Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Significant accounting policies are as follows: Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, cash includes cash on hand and cash in the bank. The Company maintains its cash in accounts held by a large, globally recognized bank, and the balance of such accounts, at times, may exceed federally insured limits, as guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The FDIC insures these deposits up to $250,000. At June 30, 2019, $9,404,737 of the Company’s cash balance was uninsured. Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Common Share Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The weighted-average number of shares is calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options, warrants, and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised or equity awards vest, resulting in the issuance of common stock that could share in the earnings of the Company. As of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, the Company had 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding, which are convertible into 1,500,000 shares of common stock. Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share during periods where net losses are incurred because the inclusion of the potential common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019, 25,015,866 warrants and 1,500,000 as converted shares of convertible preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2018, 14,454,400 warrants to purchase common stock and 1,500,000 as converted shares of convertible preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. Research and Development and Software Development Costs The Company expenses all research and development costs, including patent and software development costs. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and a series of amendments which together we identify as “ASC Topic 606”. This new accounting standard, which we adopted on October 1, 2018 using the permitted modified retrospective method, outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenues arising from contracts with customers. The new standard supersedes most previous revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The effect of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on retained earnings as of October 1, 2018 was not material. The differences between our reported operating results for the 9 months ended June 30, 2019, which reflect the application of the new standard on our contracts, and the results that would have been reported if the accounting was performed pursuant to the accounting standards previously in effect, also were not material. Central to the new revenue recognition guidance is a five-step revenue recognition model that requires reporting entities to: 1. Identify the contract, 2. Identify the performance obligations of the contract, 3. Determine the transaction price of the contract, 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations, and 5. Recognize revenue. The Company accounts for a promise to provide a customer with a right to access the Company’s intellectual property as a performance obligation satisfied over time because the customer will simultaneously receive and consume the benefit from the entity’s performance of providing access to its intellectual property as the performance occurs. SoundFi – Software License Agreement The Company entered into a one-year agreement renewable for up to 4 years for an annual $50,000 Shield license fee and $25,000 watermark base license fee with SoundFi LLC (“SoundFi”). Residual income to the Company is earned based on the number of audio files downloaded per year with residual earnings of $.012 per download exceeding 3,000,001 and scaling up to $.00075 per download exceeding 100,000,000. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized $27,850 in licensing revenue. The Company has determined the best method for measuring licensing revenue to be the passage of time and more specifically on a monthly basis. The recognition of residual income occurs on an annual basis based on download volume provided by Soundfi. A download is defined as an audio file downloaded to a mobile device from the Soundfi servers. Ageos, LLC – Operating Agreement An operating agreement was entered into with Ageos, LLC and the Company on April 18, 2019. Ageos, LLC agreed to hire competent professionals, establish and maintain an approved government facility and guide engineers to customize the Company’s base products for governmental agency use. The Company agreed to advance Ageos, LLC $1,600,000 commiserate with the responsibilities and operating expense budget provided by Ageos, LLC on a periodic basis. The Company had advanced $828,596 through June 30, 2019 with an additional advance of $145,592 occurring on July 15, 2019. Under the operating agreement, Ageos, LLC was to reimburse the Company from the sale of the software by applying 50% of net revenues earned to repay the advanced operating expenses. The operating agreement was terminated on August 8, 2019. Recent Accounting Pronouncements The FASB issues ASUs to amend the authoritative literature in the ASC. There have been a number of ASUs to date that amend the original text of the ASC. Other than those discussed below, the Company believes those updates issued-to-date either (i) provide supplemental guidance, (ii) are technical corrections, (iii) are not applicable to the Company, or (iv) are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement |