DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
Organization and Business | Organization and Business |
|
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, ANIP Acquisition Company (together, “ANI,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a specialty pharmaceutical company, developing and marketing generic and branded prescription products. ANI was organized as a Delaware corporation in April 2001. At our two facilities located in Baudette, Minnesota, which have a combined manufacturing, packaging and laboratory capacity totaling 173,000 square feet, we manufacture oral solid dose products, as well as liquids and topicals, including those that must be manufactured in a fully contained environment due to their potency. We also perform contract manufacturing for other pharmaceutical companies. |
|
On June 19, 2013, BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BioSante”) acquired ANIP Acquisition Company (“ANIP”) in an all-stock, tax-free reorganization (the “Merger”) (Note 2), in which ANIP became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BioSante. BioSante was renamed ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition pursuant to which ANIP was considered the acquiring entity for accounting purposes. As such, ANIP's historical results of operations replace BioSante's historical results of operations for all periods prior to the Merger. The results of operations of both companies are included in our consolidated financial statements for all periods after completion of the Merger. |
|
Our operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including, among others, current and potential competitors with greater resources, dependence on significant customers, lack of operating history and uncertainty of future profitability and possible fluctuations in financial results. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The propriety of using the going-concern basis is dependent upon, among other things, the achievement of future profitable operations, the ability to generate sufficient cash from operations, and potential other funding sources, including cash on hand, to meet our obligations as they become due. We believe the going-concern basis is appropriate for the accompanying consolidated financial statements based on our current operating plan through December 31, 2015. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basis of Presentation | |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principles of consolidation | Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, ANIP. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In the accompanying consolidated financial statements, estimates are used for, but not limited to, stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts, accruals for chargebacks, returns and other allowances, allowance for inventory obsolescence, valuation of financial instruments and intangible assets, accruals for contingent liabilities, fair value of long-lived assets, deferred taxes and valuation allowance, and the depreciable lives of long-lived assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Concentration | Credit Concentration |
|
Our customers are primarily wholesale distributors, chain drug stores, group purchasing organizations, and other pharmaceutical companies. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, three customers represented approximately 27%, 21%, and 17% of net revenues, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, accounts receivable from these customers totaled 73% of net accounts receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2013, three customers represented approximately 27%, 18%, and 10% of net revenues, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vendor Concentration | Vendor Concentration |
|
We source the raw materials for its products, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API”), from both domestic and international suppliers. Generally, only a single source of API is qualified for use in each product due to the costs and time required to validate a second source of supply. As a result, we are dependent upon our current vendors to supply reliably the API required for ongoing product manufacturing. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we purchased approximately 42% of our inventory from two suppliers. As of December 31, 2014, amounts payable to these suppliers were immaterial. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we purchased approximately 37% of our inventory from three suppliers. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue is recognized for product sales and contract manufacturing product sales upon passing of risk and title to the customer, when estimates of the selling price and discounts, rebates, promotional adjustments, price adjustments, returns, chargebacks, and other potential adjustments are reasonably determinable, collection is reasonably assured, and we have no further performance obligations. Contract manufacturing arrangements are typically less than two weeks in duration, and therefore the revenue is recognized upon completion of the aforementioned factors rather than using a proportional performance method of revenue recognition. The estimates for discounts, rebates, promotional adjustments, price adjustments, returns, chargebacks, and other potential adjustments reduce gross revenues to net revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and are presented as current liabilities or reductions in accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (see “Accruals for Chargebacks, Rebates, Returns, and Other Allowances”). Historically, we have not entered into revenue arrangements with multiple elements. |
|
Occasionally, we engage in contract services, which include product development services, laboratory services, and royalties on net sales of certain contract manufactured products. For these services, revenue is recognized according to the terms of the agreement with the customer, which sometimes include substantive, measurable risk-based milestones, and when we have a contractual right to receive such payment, the contract price is fixed or determinable, the collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, and we have no further performance obligations under the agreement. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
We consider all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. All interest bearing and non-interest bearing accounts are guaranteed by the FDIC up to $250 thousand. We may maintain cash balances in excess of FDIC coverage. We consider this to be a normal business risk. |
|
In conjunction with the Merger, we acquired restricted cash, none of which remained at December 31, 2013 or 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable |
|
We extend credit to customers on an unsecured basis. We use the allowance method to provide for doubtful accounts based on our evaluation of the collectability of accounts receivable, whereby we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. Our estimate is based on historical collection experience and a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable. We determine trade receivables to be delinquent when greater than 30 days past due. Receivables are written off when it is determined that amounts are uncollectible. We determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts was necessary as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accruals for Chargebacks, Rebates, Returns and Other Allowances | Accruals for Chargebacks, Rebates, Returns and Other Allowances |
|
Our generic and branded product revenues are typically subject to agreements with customers allowing chargebacks, Medicaid rebates, product returns, administrative fees, and other rebates and prompt payment discounts. We accrue for these items at the time of sale based on the estimates and methodologies described below. In the aggregate, these accruals exceed 50% of generic and branded gross product sales and reduce gross revenues to net revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and are presented as current liabilities or reductions in accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We continually monitor and re-evaluate the accruals as additional information becomes available, which includes, among other things, updates to trade inventory levels, claims data from recent periods, and customer product mix. We make adjustments to the accruals at the end of each reporting period, to reflect any such updates to the relevant facts and circumstances. Accruals are relieved upon receipt of payment from or upon issuance of credit to the customer. |
|
Chargebacks |
|
Chargebacks, primarily from wholesalers, result from arrangements we have with indirect customers establishing prices for products which the indirect customer purchases through a wholesaler. Alternatively, we may pre-authorize wholesalers to offer specified contract pricing to other indirect customers. Under either arrangement, we provide a chargeback credit to the wholesaler for any difference between the contracted price with the indirect customer and the wholesaler's invoice price, typically Wholesale Acquisition Cost ("WAC"). |
|
Chargeback credits are calculated as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Prior period chargebacks claimed by wholesalers are analyzed to determine the actual average selling price ("ASP") for each product. This calculation is performed by product by wholesaler. ASPs can be affected by several factors such as: |
|
| · | A change in customer mix | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | A change in negotiated terms with customers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | A change in product sales mix | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | A change in the volume of off-contract purchases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Changes in WAC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
As necessary, we adjust ASPs based on anticipated changes in the factors above. |
|
The difference between ASP and WAC is recorded as a reduction in both gross revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets, at the time we recognize revenue from the product sale. |
|
To evaluate the adequacy of our chargeback accruals, we obtain on-hand inventory counts from the wholesalers. This inventory is multiplied by the chargeback amount, the difference between ASP and WAC, to arrive at total expected future chargebacks, which is then compared to the chargeback accruals. We continually monitor chargeback activity and adjust ASPs when we believe that actual selling prices will differ from current ASPs. |
|
Medicaid Rebates |
|
We participate in certain qualifying federal and state Medicaid rebate programs whereby discounts and rebates are provided to participating programs after the final dispensing of the product by a pharmacy to a Medicaid plan participant. Medicaid rebates are typically billed up to 135 days after the product is shipped. Medicaid rebate amounts per product unit are established by law, based on the Average Manufacturer Price (“AMP”), which is reported on a monthly and quarterly basis, and, in the case of branded products, best price, which is reported on a quarterly basis. Our Medicaid reserves are based on expected claims from state Medicaid programs. Estimates for expected claims are driven by patient usage, sales mix, calculated AMP or best price, as well as inventory in the distribution channel that will be subject to a Medicaid rebate. As a result of the delay between selling the products and rebate billing, our Medicaid rebate reserve includes both an estimate of outstanding claims for end-customer sales that occurred but for which the related claim has not been billed as well as an estimate for future claims that will be made when inventory in the distribution channel is sold through to plan participants. |
|
To evaluate the adequacy of our Medicaid rebate reserve, we review the reserve on a quarterly basis against actual claims data to ensure the liability is fairly stated. We continually monitor our Medicaid rebate reserve and adjust our estimates if we believe that actual Medicaid rebates may differ from our established accruals. Accruals for Medicaid rebates are recorded as a reduction to gross revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and as an increase to the Medicaid rebate reserve in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Returns |
|
We maintain a return policy that allows customers to return product within a specified period prior to and subsequent to the expiration date. Generally, product may be returned for a period beginning six months prior to its expiration date to up to one year after its expiration date. Our product returns are settled through the issuance of a credit to the customer. Our estimate for returns is based upon historical experience with actual returns. While such experience has allowed for reasonable estimation in the past, history may not always be an accurate indicator of future returns. We continually monitor our estimates for returns and make adjustments when we believe that actual product returns may differ from the established accruals. Accruals for returns are recorded as a reduction to gross revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and as an increase to the return goods reserve in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Administrative Fees and Other Rebates |
|
Administrative fees or rebates are offered to wholesalers, group purchasing organizations and indirect customers. We accrue for fees and rebates, by product by wholesaler, at the time of sale based on contracted rates and ASPs. |
|
To evaluate the adequacy of our administrative fee accruals, we obtain on-hand inventory counts from the wholesalers. This inventory is multiplied by the ASPs to arrive at total expected future sales, which is then multiplied by contracted rates. The result is then compared to the administrative fee accruals. We continually monitor administrative fee activity and adjust our accruals when we believe that actual administrative fees will differ from the accruals. Accruals for administrative fees and other rebates are recorded as a reduction in both gross revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Prompt Payment Discounts |
|
We often grant sales discounts for prompt payment. The reserve for sales discounts is based on invoices outstanding. We assume, based on past experience, that all available discounts will be taken. Accruals for prompt payment discounts are recorded as a reduction in both gross revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
The following table summarizes activity in the consolidated balance sheets for accruals and allowances for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013: |
|
(in thousands) | | Accruals for Chargebacks, Returns and Other Allowances | |
| | | | | | | | Administrative | | Prompt | |
| | | | | | Medicaid | | Fees and Other | | Payment | |
| | Chargebacks | | Returns | | Rebates | | Rebates | | Discounts | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | $ | 5,662 | | $ | 411 | | $ | 180 | | $ | 231 | | $ | 242 | |
Accruals/Adjustments | | | 28,009 | | | 1,595 | | | 333 | | | 2,355 | | | 1,129 | |
Credits Taken Against Reserve | | | -29,595 | | | -1,270 | | | -260 | | | -1,851 | | | -1,039 | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | $ | 4,076 | | $ | 736 | | $ | 253 | | $ | 735 | | $ | 332 | |
Accruals/Adjustments | | | 35,740 | | | 1,493 | | | 2,692 | | | 5,212 | | | 1,820 | |
Credits Taken Against Reserve | | | -32,951 | | | -784 | | | -681 | | | -4,460 | | | -1,681 | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | | $ | 6,865 | | $ | 1,445 | | $ | 2,264 | | $ | 1,487 | | $ | 471 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventories | Inventories |
|
Inventories consist of raw materials, packaging materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods. Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or net realizable value. We periodically review and adjust standard costs, which generally approximate weighted average cost. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives as follows: |
|
Buildings and improvements | | | 20 - 40 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Machinery, furniture and equipment | | | 3 - 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Construction in progress includes the cost of construction and other direct costs attributable to the construction, along with capitalized interest, if any. Depreciation is not recorded on construction in progress until such time as the assets are placed in service. |
|
We review property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the long-lived asset is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Assets held for disposal are reportable at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. We determined that no assets were impaired and no assets were held for disposal as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets | Intangible Assets |
|
Intangible assets were acquired as part of the Merger and several asset acquisition transactions. These assets include product rights for the 31 previously marketed generic products we acquired from Teva, product rights for our branded products Lithobid and Vancocin, fully amortized product rights for Reglan and a generic product, and the Teva license related to our male testosterone gel. These intangible assets originally were recorded at fair value and are stated net of accumulated amortization. |
|
The rights and licenses are amortized over their remaining estimated useful lives, ranging from 2 to 11 years, based on the straight-line method. Management reviews definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, in a manner similar to that for property and equipment. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | Goodwill |
|
Goodwill relates to the Merger and represents the excess of the total purchase consideration over the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, using the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to periodic review for impairment. Goodwill is reviewed annually, as of October 31, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the goodwill might not be recoverable. We perform our review of goodwill on our one reporting unit. |
|
Before employing detailed impairment testing methodologies, we first evaluate the likelihood of impairment by considering qualitative factors relevant to our reporting unit. When performing the qualitative assessment, we evaluate events and circumstances that would affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the goodwill. Events and circumstances evaluated include: macroeconomic conditions that could affect us, industry and market considerations for the generic pharmaceutical industry that could affect us, cost factors that could affect our performance, our financial performance (including share price), and consideration of any company-specific events that could negatively affect us, our business, or the fair value of our business. If we determine that it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired, we will then apply detailed testing methodologies. Otherwise, we will conclude that no impairment has occurred. |
|
Detailed impairment testing involves comparing the fair value of our one reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of ANI. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, then it is concluded that no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is required to measure possible goodwill impairment loss. The second step includes hypothetically valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of our one reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of our one reporting unit's goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of our one reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collaborative Arrangement | Collaborative Arrangements |
|
At times, we have entered into arrangements with various commercial partners to further business opportunities. In collaborative arrangements such as these, when we are actively involved and exposed to the risks and rewards of the activities and are determined to be the principal participant in the collaboration, we classify third party costs incurred and revenues in the consolidated statements of operations on a gross basis. Otherwise, third party revenues and costs generated by collaborative arrangements are presented on a net basis. Payments between us and the other participants are recorded and classified based on the nature of the payments. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development Expenses | Research and Development Expenses |
|
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and primarily consist of expenses relating to product development. Research and development costs totaled $2.7 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
We have a stock-based compensation plan that includes stock options and restricted stock, which are awarded in exchange for employee and non-employee director services. We recognize the estimated fair value of stock-based awards and classify the expense where the underlying salaries are classified. For the year ended December 31, 2014, $0.1 million of expense related to stock-based awards was classified as cost of goods sold, $0.1 million was classified as research and development expense and $3.2 million was classified as sales, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2013, all stock-based awards were classified as sales, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is determined at the grant date using an option pricing model and stock-based compensation cost for restricted stock is based on the closing market price of the stock at the grant date. The value of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the employee's requisite service period. |
|
Valuation of stock awards requires us to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of the awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, dividend yields, future employee turnover rates, and future employee stock option exercise behaviors. Changes in these assumptions can affect the fair value estimate. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes |
|
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that such tax rate changes are enacted. The measurement of a deferred tax asset is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We calculate income tax benefits related to stock-based compensation arrangements using the with and without method. |
|
We use a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. We have not identified any uncertain income tax positions that could have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements. We are subject to taxation in various jurisdictions in the U.S. and remain subject to examination by taxing jurisdictions for the years 1998 and all subsequent periods due to the availability of net operating loss carryforwards. |
|
We recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax exposures as a component of income tax expense. We did not have any such amounts accrued as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
We consider potential tax effects resulting from discontinued operations and record intra-period tax allocations, when those effects are deemed material. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings/(Loss) per Share | Earnings/(Loss) per Share |
|
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. |
|
Our unvested restricted shares and certain of our outstanding warrants contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and therefore are considered to be participating securities; the calculation of basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share excludes from the numerator net income (but not net loss) attributable to the unvested restricted shares and to the participating warrants, and excludes the impact of those shares from the denominator. |
|
For purposes of determining diluted earnings/(loss) per share, we have elected a policy to assume that the principal portion of the Notes (see Note 3) is settled in cash. As such, the principal portion of the Notes has no effect on either the numerator or denominator when determining diluted earnings/(loss) per share. Any conversion gain is assumed to be settled in shares and is incorporated in diluted earnings/(loss) per share using the treasury method. The warrants issued in conjunction with the issuance of the Notes (see Note 3) are considered to be dilutive when they are in-the-money relative to our average stock price during the period; the bond hedge purchased in conjunction with the issuance of the Notes is always considered to be anti-dilutive. |
|
For periods of net income, and when the effects are not anti-dilutive, we calculate diluted earnings per share by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding plus the impact of all potential dilutive common shares, consisting primarily of common stock options, unvested restricted stock awards, stock purchase warrants, and any conversion gain on our 3.0% Convertible Senior Notes due December 1, 2019 (the “Notes,” see Note 3), using the treasury stock method. For periods of net loss, diluted loss per share is calculated similarly to basic loss per share. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The numerator for earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are calculated for basic and diluted earnings per share as follows: |
|
| | Basic | | Diluted | | | | |
| | Year ended | | Year ended | | | | |
(in thousands) | | December 31, | | December 31, | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 28,747 | | $ | 106 | | $ | 28,747 | | $ | 106 | | | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | - | | | -4,975 | | | | | | -4,975 | | | | |
Net income allocated to restricted stock | | | -159 | | | - | | | -158 | | | - | | | | |
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations allocated to common shares | | $ | 28,588 | | $ | -4,869 | | $ | 28,589 | | $ | -4,869 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on discontinued operations | | $ | - | | $ | 195 | | $ | - | | $ | 195 | | | | |
Net gain on discontinued operations allocated to warrants | | | - | | | -1 | | | - | | | -2 | | | | |
Net gain on discontinued operations allocated to restricted stock | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | | |
Gain on discontinued operations allocated to common shares | | $ | - | | $ | 194 | | $ | - | | $ | 193 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding | | | 10,941 | | | 5,071 | | | 10,941 | | | 5,071 | | | | |
Dilutive effect of stock options | | | | | | | | | 71 | | | - | | | | |
Dilutive effect of warrants | | | | | | | | | 41 | | | - | | | | |
Diluted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding | | | | | | | | | 11,053 | | | 5,071 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per share from Continuing Operations | | $ | 2.61 | | $ | -0.96 | | $ | 2.59 | | $ | -0.96 | | | | |
Earnings Per share from Discontinued Operation | | | - | | | 0.04 | | | - | | | 0.04 | | | | |
Earnings/(Loss) Per Share | | $ | 2.61 | | $ | -0.92 | | $ | 2.59 | | $ | -0.92 | | | | |
|
Anti-dilutive shares consist of out-of-the-money Class C Special stock, out-of-the-money common stock options, common stock options that are anti-dilutive when calculating the impact of the potential dilutive common shares using the treasury stock method, out-of-the-money warrants exercisable for common stock, and certain participating securities, if the effect of including both the income allocated to the participating security and the impact of the potential common shares would be anti-dilutive. The number of anti-dilutive shares, which have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share and which include the shares underlying the Notes, were 4.7 million and 2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
As of December 31, 2014, we had 0.5 million common stock options, 0.1 million unvested restricted stock awards, and 2.5 million warrants exercisable for common stock outstanding. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Splits and Other Reclassifications | Stock Splits and Other Reclassifications |
|
In July 2013, our Board of Directors and stockholders approved a resolution to effect a one-for-six reverse stock split of our common stock and Class C Special stock with no corresponding change to the par values. The number of authorized shares of common stock, Class C Special stock and blank check preferred stock was reduced proportionally. Common stock and Class C Special stock for all periods presented have been adjusted retrospectively to reflect the one-for-six reverse stock split. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Our consolidated balance sheets include various financial instruments (primarily cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities) that are carried at cost and that approximate fair value. The fair value of our long-term indebtedness is estimated based on the quoted prices for the same or similar issues, or on the current rates we have been offered for debt of the same remaining maturities. Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability assuming an orderly transaction in the most advantageous market at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: |
|
| · | Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Level 2—Observable market-based inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Level 3—Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
See Note 7 for additional information regarding fair value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Information | Segment Information |
|
We currently operate in a single business segment. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued guidance requiring management to evaluate on a regular basis whether any conditions or events have arisen that could raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance 1) provides a definition for the term “substantial doubt,” 2) requires an evaluation every reporting period, interim periods included, 3) provides principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt, 4) requires certain disclosures if the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of management’s plans, 5) requires an express statement, as well as other disclosures, if the substantial doubt is not alleviated, and 6) requires an assessment period of one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for our reporting year beginning January 1, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. The standard is effective for our reporting year beginning January 1, 2017 and early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance for the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss ("NOL") carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance requires an entity to present in the financial statements an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for an NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. If the NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit will be presented in the financial statements as a liability and will not be combined with deferred tax assets. This guidance does not require any additional recurring disclosures and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this standard in 2014 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
We have evaluated all other issued and unadopted Accounting Standards Updates and believe the adoption of these standards will not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |