RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS | 10. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2016‑02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard established a right-of-use model that requires all lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities on their balance sheet that arise from leases with terms longer than 12 months as well as provide disclosures with respect to certain qualitative and quantitative information related to their leasing arrangements. This standard became effective for us on January 1, 2019 (“the Effective Date”). The FASB has subsequently issued the following amendments to ASU 2016‑02, which also became effective on January 1, 2019, and which we collectively refer to as the new leasing standards: ASU No. 2018‑01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, which permits an entity to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 land easements that exist or expired prior to adoption of Topic 842 and that were not previously accounted for as leases under the prior standard, ASC 840, Leases. ASU No. 2018‑10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, which amends certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2016‑02. ASU No. 2018‑11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which allows for a transition approach to initially apply ASU 2016‑02 at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit in the period of adoption as well as an additional practical expedient for lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component. ASU No. 2018‑20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which contains certain narrow scope improvements to the guidance issued in ASU 2016‑02. We adopted the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach of applying the new standard to all leases existing as of, or entered into after, the Effective Date and with remaining terms of 12 months or more. Our assessment included the lease of our headquarters in Burlington, MA which commenced in May 2015 and , prior to our October 2019 amendment discussed below, was scheduled to expire in July 2020 and our laboratory space in Woburn, MA which commenced in March 2019 and expires in April 2024. The adoption of the new standard on January 1, 2019 resulted in the recording of a right-of-use asset and lease liability of $0.7 million related to the lease of our headquarters in Burlington, MA that existed on the Effective Date. The lease liability is based on the present value of the remaining minimum lease payments, discounted using our secured incremental borrowing rate at the Effective Date. As permitted under ASC 842, we elected several practical expedients and therefore did not reassess at the Effective Date (1) whether any existing contract is or contains a lease, (2) the classification of existing leases, and (3) whether previously capitalized costs continue to qualify as initial indirect costs. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components. The application of the practical expedients did not have a significant impact on the measurement of the operating lease liability. In addition, we implemented internal controls to enable the preparation of financial information on adoption. The adoption did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements related to the existing lease of our headquarters in Burlington, MA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. As a result, there was no cumulative-effect adjustment. For contracts entered into on or after the Effective Date, at the inception of a contract we assess whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. Our assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether we have the right to direct the use of the asset. At inception of a lease, we allocate the consideration in the contract to each lease component based on its relative stand-alone price to determine the lease payments. Leases are classified as either finance leases or operating leases. A lease is classified as a finance lease if any one of the following criteria are met: (1) the lease transfers ownership of the asset by the end of the lease term, (2) the lease contains an option to purchase the asset that is reasonably certain to be exercised, (3) the lease term is for a major part of the remaining useful life of the asset or (4) the present value of the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the asset. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not meet any one of these criteria. Our leases are comprised of operating leases related to our headquarters in Burlington, MA and laboratory space in Woburn, MA. For all leases at the lease commencement date, a right-of-use asset and a lease liability are recognized. The right-of-use asset represents the right to use the leased asset for the lease term. The lease liability represents the present value of the lease payments under the lease. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which primarily comprises the initial amount of the lease liability, plus any initial direct costs incurred, consisting mainly of brokerage commissions, less any lease incentives received. All right-of-use assets are reviewed for impairment. The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the secured incremental borrowing rate. For our operating leases, we use our secured incremental borrowing rate if the implicit lease rate cannot be determined. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following: the fixed noncancelable lease payments, payments for optional renewal periods where it is reasonably certain the renewal period will be exercised, and payments for early termination options unless it is reasonably certain the lease will not be terminated early. Lease expense for operating leases consists of the lease payments plus any initial direct costs and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain leases contain rent escalation clauses and variable lease payments that require additional rental payments in later years of the term, including payments based on an index or inflation rate. Payments based on the change in an index or inflation rate, or payments based on a change in our portion of the operating expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance, are not included in the initial lease liability and are recorded as a period expense when incurred. Our operating leases may include an option to renew the lease term for various renewal periods and/or to terminate the leases early. As an option to exercise the renewal or early termination of our operating leases were either non-existent or not reasonably certain as of the ASC 842 Effective Date for our headquarters in Burlington, MA and the lease commencement date of our laboratory space in Woburn, MA, we did not include such options in our initial lease liability. Subsequent to the Effective Date and during the quarter ending September 30, 2019, the option to renew the lease term of our headquarters in Burlington, MA became reasonably certain. This resulted in a $1.98 million increase of our right-of-use asset and lease liability of as of September 30, 2019. As of September 30, 2019, we recognized right-of-use assets related to our headquarters in Burlington, MA and laboratory space in Woburn, MA of $2.7 million and the related net lease liabilities of $2.7 million, which represents the net present value of the remaining lease payments of approximately $3.7 million, discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate of 8.87%. We have included the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2019. The following table summarizes future minimum lease payments for our operating leases as of September 30, 2019 (in thousands): Year Ending December 31, 2019 (three months ending December 31, 2019) $ 152 2020 619 2021 642 2022 657 2023 672 Thereafter 963 Total minimum lease payments $ 3,705 In October 2019, we entered into an amendment to the lease of our headquarters in Burlington, MA that increased the amount of space subject to the lease and extended the term of the lease until July 2025. As previously disclosed in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10‑K and under the previous lease accounting standard, ASC 840, Leases , the total commitment for our non-cancelable operating lease was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands): Year Ending December 31, 2019 $ 523 2020 296 Thereafter — Total minimum lease payments $ 819 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, (“ASU 2018‑13”). The new standard removes certain disclosures, modifies certain disclosures and adds additional disclosures related to fair value measurement. The new standard will be effective beginning January 1, 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018‑13 will have on our consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350‑40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, (“ASU 2018‑15”). The amendments in this update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this update. The new standard will be effective beginning January 1, 2020. The amendments in this update should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018‑15 will have on our consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” . This ASU will require that credit losses be reported using an expected losses model rather than the incurred losses model that is currently used, and establishes additional disclosures related to credit risks. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, this standard will require allowances to be recorded instead of reducing the amortized cost of the investment. ASU 2016-13 will limit the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value and requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted, and requires adoption using a modified retrospective approach, with certain exceptions. Based on the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio, current market conditions and historical credit loss activity, we are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s financial statements. |