Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Product Warranties Changes in the liability for product warranty claim costs were as follows: (In thousands) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 2015 Balance at beginning of period $ 35 $ 353 Accruals for warranties issued during the period 100 12 Settlements (in cash or in kind) during the period — (329 ) Balance at end of period $ 135 $ 36 Restructuring Activities and Sale of Guangzhou Factory In the first quarter of 2016, we implemented a plan to reduce our manufacturing costs by transitioning manufacturing activities from our southern-most China factory, located in the city of Guangzhou in the Guangdong province, to our other three China factories where labor rates are lower. As a result, we incurred severance costs of $0.1 million and $1.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 , which are included within selling, general and administrative expenses. We expect to incur additional severance costs of approximately $10 million as we continue to execute this transition over the next 12-15 months. Because severance costs relate to involuntary terminations, we record the related liability at the communication date. At September 30, 2016 , we had $0.1 million of unpaid severance costs included within accrued compensation. On September 26, 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell our Guangzhou manufacturing facility for RMB 320 million (approximately $48 million ). Under the terms of this agreement, we have up to 24 months to cease all operations within the facility. The closing of the sale will be subject to customary due diligence and local regulatory approval and is expected to be completed within approximately 28 months from the execution of the agreement. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the buyer deposited 10% of the purchase price into an escrow account at agreement inception, which we have presented as long-term restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet (also refer to Note 2). The remaining balance of the purchase price is to be placed into the escrow account prior to the closing of the sale and will be released to us upon closing. Litigation On June 28, 2016, in connection with previously disclosed litigation matters, we entered into a confidential agreement in principal with Universal Remote Control, Inc. (“URC”), Ohsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Ohsung Electronics USA, Inc. (collectively the “URC Parties”) to settle all litigation matters (including the malicious prosecution litigation described below) between us and the URC Parties. By and during the term of this agreement, we and the URC Parties will dismiss all litigation matters and appeals. While the terms of this agreement in principal are confidential, the $4.6 million surety bond previously placed by us in connection with these litigation matters will be released to URC. Additionally, the URC Parties will receive a limited paid up license to the technologies covered by the patents in this litigation and a limited covenant not to sue with respect to certain of URC’s products existing as of the settlement date. We expect to finalize the definitive settlement agreement and other documents in the near future. Thus, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded $2.0 million of estimated litigation settlement costs within selling, general and administrative expenses. While we have been negotiating the settlement agreement and other documents, the underlying litigation with respect to the second litigation matter we filed against URC (Universal Electronics Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc., SACV13-00987 JAK (SHx)) has been stayed with a status conference set for November 14, 2016. In addition, on October 17, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit15-1410-CB Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc. "Opinion filed" (8:12-cv-00329-AG-JPR) ruled in our favor denying URC’s appeal of the lower court’s ruling in the first litigation matter we filed against URC in which URC sought to obtain more attorney fees and costs. On April 28, 2016, URC filed a malicious prosecution lawsuit against us in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Universal Remote Control, Inc. v. Universal Electronics Inc., 30-2016-00849239-CU-BT-CJC) seeking additional monetary damages against us in connection with the litigation matters we filed against them. This lawsuit has been stayed while we have been negotiating a settlement of all our disputes (see discussion above). Further, we believe that this action by URC is without merit, and we have denied all of URC’s allegations and should we not settle all of our disputes (including this one), we intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. On or about June 10, 2015, FM Marketing GmbH ("FMH") and Ruwido Austria GmbH ("Ruwido"), filed a Summons in Summary Proceedings in Belgium court against one of our subsidiaries, Universal Electronics BV ("UEBV") and one of its customers, Telenet N.V. ("Telenet"), claiming that one of the products UEBV supplies Telenet violates two design patents and one utility patent owned by FMH and/or Ruwido. By this summons, FMH and Ruwido sought to enjoin Telenet and UEBV from continued distribution and use of the products at issue. After the September 29, 2015 hearing, the Court issued its ruling in our and Telenet’s favor, rejecting FMH and Ruwido’s request entirely. On October 22, 2015, Ruwido filed its notice of appeal in this ruling. The parties have fully briefed the appeal and on February 15, 2016, the appellate court heard oral arguments. While awaiting the appellate court’s ruling, we requested and received permission to submit additional filings in support of our position. As such, the court set a new date for all new filings to be submitted and set a status conference for January 2017. In addition, in September 2015, UEBV filed an Opposition with the European Patent Office seeking to invalidate the one utility patent asserted against UEBV and Telenet by Ruwido. The hearing on this opposition has been set for July 2017. Finally, on or about February 9, 2016, Ruwido filed a writ of summons for proceeding on the merits with respect to asserted patents. UEBV and Telenet have replied, denying all of Ruwido's allegations and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims with the hearing on this matter set for February 2017. There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which our respective property is the subject. However, as is typical in our industry and to the nature and kind of business in which we are engaged, from time to time, various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced by third parties against us or by us against third parties arising from or related to product liability, infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights, breach of warranty, contractual relations, or employee relations. The amounts claimed may be substantial but may not bear any reasonable relationship to the merits of the claims or the extent of any real risk of court awards assessed against us or in our favor. However, no assurances can be made as to the outcome of any of these matters, nor can we estimate the range of potential losses to us. In our opinion, final judgments, if any, which might be rendered against us in potential or pending litigation would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Moreover, we believe that our products do not infringe any third parties' patents or other intellectual property rights. We maintain directors' and officers' liability insurance which insures our individual directors and officers against certain claims, as well as attorney's fees and related expenses incurred in connection with the defense of such claims. |