement for the Entire Issued Share Capital of eventIS Group B.V. dated as of September 1, 2009 by and among Ventise Holding B.V., SeaChange B.V. and SeaChange International, Inc |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
32