Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and payables approximated fair value because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments. Cash equivalents include only those investments having a maturity date of three months or less at the time of purchase. Derivative Financial Instruments Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC Topic 815”) requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. The Company records all derivative financial instruments at their fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. Except for certain non-designated Inventories Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process first-in, first-out on-hand, The Company evaluates inventory quarterly using the best information available at the time to inform our assumptions and estimates about future demand and resulting sales volumes, and recognizes reserves as necessary to properly state inventory. The historically severe oil-industry mid-2014 Based on an update of our assumptions at each point in time related to estimates of future demand, during 2017 and 2016 we recorded charges for additions to inventory reserves of $114 million and $606 million, respectively, consisting primarily of obsolete and surplus inventories. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, inventory reserves totaled $800 million and $1,017 million, or 21.0% and 23.4% of gross inventory, respectively. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major improvements that extend the lives of property and equipment are capitalized while minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Disposals are removed at cost less accumulated depreciation with any resulting gain or loss reflected in operations. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of individual items. Depreciation expense, which includes the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases, was $359 million, $370 million and $391 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accumulated depreciation of $2,559 million as of December 31, 2017 included accumulated depreciation of $18 million for capital leases. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of property, plant and equipment are included in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets are impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. The carrying value of assets used in operations that are not recoverable is reduced to fair value if lower than carrying value. In determining the fair market value of the assets, we consider market trends and recent transactions involving sales of similar assets, or when not available, discounted cash flow analysis. There were $10 million and $54 million in impairments of long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and nil for the year ended December 31, 2015. Intangible Assets The Company has approximately $6.2 billion of goodwill and $3.3 billion of identified intangible assets at December 31, 2017. Goodwill is identified by segment as follows (in millions): Wellbore Completion & Rig Total Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 2,874 $ 1,997 $ 2,109 $ 6,980 Goodwill acquired and adjusted during period 4 70 — 74 Impairment — — (972 ) (972 ) Currency translation adjustments (4 ) (9 ) (2 ) (15 ) Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 2,874 $ 2,058 $ 1,135 $ 6,067 Goodwill acquired and adjusted during period 37 41 11 89 Currency translation adjustments 45 23 3 71 Balance at December 31, 2017 (1) $ 2,956 $ 2,122 $ 1,149 $ 6,227 (1) Accumulated goodwill impairment was $2,457 million as of December 31, 2017. Identified intangible assets with determinable lives consist primarily of customer relationships, trademarks, trade names, patents, and technical drawings acquired in acquisitions, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of 2-30 years. The net book values of identified intangible assets are identified by segment as follows (in millions): Wellbore Completion & Rig Total Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 2,254 $ 1,296 $ 299 $ 3,849 Additions to intangible assets 15 9 — 24 Amortization (205 ) (106 ) (22 ) (333 ) Currency translation adjustments — (8 ) (2 ) (10 ) Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 2,064 $ 1,191 $ 275 $ 3,530 Additions to intangible assets 18 41 2 61 Amortization (208 ) (108 ) (23 ) (339 ) Currency translation adjustments 9 36 4 49 Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 1,883 $ 1,160 $ 258 $ 3,301 Identified intangible assets by major classification consist of the following (in millions): Gross Accumulated Net Book December 31, 2016: Customer relationships $ 4,024 $ (1,874 ) $ 2,150 Trademarks 878 (290 ) 588 Patents 585 (345 ) 240 Indefinite-lived trade names 384 — 384 Other 463 (295 ) 168 Total identified intangibles $ 6,334 $ (2,804 ) $ 3,530 December 31, 2017: Customer relationships $ 4,074 $ (2,118 ) $ 1,956 Trademarks 885 (317 ) 568 Patents 602 (384 ) 218 Indefinite-lived trade names 384 — 384 Other 499 (324 ) 175 Total identified intangibles $ 6,444 $ (3,143 ) $ 3,301 Asset Impairment Generally Accepted Accounting Principles require the Company test goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually or more frequently whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that those assets might be impaired. Prior to 2017, the impairment analysis was a two-step process as the Company early adopted Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-04 “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which eliminates step two effective July 1, 2017. The impairment analysis compares the reporting unit’s carrying value to the respective fair value. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” using significant unobservable inputs, or level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. These inputs are based on internal management estimates, forecasts and judgments, using discounted cash flow. The discounted cash flow is based on management’s forecast of operating performance for the reporting unit. The two main assumptions used in measuring goodwill impairment, which bear the risk of change and could impact the Company’s goodwill impairment analysis, include the cash flow from operations from each reporting unit and its weighted average cost of capital. The starting point for each of the reporting unit’s cash flow from operations is the detailed annual plan or updated forecast. Cash flows beyond the updated forecasted operating plans were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which incorporated historical and forecasted financial cyclical trends for each reporting unit and considered long-term earnings growth rates. The financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through our weighted average cost of capital that we use to determine our discount rate. During times of volatility, significant judgment must be applied to determine whether credit changes are a short-term or long-term trend. Based on the Company’s step one impairment analysis, as of July 1, 2016, completed as a result of market indicators identified in the third quarter, the Rig Offshore reporting unit had a calculated fair value below its carrying value, and required a step two analysis, which compares the implied fair value of goodwill of a reporting unit to the carrying value of goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of a reporting unit’s identifiable assets and liabilities from the fair value of that reporting unit as a whole. Consistent with the step one analysis, fair value of the assets and liabilities was determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820. Based on the step two analysis performed for the Rig Offshore reporting unit, the Company recorded a $972 million write-down of goodwill during the third quarter. On July 1, 2017, the Company’s Wellbore Technologies segment reorganized three of its reporting units, moving various operations between them. The goodwill impairment analyses performed prior to and subsequent to the restructuring of the three reporting units, concluded that the calculated fair values of these reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying value. The restructuring had no effect on Wellbore Technologies consolidated financial position and results of operations. The Company combined its Rig Systems and Rig Aftermarket reporting units into two different reporting units, Rig Equipment and Marine Construction, under a segment called Rig Technologies, effective October 1, 2017. The restructuring better aligns operations with the current and anticipated market environments, reduces administrative burden, and eliminates reported intercompany transactions between Rig Technologies’ capital equipment and aftermarket operations. The Company tested the Rig Systems and Rig Aftermarket reporting units for impairment prior to combining, and the two, new reporting units under the Rig Technologies segment for impairment after combining, and concluded all fair values of the reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying values. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company performed its annual impairment test, as described in ASC Topic 350, as of October 1, 2017. Based on the Company’s annual impairment test, the calculated fair values for all of the Company’s reporting units were substantially in excess of the respective reporting unit’s carrying value. Additionally, the fair value for all of the Company’s intangible assets with indefinite lives were substantially in excess of the respective asset carrying values. Foreign Currency Certain foreign operations, including our operations in Norway, use the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. The functional currency for most of our foreign operations is the local currency. The cumulative effects of translating the balance sheet accounts from the functional currency into the U.S. dollar at current exchange rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period. Accordingly, financial statements of these foreign subsidiaries are remeasured to U.S. dollars for consolidation purposes using current rates of exchange for monetary assets and liabilities and historical rates of exchange for nonmonetary assets and related elements of expense. Revenue and expense elements are remeasured at rates that approximate the rates in effect on the transaction dates. For all operations, gains or losses from remeasuring foreign currency transactions into the functional currency are included in income. Net foreign currency transaction gains (losses) were $(3) million, $(10) million and $(47) million for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are included in other income (expense) in the accompanying statement of income. Historically, the Venezuelan government has devalued the country’s currency. During the first quarter of 2015, the Venezuelan government officially devalued the Venezuelan bolivar against the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company incurred approximately $9 million in devaluation charges in the first quarter of 2015. The reporting currency of all of the Company’s Venezuelan entities is the U.S. dollar. The Company’s net remaining investment in Venezuela, which is largely U.S. dollar, was nil at December 31, 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Argentinian government officially devalued the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company incurred approximately $7 million devaluation charges in the fourth quarter of 2015. The reporting currency of all of the Company’s Argentinian entities is the Argentine peso. Revenue Recognition The Company’s products and services are sold based upon purchase orders or contracts with the customer that include fixed or determinable prices and that do not generally include right of return or other similar provisions or other significant post delivery obligations. Except for certain construction contracts and drill pipe sales described below, the Company records revenue at the time its manufacturing process is complete, the customer has been provided with all proper inspection and other required documentation, title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, collectability is reasonably assured and the product has been delivered. Customer advances or deposits are deferred and recognized as revenue when the Company has completed all of its performance obligations related to the sale. The Company also recognizes revenue as services are performed. The amounts billed for shipping and handling costs are included in revenue and related costs are included in cost of sales. Revenue Recognition under Long-term Construction Contracts The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method to account for certain long-term construction contracts in the Completion & Production Solutions and Rig Technologies segments. These long-term construction contracts include the following characteristics: • the contracts include custom designs for customer specific applications; • the structural design is unique and requires significant engineering efforts; and • construction projects often have progress payments. This method requires the Company to make estimates regarding the total costs of the project, progress against the project schedule and the estimated completion date, all of which impact the amount of revenue and gross margin the Company recognizes in each reporting period. The Company prepares detailed cost estimates at the beginning of each project. Significant projects and their related costs and profit margins are updated and reviewed at least quarterly by senior management. Factors that may affect future project costs and margins include shipyard access, weather, production efficiencies, availability and costs of labor, materials and subcomponents and other factors. These factors can impact the accuracy of the Company’s estimates and materially impact the Company’s current and future reported earnings. The asset, “Costs in excess of billings,” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “Billings in excess of costs,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized. Drill Pipe Sales For drill pipe sales, if requested in writing by the customer, delivery may be satisfied through delivery to the Company’s customer storage location or to a third-party storage facility. For sales transactions where title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer but the supporting documentation does not meet the criteria for revenue recognition prior to the products being in the physical possession of the customer, the recognition of the revenues and related inventory costs from these transactions are deferred until the customer takes physical possession. Service and Product Warranties The Company provides service and warranty policies on certain of its products. The Company accrues liabilities under service and warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty and service claim experience in accordance with ASC Topic 450 “Contingencies” (“ASC Topic 450”). Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience change. In addition, the Company incurs discretionary costs to service its products in connection with product performance issues and accrues for them when they are encountered. The Company monitors the actual cost of performing these discretionary services and adjusts the accrual based on the most current information available. The changes in the carrying amount of service and product warranties are as follows (in millions): Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 244 Net provisions for warranties issued during the year 50 Amounts incurred (127 ) Currency translation adjustments and other 5 Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 172 Net provisions for warranties issued during the year 46 Amounts incurred (86 ) Currency translation adjustments and other 3 Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 135 Income Taxes The liability method is used to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts which are more likely than not to be realized. Concentration of Credit Risk We grant credit to our customers, which operate primarily in the oil and gas industry. Concentrations of credit risk are limited because we have a large number of geographically diverse customers, thus spreading trade credit risk. We control credit risk through credit evaluations, credit limits and monitoring procedures. We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral, but may require letters of credit for certain international sales. Credit losses are provided for in the financial statements. Allowances for doubtful accounts are determined based on a continuous process of assessing the Company’s portfolio on an individual customer basis taking into account current market conditions and trends. This process consists of a thorough review of historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts, and financial condition of the Company’s customers. Based on a review of these factors, the Company will establish or adjust allowances for specific customers. Accounts receivable are net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $187 million and $209 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation Compensation expense for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans is measured using the fair value method required by ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC Topic 718”). Under this guidance the fair value of stock option grants and restricted stock is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the shorter of the vesting period or the remaining employee service period. The Company provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee Environmental Liabilities When environmental assessments or remediations are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated, remediation liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis and are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported and contingent amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include but are not limited to, estimated losses on accounts receivable, estimated costs and related margins of projects accounted for under percentage-of-completion, Contingencies The Company accrues for costs relating to litigation claims and other contingent matters, including liquidated damage liabilities, when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. In circumstances where the most likely outcome of a contingency can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for that amount. Where the most likely outcome cannot be estimated, a range of potential losses is established and if no one amount in that range is more likely than others, the low end of the range is accrued. Such estimates may be based on advice from third parties or on management’s judgment, as appropriate. Revisions to contingent liabilities are reflected in income in the period in which different facts or information become known or circumstances change that affect the Company’s previous judgments with respect to the likelihood or amount of loss. Amounts paid upon the ultimate resolution of contingent liabilities may be materially different from previous estimates and could require adjustments to the estimated reserves to be recognized in the period such new information becomes known. Net Loss Attributable to Company Per Share The following table sets forth the computation of weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding (in millions, except per share data): Years Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Numerator: Net loss attributable to Company $ (237 ) $ (2,412 ) $ (769 ) Denominator: Basic—weighted average common shares outstanding 377 376 387 Dilutive effect of employee stock options and other unvested stock awards — — — Diluted outstanding shares 377 376 387 Basic loss attributable to Company per share $ (0.63 ) $ (6.41 ) $ (1.99 ) Diluted loss attributable to Company per share $ (0.63 ) $ (6.41 ) $ (1.99 ) Cash dividends per share $ 0.20 $ 0.61 $ 1.84 ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC Topic 260”) requires companies with unvested participating securities to utilize a two-class two-class non-forfeitable Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2015-11 2015-11). 2015-11 In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-09 2016-09). 2016-09 In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-16 2016-16). 2016-16 In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-04 2017-04). 2017-04 Recently Issued Accounting Standards In August 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-12 2017-12). 2017-12 2017-12. No. 2017-12 In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-07 2017-07). 2017-07 No. 2017-07 In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2016-15 2016-15). No. 2016-15 No. 2016-15 In March 2016, the FASB issued ASC Topic 842, “Leases” (ASC Topic 842), which supersedes the lease requirements in ASC Topic No. 840 “Leases” and most industry-specific guidance. This update increases transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASC Topic 842 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. In preparing for the adoption of this new standard, the Company has established an internal team to centralize the implementation process as well as engaged external resources to assist in our approach. We are currently utilizing a software program to consolidate and accumulate leases with documentation as required by the new standard. We have assessed the changes to the Company’s current accounting practices and are currently investigating the related tax impact and process changes. We are also in the process of quantifying the impact of the new standard on our balance sheet. In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, 2014-09), The standard permits either a full retrospective adoption, in which the standard is applied to all the periods presented, or a modified retrospective adoption, in which the standard is applied only to the current period with a cumulative-effect adjustment reflected in retained earnings. ASU 2014-09 In 2015, the Company assembled an internal team to study the provisions of ASU 2014-09, Based on an analysis of revenue streams, customer contracts and transactions, the Company does not expect a material change in the timing or other impacts to revenue recognition across most of our businesses. Certain service and repair revenue will change from point-in-time to over-time revenue recognition, and the timing of including uninstalled materials in projects will shift, changing only the timing of revenue recognition and not the total amount. We expect the cumulative-effect adjustment we will record in the first quarter of 2018, as required by the modified retrospective method, to be less than $50 million. The final adjustment is subject to concluding on the available practical expediants. |