As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934
OR
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005
Commission file number 0-28800
DRDGOLD LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter
and translation of Registrant's name into English)
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
299 PENDORING AVENUE, BLACKHEATH, RANDBURG, 2195, SOUTH AFRICA
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
None
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report.
As of June 30, 2005, the Registrant had outstanding 296,206,048 ordinary shares, of no par value.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days. YesNo
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days. Yes
No Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17
Item 18
Contact details:
Mr. D.J. Pretorius – Group Legal Counsel
DRDGOLD Limited, 299 Pendoring Avenue, Randburg, 2195, South Africa
Telephone: +2711 219 8700
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS .....................................................
5
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE .........................................................................................
5
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION ..............................................................................................................................................
5
ITEM 3A.
Selected Financial Data ...............................................................................................................................................
5
ITEM 3B.
Capitalization and Indebtedness ..................................................................................................................................
7
ITEM 3C.
Reasons For The Offer And The Use Of Proceeds ....................................................................................................
7
ITEM 3D.
Risk Factors ................................................................................................................................................................
7
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY ..................................................................................................................
19
ITEM 4A.
History And Development Of The Company .............................................................................................................
19
ITEM 4B.
Business Overview......................................................................................................................................................
25
ITEM 4C.
Organizational Structure .............................................................................................................................................
38
ITEM 4D.
Property, Plant And Equipment ..................................................................................................................................
39
ITEM 5.
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS...........................................................................
77
ITEM 5A.
Operating Results .......................................................................................................................................................
78
ITEM 5B.
Liquidity And Capital Resources v..............................................................................................................................
104
ITEM 5C.
Research And Development, Patents And Licenses Etc ............................................................................................
108
ITEM 5D.
Trend Information ......................................................................................................................................................
108
ITEM 5E.
Off-Balance Sheet Items ............................................................................................................................................
108
ITEM 5F.
Tabular Disclosure Of Contractual Obligations .........................................................................................................
109
ITEM 5G.
Safe Harbor .................................................................................................................................................................
109
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES ...........................................................................
110
ITEM 6A.
Directors And Senior Management ............................................................................................................................
110
ITEM 6B.
Compensation..............................................................................................................................................................
114
ITEM 6C.
Board Practices............................................................................................................................................................
116
ITEM 6D.
Employees ..................................................................................................................................................................
120
ITEM 6E.
Share Ownership ........................................................................................................................................................
122
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS..........................................................
124
ITEM 7A.
Major Shareholders ....................................................................................................................................................
124
ITEM 7B.
Related Party Transactions..........................................................................................................................................
125
ITEM 7C.
Interest Of Experts And Counsel ...............................................................................................................................
129
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................
130
ITEM 8A.
Consolidated Financial Statements And Other Financial Information ......................................................................
130
ITEM 8B.
Significant Changes.....................................................................................................................................................
130
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING ....................................................................................................................................
131
ITEM 9A.
Offer And Listing Details............................................................................................................................................
131
ITEM 9B.
Plan Of Distribution ..................................................................................................................................................
131
ITEM 9C.
Markets .......................................................................................................................................................................
131
ITEM 9D.
Selling Shareholders....................................................................................................................................................
132
ITEM 9E.
Dilution........................................................................................................................................................................
132
ITEM 9F.
Expenses Of The Issue ................................................................................................................................................
132
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ..............................................................................................................................
133
ITEM 10A.
Share Capital ...............................................................................................................................................................
133
ITEM 10B.
Memorandum And Articles Of Association ...............................................................................................................
133
ITEM 10C.
Material Contracts .......................................................................................................................................................
135
ITEM 10D.
Exchange Controls ......................................................................................................................................................
140
ITEM 10E.
Taxation .......................................................................................................................................................................
142
ITEM 10F.
Dividends And Paying Agents ...................................................................................................................................
147
ITEM 10G.
Statement By Experts ..................................................................................................................................................
147
ITEM 10H.
Documents On Display ...............................................................................................................................................
147
ITEM 10I.
Subsidiary Information................................................................................................................................................
147
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ........................................
148
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES .........................................................
151
PART II
ITEM 13.
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES...................................................................
152
ITEM 14.
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS..
152
ITEM 15.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES .........................................................................................................................
152
ITEM 16.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ...............................................................................................................................
155
ITEM 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert ...........................................................................................................................
155
ITEM 16B.
Code Of Ethics ...........................................................................................................................................................
155
ITEM 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees And Services ...................................................................................................................
155
ITEM 16D.
Exemptions From The Listing Standards For Audit Committees .............................................................................
155
ITEM 16E.
Purchase Of Equity Securities By The Issuer ............................................................................................................
155
PART III
ITEM 17.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS....................................................................................................................................
156
ITEM 18.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.................................................................................................................................... F-pages
ITEM 19.
EXHIBITS...................................................................................................................................................................
157
1
Preparation of Financial Information
We are a South African company and currently the majority of our operations, as measured in production ounces, are located
there. Accordingly, our books of account are maintained in South African Rands. Our financial statements attached hereto are presented
in United States Dollars and unless otherwise stated herein, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States, or US GAAP. All references to “Dollars” or “$” herein are to United States Dollars, references to “Rand” or “R” are to South
African Rands, references to “A$” are to Australian Dollars, references to “F$” are to the Fiji Dollar, and references to “Kina” or “K” are
to Papua New Guinean Kinas.
in United States Dollars and unless otherwise stated herein, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States, or US GAAP. All references to “Dollars” or “$” herein are to United States Dollars, references to “Rand” or “R” are to South
African Rands, references to “A$” are to Australian Dollars, references to “F$” are to the Fiji Dollar, and references to “Kina” or “K” are
to Papua New Guinean Kinas.
Certain information in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, or the Annual Report, presented in Rands, Australian Dollars, Fiji
Dollars or Kinas has been translated into Dollars. Unless otherwise stated, the conversion rates for currency translations for the 2005
fiscal year are R6.684 per $1.00, A$1.313 per $1.00 and K3.115 per $1.00, which reflect the noon buying rate in New York City at
June 30, 2005. For statement of operations amounts, the average conversion rate for Rand during the 2005 fiscal year of R6.222 per $1.00
is used. The rates used for currency translations for transactions occurring during the 2004 and 2003 fiscal years are the respective year
end exchange rates for balance sheet amounts and the average exchange rate for that year for statements of operations amounts. By
including convenience currency translations in this Annual Report, we are not representing that the Rand, Australian Dollars or Kinas
amounts actually represent amounts shown in Dollars or that these amounts could be converted at the rates indicated into Dollars.
fiscal year are R6.684 per $1.00, A$1.313 per $1.00 and K3.115 per $1.00, which reflect the noon buying rate in New York City at
June 30, 2005. For statement of operations amounts, the average conversion rate for Rand during the 2005 fiscal year of R6.222 per $1.00
is used. The rates used for currency translations for transactions occurring during the 2004 and 2003 fiscal years are the respective year
end exchange rates for balance sheet amounts and the average exchange rate for that year for statements of operations amounts. By
including convenience currency translations in this Annual Report, we are not representing that the Rand, Australian Dollars or Kinas
amounts actually represent amounts shown in Dollars or that these amounts could be converted at the rates indicated into Dollars.
DRDGOLD Limited
When used in this Annual Report, the term the “Company” refers to DRDGOLD Limited and the terms “we,” “our,” “us” or
“the Group” refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, associates and joint venture, as appropriate in the context.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (the “Exchange Act”), regarding future events or other future financial performance and information relating to us
that are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to our management.
Some of these forward-looking statements include forward-looking phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,”
“expects,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” or “will continue,” or similar expressions or the negatives thereof or other variations on these
expressions, or similar terminology, or discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. These statements also include descriptions in
connection with, among other things:
that are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to our management.
Some of these forward-looking statements include forward-looking phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,”
“expects,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” or “will continue,” or similar expressions or the negatives thereof or other variations on these
expressions, or similar terminology, or discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. These statements also include descriptions in
connection with, among other things:
•
our ability to successfully restructure our South African operations and significantly reduce costs;
•
estimates regarding future production and throughput capacity;
•
our anticipated commitments;
•
our ability to fund our operations in the next 12 months; and
•
estimated production costs, cash costs per ounce, total costs per ounce.
Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
Many factors could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, among others:
or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, among others:
•
adverse changes or uncertainties in general economic conditions in the markets we serve;
•
a continuing strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar;
•
regulatory developments adverse to us or difficulties in maintaining necessary licenses or other governmental approvals;
•
changes in our competitive position;
•
changes in business strategy;
•
any major disruption in production at our key facilities; or
•
adverse changes in foreign exchange rates.
For a discussion of such risks, see Item 3D.: “Risk Factors.” The risk factors described in Item 3D could affect our future results,
causing these results to differ materially from these expressed in any forward-looking statements. These risk factors are not necessarily all
of the important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Other
unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results.
of the important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Other
unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.
We do not undertake any obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
2
Imperial units of measure and metric equivalents
Units stated in this Annual Report are measured in Imperial and Metric.
Metric
Imperial
Imperial
Metric
1 metric tonne
1.10229 short tons
1 short ton
0.9072 metric tonnes
1 kilogram
2.20458 pounds
1 pound
0.4536 kilograms
1 gram
0.03215 troy ounces
1 troy ounce
31.10353 grams
1 kilometer
0.62150 miles
1 mile
1.609 kilometres
1 meter
3.28084 feet
1 foot
0.3048 metres
1 liter
0.26420 gallons
1 gallon
3.785 liters
1 hectare
2.47097 acres
1 acre
0.4047 hectares
1 centimeter
0.39370 inches
1 inch
2.54 centimetres
1 gram/tonne
0.0292 ounces/ton
1 ounce/ton
34.28 grams/tonnes
0 degree Celsius
32 degrees Fahrenheit
0 degrees Fahrenheit
- 18 degrees Celsius
3
Glossary of Terms and Explanations
Adularia............................................. A transparent or translucent variety of common feldspar.
Archaean ........................................... A period of the geological time scale between 2.5 and 4.6 billion years ago, the earliest part of the
Archaean ........................................... A period of the geological time scale between 2.5 and 4.6 billion years ago, the earliest part of the
Precambrian.
Assaying............................................ The chemical testing process of rock samples to determine the mineral content.
Auriferous ......................................... Containing gold.
Bonanza ............................................ Unexpected high-grade occurrences.
Care and maintenance....................... Cease active mining activity at a shaft, but continue to incur costs to ensure that the Ore Reserves
Auriferous ......................................... Containing gold.
Bonanza ............................................ Unexpected high-grade occurrences.
Care and maintenance....................... Cease active mining activity at a shaft, but continue to incur costs to ensure that the Ore Reserves
are open, serviceable and legally compliant.
Cash costs per ounce......................... Cash costs are production costs incurred directly in the production of gold and include labor
costs, contractor and other related costs, inventory costs and electricity costs. Cash costs per
ounce are calculated by dividing cash costs by ounces of gold produced. Cash costs per ounce
have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented. This is a non-US GAAP
financial measure and should not be considered a substitute measure of costs and expenses
reported by us in accordance with US GAAP.
ounce are calculated by dividing cash costs by ounces of gold produced. Cash costs per ounce
have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented. This is a non-US GAAP
financial measure and should not be considered a substitute measure of costs and expenses
reported by us in accordance with US GAAP.
Caving ............................................... A type of mining in which the ore is blasted and drawn in a manner causing the overhead rock to
cave in.
Conglomerate .................................... A coarse-grained sedimentary rock consisting of rounded or sub-rounded pebbles.
Cut-and-fill........................................ A mining method in which a slice of rock is removed after blasting and replaced with a slice of
Cut-and-fill........................................ A mining method in which a slice of rock is removed after blasting and replaced with a slice of
fill material to provide workers with a platform to mine the next slice of rock.
Cut-off grade ..................................... The minimum in-situ grade of ore blocks for which the cash costs per ounce, excluding overhead
costs, are equal to a projected gold price per ounce.
Depletion ........................................... The decrease in the quantity of ore in a deposit or property resulting from extraction or
production.
Dilution ............................................. Broken rock entering the ore flow at zero or minimal grade and therefore diluting the gold
content.
Diorite................................................ An igneous rock formed by the solidification of molten material.
Doré................................................... Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars consisting of approximately 90% precious metals which
Doré................................................... Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars consisting of approximately 90% precious metals which
will be further refined to almost pure metal.
Electrowinning.................................. The process of recovering a metal from an ore by means of electro-chemical processes.
Grade ................................................. The amount of gold contained within auriferous material generally expressed in ounces per ton or
Grade ................................................. The amount of gold contained within auriferous material generally expressed in ounces per ton or
grams per ton of ore.
g/t....................................................... Grams per ton.
Horizon.............................................. A plane indicating a particular position in a stratigraphic sequence. This may be a theoretical
Horizon.............................................. A plane indicating a particular position in a stratigraphic sequence. This may be a theoretical
surface with no thickness or a distinctive bed.
Igneous rock...................................... Rock which is magmatic in origin.
Intrusive............................................. Rock which while molten, penetrated into or between other rocks, but solidified before reaching
Intrusive............................................. Rock which while molten, penetrated into or between other rocks, but solidified before reaching
the surface.
Life of mine....................................... Projected life of a mining operation based on the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves.
Metallurgical plant ............................ A processing plant (mill) erected to treat ore and extract the contained gold.
Mine call factor ................................. This is the gold content recovered expressed as a percentage of the gold content called.
Mill .................................................... Material passed through the metallurgical plant for processing.
Mt ...................................................... Million tons.
Opening up........................................ The potential that previously abandoned shafts have to be reopened and mined.
Ore..................................................... A mixture of valuable and worthless minerals from which the extraction of at least one mineral is
technically and economically viable.
Metallurgical plant ............................ A processing plant (mill) erected to treat ore and extract the contained gold.
Mine call factor ................................. This is the gold content recovered expressed as a percentage of the gold content called.
Mill .................................................... Material passed through the metallurgical plant for processing.
Mt ...................................................... Million tons.
Opening up........................................ The potential that previously abandoned shafts have to be reopened and mined.
Ore..................................................... A mixture of valuable and worthless minerals from which the extraction of at least one mineral is
technically and economically viable.
Ore Reserves ..................................... Total Ore Reserves of wholly-owned subsidiaries and our 20% attributable share of the Ore
Reserves from the Porgera Joint Venture.
Pay-limit............................................ The minimum in-situ grade of ore blocks for which cash costs, including all overhead costs, are
equal to a projected gold price per ounce.
Proven Ore Reserves......................... Reserves for which (a) the quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches,
workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling
and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic
character is so well defined that size, shape, depth, and mineral content of Ore Reserves are
well-established.
and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic
character is so well defined that size, shape, depth, and mineral content of Ore Reserves are
well-established.
4
Probable Ore Reserves ...................... Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to
that used for Proven Ore Reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are
farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower
than that for Proven Ore Reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of
observation.
farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower
than that for Proven Ore Reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of
observation.
oz/t ..................................................... Ounces per ton.
Reef ................................................... A gold-bearing sedimentary horizon, normally a conglomerate band that may contain economic
levels of gold.
Refining............................................. The final purification process of a metal or mineral.
Rehabilitation .................................... The process of restoring mined land to a condition approximating its original state.
Reserves ............................................ That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at
Rehabilitation .................................... The process of restoring mined land to a condition approximating its original state.
Reserves ............................................ That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at
the time of the reserve determination.
Sedimentary ...................................... Formed by the deposition of solid fragmental material that originated from weathering of rocks
and was transported from a source to a site of deposition.
Shaft .................................................. An opening cut downwards for transporting personnel, equipment, supplies, ore and waste. It is
equipped with a hoist system that lowers and raises a cage in the shaft, transporting equipment,
personnel, materials, ore and waste.
personnel, materials, ore and waste.
Shrinkage stoping.............................. A mining method in which a small percentage of the broken ore is drawn as mining progresses to
make room for subsequent mining activities. Most of the blasted ore is left to accumulate in the
stope and is drawn after the stope is completely mined.
stope and is drawn after the stope is completely mined.
Slimes ................................................ The fraction of tailings discharged from a processing plant after the valuable minerals have been
recovered.
Sloughing .......................................... The localized failure of part of the slimes dam wall caused by a build up of water within the dam.
Stope.................................................. Underground production working area on the Ore Horizon.
Sub-level stoping .............................. A method of mining in which the ore is blasted, on multiple levels in one stope, and drawn off as
Stope.................................................. Underground production working area on the Ore Horizon.
Sub-level stoping .............................. A method of mining in which the ore is blasted, on multiple levels in one stope, and drawn off as
it is blasted, leaving an open stope.
Tailings.............................................. Finely ground rock from which valuable minerals have been extracted by milling, or any waste
rock, slimes or residue derived from any mining operation or processing of any minerals.
Tailings dam...................................... A dam created from waste material of processed ore after the economically recoverable gold has
been extracted.
Tonnage/Tons ................................... Quantities where the metric ton is an appropriate unit of measure. Typically used to measure
reserves of gold-bearing material in-situ or quantities of ore and waste material mined,
transported or milled.
transported or milled.
Total costs per ounce ........................ Total costs per ounce represent the full amount of costs incurred and represents the difference
between revenues from gold bullion delivered to refineries and profits or losses before taxation.
Total costs per ounce are calculated by dividing total costs by ounces of gold produced. Total
costs per ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented. This is a
non-US GAAP financial measure and should not be considered a substitute measure of costs and
expenses reported by us in accordance with US GAAP.
Total costs per ounce are calculated by dividing total costs by ounces of gold produced. Total
costs per ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented. This is a
non-US GAAP financial measure and should not be considered a substitute measure of costs and
expenses reported by us in accordance with US GAAP.
Tpm ................................................... Tons per month.
Up-dip mining................................... A mining method in which the drilled and blasted ore gravitates into slushers or gullies leaving
Up-dip mining................................... A mining method in which the drilled and blasted ore gravitates into slushers or gullies leaving
an open space. This is normally used in narrow stopes.
Waste rock......................................... Non-auriferous rock.
Yield .................................................. The amount of recovered gold from production generally expressed in ounces or grams per ton of
Yield .................................................. The amount of recovered gold from production generally expressed in ounces or grams per ton of
ore.
5
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
3A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004
and 2003 are derived from our consolidated financial statements set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, which have been prepared in
accordance with US GAAP. These consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG Inc. The selected consolidated
financial data as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 (as restated) and for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 (as restated) are derived from
audited consolidated financial statements not appearing in this Annual Report which have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 5.: “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects” and with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this Annual Report.
accordance with US GAAP. These consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG Inc. The selected consolidated
financial data as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 (as restated) and for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 (as restated) are derived from
audited consolidated financial statements not appearing in this Annual Report which have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 5.: “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects” and with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this Annual Report.
6
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(in thousands, except share, per share and ounce data)
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
1 2
2003
1 2
2002
2
2001
2
(as restated)
(as restated)
(as restated)
(as restated)
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Revenues .......................................................................
Revenues .......................................................................
183,609
183,254
109,419
143,262
123,214
Production costs ............................................................
(136,520)
(143,026)
(90,761)
(99,791)
(106,873)
Net operating income/(loss)............................................
6,597
(16,110)
47,237
(24,919)
962
(Loss)/profit from continuing operations before tax and
other items ...................................................................
(11,155)
(11,882)
59,406
(24,839)
(77,131)
Income and mining tax (expense)/ benefit ......................
(5,762)
(14,230)
(15,830)
21,092
128
Equity in loss from associates.........................................
(20,511)
(11,975)
(6,867)
-
-
Minority interest.............................................................
(2)
(7)
-
-
258
Net (loss)/profit from continuing operations applicable
to common stockholders .............................................
(37,430)
(38,094)
36,709
(3,747)
(76,745)
Loss from discontinued operation .................................
(44,359)
(20,804)
(22,577)
(47,962)
(7,736)
Net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders ....
(81,789)
(58,898)
13,959
(51,709)
(84,481)
Basic (loss)/profit per share - continuing operations
(cents) ..........................................................................
(15)
(17)
20
(2)
(57)
Basic (loss)/profit per share - discontinued operation
(cents) ..........................................................................
(17)
(10)
(12)
(30)
(6)
Basic (loss)/profit per share (cents) ...............................
(32)
(27)
8
(32)
(63)
Diluted (loss)/profit per share - continuing operations
(cents) ..........................................................................
(15)
(17)
18
(2)
(57)
Diluted (loss)/profit per share (cents) - discontinued
operation......................................................................
(17)
(10)
(12)
(30)
(6)
Diluted (loss)/profit per share (cents) ............................
(32)
(27)
6
(32)
(63)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................
36,085
22,453
44,423
23,852
13,889
Total assets ....................................................................
238,257
282,735
207,335
197,306
193,621
Total liabilities ...............................................................
(158,330)
(200,194)
(197,145)
(212,777)
(214,188)
Long-term loans ............................................................
(69,314)
(59,865)
(63,149)
(25,368)
(7,273)
Stockholders' (equity)/deficit.........................................
(79,053)
(81,612)
(10,190)
15,471
20,567
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity .......................
(238,257)
(282,735)
(207,335)
(197,306)
(193,621)
Number of shares issued as at June 30 .........................
296,206,048
233,307,667
184,222,073
177,173,485
154,529,578
Non-US GAAP Financial Data
Working capital..............................................................
Working capital..............................................................
11,597
(24,993)
2,419
(34,311)
(16,500)
Cash costs per ounce
3
- continuing operations..............
315
307
275
205
235
Cash costs per ounce
3
- discontinued operation ............
504
393
312
219
231
Cash costs per ounce
3
....................................................
374
343
297
212
232
Total costs per ounce
4
- continuing operations .............
449
418
151
345
440
Total costs per ounce
4
- discontinued operation............
630
441
321
426
300
Total costs per ounce
4
...................................................
506
428
250
388
360
1
The selected consolidated financial data for fiscal 2004 and 2003 has been restated for the equity method of accounting of our investment in
Emperor Mines Limited.
2
The selected consolidated financial data for fiscal 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 has been restated for the disclosure of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited as a discontinued operation.
3
Cash costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs for fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 see Item 5A.: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
4
Total costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs for fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 see Item 5A.: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
7
3B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
Not applicable.
3C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND THE USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
3D. RISK FACTORS
In conducting our business, we face many risks that may interfere with our business objectives. Some of these risks relate to our
operational processes, while others relate to our business environment. It is important to understand the nature of these risks and the
impact they may have on our business, financial condition and operating results.
impact they may have on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Some of the most relevant risks are summarized below and have been organized into the following categories:
•
Risks related to our business and operations;
•
Risks related to the gold mining industry;
•
Risks related to doing business in South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Fiji; and
•
Risks related to ownership in our ordinary shares, American Depositary shares, or ADSs.
Risks related to our business and operations
A strong Rand and a weak gold price negatively affect our operations.
As the majority of our production costs in South Africa are in Rands, while gold is generally sold in Dollars, our financial
condition has been and could be materially harmed in the future by an appreciation in the value of the Rand. For our South African
Operations, the continuing appreciation of the Rand since December 2001 has resulted in a sustained reduction in revenue received by
us in Rands. These circumstances most adversely affected the North West Operations during fiscal 2005. After undergoing various
restructuring activities due to high underground operating costs, in addition to reporting a net loss of $48.9 million for the six months
ended December 31, 2004, compounded by the collective negative impact of a series of events that culminated in a devastating
earthquake, Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and operator of the Buffelsfontein and
Hartebeestfontein mines better known as the North West Operations) was placed into provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005. Due
to the marg inal nature of our mines in South Africa, any sustained decline in the market price of gold, in Rand terms, below the cost of
production, could result in the closure of our other South African mines which would result in significant costs and expenditure, for
example, incurring retrenchment costs earlier than expected, that would negatively and adversely affect our financial situation.
Operations, the continuing appreciation of the Rand since December 2001 has resulted in a sustained reduction in revenue received by
us in Rands. These circumstances most adversely affected the North West Operations during fiscal 2005. After undergoing various
restructuring activities due to high underground operating costs, in addition to reporting a net loss of $48.9 million for the six months
ended December 31, 2004, compounded by the collective negative impact of a series of events that culminated in a devastating
earthquake, Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and operator of the Buffelsfontein and
Hartebeestfontein mines better known as the North West Operations) was placed into provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005. Due
to the marg inal nature of our mines in South Africa, any sustained decline in the market price of gold, in Rand terms, below the cost of
production, could result in the closure of our other South African mines which would result in significant costs and expenditure, for
example, incurring retrenchment costs earlier than expected, that would negatively and adversely affect our financial situation.
Changes in the market price for gold, which in the past has fluctuated widely, and exchange rate fluctuations affect the
profitability of our operations and the cash flows generated by those operations.
We generally do not enter into forward contracts to reduce our exposure to market fluctuations in the Dollar gold price or the
exchange rate movements of the Rand, Kina and Fiji Dollar. We sell our gold and trade our foreign currency at the spot price in the
market on the date of trade. If the Dollar gold price should fall and/or the regional functional currencies should strengthen against the
Dollar, resulting in revenue below our cost of production and remain at such levels for any sustained period, we may experience losses
and may be forced to curtail or suspend some or all of our operations. In addition, we might not be able to recover any losses we may
incur during that period or maintain adequate gold reserves for future exploitation.
market on the date of trade. If the Dollar gold price should fall and/or the regional functional currencies should strengthen against the
Dollar, resulting in revenue below our cost of production and remain at such levels for any sustained period, we may experience losses
and may be forced to curtail or suspend some or all of our operations. In addition, we might not be able to recover any losses we may
incur during that period or maintain adequate gold reserves for future exploitation.
Exchange rates are influenced by global economic trends which are beyond our control. In fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Rand
appreciated against the Dollar by 9.8%, 23.9% and 11.0 %, respectively (based on average exchange rates for each year). As at June 30,
2005, the Rand had appreciated by 50.3% since reaching R13.44 = $1.00 in December 2001 (based on closing rates). In fiscal 2005 and
2004, the Kina also appreciated against the Dollar by 3.9% and 13.7% respectively and in fiscal 2003 depreciated against the Dollar by
5.9% (based on average exchange rates for each year).
2005, the Rand had appreciated by 50.3% since reaching R13.44 = $1.00 in December 2001 (based on closing rates). In fiscal 2005 and
2004, the Kina also appreciated against the Dollar by 3.9% and 13.7% respectively and in fiscal 2003 depreciated against the Dollar by
5.9% (based on average exchange rates for each year).
A decrease in the gold price and a strengthening of the foreign exchange rate of the Rand and Kina has resulted and could
continue to result in a decrease in profitability. In fiscal 2005 and 2004, 57% and 71% of production (including the discontinued
operation), respectively, was from South African mines providing significant exposure to the strengthening of the Rand and a decrease in
profitability. If the Rand continues to appreciate in such a manner, our South African Operations could continue to experience a reduction
in cash flow and profitability.
operation), respectively, was from South African mines providing significant exposure to the strengthening of the Rand and a decrease in
profitability. If the Rand continues to appreciate in such a manner, our South African Operations could continue to experience a reduction
in cash flow and profitability.
8
We have a history of losses and may continue to incur losses in the future.
We incurred net losses of $81.8 million for fiscal 2005, $58.9 million for fiscal 2004 and $51.7 million for fiscal 2002. However,
we may still continue to incur losses in the future. Our profits and cash flows of the South African Operations are directly exposed to the
strength of the Rand and higher input costs as we generally do not hedge against currency fluctuations. These mines are also regarded as
older, generally higher cost gold producers. In addition to our ability to identify Ore Reserves that can be mined economically and to
maintain sufficient controls on production and other costs, exchange rate fluctuations will have a material influence on the future viability
of these mines.
strength of the Rand and higher input costs as we generally do not hedge against currency fluctuations. These mines are also regarded as
older, generally higher cost gold producers. In addition to our ability to identify Ore Reserves that can be mined economically and to
maintain sufficient controls on production and other costs, exchange rate fluctuations will have a material influence on the future viability
of these mines.
We may not be able to meet our cash requirements because of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Management’s estimates on future cash flows are subject to risks and uncertainties. If we are unable to meet our cash
requirements out of cash flows generated from our operations, we would need to fund our cash requirements from alternative financing
and we cannot guarantee that any such financing would be on acceptable terms, or would be permitted under the terms of our existing
financing arrangements. In the absence of such financing, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, make
future acquisitions, react to adverse operating results, meet out debt service obligations and fund required capital expenditures or
increased working capital requirements may be adversely affected.
and we cannot guarantee that any such financing would be on acceptable terms, or would be permitted under the terms of our existing
financing arrangements. In the absence of such financing, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, make
future acquisitions, react to adverse operating results, meet out debt service obligations and fund required capital expenditures or
increased working capital requirements may be adversely affected.
The failure to discover or acquire new Ore Reserves, particularly outside South Africa, could negatively affect our cash
flow, results of operations and financial condition.
Our future cash flow, results of operations and financial condition are directly related to the success of our exploration and
acquisition efforts and our ability to replace depleted South African reserves with reserves offshore. In fiscal 2005, our Ore Reserves
decreased by 49.1% from 11.0 million ounces at June 30, 2004 to 5.6 million ounces at June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of placing the
North West Operations into provisional liquidation and losing access to its ore reserves and because the strength of the Rand caused a
decline in the Rand gold price. Mining higher grade reserves in our South African mines is likely to be more difficult in the future and
could result in increased production costs and reduced profitability. A failure to discover or acquire new reserves in sufficient
quantities to maintain or grow the current level of our reserves will negatively affect our future cash flow, results and financial
condition. There can be no assurances that any new or ongoing exploration programs will result in new mineral producin g operations.
decreased by 49.1% from 11.0 million ounces at June 30, 2004 to 5.6 million ounces at June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of placing the
North West Operations into provisional liquidation and losing access to its ore reserves and because the strength of the Rand caused a
decline in the Rand gold price. Mining higher grade reserves in our South African mines is likely to be more difficult in the future and
could result in increased production costs and reduced profitability. A failure to discover or acquire new reserves in sufficient
quantities to maintain or grow the current level of our reserves will negatively affect our future cash flow, results and financial
condition. There can be no assurances that any new or ongoing exploration programs will result in new mineral producin g operations.
The ability to grow through acquisitions, particularly outside South Africa, may be restricted by not successfully achieving
our acquisition strategy.
Our objective is to grow our business by improving efficiency at our existing operations as well as through acquisitions.
From time to time we consider the acquisition of mining assets including Ore Reserves, development properties, operating mines or
mining companies. Successfully acquiring mining assets may be hindered by the following:
mining companies. Successfully acquiring mining assets may be hindered by the following:
•
the market for acquisitions is competitive and we may not always be successful in identifying and purchasing assets that fit
our strategy;
our strategy;
•
the ability to conduct a comprehensive due diligence analysis could be restricted due to unavailable information;
•
we may need to use a combination of historical and projected data in order to evaluate the financial and operational feasibility
of the target assets. These analyses are based on a variety of factors including historical operating results, estimates of and
assumptions about future reserves, cash and other operating costs, metal prices and projected economic returns and
evaluations of existing or potential liabilities associated with the property and its operations. Other than historical operating
results, all of these parameters could differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in the evaluation process,
which could result in an incorrect evaluation of the quality of the assets to be acquired;
of the target assets. These analyses are based on a variety of factors including historical operating results, estimates of and
assumptions about future reserves, cash and other operating costs, metal prices and projected economic returns and
evaluations of existing or potential liabilities associated with the property and its operations. Other than historical operating
results, all of these parameters could differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in the evaluation process,
which could result in an incorrect evaluation of the quality of the assets to be acquired;
•
our inability to make suitable acquisitions at an appropriate price could adversely affect our ongoing business and financial
position, particularly if the Rand continues to strengthen against the Dollar;
position, particularly if the Rand continues to strengthen against the Dollar;
•
we may experience difficulty in negotiating acceptable terms with the seller of the business to be acquired;
•
we may not be able to obtain the financing necessary to complete future acquisitions;
•
we may not be able to obtain necessary approvals from regulatory authorities;
•
acquisitions financed through the issue of shares may result in a dilution in the value of our shares if the value of the business
acquired is not realized;
acquired is not realized;
•
we could experience financial loss through costs incurred in evaluating and pursuing failed acquisitions or overpayment for
an acquisition; and
an acquisition; and
9
•
an acquisition may not have a positive effect on our results if we do not:
o assimilate the operations of an acquired business in a timely and efficient manner;
o maintain our financial and strategic focus while integrating the acquired business;
o implement uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies at the acquired business at minimum expense and
without restriction; and
o efficiently conduct and manage the new operations in a new operating environment, particularly if this acquisition is
outside South Africa.
We do not control the operations at CGR, including the Crown and ERPM Sections, the Porgera Joint Venture or the
Emperor Section.
We do not control Crown Gold Recoveries, or CGR, the Porgera Joint Venture or Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, and
cannot unilaterally cause these entities to adopt a particular budget, pay dividends or repay indebtedness, including debt held by us.
Because we do not control these entities, current management may not continue to manage these entities in a manner that is favorable to
us. With a minority interest stake in these entities, our ability to raise funding is dependent on access to capital from their shareholders,
joint venture partners or third party financiers. Decisions which reduce gold production, revenues or profitability, over which we have no
control, may serve to reduce our cash flows and decrease our profitability.
Because we do not control these entities, current management may not continue to manage these entities in a manner that is favorable to
us. With a minority interest stake in these entities, our ability to raise funding is dependent on access to capital from their shareholders,
joint venture partners or third party financiers. Decisions which reduce gold production, revenues or profitability, over which we have no
control, may serve to reduce our cash flows and decrease our profitability.
Our production costs may fluctuate and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our historical production costs have varied significantly and we cannot predict what our production costs may be in the future.
Production costs are affected by, amongst other things:
•
labor stability, lack of productivity and increases in labor costs;
•
unforeseen changes in ore grades and recoveries;
•
unexpected changes in the quality or quantity of reserves;
•
unstable or unexpected ground conditions and seismic activity;
•
technical production issues;
•
environmental and industrial accidents;
•
gold theft;
•
environmental factors;
•
pollution; and
•
oil prices.
Increased production costs would affect profitability.
The majority of our production costs consist of labor, steel, electricity and water. The production costs incurred at our South
African Operations have, and could in the future, increase at rates in excess of our annual expected inflationary increase and result in the
restructuring of these operations at substantial cost. The majority of our South African labor force is unionized and their wage increase
demands are usually above the then prevailing rates of inflation. In October 2005, we entered into a two year wage agreement for the
Blyvoor Section with the National Union of Mine Workers, or NUM, that provided wage increases of 6% as of July 1, 2005 and 6.5% as
of July 1, 2006. Similar agreements for the Crown and ERPM Sections are currently being negotiated. In addition, we have received
notification of price increases, far in excess of the current rate of inflation, to be imposed by our South African steel suppliers and
parastatal entities which supply us with electricity and water. These, combined with the increase in labor costs, cou ld result in our costs
of production increasing above the gold price received. Discussions with suppliers to moderate price increases have so far been
unsuccessful. The costs of fuels, lubricants and other oil and petroleum based products have increased in fiscal 2005 as a result of the
general increase in the cost of crude oil in global markets.
restructuring of these operations at substantial cost. The majority of our South African labor force is unionized and their wage increase
demands are usually above the then prevailing rates of inflation. In October 2005, we entered into a two year wage agreement for the
Blyvoor Section with the National Union of Mine Workers, or NUM, that provided wage increases of 6% as of July 1, 2005 and 6.5% as
of July 1, 2006. Similar agreements for the Crown and ERPM Sections are currently being negotiated. In addition, we have received
notification of price increases, far in excess of the current rate of inflation, to be imposed by our South African steel suppliers and
parastatal entities which supply us with electricity and water. These, combined with the increase in labor costs, cou ld result in our costs
of production increasing above the gold price received. Discussions with suppliers to moderate price increases have so far been
unsuccessful. The costs of fuels, lubricants and other oil and petroleum based products have increased in fiscal 2005 as a result of the
general increase in the cost of crude oil in global markets.
Due to the location of the Tolukuma Section in the highlands of Papua New Guinea, all transportation to the mine site is by
heavy lift helicopters. Approximately $79 per ounce, or 23.9%, of production costs relate to transportation, including the cost of JET A1
fuel for the helicopters. In the event that the increase in crude oil prices continues, this will have a significant impact on production costs
at the Tolukuma Section and will increase the cost of mining at our other operations.
fuel for the helicopters. In the event that the increase in crude oil prices continues, this will have a significant impact on production costs
at the Tolukuma Section and will increase the cost of mining at our other operations.
Production costs have increased significantly at the Emperor Section due to the current high crude oil prices and increased power
consumption associated with the Phase 2 expansion project. Power generation represents approximately 20% of the operating costs at the
Emperor Section. Increasing production costs at this Section will negatively impact on the profitability of the Company.
Emperor Section. Increasing production costs at this Section will negatively impact on the profitability of the Company.
Our initiatives to reduce costs may not be sufficient to offset the increases imposed on our operations and could negatively affect
our business and operating results.
10
Our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations which could impose significant costs and liabilities.
Our operations are subject to increasingly extensive laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, under
various state, provincial and local laws, which regulate air and water quality, hazardous waste management and environmental
rehabilitation and reclamation. Our mining and related activities impact the environment, including land, habitat, streams and
environment near the mining sites. Delays in obtaining, or failures to obtain government permits and approvals may adversely impact
our operations. In addition, the regulatory environment in which we operate could change in ways that could substantially increase
compliance costs, therefore having a material adverse effect on our profitability.
rehabilitation and reclamation. Our mining and related activities impact the environment, including land, habitat, streams and
environment near the mining sites. Delays in obtaining, or failures to obtain government permits and approvals may adversely impact
our operations. In addition, the regulatory environment in which we operate could change in ways that could substantially increase
compliance costs, therefore having a material adverse effect on our profitability.
We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with these laws and regulations. We have estimated
these liabilities and included them in the $22.6 million provision for the Group’s environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure
costs on our balance sheet as at June 30, 2005. However the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs may in the future exceed the current
estimates due to influences beyond our control, such as changing legislation or unidentified rehabilitation costs. The closure of mining
operations, without sufficient financial provision for the funding of rehabilitation liabilities, or unacceptable damage to the environment,
including pollution or environmental degradation, may expose us and our directors to litigation and potentially significant liabilities.
costs on our balance sheet as at June 30, 2005. However the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs may in the future exceed the current
estimates due to influences beyond our control, such as changing legislation or unidentified rehabilitation costs. The closure of mining
operations, without sufficient financial provision for the funding of rehabilitation liabilities, or unacceptable damage to the environment,
including pollution or environmental degradation, may expose us and our directors to litigation and potentially significant liabilities.
Seismicity and other natural disasters could impact the going concern of our operations.
We run the inherent risk that seismic activity and/or other natural disasters could cripple our operations and affect their ability to
continue production. On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake of 5.3 on the Richter scale. As a
consequence of the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, the Company closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of
employees. Seismic activity has had, and may continue to have, a harmful effect on our business.
consequence of the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, the Company closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of
employees. Seismic activity has had, and may continue to have, a harmful effect on our business.
Our Papua New Guinea Operations are subject to environmental risks associated with tailings discharge.
The Tolukuma and Porgera Sections in Papua New Guinea have site specific environmental risks associated with their
operations. Tailings are routinely discharged into the surrounding river systems in accordance with approved environmental water
discharge permits issued by the Papua New Guinea Department of the Environment and Conservation under the Papua New Guinea
Environmental Act 2000 and Regulations 2000. The Papua New Guinea Government has approved disposal into certain natural rivers as
the most appropriate method for treated tailings and soft incompetent waste rock because the mines are located in extremely rugged
mountainous terrain, subject to seismic activity, high rainfall and landslides, so construction of a tailings impoundment would be very
difficult and the risk of an engineering failure high.
discharge permits issued by the Papua New Guinea Department of the Environment and Conservation under the Papua New Guinea
Environmental Act 2000 and Regulations 2000. The Papua New Guinea Government has approved disposal into certain natural rivers as
the most appropriate method for treated tailings and soft incompetent waste rock because the mines are located in extremely rugged
mountainous terrain, subject to seismic activity, high rainfall and landslides, so construction of a tailings impoundment would be very
difficult and the risk of an engineering failure high.
Due to the elevated concentrations of heavy metals naturally occurring in the ore, in particular lead, mercury and arsenic,
discharges are monitored in accordance with the terms of our approved environmental management monitoring program. Cyanide
associated with the tailings deposited is detoxified and cyanide levels are monitored daily. However, should we be unable to control the
levels of lead, mercury, arsenic or cyanide, it could pose potential adverse health risks to the surrounding communities and may result in
us violating our environmental water discharge permit and may expose us to civil or criminal liability. While our Papua New Guinea
Operations currently comply with the applicable license conditions accepted by the Papua New Guinea Government in granting approval,
the eventual, cumulative environmental impacts could be greater than the estimates in, or contemplated by, the environmental plans and
environmental management monitoring programs approved by the Papua New Guinea Government. In such event the Papua New
Guinea Government could require us to remedy such consequences and the costs of such remediation could be material. We have also
encountered opposition from local people and landowners regarding our discharge of tailings. This opposition could cause delays or
stoppages which could reduce our production capacity and results of operations.
associated with the tailings deposited is detoxified and cyanide levels are monitored daily. However, should we be unable to control the
levels of lead, mercury, arsenic or cyanide, it could pose potential adverse health risks to the surrounding communities and may result in
us violating our environmental water discharge permit and may expose us to civil or criminal liability. While our Papua New Guinea
Operations currently comply with the applicable license conditions accepted by the Papua New Guinea Government in granting approval,
the eventual, cumulative environmental impacts could be greater than the estimates in, or contemplated by, the environmental plans and
environmental management monitoring programs approved by the Papua New Guinea Government. In such event the Papua New
Guinea Government could require us to remedy such consequences and the costs of such remediation could be material. We have also
encountered opposition from local people and landowners regarding our discharge of tailings. This opposition could cause delays or
stoppages which could reduce our production capacity and results of operations.
Changes in Papua New Guinean Government legislation or policy on regulatory discharges into the environment could result in
operational disruptions, especially if the government changes the method it requires for us to test tailings discharges, and may have a
material adverse affect on our profitability as additional costs may need to be incurred to facilitate other waste discharge methods.
material adverse affect on our profitability as additional costs may need to be incurred to facilitate other waste discharge methods.
Flooding at our operations may cause us to incur liabilities for environmental damage.
Flooding of underground mining areas is an inherent risk at all our operations. If the rate of water rise is not controlled, water
from our workings could potentially rise to the surface or decant into surrounding underground workings or natural underground water
sources. Due to the withdrawal of Government pumping subsidies at the Durban Deep and West Wits Sections, we have ceased active
pumping of underground water at these sections. We expect that progressive flooding could eventually cause the discharge of polluted
water to the surface and to local water sources.
sources. Due to the withdrawal of Government pumping subsidies at the Durban Deep and West Wits Sections, we have ceased active
pumping of underground water at these sections. We expect that progressive flooding could eventually cause the discharge of polluted
water to the surface and to local water sources.
11
Estimates of the probable rate of water rise in those mines are contradictory and lack scientific support, however, should
underground water levels not reach a natural subterranean equilibrium, and in the event that underground water rises to the surface, we
may face claims relating to environmental damage and pollution of ground water, streams and wetlands.
may face claims relating to environmental damage and pollution of ground water, streams and wetlands.
In addition, our underground and opencast mines in Papua New Guinea may experience flooding due to excessive annual
rainfall.
We have ageing assets in South Africa, which exposes us to greater risk of our infrastructure failing, higher maintenance
costs and potentially greater health, safety and environmental liabilities.
Our South African assets are made up predominantly of mature assets, which we acquired after they had reached the end of the
planned production cycle under their previous owners, and our strategy has been to revive these assets through specialist planning and
mining techniques. The ageing infrastructure and installations typical of these operations require constant maintenance and continuing
capital expenditure. This materially increases our operational costs. The mature state of these assets, coupled with the technology applied
in many of our installations was not regularly updated and accordingly has become obsolete compared to the technology used in more
modern mines. As a result the risk of technology failure is high, and the maintenance of these installations, costly.
mining techniques. The ageing infrastructure and installations typical of these operations require constant maintenance and continuing
capital expenditure. This materially increases our operational costs. The mature state of these assets, coupled with the technology applied
in many of our installations was not regularly updated and accordingly has become obsolete compared to the technology used in more
modern mines. As a result the risk of technology failure is high, and the maintenance of these installations, costly.
Due to the nature of the business, particularly in South Africa where our marginal mines predominantly comprise aged
infrastructures, we inherently run the risk of exposure to greater health, safety and environmental liabilities which we closely monitor but
are not always able to fully mitigate.
are not always able to fully mitigate.
Due to the nature of our business, our employees face health and safety risks.
Regrettably 10 people died in work-related incidents during fiscal year 2005. These fatalities were largely attributable to
seismicity-related rockfalls. While seismic monitoring continues to be an invaluable tool in the management of seismicity, there is still
risk of seismic induced fatalities occurring which we may not be able to prevent. Preventing occupational diseases such as tuberculosis
and noise-induced hearing loss is a priority and is addressed through close adherence to legislated requirements. However, there has been
an increase year on year in employees suffering from these kinds of conditions. Mine and safety regulations of the countries in which we
conduct our operations impose various duties on us at our mines and grant the authorities broad powers to, among other things, close
unsafe mines and order corrective action relating to health and safety matters. In the event of any future accidents at any of our mines,
regulatory authorities could take steps which could increase our costs or reduce our production capacity.
risk of seismic induced fatalities occurring which we may not be able to prevent. Preventing occupational diseases such as tuberculosis
and noise-induced hearing loss is a priority and is addressed through close adherence to legislated requirements. However, there has been
an increase year on year in employees suffering from these kinds of conditions. Mine and safety regulations of the countries in which we
conduct our operations impose various duties on us at our mines and grant the authorities broad powers to, among other things, close
unsafe mines and order corrective action relating to health and safety matters. In the event of any future accidents at any of our mines,
regulatory authorities could take steps which could increase our costs or reduce our production capacity.
If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel our business may be harmed.
The success of our business will depend, in large part, upon the skills and efforts of a small group of management and technical
personnel including Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, our Chief Financial Officer (as of
September 5, 2005). Factors critical to retaining our present staff and attracting additional highly qualified personnel include our ability to
provide these individuals with competitive compensation arrangements, equity participation and other benefits. If we are not successful in
retaining or attracting highly qualified individuals in key management positions, our business may be harmed. We do not maintain “key
person” life insurance policies on any members of our executive team. The loss of any of our key personnel could prevent us from
executing our business plans, which may result in decreased production, increased costs and decreased profitability.
September 5, 2005). Factors critical to retaining our present staff and attracting additional highly qualified personnel include our ability to
provide these individuals with competitive compensation arrangements, equity participation and other benefits. If we are not successful in
retaining or attracting highly qualified individuals in key management positions, our business may be harmed. We do not maintain “key
person” life insurance policies on any members of our executive team. The loss of any of our key personnel could prevent us from
executing our business plans, which may result in decreased production, increased costs and decreased profitability.
12
Events may occur for which we are not insured which could affect our cash flows and profitability.
We may become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards against which we are unable to insure, including those in
respect of past mining activities. Our existing property and liability insurance contains certain exclusions and limitations on coverage. We
have insured property, including loss of profits due to business interruption in the amount of $822.9 million (R5.5 billion). Claims for
each and every event are limited by the insurers to $74.8 million (R500.0 million). This policy is limited by initial deductible amounts
covering the loss of surface and underground assets, and losses due to seismic events, machinery breakdown, flooding, fire and accidents.
Business interruption is only covered from the time the loss actually occurs. The deductible amounts vary between categories with the
maximum deductible of $4.5 million (R30.0 million). A specific limitation of $15.0 million (R100.0 million) applies for loss suffered or
claims as a result of any landslide at the Tolukuma Section, however, no cover will apply for any seis mic event smaller than 4.5 on the
Richter scale. General liability insurance cover is in the amount of $86.8 million (R580.0 million).
have insured property, including loss of profits due to business interruption in the amount of $822.9 million (R5.5 billion). Claims for
each and every event are limited by the insurers to $74.8 million (R500.0 million). This policy is limited by initial deductible amounts
covering the loss of surface and underground assets, and losses due to seismic events, machinery breakdown, flooding, fire and accidents.
Business interruption is only covered from the time the loss actually occurs. The deductible amounts vary between categories with the
maximum deductible of $4.5 million (R30.0 million). A specific limitation of $15.0 million (R100.0 million) applies for loss suffered or
claims as a result of any landslide at the Tolukuma Section, however, no cover will apply for any seis mic event smaller than 4.5 on the
Richter scale. General liability insurance cover is in the amount of $86.8 million (R580.0 million).
Future insurance coverage may not cover the extent of claims against us, including claims for environmental, industrial or
pollution related accidents, for which coverage is not available. If we are required to meet the costs of claims which exceed our insurance
coverage, our costs may increase which could decrease our profitability.
coverage, our costs may increase which could decrease our profitability.
Failure to discover and remedy material weaknesses in our internal controls in relation to our US GAAP financial reporting
could have an adverse effect on our business.
During fiscal 2004, we discovered material weaknesses in our internal controls. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to
provide reliable US GAAP financial reports. Failure to remedy these material weaknesses and provide reliable US GAAP financial
reports could have an adverse effect on our share price. Remedying these material weaknesses is challenging in light of the limited
availability within South Africa, where our head office is located, of internal accounting employee candidates who have sufficient
knowledge and experience regarding the application of US GAAP and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
requirements and of potential external advisers with US GAAP expertise to supplement our internal resources.
reports could have an adverse effect on our share price. Remedying these material weaknesses is challenging in light of the limited
availability within South Africa, where our head office is located, of internal accounting employee candidates who have sufficient
knowledge and experience regarding the application of US GAAP and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
requirements and of potential external advisers with US GAAP expertise to supplement our internal resources.
In response to these discoveries, we have been working to improve our internal controls over financial reporting, including in the
areas of compliance with US GAAP and SEC reporting requirements. We documented these efforts in the form of a US GAAP Action
Plan (see Item 15: “Controls and Procedures”) which we have implemented as of the current year end. If we encounter any difficulties in
sustaining the application of our US GAAP Action Plan, or remedying any control weaknesses discovered, or any difficulties encountered
in their implementation, we could fail to meet our US GAAP reporting obligations. If we are unable to sustain our US GAAP Action
Plan, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our
shares.
Plan (see Item 15: “Controls and Procedures”) which we have implemented as of the current year end. If we encounter any difficulties in
sustaining the application of our US GAAP Action Plan, or remedying any control weaknesses discovered, or any difficulties encountered
in their implementation, we could fail to meet our US GAAP reporting obligations. If we are unable to sustain our US GAAP Action
Plan, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our
shares.
Risks related to the gold mining industry
Changes in the price of gold, which in the past has fluctuated widely, are beyond our control.
Historically, the gold price has fluctuated widely and is affected by numerous industry factors, over which we have no control,
including:
•
the physical supply of gold from world-wide production and scrap sales, and the purchase, sale or divestment by central
banks of their gold holdings;
banks of their gold holdings;
•
the demand for gold for investment purposes, industrial and commercial use, and in the manufacturing of jewellery;
•
speculative trading activities in gold;
•
the overall level of forward sales by other gold producers;
•
the overall level and cost of production of other gold producers;
•
international or regional political and economic events or trends;
•
the strength of the Dollar (the currency in which gold prices generally are quoted) and of other currencies;
•
financial market expectations regarding the rate of inflation; and
•
interest rates.
Our profitability may be negatively impacted if revenue from gold sales drops below the cost of production for an extended
period.
13
The exploration of mineral properties is highly speculative in nature, involves substantial expenditures, and is frequently
unproductive.
Our future growth and profitability will depend, in part, on our ability to identify and acquire additional mineral rights, and on
the costs and results of our continued exploration and development programs. Gold mining companies undertake exploration activities
to discover gold mineralization, which may give rise to new gold bearing ore bodies. Exploration is highly speculative in nature and
requires substantial expenditure for drilling, sampling and analysis of ore bodies in order to quantify the extent of the gold reserve.
Many exploration programs, including some of ours, do not result in the discovery of mineralization and any mineralization discovered
may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be mined profitably. If we discover a viable deposit, it usually takes several years from the
initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change. Moreover,
we rely on the evaluations of professional geologists, geophysicists, and engineers for estimates in determini ng whether to commence or
continue mining. These estimates generally rely on scientific and economic assumptions, which in some instances may not be correct, and
could result in the expenditure of substantial amounts of money on a deposit before it can be determined with any degree of accuracy
whether or not the deposit contains economically recoverable mineralization. Uncertainties as to the metallurgical recovery of any gold
discovered may not warrant mining on the basis of available technology. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully
acquire additional mineral rights, or identify new Proven and Probable Ore Reserves in sufficient quantities to justify commercial
operations in any of our properties. Our mineral exploration rights may also not contain commercially exploitable reserves of gold. The
costs incurred on unsuccessful exploration activities are, as a result, not likely to be recovered and we could incur a write-down on our
investment in that interest or the irrecoverable loss of funds spent.
to discover gold mineralization, which may give rise to new gold bearing ore bodies. Exploration is highly speculative in nature and
requires substantial expenditure for drilling, sampling and analysis of ore bodies in order to quantify the extent of the gold reserve.
Many exploration programs, including some of ours, do not result in the discovery of mineralization and any mineralization discovered
may not be of sufficient quantity or quality to be mined profitably. If we discover a viable deposit, it usually takes several years from the
initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change. Moreover,
we rely on the evaluations of professional geologists, geophysicists, and engineers for estimates in determini ng whether to commence or
continue mining. These estimates generally rely on scientific and economic assumptions, which in some instances may not be correct, and
could result in the expenditure of substantial amounts of money on a deposit before it can be determined with any degree of accuracy
whether or not the deposit contains economically recoverable mineralization. Uncertainties as to the metallurgical recovery of any gold
discovered may not warrant mining on the basis of available technology. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully
acquire additional mineral rights, or identify new Proven and Probable Ore Reserves in sufficient quantities to justify commercial
operations in any of our properties. Our mineral exploration rights may also not contain commercially exploitable reserves of gold. The
costs incurred on unsuccessful exploration activities are, as a result, not likely to be recovered and we could incur a write-down on our
investment in that interest or the irrecoverable loss of funds spent.
There is uncertainty in our Ore Reserve estimates.
Our Ore Reserve figures described in this document are the best estimates of our current management as of the dates stated
and are reported in accordance with the requirements of Industry Guide 7 of the SEC. These estimates may be imprecise and may not
reflect actual reserves or future production.
reflect actual reserves or future production.
Should we encounter mineralization or formations different from those predicted by past drilling, sampling and similar
examinations, reserve estimates may have to be adjusted and mining plans may have to be altered in a way that might ultimately cause
our results of operations and financial condition to decline. Moreover, if the price of gold declines, or stabilizes at a price that is lower
than recent levels, or if our production costs, and in particular our labor costs, increase or recovery rates decrease, it may become
uneconomical to recover Ore Reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization. Under these circumstances, we would be
required to re-evaluate our Ore Reserves. Short-term operating factors relating to the Ore Reserves, such as the need for sequential
development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different grades, may increase our production costs and decrease our profitability
during any given period. These factors have and could result in reductions in our Ore Reserve estimates, which could in turn adversely
impact upon the total value of our mining asset base and our business and operating results.
our results of operations and financial condition to decline. Moreover, if the price of gold declines, or stabilizes at a price that is lower
than recent levels, or if our production costs, and in particular our labor costs, increase or recovery rates decrease, it may become
uneconomical to recover Ore Reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization. Under these circumstances, we would be
required to re-evaluate our Ore Reserves. Short-term operating factors relating to the Ore Reserves, such as the need for sequential
development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different grades, may increase our production costs and decrease our profitability
during any given period. These factors have and could result in reductions in our Ore Reserve estimates, which could in turn adversely
impact upon the total value of our mining asset base and our business and operating results.
Gold mining is susceptible to numerous events that could have an adverse impact on a gold mining business.
The business of gold mining takes place in underground mines, open pit mines and surface operations for the retreatment of rock
dumps and tailings dams. These operations are exposed to numerous risks and events, the occurrence of which may result in the death of,
or personal injury to, employees, the loss of mining equipment, damage to or destruction of mineral properties or production facilities,
monetary losses, delays in production, environmental damage, loss of the license to mine and potential legal claims. The risks and
events associated with the business of gold mining include, but are not limited to:
or personal injury to, employees, the loss of mining equipment, damage to or destruction of mineral properties or production facilities,
monetary losses, delays in production, environmental damage, loss of the license to mine and potential legal claims. The risks and
events associated with the business of gold mining include, but are not limited to:
•
environmental hazards and pollution, including the discharge of gases, toxic chemicals, pollutants, radioactive materials and
other hazardous material into the air and water;
other hazardous material into the air and water;
•
seismic activity which could lead to rock bursts, cave-ins, pit slope failures or, in the event of a significant event, total closure of
sections or an entire underground mine;
sections or an entire underground mine;
•
unexpected geological formations which reduce or prevent mining from taking place;
•
flooding, landslides, sinkhole formation, ground subsidence, ground and surface water pollution, and waterway contamination;
•
underground fires and explosions, including those caused by flammable gas;
•
accidents caused from and related to drilling, blasting, removing, transporting and processing material, and the collapse of pit
walls and tailings dams; and
walls and tailings dams; and
•
decrease in labor productivity due to labor disruptions, work stoppages, disease, slowdowns or labor strikes.
In addition, deep level underground mines in South Africa, as compared to other gold mining countries, involve significant risks
and hazards not associated with open pit or surface rock dump and tailings dam retreatment operations. The level of seismic activity in a
deep level gold mine varies based on the rock formation and geological structures in the mine. The occurrence of any of these hazards
could delay production, increase production costs and may result in legal claims.
deep level gold mine varies based on the rock formation and geological structures in the mine. The occurrence of any of these hazards
could delay production, increase production costs and may result in legal claims.
14
Underground and opencast mines in Papua New Guinea may experience pit wall failures, landslides and flooding, due to
excessive annual rainfall. The transport of supplies and employees to and from the mine site may be inhibited by incessant rain and
damage to roads. In addition, land movement caused by excessive rain may destabilize existing buildings and plant infrastructure and
restrict access into the mines.
damage to roads. In addition, land movement caused by excessive rain may destabilize existing buildings and plant infrastructure and
restrict access into the mines.
Fiji is fairly isolated in an area that gives rise to severe cyclonic storms which can be very disruptive. As in other island
states, rising sea levels caused by the greenhouse effect are a major concern. Natural disasters of this type could potentially disrupt our
business for an extended period of time and this is of particular concern in Fiji due to the island’s exposure to such disasters in the
past. Tropical cyclone Ami hit Fiji on January 13, 2003, killing at least 15 people and leaving thousands more devastated.
business for an extended period of time and this is of particular concern in Fiji due to the island’s exposure to such disasters in the
past. Tropical cyclone Ami hit Fiji on January 13, 2003, killing at least 15 people and leaving thousands more devastated.
Risks related to doing business in South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Fiji
Political or economic instability in the regions in which we operate may reduce our production and profitability.
We are incorporated and own operations in South Africa. As a result, political and economic risks relating to South Africa could
reduce our production and profitability. Large parts of the South African population are unemployed and do not have access to adequate
education, health care, housing and other services, including water and electricity. Government policies aimed at alleviating and
redressing the disadvantages suffered by the majority of citizens under previous governments may increase our costs and reduce our
profitability. In recent years, South Africa has experienced high levels of crime. These problems have impeded fixed inward investment
into South Africa and have prompted emigration of skilled workers. As a result, we may have difficulties attracting and retaining qualified
employees.
education, health care, housing and other services, including water and electricity. Government policies aimed at alleviating and
redressing the disadvantages suffered by the majority of citizens under previous governments may increase our costs and reduce our
profitability. In recent years, South Africa has experienced high levels of crime. These problems have impeded fixed inward investment
into South Africa and have prompted emigration of skilled workers. As a result, we may have difficulties attracting and retaining qualified
employees.
In recent years, the South African economy has been growing at a relatively slow rate, inflation and unemployment have been
high by comparison with developed countries, and foreign currency reserves have been low relative to other emerging market countries.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, inflation in South Africa reached record highs of 20.6%. This increase in inflation resulted in
considerable year on year increases in operational costs. In recent years, the inflation rate has decreased and as of June 2005, the
Consumer Price Inflation Index, or CPIX, stood at 3.5%, down from 4.8% since June 2004. Analysts expect inflation to increase over the
next few months, partly in response to higher fuel prices. A return to high levels of inflation in South Africa, without a concurrent
devaluation of the Rand or increase in the price of gold, could result in an increase in our costs which could reduce our profitability.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, inflation in South Africa reached record highs of 20.6%. This increase in inflation resulted in
considerable year on year increases in operational costs. In recent years, the inflation rate has decreased and as of June 2005, the
Consumer Price Inflation Index, or CPIX, stood at 3.5%, down from 4.8% since June 2004. Analysts expect inflation to increase over the
next few months, partly in response to higher fuel prices. A return to high levels of inflation in South Africa, without a concurrent
devaluation of the Rand or increase in the price of gold, could result in an increase in our costs which could reduce our profitability.
In South Africa and Papua New Guinea there is a greater level of political and economic risk as compared to developed
countries in the world. For example, open pit operations at Porgera were suspended from August 27, 2002 to October 12, 2002, due to
interruptions in the electrical power supply as a result of election-related vandalism in Papua New Guinea. There is also a risk that social
unrest and government intervention could be exacerbated during the mine closure process. Mine infrastructure, including power, water
and fuel, may be at risk of sabotage.
interruptions in the electrical power supply as a result of election-related vandalism in Papua New Guinea. There is also a risk that social
unrest and government intervention could be exacerbated during the mine closure process. Mine infrastructure, including power, water
and fuel, may be at risk of sabotage.
In Papua New Guinea, landowners in the area, whose interests are consolidated with those of the provincial government in a
Papua New Guinea registered entity, Mineral Resources Enga, or MRE, had an expectation of receiving from us a 5% stake in the
Porgera Joint Venture. This expectation arose from an undertaking we gave at the time of acquiring our interest in Porgera, to sell a 5%
stake to MRE on commercial terms, which was subsequently cancelled as MRE failed to meet certain conditions precedent after
renegotiated, extended deadlines. This issue may become the subject of some political campaigning and canvassing in future elections.
Porgera Joint Venture. This expectation arose from an undertaking we gave at the time of acquiring our interest in Porgera, to sell a 5%
stake to MRE on commercial terms, which was subsequently cancelled as MRE failed to meet certain conditions precedent after
renegotiated, extended deadlines. This issue may become the subject of some political campaigning and canvassing in future elections.
The Porgera mine has also on a number of occasions experienced delays receiving operating permits and licenses, necessary for
this mine to conduct its lawful operations. If at any time in the future permits essential to lawful operations are not obtained, or
exemptions not granted, there is a risk that the Porgera mine may not be able to operate for a period of time. Future government actions,
or actions of other quasi-government or landowner groups, cannot be predicted but may impact on the operations and regulation of mines
including the Porgera Joint Venture. Any suspension of operations at the Porgera Joint Venture would decrease our attributable
production and profitability.
exemptions not granted, there is a risk that the Porgera mine may not be able to operate for a period of time. Future government actions,
or actions of other quasi-government or landowner groups, cannot be predicted but may impact on the operations and regulation of mines
including the Porgera Joint Venture. Any suspension of operations at the Porgera Joint Venture would decrease our attributable
production and profitability.
Fiji’s economic growth has historically been very volatile. Growth has been restrained by low rates of investment, which has
been deterred by macro-economic instability, prohibitive regulation, and poor human and physical capital. Additionally, Fiji has also
experienced periodic political volatility in recent years. The country experienced a coup d’etat in March 2000, and whilst the country’s
political environment has stabilized since 2000 following the first free and fair general election held in late 2001, potential legislative
reform under the new government could be imminent. The next elections in Fiji are expected to be held in August 2006.Changes to the
country’s constitution or government regulations could affect the political or economic climate in Fiji.
experienced periodic political volatility in recent years. The country experienced a coup d’etat in March 2000, and whilst the country’s
political environment has stabilized since 2000 following the first free and fair general election held in late 2001, potential legislative
reform under the new government could be imminent. The next elections in Fiji are expected to be held in August 2006.Changes to the
country’s constitution or government regulations could affect the political or economic climate in Fiji.
15
AIDS poses risks to us in terms of productivity and costs.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, or AIDS, and tuberculosis which is closely associated with the onset of AIDS and is
exacerbated in the presence of HIV/AIDS, represent very serious health care challenges in the mining industry. Human
Immunodeficiency Virus, or HIV, is the virus that causes AIDS and South Africa has one of the highest HIV infection rates in the world.
It is estimated that approximately 30% - 40% of the mining industry workforce in South Africa are HIV positive. The exact extent to
which our mining workforce both within and outside South Africa is infected with HIV/AIDS is unknown at this stage. Papua New
Guinea has recently been identified as a high risk country for the HIV/AIDS pandemic and this could have a direct impact on our
workforce and productivity in that country. The exact impact of increased mortality rates due to AIDS-related deaths on the costs of our
operations is as yet undefined. The only available treatments for HIV/AIDS are anti-retroviral drugs, which slow down the advancement
of the diseas e but do not present a complete cure for the disease. The cost and availability of anti-retroviral drugs could inhibit the
introduction of treatment programs at our mines in South Africa and Papua New Guinea to reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS on our
mining workforce and our businesses. The effects of the disease pose a risk to us in terms of the potential reduction in productivity and
increase in medical costs.
Immunodeficiency Virus, or HIV, is the virus that causes AIDS and South Africa has one of the highest HIV infection rates in the world.
It is estimated that approximately 30% - 40% of the mining industry workforce in South Africa are HIV positive. The exact extent to
which our mining workforce both within and outside South Africa is infected with HIV/AIDS is unknown at this stage. Papua New
Guinea has recently been identified as a high risk country for the HIV/AIDS pandemic and this could have a direct impact on our
workforce and productivity in that country. The exact impact of increased mortality rates due to AIDS-related deaths on the costs of our
operations is as yet undefined. The only available treatments for HIV/AIDS are anti-retroviral drugs, which slow down the advancement
of the diseas e but do not present a complete cure for the disease. The cost and availability of anti-retroviral drugs could inhibit the
introduction of treatment programs at our mines in South Africa and Papua New Guinea to reduce the impact of HIV/AIDS on our
mining workforce and our businesses. The effects of the disease pose a risk to us in terms of the potential reduction in productivity and
increase in medical costs.
Government policies in South Africa may adversely impact our operations and profits
Government Regulation
The mining industry in South Africa is extensively regulated through legislation and regulations issued through government’s
administrative bodies. These involve directives in respect of health and safety, the mining and exploration of minerals, and managing the
impact of mining operations on the environment. A variety of permits and authorities are required to mine lawfully, and government
enforces its regulations through the various government departments.
impact of mining operations on the environment. A variety of permits and authorities are required to mine lawfully, and government
enforces its regulations through the various government departments.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002
On May 1, 2004, the new Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act, or the MPRD Act, was enacted, which places
all mineral and petroleum resources under the custodianship of the state. Private title and ownership in minerals, or the “old order rights,”
are to be converted to “new order rights,” essentially the right to mine. The MPRD Act allows the existing holders of mineral rights a
period of five years to apply for the conversion of used old order rights, and one year for the conversion of unused old order rights. We
have submitted a mining work program, whereby we substantiate the area and period of the new order rights and additionally, we must
be in compliance with the requirements of the Mining Charter as described below. Once these periods have lapsed, the holders may
have to compete to acquire the right to mine minerals previously held under old order rights. To the extent that we are unable to convert
some of our old order rights, we may have a claim for compensation based on expropriatio n. It is not possible to forecast with any degree
of certainty whether a claim will be enforceable against the state, and the extent to which we may be compensated. Factors that are taken
into account are market value, as well as the history of the acquisition of these rights.
are to be converted to “new order rights,” essentially the right to mine. The MPRD Act allows the existing holders of mineral rights a
period of five years to apply for the conversion of used old order rights, and one year for the conversion of unused old order rights. We
have submitted a mining work program, whereby we substantiate the area and period of the new order rights and additionally, we must
be in compliance with the requirements of the Mining Charter as described below. Once these periods have lapsed, the holders may
have to compete to acquire the right to mine minerals previously held under old order rights. To the extent that we are unable to convert
some of our old order rights, we may have a claim for compensation based on expropriatio n. It is not possible to forecast with any degree
of certainty whether a claim will be enforceable against the state, and the extent to which we may be compensated. Factors that are taken
into account are market value, as well as the history of the acquisition of these rights.
Where new order rights are obtained under the MPRD Act, these rights will not be equivalent to our existing property rights.
The area covered by the new order rights may be reduced by the state if it finds that the prospecting or mining work program
submitted by an applicant does not substantiate the need to retain the area covered by the old order rights. The duration of the new
order rights will no longer be perpetual but rather, in the case of new order mining rights, for a maximum of 30 years with renewals of
up to 30 years each and, in the case of prospecting rights, up to five years with one renewal of up to three years. In addition, the new
order rights will only be transferable subject to the approval of the Minister of Minerals and Energy. Mining or prospecting must
commence within one year or 120 days, respectively, of the mining right or prospecting right becoming effective, and must be
conducted continuously and actively thereafter. The new rights can be suspended or cancelled by the Minister of Minerals and Energy
on br each of or, in the case of mining rights, on non-optimal mining in accordance with the mining work program.
submitted by an applicant does not substantiate the need to retain the area covered by the old order rights. The duration of the new
order rights will no longer be perpetual but rather, in the case of new order mining rights, for a maximum of 30 years with renewals of
up to 30 years each and, in the case of prospecting rights, up to five years with one renewal of up to three years. In addition, the new
order rights will only be transferable subject to the approval of the Minister of Minerals and Energy. Mining or prospecting must
commence within one year or 120 days, respectively, of the mining right or prospecting right becoming effective, and must be
conducted continuously and actively thereafter. The new rights can be suspended or cancelled by the Minister of Minerals and Energy
on br each of or, in the case of mining rights, on non-optimal mining in accordance with the mining work program.
The implementation of the MPRD Act will result in significant adjustments to our property ownership structure. To the extent
that we are unable to convert some of our old order rights to new order rights, and that the exclusive rights to minerals we enjoyed under
the previous statutory regime are diminished, the operations of the MPRD Act may result in significant adjustments to our property
ownership structure, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the underlying value of our operations.
the previous statutory regime are diminished, the operations of the MPRD Act may result in significant adjustments to our property
ownership structure, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the underlying value of our operations.
16
Possible taxation reform and mining royalties
The South African government has declared its intention to revisit the taxation regime of South African gold mining companies.
The South African gold mining industry is taxed under the gold taxation formula which recognizes the high level of capital expenditure
required to sustain a mining operation over the life of the mine. This results in an additional tax benefit not afforded to other commercial
companies. In addition, the South African Government has indicated that it is looking at a revenue based royalty for mining companies, as
outlined in the draft Mineral and Petroleum Royalty Bill, 2003, or Royalty Bill, which was released in March 2003 for comment. The
Royalty Bill proposed a three percent royalty on gross revenue for gold mining companies. In conjunction with the South African Mining
Development Association we have made submissions to the government outlining our concerns about a revenue based royalty and
recommended a profit based royalty be introduced instead. In his budget speech in February 2004, the South African Finance Minister
acknowledged that the draft Royalty Bill may need some refinement, but also stated that government’s preference is for a revenue based
royalty, with introduction of the royalty as of 2009. As at October 31, 2005, these issues were still under review. The introduction of the
proposed revenue based royalty would have an adverse effect on the profitability of our South African Operations.
required to sustain a mining operation over the life of the mine. This results in an additional tax benefit not afforded to other commercial
companies. In addition, the South African Government has indicated that it is looking at a revenue based royalty for mining companies, as
outlined in the draft Mineral and Petroleum Royalty Bill, 2003, or Royalty Bill, which was released in March 2003 for comment. The
Royalty Bill proposed a three percent royalty on gross revenue for gold mining companies. In conjunction with the South African Mining
Development Association we have made submissions to the government outlining our concerns about a revenue based royalty and
recommended a profit based royalty be introduced instead. In his budget speech in February 2004, the South African Finance Minister
acknowledged that the draft Royalty Bill may need some refinement, but also stated that government’s preference is for a revenue based
royalty, with introduction of the royalty as of 2009. As at October 31, 2005, these issues were still under review. The introduction of the
proposed revenue based royalty would have an adverse effect on the profitability of our South African Operations.
The Broad Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter
The Broad Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining Industry, or Mining Charter, establishes
certain numerical goals and timeframes to transform equity participation in the mining industry in South Africa and is effective from May
1, 2004.
1, 2004.
The goals set by the Mining Charter include that each mining company must achieve 15 percent ownership by historically
disadvantaged South Africans of its South African mining assets within five years and 26 percent ownership within ten years from May 1,
2004. This is to be achieved by, among other methods, the sale of assets to historically disadvantaged persons on a willing seller/willing
buyer basis at fair market value. When considering applications for the conversion of existing rights, the State will take a "scorecard"
approach, evaluating the commitments of each company to the different facets of promoting the objectives of the Mining Charter.
Failure on our part to comply with the requirements of the Mining Charter and the “scorecard” could result in us losing our mining
rights. We may incur expenses in giving additional effect to the Mining Charter and the “scorecard”, including costs which we may
incur in facilitating the financing of initiatives towards ownership by historically disadv antaged persons. There is also no guarantee
that any steps we might take to comply with the Mining Charter would ensure that we could successfully acquire new order mining
rights in place of our existing rights. In addition, the terms of such new order rights may not be as favorable to us as the terms
applicable to our existing rights.
2004. This is to be achieved by, among other methods, the sale of assets to historically disadvantaged persons on a willing seller/willing
buyer basis at fair market value. When considering applications for the conversion of existing rights, the State will take a "scorecard"
approach, evaluating the commitments of each company to the different facets of promoting the objectives of the Mining Charter.
Failure on our part to comply with the requirements of the Mining Charter and the “scorecard” could result in us losing our mining
rights. We may incur expenses in giving additional effect to the Mining Charter and the “scorecard”, including costs which we may
incur in facilitating the financing of initiatives towards ownership by historically disadv antaged persons. There is also no guarantee
that any steps we might take to comply with the Mining Charter would ensure that we could successfully acquire new order mining
rights in place of our existing rights. In addition, the terms of such new order rights may not be as favorable to us as the terms
applicable to our existing rights.
Land claims
Our privately held land and mineral rights in South Africa could be subject to land restitution claims under the Restitution of
Land Rights Act, 1994 (as amended), or Land Rights Act. Under the Land Rights Act, any person who was dispossessed of rights to land
in South Africa as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is granted certain remedies, including the restoration of the
land. The initial deadline for such claims was December 31, 1998. We have not been notified of any land claims, but it is possible that
administrative delays in the processing of claims could have delayed such notification. Any claims of which we are notified in the future
could have a material adverse effect on our right to the properties to which the claims relate and prevent us using that land and exploiting
any mineral reserves located there.
in South Africa as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is granted certain remedies, including the restoration of the
land. The initial deadline for such claims was December 31, 1998. We have not been notified of any land claims, but it is possible that
administrative delays in the processing of claims could have delayed such notification. Any claims of which we are notified in the future
could have a material adverse effect on our right to the properties to which the claims relate and prevent us using that land and exploiting
any mineral reserves located there.
Since our South African labor force has substantial trade union participation, we face the risk of disruption from labor
disputes and new South African labor laws.
Labor costs constitute 43% of our production costs for fiscal 2005, and 50% and 42% for fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. As
of June 30, 2005, we employ and contract approximately 4,300 people. Of these, approximately 3,480 people are in South Africa, of
whom, approximately 73% are members of trade unions or employee associations. This excludes all employees of our associates, CGR
and ERPM. We have entered into various agreements regulating wages and working conditions at our South African mines. For Blyvoor,
we have recently concluded these renegotiations to June 30, 2007. For ERPM and Crown, the current agreements were effective to
September 2005 and new agreements, to be effective from October 2005, are currently being negotiated. Unreasonable wage demands
could increase production costs to levels where our South African Operations are no longer profitable. This could lead to accelerated
mine closures and labor disruptions. We may also experience labor unrest at operations at which we have an equity interest. In particular,
durin g October and November 2002, ERPM experienced some labor unrest during which several striking contract workers were wounded
and two workers were killed by employees of a private security company. Our business could suffer if such activities are repeated.
whom, approximately 73% are members of trade unions or employee associations. This excludes all employees of our associates, CGR
and ERPM. We have entered into various agreements regulating wages and working conditions at our South African mines. For Blyvoor,
we have recently concluded these renegotiations to June 30, 2007. For ERPM and Crown, the current agreements were effective to
September 2005 and new agreements, to be effective from October 2005, are currently being negotiated. Unreasonable wage demands
could increase production costs to levels where our South African Operations are no longer profitable. This could lead to accelerated
mine closures and labor disruptions. We may also experience labor unrest at operations at which we have an equity interest. In particular,
durin g October and November 2002, ERPM experienced some labor unrest during which several striking contract workers were wounded
and two workers were killed by employees of a private security company. Our business could suffer if such activities are repeated.
In recent years, labor laws in South Africa have changed in ways that significantly affect our operations. In particular, laws that
provide for mandatory compensation in the event of termination of employment for operational reasons and that impose large monetary
penalties for non-compliance with the administrative and reporting requirements of affirmative action policies could result in significant
costs to us. In addition, future South African legislation and regulations relating to labor may further increase our costs or alter our
relationship with our employees.
penalties for non-compliance with the administrative and reporting requirements of affirmative action policies could result in significant
costs to us. In addition, future South African legislation and regulations relating to labor may further increase our costs or alter our
relationship with our employees.
17
Our financial flexibility could be materially constrained by South African currency restrictions.
South African law provides for exchange control regulations, which restrict the export of capital from the Common Monetary
Area, including South Africa. The Exchange Control Department of the South African Reserve Bank, or SARB, is responsible for the
administration of exchange control regulations. In particular, South African companies:
administration of exchange control regulations. In particular, South African companies:
• are generally not permitted to export capital from South Africa or to hold foreign currency without the approval of SARB;
• are generally required to repatriate, to South Africa, profits of foreign operations; and
• are limited in their ability to utilize profits of one foreign business to finance operations of a different foreign business.
These restrictions could hinder our corporate functioning and acquisition strategy, because investments of less than a 50%
plus 1 share interest can only be held subject to exchange approval. As at June 30, 2005, we hold 45.33% of Emperor and accordingly
SARB may require us to divest our interest in Emperor if we do not acquire 50% plus 1 share interest in the future.
SARB may require us to divest our interest in Emperor if we do not acquire 50% plus 1 share interest in the future.
While the South African Government has relaxed exchange controls in recent years, it is difficult to predict whether or how it
will further relax or abolish exchange control measures in the future. For further information see Item 10D.: “Exchange Controls.”
Risks related to ownership of our ordinary shares or ADSs
Your ability to sell a substantial number of ordinary shares may be restricted by the limited liquidity of ordinary shares
traded on JSE Limited, or JSE.
The primary listings for our ordinary shares are the JSE and the Australian Stock Exchange, or ASX. The principal trading
market for our ADSs are the Nasdaq Capital Market (formerly the Nasdaq SmallCap Market). On a historical basis, the trading
volumes and liquidity of shares listed on the JSE have been low in comparison with the Nasdaq Capital Market. For the 12 months
ended June 30, 2005, only 16% of our ordinary shares were publicly traded on the JSE. The limited liquidity of our ordinary shares
traded on the JSE could limit your ability to sell a substantial number of our ordinary shares on the JSE in a timely manner, especially
by means of a large block trade.
volumes and liquidity of shares listed on the JSE have been low in comparison with the Nasdaq Capital Market. For the 12 months
ended June 30, 2005, only 16% of our ordinary shares were publicly traded on the JSE. The limited liquidity of our ordinary shares
traded on the JSE could limit your ability to sell a substantial number of our ordinary shares on the JSE in a timely manner, especially
by means of a large block trade.
Sales of large volumes of our ordinary shares or ADSs or the perception that these sales may occur, could adversely affect
the prevailing market price of such securities.
The market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs could fall if substantial amounts of ordinary shares or ADSs are sold by our
stockholders, or there is the perception in the marketplace that such sales could occur. Current holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs
may decide to sell them at any time. Sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs, if substantial, or the perception that these sales may occur
and be substantial, could exert downward pressure on the prevailing market prices for our ordinary shares or ADSs, causing their
market prices to decline. Trading activity of hedge funds and the ability to borrow script in the market place will increase trading
volumes and may place our share price under pressure.
may decide to sell them at any time. Sales of our ordinary shares or ADSs, if substantial, or the perception that these sales may occur
and be substantial, could exert downward pressure on the prevailing market prices for our ordinary shares or ADSs, causing their
market prices to decline. Trading activity of hedge funds and the ability to borrow script in the market place will increase trading
volumes and may place our share price under pressure.
Your rights as a shareholder are governed by South African law, which differs in material respects from the rights of
shareholders under the laws of other jurisdictions.
Our Company is a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. The rights of
holders of our ordinary shares, and therefore many of the rights of our ADS holders, are governed by our memorandum and articles of
association and by South African law. These rights differ in material respects from the rights of shareholders in companies
incorporated elsewhere, such as in the United States. In particular, South African law significantly limits the circumstances under
which shareholders of South African companies may institute litigation on behalf of a company.
association and by South African law. These rights differ in material respects from the rights of shareholders in companies
incorporated elsewhere, such as in the United States. In particular, South African law significantly limits the circumstances under
which shareholders of South African companies may institute litigation on behalf of a company.
18
It may not be possible for you to effect service of legal process, enforce judgments of courts outside of South Africa or
bring actions based on securities laws of jurisdictions other than South Africa against us or against members of our board.
Our Company, certain members of our board of directors and executive officers are residents of South Africa. In addition, our
cash producing assets are located outside the United States and a major portion of the assets of members of our board of directors and
executive officers are either wholly or substantially located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to
effect service of legal process, within the United States or elsewhere outside South Africa, upon most of our directors or officers,
including matters arising under United States federal securities laws or applicable United States state securities laws.
executive officers are either wholly or substantially located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to
effect service of legal process, within the United States or elsewhere outside South Africa, upon most of our directors or officers,
including matters arising under United States federal securities laws or applicable United States state securities laws.
Moreover, it may not be possible for you to enforce against us or the members of our board of directors and executive
officers judgments obtained in courts outside South Africa, including the United States, based on the civil liability provisions of the
securities laws of those countries, including those of the United States. A foreign judgment is not directly enforceable in South Africa,
but constitutes a cause of action which will be enforced by South African courts provided that:
securities laws of those countries, including those of the United States. A foreign judgment is not directly enforceable in South Africa,
but constitutes a cause of action which will be enforced by South African courts provided that:
•
the court which pronounced the judgment had jurisdiction to entertain the case according to the principles recognized by South
African law with reference to the jurisdiction of foreign courts;
African law with reference to the jurisdiction of foreign courts;
•
the judgment is final and conclusive (that is, it cannot be altered by the court which pronounced it);
•
the judgment has not lapsed;
•
the recognition and enforcement of the judgment by South African courts would not be contrary to public policy, including
observance of the rules of natural justice which require that no award is enforceable unless the defendant was duly served with
documents initiating proceedings, that he was given a fair opportunity to be heard and that he enjoyed the right to be legally
represented in a free and fair trial before an impartial tribunal;
observance of the rules of natural justice which require that no award is enforceable unless the defendant was duly served with
documents initiating proceedings, that he was given a fair opportunity to be heard and that he enjoyed the right to be legally
represented in a free and fair trial before an impartial tribunal;
•
the judgment was not obtained by fraudulent means;
•
the judgment does not involve the enforcement of a penal or revenue law; and
•
the enforcement of the judgment is not otherwise precluded by the provisions of the Protection of Business Act, 1978 (as
amended), of South Africa.
amended), of South Africa.
It is the policy of South African courts to award compensation for the loss or damage actually sustained by the person to whom
the compensation is awarded. Although the award of punitive damages is generally unknown to the South African legal system that does
not mean that such awards are necessarily contrary to public policy. Whether a judgment was contrary to public policy depends on the
facts of each case. Exorbitant, unconscionable, or excessive awards will generally be contrary to public policy. South African courts
cannot enter into the merits of a foreign judgment and cannot act as a court of appeal or review over the foreign court. South African
courts will usually implement their own procedural laws and, where an action based on an international contract is brought before a South
African court, the capacity of the parties to the contract will usually be determined in accordance with South African law. It is doubtful
whether an original action based on United States federal securities laws may be brought before South African cour ts. A plaintiff who is
not resident in South Africa may be required to provide security for costs in the event of proceedings being initiated in South Africa.
Furthermore, the Rules of the High Court of South Africa require that documents executed outside South Africa must be authenticated for
the purpose of use in South African courts. It is not possible therefore for an investor to seek to impose criminal liability on us in a
South African court arising from a violation of United States federal securities laws.
not mean that such awards are necessarily contrary to public policy. Whether a judgment was contrary to public policy depends on the
facts of each case. Exorbitant, unconscionable, or excessive awards will generally be contrary to public policy. South African courts
cannot enter into the merits of a foreign judgment and cannot act as a court of appeal or review over the foreign court. South African
courts will usually implement their own procedural laws and, where an action based on an international contract is brought before a South
African court, the capacity of the parties to the contract will usually be determined in accordance with South African law. It is doubtful
whether an original action based on United States federal securities laws may be brought before South African cour ts. A plaintiff who is
not resident in South Africa may be required to provide security for costs in the event of proceedings being initiated in South Africa.
Furthermore, the Rules of the High Court of South Africa require that documents executed outside South Africa must be authenticated for
the purpose of use in South African courts. It is not possible therefore for an investor to seek to impose criminal liability on us in a
South African court arising from a violation of United States federal securities laws.
19
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
4A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
Introduction
DRDGOLD Limited is a gold mining company engaged in underground and surface gold mining including exploration,
extraction, processing and smelting. Our South African Operations consist of the deep-level Blyvooruitzicht Section and East Rand
Proprietary Mine Section, in addition to the world’s biggest surface retreatment operation, the Crown Section. Our Australasian
Operations consist of the Tolukuma Section and our 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera Joint Venture, or Porgera, both of which
are in Papua New Guinea, and a 45.33% interest in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, as of July 30, 2004 (19.78% as of June 30,
2004), which owns the Vatukoula gold mine in Fiji. We also have exploration projects in South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Australia,
though our principal focus is on our operations in South Africa and Papua New Guinea.
Proprietary Mine Section, in addition to the world’s biggest surface retreatment operation, the Crown Section. Our Australasian
Operations consist of the Tolukuma Section and our 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera Joint Venture, or Porgera, both of which
are in Papua New Guinea, and a 45.33% interest in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, as of July 30, 2004 (19.78% as of June 30,
2004), which owns the Vatukoula gold mine in Fiji. We also have exploration projects in South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Australia,
though our principal focus is on our operations in South Africa and Papua New Guinea.
We are a public company, incorporated on February 16, 1895, as Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited, and our shares were listed
on the JSE in that same year. In 1898, our milling operations commenced with 30 stamp mills and we treated 38,728 tons of ore and
produced 22,958 ounces of gold. In South Africa, we have focused our operations on the West Witwatersrand basin which has been a
gold production region for over 100 years. The Blyvoor Section (acquired on September 15, 1997, in exchange for 12,693,279 of our
ordinary shares) and North West Operations (until March 22, 2005 when Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited was placed into provisional
liquidation), which comprise of the Buffels Section (acquired on September 15, 1997, in exchange for 14,300,396 of our ordinary shares)
and the Harties Section (acquired on August 16, 1999, in exchange for $7.4 million), are predominantly underground operating mines
located within the Witwatersrand Basin, exploiting gently to moderately dipping gold bearing quartz pebble conglomerates in addition to
certain surface sources. The Crown Section (CGR was acquired on September 14, 1998, in exchange for 5,925,139 of our ordinary
shares) also located within the Witwatersrand Basin, exploits various surface sources, including sand and slime tailings deposited as part
of previous mining operations. Since 1999, our focus has been to expand our operations outside South Africa and increase our production
base from the Pacific Rim region. The Tolukuma Section (acquired from September 1999 to June 2001, in exchange for 8,125,082 shares
and $3.3 million in cash) provided an initial base in that region, and led to the acquisition of a 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera
Joint Venture (acquired in October 2003, in exchange for 6,643,902 shares and $60.3 million in cash).
produced 22,958 ounces of gold. In South Africa, we have focused our operations on the West Witwatersrand basin which has been a
gold production region for over 100 years. The Blyvoor Section (acquired on September 15, 1997, in exchange for 12,693,279 of our
ordinary shares) and North West Operations (until March 22, 2005 when Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited was placed into provisional
liquidation), which comprise of the Buffels Section (acquired on September 15, 1997, in exchange for 14,300,396 of our ordinary shares)
and the Harties Section (acquired on August 16, 1999, in exchange for $7.4 million), are predominantly underground operating mines
located within the Witwatersrand Basin, exploiting gently to moderately dipping gold bearing quartz pebble conglomerates in addition to
certain surface sources. The Crown Section (CGR was acquired on September 14, 1998, in exchange for 5,925,139 of our ordinary
shares) also located within the Witwatersrand Basin, exploits various surface sources, including sand and slime tailings deposited as part
of previous mining operations. Since 1999, our focus has been to expand our operations outside South Africa and increase our production
base from the Pacific Rim region. The Tolukuma Section (acquired from September 1999 to June 2001, in exchange for 8,125,082 shares
and $3.3 million in cash) provided an initial base in that region, and led to the acquisition of a 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera
Joint Venture (acquired in October 2003, in exchange for 6,643,902 shares and $60.3 million in cash).
To ensure access to global markets our ordinary shares and/or related instruments trade on the JSE, Nasdaq Capital Market
(formerly the Nasdaq SmallCap Market), London Stock Exchange, the Marche Libre on the Paris Bourse, the Brussels Bourse in the
form of International Depository Receipts, the Australian Stock Exchange, or ASX, the Port Moresby Stock Exchange in Papua New
Guinea (as from August 18, 2004), the Over The Counter, or OTC, market in Berlin and Stuttgart and the Regulated Unofficial Market on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
form of International Depository Receipts, the Australian Stock Exchange, or ASX, the Port Moresby Stock Exchange in Papua New
Guinea (as from August 18, 2004), the Over The Counter, or OTC, market in Berlin and Stuttgart and the Regulated Unofficial Market on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
Our registered office and business address is 299 Pendoring Avenue, Blackheath, Randburg, South Africa, 2195. The postal
address is P.O. Box 390, Maraisburg 1700, South Africa. Our telephone number is (+27 11) 219-8700 and our facsimile number is (+27
11) 476-2637. We are registered under the South African Companies Act, 1973 (as amended) under registration number 1895/000926/06.
For our ADSs, The Bank of New York, at 101 Barclay Street, New York, NY 10286, United States, has been appointed as agent.
11) 476-2637. We are registered under the South African Companies Act, 1973 (as amended) under registration number 1895/000926/06.
For our ADSs, The Bank of New York, at 101 Barclay Street, New York, NY 10286, United States, has been appointed as agent.
20
Important Events in Our Development Generally and in the Current Year
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited
We own 100% of Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, or CCGR, which in turn owns 40% of Crown Gold Recoveries
(Pty) Limited, or CGR. CCGR was incorporated in South Africa on May 23, 1997. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, we acquired
100% of CCGR on September 14, 1998.
100% of CCGR on September 14, 1998.
On June 12, 2002, we entered into an agreement with the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, or IDC, Khumo
Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH, and CCGR whereby, with effect from July 1, 2002, we sold 3% of the entire issued share
capital of and shareholders loans held in CGR to KBH and 57% of the entire issued share capital of and shareholders loans held in CGR
to the IDC, for a total amount of $10.1 million. As part of this transaction, we loaned KBH R5.3 million ($0.7 million) to fund its initial
purchase of 3% interest in CGR. According to the terms of the shareholders agreement entered into between these parties, the parties
agreed that IDC would not remain a shareholder in CGR, but would transfer its shares and claims held in CGR to KBH. Accordingly,
IDC granted an option to KBH to purchase its shares and claims held by it in CGR subject to certain terms and conditions. The option
was exercised by KBH in July 2002 and KBH is currently the owner of 60% of the entire issued share capital of and shareholders loa ns
held in CGR. CCGR holds 40% of the issued share capital of CGR, which has four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Crown Mines Limited,
City Deep Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM.
capital of and shareholders loans held in CGR to KBH and 57% of the entire issued share capital of and shareholders loans held in CGR
to the IDC, for a total amount of $10.1 million. As part of this transaction, we loaned KBH R5.3 million ($0.7 million) to fund its initial
purchase of 3% interest in CGR. According to the terms of the shareholders agreement entered into between these parties, the parties
agreed that IDC would not remain a shareholder in CGR, but would transfer its shares and claims held in CGR to KBH. Accordingly,
IDC granted an option to KBH to purchase its shares and claims held by it in CGR subject to certain terms and conditions. The option
was exercised by KBH in July 2002 and KBH is currently the owner of 60% of the entire issued share capital of and shareholders loa ns
held in CGR. CCGR holds 40% of the issued share capital of CGR, which has four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Crown Mines Limited,
City Deep Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM.
On October 10, 2002, CGR entered into an agreement with third parties to purchase the entire issued share capital and all
shareholders’ claims of ERPM for a purchase price of $11.0 million. CGR’s acquisition of ERPM was approved by the South African
competition authorities. ERPM is predominantly an underground mining operation located near the town of Boksburg on the East Rand,
which is east of Johannesburg and approximately 60 miles (97 kilometers) from the Blyvoor Section. We loaned CGR the sum of
R60.0 million ($8.0 million) to facilitate its acquisition of ERPM. We have subsequently loaned CGR an additional R9.9 million
($1.3 million), which CGR in turn loaned to ERPM as working capital. As of June 30, 2003, the loan had been repaid in full. Surface
mining of the Cason Dump will continue, with treatment through the Knights plant for a further 5 years, based on the current rate of
production of approximately 150,000 tons per month.
competition authorities. ERPM is predominantly an underground mining operation located near the town of Boksburg on the East Rand,
which is east of Johannesburg and approximately 60 miles (97 kilometers) from the Blyvoor Section. We loaned CGR the sum of
R60.0 million ($8.0 million) to facilitate its acquisition of ERPM. We have subsequently loaned CGR an additional R9.9 million
($1.3 million), which CGR in turn loaned to ERPM as working capital. As of June 30, 2003, the loan had been repaid in full. Surface
mining of the Cason Dump will continue, with treatment through the Knights plant for a further 5 years, based on the current rate of
production of approximately 150,000 tons per month.
CGR has a surface retreatment operation consisting of the Crown Central, City Deep and Knights business units, collectively
referred to as the Crown Section. The ERPM Section consists of an underground section and the Cason Dump surface retreatment
operation. The underground mining operation at ERPM implemented a controlled closure program which was scheduled to close in
March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine has achieved
a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result the original planned closure of the underground section has been
postponed. The Cason Dump surface re-treatment operation will continue to operate until 2010 under the management of the Crown
Section based on the current rate of production of approximately 150,000 tons per month. The Crown Section undertakes the retreatment
of surface sources deposited as tailing from non-operation mining sites across central Johannesburg.
operation. The underground mining operation at ERPM implemented a controlled closure program which was scheduled to close in
March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine has achieved
a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result the original planned closure of the underground section has been
postponed. The Cason Dump surface re-treatment operation will continue to operate until 2010 under the management of the Crown
Section based on the current rate of production of approximately 150,000 tons per month. The Crown Section undertakes the retreatment
of surface sources deposited as tailing from non-operation mining sites across central Johannesburg.
On July 6, 2005, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with our black economic empowerment partner, KBH, regarding
the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in our South African Operations. The intention of the transaction is to bring us into full
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter.
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter.
On July 20, 2005, we acquired from the IDC, all the debt which it holds against CGR and ERPM for a consideration which was
settled through the issue of 4,451,219 of our ordinary shares, which at the date of issue, represented approximately $4.3 million (R28.9
million).
million).
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the extension of our existing black economic empowerment structure with
KBH to cover all of our South African assets. The transaction has been facilitated by the IDC, which agreed to a debt restructuring in
CGR.
CGR.
The transaction comprises the exchange of 75% of KBH’s 60% stake in CGR, including its wholly-owned subsidiary ERPM, and
a cash payment of $2.0 million (R13.2 million),foran effective 15% interest in our wholly-owned subsidiary, Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor. The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, acquiring initially, a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which holds ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
In addition, Khumo Gold was granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in DRDGOLD
SA for $1.4 million (R9.3 million). This further equity tranche will include a 6% stake to be placed in a new Employee Trust. The
transaction has been financed by the issuance of $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares.
transaction has been financed by the issuance of $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares.
21
Dr. M.P. Ncholo, will take over as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD SA with effect from November 1, 2005. Due to the fact
that Dr. M.P. Ncholo is also KBH’s Chairman, the transaction will meet the definition of a related party transaction. For further details,
see Item 7: “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
see Item 7: “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
We have recognized losses generated by CGR and its subsidiaries against the cost of the investment and any advances we have
made to them. CGR is carried at a $nil value at June 30, 2005 (2004: $nil).
Porgera Joint Venture (Papua New Guinea)
Effective October 14, 2003, we acquired all the shares of Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited, or OMP, and Mineral Resources
Porgera Limited, or MRP, from Oil Search Limited, or OSL. The transaction was effected through the amalgamation of OML and MRP
and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Dome Resources (PNG) Limited which was subsequently renamed DRD (Porgera) Limited.
and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Dome Resources (PNG) Limited which was subsequently renamed DRD (Porgera) Limited.
The transaction resulted in us acquiring an effective 20% interest in an unincorporated gold mining joint venture, the Porgera
Joint Venture, which has fifteen mineral tenements which form part of the Porgera mine located in Papua New Guinea. The final
purchase price of $77.1 million comprised $60.3 million in cash and 6,643,902 ($16.7 million) of our ordinary shares based on the
prevailing market value on November 22, 2003, being the final settlement date. As at June 30, 2005, the Porgera Joint Venture is owned
by Placer Dome Limited (75%), DRD (Porgera) Limited (20%) and the MRE, on behalf of the Enga Provincial Governments and
landowners in Papua New Guinea (5%). An affiliate of Placer Dome Inc., Placer (PNG) Limited is the operator of the Porgera Joint
Venture and is subject to the control of a management committee made up of representatives of the joint venture partners, including one
of our representatives. The management committee is governed by an operating agreement that prevents the partners from acting
unilaterally.
purchase price of $77.1 million comprised $60.3 million in cash and 6,643,902 ($16.7 million) of our ordinary shares based on the
prevailing market value on November 22, 2003, being the final settlement date. As at June 30, 2005, the Porgera Joint Venture is owned
by Placer Dome Limited (75%), DRD (Porgera) Limited (20%) and the MRE, on behalf of the Enga Provincial Governments and
landowners in Papua New Guinea (5%). An affiliate of Placer Dome Inc., Placer (PNG) Limited is the operator of the Porgera Joint
Venture and is subject to the control of a management committee made up of representatives of the joint venture partners, including one
of our representatives. The management committee is governed by an operating agreement that prevents the partners from acting
unilaterally.
Review and restructuring of South African Operations
On May 4, 2004, our associate, ERPM, entered into a 60-day review period of its underground section designed to restore the
operations to profitability. A task team comprising of management, union representatives and labor was established to assess the
proposals and make a final recommendation. On July 4, 2004, at the end of the process, ERPM's management and the consultative forum
concluded that continued mining of the underground section was not sustainable, even at a higher Rand gold price of R2,650 per ounce.
As a result, a controlled closure program of the underground section was implemented and was expected to be completed by March 2005.
Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine achieved a reduction in
costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the underground section was postponed indefinitely.
proposals and make a final recommendation. On July 4, 2004, at the end of the process, ERPM's management and the consultative forum
concluded that continued mining of the underground section was not sustainable, even at a higher Rand gold price of R2,650 per ounce.
As a result, a controlled closure program of the underground section was implemented and was expected to be completed by March 2005.
Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine achieved a reduction in
costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the underground section was postponed indefinitely.
On June 26, 2004, and June 28, 2004, respectively, we entered into a further 60-day review period at the Buffels Section at
our North West Operations and at our Blyvoor Section designed to restore the operations to profitability. Proposals were received into
a consultative forum in which both management and organized labor participated, and was distributed to the Department of Labour
and the Department of Minerals and Energy, for their input. At the Buffels Section, agreement was reached with all the relevant
parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12 Shafts in operation on condition that certain
defined sustainability thresholds are met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of 120 employees at this mining operation
during fiscal 2005 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million). At the Blyvoor Section, the 60-day review was extended by two weeks to
conclude on September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees had been retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million, with possible future
rest ructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances. In terms of the agreement organized labor recorded its commitment to
certain production targets, and undertook not to disrupt production for at least six months for reasons relating to restructuring of the
operations.
a consultative forum in which both management and organized labor participated, and was distributed to the Department of Labour
and the Department of Minerals and Energy, for their input. At the Buffels Section, agreement was reached with all the relevant
parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12 Shafts in operation on condition that certain
defined sustainability thresholds are met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of 120 employees at this mining operation
during fiscal 2005 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million). At the Blyvoor Section, the 60-day review was extended by two weeks to
conclude on September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees had been retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million, with possible future
rest ructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances. In terms of the agreement organized labor recorded its commitment to
certain production targets, and undertook not to disrupt production for at least six months for reasons relating to restructuring of the
operations.
Emperor Mines Limited (Emperor Mine, Vatukoula, Fiji)
Over the period December 2002 to July 2004, we acquired a 45.33% interest in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, an
Australian listed gold mining company with a single gold mine based in Vatukoula, Fiji.
Our interest in Emperor was acquired through a series of transactions. As of December 31, 2002, we had acquired 14.15% of
Emperor for approximately A$11.9 million ($6.7 million). By April 2003, we had increased our percentage holding in Emperor through
additional purchases on the open market to 19.81% at a total additional cost of A$4.3 million ($2.6 million). At June 30, 2004, our
effective holding had decreased to 19.78% as a result of additional shares issued by Emperor during fiscal 2004. Given the size of our
holding, Emperor appointed two of our representatives to its board of directors in January 2003.
additional purchases on the open market to 19.81% at a total additional cost of A$4.3 million ($2.6 million). At June 30, 2004, our
effective holding had decreased to 19.78% as a result of additional shares issued by Emperor during fiscal 2004. Given the size of our
holding, Emperor appointed two of our representatives to its board of directors in January 2003.
22
On March 8, 2004, we announced a conditional takeover offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares in Emperor that were not
already owned by us for a consideration of one of our shares for every five shares in Emperor held. At that time, the offer valued Emperor
at approximately A$105 million ($79.8 million). On June 10, 2004, we announced a revised final offer of five of our shares for every
twenty two shares in Emperor held. The revised offer represented a 14% increase over the previous offer. On July 30, 2004, our offer to
Emperor’s shareholders closed with us having received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of
Emperor’s issued capital, thereby increasing our shareholding in Emperor to 45.33%. Accordingly, we issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of our shares on the date issued,
with share issue and transaction costs associated with the take over offer, amounting to $1.3 million.
at approximately A$105 million ($79.8 million). On June 10, 2004, we announced a revised final offer of five of our shares for every
twenty two shares in Emperor held. The revised offer represented a 14% increase over the previous offer. On July 30, 2004, our offer to
Emperor’s shareholders closed with us having received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of
Emperor’s issued capital, thereby increasing our shareholding in Emperor to 45.33%. Accordingly, we issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of our shares on the date issued,
with share issue and transaction costs associated with the take over offer, amounting to $1.3 million.
With effect from August 3, 2004, Emperor’s board of directors appointed our Executive Chairman, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood
as Managing Director of Emperor and our Divisional Director: Australasian Operations, Mr. R.L. Johnson as a Non-Executive Director of
Emperor. With effect from October 5, 2005, Emperor’s Board appointed our Chief Operating Officer, DRDGOLD Australasia, Mr. M.P.
Marriott, as an Executive Director. On September 9, 2004, Emperor shareholders approved a resolution to remove two independent
directors from the board of Emperor and to confirm Mr. R. Johnson’s appointment as a Non-Executive Director of Emperor. As a result,
we have three of our representatives on the six member Emperor board, with Emperor’s independent Chairman having a casting vote. At
the date of this annual report we did not have control over Emperor.
Emperor. With effect from October 5, 2005, Emperor’s Board appointed our Chief Operating Officer, DRDGOLD Australasia, Mr. M.P.
Marriott, as an Executive Director. On September 9, 2004, Emperor shareholders approved a resolution to remove two independent
directors from the board of Emperor and to confirm Mr. R. Johnson’s appointment as a Non-Executive Director of Emperor. As a result,
we have three of our representatives on the six member Emperor board, with Emperor’s independent Chairman having a casting vote. At
the date of this annual report we did not have control over Emperor.
In May 2005, gold production at Emperor was adversely affected by a combination of factors including flooding of the lower
levels of the Smith Shaft caused by significant water ingress after sustained heavy rainfall; the impact of high fuel prices on operating
costs; and the failure of the Philip Shaft winder which suspended production for 4 weeks. The winder was repaired and production from
Philip Shaft commenced in June 2005. The board and management have reviewed the impact of overall lost production including the
suspension of production from Philip Shaft. As a result, Emperor has finalized a plan to restore the Emperor Gold Mine to a positive cash
flow. The plan involves total capital expenditure of $11.4 million (A$15 million) over the next 12 months which will reduce operating
costs by approximately $7.6 million (A$10 million). The key objective of the plan is to increase development and to reduce dilution by
better control of mining heights and thereby increase recovered grade.
costs; and the failure of the Philip Shaft winder which suspended production for 4 weeks. The winder was repaired and production from
Philip Shaft commenced in June 2005. The board and management have reviewed the impact of overall lost production including the
suspension of production from Philip Shaft. As a result, Emperor has finalized a plan to restore the Emperor Gold Mine to a positive cash
flow. The plan involves total capital expenditure of $11.4 million (A$15 million) over the next 12 months which will reduce operating
costs by approximately $7.6 million (A$10 million). The key objective of the plan is to increase development and to reduce dilution by
better control of mining heights and thereby increase recovered grade.
On July 11, 2005, Emperor announced the finalization of a financial and operational restructuring package aimed at returning
them to positive cash flow and creating a sustainable, long-term future for the company and its operations in Fiji. An A$10.0 million
Convertible Loan Facility was negotiated by the independent directors of Emperor. The financing package also includes an agreement
with ANZ Bank, subject to a number of conditions, to a restructuring of Emperor’s debt servicing obligations to assist them with their
restructuring plan. The ANZ Bank has also consented to the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security. The Convertible Loan
Facility was approved by the shareholders of Emperor on August 29, 2005 (we did not participate in the voting). In addition, in July 2005
we entered into an operational support agreement with Emperor negotiated by its independent directors, pursuant to which we will
provide Emperor with management and technical services.
Convertible Loan Facility was negotiated by the independent directors of Emperor. The financing package also includes an agreement
with ANZ Bank, subject to a number of conditions, to a restructuring of Emperor’s debt servicing obligations to assist them with their
restructuring plan. The ANZ Bank has also consented to the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security. The Convertible Loan
Facility was approved by the shareholders of Emperor on August 29, 2005 (we did not participate in the voting). In addition, in July 2005
we entered into an operational support agreement with Emperor negotiated by its independent directors, pursuant to which we will
provide Emperor with management and technical services.
In Emperor’s fiscal 2005 annual report its auditors issued an audit report with an emphasis of matter to the effect that until such
time as Emperor completes its financial and operational restructuring, there remains a significant uncertainty as to whether Emperor will
continue as a going concern and, therefore, whether it will realize its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business
and at the amounts stated in the annual report.
continue as a going concern and, therefore, whether it will realize its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business
and at the amounts stated in the annual report.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire
our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets,
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
Implementation of the transaction requires the restructuring of our offshore operations, whereby DRD (Isle of Man) will
transfer the following material assets to our new wholly-owned subsidiary, DRDGOLD (Offshore) Limited, or DRD (Offshore):
•
its 45.33% interest in Emperor; and
•
an A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) convertible loan facility which DRD (Isle of Man) has advanced to Emperor, in terms of
which we can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23) per Emperor share.
which we can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23) per Emperor share.
We will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to DRD (Offshore) for a purchase consideration of $230.0 million. The restructuring is
subject, inter alia, to the following conditions precedent:
•
our shareholder approval;
•
South African Reserve Bank, or SARB, approval; and
•
other regulatory consents.
23
DRD (Offshore) will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to Emperor. The purchase consideration for DRD (Isle of Man) is $230.0
million, which is subject to certain completion adjustments to reflect the change in the capital position of both Emperor and DRD (Isle
of Man) between October 1, 2005, which is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be
settled by:
of Man) between October 1, 2005, which is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be
settled by:
•
the issue of 751,879,699 new Emperor shares to DRD (Offshore), issued at A$0.35 ($0.26) per share which currently
equates to $200.0 million; and
equates to $200.0 million; and
•
$30.0 million in cash.
We intend to utilize the cash consideration for acquisitions and general working capital purposes.
The transaction is subject, inter alia, to the following conditions precedent:
•
the restructuring becoming unconditional,
•
approval by the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board;
•
SARB approval;
•
Emperor shareholder approval;
•
there being no material adverse change in either Emperor or the gold assets; and
•
a number of regulatory and banking consents and approvals being obtained.
Upon completion of the transaction and the issue of the new Emperor shares, we will hold approximately 90.5% of Emperor
and Emperor will become our subsidiary
We will not exercise our right to compulsorily acquire any of the shares held by non-associated shareholders arising under
Section 664A of the Australian Corporations Act, as a result of the new Emperor shares issued to us pursuant to the transaction.
Emperor has announced its intention to raise approximately $15.0 million through the placement of new shares following
completion of the transaction. The capital raising would take place in early 2006 and would be used for a variety of capital programs
across the three mines and to provide general working capital for Emperor. The capital raising will allow institutions to participate in
Emperor and will dilute our shareholding.
across the three mines and to provide general working capital for Emperor. The capital raising will allow institutions to participate in
Emperor and will dilute our shareholding.
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited
On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake which registered 5.3 on the Richter scale. As
a consequence of the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited, or Buffelsfontein (which owns the North West Operations), which order was granted on the same day.
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited, or Buffelsfontein (which owns the North West Operations), which order was granted on the same day.
We committed to pay the wages at Buffelsfontein’s operations until the end of March 2005, amounting to $4.5 million
(R27.9 million), and continued the essential services at the mine until such time as the liquidator took control of the mine, which
amounted to $0.8 million (R5.1 million). We recognized a provision of $1.5 million (R9.0 million) for a social plan for employees, which
includes counseling and reskilling programs, and we incurred legal and other costs of $0.5 million (R3.2 million). An insurance claim has
been submitted for damage caused by the earthquake, which will be paid out to the liquidators when approved.
amounted to $0.8 million (R5.1 million). We recognized a provision of $1.5 million (R9.0 million) for a social plan for employees, which
includes counseling and reskilling programs, and we incurred legal and other costs of $0.5 million (R3.2 million). An insurance claim has
been submitted for damage caused by the earthquake, which will be paid out to the liquidators when approved.
On October 6, 2005, we concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Limited, or S&J, for the sale of our shareholdings in
Buffelsfontein subject to certain conditions. These include indemnifying us against any liabilities or obligations that could arise relating to
environmental rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of arrangement was
conditional upon the following:
environmental rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of arrangement was
conditional upon the following:
•
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, or DWAF, agreeing to substitute us with S&J to the extent that DWAF envisaged
imposing further responsibility on us;
imposing further responsibility on us;
•
the acceptance by the High Court of South Africa and the majority of Buffelsfontein’s creditors of a scheme arrangement
proposed by S&J; and
proposed by S&J; and
•
approval by the Competition Commission of South Africa.
24
On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein proposed by S&J and accepted by the
majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa. The order for the
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005 and all the conditions of the
scheme have been met.
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005 and all the conditions of the
scheme have been met.
Other
On July 27, 2004, we established the DRD (Isle of Man) Limited (Singapore Branch), a branch of DRD (Isle of Man) Limited,
registered in Singapore. It is intended that the establishment of the branch will facilitate our further expansion in the Australasian region
in line with our growth strategy.
in line with our growth strategy.
At our Annual General Meeting held on November 26, 2004, our shareholders approved the changing of our name from Durban
Roodepoort Deep, Limited to DRDGOLD Limited.
We concluded an agreement with M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd, or M5, on July 21, 2005, in terms of which M5, against payment
of a non-refundable fee of R1.5 million ($0.2 million), was granted an option to acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for
R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the
purchase consideration.
R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the
purchase consideration.
On November 11, 2005 we acquired a 5% holding in the Australian Stock Exchange listed Allied Gold Limited, or Allied, for
A$3.0 million ($2.3 million). In a separate transaction, we have also undertaken to, pursuant to any existing Allied shareholder electing
not to follow its rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million)
at an issue price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share. Both these transactions are subject to South African Reserve Bank approval. The capital
raising, which represents approximately 17.5% of Allied's share capital will also be subject to Allied shareholder approval, which Allied
has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
not to follow its rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million)
at an issue price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share. Both these transactions are subject to South African Reserve Bank approval. The capital
raising, which represents approximately 17.5% of Allied's share capital will also be subject to Allied shareholder approval, which Allied
has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
For further information on other capital investments, divestures, capital expenditure and capital commitments, see Item 4D.:
“Property, Plant and Equipment,” and Item 5B.: “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
25
4B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Description of Our Mining Business
Exploration
Exploration activities are focused on the extension of existing ore bodies and identification of new ore bodies both at existing
sites and at undeveloped sites. Once a potential ore body has been discovered, exploration is extended and intensified in order to enable
clearer definition of the ore body and the portions with the potential to be mined. Geological techniques are constantly refined to improve
the economic viability of exploration and exploitation.
clearer definition of the ore body and the portions with the potential to be mined. Geological techniques are constantly refined to improve
the economic viability of exploration and exploitation.
Mining
Our South African Operations comprise relatively old assets and the principal mining method is the extraction of previously
abandoned Ore Reserves, which require a high degree of opening up of these previously abandoned Ore Reserves.
The Australasian Operations comprise open-pit mines and decline shafts, with appropriate mining methods.
Our Metallurgical Plants and Processes
A detailed review of the metallurgical plants and processes for each of the mining operations is provided under Item 4D.:
“Property, Plant and Equipment.”
Market
The gold market is relatively liquid compared to other commodity markets, with the price of gold generally quoted in Dollars.
Physical demand for gold is primarily for manufacturing purposes, and gold is traded on a world-wide basis. Refined gold has a variety of
uses, including jewellery, electronics, dentistry, decorations, medals and official coins. In addition, central banks, financial institutions
and private individuals buy, sell and hold gold bullion as an investment and as a store of value (the tendency of gold to retain its value in
relative terms against basic goods and in times of inflation and monetary crises).
uses, including jewellery, electronics, dentistry, decorations, medals and official coins. In addition, central banks, financial institutions
and private individuals buy, sell and hold gold bullion as an investment and as a store of value (the tendency of gold to retain its value in
relative terms against basic goods and in times of inflation and monetary crises).
The use of gold as a store of value and the large quantities of gold held for this purpose in relation to annual mine production
have meant that historically the potential total supply of gold has been far greater than demand. Thus, while current supply and demand
play some part in determining the price of gold, this does not occur to the same extent as in the case of other commodities. Instead, the
gold price has from time to time been significantly affected by macro-economic factors such as expectations of inflation, interest rates,
exchange rates, changes in reserve policy by central banks, and global or regional political and economic crises. In times of inflation and
currency devaluation, gold is often seen as a safe haven, leading to increased purchases of gold and support for the price of gold.
play some part in determining the price of gold, this does not occur to the same extent as in the case of other commodities. Instead, the
gold price has from time to time been significantly affected by macro-economic factors such as expectations of inflation, interest rates,
exchange rates, changes in reserve policy by central banks, and global or regional political and economic crises. In times of inflation and
currency devaluation, gold is often seen as a safe haven, leading to increased purchases of gold and support for the price of gold.
We believe that the primary mover in gold continues to be strong speculator and investor interest in the metal, driven by a
number of fundamental economic circumstances. While the gold price passed the $400 per ounce mark in the second half of fiscal
2004, the first time since 1996, the rally did not have the momentum it needed to maintain this higher level. However, continued
investor dissatisfaction with the state of the global economy and currency markets finally saw the Dollar gold price breach the $400
per ounce mark, where it has stayed since. While our offshore operations have received the full benefit of the higher Dollar gold price
for the year, our South African Operations suffered due to the continued strength of the South African Rand against major currencies.
Indeed the Rand has been one of the best performing currencies against the Dollar for the last two years. Only towards the end of the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, did we see some benefit from a Rand weakened by interest rate cuts in South Africa and interest raterises in the US that closed the yield differential.
2004, the first time since 1996, the rally did not have the momentum it needed to maintain this higher level. However, continued
investor dissatisfaction with the state of the global economy and currency markets finally saw the Dollar gold price breach the $400
per ounce mark, where it has stayed since. While our offshore operations have received the full benefit of the higher Dollar gold price
for the year, our South African Operations suffered due to the continued strength of the South African Rand against major currencies.
Indeed the Rand has been one of the best performing currencies against the Dollar for the last two years. Only towards the end of the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, did we see some benefit from a Rand weakened by interest rate cuts in South Africa and interest raterises in the US that closed the yield differential.
26
Our total revenue from continuing operations by geographic market is as follows:
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
1
2003
1
$’000
$’000
$’000
South Africa.........................................................................................................................
68,370
90,066
86,549
Australasia ...........................................................................................................................
115,239
93,188
22,870
183,609
183,254
109,419
All gold produced by our South African Operations is sold by the Rand Refinery Ltd, or RRL, pursuant to a refining agreement
we entered into in October 2001. At our various operations the gold bars which are produced consist of approximately 85% gold, 7-8%
silver and the balance comprises copper and other common mineral elements. The gold bars are sent to the RRL for assaying and final
refining where the gold is purified to 99.9% and cast into troy ounce bars of varying weights. RRL then sells the gold on the same day as
delivery, for the London afternoon fixed Dollar price on the day the gold is sold, with the proceeds remitted to us in Rand within two
days. In exchange for this service, we pay RRL a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan and administration fees. We currently
own 3% (fiscal 2004: 10.6%) of RRL (which is jointly owned by South African mining companies). Mr. D.J. Pretorius, our Group Legal
Counsel and General Manager Corporate Services, is a director of RRL.
silver and the balance comprises copper and other common mineral elements. The gold bars are sent to the RRL for assaying and final
refining where the gold is purified to 99.9% and cast into troy ounce bars of varying weights. RRL then sells the gold on the same day as
delivery, for the London afternoon fixed Dollar price on the day the gold is sold, with the proceeds remitted to us in Rand within two
days. In exchange for this service, we pay RRL a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan and administration fees. We currently
own 3% (fiscal 2004: 10.6%) of RRL (which is jointly owned by South African mining companies). Mr. D.J. Pretorius, our Group Legal
Counsel and General Manager Corporate Services, is a director of RRL.
The gold produced in Papua New Guinea by the Tolukuma section is sold directly to N.M. Rothschild under an agreement
signed by us in December 2001. Proceeds for gold sold are received within two days of sale. The selling price is determined by the
previous day's London afternoon close Dollar price and we are paid in Dollars. We do not have an interest in N.M. Rothschild.
previous day's London afternoon close Dollar price and we are paid in Dollars. We do not have an interest in N.M. Rothschild.
The gold produced by Porgera in Papua New Guinea is sold directly to the Bank of Western Australia Limited, or BankWest.
Proceeds for gold sold are received within two days of sale. The selling price is determined by the spot price at the time of sale and we are
paid in Dollars. We do not have an interest in BankWest.
paid in Dollars. We do not have an interest in BankWest.
The contractual agreements described above are important to us because in order to sell gold, it needs to be approximately 100%
refined and none of our locations are able to refine gold to this sellable level.
Ore Reserves
The tables below set out the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves that are the Group’s Ore Reserves as of June 30th, 2005 and
2004, in both imperial and metric units. Our Ore Reserves are comprised of the total Ore Reserves of our wholly-owned subsidiaries,
as well as our 20% attributable share of the Ore Reserves of the Porgera Joint Venture. Our attributable 20% share of the Ore Reserves
of the Porgera Joint Venture is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75% interest in the Porgera Joint
Venture) in its annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 3, 2005. The
Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004, using appropriate cut-off grades associated with an average long-term
gold price of 350 per ounce, and on the Australian Dollar and Kina average long-term exchange rates to the US Dollar of A$1.54 =
$1.00 and K3.33 = $1.00.
as well as our 20% attributable share of the Ore Reserves of the Porgera Joint Venture. Our attributable 20% share of the Ore Reserves
of the Porgera Joint Venture is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75% interest in the Porgera Joint
Venture) in its annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 3, 2005. The
Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004, using appropriate cut-off grades associated with an average long-term
gold price of 350 per ounce, and on the Australian Dollar and Kina average long-term exchange rates to the US Dollar of A$1.54 =
$1.00 and K3.33 = $1.00.
Ore Reserve estimates in this Annual Report are reported in accordance with the requirements of the SEC’s Industry Guide 7.
Accordingly, as of the date of reporting, all reserves are planned to be mined out under the life of mine plans within the period of our
existing rights to mine, or within the time period of assured renewal periods of our rights to mine. In addition, as of the date of
reporting, all reserves are covered by required permits and governmental approvals. See Item 4D.: “Property, Plant and Equipment”
for a description of the rights in relation to each mine.
existing rights to mine, or within the time period of assured renewal periods of our rights to mine. In addition, as of the date of
reporting, all reserves are covered by required permits and governmental approvals. See Item 4D.: “Property, Plant and Equipment”
for a description of the rights in relation to each mine.
In Australia and South Africa, we are legally required to publicly report Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources in compliance
with the South African Code for the Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, or SAMREC Code, together with the
Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, or JORC Code, and the National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects dated February 2001. The SAMREC Code is based on, and is comparable with the JORC
Code. The SEC’s Industry Guide 7 does not recognize Mineral Resources. Accordingly, we do not include estimates of Mineral
Resources in this Annual Report.
Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, or JORC Code, and the National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects dated February 2001. The SAMREC Code is based on, and is comparable with the JORC
Code. The SEC’s Industry Guide 7 does not recognize Mineral Resources. Accordingly, we do not include estimates of Mineral
Resources in this Annual Report.
1
Revenue for fiscal 2004 and 2003 has been restated for the disclosure of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited as a discontinued operation.
27
Ore Reserve calculations are subject to a review conducted in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7. Components of the
calculations included in the geological models and input parameters of the reserve estimation procedures, were checked. In addition,
visual inspection of the planning to deliver an individual block to the metallurgical plant, and the recovery, and deposition of the tails,
took place. A check is also made of the financial input into the costs and revenue to affirm that they are within reasonable limits.
visual inspection of the planning to deliver an individual block to the metallurgical plant, and the recovery, and deposition of the tails,
took place. A check is also made of the financial input into the costs and revenue to affirm that they are within reasonable limits.
The Ore Reserves are inclusive of diluting materials and allow for losses that may occur when the material is mined. Ore
Reserve tons, grade and content are quoted as delivered to the gold plant. There are two types of methods available to select ore for
mining. The first is pay-limit, which includes cash costs, including overhead costs, to calculate the pay-limit grade. The second is the cut-
off grade which includes cash costs, excluding fixed overhead costs, to calculate the cut-off grade, resulting in a lower figure than the full
pay-limit grade. The cut-off grade is based upon direct costs from the mining plan, taking into consideration production levels, production
efficiencies and the expected costs. We use the pay-limit to determine which areas to mine, as an overhead inclusive amount that is
indicative of the break-even position, especially for marginal mining operations.
mining. The first is pay-limit, which includes cash costs, including overhead costs, to calculate the pay-limit grade. The second is the cut-
off grade which includes cash costs, excluding fixed overhead costs, to calculate the cut-off grade, resulting in a lower figure than the full
pay-limit grade. The cut-off grade is based upon direct costs from the mining plan, taking into consideration production levels, production
efficiencies and the expected costs. We use the pay-limit to determine which areas to mine, as an overhead inclusive amount that is
indicative of the break-even position, especially for marginal mining operations.
The pay-limit approach is based on the minimum in-situ grade of ore blocks, for which the production costs, which includes all
overhead costs, including head office charges, are equal to a three year historical average gold price per ounce for that year. This
calculation also considers the previous three year's mining and milling efficiencies, which includes metallurgical and other mining factors
and the production plan for the next twelve months. Only blocks above the pay-limit grade are considered for mining. The pay-limit grade
is higher than the cut-off grade, because this includes overhead costs, which indicates the break-even position of the operation,
specifically significant for marginal mines.
calculation also considers the previous three year's mining and milling efficiencies, which includes metallurgical and other mining factors
and the production plan for the next twelve months. Only blocks above the pay-limit grade are considered for mining. The pay-limit grade
is higher than the cut-off grade, because this includes overhead costs, which indicates the break-even position of the operation,
specifically significant for marginal mines.
When delineating the economic limits to the ore bodies we adhere to the following guidelines:
•
The potential ore to be mined is well defined by an externally verified and approved geological model created using our mining
software;
software;
•
The potential ore, which is legally allowed to be mined, is also confined by the mine's lease boundaries; and
•
A full life of mine plan (physical 5 year plan) is constructed to mine the ore from existing infrastructure.
Our Ore Reserves figures are estimates, which may not reflect actual reserves or future production. We have prepared these
figures in accordance with industry practice, converting mineral deposits to an Ore Reserve through the preparation of a mining plan. The
Ore Reserve estimates contained herein inherently includes a degree of uncertainty and depends to some extent on statistical inferences
which may ultimately prove to have been unreliable.
Ore Reserve estimates contained herein inherently includes a degree of uncertainty and depends to some extent on statistical inferences
which may ultimately prove to have been unreliable.
Reserve estimates require revisions based on actual production experience or new information. Should we encounter
mineralization or formations different from those predicted by past drilling, sampling and similar examinations, reserve estimates may
have to be adjusted and mining plans may have to be altered in a way that might adversely affect our operations. Moreover, if the price of
gold declines, or stabilizes at a price that is lower than recent levels, or if our production costs increase or recovery rates decrease, it may
become uneconomical to recover Ore Reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization.
have to be adjusted and mining plans may have to be altered in a way that might adversely affect our operations. Moreover, if the price of
gold declines, or stabilizes at a price that is lower than recent levels, or if our production costs increase or recovery rates decrease, it may
become uneconomical to recover Ore Reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization.
For fiscal 2005, in respect of our South African assets, Ore Reserves were determined assuming a gold price of
approximately R88,960 per kilogram ($381 per ounce) as determined from the three year historical average. At June 30, 2005, the
Rand gold price was R93,931 per kilogram. In respect of our Australasian assets:
Rand gold price was R93,931 per kilogram. In respect of our Australasian assets:
•
Ore Reserves for the Tolukuma Section were determined assuming a gold price of K1,312.50 per ounce ($381 per ounce);
and
and
•
Ore Reserves in respect of our 20% attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, are as determined by Placer Dome Inc.
and as set forth in its annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on
March 3, 2005, assuming an average long-term gold price of $350 per ounce and exchange rates of A$1.54 = $1.00 and
K3.33 = $1.00.
and as set forth in its annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on
March 3, 2005, assuming an average long-term gold price of $350 per ounce and exchange rates of A$1.54 = $1.00 and
K3.33 = $1.00.
For fiscal 2004, in respect of our South African assets, Ore Reserves were determined assuming a gold price of
approximately R90,023 per kilogram as determined from the three year historical averages in accordance with SEC Industry Guide 7.
Based on the average exchange rate for fiscal 2004 the assumed Dollar gold price would be approximately $400 per ounce. In respect
of our Australasian assets, Ore Reserves for the Tolukuma Section were determined assuming a gold price of $400 per ounce at an
exchange rate of K3.22 = $1.00 based on the Kina gold price and exchange rate as at June 30, 2004.
Based on the average exchange rate for fiscal 2004 the assumed Dollar gold price would be approximately $400 per ounce. In respect
of our Australasian assets, Ore Reserves for the Tolukuma Section were determined assuming a gold price of $400 per ounce at an
exchange rate of K3.22 = $1.00 based on the Kina gold price and exchange rate as at June 30, 2004.
The principal reason for the decrease in our Ore Reserves as at June 30, 2005, of 5.6 million ounces, compared with
June 30, 2004, of 11.0 million ounces, other than depletion, is largely due to a decrease of 5.1 million ounces, or 46%, of the Ore
Reserves at the North West Operations as a result of the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited.
Reserves at the North West Operations as a result of the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited.
28
Based on the revised Ore Reserves set forth below, the revised life of mine for our operations are as follows:
Underground
Surface
Mine
2005
2004
2005
2004
South Africa
Blyvoor Section .........................................
Blyvoor Section .........................................
17 years
15 years
7 years
8 years
Crown Section
1
..........................................
N/A
N/A
7 years
7 years
ERPM Section
1
..........................................
5 years
9 months
8 years
6 years
Australasia
Emperor Section
Emperor Section
2
......................................
5 years
5 years
N/A
N/A
Tolukuma Section ......................................
2 years
3 years
2 years
2 years
Porgera Section
3
.........................................
3 years
4 years
11 years
11 years
Our Ore Reserves as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 are set forth in the table below.
1
The results of the Crown Section and its subsidiary ERPM are accounted for using the equity method.
2
The results of the Emperor Section are accounted for using the equity method with effect from July 30, 2004. The results for fiscal 2004 and 2003
have been restated for the equity method of accounting for our investment in the Emperor Section.
3
Our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture was only acquired with effect from October 14, 2003.
29
Ore Reserves: Imperial
At June 30, 2005
At June 30, 2004
Proven Ore Reserves
Probable Ore Reserves
Proven Ore Reserves
Probable Ore Reserves
Tons
Grade
Gold
Content
Tons
Grade
Gold
Content
Tons
Grade
Gold
Content
Tons
Grade
Gold
Content
(mill)
(oz/ton)
('000 ozs)
(mill)
(oz/ton)
('000 ozs)
(mill)
(oz/ton)
('000 ozs.)
(mill)
(oz/ton)
('000 ozs)
South African Operations
Blyvoor Section
Underground ..............................................
12.32
0.22
2,713
4.57
0.18
825
13.56
0.23
3,081
3.78
0.20
743
Surface .......................................................
26.21
0.02
460
-
-
-
29.37
0.02
505
-
-
-
Total Blyvoor Section ..............................
38.53
0.08
3,173
4.57
0.18
825
42.93
0.08
3,586
3.78
0.20
743
Buffels Section
1
Underground .............................................
0.06
0.20
12
-
-
-
Total Buffels Section................................
0.06
0.20
12
-
-
-
Harties Section
1
Underground ..............................................
15.35
0.22
3,346
8.58
0.20
1,689
Surface .......................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Harties Section ...............................
15.35
0.22
3,346
8.58
0.20
1,689
Papua New Guinea Operations
Porgera Section
Underground ..............................................
0.41
0.22
89
1.14
0.24
273
0.20
0.24
48
0.54
0.26
139
Open Pit ....................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.98
0.11
738
1.72
0.09
153
Surface .......................................................
9.76
0.09
891
0.91
0.11
98
4.93
0.07
359
-
-
-
Total Porgera Section
2
.............................
10.17
0.10
980
2.05
0.18
371
12.11
0.09
1,145
2.25
0.13
292
Tolukuma Section
Underground ..............................................
0.18
0.52
91
0.26
0.40
105
0.27
0.57
153
0.09
0.43
38
Open Pit .....................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.01
0.50
6
0.01
0.44
6
Surface .......................................................
-
0.71
5
0.02
0.65
17
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Tolukuma Section ..........................
0.18
0.52
96
0.28
0.18
122
0.28
0.57
159
0.10
0.43
44
Total: Group.............................................
Underground ..............................................
Underground ..............................................
12.91
0.22
2,893
5.97
0.20
1,203
29.44
0.23
6,640
12.99
0.20
2,609
Open Pit .....................................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.99
0.11
744
1.73
0.09
159
Total Surface..............................................
35.97
0.04
1,356
0.93
0.12
115
34.3
0.03
864
-
-
-
Total
3
.........................................................
48.88
0.09
4,249
6.90
0.19
1,318
70.73
0.12
8,248
14.72
0.19
2,768
1
The North West Operations were placed into provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005.
2
Total Proven and Probable Ore reserves for 2005 reflect our attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture. This is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75%
interest in the Porgera Joint Venture) in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 3, 2005.
3
The Ore reserves listed in the above table are estimates of what can be legally and economically recovered from operations, and, as stated, are estimates of mill delivered in tons.
30
Ore Reserves: Metric
At June 30, 2005
At June 30, 2004
Proven Ore Reserves
Probable Ore Reserves
Proven Ore Reserves
Probable Ore Reserves
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Content
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Content
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Content
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Content
(mill)
(g/tonne)
(tonnes)
(mill)
(g/tonne)
(tonnes)
(mill)
(g/tonne)
(tonnes)
(mill)
(g/tonne)
(tonnes)
South African Operations
Blyvoor Section
Underground ...........................
11.175
7.55
84.396
4.144
6.19
25.645
12.301
7.79
95.823
3.432
6.73
23.110
Surface ....................................
23.777
0.60
14.304
-
-
-
26.645
0.59
15.721
-
-
-
Total Blyvoor Section ...........
34.952
2.82
98.700
4.144
6.19
25.645
38.946
2.86
111.544
3.432
6.73
23.110
Buffels Section
1
Underground ............................
0.057
6.82
0.389
-
-
-
Total Buffels Section...............
0.057
6.82
0.389
-
-
-
Harties Section
1
Underground .............................
13.922
7.47
104.059
7.784
6.75
52.548
Surface ......................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Harties Section ..............
13.922
7.47
104.059
7.784
6.75
52.548
Papua New Guinea Operations
Porgera Section
Underground ...........................
0.371
7.43
2.756
1.034
8.21
8.491
0.180
8.33
1.497
0.489
8.83
4.314
Open pit ..................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.330
3.63
22.960
1.556
3.06
4.768
Surface ....................................
8.853
3.13
27.724
0.822
3.70
3.042
4.472
2.50
11.172
-
-
-
Total Porgera Section
2
..........
9.224
3.30
30.480
1.856
6.21
11.533
10.982
3.24
35.629
2.045
4.44
9.082
Tolukuma Section
Underground ...........................
0.160
17.60
2.823
0.237
13.79
3.269
0.244
19.49
4.760
0.081
14.73
1.193
Open pit ..................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.012
16.98
0.196
0.012
15.20
0.189
Surface ....................................
0.006
23.58
0.157
0.024
22.36
0.540
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Tolukuma Section .......
0.166
17.84
2.980
0.261
14.58
3.810
0.256
19.37
4.956
0.093
14.79
1.382
Total
Underground ...........................
11.706
7.69
89.975
5.415
6.91
34.405
26.704
7.73
207
11.786
6.89
81.165
Open pit ..................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.342
3.65
23.156
1.568
3.16
4.957
Surface ....................................
32.636
1.29
42.185
0.846
4.23
3.582
31.117
0.86
26.893
-
-
-
Total
3
......................................
44.342
2.98
132.160
6.261
6.55
40.987
64.163
4.00
256.577
13.354
6.45
86.122
1
The North West Operations were placed into provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005.
2
Total Proven and Probable Ore reserves for 2005 reflect our attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture. This is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75%
interest in the Porgera Joint Venture) in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 3, 2005.
3
The Ore reserves listed in the above table are estimates of what can be legally and economically recovered from operations, and, as stated, are estimates of mill delivered in tons.
31
The approximate mining recovery factors for the 2005 Ore Reserves shown in the above table are as follows:
Underground
Surface
Mine
Dilution
(Sundries,
Shortfall and
Development)
(%)
Mine Call Factor
(%)
Metallurgical and
recovery factor
(%)
Mine Call Factor
(%)
Metallurgical and
recovery factor
(%)
Blyvoor Section ..........
30.0
85.2
95.8
100.0
45.0
Tolukuma Section .....
29.5
79.7
91.0
95.0
91.0
Porgera Section
1
........
Not available
100.0
86.7
100.0
84.0
The approximate mining recovery factors for the 2004 Ore Reserves shown in the above table are as follows:
Underground
Surface
Mine
Dilution
(Sundries,
Shortfall and
Development)
(%)
Mine Call Factor
(%)
Metallurgical and
recovery factor
(%)
Mine Call Factor
(%)
Metallurgical and
recovery factor
(%)
Blyvoor Section ..........
29.8
83.5
94.5
100.0
55.0
Tolukuma Section .....
19.3
87.0
91.0
95.0
91.0
Porgera Section
1
........
Not available
100.0
86.7
100.0
84.0
The following table shows the average drill/sample spacing (rounded to the nearest foot), as at June 30, 2005, for each category
of Ore Reserves at our mines:
Mine
Proven
Reserves
Probable
Reserves
South Africa
Blyvoor Section .....................................................................................................
Blyvoor Section .....................................................................................................
16 ft. by 24 ft.
Nil
Australasia
Tolukuma Section ..................................................................................................
Tolukuma Section ..................................................................................................
3 ft. by 33 ft.
33 ft. by 66 ft.
Porgera Section
1
.....................................................................................................
49 ft. by 49 ft.
98 ft. by 98 ft.
We apply the pay-limit approach to the mineralized material database of our various shafts or business units in order to
determine the tonnage and grade available for mining.
The underground reserves quoted as of June 30, 2005, are sensitive to operating costs and gold price assumptions as shown in
the table below. These sensitivities are presented to give an indication of changes in reserves relative to the gold price assumptions used.
All sensitivities have been calculated at an exchange rate of R7.32 = $1.00 for the South African Operations and K3.36 = $1.00 for Papua
New Guinea Operations. No sensitivities are presented for Porgera as our disclosures are based on the publicly available information as at
December 31, 2004, which did not include these sensitivities. At different gold prices, alternative mining strategies may be pursued to
optimally exploit the ore body. Due to the re-processing nature of our surface operations, those reserves are not sensitive to the price of
gold and are included in our reserve statement provided that the gold price per ounce exceeds the per ounce cost of processing the
materials.
All sensitivities have been calculated at an exchange rate of R7.32 = $1.00 for the South African Operations and K3.36 = $1.00 for Papua
New Guinea Operations. No sensitivities are presented for Porgera as our disclosures are based on the publicly available information as at
December 31, 2004, which did not include these sensitivities. At different gold prices, alternative mining strategies may be pursued to
optimally exploit the ore body. Due to the re-processing nature of our surface operations, those reserves are not sensitive to the price of
gold and are included in our reserve statement provided that the gold price per ounce exceeds the per ounce cost of processing the
materials.
Sensitivities, conducted using the $381 per ounce average gold price in local currencies, where applicable, indicate that there
is material difference to the Ore Reserves as stated below. These sensitivities are presented to give an indication of changes relative to
gold price. These are not supported by life of mine plans and should therefore only be considered as indicative and comparable on a
relative basis. At different gold prices, alternative mining strategies may be pursued to exploit the ore body optimally. The mining
process is dynamic and will thus have a “knock-on-effect” on the operating costs and pay limit grade associated with the change in
scale of operations. The inclusion of large tonnages of surface material will also influence the Ore Reserve sensitivity.
gold price. These are not supported by life of mine plans and should therefore only be considered as indicative and comparable on a
relative basis. At different gold prices, alternative mining strategies may be pursued to exploit the ore body optimally. The mining
process is dynamic and will thus have a “knock-on-effect” on the operating costs and pay limit grade associated with the change in
scale of operations. The inclusion of large tonnages of surface material will also influence the Ore Reserve sensitivity.
1
This is based on information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture) in its annual report for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 3, 2005.
32
$300/oz
$340/oz
$381/oz
$420/oz
$440/oz
Operation
Tonnes Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes Grade
Gold
Gold
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Blyvoor Section
Proven ..................28.290
Proven ..................28.290
2.12
1.970
61.268
31.955
2.59
2.657
82.629
34.952
2.82
3.173
98.700
38.321
3.00
3.695
114.921
39.877
3.06
3.919
121.886
Probable....................
1.206
7.63
0.296
9.199
2.285
6.84
0.503
15.633
4.144
6.19
0.824
25.645
6.403
5.65
1.163
36.159
7.168
5.49
1.265
39.349
Total.....................30.095
2.34
2.266
70.467
34.241
2.87
3.159
98.262
39.096
3.18
3.998
124.344
44.724
3.38
4.857
151.080
47.045
3.43
5.184
161.235
$320/oz
$360/oz
$400/oz
$440/oz
$480/oz
Operation
Tonne
s
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonnes
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonne
s
Grade
Gold
Gold
Tonne
s
Grade
Gold
Gold
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Mt
g/t
'000 ozs
Tonnes
Tolukuma Section
Proven ....................
Proven ....................
0.148
19.2
91.342
2.841
0.152
19.0
92.829
2.887
0.154
18.9
93.924
2.921
0.167
17.8
95.821
2.980
0.190
16.2
98.814
3.073
Probable..................
0.232
15.7
116.765
3.632
0.237
15.6
118.666
3.691
0.241
15.5
120.067
3.735
0.261
14.6
122.491
3.810
0.297
13.2
126.317
3.929
Total.......................
0.380
17.0
208.107
6.473
0.389
16.3
211.495
6.578
0.396
16.8
213.991
6.656
0.428
15.9
218.312
6.790
0.487
14.4
225.131
7.002
33
Governmental regulations and its effect on our business
South Africa
Common Law Mineral Rights and Statutory Mining Rights
Prior to the introduction of the MPRD Act in 2002, private ownership in mineral rights and statutory mining rights in South
Africa could be acquired through the common law or by statute. Under the old regime, the term freehold title refers to a right of
ownership of land and the surface thereof and the term “mining title” refers to a right of ownership of the minerals below the surface or
the right to mine such minerals. With effect from May 1, 2004, all minerals have been placed under the custodianship of the South
African government under the provisions of the MPRD Act, and old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of
use within certain prescribed periods, as dealt with more fully below.
ownership of land and the surface thereof and the term “mining title” refers to a right of ownership of the minerals below the surface or
the right to mine such minerals. With effect from May 1, 2004, all minerals have been placed under the custodianship of the South
African government under the provisions of the MPRD Act, and old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of
use within certain prescribed periods, as dealt with more fully below.
Old Order Rights - Mining Authorizations
Because mining authorizations issued under the previous regime remain valid until May 1, 2009, they are dealt with briefly. No
person or mining entity may prospect or mine for minerals without being granted a prospecting or mining authorization. Prior to granting
a prospecting or mining authorization, two requirements had to be fulfilled. First, the mining entity must either be the registered holder of
the mineral rights or have obtained the written consent of the registered holder of the mineral rights to mine the minerals concerned for its
own account. Second, the Department of Minerals and Energy, or the DME, must be satisfied with the scale, manner and duration of the
intended prospecting or mining operations and must approve an Environmental Management Program, or EMP. A prospecting permit
was issued for a limited period but could be renewed on application. A mining license was generally issued until such time that the
minerals could no longer be mined in an economically viable manner. The rights enjoyed under these authorities will endure until they are
converted within the period of time prescribed in the MPRD Act. Thereafter, such rights will lapse.
a prospecting or mining authorization, two requirements had to be fulfilled. First, the mining entity must either be the registered holder of
the mineral rights or have obtained the written consent of the registered holder of the mineral rights to mine the minerals concerned for its
own account. Second, the Department of Minerals and Energy, or the DME, must be satisfied with the scale, manner and duration of the
intended prospecting or mining operations and must approve an Environmental Management Program, or EMP. A prospecting permit
was issued for a limited period but could be renewed on application. A mining license was generally issued until such time that the
minerals could no longer be mined in an economically viable manner. The rights enjoyed under these authorities will endure until they are
converted within the period of time prescribed in the MPRD Act. Thereafter, such rights will lapse.
Conversion of Rights under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002
Existing common law prospecting, mining and mineral rights, or old order rights, need to be converted into new order rights in
order to ensure exclusive access to the mineral for which rights existed at the time of the enactment of the MPRD Act.
In respect of used mineral rights, the DME is obliged to convert the rights if the applicant complies with certain statutory criteria.
These include the submission of a mining plan, demonstrable technical and financial capability to give effect to the plan, provision for
environmental management and rehabilitation, and compliance with certain black empowerment and social-economic guidelines. These
applications need to be submitted within five years after the enactment of the MPRD Act on May 1, 2004. Similar procedures apply
where we hold prospecting rights and a prospecting permit and conduct prospecting operations. Where we hold unused rights however,
the application for conversion to mining or prospecting rights had to be submitted within one year. The requirements for unused rights are
more stringent than for used rights, particularly insofar as participation in benefits from historically disadvantaged groups are concerned.
The DME has, in these instances also a wider discretion to refuse an application for conversion. Under the new MRPD Act, mining rights
are not perpetual, but endure for a maximum of thirty years, after which they may be renewed for a further thirty years. Prospecting rights
are limited to five years, with one renewal of up to three years. All relevant applications have been submitted.
environmental management and rehabilitation, and compliance with certain black empowerment and social-economic guidelines. These
applications need to be submitted within five years after the enactment of the MPRD Act on May 1, 2004. Similar procedures apply
where we hold prospecting rights and a prospecting permit and conduct prospecting operations. Where we hold unused rights however,
the application for conversion to mining or prospecting rights had to be submitted within one year. The requirements for unused rights are
more stringent than for used rights, particularly insofar as participation in benefits from historically disadvantaged groups are concerned.
The DME has, in these instances also a wider discretion to refuse an application for conversion. Under the new MRPD Act, mining rights
are not perpetual, but endure for a maximum of thirty years, after which they may be renewed for a further thirty years. Prospecting rights
are limited to five years, with one renewal of up to three years. All relevant applications have been submitted.
If any of our applications for conversion are refused, rights for damages, based on expropriation will vest with us. The DME
may attach specific conditions and limitations to the exercise of new order rights. It may, for example, reduce the area over which the new
order right applies, if it is of the view that the prospecting or mining work programs submitted by an applicant do not justify the extent of
the area covered by the old order right. They may also be suspended or cancelled by the Minister of Minerals and Energy in the event of
a breach or, in the case of mining rights, of non-optimal mining in accordance with the mining works program.
order right applies, if it is of the view that the prospecting or mining work programs submitted by an applicant do not justify the extent of
the area covered by the old order right. They may also be suspended or cancelled by the Minister of Minerals and Energy in the event of
a breach or, in the case of mining rights, of non-optimal mining in accordance with the mining works program.
The South African government has declared its intention to revisit the taxation regime of South African gold mining companies.
The South African gold mining industry is taxed under the gold tax formula which recognizes the high level of capital expenditure
required to sustain a mining operation over the life of mine. This results in an additional tax benefit, not afforded to other commercial
companies. In addition, the South African Government has indicated that it is looking at a revenue based royalty for mining companies, as
outlined in the draft Mineral and Petroleum Royalty Bill, 2003, or Royalty Bill, which was released in March 2003 for comment. The
Royalty Bill proposed a three percent royalty on gross revenue for gold mining companies. In conjunction with the South African Mining
Development Association we have made submissions to the government outlining our concerns about a revenue based royalty and
recommended a profit based royalty be introduced instead. In his budget speech in February 2004, the South African Finance Ministe r
acknowledged that the draft Royalty Bill may need some refinement, but also stated that government’s preference is for a revenue based
royalty, with introduction of the revenue based royalty as of 2009. As at October 31, 2005, these issues were still under review. The
introduction of the proposed revenue based royalty would have an adverse effect on the profitability of our South African Operations. We
are currently evaluating the impact of the proposed revenue based royalty.
required to sustain a mining operation over the life of mine. This results in an additional tax benefit, not afforded to other commercial
companies. In addition, the South African Government has indicated that it is looking at a revenue based royalty for mining companies, as
outlined in the draft Mineral and Petroleum Royalty Bill, 2003, or Royalty Bill, which was released in March 2003 for comment. The
Royalty Bill proposed a three percent royalty on gross revenue for gold mining companies. In conjunction with the South African Mining
Development Association we have made submissions to the government outlining our concerns about a revenue based royalty and
recommended a profit based royalty be introduced instead. In his budget speech in February 2004, the South African Finance Ministe r
acknowledged that the draft Royalty Bill may need some refinement, but also stated that government’s preference is for a revenue based
royalty, with introduction of the revenue based royalty as of 2009. As at October 31, 2005, these issues were still under review. The
introduction of the proposed revenue based royalty would have an adverse effect on the profitability of our South African Operations. We
are currently evaluating the impact of the proposed revenue based royalty.
34
In order to promote broader based participation in mining revenue, the MPRD Act provides for a Broad Based Socio-Economic
Empowerment Charter, or Mining Charter, to be developed by the Minister within five years of commencement of the Act, beginning
May 1, 2004. The mining industry has submitted its proposals on the content of the Mining Charter. In its current format its objectives
include:
May 1, 2004. The mining industry has submitted its proposals on the content of the Mining Charter. In its current format its objectives
include:
•
increased direct and indirect ownership of mining entities;
•
expansion of opportunities for persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination under the previous political dispensation;
•
expansion of the skills base of such persons, the promotion of employment and advancement of the social and economic welfare
of mining communities; and
of mining communities; and
•
promotion of beneficiation.
The Mining Charter sets certain numerical and timeframe goals on equity participation by historically disadvantaged South
Africans of South African mining assets. It recommends that these are achieved by, among other methods, the sale of assets by mining
companies to historically disadvantaged persons on a willing seller, willing buyer basis at fair market value. The goals set by the Mining
Charter require each mining company to achieve 15 percent ownership by historically disadvantaged South Africans of its South African
mining assets within five years and 26 percent ownership within ten years from May 1, 2004. It also sets out guidelines and goals in
respect of employment equity at management level with a view to achieving 40 percent participation by historically disadvantaged
persons in management and ten percent participation by women in the mining industry, each within five years. Compliance with these
objectives is measured on the weighted average “scorecard” approach in accordance with a draft scorecard which was published by the
government in February 2003.
companies to historically disadvantaged persons on a willing seller, willing buyer basis at fair market value. The goals set by the Mining
Charter require each mining company to achieve 15 percent ownership by historically disadvantaged South Africans of its South African
mining assets within five years and 26 percent ownership within ten years from May 1, 2004. It also sets out guidelines and goals in
respect of employment equity at management level with a view to achieving 40 percent participation by historically disadvantaged
persons in management and ten percent participation by women in the mining industry, each within five years. Compliance with these
objectives is measured on the weighted average “scorecard” approach in accordance with a draft scorecard which was published by the
government in February 2003.
We are supportive of addressing the legacies of the past through developing opportunities in accordance with the objects and
parameters of the MPRD Act. We have demonstrated our commitment through our 40% owned associate company, CGR, through which
we facilitated the acquisition of 60% of our interest in CGR by KBH in fiscal 2004. We also plan to enter into a new transaction in fiscal
2006 to provide sustainability to our black empowerment partnership with KBH (See Item 4A: “History and Development of the
Company”). However, it is still too soon for us to be able to set out a definitive timeline of when we will comply with our objectives
before the expiration of the 10 year time limit, as the legislation was only passed in 2004. The provisions of the Mining Charter apply to
each mining company individually. It is not possible for us to meet our obligations under the Mining Charter solely by disposing of our
less profitable operations which would undermine the objectives of the Mining Charter. In order to comply with the Min ing Charter,
empowerment transactions must be at fair market value, we do not anticipate incurring any loss in fulfilling our obligations provided that
we are able to identify suitable partners that are able to obtain adequate funding.
we facilitated the acquisition of 60% of our interest in CGR by KBH in fiscal 2004. We also plan to enter into a new transaction in fiscal
2006 to provide sustainability to our black empowerment partnership with KBH (See Item 4A: “History and Development of the
Company”). However, it is still too soon for us to be able to set out a definitive timeline of when we will comply with our objectives
before the expiration of the 10 year time limit, as the legislation was only passed in 2004. The provisions of the Mining Charter apply to
each mining company individually. It is not possible for us to meet our obligations under the Mining Charter solely by disposing of our
less profitable operations which would undermine the objectives of the Mining Charter. In order to comply with the Min ing Charter,
empowerment transactions must be at fair market value, we do not anticipate incurring any loss in fulfilling our obligations provided that
we are able to identify suitable partners that are able to obtain adequate funding.
Mine and Safety Regulation
The South African Mine Health and Safety Act, 1996 (as amended), or the Mine Health and Safety Act, came into effect in
January 1997. The principal object of the Mine Health and Safety Act is to improve health and safety at South African mines and to this
end, imposes various duties on us at our mines, and grants the authorities broad powers to, among other things, close unsafe mines and
order corrective action relating to health and safety matters. In the event of any future accidents at any of our mines, regulatory authorities
could take steps which could increase our costs or reduce our production capacity.
end, imposes various duties on us at our mines, and grants the authorities broad powers to, among other things, close unsafe mines and
order corrective action relating to health and safety matters. In the event of any future accidents at any of our mines, regulatory authorities
could take steps which could increase our costs or reduce our production capacity.
Under the South African Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, 1993 (as amended), or COID Act,
employers are required to contribute to a fund specifically created for the purpose of compensating employees or their dependants for
disability or death arising in the course of their work. Employees who are incapacitated in the course of their work have no claim for
compensation directly from the employer and must claim compensation from the COID Act fund. Employees are entitled to
compensation without having to prove that the injury or disease was caused by negligence on the part of the employer, although if
negligence is involved, increased compensation may be payable by this fund. The COID Act relieves employers from the prospect of
costly damages, but does not relieve employers from liability for negligent acts caused to third parties outside the scope of employment.
We have contributed approximately $5.6 million over the past three fiscal years under the COID Act, to a multi-employer industry fund
admin istered by Rand Mutual Assurance Limited.
disability or death arising in the course of their work. Employees who are incapacitated in the course of their work have no claim for
compensation directly from the employer and must claim compensation from the COID Act fund. Employees are entitled to
compensation without having to prove that the injury or disease was caused by negligence on the part of the employer, although if
negligence is involved, increased compensation may be payable by this fund. The COID Act relieves employers from the prospect of
costly damages, but does not relieve employers from liability for negligent acts caused to third parties outside the scope of employment.
We have contributed approximately $5.6 million over the past three fiscal years under the COID Act, to a multi-employer industry fund
admin istered by Rand Mutual Assurance Limited.
Under the Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Act, 1973 (as amended), or the Occupational Diseases Act, the multi-
employer fund pays compensation to employees of mines performing “risk work,” as defined by the Minister for Health, usually in
circumstances where the employee is exposed to dust, gases, vapors, chemical substances or other working conditions which are
potentially harmful, if the employee contracts a “compensatable disease,” which includes pneumoconiosis, tuberculosis, or a permanent
obstruction of the airways. No employee is entitled to benefits under the Occupational Diseases Act for any disease for which
compensation has been received or is still to be received under the COID Act. We are currently in compliance with these payment
requirements, which are based on a combination of the employee costs and claims made during the year.
circumstances where the employee is exposed to dust, gases, vapors, chemical substances or other working conditions which are
potentially harmful, if the employee contracts a “compensatable disease,” which includes pneumoconiosis, tuberculosis, or a permanent
obstruction of the airways. No employee is entitled to benefits under the Occupational Diseases Act for any disease for which
compensation has been received or is still to be received under the COID Act. We are currently in compliance with these payment
requirements, which are based on a combination of the employee costs and claims made during the year.
35
Uranium and radon are often encountered during the ordinary course of gold mining operations in South Africa, and present
potential risks for radiation exposure of workers at those operations and the public in the nearby vicinity. We monitor our uranium and
radon emissions and believe that we are currently in compliance with all local laws and regulations pertaining to uranium and radon
management and that we are within the current legislative exposure limits prescribed for workers and the public, under the Nuclear
Energy Act, 1999 (as amended) and Regulations from the National Nuclear Regulator.
radon emissions and believe that we are currently in compliance with all local laws and regulations pertaining to uranium and radon
management and that we are within the current legislative exposure limits prescribed for workers and the public, under the Nuclear
Energy Act, 1999 (as amended) and Regulations from the National Nuclear Regulator.
Environmental Regulation in South Africa
Managing the impact of mining on the environment is extensively regulated by statute in South Africa. Recent statutory
enactments set compliance standards both generally, in the case of the National Environmental Management Act, and in respect of
specific areas of environment impact, as in the case of the Atmospheric Pollution Act (dust pollution), the National Water Act (managing
effluent), the Environmental Conservation Act (waste disposal) and the Nuclear Energy Act (latent radon contamination). Liability for
environmental damage is also extended beyond the corporate veil to impose personal liability on managers and directors of mining
corporations that are found to have violated applicable laws.
specific areas of environment impact, as in the case of the Atmospheric Pollution Act (dust pollution), the National Water Act (managing
effluent), the Environmental Conservation Act (waste disposal) and the Nuclear Energy Act (latent radon contamination). Liability for
environmental damage is also extended beyond the corporate veil to impose personal liability on managers and directors of mining
corporations that are found to have violated applicable laws.
Managing the impact on the environment by mining operations is extensively provided for in the MRPD Act. The MRPD Act
has onerous provisions for personal liability of directors of companies whose mining operations have an unacceptable impact on the
environment.
environment.
Under the MPRD Act, new order mining licenses are not issued unless a complete environmental impact assessment is
conducted and all potentially affected parties have been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed mining. Mining companies are
also required to demonstrate both the technical and financial ability to sustain an ongoing environmental management program, and
achieve ultimate rehabilitation, the particulars of which are to be incorporated in an environmental management program, or EMP. This
program is required to be submitted and approved by the DME as a prerequisite for the issue of a new order mining license. Financial
provision is made by depositing funds into a rehabilitation trust fund. We have a registered fund for each of the Blyvoor, Durban Deep
and West Wits Sections and our associate, CGR, has registered funds for the Crown and ERPM Sections. These funds are discussed
below.
also required to demonstrate both the technical and financial ability to sustain an ongoing environmental management program, and
achieve ultimate rehabilitation, the particulars of which are to be incorporated in an environmental management program, or EMP. This
program is required to be submitted and approved by the DME as a prerequisite for the issue of a new order mining license. Financial
provision is made by depositing funds into a rehabilitation trust fund. We have a registered fund for each of the Blyvoor, Durban Deep
and West Wits Sections and our associate, CGR, has registered funds for the Crown and ERPM Sections. These funds are discussed
below.
The MPRD Act imposes specific, ongoing environmental monitoring and financial reporting obligations on the holders of
mining licenses.
Because of the diverse nature of our operations, ranging from underground mining to surface reclamation activities,
environmental risks vary from site to site. These risks have been addressed in EMPs which have been submitted to the DWAF and are
reviewed and updated on an annual basis. As of June 30, 2005, EMPs have been submitted for all operations in South Africa and all have
been approved by the DWAF. Additionally, the key environmental issues have been prioritized and are being addressed through active
management input and support and progress measured in terms of activity schedules and timescales determined for each activity. Two
environmental compliance assessments have been conducted at the Blyvoor Section and the Crown Section, which both show that these
mines are in substantial compliance with the conditions of their EMPs.
reviewed and updated on an annual basis. As of June 30, 2005, EMPs have been submitted for all operations in South Africa and all have
been approved by the DWAF. Additionally, the key environmental issues have been prioritized and are being addressed through active
management input and support and progress measured in terms of activity schedules and timescales determined for each activity. Two
environmental compliance assessments have been conducted at the Blyvoor Section and the Crown Section, which both show that these
mines are in substantial compliance with the conditions of their EMPs.
Our existing reporting and controls framework is consistent with the additional reporting and assessment requirements of the
MPRD Act.
Financial Provision for Rehabilitation
We are required to make financial provision for the cost of mine closure and post-closure rehabilitation, including monitoring,
once the mining operations cease. In South Africa we have funded these environmental rehabilitation costs by making contributions over
the life of the mine to environmental trust funds established for each operation. Funds are irrevocably contributed to trusts that function
under the authority of trustees that have been appointed by, and who owe a statutory duty of trust, to the Master of the High Court of
South Africa. The funds held in these trusts are invested primarily in interest bearing debt securities and equity-limited unit trusts. As of
June 30, 2005, we held a total of $6.4 million in trust, the balance held in each fund being $1.8 million (2004: $1.8 million) for West Wits
Section, $2.5 million (2004: $2.5 million) for Blyvoor Section and $2.1 million (2004: $2.1 million) for the Durban Deep Section. Trustee
meetings are held as required, and quarterly reports on the financial status of the funds, are submitted to our board of directors.
the life of the mine to environmental trust funds established for each operation. Funds are irrevocably contributed to trusts that function
under the authority of trustees that have been appointed by, and who owe a statutory duty of trust, to the Master of the High Court of
South Africa. The funds held in these trusts are invested primarily in interest bearing debt securities and equity-limited unit trusts. As of
June 30, 2005, we held a total of $6.4 million in trust, the balance held in each fund being $1.8 million (2004: $1.8 million) for West Wits
Section, $2.5 million (2004: $2.5 million) for Blyvoor Section and $2.1 million (2004: $2.1 million) for the Durban Deep Section. Trustee
meetings are held as required, and quarterly reports on the financial status of the funds, are submitted to our board of directors.
The financial provisions for the West Wits Section and Durban Deep Section have been consolidated into a single fund. We
address shortfalls in the funds by accruing trust investment income for the benefit of the funds and by replenishing it with the proceeds
from the sale of redundant mining equipment at the end of the life of the mine. If any of the operations are prematurely closed, the
rehabilitation funds may be insufficient to meet all the rehabilitation obligations of those operations.
from the sale of redundant mining equipment at the end of the life of the mine. If any of the operations are prematurely closed, the
rehabilitation funds may be insufficient to meet all the rehabilitation obligations of those operations.
36
Whereas the old Minerals Act allowed for the establishment of a fully funded rehabilitation fund over the life of mine, the
MPRD Act assumes a fully compliant fund at any given time in the production life of a mine. The DME has indicated that the traditional
ring fencing of funds may, for investment purposes, be relaxed and that insurance instruments may also be received subject to the DME’s
consent, to make up the shortfall in available cash funds.
ring fencing of funds may, for investment purposes, be relaxed and that insurance instruments may also be received subject to the DME’s
consent, to make up the shortfall in available cash funds.
The aggregate group rehabilitation, reclamation and closure cost provision was calculated at June 30, 2005 at $22.6 million,
down from $39.1 million on June 30, 2004. The decrease is attributable to the exclusion of Buffelsfontein Gold Mine Limited (which
owns the North West Operations that was placed under provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005).
owns the North West Operations that was placed under provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005).
Papua New Guinea
Mineral exploration and mining operations in Papua New Guinea are principally regulated by the following legislation:
•
Papua New Guinea Mining Act 1992 and Mining Regulations 1992, or the Mining Act and Regulations;
•
Mining Safety Act and Regulations; and
•
Papua New Guinea Environmental Act 2000 and Regulations 2000, or the Environmental Act and Regulations.
Current mining activities at the Tolukuma Section are covered by a mining lease (ML104), granted under the Mining Act. The
initial term of this lease was for a period of 8 years, which was renewed for a further 10 years, expiring 2012. The mining lease may be
renewed for further periods not exceeding 10 years in accordance with applicable laws. Current exploration activities are covered by a
number of exploration licenses. These licenses have been granted for a term not to exceed two years but can be renewed for further two
year periods. In total, there are 11 exploration licenses or applications covering the Tolukuma Section.
renewed for further periods not exceeding 10 years in accordance with applicable laws. Current exploration activities are covered by a
number of exploration licenses. These licenses have been granted for a term not to exceed two years but can be renewed for further two
year periods. In total, there are 11 exploration licenses or applications covering the Tolukuma Section.
The Porgera Joint Venture has approval to mine the Porgera deposit within the agreed development plan under the terms of the
Porgera Mining Development Contract, or the Porgera Contract, between the Government of Papua New Guinea and the members of the
Porgera Joint Venture. The Porgera Contract specifies, among other matters, the annual rents that must be paid for the Special Mining
Lease and the various classes of compensation that are payable to the landowners for the various land uses. The Special Mining Lease,
which expires in 2019, encompasses approximately 5,530 acres (2,240 hectares) including the mine area and the areas in which the
project infrastructure is located. There is no expiration date for the Porgera Contract, but it is tied to the continuation of the Special
Mining Lease. Leases for mining purposes have also been awarded by the Government of Papua New Guinea for land use associated with
the mining operation such as waste dumps, campsite, and an airstrip. Permits are held for water use, including run-off from
unco nsolidated surfaces, such as the open pit, the underground mine and the waste dumps. These permits are renewable on a regular basis
and are subject to public hearing before approval.
Porgera Joint Venture. The Porgera Contract specifies, among other matters, the annual rents that must be paid for the Special Mining
Lease and the various classes of compensation that are payable to the landowners for the various land uses. The Special Mining Lease,
which expires in 2019, encompasses approximately 5,530 acres (2,240 hectares) including the mine area and the areas in which the
project infrastructure is located. There is no expiration date for the Porgera Contract, but it is tied to the continuation of the Special
Mining Lease. Leases for mining purposes have also been awarded by the Government of Papua New Guinea for land use associated with
the mining operation such as waste dumps, campsite, and an airstrip. Permits are held for water use, including run-off from
unco nsolidated surfaces, such as the open pit, the underground mine and the waste dumps. These permits are renewable on a regular basis
and are subject to public hearing before approval.
The Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are operated subject to the requirements of the Mining Act and Regulations and the Mining
Safety Act and Regulations as applied by the Papua New Guinea Government. We believe all requisite licenses and permits are in good
standing.
standing.
The Mining Safety Act and Regulations
The Mining Safety Act and Regulations sets out in detail the standards pertaining to safe and responsible mining. It lays down
the conditions a mining operation has to comply with to ensure that the health and safety of all workers is protected. It includes
requirements pertaining to worker training, risk assessment and safe working procedures with regard to all activities associated with
mining.
requirements pertaining to worker training, risk assessment and safe working procedures with regard to all activities associated with
mining.
Environmental Regulations in Papua New Guinea
The Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are subject to the Environmental Act and Regulations which came into effect on January 1,
2004. The Environmental Act and Regulations provide for objective criteria for regulating the impact of activities on the environment, as
well as the regulation of air and water pollution. Both the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections have a number of licenses and permits with
which those respective operations are required to comply.
well as the regulation of air and water pollution. Both the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections have a number of licenses and permits with
which those respective operations are required to comply.
The activities at the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are categorized under the Environmental Act and Regulations as Level 3
activities because of the size and complexity of their processes. Level 3 activities are subject to more rigorous regulation as they are
regarded as being more likely to create an adverse impact on the environment. Pursuant to the grandfathering provisions of the
Environmental Act and Regulations, both the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are able to continue to operate under their existing
environmental plans and permits.
regarded as being more likely to create an adverse impact on the environment. Pursuant to the grandfathering provisions of the
Environmental Act and Regulations, both the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are able to continue to operate under their existing
environmental plans and permits.
37
An environmental plan for the mining related activity at the Tolukuma Section was submitted to the Directorate Environment
and Conservation, or DEC, in Papua New Guinea, in November 1993 and was approved, subject to certain conditions, on May 24, 1994.
The three principal conditions are:
The three principal conditions are:
•
submission of an environmental management and monitoring program;
•
rehabilitation on a progressive basis throughout the life;
•
progress reports every six months; and
•
development of a final site rehabilitation plan and submission of the plan four years from the date of final plant commissioning.
Tolukuma submitted their environmental management and monitoring program in July 1994 and have adhered to its
requirements.
Similarly an environmental plan for mining related activity at Porgera was submitted in 1989 and was approved by the DEC.
A detailed review of the environmental issues and concerns for the Tolukuma and Porgera Sections are provided under Item 4D.:
“Property, Plant and Equipment – Description of Significant Subsidiaries, Properties and Mining Operations” under “Environmental and
Closure Aspects.”
Closure Aspects.”
Fiji
Environmental Regulation in Fiji
Managing the impact of mining on the environment is regulated by various statutes in Fiji, dealing with various mining and
mining-related activities and the effect that they may have upon the environment.
The Fijian Mining Act of 1978 regulates mining activities generally within Fiji. In particular:
•
the Director of Mines grants mining permits and leases under the Fijian Mining Act and has the power to attach conditions to
those permits or leases. Under certain provisions of the Fijian Mining Act, the Director of Mines has power to cancel a lease
or permit where the holder of that lease or permit has failed to comply with certain requirements of the Fijian Mining Act;
those permits or leases. Under certain provisions of the Fijian Mining Act, the Director of Mines has power to cancel a lease
or permit where the holder of that lease or permit has failed to comply with certain requirements of the Fijian Mining Act;
•
the Fijian Mining Act places an obligation on the owners of mining leases in Fiji to take all necessary actions to restore land
once mining operations cease. There is also a requirement under the Fijian Mining Act to pay compensation to land owners
for any damage to the surface of land caused by the mining operations; and
once mining operations cease. There is also a requirement under the Fijian Mining Act to pay compensation to land owners
for any damage to the surface of land caused by the mining operations; and
•
pollution of a watercourse is an offense under the Fijian Mining Act, although permits can be obtained to authorize the
deposit of sludge and tailings. The Fijian Mining Act requires all areas of subsidence to be clearly marked and fenced off
with warning signs posted. Failure to comply with these provisions is again an offense. The Fijian Mining Act also contains
provisions regulating the storage and protection of chemicals and poisons and accompanying washes and antidotes, dust
abatement requirements and the construction of dams.
deposit of sludge and tailings. The Fijian Mining Act requires all areas of subsidence to be clearly marked and fenced off
with warning signs posted. Failure to comply with these provisions is again an offense. The Fijian Mining Act also contains
provisions regulating the storage and protection of chemicals and poisons and accompanying washes and antidotes, dust
abatement requirements and the construction of dams.
The general penalty under the Fijian Mining Act, where the section does not impose a specific penalty, is a fine of 200 Fijian
Dollars or six months imprisonment or both.
In addition to the Fijian Mining Act, the Rivers and Streams Act creates temporary and special water rights. The Water
Supply Act imposes a penalty for polluting a water supply of F$100.
Health and safety legislation also imposes upon employers a duty to take all practicable measures to minimize the risk of
explosions and to render safe hazardous conditions and materials.
As mining and environmental protection legislation in Fiji is still in the early stages of development, penalties for breaching
the existing mining and environmental protection legislation are relatively small compared to international standards. However, the
Fijian Parliament is currently considering an Environment Management Bill introduced on July 28, 2004 which was ready for
enactment on March 17, 2005. When passed, this bill will introduce a number of environment protection measures, many of which
will impact the mining industry. The Bill contains provisions imposing liability upon directors for offenses committed by a company.
Fijian Parliament is currently considering an Environment Management Bill introduced on July 28, 2004 which was ready for
enactment on March 17, 2005. When passed, this bill will introduce a number of environment protection measures, many of which
will impact the mining industry. The Bill contains provisions imposing liability upon directors for offenses committed by a company.
38
4C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The following chart shows our percentage of ownership and voting rights in our principal subsidiaries, associate, joint venture
and investments as of June 30, 2005. All of our subsidiaries are incorporated in South Africa unless otherwise indicated. We hold the
majority of the investments directly or indirectly as indicated below. Refer to Exhibit 8.1 for a list of our directly held subsidiaries.
majority of the investments directly or indirectly as indicated below. Refer to Exhibit 8.1 for a list of our directly held subsidiaries.
South African Operations
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
40%
100%
Australasian Operations
100%
45.33%
4
100%
20%
100%
1
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited was placed into provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005.
2
All shafts at the Durban Deep Section have been closed.
3
The West Wits Section will be used going forward to extract and dispose of underground water.
4
The Company's investment in Emperor Mines Limited increased to 45.33% at July 30, 2004.
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company Limited
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited
1
Durban Deep Section
2
DRDGOLD Limited
West Witswatersrand Gold
Holdings Limited
Crown Consolidated Gold
Recoveries Limited
Buffels Section
Harties Section
Duff Scott Hospital (Pty)
Limited
West Witwatersrand Gold
Mines Limited
3
Crown Gold Recoveries
(Pty) Limited
East Rand Proprietary
Mines Limited
Blyvoor Section
North West Operations
West Wits Section
Crown Section
ERPM Section
Porgera Section
Tolukuma Section
Tolukuma Gold Mines Ltd
(Papua New Guinea)
DRD (Isle of Man) Limited
(Isle of Man)
Emperor Mines Limited
(Australia)
DRD (Porgera) Limited
(Papua New Guinea)
Vatukoula Mine (Fiji)
Porgera Joint Venture
(Papua New Guinea)
39
4D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following maps set out the location of our mines and projects in South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Fiji.
DRDGOLD’s Global Operations
South African Operations
40
Tolukuma and Porgera
Vatukoula Gold Mine
41
Description of Significant Subsidiaries, Properties and Mining Operations
South Africa
West Witwatersrand Basin Geology
The Blyvoor Operation is predominantly an underground operating mine located within a geographical region known as the
Witwatersrand Basin, exploiting gold bearing reefs in addition to certain surface sources. The Crown Section and the ERPM Section are
also located within the Witwatersrand Basin. The Crown Section exploits various surface sources, including sand and slime tailings
deposited as part of historical mining operations. The ERPM Section is predominantly an underground mining operation with a surface
operation for the processing of sand from the Cason Dump. Our underground operations are typical of the many gold mining operations
in the area which together have produced approximately 1.5 billion ounces of gold over a period of more than 100 years.
also located within the Witwatersrand Basin. The Crown Section exploits various surface sources, including sand and slime tailings
deposited as part of historical mining operations. The ERPM Section is predominantly an underground mining operation with a surface
operation for the processing of sand from the Cason Dump. Our underground operations are typical of the many gold mining operations
in the area which together have produced approximately 1.5 billion ounces of gold over a period of more than 100 years.
The Witwatersrand Basin comprises a 4 mile (6 kilometers) vertical thickness of sedimentary rocks situated within the Kaapvaal
Craton, extending laterally for approximately 186 miles (299 kilometers) east-northeast and 62 miles (100 kilometers) south-southeast.
The sedimentary rocks generally dip at shallow angles towards the center of the basin though locally this may vary. The Witwatersrand
Basin is Achaean in age and the sedimentary rocks are considered to be approximately 2.7 to 2.8 billion years old.
The sedimentary rocks generally dip at shallow angles towards the center of the basin though locally this may vary. The Witwatersrand
Basin is Achaean in age and the sedimentary rocks are considered to be approximately 2.7 to 2.8 billion years old.
Gold mineralization in the Witwatersrand Basin occurs within horizons termed reefs. These occur within seven separate
goldfields located along the eastern, northern and western margins of the basin. These goldfields are known as the Evander Goldfield, the
East Rand Goldfield, the West Rand Goldfield, the Far West Rand Goldfield, the Central Rand Goldfield, the Klerksdorp Goldfield and
the Free State Goldfield. As a result of faulting and other primary controls of mineralization, the goldfields are not continuous and are
characterized by the presence or dominance of different reef units. The reefs are generally less than 6 feet (2 meters) thick but in certain
instances, these deposits form stacked elastic wedges which are hundreds of feet thick.
East Rand Goldfield, the West Rand Goldfield, the Far West Rand Goldfield, the Central Rand Goldfield, the Klerksdorp Goldfield and
the Free State Goldfield. As a result of faulting and other primary controls of mineralization, the goldfields are not continuous and are
characterized by the presence or dominance of different reef units. The reefs are generally less than 6 feet (2 meters) thick but in certain
instances, these deposits form stacked elastic wedges which are hundreds of feet thick.
The gold generally occurs in native form within the various reefs, often associated with pyrite and carbon.
Blyvooruitzicht Mine
Overview
We own 100% of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, which in turn owns 100% of the Doornfontein Gold
Mining Company Limited. The consolidated mining operation, referred to as the Blyvoor Section, consists of the adjacent mines of
Blyvooruitzicht and Doornfontein which are located within the Far West Rand Goldfields on the northwestern edge of the Witwatersrand
Basin. Blyvoor was the first mine in the “West Wits” line. Together, these two operations have produced over 35 million ounces of gold
since inception. The net book value of the mining assets at the Blyvoor Section is $46.1 million at June 30, 2005, with 4.0 million ounces
of Ore Reserves.
Blyvooruitzicht and Doornfontein which are located within the Far West Rand Goldfields on the northwestern edge of the Witwatersrand
Basin. Blyvoor was the first mine in the “West Wits” line. Together, these two operations have produced over 35 million ounces of gold
since inception. The net book value of the mining assets at the Blyvoor Section is $46.1 million at June 30, 2005, with 4.0 million ounces
of Ore Reserves.
On June 28, 2004, we entered into a 60-day review period on the Blyvoor Section designed to restore the operations to
profitability. The 60-day review was extended to September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees had been retrenched at a cost
of $3.1 million, with possible future restructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances. In terms of the agreement,
organized labor recorded its commitment to certain production targets, and undertook not to disrupt production for at least six months for
reasons related to restructuring of the operations.
of $3.1 million, with possible future restructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances. In terms of the agreement,
organized labor recorded its commitment to certain production targets, and undertook not to disrupt production for at least six months for
reasons related to restructuring of the operations.
As of June 30, 2005, the mine has 3,445 employees, including contractors.
In August 2005, our Board approved a project to re-establish mining operations from the No. 2 Sub-Shaft in three phases at a
total capital cost of $12.0 million (R80.5 million). In total, the No. 2 Sub-Shaft Project, is expected to yield some 770,491 0z of gold
from 2.4 million tons of ore with an average delivered grade of 8.18 g/t, restoring Blyvoor’s life to 17 years. This project has been
designed in three phases. Phase 1 will include the opening up of and the gaining of access to the No. 2 Sub-shaft to a certain level.
Stoping operations will also commence then. The estimated completion deadline for Phase 1 is April 2006. Phase 2 includes the
commissioning of the winders and the re-equipping of the No. 2 Sub-shaft where we will also attempt to gain access to stoping areas
below the level established during Phase 1. The estimated completion date for Phase 2 is December 2006. Phase 3 will commence in
September 2006 and will be completed by September 2009. This phase will involve the opening up of all other levels for the shaft and
mining will begin by level as each level is opened up.
from 2.4 million tons of ore with an average delivered grade of 8.18 g/t, restoring Blyvoor’s life to 17 years. This project has been
designed in three phases. Phase 1 will include the opening up of and the gaining of access to the No. 2 Sub-shaft to a certain level.
Stoping operations will also commence then. The estimated completion deadline for Phase 1 is April 2006. Phase 2 includes the
commissioning of the winders and the re-equipping of the No. 2 Sub-shaft where we will also attempt to gain access to stoping areas
below the level established during Phase 1. The estimated completion date for Phase 2 is December 2006. Phase 3 will commence in
September 2006 and will be completed by September 2009. This phase will involve the opening up of all other levels for the shaft and
mining will begin by level as each level is opened up.
42
In August 2005, our Board also approved a $0.3 million (R2.3 million) expansion of the Slimes Dam Project which is scheduled
for completion by the end of December 2005. This expansion involves the installation of an additional pump and wider gauge pipes in
order to ease congestion and further improve plant efficiency, together with the implementation of a number of in-plant process upgrades
to ease maintenance demands. We estimate that this expansion will result in a 24% increase in volume, a 12% increase in gold
production, and a slight reduction in operating costs. The capital cost of the expansion was minimized by acquiring pipes, pumps and
valves second-hand from AngloGold Ashanti’s Ergo surface reclamation operation which closed earlier in the year.
order to ease congestion and further improve plant efficiency, together with the implementation of a number of in-plant process upgrades
to ease maintenance demands. We estimate that this expansion will result in a 24% increase in volume, a 12% increase in gold
production, and a slight reduction in operating costs. The capital cost of the expansion was minimized by acquiring pipes, pumps and
valves second-hand from AngloGold Ashanti’s Ergo surface reclamation operation which closed earlier in the year.
Property
The Blyvoor Section is located on the West Wits line within the Far West Rand Goldfields on the northwestern rim of the
Witwatersrand Basin, near the town of Carletonville, Gauteng Province, about 50.0 miles (80.5 kilometers) south-west of Johannesburg
and is reached via the R528 road to Carletonville on the N12 Johannesburg-Potchefstroom-Kimberly highway.
and is reached via the R528 road to Carletonville on the N12 Johannesburg-Potchefstroom-Kimberly highway.
The climate of the Highveld area (at an elevation of 5,249 feet (1,600 meters) above mean sea level), where the mine is
situated, is humid continental with warm summers and cold winters. Temperatures range from a minimum of 23 degrees Fahrenheit (-
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
The operating facilities are all situated on property belonging to the Blyvoor Section, and include the shaft complexes,
administrative offices for the managerial, administrative, financial and technical disciplines, workshops and consumable stores, the
metallurgical plants, tailings dams and waste rock dumps. Blyvoor also houses the majority of its employees in Blyvoor-owned houses on
the property and in the town of Carletonville. The normal support structures, including training, security, sport and recreational facilities,
schools and churches are situated on the property. Blyvoor has mining title to 16,242 acres (6,573 hectares) and owns 5,138 acres (2,079
hectares) of freehold property.
metallurgical plants, tailings dams and waste rock dumps. Blyvoor also houses the majority of its employees in Blyvoor-owned houses on
the property and in the town of Carletonville. The normal support structures, including training, security, sport and recreational facilities,
schools and churches are situated on the property. Blyvoor has mining title to 16,242 acres (6,573 hectares) and owns 5,138 acres (2,079
hectares) of freehold property.
The Blyvoor Section consists of one mining license, ML46/99, in respect of statutory mining rights and mineral rights held by
Blyvoor. We are in the process of converting these old order property rights to new order rights under the MPRD Act.
History
1937
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor, was incorporated and registered as a public company in South
Africa on June 10, 1937.
Africa on June 10, 1937.
1942
Gold production commenced.
1995
Blyvoor acquired the Doornfontein Gold Mining Company Limited in November 1995.
1996
Blyvoor acquired the mineral rights representing the Western Deep Levels tribute area.
1997
We acquired the entire share capital of Blyvoor on September 15, 1997.
2001
Implementation of the Blyvoor expansion project.
2003
Commissioning of 4 and 5 Slimes Dam retreatment facility at a cost of $6.5 million.
2004
On June 28, 2004, we entered into a 60-day review period on the Blyvoor Section. The 60-day review was extended to
September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004 1,619 employees had been retrenched at a cost of approximately $3.1 million, with
possible future restructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances.
September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004 1,619 employees had been retrenched at a cost of approximately $3.1 million, with
possible future restructuring initiatives depending on the economic circumstances.
2005
In August 2005, our Board of Directors approved No. 2 Sub-Shaft Project and the Slimes Dam Project to establish mining
operations from the No. 2 Shaft and expansion to further improve plant efficiency respectively.
On July 6, 2005 we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with KBH regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in
our South African Operations.
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the transaction with KBH. The new structure results in KBH acquiring a
15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which
includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
operations from the No. 2 Shaft and expansion to further improve plant efficiency respectively.
On July 6, 2005 we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with KBH regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in
our South African Operations.
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the transaction with KBH. The new structure results in KBH acquiring a
15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which
includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
Geology and Mineralization
The Blyvoor Section exploits the two gold-bearing pebble horizons in the Central Rand Goldfields, the Carbon Leader, which
is one of the principal ore bodies in the goldfield, and the Middelvlei Reef horizons which occur in discrete channels over parts of the
lease area approximately 246 feet (75.0 meters) vertically above the Carbon Leader Reef horizon. The Carbon Leader Reef is the
principal economic horizon across the lease area and is a planar single sheet conglomerate. The Carbon Leader Reef typically
comprises basal carbon seam, overlain by a thin, small pebble conglomerate, enriched in carbon in the lower portion. The grade of the
Carbon Leader Reef is more variable than the Middelvlei Reef. The Middelvlei Reef consists of a variable number of polymictic
quartz conglomerate bands, interbedded with coarse grain quartzite. The grade of the Middelvlei Reef is more erratic than the Carbon
Leader Reef, with distinctive payshoots forming as southward-orientated linear zones.
lease area approximately 246 feet (75.0 meters) vertically above the Carbon Leader Reef horizon. The Carbon Leader Reef is the
principal economic horizon across the lease area and is a planar single sheet conglomerate. The Carbon Leader Reef typically
comprises basal carbon seam, overlain by a thin, small pebble conglomerate, enriched in carbon in the lower portion. The grade of the
Carbon Leader Reef is more variable than the Middelvlei Reef. The Middelvlei Reef consists of a variable number of polymictic
quartz conglomerate bands, interbedded with coarse grain quartzite. The grade of the Middelvlei Reef is more erratic than the Carbon
Leader Reef, with distinctive payshoots forming as southward-orientated linear zones.
43
The Blyvoor Section was established in 1937 to exploit the rich Carbon Leader Reef but by the late 1980s had reached a position
where continued existence of mining operations was dependent upon the mining of scattered Carbon Leader Reef remnants and limited
sections of the lower grade Middelvlei Reef.
sections of the lower grade Middelvlei Reef.
Mining and processing
Access from the surface to the current underground workings of the mines is through a system of vertical and incline shafts
situated at the Blyvoor and Doornfontein mines. Doornfontein was previously a separate mine adjacent to the Blyvoor mine but has since
been merged to form the Blyvoor Section. The shaft system consists of four vertical shafts from the surface, thirteen sub-incline shafts
and two sub-vertical shafts underground. Of these thirteen incline shafts, only nine are in operation and are used for the conveyance of
personnel, pumping and hoisting of mined ore and waste.
been merged to form the Blyvoor Section. The shaft system consists of four vertical shafts from the surface, thirteen sub-incline shafts
and two sub-vertical shafts underground. Of these thirteen incline shafts, only nine are in operation and are used for the conveyance of
personnel, pumping and hoisting of mined ore and waste.
Two levels have been holed between the previous Doornfontein mine and workings within the Blyvoor lease extension
(purchased in 1996 from Western Deep Levels Limited) to allow ore from the bottom of the Blyvoor workings to be trammed across and
hoisted up via the Blyvoor No. 5 Shaft, from where, it is trucked to the gold plant. The average mining depth at the Blyvoor Section is
10,541 feet (3,213 meters), 5,292 feet (1,613 meters) below mean sea level.
hoisted up via the Blyvoor No. 5 Shaft, from where, it is trucked to the gold plant. The average mining depth at the Blyvoor Section is
10,541 feet (3,213 meters), 5,292 feet (1,613 meters) below mean sea level.
Mining of the reef takes place in stope panels. Holes are drilled into the solid rock and are charged with explosives and blasted.
The loosened rock is removed from the stope panels and is conveyed to the shaft, tipped into the ore-pass systems, hoisted to the surface
and transported to the metallurgical plant for gold extraction.
and transported to the metallurgical plant for gold extraction.
Metallurgical processing facilities at the Blyvoor Section are comprised of a single metallurgical plant. The process route is
based on a conventional flowsheet comprising multi-stage crushing, open circuit primary and closed circuit secondary milling with
hydrocyclones, thickening and cyanide leaching in a Carbon-in-Pulp, or CIP, carousel arrangement. The gold is recovered through
electrowinning followed by smelting to doré. The circuit was recently modified by the closure of the filtration system and the
commissioning of a modern carbon Kemix pumpcell plant.
hydrocyclones, thickening and cyanide leaching in a Carbon-in-Pulp, or CIP, carousel arrangement. The gold is recovered through
electrowinning followed by smelting to doré. The circuit was recently modified by the closure of the filtration system and the
commissioning of a modern carbon Kemix pumpcell plant.
In April 2001, we launched the Blyvoor expansion project. The project, valued at R65.0 million ($10.4 million), was funded
from the Industrial Development Corporation, or IDC, loan granted to Blyvoor, for this purpose. This project was to facilitate the
commissioning of additional infrastructure and the opening up of additional mining areas to further enable the effective mining of
reserves at the Blyvoor Section.
commissioning of additional infrastructure and the opening up of additional mining areas to further enable the effective mining of
reserves at the Blyvoor Section.
In fiscal 2003, the Blyvoor Section processed an average of approximately 70,000 tpm of ore from the underground section and
135,000 tpm from surface rock dumps. With the depletion of the surface rock dumps, only remnant amounts are available for processing.
Processing of material from the No. 4 and 5 slimes dam project, which was commissioned in December 2003, is building up to the
planned processing capacity of 240,000 tpm and will replace the processing of the surface rock dump material which has been depleted.
Initial processing of material took place from the 4 Slimes Dam and the recovery grades were below expectation. From August 2004, the
processing of material from the 5 Slimes Dam commenced and the recovery grade improved. With the conclusion of the 60-day review
entered into on June 28, 2004, certain shafts were placed on a “care and maintenance” program, resulting in a decrease to a total of seven
vertical and decline shafts.
Processing of material from the No. 4 and 5 slimes dam project, which was commissioned in December 2003, is building up to the
planned processing capacity of 240,000 tpm and will replace the processing of the surface rock dump material which has been depleted.
Initial processing of material took place from the 4 Slimes Dam and the recovery grades were below expectation. From August 2004, the
processing of material from the 5 Slimes Dam commenced and the recovery grade improved. With the conclusion of the 60-day review
entered into on June 28, 2004, certain shafts were placed on a “care and maintenance” program, resulting in a decrease to a total of seven
vertical and decline shafts.
In fiscal 2005, mining of the lower grade Middelvlei Reef at No. 6 Shaft was cut by 50% in favor of increased mining of the
higher grade Carbon Leader Reef at No. 5 Shaft. Accelerated development, however, has ensured that the mine is well positioned to
restore Main Reef mining to appropriate levels at No. 5 and No. 6 Shafts in response to gold price fluctuations.
restore Main Reef mining to appropriate levels at No. 5 and No. 6 Shafts in response to gold price fluctuations.
Electricity for South Africa is provided by Eskom, which is government owned. Eskom is the largest producer of electricity in
Africa. Eskom operates a national power supply grid consisting of 24 power stations across the country. Electricity to the Blyvoor Section
is provided from the Wes Wits substation outside Carletonville at 44,000 volts. Further substations, located on mine site, transform the
power to 6,600 volts or 22,000 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The power supply is further reduced to 525
volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power consumption is about 432 GWHr and the maximum
demand is about 66 MW.
is provided from the Wes Wits substation outside Carletonville at 44,000 volts. Further substations, located on mine site, transform the
power to 6,600 volts or 22,000 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The power supply is further reduced to 525
volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power consumption is about 432 GWHr and the maximum
demand is about 66 MW.
Several major capital expansion projects were conducted over the period fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2005, including processing and
extension of Slimes Dams 4, 5 and 6 ($7.6 million), underground expansion projects ($2.5 million) and a water project ($0.4 million). In
addition, approximately $0.4 million was spent on the installation of a Knelsen concentrator and Acacia reactor and $0.3 million on an
Overland conveyor.
addition, approximately $0.4 million was spent on the installation of a Knelsen concentrator and Acacia reactor and $0.3 million on an
Overland conveyor.
44
Exploration and Development
At the beginning of fiscal 2003, the Blyvoor Section began a feasibility study looking at the opportunity to re-mine and treat the
slimes dam material from the 4 and 5 Slimes Dam Project. The project was commissioned during November 2003 and completed at a cost
of $6.9 million including the conversion of leaching tanks, linear screens, pipes and site construction. The No. 6 Slimes Dam has been
extended to provide additional capacity for the tailings from this project at a cost of $0.7 million. The project involves the reclamation of
approximately 24 million tonnes of slime material at a rate of 240,000 tpm by high water monitoring and processed through a CIP circuit.
The project has an estimated life of 8 years and an average recovery grade of 0.02 ounces per ton at a cash cost of $200 per ounce of gold
produced. The project costs were funded from the R65.0 million ($10.4 million) loan facility from the IDC.
of $6.9 million including the conversion of leaching tanks, linear screens, pipes and site construction. The No. 6 Slimes Dam has been
extended to provide additional capacity for the tailings from this project at a cost of $0.7 million. The project involves the reclamation of
approximately 24 million tonnes of slime material at a rate of 240,000 tpm by high water monitoring and processed through a CIP circuit.
The project has an estimated life of 8 years and an average recovery grade of 0.02 ounces per ton at a cash cost of $200 per ounce of gold
produced. The project costs were funded from the R65.0 million ($10.4 million) loan facility from the IDC.
Environmental and closure aspects
The predominantly dolomitic geology of the area in and around the Blyvoor Section, and the resultant occasional occurrence of
sinkholes and subsidences, exposes the Blyvoor Section to relatively unique environmental risks and costs associated with the
remediation and filling of these sinkholes.
remediation and filling of these sinkholes.
Blyvoor has to maintain a rate of pumping of fissure water sufficient to keep the rate of rise of underground water below the
level of underground workings. The required rate is in the order of 4 million gallons (14 million liters) per day. Water not used in the
operations is discharged into the Wonderfonteinspruit and the Doorndraai Dam. In order to address the risk of contamination of ground
water, streams and wetlands, water is sampled and the level of contaminants monitored in accordance with Blyvoor’s water management
plan. Fissure water at Blyvoor is generally of a good quality, therefore we believe that the contribution of this water to pollution of water
in the area is minimal.
operations is discharged into the Wonderfonteinspruit and the Doorndraai Dam. In order to address the risk of contamination of ground
water, streams and wetlands, water is sampled and the level of contaminants monitored in accordance with Blyvoor’s water management
plan. Fissure water at Blyvoor is generally of a good quality, therefore we believe that the contribution of this water to pollution of water
in the area is minimal.
We have not conducted an assessment of the full scope of pollution to surface water as a result of the discharge from the Blyvoor
Section. This is because the impact of our discharge cannot be addressed without addressing the impact from the discharge of other
neighboring mining operations. The Far West Rand Dolomitic Water Association, of which all mining operations in the area are
members, has undertaken two studies. Apportioned responsibility has been recognized by the DWAF and they have initiated an impact
assessment on the Wonderfonteinspruit in order to assess the cumulative impact from the different mining operations. The first study,
commissioned and completed in January 2003, addressed the methodologies proposed for filling in sinkholes and subsidences. The
second study will address the impact of the flooding on the dolomitic aquifers when mining in the area ceases. This study has been
commissioned and is scheduled to be completed by the end of calendar 2005.
neighboring mining operations. The Far West Rand Dolomitic Water Association, of which all mining operations in the area are
members, has undertaken two studies. Apportioned responsibility has been recognized by the DWAF and they have initiated an impact
assessment on the Wonderfonteinspruit in order to assess the cumulative impact from the different mining operations. The first study,
commissioned and completed in January 2003, addressed the methodologies proposed for filling in sinkholes and subsidences. The
second study will address the impact of the flooding on the dolomitic aquifers when mining in the area ceases. This study has been
commissioned and is scheduled to be completed by the end of calendar 2005.
Sinkholes are caused by ground water seeping into the underground dolomitic structures, which dissolve and weaken causing a
collapse in the rock structure. Dolomitic rock could be dissolved, resulting in an increased risk of sinkholes and possible pollution of fresh
water resources stored in the dolomitic formations. The seepage may also cause pollution of fresh water resources stored in dolomitic
formations, which if pumped to surface will result in pollution on the surface. The occurrence of sinkholes is limited to a particular area of
the Blyvoor Section, which requires an active program in the water management plan to continuously divert ground water away from the
affected area and reduce the risk of seepage into the dolomitic structure. Should the pumping apparatus fail and there is an excessive build
up of surface water, this could over a period of time result in a weakening of the underlying dolomitic structure and the occurrence of a
sinkhole in that area. In addition to purifying the water for our own use, we repair all sinkh oles that form on our property, in accordance
with industry and government standards. Sinkholes which form outside of our property are repaired by the Far West Rand Dolomitic
Water Association.
water resources stored in the dolomitic formations. The seepage may also cause pollution of fresh water resources stored in dolomitic
formations, which if pumped to surface will result in pollution on the surface. The occurrence of sinkholes is limited to a particular area of
the Blyvoor Section, which requires an active program in the water management plan to continuously divert ground water away from the
affected area and reduce the risk of seepage into the dolomitic structure. Should the pumping apparatus fail and there is an excessive build
up of surface water, this could over a period of time result in a weakening of the underlying dolomitic structure and the occurrence of a
sinkhole in that area. In addition to purifying the water for our own use, we repair all sinkh oles that form on our property, in accordance
with industry and government standards. Sinkholes which form outside of our property are repaired by the Far West Rand Dolomitic
Water Association.
Pollution from slime dams is controlled by dust suppression and water management programs. Short-term dust control is
accomplished through ridge ploughing the top surface of dormant tailings dams. Environmentally friendly dust suppressants, such as
molasses, are also applied when deemed necessary. In the long-term, dust suppression and water pollution is managed through a program
of progressive vegetation of the tailings complexes followed by the application of lime, to neutralize the natural acidic conditions, and
fertilizer as the organic growth medium.
molasses, are also applied when deemed necessary. In the long-term, dust suppression and water pollution is managed through a program
of progressive vegetation of the tailings complexes followed by the application of lime, to neutralize the natural acidic conditions, and
fertilizer as the organic growth medium.
During 2004, Blyvoor implemented a new tailings reclamation project, as a result of which amendments to Blyvoor's EMP
were made by the relevant regulator. The environmental management program identified the impacts associated with the reclamation
of the dams and the extension of the No. 6 return water dam and identified remedial measures to minimize the risk. The DWAF visited
the site in August 2004 and was satisfied with our environmental performance.
of the dams and the extension of the No. 6 return water dam and identified remedial measures to minimize the risk. The DWAF visited
the site in August 2004 and was satisfied with our environmental performance.
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that the total cost
for the Blyvoor Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $8.2 million. This has been included in the provision for
environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $2.5 million has been contributed to a
Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are appointed
as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $2.5 million has been contributed to a
Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are appointed
as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
45
Life of Mine
Based upon a gold price of approximately R88,960 per kilogram ($381 per ounce), at June 30, 2005, the Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves of the Blyvoor Section were 4.0 million ounces. In fiscal 2004, based upon a gold price of approximately R90,023 per
kilogram at June 30, 2004, the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Blyvoor Section were 4.3 million ounces. The decrease of 0.3
million ounces is due to mining depletion and an increase in working costs. The increase in the working costs resulted in a larger
percentage of marginal ore being included in the Life of Mine Plan and hence Ore Reserve Statement. A Mineral Resource competent
person is appointed at each operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For Blyvoor, David Edwin James Whittaker
(SACNASP) is the appointed Mineral Resource competent person.
kilogram at June 30, 2004, the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Blyvoor Section were 4.3 million ounces. The decrease of 0.3
million ounces is due to mining depletion and an increase in working costs. The increase in the working costs resulted in a larger
percentage of marginal ore being included in the Life of Mine Plan and hence Ore Reserve Statement. A Mineral Resource competent
person is appointed at each operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For Blyvoor, David Edwin James Whittaker
(SACNASP) is the appointed Mineral Resource competent person.
In light of the No. 2 Shaft project which is expected to yield 770,491 ounces of gold from 2.4 million tons of ore, we are
reassessing the life-of-mine to 17 years, as at June 30, 2005.
Current year production
The Blyvoor Section produced a total of 161,878 ounces of gold in fiscal 2005, with 137,958 ounces from underground areas
and 23,920 ounces from surface areas. This represents 37% of our production from continuing operations of 433,586 ounces based on our
subsidiaries and our attributable 20% interest in Porgera. In fiscal 2004, a total of 233,094 ounces of gold were produced compared to
247,626 ounces in fiscal 2003.
subsidiaries and our attributable 20% interest in Porgera. In fiscal 2004, a total of 233,094 ounces of gold were produced compared to
247,626 ounces in fiscal 2003.
Underground gold production has decreased from 198,211 ounces in fiscal 2004 to 137,958 ounces in fiscal 2005. No shafts
were closed but non-contributing business units such as No. 4 Shaft were placed on care and maintenance. Additionally, mining of the
lower grade Main Reef at No. 6 shaft was cut by 50% in favor of increased mining of the higher grade Carbon Leader Reef at No. 5 Shaft.
Surface gold production decreased from 34,883 ounces in fiscal 2004 to 23,920 ounces in fiscal 2005 due to the depletion of the surface
rock dump material.
lower grade Main Reef at No. 6 shaft was cut by 50% in favor of increased mining of the higher grade Carbon Leader Reef at No. 5 Shaft.
Surface gold production decreased from 34,883 ounces in fiscal 2004 to 23,920 ounces in fiscal 2005 due to the depletion of the surface
rock dump material.
Blyvoor ended fiscal 2004 facing considerable restructuring necessitated by the combined effect of a range of issues – the low
Rand gold price, price increases in key consumables, operational difficulties, increased lock-up in the plant due to the ending of surface
rock dump feed to the mill and poor initial recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project. As a result of operational difficulties, we also
announced a 60-day review of the operations on July 28, 2004 in order to restore profitability.
rock dump feed to the mill and poor initial recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project. As a result of operational difficulties, we also
announced a 60-day review of the operations on July 28, 2004 in order to restore profitability.
By the end of fiscal 2005, a significant turnaround had been achieved. While gold production from underground continuing
operations declined by approximately 30% to 137,958 ounces year on year, productivity improved by 32% to 125 grams per total
employee costed. Cash costs of $456 per ounce in fiscal 2005 increased from $388 per ounce in fiscal 2004. Total costs for fiscal 2005 of
$498 per ounce in the current year also shows an increase compared to $427 per ounce in fiscal 2004. While the cash operating target of
$400 per ounce remained elusive, it moved within striking distance during the second half of fiscal 2005 at $407 per ounce. This
compares with $498 per ounce in the first half. A Knelsen concentrator and Acacia reactor were installed at a cost of $0.4 million (R2.5
million) in order to prevent lock-ups, improve recoveries by lowering residue grades and reducing costs. While the full benefits have yet
to be realized, performance during commissioning has been very promising.
employee costed. Cash costs of $456 per ounce in fiscal 2005 increased from $388 per ounce in fiscal 2004. Total costs for fiscal 2005 of
$498 per ounce in the current year also shows an increase compared to $427 per ounce in fiscal 2004. While the cash operating target of
$400 per ounce remained elusive, it moved within striking distance during the second half of fiscal 2005 at $407 per ounce. This
compares with $498 per ounce in the first half. A Knelsen concentrator and Acacia reactor were installed at a cost of $0.4 million (R2.5
million) in order to prevent lock-ups, improve recoveries by lowering residue grades and reducing costs. While the full benefits have yet
to be realized, performance during commissioning has been very promising.
46
Cash costs from production were $388 per ounce for fiscal 2004 as a result of the strengthening of the Rand from R7.47 = $1.00
at June 30, 2003 to R6.28 = $1.00 at June 30, 2004. Total costs per ounce of gold produced increased to $427 per ounce in fiscal 2004
from $110 per ounce in fiscal 2003 primarily attributable to operational difficulties and a decrease in the recovered grade.
The following table details the operating and production results from the Blyvoor Section for the past three fiscal years.
from $110 per ounce in fiscal 2003 primarily attributable to operational difficulties and a decrease in the recovered grade.
The following table details the operating and production results from the Blyvoor Section for the past three fiscal years.
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Production
- Surface Operations
- Surface Operations
Ore mined ('000 tons) .................................................................................................................
3,233
2,522
1,838
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ...........................................................................................................
0.007
0.014
0.024
Gold produced (ounces) .............................................................................................................
23,920
34,883
44,626
- Underground Operations
Ore mined ('000 tons) .................................................................................................................
649
916
970
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ...........................................................................................................
0.213
0.216
0.210
Gold produced (ounces) .............................................................................................................
137,958
198,211
203,000
Total ounces produced...................................................................................................................
161,878
233,094
247,626
Results of Operations ($)
Revenues ('000) .............................................................................................................................
Revenues ('000) .............................................................................................................................
68,370
90,066
81,753
Production cost ('000)....................................................................................................................
73,814
90,366
65,240
Non-US GAAP Financial Data
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
...................................................................................................
456
388
263
Total cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
...................................................................................................
498
427
110
1
Cash cost per ounce and total cost per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures of performance that we use to determine cash generating
capacities of the mines and to monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
47
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited (CGR)
Overview
We own 100% of Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, or CCGR, which in turn owns 40% of Crown Gold Recoveries
(Pty) Limited, or CGR. CCGR was incorporated in South Africa on May 23, 1997. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, we acquired
100% of CCGR on September 14, 1998. Additionally, in October 2002, we entered into an agreement with third parties to purchase the
entire issued share capital and all shareholders’ claims of East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for a purchase price of $11.0
million. For a full description of the transactions associated with our acquisition of CGR, see Item 4A: “History and Development of the
Company.”
100% of CCGR on September 14, 1998. Additionally, in October 2002, we entered into an agreement with third parties to purchase the
entire issued share capital and all shareholders’ claims of East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for a purchase price of $11.0
million. For a full description of the transactions associated with our acquisition of CGR, see Item 4A: “History and Development of the
Company.”
CGR has a surface retreatment operation consisting of the Crown Central, City Deep and Knights business units, collectively
referred to as the Crown Section. The ERPM Section consists of an underground section and the Cason Dump surface retreatment
operation. The underground mining operation at ERPM implemented a controlled closure program and was scheduled to close in
March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine has achieved
a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the underground section was
postponed. The Cason Dump surface re-treatment operation will continue to operate until 2010 under the management of the Crown
Section based on the current rate of production of approximately 150,000 tpm. The Crown Section undertakes the retreatment of surface
sources deposited as tailing from non-operating mining sites across central Johannesburg.
operation. The underground mining operation at ERPM implemented a controlled closure program and was scheduled to close in
March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million (R3.7 million), the mine has achieved
a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the underground section was
postponed. The Cason Dump surface re-treatment operation will continue to operate until 2010 under the management of the Crown
Section based on the current rate of production of approximately 150,000 tpm. The Crown Section undertakes the retreatment of surface
sources deposited as tailing from non-operating mining sites across central Johannesburg.
We have accounted for our 40% interest in CGR under the equity method commencing July 1, 2002. We have recognized losses
generated by CGR and its subsidiaries against any advances we have made to them.
At June 30, 2005, CGR had 925 employees, including a small number of contractors, and ERPM had 2,020 employees,
including a small number of contractors.
The ability of CGR and ERPM to continue as a going concern conducting business depends on the support of their stockholders,
secured lenders and creditors.
Current year production
The following table details our 40% attributable share of the production results from the Crown and ERPM Sections for the past
three fiscal years:
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Production
Surface and underground operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)............................................................................................................................
Ore mined ('000 tons)............................................................................................................................
4,902
4,772
4,884
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ......................................................................................................................
0.018
0.020
0.016
Gold produced (ounces) ........................................................................................................................
90,024
96,878
77,239
Our 40% share of gold production for CGR, including the Crown Section and ERPM Section, was 90,024 ounces in fiscal 2005
compared to 96,878 ounces in fiscal 2004, and 77,239 ounces for fiscal 2003. The decrease in fiscal 2005 is due to a decrease in the
recovered grade from 0.020 ounces per ton in fiscal 2004 to 0.018 ounces per ton in fiscal 2005.
recovered grade from 0.020 ounces per ton in fiscal 2004 to 0.018 ounces per ton in fiscal 2005.
Our 40% share of gold production from the Crown Section was 45,424 ounces in fiscal 2005, which was lower than our 40%
share of gold production of 51,982 ounces in fiscal 2004. The decrease is due to less reclamation site flexibility and pipeline failures.
Our 40% share of gold production from the ERPM Section was 44,600 ounces in fiscal 2005, which was comparable to our 40%
share of gold production of 44,895 ounces in fiscal 2004. ERPM’s consistent performance, in comparison to prior year, is largely due to
the Knights plant’s absorption of tonnage from ERPM’s Cason surface retreatment operation, which has run smoothly throughout the
current fiscal year.
the Knights plant’s absorption of tonnage from ERPM’s Cason surface retreatment operation, which has run smoothly throughout the
current fiscal year.
Separate consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for CGR for its fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are being
filed pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
filed pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
48
A discussion follows of the Crown and ERPM Sections:
Crown Section
Property
The Crown Section is situated on the outskirts of Johannesburg, South Africa and consists of three separate locations. It has
mining rights to 5,787 acres (2,342 hectares) and has the right to occupy 1,490 acres (603 hectares) of freehold property. CGR is in the
process of converting these old order property rights to new order rights under the MPRD Act.
process of converting these old order property rights to new order rights under the MPRD Act.
The Crown Central operation is located on the West Wits line within the Central Goldfields of the Witwatersrand Basin,
approximately 6 miles (10 kilometers) west of the Johannesburg central business district in the province of Gauteng. Access is via Xavier
Road on the M1 Johannesburg-Kimberley-Bloemfontein highway. The City Deep operation is located on the West Wits line within the
Central Goldfields of the Witwatersrand Basin, approximately 3 miles (5 kilometers) south-east of the Johannesburg central business
district in the province of Gauteng. Access is via the Heidelberg Road on the M2 Johannesburg-Germiston motorway. The Knights
operation is located at Stanley and Knights Road Germiston off the R29 Main Reef Road.
Road on the M1 Johannesburg-Kimberley-Bloemfontein highway. The City Deep operation is located on the West Wits line within the
Central Goldfields of the Witwatersrand Basin, approximately 3 miles (5 kilometers) south-east of the Johannesburg central business
district in the province of Gauteng. Access is via the Heidelberg Road on the M2 Johannesburg-Germiston motorway. The Knights
operation is located at Stanley and Knights Road Germiston off the R29 Main Reef Road.
As of June 30, 2005, the net book value of Crown’s mining assets was approximately $8.5 million.
History
1979
Rand Mines Limited directors approved the formation of the company Rand Mines Milling & Mining Limited (RM3) to
treat the surface gold tailings created from the underground section of the original Crown Mines, which had been in
operation since the start of gold mining on the Witwatersrand in the late 1800's.
treat the surface gold tailings created from the underground section of the original Crown Mines, which had been in
operation since the start of gold mining on the Witwatersrand in the late 1800's.
1982
First plant commissioned at Crown Mines to process surface material.
1986
Second plant commissioned at City Deep to process surface material.
1997
Randgold Exploration Limited and Continental Goldfields of Australia entered into a joint venture with the intention to
establish a company that would acquire dump retreatment operations on the Witwatersrand. This resulted in the
establish a company that would acquire dump retreatment operations on the Witwatersrand. This resulted in the
formation of CCGR, which was incorporated as a public company in South Africa in May 1997. CGR is a wholly owned
subsidiary of CCGR and consists of the surface retreatment operations of Crown Central, City Deep and Knights.
subsidiary of CCGR and consists of the surface retreatment operations of Crown Central, City Deep and Knights.
1998
We purchased 100% of CCGR.
2002
KBH purchased 60% of CGR. We were appointed as joint manager of the operation with KBH.
2005
On July 6, 2005 we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with KBH regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15%
stake in our South African Operations.
stake in our South African Operations.
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the transaction with KBH. The new structure results in KBH
acquiring a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD
SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
acquiring a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD
SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
Mining and processing
The Crown Section undertakes the re-treatment of surface sources deposited as tailings from non-operational mining sites
across central Johannesburg.
Material processed by the Crown Section is sourced from numerous secondary surface sources namely, sand and slime. The
surface sources have generally undergone a complex depositional history resulting in grade variations associated with improvements
in plant recovery over the period of time the material was deposited. Archive material is a secondary source of gold bearing material.
This material is generally made up of old gold metallurgical plant sites as well as “river bed” material.
in plant recovery over the period of time the material was deposited. Archive material is a secondary source of gold bearing material.
This material is generally made up of old gold metallurgical plant sites as well as “river bed” material.
The three metallurgical plants, known as the Crown Mines, City Deep and Knights, have an installed capacity to treat
approximately 11.0 million tons of material per year. Up to fiscal 2003, the Crown Section also operated the West Wits gold plant for
the processing of sand and slime. The Crown Section also includes the ERPM plant discussed below. All of the plants have undergone
various modifications during recent years resulting in significant changes to the processing circuits.
the processing of sand and slime. The Crown Section also includes the ERPM plant discussed below. All of the plants have undergone
various modifications during recent years resulting in significant changes to the processing circuits.
49
Electricity for South Africa is provided by Eskom, which is government owned. Eskom is the largest producer of electricity
in Africa. Eskom operates a national power supply grid consisting of 24 power stations across the country. Electricity to the Crown
Section is supplied to the Crown Central and City Deep business units from separate substations referred to as Jupiter and No. 15
Shaft Crown Mines, and for the Knights by the Ekhurhuleni Town Council. Electricity is supplied directly from the national power
grid to the substation and town council at 44,000 volts. Substations, located on mine sites, transform the power to 6,600 volts for
direct supply to the plants. The power supply is further reduced to 525 volts for smaller devices and equipment.
Section is supplied to the Crown Central and City Deep business units from separate substations referred to as Jupiter and No. 15
Shaft Crown Mines, and for the Knights by the Ekhurhuleni Town Council. Electricity is supplied directly from the national power
grid to the substation and town council at 44,000 volts. Substations, located on mine sites, transform the power to 6,600 volts for
direct supply to the plants. The power supply is further reduced to 525 volts for smaller devices and equipment.
For Crown Central and City Deep, the average annual power consumption is about 72 GWHr and the maximum demand is
about 3.7 MW. For Knights the average annual power consumption is about 36 GWHr and the maximum demand is about 1.8 MW.
CGR operates three plants with slight variations in design in each plant, with a processing capacity of approximately 1
million tpm, yielding approximately 0.01 oz/t (0.4 g/t). The feed stock is made up of sand and slime which are reclaimed separately.
Sand is reclaimed using mechanical front-end loaders, re-pulped with water and pumped to the plant. Slime is reclaimed using high
pressure water monitoring guns. The re-pulped slime is pumped to the plant and the reclaimed material is treated using screens,
cyclones, ball mills and CIL technology to extract the gold. As at June 30, 2005, the overall plant utilization was 95%.
Sand is reclaimed using mechanical front-end loaders, re-pulped with water and pumped to the plant. Slime is reclaimed using high
pressure water monitoring guns. The re-pulped slime is pumped to the plant and the reclaimed material is treated using screens,
cyclones, ball mills and CIL technology to extract the gold. As at June 30, 2005, the overall plant utilization was 95%.
City Deep Plant: Commissioned in 1987, this surface/underground plant is comprised of a circuit including screening, primary,
secondary and tertiary cycloning in closed circuit milling, thickening, oxygen preconditioning, CIL, elution and zinc precipitation
followed by calcining and smelting to doré. In 1998, the plant was converted to a slimes only operation. However, due to operational
difficulties caused by the particulate nature of the slimes, the milling circuit has subsequently been recommissioned to facilitate the
treatment of sand.
followed by calcining and smelting to doré. In 1998, the plant was converted to a slimes only operation. However, due to operational
difficulties caused by the particulate nature of the slimes, the milling circuit has subsequently been recommissioned to facilitate the
treatment of sand.
Crown Mines Plant: Commissioned in 1982, this surface/underground plant has already been modified and is comprised of a
circuit including screening, primary cycloning, open circuit milling, thickening, oxygen preconditioning, CIP and CIL, elution, zinc
precipitation followed by calcining and smelting to doré.
precipitation followed by calcining and smelting to doré.
Knights Plant: Commissioned in 1988, this surface/underground plant is comprised of a circuit including screening, primary
cycloning, spiral pre-concentration, milling in closed circuit with hydrocyclones, thickening, oxygen preconditioning, CIL, elution,
electrowinning and smelting to doré.
electrowinning and smelting to doré.
Exploration and development
Exploration and development activity at the Crown Section involves the drilling of existing surface dumps and evaluating the
potential gold bearing surface material owned by third parties that could be processed on a full treatment basis or purchased outright by
the Crown Section.
the Crown Section.
Environmental and closure aspects
The Crown Section operates at sites located in close proximity to significant municipal infrastructure, commercial and
residential development. The major environmental risks are associated with dust from various recovery sites, and effective management
of relocated process material on certain tailings dams. Capital expenditure of $1.5 million (R9.6 million) was spent in fiscal 2005, most of
which was directed to upgrading and maintenance of the CGR tailings dams. The impact of windblown dust on the surrounding
environment and community is addressed through a scientific monitoring and evaluation process, with active input from the University of
Witwatersrand and appropriate community involvement. Environmental management programs, addressing a wide range of
environmental issues, have been prepared by specialist environmental consultants and applied specifically to each dust sample recovery
monitoring site and integrated into CGR’s internal environmental assessment process. Although CGR completed a project for thickening
r e-processed tailings, there also remains a risk of localized sloughing which can result in that section of the tailings dam being closed
temporarily, with repair work being done to the dam wall. Water pollution is controlled by means of a comprehensive system of return
water dams which allow for used water to be recycled for use in CGR’s metallurgical plant. Overflows of return water dams may,
depending on their location, pollute surrounding streams and wetlands. CGR has an ongoing monitoring program to ensure that its water
balances (in its reticulation system, tailings and return water dams) are maintained at levels that are sensitive to that capacity of return
water dams.
of relocated process material on certain tailings dams. Capital expenditure of $1.5 million (R9.6 million) was spent in fiscal 2005, most of
which was directed to upgrading and maintenance of the CGR tailings dams. The impact of windblown dust on the surrounding
environment and community is addressed through a scientific monitoring and evaluation process, with active input from the University of
Witwatersrand and appropriate community involvement. Environmental management programs, addressing a wide range of
environmental issues, have been prepared by specialist environmental consultants and applied specifically to each dust sample recovery
monitoring site and integrated into CGR’s internal environmental assessment process. Although CGR completed a project for thickening
r e-processed tailings, there also remains a risk of localized sloughing which can result in that section of the tailings dam being closed
temporarily, with repair work being done to the dam wall. Water pollution is controlled by means of a comprehensive system of return
water dams which allow for used water to be recycled for use in CGR’s metallurgical plant. Overflows of return water dams may,
depending on their location, pollute surrounding streams and wetlands. CGR has an ongoing monitoring program to ensure that its water
balances (in its reticulation system, tailings and return water dams) are maintained at levels that are sensitive to that capacity of return
water dams.
Dust pollution is controlled through an active environmental management program for the residue disposal sites and chemical
and organic dust suppression on recovery sites. Short-term dust control is accomplished through ridge ploughing the top surface of
dormant tailings dams. Additionally, environmentally friendly dust suppressants, such as molasses, are applied. Dust fall-out is also
monitored. In the long-term, dust suppression and water pollution is managed through a program of progressive vegetation of the tailings
followed by the application of lime, to reduce the natural acidic conditions, and fertilizer to assist in the growth of vegetation planted on
the tailings dam.
dormant tailings dams. Additionally, environmentally friendly dust suppressants, such as molasses, are applied. Dust fall-out is also
monitored. In the long-term, dust suppression and water pollution is managed through a program of progressive vegetation of the tailings
followed by the application of lime, to reduce the natural acidic conditions, and fertilizer to assist in the growth of vegetation planted on
the tailings dam.
50
A program of environmental restoration that provides for the rehabilitation of areas affected by mining operations during the life
of the mine is in place. The surface reclamation process at the Crown Section has several environmental merits as it has removed a
potential pollution source and opens up land for development. The Crown Section has conducted its environmental management program
performance assessment, which was submitted to and approved by the DME during fiscal 2005.
potential pollution source and opens up land for development. The Crown Section has conducted its environmental management program
performance assessment, which was submitted to and approved by the DME during fiscal 2005.
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we estimate that the total cost for the
Crown Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is approximately $15.8 million. A total of $1.0 million has been
contributed to the Crown Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who CGR
nominated and who are appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
contributed to the Crown Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who CGR
nominated and who are appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
Life of Mine
Based upon a gold price of approximately R88,960 per kilogram ($381 per ounce), at June 30, 2005, our 40% share of the
Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Crown Section was 0.3 million ounces. In fiscal 2004, based upon a gold price of approximately
R90,023 per kilogram, our 40% share of Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Crown Section was also 0.3 million ounces. CGR’s
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves have not changed from the previous year. A Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at
each operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For CGR Surface, William John Laing (PLATO) is the appointed
Mineral Resource competent person. The current life-of-mine is seven years.
R90,023 per kilogram, our 40% share of Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Crown Section was also 0.3 million ounces. CGR’s
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves have not changed from the previous year. A Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at
each operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For CGR Surface, William John Laing (PLATO) is the appointed
Mineral Resource competent person. The current life-of-mine is seven years.
ERPM Section
Property
The ERPM Section is situated on the Central Rand Goldfield located within and near the northern margin of the
Witwatersrand Basin in the town of Boksburg, 20 miles (32 kilometers) east of Johannesburg. Access is via Jet Park Road on the N12
Boksburg-Benoni highway. Underground mining and recovery operations comprise relatively shallow remnant pillar mining in the
central area and conventional longwall mining in the south-eastern area. Surface reclamation operations including the treatment of
sand from the Cason Dump, is conducted through the metallurgical plant, tailings deposition facilities and associated facilities.
Boksburg-Benoni highway. Underground mining and recovery operations comprise relatively shallow remnant pillar mining in the
central area and conventional longwall mining in the south-eastern area. Surface reclamation operations including the treatment of
sand from the Cason Dump, is conducted through the metallurgical plant, tailings deposition facilities and associated facilities.
The mine exploits the conglomeratic South Reef, Main Reef Leader and Main Reef in the central area and the Composite
Reef in the south-eastern area.
A planned controlled closure of the underground operations at ERPM by the end of fiscal 2004 has been postponed due to the
current reduction in costs and improved productivity at the mine.
During fiscal 2005, all mining activity was moved to the Far East Vertical, or FEV, Shaft lease area. The South East Vertical
Shaft was maintained for hoisting and pumping, the Central Shaft was placed on care and maintenance and the Hercules Shaft was
decommissioned resulting in the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004. At FEV, there has been a drive on development and
a focus on effective grade control. Improvements in production, efficient cost controls, a better Rand gold price received and the re-
institution of State assistance with pumping have all contributed to restoring the mine’s underground operations to profitability.
decommissioned resulting in the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004. At FEV, there has been a drive on development and
a focus on effective grade control. Improvements in production, efficient cost controls, a better Rand gold price received and the re-
institution of State assistance with pumping have all contributed to restoring the mine’s underground operations to profitability.
At ERPM’s Cason surface retreatment operation, gold production has increased during fiscal 2005 the year, due to a better
head grade.
At June 30, 2005, the net book value of ERPM’s mining assets was approximately $6.7 million.
51
History
1895
Formation of East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited.
1991
The FEV shaft was commissioned.
1999
The company was liquidated in August 1999. The mine was run by a small number of employees during liquidation.
Underground flooding continued during liquidation.
Underground flooding continued during liquidation.
2000
KBH took over control of the mine in January 2000. Operating as Enderbrooke Investments (Pty) Limited, or
Enderbrooke, and employing an outside contractor, the mine re-commenced mining operations in February 2000.
Enderbrooke, and employing an outside contractor, the mine re-commenced mining operations in February 2000.
2002
CGR purchased 100% of ERPM, from Enderbrooke.
2003
Underground fire at FEV Shaft, in February 2003. There was also a loss of Hercules Shaft in June 2003 and the loss of
secondary outlet at the FEV shaft in November 2003.
secondary outlet at the FEV shaft in November 2003.
2004
In July 2004 it was determined that the underground section would undergo a controlled closure program ending March
2005. The closure program has been postponed due to the current reduction in costs and improved productivity at the
mine.
2005. The closure program has been postponed due to the current reduction in costs and improved productivity at the
mine.
2005
Central Shaft placed on care and maintenance.
On July 6, 2005 we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with KBH regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15%
stake in our South African Operations.
stake in our South African Operations.
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the transaction with KBH. The new structure results in KBH
acquiring a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD
SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
acquiring a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD
SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
Mining and processing
Underground mining operations at the ERPM Section are comprised of one vertical shaft known as the FEV Shaft. There are
also two additional shafts namely the South East Vertical Shaft, or SEV Shaft, used for the transport of employees and materials and the
hoisting of rock and the SWV Shaft that is used for water pumping only. The Cason Dump Project is used for the retreatment of surface
material mined from the defunct Cason shaft.
hoisting of rock and the SWV Shaft that is used for water pumping only. The Cason Dump Project is used for the retreatment of surface
material mined from the defunct Cason shaft.
An operational reassessment of the underground operations was undertaken in April 2004. Formal notice under the South
African Labour Relations Act was issued on May 4, 2004, which required a review period of no less than 60 days to assess the
operational performance of the ERPM underground operations to consider options to restore the operations to profitability. A task team
comprising management, union representatives and labor was established to assess the proposals and make a final recommendation.
operational performance of the ERPM underground operations to consider options to restore the operations to profitability. A task team
comprising management, union representatives and labor was established to assess the proposals and make a final recommendation.
On July 4, 2004, ERPM management announced that the underground mining operation was not sustainable, even at a higher
Rand-gold price of R2,650 per ounce. As a result, a controlled closure program of the underground section was implemented, which was
expected to be completed by March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million
(R3.7 million), the mine achieved a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the
underground section was postponed.
expected to be completed by March 2005. Following the retrenchment of 806 employees in August 2004 at a cost of $0.6 million
(R3.7 million), the mine achieved a reduction in costs coupled with improved productivity. As a result, the original planned closure of the
underground section was postponed.
Electricity for South Africa is provided by Eskom, which is government owned. Eskom is the largest producer of electricity
in Africa. Eskom operates a national power supply grid consisting of 24 power stations across the country. Electricity to the ERPM
Section is provided to the Cason Dump, SEV and FEV Shafts from the Bremmer substation, located in close proximity to the mine in
Boksburg. Transmission is at the rate of 88,000 volts. The Simmer Pan substation, located approximately 10 miles (16 kilometers)
away from the mine site in Germiston, supplies the SWV and Hercules Shafts. Transmission is at the rate of 44,000 volts. The two
substations, located on the mine site, transform the power to 6,600 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The
power supply is further reduced to 525 volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power
consumption is about 240 GWHr and the maximum demand is about 52 MW.
Section is provided to the Cason Dump, SEV and FEV Shafts from the Bremmer substation, located in close proximity to the mine in
Boksburg. Transmission is at the rate of 88,000 volts. The Simmer Pan substation, located approximately 10 miles (16 kilometers)
away from the mine site in Germiston, supplies the SWV and Hercules Shafts. Transmission is at the rate of 44,000 volts. The two
substations, located on the mine site, transform the power to 6,600 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The
power supply is further reduced to 525 volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power
consumption is about 240 GWHr and the maximum demand is about 52 MW.
The on-mine substations are older in nature and undergo annual infrared testing to identify hot connections which are
potential fire hazards and are subject to regular maintenance which includes the inspection of the settings, blades and changing the
transformer oil in the circuit breakers.
transformer oil in the circuit breakers.
52
Exploration and development
Exploration and development activity has been curtailed at the ERPM Section with the decision to close the underground section
at a later date depending on prevailing circumstances. Looking ahead, it will be necessary to extend the FEV decline from 75 to 78 level
to replace face length. There is also the prospect of extending ERPM’s Ore Reserves into the neighboring Sallies lease area and
significantly increasing the life of the mine’s underground operations. An application has been made to the DME for a prospecting
license.
to replace face length. There is also the prospect of extending ERPM’s Ore Reserves into the neighboring Sallies lease area and
significantly increasing the life of the mine’s underground operations. An application has been made to the DME for a prospecting
license.
Environmental and closure aspects
There is a regular ingress of water into the underground workings of the ERPM Section, which was contained by continuous
pumping from the underground section. On May 31, 2004, ERPM stopped continuous pumping of water from the underground section
for financial reasons due to the withdrawal of the pumping subsidy and the low Rand gold price making the cost of full time pumping
unaffordable, with occasional pumping to surface conducted on weekends. In December 2004 the mine received the pumping subsidy
funds and continuous pumping was reinstated. Studies on the estimates of the probable rate of rise of water have been inconsistent, with
certain theories suggesting that the underground water might reach a natural subterranean equilibrium, whilst other theories maintain that
the water could decant or surface. A program is in place to routinely monitor the rise in water level in the various underground
compartments and there has been a substantial increase in the subsurface water levels. There is a need for further studies to be undertak en
so as to qualify and quantify this risk more analytically.
for financial reasons due to the withdrawal of the pumping subsidy and the low Rand gold price making the cost of full time pumping
unaffordable, with occasional pumping to surface conducted on weekends. In December 2004 the mine received the pumping subsidy
funds and continuous pumping was reinstated. Studies on the estimates of the probable rate of rise of water have been inconsistent, with
certain theories suggesting that the underground water might reach a natural subterranean equilibrium, whilst other theories maintain that
the water could decant or surface. A program is in place to routinely monitor the rise in water level in the various underground
compartments and there has been a substantial increase in the subsurface water levels. There is a need for further studies to be undertak en
so as to qualify and quantify this risk more analytically.
After the final phase of the planned closure of the underground operations at ERPM which was expected to be completed in
March 2005, but has been postponed, only reclamation of underground equipment will take place.
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, ERPM have estimated that the total
cost for the ERPM Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $7.4 million. A total of $0.2 million has been contributed to
the ERPM Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who ERPM nominated and
who are appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
the ERPM Rehabilitation Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who ERPM nominated and
who are appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
Life of mine
Based upon a gold price of approximately R88,960 per kilogram ($381 per ounce ), at June 30, 2005, our 40% share of Proven
and Probable Ore Reserves of the ERPM Section was 0.4 million ounces, of which 0.2 million ounces relate to the underground section
which is scheduled for closure at a later date, depending on prevailing circumstances. The remaining 0.2 million ounces relate to the
Cason Dump surface material which, based on the estimated rate of production, will be processed over a remaining 6 year period ending
in fiscal 2010. Based upon a gold price of approximately R90,023 per kilogram, at June 30, 2004, our 40% share of Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves of the ERPM Section were 0.2 million ounces. The year on year increase is mostly attributable to the continuation of
mining operations which were planned to be suspended in March 2005. A Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at each
operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For ERPM, Johan Smit (PLATO) is the appointed Mineral Resource
competen t person. The current life-of-mine is five years.
which is scheduled for closure at a later date, depending on prevailing circumstances. The remaining 0.2 million ounces relate to the
Cason Dump surface material which, based on the estimated rate of production, will be processed over a remaining 6 year period ending
in fiscal 2010. Based upon a gold price of approximately R90,023 per kilogram, at June 30, 2004, our 40% share of Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves of the ERPM Section were 0.2 million ounces. The year on year increase is mostly attributable to the continuation of
mining operations which were planned to be suspended in March 2005. A Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at each
operation to review our Ore Reserve calculations for accuracy. For ERPM, Johan Smit (PLATO) is the appointed Mineral Resource
competen t person. The current life-of-mine is five years.
53
Papua New Guinea
Porgera Mine
Overview
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, DRD (Porgera) Limited, we own a 20% interest in an unincorporated joint venture, the
Porgera Joint Venture, which holds certain mining leases, easements and exploration licenses which form part of the Porgera gold mine,
or Porgera, in the highlands of Papua New Guinea, or PNG. We purchased this interest in October 2003 for a purchase consideration of
$77.1 million. Placer Dome Inc. is the owner of a 75% interest. The remaining interest of 5% is held by Mineral Resources Enga
Limited, or MRE (on behalf of Enga Provincial Government and landowners in PNG). All of the various mineral tenements making up
Porgera are exploited collectively by the joint venture partners.
or Porgera, in the highlands of Papua New Guinea, or PNG. We purchased this interest in October 2003 for a purchase consideration of
$77.1 million. Placer Dome Inc. is the owner of a 75% interest. The remaining interest of 5% is held by Mineral Resources Enga
Limited, or MRE (on behalf of Enga Provincial Government and landowners in PNG). All of the various mineral tenements making up
Porgera are exploited collectively by the joint venture partners.
An affiliate of Placer Dome Inc., Placer (PNG) Limited, is the operator of Porgera and is subject to the control of a management
committee made up of representatives of the joint venture partners. Decisions regarding the assets which comprise Porgera, including any
sale thereof, are made collectively by the parties through the management committee. The parties also have a right of first refusal with
regard to certain assignments of assets which make up Porgera. Each party has the right to own and to take in kind and dispose of its share
of all ores, concentrates and refined products produced by Porgera. Each party also pays for its proportionate share of the costs associated
with the mining activities.
sale thereof, are made collectively by the parties through the management committee. The parties also have a right of first refusal with
regard to certain assignments of assets which make up Porgera. Each party has the right to own and to take in kind and dispose of its share
of all ores, concentrates and refined products produced by Porgera. Each party also pays for its proportionate share of the costs associated
with the mining activities.
The net book value of our share of property, plant and equipment, deferred stripping and purchased undeveloped mineral
interests is $66.2 million at June 30, 2005.
As at June 30, 2005, the workforce at Porgera comprised approximately 2,340 employees of whom approximately 2,130
(91%) are PNG nationals. In addition, there are approximately 470 contractors of whom 440 are PNG nationals. Of the total workforce
of approximately 2,340, approximately 75% are local residents, while the remainder work on a “fly-in-fly-out” basis. We understand
that Placer Dome Inc., in conjunction with other primary industry producers, is continuing to work with the PNG Government to
address causes of civil unrest which affected production in 2002.
of approximately 2,340, approximately 75% are local residents, while the remainder work on a “fly-in-fly-out” basis. We understand
that Placer Dome Inc., in conjunction with other primary industry producers, is continuing to work with the PNG Government to
address causes of civil unrest which affected production in 2002.
Our 20% attributable share of production for fiscal 2005 was 195,394 ounces at a cash and total cost of $185 and $273 per
ounce, respectively.
Production from Porgera is subject to a 2% net smelter royalty payable to the National Government Department of Mining
which then distributes it to the Enga Provincial Government, the Porgera District Authority, and local landowners.
Property
The Porgera deposit and the mine is located in the Enga Province in the highlands of PNG, approximately 7,260 feet (2,213
meters) to 8,910 feet (2,716 meters) above mean sea level, about 82 miles (132 kilometers) west of the established town of Mount
Hagen, 275 miles (443 kilometers) northwest of Port Moresby, and about 425 miles (684.0 kilometers) by road from the coastal port
of Lae from which all materials are freighted. The road is partly paved and passes through unstable mountainous terrain with many
major river crossings. Personnel are transported to mine site by bus, fixed wing aircraft and helicopter.
Hagen, 275 miles (443 kilometers) northwest of Port Moresby, and about 425 miles (684.0 kilometers) by road from the coastal port
of Lae from which all materials are freighted. The road is partly paved and passes through unstable mountainous terrain with many
major river crossings. Personnel are transported to mine site by bus, fixed wing aircraft and helicopter.
Temperatures range from 50 to 77 degrees Fahrenheit (10 to 25 degrees Celsius) and rainfall averages 3,650mm per year. The
vegetation is largely rainforest below an elevation of 7,920 feet (2,414 meters).
The Porgera Joint Venture has approval to work the Porgera deposit within the agreed development plan under the terms of
the Porgera Mining Development Contract, or the Porgera Contract, between the Government of PNG and the joint venturers. The
Porgera Contract specifies, amongst other matters, the annual rents that must be paid for the Special Mining Lease, and the various
classes of compensation that are payable to the landowners for the various land uses. The Special Mining Lease, which expires in
2019, encompasses approximately 2,240 hectares including the mine area and the areas in which the project infrastructure is located.
There is no expiration date for the Porgera Contract, but it is tied to the continuation of the Special Mining Lease. Leases for Mining
Purposes have also been awarded by the Government for land use associated with the mining operation such as waste dumps,
campsites, water supply, power generation and an airstrip. The Porgera Joint Venture holds a mining lease for the operation of a
limestone quarry f or the supply of lime to the process plant. Permits are held for water use, including run-off from unconsolidated
surfaces, such as the open pit, the underground mine and the waste dumps. These water use permits are renewable on a regular basis
and are subject to public hearing before approval. The Porgera Joint Venture runs an environmental monitoring program to ensure
compliance with the requirements of these permits.
Porgera Contract specifies, amongst other matters, the annual rents that must be paid for the Special Mining Lease, and the various
classes of compensation that are payable to the landowners for the various land uses. The Special Mining Lease, which expires in
2019, encompasses approximately 2,240 hectares including the mine area and the areas in which the project infrastructure is located.
There is no expiration date for the Porgera Contract, but it is tied to the continuation of the Special Mining Lease. Leases for Mining
Purposes have also been awarded by the Government for land use associated with the mining operation such as waste dumps,
campsites, water supply, power generation and an airstrip. The Porgera Joint Venture holds a mining lease for the operation of a
limestone quarry f or the supply of lime to the process plant. Permits are held for water use, including run-off from unconsolidated
surfaces, such as the open pit, the underground mine and the waste dumps. These water use permits are renewable on a regular basis
and are subject to public hearing before approval. The Porgera Joint Venture runs an environmental monitoring program to ensure
compliance with the requirements of these permits.
54
In addition to the Special Mining Lease, the Porgera Joint Venture also holds additional mining tenements for utilities such as
power transmission lines and water supply pipelines and other activities incidental to the main mining activity. Separate from the
mining tenements, there are two Exploration Licenses adjacent to the Porgera Mine, namely EL454 and EL858, which we assert we
have 20% ownership of as joint venture assets. Placer Dome Inc., or Placer, asserts we do not have a 20% interest in these Exploration
Licenses and that the Exploration Licenses are not joint venture property. On August 9, 2004, we placed a caveat on the title register
in order to prevent changes taking place without notification to us. The dispute between us and Placer regarding these Exploration
Licenses is the subject of ongoing discussion and the tenements are the subject of ongoing exploration expenditure.
mining tenements, there are two Exploration Licenses adjacent to the Porgera Mine, namely EL454 and EL858, which we assert we
have 20% ownership of as joint venture assets. Placer Dome Inc., or Placer, asserts we do not have a 20% interest in these Exploration
Licenses and that the Exploration Licenses are not joint venture property. On August 9, 2004, we placed a caveat on the title register
in order to prevent changes taking place without notification to us. The dispute between us and Placer regarding these Exploration
Licenses is the subject of ongoing discussion and the tenements are the subject of ongoing exploration expenditure.
Porgera has on a number of occasions experienced delays in the granting of operating permits and licenses necessary for
these businesses to conduct their lawful operations. Although there has never been an interruption to operations due to an issue of this
nature, if at any time in the future permits essential to lawful operations are not obtained or exemptions not granted, there is a risk that
Porgera may not be able to operate for a period. Future government actions cannot be predicted, but may impact the operation and
regulation of the Porgera mine.
nature, if at any time in the future permits essential to lawful operations are not obtained or exemptions not granted, there is a risk that
Porgera may not be able to operate for a period. Future government actions cannot be predicted, but may impact the operation and
regulation of the Porgera mine.
Porgera is operated subject to the requirements of the PNG Mining Safety Act and Regulations as applied by the Mines
Inspectorate.
History
1938
Alluvial gold was first reported at Porgera.
1975
Placer (PNG) Limited, or Placer (PNG), a wholly owned subsidiary of Placer Dome Inc., became the operator and owner of a
two-third interest in an exploration venture with Mount Isa Mines Limited (now MIM Holdings Ltd.), or MIM.
two-third interest in an exploration venture with Mount Isa Mines Limited (now MIM Holdings Ltd.), or MIM.
1979
A Joint Venture Agreement was signed whereby Placer (PNG), MIM and New Guinea Goldfields Ltd. (a subsidiary of
Goldfields Limited) each held a one third interest and the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, or the State, had the right
to acquire at cost up to a 10% interest in the project if developed.
Goldfields Limited) each held a one third interest and the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, or the State, had the right
to acquire at cost up to a 10% interest in the project if developed.
1989
The joint venturers' application for a Special Mining Lease was approved in May and construction began immediately. The
State accepted its full 10% entitlement (inclusive of 5% on behalf of the Enga Provincial Government), thus diluting each of
the other joint ventures down to 30% each. The State took its interest in the name of a corporate nominee, Mineral Resources
Porgera Limited.
State accepted its full 10% entitlement (inclusive of 5% on behalf of the Enga Provincial Government), thus diluting each of
the other joint ventures down to 30% each. The State took its interest in the name of a corporate nominee, Mineral Resources
Porgera Limited.
1990
Commercial production commenced in August. MIM sold its 30% interest to Highlands Gold Ltd., or Highlands Gold.
1993
Placer (PNG), Goldfields and Highland Gold each sold a further 5% to the State (15%). The additional 15% was taken by the
State in the name of a corporate nominee, Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited.
State in the name of a corporate nominee, Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited.
1997
Placer Dome’s joint venture interest was increased from 25% to 50% as of January 1, 1997 following the completion of the
acquisition of Highlands Gold.
acquisition of Highlands Gold.
1999
The State reorganized the holding of Mineral Resources Porgera Limited by transferring a 5% direct interest in the Joint
Venture to Mineral Resources Enga Limited owned by the Enga Provincial Government and project area landowners.
Venture to Mineral Resources Enga Limited owned by the Enga Provincial Government and project area landowners.
2002
Placer Dome’s joint venture interest in Porgera was increased from 50% to 75% through the acquisition of AurionGold. The
State reorganized its holdings in the Joint Venture such that Oil Search Limited then held a 20% direct interest in the Joint
Venture through two subsidiaries.
State reorganized its holdings in the Joint Venture such that Oil Search Limited then held a 20% direct interest in the Joint
Venture through two subsidiaries.
2003
We acquired the shares of Oil Search Limited in Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited and Mineral Resources Porgera Limited
through the amalgamation of Mineral Resources Porgera Limited with Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited and Dome
Resources (PNG) Limited, our wholly-owned subsidiary.
through the amalgamation of Mineral Resources Porgera Limited with Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited and Dome
Resources (PNG) Limited, our wholly-owned subsidiary.
2004
Porgera concentrated on upgrading East Zone and drilling was carried out on the Lower Central Zone.
2005
Expansion of existing exploration projects continues under the Porgera Deep Minex project.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire
our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea
assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of
our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire
our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea
assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of
our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
Geology and Mineralization
Mineralization is structurally controlled and occurs within the Porgera diorite intrusive complex, around the margins of, and
within, the intrusive bodies.
The Porgera ore body is an epithermal style ore body hosted within thermally metamorphosed sediments. The known ore
body extends for up to 3,050 feet (930 meters) along strike. The maximum width across strike is 330 feet (100.6 meters), but the width
is commonly no more than 65 to 98 feet (20 to 30 meters). The intrusive diorite complex has many individual stocks and dykes. The
rocks are competent however they tend to be brittle, and in the vicinity of the ore body, are extensively veined and brecciated. The
intrusive bodies tend to be concentrated towards the footwall of the deposit.
is commonly no more than 65 to 98 feet (20 to 30 meters). The intrusive diorite complex has many individual stocks and dykes. The
rocks are competent however they tend to be brittle, and in the vicinity of the ore body, are extensively veined and brecciated. The
intrusive bodies tend to be concentrated towards the footwall of the deposit.
55
The gold and electrum metal association is the source of the high gold grades found in the deposit. The majority of gold
occurs as submicroscopic gold intimately associated with and disseminated throughout pyrite.
Mining and Processing
The Porgera deposit is currently being extracted using open pit and underground mining methods. Mill feed, on a tonnage
basis, was sourced 88% from open pit and run of mine stockpiled ore, and 12% from underground. Underground ore accounted for
14% of the contained gold in mill feed.
14% of the contained gold in mill feed.
Open pit mining is a typical hard rock operation utilizing 33 feet (10 meter) benches. The current mining fleet of DML blast
hole drills, O&K RH200 hydraulic face shovels and Caterpillar 789 haul trucks, gives a nominal capacity in the order of 80 million
tonnes per annum. Waste stripping requirements will reduce as the open pit mining operation approaches closure in 2006, allowing a
progressive retirement of the mining fleet.
tonnes per annum. Waste stripping requirements will reduce as the open pit mining operation approaches closure in 2006, allowing a
progressive retirement of the mining fleet.
Underground mining was suspended in 1997, and subsequently recommenced in 2002. Underground production is now
expected to continue through to late 2008. Currently, ore is being mined from the 2,210 meter level in Stage 4, and waste is being
mined from the 2,390 meter level in Stage 5. Stage 5 is the final open pit development stage and will be completed in late 2008 at
2,050 meter level. Stockpiled low grade ore will form the basis of ongoing gold production from mid 2008 until 2015. The open pit
plans to deliver 5.3 million tones of ore to the mill by mid fiscal 2006, containing approximately 891,000 ounces of gold for a
recovered production of 787,000 ounces of gold. On completion of the open pit operation, the mill will continue to process
accumulated lower grade ore stockpiles through to 2015, supplemented by the underground ore until 2008. Gold production from the
open pit and underground from 2008 onward will fall, as lower grade stockpile ore replaces the open pit ore feed.
mined from the 2,390 meter level in Stage 5. Stage 5 is the final open pit development stage and will be completed in late 2008 at
2,050 meter level. Stockpiled low grade ore will form the basis of ongoing gold production from mid 2008 until 2015. The open pit
plans to deliver 5.3 million tones of ore to the mill by mid fiscal 2006, containing approximately 891,000 ounces of gold for a
recovered production of 787,000 ounces of gold. On completion of the open pit operation, the mill will continue to process
accumulated lower grade ore stockpiles through to 2015, supplemented by the underground ore until 2008. Gold production from the
open pit and underground from 2008 onward will fall, as lower grade stockpile ore replaces the open pit ore feed.
The Porgera plant was completed in 1996. The mill has undergone four stages of improvement and expansion, since it was
first commissioned in September 1990. The last expansion was completed in 1996 with the installation of additional milling, flotation
and leaching capacity increasing the nominal throughput from 10,000 tonnes per day to 17,700 tonnes per day. Further improvements
were made in 1999 with the addition of further flotation capacity and the installation of gravity concentrators to remove free gold and
to improve overall recoveries.
and leaching capacity increasing the nominal throughput from 10,000 tonnes per day to 17,700 tonnes per day. Further improvements
were made in 1999 with the addition of further flotation capacity and the installation of gravity concentrators to remove free gold and
to improve overall recoveries.
The main water supply for the mine is the Waile Creek Dam, located approximately 7 kilometers (4 miles) from the mine.
Water for the grinding circuit is also extracted from Kogai Creek, which is located adjacent to the grinding circuit. The mine operates
four water treatment plants for potable water and five sewage treatment plants.
four water treatment plants for potable water and five sewage treatment plants.
The principal source of power for Porgera is supplied by a 73-kilometre (45 mile) transmission line from the gas fired Hides
Power Station. The station has a total output of 62 MW. A back up diesel power station is located at the mine and has an output of
13MW. The average power requirement of the mine is about 60 MW. Average annual power consumption is 518 GWHr.
13MW. The average power requirement of the mine is about 60 MW. Average annual power consumption is 518 GWHr.
Our 20% share of Porgera’s most significant capital expenditure during fiscal 2005, related to deferred stripping
($11.1 million), plant and equipment ($1.4 million) and mine development and construction ($3.5 million).
Exploration and Development
Exploration work in calendar 2004 concentrated on upgrading the East Zone to an indicated Mineral Resource for
underground mining exploitation. This zone is an eastward continuation of the North Zone, which is now in production and which
shares the same characteristics. Drilling also was carried out in the later part of 2004 on the Lower Central Zone. Both these zones are
hosted within diorite bodies and surrounding altered sediments and consist of continuous or on echelon quartz roscoelite veins. There
is still further resource potential in these zones, as they are not completely closed off. Drilling will continue to further define these
targets as suitable for development. A small amount of open pit delineation drilling has been carried from underground in order to
upgrade the geological model.
shares the same characteristics. Drilling also was carried out in the later part of 2004 on the Lower Central Zone. Both these zones are
hosted within diorite bodies and surrounding altered sediments and consist of continuous or on echelon quartz roscoelite veins. There
is still further resource potential in these zones, as they are not completely closed off. Drilling will continue to further define these
targets as suitable for development. A small amount of open pit delineation drilling has been carried from underground in order to
upgrade the geological model.
Exploration plans for calendar 2005 have a two pronged approach. The majority of the drilling will be carried out within or
adjacent to the current mine infrastructure. There are a total of seven known targets where at least some previous drilling has taken
place. This drilling is designed to bring these targets ounces to an indicated Mineral Resource status. There are also some targets that
are less well known and more conceptual in nature.
place. This drilling is designed to bring these targets ounces to an indicated Mineral Resource status. There are also some targets that
are less well known and more conceptual in nature.
56
In addition, during fiscal 2005 a project termed Porgera Deep Minex was initiated and will continue into fiscal 2006. This
project was part of the mine’s ongoing existing exploration projects however was newly termed Project Deep Minex because this
particular part of the exploration process consists of a multi-disciplinary approach to determine targets and test the volume of ground
below the known Porgera deposits. This approach involves the building of an integrated geological and geophysical model, various
geochemistry techniques, and the use of seismics is to be investigated. Much of this will be the “mining” and integrating of existing
data. Drilling will be carried out with a prime target being the intersection of the Roamane Fault and the North Zone shear in depth.
particular part of the exploration process consists of a multi-disciplinary approach to determine targets and test the volume of ground
below the known Porgera deposits. This approach involves the building of an integrated geological and geophysical model, various
geochemistry techniques, and the use of seismics is to be investigated. Much of this will be the “mining” and integrating of existing
data. Drilling will be carried out with a prime target being the intersection of the Roamane Fault and the North Zone shear in depth.
Life of Mine
The Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Porgera Joint Venture at December 31, 2004, are estimated at 7.23 million
ounces of gold with a projected life of 10 years. Our 20% attributable share of estimated Proven and Probable Ore Reserves as at
December 31, 2004, before Ore Reserve depletion, is 1.4 million ounces. Our attributable 20% share of the Proven and Probable Ore
Reserves in the Porgera Joint Venture is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75% interest in the
Porgera Joint Venture) in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on
March 3, 2005. The Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004. At June 30, 2005, our attributable Mineral
Resources decreased by 16.7% or 0.5 million ounces, from fiscal 2004 and Ore Reserves decreased by 6.0%, or 0.1 million ounces
from fiscal 2004 mainly due to the open pit mining depletion. For Porgera, the reserves are reviewed for accuracy by Jacobus Du Plessis
(Mining Technical Servi ces Manager, Tolukuma Gold Mine).
December 31, 2004, before Ore Reserve depletion, is 1.4 million ounces. Our attributable 20% share of the Proven and Probable Ore
Reserves in the Porgera Joint Venture is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which has a 75% interest in the
Porgera Joint Venture) in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on
March 3, 2005. The Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004. At June 30, 2005, our attributable Mineral
Resources decreased by 16.7% or 0.5 million ounces, from fiscal 2004 and Ore Reserves decreased by 6.0%, or 0.1 million ounces
from fiscal 2004 mainly due to the open pit mining depletion. For Porgera, the reserves are reviewed for accuracy by Jacobus Du Plessis
(Mining Technical Servi ces Manager, Tolukuma Gold Mine).
Environmental and Closure Aspects
Porgera is located in extremely rugged mountainous terrain, subject to seismic activity, high rainfall and landslides. In such
conditions construction of a tailings impoundment would be very difficult and the risk of an engineering failure high. Therefore the Papua
New Guinea Government approved riverine disposal as the most appropriate method for treated tailing and soft incompetent waste rock.
Competent rock is stored in stable waste dumps. The mine follows a government approved Environmental Management and Monitoring
Program.
New Guinea Government approved riverine disposal as the most appropriate method for treated tailing and soft incompetent waste rock.
Competent rock is stored in stable waste dumps. The mine follows a government approved Environmental Management and Monitoring
Program.
In 1996, an independent study was undertaken by the Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organization, or CSIRO,
an Australian based independent research organization, to assess the mine's impact on the downstream river system and local people. In
its report CSIRO made certain recommendations to the Porgera Joint Venture that have either been implemented or are in the advanced
stages of implementation. An advisory group, called the Porgera Environmental Advisory Komiti, or PEAK, was formed as a result of the
CSIRO recommendations. PEAK comprises representatives from the Papua New Guinea Government, Papua New Guinea and
international non-governmental organization groups, Placer (PNG) Limited and independent technical experts. The primary function of
PEAK is to enhance understanding and provide transparency of Porgera's environmental (physical and social) issues with external
stakeholders and to assist in reviewing its environmental performance and public accountability. In 2002, PEAK had its terms of
reference expanded to include mine closure.
its report CSIRO made certain recommendations to the Porgera Joint Venture that have either been implemented or are in the advanced
stages of implementation. An advisory group, called the Porgera Environmental Advisory Komiti, or PEAK, was formed as a result of the
CSIRO recommendations. PEAK comprises representatives from the Papua New Guinea Government, Papua New Guinea and
international non-governmental organization groups, Placer (PNG) Limited and independent technical experts. The primary function of
PEAK is to enhance understanding and provide transparency of Porgera's environmental (physical and social) issues with external
stakeholders and to assist in reviewing its environmental performance and public accountability. In 2002, PEAK had its terms of
reference expanded to include mine closure.
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that our attributable
20% portion of total costs for Porgera, based on information provided by the operator, Placer (PNG) Limited, in current monetary terms
as at December 31, 2004, is $8.0 million. This has been included in the provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and
closure costs.
as at December 31, 2004, is $8.0 million. This has been included in the provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and
closure costs.
Current Production
Our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture was acquired with effect from October 14, 2003. Attributable (20%) production
at June 30, 2005 amounted to 195,394 ounces at a cash cost and total cost per ounce of $185 and $273, respectively. Placer Dome, 75%
owner of the mine, predicted lower production in calendar 2005 due to a shift of operations from Stage 4 to Stage 5 of the open pit, which
has harder ore and lower grades. Performance in the first six months of calendar 2005 has been negatively affected by the impact of heavy
rains on the stability of the pit’s West Wall.
owner of the mine, predicted lower production in calendar 2005 due to a shift of operations from Stage 4 to Stage 5 of the open pit, which
has harder ore and lower grades. Performance in the first six months of calendar 2005 has been negatively affected by the impact of heavy
rains on the stability of the pit’s West Wall.
Studies to determine a long-term solution to the stability problems indicate that a cutback of near-surface material in the central
part of the West Wall is necessary. Subject to final design and approvals, the work is expected to be completed by the end of calendar
2006. No impact on the mine’s reserve position is expected.
2006. No impact on the mine’s reserve position is expected.
57
The following table details our attributable (20%) operating and production results from the Porgera Joint Venture for fiscal
2005.
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
Production
Surface and underground operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)............................................................................................................................
Ore mined ('000 tons)............................................................................................................................
1,324
1,038
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ......................................................................................................................
0.148
0.142
Gold produced (ounces) ........................................................................................................................
195,394
147,475
Results of Operations ($)
Revenues ('000) ......................................................................................................................................
Revenues ('000) ......................................................................................................................................
82,793
60,445
Production cost ('000).............................................................................................................................
36,210
31,650
Non-US GAAP Financial Data
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
............................................................................................................
185
215
Total cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
............................................................................................................
273
291
1
Cash cost per ounce and total cost per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures of performance that we use to determine cash generating
capacities of the mines and to monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
58
Tolukuma Gold Mine
Overview
Dome Resources (Pty) Limited, or Dome, was incorporated on May 17, 1984, under the name Dome Resources NL. Dome
owned and operated the Tolukuma gold and silver mine in PNG. During September 1999, we purchased 28,693,002 (19.93%) of Dome’s
ordinary shares for A$0.30 ($0.19) per share. In June 2001 we acquired all the shares in Dome which we did not already own.
ordinary shares for A$0.30 ($0.19) per share. In June 2001 we acquired all the shares in Dome which we did not already own.
The Tolukuma gold mine is located approximately 6km east of Fane Mission, 12km west of Woitape and 100km north or
Port Moresby in Central Province, Papua New Guinea. The mine is in an area of steep mountainous terrain in the headwaters of Iwu
Creek, which drains into the Auga River. Elevations in the mine lease area range from 1,100m above sea level at the Auga River to
1,750m above sea level at the top of Tolukuma hill.
Creek, which drains into the Auga River. Elevations in the mine lease area range from 1,100m above sea level at the Auga River to
1,750m above sea level at the top of Tolukuma hill.
As at June 30, 2005, the mine is a low capacity (18,000 tpm capacity), high-grade (0.39 ounces per ton) operation and
employs 824 people, including 186 contractors.
Property
The Tolukuma Section consists of one mining lease, ML104, covering 1,898 acres (768 hectares) and five current exploration
licenses covering an area of approximately 513,962 acres (208,000 hectares), two licenses under renewal covering 125,525 acres (50,800
hectares) and four licenses under application totaling 1,073,884 acres (434,600 hectares).
hectares) and four licenses under application totaling 1,073,884 acres (434,600 hectares).
The total exploration area amounts to
approximately 2,456,144 acres (994,000 hectares). For a summary of our exploration licenses see “Exploration Projects” in Item 4D:
“Property, Plant and Equipment.”
“Property, Plant and Equipment.”
All current mining activities are carried out under the terms of Mining Lease 104 (ML104), granted under Section 38 of the
Papua New Guinea Mining Act of 1992 and Mining Regulations 1992. The lease is granted for a term of 20 years expiring on August 29,
2012, and is renewable for further periods not exceeding 10 years each.
2012, and is renewable for further periods not exceeding 10 years each.
The mine is located about 62 miles (100 kilometers) north of Port Moresby in the Central Province of Papua New Guinea at an
elevation of 5,115 feet (1,560 meters) above mean sea level. The mine is situated in very steep mountainous terrain that is not accessible
by road. All transport of employees, materials and equipment to and from the mine is by helicopter. As a result, approximately 24% of
the production costs of the mine are spent on transportation and logistics, including the cost of jet fuel. The Tolukuma Section is
worked on a “fly-in-fly-out basis,” with all staff being accommodated in quarters when at the mine.
by road. All transport of employees, materials and equipment to and from the mine is by helicopter. As a result, approximately 24% of
the production costs of the mine are spent on transportation and logistics, including the cost of jet fuel. The Tolukuma Section is
worked on a “fly-in-fly-out basis,” with all staff being accommodated in quarters when at the mine.
The climate of the Central Province area is temperate with year round rainfall. Temperatures range from 50 to 77 degrees
Fahrenheit (10 to 25 degrees Celsius) and rainfall averages 144 inches (3,650mm) per year. The vegetation is largely rainforest and
thick vegetation associated with high rainfall and mountainous regions.
thick vegetation associated with high rainfall and mountainous regions.
At the Tolukuma Section, the traditional landowners are the Yulai people who belong to the Auga tribes – Auga being the
main river in the area. There are three clans and at the head of each clan is a chief. The population around the mine is approximately
2,700, with approximately 700 being landowners and the rest made up of outsiders coming into the area to seek employment. There is
a Memorandum of Agreement, or MOA, between National Government, Provincial Government, the landowners and Tolukuma Gold
Mines Limited, or Tolukuma. The MOA is a working document which indicates the responsibilities of each party and their role in the
sustainable development of the community. The MOA is reviewed every two years, with an MOA to be mutually agreed by the parties
if revised. Currently, there is an agreed on MOA in place.
2,700, with approximately 700 being landowners and the rest made up of outsiders coming into the area to seek employment. There is
a Memorandum of Agreement, or MOA, between National Government, Provincial Government, the landowners and Tolukuma Gold
Mines Limited, or Tolukuma. The MOA is a working document which indicates the responsibilities of each party and their role in the
sustainable development of the community. The MOA is reviewed every two years, with an MOA to be mutually agreed by the parties
if revised. Currently, there is an agreed on MOA in place.
Production from the Tolukuma Section is subject to a 2% net smelter royalty. This royalty is distributed to the Yulai future
generation fund, a landowners’ association, the landowners, and to a Central Provincial Government fund for projects outside the mine
area.
area.
59
History
1984
Dome Resource (Pty) Limited was incorporated on May 17, 1984, under the name Dome Resources NL, or Dome.
1987
Tolukuma mine was discovered by Newmont Proprietary Limited.
1993
Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited was acquired by Dome from Newmont Second Capital Corporation.
1999
In September, we purchased an initial stake of 19.93% of Dome.
2001
In June, we acquired all outstanding shares of Dome we did not already own, bringing our shareholding to 100%.
2005
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will
acquire our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua
New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited and all of our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
acquire our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua
New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited and all of our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
Exploration and development
Exploration within the mining lease, ML104, has recently been expanded with the purchase of two underground diamond
drill rigs, including one with long hole capability, and an additional rig for surface drilling. This brought the number of rigs on site to
five in fiscal 2004, compared to only one in fiscal 2003. An air-driven Kempe rig, commissioned in December 2003, is used for short
holes underground, currently targeting the down dip extension of the Tinabar ore body and an LMA90 drill rig, commissioned in
January 2004, is used for longer exploration holes, initially in the Gulbadi south area and the Milaihamba structural target. Another
manportable DT600P was purchased to support the existing manportable DT250P on surface drilling of ML104 and later the Saki,
Sere Sere, Taula and Taula North prospects in Exploration License 580 followed by other regional targets. The LY44 is also currently
drilling ML104 targets.
five in fiscal 2004, compared to only one in fiscal 2003. An air-driven Kempe rig, commissioned in December 2003, is used for short
holes underground, currently targeting the down dip extension of the Tinabar ore body and an LMA90 drill rig, commissioned in
January 2004, is used for longer exploration holes, initially in the Gulbadi south area and the Milaihamba structural target. Another
manportable DT600P was purchased to support the existing manportable DT250P on surface drilling of ML104 and later the Saki,
Sere Sere, Taula and Taula North prospects in Exploration License 580 followed by other regional targets. The LY44 is also currently
drilling ML104 targets.
Drilling during fiscal 2005 concentrated mainly within ML104, testing the extensions of known mineralized structures such
as the Zine, 120, Gulbadi, Tolukuma, and Tinabar veins, with the aim of delineating and defining additional mineralized materials for
mill feed. Drilling in fiscal 2005 continued at new structures that have been identified for drill testing including the Loch, Tofun, and
Banana vein structures.
mill feed. Drilling in fiscal 2005 continued at new structures that have been identified for drill testing including the Loch, Tofun, and
Banana vein structures.
In fiscal 2005, exploration expenditure of $2.1 million was incurred.
Geology and Mineralization
The Tolukuma deposit is a narrow epithermal low sulphidation gold/silver/quartz/adularia vein system noted for its high-
grade “bonanza” style mineralization. The primary structures extend 4.4 miles (7 kilometers) on strike with economic mineralization
usually occurring in well-defined zones on dip and along strike.
usually occurring in well-defined zones on dip and along strike.
The Tolukuma deposit is comprised of two sub-parallel structures that are connected by a series of linked structures trending
generally from north west to south east. Individual quartz veins average 0.6 feet to 6.6 feet (0.2 meters to 2.0 meters) in width over a
strike length of more than 0.9 mile (1.4 kilometers). Likewise, the Zine and 120 veins located approximately 250 meters to the east,
have similar geological features. These are connected by a series of linked structures tending generally in a south east to north west
direction.
strike length of more than 0.9 mile (1.4 kilometers). Likewise, the Zine and 120 veins located approximately 250 meters to the east,
have similar geological features. These are connected by a series of linked structures tending generally in a south east to north west
direction.
All the current Ore Reserves are located within these veins in five sections that have different geological characteristics.
These zones include from north to south, Tolukuma, Tolimi, Tinabar and Gulbadi. The Gulbadi zone includes the Gulbadi and Gulbadi
X-veins. Clay zones of variable width are located in the intersections on two or more structures. Minor loops off the main veins, minor
splay veins and minor cross veins are excluded from the potential reserves, although they are mined at times. Infill diamond drilling of the
Zine and 120 veins is continuing and an underground diamond drilling program has commenced.
X-veins. Clay zones of variable width are located in the intersections on two or more structures. Minor loops off the main veins, minor
splay veins and minor cross veins are excluded from the potential reserves, although they are mined at times. Infill diamond drilling of the
Zine and 120 veins is continuing and an underground diamond drilling program has commenced.
Mining and processing
In 1995, the Tolukuma plant was built and at June 30, 2005, the current production is approximately 93% from underground
mining and 7% from open pit mining. All open pit and underground mining is conducted using mining plant and equipment owned by
the Tolukuma Section. The average mining depth at the Tolukuma Section is 490 feet (150 meters) below surface or approximately 4,760
feet (1,450 meters) above mean sea level. Access to underground workings is via decline shafts. Mining methods vary according to local
ground conditions and are generally mechanized cut and fill shrinkage methods.
the Tolukuma Section. The average mining depth at the Tolukuma Section is 490 feet (150 meters) below surface or approximately 4,760
feet (1,450 meters) above mean sea level. Access to underground workings is via decline shafts. Mining methods vary according to local
ground conditions and are generally mechanized cut and fill shrinkage methods.
The metallurgical plant is compact and is located on a steep ridge in very mountainous terrain. Ore is trucked to the plant, then
milled and treated through a conventional gravity and CIL circuit. The plant consists of a closed circuit semi-autogenous mill that at June
30, 2005 is capable of processing 18,000 tpm. Cyanide in the residue is neutralized in a detoxification plant prior to riverine discharge.
30, 2005 is capable of processing 18,000 tpm. Cyanide in the residue is neutralized in a detoxification plant prior to riverine discharge.
60
Tolukuma is situated in a remote area, and as a result is forced to be self sufficient with regard to the generation of power.
Power is generated through a combination of diesel driven generator sets and hydro-turbine driven generator sets. Three hydro units
are installed, capable of generating 1.8 MW of power. These units are dependant on the supply of adequate water. These generators
supply 32,000 volts via overhead lines to the mine, where it is transformed down to either 6,600 volts, 1,000 volts or 525 volts,
depending on the requirement. On average the mine consumes 30 MW of power. Any shortfall from the hydro units is made up by the
diesel units (a total of 3.2 MW of diesel generating power is installed).
are installed, capable of generating 1.8 MW of power. These units are dependant on the supply of adequate water. These generators
supply 32,000 volts via overhead lines to the mine, where it is transformed down to either 6,600 volts, 1,000 volts or 525 volts,
depending on the requirement. On average the mine consumes 30 MW of power. Any shortfall from the hydro units is made up by the
diesel units (a total of 3.2 MW of diesel generating power is installed).
Several capital projects were conducted over the period fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2005, including expansion of the mobile plant and
additions to plant, and equipment of approximately $5.8 million, and $2.9 million on underground exploration.
Environmental and closure aspects
The Tolukuma Section has been developed in accordance with an environmental plan approved by the Papua New Guinea
authorities in July 1994. The Tolukuma Section is compliant with the Papua New Guinea Government’s regulatory requirements. To
ensure continuing compliance with the government’s regulatory requirements, Tolukuma has implemented a broad-based Environmental
Management and Monitoring Program, or EMMP. The measures we have taken to implement this program include addressing water
quality, population dietary surveys and aquatic fauna and metals-in-tissue surveys. These surveys were conducted during July and
September of calendar 2003. During March 2003, an environmental audit was concluded at the Tolukuma Section which found the
operations to be in substantial compliance with applicable Papua New Guinea legislation and the EMMP environmental plan. The studies
conducted in 2003 confirmed existing trends that had been established over recent years. The water quality meets legal requirements, as
per the cri teria set by the water license.
ensure continuing compliance with the government’s regulatory requirements, Tolukuma has implemented a broad-based Environmental
Management and Monitoring Program, or EMMP. The measures we have taken to implement this program include addressing water
quality, population dietary surveys and aquatic fauna and metals-in-tissue surveys. These surveys were conducted during July and
September of calendar 2003. During March 2003, an environmental audit was concluded at the Tolukuma Section which found the
operations to be in substantial compliance with applicable Papua New Guinea legislation and the EMMP environmental plan. The studies
conducted in 2003 confirmed existing trends that had been established over recent years. The water quality meets legal requirements, as
per the cri teria set by the water license.
Tailings are routinely discharged into the Auga/Angabanga river system. The discharging of tailings into riverine and marine
systems in Papua New Guinea is an acceptable practice due to the seismic instability of the area and the dangers this poses for the stability
of conventional tailings dams. Due to the fact that ore mined at the Tolukuma Mine, and the surrounding land in general is high in
mercury, the potential does exist that levels of mercury discharged into the river system might expose us to criminal liability under Papua
New Guinea legislation. As result of an internal study of the Tolukuma Mine in 2000, in order to ensure that mercury discharges remain
within allowable limits, the following program is being followed:
of conventional tailings dams. Due to the fact that ore mined at the Tolukuma Mine, and the surrounding land in general is high in
mercury, the potential does exist that levels of mercury discharged into the river system might expose us to criminal liability under Papua
New Guinea legislation. As result of an internal study of the Tolukuma Mine in 2000, in order to ensure that mercury discharges remain
within allowable limits, the following program is being followed:
•
daily monitoring of mercury levels at the tailings discharge point and approximately 1500 feet downstream (grab sampling);
•
monthly monitoring of mercury and other heavy metals at government mandated water quality inspection points; and
•
biennial monitoring of stream sediments.
Lead, mercury, and arsenic occur naturally in the ore processed at the Tolukuma Section. The concentration of these metals is
reduced when the ore is processed and there is strict monitoring of these metals. Cyanide is used in the gold recovery process and the
Tolukuma Section has a detoxification plant which reduces the levels of cyanide discharged to permissible levels. The Tolukuma Section
has a water permit, issued by the Papua New Guinea Government, to permit discharge into the local river system at acceptable monitored
limits.
Tolukuma Section has a detoxification plant which reduces the levels of cyanide discharged to permissible levels. The Tolukuma Section
has a water permit, issued by the Papua New Guinea Government, to permit discharge into the local river system at acceptable monitored
limits.
Through visits with local communities by mine staff members, we have been informed that communities located downstream from
the Tolukuma Mine do not generally use water from the Auga/Angabanga river system for consumption as these communities rely on
water from creeks, tributaries and strategically placed wells, many of which we have provided, and we are not aware of any adverse
health effects on communities associated with the Tolukuma Mine.
water from creeks, tributaries and strategically placed wells, many of which we have provided, and we are not aware of any adverse
health effects on communities associated with the Tolukuma Mine.
Furthermore, we are not aware of any scientific or engineering report that states that the level of mercury discharges from the
Tolukuma Mine into the Auga/Angabanga river system is harmful to human life. In November 2002, Oxfam Community Aid Abroad
released their “Mining Ombudsman Annual Report 2001-2002” which we believe made inaccurate and unsubstantiated references to
mercury output and other findings contained in an internally prepared study on the Tolukuma Section done in 2000. This study was not
conclusive on the mercury output at the Tolukuma Section and the results of this study were not scientifically tested. As discussed above,
we increased our environmental management systems in response to this study.
released their “Mining Ombudsman Annual Report 2001-2002” which we believe made inaccurate and unsubstantiated references to
mercury output and other findings contained in an internally prepared study on the Tolukuma Section done in 2000. This study was not
conclusive on the mercury output at the Tolukuma Section and the results of this study were not scientifically tested. As discussed above,
we increased our environmental management systems in response to this study.
Two water quality and geochemical investigations were conducted by an independent consultant in July 2000 and June 2002. These
investigations concluded that there were was little difference between mercury concentrations in mining sediment from the Tolukuma
Mine being dumped into the Auga/Angabanga river system and the naturally occurring sediments in the area. Although mercury is
detectable in the mining derived sediments immediately adjacent to the discharge point, these levels are immediately diluted to levels
below detectable limits upon meeting with the Alabule River. This area consists of steep gorges and fast, turbid currents. The result is a
high dilution of mining sediments and, therefore, negligible impact on the lower Angabanga floodplain and oxbow lakes which are
located downstream from the Tolukuma Mine. An additional study took place during June 2003, reinforcing earlier findings. While the
ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that the total cost for the Toluku ma
Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $1.2 million. This has been included in the provision for environmental
rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs on our balance sheet.
Mine being dumped into the Auga/Angabanga river system and the naturally occurring sediments in the area. Although mercury is
detectable in the mining derived sediments immediately adjacent to the discharge point, these levels are immediately diluted to levels
below detectable limits upon meeting with the Alabule River. This area consists of steep gorges and fast, turbid currents. The result is a
high dilution of mining sediments and, therefore, negligible impact on the lower Angabanga floodplain and oxbow lakes which are
located downstream from the Tolukuma Mine. An additional study took place during June 2003, reinforcing earlier findings. While the
ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that the total cost for the Toluku ma
Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $1.2 million. This has been included in the provision for environmental
rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs on our balance sheet.
61
Life of Mine
Proven and Probable Ore Reserves for the Tolukuma Section, as at June 30, 2005, were 0.22 million ounces, assuming a gold
price of K1,313 per ounce ($381 per ounce). Based on a gold price of $400 per ounce and an exchange rate of K3.22 = $1.00, at June 30,
2004, the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Tolukuma Section were 0.2 million ounces. The 0.02 million ounces increase is
primarily due to the focus on development at the Tolukuma mine.
2004, the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Tolukuma Section were 0.2 million ounces. The 0.02 million ounces increase is
primarily due to the focus on development at the Tolukuma mine.
A Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at each operation to review our Ore Reserves calculations for accuracy. For
Tolukuma, Joe Sine (AusIMM) is the appointed Mineral Resource competent person. As at June 30, 2005, the Tolukuma gold mine has
been assessed with a two year life of mine for both its underground and surface operations.
been assessed with a two year life of mine for both its underground and surface operations.
Current Production
Total gold production for fiscal 2005 was 76,314 ounces compared to 85,715 ounces for fiscal 2004 and 68,096 ounces for fiscal
2003. The Tolukuma Section also produced 168,314 ounces of silver in fiscal 2005 compared to 180,252 ounces of silver in fiscal 2004
and 157,844 ounces of silver in fiscal 2003. Cash costs increased to $331 per ounce of gold in fiscal 2005 from $231 per ounce of gold in
fiscal 2004, primarily due to lower grades, the higher cost of fuel and the logistics involved in keeping the mine supplied with
consumables and services. Total cost per ounce increased to $434 per ounce in fiscal 2005 from $355 per ounce in fiscal 2004 and
decreased to $355 per ounce in fiscal 2004 from $441 per ounce in fiscal 2003.
and 157,844 ounces of silver in fiscal 2003. Cash costs increased to $331 per ounce of gold in fiscal 2005 from $231 per ounce of gold in
fiscal 2004, primarily due to lower grades, the higher cost of fuel and the logistics involved in keeping the mine supplied with
consumables and services. Total cost per ounce increased to $434 per ounce in fiscal 2005 from $355 per ounce in fiscal 2004 and
decreased to $355 per ounce in fiscal 2004 from $441 per ounce in fiscal 2003.
The following table details the operating and production results from the Tolukuma Section for the past three fiscal years.
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Production
Underground Operations
Ore mined (`000 tons) ........................................................................................................................
Ore mined (`000 tons) ........................................................................................................................
235
218
177
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ...................................................................................................................
0.33
0.39
0.38
Gold produced (ounces) .....................................................................................................................
76,314
85,715
68,096
Results of Operations ($)
Revenues ('000) ...................................................................................................................................
Revenues ('000) ...................................................................................................................................
32,446
32,743
22,870
Production cost ('000)..........................................................................................................................
25,278
19,821
19,105
Non US GAAP Financial Data
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
.........................................................................................................
331
231
281
Total cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
.........................................................................................................
434
355
441
1
Cash cost per ounce and total cost per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures of performance that we use to determine cash generating
capacities of the mines and to monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
62
Fiji
Emperor Mines Limited
Overview
As of July 30, 2004, we own, through DRD (Isle of Man), 45.33% of Emperor Mines Limited, the owner of the Vatukoula mine.
The mine located at Vatukoula on the South Pacific island nation of Fiji, has been in operation since 1933 with 6.8 million
ounces of gold produced since operations commenced. The Emperor mine is a multi-shaft underground mine. Our 45.33% attributable
share of Emperor’s gold production for the year ended June 30, 2005 was 45,426 ounces. The Vatukoula mine is Fiji's second largest
private employer with approximately 1,990 employees at June 30, 2005, and accounts for approximately 8.0% of Fiji's national foreign
income on that date.
share of Emperor’s gold production for the year ended June 30, 2005 was 45,426 ounces. The Vatukoula mine is Fiji's second largest
private employer with approximately 1,990 employees at June 30, 2005, and accounts for approximately 8.0% of Fiji's national foreign
income on that date.
On September 13, 2004, Emperor announced an A$20.4 million ($14.6 million) non-renounceable rights issue. See Item 4A.:
“History and Development of the Company.” Emperor’s rights offering closed on November 12, 2004, and we subscribed for our
entitlement under the rights offering. We did not participate in any shortfall to the rights offer.
entitlement under the rights offering. We did not participate in any shortfall to the rights offer.
Subsequent to June 30, 2005, we initiated a financing and operating assistance package to Emperor. This follows a complete
review by us of Emperor’s operations. To assist Emperor with its restructuring plan, we have agreed to provide an A$10.0 million ($7.6
million) Convertible Loan Facility to Emperor as part of a re-financing package, which includes an agreement with ANZ Bank to
restructure Emperor’s existing debt servicing obligations.
million) Convertible Loan Facility to Emperor as part of a re-financing package, which includes an agreement with ANZ Bank to
restructure Emperor’s existing debt servicing obligations.
ANZ Bank has given its consent to the granting of the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security to us. In addition the
Australian Stock Exchange has also granted Emperor a waiver of certain listing rules required to permit Emperor to grant such security to
us on the terms incorporated in the Convertible Loan Facility. The Convertible Loan Facility, which was negotiated on behalf of Emperor
by its independent directors, carries an interest rate of 9% per annum and is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100%
interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji.
us on the terms incorporated in the Convertible Loan Facility. The Convertible Loan Facility, which was negotiated on behalf of Emperor
by its independent directors, carries an interest rate of 9% per annum and is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100%
interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji.
The Convertible Loan Facility is repayable upon either the receipt of the proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s interest
in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect, or by December 31, 2007. Emperor has previously announced a conditional sale agreement in relation to the
Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of approximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion of that
transaction.
Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of approximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion of that
transaction.
The Convertible Loan Facility is convertible, at our election, into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor at a conversion price
equal to the lower of A$0.30 ($0.23) per Emperor share or the 45 day volume weighted average price of Emperor shares on the Australian
Stock Exchange prior to the date of conversion.
Stock Exchange prior to the date of conversion.
The Convertible Loan Facility was approved by the shareholders of Emperor on August 29, 2005. We did not participate in the
voting.
Pursuant to the terms of an operational support agreement, also negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, we
will provide Emperor with management and technical services.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire
our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets,
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
The purchase consideration will be settled by the issue of new Emperor shares and a portion in cash. Upon completion of the
transaction and the issue of the new Emperor shares, we will hold approximately 90.5% of Emperor and Emperor will become our
subsidiary.
subsidiary.
Separate consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for Emperor for its fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
are being filed pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
63
Property
The mine is situated 60km on the north east of the city of Nadi, off the coast of the island of Viti Levu, the main island of
Fiji. Gold mineralization is associated with a volcanic caldera, and occurs in both flat-lying and steeply-dipping structures, typically
less than a meter in width, principally on the western fringe of the caldera. The mine can be accessed via the highway from Nadi to the
Vatukoula Mine. Mining is conducted underground from four main shafts exploiting the ore bodies in the southwest portion of the
volcanic margin to the Tavua Caldera, a large shield volcano about 9 miles (15 kilometers) in diameter and the recently accessed R1
ore bodies situated within the caldera. The main mining licenses include Special Mining Lease 54, 55 and 56.
less than a meter in width, principally on the western fringe of the caldera. The mine can be accessed via the highway from Nadi to the
Vatukoula Mine. Mining is conducted underground from four main shafts exploiting the ore bodies in the southwest portion of the
volcanic margin to the Tavua Caldera, a large shield volcano about 9 miles (15 kilometers) in diameter and the recently accessed R1
ore bodies situated within the caldera. The main mining licenses include Special Mining Lease 54, 55 and 56.
History
1930
Discovery of alluvial gold in the Nasivi river in Vatukoula.
1933
Commencement of mining activities at the Vatukoula mine.
1950s
Emperor secures ownership of the Vatukoula mining field.
1992
Western Mining Corporation relinquishes its joint venture with respect to the EmperorGold Mine.
2003
We acquired a 19.81% interest in Emperor.
2004
In July 2004, we increased our shareholding in Emperor to 45.33% through a conditional takeover offer. Emperor appointed
our Executive Chairman, Mark Wellesley-Wood as Managing Director and our Divisional Director: Australasia, Richard
Johnson as Non-Executive Director, both with effect from August 3, 2004.
In November 2004, Emperor’s rights offer closed and we subscribed for our entitlement under the rights offer
our Executive Chairman, Mark Wellesley-Wood as Managing Director and our Divisional Director: Australasia, Richard
Johnson as Non-Executive Director, both with effect from August 3, 2004.
In November 2004, Emperor’s rights offer closed and we subscribed for our entitlement under the rights offer
2005
In August 2005, the shareholders approved a convertible loan facility to assist with Emperor’s restructuring plan. An
operational and support agreement was also signed pursuant to which we will provide Emperor with management and
technical services.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will
acquire our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua
New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited and all of our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
operational and support agreement was also signed pursuant to which we will provide Emperor with management and
technical services.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will
acquire our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua
New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited and all of our exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
Geology and Mineralization
Vatukoula is a low-sulphidation epithermal gold deposit associated with alkaline type igneous rocks in a volcanic setting. This
volcanic setting and rock type is typical of several major gold mines in the southwest Pacific region, such as Porgera. The ore deposits lie
along the margin of Tavua volcanic caldera and consist of various types of quartz-adularia-telluride-auriferous-pyrite fillings deposited in
fractured, faulted and shattered volcanic rocks.
along the margin of Tavua volcanic caldera and consist of various types of quartz-adularia-telluride-auriferous-pyrite fillings deposited in
fractured, faulted and shattered volcanic rocks.
The majority of the Vatukoula mine's ore bodies are situated in the southwest portion of the volcanic margin of the Tavua
volcanic caldera, a large shield volcano about 9.3 miles (15.0 kilometers) in diameter.
Volcanism commenced about 5 million years ago and ceased about 3.5 million years ago. The ore bodies were the last major
geological event and mineralized fractures persist throughout the very late stage sediments that filled in the central part of the caldera. The
gold is found as native gold, auriferous pyrite, and as gold tellurides.
gold is found as native gold, auriferous pyrite, and as gold tellurides.
Mining and Processing
Most of the known ore bodies at Vatukoula are relatively narrow, flat dipping structures previously mined by room and pillar
methods. They are now mined predominantly by longwall stoping, although throughout the mine a number of other mining methods, such
as sub-level stoping and caving, cut-and-fill, shrinkage stoping and up-dip mining, are also practiced. The remnants of 50 years of room
and pillar mining are also currently being successfully exploited.
as sub-level stoping and caving, cut-and-fill, shrinkage stoping and up-dip mining, are also practiced. The remnants of 50 years of room
and pillar mining are also currently being successfully exploited.
Current production at the Vatukoula mine comes from four mining sections that are named according to the shaft or drive
access: Smith Shaft, Philip Shaft, R1-Cayzer Shaft and the Emperor Decline Shaft.
The Emperor plant, built in 1997, consists of two parallel grinding mills, namely a Smith grinding mill and a larger
Morgardshammer mill. There are also two flotation circuits, one for slimes washed from the ore, and a conventional sulphide circuit for
the grinding circuit product. Both circuits are combined in a thickener and roasted before passing through a CIP circuit. Loaded carbon is
stripped and the gold-rich solution is combined with the calcine rich solution for zinc precipitation before being smelt into bars. As at
June 30, 2005, the plant utilizes approximately 75% of its capacity.
the grinding circuit product. Both circuits are combined in a thickener and roasted before passing through a CIP circuit. Loaded carbon is
stripped and the gold-rich solution is combined with the calcine rich solution for zinc precipitation before being smelt into bars. As at
June 30, 2005, the plant utilizes approximately 75% of its capacity.
64
Exploration and development
Emperor holds three mining tenements. Special Mining Lease:
•
S54 – covers an area of approximately 610 m
2
and expires on March 21, 2025;
•
S55 - covers an area of approximately 400 m
2
and expires on March 21, 2025; and
•
S56 – covers an area of approximately 250 m
2
and expires on March 21, 2025.
Additionally, Emperor holds 100% of Special Prospecting Licenses, or SPLs, for tenements 1201, 1283, 1296, 1344, 1360 and
1411. Emperor has also submitted applications for Special Prospecting License CX626 situated south of and adjacent to SPL 1411 on the
island of Vanua Levu.
island of Vanua Levu.
Environmental and closure aspects
The Emperor Section is subject to Fiji environmental regulations in respect of its exploration and mining activities. The Emperor
board’s policy is to work with Government environmental protection agencies to ensure compliance with all relevant regulations. In
addition, the Emperor Section undertakes environmental projects which it considers appropriate.
addition, the Emperor Section undertakes environmental projects which it considers appropriate.
The Emperor Section has an internal reporting system with regard to environmental activities, and operational managers are
required to provide monthly updates on performance to the Managing Director who brings, and allows, operational managers to bring,
major issues to the attention of the Emperor board of directors. We are not aware of any environmental issues in the Emperor Section that
could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s business.
major issues to the attention of the Emperor board of directors. We are not aware of any environmental issues in the Emperor Section that
could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s business.
Life of Mine
Based on a gold price of approximately $420 per ounce (A$551 per ounce) at an exchange rate of A$1.31 = $1 at June 30, 2005,
our 45.33% share of the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the Emperor Section has increased by 40.6% or 0.1 million ounces, mainly
due to the additional 25.5% interest acquired in July 2004. Emperor’s current life-of-mine plan is based on a projected life of 5 years. A
Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at each operation to review our Ore Reserves calculations for accuracy. For Emperor,
Greg MacDonald (AusIMM) is the appointed Mineral Resource competent person.
due to the additional 25.5% interest acquired in July 2004. Emperor’s current life-of-mine plan is based on a projected life of 5 years. A
Mineral Resource competent person is appointed at each operation to review our Ore Reserves calculations for accuracy. For Emperor,
Greg MacDonald (AusIMM) is the appointed Mineral Resource competent person.
Current production
Emperor’s production or related revenue and costs are not consolidated into our results, as we account for the associate’s results
using the equity method. Total gold production decreased in fiscal 2005 to 113,892 from 118,581 in fiscal 2004. The decrease in
production resulted primarily from delays in the Philip Shaft Deepening Project; poor heavy vehicle availability due to delays in the re-
build program and ageing fleet; lower than expected mining grades; high levels of absenteeism in the workforce; and flooding on the
lower levels of the Smith Shaft in April 2005.
production resulted primarily from delays in the Philip Shaft Deepening Project; poor heavy vehicle availability due to delays in the re-
build program and ageing fleet; lower than expected mining grades; high levels of absenteeism in the workforce; and flooding on the
lower levels of the Smith Shaft in April 2005.
The following table details our 45.33% attributable share of the production results from the Emperor Section for fiscal 2005:
Period ended June 30
2005
1
Production
Surface and underground operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)..................................................................................................................................................
Ore mined ('000 tons)..................................................................................................................................................
234
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ............................................................................................................................................
0.19
Gold produced (ounces) ..............................................................................................................................................
45,426
1
We increased our ownership in Emperor to 45.33% with effect from July 30, 2004 and Emperor is now accounted for using the equity method. As a
result we have not disclosed the attributable portion of Emperor’s production results for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003.
65
Exploration Projects
Our exploration and project development activities during fiscal 2005 continued to enhance our growth strategy by growing
the Tolukuma Section (through both brownfields and greenfields exploration). Total exploration and project expenditure for fiscal
2005 was $2.1 million for the Tolukuma Section. During fiscal 2005, we lodged an application for a prospecting right in respect of the
Argonaut area in South Africa. ERPM also lodged an application for a prospecting right over the Sallies area in South Africa. Both
these applications are pending at the Department of Minerals and Energy.
2005 was $2.1 million for the Tolukuma Section. During fiscal 2005, we lodged an application for a prospecting right in respect of the
Argonaut area in South Africa. ERPM also lodged an application for a prospecting right over the Sallies area in South Africa. Both
these applications are pending at the Department of Minerals and Energy.
South Africa
Argonaut Project
The Argonaut Project represents the southern down-dip extension of the Central Rand Goldfield. The strike length of the area
covered by the mineral rights covers approximately 19 miles (30 kilometers) from Durban Deep in the west to ERPM in the east with the
possible exploitation of part of the potential mineralized material striking 3 miles (5 kilometers) east/west from City Deep Mine to
Robinson Deep Mine and extending from 9,900 feet to 13,200 feet (3,018 meters to 4,023 meters) below surface. Most of the main
exploration target area incorporated by our 42 square kilometers of mineral rights above the 5,000 meter depth contour of the Main
Reef Leader is covered by urban residential development. The mining activity may, as a result, give rise to an increase in seismicity and
associated environmental pollution in the immediate proximity of the mine. If operated, this would be the first mine in the world to
operate at such depths and the seismicity associated with the mining activity and the impact on the health and safety of the mine
employees working in the underground section is unknown at this stage. The environmental risks could result in public opposition to the
project and delay our application for the necessary permits, or prevent the implementation of the project.
possible exploitation of part of the potential mineralized material striking 3 miles (5 kilometers) east/west from City Deep Mine to
Robinson Deep Mine and extending from 9,900 feet to 13,200 feet (3,018 meters to 4,023 meters) below surface. Most of the main
exploration target area incorporated by our 42 square kilometers of mineral rights above the 5,000 meter depth contour of the Main
Reef Leader is covered by urban residential development. The mining activity may, as a result, give rise to an increase in seismicity and
associated environmental pollution in the immediate proximity of the mine. If operated, this would be the first mine in the world to
operate at such depths and the seismicity associated with the mining activity and the impact on the health and safety of the mine
employees working in the underground section is unknown at this stage. The environmental risks could result in public opposition to the
project and delay our application for the necessary permits, or prevent the implementation of the project.
In utilizing a comprehensive computerized database of historical underground sample and borehole core assay values of the
Main Reef and Main Reef Leader, sedimentological and structural interpretations of these major gold-bearing ore bodies across the
former Central Rand have been undertaken with the objective of defining sedimentological facies trends and delineating geozones for
statistical and geostatistical estimation purposes and predictive analysis. A log-linear extrapolation technique was applied to the trend
directions exhibited within the data for each geodomain, enabling the calculation of the likely distances over which the gold
accumulation decreases within the respective geodomains down the palaeoslope. The end product is a grade block model for the Main
Reef Leader showing the rapid downdip decrease in the gold accumulation in all of the defined geodomains.
former Central Rand have been undertaken with the objective of defining sedimentological facies trends and delineating geozones for
statistical and geostatistical estimation purposes and predictive analysis. A log-linear extrapolation technique was applied to the trend
directions exhibited within the data for each geodomain, enabling the calculation of the likely distances over which the gold
accumulation decreases within the respective geodomains down the palaeoslope. The end product is a grade block model for the Main
Reef Leader showing the rapid downdip decrease in the gold accumulation in all of the defined geodomains.
Renewed focus had been placed on progressing the Argonaut Project by reviewing the geological modeling in the project
target area and valuation model. The results were a substantial downgrading of the estimated mineralized material from that previously
reported. Due to unreliable data, no estimate of mineralized material was deduced for the Main Reef. Future work will include the
drilling of three additional boreholes to test the model and extrapolations and estimates, and upgrade and increase the mineralized
material estimate within our mineral rights area.
reported. Due to unreliable data, no estimate of mineralized material was deduced for the Main Reef. Future work will include the
drilling of three additional boreholes to test the model and extrapolations and estimates, and upgrade and increase the mineralized
material estimate within our mineral rights area.
At June 30, 2005, no Ore Reserves have been included in the Proven and Probable Ore Reserve statement. The lead time to
mining any reserves is estimated to be in excess of 10 years.
During fiscal 2004, progress on advancing the Argonaut Project towards a bankable feasibility study was hampered by the
low Rand gold price and the enactment of the MPRD Act which delayed the issuing of a prospecting permit by the DME. Under the
MPRD Act, the prospecting permit is classified as a pending application and, as a result, only geological modeling and resource
estimation took place.
MPRD Act, the prospecting permit is classified as a pending application and, as a result, only geological modeling and resource
estimation took place.
During fiscal 2005, the Argonaut mineral rights reverted to the South African Government. We lodged an application for a
prospecting right in respect of the Argonaut area, which is pending at the Department of Minerals and Energy. The Argonaut Project
still represents a promising, yet challenging deep-level mining development opportunity which is dependent on significant increases in
the Rand gold price before becoming viable.
still represents a promising, yet challenging deep-level mining development opportunity which is dependent on significant increases in
the Rand gold price before becoming viable.
66
Papua New Guinea
Tolukuma Section
Tolukuma has ten Exploration Licenses, or ELs, as well as one new EL application and a Mining Lease 104, or ML104. The
ML104 covers an area of 7.68 square kilometers and has extensive exploration tenements in the vicinity of the mine covering
approximately 9,937 square kilometers and within 40 minutes flying radius of the mine site. The Tolukuma Section is being explored
using geophysical surveys, interpretation of satellite images, mapping and sampling of streams. This is followed up by detailed
mapping, trenching and drilling of prospective target areas.
approximately 9,937 square kilometers and within 40 minutes flying radius of the mine site. The Tolukuma Section is being explored
using geophysical surveys, interpretation of satellite images, mapping and sampling of streams. This is followed up by detailed
mapping, trenching and drilling of prospective target areas.
Exploration within the mining lease was expanded with the purchase of two underground diamond drill rigs, including one
with long hole capability, and an additional rig for surface drilling. This brings the number of rigs on site to five in fiscal 2004,
compared to only one in fiscal 2003. No new drills were added during fiscal 2005. The short-term focus will continue to be on
increasing the resource base at and around the Tolukuma Section.
compared to only one in fiscal 2003. No new drills were added during fiscal 2005. The short-term focus will continue to be on
increasing the resource base at and around the Tolukuma Section.
In fiscal 2005, exploration was focused on finding resources for mill feed. Much of this work involved diamond drilling
concentrated mostly within ML104. Some regional exploration was also carried out in a few of the outer ELs. An intensive diamond-
drilling program with associated fieldwork is planned for the coming year. This work is aimed at testing more than sixteen drill targets
identified and classified within ML104. More regional exploration work is also being planned for other ELs outside of EL580 and
ML104.
drilling program with associated fieldwork is planned for the coming year. This work is aimed at testing more than sixteen drill targets
identified and classified within ML104. More regional exploration work is also being planned for other ELs outside of EL580 and
ML104.
Much of the ML104 exploration involved diamond drill testing of mostly known structures both on surface and underground.
Tolukuma’s five diamond drill rigs which includes three surface (DT250P, DT600O, LY 44) and two underground (LMA 90,
KEMPE) were all utilized. All rigs except the DT250P stayed within ML104. The DT250P also drilled 3 holes at the Mt. Sen prospect
with EL580. During the year, a total of 68 holes have been drilled for a total of 23,487 meters.
KEMPE) were all utilized. All rigs except the DT250P stayed within ML104. The DT250P also drilled 3 holes at the Mt. Sen prospect
with EL580. During the year, a total of 68 holes have been drilled for a total of 23,487 meters.
Diamond drilling underground led to the discovery of several new structures. The more significant structure is the
Degot/Fundoot with over 70,000 ounces contained gold potential. This structure has already been accessed from underground and is
likely to be mined in the near future. The southern extension of this structure is currently being tested.
likely to be mined in the near future. The southern extension of this structure is currently being tested.
Another structure with about a 200 meter strike length and thought to be the fault-displaced portion of the Zine and Gulbadi
(converged) has also been drill tested. A couple of high grade intersections have been obtained within this structure including one
1.5 meters at 42.9 g/t. The southern extension is also being tested with the LMA 90 rig in the process of testing the Degot/Fundoot. All
results from this structure will be reviewed to further assess the resource potential.
1.5 meters at 42.9 g/t. The southern extension is also being tested with the LMA 90 rig in the process of testing the Degot/Fundoot. All
results from this structure will be reviewed to further assess the resource potential.
Follow-up exploration work in fiscal 2005 continued at the Gulbadi Red Structure, Zine/120, Sawmill and the Banana-Snake
Creek. Additionally, limited surface mapping and sampling resulted in the discovery of a number of new structures within the
southern portion of the lease. The first two are the Tolukuma South and Tolukuma Southeast structures which returned highest trench
results of 0.8 meters at 7.4 g/t and 1.0 meters at 3.9 g/t respectively. Further work is required in these areas. Exploration work was also
undertaken in the following areas: Gira (under EL 1297), Aikora (under EL 1327) and Minaru (under EL 1264).
southern portion of the lease. The first two are the Tolukuma South and Tolukuma Southeast structures which returned highest trench
results of 0.8 meters at 7.4 g/t and 1.0 meters at 3.9 g/t respectively. Further work is required in these areas. Exploration work was also
undertaken in the following areas: Gira (under EL 1297), Aikora (under EL 1327) and Minaru (under EL 1264).
Exploration tenements remain in good standing and our mine lease ML104, expires on August 29, 2012. Below is a summary of
exploration licenses:
EL No
No of Sub blocks
Area under EL (sq km)
Status
Expiry date
683
30
102
under renewal
April 3, 2005
580
68
230
under renewal
April 4, 2005
1264
75
254
under renewal
April 29, 2005
1327
146
494
under renewal
June 23, 2005
894
75
254
under renewal
April 3, 2005
1284
58
196
current
April 18, 2006
1297
75
254
current
August 30, 2006
1271
564
1,909
current
January 4, 2007
1352
550
1,862
current
October 18, 2006
1366
403
1,364
current
January 4, 2007
1379
648
2,194
current
May 3, 2007
Totals
2,692
9,114
67
Closed Operations
North West Operations
Overview
Until March 22, 2005, we owned 100% of the North West Operations through our wholly owned subsidiary, Buffelsfontein
Gold Mines Limited, which in turn owns 100% of Hartebeestfontein Gold Mining Company Limited and Duff Scott Hospital (Pty)
Limited. The consolidated mining operations of the North West Operations consisted of the Buffels Section and the Harties Section,
which lie adjacent to each other within the Klerksdorp Goldfield on the northwestern rim of the Witwatersrand Basin.
Limited. The consolidated mining operations of the North West Operations consisted of the Buffels Section and the Harties Section,
which lie adjacent to each other within the Klerksdorp Goldfield on the northwestern rim of the Witwatersrand Basin.
Since its inception in 1949, Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited has produced over 32 million ounces of gold, with 20,100 tons
of uranium as a by-product.
Mining activity at the Harties Section, including exploration, development and production dates back to 1949 with gold
production from the area totaling over 38 million ounces, with uranium oxide, sulfuric acid, pyrite and silver being recovered as by-
products.
products.
On July 21, 2003, we entered into a 60-day review period on our North West Operations designed to restore the operations to
profitability. An agreement was reached with all labor organizations and the process was completed on September 21, 2003, with
approximately 3,000 employees retrenched and the placing of No. 6 Shaft of the Harties Section on a “care and maintenance” program,
effectively suspending the use of the asset. On March 16, 2004, we reopened the No. 6 Shaft at the Harties Section to mine high grade
areas on a selective basis. We recalled approximately 800 employees previously retrenched from the North West Operations to man this
shaft. On February 18, 2004, we announced the closure of the No. 11 Shaft in the Buffels Section after the revised work practices
implemented based on the operational review proved to be unsustainable. As a result, approximately 1,000 employees were retrenched.
The total cost of the July 21, 2003 and March 16, 2004 retrenchments was $7.1 million.
approximately 3,000 employees retrenched and the placing of No. 6 Shaft of the Harties Section on a “care and maintenance” program,
effectively suspending the use of the asset. On March 16, 2004, we reopened the No. 6 Shaft at the Harties Section to mine high grade
areas on a selective basis. We recalled approximately 800 employees previously retrenched from the North West Operations to man this
shaft. On February 18, 2004, we announced the closure of the No. 11 Shaft in the Buffels Section after the revised work practices
implemented based on the operational review proved to be unsustainable. As a result, approximately 1,000 employees were retrenched.
The total cost of the July 21, 2003 and March 16, 2004 retrenchments was $7.1 million.
With the continuing strength of the Rand and the decline in the Rand gold price, we entered into a 60-day review period at the
Buffels Section at our North West Operations on June 26, 2004, in order to restore profitability. An agreement was reached with all the
relevant parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12 Shafts in operation, on the condition that
certain defined sustainability thresholds are met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of 120 employees at this mining operation
during fiscal 2005, at a cost of R 3.7 million ($0.6 million). At October 31, 2004, approximately 600 employees were employed at No. 10
and 12 Shafts.
relevant parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12 Shafts in operation, on the condition that
certain defined sustainability thresholds are met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of 120 employees at this mining operation
during fiscal 2005, at a cost of R 3.7 million ($0.6 million). At October 31, 2004, approximately 600 employees were employed at No. 10
and 12 Shafts.
On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake of 5.3 on the Richter scale. As a
consequence of the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited, which order was granted on the same day. For further details, see the “Legal Proceedings” section of Item 4D: “Property Plant
and Equipment.”
continuing seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines
Limited, which order was granted on the same day. For further details, see the “Legal Proceedings” section of Item 4D: “Property Plant
and Equipment.”
Property
The North West Operations were located in the Klerksdorp Goldfield of the Witwatersrand Basin approximately 100 miles (161
kilometers) southwest of Johannesburg near the towns of Stilfontein and Klerksdorp, North West Province, and are reached via the R12
Johannesburg-Potchefstroom-Kimberley highway.
Johannesburg-Potchefstroom-Kimberley highway.
The climate of the Highveld area (at an elevation of 5,249 feet (1,600 meters) above mean sea level), where the mine is
situated, is humid continental with warm summers and cold winters. Temperatures range from a minimum of 23 degrees Fahrenheit (-
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
The mines’ infrastructure included the shaft complexes, metallurgical plants, engineering workshops and its associated tailings
dams. Buffels had mining title to 17,575 acres (7,113 hectares) and freehold title to 4,893 acres (1,980 hectares). The Harties Section had
mining title to 15,560 acres (6,297 hectares) and freehold title to 375 acres (152 hectares), all held in the name of Buffels. The Buffels
Section consisted of one mining license, ML4/2001 in respect of statutory mining rights, and one prospecting permit, RP54/2002 in
respect of statutory mining rights and mineral rights held by the Buffels Section.
mining title to 15,560 acres (6,297 hectares) and freehold title to 375 acres (152 hectares), all held in the name of Buffels. The Buffels
Section consisted of one mining license, ML4/2001 in respect of statutory mining rights, and one prospecting permit, RP54/2002 in
respect of statutory mining rights and mineral rights held by the Buffels Section.
Accommodation for staff was situated on the property as well as in the neighboring towns of Stilfontein and Klerksdorp. In
addition to mining its lease area, the Buffels Section operated and mined the adjoining Harties Section mineral rights areas and another
area pursuant to royalty-based tribute agreements with Lucas Block Minerals Limited, a South African company, and the Harties Section.
area pursuant to royalty-based tribute agreements with Lucas Block Minerals Limited, a South African company, and the Harties Section.
68
The average mining depth at the Harties Section is 5,322 feet (1,622.1 meters), 961 feet (292.9 meters) below mean sea level and
at the Buffels Section is 6,099 feet (1,859 meters), 1,790 feet (545.6 meters) below mean sea level.
History
1949
Hartebeestfontein Gold Mining Company Limited, or Hartebeestfontein, was incorporated as a public company in South
Africa on June 20, 1949. The company is dormant and no longer trades.
Africa on June 20, 1949. The company is dormant and no longer trades.
1995
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Buffels, was incorporated and registered as a public company in South Africa on
September 20, 1995, under the name Camelian Investments (Pty) Ltd.Camelian Investments changed its name to
September 20, 1995, under the name Camelian Investments (Pty) Ltd.Camelian Investments changed its name to
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Ltd on December 29, 1995. As of December 31, 1995, Buffels acquired the assets and liabilities
of the Buffelsfontein mine division of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Company Limited previously managed by Gencor
Limited, a South African mining company.
of the Buffelsfontein mine division of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Company Limited previously managed by Gencor
Limited, a South African mining company.
1997
We acquired Buffels on September 15, 1997.
1999
On August 16, 1999, Buffels acquired both the Harties business assets and Hartebeestfontein from Avgold Limited.
2003
On July 21, 2003, we entered into a 60-day review period of our North West Operations. The process was completed on
September 21, 2003, with approximately 3,000 employees retrenched at a cost of $6.5 million and the placing of certain
infrastructure (No. 6 Shaft at the Harties Section) on a “care and maintenance” program.
September 21, 2003, with approximately 3,000 employees retrenched at a cost of $6.5 million and the placing of certain
infrastructure (No. 6 Shaft at the Harties Section) on a “care and maintenance” program.
2004
In March 2004, the No. 6 Shaft at the Harties Section was reopened to mine high grade areas on a selective basis. We recruited
800 staff previously retrenched to man this shaft.
In April 2004, the No. 11 Shaft at the Buffels Section was closed as the shaft reached the end of its economic life.
Approximately 1,000 employees were retrenched at a cost of $0.6 million.
In September 2004, the No. 9 Shaft at the Buffels Section was closed as the shaft reached the end of its economic life.
800 staff previously retrenched to man this shaft.
In April 2004, the No. 11 Shaft at the Buffels Section was closed as the shaft reached the end of its economic life.
Approximately 1,000 employees were retrenched at a cost of $0.6 million.
In September 2004, the No. 9 Shaft at the Buffels Section was closed as the shaft reached the end of its economic life.
2005
On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake of 5.3 on the Richter scale.
On March 16, 2005, further seismic activity in the area occurred and we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the
employees’ safety.
On March 22, 2005, an application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, which order was granted on the same day.
On October 6, 2005, we concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Limited, or S&J for the sale of its shareholding in
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited subject to certain conditions.
On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited proposed by S&J
and accepted by the majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of
South Africa.
All the conditions of the scheme have been met, and the order for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the
High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005.
On March 16, 2005, further seismic activity in the area occurred and we closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the
employees’ safety.
On March 22, 2005, an application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, which order was granted on the same day.
On October 6, 2005, we concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Limited, or S&J for the sale of its shareholding in
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited subject to certain conditions.
On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited proposed by S&J
and accepted by the majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of
South Africa.
All the conditions of the scheme have been met, and the order for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the
High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005.
Geology and Mineralization
The Buffels Section and Harties Section, were predominantly underground operating mines located within a geographical region
known as the Witwatersrand Basin, that exploit gold bearing reefs consisting of Vaal Reef ore and surface sources from previously
discarded low-grade rock dumps. The Vaal Reef is an oligomictic, quartz-pebble conglomerate no more than 20 inches (50
centimeters) thick. Gold is present throughout the reef horizon, but is concentrated on the bottom contact, where carbon commonly
forms as a thin seam.
discarded low-grade rock dumps. The Vaal Reef is an oligomictic, quartz-pebble conglomerate no more than 20 inches (50
centimeters) thick. Gold is present throughout the reef horizon, but is concentrated on the bottom contact, where carbon commonly
forms as a thin seam.
The Buffels Section exploited the Vaal Reef, occurring within the Central Rand Group of the Witwatersrand Supergroup, at
the base of the Strathmore formation. The bulk of the Buffels Section Ore Reserves had been mined-out but the infrastructure was being
used to access remnant reserves and blocks originally bypassed because of structural complexity. Access from the surface to the
underground workings of the mine was through vertical and underground incline shafts. Mining of the reef took place in stope panels.
Holes were drilled into the solid rock and were charged with explosives and blasted. The loosened rock was removed from the stope
panels and was conveyed to the shaft, tipped into the ore-pass systems, hoisted to the surface and conveyed to the metallurgical plant for
gold extraction.
used to access remnant reserves and blocks originally bypassed because of structural complexity. Access from the surface to the
underground workings of the mine was through vertical and underground incline shafts. Mining of the reef took place in stope panels.
Holes were drilled into the solid rock and were charged with explosives and blasted. The loosened rock was removed from the stope
panels and was conveyed to the shaft, tipped into the ore-pass systems, hoisted to the surface and conveyed to the metallurgical plant for
gold extraction.
Similar to the Buffels Section, the Harties Section exploited the Vaal Reef within the Central Rand Group of the
Witwatersrand Supergroup. Gold production at the Harties Section started in 1955 on the Vaal Reef. By the late 1990s the mine had
reached a position where its life was dependent on the mining of shaft pillars and scattered remnants. The Harties Section had been
converted from a high-grade mine with a short life to a medium-grade mine with a longer life. This has been achieved in three stages,
firstly, by the conversion of the previous owners' mine plan and operating method, secondly, by dropping the pay limits and putting in
place a medium-term operational plan including the opening up of old mining areas for remnant mining, and thirdly, developing a
sustainable life of mine plan that would have been supported by areas not included in the previous owners' mining plan due to high pay
limits.
reached a position where its life was dependent on the mining of shaft pillars and scattered remnants. The Harties Section had been
converted from a high-grade mine with a short life to a medium-grade mine with a longer life. This has been achieved in three stages,
firstly, by the conversion of the previous owners' mine plan and operating method, secondly, by dropping the pay limits and putting in
place a medium-term operational plan including the opening up of old mining areas for remnant mining, and thirdly, developing a
sustainable life of mine plan that would have been supported by areas not included in the previous owners' mining plan due to high pay
limits.
69
Mining and processing
Metallurgical processing facilities at the North West Operations included two operating plants. All the underground ore was
processed by the Buffels or South Plant. All the surface material was processed in the North Plant previously known as the Low Grade
Gold Plant, or LGGP, with limited underground material. These plants had a combined operating capacity of 260,000 tpm.
Gold Plant, or LGGP, with limited underground material. These plants had a combined operating capacity of 260,000 tpm.
Electricity for South Africa is provided by Eskom, which is government owned. Eskom is the largest producer of electricity in
Africa. In South Africa, Eskom operates a national power supply grid consisting of 24 power stations across the country. Electricity to the
North West Operations is provided from the Kardell and Hermies substation located between Stilfontein and Orkney in the Buffels area.
Electricity is supplied directly from the national power grid to these substations at 88,000 volts. Further substations, located on mine site,
transform the power to 6,600 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The power supply is further reduced to 525
volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power consumption is about 852 gigawatt hours, or GWHr
and the maximum demand is about 92 megawatts.
North West Operations is provided from the Kardell and Hermies substation located between Stilfontein and Orkney in the Buffels area.
Electricity is supplied directly from the national power grid to these substations at 88,000 volts. Further substations, located on mine site,
transform the power to 6,600 volts for direct supply to the shaft winder and air compressors. The power supply is further reduced to 525
volts for smaller devices and equipment used on the mine. The average annual power consumption is about 852 gigawatt hours, or GWHr
and the maximum demand is about 92 megawatts.
Environmental and closure aspects
Dust pollution was addressed through an active vegetation program and selective ridge plowing in areas marked for
rehabilitation. The vegetation program for the tailings dams was preceded by a detailed scientific and site-specific evaluation of the
tailings complex. Based on the results of geo-chemical analyses performed, the tailings medium was prepared for vegetation by the
addition of lime to neutralize the natural acidic conditions and fertilizer. Vegetation was then established and care is taken to select
species endemic to the area. A variety of species selected were then planted to ensure species diversity using either the leaching
(irrigation) or dry land method. Regular monitoring was conducted. To address dust pollution in unvegetated areas, in the short-term, the
open surface areas on top of the tailings dam are ridge ploughed mechanically. This method significantly reduces dust re-suspension. As
an additional measure in inaccessible areas, environmentally friendly chemical and organic dust suppressants are employ ed, where
necessary.
tailings complex. Based on the results of geo-chemical analyses performed, the tailings medium was prepared for vegetation by the
addition of lime to neutralize the natural acidic conditions and fertilizer. Vegetation was then established and care is taken to select
species endemic to the area. A variety of species selected were then planted to ensure species diversity using either the leaching
(irrigation) or dry land method. Regular monitoring was conducted. To address dust pollution in unvegetated areas, in the short-term, the
open surface areas on top of the tailings dam are ridge ploughed mechanically. This method significantly reduces dust re-suspension. As
an additional measure in inaccessible areas, environmentally friendly chemical and organic dust suppressants are employ ed, where
necessary.
With the sale of Buffelsfontein to S&J, any liabilities or obligations in connection with the environmental rehabilitation of
Buffelsfontein, as well as the management and pumping of underground water are the responsibility of S&J. S&J will have the benefit,
however, of drawing down against the rehabilitation trust fund which was transferred to the Department of Minerals and Energy upon the
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein.
however, of drawing down against the rehabilitation trust fund which was transferred to the Department of Minerals and Energy upon the
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein.
Current Year Production
The following table details the operating and production results from the North West Operations for the past three fiscal years
noting that the fiscal 2005 results are represented up until March 22, 2005, the date that Buffelsfontein was placed into provisional
liquidation:
liquidation:
Year ended June 30,
2005
1
2004
2003
Production
- Surface Operations
- Surface Operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)...............................................................................................................
976
1,647
5,519
Recovered grade (oz/ton) .........................................................................................................
0.028
0.026
0.014
Gold produced (ounces) ...........................................................................................................
27,328
43,180
78,447
- Underground Operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)...............................................................................................................
1,088
1,834
2,774
Recovered grade (oz/ton) .........................................................................................................
0.159
0.163
0.139
Gold produced (ounces) ...........................................................................................................
172,522
298,681
384,296
Total ounces produced..............................................................................................................
199,850
341,861
462,743
Results of Operations ($)
Revenues ('000) ...........................................................................................................................
Revenues ('000) ...........................................................................................................................
81,538
130,036
151,923
Production cost ('000)..................................................................................................................
100,695
134,465
144,568
Non-US GAAP Financial Data
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
2
.................................................................................................
504
393
312
Total cost per ounce of gold ($)
2
.................................................................................................
630
441
321
1
These operating and production results for the Buffels and Harties sections are for the period ending March 22, 2005, which is the date that
Buffelsfontein Gold Mine Limited was placed under provisional liquidation.
2
Cash cost per ounce and total cost per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures of performance that we use to determine cash generating
capacities of the mines and to monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
70
Durban Deep Section
Overview
The Durban Roodepoort Deep Gold Mine, or Durban Deep Section, was the original gold mine of the Group. The section is
situated on the northern edge of the Witwatersrand Basin immediately to the west of Johannesburg. Mining had been taking place within
the lease area since the discovery of the Witwatersrand Goldfield in 1886 at nearby Langlaagte.
the lease area since the discovery of the Witwatersrand Goldfield in 1886 at nearby Langlaagte.
As of August 2000, we ceased all underground and open pit mining operations at the Durban Deep Section. Following the
withdrawal of our underground pumping subsidy, the deeper sections of the mine were flooded. On a combined basis, the Durban Deep
Section produced more than 37 million ounces of gold prior to the cessation of operations.
Section produced more than 37 million ounces of gold prior to the cessation of operations.
We concluded an agreement with M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd, or M5, on July 21, 2005, in terms of which M5, against payment
of a non-refundable fee of R1.5 million ($0.2 million), was granted an option to acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for
R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the
purchase consideration.
R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the
purchase consideration.
Property
The Durban Deep Section is located within the Central Witwatersrand Basin which stretches from the Durban Deep Section in
the west to the ERPM Section in the east. The Durban Deep Section is situated 9.3 miles (15 kilometers) west of Johannesburg and
contains mining title to 14,262 acres (5,772 hectares) and owns 3,667 acres (1,484 hectares) of freehold property. These include
administrative buildings, hospital, recreation complexes, housing in both hostel and free-standing houses and a security complex. We
have title to substantial land tracts on the outskirts of the City of Roodepoort, which is located in this section. We do not intend to convert
our old order rights under the MPRD Act.
contains mining title to 14,262 acres (5,772 hectares) and owns 3,667 acres (1,484 hectares) of freehold property. These include
administrative buildings, hospital, recreation complexes, housing in both hostel and free-standing houses and a security complex. We
have title to substantial land tracts on the outskirts of the City of Roodepoort, which is located in this section. We do not intend to convert
our old order rights under the MPRD Act.
Mining and processing
Five different ore bodies have been mined at the Durban Deep Section. Ore was mined from outcrops at the surface down to a
maximum depth of 9,200 feet (2,804 meters) and the reefs are known to persist to 13,000 feet (3,962.4 meters) below the surface within
the lease area.
the lease area.
Environmental and closure aspects
Underground mining at the Durban Deep Section ceased in August 2000. A detailed closure program was prepared and
submitted to the DME in December 2000. The drafting of the program was preceded by a comprehensive risk assessment process, during
which both residual and latent environmental risks and impacts were identified and prioritized. The risks identified are currently being
addressed in accordance with the closure program.
which both residual and latent environmental risks and impacts were identified and prioritized. The risks identified are currently being
addressed in accordance with the closure program.
In order to mitigate the impact of windblown dust from dormant tailings dams in proximity to surrounding communities, short-
term dust suppression methods are currently being employed. In addition to dust suppression, amelioration and vegetation of the tailings
dams, the closure program is also focused on the sealing of shafts and openings to the surface, the demolition and rehabilitation of shaft
infrastructure and the rehabilitation of open surface areas.
dams, the closure program is also focused on the sealing of shafts and openings to the surface, the demolition and rehabilitation of shaft
infrastructure and the rehabilitation of open surface areas.
The Durban Deep Section is located in the geographical area known as the Western Basin. There is no hydraulic continuity
between the Western Basin and the Central Basin. Water has already begun to flood to the surface in this area from other neighboring
mining operations. This water is of poor quality, containing heavy metals, sulphates and other pollutants. However, there has been no
flooding of water to the surface on any of our properties located in the Western Basin.
mining operations. This water is of poor quality, containing heavy metals, sulphates and other pollutants. However, there has been no
flooding of water to the surface on any of our properties located in the Western Basin.
We developed a program to progressively seal all potential ingress points at the Durban Deep Section. During fiscal 2005, our
rehabilitation and environmental closure efforts continued in pursuit of the objectives of the mine’s Environmental Management Program.
A total of 39 hectares of additional vegetation was established on 2L24 Dump and, with the exception of Circular Shaft, all previously
operational shafts have now been closed and capped. All plugs used have been approved by the DME which also performs periodic
inspections during the sealing phase to monitor progress. However, despite these sealing programs, naturally occurring water conduits and
other geological features which are not mine-related and may not be located on mine property will allow surface water, especially storm
runoff, to reach underground aquifers. This will eventually cause water levels to rise. The costs associated with sealing off all potential
water ingress points at the Durban Deep Section have been included in our provision for environmental rehabil itation, restoration and
closure costs. The Company will continue to rehabilitate this land by breaking down the shaft heads and plugging holes.
A total of 39 hectares of additional vegetation was established on 2L24 Dump and, with the exception of Circular Shaft, all previously
operational shafts have now been closed and capped. All plugs used have been approved by the DME which also performs periodic
inspections during the sealing phase to monitor progress. However, despite these sealing programs, naturally occurring water conduits and
other geological features which are not mine-related and may not be located on mine property will allow surface water, especially storm
runoff, to reach underground aquifers. This will eventually cause water levels to rise. The costs associated with sealing off all potential
water ingress points at the Durban Deep Section have been included in our provision for environmental rehabil itation, restoration and
closure costs. The Company will continue to rehabilitate this land by breaking down the shaft heads and plugging holes.
71
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that the remaining
cost for the Durban Deep Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $5.9 million. This has been included in the provision
for environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $2.1 million has been contributed to the
Environmental Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are
appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
for environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $2.1 million has been contributed to the
Environmental Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are
appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
West Wits Section
Overview
We own 100% of West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited, or West Wits, which held the West Wits Section. We acquired the
entire share capital of West Witwatersrand Gold Holdings Limited, which was the parent company of West Wits, as well as Consolidated
Mining Corporation Limited's loan to West Witwatersrand Gold Holdings Limited, on April 1, 1996. We also acquired the entire issued
capital and the shareholders' claim and loan account of East Champ d'Or Gold Mine Ltd, a gold mining company with mining title in the
West Rand. The mining assets were sold to Bophelo Trading (Pty) Limited, subsequently renamed, Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited, or
Mogale, during fiscal 2004, effectively leading to the closure of the mining operation.
Mining Corporation Limited's loan to West Witwatersrand Gold Holdings Limited, on April 1, 1996. We also acquired the entire issued
capital and the shareholders' claim and loan account of East Champ d'Or Gold Mine Ltd, a gold mining company with mining title in the
West Rand. The mining assets were sold to Bophelo Trading (Pty) Limited, subsequently renamed, Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited, or
Mogale, during fiscal 2004, effectively leading to the closure of the mining operation.
The West Wits Section is situated on the northern edge of the Witwatersrand Basin near the town of Krugersdorp to the west of
Johannesburg.
Property
The West Wits Section was formed out of the northern section of Randfontein Estates located in the West Rand Goldfields,
about 22.0 miles (35.4 kilometers) west of Johannesburg, Gauteng Province. The mine is reached via the R28 Johannesburg-Krugersdorp
highway.
highway.
West Wits also had rights to mine on three adjacent mining leases, namely, East Champ d'Or, West Rand Consolidated and
Luipaardsvlei. West Wits had mining title to 8,364 acres (3,790 hectares) and owns 72 acres (29 hectares) of freehold property on which
all of its mining operations are situated. These rights were sold to Mogale during fiscal 2004.
all of its mining operations are situated. These rights were sold to Mogale during fiscal 2004.
The climate of the Highveld area (at an elevation of 5,249 feet (1,600 meters) above mean sea level), where the mine is
situated, is humid continental with warm summers and cold winters. Temperatures range from a minimum of 23 degrees Fahrenheit (-
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
5 degrees Celsius) in June and July to a maximum of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (34 degrees Celsius) in December and January.
West Wits Section has entered into an agreement with Randfontein Estates Gold Mines Limited (represented by Harmony Gold)
and Atomaer (Pty) Limited, for the establishment of a regional underground water management vehicle. The ultimate objective of this
initiative is to collectively collect, process and report environmentally sensitive information relating to the impact of underground water
seepage on to surface, to the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, or DWAF. It has set itself the objective of putting in place the
requisite infrastructure and technology to establish a commercially self-sustainable entity to extract underground water, treat the same and
to dispose of it either for commercial or agricultural use. Representations to DWAF to allow the treatment and disposal of water on
commercial terms were favorably received.
initiative is to collectively collect, process and report environmentally sensitive information relating to the impact of underground water
seepage on to surface, to the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, or DWAF. It has set itself the objective of putting in place the
requisite infrastructure and technology to establish a commercially self-sustainable entity to extract underground water, treat the same and
to dispose of it either for commercial or agricultural use. Representations to DWAF to allow the treatment and disposal of water on
commercial terms were favorably received.
An integrated water management process for this area is important, both from the perspective of optimizing natural water
resources, considering the predominantly dry climate of South Africa, and also from an environmental perspective – a program that
captures and treats underground water before it decants into the Tweelopiesspruit area and the Krugersdorp Game Reserve (which is just
upstream from the Sterkfontein Caves system) is in place. If the above initiatives fail and the ingress of water and the subsequent flooding
into sensitive areas occur, and to the extent that liability is attributed to us, and not only to West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited, the
amounts involved could be significant.
captures and treats underground water before it decants into the Tweelopiesspruit area and the Krugersdorp Game Reserve (which is just
upstream from the Sterkfontein Caves system) is in place. If the above initiatives fail and the ingress of water and the subsequent flooding
into sensitive areas occur, and to the extent that liability is attributed to us, and not only to West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited, the
amounts involved could be significant.
72
History
1967
West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Ltd, or West Wits, was incorporated and registered as a public company in South Africa
on December 21, 1967.
on December 21, 1967.
1996
We acquired the entire share capital of West Wits on April 1, 1996.
2000
All mining ceased at the West Wits Section in August 2000.
2002
We entered into an agreement with Bophelo Trading (Pty) Limited, subsequently renamed Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited, or
Mogale, for the sale of the West Wits gold plant, freehold areas, surface rights permits and certain related assets.
Mogale, for the sale of the West Wits gold plant, freehold areas, surface rights permits and certain related assets.
2003
The agreement with Mogale was subsequently amended by a Memorandum of Agreement on June 6, 2003. The effective
date of this sale was July 21, 2003.
2004
Mogale was placed under judicial management on April 13, 2004. As a result, the remaining balance on the purchase price
was impaired for $1.1 million.
2005
West Wits enters into an agreement with Randfontein Estates Gold Mines Limited and Atomaer (Pty) Limited, for the
establishment of a regional underground water management vehicle.
establishment of a regional underground water management vehicle.
Mining and processing
In August 2000, we decided to cease all operations at both the underground and open pit operations at the West Wits Section.
This decision was taken after the South African government withdrew the water pumping subsidy. Without the subsidy, mining at the
West Wits Section became prohibitively expensive. The mining operation is an agglomeration of old mines on the Randfontein Basin
separated from the main part of the Witwatersrand Basin by a geological structure known as the Witpoortjie Horst. Over fifteen different
gold-bearing pebble horizons have been mined. Ore has been mined from outcrops at the surface down to a maximum depth of
approximately 5,900 feet (approximately 1,800 meters).
West Wits Section became prohibitively expensive. The mining operation is an agglomeration of old mines on the Randfontein Basin
separated from the main part of the Witwatersrand Basin by a geological structure known as the Witpoortjie Horst. Over fifteen different
gold-bearing pebble horizons have been mined. Ore has been mined from outcrops at the surface down to a maximum depth of
approximately 5,900 feet (approximately 1,800 meters).
West Wits mined the Livingston Reef package, locally known as the East Reef. It comprises a 100-foot thick package of
conglomerates and quartzites dipping at an average of 18 degrees. The combined West Wits Section produced more than 1.0 million
ounces of gold since inception, before the cessation of underground and open-pit operations at the end of August 2000. Subsequent to the
cessation of mining operations, the metallurgical plant at the West Wits Section was taken over by the Crown Section for the processing
of sand dumps only.
ounces of gold since inception, before the cessation of underground and open-pit operations at the end of August 2000. Subsequent to the
cessation of mining operations, the metallurgical plant at the West Wits Section was taken over by the Crown Section for the processing
of sand dumps only.
Environmental and closure aspects
Underground mining at the West Wits Section ceased as of August 2000. We are required to affect environmental closure at the
West Wits Section although certain aspects of this have been assumed by Mogale. Commensurate with the decision to close these
operations, a detailed closure program was prepared and submitted to the DME in December 2000. The drafting of the program was
preceded by a comprehensive risk assessment process, during which both residual and latent environmental risks and impacts were
identified and prioritized. The risks identified are currently being addressed by the West Wits Section, in accordance with the closure
program submitted to the DME. In order to mitigate the impact of windblown dust from dormant tailings dams in proximity to
surrounding communities, short-term dust suppression methods are currently being employed. Although this is to continue until 2006, the
program is being run along with a vegetation program, currently focusing on the main tailings impoundments in question, namely the
main mine comple x. During fiscal 2004, and as part of the rehabilitation program, a total of 17,000 trees were planted on the complex and
key surface areas were rehabilitated and grassed. Preliminary indications are that the tree species have established well.
operations, a detailed closure program was prepared and submitted to the DME in December 2000. The drafting of the program was
preceded by a comprehensive risk assessment process, during which both residual and latent environmental risks and impacts were
identified and prioritized. The risks identified are currently being addressed by the West Wits Section, in accordance with the closure
program submitted to the DME. In order to mitigate the impact of windblown dust from dormant tailings dams in proximity to
surrounding communities, short-term dust suppression methods are currently being employed. Although this is to continue until 2006, the
program is being run along with a vegetation program, currently focusing on the main tailings impoundments in question, namely the
main mine comple x. During fiscal 2004, and as part of the rehabilitation program, a total of 17,000 trees were planted on the complex and
key surface areas were rehabilitated and grassed. Preliminary indications are that the tree species have established well.
Shaft rehabilitation has been scheduled to run concurrently with the rehabilitation of the slimes dam project. This will in effect
reduce the ingress of surface water to the groundwater system.
Similar to the Durban Deep Section, the company has developed a program to progressively seal all potential ingress points
at the West Wits Section. In addition, DWAF has authorized the Council of Geoscience to rehabilitate the sources outside of the
mining area. Further to this, rehabilitation of the main tailings dam was started during fiscal 2004, with ridge-ploughing and the
establishment of dry land vegetation on the top surface of the dam.
mining area. Further to this, rehabilitation of the main tailings dam was started during fiscal 2004, with ridge-ploughing and the
establishment of dry land vegetation on the top surface of the dam.
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, we have estimated that the remaining
cost for the West Wits Section, in current monetary terms as at June 30, 2005, is $1.7 million. This has been included in the provision for
environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $1.8 million has been contributed to the
Environmental Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are
appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
environmental rehabilitation, restoration and closure costs on our balance sheet. A total of $1.8 million has been contributed to the
Environmental Trust Fund. This is an irrevocable trust, managed by specific responsible people who we nominated and who are
appointed as trustees by the Master of the High Court of South Africa.
73
Current year production
In fiscal 2004 these mining assets were sold to Mogale and accordingly, there was no production or related costs for fiscal 2005
and 2004. However, the following table details the operating and production results from the West Wits Section for the past three fiscal
years:
years:
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Production
Surface Operations
Ore mined ('000 tons)..................................................................................................................
Ore mined ('000 tons)..................................................................................................................
-
-
1,606
Recovered grade (oz/ton) ............................................................................................................
-
-
0.009
Gold produced (ounces) ..............................................................................................................
-
-
14,531
Results of Operations ($)
Revenues ('000) ............................................................................................................................
Revenues ('000) ............................................................................................................................
-
-
4,796
Production cost ('000)...................................................................................................................
-
-
4,859
Non US GAAP Financial Data
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
Cash cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
..................................................................................................
-
-
334
Total cost per ounce of gold ($)
1
..................................................................................................
-
-
319
1
Cash cost per ounce and total cost per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures of performance that we use to determine cash generating
capacities of the mines and to monitor performance of our mining operations. For reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A: “Operating
Results.”
Results.”
74
Legal Proceedings
Securities class action
On June 13, 2005, a securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
against us and two of our officers. Since then, four nearly identical securities class action complaints have been filed against us and the
same officers. The cases have been consolidated in the Southern District of New York. We expect that a consolidated amended complaint
will be filed on behalf of a group of lead plaintiffs selected by the Court to represent the putative class of plaintiffs alleged in the
complaints. We anticipate that a response to such a complaint will be required some time in early 2006. To date, neither us, nor the
individual defendants have been formally served with a statement of claim regarding these matters.
same officers. The cases have been consolidated in the Southern District of New York. We expect that a consolidated amended complaint
will be filed on behalf of a group of lead plaintiffs selected by the Court to represent the putative class of plaintiffs alleged in the
complaints. We anticipate that a response to such a complaint will be required some time in early 2006. To date, neither us, nor the
individual defendants have been formally served with a statement of claim regarding these matters.
The actions are allegedly filed on behalf of purchasers of our shares during two purported class periods spanning from October
23, 2003 to February 25, 2005. The complaints allege generally that we and the individual defendants made false and misleading public
statements regarding, among other things:
statements regarding, among other things:
•
the restructuring of our North West Operations in South Africa;
•
our ability to reduce the negative impact of the increasing value of the South African Rand; and
•
the strength of our balance sheet.
Based on our review of the complaints, we believe the lawsuits are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves and
our officers named in the complaints. We are not currently in a position to estimate the extent of any losses that may result from the
securities class action.
securities class action.
Invalid Issuance of Ordinary Shares in Connection with the Rawas Acquisition
During the months of July and October of 1999, we issued and allotted a total of 8,282,056 ordinary shares to Rothschild
Nominees Pty Ltd, Maxidrill Pty Ltd, PT Petrosea TBK, Repadre International Corporation, Minproc Engineering Pty Ltd, Rio Tinto
Rawas Holdings Ltd, Continental Goldfields Ltd, Consolidated African Mines Ltd, JCI (Isle of Man) Ltd, Weston Inv. Ltd and
Consolidated African Mines Australia Pty Ltd, all of which were creditors of Laverton or its subsidiaries, below the average stated capital
price. At the time, our then executive chairman, Mr. R.A.R. Kebble, was a director of Laverton Gold NL and JCI Gold Limited. These
ordinary shares were ostensibly issued pursuant to the planned acquisition of Rawas, a gold mine located in Indonesia, in consideration
for, or in anticipation of receiving, shares in and claims against various companies with ownership interests in Rawas and its mining
rights. Evidence came to light revealing that the ordinary shares were issued without our legal authority and suggesting that this occ urred
as a result of a transaction entered into for the benefit of certain third parties. However, because of subsequent trades, splits and
consolidations, it was no longer possible to distinguish the affected shares from all of the other ordinary shares resulting in their identity
being lost. This meant that it was no longer possible to identify the invalidly issued shares or their holders. Accordingly, it was not
possible to remove these invalidly issued shares from our members' register. Under the South African Companies Act, 1973 (as
amended), the High Court of South Africa is permitted to validate an invalid share issuance. During a shareholders' meeting in 2002, our
shareholders, by special resolution, resolved to ratify the share issuance. We subsequently made an application to the High Court of South
Africa to validate the invalid issuance. This application was successful and the High Court validated the issuance in July 2002.
Rawas Holdings Ltd, Continental Goldfields Ltd, Consolidated African Mines Ltd, JCI (Isle of Man) Ltd, Weston Inv. Ltd and
Consolidated African Mines Australia Pty Ltd, all of which were creditors of Laverton or its subsidiaries, below the average stated capital
price. At the time, our then executive chairman, Mr. R.A.R. Kebble, was a director of Laverton Gold NL and JCI Gold Limited. These
ordinary shares were ostensibly issued pursuant to the planned acquisition of Rawas, a gold mine located in Indonesia, in consideration
for, or in anticipation of receiving, shares in and claims against various companies with ownership interests in Rawas and its mining
rights. Evidence came to light revealing that the ordinary shares were issued without our legal authority and suggesting that this occ urred
as a result of a transaction entered into for the benefit of certain third parties. However, because of subsequent trades, splits and
consolidations, it was no longer possible to distinguish the affected shares from all of the other ordinary shares resulting in their identity
being lost. This meant that it was no longer possible to identify the invalidly issued shares or their holders. Accordingly, it was not
possible to remove these invalidly issued shares from our members' register. Under the South African Companies Act, 1973 (as
amended), the High Court of South Africa is permitted to validate an invalid share issuance. During a shareholders' meeting in 2002, our
shareholders, by special resolution, resolved to ratify the share issuance. We subsequently made an application to the High Court of South
Africa to validate the invalid issuance. This application was successful and the High Court validated the issuance in July 2002.
Internal investigations, which began in 2000 after we became aware of certain irregularities in the transaction, continued and
considered the potential for recovery through the pursuit of legal claims.
We have not instituted any actions against the recipients of our shares in this transaction as each of these entities had ceded to us
their claims against the companies in the Rawas group in exchange for those shares. However, legal action has begun both in South
Africa and Australia.
Africa and Australia.
In July 2003, DRDGOLD Limited, Australasia (Pty) Limited and DRD Australasia Aps instituted action in the High Court of
South Africa, against Messrs. R.A.R. Kebble, M. Prinsloo, J. Stratton and H. C. Buitendag and JCI Limited. The following claims are
being pursued:
being pursued:
•
R69.6 million ($11.2 million) for the 7,644,944 ordinary shares issued on July 9, 1999, at a price per share of R9.10; and
•
R7.6 million ($1.2 million) for the 637,062 ordinary shares issued on October 8, 1999, at a price per share of R11.90.
75
We instituted a separate action in Australia on December 12, 2003 against Mr. C. Mostert, Mr. J. Stratton, Continental Gold
Fields Limited, CAM Australia, (Pty) Ltd, Weston Investments (Pty) Ltd, CAM Jersey Ltd, and JCI (Isle of Man) Ltd for:
•
R67,942 ($10,827) being the costs of issuing our shares;
•
R77.0 million ($12.3 million) being profits made by third parties who were issued our shares at the time; and
•
R4.7 million (0.8 million) being costs incurred to validate the shares invalidly issued.
Pleadings in these matters have closed and we are currently awaiting the allocation of a trial date by the High Court of South
Africa.
Liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mine Limited
On March 22, 2005, Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited (which owns the North West Operations), or Buffelsfontein, was placed
under provisional liquidation after an earthquake damaged its No. 5 Shaft. Buffelsfontein had up until the date of provisional liquidation,
maintained the underground water levels in the area by pumping water from underground to surface at three of its own shafts, as well as
the Margaret Shaft of the neighboring Stilfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Stilfontein. The latter arrangement occurred in terms of an
agreement entered into in 1992 between Stilfontein and Hartebeestfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Hartebeestfontein. Hartebeestfontein
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Buffelsfontein when Buffelsfontein subsequently acquired Hartebeestfontein.
maintained the underground water levels in the area by pumping water from underground to surface at three of its own shafts, as well as
the Margaret Shaft of the neighboring Stilfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Stilfontein. The latter arrangement occurred in terms of an
agreement entered into in 1992 between Stilfontein and Hartebeestfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Hartebeestfontein. Hartebeestfontein
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Buffelsfontein when Buffelsfontein subsequently acquired Hartebeestfontein.
In April 2005, AngloGold Ashanti Limited, or AngloGold Ashanti, brought urgent proceedings before the High Court of South
Africa for an order to compel us to continue with the pumping operations after it was announced that Buffelsfontein had been placed into
provisional liquidation. Relief was also sought against the relevant government departments to either assume responsibility for, or
contribute to the pumping of underground water. These proceedings were postponed after the DWAF issued various directives under
Section 19 of the Water Affairs Act against us, the provisional liquidators of Buffelsfontein, Harmony Gold, AngloGold Ashanti and
Stilfontein to continue with pumping operations and to contribute to pumping costs in equal shares. A total of three directives have been
issued, the last of which expired on October 21, 2005.
provisional liquidation. Relief was also sought against the relevant government departments to either assume responsibility for, or
contribute to the pumping of underground water. These proceedings were postponed after the DWAF issued various directives under
Section 19 of the Water Affairs Act against us, the provisional liquidators of Buffelsfontein, Harmony Gold, AngloGold Ashanti and
Stilfontein to continue with pumping operations and to contribute to pumping costs in equal shares. A total of three directives have been
issued, the last of which expired on October 21, 2005.
On October 6, 2005, we entered into an agreement with S&J for the sale of our shareholding in Buffelsfontein subject to certain
conditions and approval by the High Court of South Africa. These conditions included indemnifying us against any liabilities or
obligations related to environmental rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of
arrangement was conditional upon DWAF agreeing to substitute us with S&J to the extent that DWAF envisaged imposing further
responsibility on us. On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein proposed by S&J and accepted
by the majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa. All the
conditions of the scheme have been met, and the order for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of
South Africa on November 1, 2005.
obligations related to environmental rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of
arrangement was conditional upon DWAF agreeing to substitute us with S&J to the extent that DWAF envisaged imposing further
responsibility on us. On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein proposed by S&J and accepted
by the majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa. All the
conditions of the scheme have been met, and the order for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of
South Africa on November 1, 2005.
AngloGold Ashanti has, pursuant to the implementation of the scheme and the release by DWAF, notified us that it no longer
intends to seek any substantive relief against us.
In terms of the DWAF directives, subsequent to the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein, we incurred pumping costs of
approximately R8.2 million ($1.3 million).
Other Proceedings
On June 12, 2002, DRD Australia Aps and DRD Australia Pty Limited instituted proceedings against Mr. J. Stratton in the
Supreme Court of Western Australia for payment of A$2,794,318 ($1.9 million) plus interest in respect of dishonestly assisting Mr. C.
Mostert in making payments referred to below and receiving part of the proceeds of these wrongful actions. No trial date has been set as
yet.
Mostert in making payments referred to below and receiving part of the proceeds of these wrongful actions. No trial date has been set as
yet.
In 2003, DRD Australasia Aps instituted three separate proceedings against Mr. C. Mostert, Newshore Nominees (Pty) Ltd and
Mr. R. Bryer in the Supreme Court of Western Australia for payment of A$902,000 ($622,650) in respect of unauthorized and undue
payments made to Cartier Management (Pty) Ltd, and overpayment to Goldspark Ltd and Transit Securities Inc. It is alleged that payment
was made to facilitate the intended acquisition of Dome Resources NL by favoring Mr. J.P. Boyer, a director of Dome Resources NL at
the time, as well as other reasons.
payments made to Cartier Management (Pty) Ltd, and overpayment to Goldspark Ltd and Transit Securities Inc. It is alleged that payment
was made to facilitate the intended acquisition of Dome Resources NL by favoring Mr. J.P. Boyer, a director of Dome Resources NL at
the time, as well as other reasons.
76
Mr. M. Silver and Fairchoice Ltd have brought an action against us and Dome in the Supreme Court of New South Wales,
Australia seeking to enforce a contract under which Dome agreed to pay, and we agreed to guarantee, a payment of $475,000 to Mr. M.
Silver upon his retirement from the board of directors of Dome. Mr. M. Silver retired from Dome's board of directors in May 2000. The
contract was also entered into in May 2000. However, we believe that this contract is not enforceable as it was not authorized by our
directors or shareholders nor was it authorized by Dome's directors or shareholders. Therefore, we and Dome have not made any payment
to Mr. M. Silver. We believe that this action is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against it.
Silver upon his retirement from the board of directors of Dome. Mr. M. Silver retired from Dome's board of directors in May 2000. The
contract was also entered into in May 2000. However, we believe that this contract is not enforceable as it was not authorized by our
directors or shareholders nor was it authorized by Dome's directors or shareholders. Therefore, we and Dome have not made any payment
to Mr. M. Silver. We believe that this action is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against it.
Newshore Nominees Pty Ltd, or Newshore, has brought an action against us in the District Court of Western Australia claiming
that they are owed $148,000 as payment under an invoice issued in August 2000 for financial services. The Court ruled in favor of
Newshore on March 31, 2004, ordering us to pay the amount claimed. We have since instituted appeal proceedings. Our claim against
Newshore is still pending.
Newshore on March 31, 2004, ordering us to pay the amount claimed. We have since instituted appeal proceedings. Our claim against
Newshore is still pending.
On May 20, 2003, a summons was issued by our former chairman, Mr. R.A.R. Kebble and his son, Mr. B. Kebble, against us,
our executive chairman, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and Associated Intelligence Network (Pty) Limited, or AIN. AIN is a private
investigator firm. Their claim is based on allegations that we hired AIN to invade their privacy by obtaining personal information about
them and to cause them embarrassment and commercial harm. They seek compensation for damages suffered as a result of these alleged
actions in an amount of R1.0 million ($0.2 million) each from us, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and AIN jointly and severally. In addition,
they seek punitive damages in a total amount of R10 million ($1.6 million) from us and AIN jointly and severally. The punitive damages
claim is unique under South African law. Initial hearings have taken place to decide a preliminary point raised by us that no such claim
exists in South African law. The court has ruled against us on a technicality, making a ruling to the effect that the trial cour t will hear and
adjudicate this issue. Mr. B Kebble has since passed on, and it is uncertain whether the executors of his estate intend to pursue this matter.
Should they proceed, we will continue to defend against these claims. We are currently awaiting the allocation of a trial date.
investigator firm. Their claim is based on allegations that we hired AIN to invade their privacy by obtaining personal information about
them and to cause them embarrassment and commercial harm. They seek compensation for damages suffered as a result of these alleged
actions in an amount of R1.0 million ($0.2 million) each from us, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and AIN jointly and severally. In addition,
they seek punitive damages in a total amount of R10 million ($1.6 million) from us and AIN jointly and severally. The punitive damages
claim is unique under South African law. Initial hearings have taken place to decide a preliminary point raised by us that no such claim
exists in South African law. The court has ruled against us on a technicality, making a ruling to the effect that the trial cour t will hear and
adjudicate this issue. Mr. B Kebble has since passed on, and it is uncertain whether the executors of his estate intend to pursue this matter.
Should they proceed, we will continue to defend against these claims. We are currently awaiting the allocation of a trial date.
On May 22, 2003, we issued a summons in the High Court of Johannesburg against Mr. R.A.R. Kebble in which we seek
payment of R3.2 million ($0.5 million) plus interest. This amount represents a sum paid to Mr. R.A.R. Kebble by us during the period
beginning in September 1999, and ending in April 2000, under a restraint of trade agreement entered into between us and Mr. R.A.R.
Kebble. We believe that Mr. R.A.R. Kebble has repudiated and/or materially breached the provisions of this agreement. We have,
accordingly, cancelled the agreement and we seek restitution of the amounts paid. Mr. R.A.R. Kebble has lodged a counterclaim,
claiming cancellation of an agreement providing for the payment of retirement benefits ($0.3 million), and challenging the cancellation of
share-options that he held at the time of his resignation from our board. Both these claims are being defended.
beginning in September 1999, and ending in April 2000, under a restraint of trade agreement entered into between us and Mr. R.A.R.
Kebble. We believe that Mr. R.A.R. Kebble has repudiated and/or materially breached the provisions of this agreement. We have,
accordingly, cancelled the agreement and we seek restitution of the amounts paid. Mr. R.A.R. Kebble has lodged a counterclaim,
claiming cancellation of an agreement providing for the payment of retirement benefits ($0.3 million), and challenging the cancellation of
share-options that he held at the time of his resignation from our board. Both these claims are being defended.
On April 22, 2002, we issued a summons in the High Court of Johannesburg against JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd for payment of
R21.6 million ($3.4 million) plus interest for option fees on shares that we held in Randgold & Exploration Ltd, and in respect of which
we extended an option to purchase to JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd against payment of an agreed option fee, plus a further claim for the
reimbursement of costs, totaling R3.0 million ($0.5 million) which we had incurred on behalf of the defendants in the attempted corporate
reconstruction of Western Areas Ltd and Randfontein Estates Gold Mine Ltd. The matter was heard on August 30, 2004. At this date
partial settlement of certain small claims related to the larger JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd claim, to the value of R2.4 million ($0.4 million), was
awarded to us by the High Court of Johannesburg. On October 21, 2004, the High Court of Johannesburg ordered JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd
to pay us an amount of R35.7 million ($5.5 million), plus interest and costs, including the costs of two of our legal cou nsel. JCI Limited’s
and CAM Limited’s counterclaim to recover the earlier part-payment was also dismissed with costs. JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd made an
application to the High Court of Johannesburg for leave to appeal, which was rejected. In fiscal 2005, we received full payment of this
claim.
we extended an option to purchase to JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd against payment of an agreed option fee, plus a further claim for the
reimbursement of costs, totaling R3.0 million ($0.5 million) which we had incurred on behalf of the defendants in the attempted corporate
reconstruction of Western Areas Ltd and Randfontein Estates Gold Mine Ltd. The matter was heard on August 30, 2004. At this date
partial settlement of certain small claims related to the larger JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd claim, to the value of R2.4 million ($0.4 million), was
awarded to us by the High Court of Johannesburg. On October 21, 2004, the High Court of Johannesburg ordered JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd
to pay us an amount of R35.7 million ($5.5 million), plus interest and costs, including the costs of two of our legal cou nsel. JCI Limited’s
and CAM Limited’s counterclaim to recover the earlier part-payment was also dismissed with costs. JCI Ltd and CAM Ltd made an
application to the High Court of Johannesburg for leave to appeal, which was rejected. In fiscal 2005, we received full payment of this
claim.
On September 23, 2002, we and Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited, another South African gold mining company, filed a
complaint with the South African Competition Commission against Iscor, a South African steel producer. The complaint alleges that Iscor
is abusing its dominant position by charging excessive prices for its local flat steel products and providing inducements for steel
purchasers to refrain from importing competing steel products. The Competition Commission dismissed our claim, and the matter has
since been referred to the Competition Tribunal, who has the authority to overrule the determination of the commission. Pleadings in the
matter have closed and we await the allocation of a hearing date.
is abusing its dominant position by charging excessive prices for its local flat steel products and providing inducements for steel
purchasers to refrain from importing competing steel products. The Competition Commission dismissed our claim, and the matter has
since been referred to the Competition Tribunal, who has the authority to overrule the determination of the commission. Pleadings in the
matter have closed and we await the allocation of a hearing date.
We are not a party to any other material legal proceedings, nor to our knowledge is any of our property the subject of any other
material pending legal proceedings.
77
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The following Operating and Financial Review and Prospects section is intended to help the reader understand the factors
that have affected the Company's financial condition and results of operations for the historical period covered by the financial
statements and management's assessment of factors and trends which are anticipated to have a material effect on the Company's
financial condition and results in future periods. This section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with,
our audited financial statements and the other financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Our discussion contains forward looking information based on current
expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives and intentions. Our actual results may differ from those
indicated in such forward looking statements.
statements and management's assessment of factors and trends which are anticipated to have a material effect on the Company's
financial condition and results in future periods. This section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with,
our audited financial statements and the other financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Our discussion contains forward looking information based on current
expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives and intentions. Our actual results may differ from those
indicated in such forward looking statements.
The Operating and Financial Review and Prospects include the following sections:
•
Operating results:
o Business overview, a general description of our business.
o Key drivers of our operating results and principal factors affecting our operating results, a general description of
the principal uncertainties and variables facing our business and the primary factors that have a significant impact on
our operating performance.
our operating performance.
o Recent acquisitions and dispositions, a description of the recent acquisitions and other transactions that have
impacted, or will impact, our performance.
o Key financial and operating indicators, a presentation of the key financial measures we use to track our operating
performance.
o Application of critical accounting policies, a discussion of accounting policies that require critical judgments and
estimates.
o Operating results, an analysis of our consolidated results of operations during the three fiscal years presented in our
financial statements. The analysis is presented both on a consolidated basis, and by geographic segment.
•
Liquidity and capital resources, an analysis of our cash flows, borrowings and our anticipated funding requirements and
sources.
sources.
•
Trend information, a review of the outlook for, and trends affecting, our business.
•
Off-balance sheet arrangements.
•
Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations, being the numerical review of our contractual future cash obligations.
78
5A. OPERATING RESULTS
Business overview
We are a gold mining company engaged in underground and surface gold mining, including exploration, extraction,
processing and smelting. We have operations comprising underground and open-pit mining and surface retreatment operations,
including the requisite infrastructure and metallurgical processing plants. Our operations are located in South Africa and Papua New
Guinea. In addition, we hold a 45.33% equity interest in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, in Fiji. We divide our worldwide
operations into two geographic regions, based on revenue generated from the location of the seller, as follows:
including the requisite infrastructure and metallurgical processing plants. Our operations are located in South Africa and Papua New
Guinea. In addition, we hold a 45.33% equity interest in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, in Fiji. We divide our worldwide
operations into two geographic regions, based on revenue generated from the location of the seller, as follows:
•
South Africa comprises the Blyvoor Section. We also hold a 40% equity interest in Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty)
Limited which includes the Crown and ERPM Sections. On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations (Harties
and Buffels Sections) were placed under provisional liquidation after an earthquake damaged its No. 5 Shaft. As a
result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 information relating to the North West Operations as a discontinued
operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods
accordingly.
Limited which includes the Crown and ERPM Sections. On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations (Harties
and Buffels Sections) were placed under provisional liquidation after an earthquake damaged its No. 5 Shaft. As a
result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 information relating to the North West Operations as a discontinued
operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods
accordingly.
•
Australasia is comprised of the Tolukuma Section, a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, or Porgera, and a
45.33% interest in Emperor.
45.33% interest in Emperor.
In fiscal 2005, the continuing South African Operations accounted for 37% of our continuing production, 72% of our Ore
Reserves, a $33.5 million net loss after tax and 32% of our total assets. The Australasian Operations accounted for 63% of our
continuing production, 28% of our Ore Reserves, a net loss after tax of $3.9 million and 68% of our total assets.
continuing production, 28% of our Ore Reserves, a net loss after tax of $3.9 million and 68% of our total assets.
Exploration activities are undertaken in South Africa, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Australia.
From 1895 to 1997 our principal mining operation was the Durban Deep Section. Up to 1999, our general growth strategy
was to acquire existing under-performing mines in South Africa at relatively low acquisition costs, and attempting to turn them into
profitable business units by introducing low-cost mining methods and reducing costs through employing our experience in managing
marginal gold mines to more efficiently utilize existing infrastructures. Since 1999 our focus has been to expand our operations
outside of South Africa by acquiring lower cash cost and higher margin mines than those in South Africa, through the acquisition of
Dome Resources NL (Tolukuma Section), our 20% interest in Porgera and our 45.33% interest in Emperor (Vatukoula Section).
profitable business units by introducing low-cost mining methods and reducing costs through employing our experience in managing
marginal gold mines to more efficiently utilize existing infrastructures. Since 1999 our focus has been to expand our operations
outside of South Africa by acquiring lower cash cost and higher margin mines than those in South Africa, through the acquisition of
Dome Resources NL (Tolukuma Section), our 20% interest in Porgera and our 45.33% interest in Emperor (Vatukoula Section).
The North West Operations recorded significant losses of $62.5 million, compounded by the collective negative impact of a
series of events that culminated in a devastating earthquake. As a result, these operations were placed under provisional liquidation on
March 22, 2005. This, as well as the continued weakness of the Dollar, price increases in key consumables in South Africa and
operational difficulties ultimately resulted in a decrease in our results for fiscal 2005 in comparison to fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003. Our
balance sheet has strengthened as a result of the liquidation of the North West Operations, which had a negative $17.8 million net
asset value, as at March 22, 2005.
March 22, 2005. This, as well as the continued weakness of the Dollar, price increases in key consumables in South Africa and
operational difficulties ultimately resulted in a decrease in our results for fiscal 2005 in comparison to fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003. Our
balance sheet has strengthened as a result of the liquidation of the North West Operations, which had a negative $17.8 million net
asset value, as at March 22, 2005.
As at June 30, 2005, we had Ore Reserves of approximately 5.6 million ounces, compared to 6.0 million ounces as at
June 30, 2004, excluding reserves at our discontinued operations.
79
Key drivers of our operating results and principal factors affecting our operating results
The principal uncertainties and variables facing our business and, therefore, the key drivers of our operating results are:
•
The price of gold, which fluctuates widely in local currencies;
•
The tonnages produced and gold content thereof, impacting on the amount of gold we produce at our operations;
•
The cost of producing that gold as a result of mining efficiencies; and
•
General economic factors, such as exchange rate fluctuations and inflation, and factors affecting mining operations in the
developing countries in which we operate.
developing countries in which we operate.
Gold price
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of gold produced at our mines. As a result, our operating results are directly
related to the price of gold which can fluctuate widely and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including industrial and
jewellery demand, expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the strength of the Dollar (the currency in which the price of gold
is generally quoted) and of other currencies, interest rates, actual or expected gold sales by central banks, forward sales by producers,
global or regional political or economic events, and production and cost levels in major gold-producing regions such as South Africa.
In addition, the price of gold sometimes is subject to rapid short-term changes because of speculative activities. The demand for and
supply of gold may affect gold prices, but not necessarily in the same manner that supply and demand affect the prices of other
commodities. The supply of gold consists of a combination of new production from mining and existing stocks of bullio n and
fabricated gold held by governments, public and private financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals. As a
general rule we sell the gold produced at market prices to obtain the maximum benefit from prevailing gold prices, although we have
previously entered into hedging arrangements, such as forward sales or other derivative instruments, which established a price in
advance for the sale of our future gold production. During fiscal 2002, we undertook a major restructuring of our hedge book,
designed to close out our hedge positions.
jewellery demand, expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the strength of the Dollar (the currency in which the price of gold
is generally quoted) and of other currencies, interest rates, actual or expected gold sales by central banks, forward sales by producers,
global or regional political or economic events, and production and cost levels in major gold-producing regions such as South Africa.
In addition, the price of gold sometimes is subject to rapid short-term changes because of speculative activities. The demand for and
supply of gold may affect gold prices, but not necessarily in the same manner that supply and demand affect the prices of other
commodities. The supply of gold consists of a combination of new production from mining and existing stocks of bullio n and
fabricated gold held by governments, public and private financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals. As a
general rule we sell the gold produced at market prices to obtain the maximum benefit from prevailing gold prices, although we have
previously entered into hedging arrangements, such as forward sales or other derivative instruments, which established a price in
advance for the sale of our future gold production. During fiscal 2002, we undertook a major restructuring of our hedge book,
designed to close out our hedge positions.
The following table indicates the movement in the Dollar gold spot price for the 2005, 2004 and 2003 fiscal years:
2005 fiscal year
2004 fiscal year
% increase
Opening gold spot price on July 1, ..................................
$396 per ounce
$346 per ounce
14%
Closing gold spot price on June 30, .................................
$437 per ounce
$396 per ounce
10%
Lowest gold spot price during the fiscal year ...................
$387 per ounce
$343 per ounce
13%
Highest gold spot price during the fiscal year...................
$454 per ounce
$427 per ounce
6%
Average gold spot price for the fiscal year .......................
$421 per ounce
$389 per ounce
8%
2004 fiscal year
2003 fiscal year
% increase
Opening gold spot price on July 1, ..................................
$346 per ounce
$315 per ounce
10%
Closing gold spot price on June 30, .................................
$396 per ounce
$346 per ounce
14%
Lowest gold spot price during the fiscal year ...................
$343 per ounce
$302 per ounce
14%
Highest gold spot price during the fiscal year...................
$427 per ounce
$382 per ounce
12%
Average gold spot price for the fiscal year .......................
$389 per ounce
$334 per ounce
16%
2003 fiscal year
2002 fiscal year
% increase
Opening gold spot price on July 1, ..................................
$315 per ounce
$271 per ounce
16%
Closing gold spot price on June 30, .................................
$346 per ounce
$315 per ounce
10%
Lowest gold spot price during the fiscal year ...................
$302 per ounce
$265 per ounce
14%
Highest gold spot price during the fiscal year...................
$382 per ounce
$327 per ounce
17%
Average gold spot price for the fiscal year .......................
$334 per ounce
$296 per ounce
13%
A significant upward trend in the Dollar gold price has been noted over the past few years, however, as the majority of our
production has been sourced from our South African Operations during those three fiscal years, the impact of the Rand/Dollar
exchange rate has been significant on our operating results. Whereas the Dollar gold price has shown consistent growth over the last
three fiscal years, the Rand gold price (based on average prices for the year) has decreased from R3,023 per ounce, in fiscal 2003, to
R2,619 per ounce in fiscal 2005.
exchange rate has been significant on our operating results. Whereas the Dollar gold price has shown consistent growth over the last
three fiscal years, the Rand gold price (based on average prices for the year) has decreased from R3,023 per ounce, in fiscal 2003, to
R2,619 per ounce in fiscal 2005.
80
Gold production and production costs
Gold production from our continuing operations, including our 20% attributable share of Porgera, totaled 433,586 ounces
during fiscal 2005, in comparison to 466,284 ounces in fiscal 2004, and 330,253 ounces in fiscal 2003. The North West Operations
(our discontinued operation) recorded production of 199,850 in fiscal 2005, 341,861 in fiscal 2004 and 462,743 in fiscal 2003.
(our discontinued operation) recorded production of 199,850 in fiscal 2005, 341,861 in fiscal 2004 and 462,743 in fiscal 2003.
Our costs and expenses consist primarily of production costs, royalties and depreciation and amortization. Production costs
include labor, contractor services, stores, electricity and other related costs, incurred in the production of gold. Labor is the largest
component of production costs, constituting 51% of production costs for fiscal 2005, as the majority of our mining operations are deep
level underground mines which are more labor intensive.
component of production costs, constituting 51% of production costs for fiscal 2005, as the majority of our mining operations are deep
level underground mines which are more labor intensive.
At our continuing South African Operations, production decreased from 262,157 ounces in fiscal 2003, produced from 4.6
million tonnes milled at an average yield of 2.24g/t, to 233,094 ounces in fiscal 2004, produced from 3.1 million tonnes milled at an
average yield of 2.33g/t, to 161,878 ounces produced from 3.5 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 1.43g/t in fiscal 2005. Due
to the decline in the Rand gold price over the last three fiscal years, our South African Operations have increasingly focused on
mining higher grade ore panels, to achieve an increased yield from the tonnages milled. During fiscal 2005, however, the benefits of
mining higher grade ore were negated as a result of poor initial recoveries from the Slimes Dam project at Blyvoor.
average yield of 2.33g/t, to 161,878 ounces produced from 3.5 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 1.43g/t in fiscal 2005. Due
to the decline in the Rand gold price over the last three fiscal years, our South African Operations have increasingly focused on
mining higher grade ore panels, to achieve an increased yield from the tonnages milled. During fiscal 2005, however, the benefits of
mining higher grade ore were negated as a result of poor initial recoveries from the Slimes Dam project at Blyvoor.
At our Australasian Operations production increased from 68,096 ounces in fiscal 2003, produced from 0.2 million tonnes
milled at an average yield of 13.07g/t, to 233,190 ounces, produced from 1.1 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 6.38g/t in
fiscal 2004, to 271,708 ounces, produced from 1.4 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 5.99g/t in fiscal 2005. Our 20% interest
in Porgera contributed 195,394 ounces in fiscal 2005, produced from 1.2 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 5.06g/t, in
comparison with 147,475 ounces, produced from 0.9 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 4.87g/t in fiscal 2004 (acquired
October 14, 2003). The Tolukuma Section has been a consistent producer at a high grade of 11.25g/t in fiscal 2005, 13.60g/t in fiscal
2004 and 13.07g/t in fiscal 2003.
fiscal 2004, to 271,708 ounces, produced from 1.4 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 5.99g/t in fiscal 2005. Our 20% interest
in Porgera contributed 195,394 ounces in fiscal 2005, produced from 1.2 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 5.06g/t, in
comparison with 147,475 ounces, produced from 0.9 million tonnes milled at an average yield of 4.87g/t in fiscal 2004 (acquired
October 14, 2003). The Tolukuma Section has been a consistent producer at a high grade of 11.25g/t in fiscal 2005, 13.60g/t in fiscal
2004 and 13.07g/t in fiscal 2003.
Due to the accessibility of the Ore Reserves at our Australasian Operations and the high yield per tonne milled, these operations
produced at a cash cost
1
of $226 per ounce and a total cost
2
of $343 per ounce in fiscal 2005, compared with our continuing South African
Operations that produced at a cash cost of $464 per ounce and a total cost of $628 per ounce in fiscal 2005.
General economic factors
As at October 31, 2005, we have three operations in two countries (South Africa and Papua New Guinea), and we are exposed
to a number of factors, which could impact on our profitability, resulting from exchange rate fluctuations, inflation and other risks
relating to these specific countries (refer to Item 3D.: “Risk factors”). In conducting mining operations, we recognize the inherent risks
and uncertainties of the industry, and the wasting nature of the assets.
relating to these specific countries (refer to Item 3D.: “Risk factors”). In conducting mining operations, we recognize the inherent risks
and uncertainties of the industry, and the wasting nature of the assets.
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations
As of June 30, 2005, approximately 57% of our total revenues (including revenue of our discontinued operation) are
generated in South Africa, and approximately 43% of our total revenues are generated from operations in Papua New Guinea. Most of
our production costs, therefore, are denominated in local currencies, such as the South African Rand and the Papua New Guinean
Kina. In fiscal 2005, we derived 100% of our revenues in Dollars and incurred 83% of our production costs in these local currencies.
Although fiscal 2005 was marked by a stabilization of the trend noted in the prior year of the weakening of the Dollar against the
Rand, this currency movement still accounted for approximately $4 per ounce, or 6%, of the total increase in cash costs per ounce for
our South African Operations from fiscal 2004. The weakening of the Dollar against the Rand accounted for $121 per ounce, or a
101%, increase in cash costs per ounce for our South African Operations from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. As the price of gold is
denominated in Dollars and we realize our revenues in Dollars, the depreciation of the Dollar against these local currencies reduces
our profitability. Based upon average rates during the respective years, the Rand strengthened by 10% against the Dollar in fiscal 2005
compared to fiscal 2004 and 24% from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. This has led to an effective decrease of 8.5% in the average Rand
gold price in comparison to fiscal 2004 and 11.2% in fiscal 2004, compared to fiscal 2003. The Kina, based on average rates in the
respective fiscal years, strengthened by 4% against the Dollar in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 and 16% in fiscal 2004 compared
to fiscal 2003.
our production costs, therefore, are denominated in local currencies, such as the South African Rand and the Papua New Guinean
Kina. In fiscal 2005, we derived 100% of our revenues in Dollars and incurred 83% of our production costs in these local currencies.
Although fiscal 2005 was marked by a stabilization of the trend noted in the prior year of the weakening of the Dollar against the
Rand, this currency movement still accounted for approximately $4 per ounce, or 6%, of the total increase in cash costs per ounce for
our South African Operations from fiscal 2004. The weakening of the Dollar against the Rand accounted for $121 per ounce, or a
101%, increase in cash costs per ounce for our South African Operations from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. As the price of gold is
denominated in Dollars and we realize our revenues in Dollars, the depreciation of the Dollar against these local currencies reduces
our profitability. Based upon average rates during the respective years, the Rand strengthened by 10% against the Dollar in fiscal 2005
compared to fiscal 2004 and 24% from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. This has led to an effective decrease of 8.5% in the average Rand
gold price in comparison to fiscal 2004 and 11.2% in fiscal 2004, compared to fiscal 2003. The Kina, based on average rates in the
respective fiscal years, strengthened by 4% against the Dollar in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 and 16% in fiscal 2004 compared
to fiscal 2003.
1
Cash costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results – Reconciliation of cash
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce.”
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce.”
2
Total costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results– Reconciliation of cash
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce.”
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results– Reconciliation of cash
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce.”
81
As an unhedged gold producer we do not enter into forward gold sales contracts to reduce our exposure to market
fluctuations in the Dollar gold price or the exchange rate movements of the Rand and Kina. If revenue from gold sales falls for a
substantial period below our cost of production at our operations, we could determine that it is not economically feasible to continue
commercial production at any or all of our operations or to continue the development of some or all of our projects. Our weighted
average total costs per ounce for the continuing operations of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as Porgera, was $449 per ounce
of gold produced in the fiscal 2005 year, $418 per ounce in the 2004 fiscal year and $151 per ounce in the 2003 fiscal year. The
average gold price received, from continuing operations, was $423 per ounce in fiscal 2005, $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004 and $331
per ounce in fiscal 2003.
substantial period below our cost of production at our operations, we could determine that it is not economically feasible to continue
commercial production at any or all of our operations or to continue the development of some or all of our projects. Our weighted
average total costs per ounce for the continuing operations of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as Porgera, was $449 per ounce
of gold produced in the fiscal 2005 year, $418 per ounce in the 2004 fiscal year and $151 per ounce in the 2003 fiscal year. The
average gold price received, from continuing operations, was $423 per ounce in fiscal 2005, $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004 and $331
per ounce in fiscal 2003.
In addition, to fund local operations and comply with South African exchange controls, we hold funds in local currencies,
such as the Rand, Kina and Australian Dollar. The Dollar value of these currencies may be affected by exchange rate fluctuations and,
as a result, our cash and cash equivalents reported in Dollars could change. At June 30, 2005, approximately 64% of our cash and cash
equivalents, being $23.2 million, were held in such currencies in comparison to 66%, or $14.8 million, at June 30, 2004 and 100%, or
$44.4 million, at June 30, 2003.
as a result, our cash and cash equivalents reported in Dollars could change. At June 30, 2005, approximately 64% of our cash and cash
equivalents, being $23.2 million, were held in such currencies in comparison to 66%, or $14.8 million, at June 30, 2004 and 100%, or
$44.4 million, at June 30, 2003.
Effect of inflation
In the past, our operations have been materially adversely affected by inflation. As we are unable to control the prices at
which our gold is sold, if there is a significant increase in inflation in South Africa and in Papua New Guinea, without a concurrent
devaluation of the local currency or an increase in the price of gold, our costs will increase, negatively affecting our operating results.
devaluation of the local currency or an increase in the price of gold, our costs will increase, negatively affecting our operating results.
The movement in the Rand/Dollar exchange rate, based upon average rates during the respective years, and the local annual
inflation rate, as measured by the South African Consumer Price Index, or CPIX, are set out in the table below:
Year ended June 30,
2005
(%)
2004
(%)
2003
(%)
The average Rand/Dollar exchange rate strengthened
(9.8)
(23.9)
(11.0)
Less: CPIX (inflation rate).............................................................................................................
3.5
4.8
9.6
Net effect ......................................................................................................................................
(13.3)
(28.7)
(20.6)
The South African CPIX inflation rate has decreased in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 and has decreased significantly in
comparison to historical trends. However, historically the effect of the movements in the exchange rate has exacerbated the effect on
profitability experienced as a result of the movement in the CPIX inflation rate, as illustrated above.
profitability experienced as a result of the movement in the CPIX inflation rate, as illustrated above.
The movement in the Kina/Dollar exchange rate, based upon average rates during the respective years, and the local annual
inflation rate, as measured by the Papua New Guinea CPIX, are set out in the table below:
Year ended June 30,
2005
(%)
2004
(%)
2003
(%)
The average Kina/Dollar exchange rate (strengthened)/weakened by
(3.9)
(13.7)
5.9
Less: CPIX (inflation rate).............................................................................................................
0.9
1.9
19.0
Net effect ......................................................................................................................................
(4.8)
(15.6)
(13.1)
The Papua New Guinea CPIX inflation rate has decreased in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004. The decrease in the inflation rate
in Papua New Guinea has also been exacerbated by the strengthening of the Kina against the Dollar, as illustrated above.
South African political, economic and other factors
We are a South African company with a large portion of our operations situated in South Africa. As a result, we are subject to
various economic, fiscal, monetary and political factors that affect South African companies generally. South African companies are
subject to exchange control regulations. Governmental officials have from time to time stated their intentions to lift South Africa’s
exchange control regulations when economic conditions permit such action. Over the last few years, certain aspects of exchange
controls for financial institutions and individuals have been incrementally relaxed. It is, however, impossible to predict when the
South African Government will remove exchange controls in their entirety. South African companies remain subject to restrictions on
their ability to export and deploy capital outside of the Southern African Common Monetary Area, unless dispensation has been
granted by the South African Reserve Bank. For a detailed discussion of exchange controls, see Item 10D.: “Exchange controls.” ;
subject to exchange control regulations. Governmental officials have from time to time stated their intentions to lift South Africa’s
exchange control regulations when economic conditions permit such action. Over the last few years, certain aspects of exchange
controls for financial institutions and individuals have been incrementally relaxed. It is, however, impossible to predict when the
South African Government will remove exchange controls in their entirety. South African companies remain subject to restrictions on
their ability to export and deploy capital outside of the Southern African Common Monetary Area, unless dispensation has been
granted by the South African Reserve Bank. For a detailed discussion of exchange controls, see Item 10D.: “Exchange controls.” ;
82
On May 1, 2004, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, or MPRD Act, became effective. Prior to the
introduction of the MPRD Act, private ownership in mineral rights and statutory mining rights in South Africa could be acquired
through the common law or by statute. Now, all mineral rights have been placed under the custodianship of the South African
government under the provisions of the MPRD Act, and old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of use
within certain prescribed periods. We have submitted certain applications in this regard. This process is described more fully under
Item 4B.: “Business Overview – Governmental regulations and its effect on our business - South Africa – Common Law Mineral
Rights and Statutory Mining Rights.”
through the common law or by statute. Now, all mineral rights have been placed under the custodianship of the South African
government under the provisions of the MPRD Act, and old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of use
within certain prescribed periods. We have submitted certain applications in this regard. This process is described more fully under
Item 4B.: “Business Overview – Governmental regulations and its effect on our business - South Africa – Common Law Mineral
Rights and Statutory Mining Rights.”
Papua New Guinea political, economic and other factors
Our operations based in Papua New Guinea are also subject to political and economical uncertainties, including the risk of
civil rebellion, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation of existing contracts, mining licenses and permits, changes in laws or
taxation policies, currency exchange restrictions and international monetary fluctuations.
taxation policies, currency exchange restrictions and international monetary fluctuations.
Recent acquisitions and dispositions
In June 2002, we entered into an agreement with Bophelo Trading (Pty) Limited, subsequently renamed Mogale Gold (Pty)
Limited, or Mogale, for the sale of the West Wits gold plant and certain related assets for R25.0 million ($2.4 million) to process certain
sand dumps, surface materials, freehold areas and surface right permits located at the West Wits Section. We retain the right to mine
underground by virtue of certain mining titles and mining authorizations on the property, subject to the conversion of these rights in terms
of the MPRD Act. As part of the agreement, we agreed to indemnify Mogale against any loss, damage or expense which Mogale might
incur as a result of any liability in connection with the transferred assets, the cause of which arose prior to this sale. The effective date of
this sale was July 21, 2003, when all of the conditions precedent were fulfilled and Mogale was granted a mining license.
sand dumps, surface materials, freehold areas and surface right permits located at the West Wits Section. We retain the right to mine
underground by virtue of certain mining titles and mining authorizations on the property, subject to the conversion of these rights in terms
of the MPRD Act. As part of the agreement, we agreed to indemnify Mogale against any loss, damage or expense which Mogale might
incur as a result of any liability in connection with the transferred assets, the cause of which arose prior to this sale. The effective date of
this sale was July 21, 2003, when all of the conditions precedent were fulfilled and Mogale was granted a mining license.
Beginning in July 2002, we entered into a series of transactions, consistent with our black economic empowerment strategy (see
Item 4B.: "Business Overview"), resulting in the sale of 60% of our interest in Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, to Khumo
Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH, for R105.0 million ($11.6 million). In October 2002, CGR acquired 100% of the outstanding
share capital of, and loan accounts in, East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for R100.0 million ($11.0 million) from Daun et
Cie AG, Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd, KBH, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Masechaba
Palesa Moletsane Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird, Derek Sean Webbstock.
Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH, for R105.0 million ($11.6 million). In October 2002, CGR acquired 100% of the outstanding
share capital of, and loan accounts in, East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for R100.0 million ($11.0 million) from Daun et
Cie AG, Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd, KBH, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Masechaba
Palesa Moletsane Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird, Derek Sean Webbstock.
With effect from October 14, 2003, we acquired the shares in Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited, or OMP, and Mineral
Resources Porgera Limited, or MRP. The transaction was affected through the amalgamation of OMP, MRP and our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Dome Resources (PNG) Limited. OMP changed its name to DRD (Porgera) Limited. This resulted in us acquiring a 20%
interest in the Porgera Joint Venture in Papua New Guinea for $77.1 million, comprising $16.7 million in shares and $59.2 million in
cash, net of cash acquired. The Porgera mine's main business focus is the extraction of gold.
subsidiary, Dome Resources (PNG) Limited. OMP changed its name to DRD (Porgera) Limited. This resulted in us acquiring a 20%
interest in the Porgera Joint Venture in Papua New Guinea for $77.1 million, comprising $16.7 million in shares and $59.2 million in
cash, net of cash acquired. The Porgera mine's main business focus is the extraction of gold.
The global gold mining industry has experienced active consolidation and rationalization activities in recent years.
Accordingly, we have been, and expect to continue to be, involved in a number of acquisitions and dispositions as part of this global
trend and to identify value-adding business combinations and acquisition opportunities. To ensure that our Ore Reserve base is
maintained, or increased, we are currently focusing on acquiring low cost, high margin mines in other global regions. Our recent
acquisitions, over the last fiscal year, include an increase in our interest in Emperor from 19.78% as at June 30, 2004, to 45.33%
through a takeover offer completed on July 30, 2004. We acquired 29,097,269 Emperor shares in exchange for 6,612,676 of our
ordinary shares, valued at $16.6 million, based on the market value of our shares on the date of issue.
trend and to identify value-adding business combinations and acquisition opportunities. To ensure that our Ore Reserve base is
maintained, or increased, we are currently focusing on acquiring low cost, high margin mines in other global regions. Our recent
acquisitions, over the last fiscal year, include an increase in our interest in Emperor from 19.78% as at June 30, 2004, to 45.33%
through a takeover offer completed on July 30, 2004. We acquired 29,097,269 Emperor shares in exchange for 6,612,676 of our
ordinary shares, valued at $16.6 million, based on the market value of our shares on the date of issue.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein
Gold Mines Limited, our subsidiary that owns the North West Operations, which order was granted on the same day. On
October 6, 2005, we concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Limited, or S&J, for the sale of our shareholdings in Buffelsfontein
subject to certain conditions. These include indemnifying us against any liabilities or obligations that could arise relating to environmental
rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of arrangement was conditional upon the
following:
October 6, 2005, we concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Limited, or S&J, for the sale of our shareholdings in Buffelsfontein
subject to certain conditions. These include indemnifying us against any liabilities or obligations that could arise relating to environmental
rehabilitation and the management and pumping of underground water. The proposed scheme of arrangement was conditional upon the
following:
•
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, or DWAF, agreeing to substitute us with S&J to the extent that DWAF envisaged
imposing further responsibility on us;
imposing further responsibility on us;
•
the acceptance by the High Court of South Africa and the majority of Buffelsfontein’s creditors of a scheme arrangement
proposed by S&J; and
proposed by S&J; and
•
approval by the Competition Commission of South Africa.
83
On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein proposed by S&J and accepted by the
majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including us, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa. The order for the
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005 and all the conditions of the
scheme have been met.
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein was lifted by the High Court of South Africa on November 1, 2005 and all the conditions of the
scheme have been met.
On July 6, 2005, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with our black economic empowerment partner, KBH, regarding
the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in our South African Operations. The intention of the transaction is to bring us into full
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter. On October 27,
2005, our board of directors approved the black economic empowerment transaction. The transaction has been facilitated by the IDC,
which agreed to a debt restructuring in CGR. The transaction comprises the exchange of 75% of KBH’s 60% stake in CGR, including its
wholly-owned subsidiary ERPM, and a cash payment of $2.0 million (R13.2 million) for an effective 15% interest in our wholly-owned subsidiary, Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor. The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, which is an affiliate of KBH, acquiring initially, a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest. In addition, Khumo Gold was granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in DRDGOLD SA for $1.4 million (R9.3 million). Khumo Gold will place a portion of the further 11% interest in a new Employee Trust. DRDGOLD Limited will subscribe for $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares. The proceeds from these preference shares will be used by Khumo Gold to settle an existing loan to KBH of $1.2 million (R7.9 million), subscribe for $0.6 million (R4.1 million) new preference shares in ERPM, subscribe for $0.4 million (R2.7 million) new preference shares in CGR, subscribe for $0.6 million (R3.9 million) new preference shares in Blyvoor and subscribe for an initial 15% of the issued ordinary shares in DRDGOLD SA for $2.0 million (R13.2 million). Dr. Paseka Ncholo, our Non-Executive Chairman, will take over as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD SA with effect from November 1, 2005.
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter. On October 27,
2005, our board of directors approved the black economic empowerment transaction. The transaction has been facilitated by the IDC,
which agreed to a debt restructuring in CGR. The transaction comprises the exchange of 75% of KBH’s 60% stake in CGR, including its
wholly-owned subsidiary ERPM, and a cash payment of $2.0 million (R13.2 million) for an effective 15% interest in our wholly-owned subsidiary, Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor. The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, which is an affiliate of KBH, acquiring initially, a 15% interest in a newly created vehicle, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which includes ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest. In addition, Khumo Gold was granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in DRDGOLD SA for $1.4 million (R9.3 million). Khumo Gold will place a portion of the further 11% interest in a new Employee Trust. DRDGOLD Limited will subscribe for $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares. The proceeds from these preference shares will be used by Khumo Gold to settle an existing loan to KBH of $1.2 million (R7.9 million), subscribe for $0.6 million (R4.1 million) new preference shares in ERPM, subscribe for $0.4 million (R2.7 million) new preference shares in CGR, subscribe for $0.6 million (R3.9 million) new preference shares in Blyvoor and subscribe for an initial 15% of the issued ordinary shares in DRDGOLD SA for $2.0 million (R13.2 million). Dr. Paseka Ncholo, our Non-Executive Chairman, will take over as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD SA with effect from November 1, 2005.
We concluded an agreement with M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd, or M5, on July 21, 2005, in terms of which M5, against payment
of a non-refundable monthly fee of R0.5 million ($0.1 million) payable until the exercise of the option, was granted an option to acquire
the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option
fee will be deemed part payment of the purchase consideration.
the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option
fee will be deemed part payment of the purchase consideration.
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire
our wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets,
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor. Implementation of the
transaction requires the restructuring of our offshore operations, whereby DRD (Isle of Man) will transfer the following material
assets to our new wholly-owned subsidiary, DRDGOLD (Offshore) Limited, or DRD (Offshore):
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor. Implementation of the
transaction requires the restructuring of our offshore operations, whereby DRD (Isle of Man) will transfer the following material
assets to our new wholly-owned subsidiary, DRDGOLD (Offshore) Limited, or DRD (Offshore):
•
its 45.33% interest in Emperor; and
•
an A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) convertible loan facility which DRD (Isle of Man) has advanced to Emperor, in terms of
which we can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23) per Emperor share.
which we can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23) per Emperor share.
We will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to DRD (Offshore) for a purchase consideration of $230.0 million. The restructuring is
subject, inter alia, to the following conditions precedent:
•
our shareholder approval;
•
South African Reserve Bank, or SARB, approval; and
•
other regulatory consents.
DRD (Offshore) will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to Emperor. The purchase consideration for DRD (Isle of Man) is $230.0
million, which is subject to certain completion adjustments to reflect the change in the capital position of both Emperor and DRD (Isle
of Man) between October 1, 2005, which is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be
settled by:
of Man) between October 1, 2005, which is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be
settled by:
•
the issue of 751,879,699 new Emperor shares to DRD (Offshore), issued at A$0.35 ($0.26) per share which currently
equates to $200.0 million; and
equates to $200.0 million; and
•
$30.0 million in cash.
The transaction is subject, inter alia, to the following conditions precedent:
•
the restructuring becoming unconditional,
•
approval by the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board;
•
SARB approval;
•
Emperor shareholder approval;
•
there being no material adverse change in either Emperor or the gold assets; and
•
a number of regulatory and banking consents and approvals being obtained.
84
Upon completion of the transaction and the issue of the new Emperor shares, we will hold approximately 90.5% of Emperor
and Emperor will become our subsidiary
On November 11, 2005 we acquired a 5% holding in the Australian Stock Exchange listed Allied Gold Limited, or Allied, for
A$3.0 million ($2.3 million). In a separate transaction, we have also undertaken to, pursuant to any existing Allied shareholder electing
not to follow its rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million)
at an issue price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share. Both these transactions are subject to South African Reserve Bank approval. The capital
raising, which represents approximately 17.5% of Allied's share capital will also be subject to Allied shareholder approval, which Allied
has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
not to follow its rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million)
at an issue price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share. Both these transactions are subject to South African Reserve Bank approval. The capital
raising, which represents approximately 17.5% of Allied's share capital will also be subject to Allied shareholder approval, which Allied
has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
For further details on these transactions refer to Item 4A.: “History and Development of the Company.”
Key financial and operating indicators
We consider the key performance measures for the growth of our business and its profitability to be gold revenue, production,
production costs, cash costs per ounce and total costs per ounce, capital expenditure and Ore Reserves. The following table presents
the key performance measurement data for the past three fiscal years:
the key performance measurement data for the past three fiscal years:
Operating data
Continuing operations
1
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Revenues ($'000) ...................................................................................................
183,609
183,254
109,419
Gold production (ounces) ......................................................................................
433,586
466,284
330,253
Production costs ($'000) ........................................................................................
136,520
143,026
90,761
Revenue ($/oz).......................................................................................................
423
393
331
Cash costs ($/oz)....................................................................................................
315
307
275
Total costs ($/oz) ...................................................................................................
449
418
151
Capital expenditure ($'000)....................................................................................
21,339
21,406
7,039
Ore Reserves (ounces) ...........................................................................................
5,567,000
5,969,000
5,925,000
Discontinued operation
1
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
2003
Revenues ($'000) ...................................................................................................
81,538
130,036
151,923
Gold production (ounces) ......................................................................................
199,850
341,861
462,743
Production costs ($'000) ........................................................................................
100,695
134,465
144,598
Revenue ($/oz).......................................................................................................
408
380
328
Cash costs ($/oz)....................................................................................................
504
393
312
Total costs ($/oz) ...................................................................................................
630
441
321
Capital expenditure ($'000)....................................................................................
3,524
5,511
6,375
Ore Reserves (ounces) ...........................................................................................
-
5,047,000
8,483,000
1
For fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 the operating data excludes our 40% share of our equity accounted associate, CGR, including the Crown and ERPM
Sections, and our 45.33% (2004: 19.78% and 2003: 19.81%) investment in Emperor, but includes our 20% attributable interest in the proportionately
consolidated Porgera Joint Venture. On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report
the 2005, 2004 and 2003 information relating to the North West Operations, as a discontinued operation and all other operations as continuing
operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods accordingly.
consolidated Porgera Joint Venture. On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report
the 2005, 2004 and 2003 information relating to the North West Operations, as a discontinued operation and all other operations as continuing
operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods accordingly.
85
Revenue
Revenue is derived from the sale of gold. The following table analyzes the revenue per operation:
Year ended June 30,
Continuing operations
2005
$'000
2004
$'000
2003
$'000
Blyvoor Section .....................................................................................................
68,370
90,066
81,753
West Wits Section
1
...............................................................................................
-
-
4,796
Total South African Operations ..................................................................
68,370
90,066
86,549
Tolukuma Section ..................................................................................................
32,446
32,743
22,870
Porgera Joint Venture
2
..........................................................................................
82,793
60,445
-
Total Australasian Operations......................................................................
115,239
93,188
22,870
Total ................................................................................................................
183,609
183,254
109,419
Discontinued operation
North West Operations
3
........................................................................................
81,538
130,036
151,923
For fiscal 2005, revenue from continuing operations increased marginally from $183.3 million in fiscal 2004 to $183.6
million, with the average gold price received by us increasing to $423 per ounce, compared to $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004. The
effect on revenue of the increased gold price was offset by the decrease in production of 32,698 ounces from fiscal 2004. On March
22, 2005 we announced the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations. Revenues from the North West Operations for the
period ended March 22, 2005 were $81.5 million compared to $130.0 million in fiscal 2004. These operations have been treated as a
discontinued operation.
effect on revenue of the increased gold price was offset by the decrease in production of 32,698 ounces from fiscal 2004. On March
22, 2005 we announced the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations. Revenues from the North West Operations for the
period ended March 22, 2005 were $81.5 million compared to $130.0 million in fiscal 2004. These operations have been treated as a
discontinued operation.
For fiscal 2004, revenue from continuing operations increased from $109.4 million in fiscal 2003 to $183.3 million, with the
average gold price received by us increasing to $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004, compared to $331 per ounce in fiscal 2003. The
acquisition of our 20% interest in Porgera contributed $60.4 million to revenue for fiscal 2004. Other movements in revenue are
attributable to changes in production volumes, from a total of 330,253 ounces in fiscal 2003 to 466,284 ounces in fiscal 2004, from
continuing operations. The North West Operations recorded revenue of $151.9 million in fiscal 2003 and $130.0 million in fiscal
2004.
acquisition of our 20% interest in Porgera contributed $60.4 million to revenue for fiscal 2004. Other movements in revenue are
attributable to changes in production volumes, from a total of 330,253 ounces in fiscal 2003 to 466,284 ounces in fiscal 2004, from
continuing operations. The North West Operations recorded revenue of $151.9 million in fiscal 2003 and $130.0 million in fiscal
2004.
1
With effect from July 21, 2003, we disposed of the West Wits operating mining assets in a black economic empowerment deal to Mogale, for $2.4
million.
2
With effect from October 14, 2004, we acquired a 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera Joint Venture. This interest is proportionately
consolidated from that date.
3
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003
information as a discontinued operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods
accordingly.
accordingly.
86
Gold production
The following table analyzes the production per operation:
Year ended June 30,
Production in ounces
Continuing operations
2005
2004
2003
Blyvoor Section ...................................................................................................................
161,878
233,094
247,626
Surface operations ..............................................................................................................
23,920
34,883
44,626
Underground operations .....................................................................................................
137,958
198,211
203,000
West Wits Section
1
............................................................................................................
-
-
14,531
Total South African Operations ................................................................................
161,878
233,094
262,157
Porgera
2
...............................................................................................................................
195,394
147,475
-
Tolukuma Section ................................................................................................................
76,314
85,715
68,096
Total Australasian Operations ..................................................................................
271,708
233,190
68,096
Total..............................................................................................................................
433,586
466,284
330,253
North West Operations
3
......................................................................................................
199,850
341,861
462,743
Surface operations ..............................................................................................................
27,328
43,180
78,447
Underground operations .....................................................................................................
172,522
298,681
384,296
For fiscal 2005, our total gold production from continuing operations decreased by 32,698 ounces, or 7%, to 433,586 ounces
from 466,284 ounces produced in fiscal 2004. Gold production from our continuing South African Operations decreased by 31% from
233,094 ounces produced in fiscal 2004 to 161,878 ounces in fiscal 2005. This was as a result of the poor recoveries at the Slimes
Dam Project and the restructuring, which impacted productivity, completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 at Blyvoor. Gold
production at the Australasian Operations increased by 17%, from 233,190 ounces in fiscal 2004, to 271,708 ounces in fiscal 2005.
This is as a result of improved production at Porgera in the first two quarters of our financial year, reflecting higher grades and the
installation of a secondary crusher. The North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005,
following a series of events culminating in a devastating earthquake, and have therefore been treated as a discontinued operation.
233,094 ounces produced in fiscal 2004 to 161,878 ounces in fiscal 2005. This was as a result of the poor recoveries at the Slimes
Dam Project and the restructuring, which impacted productivity, completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 at Blyvoor. Gold
production at the Australasian Operations increased by 17%, from 233,190 ounces in fiscal 2004, to 271,708 ounces in fiscal 2005.
This is as a result of improved production at Porgera in the first two quarters of our financial year, reflecting higher grades and the
installation of a secondary crusher. The North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation on March 22, 2005,
following a series of events culminating in a devastating earthquake, and have therefore been treated as a discontinued operation.
For fiscal 2004, our total gold production from continuing operations increased by 136,031 ounces, or 41%, to 466,284
ounces from 330,253 ounces produced in fiscal 2003. Gold production from our South African Operations decreased by 11% from
262,157 ounces produced in fiscal 2003 to 233,094 ounces in fiscal 2004. This is attributable to us ceasing mining unprofitable gold
reserves as a result of the lower Rand per kilogram gold price. Gold production at the Australasian Operations increased by 242%
from 68,096 ounces in fiscal 2003 to 233,190 ounces in fiscal 2004, mainly due to the acquisition of our 20% attributable interest in
the Porgera Joint Venture and improved gold recovery at the Tolukuma Section.
262,157 ounces produced in fiscal 2003 to 233,094 ounces in fiscal 2004. This is attributable to us ceasing mining unprofitable gold
reserves as a result of the lower Rand per kilogram gold price. Gold production at the Australasian Operations increased by 242%
from 68,096 ounces in fiscal 2003 to 233,190 ounces in fiscal 2004, mainly due to the acquisition of our 20% attributable interest in
the Porgera Joint Venture and improved gold recovery at the Tolukuma Section.
A more detailed review of gold production at each of our operations is provided under Item 4D.: “Property, Plant and
Equipment.”
1
With effect from July 21, 2003, we disposed of the West Wits operating mining assets in a black economic empowerment transaction to Mogale, for
$2.4 million.
2
With effect from October 14, 2004, we acquired a 20% interest in the unincorporated Porgera Joint Venture. This interest is proportionately
consolidated from that date.
3
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003
information as a discontinued operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods
accordingly.
accordingly.
87
Cash costs
1
and total costs
2
per ounce
Our operational focus is to increase production, improve productivity and reduce costs. For fiscal 2005, cash costs from our
continuing operations increased to $315 per ounce of gold from $307 per ounce of gold in fiscal 2004. Total costs from our continuing
operations increased to $449 per ounce of gold from $418 per ounce of gold in fiscal 2004.
operations increased to $449 per ounce of gold from $418 per ounce of gold in fiscal 2004.
In fiscal 2005, the cash costs per ounce from our continuing South African Operations increased by 18%, from $393 per
ounce to $464 per ounce, compared to fiscal 2004. Cash costs per ounce from our Australasian Operations increased by 2%, from $221
per ounce to $226 per ounce compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in cash costs per ounce at our South African Operations was mainly
due to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar, price increases in key consumables (labor, inventories and electricity), a
decrease in production due to the poor recoveries at the Slimes Dam Project and the restructuring completed in the second quarter of
fiscal 2005 at Blyvoor. The increase in cash costs per ounce at our Australasian Operations was due to less efficient mining and
increased costs associated with consumables and services, especially the cost of fuel.
per ounce to $226 per ounce compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in cash costs per ounce at our South African Operations was mainly
due to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar, price increases in key consumables (labor, inventories and electricity), a
decrease in production due to the poor recoveries at the Slimes Dam Project and the restructuring completed in the second quarter of
fiscal 2005 at Blyvoor. The increase in cash costs per ounce at our Australasian Operations was due to less efficient mining and
increased costs associated with consumables and services, especially the cost of fuel.
In fiscal 2004, the cash costs per ounce from our continuing South African Operations increased by 44% whereas the cash
costs per ounce for the Australasian Operations decreased by 21%, compared to fiscal 2003. The increase in cash costs per ounce at
our South African Operations was mainly due to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar and operational difficulties due to
the mining of below pay-limit panels, poor advances per blast, lower than expected mine call factors, increased lock-up in the plant
due to the ending of surface rock dump feed to the mill and poor recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project. The decrease in cash costs
per ounce at our Australasian Operations was primarily due to our acquisition of Porgera which operated at a cash cost of $215 per
ounce in fiscal 2004.
our South African Operations was mainly due to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar and operational difficulties due to
the mining of below pay-limit panels, poor advances per blast, lower than expected mine call factors, increased lock-up in the plant
due to the ending of surface rock dump feed to the mill and poor recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project. The decrease in cash costs
per ounce at our Australasian Operations was primarily due to our acquisition of Porgera which operated at a cash cost of $215 per
ounce in fiscal 2004.
Our total cost per ounce from continuing operations, increased from $418 per ounce in fiscal 2004 to $449 per ounce in fiscal
2005. This increase was mainly due to employment termination costs of $4.2 million ($10 per ounce) at the Blyvoor Section and our
head office in South Africa in fiscal 2005, unrealized foreign exchange losses of $9.3 million ($15 per ounce) recorded in fiscal 2005,
compared to unrealized foreign exchange gains of $10.7 million ($26 per ounce) recorded in fiscal 2004.
head office in South Africa in fiscal 2005, unrealized foreign exchange losses of $9.3 million ($15 per ounce) recorded in fiscal 2005,
compared to unrealized foreign exchange gains of $10.7 million ($26 per ounce) recorded in fiscal 2004.
Our total cost per ounce from continuing operations, increased from $151 per ounce in fiscal 2003 to $418 per ounce in fiscal
2004. This increase was mainly due to the weakening of the Dollar against the local operating currencies. The total cost per ounce of
$151 recorded in fiscal 2003 included a profit on financial instruments of $42.4 million ($128 per ounce) as a result of the closing out
of put and call options. In addition, the total cost per ounce of $418 recorded in fiscal 2004 included additional depreciation of
$19.5 million ($41 per ounce), primarily due to the acquisition of Porgera.
$151 recorded in fiscal 2003 included a profit on financial instruments of $42.4 million ($128 per ounce) as a result of the closing out
of put and call options. In addition, the total cost per ounce of $418 recorded in fiscal 2004 included additional depreciation of
$19.5 million ($41 per ounce), primarily due to the acquisition of Porgera.
1
Cash costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results.”
2
Total costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results.”
88
Reconciliation of cash costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce
Cash costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce are not US GAAP financial measures.
Cash costs of production include costs for all mining, processing, administration, royalties and production taxes, but exclude
depreciation, depletion and amortization, rehabilitation, employment termination costs, corporate administration costs, capital costs
and exploration costs. Cash costs per ounce are calculated by dividing production costs by ounces of gold produced. Cash costs per
ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented.
and exploration costs. Cash costs per ounce are calculated by dividing production costs by ounces of gold produced. Cash costs per
ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all periods presented.
Total production costs include cash costs of production, depreciation, depletion and amortization and the accretion of
rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs.
Total costs, as calculated and reported by us, include total production costs, plus other operating and non-operating income,
finance charges and other operating and non-operating costs, but excludes taxation, minority interest, equity in loss from associates
and the cumulative effect of accounting changes. These costs are excluded as the mines do not have control over these costs and they
have little or no impact on the day-to-day operating performance of the mines. Total costs per ounce are calculated by dividing total
costs by attributable ounces of gold produced. Total costs and total costs per ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all
periods presented.
and the cumulative effect of accounting changes. These costs are excluded as the mines do not have control over these costs and they
have little or no impact on the day-to-day operating performance of the mines. Total costs per ounce are calculated by dividing total
costs by attributable ounces of gold produced. Total costs and total costs per ounce have been calculated on a consistent basis for all
periods presented.
Cash costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce are non-US GAAP financial measures that should not be
considered by investors in isolation or as alternatives to production costs, net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders,
(loss)/profit before tax and other items or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with US GAAP or as an
indicator of our performance. While the Gold Institute has provided definitions for the calculation of cash costs, the calculation of cash
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce may vary significantly among gold mining companies, and these definitions by
themselves do not necessarily provide a basis for comparison with other gold mining companies. However, we believe that cash costs
per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce are useful indicators to investors and management of an individual mine's performance
and of the performance of our operations as a whole as they provide:
(loss)/profit before tax and other items or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with US GAAP or as an
indicator of our performance. While the Gold Institute has provided definitions for the calculation of cash costs, the calculation of cash
costs per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce may vary significantly among gold mining companies, and these definitions by
themselves do not necessarily provide a basis for comparison with other gold mining companies. However, we believe that cash costs
per ounce, total costs and total costs per ounce are useful indicators to investors and management of an individual mine's performance
and of the performance of our operations as a whole as they provide:
•
an indication of a mine’s profitability and efficiency;
•
the trend in costs;
•
a measure of a mine's margin per ounce, by comparison of the cash costs per ounce by mine to the price of gold; and
•
a benchmark of performance to allow for comparison against other mines and mining companies.
A reconciliation of production costs to total costs, cash costs per ounce and total costs per ounce, for each of the three years in
the period ending June 30, 2005, is presented below. In addition, we have also provided below detail of the ounces of gold produced
by mine for each of those periods.
by mine for each of those periods.
89
For the year ended June 30, 2005
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
Continuing operations
Discontinued
operation
Blyvoor
West Wits
1
Other
2
Total South
African
Operations
Porgera
3
Tolukuma
Other
Total
Australasian
Operations
Total
North West
4
Production costs .........................................
73,814
-
1,218
75,032
36,210
25,278
-
61,488
136,520
100,695
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization ....................
2,716
-
(2,773)
(57)
11,613
3,336
(1,095)
13,854
13,797
971
Movement in rehabilitation provision,
reclamation and closure costs ...................
(1,353)
299
1,368
314
2,424
(1)
-
2,423
2,737
1,023
Total production costs ...............................
75,177
299
(187)
75,289
50,247
28,613
(1,095)
77,765
153,054
102,689
Plus:
Employment termination costs....................
3,050
-
1,151
4,201
-
-
-
-
4,201
224
Movement in gold in process ......................
(421)
-
-
(421)
(1,182)
(114)
-
(1,296)
(1,717)
383
Non-operating income ................................
(220)
(132)
2,445
2,093
265
955
3,074
4,294
6,387
(320)
Interest expense...........................................
607
1
9,926
10,534
-
-
831
831
11,365
70
Impairment of assets ...................................
-
-
664
664
-
-
-
-
664
39,451
Management and consulting fees ................
307
-
5,599
5,906
493
-
252
745
6,651
-
Loss/(profit) on derivative instruments .......
388
-
(4,004)
(3,616)
-
-
-
-
(3,616)
-
Loss/(profit) on sale of mining assets .........
-
-
(2)
(2)
-
-
-
-
(2)
-
Profit on disposal of subsidiary...................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(18,105)
Selling, administration and general
charges ......................................................
1,786
187
4,982
6,955
3,427
3,702
3,693
10,822
17,777
1,505
Total costs ...................................................
80,674
355
20,574
101,603
53,250
33,156
6,755
93,161
194,764
125,897
Gold produced (ounces)
5
..............................
161,878
-
-
161,878
195,394
76,314
-
271,708
433,586
199,850
Cash costs per ounce ($ per ounce)..............
456
-
-
464
185
331
-
226
315
504
Total costs per ounce ($ per ounce) .............
498
-
-
628
273
434
-
343
449
630
1
With effect from July 21, 2003, we disposed of the West Wits operating mining assets in a black economic empowerment deal, to Mogale Gold Limited.
2
Relates to other non-core operating entities within the Group.
3
With effect from October 14, 2004, we acquired a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture.
4
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 North West Operations’ information as a discontinued
operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods accordingly.
5
The gold production numbers exclude production from our 40% held associate, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, which holds the Crown and ERPM Sections, and our 45.33% investment in
Emperor, but include our 20% attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture.
90
For the year ended June 30, 2004
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
Continuing operations
Discontinued
operation
Blyvoor
West Wits
1
Other
2
Total South
African
Operations
Porgera
3
Tolukuma
Other
Total
Australasian
Operations
Total
North West
4
Production costs .........................................
90,366
-
1,189
91,555
31,650
19,821
-
51,471
143,026
134,465
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization ....................
2,643
-
(1,199)
1,444
9,260
7,340
7,931
24,531
25,975
4,160
Movement in rehabilitation provision,
reclamation and closure costs ...................
779
109
(30)
858
180
148
63
391
1,249
2,206
Total production costs ...............................
93,788
109
(40)
93,857
41,090
27,309
7,994
76,393
170,250
140,831
Plus:
Employment termination costs....................
899
-
-
899
-
-
-
-
899
7,064
Movement in gold in process ......................
579
-
-
579
(1,499)
-
-
(1,499)
(920)
(80)
Non-operating income ................................
(192)
(136)
(23,125)
(23,453)
(9)
(118)
11,602
11,475
(11,978)
(881)
Interest expense...........................................
906
-
6,800
7,706
1,103
226
(1,285)
44
7,750
162
Impairment of assets ...................................
-
-
2,990
2,990
-
-
-
-
2,990
1,276
Management and consulting fees ................
198
-
1,850
2,048
244
-
156
400
2,448
-
Loss/(profit) on derivative instruments .......
1,376
-
(334)
1,042
-
-
-
-
1,042
124
Loss/(profit) on sale of mining assets .........
56
-
(1)
55
-
-
-
-
55
-
Selling, administration and general
charges ......................................................
2,037
1,430
23,303
26,770
1,979
3,032
(9,181)
(4,170)
22,600
2,344
Total costs ...................................................
99,647
1,403
11,443
112,493
42,908
30,449
9,286
82,643
195,136
150,840
Gold produced (ounces)
5
.............................
233,094
-
-
233,094
147,475
85,715
-
233,190
466,284
341,861
Cash costs per ounce ($ per ounce)..............
388
-
-
393
215
231
-
221
307
393
Total costs per ounce ($ per ounce) .............
427
-
-
483
291
355
-
354
418
441
1
With effect from July 21, 2003, we disposed of the West Wits operating mining assets in a black economic empowerment deal, to Mogale Gold Limited.
2
Relates to other non-core operating entities within the Group.
3
With effect from October 14, 2004, we acquired a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture.
4
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 North West Operations’ information as a discontinued
operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods accordingly.
5
The gold production numbers exclude production from our 40% held associate, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, which holds the Crown and ERPM Sections, and our 19.78% investment in
Emperor, but include our 20% attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture.
91
For the year ended June 30, 2003
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
(in $'000, except as otherwise noted)
Continuing operations
Discontinued
operation
Blyvoor
West Wits
1
Other
2
Total South
African
Operations
Total
Australasian
Operations
Total
North West
3
Production costs ..........................................
65,240
4,859
1,557
71,656
19,105
90,761
144,598
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization ......................
1,509
402
369
2,280
6,561
8,841
1,761
Movement in rehabilitation provision,
reclamation and closure costs .....................
130
71
306
507
(27)
480
934
Total production costs ................................
66,879
5,332
2,232
74,443
25,639
100,082
147,293
Plus:
Employment termination costs......................
85
53
542
680
-
680
821
Movement in gold in process ........................
(160)
131
-
(29)
593
564
687
Non-operating income ...................................
(391)
(251)
(19,745)
(20,387)
1,519
(18,868)
(1,216)
Interest expense.............................................
530
10
5,544
6,084
615
6,699
210
Impairment of assets .....................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Management and consulting fees ..................
149
11
1,360
1,520
130
1,650
-
Loss/(profit) on derivative instruments .........
(41,719)
-
(665)
(42,384)
-
(42,384)
(1,437)
Loss/(profit) on sale of mining assets ...........
-
(652)
(1,077)
(1,729)
-
(1,729)
-
Profit on disposal of subsidiary.....................
-
-
(5,302)
(5,302)
-
(5,302)
-
Selling, administration and general
charges ........................................................
1,806
1
5,313
7,120
1,501
8,621
2,207
Total costs .....................................................
27,179
4,635
(11,798)
20,016
29,997
50,013
148,565
Gold produced (ounces)
4
..............................
247,626
14,531
-
262,157
68,096
330,253
462,743
Cash costs per ounce ($ per ounce)................
263
334
-
273
281
275
312
Total costs per ounce ($ per ounce) ...............
110
319
-
76
441
151
321
1
With effect from July 21, 2003, we disposed of the West Wits operating mining assets in a black economic empowerment deal, to Mogale Gold Limited.
2
Relates to other non-core operating entities within the Group.
3
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 North West Operations’ information as a discontinued
operation and all other operations as continuing operations. We have adjusted the results for prior reporting periods accordingly.
4
The gold production numbers exclude production from our 40% held associate, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, which holds the Crown and ERPM Sections, and our 19.81% investment in
Emperor, but include our 20% attributable interest in the Porgera Joint Venture.
92
Capital expenditure
Total capital expenditure relating to continuing operations during fiscal 2005 was $21.3 million, compared to $21.4 million in
fiscal 2004. At our continuing South African Operations, capital expenditure decreased from $9.2 million in fiscal 2004, to $0.8 million in
fiscal 2005, due to an increased focus on efficient utilization of existing assets. This expenditure included the installation of a Knelsen
concentrator and Acacia reactor at the Blyvoor plant. Capital expenditure in the Australasian Operations, increased from $12.2 million in
fiscal 2004, to $20.6 million in fiscal 2005. Of this expenditure $17.2 million relates to Porgera, mostly as a result of capitalized deferred
stripping costs of $11.1 million, and $3.4 million relates to the Tolukuma Section, as a result of additions to plant, and equipment.
fiscal 2005, due to an increased focus on efficient utilization of existing assets. This expenditure included the installation of a Knelsen
concentrator and Acacia reactor at the Blyvoor plant. Capital expenditure in the Australasian Operations, increased from $12.2 million in
fiscal 2004, to $20.6 million in fiscal 2005. Of this expenditure $17.2 million relates to Porgera, mostly as a result of capitalized deferred
stripping costs of $11.1 million, and $3.4 million relates to the Tolukuma Section, as a result of additions to plant, and equipment.
Total capital expenditure relating to continuing operations, during fiscal 2004 was $21.4 million, compared to $7.0 million in
fiscal 2003, which represents a $14.4 million, or 206%, increase in capital expenditure on a Group level. At our continuing South
African Operations, capital expenditure increased from $4.3 million in fiscal 2003 to $9.2 million in fiscal 2004, mainly due to the
inclusion of new capital development projects, that included the completion of the No. 4 and 5 slimes dam project at Blyvoor
amounting to $6.9 million, and the effects of the strengthening of the South African Rand against the Dollar by 16% during fiscal
2004. Capital expenditure in the Australasian Operations, increased from $2.7 million in fiscal 2003, to $12.2 million in fiscal 2004.
The increase partly related to the strengthening of the local currencies against the Dollar, and the inclusion of $8.7 million of capital
expenditure at Porgera, which included capitalized deferred stripping costs of $4.1 million.
African Operations, capital expenditure increased from $4.3 million in fiscal 2003 to $9.2 million in fiscal 2004, mainly due to the
inclusion of new capital development projects, that included the completion of the No. 4 and 5 slimes dam project at Blyvoor
amounting to $6.9 million, and the effects of the strengthening of the South African Rand against the Dollar by 16% during fiscal
2004. Capital expenditure in the Australasian Operations, increased from $2.7 million in fiscal 2003, to $12.2 million in fiscal 2004.
The increase partly related to the strengthening of the local currencies against the Dollar, and the inclusion of $8.7 million of capital
expenditure at Porgera, which included capitalized deferred stripping costs of $4.1 million.
Ore Reserves
As at June 30, 2005, our Ore Reserves, attributable to our continuing operations, were estimated at 5.6 million ounces, as
compared to approximately 6.0 million ounces at June 30, 2004, representing a 7% decrease – mostly due to depletion during the year.
The reduction was offset in part by continued efforts to explore and prove up Ore Reserves at the Tolukuma Section. Our Ore Reserves
attributable to our continuing operations increased from 5.9 million ounces of gold in fiscal 2003 to 6.0 million ounces in fiscal 2004. As
at June 30, 2004, 5.0 million ounces of Ore Reserves, in addition to those reflected above, were attributable to the North West Operations.
These have been lost following the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations announced on March 22, 2005.
The reduction was offset in part by continued efforts to explore and prove up Ore Reserves at the Tolukuma Section. Our Ore Reserves
attributable to our continuing operations increased from 5.9 million ounces of gold in fiscal 2003 to 6.0 million ounces in fiscal 2004. As
at June 30, 2004, 5.0 million ounces of Ore Reserves, in addition to those reflected above, were attributable to the North West Operations.
These have been lost following the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations announced on March 22, 2005.
We seek to increase our Ore Reserves through development and to acquire new Ore Reserves through acquisitions.
Year ended June 30,
('000 ounces)
2005
2004
2003
Continuing operations
Blyvoor Section ...............................................................................
Blyvoor Section ...............................................................................
3,998
4,329
5,780
Total South African Operations .............................................
3,998
4,329
5,780
Porgera
1
...........................................................................................
1,351
1,437
-
Tolukuma Section ............................................................................
218
203
145
Total Australasian Operations ...............................................
1,569
1,640
145
Total..........................................................................................
5,567
5,969
5,925
Associates
2
......................................................................................
986
505
1,211
Discontinued operation
North West Operations
North West Operations
3
...................................................................
-
5,047
8,483
1
Our attributable 20% share of the Proven and Probable Ore Reserves in the Porgera Joint Venture is based on the information disclosed by Placer Dome Inc. (which
has a 75% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture) in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on Form 40-F on March 5,
2004. The Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004.
2004. The Porgera Ore Reserves are estimated as at December 31, 2004.
2
Comprise our 40% interest in CGR, which owns the Crown and ERPM Sections, as well as, for fiscal 2005, our 45.33% interest in Emperor.
3
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. As a result we report the 2005, 2004 and 2003 information as a
discontinued operation.
93
Application of critical accounting policies
Some of our critical accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the
appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty and are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, management's view on trends in the gold mining
industry and information from outside sources.
uncertainty and are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, management's view on trends in the gold mining
industry and information from outside sources.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies involve the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements and could potentially impact our financial results and future financial performance:
•
Mining assets
•
Deferred stripping costs
•
Impairment of mining assets
•
Deferred income and mining taxes
•
Reclamation and closure costs
•
Environmental rehabilitation costs
•
Collectability of receivables
Management has discussed the development and selection of each of these critical accounting policies with the Board of
Directors and the Audit Committee, both of which have approved and reviewed the disclosure of these policies.
Mining assets
Actual expenditures incurred for mineral property interests, mine development costs, mine plant facilities and equipment are
capitalized to the specific mine to which the cost relates. Amortization is calculated on a mine-by-mine basis (i.e. the cost pools are the
individual mines) using the units of production method. Under the units of production method, we estimate the amortization rate based on
actual production over total Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the particular mine. This rate is then applied to actual costs capitalized
to date to arrive at the amortization expense for the period. Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the particular mine reflect estimated
quantities of economically and legally recoverable reserves, as determined in accordance with the SEC's Industry Guide 7 under the US
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The estimate of the total reserves of our mines could be materially different from the actual
gold mined due to changes in the factors used in determining our Ore Reserves, such as the gold pric e, foreign currency exchange rates,
labor costs, engineering evaluations of assay values derived from sampling of drill holes and other openings. Any change in
management’s estimate of the total Proven and Probable Ore Reserves, would impact the amortization charges recorded in our
consolidated financial statements.
individual mines) using the units of production method. Under the units of production method, we estimate the amortization rate based on
actual production over total Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the particular mine. This rate is then applied to actual costs capitalized
to date to arrive at the amortization expense for the period. Proven and Probable Ore Reserves of the particular mine reflect estimated
quantities of economically and legally recoverable reserves, as determined in accordance with the SEC's Industry Guide 7 under the US
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The estimate of the total reserves of our mines could be materially different from the actual
gold mined due to changes in the factors used in determining our Ore Reserves, such as the gold pric e, foreign currency exchange rates,
labor costs, engineering evaluations of assay values derived from sampling of drill holes and other openings. Any change in
management’s estimate of the total Proven and Probable Ore Reserves, would impact the amortization charges recorded in our
consolidated financial statements.
Deferred stripping costs
We have only one significant open-pit operation, at Porgera, where stripping costs incurred during the production phase to
remove additional waste are charged to operating costs on the basis of the average life of mine stripping ratio. For other open-pit
operations stripping costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Stripping costs included in mining assets as at
June 30, 2005, for Porgera are $12.5 million (June 30, 2004: $3.5 million; June 30, 2003: $nil) with $11.1 million capitalized to mining
assets during fiscal 2005 (fiscal 2004: $4.1 million; fiscal 2003: $nil). During fiscal 2005, the average stripping ratio was 7.1 in
comparison with the Life of Mine stripping ratio of 3.5. Wedge and mudstone failure on the West Wall of the Stage 5 pit at Porgera
created unplanned waste material which is in the process of being removed and negatively affected the stripping ratio. The stripping
ratio is determined based on the life of mine plan. The estimate of the total reserves of a mine could be materially different fro m the
actual gold mined and from the actual usage of a mine due to changes in the factors used in determining the economic value of our
mineral reserves and deferred stripping costs, such as the gold price and foreign currency exchange rates. Any change in management’s
estimate of the total expected future life of a mine would impact the amortization charge recorded and deferred stripping capitalized in our
consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of mining assets
operations stripping costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Stripping costs included in mining assets as at
June 30, 2005, for Porgera are $12.5 million (June 30, 2004: $3.5 million; June 30, 2003: $nil) with $11.1 million capitalized to mining
assets during fiscal 2005 (fiscal 2004: $4.1 million; fiscal 2003: $nil). During fiscal 2005, the average stripping ratio was 7.1 in
comparison with the Life of Mine stripping ratio of 3.5. Wedge and mudstone failure on the West Wall of the Stage 5 pit at Porgera
created unplanned waste material which is in the process of being removed and negatively affected the stripping ratio. The stripping
ratio is determined based on the life of mine plan. The estimate of the total reserves of a mine could be materially different fro m the
actual gold mined and from the actual usage of a mine due to changes in the factors used in determining the economic value of our
mineral reserves and deferred stripping costs, such as the gold price and foreign currency exchange rates. Any change in management’s
estimate of the total expected future life of a mine would impact the amortization charge recorded and deferred stripping capitalized in our
consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of mining assets
The impairment of long-lived assets is accounted for in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or
SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” or SFAS 144.
Under SFAS 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable, including a reduction in the extent to which a gold plant is used, a
dramatic change in the amount of the Ore Reserves, a substantial drop in the gold price, a change in the law or environment in the country
in which the Ore Reserves are based or gold is sold, forecasts showing lack of long-term profitability or production costs are in excess of
an amount originally expected when the asset was acquired or constructed. Recoverability of an asset or asset group is assessed by
dramatic change in the amount of the Ore Reserves, a substantial drop in the gold price, a change in the law or environment in the country
in which the Ore Reserves are based or gold is sold, forecasts showing lack of long-term profitability or production costs are in excess of
an amount originally expected when the asset was acquired or constructed. Recoverability of an asset or asset group is assessed by
94
comparing the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows of the asset or group of
assets. Estimates of future cash flows include estimates of future gold prices and foreign exchange rates. Therefore, changes could occur
which may affect the recoverability of our mining assets. If an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment which is
recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds the discounted future cash
flows expected to be derived from that asset or group of assets. The asset or asset group is the lowest level for which there are identifiable
cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows. In carrying out the economic valuations, an assessment is made of the future
cash flows expected to be generated by these assets, taking into account current market condition s and the expected lives of our assets.
The lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows is calculated on a mine-by-
mine basis. We make the analysis periodically on a mine-by-mine basis or when indicators of impairment exist. During fiscal 2005,
$0.7 million was recorded as an impairment and during fiscal 2004, $1.4 million (attributable to our discontinued operation) was recorded
as an impairment through applying these principles. No impairments were recognized during fiscal 2003.
assets. Estimates of future cash flows include estimates of future gold prices and foreign exchange rates. Therefore, changes could occur
which may affect the recoverability of our mining assets. If an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment which is
recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds the discounted future cash
flows expected to be derived from that asset or group of assets. The asset or asset group is the lowest level for which there are identifiable
cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows. In carrying out the economic valuations, an assessment is made of the future
cash flows expected to be generated by these assets, taking into account current market condition s and the expected lives of our assets.
The lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows is calculated on a mine-by-
mine basis. We make the analysis periodically on a mine-by-mine basis or when indicators of impairment exist. During fiscal 2005,
$0.7 million was recorded as an impairment and during fiscal 2004, $1.4 million (attributable to our discontinued operation) was recorded
as an impairment through applying these principles. No impairments were recognized during fiscal 2003.
Deferred income and mining taxes
We follow the liability method of accounting for deferred income and mining tax whereby we recognize the tax consequences of
temporary differences by applying current statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between financial statement
amounts and the tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities include the impact of any tax rate
changes enacted during the year.
amounts and the tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities include the impact of any tax rate
changes enacted during the year.
A valuation allowance is raised against deferred tax assets which are not considered more likely than not to be realizable. These
determinations are based on the projected realization of tax allowances and tax loss carry forwards. Assessing the recoverability of
deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. If these tax assets
are not more likely than not to be realized, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be required, which would be charged to
income in the period that the determination was made. If we determine that it is more likely than not that we would be able to realize the
tax assets in the future, in excess of the recorded amount thereof, an adjustment to reduce the valuation allowance would be recorded.
Management considers historical taxable positions in determining if a tax asset will be utilized, specifically with reference to the
immediately preceding three fiscal years. As a result of these determinations, additional valuation allowances of $ 10.1 million, $16.9
million and $nil were recorded during fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The bulk of these related to the continuing South African
Operations. In addition, valuation allowances relating to our discontinued operation, the North West Operations, amounted to $nil,
$70.2 million and $50.3 million in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. If these tax assets
are not more likely than not to be realized, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be required, which would be charged to
income in the period that the determination was made. If we determine that it is more likely than not that we would be able to realize the
tax assets in the future, in excess of the recorded amount thereof, an adjustment to reduce the valuation allowance would be recorded.
Management considers historical taxable positions in determining if a tax asset will be utilized, specifically with reference to the
immediately preceding three fiscal years. As a result of these determinations, additional valuation allowances of $ 10.1 million, $16.9
million and $nil were recorded during fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The bulk of these related to the continuing South African
Operations. In addition, valuation allowances relating to our discontinued operation, the North West Operations, amounted to $nil,
$70.2 million and $50.3 million in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Reclamation and closure costs
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 143, “Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations,” or SFAS 143. SFAS 143 came into effect for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 and we
adopted it on July 1, 2002. SFAS 143 requires that the fair value of liabilities for asset retirement obligations be recognized in the period
in which they are incurred. A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset, where one is identifiable, is recorded and
is depreciated over the life of the asset. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 143, we accrued for the estimated reclamation and closure liability
through annual charges to earnings over the estimated life of the mine.
adopted it on July 1, 2002. SFAS 143 requires that the fair value of liabilities for asset retirement obligations be recognized in the period
in which they are incurred. A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset, where one is identifiable, is recorded and
is depreciated over the life of the asset. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 143, we accrued for the estimated reclamation and closure liability
through annual charges to earnings over the estimated life of the mine.
The provision for asset retirement obligations relates to expected costs associated with the demolition of gold plants, shaft
headgear and shaft infrastructure. Estimates of these costs are based on our knowledge at the time of creating the provision. Determining
these costs is complex and requires management to make estimates and judgments because most of the removal obligations will be
fulfilled in the future and contracts and regulations often have vague descriptions of what constitutes removal. These estimates are subject
to changes in regulations and unexpected movements in inflation rates and are, therefore, subject to annual review to ensure that the asset
and liability is a fair reflection of the expected reclamation and closure costs as at June 30 of every year. The actual liability for
rehabilitation costs can vary significantly from our estimate, if our assessment of these costs changes. As we use the expected cash flow
technique to determine our future liability, the liability is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows using a credit-adjusted risk-
free rate. Thus, the effect of our credit standing is reflected in the discount rate rather than in the estimated cash flows. As at
June 30, 2005, the discount rate was determined to be 7.26%. As a result of changes in estimates, additional liabilities of $0.1 million,
$2.0 million and $0.6 million were raised in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including movements related to the discontinued
operation.
these costs is complex and requires management to make estimates and judgments because most of the removal obligations will be
fulfilled in the future and contracts and regulations often have vague descriptions of what constitutes removal. These estimates are subject
to changes in regulations and unexpected movements in inflation rates and are, therefore, subject to annual review to ensure that the asset
and liability is a fair reflection of the expected reclamation and closure costs as at June 30 of every year. The actual liability for
rehabilitation costs can vary significantly from our estimate, if our assessment of these costs changes. As we use the expected cash flow
technique to determine our future liability, the liability is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows using a credit-adjusted risk-
free rate. Thus, the effect of our credit standing is reflected in the discount rate rather than in the estimated cash flows. As at
June 30, 2005, the discount rate was determined to be 7.26%. As a result of changes in estimates, additional liabilities of $0.1 million,
$2.0 million and $0.6 million were raised in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including movements related to the discontinued
operation.
95
Environmental rehabilitation costs
Where a related asset is not easily identifiable, other estimated rehabilitation costs associated with the revegetation of tailings
dams, revegetation of rock dumps and the rehabilitation of open cast areas are accrued as tailings are deposited. The estimated costs of
rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology or other circumstances. Based on
current environmental regulations and known rehabilitation requirements, our management has included its best estimate of these
obligations in our Provision for Rehabilitation. However, it is reasonably possible that these estimates of our ultimate rehabilitation
liabilities could change as a result of changes in regulations or cost estimates. As a result of changes in estimates, additional liabilities of
$3.7 million, $1.5 million and $0.8 million were raised in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including the discontinued operation.
rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology or other circumstances. Based on
current environmental regulations and known rehabilitation requirements, our management has included its best estimate of these
obligations in our Provision for Rehabilitation. However, it is reasonably possible that these estimates of our ultimate rehabilitation
liabilities could change as a result of changes in regulations or cost estimates. As a result of changes in estimates, additional liabilities of
$3.7 million, $1.5 million and $0.8 million were raised in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including the discontinued operation.
In South Africa, annual contributions are made to dedicated Rehabilitation Trust Funds, to fund the estimated cost of
rehabilitation during and at the end of the life of the relevant mine.
Collectability of receivables
In determining the collectability of receivables, management judgment is required in instances where uncertainty exists over the
period and amount of cash flows which will be received. In determining this expectation, operational and economical circumstances
affecting the receivable are considered. These principles were applied in evaluating the collectability of the receivables owed by CGR,
ERPM, KBH and Mogale. Advances to the value of $1.9 million and $5.2 million were provided for in fiscal 2004 and 2003,
respectively. No further advances were made during fiscal 2005, however we provided for $0.6 million against the receivable owed by
Mogale.
affecting the receivable are considered. These principles were applied in evaluating the collectability of the receivables owed by CGR,
ERPM, KBH and Mogale. Advances to the value of $1.9 million and $5.2 million were provided for in fiscal 2004 and 2003,
respectively. No further advances were made during fiscal 2005, however we provided for $0.6 million against the receivable owed by
Mogale.
96
Operating results
Comparison of financial performance for fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 with fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
Revenue
The following table illustrates the year-on-year change in revenue from continuing operations by evaluating the contribution
of each segment to the total change on a consolidated basis for fiscal 2005 in comparison to fiscal 2004:
Impact of change in volume
$’000
Total
revenue
2004
Acquisitions/
(dispositions)
Internal
growth/
(decline)
Impact of
change in
price
Net change
Total
revenue
2005
Blyvoor Section..................................
90,066
-
(27,989)
6,293
(21,696)
68,370
Total South African Operations......
90,066
-
(27,989)
6,293
(21,696)
68,370
Porgera Joint Venture.........................
60,445
-
18,833
3,515
22,348
82,793
Tolukuma Section ..............................
32,743
-
(3,695)
3,398
(297)
32,446
Total Australasian Operations ........
93,188
-
15,138
6,913
22,051
115,239
Total ..................................................
183,254
-
(12,851)
13,206
355
183,609
Revenue from continuing operations, for fiscal 2005, was consistent at $183.6 million compared to $183.3 million in fiscal
2004, as a result of revenue from the Australasian Operations, negating the effect of a significant decrease in production volumes at
the continuing South African Operations, because of poor recoveries at the Slimes Dam Project, the restructuring completed in the
second quarter of our financial year at Blyvoor and the yield at these operations decreasing in fiscal 2005. The decrease in production
in fiscal 2005 was partially offset by a stronger Dollar gold price received during the year. The average gold price received by us was
$423 per ounce in fiscal 2005, compared to $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004.
the continuing South African Operations, because of poor recoveries at the Slimes Dam Project, the restructuring completed in the
second quarter of our financial year at Blyvoor and the yield at these operations decreasing in fiscal 2005. The decrease in production
in fiscal 2005 was partially offset by a stronger Dollar gold price received during the year. The average gold price received by us was
$423 per ounce in fiscal 2005, compared to $393 per ounce in fiscal 2004.
Production costs
The following table illustrates the year-on-year change in production costs from continuing operations by evaluating the
contribution of each segment to the total change on a consolidated basis for fiscal 2005 in comparison to fiscal 2004:
Impact of change in volume
$’000
Total
production
costs
2004
Acquisitions/
(dispositions)
Internal
growth/
(decline)
Impact of
change in
costs
Foreign
exchange
Net change
Total
production
costs
2005
Blyvoor Section ...........................
90,366
-
(21,844)
(3,664)
8,956
(16,552)
73,814
Other
1
..........................................
1,189
-
-
29
-
29
1,218
Total South African Operations .
91,555
-
(21,844)
(3,635)
8,956
(16,523)
75,032
Porgera Joint Venture ..................
31,650
-
14,698
(11,374)
1,236
4,560
36,210
Tolukuma Section........................
19,821
-
(2,884)
7,567
774
5,457
25,278
Other
1
.........................................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Australasian Operations ...
51,471
-
11,815
(3,808)
2,010
10,017
61,488
Total...........................................
143,026
-
(10,030)
(7,443)
10,966
(6,506)
136,520
1
Relates to non-operating entities within the Group.
97
The following table lists the components of production costs for each of the years set forth below:
Years ended June 30,
Costs
2005
2004
Labor.....................................................................................................................
51%
50%
Contractor Services ...............................................................................................
19%
19%
Supplies.................................................................................................................
19%
20%
Electricity...............................................................................................................
11%
11%
As gold mining in South Africa is very labor intensive, labor costs and contractor services are the largest components of our
production costs in that region. Production costs are linked directly to the level of production of a specific fiscal year. We incurred
production costs of $136.5 million in fiscal 2005, compared to $143.0 million in fiscal 2004. The decrease of 5% is mostly as a result
of a decrease in production volumes at the continuing South African Operations which have been partially offset by an increase in
production at the Australasian Operations. The majority of our production costs are incurred in local currencies and foreign exchange
movements on these costs also contributed to the increase in production costs.
production costs of $136.5 million in fiscal 2005, compared to $143.0 million in fiscal 2004. The decrease of 5% is mostly as a result
of a decrease in production volumes at the continuing South African Operations which have been partially offset by an increase in
production at the Australasian Operations. The majority of our production costs are incurred in local currencies and foreign exchange
movements on these costs also contributed to the increase in production costs.
Rehabilitation provision
As of June 30, 2005, we estimate our total rehabilitation provision being the discounted estimate of future costs, to be $22.6
million ($nil of this balance relating to the discontinued North West Operations) as opposed to $39.1 million at June 30, 2004 ($18.5
million of this balance relating to the discontinued North West Operations). Accretion of $2.7 million was recorded in fiscal 2005 and
$1.2 million was recorded in fiscal 2004, relating to the continuing operations. The total rehabilitation provision of $19.6 million on
March 22, 2005, relating to the North West Operations, was transferred to the liquidators.
million of this balance relating to the discontinued North West Operations). Accretion of $2.7 million was recorded in fiscal 2005 and
$1.2 million was recorded in fiscal 2004, relating to the continuing operations. The total rehabilitation provision of $19.6 million on
March 22, 2005, relating to the North West Operations, was transferred to the liquidators.
A total of $6.4 million was invested in our various environmental trust funds at the end of fiscal 2005, as compared to $22.8
million for fiscal 2004. Growth in the environmental trust funds amounted to $0.8 million during fiscal 2005, with $16.9 million of the
fiscal 2004 balance having been transferred to the liquidators of Buffelsfontein Gold Mine Limited (the North West Operations). The
shortfall relating to the continuing operations is expected to be financed by ongoing financial contributions to the Environmental
Rehabilitation Trust Funds of the respective mining operations.
fiscal 2004 balance having been transferred to the liquidators of Buffelsfontein Gold Mine Limited (the North West Operations). The
shortfall relating to the continuing operations is expected to be financed by ongoing financial contributions to the Environmental
Rehabilitation Trust Funds of the respective mining operations.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization charges were $13.8 million for fiscal 2005 as compared to $26.0 million for fiscal 2004. This
decrease relates to a reduction in depreciation on mine development at the Tolukuma Section, due to a decrease in the life of mine for
underground operations and non-recurring amortization charges during fiscal 2004, which were associated with the restructuring of
the Tolukuma Section.
underground operations and non-recurring amortization charges during fiscal 2004, which were associated with the restructuring of
the Tolukuma Section.
Employment termination costs
Employment termination costs increased to $4.2 million for fiscal 2005 as compared to $0.9 million for fiscal 2004. For fiscal
2005, these costs mostly relate to a retrenchment process following a 60-day review at the Blyvoor Section, where 1,619 employees
were retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million, by October 5, 2004. In addition, retrenchments at our head office, to improve corporate
efficiencies and minimize corporate expenditure, gave rise to an expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2005.
were retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million, by October 5, 2004. In addition, retrenchments at our head office, to improve corporate
efficiencies and minimize corporate expenditure, gave rise to an expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2005.
Impairment of assets
During fiscal 2005, mining properties at the Durban Deep Section were written down by $0.7 million to $2.2 million, being
the estimated fair value of these assets. We have negotiated the sale of these mining properties and the estimated fair value was
determined during these negotiations.
determined during these negotiations.
Management and consulting fees
Management and consulting fees in fiscal 2005 increased by $4.3 million to $6.7 million compared to $2.4 million in fiscal
2004. These expenses mostly related to consulting fees for the evaluation of possible acquisitions in fiscal 2005, preparatory work for
complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and capital raisings.
complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and capital raisings.
98
Profit/(loss) on derivative instruments
The profit/(loss) on derivative instruments in fiscal 2005 was a gain of $3.6 million, as compared with a loss of $1.0 million
in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004, 265,000 ounces were closed out on the Eskom gold for electricity contract, realizing a loss of
$1.4 million compared to the remaining 50,000 ounces which were closed out in fiscal 2005, realizing a loss of $0.4 million. Due to
higher interest rates in fiscal 2005, the fair value adjustment on the interest rate swap was a profit of $0.2 million compared to a loss of
$1.6 million in fiscal 2004. The fair value adjustment on the derivative portion of the senior convertible notes was a profit of
$3.8 million in fiscal 2005 (2004: $2.0 million).
$1.4 million compared to the remaining 50,000 ounces which were closed out in fiscal 2005, realizing a loss of $0.4 million. Due to
higher interest rates in fiscal 2005, the fair value adjustment on the interest rate swap was a profit of $0.2 million compared to a loss of
$1.6 million in fiscal 2004. The fair value adjustment on the derivative portion of the senior convertible notes was a profit of
$3.8 million in fiscal 2005 (2004: $2.0 million).
Selling, administration and general charges
In fiscal 2005, the selling, administration and general charges decreased by $4.8 million to $17.8 million from $22.6 million
in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, management instituted tighter cost controls together with retrenchments at corporate level, which
contributed to the reduction of these expenses.
contributed to the reduction of these expenses.
Interest and dividends
Interest and dividends increased by $1.2 million, or 100%, from $1.2 million during fiscal 2004 to $2.4 million during fiscal
2005. This was mainly as a result of investing excess cash from borrowings and capital raising, in high interest bearing accounts held
at financial institutions.
at financial institutions.
Unrealized foreign exchange gains
Our functional currency is the Rand for our South African Operations and the Kina for the Papua New Guinea Operations.
The unrealized foreign exchange loss of $9.3 million for fiscal 2005, compared to a gain of $10.7 million for fiscal 2004, represented
the effect of the translation of monetary items, primarily external debt, which is denominated in currencies other than our functional
currencies.
the effect of the translation of monetary items, primarily external debt, which is denominated in currencies other than our functional
currencies.
Interest expense
Our interest expense increased to $11.4 million for fiscal 2005 as compared to $7.8 million for fiscal 2004. The increase was
primarily as a result of obtaining new borrowing facilities from Investec Bank Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited during
fiscal 2005.
fiscal 2005.
Income and mining tax expense
The net tax expense for fiscal 2005 comprises a deferred tax benefit of $6.8 million and a current tax charge of $12.6 million.
This compares to a deferred tax charge of $6.8 million and a current tax charge of $7.4 million in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, the
increase in the current tax charge mostly relates to the inclusion of the Porgera Section for a full year compared to nine months in
fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004, $5.5 million of the deferred tax charge related to the South African Operations and $1.3 million related to
the Australasian Operations. Valuation allowances of $30.5 million have been raised against the deferred tax assets of the South
African Operations in fiscal 2005, compared to $96.4 million in fiscal 2004. The decrease is primarily as a result of the liquidation of
the North West Operations in fiscal 2005.
increase in the current tax charge mostly relates to the inclusion of the Porgera Section for a full year compared to nine months in
fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004, $5.5 million of the deferred tax charge related to the South African Operations and $1.3 million related to
the Australasian Operations. Valuation allowances of $30.5 million have been raised against the deferred tax assets of the South
African Operations in fiscal 2005, compared to $96.4 million in fiscal 2004. The decrease is primarily as a result of the liquidation of
the North West Operations in fiscal 2005.
Equity in loss from associates
A loss of $20.5 million was recorded during fiscal 2005 in relation to our associate, Emperor, $13.3 million relating to an
impairment of the carrying amount of the investment and $7.2 million relating to losses recognized against our equity investment. No
amount was recorded for CGR, as no further advances were made to this associate during fiscal 2005 and the investment is carried at
nil value in fiscal 2005 (2004: $nil). An impairment of $8.8 million was recognized in fiscal 2004 relating to advances made during
that fiscal year to CGR, which were seen by management to be irrecoverable.
amount was recorded for CGR, as no further advances were made to this associate during fiscal 2005 and the investment is carried at
nil value in fiscal 2005 (2004: $nil). An impairment of $8.8 million was recognized in fiscal 2004 relating to advances made during
that fiscal year to CGR, which were seen by management to be irrecoverable.
99
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein
Gold Mines Limited, our subsidiary which owns the North West Operations, which order was granted on the same day. As a result of
the liquidation, a profit of $18.1 million was recorded in fiscal 2005. Included in the calculation of this profit is expenditure of $7.3
relating to the liquidation. This expenditure includes additional wages of $4.5 million, $1.5 million set aside for a social plan, $0.8
million relating to essential services, such as pumping, and $0.5 million relating to legal and other costs.
the liquidation, a profit of $18.1 million was recorded in fiscal 2005. Included in the calculation of this profit is expenditure of $7.3
relating to the liquidation. This expenditure includes additional wages of $4.5 million, $1.5 million set aside for a social plan, $0.8
million relating to essential services, such as pumping, and $0.5 million relating to legal and other costs.
Revenue from the sale of gold from our discontinued operation, for fiscal 2005, was $81.5 million and for fiscal 2004 was
$130.0 million.
During fiscal 2004, the production focus at the North West Operations shifted towards the mining of high-grade ore panels.
This continued during fiscal 2005, with the production of 199,850 ounces of gold from 1.9 million tonnes of ore mined, resulting in a
yield of 3.32 g/t. During fiscal 2004, 341,861 ounces of gold were produced from 3.2 million tonnes of ore milled, with a yield of
3.37 g/t.
yield of 3.32 g/t. During fiscal 2004, 341,861 ounces of gold were produced from 3.2 million tonnes of ore milled, with a yield of
3.37 g/t.
On June 26, 2004, we entered into a further 60−day review period at the Buffels Section at our North West Operations
designed to restore the operations to profitability. Proposals were received in a consultative forum in which both management and
organized labor participated, and were distributed to the Department of Labour and the Department of Minerals and Energy, for their
input. Agreement was reached with all the relevant parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12
Shafts in operation on condition that certain defined sustainability thresholds were met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of
120 employees at this mining operation during fiscal 2005 at a cost of R3.7 million ($0.6 million).
organized labor participated, and were distributed to the Department of Labour and the Department of Minerals and Energy, for their
input. Agreement was reached with all the relevant parties early in August 2004 to close the No. 9 Shaft, but to keep the No. 10 and 12
Shafts in operation on condition that certain defined sustainability thresholds were met. This agreement resulted in the retrenchment of
120 employees at this mining operation during fiscal 2005 at a cost of R3.7 million ($0.6 million).
At December 31, 2004, due to the poor operational results at the North West Operations, we evaluated the carrying amount of
these mining assets and determined that the carrying value was not recoverable. The difference between the carrying amount and fair
value of the North West Operations’ mining assets was recognized as an impairment loss of $39.5 million for the year ended June 30,
2005. The fair value was determined by calculating the present value of future cash flows of the North West Operations’ mining assets
discounted at the credit adjusted rate.
value of the North West Operations’ mining assets was recognized as an impairment loss of $39.5 million for the year ended June 30,
2005. The fair value was determined by calculating the present value of future cash flows of the North West Operations’ mining assets
discounted at the credit adjusted rate.
100
Comparison of financial performance for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 with fiscal year ended June 30, 2003
On March 22, 2005, the North West Operations were placed under provisional liquidation. We have adjusted our consolidated
statement of operations for all periods presented to reflect the North West Operations as a discontinued operation.
statement of operations for all periods presented to reflect the North West Operations as a discontinued operation.
Revenue
The following table illustrates the year-on-year change in revenue from continuing operations by evaluating the contribution
of each segment to the total change on a consolidated basis for fiscal 2004 in comparison to fiscal 2003:
Impact of change in volume
$’000
Total
revenue
2003
Acquisitions/
(dispositions)
Internal
growth/
(decline)
Impact of
change in
price
Net change
Total
revenue
2004
Blyvoor Section................................
81,753
-
(4,798)
13,111
8,313
90,066
West Wits Section ............................
4,796
(4,796)
-
-
(4,796)
-
Total South African Operations......
86,549
(4,796)
(4,798)
13,111
3,517
90,066
Porgera Joint Venture.......................
-
60,445
-
-
60,445
60,445
Tolukuma Section ............................
22,870
-
5,917
3,956
9,873
32,743
Total Australasian Operations ......
22,870
60,445
5,917
3,956
70,318
93,188
Total ................................................
109,419
55,649
1,119
17,067
73,835
183,254
Revenue for fiscal 2004 increased by $73.8 million, or 67%, to $183.3 million, primarily due to the increase in revenue from
the Australasian Operations of $70.3 million. The acquisition of a 20% interest in Porgera on October 14, 2003, contributed to
$60.4 million of the increase in revenue from Australasian Operations. The remainder of the increase in revenue from the Australasian
Operations consisted of $5.9 million from improved output and an increase in the Dollar price of gold which contributed $4.0 million
at the Tolukuma Section. Despite production difficulties at the Blyvoor Section and the continued strengthening of the South African
Rand against the Dollar, an increase in the Dollar gold price negated the effect of lower production volumes at the Blyvoor Section.
$60.4 million of the increase in revenue from Australasian Operations. The remainder of the increase in revenue from the Australasian
Operations consisted of $5.9 million from improved output and an increase in the Dollar price of gold which contributed $4.0 million
at the Tolukuma Section. Despite production difficulties at the Blyvoor Section and the continued strengthening of the South African
Rand against the Dollar, an increase in the Dollar gold price negated the effect of lower production volumes at the Blyvoor Section.
Production costs
The following table illustrates the year-on-year change in production costs from continuing operations by evaluating the
contribution of each segment to the total change on a consolidated basis for fiscal 2004 in comparison to fiscal 2003:
Impact of change in volume
$’000
Total
production
costs
2003
Acquisitions/
(dispositions)
Internal
growth/
(decline)
Impact of
change in
costs
Foreign
exchange
Net
change
Total
production
costs
2004
Blyvoor Section ........................
65,240
-
(3,829)
7,486
21,469
25,126
90,366
West Wits Section ....................
4,859
(4,859)
-
-
-
(4,859)
-
Other
1
.......................................
1,557
-
-
(680)
312
(368)
1,189
Total South African Operations
71,656
(4,859)
(3,829)
6,806
21,781
19,899
91,555
Porgera Joint Venture ...............
-
31,650
-
-
-
31,650
31,650
Tolukuma Section.....................
17,498
-
4,527
(4,963)
2,759
2,323
19,821
Other
1
.......................................
1,607
-
(1,607)
-
-
(1,607)
-
Total Australasian Operations
19,105
31,650
2,920
(4,963)
2,759
32,366
51,471
Total.........................................
90,761
26,791
(909)
1,843
24,540
52,265
143,026
1
Relates to non-operating entities within the Group.
101
The following table lists the components of production costs for each of the years set forth below:
Years ended June 30,
Costs
2004
2003
Labor.................................................................................................................
50%
42%
Contractor Services ...........................................................................................
19%
22%
Supplies.............................................................................................................
20%
25%
Electricity...........................................................................................................
11%
11%
As gold mining in South Africa is very labor intensive, labor costs and contractor services are the largest components of
production costs in that region. Production costs are linked directly to the level of production of a specific fiscal year. Production costs
in fiscal 2004 increased by 58% to $143.0 million compared to production costs of $90.8 million in fiscal 2003. This increase was
primarily attributable to the significant appreciation of the Rand against the Dollar during fiscal 2004 and the acquisition of Porgera. A
23.9% strengthening in the average Rand/US Dollar exchange rate was noted during fiscal 2004, with a 13.7% strengthening of the
average Kina/US Dollar exchange rate. In addition, operational difficulties at our South African Operations due to the mining of
below pay-limit panels, poor advances per blast, lower than expected mine call factors, increased lock-up in the plant due to the
ending of surface rock dump feed to the mill and poor recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project led to an increase in production cos ts.
in fiscal 2004 increased by 58% to $143.0 million compared to production costs of $90.8 million in fiscal 2003. This increase was
primarily attributable to the significant appreciation of the Rand against the Dollar during fiscal 2004 and the acquisition of Porgera. A
23.9% strengthening in the average Rand/US Dollar exchange rate was noted during fiscal 2004, with a 13.7% strengthening of the
average Kina/US Dollar exchange rate. In addition, operational difficulties at our South African Operations due to the mining of
below pay-limit panels, poor advances per blast, lower than expected mine call factors, increased lock-up in the plant due to the
ending of surface rock dump feed to the mill and poor recoveries from the Slimes Dam Project led to an increase in production cos ts.
At the Blyvoor Section production costs increased from $65.2 million in fiscal 2003 to $90.3 million in fiscal 2004, with a
decrease in volume from 247,626 to 233,094 – due to operational difficulties giving rise to a 60-day review.
Production costs at Porgera, acquired during fiscal 2004, amounted to $31.7 million. The Tolukuma Section contributed
$19.8 million to production costs and 85,715 ounces to gold production.
Rehabilitation provision and amounts contributed to environmental trust funds
As of June 30, 2004, we estimate our total rehabilitation provision, being the discounted estimate of future costs, to be $39.1
million, $31.6 million relating to the South African Operations (of this $18.5 million related to the North West Operations) and $7.5
million relating to the Australasian Operations, as compared to $24.6 million at June 30, 2003, with $16.0 million relating to the South
African Operations (of this $13.5 million related to the North West Operations which has been disclosed as a discontinued operation)
and $8.6 million relating to the Australasian Operations. Accretion of $3.4 million was recorded in fiscal 2004, and $1.4 million was
recorded in fiscal 2003.
million relating to the Australasian Operations, as compared to $24.6 million at June 30, 2003, with $16.0 million relating to the South
African Operations (of this $13.5 million related to the North West Operations which has been disclosed as a discontinued operation)
and $8.6 million relating to the Australasian Operations. Accretion of $3.4 million was recorded in fiscal 2004, and $1.4 million was
recorded in fiscal 2003.
A total of $22.8 million (of this $15.7 million related to the North West Operations which has been treated as a discontinued
operation) was invested in our various environmental trust funds as at the end of fiscal 2004, as compared to $17.9 million (of this
$13.8 million related to the North West Operations which has been treated as a discontinued operation) for fiscal 2003. The increase is
mostly attributable to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar in fiscal 2004. Additional contributions were also made during
fiscal 2004, due to under funding of the liability. The shortfall between the funds in the trust and the estimated provisions, in South
Africa, is expected to be financed by ongoing financial contributions over the remaining production life of the mine.
$13.8 million related to the North West Operations which has been treated as a discontinued operation) for fiscal 2003. The increase is
mostly attributable to the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar in fiscal 2004. Additional contributions were also made during
fiscal 2004, due to under funding of the liability. The shortfall between the funds in the trust and the estimated provisions, in South
Africa, is expected to be financed by ongoing financial contributions over the remaining production life of the mine.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization charges relating to the continuing operations were $26.0 million for fiscal 2004 compared to
$8.8 million for fiscal 2003. This increase is mainly due to our increase in the asset base for our Australasian Operations, as a result of
our acquisition of a 20% interest in Porgera ($9.3 million) and the continued weakening of the Dollar against the local functional
currencies ($1.3 million). The remainder of the increase ($6.8 million) is as a result of an increase in the amortization rate due to
decreased Ore Reserves of 6.0 million ounces.
our acquisition of a 20% interest in Porgera ($9.3 million) and the continued weakening of the Dollar against the local functional
currencies ($1.3 million). The remainder of the increase ($6.8 million) is as a result of an increase in the amortization rate due to
decreased Ore Reserves of 6.0 million ounces.
Employment termination costs
Employment termination costs increased to $0.9 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $0.7 million for fiscal 2003. These
costs relate to voluntary retrenchments at Blyvoor.
102
Impairment of assets
During fiscal 2004 impairments of $3.0 million were recorded. These impairments relate to the following:
•
Loans made that were seen to be irrecoverable, which amounted to $1.9 million. $1.1 million of loans were advanced to
enable the West Wits mine to be sold as part of black economic empowerment to Mogale. This balance is seen to be
irrecoverable due to Mogale having been placed under judicial management during fiscal 2004. $0.8 million relates to funds
advanced to KBH, which we impaired as KBH's main asset is a 60% interest in CGR and ERPM which are incurring losses.
enable the West Wits mine to be sold as part of black economic empowerment to Mogale. This balance is seen to be
irrecoverable due to Mogale having been placed under judicial management during fiscal 2004. $0.8 million relates to funds
advanced to KBH, which we impaired as KBH's main asset is a 60% interest in CGR and ERPM which are incurring losses.
•
Goodwill in Net-Gold Services Limited, acquired during fiscal 2004, impaired as a result of losses recorded in this entity,
which amounted to $1.0 million.
which amounted to $1.0 million.
No impairments were recorded in fiscal 2003.
Management and consulting fees
Management and consulting fees in fiscal 2004 increased by $0.7 million to $2.4 million compared to $1.7 million in fiscal
2003. These expenses relate to the evaluation of possible acquisitions.
Loss/(profit) on derivative instruments
Changes in the loss/(profit) on derivative instruments in fiscal 2004 resulted in a loss of $1.0 million, as compared with a
profit of $42.4 million in fiscal 2003. The decrease mostly relates to the closing out of a major portion of the Eskom gold for
electricity contract during fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2004, a total amount of $25.1 million was used to close out 265,000 ounces under
the Eskom gold for electricity contract. As at June 30, 2004, the remaining portion on the contract was 50,000 ounces. The appreciation of
the Rand during fiscal 2003 and the resulting positive effect that these changes had on the fair value of our derivative instruments
contributed to the profit on derivative financial instruments in that period.
electricity contract during fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2004, a total amount of $25.1 million was used to close out 265,000 ounces under
the Eskom gold for electricity contract. As at June 30, 2004, the remaining portion on the contract was 50,000 ounces. The appreciation of
the Rand during fiscal 2003 and the resulting positive effect that these changes had on the fair value of our derivative instruments
contributed to the profit on derivative financial instruments in that period.
Selling, administration and general charges
The selling, administration and general charges increased in fiscal 2004 to $22.6 million as compared to $8.6 million in fiscal
2003. The increase of $14.0 million comprised realized foreign exchange movements of $8.1 million, additional head office salary
expenses of $2.2 million, expenses in respect of Porgera of $2.2 million, additional DRD (Isle of Man) office costs of $1.1 million and
costs associated with preparatory work for complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of $0.2 million. As most of the
administrative charges are incurred in South Africa, where our head office is based, the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar
by 24% had a significant impact on the administrative costs incurred.
expenses of $2.2 million, expenses in respect of Porgera of $2.2 million, additional DRD (Isle of Man) office costs of $1.1 million and
costs associated with preparatory work for complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of $0.2 million. As most of the
administrative charges are incurred in South Africa, where our head office is based, the strengthening of the Rand against the Dollar
by 24% had a significant impact on the administrative costs incurred.
Interest and dividends
Interest and dividend income decreased by $6.3 million, or 84%, from $7.5 million during fiscal 2003 to $1.2 million during
fiscal 2004. The decrease was mostly attributable to a decrease in our cash and cash equivalents from $44.4 million as at June 30,
2003 to $22.5 million as at June 30, 2004, and interest income of $3.2 million accrued to us in respect of interest on amounts owed by
associates, during fiscal 2003.
2003 to $22.5 million as at June 30, 2004, and interest income of $3.2 million accrued to us in respect of interest on amounts owed by
associates, during fiscal 2003.
Unrealized foreign exchange gains
Our functional currency is the Rand for our South African Operations and the Kina for our Papua New Guinean Operations.
The unrealized foreign exchange non-cash gain of $10.7 million for fiscal 2004, compared to $11.2 million for fiscal 2003, represents
the effect of the translation of monetary items, primarily external debt, which is denominated in currencies other than our functional
currencies.
the effect of the translation of monetary items, primarily external debt, which is denominated in currencies other than our functional
currencies.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased to $7.8 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $6.7 million for fiscal 2003. The increase was due
primarily to the inclusion of a full year of interest for our 6% Senior Convertible Notes due 2006, which were issued on November 12,
2002, increasing the interest charge from $4.7 million in fiscal 2003 to $5.9 million in fiscal 2004.
2002, increasing the interest charge from $4.7 million in fiscal 2003 to $5.9 million in fiscal 2004.
103
Income and mining tax expense
The net tax expense of $14.2 million for fiscal 2004 comprises a current taxation charge of $7.4 million mainly relating to
Porgera and a deferred tax charge of $6.8 million mainly comprising of valuation allowances raised against deferred tax assets at
Blyvoor. During fiscal 2003, a deferred tax charge of $34.3 million was recorded and a deferred tax credit of $18.4 million was
recorded as a result of changing the tax rate from 30% in fiscal 2002 to the maximum mining tax rate applicable to our South African
mining operations of either 37% or 46% for fiscal 2003.
Blyvoor. During fiscal 2003, a deferred tax charge of $34.3 million was recorded and a deferred tax credit of $18.4 million was
recorded as a result of changing the tax rate from 30% in fiscal 2002 to the maximum mining tax rate applicable to our South African
mining operations of either 37% or 46% for fiscal 2003.
Equity in loss from associate
Losses amounting to $8.8 million were recorded against advances of the same amount made to our associates, CGR and ERPM
during fiscal 2004. Following the retroactive restatement for the change to the equity method in accounting for the investment in
Emperor, a loss of $3.1 million was recorded against our equity investment for fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2003 our attributable portion
of our associate’s losses amounted to $1.7 million which were recorded against our equity investment in our associate. In addition,
advances of $5.2 million were impaired in fiscal 2003.
Emperor, a loss of $3.1 million was recorded against our equity investment for fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2003 our attributable portion
of our associate’s losses amounted to $1.7 million which were recorded against our equity investment in our associate. In addition,
advances of $5.2 million were impaired in fiscal 2003.
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Africa for the provisional liquidation of our wholly-
owned subsidiary, Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, which owns the North West Operations, which order was granted on the same
day. During fiscal 2004 a net loss after taxation of $20.8 million was recorded, versus a net loss after taxation of $22.6 million in fiscal
2003.
day. During fiscal 2004 a net loss after taxation of $20.8 million was recorded, versus a net loss after taxation of $22.6 million in fiscal
2003.
Revenue contributed from the sale of gold from our discontinued operation, amounted to $130.0 million in fiscal 2004 and
$151.9 million in fiscal 2003.
During fiscal 2004, the production focus shifted towards the mining of high-grade ore panels. This resulted in the production
of 341,861 ounces of gold from 3.2 million tonnes of ore mined, resulting in a yield of 3.37 g/t. During fiscal 2003 463,743 ounces of
gold were produced from 8.3 million tonnes of ore milled, with a yield of 1.74 g/t. The shift towards high-grade ore panels was
prompted by a series of 60-day operation reviews. On July 21, 2003, we entered into a 60−day review period on our North West
Operations designed to restore the operations to profitability. The time period of the review coincides with statutory limitations
imposed by the Labour Relations Act to implement strategic changes involving a substantial reduction in labor force. This proposal
was submitted to all stakeholders, including organized labor, the Department of Labour and the Department of Minerals and Energy
for their input. An agreement was reached with all labor organizations and the process was completed on September 21, 2003, with
approxima tely 2,400 employees retrenched at a cost of $6.5 million and the placing of certain infrastructure (No. 6 Shaft at the Harties
Section) on a “care and maintenance” program. On March 16, 2004, we reopened the No. 6 Shaft in the Harties Section of the North
West Operations, to mine higher-grade areas on a selective basis. We recalled 400 staff previously retrenched from the North West
Operations to man this shaft. On February 18, 2004, we announced that the No. 11 Shaft at the Buffels Section of the North West
Operations was to be closed after the revised work practices, implemented based on the operational review, proved to be
unsustainable. As a result, 600 employees were retrenched, at a cost of $0.6 million. As a result of these reviews an impairment charge
of $1.3 million was recorded in fiscal 2004. The implementation of the recommendations of the 60-day reviews were, however, unable
to curb the increase in cash cost per ounce
gold were produced from 8.3 million tonnes of ore milled, with a yield of 1.74 g/t. The shift towards high-grade ore panels was
prompted by a series of 60-day operation reviews. On July 21, 2003, we entered into a 60−day review period on our North West
Operations designed to restore the operations to profitability. The time period of the review coincides with statutory limitations
imposed by the Labour Relations Act to implement strategic changes involving a substantial reduction in labor force. This proposal
was submitted to all stakeholders, including organized labor, the Department of Labour and the Department of Minerals and Energy
for their input. An agreement was reached with all labor organizations and the process was completed on September 21, 2003, with
approxima tely 2,400 employees retrenched at a cost of $6.5 million and the placing of certain infrastructure (No. 6 Shaft at the Harties
Section) on a “care and maintenance” program. On March 16, 2004, we reopened the No. 6 Shaft in the Harties Section of the North
West Operations, to mine higher-grade areas on a selective basis. We recalled 400 staff previously retrenched from the North West
Operations to man this shaft. On February 18, 2004, we announced that the No. 11 Shaft at the Buffels Section of the North West
Operations was to be closed after the revised work practices, implemented based on the operational review, proved to be
unsustainable. As a result, 600 employees were retrenched, at a cost of $0.6 million. As a result of these reviews an impairment charge
of $1.3 million was recorded in fiscal 2004. The implementation of the recommendations of the 60-day reviews were, however, unable
to curb the increase in cash cost per ounce
1
, as this increased to $389 per ounce in fiscal 2004 from $312 per ounce in fiscal 2003.
1
Cash costs per ounce is a non-US GAAP financial measure of performance that we use to determine cash generating capacities of the mines and to
monitor performance of our mining operations. For a reconciliation to production costs see Item 5A:. “Operating Results.”
104
5B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash utilized by operating activities
Net cash of $23.8 million was utilized by operating activities for fiscal 2005 as compared to cash utilized by operating activities
of $25.1 million for fiscal 2004 and cash utilized by operating activities of $23.9 million for fiscal 2003. During fiscal 2005, the net
working capital movement represented an inflow of cash of $7.1 million, compared to an inflow of $9.1 million in fiscal 2004. In line
with our hedging policy which precludes forward selling of gold, the amount of derivative instruments have decreased resulting in a
decrease in the cash outflow associated with these instruments. In fiscal 2004, $25.1 million was used to close out 265,000 ounces under
the Eskom gold for electricity contract, followed by another $3.6 million in fiscal 2005 to close out the remaining balance of the Eskom
gold for electricity contract. The decrease in cash utilized in fiscal 2005 compared with fiscal 2004 was primarily due to improved
profitability from our operating activities. For the last three fiscal years, our operating activities consistently u tilized cash. This is mainly
attributable to the marginal nature of the South African Operations and the pressures experienced as a result of a decline in the Rand gold
price without a corresponding decrease in production costs.
working capital movement represented an inflow of cash of $7.1 million, compared to an inflow of $9.1 million in fiscal 2004. In line
with our hedging policy which precludes forward selling of gold, the amount of derivative instruments have decreased resulting in a
decrease in the cash outflow associated with these instruments. In fiscal 2004, $25.1 million was used to close out 265,000 ounces under
the Eskom gold for electricity contract, followed by another $3.6 million in fiscal 2005 to close out the remaining balance of the Eskom
gold for electricity contract. The decrease in cash utilized in fiscal 2005 compared with fiscal 2004 was primarily due to improved
profitability from our operating activities. For the last three fiscal years, our operating activities consistently u tilized cash. This is mainly
attributable to the marginal nature of the South African Operations and the pressures experienced as a result of a decline in the Rand gold
price without a corresponding decrease in production costs.
Net cash utilized in investing activities
Net cash utilized in investing activities decreased to $31.6 million in fiscal 2005 from $94.1 million in fiscal 2004 and $9.8
million in fiscal 2003. Investing activities during fiscal 2005 included $6.9 million with regards to taking up our share of the Emperor
Rights offering, $1.7 million relating to costs of the Emperor share offer and capital expenditure of $21.4 million relating to our
continuing operations and $3.5 million relating to our discontinued operation (North West Operations). The increase in cash utilized in
investing in fiscal 2004, compared to fiscal 2003, was a result of funds advanced to CGR and ERPM of $8.8 million, our acquisition of a
20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture for $59.2 million, net of cash acquired, our acquisition of a 50.25% interest in Net-Gold
Services Limited for $0.6 million, net of cash acquired, and increased capital expenditure at our continuing operations of $21.4 million
(2003: $7.0 million) and $5.5 million (2003: $6.4 million) at our discontinued operation. The cash outflow in fiscal 2003 was a result of
our acquisition of a 19.81% stake in Emperor for $9.6 million and capital expenditure at our continuing operations of $7.0 million and
discontinued operation of $6.4 million, which was partially offset by cash inflows from the disposal of mining assets and CGR.
Rights offering, $1.7 million relating to costs of the Emperor share offer and capital expenditure of $21.4 million relating to our
continuing operations and $3.5 million relating to our discontinued operation (North West Operations). The increase in cash utilized in
investing in fiscal 2004, compared to fiscal 2003, was a result of funds advanced to CGR and ERPM of $8.8 million, our acquisition of a
20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture for $59.2 million, net of cash acquired, our acquisition of a 50.25% interest in Net-Gold
Services Limited for $0.6 million, net of cash acquired, and increased capital expenditure at our continuing operations of $21.4 million
(2003: $7.0 million) and $5.5 million (2003: $6.4 million) at our discontinued operation. The cash outflow in fiscal 2003 was a result of
our acquisition of a 19.81% stake in Emperor for $9.6 million and capital expenditure at our continuing operations of $7.0 million and
discontinued operation of $6.4 million, which was partially offset by cash inflows from the disposal of mining assets and CGR.
Total capital expenditure for fiscal 2003 was $13.4 million. Capital expenditures were predominantly on Ore Reserve
development and new underground mining equipment at all operations. Significant capital projects for fiscal 2003 included:
•
Ore Reserve development at the North West Operations at a cost of $2.7 million;
•
Acquisition of new mining equipment at the North West Operations at a cost of $1.2 million;
•
Ore Reserve development at the Blyvoor Section at a cost of $2.1 million; and
•
Expansion of and additions to the mobile plant and equipment at the Tolukuma Section at a cost of $1.0 million.
Total capital expenditure for fiscal 2004 was $26.9 million. In fiscal 2004, capital expenditures were predominantly on Ore
Reserve development, building a slimes dam reclamation facility at the Blyvoor Section and the inclusion of our 20% share of the capital
expenditure of Porgera. Redundant capital equipment was sold during the year, the proceeds of which amounted to $3.4 million.
Significant capital projects for fiscal 2004 included:
expenditure of Porgera. Redundant capital equipment was sold during the year, the proceeds of which amounted to $3.4 million.
Significant capital projects for fiscal 2004 included:
•
Ore Reserve development at the North West Operations at a cost of $2.2 million;
•
Construction of the processing facilities at No. 4 and 5 Slimes Dams at the Blyvoor Section at a cost of $6.9 million;
•
Extensions to the No. 6 Slimes Dam at the Blyvoor Section at a cost of $0.7 million;
•
Expansion of and additions to the mobile plant and equipment at the Tolukuma Section at a cost of $2.5 million; and
•
Capital expenditure of $8.7 million with respect to our 20% interest in Porgera, which includes the capitalization of deferred
stripping costs of $4.1 million.
stripping costs of $4.1 million.
Total capital expenditure for fiscal 2005 was $24.9 million. In fiscal 2005, capital expenditures were predominantly on mining
equipment and development, upgrading existing underground operations and upgrading metallurgical plants. Redundant capital
equipment was sold during the year, the proceeds of which amounted to $2.2 million. Significant capital projects for fiscal 2005
included:
equipment was sold during the year, the proceeds of which amounted to $2.2 million. Significant capital projects for fiscal 2005
included:
•
Ore Reserve development at the North West Operations at a cost of $3.5 million;
•
Investment in mobile motor vehicle equipment at Tolukuma of $1.5 million;
•
Improvements to the plant and equipment at Porgera of $1.4 million; and
•
Capitalization of $11.1 million of deferred stripping costs at Porgera.
105
We anticipate decreasing our capital expenditure in fiscal 2006 by approximately 39.7% from our capital expenditure for
fiscal 2005. We expect to incur $15.0 million of capital expenditure on mining equipment and development, upgrading existing
underground operations and upgrading current metallurgical plants as follows:
underground operations and upgrading current metallurgical plants as follows:
•
the Blyvoor Section - $4.2 million;
•
Porgera - $4.4 million (our 20% attributable share); and
•
the Tolukuma Section - $6.4 million.
Net cash generated in financing activities
Net cash generated from financing activities was $67.4 million in fiscal 2005 compared to $88.6 million in fiscal 2004 and
$55.4 million in fiscal 2003.
During fiscal 2005, we issued a total of 56,230,705 shares to raise $65.9 million. On October 14, 2004, DRD (Isle of Man)
entered into a facility of $15.0 million with Investec (Mauritius), of which $10.0 million had been drawn down at June 30, 2005. The
facility may be used to finance future acquisitions or rights offers by companies in which we wish to acquire shares, or with prior written
consent of Investec (Mauritius), it may be used for any other purpose. Of the total shares issued in fiscal 2005, we issued 17,000,000
shares to Baker Steel by way of a specific issue raising $14.4 million, 15,804,116 shares through a claw-back rights offer raising
$13.3 million and 23,348,465 shares to Investec raising $38.2 million, in settlement of financing facilities acquired in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004 and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2005.
facility may be used to finance future acquisitions or rights offers by companies in which we wish to acquire shares, or with prior written
consent of Investec (Mauritius), it may be used for any other purpose. Of the total shares issued in fiscal 2005, we issued 17,000,000
shares to Baker Steel by way of a specific issue raising $14.4 million, 15,804,116 shares through a claw-back rights offer raising
$13.3 million and 23,348,465 shares to Investec raising $38.2 million, in settlement of financing facilities acquired in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004 and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2005.
On March 8, 2004, we announced a conditional takeover offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares in Emperor that were not
already owned by us for a consideration of one of our shares for every five shares in Emperor held. On June 10, 2004, we announced a
revised final offer of five of our shares for every twenty two shares in Emperor held. The revised offer represented a 14% increase over
the previous offer. On July 30, 2004, our offer to Emperor’s shareholders closed with us having received acceptances from Emperor’s
shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued capital, thereby increasing our shareholding in Emperor to 45.33%.
Accordingly, we issued 6,612,676 shares in exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the
market value of our shares on the date issued, with share issue and transaction costs associated with the take over offer, amounting to $1.7
million.
revised final offer of five of our shares for every twenty two shares in Emperor held. The revised offer represented a 14% increase over
the previous offer. On July 30, 2004, our offer to Emperor’s shareholders closed with us having received acceptances from Emperor’s
shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued capital, thereby increasing our shareholding in Emperor to 45.33%.
Accordingly, we issued 6,612,676 shares in exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the
market value of our shares on the date issued, with share issue and transaction costs associated with the take over offer, amounting to $1.7
million.
During fiscal 2004, we raised $108.7 million principally through the issue of 41,463,639 ordinary shares to Investec and
Investec (Mauritius) under various agreements (for more details refer to Item 10C.: “Material Contracts”). We repaid $19.1 million of the
short-term portion of our long-term loans and we drew down $2.8 million from our R100.0 million ($15.9 million) Investec facility
entered into on June 24, 2004.
short-term portion of our long-term loans and we drew down $2.8 million from our R100.0 million ($15.9 million) Investec facility
entered into on June 24, 2004.
Borrowings and funding
Our external sources of capital include the issuance of debt, bank borrowings and the issuance of equity securities.
Senior Convertible Notes
On November 12, 2002, we issued $66,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6% Senior Convertible Notes due November
2006, in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers and to non-US persons. As of October 31, 2004, no notes have been
converted. We issued the notes at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount thereof. If not converted or previously redeemed, the
notes will be repaid at 102.5% of their principal amount plus accrued interest on the fifth business day following their maturity date in
November 2006. The notes are convertible into our ordinary shares, or, under certain conditions, ADSs, at a conversion price of $3.75 per
share or ADS, subject to adjustment in certain events. We are entitled to redeem the notes at their accreted value plus accrued interest, if
any, subject to certain prescribed conditions being fulfilled, after November 12, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, the effective interest rate on
the convertible notes was 16.08% per annum and the outstanding balance was $64.9 million. As of October 31, 2005, the effective
interest rate on the convertible notes was 16.08% per annum and the outstanding balance was $65.8 million.
converted. We issued the notes at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount thereof. If not converted or previously redeemed, the
notes will be repaid at 102.5% of their principal amount plus accrued interest on the fifth business day following their maturity date in
November 2006. The notes are convertible into our ordinary shares, or, under certain conditions, ADSs, at a conversion price of $3.75 per
share or ADS, subject to adjustment in certain events. We are entitled to redeem the notes at their accreted value plus accrued interest, if
any, subject to certain prescribed conditions being fulfilled, after November 12, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, the effective interest rate on
the convertible notes was 16.08% per annum and the outstanding balance was $64.9 million. As of October 31, 2005, the effective
interest rate on the convertible notes was 16.08% per annum and the outstanding balance was $65.8 million.
106
Industrial Development Corporation Loan
On July 18, 2002, Blyvoor entered into a loan agreement with IDC for R65.0 million ($10.4 million) to finance capital
expenditures incurred by Blyvoor in completing the Blyvoor expansion project. The loan bears interest at 1% below the prime rate of
First National Bank of Southern Africa Limited on overdraft. The loan is repayable in 48 monthly installments. Repayments were
suspended in January 2005 until January 2006. The loan is secured by means of a general notarial bond over the Blyvoor metallurgical
plant.
First National Bank of Southern Africa Limited on overdraft. The loan is repayable in 48 monthly installments. Repayments were
suspended in January 2005 until January 2006. The loan is secured by means of a general notarial bond over the Blyvoor metallurgical
plant.
The loan agreement prohibits us from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets and places restrictions over our
ability to change the business of Blyvoor. Current restructuring changes have not impacted on the terms of the loan agreement.
As of June 30, 2005, we have drawn down R26.9 million ($4.0 million) under this facility. As of June 30, 2005, the interest rate
on this loan was 9.5%. At October 31, 2005, the outstanding balance was R27.7 million ($4.1 million) with an applicable interest rate of
9.5%.
9.5%.
Investec Bank Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited
We have entered into five separate funding facilities with Investec Bank Limited, or Investec, or its affiliates:
On June 24, 2004, we entered into the first facility of R100.0 million ($15.9 million) with Investec. The facility bore interest
at the three-month Johannesburg Inter-bank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 basis points. As at September 30, 2004, this facility
had been fully utilized and settled by us issuing 7,850,657 ordinary shares to the value of $15.4 million, based on the market value on
the date of issue. This facility was a general funding facility and was not renewable.
had been fully utilized and settled by us issuing 7,850,657 ordinary shares to the value of $15.4 million, based on the market value on
the date of issue. This facility was a general funding facility and was not renewable.
On September 15, 2004, we entered into the second facility of R100.0 million ($15.9 million) with Investec. The facility bore
interest at the three-month JIBAR plus 300 basis points. As at January 11, 2005, this facility had been fully utilized and settled by us
issuing 8,700,800 ordinary shares to the value of $15.9 million, based on the market value at the date of issue. This facility was a
general funding facility and was not renewable.
issuing 8,700,800 ordinary shares to the value of $15.9 million, based on the market value at the date of issue. This facility was a
general funding facility and was not renewable.
On October 14, 2004, our subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) entered into the third facility of $15.0 million with Investec Bank
(Mauritius) Limited, or Investec (Mauritius). The facility may be used to finance future acquisitions or rights offers by companies in
which we wish to acquire shares, or with prior written consent of Investec (Mauritius), it may be used for any other purpose. The
facility bears interest at the three-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 300 basis points. Funds advanced and
interest on this facility must be repaid in cash in equal installments every three months from the date of the relevant advance so that
the amount of the advance is paid in full to Investec (Mauritius) on or before November 12, 2007. The facility is secured by DRD (Isle
of Man)’s shares in Emperor Mines Limited, DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited. The loan agreement
prohibits us from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets. The facility restricts the flow of payments from DRD (Isle of
M an) to the Company through requiring that all net operating cash or cash distributions received by DRD (Isle of Man) in respect of
the secured assets must be used to first service our interest and principal payment obligations under the facility by requiring that we
hold, in a debt servicing account, sufficient cash to cover our quarterly principal payments. Any funds in excess of these repayment
requirements may be transferred to the Company. Investec (Mauritius) has the option to require DRD (Isle of Man) to pay 50% of any
payments, which are a distribution, by or on behalf of DRD (Isle of Man) to or for the account of the Company as a prepayment of the
facility. The facility agreement contains a number of additional customary restrictive covenants. At June 30, 2005, $10.0 million had
been drawn under this facility. As at October 31, 2005, this amount had been fully settled in cash and $15.0 million was available to
be drawn under this facility.
which we wish to acquire shares, or with prior written consent of Investec (Mauritius), it may be used for any other purpose. The
facility bears interest at the three-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 300 basis points. Funds advanced and
interest on this facility must be repaid in cash in equal installments every three months from the date of the relevant advance so that
the amount of the advance is paid in full to Investec (Mauritius) on or before November 12, 2007. The facility is secured by DRD (Isle
of Man)’s shares in Emperor Mines Limited, DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited. The loan agreement
prohibits us from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets. The facility restricts the flow of payments from DRD (Isle of
M an) to the Company through requiring that all net operating cash or cash distributions received by DRD (Isle of Man) in respect of
the secured assets must be used to first service our interest and principal payment obligations under the facility by requiring that we
hold, in a debt servicing account, sufficient cash to cover our quarterly principal payments. Any funds in excess of these repayment
requirements may be transferred to the Company. Investec (Mauritius) has the option to require DRD (Isle of Man) to pay 50% of any
payments, which are a distribution, by or on behalf of DRD (Isle of Man) to or for the account of the Company as a prepayment of the
facility. The facility agreement contains a number of additional customary restrictive covenants. At June 30, 2005, $10.0 million had
been drawn under this facility. As at October 31, 2005, this amount had been fully settled in cash and $15.0 million was available to
be drawn under this facility.
On December 10, 2004, we entered into the fourth facility of R100.0 million ($15.0 million) with Investec. The facility bears
interest at the three-month JIBAR plus 300 basis points. As at June 30, 2005, we had drawn down R60.0 million ($9.0 million) under
this facility, and settled this amount by issuing 8,060,647 ordinary shares to the value of $10.0 million, based on the market value at
the date of issue. This facility is a general funding facility and is not renewable. As at October 31, 2005, R40.0 million ($6.0 million)
is still available under this facility.
this facility, and settled this amount by issuing 8,060,647 ordinary shares to the value of $10.0 million, based on the market value at
the date of issue. This facility is a general funding facility and is not renewable. As at October 31, 2005, R40.0 million ($6.0 million)
is still available under this facility.
On March 3, 2005, an additional acquisition facility of $35.0 million was entered into with Investec (Mauritius). The
acquisition facility of $35.0 million was on similar terms as the $15.0 million facility entered into on October 14, 2004, and has
similar restrictions on the flow of funds and will be settled through the issue of shares. As at June 30, 2005 this facility had not been
utilized. As at October 31, 2005, we had drawn down $10.0 million under this facility, which was partially settled by us issuing
5,187,080 ordinary shares to the value of $7.4 million, based on the market value at the date of issue, reducing the amount outstanding
at October 31, 2005 to $2.6 million.
similar restrictions on the flow of funds and will be settled through the issue of shares. As at June 30, 2005 this facility had not been
utilized. As at October 31, 2005, we had drawn down $10.0 million under this facility, which was partially settled by us issuing
5,187,080 ordinary shares to the value of $7.4 million, based on the market value at the date of issue, reducing the amount outstanding
at October 31, 2005 to $2.6 million.
107
Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP
On April 5, 2005, we entered into a subscription agreement and an underwriting agreement pursuant to which we would
raise, in aggregate, R180.4 million ($27.7 million) through the issue of new shares by way of:
•
a specific issue of 17 million new shares at a cash price of R5.50 each to Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP, or BSCM,
clients to raise R93.5 million ($14.4 million); and
clients to raise R93.5 million ($14.4 million); and
•
a claw-back offer of 15,804,116 shares at an issue price of R5.50 each to our shareholders to raise R86.9 million ($13.3
million) in accordance with the terms of a separate offering circular to our shareholders. The funds from the claw-back offer
were received on April 12, 2005.
million) in accordance with the terms of a separate offering circular to our shareholders. The funds from the claw-back offer
were received on April 12, 2005.
In terms of the subscription agreement, BSCM clients subscribed for 17 million new shares at a subscription price of R5.50
per share, which was equivalent to the volume weighted average price of our shares on the JSE for the ten trading days immediately
prior to April 5, 2005. The specific issue shares rank pari passu with our shares already in issue. At a general meeting of our
shareholders held on May 20, 2005, a specific resolution was passed to authorize our directors to allot and issue these shares. The
funds from the specific issue were received on June 1, 2005.
prior to April 5, 2005. The specific issue shares rank pari passu with our shares already in issue. At a general meeting of our
shareholders held on May 20, 2005, a specific resolution was passed to authorize our directors to allot and issue these shares. The
funds from the specific issue were received on June 1, 2005.
In addition to the provision of working capital, we have used the proceeds from the specific issue and claw-back offer to
restructure our local operations and fund necessary capital expenditure.
Compliance with Loan Covenants
We have been in compliance with all material covenants contained in the above mentioned convertible notes indenture and
loan agreements during the periods covered by our financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Anticipated funding requirements and sources
At June 30, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $36.1 million, and positive working capital (defined as current assets
less current liabilities) of $11.6 million, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $22.5 million and negative working capital of $25.0
million at June 30, 2004 and cash and cash equivalents of $44.4 million and positive working capital of $2.4 million at June 30, 2003.
At October 31, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents were $25.1 million.
million at June 30, 2004 and cash and cash equivalents of $44.4 million and positive working capital of $2.4 million at June 30, 2003.
At October 31, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents were $25.1 million.
As at June 30, 2005, we estimated that our anticipated commitments for fiscal 2006 will be between $35.0 million and $40.0
million, which includes capital expenditure of $15.0 million as discussed above, interest payments on our convertible notes of
$4.0 million, the current portion of long-term loans of $5.7 million and working capital of approximately $14.7 million. As at June 30,
2005, we expected to finance these commitments from cash resources of $36.1 million at that date, net cash generated by operations
and undrawn borrowing facilities of $11.0 million.
$4.0 million, the current portion of long-term loans of $5.7 million and working capital of approximately $14.7 million. As at June 30,
2005, we expected to finance these commitments from cash resources of $36.1 million at that date, net cash generated by operations
and undrawn borrowing facilities of $11.0 million.
Our management believes that existing cash resources, net cash generated from operations and additional funding will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated commitments for fiscal 2006 as described above. In making this statement, management has
assumed that there will be an increase in production from our continuing South African Operations and a decrease in production from
our Australasian Operations, mainly as a result of the cutback of near-surface material in the central part of the West Wall at the Porgera
Joint Venture. Management has assumed a current gold price and exchange rate.
assumed that there will be an increase in production from our continuing South African Operations and a decrease in production from
our Australasian Operations, mainly as a result of the cutback of near-surface material in the central part of the West Wall at the Porgera
Joint Venture. Management has assumed a current gold price and exchange rate.
Our estimated working capital, capital expenditure and other funding commitments, as well as our sources of liquidity, would
be adversely affected if:
•
our operations fail to generate forecasted net cash flows from operations;
•
there is an adverse variation in the price of gold or foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the US Dollar, particularly
with respect to the Rand;
with respect to the Rand;
•
we default on our borrowing arrangements, including the Investec (Mauritius) facility of $35.0 million or the Senior
Convertible Notes, and we are therefore required to accelerate the repayment of funds;
Convertible Notes, and we are therefore required to accelerate the repayment of funds;
•
Investec (Mauritius) exercises it discretion under the third and fifth Investec (Mauritius) facilities to require us to make a
prepayment of 50% of any payments made by the intermediate holding companies of our offshore operations to the Company
using cash flows generated from our offshore operations; or
prepayment of 50% of any payments made by the intermediate holding companies of our offshore operations to the Company
using cash flows generated from our offshore operations; or
•
our operating results or financial condition are adversely affected by the uncertainties and variables facing our business
discussed under Item 5A in the section entitled “Operating Results” or the risk factors described in Item 3D.: “Risk Factors.”
discussed under Item 5A in the section entitled “Operating Results” or the risk factors described in Item 3D.: “Risk Factors.”
108
In such circumstances, we could have insufficient capital to meet our current obligations in the normal course of business,
which would have an adverse impact on our financial position and our ability to continue operating as a going concern. We would
need to reassess our operations, consider further restructuring and/or obtain additional debt or equity funding. There can be no
assurance that we will obtain this additional or any other funding on acceptable terms or at all.
need to reassess our operations, consider further restructuring and/or obtain additional debt or equity funding. There can be no
assurance that we will obtain this additional or any other funding on acceptable terms or at all.
5C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.
We are not involved in any research and development and have no registered patents or licenses.
5D. TREND INFORMATION
The marginal nature of our South African Operations and the ageing infrastructure at these mines has reduced the operational
flexibility of the Group. The importance of these operations, in terms of our total production ounces from continuing operations, has
reduced from 79% in fiscal 2003 to 37% in fiscal 2005. We expect that the overall proportion of the Group’s production from our
South African Operations will continue to diminish over time.
reduced from 79% in fiscal 2003 to 37% in fiscal 2005. We expect that the overall proportion of the Group’s production from our
South African Operations will continue to diminish over time.
Our South African mines have undergone significant changes over the past three fiscal years as a result of the continued
strengthening of the Rand, resulting in a lower Rand gold price, and inflationary increases in costs. Accordingly, our South African
Operations incurred a net loss after tax, from continuing operations, of $33.5 million in fiscal 2005 and the Group may incur a net loss
in fiscal 2006. A net loss after tax of $48.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2004, compounded by the collective impact
of a series of events that culminated in an earthquake, prompted the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and owner of the North West Operations, on March 22, 2005. On June 28, 2004, the
Company entered into a 60-day review period at the Blyvoor Section designed to restore the operation to profitability. The 60-day
review was extended to September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees were retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million. In an
effort t o reduce corporate costs, retrenchments were made at the Company’s corporate head office during fiscal 2005. These
retrenchment costs amounted to $1.2 million. Whether we will need to engage in any further restructuring, and consequentially incur
further restructuring costs, depends on several variables which are discussed under Item 5B.: “Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Operations incurred a net loss after tax, from continuing operations, of $33.5 million in fiscal 2005 and the Group may incur a net loss
in fiscal 2006. A net loss after tax of $48.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2004, compounded by the collective impact
of a series of events that culminated in an earthquake, prompted the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and owner of the North West Operations, on March 22, 2005. On June 28, 2004, the
Company entered into a 60-day review period at the Blyvoor Section designed to restore the operation to profitability. The 60-day
review was extended to September 13, 2004. By October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees were retrenched at a cost of $3.1 million. In an
effort t o reduce corporate costs, retrenchments were made at the Company’s corporate head office during fiscal 2005. These
retrenchment costs amounted to $1.2 million. Whether we will need to engage in any further restructuring, and consequentially incur
further restructuring costs, depends on several variables which are discussed under Item 5B.: “Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Anticipated Funding Requirements and Sources,” including the strength of the South African Rand.
If the South African Rand strengthens further or if our restructuring efforts are unsuccessful in restoring profitability to our
South African Operations, we would review and consider various alternative approaches for our South African business. We are aware
that currently we would be unable to sell any of our South African Operations, as there are very few buyers interested in marginal
South African gold mines.
that currently we would be unable to sell any of our South African Operations, as there are very few buyers interested in marginal
South African gold mines.
Our strategy to increase the production from operations outside South Africa has provided diversification to counter the poor
performance from the South African Operations. For the year ended June 30, 2005, we produced 76,314 ounces from the Tolukuma
Section and 195,394 ounces from our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture. Production from the Australasian region amounted to
63% of total production from continuing operations in 2005.
Section and 195,394 ounces from our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture. Production from the Australasian region amounted to
63% of total production from continuing operations in 2005.
As part of our strategic growth objective we plan to diversify our production base outside South Africa through organic
growth at existing mines and acquisitions of gold mining operations that meet our strategic criteria. As discussed in Item 3D.: “Risk
Factors” there are inherent risks involved in acquisitions. In addition, we would need to find financing for these acquisitions through
additional borrowings which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. We could also seek to use our shares as consideration
for acquisitions as we have done in the past, but this will be dependent on market conditions, such as our share price and our ability to
satisfy listing requirements for any such share issues.
Factors” there are inherent risks involved in acquisitions. In addition, we would need to find financing for these acquisitions through
additional borrowings which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. We could also seek to use our shares as consideration
for acquisitions as we have done in the past, but this will be dependent on market conditions, such as our share price and our ability to
satisfy listing requirements for any such share issues.
5E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ITEMS
The Company does not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities, and does not have any off-balance sheet debt
obligations, special purposes entities or unconsolidated affiliates.
109
5F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Payments due by period
Total
Less than
1 year
Between
1-3 years
Between
3-5 years
More than
5 years
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Long-term loans............................................................................
78,992
9,678
69,314
-
-
Derivative instruments
1
...............................................................
550
-
550
-
-
Purchase obligations – contracted capital expenditure
2
..............
274
274
-
-
-
Environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs
3
....
25,840
-
-
5,905
19,935
Total contractual cash obligations............................................
105,656
9,952
69,864
5,905
19,935
5G.
SAFE HARBOR
See “Special Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
1
This amount represents the fair value at June 30, 2005, of our obligation under the interest rate swap.
2
Represents planned capital expenditure for which contractual obligations exist.
3
Operations of gold mining companies are subject to extensive environmental regulations in the various jurisdictions in which they operate. These
regulations establish certain conditions on the conduct of our operations. Pursuant to environmental regulations, we are also obliged to close our
operations and reclaim and rehabilitate the lands upon which we have conducted our mining and gold recovery operations. The gross estimated closure
costs at existing operating mines and mines in various stages of closure are reflected in this table. For more information on environmental rehabilitation
obligations, see Item 4D.:“Property, Plant and Equipment” and Note 19 “Provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs” to our
financial statements.
operations and reclaim and rehabilitate the lands upon which we have conducted our mining and gold recovery operations. The gross estimated closure
costs at existing operating mines and mines in various stages of closure are reflected in this table. For more information on environmental rehabilitation
obligations, see Item 4D.:“Property, Plant and Equipment” and Note 19 “Provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs” to our
financial statements.
110
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
6A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
Our board of directors may consist of not less than four and not more than twenty directors. As of June 30, 2005, our board
consisted of seven directors, while as of June 30, 2004, our board consisted of seven directors and two alternate directors.
In accordance with JSE listing requirements and our Articles of Association, one third of the directors comprising the board of
directors, on a rotating basis, are subject to re-election at each annual general shareholders’ meeting. Additionally, all directors are subject
to re-election at the first annual general meeting following their appointment. Retiring directors normally make themselves available for
re-election.
to re-election at the first annual general meeting following their appointment. Retiring directors normally make themselves available for
re-election.
The address of each of our executive directors and Non-Executive Directors is the address of our principal executive offices.
Executive Directors
Mark Michael Wellesley-Wood (54) Chief Executive Officer. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood was appointed Non-Executive
Chairman in May 2000 and appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in November 2000. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood was
appointed Executive Chairman on December 19, 2003. In February 2005, Dr Ncholo was appointed as Non-Executive Chairman and Mr.
Wellesley-Wood resumed his role as Chief Executive Officer. He holds a degree in Mining Engineering from the Royal School of Mines,
Imperial College, London and a Post Graduate Business Studies from London Metropolitan University. He is a Chartered Engineer, a
Member of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, a former Member of the Stock Exchange in London, a Fellow of the Securities
Institute and a Member of the Society of Investment Professionals. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has been involved in all aspects of raising
finance and financial advice for mining companies since 1977. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is also a director of WCS Limited and
Emperor Mines Limited. He was Chairman of the Unwins Wine Group Limited from December 2001 to December 2003. On August 3,
2004, he was appointed as the Managing Director of Emperor Mines Limited.
appointed Executive Chairman on December 19, 2003. In February 2005, Dr Ncholo was appointed as Non-Executive Chairman and Mr.
Wellesley-Wood resumed his role as Chief Executive Officer. He holds a degree in Mining Engineering from the Royal School of Mines,
Imperial College, London and a Post Graduate Business Studies from London Metropolitan University. He is a Chartered Engineer, a
Member of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, a former Member of the Stock Exchange in London, a Fellow of the Securities
Institute and a Member of the Society of Investment Professionals. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has been involved in all aspects of raising
finance and financial advice for mining companies since 1977. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is also a director of WCS Limited and
Emperor Mines Limited. He was Chairman of the Unwins Wine Group Limited from December 2001 to December 2003. On August 3,
2004, he was appointed as the Managing Director of Emperor Mines Limited.
Ian Louis Murray (39) Chief Financial and Corporate Development Officer. Mr. I.L. Murray was appointed Manager Corporate
Finance in 1997, alternate director in July 1999, Chief Financial Officer in November 2000 and Deputy Chief Executive Officer in
January 2003. Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as Chief Financial Officer in January 2003 but re-assumed that position on June 30, 2003 upon
the resignation of Mr. J.H. Dissel. Mr. I.L. Murray was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on December 19,
2003. In January 2005 Mr. I.L. Murray relinquished his position as Chief Financial Officer to Mr. D.N. Campbell and in February 2005
relinquished his position as Chief Executive Officer to Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood. Mr. I.L. Murray resumed his position as Chief
Financial Officer upon the resignation of Mr. D.N. Campbell. Mr. I.L. Murray obtained his B.Comm degree from the University of Cape
Town and is a member of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants, and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
He also has an Advanced Taxation Certificate from the University of South Africa. Prior to joining us, Mr. I.L. Murray was group
financial and administration manager of Bioclones (Pty) Limited, a subsidiary of S A Breweries Limited from August 1995 to
January 1997. Mr. I.L. Murray is also a director of Net-Gold Services Limited and G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com) and he was
a director of Emperor Mines Limited, but resigned from this position on October 6, 2005. On September 5, 2005, Mr. I.L. Murray
relinquished his position as Chief Financial Officer to Mr. J.W.C. Sayers. On November 30, 2005, Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as an
Executive Director.
January 2003. Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as Chief Financial Officer in January 2003 but re-assumed that position on June 30, 2003 upon
the resignation of Mr. J.H. Dissel. Mr. I.L. Murray was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on December 19,
2003. In January 2005 Mr. I.L. Murray relinquished his position as Chief Financial Officer to Mr. D.N. Campbell and in February 2005
relinquished his position as Chief Executive Officer to Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood. Mr. I.L. Murray resumed his position as Chief
Financial Officer upon the resignation of Mr. D.N. Campbell. Mr. I.L. Murray obtained his B.Comm degree from the University of Cape
Town and is a member of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants, and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
He also has an Advanced Taxation Certificate from the University of South Africa. Prior to joining us, Mr. I.L. Murray was group
financial and administration manager of Bioclones (Pty) Limited, a subsidiary of S A Breweries Limited from August 1995 to
January 1997. Mr. I.L. Murray is also a director of Net-Gold Services Limited and G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com) and he was
a director of Emperor Mines Limited, but resigned from this position on October 6, 2005. On September 5, 2005, Mr. I.L. Murray
relinquished his position as Chief Financial Officer to Mr. J.W.C. Sayers. On November 30, 2005, Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as an
Executive Director.
John William Cornelius Sayers (59). Mr. J.W.C. Sayers was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 5, 2005.
Mr. J.W.C. Sayers has almost 40 years’ financial experience, most recently as Financial Director of Nampak Limited, from 1996 to 2004,
and immediately prior to that, as Financial Director of Altron Limited, from 1989 to 1996.
and immediately prior to that, as Financial Director of Altron Limited, from 1989 to 1996.
111
Non-Executive Directors
Geoffrey Charles Campbell (44). Mr. G.C. Campbell was appointed as Non-Executive Director in 2002 and as Senior
Independent Non-Executive Director on December 19, 2003. Mr. G.C. Campbell is a qualified geologist and started his professional
career working on gold mines in Wales and Canada. In 1986 he joined Sheppards Stockbrokers in London as a mining analyst. In 1988 he
joined the Australian stockbrokers, Ord Minnett, and spent some time working for its sister company, Fleming Martin, in New York, as a
senior research analyst. In 1995 Mr. G.C. Campbell joined Merrill Lynch Investment Managers to run the Gold and General Fund, one of
the largest gold mining investment funds. He was also Research Director for Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, responsible for
coordinating investment research across the entire group. Mr. G.C. Campbell is currently the managing director of Boatlaunch Limited
and also a director of Oxford Abstracts. Mr. G.C. Campbell was appointed as Non-Executive Chairman with effect from October 25,
2005.
career working on gold mines in Wales and Canada. In 1986 he joined Sheppards Stockbrokers in London as a mining analyst. In 1988 he
joined the Australian stockbrokers, Ord Minnett, and spent some time working for its sister company, Fleming Martin, in New York, as a
senior research analyst. In 1995 Mr. G.C. Campbell joined Merrill Lynch Investment Managers to run the Gold and General Fund, one of
the largest gold mining investment funds. He was also Research Director for Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, responsible for
coordinating investment research across the entire group. Mr. G.C. Campbell is currently the managing director of Boatlaunch Limited
and also a director of Oxford Abstracts. Mr. G.C. Campbell was appointed as Non-Executive Chairman with effect from October 25,
2005.
Robert Peter Hume (65). Mr. R.P. Hume was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in 2001. Mr. R.P. Hume has forty one
years' experience in the auditing field of which the last eighteen years were as a partner in the firm KPMG at its East London office. Since
retirement in 1999, he spent five years as an investment manager at Sasfin Frankel Pollak in East London. Mr. R.P. Hume is also a
director of King Consolidated Holdings Limited.
retirement in 1999, he spent five years as an investment manager at Sasfin Frankel Pollak in East London. Mr. R.P. Hume is also a
director of King Consolidated Holdings Limited.
Moltin Paseka Ncholo (42). Non-Executive Chairman. Dr. M.P. Ncholo was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in 2002 and
as Non-Executive Chairman in February 2005. Dr. M.P. Ncholo was awarded his doctorate in Philosophy in 1992 and became an
advocate of the High Court of South African in 1994. Prior to becoming the chairman of KBH and ERPM in 1999, he was
director-general of the Department of Public Service and Administration. Dr. M.P. Ncholo is also a director of CGR and Mvelaphanda
Resources Limited. Dr. M.P. Ncholo resigned as Non-Executive Chairman with effect from October 25, 2005 and as a Non-Executive
Director on November 1, 2005. Dr. M.P. Ncholo was appointed as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
Limited on November 1, 2005.
advocate of the High Court of South African in 1994. Prior to becoming the chairman of KBH and ERPM in 1999, he was
director-general of the Department of Public Service and Administration. Dr. M.P. Ncholo is also a director of CGR and Mvelaphanda
Resources Limited. Dr. M.P. Ncholo resigned as Non-Executive Chairman with effect from October 25, 2005 and as a Non-Executive
Director on November 1, 2005. Dr. M.P. Ncholo was appointed as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
Limited on November 1, 2005.
Douglas John Meldrum Blackmur (61). Professor D.J.M. Blackmur was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in October 2003
and as Senior Independent Non-Executive Director on October 25, 2005. Professor D.J.M. Blackmur holds a doctorate in industrial
relations from the University of Queensland and has a career which spans more than 35 years, primarily in management, regulation,
industrial relations and universities, including positions held at Shell Australia, the University of Queensland, the Queensland University
of Technology, the Canberra Institute of Technology, New Zealand Qualifications Authority and the University of the Western Cape. He
currently holds the position of Standard Bank Professor of Management at the University of the Western Cape.
relations from the University of Queensland and has a career which spans more than 35 years, primarily in management, regulation,
industrial relations and universities, including positions held at Shell Australia, the University of Queensland, the Queensland University
of Technology, the Canberra Institute of Technology, New Zealand Qualifications Authority and the University of the Western Cape. He
currently holds the position of Standard Bank Professor of Management at the University of the Western Cape.
James Turk (58). Mr. J. Turk was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on October 27, 2004. Mr. J. Turk is the founder and a
director of G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com), the operator of a digital gold currency payment system. He has specialized in
international banking, finance and investments since graduating in 1969 from George Washington University with a B.A. degree in
International Economics. He began his business career with The Chase Manhattan Bank (now J.P. Morgan Chase). In 1980 he joined
RTB, Inc., the private investment and trading company of a prominent precious metals trader. He moved to the United Arab Emirates in
1983 to be appointed Manager of the Commodity Department of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. In this position he was responsible
for developing and implementing the investment strategies for the Authority’s portfolio of precious metals. Since resigning from this
position in 1987, he has written “The Freemarket Gold and Money Report”, an investment newsletter and has been the author of s everal
books on money and banking.
international banking, finance and investments since graduating in 1969 from George Washington University with a B.A. degree in
International Economics. He began his business career with The Chase Manhattan Bank (now J.P. Morgan Chase). In 1980 he joined
RTB, Inc., the private investment and trading company of a prominent precious metals trader. He moved to the United Arab Emirates in
1983 to be appointed Manager of the Commodity Department of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. In this position he was responsible
for developing and implementing the investment strategies for the Authority’s portfolio of precious metals. Since resigning from this
position in 1987, he has written “The Freemarket Gold and Money Report”, an investment newsletter and has been the author of s everal
books on money and banking.
Senior Management - Corporate
Craig Clinton Barnes (35) Group Financial Accountant. Mr. C.C. Barnes joined the Company in his current position in August
2004. A Chartered Accountant, he has a B.Comm degree from the University of the Witwatersrand, and a B.Compt Honors degree and
post graduate diploma in auditing, both from the University of South Africa. Prior to joining the Company, he was Head of Financial
Reporting for the Liberty Group.
post graduate diploma in auditing, both from the University of South Africa. Prior to joining the Company, he was Head of Financial
Reporting for the Liberty Group.
Jacob Hendrik Dissel (47) Group Financial Manager. Mr. J.H. Dissel holds a B.Comm Honors degree and joined the Company
as Group Financial Manager in October 1999 from Anglogold. Mr. J.H. Dissel has 22 years’ experience in the mining industry.
Ilja David Graulich (33) General Manager Investor Relations. Mr. I.D. Graulich was appointed General Manager Investor
Relations in February 2003. Mr. I.D. Graulich is a former financial journalist and has 6 years’ experience across a number of media
sectors including mining editor of a pre-eminent South African financial newspaper. Mr. I.D. Graulich is an alternate director of Rand
Refinery Limited, G. M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com) and Net-Gold Services Limited.
sectors including mining editor of a pre-eminent South African financial newspaper. Mr. I.D. Graulich is an alternate director of Rand
Refinery Limited, G. M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com) and Net-Gold Services Limited.
Themba John Gwebu (41) Group Company Secretary. Mr. T.J. Gwebu (B Juris, LLB, LLM) is a qualified attorney who worked
as a magistrate prior to joining the Company in April 2004 as Assistant Legal Advisor. He was appointed to his current position of
Company Secretary in April 2005.
Company Secretary in April 2005.
112
Amanda Roxanne Hoosen (27) Manager Internal Audit and Compliance. Ms. A.R. Hoosen joined the Company in her current
position in October 2004. She is a graduate in accounting and international business from Drexel University in the United States, and is
Certified Public Accountant. She was previously employed in the US by Cox Enterprises Incorporated and Ernst and Young.
Certified Public Accountant. She was previously employed in the US by Cox Enterprises Incorporated and Ernst and Young.
Daniel Johannes Pretorius (38) Legal Advisor. Mr. D.J. Pretorius (B.Proc, LLB) was appointed Legal Advisor in May 2003 and
as Group Legal Counsel in February 2004. Mr. D.J. Pretorius is an attorney admitted in the High Court of South Africa, and has 12 years’
legal experience in the mining industry, 9 years of which were in private practice. Mr. D.J. Pretorius is a director of Rand Refinery
Limited.
legal experience in the mining industry, 9 years of which were in private practice. Mr. D.J. Pretorius is a director of Rand Refinery
Limited.
Andrew Norman Weir (41) General Manager Human Resources. Mr. A.N. Weir, holds a B.Soc.Sci degree and diploma in
advanced labor law. Mr. A.N. Weir was appointed General Manager Human Resources in April 2005 and has 17 years’ experience in the
mining industry.
mining industry.
Senior Management – South Africa
William Thomas Beer (53) Regional General Manager Assets and Commercial. Mr. W.T. Beer was appointed Regional General
Manager Assets and Commercial in April 2005. Appointed Chief Administration Officer in January 2002, he has 23 years’ management
experience.
experience.
Manual Jorge Monteiro Da Silva (35) General Manager ERPM. Mr. M.J.M da Silva is a B.Sc Mining Engineering graduate
from the University of the Witwatersrand and obtained his Mine Manager’s Certificate in 1995. He joined the Company as Production
Manager at Blyvoor in 2002 and was appointed to his current position in August 2005. He has 13 years’ experience in the mining
industry.
Manager at Blyvoor in 2002 and was appointed to his current position in August 2005. He has 13 years’ experience in the mining
industry.
Kevin Peter Kruger (37) Regional Engineering Manager and Environmental Manager. Mr. K.P. Kruger holds a BSc degree in
mechanical engineering from the University of the Witwatersrand, and joined the Company in 1994. Previously Engineering Manager at
the Company’s North West Operations, he was appointed to his current position in April 2005.
the Company’s North West Operations, he was appointed to his current position in April 2005.
Louis Charles Lamsley (57) Regional General Manager. Mr. L.C. Lamsley who has a National Diploma in Metalliferous Mining
and Mine Manager’s Certificate of Competency, was appointed Regional general Manager in April 2005. He has 32 years’ experience in
the gold mining industry, 25 years of which have been spent in management.
the gold mining industry, 25 years of which have been spent in management.
Mark Craig Munroe (37) General Manager Blyvooruitzicht. Mr. M.C. Munroe joined the Company in 2002 and was appointed
General Manager at Blyvoor in September 2004. Previously, he was Manager New Business and Growth Projects. A B.Comm graduate,
Mr. M.C. Munroe holds a National Diploma and a National Higher Diploma in Metalliferous Mining. He obtained his Mine Manager’s
Certificate of Competency in 1999. He has 19 years’ experience in the mining industry.
Mr. M.C. Munroe holds a National Diploma and a National Higher Diploma in Metalliferous Mining. He obtained his Mine Manager’s
Certificate of Competency in 1999. He has 19 years’ experience in the mining industry.
Charles Methley Symons (51) General Manager Crown Gold Recoveries. Mr. C.M. Symons was appointed to his current
position in 1997. He holds a Masters degree in Business Leadership and a B.Comm degree from the University of South Africa, and a
National Diploma in Extractive Metallurgy.
National Diploma in Extractive Metallurgy.
David Edwin Whittaker (49) Regional Geologist. Mr. D.E. Whittaker joined the Company in 1996 and took up his current
position in April 2005. He has a BSc Honors degree from Luton College of Higher Education, a diploma in mining engineering from the
Camborne School of Mines and a graduate diploma in engineering from the University of the Witwatersrand. He has 23 years’ experience
in the mining industry.
Camborne School of Mines and a graduate diploma in engineering from the University of the Witwatersrand. He has 23 years’ experience
in the mining industry.
Senior Management- Australasia
Fergus Hart (43) General Manager Tolukuma. Mr. F. Hart, who holds a BSc degree in Mining Engineering, took up his current
position in July 2005. Previously, he was at Emperor Mines Limited in Fiji for four years. He has some 20 years’ gold mining experience,
obtained primarily in South Africa in both operational and project roles with the Gencor, Goldfields and Harmony groups.
obtained primarily in South Africa in both operational and project roles with the Gencor, Goldfields and Harmony groups.
Richard Lewis Johnson (53) Divisional Director Australasia. Mr. R.L. Johnson was appointed Divisional Director Australia in
February 2003. Mr. R.L. Johnson has a BSc degree in mining engineering. Mr. R.L. Johnson was appointed as a Non-Executive Director
of Emperor Mines Limited in August 2004.
of Emperor Mines Limited in August 2004.
Willie Andre Labuschagne (38) Divisional Financial Manager. Mr. W.A. Labuschagne has a B.Comm degree and 15 years’
experience in financial and general management in the mining sector. He joined the Company in 2002 and moved to Brisbane in February
2004 to establish a regional office there.
2004 to establish a regional office there.
113
Terry Sean O’Connor (54) General Manager Vatukoula. Mr. T.S. O’Connor joined the Company in May 2005. A B.Comm
graduate from the University of South Africa, he holds a National Higher Diploma in Metalliferous Mining and South African Mine
Manager’s Certificate. He was previously a mine manager with Anglo Platinum.
Manager’s Certificate. He was previously a mine manager with Anglo Platinum.
Sandra Christine Spencer (40) General Manager Human Resources. Ms. S.C. Spencer was appointed in June 2005 as General
Manager Human Resources in Australasia. She has more than 16 years’ professional human resources experience in the finance,
management consultancy and IT sectors. She has a Certificate in Personnel Practice.
management consultancy and IT sectors. She has a Certificate in Personnel Practice.
Michael Patrick Marriott (49) Chief Operating Officer Australasia. Mr. M.P. Marriott, who holds a National Diploma in
Metalliferous Mining and a South African Mine Manager’s Certificate of Competency, was appointed as General Manager Projects in
March 2004, and as Divisional Director SA Operations in August 2004. He became Chief Operating Officer in Australasia in June 2005.
He has 31 years’ experience in the gold mining industry, including positions held at Anglo American Gold Division, Cluff Resources,
Ashanti Goldfields Zimbabwe, Independence Gold Mining Zimbabwe and Highland African Mining Company Limited.
Mr. M.P. Marriott is a director of Emperor Mines Limited.
March 2004, and as Divisional Director SA Operations in August 2004. He became Chief Operating Officer in Australasia in June 2005.
He has 31 years’ experience in the gold mining industry, including positions held at Anglo American Gold Division, Cluff Resources,
Ashanti Goldfields Zimbabwe, Independence Gold Mining Zimbabwe and Highland African Mining Company Limited.
Mr. M.P. Marriott is a director of Emperor Mines Limited.
Changes in our Board of Directors and Executive Officers
The following changes occurred in our board of directors and executive officers from July 1, 2004 to November 30, 2005.
Appointments
Title
Date
D.N. Campbell
Chief Financial Officer
January 17, 2005
T.J. Gwebu
Group Company Secretary
April 1, 2005
M.P. Ncholo
Non-Executive Chairman
February 15, 2005
J.W.C. Sayers
Chief Financial Officer
September 5, 2005
J. Turk
Non-Executive Director
October 27, 2004
G.C. Campbell
Non-Executive Chairman
October 25, 2005
Resignations
Title
Date
D.C. Baker
Non-Executive Director
October 27, 2004
D.N. Campbell
Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2005
W.G. Koonin
Divisional Director Group Finance
January 17, 2005
A. Lubbe
Divisional Director Growth and Technical Services and
Alternate Director
Alternate Director
March 23, 2005
A.I. Townsend
Group Company Secretary
March 31, 2005
D.T. van der Mescht
Divisional Director South African Operations and Alternate
Director
Director
August 5, 2004
M.P. Ncholo
Non-Executive Chairman
October 25, 2005
I.L. Murray
Corporate Development Officer
November 30, 2005
Directors' Terms of Service
The following table shows the date of appointment, expiration of term and number of years of service with us of each of the
directors:
Director
Title
Year first
Appointed
Appointed
Term of
current
office
M.M. Wellesley-Wood
Chief Executive Officer
2000*
2 years
I.L. Murray
Corporate Development Officer
2000*##
2 years
J.W.C. Sayers
Chief Financial Officer
2005
2 years
M.P. Ncholo
Non-Executive Chairman
2002*#
2 years
G.C. Campbell
Non-Executive Director
2002*
3 years
R.P. Hume
Non-Executive Director
2001*
3 years
D.J.M. Blackmur
Non-Executive Director
2003
2 years
J. Turk
Non-Executive Director
2004
2 years
* Reappointed in 2005
# Resigned October 25, 2005
## Resigned November 30, 2005
# Resigned October 25, 2005
## Resigned November 30, 2005
There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers or directors. There are no arrangements or
understandings between any of our directors or executive officers and any other person by which any of our directors or executive officers
have been so elected or appointed.
have been so elected or appointed.
114
6B. COMPENSATION
Our Articles of Association provide that the directors' fees should be determined from time to time in a general meeting or by a
quorum of Non-Executive Directors. The total amount of directors' remuneration paid for the year ended June 30, 2005 was R17.2 million
($2.8 million). Non-Executive Directors receive a basic fee of $20,000 per annum, subcommittee fees of $2,000 per annum for each
subcommittee of which they are a member and $4,000 per annum for each subcommittee of which they are chairperson. During the year
ended June 30, 2005, we contributed R0.5 million ($0.1 million) to our defined contribution plans for our officers and directors.
($2.8 million). Non-Executive Directors receive a basic fee of $20,000 per annum, subcommittee fees of $2,000 per annum for each
subcommittee of which they are a member and $4,000 per annum for each subcommittee of which they are chairperson. During the year
ended June 30, 2005, we contributed R0.5 million ($0.1 million) to our defined contribution plans for our officers and directors.
The following table sets forth the compensation for our directors for the year ended June 30, 2005:
Directors
Basic
salary/fees
($'000)
Change in terms of
employment
payment
($'000)
Retirement fund
contributions/
bonus/restraint of
trade/expenses
($'000)
Total
($'000)
Share option
scheme gains
($'000)
Executive
M.M. Wellesley-Wood
M.M. Wellesley-Wood
1
.......................................
542
21
265
828
-
I.L. Murray
2
.........................................................
D.N. Campbell
3
…………………………..
591
53
229
-
251
-
1,071
53
-
-
-
A. Lubbe (Alternate director)
4
............................
164
-
135
299
14
D.T. van der Mescht (Alternate director)
5
...........
19
-
236
255
-
Subtotal ..............................................................
1,369
250
887
2,506
14
Non-Executive
M.P. Ncholo
M.P. Ncholo
6
........................................................
38
-
11
49
-
G.C. Campbell......................................................
51
-
14
65
-
R. Hume ...............................................................
33
-
14
47
-
D. Baker
7
.............................................................
13
-
19
32
-
D.J.M. Blackmur..................................................
J Turk
J Turk
8
..................................................................
33
18
18
-
-
-
15
-
48
18
18
-
-
-
Subtotal ...............................................................
186
-
73
259
-
Total
1,555
250
960
2,765
14
Refer to Item 6E “Share Ownership” for details of share options held by directors.
1
Under the terms of Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreement of employment effective from December 1, 2003, he was entitled to a change in terms
of employment payment by virtue of his relinquishing the post of Chief Executive Officer of the Company, equal to 92% of his South African
remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package received on December 1, 2003. This payment accrued during May 2004,
but was deferred for six months, at Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s request. The role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was split in accordance
with the rules prescribed by the JSE Limited, which came into effect from January 1, 2004 and not as a result of any internal operating requirement
of the Company. No other payment of this nature was made to any officer of the Company in fiscal 2004. The Remuneration and Nominations
Committee approved the payment which amounted to R1.7 million ($0.3 million) plus interest of R0.1 million ($0.02 million).
remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package received on December 1, 2003. This payment accrued during May 2004,
but was deferred for six months, at Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s request. The role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was split in accordance
with the rules prescribed by the JSE Limited, which came into effect from January 1, 2004 and not as a result of any internal operating requirement
of the Company. No other payment of this nature was made to any officer of the Company in fiscal 2004. The Remuneration and Nominations
Committee approved the payment which amounted to R1.7 million ($0.3 million) plus interest of R0.1 million ($0.02 million).
2
Under the terms of Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreement of employment dated effective of December 1, 2003, he was entitled to receive a change in terms
of employment payment by virtue of his relinquishing the post of Chief Financial Officer. Mr. I.L. Murray was previously the Deputy Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer until December 2003 at which time the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were split and
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood was appointed as Executive Chairman and Mr. I.L. Murray was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. By virtue of him relinquishing the post of Chief Financial Officer and appointing a replacement Chief Financial Officer, he became entitled
to an amount equal to 93% of his South African remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package received on December 1,
2003. Such payment amounted to R1.1 million ($0.2 million) plus interest of R0.3 million ($0.05 million) and was approved by the Remuneration
and Nominations Committee which approved the agreement of employment . Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as an Executive Director with effect from
November 30, 2005.
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer until December 2003 at which time the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were split and
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood was appointed as Executive Chairman and Mr. I.L. Murray was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. By virtue of him relinquishing the post of Chief Financial Officer and appointing a replacement Chief Financial Officer, he became entitled
to an amount equal to 93% of his South African remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package received on December 1,
2003. Such payment amounted to R1.1 million ($0.2 million) plus interest of R0.3 million ($0.05 million) and was approved by the Remuneration
and Nominations Committee which approved the agreement of employment . Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as an Executive Director with effect from
November 30, 2005.
3
Appointed January 17, 2005; resigned February 12, 2005.
4
Resigned March 23, 2005.
5
Resigned August 5, 2004.
6
Resigned November 1, 2005.
7
Retired October 27, 2004.
8
Appointed October 27, 2004.
115
Compensation of senior management
Our senior management is comprised of executive directors and executive officers. Under the JSE Listing Rules we are not
required to, and we do not otherwise, disclose compensation paid to individual senior managers other than Executive and Non-
Executive Directors. However, the aggregate compensation paid to executive officers, excluding compensation paid to Executive
Directors, in fiscal 2005 was $1.8 million (fiscal 2004: $2.4 million), representing 12 executive officers in fiscal 2005 and 20
executive officers in fiscal 2004.
Executive Directors. However, the aggregate compensation paid to executive officers, excluding compensation paid to Executive
Directors, in fiscal 2005 was $1.8 million (fiscal 2004: $2.4 million), representing 12 executive officers in fiscal 2005 and 20
executive officers in fiscal 2004.
Bonuses or incentives are paid based upon performance against predetermined key performance indicators. Should an executive
director meet all the targets set in terms of such predetermined key performance indicators, he will be entitled to a bonus of 40% or 50%
of his remuneration package, depending on his particular agreement. Should an Executive Director not meet all the targets set in terms of
the predetermined key performance indicators, he will be entitled to a lesser bonus as determined by the Remuneration and Nominations
Committee.
of his remuneration package, depending on his particular agreement. Should an Executive Director not meet all the targets set in terms of
the predetermined key performance indicators, he will be entitled to a lesser bonus as determined by the Remuneration and Nominations
Committee.
Service Agreements
Service contracts negotiated with each executive and Non-Executive Director incorporate their terms and conditions of
employment and are approved by our Remuneration and Nominations Committee.
The Company’s executive directors, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and Mr. I.L. Murray, entered into agreements of
employment with us and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), on May 7, 2004. These agreements regulate the
employment relationship with Messrs. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and I.L. Murray for the period that commenced on December 1, 2003
and ending on November 30, 2005. Separate agreements of employment were entered into with us and DRD (Isle of Man) to reflect
the proportionate distribution of time and effort which they apply between our South African and Australasian operations. Mr. J.W.C.
Sayers entered into an agreement of employment with the Company for the period that commenced on September 5, 2005 and ending
September 4, 2007.
employment relationship with Messrs. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and I.L. Murray for the period that commenced on December 1, 2003
and ending on November 30, 2005. Separate agreements of employment were entered into with us and DRD (Isle of Man) to reflect
the proportionate distribution of time and effort which they apply between our South African and Australasian operations. Mr. J.W.C.
Sayers entered into an agreement of employment with the Company for the period that commenced on September 5, 2005 and ending
September 4, 2007.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood receives from us an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.9 million ($0.3 million), and from
DRD (Isle of Man) $250,000 per annum (payable in pounds sterling in accordance with the exchange rate in effect on December 1,
2003, in an amount of £145,000 per annum). He is also eligible, under both agreements, to receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of
his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each, over the duration of his appointment, on
condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreements also provide that he
will receive a total of up to 460,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 12 months over the duration of his
agreements of employment and beyond. In terms of a JSE listing requirement, these allotments were subject to approval by
shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders
and t hat he will not be issued these shares. An alternate means of achieving the objective of the retention incentive has been
implemented through the payment of a bonus. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood became entitled to an amount equal to 92% of his
remuneration package from us, by virtue of his relinquishing the position of Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman of the
Company.
2003, in an amount of £145,000 per annum). He is also eligible, under both agreements, to receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of
his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each, over the duration of his appointment, on
condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreements also provide that he
will receive a total of up to 460,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 12 months over the duration of his
agreements of employment and beyond. In terms of a JSE listing requirement, these allotments were subject to approval by
shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders
and t hat he will not be issued these shares. An alternate means of achieving the objective of the retention incentive has been
implemented through the payment of a bonus. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood became entitled to an amount equal to 92% of his
remuneration package from us, by virtue of his relinquishing the position of Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman of the
Company.
Mr. I.L. Murray receives from us an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.5 million ($0.2 million) and from DRD (Isle of
Man) $200,000 per annum. Mr. I.L. Murray is eligible, under both agreements, for an incentive bonus in respect of up to 50% of his
annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration of his appointment, on
condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators. Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of
up to 366,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 12 months over the duration of his agreements of
employment and beyond. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have
since decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued
these shares. An alternate means of achieving the objective of the retention incentive has been implemented through the payment of a
bonus . Our agreement further provides that Mr. I.L. Murray became entitled to an amount equal to 93% of his South African
remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package as determined on December 1, 2003, by virtue of his
relinquishing the position as Chief Financial Officer.
annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration of his appointment, on
condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators. Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of
up to 366,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 12 months over the duration of his agreements of
employment and beyond. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have
since decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued
these shares. An alternate means of achieving the objective of the retention incentive has been implemented through the payment of a
bonus . Our agreement further provides that Mr. I.L. Murray became entitled to an amount equal to 93% of his South African
remuneration package calculated on the basis of the remuneration package as determined on December 1, 2003, by virtue of his
relinquishing the position as Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 5, 2005, receives from us an all-inclusive
remuneration package of R2.0 million ($0.3 million) per annum. Mr. J.W.C. Sayers is eligible under his employment agreement, for
an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the
duration his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators.
an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the
duration his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators.
116
Each service agreement with our directors provides for the provision of benefits to the director where the agreement is
terminated by us, or DRD (Isle of Man) in the case of our executive officers, except where terminated as a result of certain action on the
part of the director, or upon the director reaching a certain age, or by the director upon the occurrence of a change of control of us. A
termination of a director's employment upon the occurrence of a change of control of us is referred to as an “eligible termination.” Upon
an eligible termination, the director is entitled to receive a payment equal to at least one year's salary or fees, but not more than four years
salary or fees, depending on the period of time that the director has been employed. Upon an eligible termination, all options held by the
director under our share option scheme become exercisable by the director at any time prior to the closing of the transaction involving a
change of control or, in certain circumstances in the case of executive direc tors, during the thirty day period following the closing of such
a transaction. Additionally, upon an eligible termination, the executive directors become entitled to any of the shares granted to such
executive director that have not yet vested, subject to shareholder approval. Moreover, the Board of Directors may, at its discretion,
accelerate the issuance of shares granted to the executive directors that are scheduled to vest following the expiration of the agreement in
the event that the agreement automatically terminates and is not extended or replaced by another agreement with the executive director.
part of the director, or upon the director reaching a certain age, or by the director upon the occurrence of a change of control of us. A
termination of a director's employment upon the occurrence of a change of control of us is referred to as an “eligible termination.” Upon
an eligible termination, the director is entitled to receive a payment equal to at least one year's salary or fees, but not more than four years
salary or fees, depending on the period of time that the director has been employed. Upon an eligible termination, all options held by the
director under our share option scheme become exercisable by the director at any time prior to the closing of the transaction involving a
change of control or, in certain circumstances in the case of executive direc tors, during the thirty day period following the closing of such
a transaction. Additionally, upon an eligible termination, the executive directors become entitled to any of the shares granted to such
executive director that have not yet vested, subject to shareholder approval. Moreover, the Board of Directors may, at its discretion,
accelerate the issuance of shares granted to the executive directors that are scheduled to vest following the expiration of the agreement in
the event that the agreement automatically terminates and is not extended or replaced by another agreement with the executive director.
Messrs. M.P. Ncholo, G.C. Campbell, R.P. Hume, D.J.M. Blackmur and J. Turk each have service agreements which run for
fixed periods until February 13, 2007, October 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, respectively.
Mr. D.C. Baker resigned from our board of directors on October 27, 2004, and his service agreement was terminated. Dr. M.P. Ncholo
resigned from our board of directors on November 1, 2005, and his service agreement was terminated. After their respective two and
three year periods, the agreements continue indefinitely until terminated by either party on not less than three months prior written notice.
Mr. D.C. Baker resigned from our board of directors on October 27, 2004, and his service agreement was terminated. Dr. M.P. Ncholo
resigned from our board of directors on November 1, 2005, and his service agreement was terminated. After their respective two and
three year periods, the agreements continue indefinitely until terminated by either party on not less than three months prior written notice.
6C. BOARD PRACTICE
Board of Directors
As at October 31, 2005, the board of directors comprises three Executive Directors (Messrs. M.M. Wellesley-Wood,
I.L. Murray and J.W.C. Sayers) and five Non-Executive Directors (Messrs. G.C. Campbell, D.J.M. Blackmur, R.P. Hume,
M.P. Ncholo and J. Turk). The Non-Executive Directors are independent under the Nasdaq requirements and the South African King
II Report, with the exception of Dr. M.P. Ncholo, by virtue of his shareholding in KBH, the 60% shareholder of CGR, and Mr. J.
Turk, by virtue of his directorship of G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com), the holding company of Net-Gold Services Limited
in which we have a 50.25% interest.
M.P. Ncholo and J. Turk). The Non-Executive Directors are independent under the Nasdaq requirements and the South African King
II Report, with the exception of Dr. M.P. Ncholo, by virtue of his shareholding in KBH, the 60% shareholder of CGR, and Mr. J.
Turk, by virtue of his directorship of G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com), the holding company of Net-Gold Services Limited
in which we have a 50.25% interest.
In accordance with the King II Report on corporate governance, as encompassed in the JSE Listing Rules, and in accordance
with the South African Combined Code, the responsibilities of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were separated during January
2004. Dr M.P. Ncholo is now the Non-Executive Chairman, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is now the Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
J.W.C. Sayers is appointed as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. I.L. Murray has taken up the position of Corporate Development Officer. In
December 2004, Mr. G.C. Campbell was appointed senior independent Non-Executive Director. In future, the evaluation of the
Chairman’s performance will be considered by the Non-Executive Directors led by the senior independent Non-Executive Director.
Mr. D.C. Baker resigned from our board of directors on October 27, 2004, and Mr. J. Turk a Non-Executive Director was appointed on
October 27, 2004. Mr. D.T. van der Mescht, an alternate director, resigned on August 5, 2004 and Mr. A. Lubbe, an alternate director,
resigned on Marc h 30, 2005, and no replacements have been appointed as yet. The board has established a nominations committee,
and it is our policy for details of a prospective candidate to be distributed to all directors for formal consideration at a full meeting of
the board. A prospective candidate would be invited to attend a meeting and be interviewed before any decision is taken. In
compliance with the Nasdaq rules a majority of independent directors will select or recommend director nominees.
2004. Dr M.P. Ncholo is now the Non-Executive Chairman, Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is now the Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
J.W.C. Sayers is appointed as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. I.L. Murray has taken up the position of Corporate Development Officer. In
December 2004, Mr. G.C. Campbell was appointed senior independent Non-Executive Director. In future, the evaluation of the
Chairman’s performance will be considered by the Non-Executive Directors led by the senior independent Non-Executive Director.
Mr. D.C. Baker resigned from our board of directors on October 27, 2004, and Mr. J. Turk a Non-Executive Director was appointed on
October 27, 2004. Mr. D.T. van der Mescht, an alternate director, resigned on August 5, 2004 and Mr. A. Lubbe, an alternate director,
resigned on Marc h 30, 2005, and no replacements have been appointed as yet. The board has established a nominations committee,
and it is our policy for details of a prospective candidate to be distributed to all directors for formal consideration at a full meeting of
the board. A prospective candidate would be invited to attend a meeting and be interviewed before any decision is taken. In
compliance with the Nasdaq rules a majority of independent directors will select or recommend director nominees.
The board’s main roles are to create value for shareholders, to provide leadership of the Company, to approve the Company’s
strategic objectives and to ensure that the necessary financial and other resources are made available to the management to enable
them to meet those objectives. The board retains full and effective control over the Company, meeting on a quarterly basis with
additional ad hoc meetings being arranged when necessary, to review strategy and planning and operational and financial
performance. The board further authorizes acquisitions and disposals, major capital expenditure, stakeholder communication and
other material matters reserved for its consideration and decision under its terms of reference. The board also approves the annual
budgets for the various operational units.
them to meet those objectives. The board retains full and effective control over the Company, meeting on a quarterly basis with
additional ad hoc meetings being arranged when necessary, to review strategy and planning and operational and financial
performance. The board further authorizes acquisitions and disposals, major capital expenditure, stakeholder communication and
other material matters reserved for its consideration and decision under its terms of reference. The board also approves the annual
budgets for the various operational units.
The board is responsible for monitoring the activities of executive management within the Company and ensuring that
decisions on material matters are referred to the board. The board approves all the terms of reference for the various subcommittees of
the board, including special committees tasked to deal with specific issues. Only the executive directors are involved with the day-to-
day management of the Company.
the board, including special committees tasked to deal with specific issues. Only the executive directors are involved with the day-to-
day management of the Company.
117
To assist new directors, an induction program has been established by the Company, which includes background materials,
meetings with senior management, presentations by the Company’s advisors and site visits. The directors are assessed annually, both
individually and as a board, as part of an evaluation process, which is driven by an independent consultant. addition, the
Remuneration and Nominations Committee formally evaluates the executive directors and the alternate directors on an annual basis,
based on objective criteria.
individually and as a board, as part of an evaluation process, which is driven by an independent consultant. addition, the
Remuneration and Nominations Committee formally evaluates the executive directors and the alternate directors on an annual basis,
based on objective criteria.
All directors, in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, are subject to retirement by rotation and re-election
by shareholders. In addition, all directors are subject to re-election by shareholders at the first annual general meeting following their
appointment. The appointment of new directors is approved by the board as a whole. The names of the directors submitted for re-
election are accompanied by sufficient biographical details in the notice of the forthcoming annual general meeting to enable
shareholders to make an informed decision in respect of their re-election.
appointment. The appointment of new directors is approved by the board as a whole. The names of the directors submitted for re-
election are accompanied by sufficient biographical details in the notice of the forthcoming annual general meeting to enable
shareholders to make an informed decision in respect of their re-election.
All directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary, who is responsible to the board for ensuring
compliance with procedures and regulations of a statutory nature. Directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice
concerning the affairs of the Company at the Company’s expense, should they believe that course of action would be in the best
interest of the Company.
concerning the affairs of the Company at the Company’s expense, should they believe that course of action would be in the best
interest of the Company.
A majority of the Non-Executive Directors have share options under the Company’s share option scheme, but do not believe
that this interferes with their independence. See Item 6A.: “Directors, Senior Management and Employees” and Item 6E.: “Share
ownership”.
ownership”.
Board meetings are held quarterly in South Africa or internationally. The structure and timing of the Company’s board
meetings, which are scheduled over 2 or 3 days, allows adequate time for the Non-Executive Directors to interact without the presence
of the executive directors. The board meetings include the meeting of the Risk Committee, Audit Committee and Remuneration and
Nominations Committee which act as subcommittees to the main Board. Each subcommittee is chaired by one of the Independent
Non-Executive Directors who provide a formal report back to the main Board, as part of the quarterly reporting process. Each
subcommittee meets for approximately half a day. Certain senior members of staff are invited to attend the subcommittee meetings.
of the executive directors. The board meetings include the meeting of the Risk Committee, Audit Committee and Remuneration and
Nominations Committee which act as subcommittees to the main Board. Each subcommittee is chaired by one of the Independent
Non-Executive Directors who provide a formal report back to the main Board, as part of the quarterly reporting process. Each
subcommittee meets for approximately half a day. Certain senior members of staff are invited to attend the subcommittee meetings.
The board sets the standards and values of the Company and much of this has been embodied in the Company’s Code of
Ethics and Conduct, a copy of which is available on our website at www.drdgold.com. The Code of Ethics and Conduct applies to all
directors, officers and employees, including the principal executive, financial and accounting officers, in accordance with Section 406
of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the related US securities laws and the Nasdaq rules. The Code contains provisions under
which employees can report violations of Company policy or any applicable law, rule or regulation, including US securities laws.
directors, officers and employees, including the principal executive, financial and accounting officers, in accordance with Section 406
of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the related US securities laws and the Nasdaq rules. The Code contains provisions under
which employees can report violations of Company policy or any applicable law, rule or regulation, including US securities laws.
The Company has a wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, and has established a subsidiary board on the Isle
of Man. This board comprises of three Non-Executive Directors, Mr. M.G. Gisborne, Mr. P.F. Matthews and Mr. G.C. Campbell.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is an executive director, with Mr. J.W.C. Sayers acting as his alternate.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood is an executive director, with Mr. J.W.C. Sayers acting as his alternate.
Board Committees
The board has established a number of standing committees to enable it to properly discharge its duties and responsibilities
and to effectively fulfill its decision-making process. Each committee acts within written terms of reference which have been
approved by the Board and under which specific functions of the board are delegated. The terms of reference for all committees can be
obtained by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office. Each committee has defined purposes,
membership requirements, duties and reporting procedures. Minutes of the meetings of these committees are circulated to the
members of the committees and made available to the board. Remuneration for Non-Executive Directors for their services on the
committees concerned is determined by the board. Currently this is in the case of each committee: chairperson $4,000 per annum;
members $2,000 per annum. The committees are subject to regular evaluation by the board with respect to performance and
effectiveness.
approved by the Board and under which specific functions of the board are delegated. The terms of reference for all committees can be
obtained by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office. Each committee has defined purposes,
membership requirements, duties and reporting procedures. Minutes of the meetings of these committees are circulated to the
members of the committees and made available to the board. Remuneration for Non-Executive Directors for their services on the
committees concerned is determined by the board. Currently this is in the case of each committee: chairperson $4,000 per annum;
members $2,000 per annum. The committees are subject to regular evaluation by the board with respect to performance and
effectiveness.
The following information reflects the composition and activities of these committees.
Executive Committees
Two Executive Committees have been established. An Executive Committee for the Australasian operations and an Executive
Committee for the South African operations. As at June 30, 2005, the Australasian Executive Committees consisted of Mr. M.M.
Wellesley-Wood (Chairman), Mr. I.L. Murray, Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, Mr. T.S. O’Connor, Mr. F. Hart, Mr. R.L. Johnson, Mr. M.P. Marriott,
Mr. W.A. Labuschagne and Ms. S.C. Spencer. The South African operations Executive Committee consisted of Mr. M.M. Wellesley-
Wood (Chairman), Mr. I.L. Murray, Mr. W.T. Beer, Mr. J.H. Dissel, Mr. L.C. Lamsley, Mr. D.J. Pretorius, Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, Mr. A.N.
Weir and Mr. I.D. Graulich.
Wellesley-Wood (Chairman), Mr. I.L. Murray, Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, Mr. T.S. O’Connor, Mr. F. Hart, Mr. R.L. Johnson, Mr. M.P. Marriott,
Mr. W.A. Labuschagne and Ms. S.C. Spencer. The South African operations Executive Committee consisted of Mr. M.M. Wellesley-
Wood (Chairman), Mr. I.L. Murray, Mr. W.T. Beer, Mr. J.H. Dissel, Mr. L.C. Lamsley, Mr. D.J. Pretorius, Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, Mr. A.N.
Weir and Mr. I.D. Graulich.
118
The Executive Committees meet on a weekly basis to review current operations in detail, develop strategy and policy proposals
for consideration by the Board of Directors, implement its directives and consider disclosure controls and procedures. Members of the
Executive Committees, who are unable to attend the meetings in person, are able to participate via teleconference facilities, to allow
participation in the discussion and conclusions reached.
Executive Committees, who are unable to attend the meetings in person, are able to participate via teleconference facilities, to allow
participation in the discussion and conclusions reached.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Remuneration and Nominations Committee
The Remuneration and Nominations Committee consists of Professor D.J.M. Blackmur (Chairman) and Mr. G.C. Campbell.
The Remuneration and Nominations Committee, which is comprised of Non-Executive Directors, has been appointed by the
board of directors. The committee meets quarterly, but may meet more often on an ad hoc basis if required. The Remuneration and
Nominations Committee is governed by its terms of reference and is responsible for approving the remuneration policies of the
Company, the terms and conditions of employment, and the eligibility and performance measures of the DRDGOLD (1996) Share
Option Scheme applicable to directors and senior management.
Nominations Committee is governed by its terms of reference and is responsible for approving the remuneration policies of the
Company, the terms and conditions of employment, and the eligibility and performance measures of the DRDGOLD (1996) Share
Option Scheme applicable to directors and senior management.
The committee’s objective is to evaluate and recommend to the board competitive packages which will attract and retain
executives of the highest caliber and encourage and reward superior performance. The committee also aims to ensure that criteria are
in place to measure individual performance. The committee approves the performance-based bonuses of the executive directors based
on such criteria. The General Manager Human Resources provides the committee with access to comparative industry surveys, which
assist in formulating remuneration policies. As and when required the committee may also engage the services of independent
consultants to evaluate and review remuneration policies and related issues and brief members on pertinent issues. The committee has
in the past year engaged the services of such consultants to review the employment contracts of the executive directors.
in place to measure individual performance. The committee approves the performance-based bonuses of the executive directors based
on such criteria. The General Manager Human Resources provides the committee with access to comparative industry surveys, which
assist in formulating remuneration policies. As and when required the committee may also engage the services of independent
consultants to evaluate and review remuneration policies and related issues and brief members on pertinent issues. The committee has
in the past year engaged the services of such consultants to review the employment contracts of the executive directors.
The remuneration policy, relating to the remuneration of directors and senior executives, is based on a reward system
comprising of four principal elements:
1.
Basic remuneration, as benchmarked against industry norms;
2.
Bonuses or incentives, which are measured against agreed outcomes or Key Performance Indicators, or KPIs;
3.
Short-term rewards for exceptional performance; and
4.
Long-term retention of key employees based on scarcity of skill and strategic value, using share options granted under the
DRDGOLD (1996) Share Option Scheme or shares for the Executive Directors.
DRDGOLD (1996) Share Option Scheme or shares for the Executive Directors.
A copy of the policy is available by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.
Audit and Risk Committee
On February 11, 2005, the Audit and Risk Committees were merged into one committee (the Audit / Risk Committee) made
up of the Audit and Risk sections. The two sections sit together one after the other (chaired by their respective Chairmen) and engage
in joint deliberations. The Audit section is chaired by Mr. R.P. Hume and the Risk section is chaired by Professor D.J.M. Blackmur.
The reason for the merger is that there was a great deal of overlap between the financial risks discussed at Audit Committee level and
at Risk Committee level. The Company believes that the merging of these committees will provide better disclosure and aligns the
Company with the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 process. For the sake of convenience the Audit Section of the Committee will be
referred to as the Audit Committee and the Risk Section as Risk Committee in this part of the report.
Audit section of the Audit and Risk Committee
in joint deliberations. The Audit section is chaired by Mr. R.P. Hume and the Risk section is chaired by Professor D.J.M. Blackmur.
The reason for the merger is that there was a great deal of overlap between the financial risks discussed at Audit Committee level and
at Risk Committee level. The Company believes that the merging of these committees will provide better disclosure and aligns the
Company with the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 process. For the sake of convenience the Audit Section of the Committee will be
referred to as the Audit Committee and the Risk Section as Risk Committee in this part of the report.
Audit section of the Audit and Risk Committee
As at June 30, 2005, the Audit Committee consisted of Mr. R.P. Hume (Chairman), Mr. G.C. Campbell and Professor D.J.M.
Blackmur who was appointed to the Audit Committee on November 2, 2004. Mr. D.C. Baker resigned on October 27, 2004.
The Audit Committee comprises solely of Non-Executive Directors, all of whom are independent.The primary
responsibilities of the Audit Committee, as set out in the Audit Committee charter, is to assist the board in carrying out its duties
relating to accounting policies, internal financial control, financial reporting practices and the preparation of accurate financial
reporting and financial statements in compliance with all applicable legal requirements and accounting standards. A copy of the
charter is available by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.
relating to accounting policies, internal financial control, financial reporting practices and the preparation of accurate financial
reporting and financial statements in compliance with all applicable legal requirements and accounting standards. A copy of the
charter is available by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.
119
The Audit Committee meets quarterly with the external auditors, the Company’s internal audit practitioner, the Chief
Financial Officer and the Internal Audit and Compliance Manager to review the audit plans of the internal auditors, to ascertain the
extent to which the scope of the internal audits can be relied upon to detect weaknesses in the internal controls and to review the
annual and interim financial statements prior to approval by the board. The Audit Committee reviews our annual results, the
effectiveness of our system of internal financial controls, internal audit procedures and legal and regulatory compliance. The committee
also reviews the scope of work carried out by our internal auditors and holds regular discussions with the external auditors and internal
auditors.
extent to which the scope of the internal audits can be relied upon to detect weaknesses in the internal controls and to review the
annual and interim financial statements prior to approval by the board. The Audit Committee reviews our annual results, the
effectiveness of our system of internal financial controls, internal audit procedures and legal and regulatory compliance. The committee
also reviews the scope of work carried out by our internal auditors and holds regular discussions with the external auditors and internal
auditors.
The committee appoints, re-appoints and removes the external auditors and approves the remuneration and terms of
engagement of the external auditors. The committee is required to pre-approve, and has pre-approved, non-audit services provided by
our external auditors. The Company’s external audit function is currently being undertaken by KPMG Inc.
our external auditors. The Company’s external audit function is currently being undertaken by KPMG Inc.
The Company’s internal and external auditors have unrestricted access to the chairman of the Audit Committee and, where
necessary, to the Chairman of the board and Chief Executive Officer. All important findings arising from audit procedures are
brought to the attention of the committee and, if necessary, to the board.
brought to the attention of the committee and, if necessary, to the board.
Risk section of the Audit and Risk Committee
As at June 30, 2005, the Risk Committee consisted of Professor D.J.M Blackmur (Chairman), Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood and
Mr. J. Turk. Mr. D.C. Baker resigned on October 27, 2004.
The Risk Committee was established in January 2004, with a non-executive chairman. Its overall objective is to assist the
Board in its duties relating to risk management and control responsibilities, assurance issues, health, safety and environmental
compliance, and the monitoring and reporting of all these matters. The Risk Committee facilitates communication between the board,
the Audit Committee, internal auditors and other parties engaged in risk management activities. The terms of reference of the Risk
Committee can be obtained by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.
compliance, and the monitoring and reporting of all these matters. The Risk Committee facilitates communication between the board,
the Audit Committee, internal auditors and other parties engaged in risk management activities. The terms of reference of the Risk
Committee can be obtained by application to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.
The Risk Committee’s role is to ensure that:
•
•
an effective risk management program is implemented and maintained;
•
risk management awareness is promoted amongst all employees;
•
risk programs (financing/insurance) adequately protect the Company against catastrophic risks;
•
regular risk assessments are conducted;
•
total cost of risk in the long term is reduced;
•
the protection of the Group's assets is promoted throughout the Group;
•
the health and safety and well being of all stakeholders is improved; and
•
the Company’s activities are carried out in such a way so as to ensure the safety and health of employees.
The Risk Committee meets quarterly and reports to the board. Additional ad hoc meetings may be arranged as and when
required. Certain members of executive management are invited to attend Risk Committee meetings on a regular basis, such as the
Chief Financial Officer, Internal Audit and Compliance Manager, the Group Risk Manager, the Group Financial Manager, the
Operational Managers, the Group Legal Counsel, the manager responsible for safety, health and environment and the General
Manager Assets and Commercial.
Chief Financial Officer, Internal Audit and Compliance Manager, the Group Risk Manager, the Group Financial Manager, the
Operational Managers, the Group Legal Counsel, the manager responsible for safety, health and environment and the General
Manager Assets and Commercial.
Following the release of the King II Report, in South Africa, containing minimum practices to be adopted, we have
formulated a risk corporate governance structure, which has been approved by the board.
The system to manage risk involves all significant business and operational risks which could undermine the achievement of
business objectives and undermine the preservation of shareholders values. The significant risks facing the Group including those at
operations have been identified and have been included in Item 3D.: “Risk factors.” Individuals have been appointed to address each
risk and the results thereof, are reviewed by senior management through regular risk meetings. The aim of the internal control
systems is for management to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives will be met. In addition to the above initiatives the
Group also employs third party consultants to benchmark our operations against other mining operations throughout South Africa and
more than 300 different mining companies worldwide.
operations have been identified and have been included in Item 3D.: “Risk factors.” Individuals have been appointed to address each
risk and the results thereof, are reviewed by senior management through regular risk meetings. The aim of the internal control
systems is for management to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives will be met. In addition to the above initiatives the
Group also employs third party consultants to benchmark our operations against other mining operations throughout South Africa and
more than 300 different mining companies worldwide.
120
An important aspect of risk management is the transfer of risk to third parties to protect the Company from any major
disaster. We have embarked on a program to ensure that our major assets and potential business interruption and liability claims are
covered by group insurance policies that encompass our operations world-wide. The majority of the cover is through reputable
insurance companies in London and Europe and the insurance programs are renewed on an annual basis. Insurance premiums for the
Group have been reduced by more than 30% in fiscal 2004, due to the risk initiatives undertaken in the Group. A cell captive has been
established to enable further reduction in annual insurance premiums. An insurance company, Fortis Limited, has been established to
provide workers compensation insurance to the Tolukuma Section in Papua New Guinea.
covered by group insurance policies that encompass our operations world-wide. The majority of the cover is through reputable
insurance companies in London and Europe and the insurance programs are renewed on an annual basis. Insurance premiums for the
Group have been reduced by more than 30% in fiscal 2004, due to the risk initiatives undertaken in the Group. A cell captive has been
established to enable further reduction in annual insurance premiums. An insurance company, Fortis Limited, has been established to
provide workers compensation insurance to the Tolukuma Section in Papua New Guinea.
6D. EMPLOYEES
Employees
The geographic breakdown of our employees (including contractors who are contracted employees employed by third parties),
was as follows at the end of each of the past three fiscal years:
Year ended June 30
2005
2004
2003
South Africa …………………………………………………………..
3,481
12,986
18,766
Australasia ...........................................................................................................
824
751
472
Total.....................................................................................................................
4,305
13,737
19,238
The total number of employees at June 30, 2005, of 4,305 comprises 676 contractors and 3,629 employees who are directly
employed by us and our wholly-owned Group companies. As of October 31, 2005, we had 4,324 employees. The decrease in the number
of employees in fiscal 2005 is due to the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations which included 7,614 employees in March
2005. The decrease in the number of employees in fiscal 2004, was due to the restructuring at the North West Operations which included
the retrenchment of approximately 2,200 employees in September 2003 and 1,000 employees in April 2004, and the reduction of
contractors.
of employees in fiscal 2005 is due to the provisional liquidation of the North West Operations which included 7,614 employees in March
2005. The decrease in the number of employees in fiscal 2004, was due to the restructuring at the North West Operations which included
the retrenchment of approximately 2,200 employees in September 2003 and 1,000 employees in April 2004, and the reduction of
contractors.
As of June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the breakdown of our employees (excluding Porgera, Emperor, CGR and ERPM) by main
categories of activity was as follows:
Year ended June 30,
Category of Activity
2005
2004
2003
Mining - Our Employees............................................................................................
2,317
7,507
9,877
Mining – Contractors .................................................................................................
676
2,372
4,426
Engineering ................................................................................................................
586
2,183
2,871
Metallurgy ..................................................................................................................
322
728
960
Mineral Resources......................................................................................................
162
256
361
Administration............................................................................................................
124
240
243
Environmental ............................................................................................................
36
105
155
Human Resources.......................................................................................................
43
204
185
Medical .......................................................................................................................
9
116
129
Safety ..........................................................................................................................
30
26
31
Total............................................................................................................................
4,305
13,737
19,238
Labor Relations
As at June 30, 2005, we employed and contracted 3,481 people in South Africa and 824 in Papua New Guinea. Approximately
70% of South African employees are members of trade unions or employee associations. This excludes all employees of the Crown
Section and ERPM Section, and all employees from our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture and our 45.33% interest in the Emperor
Section. There were no material incidents of industrial action or labor unrest at our operations during fiscal 2005.
Section and ERPM Section, and all employees from our 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture and our 45.33% interest in the Emperor
Section. There were no material incidents of industrial action or labor unrest at our operations during fiscal 2005.
South Africa's labor relations environment remains a platform for social reform, while the political transitions that have taken
place in the country have reduced the impact of organized labor on political transformation. The National Union of Mineworkers, or
NUM, the main South African mining industry union, is influential in the tripartite alliance between the ruling African National Congress,
the Congress of South African Trade Unions, or COSATU, and the South African Communist Party as it is the biggest affiliate of
COSATU. The relationship between management and labor unions remains cordial. The DRDGOLD/National Union of Mineworkers co-
coordinating forum meets regularly to discuss matters pertinent to both parties at Group level, while operations level forums continue to
deal with local matters. The wage agreements for the period 2005 to 2007 provided for wage increases of 6% for the first year and 6.5%
increase for the second year. This agreement took effect from July 1, 2005. Wage agreements were also signed with the other recogniz ed
unions and associations.
NUM, the main South African mining industry union, is influential in the tripartite alliance between the ruling African National Congress,
the Congress of South African Trade Unions, or COSATU, and the South African Communist Party as it is the biggest affiliate of
COSATU. The relationship between management and labor unions remains cordial. The DRDGOLD/National Union of Mineworkers co-
coordinating forum meets regularly to discuss matters pertinent to both parties at Group level, while operations level forums continue to
deal with local matters. The wage agreements for the period 2005 to 2007 provided for wage increases of 6% for the first year and 6.5%
increase for the second year. This agreement took effect from July 1, 2005. Wage agreements were also signed with the other recogniz ed
unions and associations.
121
By statute we are required to pay each employee who is dismissed for reasons based on the operational requirements of our
operations, a severance package of not less than one week’s remuneration for every completed year of service. In the aforementioned
agreements with organized labor we undertook, as in the past, to pay packages equal to two weeks basic pay for every completed year
of service as part of a balancing compromise with the labor unions between the high additional costs of non-financial items and
incentive payments (which are deemed part of remuneration), and an additional one week benefit based on basic pay.
agreements with organized labor we undertook, as in the past, to pay packages equal to two weeks basic pay for every completed year
of service as part of a balancing compromise with the labor unions between the high additional costs of non-financial items and
incentive payments (which are deemed part of remuneration), and an additional one week benefit based on basic pay.
The Tolukuma Section in Papua New Guinea is not unionized, however, labor relations and the relationship with the
surrounding communities are maintained by way of worker consultative committees and a community forum lead by the Community
Relations Manager.
Relations Manager.
AIDS represents a very serious threat to us and the gold mining industry as a whole in terms of the potential reduced
productivity and increased medical costs. The exact extent of infection in our workforce is not known at present, although it is roughly
estimated by the industry that the prevalence of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, in the South African industry is currently approximately
30% to 40%. We have several AIDS awareness campaigns in place at our operations.
estimated by the industry that the prevalence of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, in the South African industry is currently approximately
30% to 40%. We have several AIDS awareness campaigns in place at our operations.
Blyvoor has contracted AngloGold Health Services to provide all health care services, including a wellness program, which
treats AIDS related illnesses, provides counseling on healthy life styles and monitors the progression of the HIV virus.
Safety statistics
Due to the importance of our labor force, we continuously strive to create a safe and healthy working environment. The
following overall statistics for our managed mines (including the Crown and ERPM Sections, but excluding Porgera and Emperor Mines
Limited) are reflected below.
Limited) are reflected below.
(Per million man hours)
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR)
1
......................................................
9.55
8.63
Reportable incidence
1
.....................................................................................
3.44
3.49
Fatalities...........................................................................................................
0.25
0.25
Number of fatalities (average per month).........................................................
0.83
0.92
1
Calculated as follows: Actual number of instances divided by the total number of man hours worked multiplied by one million.
122
6E. SHARE OWNERSHIP
As of October 31, 2005, options to purchase ordinary shares held by directors were as follows:
Directors
Options at
June 30,
2004
Options
granted
granted
during the
period
Average
Exercise
Exercise
price (R)
Options
exercised
during the
year
Average
Exercise
Exercise
Price (R)
Options
lapsed
during the
year
Options at
Oct 31,
2005
Expiration
Dates
Dates
1
Executive
M.M. Wellesley Wood...
1,023,912
57,710
5.50
-
-
-
1,081,622
4/30/12-
10/27/13
I.L. Murray
2
....................
793,371
44,716
5.50
-
-
-
838,087
8/21/10-
10/27/13
Alternate Directors
A. Lubbe
3
......................
252,458
106,500
10.93
25,000
7.26
-
333,958
10/1/11-
11/1/17
D.T. van der Mescht
4
.....
307,795
-
-
-
-
-
307,795
10/1/11-
4/26/14
Non-Executive
M.P. Ncholo
5
..................
47,800
2,694
5.50
-
-
-
50,494
3/20/12-
10/27/13
G.C. Campbell................
54,900
3,094
5.50
-
-
-
57,994
3/20/12-
10/27/13
R.P. Hume ......................
73,750
4,157
5.50
-
-
-
77,907
10/1/11-
10/27/13
D.C. Baker
6
....................
49,600
-
-
-
-
-
49,600
9/26/11-
10/27/13
Each option is representative of a right to acquire one ordinary share at a predetermined exercise price.
Closed periods apply to share trading by directors and other employees, whenever certain employees of the Company become
or could potentially become aware of material price sensitive information, such as information relating to an acquisition, quarterly
results etc., which is not in the public domain. When these employees have access to this information an embargo is placed on share
trading for those individuals concerned. The embargo need not involve the entire Company in the case of an acquisition and may
apply only to the board of directors, executive committee, and the financial and new business teams, but in the case of quarterly results
the embargo is group-wide.
results etc., which is not in the public domain. When these employees have access to this information an embargo is placed on share
trading for those individuals concerned. The embargo need not involve the entire Company in the case of an acquisition and may
apply only to the board of directors, executive committee, and the financial and new business teams, but in the case of quarterly results
the embargo is group-wide.
Under the listings requirements of the JSE, we are not required to disclose, and we do not otherwise disclose or ascertain, share
ownership of individual executive officers in our share capital.
However, to the best of our knowledge, we believe that our ordinary shares held by executive officers, in aggregate, do not exceed 1
percent of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital. For details of share ownership of directors see Item 7A.: “Major Shareholders.”
However, to the best of our knowledge, we believe that our ordinary shares held by executive officers, in aggregate, do not exceed 1
percent of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital. For details of share ownership of directors see Item 7A.: “Major Shareholders.”
1
Certain Directors hold options which expire at various times. For those directors, a range is provided indicating the earliest and latest expiration
dates.
2
Mr. I.L. Murray resigned as an Executive Director on November 30, 2005.
3
Mr. A. Lubbe was appointed to our Board of Directors as an Alternate Director on July 1, 2003. He subsequently resigned from his position and as
an Alternate Director of the Board on March 23, 2005.
4
Mr. D.T. van der Mescht was appointed to our Board of Directors as an Alternate Director on July 1, 2003. He subsequently resigned from his
position of Divisional Director: South African Operations and as an alternate member of the board on August 5, 2004.
5
Mr. M.P. Ncholo resigned as Non-Executive Chairman on October 25, 2005.
6
Mr. D.C. Baker retired from the Board on October 27, 2004.
123
DRDGOLD (1996) Share Option Scheme, or the Scheme
We operate a securities option plan as an incentive tool for our executive directors, Non-Executive Directors and senior
employees whose skills and experience are recognized as being essential to the Company’s performance. In terms of the Scheme rules, a
maximum of 15% of the issued ordinary shares is reserved for issuance thereunder and no participant may hold options at any time, which
if exercised in full, would exceed 2% of our issued share capital at that time. As at October 31, 2005, the number of issued and
exercisable share options is approximately 4.4% of the issued ordinary share capital, which is within the National Association of
Pension Funds (United Kingdom) international accepted guideline of 3 to 5% for such schemes. In addition, the participants in the
Scheme are fully taxed at their maximum marginal tax rate on any gains realized on the exercise of their options.
maximum of 15% of the issued ordinary shares is reserved for issuance thereunder and no participant may hold options at any time, which
if exercised in full, would exceed 2% of our issued share capital at that time. As at October 31, 2005, the number of issued and
exercisable share options is approximately 4.4% of the issued ordinary share capital, which is within the National Association of
Pension Funds (United Kingdom) international accepted guideline of 3 to 5% for such schemes. In addition, the participants in the
Scheme are fully taxed at their maximum marginal tax rate on any gains realized on the exercise of their options.
The price at which an option may be exercised is the lowest seven day trading average of the closing market prices of an
ordinary share on the JSE, as confirmed by our directors, during the three months preceding the day on which the employee is granted the
option. Each option remains in force for ten years after the date of grant, subject to the terms of the option plan. Options granted under the
plan vest at the discretion of our directors, but primarily according to the following schedule over a maximum of a three year period:
option. Each option remains in force for ten years after the date of grant, subject to the terms of the option plan. Options granted under the
plan vest at the discretion of our directors, but primarily according to the following schedule over a maximum of a three year period:
Percentage vested in each period
Period after the original date of the option grant
25%
6 months
25%
1 year
25%
2 years
25%
3 years
Any options not exercised within ten years from the original date of the option grant will expire and may not thereafter be
exercised.
Options to purchase a total of 13,051,786 ordinary shares were outstanding on June 30, 2005, of which options to purchase
6,507,374 ordinary shares were currently exercisable. In fiscal 2005, a total of 125 employees participated in the Scheme including
Executive Directors, Non-Executive Directors and other senior employees. The outstanding options are exercisable at purchase prices that
range from R3.11 to R36.08 per share and expire ten years from the date of issue to the participants.
Executive Directors, Non-Executive Directors and other senior employees. The outstanding options are exercisable at purchase prices that
range from R3.11 to R36.08 per share and expire ten years from the date of issue to the participants.
124
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
7A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
As of October 31, 2005, our issued capital consisted of:
•
305,844,347 ordinary shares of no par value; and
•
5,000,000 cumulative preference shares.
To our knowledge, we are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or any person or foreign
government and there are no arrangements, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of us.
Based on information available to us, as of October 31, 2005:
•
there were 6,185 record holders of our ordinary shares in South Africa, who held approximately 9,826,233 or approximately
3.2% of our ordinary shares;
3.2% of our ordinary shares;
•
there was one record holder of our cumulative preference shares in South Africa, who held 5,000,000 or 100% of our cumulative
preference shares;
preference shares;
•
there were no record holders of our ordinary shares or ADSs underlying the 6% Senior Convertible Notes due 2006;
•
there were no US record holders of our ordinary shares, excluding those shares which are held as part of our ADS program; and
•
there were 3,501 record holders of our ADSs in the United States, who held approximately 243,467,791or approximately
79.61% of our ordinary shares.
79.61% of our ordinary shares.
The following table set forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of October 31, 2005 by:
•
each of our directors; and
•
any person whom the directors are aware of as at October 31, 2005 who is interested directly or indirectly in 5% or more of our
ordinary shares.
ordinary shares.
Shares Beneficially Owned
Holder
Number
Percent
M. M. Wellesley-Wood..................................................................................................
*
I.L. Murray ....................................................................................................................
*
A. Lubbe ........................................................................................................................
*
M.P. Ncholo...................................................................................................................
*
G.C. Campbell ...............................................................................................................
*
R.P. Hume .....................................................................................................................
*
D.C. Baker .....................................................................................................................
*
Bank of New York ADRs
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10011
101 Barclay Street
New York, NY 10011
243,467,791
79.61%
* Indicates share ownership of less than 1% of our outstanding ordinary shares.
125
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power
with respect to securities. Ordinary shares issuable pursuant to options, to the extent the options are currently exercisable or convertible
within 60 days of October 31, 2005, are treated as outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. As of October 31, 2005,
we are not aware of anyone owning 5% or more of our ordinary shares other than the Bank of New York which holds 79.61% of our
issued ordinary shares through our ADR program. Unless otherwise noted, each person or group identified possesses sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless indicated otherwise, the
business address of the beneficial owner is: DRDGOLD Limited, EBSCO House 4, 299 Pendoring Avenue, Blackheath, Randburg, South
Africa.
within 60 days of October 31, 2005, are treated as outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. As of October 31, 2005,
we are not aware of anyone owning 5% or more of our ordinary shares other than the Bank of New York which holds 79.61% of our
issued ordinary shares through our ADR program. Unless otherwise noted, each person or group identified possesses sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless indicated otherwise, the
business address of the beneficial owner is: DRDGOLD Limited, EBSCO House 4, 299 Pendoring Avenue, Blackheath, Randburg, South
Africa.
Cumulative Preference Shares
Randgold and Exploration Company Limited, or Randgold, owns 5,000,000 (100%) of our cumulative preference shares.
Randgold's address is 28 Harrison Street, Johannesburg, South Africa.
The holders of cumulative preference shares do not have voting rights unless any preference dividend is in arrears for more than
six months. The terms of issue of the cumulative preference shares are that they carry the right, in priority to the Company's ordinary
shares, to receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploitation or the disposal of the Argonaut mineral
rights acquired from Randgold & Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. They will obtain their potential voting rights only
once the Argonaut Project becomes an operational gold mine, and dividends accrue to them. Additionally, holders of cumulative
preference shares may vote on resolutions which adversely affect their interests and on the disposal of all or substantially all of our assets
or mineral rights. There is currently no active trading market for our cumulative preference shares. No shareholder has voting rights
which differ from the voting rights of any other shareholder. On May 1, 2005, the Argonaut mineral rights revert ed to the South African
State, in terms of the MPRD Act. An application to be issued with prospecting rights in respect of our former holdings is currently
pending before the Department of Minerals and Energy. If we do not acquire new rights under the MPRD Act, we would be entitled to
claim compensation from the South African Government if we can prove that thereby our property has been expropriated as provided for
under the Constitution of South Africa. Whether mineral rights constitute property and whether the MPRD Act does bring about an
expropriation, are both aspects which are the subject of legal debate which is likely to be settled ultimately by litigation. The factors in
determining compensation include not only fair market value but also history of acquisition and use and aspects of redress and reform
which could have the effect of reducing the compensation.
shares, to receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploitation or the disposal of the Argonaut mineral
rights acquired from Randgold & Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. They will obtain their potential voting rights only
once the Argonaut Project becomes an operational gold mine, and dividends accrue to them. Additionally, holders of cumulative
preference shares may vote on resolutions which adversely affect their interests and on the disposal of all or substantially all of our assets
or mineral rights. There is currently no active trading market for our cumulative preference shares. No shareholder has voting rights
which differ from the voting rights of any other shareholder. On May 1, 2005, the Argonaut mineral rights revert ed to the South African
State, in terms of the MPRD Act. An application to be issued with prospecting rights in respect of our former holdings is currently
pending before the Department of Minerals and Energy. If we do not acquire new rights under the MPRD Act, we would be entitled to
claim compensation from the South African Government if we can prove that thereby our property has been expropriated as provided for
under the Constitution of South Africa. Whether mineral rights constitute property and whether the MPRD Act does bring about an
expropriation, are both aspects which are the subject of legal debate which is likely to be settled ultimately by litigation. The factors in
determining compensation include not only fair market value but also history of acquisition and use and aspects of redress and reform
which could have the effect of reducing the compensation.
7B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Rand Refinery Agreement
On October 12, 2001, we entered into an agreement with Rand Refinery Limited, or RRL, for the refining and sale of all of our
gold produced in South Africa. Under the agreement, RRL performs the final refining of our gold and casts it into troy ounce bars. RRL
then sells the gold on the same day as delivery, at the London afternoon close price on the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this
service, we pay RRL a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan and administration fees. For fiscal 2005 this amounted to $0.4
million and $0.9 million for fiscal 2004. Mr. D.J. Pretorius, our Legal Advisor, is also a director of RRL and has been appointed as a
member of their audit committee. Also, Mr. I.D. Graulich, our General Manager: Investor Relations, is an alternate director to Mr. D.J.
Pretorius. With the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited on March 22, 2005, our 10.6% interest in RRL
decreased to our current ownership of 3%. RRL is jointly owned by South African gold mining companies.
then sells the gold on the same day as delivery, at the London afternoon close price on the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this
service, we pay RRL a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan and administration fees. For fiscal 2005 this amounted to $0.4
million and $0.9 million for fiscal 2004. Mr. D.J. Pretorius, our Legal Advisor, is also a director of RRL and has been appointed as a
member of their audit committee. Also, Mr. I.D. Graulich, our General Manager: Investor Relations, is an alternate director to Mr. D.J.
Pretorius. With the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited on March 22, 2005, our 10.6% interest in RRL
decreased to our current ownership of 3%. RRL is jointly owned by South African gold mining companies.
R.A.R. Kebble
We entered into an agreement with Mr. R.A.R. Kebble in March 2002 whereby Mr. R.A.R. Kebble retired from employment
with us with effect from March 19, 2002 and ceased to be a director of our board with effect from June 30, 2002. Pursuant to that
agreement we undertook to pay an amount of R3.1 million ($0.3 million) to Mr. R.A.R. Kebble on June 30, 2002. We believe that we are
not required to pay this amount and we have not done so. One of the reasons for this is that we believe we have a counterclaim against
Mr. R.A.R. Kebble in excess of this claim.
agreement we undertook to pay an amount of R3.1 million ($0.3 million) to Mr. R.A.R. Kebble on June 30, 2002. We believe that we are
not required to pay this amount and we have not done so. One of the reasons for this is that we believe we have a counterclaim against
Mr. R.A.R. Kebble in excess of this claim.
C. Press Loan
During fiscal 2003, Mr. C. Press, a director of Net-Gold Services (Pty) Limited, or Net-Gold, a consolidated subsidiary
company, loaned an amount of $24,946 to Net-Gold. This loan is interest free, unsecured and has no fixed terms of repayment. The funds
were used for short-term working capital advances. As at October 31, 2005, the full balance was still outstanding.
were used for short-term working capital advances. As at October 31, 2005, the full balance was still outstanding.
126
iProp Loan Note
On June 12, 2002, we entered into a loan agreement with Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, in terms of which an
amount of R37.7 million ($3.6 million) is recorded as owing by CGR to us. At the time, CGR was an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CCGR. We sold 60% of our interest in CGR to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty)
Limited, or KBH. This amount was originally owed by CGR to iProp Ltd (previously known as RMP Properties SA Limited), or iProp, in
terms of a secured loan note. In an arrangement in which JCI Gold Limited, or JCI, paid iProp R38.0 million ($3.7 million) in exchange
for an issue by us to JCI of 8,000,000 ordinary shares, the loan note was ceded to us. The loan note has now been cancelled and restated
in terms of the loan agreement entered into on June 12, 2002. The total amount outstanding on this loan as of October 31, 2005, is
R54.2 million ($8.1 million). The loan bears interest at the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited. As of June 30,
2005, the interest rate was 10.5% per annum and as of October 31, 2005, the interest rate on this loan stood at 10.5%. The loan is
repayable on demand within seven years. During fiscal 2005 we agreed to suspend our right to demand repayment of this balance
indefinitely. Interest is payable annually in arrears. The loan is unsecured. In terms of the loan agreement the principal amount will be
repaid in equal annual installments. As at October 31, 2005, this balance was still owing to us, however, we have recognized losses
generated by CGR and its subsidiary against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CCGR. We sold 60% of our interest in CGR to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty)
Limited, or KBH. This amount was originally owed by CGR to iProp Ltd (previously known as RMP Properties SA Limited), or iProp, in
terms of a secured loan note. In an arrangement in which JCI Gold Limited, or JCI, paid iProp R38.0 million ($3.7 million) in exchange
for an issue by us to JCI of 8,000,000 ordinary shares, the loan note was ceded to us. The loan note has now been cancelled and restated
in terms of the loan agreement entered into on June 12, 2002. The total amount outstanding on this loan as of October 31, 2005, is
R54.2 million ($8.1 million). The loan bears interest at the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited. As of June 30,
2005, the interest rate was 10.5% per annum and as of October 31, 2005, the interest rate on this loan stood at 10.5%. The loan is
repayable on demand within seven years. During fiscal 2005 we agreed to suspend our right to demand repayment of this balance
indefinitely. Interest is payable annually in arrears. The loan is unsecured. In terms of the loan agreement the principal amount will be
repaid in equal annual installments. As at October 31, 2005, this balance was still owing to us, however, we have recognized losses
generated by CGR and its subsidiary against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, or CGR
In connection with the sale by us of 60% of our interest in CGR we agreed to lend KBH R5.3 million ($0.7 million) under a loan
agreement entered into on June 12, 2002. Prior to this, CGR was an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. The loan bears interest at
the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited. As of October 31, 2005, the outstanding balance was R7.9 million
($1.2 million). The loan is repayable on demand within five years from such a demand having been made. During fiscal 2005 we reached
an agreement with CGR that we would suspend our right to demand repayment of this balance indefinitely, due to the loss making
position of CGR. Interest is payable annually in arrears. The loan was secured by KBH's pledge to us of 49,928,824 shares in ERPM.
However, since the acquisition of ERPM by CGR, the loan is no longer secured. The strategic value of this transaction was that it has
enabled us to introduce a black empowerment entity, KBH, which is necessary in terms of the new Mining Charter.
the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited. As of October 31, 2005, the outstanding balance was R7.9 million
($1.2 million). The loan is repayable on demand within five years from such a demand having been made. During fiscal 2005 we reached
an agreement with CGR that we would suspend our right to demand repayment of this balance indefinitely, due to the loss making
position of CGR. Interest is payable annually in arrears. The loan was secured by KBH's pledge to us of 49,928,824 shares in ERPM.
However, since the acquisition of ERPM by CGR, the loan is no longer secured. The strategic value of this transaction was that it has
enabled us to introduce a black empowerment entity, KBH, which is necessary in terms of the new Mining Charter.
On June 12, 2002, we entered into two loan agreements with CGR, the first being for R0.9 million ($0.09 million) and the
second being for R37.7 million ($3.6 million). The first loan is payable on demand within three years from such a demand having been
made and interest is payable annually in arrears and the second loan is payable on demand within seven years from such a demand having
been made and interest is payable annually in arrears. During fiscal 2005 we reached an agreement with and CGR that we would suspend
our right to demand repayment of this balance indefinitely, due to the loss making position of CGR. The total amount outstanding on
these loans, as at October 31, 2005, is R54.8 million ($8.2 million), however, we have recognized losses generated by CGR and its
subsidiary against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
made and interest is payable annually in arrears and the second loan is payable on demand within seven years from such a demand having
been made and interest is payable annually in arrears. During fiscal 2005 we reached an agreement with and CGR that we would suspend
our right to demand repayment of this balance indefinitely, due to the loss making position of CGR. The total amount outstanding on
these loans, as at October 31, 2005, is R54.8 million ($8.2 million), however, we have recognized losses generated by CGR and its
subsidiary against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
At the same date, we entered into a shareholders' agreement with KBH, the Industrial Development Corporation, or IDC, CCGR
and CGR. This agreement provides that the board of CGR shall comprise two directors appointed by CCGR and three directors appointed
by KBH. The agreement also provides that certain business matters such as amending the memorandum and articles of association of
CGR, canceling the services agreement with us or incurring certain indebtedness requires the approval of CCGR, in the case of
shareholder matters, or a director appointed by CCGR in the case of directors matters. Additionally, the agreement places restrictions on
our ability to dispose of shares of CGR without the prior written consent of the other shareholders. The shareholder agreement also
provides that unless its board of directors determines otherwise, CGR shall declare an annual dividend of a minimum of 30% of the net
profits of CGR after taxes and interest. As of October 31, 2005, no dividends have been declared.
by KBH. The agreement also provides that certain business matters such as amending the memorandum and articles of association of
CGR, canceling the services agreement with us or incurring certain indebtedness requires the approval of CCGR, in the case of
shareholder matters, or a director appointed by CCGR in the case of directors matters. Additionally, the agreement places restrictions on
our ability to dispose of shares of CGR without the prior written consent of the other shareholders. The shareholder agreement also
provides that unless its board of directors determines otherwise, CGR shall declare an annual dividend of a minimum of 30% of the net
profits of CGR after taxes and interest. As of October 31, 2005, no dividends have been declared.
This shareholders' agreement also documents three previously interest free loans from CCGR to CGR totaling R190.0 million
($30.3 million). Under the terms of the share purchase agreement, 57% (R108.0 million ($17.2 million)) of the principal amount of these
loans were sold to IDC and 3% (R5.7 million ($0.9 million)) to KBH. However, upon KBH exercising its option to purchase IDC's
interest in CGR, IDC's portion of this loan was ceded to KBH. These balances are still outstanding as at October 31, 2005, however, we
have recognized losses generated by CGR and its subsidiaries against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
loans were sold to IDC and 3% (R5.7 million ($0.9 million)) to KBH. However, upon KBH exercising its option to purchase IDC's
interest in CGR, IDC's portion of this loan was ceded to KBH. These balances are still outstanding as at October 31, 2005, however, we
have recognized losses generated by CGR and its subsidiaries against this loan and it is carried at a nil value.
On July 20, 2005, we acquired from the IDC all the remaining balances owing by CGR and ERPM through the issue of
4,451,219 of our shares, representing a cost of R28.9 million ($4.3 million). These balances are still outstanding as at October 31, 2005.
These loans currently bear interest at the prime rate charged by The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited on overdraft which
as of October 31, 2005, stood at 10.5%. It is the intention of the parties to amend the terms of the shareholders' loans. It is expected that
the shareholders' loans will continue to bear interest at the prime rate and the interest will be repayable in equal monthly payments over
the period of the loans.
the shareholders' loans will continue to bear interest at the prime rate and the interest will be repayable in equal monthly payments over
the period of the loans.
127
Dr. M.P. Ncholo, one of our non-executive directors, is also the chairman of KBH. The 4,794,889 shares originally issued to
KBH were subject to a put and call option instrument between KBH and Investec, with the shares held as security. The option was
exercised and Investec took possession of the shares in three equal tranches in June, July and August 2004.
exercised and Investec took possession of the shares in three equal tranches in June, July and August 2004.
East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited
On October 10, 2002, Daun et Cie AG, Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd, KBH, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas
Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Masechaba Palesa Moletsane Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird, Derek Sean Webbstock, or collectively
the Sellers, and CGR, entered into an agreement in terms of which CGR agreed to purchase from the Sellers the entire issued share capital
and shareholders' claims of ERPM. Dr. M.P. Ncholo is one of our non-executive directors and we own a 40% interest in CGR. The
purchase price for the acquisition of the shares and the claims was R100.0 million ($9.5 million). CGR loaned an amount of
R60.0 million ($5.7 million) to the Sellers as an interest free loan, and CGR received from the Sellers, as security for the loan, a pledge of
the entire issued share capital of ERPM and a cession of the Sellers' claims to CGR. The conditions of the sale were fulfilled and the
amount was deemed to be paid to the Sellers on account of the purchase price. An existing mortgage bond registered by ERPM in favor
of Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd securing shareholder loans in the sum of R10.0 million ($1.9 million) was also ceded to CGR as security
on October 11, 2002. The full amount is still owing under the bond.
the Sellers, and CGR, entered into an agreement in terms of which CGR agreed to purchase from the Sellers the entire issued share capital
and shareholders' claims of ERPM. Dr. M.P. Ncholo is one of our non-executive directors and we own a 40% interest in CGR. The
purchase price for the acquisition of the shares and the claims was R100.0 million ($9.5 million). CGR loaned an amount of
R60.0 million ($5.7 million) to the Sellers as an interest free loan, and CGR received from the Sellers, as security for the loan, a pledge of
the entire issued share capital of ERPM and a cession of the Sellers' claims to CGR. The conditions of the sale were fulfilled and the
amount was deemed to be paid to the Sellers on account of the purchase price. An existing mortgage bond registered by ERPM in favor
of Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd securing shareholder loans in the sum of R10.0 million ($1.9 million) was also ceded to CGR as security
on October 11, 2002. The full amount is still owing under the bond.
The competition authorities' approval for the acquisition of ERPM by CGR was obtained and the R60.0 million ($5.7 million)
loan was deemed to be part payment of the purchase price. As to the balance of the purchase price of R40.0 million ($3.8 million), KBH,
a 40% shareholder in CGR, agreed to use its best endeavors to obtain a loan of R40.0 million ($3.8 million) from the IDC which was paid
to the Sellers as final part payment of the purchase price of the ERPM acquisition. CGR procured the release of the Sellers from all
statutory environmental obligations, including obligations to furnish guarantees and the like to the Department of Minerals and Energy, or
DME, and ERPM will assume the Sellers' responsibilities in this regard. CGR acquired ERPM as is, without indemnification for any
disclosed or undisclosed liabilities, which could require CGR to incur significant financial obligations to satisfy any liability.
a 40% shareholder in CGR, agreed to use its best endeavors to obtain a loan of R40.0 million ($3.8 million) from the IDC which was paid
to the Sellers as final part payment of the purchase price of the ERPM acquisition. CGR procured the release of the Sellers from all
statutory environmental obligations, including obligations to furnish guarantees and the like to the Department of Minerals and Energy, or
DME, and ERPM will assume the Sellers' responsibilities in this regard. CGR acquired ERPM as is, without indemnification for any
disclosed or undisclosed liabilities, which could require CGR to incur significant financial obligations to satisfy any liability.
Additionally, on September 18, 2002, in connection with CGR's acquisition of ERPM, we provided a working capital facility of
R10.0 million ($1.6 million) to ERPM. The loan bears interest at the prime rate charged by The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
on overdraft and as of October 31, 2005, the interest rate on the loan stood at 10.5%. The loan is secured by a pledge of certain movable
assets of ERPM.
on overdraft and as of October 31, 2005, the interest rate on the loan stood at 10.5%. The loan is secured by a pledge of certain movable
assets of ERPM.
On January 1, 2003 and April 7, 2003, we advanced to CGR R9.8 million ($1.6 million) and R2.1 million ($0.3 million),
respectively, on the same terms. These amounts were advanced for ERPM acquisition costs and working capital requirements
respectively.
respectively.
Furthermore, from July 1, 2003 to April 30, 2004, funds were advanced to ERPM by way of a capital expansion loan of R32.2
million ($5.1 million) and on September 1, 2003, by way of debentures of R16.0 million ($2.6 million). These funds were utilized to fund
infrastructure upgrades and the purchase of mining equipment. The loan facility is repayable in equal installments over the 5 years, and
bears interest at prime less 0.5%. The debentures are repayable in 78 months from issue date and bear interest at prime less 2.5%. In
addition the debentures attract a royalty of 0.267% of the gross revenue received from net smelter revenue.
infrastructure upgrades and the purchase of mining equipment. The loan facility is repayable in equal installments over the 5 years, and
bears interest at prime less 0.5%. The debentures are repayable in 78 months from issue date and bear interest at prime less 2.5%. In
addition the debentures attract a royalty of 0.267% of the gross revenue received from net smelter revenue.
As a result of the low Rand gold price coupled with a number of unforeseen operational setbacks, the structured capital
expansion and underground resource development plan at ERPM was abandoned. All project finance loans advanced to CGR and
ERPM, and included above, totaling $8.8 million were included in the investment in our associate, against which losses recorded by the
associate, were recognized against these advances in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, no further advances were made. No repayment has been
received on either the loan or the debentures and management have agreed to suspend repayments indefinitely.
ERPM, and included above, totaling $8.8 million were included in the investment in our associate, against which losses recorded by the
associate, were recognized against these advances in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, no further advances were made. No repayment has been
received on either the loan or the debentures and management have agreed to suspend repayments indefinitely.
Management Service Agreements
We provide management services for CGR and ERPM under management service agreements entered into with each of them.
These services include financial management, gold administration and hedging, technical and engineering services, mineral resource
services and other management related services. We own a 40% interest in CGR. ERPM is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CGR. These
arrangements allow us to monitor and provide input on the management of these companies in which we have an investment.
services and other management related services. We own a 40% interest in CGR. ERPM is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CGR. These
arrangements allow us to monitor and provide input on the management of these companies in which we have an investment.
For CGR we provide management services with KBH. The management services at ERPM are provided exclusively by us. Our
management fee for services performed at the Crown Section was R0.7 million ($0.07 million) per month and our management fee for
services performed at the ERPM Section is approximately R1.5 million ($0.1 million) per month. The agreement with CGR entered on
July 1, 2002, was for one year and was renewable annually. The agreement with the ERPM Section entered on July 1, 2002, was for a
fixed two year period with an option to renew. In April 2004, the management fees were revised to R0.3 million ($ 0.04 million) per
month for both the Crown Section and the ERPM Section. Subject to the annual renewal clauses of these management contracts the
management fees were further revised to R1.0 million ($0.1 million) per month for the Crown Section and the ERPM Section, during
fiscal 2006.
services performed at the ERPM Section is approximately R1.5 million ($0.1 million) per month. The agreement with CGR entered on
July 1, 2002, was for one year and was renewable annually. The agreement with the ERPM Section entered on July 1, 2002, was for a
fixed two year period with an option to renew. In April 2004, the management fees were revised to R0.3 million ($ 0.04 million) per
month for both the Crown Section and the ERPM Section. Subject to the annual renewal clauses of these management contracts the
management fees were further revised to R1.0 million ($0.1 million) per month for the Crown Section and the ERPM Section, during
fiscal 2006.
128
Assistance with regards to funeral expenses
During fiscal 2004, financial assistance was provided by ERPM, our 40% associate company with KBH, to the family of Dr.
M.P. Ncholo, a non-executive director of our Company, and executive director of KBH, with regards to funeral expenses relating to
the death of a family member who was a temporary employee of ERPM. In terms of ERPM’s practice, the funds were advanced on
compassionate grounds to assist the family with costs associated with the funeral. This amounted to R90,447 ($14,414). At October
31, 2005 this amount was still outstanding in the accounts of ERPM.
the death of a family member who was a temporary employee of ERPM. In terms of ERPM’s practice, the funds were advanced on
compassionate grounds to assist the family with costs associated with the funeral. This amounted to R90,447 ($14,414). At October
31, 2005 this amount was still outstanding in the accounts of ERPM.
Black Economic Empowerment, or BEE, transaction with Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH
On July 6, 2005, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with our black economic empowerment partner, KBH, regarding
the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in our South African Operations. The intention of the transaction is to bring us into full
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter.
compliance with the 10-year, 26% black economic empowerment equity requirement as stipulated in the Mining Charter.
On July 20, 2005, we acquired from the IDC, all the debt which it holds against CGR and ERPM for a consideration which was
settled through the issue of 4,451,219 of our ordinary shares, which at the date of issue, represented approximately $4.3 million (R28.9
million).
million).
On October 27, 2005, our board of directors approved the extension of our existing black economic empowerment structure with
KBH to cover all of our South African assets. The transaction has been facilitated by the IDC, which agreed to a debt restructuring in
CGR.
CGR.
The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, acquiring initially, a 15% interest in a newly created
vehicle, DRDGOLD South AfricanOperations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which holds ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. We will retain an 85% interest.
In addition, Khumo Gold was granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in DRDGOLD
SA for $1.4 million (R9.3 million). This further equity tranche will include a 6% stake to be placed in a new Employee Trust. The
transaction has been financed by the issuance of $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares.
transaction has been financed by the issuance of $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares.
Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor
In August 2005, we initiated a financing and operating assistance package to Emperor. This follows a complete review of
Emperor’s operations.
To assist Emperor with its restructuring plan, we have agreed to provide a A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) Convertible Loan
Facility to Emperor as part of a re-financing package, which includes an agreement with ANZ Bank to restructure Emperor’s existing
debt servicing obligations.
debt servicing obligations.
ANZ Bank has given its consent to our granting of the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security. Further the Australian
Stock Exchange has also granted a waiver of listing rules to permit Emperor to grant such security to us on the terms incorporated in the
Convertible Loan Facility.
Convertible Loan Facility.
The Convertible Loan Facility is repayable upon the first of the receipt of the proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s
interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect, or by December 31, 2007. Emperor has previously announced a conditional sale agreement in
relation to the Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of approximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion
of that transaction.
relation to the Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of approximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion
of that transaction.
The Convertible Loan Facility is convertible, at our election, into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor at a conversion price
equal to the lower of A$0.30 per Emperor share or the 45 day volume weighted average price of Emperor shares on the Australian Stock
Exchange prior to the date of conversion.
Exchange prior to the date of conversion.
On August 29, 2005, the shareholders of Emperor approved the Convertible Loan Facility. We did not participate in the voting.
In terms of an operational support agreement, also negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, we will provide
Emperor with management and technical services going forward. As at October 31, 2005, $0.1 million had been received for services
rendered.
rendered.
129
On November 16, 2005, we concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire our
wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets,
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Refer to Item 4A.: “History and Development of the Company.”
comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Refer to Item 4A.: “History and Development of the Company.”
Employment agreements with executive directors
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood receives from the Company an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.9 million ($0.3 million),
and from DRD (Isle of Man) $250,000 per annum. He is also eligible, under his agreement with us and his agreement with DRD (Isle
of Man), to receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6
months each, over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of up to 460,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal
tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreements of employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these
allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has agreed, that we will
not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares. An alternative means of achieving the objective of
the retention inventive has been implemented through payment of a bonus. In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr.
M.M. Wellesley-Wood became entitled to an amount equal to 92% of his annual remuneration package, plus interest, by relinquishing
the position of Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman of the Company. These agreements were entered into on May 7, 2004,
and regulate the employment relationship with Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood that commenced on December 1, 2003 and ending on
November 30, 2005.
of Man), to receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6
months each, over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of up to 460,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal
tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreements of employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these
allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood has agreed, that we will
not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares. An alternative means of achieving the objective of
the retention inventive has been implemented through payment of a bonus. In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr.
M.M. Wellesley-Wood became entitled to an amount equal to 92% of his annual remuneration package, plus interest, by relinquishing
the position of Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chairman of the Company. These agreements were entered into on May 7, 2004,
and regulate the employment relationship with Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood that commenced on December 1, 2003 and ending on
November 30, 2005.
Mr. I.L. Murray receives from the Company an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.5 million ($0.2 million) and from
DRD (Isle of Man) $200,000 per annum. Mr. I.L. Murray is eligible, under his agreement with us and his agreement with DRD (Isle
of Man), to receive an incentive bonus in respect of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus
cycles of 6 months each over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators.
Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of up to 366,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at
intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreements of employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirements these allotments were
subject to approval by shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our
shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares. An alternative means of achieving the objective of the retention inven tive has
been implemented through payment of a bonus. Mr. I.L. Murray became entitled to an amount equal to 93% of his annual South African
remuneration package as determined on December 1, 2003, plus interest, by relinquishing the position of Chief Financial Officer. These
agreements were entered into on May 7, 2004 and regulate the employment relationship with Mr. I.L. Murray that commenced on
December 1, 2003 and ending on November 30, 2005.
of Man), to receive an incentive bonus in respect of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus
cycles of 6 months each over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators.
Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreements also provide that he will receive a total of up to 366,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at
intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreements of employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirements these allotments were
subject to approval by shareholders. We have since decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our
shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares. An alternative means of achieving the objective of the retention inven tive has
been implemented through payment of a bonus. Mr. I.L. Murray became entitled to an amount equal to 93% of his annual South African
remuneration package as determined on December 1, 2003, plus interest, by relinquishing the position of Chief Financial Officer. These
agreements were entered into on May 7, 2004 and regulate the employment relationship with Mr. I.L. Murray that commenced on
December 1, 2003 and ending on November 30, 2005.
Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, who commenced his employment as Chief Financial Officer on September 5, 2005, receives from the
Company an all-inclusive remuneration package or R2.0 million (0.3 million) per annum. Mr. J.W.C. Sayers is eligible under his
employment agreement, for an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles
of 6 months each over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators. This service
contract expires on September 4, 2007.
employment agreement, for an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles
of 6 months each over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance indicators. This service
contract expires on September 4, 2007.
Appointment of J. Turk as Non-Executive Director
Mr. J. Turk was appointed as a non-executive director on October 27, 2004. Mr. J. Turk is the founder and a director of G.M.
Network Limited (GoldMoney.com). In April 2004, we acquired 50.25% of the shares in Net-Gold Services Limited, a subsidiary of
G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com).
G.M. Network Limited (GoldMoney.com).
7C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
Not applicable.
130
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
8A. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
See Item 18.: "Financial Statements."
Legal Proceedings
See “Legal proceedings” under Item 4D.: "Property, plant and equipment."
Dividend Policy
See Item 10B.: "Memorandum and Articles of Association."
8B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
See Note 27 “Subsequent Events” under Item 18.: "Financial Statements."
131
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
9A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low market sales prices and average daily trading volumes
of our ordinary shares on the JSE and ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market (formerly Nasdaq SmallCap Market).
Price Per
Ordinary Share
R
Price Per
ADS
$
Average Daily
Trading
Volume
Year Ended
High
Low
High
Low
Ordinary
Share
ADSs
June 30, 2001 ...............................................
10.70
4.40
1.40
0.59
141,868
593,520
June 30, 2002 ...............................................
55.00
6.50
5.59
0.79
246,934
2,085,179
June 30, 2003 ...............................................
49.20
15.60
4.72
2.11
245,634
2,809,445
June 30, 2004 ...............................................
27.75
15.00
4.10
2.20
118,454
4,084,794
June 30, 2005 ...............................................
15.80
4.15
2.66
0.30
136,947
2,440,765
Price Per
Ordinary Share
R
Price Per ADS
$
Average Daily
Trading Volume
Month Ended
High
Low
High
Low
Ordinary
Share
ADSs
May 31, 2005.........................................
7.81
4.15
1.18
0.62
149,204
1,855,206
June 30, 2005.........................................
8.09
5.69
1.16
0.88
130,762
2,737,937
July 31, 2005 .........................................
6.80
5.60
1.09
0.87
84,019
1,793,120
August 31, 2005 ....................................
7.50
5.70
1.06
0.85
59,960
1,445,521
September 30, 2005............................... 10.25
6.60
1.66
1.03
412,403
4,384,106
October 31, 2005 ...................................
9.40
8.20
1.48
1.21
486,580
2,226,405
9B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Not applicable.
9C. MARKETS
Nature of Trading Markets
The principal trading market for our equity securities is the JSE and the Australian Stock Exchange, or ASX, and our ADSs that
trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market (formerly Nasdaq SmallCap Market) in the form of ADRs under the symbol “DROOY.” Our
ordinary shares trade on the JSE under the symbol “DUR.” Our ordinary shares also trade on the LSE (symbol: DBNR), the Marche Libre
on the Paris Bourse (symbol: DUR), Brussels Bourse (symbol: DUR) in the form of International Depository Receipts, Port Moresby
Stock Exchange (symbol: DUR) and ASX (symbol: DRD). The ordinary shares also trade on the over the counter markets in Berlin,
Stuttgart and the Regulated Unofficial Market on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The ADRs are issued by The Bank of New York, as
depositary. Each ADR represents one ADS. Each ADS represents one of our ordinary shares. Prior to February 2001, our ADSs traded on
the Nasdaq National Market.
ordinary shares trade on the JSE under the symbol “DUR.” Our ordinary shares also trade on the LSE (symbol: DBNR), the Marche Libre
on the Paris Bourse (symbol: DUR), Brussels Bourse (symbol: DUR) in the form of International Depository Receipts, Port Moresby
Stock Exchange (symbol: DUR) and ASX (symbol: DRD). The ordinary shares also trade on the over the counter markets in Berlin,
Stuttgart and the Regulated Unofficial Market on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The ADRs are issued by The Bank of New York, as
depositary. Each ADR represents one ADS. Each ADS represents one of our ordinary shares. Prior to February 2001, our ADSs traded on
the Nasdaq National Market.
132
Nasdaq Exemption
Exemption from the shareholder approval requirements
Between August and December 2003, the Company entered into a series of discounted issuances with several different
investors resulting in the issuance of ordinary shares, and securities convertible into ordinary shares, totaling 46,843,902, or 25.43% of
the total shares outstanding on a pre-issuance basis. Included within those issuances, on December 12, 2003, the Company entered
into an agreement granting Investec the option to acquire 10.2 million ordinary shares. The Company requested an exemption from
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) in reliance upon Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(a). Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) provides that
shareholder approval is required upon issuing 20% or more of the common stock or 20% or more of the voting power outstanding
before the issuance for less than the greater of book or market value of the stock. Nasdaq granted this exemption on the basis that the
shareholder approval requirements of Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) are contrary to generally accepted business practices of companies located in
South Africa.
the total shares outstanding on a pre-issuance basis. Included within those issuances, on December 12, 2003, the Company entered
into an agreement granting Investec the option to acquire 10.2 million ordinary shares. The Company requested an exemption from
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) in reliance upon Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(a). Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) provides that
shareholder approval is required upon issuing 20% or more of the common stock or 20% or more of the voting power outstanding
before the issuance for less than the greater of book or market value of the stock. Nasdaq granted this exemption on the basis that the
shareholder approval requirements of Rule 4350(i)(1)(D) are contrary to generally accepted business practices of companies located in
South Africa.
The South African Companies Act of 1973 (as amended) requires issuers to obtain shareholder approval before the issuance
of any shares or rights to shares, which approval can be provided by specific authority or a general authority granted by means of a
resolution passed by shareholders in a general meeting. JSE Listing Requirements require 75% shareholder approval for any issuance
of shares for cash. JSE Listing Requirements do, however, permit an issuer to issue shares for cash under a general authority granted
by its shareholders, but not in excess of 15% of the company’s total issued share capital during any financial year under that authority,
or the general authority. In terms of the specific issuances for which the Company received the exemption from Nasdaq described
above, there was no JSE requirement that would mandate specific shareholder approval for these transactions. The JSE Listing
Requirements accept a general authority by our shareholders under certain circumstances. The shareholders had approved a general
authority which covered the relevant transactions by resolutions passed at the Company's annual general meetings in November 2003.
In addition, included in the shares issued for cash were approximately 24.4 million shares to the value of R435.5 million
($63.1 million) which were used for the acquisition of the Porgera Joint Venture. Approval was obtained from the JSE to deem these
shares to be a vendor placing.
resolution passed by shareholders in a general meeting. JSE Listing Requirements require 75% shareholder approval for any issuance
of shares for cash. JSE Listing Requirements do, however, permit an issuer to issue shares for cash under a general authority granted
by its shareholders, but not in excess of 15% of the company’s total issued share capital during any financial year under that authority,
or the general authority. In terms of the specific issuances for which the Company received the exemption from Nasdaq described
above, there was no JSE requirement that would mandate specific shareholder approval for these transactions. The JSE Listing
Requirements accept a general authority by our shareholders under certain circumstances. The shareholders had approved a general
authority which covered the relevant transactions by resolutions passed at the Company's annual general meetings in November 2003.
In addition, included in the shares issued for cash were approximately 24.4 million shares to the value of R435.5 million
($63.1 million) which were used for the acquisition of the Porgera Joint Venture. Approval was obtained from the JSE to deem these
shares to be a vendor placing.
Exemption from the quorum requirements
Nasdaq’s Marketplace Rules, which apply to all companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and Nasdaq Capital Market, state
in Rule 4350(f) that the minimum quorum for any meeting of holders of the company’s common stock must be no less than 33 1/3 % of
the issuer’s outstanding shares. Consistent with the practice of companies incorporated in South Africa, our articles of association only
require a quorum of three members. As a result, and in connection with the listing of our ADSs on the Nasdaq National Market in July
1996, we requested, and Nasdaq granted us in October 1996, an exemption from compliance with the Rule 4350(f) quorum requirement.
the issuer’s outstanding shares. Consistent with the practice of companies incorporated in South Africa, our articles of association only
require a quorum of three members. As a result, and in connection with the listing of our ADSs on the Nasdaq National Market in July
1996, we requested, and Nasdaq granted us in October 1996, an exemption from compliance with the Rule 4350(f) quorum requirement.
9D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
Not applicable.
9E. DILUTION
Not applicable.
9F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE
Not applicable.
133
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
10A. SHARE CAPITAL
Not applicable.
10B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Description of Our Memorandum and Articles of Association and Ordinary Shares
On June 30, 2005, we had 600,000,000 ordinary shares, no par value, and 5,000,000 cumulative preference shares, R0.10 par
value, authorized for issuance. On that date, we had issued 296,206,048 ordinary shares and 5,000,000 cumulative preference shares.
On October 31, 2005, we had 600,000,000 ordinary shares, no par value, and 5,000,000 cumulative preference shares, R0.10 par
value, authorized for issuance. On that date, we had issued 305,844,347 ordinary shares and 5,000,000 cumulative preference shares.
Set out below are brief summaries of certain provisions of our Articles of Association, or our Articles, the South African
Companies Act, 1973 (as amended), or the Companies Act, and the requirements of the JSE, all as in effect on October 31, 2005. The
summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Articles, the
Companies Act, and the requirements of the JSE.
summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Articles, the
Companies Act, and the requirements of the JSE.
We are registered under the Companies Act under registration number 1895/000926/06. As set forth in Section 4-Objects of our
Memorandum of Association, our purpose is to explore and exploit mineral rights and establish and own mining enterprises.
Borrowing Powers
Our directors may, at their discretion, raise or borrow or secure the payment of any sum or sums of money for our use as they
see fit. For so long as we are a listed company, the directors shall so restrict our borrowings and exercise all voting and other rights or
powers of control exercisable by us in relation to our subsidiary companies so that the aggregate principal amount outstanding in respect
of us and any of our subsidiary companies, as the case may be, exclusive of inter-company borrowings, shall not, except with the consent
of our shareholders at a general meeting, exceed R30 million or the aggregate from time to time of our issued and paid up capital, together
with the aggregate of the amounts standing to the credit of all distributable and non-distributable reserves, any of our share premium
accounts and our subsidiaries' share premium accounts certified by our auditors and which form part of our and our subsidiaries' financial
statements, whichever is higher.
powers of control exercisable by us in relation to our subsidiary companies so that the aggregate principal amount outstanding in respect
of us and any of our subsidiary companies, as the case may be, exclusive of inter-company borrowings, shall not, except with the consent
of our shareholders at a general meeting, exceed R30 million or the aggregate from time to time of our issued and paid up capital, together
with the aggregate of the amounts standing to the credit of all distributable and non-distributable reserves, any of our share premium
accounts and our subsidiaries' share premium accounts certified by our auditors and which form part of our and our subsidiaries' financial
statements, whichever is higher.
Share Ownership Requirements
Our directors are not required to hold any shares to qualify or be appointed as a director.
Voting by Directors
A director may authorize any other director to vote for him at any meeting at which neither he nor his alternate director
appointed by him is present. Any director so authorized shall, in addition to his own vote, have a vote for each director by whom he is
authorized.
authorized.
The quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of the directors may be fixed by the directors and unless so fixed shall
be not less than two.
Directors are required to notify our board of directors of interests in companies and contracts. If a director's interest is under
discussion, depending on the nature of the interest, he shall not be allowed to vote and shall not be counted, for the purpose of any
resolution regarding his interest, in the quorum present at the meeting.
resolution regarding his interest, in the quorum present at the meeting.
The Code of Corporate Practices and Conduct of the King II Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa, 2002, sets out
guidelines to promote the highest standards of corporate governance among South African companies. The board of directors believes
that our business should be conducted according to the highest legal and ethical standards. In accordance with their practice, all
remuneration of directors is approved by the Remuneration and Nominations Committee.
that our business should be conducted according to the highest legal and ethical standards. In accordance with their practice, all
remuneration of directors is approved by the Remuneration and Nominations Committee.
Under South African common law, directors are required to comply with certain fiduciary duties to the company and to exercise
proper care and skill in discharging their responsibilities.
134
Age Restrictions
There is no age limit for directors.
Election of Directors
Directors may be appointed at a general meeting from time to time. The directors may appoint any eligible person as a director
but he shall only hold office until the next annual general meeting when the relevant director shall be eligible for election. One third of
our directors, on a rotating basis, are subject to re-election at each annual general shareholders’ meeting. Retiring directors usually make
themselves available for re-election.
our directors, on a rotating basis, are subject to re-election at each annual general shareholders’ meeting. Retiring directors usually make
themselves available for re-election.
General Meetings
On the request of 100 shareholders or shareholders holding not less than one-twentieth of our share capital which carries the
right of voting at general meetings, we shall within 14 days of the lodging of a request by such shareholders issue a notice to shareholders
convening a general meeting for a date not less than 21 days and not more than 35 days from the date of the notice. Directors may
convene general meetings at any time.
convening a general meeting for a date not less than 21 days and not more than 35 days from the date of the notice. Directors may
convene general meetings at any time.
Our annual general meeting and a meeting of our shareholders for the purpose of passing a special resolution may be called by
giving 21 days advance written notice of that meeting. For any other general meeting of our shareholders, 14 days advance written notice
is required.
is required.
Our Articles provide that if at a meeting convened upon request by our shareholders a quorum is not present within one half hour
after the time selected for the meeting, such meeting shall be dissolved. The necessary quorum is three members present in person or
represented by proxy.
represented by proxy.
Voting Rights
The holders of our ordinary shares are generally entitled to vote at general meetings and on a show of hands have one vote per
person and on a poll have one for every share held. The holders of our cumulative preference shares are not entitled to vote at a general
meeting unless any preference dividend is in arrears for more than six months at the date on which the notice convening the general
meeting is posted to the shareholders.
meeting unless any preference dividend is in arrears for more than six months at the date on which the notice convening the general
meeting is posted to the shareholders.
Dividends
We may, in a general meeting, or our directors may, from time to time, declare a dividend to be paid to the shareholders in
proportion to the number of shares they each hold. No dividend shall be declared except out of our profits. Dividends may be declared
either free or subject to the deduction of income tax or duty in respect of which we may be charged. Holders of ordinary shares are
entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the directors. Holders of cumulative preference shares are entitled to receive
cumulative preferential dividends in priority to the holders of our ordinary shares equal to the prescribed portion of 3% of our future
revenue generated by the exploitation or other application of the mineral rights represented by the Argonaut Project. All unclaimed
dividends are forfeited back to us after a period of twelve years.
either free or subject to the deduction of income tax or duty in respect of which we may be charged. Holders of ordinary shares are
entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by the directors. Holders of cumulative preference shares are entitled to receive
cumulative preferential dividends in priority to the holders of our ordinary shares equal to the prescribed portion of 3% of our future
revenue generated by the exploitation or other application of the mineral rights represented by the Argonaut Project. All unclaimed
dividends are forfeited back to us after a period of twelve years.
Ownership Limitations
There are no limitations imposed by our Articles or South African law on the rights of shareholders to hold or vote on our
ordinary shares or securities convertible into our ordinary shares.
Winding-up
If we are wound-up, then the assets remaining after payment of all of our debts and liabilities, including the costs of liquidation,
shall be applied to repay to the shareholders the amount paid up on our issued capital and thereafter the balance shall be distributed to the
shareholders in proportion to their respective shareholdings. On a winding up, our cumulative preference shares rank, in regard to all
arrears of preference dividends, prior to the holders of ordinary shares. As of October 31, 2005, no such dividends have been declared.
Except for the preference dividend and as described in this paragraph our cumulative preference shares are not entitled to any other
participation in the distribution of our surplus assets on winding-up.
shareholders in proportion to their respective shareholdings. On a winding up, our cumulative preference shares rank, in regard to all
arrears of preference dividends, prior to the holders of ordinary shares. As of October 31, 2005, no such dividends have been declared.
Except for the preference dividend and as described in this paragraph our cumulative preference shares are not entitled to any other
participation in the distribution of our surplus assets on winding-up.
135
Reduction of Capital
We may, by special resolution, reduce the share capital authorized by our Memorandum of Association, or reduce our issued
share capital including, without limitation, any stated capital, capital redemption reserve fund and share premium account by making
distributions and buying back our shares.
distributions and buying back our shares.
Amendment of the Articles of Association
Our Articles may only be altered by the passing of a special resolution. A special resolution is passed when the shareholders
holding at least 25% of the total votes of all the members entitled to vote are present or represented by proxy at a meeting and, if the
resolution was passed on a show of hands, at least 75% of those shareholders voted in favor of the resolution and, if a poll was demanded,
at least 75% of the total votes to which those shareholders are entitled were cast in favor of the resolution.
resolution was passed on a show of hands, at least 75% of those shareholders voted in favor of the resolution and, if a poll was demanded,
at least 75% of the total votes to which those shareholders are entitled were cast in favor of the resolution.
Consent of the Holders of Cumulative Preference Shares
The rights and conditions attaching to the cumulative preference shares may not be cancelled, varied or added, nor may we issue
shares ranking, regarding rights to dividends or on winding up, in priority to or equal with our cumulative preference shares, or dispose of
all or part of our mineral rights without the consent in writing of the registered holders of our cumulative preference shares or the prior
sanction of a resolution passed at a separate class meeting of the holders of our cumulative preference shares.
all or part of our mineral rights without the consent in writing of the registered holders of our cumulative preference shares or the prior
sanction of a resolution passed at a separate class meeting of the holders of our cumulative preference shares.
Distributions
Under an amendment to the Articles on October 21, 2002, we are authorized to make payments in cash or in specie to our
shareholders in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and other consents required by law from time to time. We may, for
example, in a general meeting, upon recommendation of our directors, resolve that any surplus funds representing capital profits arising
from the sale of any capital assets and not required for the payment of any fixed preferential dividend, be distributed among our ordinary
shareholders. However, no such profit shall be distributed unless we have sufficient other assets to satisfy our liabilities and to cover our
paid up share capital.
example, in a general meeting, upon recommendation of our directors, resolve that any surplus funds representing capital profits arising
from the sale of any capital assets and not required for the payment of any fixed preferential dividend, be distributed among our ordinary
shareholders. However, no such profit shall be distributed unless we have sufficient other assets to satisfy our liabilities and to cover our
paid up share capital.
10C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Below is a brief summary of material contracts entered into by us, other than in the ordinary course of business, during the two
years immediately preceding the date of this Annual report.
Agreement of Employment between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley Wood, dated as of December 1, 2003.
The agreement states the employment terms and basis of remuneration for this executive director, with regards to duties for
Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited. The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. Mr. M.M.
Wellesley-Wood receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.9 million ($0.3 million), from us. He is also eligible to
receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6
months each, over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreement also provides that he will receive a total of up to 250,000 of our ordinary shares in
four equal tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreement of employment. In terms of a JSE listing
requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareho lders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-
Wood has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares.
Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited. The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. Mr. M.M.
Wellesley-Wood receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.9 million ($0.3 million), from us. He is also eligible to
receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6
months each, over the duration of his appointments, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood’s agreement also provides that he will receive a total of up to 250,000 of our ordinary shares in
four equal tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreement of employment. In terms of a JSE listing
requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareho lders. We have since decided, and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-
Wood has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued these shares.
Service Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, dated as of December 1, 2003.
The agreement states the employment terms and basis of remuneration for this executive director, with regards to duties for DRD
(Isle of Man) Limited. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of $250,000 per annum,
from DRD (Isle of Man). The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. He is also eligible to
receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of six
months each, over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
(Isle of Man) Limited. Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of $250,000 per annum,
from DRD (Isle of Man). The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. He is also eligible to
receive an incentive bonus of up to 40% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of six
months each, over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
136
Agreement of Employment between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
The agreement states the employment terms and basis of remuneration for this executive director, with regards to duties for
Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited. Mr. I.L. Murray receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of R1.5 million ($0.2
million) from us. Mr. I.L. Murray is eligible for an incentive bonus in respect of up to 50% of his annual remuneration
package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration his appointments, on condition that he
achieves certain key performance indicators. Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreement also provides that he will receive a total of up to
198,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreement of
employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have since
decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued
these shares. The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 t o November 30, 2005.
million) from us. Mr. I.L. Murray is eligible for an incentive bonus in respect of up to 50% of his annual remuneration
package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration his appointments, on condition that he
achieves certain key performance indicators. Mr. I.L. Murray’s agreement also provides that he will receive a total of up to
198,000 of our ordinary shares in four equal tranches at intervals of 6 months over the duration of his agreement of
employment. In terms of a JSE listing requirement these allotments were subject to approval by shareholders. We have since
decided, and Mr. I.L. Murray has agreed, that we will not seek the consent of our shareholders and that he will not be issued
these shares. The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 t o November 30, 2005.
Service Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
The agreement states the employment terms and basis of remuneration for this executive director, with regards to duties for DRD
(Isle of Man) Limited. Mr. I.L. Murray receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of $200,000 per annum, from DRD
(Isle of Man). The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. He is also eligible to receive an
incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of six months each,
over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
(Isle of Man) Limited. Mr. I.L. Murray receives an all-inclusive remuneration package of $200,000 per annum, from DRD
(Isle of Man). The term of the contract is from December 1, 2003 to November 30, 2005. He is also eligible to receive an
incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four bonus cycles of six months each,
over the duration of his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain agreed key performance indicators.
Confirmation, between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited, dated December 17, 2003.
On December 17, 2003, we entered into an option agreement with Investec (Mauritius) granting Investec (Mauritius) the option
to acquire 10.2 million ordinary shares. The strike price per share of the option is 95.5% of the trade-weighted average price of
our ADSs for the 10 days prior to exercise. The option had an expiry date of March 15, 2004. The option was exercised on
February 19, 2004 at a price of $3.21 per share for a total consideration of $32.3 million. Of this $19.3 million was used to close
out 180,000 ounces or 57.1% of the then committed 315,000 ounces under the Eskom gold for electricity contract.
to acquire 10.2 million ordinary shares. The strike price per share of the option is 95.5% of the trade-weighted average price of
our ADSs for the 10 days prior to exercise. The option had an expiry date of March 15, 2004. The option was exercised on
February 19, 2004 at a price of $3.21 per share for a total consideration of $32.3 million. Of this $19.3 million was used to close
out 180,000 ounces or 57.1% of the then committed 315,000 ounces under the Eskom gold for electricity contract.
Subscription and Option Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, Net Gold Services Limited and G.M. Network
Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
Under this agreement we subscribed for 50.25% of Net-Gold Services Limited’s shares in issue. In addition a put and call
option was awarded with regards to the exchange of the shares that we acquired in Net-Gold Services Limited for 523.26 shares
in G.M. Network Limited. The options expire on December 31, 2007.
option was awarded with regards to the exchange of the shares that we acquired in Net-Gold Services Limited for 523.26 shares
in G.M. Network Limited. The options expire on December 31, 2007.
Forward Bullion Transaction Agreements made and entered between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Investec Bank Limited,
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
These agreements constitute forward bullion sales transactions whereby a total of 90,000 ounces of gold bullion was forward
purchased from Investec Bank Limited.
purchased from Investec Bank Limited.
Loan Agreement made and entered between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
The agreement makes available to the Company a loan facility of R100.0 million ($15.9 million). The facility bears interest at
the three-month Johannesburg Interbank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for payment
by delivering a repayment notice. Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the issue of our
shares.
the three-month Johannesburg Interbank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for payment
by delivering a repayment notice. Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the issue of our
shares.
Termination Agreement made and entered between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
During fiscal 2004, we entered into a series of agreements with Investec to close out a significant portion of the remaining hedge
position held with Eskom Holdings Limited. This agreement terminates the previous forward bullion transaction agreements in
place with Investec and Eskom Holdings Limited, through affecting the Novation Agreement made and entered between J Aron
& Company, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec, dated June 24, 2004.
position held with Eskom Holdings Limited. This agreement terminates the previous forward bullion transaction agreements in
place with Investec and Eskom Holdings Limited, through affecting the Novation Agreement made and entered between J Aron
& Company, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec, dated June 24, 2004.
137
Novation Agreement made and entered between J Aron & Company, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated June 24,
2004.
2004.
This agreement transfers the rights, liabilities, duties and obligations that Eskom Holdings Limited were bound to under the
Eskom gold for electricity hedge contract, to Investec, thereby creating a counterparty relationship between Investec and J Aron
& Company.
Eskom gold for electricity hedge contract, to Investec, thereby creating a counterparty relationship between Investec and J Aron
& Company.
Memorandum of Understanding made and entered between Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, Buffels Division and The National Union
of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers Union (Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers
Association regarding retrenchments associated with Number 9, 10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers Union (Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers
Association regarding retrenchments associated with Number 9, 10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
This agreement states the effect of the 60-day operational review under Section 189A of the South African Labour Relations
Act, on the retrenchment of employees, based on the condition that the proposals and measures that are introduced as a result
of the 60-day review prove to be effective in restoring the Buffels Section, North West Operations, to profitability, and on the
Buffels Section attaining a sustainable gold price to cost ratio, that is budgeted tonnage, grade, kilograms and working costs.
Act, on the retrenchment of employees, based on the condition that the proposals and measures that are introduced as a result
of the 60-day review prove to be effective in restoring the Buffels Section, North West Operations, to profitability, and on the
Buffels Section attaining a sustainable gold price to cost ratio, that is budgeted tonnage, grade, kilograms and working costs.
CCMA Settlement Agreement made and entered between Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited and The United Association of
South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment
of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company, dated September 2, 2004.
South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment
of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company, dated September 2, 2004.
This agreement outlines the sustainability thresholds of the Blyvoor Section’s business plan and the acknowledgements of
these thresholds by the participants. Furthermore, the agreement outlines the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees to return
the Blyvoor Section to initially break-even point, then to work towards operating profitably over the next six months.
these thresholds by the participants. Furthermore, the agreement outlines the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees to return
the Blyvoor Section to initially break-even point, then to work towards operating profitably over the next six months.
Loan Agreement made and entered between Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated September 15, 2004.
The agreement makes available to the Company a second loan facility of R100.0 million ($15.9 million). The facility bears
interest at the three-month JIBAR plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for payment by delivering a repayment notice.
Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the issue of our shares.
interest at the three-month JIBAR plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for payment by delivering a repayment notice.
Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the issue of our shares.
Subscription Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited, dated September
21, 2004.
21, 2004.
The agreement indicates the Company’s intention to subscribe for 135 ordinary shares in DRD (Isle of Man) Limited at a
subscription price of $100,000 per shares, being a total subscription price of $13.5 million.
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
This agreement makes available to our subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) a third loan facility of $15.0 million with Investec Bank
(Mauritius) Limited, or Investec (Mauritius). Subject to the terms of the agreement the facility may be used to finance future
acquisitions or rights offers by companies in which we wish to acquire shares, or it may be used for any other purpose with prior
written consent of Investec (Mauritius). The facility bears interest at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR,
plus 300 basis points. Funds advance and interest on this facility shall be repaid in cash in equal installments every three months
from the date of that advance so that the amount of the advance is paid in full to Investec (Mauritius) within 36 months. The
facility is secured by DRD (Isle of Man)'s shares in Emperor Mines Limited, DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited. The loan agreement pr ohibits us from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets. The facility restricts the
flow of payments from DRD (Isle of Man) to the Company through requiring that all net operating cash or cash distributions
received by DRD (Isle of Man) in respect of the secured assets must be used to first service our interest and principal payment
obligations under the facility in accordance with the terms of the facility agreement. The agreement requires that we hold, in a
debt servicing account, sufficient cash to cover our quarterly principal payments. Any funds in excess of these repayment
requirements may be utilized by the Company. In addition, if DRD (Isle of Man) intends to make any payment, which is a
distribution, by or on behalf of it to or for the Company, Investec (Mauritius) has the option to require DRD (Isle of Man) to pay
50% of the distributed funds as a prepayment of the facility. The facility agreement contains a
number of additional customary restrictive covenants . On November 12, 2004, $7.0 million was drawn under this facility to fund
our portion of the Emperor rights offering.
(Mauritius) Limited, or Investec (Mauritius). Subject to the terms of the agreement the facility may be used to finance future
acquisitions or rights offers by companies in which we wish to acquire shares, or it may be used for any other purpose with prior
written consent of Investec (Mauritius). The facility bears interest at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR,
plus 300 basis points. Funds advance and interest on this facility shall be repaid in cash in equal installments every three months
from the date of that advance so that the amount of the advance is paid in full to Investec (Mauritius) within 36 months. The
facility is secured by DRD (Isle of Man)'s shares in Emperor Mines Limited, DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited. The loan agreement pr ohibits us from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets. The facility restricts the
flow of payments from DRD (Isle of Man) to the Company through requiring that all net operating cash or cash distributions
received by DRD (Isle of Man) in respect of the secured assets must be used to first service our interest and principal payment
obligations under the facility in accordance with the terms of the facility agreement. The agreement requires that we hold, in a
debt servicing account, sufficient cash to cover our quarterly principal payments. Any funds in excess of these repayment
requirements may be utilized by the Company. In addition, if DRD (Isle of Man) intends to make any payment, which is a
distribution, by or on behalf of it to or for the Company, Investec (Mauritius) has the option to require DRD (Isle of Man) to pay
50% of the distributed funds as a prepayment of the facility. The facility agreement contains a
number of additional customary restrictive covenants . On November 12, 2004, $7.0 million was drawn under this facility to fund
our portion of the Emperor rights offering.
138
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated December 10, 2004.
The agreement makes available to the Company a loan facility of R100.0 million ($15.0 million). The facility bears interest at
the three-month Johannesburg Interbank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for
payment by delivering a repayment notice. Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the
issue of our shares.
the three-month Johannesburg Interbank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 interest basis points. Investec calls for
payment by delivering a repayment notice. Upon receipt of the notice we may elect to repay the facility in cash or by the
issue of our shares.
Underwriting Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and certain underwriters, dated April 5, 2005.
Under this agreement the underwriters agreed to subscribe for the offer of an aggregate of 15,804,116 ordinary no par value
shares at a subscription price of R5.50 per share on the basis that the shares will be provisionally allotted to them, but that we
will also offer the same shares to its existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings in terms of a claw-back offer,
together with the right to renounce this offer in favor of third parties, and that the number of shares not allotted and issued
pursuant to the claw-back offer will finally be allotted and issued to the underwriters. We raised R86.9 million
($13.3 million) from the claw-back offer.
shares at a subscription price of R5.50 per share on the basis that the shares will be provisionally allotted to them, but that we
will also offer the same shares to its existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings in terms of a claw-back offer,
together with the right to renounce this offer in favor of third parties, and that the number of shares not allotted and issued
pursuant to the claw-back offer will finally be allotted and issued to the underwriters. We raised R86.9 million
($13.3 million) from the claw-back offer.
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP (BSCM), dated April 7, 2005.
Under this agreement BSCM acted as an agent on behalf of certain clients. Each BSCM client subscribed to a certain number
of our ordinary shares which added up to an aggregate of 17,000,000 shares at a subscription price of R5.50 per share and
BSCM paid the sum of R93.5 million ($14.4 million) being the subscription price due for the shares.
of our ordinary shares which added up to an aggregate of 17,000,000 shares at a subscription price of R5.50 per share and
BSCM paid the sum of R93.5 million ($14.4 million) being the subscription price due for the shares.
Memorandum of Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Simmer & Jack Mines Limited and Simmer & Jack Investments
(Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
(Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
Under this agreement we agreed to sell 13,000,460 ordinary no par value shares in Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited (in
provisional liquidation) to the S&J Companies for R0.01 per share as part of a scheme of arrangement between the S&J
Companies and Buffelsfontein’s creditors in terms of Section 311 of the South African Companies Act, 1973. This agreement
is conditional upon the S&J Companies assuming all existing and future obligations relating to the pumping and management
of underground water in the Klerksdorp/Orkney/Stilfontein/Hartebeestfontein area and providing us with indemnity against
all liability arising in this regard.
provisional liquidation) to the S&J Companies for R0.01 per share as part of a scheme of arrangement between the S&J
Companies and Buffelsfontein’s creditors in terms of Section 311 of the South African Companies Act, 1973. This agreement
is conditional upon the S&J Companies assuming all existing and future obligations relating to the pumping and management
of underground water in the Klerksdorp/Orkney/Stilfontein/Hartebeestfontein area and providing us with indemnity against
all liability arising in this regard.
Cession Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC), DRDGOLD Limited,
Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751 (Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July
13, 2005.
Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751 (Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July
13, 2005.
Under this agreement IDC sold its claims against Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, East Rand Proprietary Mines
Limited (ERPM) and the BVI Companies and the debentures it subscribed for in ERPM to us in return for the payment of the
purchase price of 4,451,219 of our ordinary shares to the value of approximately $4.3 million (R29.0 million), which have
already been allotted and issued to the IDC.
purchase price of 4,451,219 of our ordinary shares to the value of approximately $4.3 million (R29.0 million), which have
already been allotted and issued to the IDC.
Share Sale Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC), DRDGOLD
Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No. 751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated
July 13, 2005.
Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No. 751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated
July 13, 2005.
Under this agreement we acquired from the IDC, 60 ordinary shares in BVI 1, representing 60% of the total issued share
capital of BVI 1, and 60 ordinary shares in the BVI 2, representing 60% of the total issued share capital of BVI 2, for the
purchase price of R120.00.
capital of BVI 1, and 60 ordinary shares in the BVI 2, representing 60% of the total issued share capital of BVI 2, for the
purchase price of R120.00.
Memorandum of Understanding between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd (KBH), dated July 6, 2005.
Under this Memorandum of Understanding the parties agreed that East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Limited and Blyvooruitzicht Mining Company Limited will be consolidated under one subsidiary, namely
DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDSA. Furthermore KBH will subscribe for an initial 15% stake in
DRDSA and subsequently a KBH-led broad based black economic empowerment consortium will subscribe for a further
11% in DRDSA.
Recoveries (Pty) Limited and Blyvooruitzicht Mining Company Limited will be consolidated under one subsidiary, namely
DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDSA. Furthermore KBH will subscribe for an initial 15% stake in
DRDSA and subsequently a KBH-led broad based black economic empowerment consortium will subscribe for a further
11% in DRDSA.
139
Facility B Loan Agreement between Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited and DRD (Isle of Man)
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
This agreement made available to DRDIOM an acquisition loan facility for a maximum of $35.0 million. Subsequent to
June 30, 2005, this facility was drawn down in the amount of $10.0 million. The agreement provides for the repayment of the
loan with our ordinary shares. In this regard, we allotted and issued 3,353,365 of our ordinary shares, to the value of $4.9
million, and an additional 1,833,715 of our ordinary shares, to the value of $2.5 million, to Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited
to repay part of the drawn down amount.
June 30, 2005, this facility was drawn down in the amount of $10.0 million. The agreement provides for the repayment of the
loan with our ordinary shares. In this regard, we allotted and issued 3,353,365 of our ordinary shares, to the value of $4.9
million, and an additional 1,833,715 of our ordinary shares, to the value of $2.5 million, to Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited
to repay part of the drawn down amount.
Convertible Loan Facility Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited (Emperor), dated July 8, 2005.
Under this agreement we agreed to provide an A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) convertible loan facility for financial and
operational assistance to Emperor. The term of this facility will be for 2.5 years with a fixed interest of 9% per annum. The
facility is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100% interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji. The facility is
repayable upon either the receipt of proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect or by
December 31, 2007. This facility is also convertible at our election into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor.
operational assistance to Emperor. The term of this facility will be for 2.5 years with a fixed interest of 9% per annum. The
facility is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100% interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji. The facility is
repayable upon either the receipt of proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect or by
December 31, 2007. This facility is also convertible at our election into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor.
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, dated as of August 10, 2005.
Under this agreement Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 5, 2005, receives from us an all-
inclusive remuneration package of R2.0 million ($0.3 million) per annum. Mr. J.W.C. Sayers is eligible under his
employment agreement, for an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four
bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance
indicators.
inclusive remuneration package of R2.0 million ($0.3 million) per annum. Mr. J.W.C. Sayers is eligible under his
employment agreement, for an incentive bonus of up to 50% of his annual remuneration package in respect of each of four
bonus cycles of 6 months each over the duration his appointment, on condition that he achieves certain key performance
indicators.
Option Agreement entered into by and between DRDGOLD Limited and M5 Developments (Pty) Limited, dated July 21, 2005.
Under this agreement M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd was granted an option, for a non-refundable fee of R0.5 million
($0.1 million) per month, until exercise of the option, to acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for R15.0 million
($2.2 million). The option period initially expired on September 19, 2005, but was extended to November 19, 2005. On
November 19, 2005 the option was exercised and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the purchase consideration.
($0.1 million) per month, until exercise of the option, to acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine village for R15.0 million
($2.2 million). The option period initially expired on September 19, 2005, but was extended to November 19, 2005. On
November 19, 2005 the option was exercised and the option fee will be deemed part payment of the purchase consideration.
Share Sale Agreement between DRD (Offshore) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited, dated November 16, 2005
We concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will acquire our wholly owned
subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets, comprising
a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds our Papua New Guinea assets, comprising
a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and all of our exploration
tenements in Papua New Guinea. Currently we, through DRD (Isle of Man), hold a 45.33% interest in Emperor.
140
10D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS
The following is a summary of the material South African exchange control measures, which has been derived from publicly
available documents. The following summary is not a comprehensive description of all the exchange control regulations. The discussion
in this section is based on the current law and positions of the South African Government. Changes in the law may alter the exchange
control provisions that apply to you, possibly on a retroactive basis.
in this section is based on the current law and positions of the South African Government. Changes in the law may alter the exchange
control provisions that apply to you, possibly on a retroactive basis.
Introduction
Dealings in foreign currency, the export of capital and revenue, payments by residents to non-residents and various other
exchange control matters in South Africa are regulated by the South African exchange control regulations, or the Regulations. The
Regulations form part of the general monetary policy of South Africa. The Regulations are issued under Section 9 of the Currency and
Exchanges Act, 1933 (as amended). In terms of the Regulations, the control over South African capital and revenue reserves, as well as
the accruals and spending thereof, is vested in the Treasury (Ministry of Finance), or the Treasury.
Regulations form part of the general monetary policy of South Africa. The Regulations are issued under Section 9 of the Currency and
Exchanges Act, 1933 (as amended). In terms of the Regulations, the control over South African capital and revenue reserves, as well as
the accruals and spending thereof, is vested in the Treasury (Ministry of Finance), or the Treasury.
The Treasury has delegated the administration of exchange controls to the Exchange Control Department of the South African
Reserve Bank, or SARB, which is responsible for the day to day administration and functioning of exchange controls. SARB has a wide
discretion. Certain banks authorized by the Treasury to co-administer certain of the exchange controls, are authorized by the Treasury to
deal in foreign exchange. Such dealings in foreign exchange by authorized dealers are undertaken in accordance with the provisions and
requirements of the exchange control rulings, or Rulings, and contain certain administrative measures, as well as conditions and limits
applicable to transactions in foreign exchange, which may be undertaken by authorized dealers. Non-residents have been granted general
approval, in terms of the Rulings, to deal in South African assets, to invest and disinvest in South Africa.
discretion. Certain banks authorized by the Treasury to co-administer certain of the exchange controls, are authorized by the Treasury to
deal in foreign exchange. Such dealings in foreign exchange by authorized dealers are undertaken in accordance with the provisions and
requirements of the exchange control rulings, or Rulings, and contain certain administrative measures, as well as conditions and limits
applicable to transactions in foreign exchange, which may be undertaken by authorized dealers. Non-residents have been granted general
approval, in terms of the Rulings, to deal in South African assets, to invest and disinvest in South Africa.
The Regulations provide for restrictions on exporting capital from the Common Monetary Area consisting of South Africa,
Namibia, and the Kingdoms of Lesotho and Swaziland. Transactions between residents of the Common Monetary Area, are not subject to
these exchange control regulations.
these exchange control regulations.
There are many inherent disadvantages to exchange controls including distortion of the price mechanism, problems encountered
in the application of monetary policy, detrimental effects on inward foreign investment and administrative costs associated therewith. The
South African Finance Minister has indicated that all remaining exchange controls are likely to be dismantled as soon as circumstances
permit. Since 1998, there has been a gradual relaxation of exchange controls. The gradual approach to the abolition of exchange controls
adopted by the Government of South Africa is designed to allow the economy to adjust more smoothly to the removal of controls that
have been in place for a considerable period of time. The stated objective of the authorities is equality of treatment between residents and
non-residents with respect to inflows and outflows of capital. The focus of regulation, subsequent to the abolition of exchange controls, is
expected to favor the positive aspects of prudential financial supervision.
South African Finance Minister has indicated that all remaining exchange controls are likely to be dismantled as soon as circumstances
permit. Since 1998, there has been a gradual relaxation of exchange controls. The gradual approach to the abolition of exchange controls
adopted by the Government of South Africa is designed to allow the economy to adjust more smoothly to the removal of controls that
have been in place for a considerable period of time. The stated objective of the authorities is equality of treatment between residents and
non-residents with respect to inflows and outflows of capital. The focus of regulation, subsequent to the abolition of exchange controls, is
expected to favor the positive aspects of prudential financial supervision.
The present exchange control system in South Africa is used principally to control capital movements. South African companies
are not permitted to maintain foreign bank accounts without SARB approval and, without the approval of SARB, are generally not
permitted to export capital from South Africa or hold foreign currency. In addition, South African companies are required to obtain the
approval of SARB prior to raising foreign funding on the strength of their South African balance sheets, which would permit recourse to
South Africa in the event of defaults. Where 75% or more of a South African company's capital, voting power, power of control or
earnings is directly or indirectly controlled by non-residents, such a corporation is designated an “affected person” by SARB, and certain
restrictions are placed on its ability to obtain local financial assistance. We are not, and have never been, designated an “affected person”
by SARB.
permitted to export capital from South Africa or hold foreign currency. In addition, South African companies are required to obtain the
approval of SARB prior to raising foreign funding on the strength of their South African balance sheets, which would permit recourse to
South Africa in the event of defaults. Where 75% or more of a South African company's capital, voting power, power of control or
earnings is directly or indirectly controlled by non-residents, such a corporation is designated an “affected person” by SARB, and certain
restrictions are placed on its ability to obtain local financial assistance. We are not, and have never been, designated an “affected person”
by SARB.
Foreign investment and outward loans by South African companies are also restricted. In addition, without the approval of
SARB, South African companies are generally required to repatriate to South Africa profits of foreign operations and are limited in their
ability to utilize profits of one foreign business to finance operations of a different foreign business. South African companies establishing
subsidiaries, branches, offices or joint ventures abroad are generally required to submit financial statements on these operations as well as
progress reports to SARB on an annual basis. As a result, a South African Company's ability to raise and deploy capital outside the
Common Monetary Area is restricted.
ability to utilize profits of one foreign business to finance operations of a different foreign business. South African companies establishing
subsidiaries, branches, offices or joint ventures abroad are generally required to submit financial statements on these operations as well as
progress reports to SARB on an annual basis. As a result, a South African Company's ability to raise and deploy capital outside the
Common Monetary Area is restricted.
141
Although exchange controls have been gradually relaxed since 1998, unlimited outward transfers of capital are not permitted at
this stage. Some of the more salient changes to the South African exchange control provisions over the past few years have been as
follows:
follows:
•
corporations wishing to invest in countries outside the Common Monetary Area, in addition to what is set out below, apply for
permission to enter into corporate asset/share swap and share placement transactions to acquire foreign investments. The latter
mechanism entails the placement of the locally quoted corporation's shares with long-term overseas holders who, in payment for
the shares, provide the foreign currency abroad which the corporation then uses to acquire the target investment;
permission to enter into corporate asset/share swap and share placement transactions to acquire foreign investments. The latter
mechanism entails the placement of the locally quoted corporation's shares with long-term overseas holders who, in payment for
the shares, provide the foreign currency abroad which the corporation then uses to acquire the target investment;
•
corporations wishing to establish new overseas ventures are permitted to transfer offshore up to R1.0 billion ($149.6 million) to
finance approved investments abroad and up to R2.0 billion ($299.2 million) to finance approved new investments in African
countries. However, the approval of SARB is required in advance. On application to SARB, corporations are also allowed to use
part of their local cash holdings to finance up to 10% of approved new foreign investments where the cost of these investments
exceeds the current limits;
finance approved investments abroad and up to R2.0 billion ($299.2 million) to finance approved new investments in African
countries. However, the approval of SARB is required in advance. On application to SARB, corporations are also allowed to use
part of their local cash holdings to finance up to 10% of approved new foreign investments where the cost of these investments
exceeds the current limits;
•
as a general rule, SARB requires that more than 50% of equity of the acquired off-shore venture is acquired within a
predetermined period of time, as a prerequisite to allowing the expatriation of funds. If these requirements are not met, SARB
may instruct that the equity be disposed of. In our experience (with the acquisition of Emperor Mines) SARB has taken a
commercial view on this, and has on occasion extended the period of time for compliance; and
predetermined period of time, as a prerequisite to allowing the expatriation of funds. If these requirements are not met, SARB
may instruct that the equity be disposed of. In our experience (with the acquisition of Emperor Mines) SARB has taken a
commercial view on this, and has on occasion extended the period of time for compliance; and
•
remittance of directors' fees payable to persons permanently resident outside the Common Monetary Area may be approved by
authorized dealers, in terms of the Rulings.
authorized dealers, in terms of the Rulings.
Authorized dealers in foreign exchange may, against the production of suitable documentary evidence, provide forward cover to
South African residents in respect of fixed and ascertained foreign exchange commitments covering the movement of goods.
Persons who emigrate from South Africa are entitled to take limited amounts of money out of South Africa as a settling-in
allowance. The balance of the emigrant's funds will be blocked and held under the control of an authorized dealer. These blocked funds
may only be invested in:
may only be invested in:
•
blocked current, savings, interest bearing deposit accounts in the books of an authorized dealer in the banking sector;
•
securities quoted on the JSE and financial instruments listed on the Bond Exchange of South Africa which are deposited with an
authorized dealer and not released except temporarily for switching purposes, without the approval of SARB. Authorized dealers
must at all times be able to demonstrate that listed or quoted securities or financial instruments which are dematerialized or
immobilized in a central securities depository are being held subject to the control of the authorized dealer concerned; or
authorized dealer and not released except temporarily for switching purposes, without the approval of SARB. Authorized dealers
must at all times be able to demonstrate that listed or quoted securities or financial instruments which are dematerialized or
immobilized in a central securities depository are being held subject to the control of the authorized dealer concerned; or
•
mutual funds.
Aside from the investments referred to above, blocked Rands may only be utilized for very limited purposes. Dividends declared
out of capital gains or out of income earned prior to emigration remain subject to the blocking procedure. It is not possible to predict when
existing exchange controls will be abolished or whether they will be continued or modified by the South African Government in the
future.
existing exchange controls will be abolished or whether they will be continued or modified by the South African Government in the
future.
Sale of Shares
Under present exchange control regulations in South Africa, our ordinary shares and ADSs are freely transferable outside the
Common Monetary Area between non-residents of the Common Monetary Area. In addition, the proceeds from the sale of ordinary
shares on the JSE on behalf of shareholders who are not residents of the Common Monetary Area are freely remittable to such
shareholders. Share certificates held by non-residents will be endorsed with the words “non-resident,” unless dematerialized.
shares on the JSE on behalf of shareholders who are not residents of the Common Monetary Area are freely remittable to such
shareholders. Share certificates held by non-residents will be endorsed with the words “non-resident,” unless dematerialized.
142
Dividends
Dividends declared in respect of shares held by a non-resident in a Company whose shares are listed on the JSE are freely
remittable.
Any cash dividends paid by us are expected to be paid in Rands. Holders of ADSs on the relevant record date will be entitled to
receive any dividends payable in respect of the shares underlying the ADSs, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement entered on
August 12, 1996, and as amended and restated, between the Company and The Bank of New York, as the depository. Subject to
exceptions provided in the deposit agreement, cash dividends paid in Rand will be converted by the depositary to Dollars and paid by the
depositary to holders of ADSs, net of conversion expenses of the depositary, in accordance with the deposit agreement. The depositary
will charge holders of ADSs, to the extent applicable, taxes and other governmental charges and specifies fees and other expenses.
August 12, 1996, and as amended and restated, between the Company and The Bank of New York, as the depository. Subject to
exceptions provided in the deposit agreement, cash dividends paid in Rand will be converted by the depositary to Dollars and paid by the
depositary to holders of ADSs, net of conversion expenses of the depositary, in accordance with the deposit agreement. The depositary
will charge holders of ADSs, to the extent applicable, taxes and other governmental charges and specifies fees and other expenses.
Voting rights
There are no limitations imposed by South African law or by our Articles on the right of non-South African shareholders to hold
or vote our ordinary shares.
10E. TAXATION
Material Income Tax Consequences
This is a discussion of the material income tax considerations under South African and United States, or US, tax law. No
representation with respect to the consequences to any particular purchaser of our securities is made hereby. Prospective purchasers are
urged to consult their own tax advisers with respect to their particular circumstances and the effect of US national, state or local tax laws
to which they may be subject.
urged to consult their own tax advisers with respect to their particular circumstances and the effect of US national, state or local tax laws
to which they may be subject.
South Africa
South Africa imposes tax on worldwide income of South African residents. Generally, South African non-residents do not pay
tax in South Africa except in the following circumstances:
Income Tax
Non-residents will pay income tax on any amounts received by or accrued to them from a source within (or deemed to be within)
South Africa. Interest earned by a non-resident on a debt instrument issued by a South African company will be regarded as being derived
from a South African source but will be regarded as exempt from taxation in terms of Section 10(1)(hA) of the South African Income Tax
Act, 1962 (as amended), or the Income Tax Act. This exemption does not apply if:
from a South African source but will be regarded as exempt from taxation in terms of Section 10(1)(hA) of the South African Income Tax
Act, 1962 (as amended), or the Income Tax Act. This exemption does not apply if:
•
the non-resident has been a resident of South Africa at any time and carried on a business in South Africa;
•
the non-resident was a resident of the Common Monetary Area, in other words, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland, and in such an
event the non-resident shall be deemed to be a resident of South Africa;
event the non-resident shall be deemed to be a resident of South Africa;
•
the interest is effectively connected with a business carried on by the non-resident in South Africa; and/or
•
the recipient of the interest is a natural person, unless they were absent from South Africa for at least 183 days in aggregate
during the year of assessment in which the interest was received or accrued.
during the year of assessment in which the interest was received or accrued.
No withholding tax is deductible in respect of interest payments made to non-resident investors.
No income tax is payable on dividends paid to residents or non-residents, in terms of Section 10(1)(k) of the Income Tax Act
except in respect of foreign dividends received by or accrued to residents of South Africa. Accordingly, there is no withholding tax on
dividends received by or accrued to non-resident shareholders of companies listed in South Africa and non-residents will receive the same
dividend as South African resident shareholders. Prior to payment of the dividend, the Company pays Secondary Tax on Companies at a
rate of 12.5% of the excess of dividends declared over dividends received in a dividend cycle but the full amount of the dividend declared
is paid to shareholders.
dividends received by or accrued to non-resident shareholders of companies listed in South Africa and non-residents will receive the same
dividend as South African resident shareholders. Prior to payment of the dividend, the Company pays Secondary Tax on Companies at a
rate of 12.5% of the excess of dividends declared over dividends received in a dividend cycle but the full amount of the dividend declared
is paid to shareholders.
143
Capital Gains Tax
Non-residents are generally not subject to capital gains tax, or CGT, in South Africa. They will only be subject to CGT on gains
arising from the disposal of capital assets if the assets disposed of consist of:
•
immovable property owned by the non-residents situated in South Africa, or any interest or right in or to immovable property. A
non-resident will have an interest in immovable property if it has a direct or indirect shareholding of at least 20% in a company,
where 80% or more of the net assets of that company (determined on a market value basis) are attributable directly or indirectly
to immovable property; or
non-resident will have an interest in immovable property if it has a direct or indirect shareholding of at least 20% in a company,
where 80% or more of the net assets of that company (determined on a market value basis) are attributable directly or indirectly
to immovable property; or
•
any asset of a permanent establishment of a non-resident in South Africa through which a trade is carried on.
If the non-residents are not subject to CGT because the assets disposed of do not fall within the categories described above, it
follows that they will also not be able to claim the capital losses arising from the disposal of the assets.
Taxation of dividends
South Africa imposes a corporate tax known as Secondary Tax on Companies, or STC, on the distribution of earnings in the
form of dividends, and, at present, the STC tax rate is equal to 12.5%.
In 1993, all existing gold mining companies, in South Africa, had the option to elect to be exempt from STC. If the election
was made, a higher tax rate would apply for both mining and non-mining income. In fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, the tax rates for
taxable mining and non-mining income, for companies that elected the STC exemption were 46% and 38%, respectively. During those
same years the tax rates for companies that did not elect the STC exemption were 37% and 30%, respectively. In 1993, the Company
elected not to be exempt from STC, as this would have meant that the Company would have been liable for normal taxation at the
higher rates of 46% for mining income and 38% for non-mining income. The Company, having chosen not to be subject to the STC
exemption, is subject to 37% tax on mining income and 30% for non-mining income. However, with the exception of Blyvoor, all of
the Company's subsidiaries elected the STC exemption. Any dividends paid by Blyvoor, being a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, would be exempt from STC. Any dividends paid by the Company, to the extent that they are paid out of income from
Blyvoor, will be subject to STC.
taxable mining and non-mining income, for companies that elected the STC exemption were 46% and 38%, respectively. During those
same years the tax rates for companies that did not elect the STC exemption were 37% and 30%, respectively. In 1993, the Company
elected not to be exempt from STC, as this would have meant that the Company would have been liable for normal taxation at the
higher rates of 46% for mining income and 38% for non-mining income. The Company, having chosen not to be subject to the STC
exemption, is subject to 37% tax on mining income and 30% for non-mining income. However, with the exception of Blyvoor, all of
the Company's subsidiaries elected the STC exemption. Any dividends paid by Blyvoor, being a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, would be exempt from STC. Any dividends paid by the Company, to the extent that they are paid out of income from
Blyvoor, will be subject to STC.
In July 2005, the above tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income were amended, due to a revision of corporate tax
rates by the South African Government. Tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that elected the STC
exemption are 45% and 37%, respectively. The tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that did not elect
the STC exemption are 35% and 29%, respectively.
exemption are 45% and 37%, respectively. The tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that did not elect
the STC exemption are 35% and 29%, respectively.
South Africa does not impose any withholding tax or any other form of tax on dividends paid to US holders with respect to
shares. Should South Africa decide in the future to impose a withholding tax on dividends paid to a US holder with respect to shares, the
Treaty would limit the rate of this tax to 5 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if a US holder holds directly at least 10 percent of
our voting stock and 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. The above provisions shall not apply if the
beneficial owner of the dividends is resident in the US, carries on business in South Africa through a permanent establishment situated in
South Africa, or performs in South Africa independent personal services from a fixed base situated in South Africa, and the dividends are
attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base.
Treaty would limit the rate of this tax to 5 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if a US holder holds directly at least 10 percent of
our voting stock and 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. The above provisions shall not apply if the
beneficial owner of the dividends is resident in the US, carries on business in South Africa through a permanent establishment situated in
South Africa, or performs in South Africa independent personal services from a fixed base situated in South Africa, and the dividends are
attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base.
United States
Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a discussion of certain US federal income tax consequences to US holders (as defined below) of the purchase,
ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs. It deals only with US holders who hold ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets
for US federal income tax purposes. This discussion is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
the Code, published rulings, judicial decisions and the Treasury regulations, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to
change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This discussion has no binding effect or official status of any kind; we cannot assure holders that
the conclusions reached below would be sustained by a court if challenged by the Internal Revenue Service.
for US federal income tax purposes. This discussion is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
the Code, published rulings, judicial decisions and the Treasury regulations, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to
change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This discussion has no binding effect or official status of any kind; we cannot assure holders that
the conclusions reached below would be sustained by a court if challenged by the Internal Revenue Service.
This discussion does not address all aspects of US federal income taxation that may be applicable to holders in light of their
particular circumstances and does not address special classes of US holders subject to special treatment (such as dealers in securities or
currencies, partnerships or other pass-through entities, financial institutions, life insurance companies, banks, tax-exempt organizations,
certain expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States, persons holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a “hedge,”
currencies, partnerships or other pass-through entities, financial institutions, life insurance companies, banks, tax-exempt organizations,
certain expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States, persons holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a “hedge,”
144
“conversion transaction,” “synthetic security,” “straddle,” “constructive sale” or other integrated investment, persons whose functional
currency in not the US dollar, or persons that actually or constructively own ten percent or more of our voting stock). This discussion
addresses only US federal income tax consequences and does not address the effect of any state, local, or foreign tax laws that may apply,
or the alternative minimum tax.
currency in not the US dollar, or persons that actually or constructively own ten percent or more of our voting stock). This discussion
addresses only US federal income tax consequences and does not address the effect of any state, local, or foreign tax laws that may apply,
or the alternative minimum tax.
A “US holder” is a holder of ordinary shares or ADSs that is, for US federal income tax purposes,
•
a citizen or resident of the US;
•
a corporation that is organized under the laws of the US or any political subdivision thereof;
•
an estate, the income of which is subject to US federal income tax without regard to its source; or
•
a trust, if a court within the US is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more US
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or if the trust has made a valid election to be treated as a
US person.
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or if the trust has made a valid election to be treated as a
US person.
If a partnership holds any ordinary shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the
partner and on the activities of the partnership. Partners of partnerships holding any notes, ordinary shares or ADSs are urged to consult
their tax advisors.
their tax advisors.
Because individual circumstances may differ, US holders of ordinary shares or ADSs are urged to consult their own tax
advisors concerning the US federal income tax consequences applicable to their particular situations as well as any consequences
to them arising under the tax laws of any foreign, state or local taxing jurisdiction.
to them arising under the tax laws of any foreign, state or local taxing jurisdiction.
Ownership of Ordinary Shares or ADSs
For purposes of the Code, US holders of ADSs will be treated for US federal income tax purposes as the owner of the ordinary
shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges of ordinary shares for ADSs and ADSs for ordinary shares generally will not be subject to
US federal income tax.
US federal income tax.
For US federal income tax purposes, distributions with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs, other than distributions in
liquidation and distributions in redemption of stock that are treated as exchanges, will be taxed to US holders as ordinary dividend income
to the extent that the distributions do not exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits. For US federal income tax purposes,
the amount of any distribution received by a US holder will equal the Dollar value of the sum of the South African Rand payments made
(including the amount of South African income taxes, if any, withheld with respect to such payments), determined at the “spot rate” on
the date the dividend distribution is includable in such US holder's income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into
Dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date a US holder includes
the dividend payment in income to the date such holder converts the payment into Dollars will b e treated as ordinary income or loss.
Distributions, if any, in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a non-taxable return of capital and will
be applied against and reduce the holder's basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. To the extent that these distributions exceed the US
holder's tax basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs, as applicable, the excess generally will be treated as capital gain, subject to the
discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company.” We do not intend to calculate our earnings or profits for US
federal income tax purposes.
to the extent that the distributions do not exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits. For US federal income tax purposes,
the amount of any distribution received by a US holder will equal the Dollar value of the sum of the South African Rand payments made
(including the amount of South African income taxes, if any, withheld with respect to such payments), determined at the “spot rate” on
the date the dividend distribution is includable in such US holder's income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into
Dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date a US holder includes
the dividend payment in income to the date such holder converts the payment into Dollars will b e treated as ordinary income or loss.
Distributions, if any, in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a non-taxable return of capital and will
be applied against and reduce the holder's basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. To the extent that these distributions exceed the US
holder's tax basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs, as applicable, the excess generally will be treated as capital gain, subject to the
discussion below under the heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company.” We do not intend to calculate our earnings or profits for US
federal income tax purposes.
Under the recently enacted Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, the maximum US federal income tax rate on
dividends paid to individuals through 2008 is reduced to 15%. This reduced rate generally would apply to dividends paid by us if, at the
time such dividends are paid, either (i) we are eligible for benefits under a qualifying income tax treaty with the US or (ii) our ordinary
shares or ADSs with respect to which such dividends were paid are readily tradable on an established securities market in the US.
However, this reduced rate is subject to certain important requirements and exceptions, including, without limitation, certain holding
period requirements and an exception applicable if we are treated as a passive foreign investment company as discussed under the
heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company.” US holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the US federal income
tax rate that will be applicable to their receipt of any dividends paid with respect to the ordinary shares an d ADSs.
time such dividends are paid, either (i) we are eligible for benefits under a qualifying income tax treaty with the US or (ii) our ordinary
shares or ADSs with respect to which such dividends were paid are readily tradable on an established securities market in the US.
However, this reduced rate is subject to certain important requirements and exceptions, including, without limitation, certain holding
period requirements and an exception applicable if we are treated as a passive foreign investment company as discussed under the
heading “Passive Foreign Investment Company.” US holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the US federal income
tax rate that will be applicable to their receipt of any dividends paid with respect to the ordinary shares an d ADSs.
For purposes of this discussion, the “spot rate” generally means a rate that reflects a fair market rate of exchange available to the
public for currency under a “spot contract” in a free market and involving representative amounts. A “spot contract” is a contract to buy
or sell a currency on or before two business days following the date of the execution of the contract. If such a spot rate cannot be
demonstrated, the US Internal Revenue Service has the authority to determine the spot rate.
or sell a currency on or before two business days following the date of the execution of the contract. If such a spot rate cannot be
demonstrated, the US Internal Revenue Service has the authority to determine the spot rate.
145
Dividend income derived with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs will constitute “portfolio income” for purposes of the
limitation on the use of passive activity losses and, therefore, generally may not be offset by passive activity losses, and as “investment
income” for purposes of the limitation on the deduction of investment interest expense. Such dividends will not be eligible for the
dividends received deduction generally allowed to a US corporation under Section 243 of the Code. Dividend income will be treated as
foreign source income for foreign tax credit and other purposes. In computing the separate foreign tax credit limitations, dividend income
should generally constitute “passive income,” or in the case of certain US holders, “financial services income.”
income” for purposes of the limitation on the deduction of investment interest expense. Such dividends will not be eligible for the
dividends received deduction generally allowed to a US corporation under Section 243 of the Code. Dividend income will be treated as
foreign source income for foreign tax credit and other purposes. In computing the separate foreign tax credit limitations, dividend income
should generally constitute “passive income,” or in the case of certain US holders, “financial services income.”
As discussed under “Taxation - South Africa” above, South Africa currently does not impose any withholding tax on
distributions with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs. Should South Africa decide in the future to impose a withholding tax on such
distributions, the tax treaty between the United States and South Africa would limit the rate of this tax to 5 percent of the gross amount of
the distributions if a US holder holds directly at least 10 percent of our voting stock and to 15 percent of the gross amount of the
distributions in all other cases. In addition, if South Africa decided in the future to impose a withholding tax on distributions with respect
to the ordinary shares or ADSs, a determination would need to be made at such time as to whether any South African income taxes
withheld would be treated as foreign income taxes eligible for credit against such US holder's US federal income tax liability, subject to
limitations and conditions generally applicable under the Code. Any such taxes may be eligible at the ele ction of such US holder, for
deduction in computing such US holder's taxable income. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with
respect to specific classes of income. The calculation of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a US holder that elects to deduct foreign
taxes, the availability of deductions is complex and involves the application of rules that depend on a US holder's particular
circumstances. US holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability to them of foreign tax credits or
deductions in respect of South African income taxes, if any, withheld.
distributions, the tax treaty between the United States and South Africa would limit the rate of this tax to 5 percent of the gross amount of
the distributions if a US holder holds directly at least 10 percent of our voting stock and to 15 percent of the gross amount of the
distributions in all other cases. In addition, if South Africa decided in the future to impose a withholding tax on distributions with respect
to the ordinary shares or ADSs, a determination would need to be made at such time as to whether any South African income taxes
withheld would be treated as foreign income taxes eligible for credit against such US holder's US federal income tax liability, subject to
limitations and conditions generally applicable under the Code. Any such taxes may be eligible at the ele ction of such US holder, for
deduction in computing such US holder's taxable income. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately with
respect to specific classes of income. The calculation of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a US holder that elects to deduct foreign
taxes, the availability of deductions is complex and involves the application of rules that depend on a US holder's particular
circumstances. US holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability to them of foreign tax credits or
deductions in respect of South African income taxes, if any, withheld.
Disposition of Ordinary Shares or ADSs
Upon a sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs, a US holder will recognize gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realized on the sale or exchange and such holder's adjusted tax
basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. Subject to the application of the “passive foreign investment company” rules discussed below, such
gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the US holder has held the ordinary shares or
ADSs for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Gain or loss recognized by a US holder on the
taxable disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be treated as US-source gain or loss for US foreign tax credit purposes.
basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs. Subject to the application of the “passive foreign investment company” rules discussed below, such
gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the US holder has held the ordinary shares or
ADSs for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Gain or loss recognized by a US holder on the
taxable disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be treated as US-source gain or loss for US foreign tax credit purposes.
In the case of a cash basis US holder who receives Rand in connection with the taxable disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs,
the amount realized will be based on the spot rate as determined on the settlement date of such exchange. A US holder who receives
payment in Rand and converts Rand into US Dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the settlement date may have a
foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss.
payment in Rand and converts Rand into US Dollars at a conversion rate other than the rate in effect on the settlement date may have a
foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss.
An accrual basis US holder may elect the same treatment required of cash basis taxpayers with respect to a taxable disposition of
ordinary shares or ADSs, provided that the election is applied consistently from year to year. Such election may not be changed without
the consent of the Internal Revenue Service. In the event that an accrual basis holder does not elect to be treated as a cash basis taxpayer,
such US holder may have a foreign currency gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes because of the differences between the US
dollar value of the currency received prevailing on the trade date and the settlement date. Any such currency gain or loss will be treated as
ordinary income or loss and would be in addition to gain or loss, if any, recognized by such US holder on the disposition of such ordinary
shares or ADSs.
the consent of the Internal Revenue Service. In the event that an accrual basis holder does not elect to be treated as a cash basis taxpayer,
such US holder may have a foreign currency gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes because of the differences between the US
dollar value of the currency received prevailing on the trade date and the settlement date. Any such currency gain or loss will be treated as
ordinary income or loss and would be in addition to gain or loss, if any, recognized by such US holder on the disposition of such ordinary
shares or ADSs.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
A special and adverse set of US federal income tax rules apply to a US holder that holds stock in a passive foreign investment
company, or PFIC. We would be a PFIC for US federal income tax purposes if for any taxable year either (i) 75% or more of our gross
income, including our pro rata share of the gross income of any company in which we are considered to own 25% or more of the shares
by value, were passive income or (ii) 50% or more of our average total assets (by value), including our pro rata share of the assets of any
company in which we are considered to own 25% or more of the shares by value, were assets that produced or were held for the
production of passive income. If we were a PFIC, US holders of the ordinary shares or ADSs would be subject to special rules with
respect to (i) any gain recognized upon the disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs and (ii) any receipt of an excess distribution
(generally, any distributions to a US holder during a single taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average amount of distribu tions
received by such US holder during the three preceding taxable years in respect of the ordinary shares or ADSs or, if shorter, such US
holder's holding period for the ordinary shares or ADSs). Under these rules:
income, including our pro rata share of the gross income of any company in which we are considered to own 25% or more of the shares
by value, were passive income or (ii) 50% or more of our average total assets (by value), including our pro rata share of the assets of any
company in which we are considered to own 25% or more of the shares by value, were assets that produced or were held for the
production of passive income. If we were a PFIC, US holders of the ordinary shares or ADSs would be subject to special rules with
respect to (i) any gain recognized upon the disposition of the ordinary shares or ADSs and (ii) any receipt of an excess distribution
(generally, any distributions to a US holder during a single taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average amount of distribu tions
received by such US holder during the three preceding taxable years in respect of the ordinary shares or ADSs or, if shorter, such US
holder's holding period for the ordinary shares or ADSs). Under these rules:
•
the gain or excess distribution will be allocated ratably over a US holder's holding period for the ordinary shares or ADSs, as
applicable;
applicable;
146
•
the amount allocated to the taxable year in which a US holder realizes the gain or excess distribution will be taxed as ordinary
income;
income;
•
the amount allocated to each prior year, with certain exceptions, will be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for that year; and
•
the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each such
year.
year.
Although we generally will be treated as a PFIC as to any US holder if we are a PFIC for any year during a US holder's holding
period, if we cease to satisfy the requirements for PFIC classification, the US holder may avoid PFIC classification for subsequent years if
such holder elects to recognize gain based on the unrealized appreciation in the ordinary shares or ADSs through the close of the tax year
in which we cease to be a PFIC. Additionally, if we are a PFIC, a US holder who acquires ordinary shares or ADSs from a decedent
would be denied the normally available step-up in tax basis for such notes, ordinary shares or ADSs to fair market value at the date of
death and instead would have a tax basis equal to the lower of the fair market value or the decedent's tax basis.
such holder elects to recognize gain based on the unrealized appreciation in the ordinary shares or ADSs through the close of the tax year
in which we cease to be a PFIC. Additionally, if we are a PFIC, a US holder who acquires ordinary shares or ADSs from a decedent
would be denied the normally available step-up in tax basis for such notes, ordinary shares or ADSs to fair market value at the date of
death and instead would have a tax basis equal to the lower of the fair market value or the decedent's tax basis.
A US holder who beneficially owns stock in a PFIC must file Form 8621 (Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign
Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund) with the Internal Revenue Service for each tax year such holder holds stock in a PFIC.
This form describes any distributions received with respect to such stock and any gain realized upon the disposition of such stock.
This form describes any distributions received with respect to such stock and any gain realized upon the disposition of such stock.
A US holder of the ordinary shares or ADSs that are treated as “marketable stock” under the PFIC rules may be able to avoid the
imposition of the special tax and interest charge described above by making a mark-to-market election. Pursuant to this election, the US
holder would include in ordinary income or loss for each taxable year an amount equal to the difference as of the close of the taxable year
between the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs and the US holder's adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares or ADSs.
Losses would be allowed only to the extent of net mark-to-market gain previously included by the US holder under the election for prior
taxable years. If a mark-to-market election with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs is in effect on the date of a US holder's death, the tax
basis of the ordinary shares or ADSs in the hands of a US holder who acquired them from a decedent will be the lesser of the decedent's
tax basis or the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs. US holders desiring to make the mark - -to-market election are urged to
consult their tax advisors with respect to the application and effect of making the election for the ordinary shares or ADSs.
holder would include in ordinary income or loss for each taxable year an amount equal to the difference as of the close of the taxable year
between the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs and the US holder's adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares or ADSs.
Losses would be allowed only to the extent of net mark-to-market gain previously included by the US holder under the election for prior
taxable years. If a mark-to-market election with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs is in effect on the date of a US holder's death, the tax
basis of the ordinary shares or ADSs in the hands of a US holder who acquired them from a decedent will be the lesser of the decedent's
tax basis or the fair market value of the ordinary shares or ADSs. US holders desiring to make the mark - -to-market election are urged to
consult their tax advisors with respect to the application and effect of making the election for the ordinary shares or ADSs.
In the case of a US holder who holds ordinary shares or ADSs and who does not make a mark-to-market election, the special tax
and interest charge described above will not apply if such holder makes an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund” in the first
taxable year in which such holder owns the ordinary shares or ADSs and if we comply with certain reporting requirements. However, we
do not intend to supply US holders with the information needed to report income and gain pursuant to a “qualified electing fund” election
in the event that we are classified as a PFIC.
taxable year in which such holder owns the ordinary shares or ADSs and if we comply with certain reporting requirements. However, we
do not intend to supply US holders with the information needed to report income and gain pursuant to a “qualified electing fund” election
in the event that we are classified as a PFIC.
We believe that we were not a PFIC for our 2005 fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. However, the tests for determining whether
we would be a PFIC for any taxable year are applied annually and it is difficult to make accurate predictions of future income and assets,
which are relevant to this determination. In addition, certain factors in the PFIC determination, such as reductions in the market value of
our capital stock, are not within our control and can cause us to become a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not
become a PFIC.
which are relevant to this determination. In addition, certain factors in the PFIC determination, such as reductions in the market value of
our capital stock, are not within our control and can cause us to become a PFIC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not
become a PFIC.
Rules relating to a PFIC are very complex. US holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of
PFIC rules to their investments in our ordinary shares or ADSs.
PFIC rules to their investments in our ordinary shares or ADSs.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Payments made in the United States or through certain US-related financial intermediaries of dividends or the proceeds of the
sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares or ADSs may be subject to information reporting and US federal backup withholding if the
recipient of such payment is not an “exempt recipient” and fails to supply certain identifying information, such as an accurate taxpayer
identification number, in the required manner. Generally, individuals are not exempt recipients, whereas corporations and certain other
entities generally are exempt recipients. The backup withholding tax rate is currently 28%. For payments made after 2010, the backup
withholding rate will be increased to 31%. Payments made with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs to a US holder must be reported
to the Internal Revenue Service, unless the US holder is an exempt recipient or establishes an exemption. Any amount withheld from a
payment to a US holder under the backup withholding rules is refundable or allowable as a credit against the holder's US federal income
tax, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
recipient of such payment is not an “exempt recipient” and fails to supply certain identifying information, such as an accurate taxpayer
identification number, in the required manner. Generally, individuals are not exempt recipients, whereas corporations and certain other
entities generally are exempt recipients. The backup withholding tax rate is currently 28%. For payments made after 2010, the backup
withholding rate will be increased to 31%. Payments made with respect to our ordinary shares or ADSs to a US holder must be reported
to the Internal Revenue Service, unless the US holder is an exempt recipient or establishes an exemption. Any amount withheld from a
payment to a US holder under the backup withholding rules is refundable or allowable as a credit against the holder's US federal income
tax, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
US Gift and Estate Tax
An individual US holder of ordinary shares or ADSs will be subject to US gift and estate taxes with respect to ordinary shares or
ADSs in the same manner and to the same extent as with respect to other types of personal property.
147
10F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
Not applicable.
10G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS
Not applicable.
10H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
You may request a copy of our US Securities and Exchange Commission filings, at no cost, by writing or calling us at
DRDGOLD Limited, P.O. Box 390, Maraisburg, Johannesburg, South Africa 1700. Attn: Group Company Secretary. Tel No. +27-11-
219-8700. A copy of each report submitted in accordance with applicable United States law is available for public review at our principal
executive offices.
219-8700. A copy of each report submitted in accordance with applicable United States law is available for public review at our principal
executive offices.
A copy of each document concerning us that is referred to in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, is available for public view at
our principal executive offices at DRDGOLD Limited, 299 Pendoring Avenue, Blackheath, Randburg, South Africa 2195.
10I. SUBSIDIARIES
Not applicable.
148
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
General
In the normal course of our operations, we are exposed to market risk, including commodity price, foreign currency, interest,
liquidity and credit risks. We enter into transactions which make use of derivative instruments to economically hedge certain exposures.
These instruments include interest rate swaps and gold lease rate swaps. The decision to use these types of transactions is based on our
hedging policy. Although most of these instruments are used as economic hedges, none of them qualify for hedge accounting and,
consequently, are marked-to-market through the statements of operations in accordance with our accounting policies. We do not hold or
issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes, nor do we hedge forward gold sales.
These instruments include interest rate swaps and gold lease rate swaps. The decision to use these types of transactions is based on our
hedging policy. Although most of these instruments are used as economic hedges, none of them qualify for hedge accounting and,
consequently, are marked-to-market through the statements of operations in accordance with our accounting policies. We do not hold or
issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes, nor do we hedge forward gold sales.
Commodity price risk
The market price of gold has a significant effect on our results of operations, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay
dividends and undertake capital expenditures, and the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs. Historically, gold prices have
fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous industry factors over which we have no control. It is not possible for us to predict the
aggregate effect of these factors on the gold price. The price of gold may not remain at a level allowing us to economically exploit our
reserves. It is not our policy to hedge this commodity price risk.
fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous industry factors over which we have no control. It is not possible for us to predict the
aggregate effect of these factors on the gold price. The price of gold may not remain at a level allowing us to economically exploit our
reserves. It is not our policy to hedge this commodity price risk.
Until May 2002, we used forward contracts, options and swaps to reduce our risk exposure to volatility in the gold price. The
total gold production committed under our hedging program as of July 1, 2001, was 802,625 ounces over a three-year period.
Consequently, our shareholders were exposed to opportunity loss as a result of an increase in the price of gold.
Consequently, our shareholders were exposed to opportunity loss as a result of an increase in the price of gold.
During fiscal 2002, our management reached the conclusion that our hedge book structure would make it difficult for us to
provide our investors with exposure to increases in the price of gold, as gains would be offset against potential losses on the forward
contracts. As a result, our policy is not to hedge forward gold sales, however, we do hedge specified projects, acquisitions and capital
expenditure and we took advantage of opportunities in the market to close out the Eskom "gold for electricity" contract.
contracts. As a result, our policy is not to hedge forward gold sales, however, we do hedge specified projects, acquisitions and capital
expenditure and we took advantage of opportunities in the market to close out the Eskom "gold for electricity" contract.
As a result of this decision in May 2002, we entered into equal and opposite positions of all outstanding derivatives (excluding
the Eskom gold for electricity contract) to effectively close these positions out and eliminate any existing commitment to sell our gold
production. In fiscal 2003, the loss that we realized on the existing positions was $72.8 million. The various counterparties, J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, J. Aron & Company and UBS AG, each agreed to accept a portion of the amounts due to them under the restructuring
immediately in cash, which amounted to approximately $38.1 million, with the remainder, which amounted to approximately
$34.7 million, to be paid over an 18 month period. Of this amount, $6.6 million due to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank was secured by a general
notarial covering bond and surety mortgage over the metallurgical plants of the Blyvoor, West Wits and Buffels Sections and was due to
be repaid by June 2003. We repaid the full amount to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank on March 26, 2003 and obtained a release of these asset s.
During July 2003, J. Aron & Company was paid in full and during August 2003 UBS AG was paid in full.
production. In fiscal 2003, the loss that we realized on the existing positions was $72.8 million. The various counterparties, J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, J. Aron & Company and UBS AG, each agreed to accept a portion of the amounts due to them under the restructuring
immediately in cash, which amounted to approximately $38.1 million, with the remainder, which amounted to approximately
$34.7 million, to be paid over an 18 month period. Of this amount, $6.6 million due to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank was secured by a general
notarial covering bond and surety mortgage over the metallurgical plants of the Blyvoor, West Wits and Buffels Sections and was due to
be repaid by June 2003. We repaid the full amount to J.P. Morgan Chase Bank on March 26, 2003 and obtained a release of these asset s.
During July 2003, J. Aron & Company was paid in full and during August 2003 UBS AG was paid in full.
Eskom gold for electricity contract
In October 2000, we entered into a contract to buy electricity from Eskom, the parastatal authority in South Africa responsible
for the supply of electricity. Under the terms of our agreement, we pay Eskom standard electricity tariff for all energy we consume,
including the 75 GWh per month specified in the contract. This contract was to expire in September 2005. In addition, every
12 month-period starting in October we adjust the amounts paid in that period in accordance with an established formula based on the
gold price.
including the 75 GWh per month specified in the contract. This contract was to expire in September 2005. In addition, every
12 month-period starting in October we adjust the amounts paid in that period in accordance with an established formula based on the
gold price.
The gold price adjustment is based on the notional amount of 15,000 ounces per month of gold multiplied by the difference
between the contracted gold price, which is the price that was agreed on the date of the transaction for a determined period, and the
arithmetic average of London PM close for each business day in the calculation period.
arithmetic average of London PM close for each business day in the calculation period.
We have concluded that (1) the contract in its entirety does not meet the definition of a derivative instrument and therefore it
does not have to be carried on our balance sheet at fair value; (2) the embedded gold for electricity forward contract possesses economic
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and (3) a separate, stand-alone
instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument. Accordingly, the embedded derivative was separated from the
host contract and carried at fair value.
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and (3) a separate, stand-alone
instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument. Accordingly, the embedded derivative was separated from the
host contract and carried at fair value.
149
As at June 30, 2004, the fair value of the gold for electricity contract was a liability of $3.1 million, after having closed out
265,000 ounces of the Eskom gold for electricity contract, at a cost of $25.1 million, during fiscal 2004. The fair value reflects the
difference between the price that was agreed on the date of the transaction and the forward price on June 30, 2004. As discussed in
Note 24 to our financial statements, the remaining 50,000 ounces of the gold for electricity contract was closed out on April 28, 2005 at a
cost of $3.6 million. This was done to take advantage of the continued lower Rand gold price, in line with out policy of not hedging gold
production.
difference between the price that was agreed on the date of the transaction and the forward price on June 30, 2004. As discussed in
Note 24 to our financial statements, the remaining 50,000 ounces of the gold for electricity contract was closed out on April 28, 2005 at a
cost of $3.6 million. This was done to take advantage of the continued lower Rand gold price, in line with out policy of not hedging gold
production.
Put options bought
Put options bought refer to the right, but not the obligation to sell a predetermined amount of gold at a predetermined price on
a predetermined date. During fiscal 2003, the remaining put options were closed out. This resulted in a cash inflow of $7.1 million.
Included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments is $nil for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, and a profit of $9.5 million for fiscal 2003,
relating to these instruments.
Included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments is $nil for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, and a profit of $9.5 million for fiscal 2003,
relating to these instruments.
Other positions
The Company had entered into a gold rate lease swap and call position transactions which had been accounted for on a mark-
to-market basis in prior fiscal years, and which matured or were closed out in the fiscal 2004.
During fiscal 2004, a gold lease rate swap for 109,875 ounces, at a rate of 0.20%, matured.
A gold lease rate swap is a contract whereby the Company and a counterparty select a notional amount of gold, and thereafter
over the life of the contract one party pays a fixed lease rate based on that amount of gold and the other party pays a floating lease rate
based on the same amount of gold. The Company had exposure to increases in the three-month lease rate up to June 2004. The volume
the swap was based on decreases every quarter until it reached zero (by June 2004). Every quarter the Company received a fixed cash
flow equal to 0.2% per annum of the volume and $280 per ounce, and paid the three-month floating lease rate converted at the then
market spot rate.
based on the same amount of gold. The Company had exposure to increases in the three-month lease rate up to June 2004. The volume
the swap was based on decreases every quarter until it reached zero (by June 2004). Every quarter the Company received a fixed cash
flow equal to 0.2% per annum of the volume and $280 per ounce, and paid the three-month floating lease rate converted at the then
market spot rate.
During fiscal 2003, the Company bought call options as a risk management tool to protect the maximum exposure on the
gold for electricity contract. Options covering a total of 272,110 ounces were purchased for $14.9 million. These contracts were to
expire by September 2005. During fiscal 2004, the Company took advantage of the lower Rand gold price and closed out 265,000
ounces of the Eskom gold for electricity contract in line with its policy of not hedging gold production. Accordingly the exposure for
which the call options were bought as a risk management tool had been significantly reduced and the call options were closed out
during fiscal 2004, recording a gain of $0.1 million. The fair value of the call positions bought was an asset of $6.6 million as at June
30, 2003.
expire by September 2005. During fiscal 2004, the Company took advantage of the lower Rand gold price and closed out 265,000
ounces of the Eskom gold for electricity contract in line with its policy of not hedging gold production. Accordingly the exposure for
which the call options were bought as a risk management tool had been significantly reduced and the call options were closed out
during fiscal 2004, recording a gain of $0.1 million. The fair value of the call positions bought was an asset of $6.6 million as at June
30, 2003.
Included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments is $nil for fiscal 2005, a loss of $3.2 million for fiscal 2004 and a profit of
$40.9 million for fiscal 2003, respectively, relating to these instruments.
Concentration of credit risk
Our financial instruments do not represent a concentration of credit risk, because we deal with a variety of major banks and
financial institutions located in South Africa and Australia, after evaluating the credit ratings of the representative financial institutions.
Furthermore, our accounts receivable and loans are regularly monitored and assessed for recoverability. Where it is appropriate to raise a
provision, an adequate level of provision is maintained.
Furthermore, our accounts receivable and loans are regularly monitored and assessed for recoverability. Where it is appropriate to raise a
provision, an adequate level of provision is maintained.
In addition, our South African operations deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited, or RRL, which refines the gold to saleable
purity levels and then sells the gold, on our behalf, on the bullion market. The gold is sold by RRL on the same day as it is delivered and
settlement is made within two days. Once the gold has been assayed by RRL, the risks and rewards of ownership have passed.
settlement is made within two days. Once the gold has been assayed by RRL, the risks and rewards of ownership have passed.
The Tolukuma Section delivers its gold to one customer, N.M. Rothschild and receives proceeds within two days. The
concentration of credit risk in Australia is mitigated by the reputable nature of the customer and the settlement of the proceeds within a
week.
week.
Porgera delivers their gold to AGR Matthey (Australia), who refines the gold and then delivers it to the Bank of Western
Australia Limited at a price negotiated by us. The concentration of credit risk in Australia is mitigated by the reputable nature of the
customer and the settlement of the proceeds within two days.
customer and the settlement of the proceeds within two days.
150
Emperor delivers their gold to AGR Matthey (Australia), who refines the gold and then sells the gold on to third parties. All
proceeds are received within a week of delivery. The concentration of credit risk in Australia is mitigated by the reputable nature of the
sales agent and its customers and the settlement of the proceeds within 6 days.
sales agent and its customers and the settlement of the proceeds within 6 days.
Foreign currency risk
Our functional currency for the South African operations is the South African Rand; for the Tolukuma Section and Porgera it is
the Papua New Guinea Kina and for Emperor is the Fijian Dollar.
Although gold is sold in Dollars, we are obliged to convert this into Rands for our South African operations under the South
African Reserve Bank regulations. We are thus exposed to fluctuations in the Dollar/Rand exchange rate. We conduct our operations in
South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Fiji predominantly in Rand, Kina and Australian Dollar respectively. Currently, foreign exchange
fluctuations affect the cash flow that we will realize from our operations as gold is sold in Dollars while production costs are incurred
primarily in Rands, Papua New Guinean Kina and Australian Dollars. Our results are positively affected when the Dollar strengthens
against these foreign currencies and adversely affected when the Dollar weakens against these foreign currencies. Our cash and cash
equivalent balances are held in Dollars, Rands, Papua New Guinean Kina and Australian Dollars; holdings denominated in other
currencies are relatively insignificant. Certain of our financial liabilities are denominated in a currency other than the Rand. We are thus
exposed to fluctuations in the Rand exchange rate with the relevant currency.
South Africa, Papua New Guinea and Fiji predominantly in Rand, Kina and Australian Dollar respectively. Currently, foreign exchange
fluctuations affect the cash flow that we will realize from our operations as gold is sold in Dollars while production costs are incurred
primarily in Rands, Papua New Guinean Kina and Australian Dollars. Our results are positively affected when the Dollar strengthens
against these foreign currencies and adversely affected when the Dollar weakens against these foreign currencies. Our cash and cash
equivalent balances are held in Dollars, Rands, Papua New Guinean Kina and Australian Dollars; holdings denominated in other
currencies are relatively insignificant. Certain of our financial liabilities are denominated in a currency other than the Rand. We are thus
exposed to fluctuations in the Rand exchange rate with the relevant currency.
Based on our fiscal 2005 financial results, a hypothetical 10% increase/decrease in exchange rate activity would have the
following approximate impacts on revenues and net profit after tax:
Exchange rate
Impact on revenue
Impact on net profit after tax
Rand/Dollar
$15.0 million
$10.5 million
Kina/Dollar
$11.5 million
$8.1 million
We have not entered into any foreign exchange hedging contracts to attempt to mitigate our foreign currency risk.
Interest rate and liquidity risk
Fluctuations in interest rates impact on the value of short-term cash investments and financing activities, giving rise to interest
rate risks.
Liquidity
In the ordinary course of business, we receive cash from our operations and are required to fund working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. This cash is managed to ensure surplus funds are invested in a manner to achieve maximum returns while
minimizing risks. Funding deficits for our mining operations have been financed through the issue of additional shares, by utilizing
undrawn committed borrowing facilities and obtaining new facilities at competitive rates to fund our working capital requirements. Lower
interest rates result in lower returns on investments and deposits and also may have the effect of making it less expensive to borrow funds
at then current rates. Conversely, higher interest rates result in higher interest payments on loans and overdrafts. As at June 30, 2005,
undrawn committed borrowing facilities amounted to $11.0 million and at October 31, 2005, these amounted to $21.0 million.
minimizing risks. Funding deficits for our mining operations have been financed through the issue of additional shares, by utilizing
undrawn committed borrowing facilities and obtaining new facilities at competitive rates to fund our working capital requirements. Lower
interest rates result in lower returns on investments and deposits and also may have the effect of making it less expensive to borrow funds
at then current rates. Conversely, higher interest rates result in higher interest payments on loans and overdrafts. As at June 30, 2005,
undrawn committed borrowing facilities amounted to $11.0 million and at October 31, 2005, these amounted to $21.0 million.
Interest rate swap agreement
From time to time we enter into interest rate swap agreements to mitigate interest rate risk.
An interest rate swap agreement was entered into to minimize the exposure to changes in interest rates with regard to the coupon
payable on our $66,000,000 of 6% Senior Convertible Notes due 2006 (refer to Note 18 of the financial statements). The fixed coupon
rate (in Dollars) of 6% per annum was swapped for a floating South African interest rate, calculated at the forward JIBAR plus 200 basis
points per annum. An amount of 60% of the coupon rate is subject to this swap agreement, based on the requirements of the South
African Reserve Bank, as this represents the amount of the funds raised utilized in South Africa. The maturity date of this agreement is
November 2006. A 0.5% increase or decrease in the assumed weighted average interest rate would change loss/(profit) on derivative
instruments by approximately $30,000.
rate (in Dollars) of 6% per annum was swapped for a floating South African interest rate, calculated at the forward JIBAR plus 200 basis
points per annum. An amount of 60% of the coupon rate is subject to this swap agreement, based on the requirements of the South
African Reserve Bank, as this represents the amount of the funds raised utilized in South Africa. The maturity date of this agreement is
November 2006. A 0.5% increase or decrease in the assumed weighted average interest rate would change loss/(profit) on derivative
instruments by approximately $30,000.
As discussed in Note 18 to our financial statements, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement was a liability of
$0.6 million as at June 30, 2005 (a liability of $2.0 million and $1.8 million as at June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively).
151
Long-term debt
Set out below is an analysis of our debt as at June 30, 2005, analyzed between fixed and variable interest rates and classified by
currency.
Dollar
denominated
loans
Rand
denominated
loans
Total
$'000
$'000
$'000
Interest rate
Variable rate .............................................................................
Variable rate .............................................................................
10,020
4,025
14,045
Effective interest rate ............................................................
6.5%
9.5%
n/a
Fixed rate..................................................................................
64,947
-
64,947
Effective interest rate ............................................................
16.1%
n/a
n/a
Total..........................................................................................
74,967
4,025
78,992
Repayment period
2006 .........................................................................................
2006 .........................................................................................
8,462
1,216
9,678
2007 .........................................................................................
65,489
2,431
67,920
2008 .........................................................................................
1,016
378
1,394
Total..........................................................................................
74,967
4,025
78,992
Labor risk
Approximately 70% of the labor force at our South African Operations are members of labor unions. The majority of the
union members are blue-collar employees. The unions negotiate two year wage agreements which are binding on employees in the
respective bargaining units, the largest of which consists of occupational groupings of mainly blue collar workers in the organization.
These agreements are valid from July 1 in the first year to June 30 of the second year. The levels of unionization for operations outside
South Africa vary. It is mostly contained amongst blue collar workers and membership is below 50%. The current agreement for
Blyvoor expired on June 30, 2005, however a new agreement has been reached for the next two years that provides wage increases of
6% as of July 1, 2005 and 6.5% as of July 1, 2006. Agreements for the CGR and ERPM Sections are currently being negotiated.
respective bargaining units, the largest of which consists of occupational groupings of mainly blue collar workers in the organization.
These agreements are valid from July 1 in the first year to June 30 of the second year. The levels of unionization for operations outside
South Africa vary. It is mostly contained amongst blue collar workers and membership is below 50%. The current agreement for
Blyvoor expired on June 30, 2005, however a new agreement has been reached for the next two years that provides wage increases of
6% as of July 1, 2005 and 6.5% as of July 1, 2006. Agreements for the CGR and ERPM Sections are currently being negotiated.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
152
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
There have been no material defaults in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other
material defaults with respect to any indebtedness of ours.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and our Non-Executive Chairman have evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as this term is defined under the rules of the SEC) as of June 30, 2005. Based on this
evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Non-Executive Chairman concluded that, as of
June 30, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting,
on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the US Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Non-Executive Chairman concluded that, as of
June 30, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting,
on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the US Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
In the process of conducting our audit for fiscal 2004, we identified certain accounting errors in our reported US GAAP
quarterly results for fiscal 2004. As a result, we restated amounts in our quarterly financial statements, as described in Item 5A.:
“Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Restatement of US GAAP Quarterly Results” of our Form 20-F filed with the SEC
for the year ended June 30, 2004. These restatements did not result in any restatement or revision to our financial results for fiscal
2004 as a whole, which were originally announced on August 10, 2004.
“Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Restatement of US GAAP Quarterly Results” of our Form 20-F filed with the SEC
for the year ended June 30, 2004. These restatements did not result in any restatement or revision to our financial results for fiscal
2004 as a whole, which were originally announced on August 10, 2004.
In fiscal 2004, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we reported to our Audit
Committee and to our auditors. These material weaknesses comprised:
(a)
a lack of sufficient knowledge and experience among our internal accounting personnel regarding the application of US
GAAP and SEC requirements;
GAAP and SEC requirements;
(b)
insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and
application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and
application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and
(c)
insufficient emphasis by management on evaluating our compliance with US GAAP requirements.
As part of the communications by KPMG with our Audit Committee with respect to KPMG's audit procedures for fiscal
2004, KPMG informed the Audit Committee that these deficiencies constituted material weaknesses, as defined by Auditing Standard
No. 2, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements,”
established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB.
No. 2, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements,”
established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB.
153
In an effort to address these material weaknesses our senior management, under the supervision of our Audit Committee,
prepared and implemented a US GAAP financial reporting process as part of our US GAAP action plan. This plan is designed to
generally improve our US GAAP reporting processes and to strengthen our control processes and procedures in order to prevent a
recurrence of the circumstances that resulted in the need to restate our quarterly financial statements. The following is a description of
our US GAAP Action Plan and the steps that we have taken to implement these initiatives:
generally improve our US GAAP reporting processes and to strengthen our control processes and procedures in order to prevent a
recurrence of the circumstances that resulted in the need to restate our quarterly financial statements. The following is a description of
our US GAAP Action Plan and the steps that we have taken to implement these initiatives:
1.
Arrange for our senior management and certain accounting and finance-related personnel to attend training sessions on US GAAP
and financial reporting responsibilities and SEC disclosure requirements. In fiscal 2005, relevant key personnel attended the
following training courses:
and financial reporting responsibilities and SEC disclosure requirements. In fiscal 2005, relevant key personnel attended the
following training courses:
•
US GAAP compared to current International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) – December 3, 2004, May 19, 2005 to
May 20, 2005;
•
US GAAP and Corporate Reporting – June 1, 2005 to June 2, 2005;
•
Overview of US GAAP – June 13, 2005;
•
US GAAP Technical Update – June 9, 2005 to June 10, 2005;
•
SEC Reporting – June 14, 2005;
•
Sarbanes-Oxley Update – June 15, 2005; and
•
Basics of US GAAP and Finance: What Every Practicing Lawyer Needs to Know – July 28, 2005 to July 29, 2005.
2.
Modify the mandate of our internal audit function to place greater emphasis on the adequacy of, and compliance with, procedures
relating to internal controls over US GAAP financial reporting and engage an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist
our accounting department and internal audit function in the preparation of our US GAAP consolidated financial statements. On
May 20, 2005, we engaged the services of Ernst & Young to provide assistance to the internal audit function in determining the
adequacy of, and compliance with, among other things, procedures relating to internal controls over US GAAP financial
reporting. Ernst & Young has assisted us in developing our Risk Based Internal Audit plan which encompasses the impact of our
US GAAP reporting requirements.
relating to internal controls over US GAAP financial reporting and engage an internationally recognized accounting firm to assist
our accounting department and internal audit function in the preparation of our US GAAP consolidated financial statements. On
May 20, 2005, we engaged the services of Ernst & Young to provide assistance to the internal audit function in determining the
adequacy of, and compliance with, among other things, procedures relating to internal controls over US GAAP financial
reporting. Ernst & Young has assisted us in developing our Risk Based Internal Audit plan which encompasses the impact of our
US GAAP reporting requirements.
3.
Seek to recruit an accounting staff member with US GAAP expertise. In October 2004, the Company employed a Certified Public
Accountant, or CPA, whose experience includes working as an external auditor for a public accounting firm, a fortune 500
Nasdaq listed company and a registrant subject to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Accountant, or CPA, whose experience includes working as an external auditor for a public accounting firm, a fortune 500
Nasdaq listed company and a registrant subject to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
4.
Engage an internationally recognized accounting firm to provide us with technical advice on US GAAP matters and SEC
disclosure requirements on an ongoing basis. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we engaged the services of Jefferson Wells
International Inc to provide the Company with assistance on an ad hoc basis for technical US GAAP issues that the Company’s
personnel address from time to time. They have assisted us thus far by providing us with a compliance checklist for
the fiscal 2005 Form 20-F reporting process.
disclosure requirements on an ongoing basis. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we engaged the services of Jefferson Wells
International Inc to provide the Company with assistance on an ad hoc basis for technical US GAAP issues that the Company’s
personnel address from time to time. They have assisted us thus far by providing us with a compliance checklist for
the fiscal 2005 Form 20-F reporting process.
In addition to the 4-step US GAAP Action Plan discussed above, we have employed an additional resource to assist the risk
department and the internal audit function.
We have experienced difficulties in finding internal personnel and external advisors in South Africa with sufficient US
GAAP experience. Concurrent quarterly reporting in both South African Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, or SA GAAP, as
the primary basis for reporting for South African purposes and US GAAP as the primary basis for our Exchange Act filings imposes a
significant time and expense burden on a business of our size, and will prove to be challenging as we convert to International
Financial Reporting Standards. Therefore, beginning in fiscal 2005, we ceased quarterly financial reporting and instead started to
report financial information semi-annually under both SA GAAP and US GAAP, with our first semi-annual financial statements
released for the six months ended December 31, 2004. We believe this process to be a more prudent use of our staff resources and
funds.
the primary basis for reporting for South African purposes and US GAAP as the primary basis for our Exchange Act filings imposes a
significant time and expense burden on a business of our size, and will prove to be challenging as we convert to International
Financial Reporting Standards. Therefore, beginning in fiscal 2005, we ceased quarterly financial reporting and instead started to
report financial information semi-annually under both SA GAAP and US GAAP, with our first semi-annual financial statements
released for the six months ended December 31, 2004. We believe this process to be a more prudent use of our staff resources and
funds.
154
As of June 30, 2005, with regards to the scope of our assessment, we did not have the right or authority to assess, modify or
dictate the internal controls of Porgera, nor have we reviewed its internal control. We also lacked the ability, in practice, to make the
assessment, as we did not have control of this entity. Accordingly, our conclusions regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting do not extend to the disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting of Porgera. However, we do have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the
financial information for Porgera is appropriately included in our financial statements and we participate in Porgera's monthly operating committee meetings where Porgera's monthly financial results are discussed and reviewed.
assessment, as we did not have control of this entity. Accordingly, our conclusions regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting do not extend to the disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting of Porgera. However, we do have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that the
financial information for Porgera is appropriately included in our financial statements and we participate in Porgera's monthly operating committee meetings where Porgera's monthly financial results are discussed and reviewed.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the year ended June 30, 2005, there have not been any significant changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that have negatively materially affected, or are reasonably likely to negatively materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
financial reporting.
155
ITEM 16. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
There is at least one member of our audit committee that possesses the relevant attributes sufficient to have an understanding of
South African Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, or SA GAAP, and financial statements and the ability to assess the general
application of SA GAAP. However, we do not have an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 16A of the Form 20-F) as
no member of the Audit Committee currently has the required US GAAP experience.
application of SA GAAP. However, we do not have an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 16A of the Form 20-F) as
no member of the Audit Committee currently has the required US GAAP experience.
The board is satisfied that the skills, experience and attributes of the members of the audit committee are sufficient to enable
those members to discharge the responsibilities of the audit committee.
16B. CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to all senior executives including our Non-Executive Chairman,
the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the Group Financial Manager and Financial Manager at each mining
operation as well as all other employees. The Code of Ethics and Conduct can be accessed on the Company’s website at
operation as well as all other employees. The Code of Ethics and Conduct can be accessed on the Company’s website at
www.drdgold.com
.
16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
KPMG Inc has served as our independent public accountants for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, for
which audited financial statements appear in this Annual Report. The Annual General Meeting elects the auditors annually.
The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by KPMG Inc to us in fiscal
2005 and 2004:
Auditors' remuneration
Year ended June 30,
2005
2004
$’000
$’000
Audit fees......................................................................................................................
1,535
720
Audit-related fees..........................................................................................................
-
-
Tax fees ........................................................................................................................
55
250
All other fees .......................................................................................................................
5
-
1,595
970
Audit fees billed for the annual audit services engagement, which are those services that the external auditor reasonably can
provide, include the company audit; statutory audits; comfort letters and consents; attest services; and assistance with and review of
documents filed with the SEC.
documents filed with the SEC.
Fees for tax services include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.
The Audit Committee appoints, re-appoints and removes the external auditors as well as determines the remuneration and
terms of engagement of the external auditors. The committee pre-approves, and has pre-approved, all non-audit services provided by
the external auditors. The Audit Committee considered all of the fees mentioned above and determined that such fees are compatible
with maintaining KPMG Inc’s independence.
the external auditors. The Audit Committee considered all of the fees mentioned above and determined that such fees are compatible
with maintaining KPMG Inc’s independence.
16D EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDADS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
16E PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER
Not applicable.
156
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements and related auditor’s reports are filed as part of this Annual Report.
Page
Report of the independent registered public accounting firm..............................................................................................
F-1
Consolidated statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003. .............................................
F-2
Consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2005 and 2004. ....................................................................................................
F-3
Consolidated statements of stockholders' equity for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003................................
F-4
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003...............................................
F-5
Notes to the consolidated financial statements....................................................................................................................
F-6 to F-58
Separate consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and its subsidiaries for its fiscal years ended ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and Emperor Mines Limited and its subsidiaries for its fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, are being filed pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X. Reference is made to Exhibit 15.2 and Exhibit 16.1, respectively, to our Annual Report on Form 20-F.
F-1
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of DRDGOLD Limited
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DRDGOLD Limited and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and
2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosu res in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of DRDGOLD Limited and its subsidiaries at June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, DRDGOLD Limited changed its method of accounting for asset
retirement obligations effective July 1, 2002.
/s/ KPMG Inc
KPMG Inc
Registered Accountants and Auditors
Chartered Accountants (SA)
Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
December 15, 2005
F-2
DRDGOLD Limited
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30
2005
2004
2003
Notes
$'000
$'000
$'000
REVENUES
Product sales
183,609
183,254
109,419
COSTS AND EXPENSES
(137,540)
(143,355)
(91,805)
Production costs
(136,520)
(143,026)
(90,761)
Movement in gold in process
1,717
920
(564)
Movement in provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs
19
(2,737)
(1,249)
(480)
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Depreciation and amortization
12 (13,797)
(25,975) (8,841)
Employment termination costs
6
(4,201)
(899)
(680)
Impairment of assets
7
(664)
(2,990)
-
Management and consulting fees
(6,651)
(2,448)
(1,650)
Profit/(loss) on derivative instruments
3,616
(1,042)
42,384
Profit/(loss) on sale of mining assets
2
(55)
1,729
Profit on disposal of subsidiary
4
-
-
5,302
SELLING, ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL CHARGES
(including stock based compensation costs of $1.0 million (2004: $2.3 million and 2003:
$4.3 million))
$4.3 million))
(17,777)
(22,600)
(8,621)
NET OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS)
6,597
(16,110)
47,237
NON-OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS)
Interest and dividends
2,363
1,243
7,487
Unrealized foreign exchange (losses)/gains
(9,277)
10,672
11,229
Profit on sale of other assets and listed investments
527
63
152
FINANCE COSTS
Interest expense
(11,365)
(7,750)
(6,699)
(LOSS)/PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAX AND
OTHER ITEMS
OTHER ITEMS
(11,155)
(11,882)
59,406
Income and mining tax expense
8 (5,762)
(14,230)
(15,830)
Equity in loss from associates
15
(20,511)
(11,975)
(6,867)
(LOSS)/PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS AFTER TAX
(37,428)
(38,087)
36,709
Minority interest
(2)
(7)
-
NET (LOSS)/PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
(37,430)
(38,094)
36,709
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income taxes of $nil in 2003)
3
-
-
(173)
Loss from discontinued operation, net of income taxes
9
(44,359)
(20,804)
(22,577)
NET (LOSS)/PROFIT APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
(81,789)
(58,898)
13,959
BASIC (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY
(CENTS)
BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY
(CENTS)
22 (15)
(17) 20
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CENTS)
22 -
-
-
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION (CENTS)
22 (17)
(10)
(12)
BASIC (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE (CENTS)
22 (32)
(27) 8
DILUTED (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CENTS)
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CENTS)
22 (15)
(17) 18
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY (CENTS)
22 -
-
-
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION (CENTS)
22 (17)
(10)
(12)
DILUTED (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE (CENTS)
22 (32)
(27) 6
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
DRDGOLD Limited
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30
2005
2004
Notes
$'000
$'000
ASSETS
Current assets
61,355
58,460
Cash and cash equivalents
36,085
22,453
Receivables
10 7,441
19,193
Receivables owing by related parties
10
579
321
Inventories
11 15,455
16,493
Deferred income and mining tax
8
1,795
-
Mining assets
12 122,170
156,943
Cost
288,000
327,115
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(165,830)
(170,172)
Other assets
Investment in associates
15
15,442
10,015
Non-current inventories
11
32,103
32,006
Non-current assets
13 7,187
25,311
Total Assets
238,257
282,735
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
49,758
83,453
Bank overdraft
1,370
1,828
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
17
33,317
61,153
Derivative instruments
18
-
309
Short-term portion of long-term loans
20
9,678
9,315
Income and mining taxes payable
5,393
2,744
Deferred income and mining tax
8
-
8,104
Non-current liabilities
108,572
116,741
Long-term loans
20 69,314
59,865
Deferred income and mining tax
8
16,112
13,004
Derivative instruments
18
550
4,765
Provision for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs
19
22,596
39,107
Total Liabilities
158,330
200,194
Minority interest
874
929
Stockholders' equity
79,053
81,612
Authorized
600,000,000 (2004: 300,000,000) ordinary no par value shares and 5,000,000
(2004: 5,000,0000) cumulative preference shares
(2004: 5,000,0000) cumulative preference shares
Issued
296,206,048 (2004: 233,307,667) ordinary no par value shares and 5,000,000
(2004: 5,000,000) cumulative preference shares
(2004: 5,000,000) cumulative preference shares
Cumulative preference shares
21
107
107
Stated capital and share premium
21
563,045
484,772
Additional paid-in capital
21
39,732
39,347
Unearned stock compensation
(338)
(971)
Accumulated deficit
(478,506)
(396,717)
Other comprehensive loss
(44,987)
(44,926)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
238,257
282,735
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
DRDGOLD Limited
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the years ended June 30
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the years ended June 30
Cumulative
Stated capital
Additional
Unearned
Other
Total
Number of
Number of
preference
and share
paid-in
stock
Accumulated
comprehensive stockholders'
Comprehensive
common
preferred
shares
premium
capital
compensation
deficit
loss
equity
(loss)/ income
shares
shares
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
BALANCE - JULY 1, 2002
177,173,485
5,000,000
107
351,537
33,392
-
(351,778)
(48,729)
(15,471)
Exercise of employee stock options
2,253,699
2,244
2,244
Issue of shares for cash
4,794,889
6,783
6,783
Share issue expenses
(213)
(213)
Net profit for the year
11,374
11,374
11,374
Stock based compensation
4,313
4,313
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of nil
Decrease in mark-to-market on listed investments
(1,759)
(1,759)
(1,759)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(2,035)
(2,035)
(2,035)
BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2003 as previously reported
184,222,073
5,000,000
107
360,351
37,705
-
(340,404)
(52,523)
5,236
7,580
Retroactive adjustment for equity in losses of Emperor
Mines Limited
Mines Limited
2,585
2,369
4,954
4,954
BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2003 as adjusted
184,222,073
5,000,000
107
360,351
37,705
-
(337,819)
(50,154)
10,190
12,534
Exercise of employee stock options
978,053
1,298
1,298
Issue of shares for cash
41,463,639
107,367
107,367
Share issue expenses
(992)
(992)
Shares issued for acquisition of joint venture 6,643,902
16,748
16,748
Net loss for the year
(58,898)
(58,898)
(58,898)
Unearned stock compensation
1,642
(1,642)
-
Amortization of unearned stock compensation
2,310
2,310
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of nil
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(1,639)
5,228
3,589
5,228
BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2004
233,307,667
5,000,000
107
484,772
39,347
(971)
(396,717)
(44,926)
81,612
(53,670)
Exercise of employee stock options
55 000
60
60
Issue of shares for cash
56,230,705
65,914
65,914
Share issue expenses
(4,305)
(4,305)
Shares issued for acquisition of associate
6,612,676
16,604
16,604
Net loss for the year
(81,789)
(81,789)
(81,789)
Unearned stock compensation
385
(385)
-
Amortization of unearned stock compensation
1,002
1,002
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of nil
Decrease in mark-to-market on listed investments
(45)
(45)
(45)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
16
(16)
-
(16)
BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2005
296,206,048
5,000,000
107
563,045
39,732
(338)
(478,506)
(44,987)
79,053
(81,850)
Analysis of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
2002
2003
2004
2005
Mark-to-market on listed investments
45
45
45
-
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(48,774)
(50,199)
(44,971)
(44,987)
(48,729)
(50,154)
(44,926)
(44,987)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
DRDGOLD Limited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended June 30
2005 2004 2003
Notes $’000
$'000
$'000
Net cash utilized by operating activities
(23,788) (25,092) (23,878)
Net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders
(81,789) (58,898) 13,959
Reconciliation to net cash provided by operations:
Net increase in provision for rehabilitation – continuing operations
19
2,737 1,249 480
Net increase in provision for rehabilitation – discontinued operation
19
1,023 2,206 934
Depreciation and amortization – continuing operations
12
13,797 25,975 8,841
Depreciation and amortization – discontinued operation
12
971 4,160 1,761
Amortization of restraint of trade payments
- -
70
Impairment of assets – continuing operations
7
664 2,990
-
Impairment of assets – discontinued operation
39,451 1,276
-
Unrealized losses/(profits) on derivative instruments
2,158 (35,843) (72,985)
(Profit)/loss on sale of mining assets
(2) 55
(1,729)
Stock based compensation expense
1,002 2,310 4,313
Profit on sale of other assets and listed investments
(527) (63) (152)
Amortization of debt issuance costs
1,597 1,533
-
Deferred tax provision – continuing operations
(6,792) 6,842 15,830
Deferred tax provision – discontinued operation
- -
25,935
Equity in loss from associate
15
20,511 11,975 6,867
Minority interest in loss of subsidiary
2 7 -
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy
- -
173
Profit on disposal of subsidiary
4
(25,687) -
(5,302)
Effect of changes in working capital items:
Receivables
5,750 7,114
(19,224)
Inventories
439 5,014
97
Movement in gold in process – continuing operations
(1,717) (920) 564
Movement in gold in process – discontinued operation
383 (80) 687
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (excluding short-term loans)
(4,888)
(7,389)
(4,526)
Increase in interest accruals
4,029 2,082
-
Movement in net taxation liability
3,100 3,313 (471)
Net cash utilized in investing activities
(31,640) (94,074) (9,818)
Additions to investments
(849) (10,828) (9,108)
Proceeds on sale of other assets and listed investments
482 63 196
Additions to mining assets
(24,863) (26,917) (13,414)
Proceeds on disposal of mining assets
2,180
3,397
3,594
Cash paid for acquisition of joint venture interest and for subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
4
- (59,789)
-
Additions to investment in associate
(8,590) - -
Proceeds on disposal of subsidiary, net of cash disposed
4
- -
8,914
Net cash generated in financing activities
67,441 88,626 55,449
Proceeds from the issue of the convertible notes
-
-
66,000
Costs associated with the issue of the convertible notes
-
(636)
(2,395)
Net proceeds from issue of shares
65,974 108,665 9,027
Share issue expenses
(4,305) (992) (213)
(Decrease)/increase in bank overdraft
(458) (2,069) 3,365
Long-term loans received
10,020 2,765 4,733
Long-term loans repaid
(3,790) (19,107) (25,068)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
12,013 (30,540) 21,753
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
1,619 8,570
(1,182)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
22,453 44,423 23,852
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
36,085 22,453 44,423
Income taxes paid
9,224
4,075
471
Interest paid
7,107
5,014
6,909
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
DRDGOLD Limited, or the Company, was formed in 1895 and is a gold mining company engaged in underground and surface gold
mining including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. The Group (being the Company and its subsidiaries, associates and
joint venture) focuses its operations on the West Witwatersrand basin in South Africa and in Papua New Guinea.
As at June 30, 2005, the South African operations consist of, the Blyvoor Section and a 40% interest in Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty)
Limited (comprising the Crown Section and the ERPM Section). The Australasian operations consist of the Tolukuma Section and a
20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, both based in Papua New Guinea. The Company has a 45.33% interest in Emperor Mines
Limited, located in Fiji. It also has exploration projects in South Africa, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Australia.
2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On July 30, 2004, the Company’s offer to the shareholders of Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, closed with the Company having
received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued share capital, thereby
increasing the Company's shareholding in Emperor from 19.78% to 45.33%. Accordingly, the Company issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of the Company's shares on the
date issued. Share issue and transaction costs associated with the offer amounted to $1.7 million.
Due to its cumulative ownership of 45.33%, the Company has accounted for its investment in Emperor under the equity method of
accounting. Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”, or
APB Opinion No. 18, requires the use of the equity method of accounting if the investment gives the Company the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies, but not control, over an investee. As a result of the additional equity
ownership and change in relationship with Emperor, including representation on Emperor’s board of directors, the Company has the
ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of Emperor. Accordingly, the Company has restated the prior years’
financial statements, as if the equity method had been utilized from December 2002, the date of the initial acquisition of the
investment in Emperor.
As required by APB Opinion No. 18, the change to the equity method in accounting for the Emperor investment requires restatement
of prior period financial statements. Beginning in August 2004, the Company recognized 45.33% of the loss of Emperor, adjusted for
amortization of the excess purchase price. The amount included for the year ended June 30, 2004, represents 19.78% of Emperor’s
losses, adjusted for the amortization of the excess purchase price. The amount included for the year ended June 30, 2003, represents
14.15%, from January 2003 to March 2003, and 19.81%, from April 2003 to June 2003, of Emperor’s losses, adjusted for the
amortization of the excess purchase price.
DRDGOLD Limited, or the Company, was formed in 1895 and is a gold mining company engaged in underground and surface gold
mining including exploration, extraction, processing and smelting. The Group (being the Company and its subsidiaries, associates and
joint venture) focuses its operations on the West Witwatersrand basin in South Africa and in Papua New Guinea.
As at June 30, 2005, the South African operations consist of, the Blyvoor Section and a 40% interest in Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty)
Limited (comprising the Crown Section and the ERPM Section). The Australasian operations consist of the Tolukuma Section and a
20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, both based in Papua New Guinea. The Company has a 45.33% interest in Emperor Mines
Limited, located in Fiji. It also has exploration projects in South Africa, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Australia.
2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On July 30, 2004, the Company’s offer to the shareholders of Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, closed with the Company having
received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued share capital, thereby
increasing the Company's shareholding in Emperor from 19.78% to 45.33%. Accordingly, the Company issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of the Company's shares on the
date issued. Share issue and transaction costs associated with the offer amounted to $1.7 million.
Due to its cumulative ownership of 45.33%, the Company has accounted for its investment in Emperor under the equity method of
accounting. Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”, or
APB Opinion No. 18, requires the use of the equity method of accounting if the investment gives the Company the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies, but not control, over an investee. As a result of the additional equity
ownership and change in relationship with Emperor, including representation on Emperor’s board of directors, the Company has the
ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of Emperor. Accordingly, the Company has restated the prior years’
financial statements, as if the equity method had been utilized from December 2002, the date of the initial acquisition of the
investment in Emperor.
As required by APB Opinion No. 18, the change to the equity method in accounting for the Emperor investment requires restatement
of prior period financial statements. Beginning in August 2004, the Company recognized 45.33% of the loss of Emperor, adjusted for
amortization of the excess purchase price. The amount included for the year ended June 30, 2004, represents 19.78% of Emperor’s
losses, adjusted for the amortization of the excess purchase price. The amount included for the year ended June 30, 2003, represents
14.15%, from January 2003 to March 2003, and 19.81%, from April 2003 to June 2003, of Emperor’s losses, adjusted for the
amortization of the excess purchase price.
F-7
2. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following is a summary of the effects of the restatement, for the change to the equity method in accounting for the investment in
Emperor, on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as well as the effect on the
consolidated balance sheet as at June 30, 2004 and 2003.
The following is a summary of the effects of the restatement, for the change to the equity method in accounting for the investment in
Emperor, on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as well as the effect on the
consolidated balance sheet as at June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Effect on consolidated statement of operations
Year ended June 30, 2004
As previously
reported Adjustments As restated
$'000 $'000 $'000
Equity in loss from associates
(8,827)
(3,148)
(11,975)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders
(55,750)
(3,148)
(58,898)
Basic and diluted loss per share (cents)
(26)
(1)
(27)
Effect on consolidated statement of operations
Year ended June 30, 2003
As previously
reported Adjustments As restated
$'000 $'000 $'000
Equity in loss from associates
(9,452)
2,585
(6,867)
Net profit applicable to common stockholders
11,374
2,585
13,959
Basic profit per share (cents)
6
2
8
Diluted profit per share (cents)
4
2
6
Effect on consolidated balance sheet
At June 30, 2004
As previously
reported Adjustments
As restated
$'000 $'000 $'000
Investments in associates
12,255
(2,240)
10,015
Total assets
284,975
(2,240)
282,735
Accumulated deficit
(396,154)
(563)
(396,717)
Other comprehensive loss (a)
(43,249)
(1,677)
(44,926)
Effect on consolidated balance sheet
At June 30, 2003
As previously
reported Adjustments As
restated
$'000 $'000 $'000
Investments in associates
7,852
4,954
12,806
Total assets
202,381
4,954
207,335
Accumulated deficit
(340,404)
2,585
(337,819)
Other comprehensive loss (a)
(52,523)
2,369
(50,154)
(a) Other comprehensive loss adjustments represent the Company’s share of foreign currency translation adjustments of Emperor.
F-8
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following are accounting policies used by the Group which have been consistently applied as indicated below:
Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires
the Group’s management to make assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. These estimates include the collectability of related party receivables, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the impairment of
mining assets, and the estimation of reclamation and closure costs and environmental rehabilitation costs, among others. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial information includes the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries and investments in
associates and joint venture. A company which is more than 50% owned by the Group, which the Group controls directly or
indirectly, through other subsidiary interests, is classified as a subsidiary. The results of any subsidiary, associate or joint venture
acquired or disposed of during the year, are consolidated from the effective date of acquisition and up to the effective date of
disposal.
Intra-company transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation.
Investment in joint venture
Investments in unincorporated mining joint ventures in which the Group has joint control, under a contractual agreement, are reported
using the proportionate consolidation method.
Investment in associates
Investments in associates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. These are entities over which the Group has the
ability to exercise significant influence, but which it does not control. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed where
the Group owns more than 20%, but less than 50%, of the voting stock of an investee. The Group’s investments in associates are
carried in the balance sheet at an amount that reflects its share of the net assets of the associates.
The recoverable amount of the associate, that is the Group's proportionate share of the estimate of future undiscounted distributions
from the associate, or its disposal value, if higher, is compared to the carrying value of the associate. If an impairment exists on this
basis, a reduction in the carrying value of the associate is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the discoun ted future
cash flows expected to be derived from the associate.
Equity accounting involves recognizing, in the statement of operations, the Group’s share of the associates’ profit or loss for the year
after tax to the extent of the Group's investment in and advances to its associates.
Goodwill on the acquisition of associates is included in the carrying value of the investment in associates.
Goodwill
Where the excess purchase price of a business acquisition cannot be attributed to assets acquired, including acquired properties and
mineral rights, it is included in goodwill and reviewed for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
Goodwill is stated at cost less impairment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis, or more
frequently if the Group believes indicator s of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two tier process. The first step
of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with the reporting unit's carrying amount, including
goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined based on estimated future discounted cash flows. If the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to determine
the amount of the impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the
reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The impairment which is recognized is measured as the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill.
The following are accounting policies used by the Group which have been consistently applied as indicated below:
Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires
the Group’s management to make assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. These estimates include the collectability of related party receivables, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the impairment of
mining assets, and the estimation of reclamation and closure costs and environmental rehabilitation costs, among others. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial information includes the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries and investments in
associates and joint venture. A company which is more than 50% owned by the Group, which the Group controls directly or
indirectly, through other subsidiary interests, is classified as a subsidiary. The results of any subsidiary, associate or joint venture
acquired or disposed of during the year, are consolidated from the effective date of acquisition and up to the effective date of
disposal.
Intra-company transactions and balances are eliminated on consolidation.
Investment in joint venture
Investments in unincorporated mining joint ventures in which the Group has joint control, under a contractual agreement, are reported
using the proportionate consolidation method.
Investment in associates
Investments in associates are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. These are entities over which the Group has the
ability to exercise significant influence, but which it does not control. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed where
the Group owns more than 20%, but less than 50%, of the voting stock of an investee. The Group’s investments in associates are
carried in the balance sheet at an amount that reflects its share of the net assets of the associates.
The recoverable amount of the associate, that is the Group's proportionate share of the estimate of future undiscounted distributions
from the associate, or its disposal value, if higher, is compared to the carrying value of the associate. If an impairment exists on this
basis, a reduction in the carrying value of the associate is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the discoun ted future
cash flows expected to be derived from the associate.
Equity accounting involves recognizing, in the statement of operations, the Group’s share of the associates’ profit or loss for the year
after tax to the extent of the Group's investment in and advances to its associates.
Goodwill on the acquisition of associates is included in the carrying value of the investment in associates.
Goodwill
Where the excess purchase price of a business acquisition cannot be attributed to assets acquired, including acquired properties and
mineral rights, it is included in goodwill and reviewed for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
Goodwill is stated at cost less impairment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis, or more
frequently if the Group believes indicator s of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two tier process. The first step
of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with the reporting unit's carrying amount, including
goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined based on estimated future discounted cash flows. If the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to determine
the amount of the impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the
reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The impairment which is recognized is measured as the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill.
F-9
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Foreign currency
The Group's functional currency for the South African operations is the South African Rand and for the Papua New Guinean
operations is the Papua New Guinean Kina. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded at
the rate of exchange ruling at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in such currencies are translated at the
rates applicable at the balance sheet date and profits and losses arising as a result of translating those assets and liabilities to the
functional currency are recorded in the statement of operations.
For foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is a currency other than the Rand, assets and liabilities are translated using the
closing rates at year end, and the statement of operations are translated at aver age rates. Differences arising on translation are
included as a component of other comprehensive loss. The translation of amounts into US Dollars is in accordance with SFAS No.
52, “Foreign Currency Translation,” whereby assets and liabilities are translated using the closing rates at year end, the statement of
operations are translated at average rates and equity at historical rates. The translation differences arising as a result of converting to
US Dollars using the current exchange rate method, are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity - other
comprehensive loss.
Receivables
Receivables consist of amounts owing by external and related parties and include amounts of a long- and short-term nature.
Provisions for uncollectible amounts are included in determining net income or loss where a decline in the value of the receivable has
occurred. Interest on balances owed to the Group accrues on a daily basis. Interest acc rued on impaired balances owed to the Group is
not recorded as it is not considered to be recoverable.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Due to the short maturity of the investments, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value.
Non-current unlisted investments
Non-current unlisted investments, in which the Group does not have significant influence or a controlling interest, are carried at
acquisition cost. Realized gains and losses are included in determining net income or loss. Impairment losses are included in
determining net income or loss where an other than temporary decline in the value of the investment has occurred.
Non-current listed investments
Non-current listed investments, are treated as ‘available for sale’, and are accounted for at fair value with unrealized gains and loss es
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity – other comprehensive loss. Realized gains and
losses are included in determining net income or loss.
Inventories
Inventories, comprising gold in process (being gold at the stage of production immediately prior to smelting) and supplies, are stated
at the lower of cost and market value. Costs are assigned to inventory on an average cost basis. Costs relating to gold in process
comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to smelting, including costs of extraction, depletion and processing, based
on the relevant stage of production. Selling, refining and general administration costs are excluded from inventory valuation.
Non-current inventory comprises ore stockpile. These in-process inventories are measured on the absorption cost method and valued
at the lower of average production cost and net realizable value, after a reasonable allowance for further processing costs. Costs
relating to ore stockpile comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to stockpiling, including costs of extraction and
crushing, as well as processing costs associated with ore stockpiles, based on the relevant stage of production.
Exploration costs
Mining exploration costs, including property acquisitions and mineral and surface rights relating to exploration stage properties, are
expensed as incurred.
Development costs
Development costs relating to major programs at existing mines are capitalized. Development costs consist primarily of expenditures
to initially establish a mine and to expand the capacity of operating mines. Ordinary development costs to maintain production are
expensed as incurred.
Foreign currency
The Group's functional currency for the South African operations is the South African Rand and for the Papua New Guinean
operations is the Papua New Guinean Kina. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded at
the rate of exchange ruling at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in such currencies are translated at the
rates applicable at the balance sheet date and profits and losses arising as a result of translating those assets and liabilities to the
functional currency are recorded in the statement of operations.
For foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is a currency other than the Rand, assets and liabilities are translated using the
closing rates at year end, and the statement of operations are translated at aver age rates. Differences arising on translation are
included as a component of other comprehensive loss. The translation of amounts into US Dollars is in accordance with SFAS No.
52, “Foreign Currency Translation,” whereby assets and liabilities are translated using the closing rates at year end, the statement of
operations are translated at average rates and equity at historical rates. The translation differences arising as a result of converting to
US Dollars using the current exchange rate method, are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity - other
comprehensive loss.
Receivables
Receivables consist of amounts owing by external and related parties and include amounts of a long- and short-term nature.
Provisions for uncollectible amounts are included in determining net income or loss where a decline in the value of the receivable has
occurred. Interest on balances owed to the Group accrues on a daily basis. Interest acc rued on impaired balances owed to the Group is
not recorded as it is not considered to be recoverable.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Due to the short maturity of the investments, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value.
Non-current unlisted investments
Non-current unlisted investments, in which the Group does not have significant influence or a controlling interest, are carried at
acquisition cost. Realized gains and losses are included in determining net income or loss. Impairment losses are included in
determining net income or loss where an other than temporary decline in the value of the investment has occurred.
Non-current listed investments
Non-current listed investments, are treated as ‘available for sale’, and are accounted for at fair value with unrealized gains and loss es
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity – other comprehensive loss. Realized gains and
losses are included in determining net income or loss.
Inventories
Inventories, comprising gold in process (being gold at the stage of production immediately prior to smelting) and supplies, are stated
at the lower of cost and market value. Costs are assigned to inventory on an average cost basis. Costs relating to gold in process
comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to smelting, including costs of extraction, depletion and processing, based
on the relevant stage of production. Selling, refining and general administration costs are excluded from inventory valuation.
Non-current inventory comprises ore stockpile. These in-process inventories are measured on the absorption cost method and valued
at the lower of average production cost and net realizable value, after a reasonable allowance for further processing costs. Costs
relating to ore stockpile comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to stockpiling, including costs of extraction and
crushing, as well as processing costs associated with ore stockpiles, based on the relevant stage of production.
Exploration costs
Mining exploration costs, including property acquisitions and mineral and surface rights relating to exploration stage properties, are
expensed as incurred.
Development costs
Development costs relating to major programs at existing mines are capitalized. Development costs consist primarily of expenditures
to initially establish a mine and to expand the capacity of operating mines. Ordinary development costs to maintain production are
expensed as incurred.
F-10
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Mining assets
Land is recorded at cost and not depreciated. Buildings and other non-mining fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairments.
Actual expenditures incurred for mineral property interests, mine development costs, mine plant facilities and equipment are
capitalized to the specific mine to which the cost relates. Amortization is calculated on a mine-by-mine basis (i.e. the cost pools are
the individual mines) using the units of production method. Under the units of production method, the Group estimates the
amortization rate based on actual production over total proven and probable ore reserves of the particular mine. This rate is then
applied to actual costs incurred to arrive at the amortization expense for the period. Proven and probable ore reserves of a particular
mine re flect estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves that can be recovered in the future from known mineral
deposits that are presently accessible.
Impairment of mining assets
The impairment of long-lived assets is accounted for in terms of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-
Lived Assets.”
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset or asset group is assessed by comparing the carrying
amount of an asset or group of assets to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows of the asset or group of assets. Estimates of
future cash flows include estimates of future gold prices and foreign exchange rates. It is therefore reasonably possible that changes
could occur which may affect the recoverability of the Group’s mining assets. I f an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired,
the impairment which is recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds
the discounted future cash flows expected to be derived from that asset or group of assets. The asset, or asset group, is the lowest
level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows. The lowest level for which there are
identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows is on a mine-by-mine basis. Therefore the Company makes the
analysis on a mine-by-mine basis.
Deferred stripping costs
Stripping costs incurred in open-pit operations during the production phase to remove additional waste are charged to operating costs
on the basis of the average life of mine stripping ratio and the average life of mine costs per ton. The average stripping ratio is
calculated as the number of tons of waste material expected to be removed during the life of mine per ton of ore mined. The average
life of mine cost per ton is calculated as the total expected costs to be incurred to mine the ore body divided by the number of tons
expected to be mined. The average life of mine stripping ratio and the average life of mine cost per ton are recalculated annually in
light of additional knowledge and changes in estimates.
The cost of the “excess stripping” is capitalized as mine development costs when the actual mining costs exceed the sum of the
adjusted ore tons mined, being the actual ore tons plus the product of the actual ore tones multiplied by the average life of mine
stripping ratio, multiplied by the life of mine cost per ton. When the actual mining costs are below the sum of the adjusted ore tons
mined, being the actual ore tons plus the product of the actual ore tons multiplied by the average life of mine stripping ratio,
multiplied by the life of mine cost per ton, previou sly capitalized costs are expensed to increase the cost up to the average. Thus, the
cost of stripping in any period will be reflective of the average stripping rates for the ore body as a whole. Deferred stripping costs of
$12.5 million (2004: $3.5 million), at Porgera, are classified as mining assets and the amounts amortized are included in the
depreciation and amortization charge for all periods presented. During fiscal 2005, $11.1 million (2004: $4.1 million) of deferred
stripping costs were capitalized to mining assets.
The deferred stripping costs are included in the calculations of impairment tests performed in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
Borrowing costs
Interest on borrowings utilized to finance qualifying capital projects under construction is capitalized during the construction phase as
part of the cost of the project. Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred. No borrowing costs were capitalized during the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004 or 2003.
Mining assets
Land is recorded at cost and not depreciated. Buildings and other non-mining fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairments.
Actual expenditures incurred for mineral property interests, mine development costs, mine plant facilities and equipment are
capitalized to the specific mine to which the cost relates. Amortization is calculated on a mine-by-mine basis (i.e. the cost pools are
the individual mines) using the units of production method. Under the units of production method, the Group estimates the
amortization rate based on actual production over total proven and probable ore reserves of the particular mine. This rate is then
applied to actual costs incurred to arrive at the amortization expense for the period. Proven and probable ore reserves of a particular
mine re flect estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves that can be recovered in the future from known mineral
deposits that are presently accessible.
Impairment of mining assets
The impairment of long-lived assets is accounted for in terms of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-
Lived Assets.”
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset or asset group is assessed by comparing the carrying
amount of an asset or group of assets to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows of the asset or group of assets. Estimates of
future cash flows include estimates of future gold prices and foreign exchange rates. It is therefore reasonably possible that changes
could occur which may affect the recoverability of the Group’s mining assets. I f an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired,
the impairment which is recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds
the discounted future cash flows expected to be derived from that asset or group of assets. The asset, or asset group, is the lowest
level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows. The lowest level for which there are
identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of other cash flows is on a mine-by-mine basis. Therefore the Company makes the
analysis on a mine-by-mine basis.
Deferred stripping costs
Stripping costs incurred in open-pit operations during the production phase to remove additional waste are charged to operating costs
on the basis of the average life of mine stripping ratio and the average life of mine costs per ton. The average stripping ratio is
calculated as the number of tons of waste material expected to be removed during the life of mine per ton of ore mined. The average
life of mine cost per ton is calculated as the total expected costs to be incurred to mine the ore body divided by the number of tons
expected to be mined. The average life of mine stripping ratio and the average life of mine cost per ton are recalculated annually in
light of additional knowledge and changes in estimates.
The cost of the “excess stripping” is capitalized as mine development costs when the actual mining costs exceed the sum of the
adjusted ore tons mined, being the actual ore tons plus the product of the actual ore tones multiplied by the average life of mine
stripping ratio, multiplied by the life of mine cost per ton. When the actual mining costs are below the sum of the adjusted ore tons
mined, being the actual ore tons plus the product of the actual ore tons multiplied by the average life of mine stripping ratio,
multiplied by the life of mine cost per ton, previou sly capitalized costs are expensed to increase the cost up to the average. Thus, the
cost of stripping in any period will be reflective of the average stripping rates for the ore body as a whole. Deferred stripping costs of
$12.5 million (2004: $3.5 million), at Porgera, are classified as mining assets and the amounts amortized are included in the
depreciation and amortization charge for all periods presented. During fiscal 2005, $11.1 million (2004: $4.1 million) of deferred
stripping costs were capitalized to mining assets.
The deferred stripping costs are included in the calculations of impairment tests performed in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
Borrowing costs
Interest on borrowings utilized to finance qualifying capital projects under construction is capitalized during the construction phase as
part of the cost of the project. Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred. No borrowing costs were capitalized during the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004 or 2003.
F-11
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Reclamation and closure costs
SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” or SFAS No. 143, was adopted by the Group with effect from July 1,
2002, and requires that the fair value of liabilities for asset retirement obligations be recognized in the period in which they are
incurred. A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset is recorded and is depreciated over the life of the asset.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, the Group accrued for the estimated reclamation and closure liability through annual charges
to earnings over the estimated life of the mine. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting policy on the balance sheet at that
date was to increase mining assets by $0.55 million and increase rehabilitation liabilities by $0.72 million with a cum ulative effect of
change in accounting principle adjustment charge to net earnings of $0.17 million in fiscal 2003.
Environmental rehabilitation costs
Where a related asset is not easily identifiable, environmental rehabilitation costs which are based on the Group’s interpretation of
current environmental and regulatory requirements are accrued as and when tailings are deposited. The estimated costs of
rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology or other circumstances. Based
on current environmental regulations and known rehabilitation requirements, management has included its best estimate of these
obligations in its rehabilitation accrual.
Environmental liabilities other than rehabilitation costs which relate to liabilities from specific events are accrued when they are
known, probable and reasonably estimable.
In South Africa, annual contributions are made to dedicated rehabili tation trust funds to fund the estimated cost of rehabilitation
during and at the end of the life of the relevant mine. The funds contributed to the trusts, including income earned thereon, are
included under non-current assets.
Revenue
Revenue consists of sales of gold bullion and is recognized when the product is delivered to the relevant refinery, Rand Refinery
Limited in South Africa, N.M. Rothschild in Australasia (for the Tolukuma Section) and AGR Matthey in Papua New Guinea (for
Porgera), at which stage title, including all risks and rewards of ownership, passes from the Group to the buyer.
Once the gold bars reach the refinery, they are assayed to determine the gold content of each bar before being sent for refining where
it is purified to 99.9% purity and cast into troy ounce bars of varying weights. The bullion is then sold by the refinery on the same
day as the delivery, and the proceeds are remitted to the Group within two days.
De rivative instruments
Under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, all derivative instruments are
recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value, unless they meet the criteria for the normal purchase normal sale exception. On the
date a derivative contract is entered into, the derivative can be designated as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or
liability (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge), or (3) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
entity. The Group’s derivative transactions, while designed to provide effective economic hedges under the Group’s risk management
policies, do not qualify for hedge accounting. Therefore, any changes in their fair value are recognized in the statement of operations,
currently. Derivative instruments are not entered into for trading purposes.
Pension plans and other employee benefits
Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans, in the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through annual contributions.
Refer Note 23.
In addition, the Group makes long-service awards to certain eligible employees, based on qualifying ages and levels of service. Due
to the nature of the award and the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate payment of the long-service award, no provision is made for
potential payment and the Group expenses such costs as they are incurred. Refer Note 23.
The Group contributes to a defined contribution multi-employer medical fund for current employees and certain retirees on an
annually determined contribution basis. No contributions are made for employees retiring after December 31, 1996. Refer Note 23.
Reclamation and closure costs
SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” or SFAS No. 143, was adopted by the Group with effect from July 1,
2002, and requires that the fair value of liabilities for asset retirement obligations be recognized in the period in which they are
incurred. A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset is recorded and is depreciated over the life of the asset.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, the Group accrued for the estimated reclamation and closure liability through annual charges
to earnings over the estimated life of the mine. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting policy on the balance sheet at that
date was to increase mining assets by $0.55 million and increase rehabilitation liabilities by $0.72 million with a cum ulative effect of
change in accounting principle adjustment charge to net earnings of $0.17 million in fiscal 2003.
Environmental rehabilitation costs
Where a related asset is not easily identifiable, environmental rehabilitation costs which are based on the Group’s interpretation of
current environmental and regulatory requirements are accrued as and when tailings are deposited. The estimated costs of
rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology or other circumstances. Based
on current environmental regulations and known rehabilitation requirements, management has included its best estimate of these
obligations in its rehabilitation accrual.
Environmental liabilities other than rehabilitation costs which relate to liabilities from specific events are accrued when they are
known, probable and reasonably estimable.
In South Africa, annual contributions are made to dedicated rehabili tation trust funds to fund the estimated cost of rehabilitation
during and at the end of the life of the relevant mine. The funds contributed to the trusts, including income earned thereon, are
included under non-current assets.
Revenue
Revenue consists of sales of gold bullion and is recognized when the product is delivered to the relevant refinery, Rand Refinery
Limited in South Africa, N.M. Rothschild in Australasia (for the Tolukuma Section) and AGR Matthey in Papua New Guinea (for
Porgera), at which stage title, including all risks and rewards of ownership, passes from the Group to the buyer.
Once the gold bars reach the refinery, they are assayed to determine the gold content of each bar before being sent for refining where
it is purified to 99.9% purity and cast into troy ounce bars of varying weights. The bullion is then sold by the refinery on the same
day as the delivery, and the proceeds are remitted to the Group within two days.
De rivative instruments
Under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, all derivative instruments are
recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value, unless they meet the criteria for the normal purchase normal sale exception. On the
date a derivative contract is entered into, the derivative can be designated as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or
liability (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge), or (3) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
entity. The Group’s derivative transactions, while designed to provide effective economic hedges under the Group’s risk management
policies, do not qualify for hedge accounting. Therefore, any changes in their fair value are recognized in the statement of operations,
currently. Derivative instruments are not entered into for trading purposes.
Pension plans and other employee benefits
Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans, in the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through annual contributions.
Refer Note 23.
In addition, the Group makes long-service awards to certain eligible employees, based on qualifying ages and levels of service. Due
to the nature of the award and the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate payment of the long-service award, no provision is made for
potential payment and the Group expenses such costs as they are incurred. Refer Note 23.
The Group contributes to a defined contribution multi-employer medical fund for current employees and certain retirees on an
annually determined contribution basis. No contributions are made for employees retiring after December 31, 1996. Refer Note 23.
F-12
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Premium and debt costs
Discounts and underwriting, legal and other direct costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are deferred and are
amortized, over the term of the debt, to interest expense using the effective interest rate method.
Taxation
Deferred income and mining taxes
The Group follows the liability method of accounting for deferred income and mining tax whereby the Group recognizes the tax
consequences of temporary differences by applying current statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between
financial statement amounts and the tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities include the
impact of any tax rate changes enacted during the year.
A valuation allowance is raised against deferred tax asset s which are not considered more likely than not to be realizable.
Secondary Taxation on Companies (STC)
STC is a tax levied by the South African Revenue Services on dividends declared and becomes payable on declaration of a dividend.
STC is expensed when the related dividend is declared.
(Loss)/profit per share
(Loss)/profit per share is calculated based on the net result divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year.
Fully diluted (loss)/profit per share is based upon the inclusion of potential dilutive shares with a dilutive effect on (loss)/profit per
share. In fiscal 2005, the shares underlying the convertible notes and the shares underlying the staff options allocated in terms of the
Employee Share Option Scheme, or ESOS, along with their respective impact on the net (loss)/profit applicable to common
stockholders, of $7.8 million and $nil, were considered in determining the diluted (loss)/profit per share. In fisca l 2004 the shares
underlying the convertible notes and the shares underlying the staff options allocated in terms of ESOS, along with their respective
impact on the net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders, of $3.6 million and $nil, were considered in determining the
diluted loss per share. In fiscal 2003 the shares underlying the options allocated in terms of ESOS, and their respective impact on the
net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders, of $2.6 million and $nil, were considered in determining the diluted loss per
share.
In fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, a loss applicable to common stockholders of $81.8 million and $58.9 million, and a profit of
$14.0 million, respectively, was recorded. As a result of the losses recorded in fiscal 2005 and 2004, the adjustments for potential
dilutive shares were anti-dilutive.
Stock-based compensation plans
At June 30, 2005, the Company has in place an Employee Share Option Scheme, which is des cribed more fully in Note 23.
The Group has adopted the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” or
SFAS No. 123, and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure and amendment of
SFAS No. 123,” and applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” or APB
Opinion No. 25, and related Interpretations, with respect to its accounting for its employee based compensation plan.
The difference between the option strike price and the prevailing market value of the share at grant date is recorded as an expense
over the vesting period. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations, $1.0 million, (2004: $2.3 million;
2003: $4.3 million) of stock-based compensation cost was recognized as an expense for the year ended June 30, 2005.
Premium and debt costs
Discounts and underwriting, legal and other direct costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are deferred and are
amortized, over the term of the debt, to interest expense using the effective interest rate method.
Taxation
Deferred income and mining taxes
The Group follows the liability method of accounting for deferred income and mining tax whereby the Group recognizes the tax
consequences of temporary differences by applying current statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between
financial statement amounts and the tax bases of certain assets and liabilities. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities include the
impact of any tax rate changes enacted during the year.
A valuation allowance is raised against deferred tax asset s which are not considered more likely than not to be realizable.
Secondary Taxation on Companies (STC)
STC is a tax levied by the South African Revenue Services on dividends declared and becomes payable on declaration of a dividend.
STC is expensed when the related dividend is declared.
(Loss)/profit per share
(Loss)/profit per share is calculated based on the net result divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year.
Fully diluted (loss)/profit per share is based upon the inclusion of potential dilutive shares with a dilutive effect on (loss)/profit per
share. In fiscal 2005, the shares underlying the convertible notes and the shares underlying the staff options allocated in terms of the
Employee Share Option Scheme, or ESOS, along with their respective impact on the net (loss)/profit applicable to common
stockholders, of $7.8 million and $nil, were considered in determining the diluted (loss)/profit per share. In fisca l 2004 the shares
underlying the convertible notes and the shares underlying the staff options allocated in terms of ESOS, along with their respective
impact on the net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders, of $3.6 million and $nil, were considered in determining the
diluted loss per share. In fiscal 2003 the shares underlying the options allocated in terms of ESOS, and their respective impact on the
net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders, of $2.6 million and $nil, were considered in determining the diluted loss per
share.
In fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, a loss applicable to common stockholders of $81.8 million and $58.9 million, and a profit of
$14.0 million, respectively, was recorded. As a result of the losses recorded in fiscal 2005 and 2004, the adjustments for potential
dilutive shares were anti-dilutive.
Stock-based compensation plans
At June 30, 2005, the Company has in place an Employee Share Option Scheme, which is des cribed more fully in Note 23.
The Group has adopted the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” or
SFAS No. 123, and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure and amendment of
SFAS No. 123,” and applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” or APB
Opinion No. 25, and related Interpretations, with respect to its accounting for its employee based compensation plan.
The difference between the option strike price and the prevailing market value of the share at grant date is recorded as an expense
over the vesting period. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations, $1.0 million, (2004: $2.3 million;
2003: $4.3 million) of stock-based compensation cost was recognized as an expense for the year ended June 30, 2005.
F-13
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Stock-based compensation plans (continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to its employee based compensation plan (thousands except for earnings per share
information):
The following table illustrates the effect on net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to its employee based compensation plan (thousands except for earnings per share
information):
Year ended
Year ended
Year ended
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
Net (loss)/profit applicable to common stockholders
- as stated
(81,789) (58,898) 13,959
- add back: stock-based compensation costs included in statement of operations, net of
related tax effects
related tax effects
1,002
2,310 4,313
- less: total stock-based compensation costs determined under fair value based method,
net of related tax effects
net of related tax effects
(2,709)
(3,700) (4,861)
- pro-forma
(83,496) (60,288) 13,411
Basic (loss)/profit per share
- as stated (cents)
- as stated (cents)
(32) (27)
8
- pro-forma (cents)
(32) (28)
7
Diluted (loss)/profit per share
- as stated (cents)
(32) (27)
6
- pro-forma (cents)
(32) (28)
6
Discontinued operation
The results of operations of discontinued Group components and gains or losses from their disposal are each presented separately net
of tax in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. A Group component is considered a discontinued
operation if its operations and cash flows have been or will be eliminated from the ongoing activities of the Group as a result of a
disposal transaction, the Group will not have any significant subsequent continuing involvement with the component, and the
component can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes. If not disposed of by the balance sheet
date, to qualify as discontinued operation, a component must also meet the conditions to be classified as held for sale. Net assets of a
discontinued Group component classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of its ca rrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. Gains from the sale of a discontinued Group component are recognized in the period realized and reported separately.
The results of operations of discontinued Group components and gains or losses from their disposal are each presented separately net
of tax in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. A Group component is considered a discontinued
operation if its operations and cash flows have been or will be eliminated from the ongoing activities of the Group as a result of a
disposal transaction, the Group will not have any significant subsequent continuing involvement with the component, and the
component can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes. If not disposed of by the balance sheet
date, to qualify as discontinued operation, a component must also meet the conditions to be classified as held for sale. Net assets of a
discontinued Group component classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of its ca rrying amount or fair value less cost to
sell. Gains from the sale of a discontinued Group component are recognized in the period realized and reported separately.
Comparatives
Comparatives have been reclassified, where necessary to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Comparatives have been reclassified, where necessary to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Recent pronouncements
SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment”, to focus primarily on accounting for transactions where an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions and to eliminate the alternative of applying the intrinsic value measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 to stock
compensation awards issued to employees. The new standard requires enterprises to measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is to be recognized over the
period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment”, to focus primarily on accounting for transactions where an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions and to eliminate the alternative of applying the intrinsic value measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 to stock
compensation awards issued to employees. The new standard requires enterprises to measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is to be recognized over the
period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
The Company has continued to apply APB Opinion No. 25 and will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R effective July 1, 2005.
Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments,
the amortization method for compensation cost, and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. The transition methods
include prospective and retroactive adoption options. Under the retroactive options, prior periods may be restated either as of the
beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be
recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS No. 123R; the
retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the first
period restated . The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R, and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R
may have a material impact on consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The Company has not yet determined the
method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and also has not determined whether the adoption will result in
amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments,
the amortization method for compensation cost, and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. The transition methods
include prospective and retroactive adoption options. Under the retroactive options, prior periods may be restated either as of the
beginning of the year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation expense be
recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the first quarter of adoption of SFAS No. 123R; the
retroactive methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the first
period restated . The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R, and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R
may have a material impact on consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The Company has not yet determined the
method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and also has not determined whether the adoption will result in
amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
F-14
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Recent pronouncements (continued)
SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Inventory Pricing”
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,
Inventory Pricing”. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges and require the allocation of fixed production
overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Inventory Pricing”
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an amendment to Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43,
Inventory Pricing”. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges and require the allocation of fixed production
overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
The provisions of this standard are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions.” The statement eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for non-monetary
exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29 and replaces it with an exception for exchanges
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future
cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.
Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions.” The statement eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for non-monetary
exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29 and replaces it with an exception for exchanges
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future
cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.
The statement is effective for all fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3”
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” to replace APB Opinion No. 20, by
revising the accounting treatment and reporting requirements for all voluntary changes in accounting principles. APB Opinion No. 20
required that the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle be included in net income. Under the new statement, the
change in accounting principle is applied retrospectively (as if the principle had always been used) to prior period’s financial
statements, hence revising the comparative amounts. The statement also specifically requires that changes in the method of
depreciation, amortization and depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in estimate affected by a
change in accounting principle.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” to replace APB Opinion No. 20, by
revising the accounting treatment and reporting requirements for all voluntary changes in accounting principles. APB Opinion No. 20
required that the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle be included in net income. Under the new statement, the
change in accounting principle is applied retrospectively (as if the principle had always been used) to prior period’s financial
statements, hence revising the comparative amounts. The statement also specifically requires that changes in the method of
depreciation, amortization and depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in estimate affected by a
change in accounting principle.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors occurring in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
EITF Issue 03-13, “Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets, in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations”
In November 2004, the EITF of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue 03-13 on evaluating whether the criteria in paragraph 42 of
Statement 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, have been met for the purposes of classifying the
results of operations of an entity that either has been disposed or classified as held for sale as discontinued operations.
of Long-Lived Assets, in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations”
In November 2004, the EITF of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue 03-13 on evaluating whether the criteria in paragraph 42 of
Statement 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, have been met for the purposes of classifying the
results of operations of an entity that either has been disposed or classified as held for sale as discontinued operations.
The consensus stated that the criteria in paragraph 42 should only be applied to a component of the enterprise that is either disposed
of or classified as held for sale in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of
this EITF to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
of or classified as held for sale in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of
this EITF to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
EITF Issue 04-06, “Accounting For Stripping Costs Incurred During Production in the Mining Industry”
In March 2005, the EITF reached a consensus (ratified by the FASB) that stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a
mine are variable production costs that should be included in the costs of inventory produced during the period that the stripping
costs are incurred.
The EITF consensus is effective for the first reporting period in years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is reviewing the guidance issued in Issue 04-06 and has not yet determined the impact of this
pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2005, the EITF reached a consensus (ratified by the FASB) that stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a
mine are variable production costs that should be included in the costs of inventory produced during the period that the stripping
costs are incurred.
The EITF consensus is effective for the first reporting period in years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is reviewing the guidance issued in Issue 04-06 and has not yet determined the impact of this
pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.
F-15
4. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES
2005 acquisitions
Emperor Mines Limited
On July 30, 2004, the Company’s offer to the shareholders of Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, closed with the Company having
received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued share capital, thereby
increasing the Company's shareholding in Emperor from 19.78% to 45.33%. Accordingly, the Company issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of the Company's shares on the
date issued. Share issue and transaction costs associated with the offer amounted to $1.7 million.
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
2005 acquisitions
Emperor Mines Limited
On July 30, 2004, the Company’s offer to the shareholders of Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, closed with the Company having
received acceptances from Emperor’s shareholders representing approximately 25.55% of Emperor’s issued share capital, thereby
increasing the Company's shareholding in Emperor from 19.78% to 45.33%. Accordingly, the Company issued 6,612,676 shares in
exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor shares to the value of $16.6 million, based on the market value of the Company's shares on the
date issued. Share issue and transaction costs associated with the offer amounted to $1.7 million.
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
$'000
Cash and cash equivalents
1,187
Receivables
426
Inventories
2,174
Mining assets
20,034
Deferred borrowing costs
189
Deferred income and mining tax
59
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(2,698)
Short-term portion of long-term loans
(815)
Income and mining taxes payable
(37)
Long-term loans
(3,530)
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
(385)
Fair value of attributable net assets at date of acquisition (25.55% interest)
16,604
Attributable net assets at date of acquisition (25.55% interest)
7,133
Excess paid over net asset value
9,471
Costs on acquisition
1,702
Consideration
18,306
Settled by way of shares issued
16,604
Settled by way of cash
1,702
18,306
The fair value of the 6,612,676 no par value shares issued was $16.6 million, determined based on the prevailing market value of
DRDGOLD Limited shares on June 10, 2004 (refer Note 21), in final settlement of the purchase price determined on July 30, 2004.
The excess paid over the net asset value of Emperor relates to the fair value placed on Emperor’s mining assets by the Company.
F-16
4. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES (continued)
2005 disposals
North West Operations
On March 3, 2005, the Company entered into a 60-day review period at the North West Operations (comprising the Buffels and
Harties Sections) due to continuing losses at these operations. The purpose of this 60-day review period was to assess whether these
operations could be restored to break-even.
On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake of 5.3 on the Richter scale. As a consequence of
the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was continuing
seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, the Company closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of the
employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Af rica for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold
Mines Limited (which owns the North West Operations), which order was granted on the same day.
The aggregate carrying value of the assets and liabilities disposed of in connection with the provisional liquidation were as follows:
2005 disposals
North West Operations
On March 3, 2005, the Company entered into a 60-day review period at the North West Operations (comprising the Buffels and
Harties Sections) due to continuing losses at these operations. The purpose of this 60-day review period was to assess whether these
operations could be restored to break-even.
On March 9, 2005, the North West Operations suffered the effects of an earthquake of 5.3 on the Richter scale. As a consequence of
the extensive damage caused by the earthquake, the No. 5 Shaft of the North West Operations was closed. There was continuing
seismic activity in the area and on March 16, 2005, the Company closed the No. 2 Shaft because of concerns for the safety of the
employees.
On March 22, 2005, application was made to the High Court of South Af rica for the provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein Gold
Mines Limited (which owns the North West Operations), which order was granted on the same day.
The aggregate carrying value of the assets and liabilities disposed of in connection with the provisional liquidation were as follows:
$'000
Cash and cash equivalents
317
Receivables
2,645
Inventories
1,854
Mining assets
-
Non-current assets
18,672
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(21,590)
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
(19,649)
Net liabilities
(17,751)
100% thereof
17,751
Cash proceeds received
-
Costs incurred on disposal
(7,265)
Foreign currency translation gain realized
7,619
Profit realized on disposal of subsidiary
18,105
Cash proceeds received
-
Costs incurred on disposal
(7,265)
Less cash and cash equivalents of entity disposed of
(317)
Net cash flow on disposal of subsidiary
(7,582)
F-17
4. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES (continued)
2004 acquisitions
Net-Gold Services Limited
With effect from April 28, 2004, the closing date, the Group acquired 50.25% of the shares of Net-Gold Services Limited, a subsidiary
of G.M. Network Limited. This entity brokers the payment of purchases made by subscribers, through settlement in gold. The results
of Net-Gold Services Limited's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. Included in the
acquisition is an option to exchange the Group's shareholding in Net-Gold Services Limited for approximately 14.3% of the shares in
G.M. Network Limited, a non-public company that focuses on the development of patents and other intellectual property specifically
in connection with electronic trading on the Internet. This option is valid until December 31, 2007.
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
2004 acquisitions
Net-Gold Services Limited
With effect from April 28, 2004, the closing date, the Group acquired 50.25% of the shares of Net-Gold Services Limited, a subsidiary
of G.M. Network Limited. This entity brokers the payment of purchases made by subscribers, through settlement in gold. The results
of Net-Gold Services Limited's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. Included in the
acquisition is an option to exchange the Group's shareholding in Net-Gold Services Limited for approximately 14.3% of the shares in
G.M. Network Limited, a non-public company that focuses on the development of patents and other intellectual property specifically
in connection with electronic trading on the Internet. This option is valid until December 31, 2007.
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
$'000
Cash and cash equivalents
1,378
Receivables
44
Inventories
1,034
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(655)
Fair value of net assets at date of acquisition
1,801
50.25% thereof
905
Goodwill arising on acquisition (refer Note 16)
1,095
Consideration
2,000
Less cash and cash equivalents of acquired entity
(1,378)
Net consideration
622
Settled by way of cash and cash equivalents
622
Porgera Joint Venture
With effect from October 14, 2003, the Group acquired the shares in Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited, or OMP, and Mineral
Resources Porgera Limited, or MRP. The transaction was affected through the amalgamation of OMP, MRP and the Company's
wholly-owned subsidiary, Dome Resources (PNG) Limited. OMP changed its name to DRD (Porgera) Limited. This resulted in the
Company acquiring a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture in Papua New Guinea. The Porgera mine's main business focus is the
extraction of gold.
F-18
4. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES (continued)
Porgera Joint Venture (continued)
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
Porgera Joint Venture (continued)
The estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired as part of this transaction were as follows:
$'000
Cash and cash equivalents
1,219
Receivables
3,036
Taxation receivable
1,877
Inventories
9,504
Mining assets
63,812
Non-current inventories
27,826
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(6,659)
Deferred income and mining tax
(19,799)
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
(3,682)
Fair value of attributable net assets at date of acquisition (20% interest)
77,134
Attributable net assets at date of acquisition
77,134
Less cash and cash equivalents of acquired entity
(1,219)
Net consideration
75,915
Settled by way of cash and cash equivalents
59,167
Settled by way of shares issued
16,748
Net consideration
75,915
The fair value of the 6,643,902 no par value shares issued was $16.7 million, determined based on the prevailing market value of
DRDGOLD Limited shares on November 22, 2003 (refer Note 21), in final settlement of the purchase price determined on October
14, 2003.
Fortis Limited
With effect May 21, 2004, the Group acquired the shares in Fortis Limited, or Fortis, a company dealing with insurance and
reinsurance activities, in Papua New Guinea. Fortis was acquired for a consideration of $712,000, the only asset of Fortis being cash
and cash equivalents of $712,000.
2004 disposals
The Group made no disposals during the year.
2003 acquisitions
The Group made no acquisitions during the year.
F-19
4. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF BUSINESSES (continued)
2003 disposals
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company engaged in a transaction consistent with its black economic empowerment strategy by entering
into a share purchase agreement with the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, or IDC, and Khumo Bathong
Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH. Under this share purchase agreement, the Company sold 57% of its interest in Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, to IDC and 3% of its interest in CGR to KBH for a total consideration of $11.7 million, and
realized a profit of $5.3 million.
KBH obtained an option to purchase IDC's shares in CGR. IDC and KBH also each purchased their respective share of three
shareholder loans, aggregating $21.0 million owed by CGR to the Company.
As part of this transaction, the C ompany loaned KBH $0.7 million to fund that entity's initial purchase of the 3% interest in CGR. The
loan bears interest at the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa on overdraft plus 3% per annum. This loan has a term of
five years from July 1, 2002 and is repayable on demand. This loan was secured by a pledge of 49,928,824 shares of ERPM held by
KBH. However, since the acquisition of ERPM by CGR, the loan is no longer secured. As of June 30, 2004, the loan has been
impaired (Refer Note 15).
Shortly thereafter, KBH chose to exercise its option to purchase all of IDC's interest in CGR. As a result, with effect from July 15,
2002, the share capital of CGR is now owned 40% by the Company and 60% by KBH. Also, as part of this transaction, KBH repaid
IDC's portion of the shareholder loans on behalf of CGR. Consequently, CGR now owes 60% of the loans to KBH and 40% of the
loans to the Company.
As a result of this transaction, CGR is no longer a subsidiary of the Company. The results of operations and the financial position of
CGR are no longer consolidated into the Group’s annual financial statements. The Company's remaining 40% interest in CGR is
equity accounted as an investment in an associate.
The aggregate carrying value of the assets and liabilities disposed as part of this transaction were as follows:
2003 disposals
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company engaged in a transaction consistent with its black economic empowerment strategy by entering
into a share purchase agreement with the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, or IDC, and Khumo Bathong
Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH. Under this share purchase agreement, the Company sold 57% of its interest in Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, to IDC and 3% of its interest in CGR to KBH for a total consideration of $11.7 million, and
realized a profit of $5.3 million.
KBH obtained an option to purchase IDC's shares in CGR. IDC and KBH also each purchased their respective share of three
shareholder loans, aggregating $21.0 million owed by CGR to the Company.
As part of this transaction, the C ompany loaned KBH $0.7 million to fund that entity's initial purchase of the 3% interest in CGR. The
loan bears interest at the prime rate of The Standard Bank of South Africa on overdraft plus 3% per annum. This loan has a term of
five years from July 1, 2002 and is repayable on demand. This loan was secured by a pledge of 49,928,824 shares of ERPM held by
KBH. However, since the acquisition of ERPM by CGR, the loan is no longer secured. As of June 30, 2004, the loan has been
impaired (Refer Note 15).
Shortly thereafter, KBH chose to exercise its option to purchase all of IDC's interest in CGR. As a result, with effect from July 15,
2002, the share capital of CGR is now owned 40% by the Company and 60% by KBH. Also, as part of this transaction, KBH repaid
IDC's portion of the shareholder loans on behalf of CGR. Consequently, CGR now owes 60% of the loans to KBH and 40% of the
loans to the Company.
As a result of this transaction, CGR is no longer a subsidiary of the Company. The results of operations and the financial position of
CGR are no longer consolidated into the Group’s annual financial statements. The Company's remaining 40% interest in CGR is
equity accounted as an investment in an associate.
The aggregate carrying value of the assets and liabilities disposed as part of this transaction were as follows:
$'000
Cash and cash equivalents
2,738
Other current assets
2,730
Mining assets
13,886
Other assets
739
Current liabilities
(6,310)
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
(2,317)
Long-term liabilities
(882)
Net assets
10,584
60% thereof
6,350
Cash proceeds received
11,652
Profit realized on sale of subsidiary
5,302
Impairment of loan due by CGR
(4,164)
Cash proceeds received
11,652
Less cash and cash equivalents of entity disposed of
(2,738)
Net cash flow on disposal of subsidiary
8,914
F-20
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has related party relationships with its associates and with its directors and senior management.
All contracts with related parties for the supply of goods and services are approved in accordance with the Company's procurement
policies. The contract terms are compared to similar suppliers of goods and services to benchmark that the contract is on market
related terms.
Transactions with Director
Dr. M. P. Ncholo, chairman of Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH, is also a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
Dr. M. P. Ncholo earned $49,439 in board and other fees from the Company during the year ended June 30, 2005 (2004: $22,410).
During fiscal 2004, financial assistance was provided by East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, the Company’s 40%
associate company with KBH, to the family of Dr. M. P. Ncholo, with regards to funeral expenses relating to the death of a family
member who was a temporary employee of ERPM. In terms of ERPM’s practice, the funds were advanced on compassionate grounds
to assist the family with costs associated with the funeral. This amounted to $14,414. At June 30, 2005, this amount was still
outstanding in the accounts of ERPM.
Transactions with associate companies
During the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company earned $0.5 million (2004: $1.0 million and 2003: $1.3 million) in management
fees from Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, and $0.5 million (2004: $2.0 million and 2003: $1.4 million) in
management fees from ERPM. At June 30, 2005 CGR owed the Group $34.6 million (2004: $34.3 million), KBH owed the Group
$1.2 million (2004: $1.1 million), and ERPM owed the Group $10.6 million (2004: $10.2 million). Interest amounting to $2.7 million
(2004: $2.9 million) was payable to the Group on the loans to CGR, $0. 1 million (2004: $0.1 million) was payable to the Group on
the loans to KBH, and $1.1 million (2004: $0.7 million) was payable to the Group on the loans to ERPM for the year ended June 30,
2005. No interest income on the loans was recorded as it was not considered to be recoverable. No dividends were received from
associates in fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 or fiscal 2003. As of June 30, 2005, the Company has recognized losses generated by CGR and
ERPM against these loans and they are therefore carried at nil value (refer Note 15).
Rand Refinery agreement
On October 12, 2001, the Group entered into an agreement with Rand Refinery Limited, or Rand Refinery, for the refining and sale of
all of its gold produced in South Africa. Under the agreement, Rand Refinery performs the final refining of the Group’s gold and
casts it into troy ounce bars. Then, Rand Refinery sells the gold on the same day as delivery, for the London afternoon fixed price on
the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this service, the Group pays Rand Refinery a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan
and administration fees. Mr. D.J. Pretorius, the Group Legal Counsel, is also a Director of Rand Refinery and is a member of their
Audit Committee. Also, Mr. I.D. Graulich, the Group’s General Manager: Investor Relations, is Alternate Director to Mr. D.J.
Pretorius. The Group currently owns 3% (2004: 10.6%) of Rand Refinery (which is jointly owned by South African mining
companies). During the year, all gold produced in South Africa was refined by Rand Refinery and as at year-end no balances owed
by or to this entity.
Mr. C. Press loan
During fiscal 2003, Mr. C. Press, a director of Net-Gold Services (Pty) Limited, or Net-Gold, a consolidated subsidiary, loaned an
amount of US$24,946 to Net-Gold. This loan is interest free, unsecured and has no fixed terms of repayment. The funds were used
for short-term working capital advances. As at June 30, 2005, the full balance was still outstanding.
Consultancy service agreement
The Company entered into a consultancy service agreement with one of its non-executive directors, Mr. N. Goodwin. Under this
agreement, Mr. N. Goodwin provided the Company with project management services at the Argonaut Project. This agreement took
effect on September 2, 2002. The agreement was for a fixed one year term from September 2, 2002, so long as the Argonaut Project was
ongoing. Under this agreement, Mr. N. Goodwin was paid a fee of $400 per day. Mr. Goodwin worked for 128 days under this agreement
for a total amount of $51,200. Mr. N. Goodwin resigned as a non-executive director effective January 29, 2003. This agreement was
terminated as of February 26, 2003.
The Company has related party relationships with its associates and with its directors and senior management.
All contracts with related parties for the supply of goods and services are approved in accordance with the Company's procurement
policies. The contract terms are compared to similar suppliers of goods and services to benchmark that the contract is on market
related terms.
Transactions with Director
Dr. M. P. Ncholo, chairman of Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH, is also a Non-Executive Director of the Company.
Dr. M. P. Ncholo earned $49,439 in board and other fees from the Company during the year ended June 30, 2005 (2004: $22,410).
During fiscal 2004, financial assistance was provided by East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, the Company’s 40%
associate company with KBH, to the family of Dr. M. P. Ncholo, with regards to funeral expenses relating to the death of a family
member who was a temporary employee of ERPM. In terms of ERPM’s practice, the funds were advanced on compassionate grounds
to assist the family with costs associated with the funeral. This amounted to $14,414. At June 30, 2005, this amount was still
outstanding in the accounts of ERPM.
Transactions with associate companies
During the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company earned $0.5 million (2004: $1.0 million and 2003: $1.3 million) in management
fees from Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, and $0.5 million (2004: $2.0 million and 2003: $1.4 million) in
management fees from ERPM. At June 30, 2005 CGR owed the Group $34.6 million (2004: $34.3 million), KBH owed the Group
$1.2 million (2004: $1.1 million), and ERPM owed the Group $10.6 million (2004: $10.2 million). Interest amounting to $2.7 million
(2004: $2.9 million) was payable to the Group on the loans to CGR, $0. 1 million (2004: $0.1 million) was payable to the Group on
the loans to KBH, and $1.1 million (2004: $0.7 million) was payable to the Group on the loans to ERPM for the year ended June 30,
2005. No interest income on the loans was recorded as it was not considered to be recoverable. No dividends were received from
associates in fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 or fiscal 2003. As of June 30, 2005, the Company has recognized losses generated by CGR and
ERPM against these loans and they are therefore carried at nil value (refer Note 15).
Rand Refinery agreement
On October 12, 2001, the Group entered into an agreement with Rand Refinery Limited, or Rand Refinery, for the refining and sale of
all of its gold produced in South Africa. Under the agreement, Rand Refinery performs the final refining of the Group’s gold and
casts it into troy ounce bars. Then, Rand Refinery sells the gold on the same day as delivery, for the London afternoon fixed price on
the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this service, the Group pays Rand Refinery a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing, loan
and administration fees. Mr. D.J. Pretorius, the Group Legal Counsel, is also a Director of Rand Refinery and is a member of their
Audit Committee. Also, Mr. I.D. Graulich, the Group’s General Manager: Investor Relations, is Alternate Director to Mr. D.J.
Pretorius. The Group currently owns 3% (2004: 10.6%) of Rand Refinery (which is jointly owned by South African mining
companies). During the year, all gold produced in South Africa was refined by Rand Refinery and as at year-end no balances owed
by or to this entity.
Mr. C. Press loan
During fiscal 2003, Mr. C. Press, a director of Net-Gold Services (Pty) Limited, or Net-Gold, a consolidated subsidiary, loaned an
amount of US$24,946 to Net-Gold. This loan is interest free, unsecured and has no fixed terms of repayment. The funds were used
for short-term working capital advances. As at June 30, 2005, the full balance was still outstanding.
Consultancy service agreement
The Company entered into a consultancy service agreement with one of its non-executive directors, Mr. N. Goodwin. Under this
agreement, Mr. N. Goodwin provided the Company with project management services at the Argonaut Project. This agreement took
effect on September 2, 2002. The agreement was for a fixed one year term from September 2, 2002, so long as the Argonaut Project was
ongoing. Under this agreement, Mr. N. Goodwin was paid a fee of $400 per day. Mr. Goodwin worked for 128 days under this agreement
for a total amount of $51,200. Mr. N. Goodwin resigned as a non-executive director effective January 29, 2003. This agreement was
terminated as of February 26, 2003.
F-21
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
Western Areas Limited
On or about October 9, 2001, the Company concluded a contract of guarantee and cession as security for payment with Investec Bank
Limited, or Investec. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company agreed to guarantee Western Areas Limited’s, or WAL’s,
obligations to Investec up to the value of the Sale Shares (being ordinary shares of Randgold, JCI and CAM acquired by the Company
between December 14, 1999 and January 11, 2000). Also, the Company ceded the Sale Shares, as security, to and in favor of Investec
allowing Investec to sell the Sale Shares in the event that WAL defaulted.
On or about September 26, 2001, the Sale Shares were ceded to Investec and WAL granted the Company a put option in respect of
the Sale Shares at a total price of at least R116.4 million ($13.3 million). CAM and JCI undertook to apply all dividends received
from WAL in respect of their shareholdings to the reduction of all amounts owed by them to the Company. The parties agreed that
the monthly option fee would be payable to exercise their rights under the call option for the duration of the Company's guarantee and
cession and agreed that if Investec exercised its rights under that guarantee, the rights of CAM and JCI under the call option would
terminate.
The option fee payable to the Company by CAM and JCI for the period of Nove mber 2001 up to December 13, 2001 amounted to
R21.6 million ($2.0 million) plus VAT in the amount of R3.0 million ($0.3 million) plus interest in the amount of R1.7 million
($0.2 million) at the prescribed rate of 15.5% per annum from January 25, 2001 to the date of payment.
On December 13, 2001, the Company invoiced JCI on behalf of JCI and CAM in these amounts. On December 14, 2001, the
Company made a demand on CAM and JCI for the amount of R32.8 million ($3.0 million). On December 24, 2001, the Company's
attorney's made demands on CAM and JCI for the same amount. The Company instituted legal proceedings against JCI and CAM for
the recovery of these amounts. The matter was heard on August 30, 2004. At this date partial settlement of certain small claims
related to the larger JCI and CAM claim, to the value of R2.4 million ($0.4 million), was awarded by the High Court of South Africa,
however the Company had provided in full in the financial year ended June 30, 2002, fo r the balance outstanding by CAM against the
probable bad debt. Refer Note 10.
On October 21, 2004, the High Court of South Africa ordered JCI and CAM to pay the Company an amount of R35.7 million
($5.5 million), plus interest and costs, including the costs of two counsel. JCI’s and CAM’s counterclaim to recover the earlier part-
payment was also dismissed with costs. JCI and CAM made an application to the High Court of South Africa for leave to appeal,
which was rejected. In March 2005, the Company received a payment of R37.3 million ($6.6 million) in settlement of all claims. Of
this amount R31.5 million ($5.1 million) was recorded as a reversal of the doubtful debt allowance in the statement of operations and
R5.8 million ($1.5 million) was recognized as interest received.
Western Areas Limited
On or about October 9, 2001, the Company concluded a contract of guarantee and cession as security for payment with Investec Bank
Limited, or Investec. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company agreed to guarantee Western Areas Limited’s, or WAL’s,
obligations to Investec up to the value of the Sale Shares (being ordinary shares of Randgold, JCI and CAM acquired by the Company
between December 14, 1999 and January 11, 2000). Also, the Company ceded the Sale Shares, as security, to and in favor of Investec
allowing Investec to sell the Sale Shares in the event that WAL defaulted.
On or about September 26, 2001, the Sale Shares were ceded to Investec and WAL granted the Company a put option in respect of
the Sale Shares at a total price of at least R116.4 million ($13.3 million). CAM and JCI undertook to apply all dividends received
from WAL in respect of their shareholdings to the reduction of all amounts owed by them to the Company. The parties agreed that
the monthly option fee would be payable to exercise their rights under the call option for the duration of the Company's guarantee and
cession and agreed that if Investec exercised its rights under that guarantee, the rights of CAM and JCI under the call option would
terminate.
The option fee payable to the Company by CAM and JCI for the period of Nove mber 2001 up to December 13, 2001 amounted to
R21.6 million ($2.0 million) plus VAT in the amount of R3.0 million ($0.3 million) plus interest in the amount of R1.7 million
($0.2 million) at the prescribed rate of 15.5% per annum from January 25, 2001 to the date of payment.
On December 13, 2001, the Company invoiced JCI on behalf of JCI and CAM in these amounts. On December 14, 2001, the
Company made a demand on CAM and JCI for the amount of R32.8 million ($3.0 million). On December 24, 2001, the Company's
attorney's made demands on CAM and JCI for the same amount. The Company instituted legal proceedings against JCI and CAM for
the recovery of these amounts. The matter was heard on August 30, 2004. At this date partial settlement of certain small claims
related to the larger JCI and CAM claim, to the value of R2.4 million ($0.4 million), was awarded by the High Court of South Africa,
however the Company had provided in full in the financial year ended June 30, 2002, fo r the balance outstanding by CAM against the
probable bad debt. Refer Note 10.
On October 21, 2004, the High Court of South Africa ordered JCI and CAM to pay the Company an amount of R35.7 million
($5.5 million), plus interest and costs, including the costs of two counsel. JCI’s and CAM’s counterclaim to recover the earlier part-
payment was also dismissed with costs. JCI and CAM made an application to the High Court of South Africa for leave to appeal,
which was rejected. In March 2005, the Company received a payment of R37.3 million ($6.6 million) in settlement of all claims. Of
this amount R31.5 million ($5.1 million) was recorded as a reversal of the doubtful debt allowance in the statement of operations and
R5.8 million ($1.5 million) was recognized as interest received.
F-22
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
Laverton Gold NL
Laverton Gold NL is also a related party because Mr. J. Stratton, a director of CAM and Consolidated African Mines Jersey, or
CAMJ, was a corporate advisor to the Company.
In May 2000, the Company's board appointed a special committee to investigate irregular related party transactions involving Mr. J.
Stratton from the Company's office in Perth, Australia (which has now been closed). The related party transactions involved the
issuance of approximately 8.2 million Company ordinary shares (the "Rawas Shares") in exchange for assets of the Rawas group that
owned the Rawas gold mine in Indonesia, pursuant to agreements between the Company and Laverton Gold NL, an Australian listed
company.
During July and October 1999, the Company allotted and issued the Rawas Shares at the market value of $12 .4 million to several
creditors of Laverton or its subsidiaries, including CAMJ, JCI and related companies, in anticipation of receiving shares of, and
claims against, the companies in the Rawas Group and the rights to the Rawas mine. The allocation of the Rawas Shares was based
on each creditor's relative exposure. No proper valuation proceedings were conducted prior to the issuance.
According to the evidence gathered during the course of the investigation, the Company's board determined that, faced with pressure
from its creditors (i) Laverton arranged the issue by the Company of its ordinary shares to creditors in consideration for assets of no
value, for the benefit of Laverton and its creditors and not for the Company; (ii) to avoid the South African Companies Act
requirement for a special resolution, the Company had issued the Rawas Shares at an inflated issue price unrelated to the true value of
the consideration; (iii) as the special resolution was not obtained, the allotment and issue of ordinary shares for the Rawas transaction
was unlawful and invalid. Upon discovery by the board of the unlawful transactions, the board decided to rescind the agreements
with Laverton NL during fiscal 2001. At that time, the Company had received ownership of the claims against, but not the shares of,
the companies in the Rawas Group. As a result of this rescission the shares of the Rawas Group were never delivered to the
Company.
Because of subsequent splits and consolidations resulting in validly issued ordinary shares being consolidated with invalid Rawas
Shares, it was not possible to distinguish the Rawas Shares from the other issued ordinary shares of the Company. None of the Rawas
Shares, and their holders at the time, could be identified and, therefore, none of the Rawas Shares could be removed from the
Company's members' register. In July 2002 the High Court of South Africa validated the Rawas shares.
The $12.4 million value of the Rawas shares was credited to stated capital in the financial statements. During fiscal 2000, the
Company wrote off the attributed $12.4 million value of the shares in the statement of operations as aborted acquisition costs and
loans made by the Company to members of the Rawas Group, amounting to $2.9 million, as no amounts have been recovered on
these loans.
The Company has instituted various legal proceedings in South Africa and Australia in connection with these related party
transactions and these proceedings are still ongoing. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of the legal proceedings, the Company has
not recorded any amounts in respect of this litigation.
Laverton Gold NL
Laverton Gold NL is also a related party because Mr. J. Stratton, a director of CAM and Consolidated African Mines Jersey, or
CAMJ, was a corporate advisor to the Company.
In May 2000, the Company's board appointed a special committee to investigate irregular related party transactions involving Mr. J.
Stratton from the Company's office in Perth, Australia (which has now been closed). The related party transactions involved the
issuance of approximately 8.2 million Company ordinary shares (the "Rawas Shares") in exchange for assets of the Rawas group that
owned the Rawas gold mine in Indonesia, pursuant to agreements between the Company and Laverton Gold NL, an Australian listed
company.
During July and October 1999, the Company allotted and issued the Rawas Shares at the market value of $12 .4 million to several
creditors of Laverton or its subsidiaries, including CAMJ, JCI and related companies, in anticipation of receiving shares of, and
claims against, the companies in the Rawas Group and the rights to the Rawas mine. The allocation of the Rawas Shares was based
on each creditor's relative exposure. No proper valuation proceedings were conducted prior to the issuance.
According to the evidence gathered during the course of the investigation, the Company's board determined that, faced with pressure
from its creditors (i) Laverton arranged the issue by the Company of its ordinary shares to creditors in consideration for assets of no
value, for the benefit of Laverton and its creditors and not for the Company; (ii) to avoid the South African Companies Act
requirement for a special resolution, the Company had issued the Rawas Shares at an inflated issue price unrelated to the true value of
the consideration; (iii) as the special resolution was not obtained, the allotment and issue of ordinary shares for the Rawas transaction
was unlawful and invalid. Upon discovery by the board of the unlawful transactions, the board decided to rescind the agreements
with Laverton NL during fiscal 2001. At that time, the Company had received ownership of the claims against, but not the shares of,
the companies in the Rawas Group. As a result of this rescission the shares of the Rawas Group were never delivered to the
Company.
Because of subsequent splits and consolidations resulting in validly issued ordinary shares being consolidated with invalid Rawas
Shares, it was not possible to distinguish the Rawas Shares from the other issued ordinary shares of the Company. None of the Rawas
Shares, and their holders at the time, could be identified and, therefore, none of the Rawas Shares could be removed from the
Company's members' register. In July 2002 the High Court of South Africa validated the Rawas shares.
The $12.4 million value of the Rawas shares was credited to stated capital in the financial statements. During fiscal 2000, the
Company wrote off the attributed $12.4 million value of the shares in the statement of operations as aborted acquisition costs and
loans made by the Company to members of the Rawas Group, amounting to $2.9 million, as no amounts have been recovered on
these loans.
The Company has instituted various legal proceedings in South Africa and Australia in connection with these related party
transactions and these proceedings are still ongoing. Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of the legal proceedings, the Company has
not recorded any amounts in respect of this litigation.
F-23
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
Issue of shares to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited
KBH subscribed for 4,794,889 of the Company's ordinary shares for a cash subscription price of $6.8 million during the year ended
June 30, 2003. These shares were sold by KBH in fiscal 2005.
Purchase of 100% of ERPM by CGR
In October 2002, CGR entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of the outstanding share capital of and loan accounts in East Rand
Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for $11.0 million. In connection with this transaction, the Company provided ERPM with a
loan of $1.3 million. In addition, an amount of $8.0 million was lent by the Company to CGR which CGR advanced to the then
shareholders of ERPM as an interest free loan. CGR received from the shareholders, as security for the loan, a pledge of the entire
issued share capital of ERPM and a ces sion of the shareholders' claim to CGR. The South African competition authorities approved
the transaction and the $8.0 million loan is deemed to be part payment of the purchase price of $11.0 million by CGR for the
acquisition of the shares and the claims of ERPM. The Company has recognized losses generated by CGR against this loan and the loan
is therefore carried at nil value.
6. EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION COSTS
Issue of shares to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited
KBH subscribed for 4,794,889 of the Company's ordinary shares for a cash subscription price of $6.8 million during the year ended
June 30, 2003. These shares were sold by KBH in fiscal 2005.
Purchase of 100% of ERPM by CGR
In October 2002, CGR entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of the outstanding share capital of and loan accounts in East Rand
Proprietary Mines Limited, or ERPM, for $11.0 million. In connection with this transaction, the Company provided ERPM with a
loan of $1.3 million. In addition, an amount of $8.0 million was lent by the Company to CGR which CGR advanced to the then
shareholders of ERPM as an interest free loan. CGR received from the shareholders, as security for the loan, a pledge of the entire
issued share capital of ERPM and a ces sion of the shareholders' claim to CGR. The South African competition authorities approved
the transaction and the $8.0 million loan is deemed to be part payment of the purchase price of $11.0 million by CGR for the
acquisition of the shares and the claims of ERPM. The Company has recognized losses generated by CGR against this loan and the loan
is therefore carried at nil value.
6. EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION COSTS
Year ended
Year ended
Year ended
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
$'000 $'000 $'000
Blyvoor Mine (a)
3,051
899 85
West Wits Mine
-
- 53
Other (b)
1,150
- 542
4,201
899
680
(a) On June 28, 2004, the Company entered into a 60-day review period at the Blyvoor Mine designed to restore the operations to
profitability. The 60-day review was extended to September 13, 2004. On October 5, 2004, 1,619 employees were retrenched at a
cost of $3.1 million. No balance was outstanding with regards to these payments as at June 30, 2005.
During fiscal 2004, voluntary retrenchments were offered to employees and approximately 220 employees accepted the offer. This
gave rise to an expense of $0.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2004. No balance was outstanding with regards to these payments
as at June 30, 2004.
(b) In an effort to reduce corporate costs, retrenchments were made at the Company’s corporate head office during fiscal 2005.
Retrenchment costs for 20 employees amounted to $1.2 million. No balance was outstanding with regards to these payments as at
Jun e 30, 2005.
During fiscal 2003, two directors retired from active duty. Retrenchment payments of $0.1 million were made to Mr. V. Hoops (HR
Director) and $0.4 million to Mr. F. Coetzee (Chief Operating Officer).
F-24
7. IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
Year
ended
Year
ended
Year
ended
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
$'000 $'000 $'000
Mining assets
- Durban Deep Section (a)
664
-
-
Other assets (b)
-
1,965
-
Goodwill (c)
-
1,025
-
664
2,990
-
(a) During fiscal 2005, mining properties at the Durban Deep Section were written down by $0.7 million to $2.2 million, being the
estimated fair value of these assets. The Company has negotiated the sale of these mining properties and the estimated fair value was
based on these negotiations (refer to Note 27).
(b) Consistent with the Group's black economic empowerment strategy, the West Wits Operations' assets were sold during fiscal 2003
to a black economic empowerment partner, Bophelo Trading (Pty) Limited, subsequently renamed Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited, or
Mogale. During fiscal 2004, Mogale was placed under judicial management and the balance of the purchase price owed was therefore
seen to be irrecoverable. In addition, funds advanced to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited were impaired as the most
significant asset owned by this entity is its 60% interest in CGR and ERPM, which were expe riencing liquidity problems in fiscal
2004.
(c) As a result of the losses recorded by Net-Gold Services Limited, goodwill recorded on the acquisition was impaired in fiscal 2004
(refer Note 16).
F-25
8. DEFERRED INCOME AND MINING TAX
Year
ended
Year
ended
Year
ended
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
$'000 $'000 $'000
(Loss)/profit from continuing operations before tax and other items
South Africa
(33,233)
(22,427)
66,533
Foreign
22,078
10,545
(7,127)
(11,155)
(11,882)
59,406
(a) Income and mining tax (expense)/benefit
Current income and mining tax
Foreign
(12,315)
(7,165)
-
Current non-mining income tax
South Africa
(263)
(223)
-
Foreign
24
-
-
Deferred income and mining tax
South Africa
-
(5,532)
(33,955)
Foreign
6,792
(1,310)
(330)
Prior year rate change
-
-
18,455
Secondary tax on companies
-
-
-
Total income and mining tax expense from continuing operations
(5,762)
(14,230)
(15,830)
Mining tax on mining income in South Africa is determined based on a formula which takes into account the profit and revenue from
mining operations during the year. Non-mining income, which consists primarily of interest, is taxed at a standard rate. The tax rates
applicable to the mining and non-mining income of a gold mining company depends on whether the company has elected to be
exempt from the Secondary Tax on Companies, or STC. STC is a tax on dividends declared, which is payable by the company
declaring the dividend, and, at present, the STC tax rate is equal to 12.5%. In 1993, all existing gold mining companies had the option
to elect to be exempt from STC.
If the election was made, a higher tax rate would apply for both mining and non-mining income. In fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, the
tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income, for companies that elected the STC exemption were 46% and 38%, respectively.
During those same years the tax rates for companies that did not elect the STC exemption were 37% and 30%, respectively. In 1993,
the Company elected not to be exempt from STC, as this would have meant that the Company would have been liable for normal
taxation at the higher rates of 46% for mining income and 38% for non-mining income. The Company, having chosen not to be
subject to the STC exemption, is subject to 37% tax on mining income and 30% for non-mining income. However, with the exception
of Blyvoor, all of the Company's South African subsidiaries elected the STC exemption. Any dividends paid by Blyvoor, being a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, would be exempt from STC. Any dividends paid by the Company, to the extent that they
are paid out of income from Blyvoor, will be subject to STC. The tax rate for all the Australasian operations is 30%.
In July 2005, the above tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income were amende d, due to a revision of corporate tax rates by
the South African Government. Tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that elected the STC exemption
are 45% and 37%, respectively. The tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that did not elect the STC
exemption are 35% and 29%, respectively. The Company does not expect the change in tax rates to have a material impact on its
financial statements.
F-26
8. DEFERRED INCOME AND MINING TAX (continued)
South African deferred taxation has been provided at the effective mining rate applicable in terms of the mining tax formula to the
relevant operations at either 37% or 46% (2004: 37% or 46%; 2003: 37% or 46%), while the Australasian deferred tax has been
provided at the Australian statutory tax rate of 30% (2004: 30%; 2003: 30%). Material items causing the Group's income tax
provision from continuing operations to differ from the estimated effective mining tax rates were as follows:
South African deferred taxation has been provided at the effective mining rate applicable in terms of the mining tax formula to the
relevant operations at either 37% or 46% (2004: 37% or 46%; 2003: 37% or 46%), while the Australasian deferred tax has been
provided at the Australian statutory tax rate of 30% (2004: 30%; 2003: 30%). Material items causing the Group's income tax
provision from continuing operations to differ from the estimated effective mining tax rates were as follows:
Year
ended
Year
ended
Year
ended
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
$'000 $'000 $'000
Mining tax at estimated effective rate
4,686
3,646
(18,698)
Non-mining tax at statutory rate
6,855
5,763
127
Foreign tax at statutory rates
(6,979)
(6,545)
-
Taxation at normal rates
4,562
2,864
(18,571)
Non-deductible expenditure
(1,653)
(21)
(9,834)
Non-taxable income
1,626
49
7,971
Additional tax expense relating to the prior year
(212)
(223)
-
Rate change
-
-
4,623
Valuation allowances
(10,085)
(16,899)
(19)
Income and mining tax expense as reported
(5,762)
(14,230)
(15,830)
(b) Deferred income and mining tax liabilities and assets:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
South Africa
Deferred income and mining tax liabilities and assets on the balance sheet
as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, relate to the following:
Gross deferred income and mining tax liabilities:
Mining assets
(19,565)
(30,474)
Gross deferred income and mining tax assets:
49,957
126,582
Assessable tax loss carried forward
33,483
96,338
Unredeemed capital expenditure
12,098
23,743
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
2,056
1,590
Derivative instrument liability
-
1,143
Inventories
-
28
Other provisions
2,320
3,740
Deferred income and mining tax valuation allowances
(30,392)
(96,108)
Deferred income and mining tax assets
-
-
Net deferred income and mining tax liability - long-term
(909)
(982)
Net deferred income and mining tax asset - current
909
982
F-27
8. DEFERRED INCOME AND MINING TAX (continued)
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Australasia
Deferred income and mining tax liabilities and assets on the balance sheet
as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, relate to the following:
Gross deferred income and mining tax liabilities:
(19,126)
(23,780)
Mining assets
(17,731)
(13,920)
Inventories
(1,314)
(9,852)
Other
(81)
(8)
Gross deferred income and mining tax assets:
4,906
2,932
Assessable tax loss carried forward
201
499
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
2,378
1,584
Other provisions
2,327
849
Deferred income and mining tax valuation allowances
(97)
(260)
Deferred income and mining tax liabilities
(14,317)
(21,108)
Net deferred income and mining tax liability - long-term
(15,203)
(12,022)
Net deferred income and mining tax liability - current
-
(9,086)
Net deferred income and mining tax asset - current
886
-
Total
Deferred income and mining tax liabilities and assets on the balance sheet
as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, relate to the following:
Gross deferred income and mining tax liabilities:
(38,691)
(54,254)
Mining assets
(37,296)
(44,394)
Inventories
(1,314)
(9,852)
Other
(81)
(8)
Gross deferred income and mining tax assets:
54,863
129,514
Assessable tax loss carried forward
33,684
96,837
Unredeemed capital expenditure
12,098
23,743
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
4,434
3,174
Derivative instrument liability
-
1,143
Inventories
-
28
Other provisions
4,647
4,589
Deferred income and mining tax valuation allowances
(30,489)
(96,368)
Deferred income and mining tax liabilities
(14,317)
(21,108)
Net deferred income and mining tax liability - long-term
(16,112)
(13,004)
Net deferred income and mining tax liability – current
-
(8,104)
Net deferred income and mining tax asset - current
1,795
-
F-28
8. DEFERRED INCOME AND MINING TAX (continued)
The classification of deferred income and mining tax assets and liabilities is based on the related asset or liability creating the
deferred tax. Valuation allowances have been provided on deferred tax assets arising out of assessed losses and unredeemed capital
expenditure because it is more likely than not that these losses and unredeemed capital expenditures will not be utilized in the
foreseeable future.
The valuation allowance was $7.0 million as of July 1, 2002. During the years ending June 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005, the valuation
allowance increased by $75.2 million and $14.2 million and decreased by $65.9 million, respectively. These movements include
foreign exchange differences. The decrease in fiscal 2005 is impacted by the elimination of the deferred tax asset and related
valuation allowance of the discontinued op eration.
As at June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 the Group had estimated tax losses carried forward consisting of:
The classification of deferred income and mining tax assets and liabilities is based on the related asset or liability creating the
deferred tax. Valuation allowances have been provided on deferred tax assets arising out of assessed losses and unredeemed capital
expenditure because it is more likely than not that these losses and unredeemed capital expenditures will not be utilized in the
foreseeable future.
The valuation allowance was $7.0 million as of July 1, 2002. During the years ending June 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005, the valuation
allowance increased by $75.2 million and $14.2 million and decreased by $65.9 million, respectively. These movements include
foreign exchange differences. The decrease in fiscal 2005 is impacted by the elimination of the deferred tax asset and related
valuation allowance of the discontinued op eration.
As at June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 the Group had estimated tax losses carried forward consisting of:
Unredeemed
capital
Tax losses
expenditure
2005 2004
2005
2004
$'m $'m
$'m
$'m
The Company
28.2
16.5
19.8
21.1
South African subsidiaries
67.7
210.8
16.6
41.0
Australasian subsidiaries
0.6
1.7
-
-
Total
96.5
229.0
36.4
62.1
The estimated tax losses of the Company and its subsidiaries have no expiry date. Should a subsidiary cease to trade, the estimated
tax losses would be forfeited.
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries and foreign joint ventures
No provision has been made for South African income tax or foreign tax that may result from future remittances of undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries or the joint venture because it is expected that such earnings will be permanently reinvested in these
foreign entities.
The distribution of these undistributed earnings of $6.0 million at June 30, 2005, by DRD (Isle of Man), in Isle of Man, Porgera and
the Tolukuma Section in Papua New Guinea, and other foreign entities would result in income and foreign withholding taxes of
approximately $1.8 million.
F-29
9. LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION
The results of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited from July 1, 2002 to March 22, 2005 and the gain on disposal are reported as
discontinued operation. The Group's consolidated statements of operations for the years ending June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 have
been adjusted to reflect this presentation (refer to Note 4 for a more detailed discussion on the discontinued operation).
The operating results for the discontinued operation are as follows:
The results of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited from July 1, 2002 to March 22, 2005 and the gain on disposal are reported as
discontinued operation. The Group's consolidated statements of operations for the years ending June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 have
been adjusted to reflect this presentation (refer to Note 4 for a more detailed discussion on the discontinued operation).
The operating results for the discontinued operation are as follows:
Year ended
Year ended
Year ended
June 30, 2005
June 30, 2004
June 30, 2003
$'000 $'000 $'000
Revenues 81,538
130,036
151,923
(Loss)/profit before tax
(62,464)
(20,804)
3,358
Income and mining tax expense
-
-
(25,935)
Loss after tax
(62,464) (20,804) (22,577)
The gain on disposal of the discontinued operation is as follows:
Cash proceeds received
-
Costs incurred on disposal
(7,265)
Net liabilities disposed of
17,751
Foreign currency translation gain realized
7,619
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation
18,105
The loss from discontinued operation is made up as follows:
Loss after tax
(62,464)
(20,804)
(22,577)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operation
18,105
-
-
Loss from discontinued operation, net of tax
(44,359) (20,804) (22,577)
F-30
10. RECEIVABLES
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Trade accounts receivable
5,156
7,583
Less: allowances for doubtful debts – trade accounts receivable
(932)
(93)
Interest receivable
2
899
Taxation receivable
1,254
4,952
Prepayments of insurance
1,823
2,435
Receivable from associates - management fees
579
321
Payroll paid in advance
138
3,417
Amounts owing by related parties (a)
-
5,024
Less: allowances for doubtful debts – related parties
-
(5,024)
Current receivables
8,020
19,514
Non-current receivables
Amounts owing by related parties (b)
789
841
Less: allowances for doubtful debts – related parties
(789)
(841)
Total receivables
8,020
19,514
Disclosed as current receivables
7,441
19,193
Disclosed as current receivables owing by related parties
579
321
8,020
19,514
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
Reconciliation of allowances for doubtful debts - related parties
$'000 $'000 $'000
Opening balance
5,865
4,220
3,040
(Credit)/charge to statement of operations
(5,067)
765
-
Foreign exchange
(9)
880
1,180
Closing balance
789
5,865 4,220
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2003
Reconciliation of allowances for doubtful debts – trade accounts receivable
$'000 $'000 $'000
Opening balance
93
353
122
Charge/(credit) to statement of operations
907
(298)
151
Foreign exchange
(68)
38
80
Closing balance
932
93
353
a) Amounts owing by related parties comprise amounts due from CAM for the option over the Sale Shares, which were fully
provided for in fiscal 2004. In March 2005, the Company received a payment of R37.3 million ($6.6 million) as settlement of all
claims.
b) Amounts owing by KBH arising from the sale of 60% of CGR (refer Note 4). These loans had been fully provided for in fiscal
2004.
F-31
11. INVENTORIES
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Gold-in-progress
4,174
3,258
Supplies
11,281
13,235
Ore stock pile
32,103
32,006
47,558
48,499
Less: non-current inventories (Ore stock pile)
(32,103)
(32,006)
15,455
16,493
12. MINING ASSETS
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Mining properties, mine development costs and mine plant facilities and equipment
Cost
288,000
327,115
Opening balance
327,115
219,969
Impairment
(63,576)
(1,549)
Additions
24,863
26,917
Asset retirement obligation raised
-
2,538
Disposals
(2,178)
(3,480)
Acquired through business combinations
-
63,812
Disposed through liquidation of subsidiary
(309)
-
Foreign exchange
2,085
18,908
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(165,830)
(170,172)
Opening balance
(170,172)
(136,712)
Impairment
23,461
176
Depreciation and amortization - continuing operations
(13,797)
(25,975)
Depreciation and amortization - discontinued operation
(971)
(4,160)
Disposed through liquidation of subsidiary
309
-
Foreign exchange
(4,660)
(3,501)
Net book value
122,170
156,943
Certain assets, with a net book value of $10.9 million, have been pledged as security for long-term borrowings. Refer to Note 20.
F-32
12. MINING ASSETS (continued)
Included in mining assets are deferred stripping costs as follows:
Included in mining assets are deferred stripping costs as follows:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000
$'000
Deferred stripping costs
Cost
15,135 4,075
Opening balance
4,075 -
Additions
11,060 4,075
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(2,658) (548)
Opening balance
(548) -
Depreciation and amortization
(2,110) (548)
Net book value
12,477 3,527
13. NON-CURRENT ASSETS
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Listed investments (a)
101
78
Cape Tel Limited
1
2
Drillsearch Energy Limited
92
69
Startrack Communications Limited
8
7
Unlisted investments (b)
670
2,392
Rand Refinery Limited
562
1,888
The Employment Bureau of Africa
57
501
Other
51
3
Amounts contributed to environmental trust funds (c)
6,416
22,841
7,187
25,311
(a) These investments are classified as available for sale, and are accounted for at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses related to investments that are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are summarized below:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Gross unrealized holding gains
-
-
Gross unrealized holding losses
- -
Realized gains of $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.2 million were recorded in fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 respectively.
(b) Unlisted investments comprise investments in various unlisted companies, the fair value of which is not directly available from
market quotations. The directors of the Company perform valuations of the investments on an annual basis to ensure that an other
than temporary decline in the value of the investments has not occurred.
(c) Amounts have been contributed to irrevocable trusts under the Company's control. The monies in the trust are invested primarily
in interest bearing debt securities and equity-limited unit trusts and may be used only for environmental rehabilitation purposes.
F-33
14. JOINT VENTURE
The unincorporated mining joint venture for which the statement of operations and balance sheet has been proportionately
consolidated is as follows:
consolidated is as follows:
June 30, 2005
June 30, 2004
percentage held
percentage held
Porgera Joint Venture
20%
20%
Together with Placer Dome Inc. and Mineral Resources Enga, DRD (Porgera) Limited is a participant in the Porgera Joint Venture.
Each joint venture partner has an undivided holding in the mineral tenements forming part of the mine, and in a proportionate share
of the mine’s production and costs, through a joint venture agreement. Each joint venture partner is responsible for the sale of their
proportionate share of production.
Each joint venture partner has an undivided holding in the mineral tenements forming part of the mine, and in a proportionate share
of the mine’s production and costs, through a joint venture agreement. Each joint venture partner is responsible for the sale of their
proportionate share of production.
The summarized financial statements of DRD (Porgera) Limited reflect the revenue received for their 20% share of production at the
mine, as well as administrative costs, including depreciation and amortization, and taxation incurred by DRD (Porgera) Limited, in
addition to their proportionate share of the costs incurred by the joint venture. The Group acquired its 20% interest in the Porgera
Joint Venture in Papua New Guinea on October 14, 2003.
mine, as well as administrative costs, including depreciation and amortization, and taxation incurred by DRD (Porgera) Limited, in
addition to their proportionate share of the costs incurred by the joint venture. The Group acquired its 20% interest in the Porgera
Joint Venture in Papua New Guinea on October 14, 2003.
Summarized financial statements of DRD (Porgera) Limited, including the joint venture which has been proportionately consolidated,
are as follows (from date of acquisition):
are as follows (from date of acquisition):
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
Statement of operations
$'000
$'000
Revenues
82,793
60,445
Costs and expenses
(37,451)
(30,311)
Production costs
(36,209)
(31,650)
Movement in gold in process
1,182
1,499
Movement in rehabilitation provision, reclamation and closure costs
(2,424)
(160)
Other operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
(11,613)
(9,260)
Selling, administration and general charges
(4,350)
(2,243)
Net operating income
29,379
18,631
Interest and dividends
164
9
Interest expense
(1,044)
(1,103)
Profit before tax
28,499
17,537
Income and mining tax expense
(5,515)
(8,475)
Net profit
22,984
9,062
Balance sheet
Current assets
Current assets
20,687
17,498
Cash and cash equivalents
7,956
6,333
Receivables
1,546
1,768
Receivables owing by Group companies
2,126
1,897
Inventories
9,059
7,500
Mining assets
66,238
61,741
Other assets
32,103
32,006
Non-current inventories
32,103
32,006
Total assets
119,028
111,245
Current liabilities
(28,914)
(39,740)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(12,461)
(7,528)
Payables owing to Group companies
(10,965)
(29,384)
Income and mining taxes payable
(5,488)
(2,828)
Non-current liabilities
(23,132)
(27,508)
Deferred income and mining tax
(14,308)
(21,108)
Provisions for environmental rehabilitation, reclamation and closure costs
(8,824)
(6,400)
Net assets
66,982
43,997
F-34
15. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES
The associates are:
June
30,
2005
June 30,
2004
Country of incorporation
percentage
held
percentage
held
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited
South Africa
40.00%
40.00%
Emperor Mines Limited
Australia
45.33%
19.78%
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Opening carrying amount
10,015
12,806
Acquired during the year
25,191
-
Advances to associates
-
8,827
Net share of results in associates
(7,231)
(11,975)
Share of results before tax
(7,173)
(11,972)
Share of tax
(58)
(3)
Foreign exchange
747
357
Impairment of investment in associates
(13,280)
-
Closing carrying amount
15,442
10,015
The following has been recognized in the statement of operations:
Equity in loss from associates
(7,231)
(3,148)
Losses applied to advances to associates
-
(8,827)
Impairment of investment in Emperor
(13,280)
-
(20,511)
(11,975)
On July 30, 2004, the Company's shareholding in Emperor Mines Limited, or Emperor, increased from 19.78% to 45.33% (refer to
Note 4). The Company has restated the prior year’s financial statements as if the equity method had been utilized from December
2002, the date of the initial acquisition of the investment in Emperor (refer to Note 2). The amounts included for the years ended
June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 represent 45.33%, from August 2004, and 19.78% of Emperor’s losses or profits respectively,
adjusted for the amortization of the excess purchase price. The amount included for the year ended June 30, 2003, represents 14.15%,
from January 2003 to March 2003, and 19.81%, from April 2003 to June 2003, of Emperor’s losses, adjusted for the amortization of
the excess purchase price. As a result of losses incurred by Emperor, the investment in Emperor was impaired, by $13.3 million, to
fair value during fiscal 2005. The fair value of Emperor was calculated using discounted future cash flows expected to be derived
from the associate.
At June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, the proportionate share of the Company’s investment in the net assets of Emperor, as well as the
unamortized excess purchase price of Emperor, was as follows:
June 30,
2005
$’000
June 30,
2004
$’000
Proportionate share of Emperor’s net assets
13,517
4,922
Excess purchase price, net of accumulated amortization
1,925
5,093
Closing carrying amount
15,442
10,015
Market value of the Company’s investment in Emperor (based on the quoted market
price at June 30, 2005)
price at June 30, 2005)
12,525
12,255
On July 1, 2002, the Company sold 60% of its wholly owned subsidiary company, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited, or CGR, to
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited in a transaction consistent with the Company's black economic empowerment strategy (refer
Note 4). In fiscal 2002, the results of this company had been consolidated into the results of the Group. Effective July 1, 2002, the
Company’s remaining 40% interest has been treated as an investment in an associate and equity accounted. As at June 30, 2005 and
2004 the investment in CGR is carried at $nil.
F-35
16. GOODWILL
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$’000 $’000
Opening balance
-
-
Goodwill on acquisition of Net-Gold Services Limited (refer Note 4)
-
1,095
Impairment of goodwill (refer Note 7)
-
(1,025)
Foreign exchange
-
(70)
Closing balance
-
-
17. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Trade accounts payable
22,130
34,506
Accrual for leave pay provisions
4,354
13,410
Payroll and other compensation payable
6,833
13,206
Other
-
31
33,317
61,153
18. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Gold for electricity contract (a)
-
(3,090)
Interest rate swap agreement (b)
(550)
(1,984)
(550)
(5,074)
Disclosed under non-current liabilities
(550)
(4,765)
Disclosed under current liabilities
-
(309)
(550)
(5,074)
(a) The gold for electricity contract was closed out on April 28, 2005, for $3.6 million. In fiscal 2004, the amount comprised the fair
value of the gold for electricity contract entered into by the Company. Changes in fair value were recorded as profit/(loss) on
derivative instruments in the statement of operations. The fair value represented the difference between the contract price that was
agreed on the date of the transaction and the forward price on June 30, 2004, (refer to Note 24 for further details of quantities and the
timing of settlement). The liability of $3.1 million reflected the fair value as at June 30, 2004, when the gold price was R2,451 per
ounce against an average contract price of R2,256 per ounce. The gold price adjustment was based on the notional amount of 15,000
ounces of gold multiplied by the difference between the contracted gold price, which was th e price that was agreed on the date of the
transaction for a determined period, and the arithmetic average of the London PM fix for each business day in the calculation period.
During fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the realized and unrealized (loss)/gain included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments for this
instrument amounted to losses of $0.4 million (realized) and $1.4 million (unrealized), and a gain of $43.8 million (unrealized),
respectively.
b) This amount reflects the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement that was entered into to manage the interest rate and
currency risk on the bi-annual interest payments of the convertible notes which were issued in fiscal 2003. The interest rate swap has
not been accounted for as a hedge. Changes in fair value have been recorded as profit/(loss) on derivative instruments in the
statement of operations. The fair value represents the difference between the fixed coupon rate of 6% per annum and the forward
Johannesburg Inter-bank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 200 interest basis points together with the spot and forward US$ exchange
rate with reference to the coupon amount payable bi-annually. At June 30, 2005, the six month JIBAR rate was 6.929%. During
fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the realized gain/(loss) included in (loss)/profit on the interest rate swap amounted to a gain of
$0.2 million, a loss of $1.4 million and a loss of $1.5 million, respectively. During fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the unrealized
gain/(loss) included in (loss)/profit on the interest rate swap amounted to $nil, a loss of $0.3 million and $nil, respectively.
value of the gold for electricity contract entered into by the Company. Changes in fair value were recorded as profit/(loss) on
derivative instruments in the statement of operations. The fair value represented the difference between the contract price that was
agreed on the date of the transaction and the forward price on June 30, 2004, (refer to Note 24 for further details of quantities and the
timing of settlement). The liability of $3.1 million reflected the fair value as at June 30, 2004, when the gold price was R2,451 per
ounce against an average contract price of R2,256 per ounce. The gold price adjustment was based on the notional amount of 15,000
ounces of gold multiplied by the difference between the contracted gold price, which was th e price that was agreed on the date of the
transaction for a determined period, and the arithmetic average of the London PM fix for each business day in the calculation period.
During fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the realized and unrealized (loss)/gain included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments for this
instrument amounted to losses of $0.4 million (realized) and $1.4 million (unrealized), and a gain of $43.8 million (unrealized),
respectively.
b) This amount reflects the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement that was entered into to manage the interest rate and
currency risk on the bi-annual interest payments of the convertible notes which were issued in fiscal 2003. The interest rate swap has
not been accounted for as a hedge. Changes in fair value have been recorded as profit/(loss) on derivative instruments in the
statement of operations. The fair value represents the difference between the fixed coupon rate of 6% per annum and the forward
Johannesburg Inter-bank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 200 interest basis points together with the spot and forward US$ exchange
rate with reference to the coupon amount payable bi-annually. At June 30, 2005, the six month JIBAR rate was 6.929%. During
fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the realized gain/(loss) included in (loss)/profit on the interest rate swap amounted to a gain of
$0.2 million, a loss of $1.4 million and a loss of $1.5 million, respectively. During fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, the unrealized
gain/(loss) included in (loss)/profit on the interest rate swap amounted to $nil, a loss of $0.3 million and $nil, respectively.
F-36
19. PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION, RECLAMATION AND CLOSURE COSTS
While the ultimate amount of rehabilitation costs to be incurred in the future is uncertain, the Group has estimated that the total future
costs for the mines, in current monetary terms, will be $25.8 million at June 30, 2005 (2004: $39.2 million). The estimates are
prepared on an annual basis by the Group's Environmental Manager in accordance with the Company's rehabilitation plans. The
relevant rehabilitation plan is submitted to local authorities for approval and the provision is adjusted accordingly to reflect changes
therein.
Amounts have been contributed to irrevocable trusts (refer Note 13) under the Group's control. The monies in the trusts are invested
primarily in interest bearing debt securities and may be used only for environmental rehabilitation purposes. The Group intends to
finance the ultimate rehabilitation costs from the money invested with the trust funds, as well as, at the time of mine closure, the
proceeds on sale of remaining assets and gold from plant clean-up.
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Provision for asset retirement obligations
Opening balance
24,929
16,951
Foreign exchange
(224)
3,466
Disposed of through liquidation of subsidiary
(14,614)
-
Asset retirement obligation arising during period
-
2,538
Accretion - continuing operations
(1,002)
791
Accretion - discontinued operation
1,023
1,183
Closing balance
10,112
24,929
Provision for environmental rehabilitation costs
Opening balance
14,178
7,676
Foreign exchange
(136)
1,339
(Disposed of through liquidation)/assumed in purchase of subsidiary and joint venture
(5,297)
3,682
Accretion - continuing operations
3,739
458
Accretion - discontinued operation
-
1,023
Closing balance
12,484
14,178
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
22,596
39,107
The provision for asset retirement obligations relates to expected costs associated with the demolition of gold plants, shaft headgear
and shaft infrastructure.
The provision for environmental rehabilitation costs relates to the expected costs associated with the revegetation of tailings dams,
revegetation of rock dumps and the rehabilitation of open cast areas.
Included in the net book value of the mining asset balance are asset retirement costs, relating to the following mines:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Blyvoor
269
318
North West
-
389
Porgera
5,040
5,498
Tolukuma
-
21
5,309
6,226
F-37
20. LONG-TERM LOANS
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
These comprise loans from:
Secured
Industrial Development Corporation, or IDC (a)
4,025
5,281
Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited (b)
10,020
-
Unsecured
Senior Convertible Notes (c)
64,947
61,134
Investec Bank Limited (d)
-
2,765
78,992
69,180
Less: Payable within one year shown under current liabilities
(9,678)
(9,315)
Total long-term liabilities
69,314
59,865
The terms and conditions, including interest rates, attaching to the above loans are given in the narrative below:
(a) On July 18, 2002, Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor, entered into a loan agreement with the Industrial
Development Corporation, or IDC, for R65.0 million ($10.4 million) specifically for financing capital expenditures incurred by
Blyvoor in completing the Blyvoor expansion project. The loan bears interest at 1% below the prime rate of First National Bank of
Southern Africa Limited on overdraft. As of June 30, 2005, the interest rate on this loan stood at 9.5% per annum and $4.0 million
had been drawn down. The loan is repayable in 48 monthly installments starting from August 2002. Repayments were suspended in
January 2005 until January 2006, with the final payment due in July 2007.
The loan is secured over the Blyvoor metallurgical plant, with a net book value of $10.9 million at June 30, 2005. The loan agreement
prohibits the Company from disposing of or further encumbering the assets covered by the special notarial bond and places
restrictions over its ability to change the business of Blyvoor.
(b) On October 14, 2004, DRD (Isle of Man) entered into a facility of $15.0 million with Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited, or
Investec (Mauritius), of which $10.0 million has been drawn down. The facility may be used to finance future acquisitions or rights
offers by companies in which the Company wishes to acquire shares, or with prior written consent of Investec (Mauritius), it may be
used for any other purpose. The facility bears interest at the three-month London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 300 basis
points. Funds advanced and interest on this facility must be repaid in cash in equal installments every three months from the date of
the relevant advance so that the amount of the advance is paid in full to In vestec (Mauritius) on or before November 12, 2007.
The facility is secured by DRD (Isle of Man)’s shares in Emperor Mines Limited, DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines
Limited. The loan agreement prohibits the Company from disposing of or further encumbering the secured assets. The facility
restricts the flow of payments from DRD (Isle of Man) to the Company through requiring that all net operating cash or cash
distributions received by DRD (Isle of Man) in respect of the secured assets must be used to first service the Company’s interest and
principal payment obligations under the facility by requiring that the Company hold, in a debt servicing account, sufficient cash to
cover its quarterly principal payments. Any funds in excess of these repayment requirements may be transferred to the Company.
Investec (Mauritius) has the option to require DRD (Isle of Man) to pay 50% of any payments, which are a distribution, by or on
behalf of DRD (Isle of Man) to or for the account of the Company as a prepayment of the facility.
F-38
20. LONG-TERM LOANS (continued)
(c) On November 12, 2002, the Company issued $66,000,000 of 6% Senior Convertible Notes due 2006, in a private placement. The
interest payments of 6% per annum are payable semi-annually on May 12 and November 12 of each year. The Company issued the
notes at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount thereof. If not converted, or previously redeemed, the notes will be repaid
at 102.5% of their principal amount plus accrued interest on the fifth business day following their maturity date in November 2006.
The notes are convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the Company's ordinary shares, or American Depositary Shares,
or ADSs, at a conversion price of $3.75 per share or ADS, subject to adjustment in certain events if the cumulative adjustments
amount to 1% or more of the conversion rate.
The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time after November 12, 2005, at a redemption price equal to 100%
of the principal amount of the notes to the redeemed, plus accrued original issue discount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
but excluding, the date of redemption on giving not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice if (1) the closing price of its ADSs on
the Nasdaq SmallCap Market or substitute national securities exchange has exceeded 150% of the conversion price then in effect for
at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately before the date of
mailing of the provisional redemption notice and (2) the shelf registration statement covering the resale of the notes and the ordinary
shares and ordinary shares underlying the ADSs issuable upon conversion of the notes is effective and available for use and is
expected to remain effective and available for use for 30 days following the provisional redempt ion date, unless registration in no
longer required.
If there is a change in control of the Company, holders of the notes have the right to require it to repurchase their notes, at 102.5% of
the principal amount of the notes.
In connection with the offering of the notes, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchaser of the
notes. This agreement obligated the Company to file with the SEC a shelf registration statement with respect to the offer and sale of
the notes and the ordinary shares or the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs issuable upon conversion of the notes. On September
30, 2003, the SEC declared effective the Company's registration statement of Form F-3 pertaining to the notes. To date, no notes
have been converted.
In connection with the delay in the registration of the notes, the Company incurred liquidated damages payable to the note holders in
the amount of $1.2 million, which have been included in interest expense in the statement of operations for fiscal 2003.
The notes are presented in the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
(c) On November 12, 2002, the Company issued $66,000,000 of 6% Senior Convertible Notes due 2006, in a private placement. The
interest payments of 6% per annum are payable semi-annually on May 12 and November 12 of each year. The Company issued the
notes at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount thereof. If not converted, or previously redeemed, the notes will be repaid
at 102.5% of their principal amount plus accrued interest on the fifth business day following their maturity date in November 2006.
The notes are convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the Company's ordinary shares, or American Depositary Shares,
or ADSs, at a conversion price of $3.75 per share or ADS, subject to adjustment in certain events if the cumulative adjustments
amount to 1% or more of the conversion rate.
The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time after November 12, 2005, at a redemption price equal to 100%
of the principal amount of the notes to the redeemed, plus accrued original issue discount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
but excluding, the date of redemption on giving not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice if (1) the closing price of its ADSs on
the Nasdaq SmallCap Market or substitute national securities exchange has exceeded 150% of the conversion price then in effect for
at least 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately before the date of
mailing of the provisional redemption notice and (2) the shelf registration statement covering the resale of the notes and the ordinary
shares and ordinary shares underlying the ADSs issuable upon conversion of the notes is effective and available for use and is
expected to remain effective and available for use for 30 days following the provisional redempt ion date, unless registration in no
longer required.
If there is a change in control of the Company, holders of the notes have the right to require it to repurchase their notes, at 102.5% of
the principal amount of the notes.
In connection with the offering of the notes, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchaser of the
notes. This agreement obligated the Company to file with the SEC a shelf registration statement with respect to the offer and sale of
the notes and the ordinary shares or the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs issuable upon conversion of the notes. On September
30, 2003, the SEC declared effective the Company's registration statement of Form F-3 pertaining to the notes. To date, no notes
have been converted.
In connection with the delay in the registration of the notes, the Company incurred liquidated damages payable to the note holders in
the amount of $1.2 million, which have been included in interest expense in the statement of operations for fiscal 2003.
The notes are presented in the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Opening balance
61,134
61,422
Liability portion
49,732 47,750
Derivative portion (1)
11,402 13,672
Amortization of capitalized issuance costs (2)
1,597 897
Interest accrued (3)
9,869 5,932
Interest payment
(3,960) (3,960)
Change in fair value of derivative portion (1)
(3,816) (2,270)
Foreign exchange
123 (887)
Closing balance
64,947
61,134
Liability portion
57,361
49,732
Derivative portion (1)
7,586
11,402
(1) The conversion option embedded in the Senior Convertible Notes is accounted for as an embedded derivative instrument under
SFAS No. 133. The option does not qualify for hedge accounting. The embedded derivative instrument is carried at fair value, such
fair value being determined on the residual cash flow method, with changes in fair value included in the statement of operations in the
period in which the change occurs and classified as loss/(profit) on derivative instruments.
F-39
20. LONG-TERM LOANS (continued)
(2) The issuance costs relating to the convertible loan note have been capitalized, and are being amortized over the life of the
instrument.
(3) Interest on the notes is calculated on the effective yield basis, at an effective rate of 16.08% per annum.
Included in unrealized foreign exchange gains/(losses) is a loss of $4.4 million, and a gain of $10.6 million and $11.2 million, in
fiscals 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, relating to foreign exchange movements on the convertible note.
(d) On June 24, 2004, Investec Bank Limited, or Investec, granted the Company a R100.0 million (June 30, 2004: $15.9 million) loan
facility. The facility bore interest at the three-month Johannesburg Inter-bank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 300 basis points. As
at June 30, 2004, the interest rate was 10.95%. The Company could elect to re pay the facility in cash or by the issue of its ordinary
shares, valued at the market price of the shares on the date of settlement. The balance owing at June 30, 2004, including additional
amounts drawn down in fiscal 2005 totaling $13.1 million, were settled on September 30, 2004, through the issue of 7,850,657 of the
Company’s ordinary shares.
Long-term loans are scheduled for repayment in the 12 months to:
$'000
30 June 2006
9,678
30 June 2007
67,920
30 June 2008
1,394
30 June 2009 onwards
-
78,992
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
Currencies in which long-term loans are denominated are as follows:
$'000 $'000
United States Dollars
74,967
61,134
South African Rands
4,025
8,046
78,992
69,180
The Group has undrawn committed borrowing facilities of $nil (June 30, 2004: $2.9 million) from the Industrial Development
Corporation and bank overdraft facilities of $1.4 million (June 30, 2004: $1.8 million) of which $1.4 million (June 30, 2004:
$1.8 million) had been utilized at year-end. On October 14, 2004, the Company agreed a third $15.0 million loan facility with
Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited. As at June 30, 2005, $10.0 million had been drawn down and $5.0 million was available under
this facility. On December 10, 2004, the Company agreed a fourth $15.0 million loan facility with Investec. As at June 30, 2005, $9.0
million had been drawn and subsequently repaid through the issue of 8,060,647 of the Company’s shares and $6.0 million was still
available under this facility.
F-40
21. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Ordinary shares:
June 30, 2005
During the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company issued 56,230,705 no par value shares at market value to certain institutional
investors, in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $65.9 million. In addition, 6,612,676 no par value shares, with a value of $16.6
million, were issued in exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor Mines Limited shares (refer Note 4).
June 30, 2004
During the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued 41,463,639 no par value shares at market value to certain institutional
investors, in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $107.4 million. In addition, 6,643,902 no par value shares, with a value of $16.7
million, were issued to Oil Search Limited in final settlement of the Porgera Joint Venture acquisition price (refer Note 4).
June 30, 2003
Durin g the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company issued 4,794,889 shares at market value to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty)
Limited in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $6.8 million.
Cumulative preference shares:
The terms of issue of the cumulative preference shares are that they carry the right, in priority to the Company's ordinary shares, to
receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploration or the disposal of the Argonaut mineral rights
acquired from Randgold & Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. During fiscal 2005, the Argonaut mineral rights
reverted to the South African Government after no application for conversion was lodged within the stipulated period of one year,
under the provisions of the MPRD Act. The Company has lodged an application for a prospecting right in respect of the Argonaut
area, which is pending at the Department of Minerals and Energy.
Durban Deep “C” options:
The Company has authorized but not issued 10,000,000 Durban Deep “C” options on ordinary shares at an exercise price of R15 per
ordinary share which are exercisable at any time during the period from the date on which the option is issued to a date not later than
five years from the date of issue. These options are to be used as consideration for acquisitions by the Company.
Ordinary shares:
June 30, 2005
During the year ended June 30, 2005, the Company issued 56,230,705 no par value shares at market value to certain institutional
investors, in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $65.9 million. In addition, 6,612,676 no par value shares, with a value of $16.6
million, were issued in exchange for the 29,097,269 Emperor Mines Limited shares (refer Note 4).
June 30, 2004
During the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued 41,463,639 no par value shares at market value to certain institutional
investors, in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $107.4 million. In addition, 6,643,902 no par value shares, with a value of $16.7
million, were issued to Oil Search Limited in final settlement of the Porgera Joint Venture acquisition price (refer Note 4).
June 30, 2003
Durin g the year ended June 30, 2003, the Company issued 4,794,889 shares at market value to Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty)
Limited in exchange for gross cash proceeds of $6.8 million.
Cumulative preference shares:
The terms of issue of the cumulative preference shares are that they carry the right, in priority to the Company's ordinary shares, to
receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploration or the disposal of the Argonaut mineral rights
acquired from Randgold & Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. During fiscal 2005, the Argonaut mineral rights
reverted to the South African Government after no application for conversion was lodged within the stipulated period of one year,
under the provisions of the MPRD Act. The Company has lodged an application for a prospecting right in respect of the Argonaut
area, which is pending at the Department of Minerals and Energy.
Durban Deep “C” options:
The Company has authorized but not issued 10,000,000 Durban Deep “C” options on ordinary shares at an exercise price of R15 per
ordinary share which are exercisable at any time during the period from the date on which the option is issued to a date not later than
five years from the date of issue. These options are to be used as consideration for acquisitions by the Company.
F-41
22. (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE
(Loss)/profit per share is calculated based on the (loss)/profit divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the
year. Fully diluted (loss)/profit per share is based upon the inclusion of potential common shares with a dilutive effect on (loss)/profit
per share.
year. Fully diluted (loss)/profit per share is based upon the inclusion of potential common shares with a dilutive effect on (loss)/profit
per share.
For the year ended June 30, 2005
Loss
Per-share
$000 Shares
amount
(Numerator) (Denominator)
$
cents
Basic and fully diluted loss per share
Shares outstanding July, 1, 2004
233,307,667
Weighted average number of shares issued - 2005
24,388,129
Net loss from continuing operations applicable to common stockholders
(37,430) 257,695,796
(15)
Loss from discontinued operation
(44,359)
(17)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders
(81,789)
(32)
Anti-dilutive shares (shares underlying Senior Convertible Notes)
- 17,600,000
Anti-dilutive shares (shares underlying staff options allocated)
-
There is no dilution in loss per share for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as the effect of dilutive securities in issue would have
been anti-dilutive as the Company recorded a loss for the year.
(Loss)/profit per share is calculated based on the (loss)/profit divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the
year. Fully diluted (loss)/profit per share is based upon the inclusion of potential common shares with a dilutive effect on (loss)/profit
per share.
For the year ended June 30, 2004
Loss
Per-share
$000 Shares
amount
(Numerator) (Denominator)
$
cents
Basic and fully diluted loss per share
Shares outstanding July, 1, 2003
184,222,073
Weighted average number of shares issued - 2004
32,287,770
Net loss from continuing operations applicable to common stockholders
(38,094) 216,509,843
(17)
Loss from discontinued operation
(20,804)
(10)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders
(58,898)
(27)
Anti-dilutive shares (shares underlying Senior Convertible Notes)
- 17,600,000
Anti-dilutive shares (shares underlying staff options allocated)
621,713
There is no dilution in loss per share for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as the effect of dilutive securities in issue would have
been anti-dilutive as the Company recorded a loss for the year.
F-42
22. (LOSS)/PROFIT PER SHARE (continued)
For the year ended June 30, 2003
Profit
Per-share
$000 Shares
amount
(Numerator) (Denominator) $
cents
Basic profit per share
Shares outstanding July, 1, 2002
177,173,485
Weighted average number of shares issued - 2003
6,127,180
Net profit from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting
change
change
36,709 183,300,665
20
Cumulative effect of accounting change
(173)
-
Loss from discontinued operation
(22,577)
(12)
Net profit applicable to common stockholders
13,959
8
Fully diluted profit per share
Weighted average number of shares as per basic profit per share
183,300,665
Weighted average dilutive number of shares underlying Senior Convertible
Notes
Notes
(2,598) 11,090,411
Weighted average dilutive number of shares underlying staff options allocated
2,943,230
Diluted net profit from continuing operations applicable to common
stockholders 11,361
stockholders 11,361
197,334,306
6
Cumulative effect of accounting change
173
-
Loss from discontinued operation
22,577
12
Diluted net profit from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change
accounting change
34,111
18
F-43
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Pension and provident funds
In South Africa, the Group participates in a number of multi-employer industry-based retirement plans. All plans are governed by the
Pension Funds Act, 1956. The provident funds are funded on the “money accumulative basis” with the members' and Group's
contributions having been fixed in the constitutions of the funds. In Papua New Guinea retirement fund contributions are regulated by
the Superannuation Act. According to the Act, the Group has to contribute 7% of the employee's earnings to a local superfund
(NASFUND), whilst the employee contributes 5% of their gross salaries and wages. Payments are made to the fund on a monthly
basis.
The majority of the Group's employees are covered by either of the above-mentioned funds. Fund contributions by the Group for the
year ended June 30, 2005 amounted to $ 7.4 million (2004: $8.7 million; 2003: $6.4 million).
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions
Prior to the Company's acquisition of Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor, skilled workers (clerical workers
and mine management) at that operation participated in multi-employer health plans, which paid certain medical costs. Employer
contributions were determined on an annual basis by these health funds. Qualifying dependants received the same benefits as active
employees. Blyvoor voluntarily accepted liability for post-retirement medical benefits of employees who were members of these
multi-employer health plans prior to the acquisition. The fixed amount, which was determined based on negotiations between
Blyvoor and the various medical schemes, was settled during fiscal 2004.
Currently, no post-retirement benefits other than pensions are available to workers.
Long-service awards
The Group participates in the C hamber of Mines of South Africa Long-Service Awards Scheme, or the Scheme. The Scheme does
not confer on any employee or other persons any right of payment of any award. In terms of the Scheme, bonus payments may be
made to certain employees, usually semi-skilled, upon reaching the age of 55, who have completed 15 years of continuous service in
South African gold mining companies which are members of the Chamber of Mines of South Africa and the Employment Bureau of
Africa, provided such service is not pensionable service. The Scheme lays down the rules under which an employee may be eligible
for the award. The award is paid by the company for which the employee works upon becoming eligible for the award and electing to
receive payment. All awards must be confirmed by the Chamber of Mines of South Africa before payment. The amount of the award
is based on both the employee's skill level and years of service with qualified gold mining companies.
The accumulated benefit obl igation at June 30, 2005, is not significant. During fiscal 2005, the Company expensed $0.3 million
(2004: $0.2 million; 2003: $0.1 million) relating to the long-service awards.
Pension and provident funds
In South Africa, the Group participates in a number of multi-employer industry-based retirement plans. All plans are governed by the
Pension Funds Act, 1956. The provident funds are funded on the “money accumulative basis” with the members' and Group's
contributions having been fixed in the constitutions of the funds. In Papua New Guinea retirement fund contributions are regulated by
the Superannuation Act. According to the Act, the Group has to contribute 7% of the employee's earnings to a local superfund
(NASFUND), whilst the employee contributes 5% of their gross salaries and wages. Payments are made to the fund on a monthly
basis.
The majority of the Group's employees are covered by either of the above-mentioned funds. Fund contributions by the Group for the
year ended June 30, 2005 amounted to $ 7.4 million (2004: $8.7 million; 2003: $6.4 million).
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions
Prior to the Company's acquisition of Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor, skilled workers (clerical workers
and mine management) at that operation participated in multi-employer health plans, which paid certain medical costs. Employer
contributions were determined on an annual basis by these health funds. Qualifying dependants received the same benefits as active
employees. Blyvoor voluntarily accepted liability for post-retirement medical benefits of employees who were members of these
multi-employer health plans prior to the acquisition. The fixed amount, which was determined based on negotiations between
Blyvoor and the various medical schemes, was settled during fiscal 2004.
Currently, no post-retirement benefits other than pensions are available to workers.
Long-service awards
The Group participates in the C hamber of Mines of South Africa Long-Service Awards Scheme, or the Scheme. The Scheme does
not confer on any employee or other persons any right of payment of any award. In terms of the Scheme, bonus payments may be
made to certain employees, usually semi-skilled, upon reaching the age of 55, who have completed 15 years of continuous service in
South African gold mining companies which are members of the Chamber of Mines of South Africa and the Employment Bureau of
Africa, provided such service is not pensionable service. The Scheme lays down the rules under which an employee may be eligible
for the award. The award is paid by the company for which the employee works upon becoming eligible for the award and electing to
receive payment. All awards must be confirmed by the Chamber of Mines of South Africa before payment. The amount of the award
is based on both the employee's skill level and years of service with qualified gold mining companies.
The accumulated benefit obl igation at June 30, 2005, is not significant. During fiscal 2005, the Company expensed $0.3 million
(2004: $0.2 million; 2003: $0.1 million) relating to the long-service awards.
F-44
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
Share option plan
The Company has an Employee Share Option Scheme, or ESOS, under which all employees may be granted options to purchase
shares in the Company's authorized, but unissued ordinary shares. Unissued shares that have been reserved for the ESOS may not
exceed 15% of the number of issued ordinary and preferred ordinary shares.
The number of issued and exercisable share options is approximately 4.4% of the issued ordinary share capital. The participants in the
ESOS are fully taxed on any gains realized on the exercise of their options.
On October 24, 1997, the terms of the ESOS were amended. The amended terms applied to options outstanding at the date of the
amendment and options to be issued thereafter. The exercise price of options is the lowest seven day trailing average of the closing
market prices of an ordinary share on the JSE Limited (South Africa), or JSE, as confirmed by the Company's directors, during the
three months proceeding the day on which the employee is granted the option. Prior to the amendment, the exercise price was the
closing JSE market price on the day preceding the grant date of the option. The vesting period for options is determined by the
directors.
All options expire ten years after grant date.
During the fiscal years 1998 to 2005, the Company issued options, one quarter of which were exercisable six months after grant date,
a further quarter of which are exercisable twelve months after grant date and a further quarter of which are exercisable annually
thereafter. Share options activity in respect of these options was as follows:
Share option plan
The Company has an Employee Share Option Scheme, or ESOS, under which all employees may be granted options to purchase
shares in the Company's authorized, but unissued ordinary shares. Unissued shares that have been reserved for the ESOS may not
exceed 15% of the number of issued ordinary and preferred ordinary shares.
The number of issued and exercisable share options is approximately 4.4% of the issued ordinary share capital. The participants in the
ESOS are fully taxed on any gains realized on the exercise of their options.
On October 24, 1997, the terms of the ESOS were amended. The amended terms applied to options outstanding at the date of the
amendment and options to be issued thereafter. The exercise price of options is the lowest seven day trailing average of the closing
market prices of an ordinary share on the JSE Limited (South Africa), or JSE, as confirmed by the Company's directors, during the
three months proceeding the day on which the employee is granted the option. Prior to the amendment, the exercise price was the
closing JSE market price on the day preceding the grant date of the option. The vesting period for options is determined by the
directors.
All options expire ten years after grant date.
During the fiscal years 1998 to 2005, the Company issued options, one quarter of which were exercisable six months after grant date,
a further quarter of which are exercisable twelve months after grant date and a further quarter of which are exercisable annually
thereafter. Share options activity in respect of these options was as follows:
Outstanding Exercisable
Average
Average
price per
price per
Number of
share
Number of
share
Shares (in Rand)
Shares (in Rand)
Balance at July 1, 2002
5,600,364
10.30
199,000
9.54
Granted 3,113,500
23.04
Exercised (2,055,944)
8.26
Forfeited/lapsed (1,012,863)
11.85
Balance at June 30, 2003
5,645,057
17.62
931,205
19.43
Granted 3,452,117
18.37
Exercised (940,269)
8.56
Forfeited/lapsed (388,167)
17.98
Balance at June 30, 2004
7,768,738
19.03
2,964,354
18.67
Granted 5,794,784
7.21
Exercised (66,000)
6.50
Forfeited/lapsed (1,003,611)
15.10
Balance at June 30, 2005
12,493,911
13.96
5,949,499
17.68
Average price per share is disclosed in South African Rand as the options are on ordinary shares and the option price is stated in
South African Rand. As of June 30, 2005, the average price per share for outstanding options is $2.09 and average price per share for
exercisable options is $2.64.
F-45
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
For the purposes of the pro-forma disclosures in terms of SFAS No. 123, the weighted average grant date fair value of the above
options granted in fiscal 2005 at exercise prices which exceeded the market price of the stock on grant date was R0.83 (2004: R3.31;
2003: Rnil). The weighted average grant date fair value of the above options granted in fiscal 2005 at exercise prices, which were less
than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R2.33 (2004: R4.37; 2003: R8.07).
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
For the purposes of the pro-forma disclosures in terms of SFAS No. 123, the weighted average grant date fair value of the above
options granted in fiscal 2005 at exercise prices which exceeded the market price of the stock on grant date was R0.83 (2004: R3.31;
2003: Rnil). The weighted average grant date fair value of the above options granted in fiscal 2005 at exercise prices, which were less
than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R2.33 (2004: R4.37; 2003: R8.07).
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
June 30, 2005 June 30, 2004 June 30, 2003
Expected life (in years)
3
3
3
Risk free interest rate
7.98%
9.24% 10.74%
Volatility
35%
31% 47%
Dividend yield
0%
0% 0%
During fiscal 1998, the Company also issued certain options which were exercisable immediately, but which vested over a period of
twelve months. Share options activity in respect of these options was as follows:
Outstanding Exercisable
Average Average
price per
price per
Number of
share
Number of
share
Shares (in Rand) Shares (in Rand)
Balance at July 1, 2002
3,000
7.00 3,000 7.00
Forfeited/lapsed
(3,000)
7.00
Balance at June 30, 2003
-
-
-
-
For the purposes of the pro-forma disclosures in terms of SFAS 123, the weighted average grant date fair value of the above options
granted in 1998 was R2.67. These options had an exercise price equal to the market price of the stock on grant date.
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
assumptions:
1998
Expected life (in years)
1
Risk free interest rate
15.25%
Volatility
85%
Dividend
yield
0%
F-46
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
During fiscal 2002, the Company issued certain options, 25% which were exercisable immediately and the remaining 75% in equal
tranches after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Share options activity in respect of these options was as follows:
During fiscal 2002, the Company issued certain options, 25% which were exercisable immediately and the remaining 75% in equal
tranches after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Share options activity in respect of these options was as follows:
Outstanding Exercisable
Average Average
price per
price per
Number of
share
Number of
share
Shares
(in Rand)
Shares
(in Rand)
Balance at July 1, 2002
937,500
15.81 187,500 15.81
Exercised
(227,125)
15.81
Forfeited/lapsed
(78,750)
15.81
Balance at June 30, 2003
631,625
15.81 305,375 15.81
Exercised
(43,750)
15.81
Forfeited/lapsed
(11,250)
15.81
Balance at June 30, 2004
576,625
15.81 419,125 15.81
Exercised
-
15.81
Forfeited/lapsed
(18,750)
15.81
Balance at June 30, 2005
557,875
15.81 557,875 15.81
Average price per share is disclosed in South African Rand as the options are on ordinary shares and the option price is stated in
South African Rand. As of June 30, 2005, the average price per share for outstanding options is $2.37 and average price per share for
exercisable options is $2.37.
For the purposes of the pro-forma disclosures in terms of SFAS No. 123, the weighted average grant date fair value of the above
options granted in 2002 at exercise prices, all of which were less than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R19.08.
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
options granted in 2002 at exercise prices, all of which were less than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R19.08.
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
2002
Expected life (in years)
3
Risk free interest rate
12.58%
Volatility
49.7%
Dividend yield
0%
F-47
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
During fiscal 2002, the Company issued certain options, which were exercisable immediately. Share options activity in respect of
these options was as follows:
During fiscal 2002, the Company issued certain options, which were exercisable immediately. Share options activity in respect of
these options was as follows:
Outstanding Exercisable
Average Average
price per price
per
Number of
share
Number of
share
Shares
(in Rand)
Shares
(in Rand)
Balance at July 1, 2002
9,292
8.37 9,292 8.37
Exercised
(9,292)
8.37
Balance at June 30, 2003
-
-
-
-
For the purposes of the pro-forma disclosures in terms of SFAS 123, the weighted average grant date fair value of the above options
granted in 2002 at exercise prices, all of which were less than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R6.20.
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
granted in 2002 at exercise prices, all of which were less than the market price of the stock on grant date, was R6.20.
The grant date fair value of these options was determined using a Black-Scholes pricing option model, applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
2002
Expected life (in years)
0
Risk free interest rate
12.79%
Volatility
23.4%
Dividend yield
0%
The following tables summarize information relating to all employee stock options outstanding as June 30, 2005:
Outstanding Exercisable
Weighted
average
Weighted Weighted
contractual
average
average
Number of
life (in
exercise
Number of
exercise
Shares
years) price Shares price
(in
Rand)
(in
Rand)
Range of exercise prices (R)
R4.52 to R6.78
3,765,624 9.57 5.24
402,587
5.70
R6.79 to R10.18
333,375 5.89 7.41
333,375
7.41
R10.19 to R15.28
1,838,300
9.30 10.93
600,650
10.93
R15.29 to R22.93
6,141,487
7.90
18.29
4,407,362
18.20
R22.94 to R34.41
933,000
7.32
29.09
723,400
29.09
R34.42 to R36.08
40,000
7.00
36.08
40,000
36.06
13,051,786
8.48
14.04
6,507,374
17.52
F-48
24. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these deposits. The
Group attempts to minimize its credit risk by placing cash and cash equivalents with major banks and financial institutions located in
South Africa, Australia and Papua New Guinea, after evaluating the credit ratings of the respective financial institutions. The Group
believes that no concentration of credit risk exists in respect of cash and cash equivalents.
Derivative instruments
In the normal course of its operations, the Group is exposed to market risks, including commodity price, foreign currency, interest,
liquidity and credit risks. The Company entered into transactions, which make use of derivative instruments, to economically hedge
certain exposures. These instruments include interest rate swaps and gold lease rate swaps. The decision to use these types of
transactions is based on the Company's hedging policy, which precludes the forward selling of gold. Although most of these
instruments are used as economic hedges, none of them qualify for hedge accounting and, consequently, are marked-to-market
through the statement of operations in accordance SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
The Group does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Eskom gold for electricity contract
In October 2000, the Company entered into a contract to buy electricity from Eskom. Under the terms of the Company's agreement,
the Company pays Eskom the standard electricity tariff for all energy it consumes, including the 75 GWh per month specified in the
contract. This contract was to expire in September 2005. In addition, every 12 month-period starting in October the Company adjusts
the amounts paid in that period in accordance with an established formula based on the gold price.
The gold price adjustment is based on the notional amount of 15,000 ounces of gold multiplied by the difference between the
contracted gold price, which is the price that was agreed on the date of the transaction for a determined period, and the arithmetic
average of London PM fix for each business day in the calculation period.
The Company concluded that (1) the contract in its entirety does not meet the definition of a derivative instrument and therefore it
does not have to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value; (2) the embedded gold for electricity forward contract possesses
economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and (3) a
separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument. Accordingly, the embedded derivative
was separated from the hos t contract and carried at fair value.
As discussed in Note 18, the contract was closed out on April 28, 2005, at a cost of $3.6 million. The fair value of the gold for
electricity contract was a liability of $3.1 million as at June 30, 2004. The fair value reflected the difference between the price that
was agreed on the date of the transaction and the forward price on June 30, 2004. Therefore, the liability of $3.1 million reflected the
loss as at June 30, 2004, when the gold price was R2,451 per ounce against an average contract price of R2,256 per ounce.
F-49
24. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Put options bought
Put options bought refer to the right, but not the obligation to sell a predetermined amount of gold at a predetermined price on a
predetermined date. During fiscal 2003, the remaining put options were closed out. This resulted in a realized gain of $7.1 million.
Included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments is $nil for fiscal 2004, and a profit of $9.5 million for fiscal 2003, relating to this
instrument.
Other positions
The Company had entered into a gold rate lease swap and call option transactions which had been accounted for in the financial
statements on a mark-to-market basis in prior fiscal years, and which matured or were closed out in fiscal 2004.
During fiscal 2004, a gold lease rate swap for 109,875 ounces, at a rate of 0.20% matured. A gold lease rate swap is a contract
whereby the Company and a counterparty select a notional amount of gold, and thereafter over the life of the contract one party pays
a fixed lease rate based on that amount of gold and the other party pays a floating lease rate based on the same amount of gold. The
Company had exposure to increases in the three-month lease rate up to June 2004. The volume the swap was based on decreases
every quarter until it reached zero (by June 2004). Every quarter the Company received a fixed cash flow equal to 0.2% per annum of
the volume and $280/oz, and paid the three-month floating lease rate converted at the then market spot rate.
During fiscal 2003, the Company bought call options as a risk management tool to protect the maximum exposure on the gold for
electricity contract. Options covering a total of 272,110 ounces were purchased for $14.9 million. These contracts expire by
September 2005. During fiscal 2004, the Company took advantage of the lower rand gold price and closed out 265,000 ounces of the
Eskom gold for electr icity contract in line with its policy of not hedging gold production. Accordingly the exposure for which the call
options were bought as a risk management tool had been significantly reduced and the remaining call options were closed out during
fiscal 2004, recording a gain of $0.1 million.
Included in profit/(loss) on derivative instruments is $nil for fiscal 2005, a loss of $3.2 million for fiscal 2004 and a profit of $40.9
million for fiscal 2003, relating to these instruments.
Concentration of credit risk
The Company believes that its financial instruments do not represent a concentration of credit risk, because the Group deals with a
variety of major banks and financial institutions located in South Africa, Australia and Papua New Guinea, after evaluating the credit
ratings of the representative financial institutions. Furthermore, its debtors and loans are regularly monitored and assessed for
recoverability. Where it is appropriate to ra ise a provision, an adequate level of provision is maintained.
In addition, the Group's South African operations all deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited, or Rand Refinery, which refines the
gold to saleable purity levels and then sells the gold, on behalf of the Group, on the bullion market. The gold is sold by Rand
Refinery on the same day as it is delivered and settlement is made within two days. Once the gold has been delivered to Rand
Refinery, the risks and rewards of ownership have passed.
The Tolukuma mining operation delivers its gold to one customer, N M Rothschild (Australia) and receives proceeds within two
days. The concentration of credit risk in Australia is mitigated by the reputable nature of the customer and the settlement of the
proceeds within two days.
F-50
24. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The Porgera mining operation delivers its gold to AGR Matthey (Papua New Guinea) who refines the gold and then delivers it to the
Bank of Western Australia Limited at a price negotiated by the Company. The concentration of credit risk in Papua New Guinea is
mitigated by the reputable nature of the customer and the settlement of the proceeds within two days.
Foreign currency risk
The Group's functional currency for the South African operations is the South African Rand and for the Papua New Guinea
operations it is the Papua New Guinea Kina. Although gold is sold in US Dollars, the Company is obliged to convert these into
Rands for its South African operations in terms of South African Reserve Bank, or SARB, regulations. The Company is thus exposed
to fluctuations in the Dollar / South African Rand exchange rate. The Company conducts its operations in South Africa and Papu a
New Guinea. Currently, foreign exchange fluctuations affect the cash flow that it will realize from its operations as gold is sold in
US Dollars while production costs are incurred primarily in Rands and Kina.
The Company's results are positively affected when the Dollar strengthens against these foreign currencies and adversely affected
when the Dollar weakens against the foreign currencies. The Company's cash and cash equivalent balances are held in US Dollars,
Rands and Australian Dollars; holdings denominated in other currencies are relatively insignificant. Certain of the Company's
financial liabilities are denominated in a currency other than the Rand (refer Note 20). The Company is thus exposed to fluctuations
in the Rand with the relevant currency. The Company has not entered into any foreign exchange hedging contracts to attempt to
mitigate its foreign currency risk.
Interest rate and liquidity risk
Fluctuations in interest rates impact the value of short-term cash investments and financing activities, giving rise to interest rate risks.
Interest rate swap agreement
An interest rate swap agreement was entered into in November 2002 to manage the exposure to changes in interest rates with regard
to the interest payable on the Senior Convertible Notes (refer Note 20). The fixed interest rate (in US Dollars) was swapped for a
floating South African interest rate, calculated at the Johannesburg Inter Bank Acceptance Rate, or JIBAR, plus 200 basis points per
annum. An amount of 60% of the coupon rate is subject to this swap agreement, based on the requirements of the SARB, as this
represents the amount of the funds raised in South Africa. The maturity date of this agreement is November 2006. The Company
believes that the counterparty to this agreement, being The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited, is a financially sound institution
and the credit risk for non-performance is not significant.
As discussed in Note 18, the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement was a liability of $0.6 million as at June 30, 2005.
Labor risk
Approximately 70% of the labor force, at our South African Operations, are members of labor unions. The majority of the union
members are blue-collar employees. The unions negotiate two year wage agreements which are binding on employees in the
respective bargaining units, the largest of which consists of occupational groupings of mainly blue collar workers in the organization.
The new wage agreement for Blyvoor is valid from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007. As at October 31, 2005, wage agreements were
still being negotiated at Crown and ERPM. The levels of unionization for operations outside South Africa vary. It is mostly contained
amongst blue-collar workers and membership is below 50%.
F-51
24. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction
between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.
The following table represents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Group's financial instruments outstanding:
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Carrying
amount
Fair value
Carrying
amount
Fair value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
36,085
36,085 22,453
22,453
Receivables
8,020
8,020 19,514
19,514
Listed investments
101
101 78
78
Unlisted investments
670
670 2,392
2,392
Investment in environmental trusts
6,416
6,416 22,841
22,841
Financial liabilities
Bank overdraft
1,370
1,370 1,828
1,828
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
33,317
33,317 61,153
61,153
Derivative instruments
550
550 5,074
5,074
Long-term loans
- long-term portion
69,314
63,819 59,865
53,512
- short-term portion
9,678
9,678 9,315
9,315
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and short-term loans
approximates their fair values due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
The fair value of listed investments has been determined by reference to the market value of the underlying investments. The
investment in the environmental trusts is invested primarily in interest bearing securities and equity-limited unit trusts, the carrying
value of which approximates their fair value.
The fair value of the fixed interest rate long-term debt instruments is subject to changes in market interest rates. The fair values are
calculated based on a credit adjusted US Treasury rate, with comparable terms of maturity.
25. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
June 30,
2005
June 30,
2004
$'000 $'000
Capital expenditure commitments:
Contracted but not provided for in the financial statements
274
1,671
Authorized by the directors but not contracted for
3,393
12,167
3,667
13,838
Litigation
The Group is subject to litigation in the normal course of business. The Group believes that any adverse outcome from litigation would
not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
F-52
25. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued)
Securities class action
On June 13, 2005, a securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the
Company and two of its officers. Since then, four nearly identical securities class action complaints have been filed against the Company
and the same officers. The cases have been consolidated in the Southern District of New York. The Company expects that a consolidated
amended complaint will be filed on behalf of a group of lead plaintiffs selected by the Court to represent the putative class of plaintiffs
alleged in the complaints. The Company anticipates that a response to such a complaint will be required some time in early 2006. To date,
neither the Company nor the individual defendants have been formally served with any complaint regarding these matters.
The actions are allegedly filed on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s shares during two purported class periods spanning from
October 23, 2003 to February 25, 2005. The complaints allege generally that the Company and the individual defendants made false and
misleading public statements regarding, among other things:
Securities class action
On June 13, 2005, a securities class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the
Company and two of its officers. Since then, four nearly identical securities class action complaints have been filed against the Company
and the same officers. The cases have been consolidated in the Southern District of New York. The Company expects that a consolidated
amended complaint will be filed on behalf of a group of lead plaintiffs selected by the Court to represent the putative class of plaintiffs
alleged in the complaints. The Company anticipates that a response to such a complaint will be required some time in early 2006. To date,
neither the Company nor the individual defendants have been formally served with any complaint regarding these matters.
The actions are allegedly filed on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s shares during two purported class periods spanning from
October 23, 2003 to February 25, 2005. The complaints allege generally that the Company and the individual defendants made false and
misleading public statements regarding, among other things:
•
the Company’s restructuring of its North West Operations in South Africa;
•
the Company’s ability to reduce the negative impact of the increasing value of the South African Rand; and
•
the strength of the Company’s balance sheet.
Based on the Company’s review of the complaints, management believes the lawsuits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend
the Company and its officers named in the complaints. The Company is not currently in a position to estimate the extent of any losses that
may result from the securities class action.
Tax on earnings of Company officers
The South African Revenue Services, or SARS, conducted a payroll audit on the Company’s payroll during 2002. At the time the
Company, acting on professional advice, did not deduct tax from some of the earnings of certain of its officers, who were provisional
tax payers. SARS took the view that the Company was in fact obliged to have made these deductions and called for a full disclosure
of all payments for the tax years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 in respect of the earnings of Mr. R.A.R. Kebble and Mr. M.J.
Prinsloo.
If it is established that these officers had failed to declare and pay taxes on their earnings during these tax years, SARS may have
recourse for arrear taxes against the Company in terms of Section 5(2) of the South African Income Tax Act, 1962 as amended.
Whilst the Company is aware that its possible exposure could be up to R25.0 million ($3.7 million), it is, in view of the fact that the
tax records of the aforementioned individuals are protected by statutory confidence, not yet possible to determine the full extent of
the exposure, if any, that the Company faces. Whilst the Company is aware that SARS have engaged the aforementioned individuals
personally, to date no tax assessments have been made against the Company.
F-53
26. GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based on risks and returns, the Directors consider that the primary reporting format is by business segment. The Group operates in one industry segment, being the extraction and production of gold and related by-products. Therefore the disclosures for the primary segment have already been given in these financial statements.
The chief operating decision-maker is the Board of Directors, who evaluate the business based on the following geographical operational segments, based on revenue generated from the location of the seller:
Based on risks and returns, the Directors consider that the primary reporting format is by business segment. The Group operates in one industry segment, being the extraction and production of gold and related by-products. Therefore the disclosures for the primary segment have already been given in these financial statements.
The chief operating decision-maker is the Board of Directors, who evaluate the business based on the following geographical operational segments, based on revenue generated from the location of the seller:
Year ended June 30, 2005
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Blyvoor
Mine
North
West Mine
West Wits
Mine
Other
Total South
African
operations
Porgera
Mine
Tolukuma
Mine
Other
Total
Australasian
operations
Total
operations
Discontinued
operation
Total
continuing
operations
Revenues
68,370 81,538
-
- 149,908 82,793 32,446 -
115,239
265,147
(81,538)
183,609
Depreciation and amortization
(2,716) (971)
- 2,773 (914)
(11,613)
(3,336) 1,095 (13,854)
(14,768)
971
(13,797)
Production costs
(73,814) (100,695)
- (1,218) (175,727) (36,210) (25,278) -
(61,488)
(237,215) 100,695
(136,520)
Results
Net operating income/(loss)
(11,917)
(62,714)
(486)
(8,203) (83,320) 29,808
245 (2,850) 27,203
(56,117) 62,714 6,597
(Loss)/profit after tax
(12,567)
(62,464)
(355)
(20,574)
(95,960) 24,028 (718)
(27,242) (3,932) (99,892)
62,464 (37,428)
Balance sheet
Mining assets
46,112
-
152
1,384
47,648 66,238 7,344 940 74,522
122,170
Total assets
54,665
-
1,971
20,527
77,163 117,788 17,259 26,047 161,094 238,257
Net current assets/(liabilities)
(6,715)
-
(35)
6,697
(53)
(1,262)
6,371
6,541
11,650
11,597
Other information
Capital expenditures
729
3,524
-
37
4,290
17,174 3,399
- 20,573 24,863 (3,524) 21,339
Impairment of assets
-
39,451
- 664
40,115 - - -
-
40,115
(39,451) 664
Total number of employees
3,481
824
4,305
The South African operations deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited, which acts as their agent in the sale of gold bullion. The Tolukuma mining operation and Porgera mining operation also has one customer for their gold bullion, namely N M Rothschild and AGR Matthey, respectively.
F-54
26. GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
Year ended June 30, 2004
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Blyvoor
Mine
North
West Mine
West Wits
Mine
Other
Total South
African
operations
Porgera
Mine
Tolukuma
Mine
Other
Total
Australasian
operations
Total
operations
Discontinued
operation
Total
continuing
operations
Revenues
90,066 130,036
-
- 220,102 60,445 32,743 -
93,188
313,290
(130,036)
183,254
Depreciation and amortization
(2,643) (4,160)
- 1,199 (5,604) (9,260) (7,340) (7,931) (24,531) (30,135) 4,160
(25,975)
Production costs
(90,366) (134,465)
- (1,189) (226,020) (31,650) (19,821) -
(51,471)
(277,491) 134,465
(143,026)
Results
Net operating income/(loss)
(8,980)
(21,523)
(1,539)
(26,890) (58,932) 18,631 2,402 266 21,299 (37,633)
21,523 (16,110)
(Loss)/profit after tax
(15,450)
(20,804)
(1,403)
(20,157)
(57,814) 9,062 2,294
(12,433) (1,077) (58,891)
20,804 (38,087)
Balance sheet
Mining assets
48,518
27,689
-
6,164
82,371 61,741 7,000 5,831 74,572
156,943
Total assets
31,572
79,368
4,245
103,681
218,866 19,204 9,571 35,094 63,869
282,735
Net current (liabilities)/assets
(59,902)
(157,709)
(19,036) 298,902 62,255 (25,102) (1,651)
(60,495) (87,248)
(24,993)
Other information
Capital expenditures
9,151
5,511
-
89
14,751 8,723 3,442
1 12,166
26,917 (5,511) 21,406
Impairment of assets
-
1,276
-
2,990 4,266
-
- -
-
4,266 (1,276) 2,990
Total number of employees
12,986
751
13,737
The South African operations deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited, which acts as their agent in the sale of gold bullion. The Tolukuma mining operation and Porgera mining operation also has one customer for their gold bullion, namely N M Rothschild and AGR Matthey, respectively.
F-55
26. GEOGRAPHIC AND SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
Year ended June 30, 2003
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Blyvoor Mine
North West
Mine
West Wits
Mine
Other
Total South
African
operations
Australasian
operations
Total
operations
Discontinued
operation
Total
continuing
operations
Revenues
81,753 151,923 4,796
- 238,472 22,870 261,342 (151,923) 109,419
Depreciation and amortization
(1,509) (1,761) (402) (369) (4,041) (6,561)
(10,602) 1,761
(8,841)
Production costs
(65,240) (144,598) (4,859) (1,557) (216,254) (19,105)
(235,359) 144,598
(90,761)
Results
Net operating income/(loss)
54,713
2,352
(80)
(2,403) 54,582 (4,993)
49,589 (2,352)
47,237
Profit/(loss) after tax
39,074
(22,577) 161
2,173
18,831
(4,872)
13,959
22,577
36,536
Balance sheet
Mining assets
38,089
31,920
-
602
70,611
12,646
83,257
Total assets
56,088
63,530
20,217
31,350
171,185
36,150
207,335
Net current assets/(liabilities)
(13,788)
(24,356)
1,306
55,913
19,075
(16,656)
2,419
Other information
Capital expenditures
4,176
6,375
-
170 10,721 2,693
13,414 (6,375) 7,039
Impairment of assets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total number of employees
18,766
472
19,238
The South African operations deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited, which acts as their agent in the sale of gold bullion. The Australasian operations also have one customer for their gold bullion, namely N M Rothschild.
The Australasian operations comprise Tolukuma gold mine and its related corporate structures.
The Australasian operations comprise Tolukuma gold mine and its related corporate structures.
F-56
27. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Simmer and Jack Mines Limited’s acquisition of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited
On October 6, 2005, the Company concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Mines Limited, or Simmer and Jack, for the
sale of its shareholding in Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Buffelsfontein (in provisional liquidation). The agreement is
conditional upon:
Simmer and Jack Mines Limited’s acquisition of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited
On October 6, 2005, the Company concluded an agreement with Simmer and Jack Mines Limited, or Simmer and Jack, for the
sale of its shareholding in Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, or Buffelsfontein (in provisional liquidation). The agreement is
conditional upon:
•
the acceptance by the High Court of South Africa and the majority of Buffelsfontein’s creditors of a scheme of
arrangement proposed by Simmer and Jack;
arrangement proposed by Simmer and Jack;
•
approval by the Competition Commission; and
•
the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry agreeing to substitute the Company with Simmer and Jack in the
underground water pumping directives that currently regulate the proportionate contribution of the surrounding mines to
the costs and maintenance of pumping.
underground water pumping directives that currently regulate the proportionate contribution of the surrounding mines to
the costs and maintenance of pumping.
Buffelsfontein, known as the Company’s North West Operations, or NWO, was placed in provisional liquidation on
March 22, 2005, following continued financial losses and a massive earthquake on March 9, 2005, which caused irreparable
damage to No. 5 Shaft.
Simmer and Jack’s scheme of arrangement involves the payment of R45.0 million ($6.7 million) to the provisional liquidators
and the fresh appointment of employees without assumption of any accumulated pre-liquidation employee benefits.
Simmer and Jack currently manages NWO, pays its holding costs in terms of an interim agreement with the provisional
liquidators and conducts limited mining of surface dumps. It may offset up to R20.0 million ($3.0 million) of its contribution to
holding costs against the proposed payment to the provisional liquidators of R45.0 million ($6.7 million).
In exchange for the transfer of it s holding in Buffelsfontein, Simmer and Jack paid the Company one Rand, and indemnified the
Company against any liabilities or obligations which could arise against it in connection with the environmental rehabilitation of
Buffelsfontein, as well as the management and pumping of underground water. Simmer and Jack has the benefit, however, of
drawing down against the rehabilitation trust fund which was transferred to the Department of Minerals and Energy upon the
provisional liquidation of Buffelsfontein.
The Company remains committed to the R9.0 million ($1.3 million) social fund established to help any NWO employees who
may be retrenched as a result of the liquidation and has made a provision for this amount at June 30, 2005. In total, the Company
has paid an amount of R47.9 million ($7.7 million), post-liquidation to assist the NWO’s liquidators, most of which was used to
pay workers’ wages. The Company remains Buffelsfontein’s largest creditor with a pproximately R1 billion ($149.6 million)
owing.
The provisional liquidators of Buffelsfontein are pursuing a valid, but as yet unquantified insurance claim for damage and losses
incurred in the March 2005 earthquake. The proceeds of this claim are not included in the scheme proposed by Simmer and Jack.
On October 21, 2005, the scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of Buffelsfontein proposed by Simmer and Jack and accepted
by the majority of Buffelsfontein creditors, including the Company, was approved and sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa.
Buffelsfontein applied to the High Court for the lifting of its provisional liquidation, which was granted on November 1, 2005.
Capital development projects at Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, or Blyvoor
Two projects at Blyvoor, with a total capital cost of R82.8 million ($12.4 million), the re-establishment of mining operations
from the No. 2 Sub-Shaft in two phases costing R80.5 million ($12.0 million) and a R2.3 million ($0.4 million) expansion of the
Slimes Dam Project, were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2005.
F-57
27. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)
Black Economic Empowerment, or BEE, transaction with Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH
On July 6, 2005, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with its black economic empowerment partner, KBH,
regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in the Company’s South African Operations.
In addition, on July 20, 2005, the Company acquired, from the Industrial Development Corporation, all of its CGR and ERPM
debt through the issue of 4,451,219 shares in the Company, which at the date of issue represented approximately $4.3 million
(R29.0 million).
On October 27, 2005, the Company’s board of directors approved the black economic empowerment transaction. The transaction has
been facilitated by the Industrial Development Corporation, which agreed to a debt restructuring in CGR.
The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, which is an affiliate of KBH acquiring, as a first step,
a 15% interest in a newly created company, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which includes
ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. The Company will retain an 85% interest.
In the second step, Khumo Gold has been granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in
DRDGOLD SA for the payment consideration of $1.4 million (R9.3 million). This further equity tranche will include a 6% stake to
be placed in a new, proposed Employee Trust. DRDGOLD Limited will subscribe for $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares. The proceeds from these preference shares will be used by Khumo Gold to settle an existing loan to KBH of $1.2 million (R7.9 million), subscribe for $0.6 million (R4.1 million) new preference shares in ERPM, subscribe for $0.4 million (R2.7 million) new preference shares in CGR, subscribe for $0.6 million (R3.9 million) new preference shares in Blyvoor and subscribe for an initial 15% of the issued ordinary shares in DRDGOLD SA for $2.0 million (R13.2 million).
Dr. Paseka Ncholo, the Company’s Non-Executive Chairman, will take over as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD SA with effect
from November 1, 2005. Due to the fact that Dr. Paseka Ncholo is also KBH’s Chairman, the transaction will be a related party
transaction. It will therefore be subject to regulatory approvals and to confirmation by an appointed, independent expert and the
Company’s audit committee that it is fair and reasonable to the Company’s shareholders.
Financing and operating assistance for Emperor
The Company has initiated a financing and operating assistance package to 45.33% owned Emperor. This follows a complete
review by the Company of Emperor’s operations.
To assist Emperor with its restructuring plan, the Company has agreed to provide a A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) Convertible
Loan Facility to Emperor as part of a re-financing package, which includes an agreement with ANZ Ban k to restructure
Emperor’s existing debt servicing obligations.
ANZ Bank has given its consent to the granting of the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security to the Company. Further
the Australian Stock Exchange has also granted a waiver of listing rules to permit Emperor to grant such security to the Company
on the terms incorporated in the Convertible Loan Facility.
The Convertible Loan Facility, which was negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, carries an interest rate of
9% per annum and is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100% interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji.
The Convertible Loan Facility is repayable upon either receipt of the proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s interest in the
Tuvatu Gold Prospect, or by December 31, 2007. Emperor has previously announced a conditional sale agreement in relation to
the Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of a pproximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion of
that transaction.
The Convertible Loan Facility is convertible, at the Company’s election, into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor at a
conversion price equal to the lower of A$0.30 per Emperor share or the 45 day volume weighted average price of Emperor shares
on Australian Stock Exchange prior to the date of conversion. The Convertible Loan Facility was approved by the shareholders
of Emperor, other than the Company, on August 29, 2005.
In terms of an operational support agreement, also negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, the Company
will provide Emperor with management and technical services.
Sale of the Durban Deep Section’s mine village
The Company concluded an agreement with M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd, or M5, on July 21, 2005, in terms of which M5, against
payment of a non-refundable fee of R1.5 million ($0.2 million), was granted an option t o acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine
village for R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part
payment of the purchase consideration.
Black Economic Empowerment, or BEE, transaction with Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited, or KBH
On July 6, 2005, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with its black economic empowerment partner, KBH,
regarding the acquisition by KBH of a 15% stake in the Company’s South African Operations.
In addition, on July 20, 2005, the Company acquired, from the Industrial Development Corporation, all of its CGR and ERPM
debt through the issue of 4,451,219 shares in the Company, which at the date of issue represented approximately $4.3 million
(R29.0 million).
On October 27, 2005, the Company’s board of directors approved the black economic empowerment transaction. The transaction has
been facilitated by the Industrial Development Corporation, which agreed to a debt restructuring in CGR.
The new structure results in Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, or Khumo Gold, which is an affiliate of KBH acquiring, as a first step,
a 15% interest in a newly created company, DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited, or DRDGOLD SA, which includes
ERPM, CGR and Blyvoor. The Company will retain an 85% interest.
In the second step, Khumo Gold has been granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in
DRDGOLD SA for the payment consideration of $1.4 million (R9.3 million). This further equity tranche will include a 6% stake to
be placed in a new, proposed Employee Trust. DRDGOLD Limited will subscribe for $4.8 million (R31.8 million) new Khumo Gold preference shares. The proceeds from these preference shares will be used by Khumo Gold to settle an existing loan to KBH of $1.2 million (R7.9 million), subscribe for $0.6 million (R4.1 million) new preference shares in ERPM, subscribe for $0.4 million (R2.7 million) new preference shares in CGR, subscribe for $0.6 million (R3.9 million) new preference shares in Blyvoor and subscribe for an initial 15% of the issued ordinary shares in DRDGOLD SA for $2.0 million (R13.2 million).
Dr. Paseka Ncholo, the Company’s Non-Executive Chairman, will take over as Executive Chairman of DRDGOLD SA with effect
from November 1, 2005. Due to the fact that Dr. Paseka Ncholo is also KBH’s Chairman, the transaction will be a related party
transaction. It will therefore be subject to regulatory approvals and to confirmation by an appointed, independent expert and the
Company’s audit committee that it is fair and reasonable to the Company’s shareholders.
Financing and operating assistance for Emperor
The Company has initiated a financing and operating assistance package to 45.33% owned Emperor. This follows a complete
review by the Company of Emperor’s operations.
To assist Emperor with its restructuring plan, the Company has agreed to provide a A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) Convertible
Loan Facility to Emperor as part of a re-financing package, which includes an agreement with ANZ Ban k to restructure
Emperor’s existing debt servicing obligations.
ANZ Bank has given its consent to the granting of the Convertible Loan Facility and the related security to the Company. Further
the Australian Stock Exchange has also granted a waiver of listing rules to permit Emperor to grant such security to the Company
on the terms incorporated in the Convertible Loan Facility.
The Convertible Loan Facility, which was negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, carries an interest rate of
9% per annum and is secured by a first ranking charge over Emperor’s 100% interest in the Tuvatu Gold Prospect in Fiji.
The Convertible Loan Facility is repayable upon either receipt of the proceeds expected from the sale of Emperor’s interest in the
Tuvatu Gold Prospect, or by December 31, 2007. Emperor has previously announced a conditional sale agreement in relation to
the Tuvatu Gold Prospect and expects to receive consideration of a pproximately A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) on completion of
that transaction.
The Convertible Loan Facility is convertible, at the Company’s election, into ordinary fully paid shares of Emperor at a
conversion price equal to the lower of A$0.30 per Emperor share or the 45 day volume weighted average price of Emperor shares
on Australian Stock Exchange prior to the date of conversion. The Convertible Loan Facility was approved by the shareholders
of Emperor, other than the Company, on August 29, 2005.
In terms of an operational support agreement, also negotiated on behalf of Emperor by its independent directors, the Company
will provide Emperor with management and technical services.
Sale of the Durban Deep Section’s mine village
The Company concluded an agreement with M5 Developments (Pty) Ltd, or M5, on July 21, 2005, in terms of which M5, against
payment of a non-refundable fee of R1.5 million ($0.2 million), was granted an option t o acquire the Durban Deep Section’s mine
village for R15.0 million ($2.2 million). The option was exercised on November 19, 2005 and the option fee will be deemed part
payment of the purchase consideration.
F-58
27. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)
Acquisition of a 5% holding in Allied Gold Limited
On November 11, 2005 the Company acquired a 5% holding in the Australian Stock Exchange listed Allied Gold Limited, or Allied,
for A$3.0 million ($2.3 million).
On November 11, 2005 the Company acquired a 5% holding in the Australian Stock Exchange listed Allied Gold Limited, or Allied,
for A$3.0 million ($2.3 million).
In a separate transaction, the Company has also undertaken to, pursuant to any existing Allied shareholder electing not to follow its
rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million) at an issue
price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share.
rights, take up not more than 17,420,000 shares, to be issued by Allied to raise an additional A$7.0 million ($5.3 million) at an issue
price of A$0,40 ($0.30) per share.
Both these transactions are subject to South African Reserve Bank approval.
The capital raising, which represents approximately 17.5% of Allied's share capital will also be subject to Allied shareholder
approval, which Allied has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
approval, which Allied has undertaken to seek to obtain by no later than January 20, 2006.
Consolidation of the Company’s offshore operations into Emperor Mines Limited
On November 16, 2005, the Company concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will
acquire the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds the
Company’s Papua New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma
Gold Mines Limited and all of the Company’s exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
On November 16, 2005, the Company concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Emperor, in terms of which Emperor will
acquire the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, or DRD (Isle of Man), which in turn holds the
Company’s Papua New Guinea assets, comprising a 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture, a 100% interest in Tolukuma
Gold Mines Limited and all of the Company’s exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea.
Implementation of the transaction requires the restructuring of the Company’s offshore operations, whereby DRD (Isle of Man)
will transfer the following material assets to the Company’s new wholly-owned subsidiary DRDGOLD (Offshore) Limited, or
DRD (Offshore):
will transfer the following material assets to the Company’s new wholly-owned subsidiary DRDGOLD (Offshore) Limited, or
DRD (Offshore):
•
its 45.33% interest in Emperor; and
•
an A$10.0 million ($7.6 million) convertible loan facility which DRD (Isle of Man) has advanced to Emperor, in
terms of which the Company can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23)
per Emperor share.
terms of which the Company can elect to convert such debt facility into additional Emperor shares at A$0.30 ($0.23)
per Emperor share.
The Company will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to DRD (Offshore). The restructuring is subject, inter alia, to the following
conditions precedent:
conditions precedent:
•
Shareholder approval;
•
South African Reserve Bank, or SARB, approval; and
•
other regulatory consents.
DRD (Offshore) will then sell DRD (Isle of Man) to Emperor. The purchase consideration is subject to certain completion
adjustments to reflect the change in the capital position of both Emperor and DRD (Isle of Man) between October 1, 2005, which
is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be settled by the issue of new Emperor
shares to DRD (Offshore) and a portion in cash.
adjustments to reflect the change in the capital position of both Emperor and DRD (Isle of Man) between October 1, 2005, which
is the effective date, and completion of the transaction. The purchase consideration will be settled by the issue of new Emperor
shares to DRD (Offshore) and a portion in cash.
The transaction is subject, inter alia, to the following conditions precedent:
•
the restructuring becoming unconditional,
•
approval by the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board;
•
SARB approval;
•
Emperor shareholder approval;
•
there being no material adverse change in either Emperor or the gold assets; and
•
a number of regulatory and banking consents and approvals being obtained.
Upon completion of the transaction and the issue of the new Emperor shares, the Company will hold approximately 90.5% of
Emperor. This transaction will be accounted for as a reverse acquisition.
Emperor. This transaction will be accounted for as a reverse acquisition.
Emperor has announced its intention to raise approximately $15.0 million through the placement of new shares following
completion of the transaction. The capital raising would take place in early 2006.
completion of the transaction. The capital raising would take place in early 2006.
157
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this Annual Report:
1.1*
Memorandum of Association of DRDGOLD Limited.
1.2^^
Articles of Association of DRDGOLD Limited, as amended on November 8, 2002.
1.3*
Excerpts of relevant provisions of the South African Companies Act.
1.4**
Durban Roodepoort Deep (1996) Share Option Scheme as amended.
2.1*
Excerpts of relevant provisions of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirements.
2.2^^
Indenture between DRDGOLD Limited, as Issuer, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated November 12, 2002.
2.3^^
Purchase Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and CIBC World Markets Corp., dated November 4, 2002.
2.4^^
Registration Rights Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and CIBC World Markets Corp., dated November 4,
2002.
2002.
2.5^^
DRDGOLD Limited 6% Senior Convertible Note Due 2006 in the amount of $61,500,000 issued pursuant to Rule
144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.6^^
DRDGOLD Limited 6% Senior Convertible Note Due 2006 in the amount of $4,500,000 issued pursuant to
Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
4.1*
Tribute Agreement, dated October 9, 1992 between DRDGOLD Limited and Rand Leases.
4.2*
Service Agreement, dated July 27, 1995, between DRDGOLD Limited and Randgold.
4.3*
Agreement, dated September 28, 1995, among First Wesgold Mining (Proprietary) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited and
Rand Leases in respect of purchase of assets of First Wesgold by Rand Leases.
Rand Leases in respect of purchase of assets of First Wesgold by Rand Leases.
4.4**
Pumping Assistance, dated October 14, 1997, for the 1997/1998 fiscal year from the Minister of Mineral and Energy
Affairs – Republic of South Africa to DRDGOLD Limited.
Affairs – Republic of South Africa to DRDGOLD Limited.
4.5***
Deposit Agreement among DRDGOLD Limited, The Bank of New York as Depositary, and owners and holders of
American Depositary Receipts, dated as of August 12, 1996, as amended and restated as of October 2, 1996, as further
amended and restated as of August 11, 1998.
American Depositary Receipts, dated as of August 12, 1996, as amended and restated as of October 2, 1996, as further
amended and restated as of August 11, 1998.
4.6****
Security Agreement, dated November 5, 1998, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, DRDGOLD Limited, Blyvoor,
Buffels and West Wits.
Buffels and West Wits.
4.7****
Loan Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited, Crown
and DRDGOLD Limited.
and DRDGOLD Limited.
4.8****
Lender Substitution Deed, dated August 18, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, DRD Australasia, NM Rothschild &
Sons (Singapore) Limited, NM Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited, as agent in its own capacity, and Rothschild
Nominees (Pty) Limited.
Sons (Singapore) Limited, NM Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited, as agent in its own capacity, and Rothschild
Nominees (Pty) Limited.
4.9****
A $10m Facility Agreement, dated September 10, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, DRD Australasia and NM
Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited.
Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited.
4.10****
Facility Agreement, dated August 9, 1996, between PT Barisan Tropical Mining, Rothschild Australia Limited and the
Participants.
Participants.
4.11****
Deposit Agreement, dated September 30, 1999, between Buffels and BOE Merchant Bank, a division of BOE Bank
Limited.
Limited.
4.12**** Undertaking
and Security Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between BOE Bank Limited, through its division
BOE Merchant Bank, and Buffels.
4.13****
Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, Blyvoor, Argonaut
Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited, West Wits, Crown and BOE Bank Limited, through its division BOE
Merchant Bank.
Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited, West Wits, Crown and BOE Bank Limited, through its division BOE
Merchant Bank.
4.14****
Loan Security Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between FBCF Equipment Finance (Proprietary) Limited and
Buffels.
Buffels.
4.15****
Sale of Business Agreement in respect of Harties, dated August 16, 1999, between Avgold Limited, Buffels and
DRDGOLD Limited.
DRDGOLD Limited.
4.16****
Form of Restraint Agreement.
4.17****
Sale of Shares Agreement, dated September 29, 1997, between RMP Properties Limited, Randgold, Crown, City Deep
Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited, Crown Mines Limited, RMP Properties SA Limited and
Industrial Zone Limited.
Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited, Crown Mines Limited, RMP Properties SA Limited and
Industrial Zone Limited.
4.18***** Form
of
Non-Executive Employment Agreement.
4.19*****
Form of Executive Employment Agreement.
4.20*****
Share Sale Option Agreement, dated March 12, 1993, between Newmont Proprietary Limited, Ballimore No. 56
Proprietary Limited, Clayfield Proprietary Limited and Dome Resources N.L.
Proprietary Limited, Clayfield Proprietary Limited and Dome Resources N.L.
158
4.21*****
Convertible Loan Agreement, dated November 19, 1997, between Tolukuma Gold Mines Proprietary Limited, Dome
Resources N.L. and Mineral Resources Development Company Proprietary Limited.
Resources N.L. and Mineral Resources Development Company Proprietary Limited.
4.22*****
First Deed of Variation of Loan Agreement, between Mineral Resources Development Company Pty Limited, Dome
Resources N.L. and Tolukuma Gold Mines Pty Limited.
Resources N.L. and Tolukuma Gold Mines Pty Limited.
4.23*****
Agreement, dated February 21, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas Limited.
4.24***** Independent Auditor’s Report from PricewaterhouseCoopers to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Crown
Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited, dated August 28, 2000.
4.25***** Shareholders’ Agreement, dated September 29, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited, Fraser Alexander Tailings
(Proprietary) Limited and Mine Waste Solutions (Proprietary) Limited.
4.26***** First Addendum to the Agreement, dated November 15, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas
Limited.
4.27*****
Second Addendum to the Agreement, dated December 21, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas
Limited.
Limited.
4.28^
Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas, Limited, Consolidated African Mines Limited and JCI Gold
Limited, dated April 25, 2001.
Limited, dated April 25, 2001.
4.29^
Addendum to the Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas Limited, Consolidated African Mines
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated August 31, 2001.
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated August 31, 2001.
4.30^
Addendum to the Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas Limited, Consolidated African Mines
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated September 26, 2001.
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated September 26, 2001.
4.31^
Guarantee and Cession in Securitatem Debiti Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited,
dated October 9, 2001.
dated October 9, 2001.
4.32^
Second Deed of Variation of Loan Agreement between Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, Dome Resources NL and
Mineral Resources Development Company Limited, dated June 28, 2001.
Mineral Resources Development Company Limited, dated June 28, 2001.
4.33^
Principal Terms and Conditions for Waiving Right to Declare Default and Enforce Security Deed under 1993 Purchase
Agreement between Newmont Second Capital Corporation, Tolukuma Gold Mines (Pty.) Limited, Dome Resources
(PNG) Pty. Limited, Dome Resources NL and DRDGOLD Limited, dated July 16, 2001.
Agreement between Newmont Second Capital Corporation, Tolukuma Gold Mines (Pty.) Limited, Dome Resources
(PNG) Pty. Limited, Dome Resources NL and DRDGOLD Limited, dated July 16, 2001.
4.34^
Loan Agreement between Bank of South Pacific Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 8,
2001.
2001.
4.35^^
Master Finance Lease between Volvo Truck Finance Australia (Pty) Ltd and Dome Resources N.L., dated October 31,
2000.
2000.
4.36^^
Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Rand Refinery Ltd, dated October 12, 2001.
4.37^^
Share Purchase Agreement between Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, The Industrial Development
Corporation of South Africa Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
Corporation of South Africa Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
4.38^^
Shareholder’s Agreement between The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited, Khumo Bathong
Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd. And DRDGOLD
Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd. And DRDGOLD
Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
4.39^^
Addendum to Shareholder’s Agreement between The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited,
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd.
And DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 14, 2002.
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd.
And DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 14, 2002.
4.40^^
Subscription Agreement between Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited and DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 12,
2002.
2002.
4.41^^
Loan Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
4.42^^
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 1 between Durban Roodepoort Deep and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd,
dated June 12, 2002.
dated June 12, 2002.
4.43^^
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 2 between DRDGOLD Limited and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated
June 12, 2002.
June 12, 2002.
4.44^^
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 3 between Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd and Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
4.45^^
Loan Agreement between Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Ltd. And Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company Ltd, dated July 18, 2002.
Company Ltd, dated July 18, 2002.
4.46^^
Agreement of Loan and Pledge between DRDGOLD Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Ltd, dated September
18, 2002.
18, 2002.
4.47^^
Management Services Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty)Ltd, dated October 1, 2002.
Recoveries (Pty)Ltd, dated October 1, 2002.
4.48^^
Agreement amongst DRDGOLD Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited and Bophelo Trading (Pty) Ltd,
dated October 1, 2002.
dated October 1, 2002.
159
4.49^^
Letter Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and The Standard Bank of South Africa, represented by its Standard
Corporate and Merchant Bank Division, dated October 7, 2002.
Corporate and Merchant Bank Division, dated October 7, 2002.
4.50^^
Memorandum of Agreement between Daun Et Cie A.G., Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings
(Pty) Ltd, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird,
Derek Sean Webbstock, as sellers, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, as purchaser, dated October 10, 2002.
(Pty) Ltd, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird,
Derek Sean Webbstock, as sellers, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, as purchaser, dated October 10, 2002.
4.51^^
Memorandum of Loan Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated October
10, 2002.
10, 2002.
4.52^^
Letter Agreement Relating to Consultancy Arrangement between DRDGOLD Limited and Nicolas Goodwin.
4.53^^
Management Services Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Ltd, dated October
10, 2002.
10, 2002.
4.54^^
Agreement for sale of shares in Emperor Mines Limited, between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Kola Ventures
Limited, dated December 13, 2002.
Limited, dated December 13, 2002.
4.55^^^
Confirmation,
dated
August 14, 2003, between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited.
4.56^^^
Amendment to Confirmation, dated September 4, 2003, between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius)
Limited.
Limited.
4.57^^^^
Deed of Amalgamation for the Corporate Restructuring of Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited, Mineral Resources
Porgera Limited and Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
Porgera Limited and Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.58^^^^
Undertaking, between Oil Search Limited and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.59^^^^
Loan Assignment Agreement between Orogen Minerals Limited, DRD (Isle of Man) and Orogen Minerals (Porgera)
Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.60^^^^
Agreement between Orogen Minerals Limited and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.61^^^^
Loan Assignment Agreement, between Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, Dome Resources Pty Limited, DRD (Isle of
Man) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 21, 2003.
Man) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 21, 2003.
4.62^^^^
Memorandum of Agreement made and entered into between DRDGOLD Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines
Limited, Mogale Gold (Proprietary) Limited and Luipaards Vlei Estates (Proprietary) Limited dated June 6, 2003.
Limited, Mogale Gold (Proprietary) Limited and Luipaards Vlei Estates (Proprietary) Limited dated June 6, 2003.
4.63#
Porgera Joint Venture Operating Agreement between Placer (P.N.G.) Pty Limited and Highlands Gold Properties Pty.
Limited and PGC (Papua New Guinea) Pty Limited, dated November 2, 1988.
Limited and PGC (Papua New Guinea) Pty Limited, dated November 2, 1988.
4.64#
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. D.J.M. Blackmur, dated as of October 21, 2003.
4.65#
Banking facilities Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Standard Bank of South Africa,
Limited, dated November 14, 2003.
Limited, dated November 14, 2003.
4.66#
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, dated as of December 1,
2003.
2003.
4.67#
Service Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, dated as of December 1,
2003.
2003.
4.68#
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
4.69# Service
Agreement
between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
4.70#
Subscription and Option Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, Net-Gold Services
Limited and G.M. Network Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
Limited and G.M. Network Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
4.71#
Forward Bullion Transaction Agreements made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited,
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
4.72#
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.73#
Termination Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.74#
Novation Agreement made and entered between J Aron & Company, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.75#
Memorandum of Understanding made and entered between Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, Buffels Division
and The National Union of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers Union
(Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers Association regarding retrenchments associated with No. 9,
10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
and The National Union of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers Union
(Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers Association regarding retrenchments associated with No. 9,
10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
4.76#
CCMA Settlement Agreement made and entered between Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited and The
United Association of South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National
Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company, dated September 2, 2004.
United Association of South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National
Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company, dated September 2, 2004.
4.77#
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated September 15,
2004.
2004.
4.78#
Subscription Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and DRDGOLD Limited, dated
September 21, 2004.
September 21, 2004.
4.79#
Common Terms Agreement of Loan made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Investec Bank
(Mauritius) Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
(Mauritius) Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
160
4.80#
Facility A Loan Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius)
Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
4.81##
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated December 10,
2004.
2004.
4.82##
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP (BSCM), dated April 7,
2005.
2005.
4.83##
Underwriting Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, the Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP (BSCM) and certain
underwriters, dated April 5, 2005.
underwriters, dated April 5, 2005.
4.84##
Memorandum of Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Simmer & Jack Mines Limited and Simmer & Jack
Investments (Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
Investments (Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
4.85##
Cession Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC),
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751
(Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July 13, 2005.
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751
(Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July 13, 2005.
4.86##
Share Sale Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC),
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No.
751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated July 13, 2005.
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No.
751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated July 13, 2005.
4.87##
Memorandum of Understanding between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd (KBH), dated
July 6, 2005.
July 6, 2005.
4.88##
Facility B Loan Agreement between Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited and DRD (Isle of Man)
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
4.89##
Convertible Loan Facility Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited (Emperor), dated
July 8, 2005.
July 8, 2005.
4.90##
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, dated as of August 10, 2005.
4.91##
Option Agreement entered into by and between DRDGOLD Limited and M5 Developments (Pty) Limited, dated July
21, 2005.
21, 2005.
4.92##
Share Sale Agreement between DRD (Offshore) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited, dated
November 16, 2005.
November 16, 2005.
8.1##
List of Subsidiaries.
12.1##
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12.2##
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.1##
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.2##
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
14.1##
Consent of KPMG Inc - DRDGOLD Limited.
14.2##
Consent of KPMG Inc - Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited.
14.3##
Consent of KPMG - Emperor Mines Limited.
15.1#
15.2##
15.2##
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
16.1##
Emperor Mines Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
___________
*
*
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement (File No. 0-28800) on Form 20-F.
**
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997.
***
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement (File No. 333-9242) on Form F-6.
**** Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.
***** Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.
^
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001.
^^
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
^^^ Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
^^^^ Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.
#
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
## Filed herewith.
161
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and
authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
DRDGOLD LIMITED
By: /s/ M.M. Wellesley-Wood
M.M. Wellesley-Wood
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ J.W.C. Sayers
J.W.C. Sayers
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Date: December 15, 2005